The Gay-Outing Terrorists of the Left: The 'Gayjahidiin'

Thanks to the terrorist tactics of the gay-outing left, The Gay Patriot has been silenced. Darleen calls this Leftist jihadism. I think the term gayjahidin is apt.

The tactics used by John Aravosis (Americablog) and Michael Rogers (BlogActive-Raw Story) have become more and more disgusting with time. Recently, we noted in a series of posts that the two have teamed up to 'out' Republican National Committee Chair, Ken Mehlman.

Now, the pair have sunk to an even lower low--if that is possible to imagine. Gay Patriot likened the two to 'terrorists'. What did it get the anonymous gay-blogger? According to Outlet Radio:

According to GayPatriot, who is also a client of mine, Michael Rogers called GayPatriot's place of employment on Friday immediately following the post above and spoke to GayPatriot's secretary and boss. GayPatriot had no idea Rogers would go to such measures and shared with me that both he and his secretary were very upset by the calls but that his boss was understanding.
Rogers excuse for calling Gay Patriot's boss?
Rogers expressed feeling threatened by the post and compared it to posts by anti-abortionists who posted the names of doctors performing them.
That is how threatening people behave, not those that feel threatened.

Rogers later instigated a police investigation and demanded from Gay Patriot's webhost that his site be taken down (check the update).

As Rob at Say Anything puts it:

They’re telling us, with their actions, that if you’re gay in this country you can not support the Republican party or any aspect of the political right and if you do support that sort of thing you will be persecuted.
He also points me to Lime Sherbert who was appparently also a victim of the gayjahidin.

Jay Tea over at Wizbang adds:

So, let's sum things up: the attitude of conservatives towards gays is "do whatever the hell you want, just keep it in private. And no, you aren't getting married, so forget about that." The liberals say "we're all for you, we'll give you whatever you want, just so long as you do exactly as we say. Otherwise, we'll fry your faggot asses -- and not in a way you'll like."
The left keeps using that word tolerance. I do not think that word means what they think it means.

Update: Emperor Misha barks in and points me to Lime Sherbert's banner. You can check it out here.

Posted by: Rusty at 01:55 PM

Comments

1 "The left keeps using that word tolerance. I do not think that word means what they think it means."

I don't think the left is of one mind on outing.

Of course, if we had proper workplace laws protecting sexual orientation, it wouldn't be problematic for people to do reference checks by calling bosses.

Posted by: actus at March 29, 2005 02:00 PM

2 Black conservatives get much the same treatment.

I used to distinguish between a Liberal and a Leftist. But that's becoming increasingly harder to do. Modern Liberals are looking more and more like their stalinist forebears.

Where's the "tolerance"? Where's the "diversity"? Where's the love?

Posted by: Carlos at March 29, 2005 02:03 PM

3 Liberalism ALWAYS generates the EXACT OPPOSITE of it's stated intent.

Never fails.

Remember that the next time you hear about liberal "tolerance", "inclusiveness" and any other thing they claim. Hell,..they've even taken the meaning of the word "liberal" and perverted it to mean the exact opposite of it's dictionary definition.

Posted by: likwidshoe at March 29, 2005 03:03 PM

4 "do whatever the hell you want, just keep it in private. And no, you aren't getting married, so forget about that."

Guess what - second class citizenship would be unacceptable.

Posted by: Collin Baber at March 29, 2005 06:18 PM

5 "Hell,..they've even taken the meaning of the word "liberal" and perverted it to mean the exact opposite of it's dictionary definition."

I think the liberal word was imposed on them, no?

Posted by: actus at March 29, 2005 06:32 PM

6 Apostasy...

It brings the Gay-Stop-O

Posted by: DANEgerus at March 29, 2005 06:41 PM

7 >>>"do whatever the hell you want, just keep it in private. And no, you aren't getting married, so forget about that."

LMAO!

Yeah, I think that about sums it up. Live with it.

Posted by: Carlos at March 29, 2005 06:54 PM

8 Tolerance means to disagree with something yet allow it to happen anyway. Ie, I think sex between men is pretty gross but I'm not going to make it illegal. (Between women, that's another subject). I tolerate homosexuality.

The left wants us to embrace homosexuality and any one who doesn't they call 'intolerant'.

Posted by: Rusty Shackleford at March 29, 2005 07:12 PM

9 >>>"The left wants us to embrace homosexuality and any one who doesn't they call 'intolerant'."

Rusty, they've evolved. Now they call it "hate." The Left is ever evolving, or """progressing."""

Posted by: Carlos at March 29, 2005 11:15 PM

10 collin babler: What's the matter? They would'nt let you marry your domestic pardner? Figured, You were easy to spot.

Posted by: greyrooster at March 30, 2005 05:07 AM

11 DANEgerus: GAY-STOP-O. That was a good one. And how so true.

Posted by: greyrooster at March 30, 2005 05:11 AM

12 "Guess what - second class citizenship would be unacceptable."

Where's the logic here? There shouldn't be any standards to anything so a person doesn't "feel" like a second class citizen?

A seventy year-old wants to go to Iraq and fight but can't due to age restrictions. Does that makes him a second class citizen?

An adult who is below average in intelligence with an eigth grade education wants to be a surgeon but can't. Does that makes him a second class citizen?

Tough noogies, folkes.

Non compos mentis.

Posted by: Young Bourbon Professional at March 30, 2005 03:17 PM

13 So true Bourbon, so true. I always wanted to be heavy weight champion of the world. Couldn't make it. Guess I was discriminated against. Couldn't have been my lack of ability.

Posted by: greyrooster at March 30, 2005 10:02 PM

14 Greyrooster: And I wanted to be a lightweight but am too damn heavy!

In promoting "diversity," we homogenize everything. Same-sex schools/clubs/organizations? That's unconstitutional. They need to be all the SAME.

Posted by: Young Bourbon Professional at March 31, 2005 07:15 AM

15 Well, I know you are a racist :-) and there really is no tolerance on either side of the aisle. Too bad, too, since they say that 1 out of every 5 men are gay and 1 out of 7 women are gay. Seems high odds for me. I have 2 cousins, one a female, one a male on two different sides of my family that are gay...so how could those numbers be true?

Oh,well, guess they know what they are talking about. (ya think?)

Cindy

Posted by: firstbrokenangel at March 31, 2005 10:07 AM

16 Cindy:

Those are VERY high percentages, often overstated for political motivations. For males, it's closer under 5%.

What a world!

Posted by: Young Bourbon Professional at March 31, 2005 11:18 AM

17 Cindy: Who is they?
No gays in my family. Unless they have the decency to stay in the closet. We don't hate gays. We hate what they sometimes do and sometimes act.
You're dingy. Is that a word?

Posted by: greyrooster at March 31, 2005 07:12 PM

18 Greyrooster: "Who is they?" Great line by Edmond O'Brien in "The Wild Bunch." Check it out!

Posted by: Young Bourbon Professional at April 01, 2005 08:39 AM

19 I don't know who THEY is but THEY are definately no fun.

Posted by: greyrooster at April 01, 2005 10:12 AM

20 "They" are the same lewd creeps I saw cavorting down Fifth Avenue in NYC in a parade--right by St. Patrick's Cathedral. I was ashamed for all of the foreign tourists and their kids who were standing by watching the spectacle.

Posted by: Young Bourbon Professional at April 01, 2005 10:31 AM

21 I will add that to my list of Why some Muslims may not want emulate all things American. You've allready read some of them. Another display of liberalism. "They have the right to do whatever they wish as long as they're not hurting anyone". How can you display such filth without hurting the kids watching?
I have an aquaintance that used to go to the casinos with my bunch on Sundays. He's an well educated ex hippy. Somehow a conversation came up of kids and drugs. My stance was if I caught one of my kids using drugs I would be whooping some ass and that would just be a starter. His comment was that I would just be causing them to use drugs away from home. I replied "you mean you let your son use drugs at home". His reply "they're just going to use them anyway and it's better they do it at home than sneaking around somewhere else". The rest of us replied "bullshit".
Now, on Sunday we go visit the casino and he goes to visit his son.
True story. Example of liberalism that always achieves the opposite result.

Posted by: greyrooster at April 01, 2005 11:06 AM

22 The Bible says that a parent who does not discipline his child hates his child.

And Shakespeare: "I must be cruel, only to be kind."--Hamlet

Posted by: Young Bourbon Professional at April 01, 2005 12:01 PM

23 GAY PEOPLE ARE SICK ITS NOT NATURAL, THEY CLAIM ITS IN THERE JEANS BUT THATS CRAP IF YOU START HAVING THOUGHTS OF THE SAME SEX YOU MUST NOT PHYSICALLY DO ANYTHING ABOUT IT. YOUR BRAIN GIVES YOU GOOD THOUGHTS AND BAD THOUGHTS BUT YOU NEVER GO ALONG WITH THE BAD THINGS. IF YOU DO YOU ARE WEAK.

Posted by: denise at May 26, 2005 03:45 PM

24 GAYS ARE DISGUSTING IT IS AN AWFUL THINK AND THEY BECOME GAY AS ITS THE LATEST FASHION BUT IT DOES NOT GO A MAN AND A MAN OR A WOME AND A WOMEN. OPPOSITE ATTRACTS AND THEY PRODUCE A BABY A MAN AND A MAN PRODUCE JACK.

Posted by: sam at August 07, 2005 02:12 PM






Processing 0.01, elapsed 0.008 seconds.
15 queries taking 0.0052 seconds, 32 records returned.
Page size 18 kb.
Powered by Minx 0.7 alpha.