#FreeJahar: Troy Crossley Hearts The #BostonBomber
Zubeidat Tsarnaev Starts 'Fundraiser' For Her Son Jahar

I despise bitches like Troy.

Via Jester

Troy (terrorist sympathizer) - I'm laughing quite vigorously at some of the comments on ur video" goo.gl/UwVX6 (ps expect a spike)"
I decided to help spike it up a bit.

Sunlight is the best disinfectant:

#freejahar #TroyCrossleyTruth follow me @troycrossley
Facebook: Troy Crossley MP

Jester breaks down why, possibly, Troy (and others) are doing the truther thing. It is a must read

Anyone is wondering why the founders of '' #freejahar movement' are desperate to show him innocent? Here's an answer: http://goo.gl/vF9GS

Btw, someone started a @FuckJahar twitter account to counter these idiots.

Update: Troy's "FB page shows a 'fundraiser' for Jahar by Mommy dearest

Click for larger size

Mommy needs money, but not for Jahar.

Here's mommy dearest showing her love for America:

She needed some onions or something to help in her 'fake crying'.

Posted by: Stable Hand at 08:56 AM


1 Does this dickhead work for Eric Holder?

Posted by: Mark at April 27, 2013 10:26 AM

2 Greetings:

Troy's doing marvelous things with his eyebrows these days.

Posted by: 11B40 at April 27, 2013 11:09 AM

3 Is he wearing eye shadow?

Posted by: WhoCaresAnyMore. at April 27, 2013 01:45 PM

4 Crossley was calling out Jeff Bauman on his own face book page. Saying he didn't lose his legs in the bombing and that it was faked. The douchebag appears to have had a clean up,it's not there now.

Posted by: WhoCaresAnyMore. at April 27, 2013 01:53 PM

5 troy

I looked in the mirror today an I saw a Revolutionary


Mirrors are funny like that. I bet through a scope you look like a pop up silhouette.

Posted by: Storm Saxon's Gall Bladder at April 27, 2013 02:13 PM

6 Of course she's crying. She knows she is responsible for the death of one of her sons and at very least life in prison for another of her sons. She had much to do with the radicalizing of her sons. Piss on her. Why isn't she in jail? She's also a thief. Why isn't she in jail for stealing clothes? WTF is going on. Charge the bitch.

Posted by: Average Whitewinger at April 27, 2013 07:16 PM


Posted by: Aussie at April 27, 2013 07:39 PM

8 The courtjester has an interesting theory about Troy Crossley. Our little bitch is not some sweet and innocent guy. Sorry I cannot supply link because I do not know how to use tiny url

Posted by: Aussie at April 27, 2013 07:40 PM

9 Stable Hand has the link in his post.

But here's another one. http://tinyurl.com/crgdufu

Posted by: Christine at April 27, 2013 08:32 PM

10 The thing is, those two chuckleheads that planted and detonated those bombs were certainly not "lone wolf" operators. There were two of them, and by definition, a "lone wolf" is just that: someone acting alone.

Having said that, there is no way in hell those two morons could safely build that type of bomb from an online magazine article. Someone had to physically show them the details of just HOW to pack it, how to rig the detonator, and, most importantly, how to ensure that it remained safe while being transported in a frikkin' knapsack for Lord knows how long.

Sure, most any retard can build a pipe bomb with a fuse, and probably light it and throw it and get to safety. But these weren't pipe bombs. Not even close.

So these guys were likely one cell in a larger group, and it will be interesting to see how things pan out. Junes and Troy ought to be buying up a value bag of depends, because they're likely pissing and shitting themselves right now as all this info is getting posted.

Posted by: AW1 Tim at April 28, 2013 12:19 AM

11 Tim, you are exactly right, and since the holder-appointed lawyer will get little joker off, or damn near off, we will never know who the others are. And, SSGB @ 5, dead on target with the silhouette. See what I did there?

Posted by: EROWMER at April 28, 2013 08:26 AM

12 I'll disagree with you, AW1Tim, on the knowledge required to make a bomb, so long as we can dispense with the words "remain safe." Suicidal muzzlum hatred takes risks that would be unacceptable to a professional person who values his own life. 97% chance of not going off on the way to the target is good enough for them, and that's sort of timer is not so difficult to make and seal up in the pressure container. HOW to pack it mighty just involve duct tape and a clock, using a larger and easier version of the black sock and wrist watch set of of Metesky; if "tape battery to wire" was too much for him then the dead bomber could have gotten his wife to do that for him. She looks like she could do a lot of useful tricks.

Remember that in the apparent test run that Jester points to (Hanover MA, 12 March) there were several unexploded devices the state bomb squad detonated, so they had at least one practice run. I'm just saying that making bombs is easy and it's only the making of safe, reliable bombs that needs training. Muzzleman don't need any of that.

Posted by: Storm Saxon's Gall Bladder at April 28, 2013 09:25 AM

13 Im sure that aideres and abettors like this bitch will be eventually PAID IN FULL....

Posted by: ebiltwinnn at April 28, 2013 10:01 AM

14 Dismisses reality and inserted a reality of his very own, many in hollywood and Washington DC do the same.
These folks just aren't bright enough to know many people can see right through their Bullshit.
I don't see Troy building and setting off bombs, he's not that stupid nor is he that brave all he does is bravely runOFT at the mouth.

Posted by: obsidian at April 28, 2013 10:18 AM

15 AW1 Tim, you are probably right about these chowderheads having accomplices, beginning with mom and wife. Where this will lead is anyone's guess. Their mentors may be foreign, domestic, or both.

As for building a cookbook bomb: a jihadi bomb recipe is designed for morons like these two. If anyone knows what kind of timer, detonator, or explosive was used, let me know, because I don't. I doubt any commercial restricted explosive components were used, as these would point to a sponsor and are relatively hard to obtain in the US - difficult but not impossible.

Shrapnel would likely be the usual nuts and bolts from the hardware store embedded in modelling clay or such. Any jackass can manufacture explosives if they are crazy enough and don't mind dyin'. Reliable detonators are more difficult. This was not an OSHA compliant effort.

Posted by: Mark at April 28, 2013 11:02 AM

16 It's not the explosives or shrapnel and casing that is hard. pretty much any chucklehead can do that part.

The difficult part is the fuze and timer mechanism. These guys were using parts from a remote-control toy vehicle. The question is how they were taught to use that, as compared to the normal trackphone device, and also how they were taught to safely pack the bomb and it's detonator so as not to go off ahead of time, especially in transit. You can't learn all of that from the interwebs, despite some of the MSM saying it's all readily available.

It isn't, and a lot of the "technical know-how" is kept close to the vest and only taught by a professional bomb-maker to someone he trusts. THAT leads to all sorts of interesting questions.

Posted by: AW1 Tim at April 28, 2013 03:43 PM

17 K, i don't know diddly schnitzel about how these devices were detonated. Judging by the ring of jet fueled geniuses in his family and twitter friends I'd agree with G Beck that the instructor is back home in Saudi now with a letter of apology from Clinton and a hug from Michelle.

Posted by: Storm Saxon's Gall Bladder at April 29, 2013 08:36 AM

A couple of points here... first AW1 Tim you are both right and wrong... you are right in the creation of the devices is not something people simply pick-up on, therefore they had help. Although, you are wrong to assume accomplices. The older brother was gone long enough to learn and use such devices. So while they had "help" the likely did not have direct assistance.
Note for the naysayers... if explosive devices were so simple to create how come so many have failed to create viable devices?
Second point, is the idiot commentary provided by Crossley... he states numerous times "I think", which typically means "I have no evidence, but..." One of the biggest holles he has is in the definition (legal) for WMDs, if he bothered to do ANY research, which by the way any @$$monkey, f*ckt@rd could do he would realize that a couple M80s tapped together we constitute a WMD.

Posted by: PSDiver at April 29, 2013 01:29 PM

Processing 0.01, elapsed 0.0046 seconds.
15 queries taking 0.0024 seconds, 26 records returned.
Page size 17 kb.
Powered by Minx 0.7 alpha.