#FreeJahar: Troy Crossley Hearts The #BostonBomber Zubeidat Tsarnaev Starts 'Fundraiser' For Her Son Jahar
I despise bitches like Troy.Via Jester
Troy (terrorist sympathizer) - I'm laughing quite vigorously at some of the comments on ur video" goo.gl/UwVX6 (ps expect a spike)"I decided to help spike it up a bit. Sunlight is the best disinfectant:
Facebook: Troy Crossley MP
Anyone is wondering why the founders of '' #freejahar movement' are desperate to show him innocent? Here's an answer: http://goo.gl/vF9GSBtw, someone started a @FuckJahar twitter account to counter these idiots. Update: Troy's "FB page shows a 'fundraiser' for Jahar by Mommy dearest
Posted by: Mark at April 27, 2013 10:26 AM
Troy's doing marvelous things with his eyebrows these days.
Posted by: 11B40 at April 27, 2013 11:09 AM
Posted by: WhoCaresAnyMore. at April 27, 2013 01:45 PM
Posted by: WhoCaresAnyMore. at April 27, 2013 01:53 PM
I looked in the mirror today an I saw a Revolutionary
Mirrors are funny like that. I bet through a scope you look like a pop up silhouette.
Posted by: Storm Saxon's Gall Bladder at April 27, 2013 02:13 PM
Posted by: Average Whitewinger at April 27, 2013 07:16 PM
Posted by: Aussie at April 27, 2013 07:39 PM
Posted by: Aussie at April 27, 2013 07:40 PM
But here's another one. http://tinyurl.com/crgdufu
Posted by: Christine at April 27, 2013 08:32 PM
Having said that, there is no way in hell those two morons could safely build that type of bomb from an online magazine article. Someone had to physically show them the details of just HOW to pack it, how to rig the detonator, and, most importantly, how to ensure that it remained safe while being transported in a frikkin' knapsack for Lord knows how long.
Sure, most any retard can build a pipe bomb with a fuse, and probably light it and throw it and get to safety. But these weren't pipe bombs. Not even close.
So these guys were likely one cell in a larger group, and it will be interesting to see how things pan out. Junes and Troy ought to be buying up a value bag of depends, because they're likely pissing and shitting themselves right now as all this info is getting posted.
Posted by: AW1 Tim at April 28, 2013 12:19 AM
Posted by: EROWMER at April 28, 2013 08:26 AM
Remember that in the apparent test run that Jester points to (Hanover MA, 12 March) there were several unexploded devices the state bomb squad detonated, so they had at least one practice run. I'm just saying that making bombs is easy and it's only the making of safe, reliable bombs that needs training. Muzzleman don't need any of that.
Posted by: Storm Saxon's Gall Bladder at April 28, 2013 09:25 AM
Posted by: ebiltwinnn at April 28, 2013 10:01 AM
These folks just aren't bright enough to know many people can see right through their Bullshit.
I don't see Troy building and setting off bombs, he's not that stupid nor is he that brave all he does is bravely runOFT at the mouth.
Posted by: obsidian at April 28, 2013 10:18 AM
As for building a cookbook bomb: a jihadi bomb recipe is designed for morons like these two. If anyone knows what kind of timer, detonator, or explosive was used, let me know, because I don't. I doubt any commercial restricted explosive components were used, as these would point to a sponsor and are relatively hard to obtain in the US - difficult but not impossible.
Shrapnel would likely be the usual nuts and bolts from the hardware store embedded in modelling clay or such. Any jackass can manufacture explosives if they are crazy enough and don't mind dyin'. Reliable detonators are more difficult. This was not an OSHA compliant effort.
Posted by: Mark at April 28, 2013 11:02 AM
The difficult part is the fuze and timer mechanism. These guys were using parts from a remote-control toy vehicle. The question is how they were taught to use that, as compared to the normal trackphone device, and also how they were taught to safely pack the bomb and it's detonator so as not to go off ahead of time, especially in transit. You can't learn all of that from the interwebs, despite some of the MSM saying it's all readily available.
It isn't, and a lot of the "technical know-how" is kept close to the vest and only taught by a professional bomb-maker to someone he trusts. THAT leads to all sorts of interesting questions.
Posted by: AW1 Tim at April 28, 2013 03:43 PM
Posted by: Storm Saxon's Gall Bladder at April 29, 2013 08:36 AM
A couple of points here... first AW1 Tim you are both right and wrong... you are right in the creation of the devices is not something people simply pick-up on, therefore they had help. Although, you are wrong to assume accomplices. The older brother was gone long enough to learn and use such devices. So while they had "help" the likely did not have direct assistance.
Note for the naysayers... if explosive devices were so simple to create how come so many have failed to create viable devices?
Second point, is the idiot commentary provided by Crossley... he states numerous times "I think", which typically means "I have no evidence, but..." One of the biggest holles he has is in the definition (legal) for WMDs, if he bothered to do ANY research, which by the way any @$$monkey, f*ckt@rd could do he would realize that a couple M80s tapped together we constitute a WMD.
Posted by: PSDiver at April 29, 2013 01:29 PM
Processing 0.01, elapsed 0.0061 seconds.
15 queries taking 0.0037 seconds, 26 records returned.
Page size 17 kb.
Powered by Minx 0.7 alpha.