Be On The Lookout For Someone In A Blue Shirt

anonymousperson.png

That should be enough of a description to locate the suspect. At least according to some looney New York Democrats who decided profiling is so bad, police can't use race, gender, or age to look for crime suspects.

Cops might as well wear blindfolds if the City Council passes a bill that would let them use little more than the color of a suspect's clothing in descriptions -- or risk being sued for profiling, according to this provocative new ad (pictured) from the NYPD captains union.

The ad asks, "How effective is a police officer with a blindfold on?"

And the answer is not very, says the NYPD Captains Endowment Association, which is fighting the measure, claiming it would handcuff cops and send crime rates soaring.

Union President Roy Richter -- who is seen in the ad wearing a blindfold in Times Square -- told The Post the bill is dangerous because "it will ban cops from identifying a suspect's age, gender, color or disability.

"When we have wanted suspects and patterns of crimes, those are very important descriptive terms to let officers know who to look for."

The ad warns that if cops transmit a description of a suspect that goes beyond the color of his or her clothing, they could be sued for racial profiling if the proposal becomes law.

The ad will appear in tomorrow's Post, in addition to the union's Web site, Twitter and Facebook -- and provides links to contacts for City Council members to sway their vote on the measure.

The bill's sponsor, Jumaane Williams (D-Brooklyn), and Speaker Christine Quinn are going to bypass normal committee process and bring the measure directly to a vote.

One of the ads:

nypd_blindfold_ad.jpg

Posted by: DMartyr at 09:19 AM

Comments

1 This policy will not apply to white people. If a white person commits a crime, your picture and full description will be flashed on the screen.

Posted by: ejazzyjeff at June 20, 2013 09:26 AM

2 They try and pass shit like this, then want to disarm you.

Posted by: Moshe Ben Avram at June 20, 2013 09:51 AM

3 Endagering the public is a serious crime -- Democrats and Liberals (and their Leftist string pullers) are guilty.

Payback will eventually be turning our backs on them when "the excrement hits the impellor blades" and letting them all starve.

Be ready with your "Go to Hell" warface for that day.

Posted by: dippitywho at June 20, 2013 12:28 PM

4 This level of stupidity is impressive even for liberals....when you lean too far forward with an open mind, what inevitably falls out??

Posted by: frustrated Teacher at June 20, 2013 12:55 PM

5 And how long before they can't even describe the clothing because it might imply something about the wearer? The clothes make the man...er...person, after all.

Posted by: T.Y. at June 20, 2013 01:34 PM

6 I am offended by the profligate use of a's in Jumaane's name.

Posted by: EROWMER at June 20, 2013 03:19 PM

7 A simply worded letter to all eligible to vote telling them if they pass the law they and all their family will go on a Do Not Assist or Respond list and that the list will be distributed to high crime neighbourhoods. That should see them shitting themselves and voting NO.

Posted by: The Realist of Qld at June 20, 2013 05:26 PM

8 The solution is simple.


Rob a bank wearing an Obama shirt.

Posted by: Alan at June 20, 2013 08:38 PM






Processing 0.01, elapsed 0.0047 seconds.
15 queries taking 0.0033 seconds, 16 records returned.
Page size 9 kb.
Powered by Minx 0.7 alpha.