Rusty's BuzzKill No Sex Droids
Dr Richardson, a robot ethicist at De Montfort University in Leicester, wants to raise awareness of the issue and persuade those developing sex robots to rethink how their technology is used.Of course it would be a woman, probably a feminist telling Rusty he can't boink his sex droid. So my question is why does this feminist fear females losing control of sex. I mean if Rusty boinks his robot she cant use sex to control men anymore, no more than men can control the sexual habits of liberated women. Seems fair, but of course feminists want both, to control when then have sex and to control when men have sex, so they can control men. This is why they hate the idea of sex droids. I hope Rusty recovers from this, first no flying cars now no hot sex droids. The future is looking dimmer and dimmer. More form the other McCain.
I'll take the red one.
(red one blow up)
Ok the blue one....
"Sex robots seem to be a growing focus in the robotics industry and the models that they draw on - how they will look, what roles they would play - are very disturbing indeed," she told the BBC. She believes that they reinforce traditional stereotypes of women and the view that a relationship need be nothing more than physical. "We think that the creation of such robots will contribute to detrimental relationships between men and women, adults and children, men and men and women and women," she said.
In the zero-sum-game worldview of feminism, anything that makes men happy is bad. Kathleen Richardson, a professor at De Montfort University in England, is afraid that having sex with robots will make men happy:Whoa that bitch is homely now, she should be for sex droids because its cruel to make a human male f*ck her.
Posted by: Kafiroon at September 16, 2015 02:16 PM
Imagine the second date begins with, "Dear, i should like you to take a look at this screen and tell me what words you see written there."
Anyhow, i will be in favor of this developing new tech partly because it makes feminists angry but mostly because it'll thin the herd of competing males for the women... unless they make mechanical men for the women because THAT must be banned. Now and forever.
Posted by: Storm Saxon's Gall Bladder at September 16, 2015 03:06 PM
Boys, seeing these shrews, and the way in which laws are stacked against them often decide that dating, relationships, sex, and ultimately marriage is not worthwhile. Some go gay. Some just give up and go the way of the Japanese Herbivores.
So here we have a third option, one that wouldn't be nearly as attractive if the situation were just a bit less stacked against men. If "professor" Richardson doesn't think women can stack up against a robot, then maybe women should think about how they can improve so that a cold, inhuman substitute doesn't look so attractive.
Posted by: Gork at September 16, 2015 04:26 PM
A vibrator is advertised on Tee Vee.
A pocket pussy, nope never see that.
Posted by: Tony Montana Political Refugee From Cuba at September 16, 2015 04:41 PM
Posted by: Neal5x5 at September 16, 2015 05:53 PM
I want a Niska
Posted by: DaveInTampa at September 19, 2015 12:11 AM
Posted by: tildenparker at September 20, 2015 07:37 AM
Posted by: tildenparker at September 20, 2015 07:39 AM
Processing 0.0, elapsed 0.0055 seconds.
15 queries taking 0.0042 seconds, 16 records returned.
Page size 10 kb.
Powered by Minx 0.7 alpha.