Google's Blogger Removes Gates of Vienna, Keeps al Qaeda Sympathizers
Update: They're Back
The Banner of an al Qaeda Support website hosted by Google
Next reaction...bwahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahah,and hahahahahahja, and I might add h a ha ha ha ha....
That bloke who ran it is a complete and utter arsehole. He and his half-witted regulars are full of unequivocal endorsement of anyone who says they are anti-Islam without knowing a damn fecking thing about the people they are supporting. They are the kind of people who give anti-Islam a bad name.
Posted by: Axel at January 17, 2013 02:30 PM
As to google, for an independent 3d party it is very interesting to observe how you in the US are tolerating a terrorist sympathiser corporation that google is. Forensic audit anyone?
Posted by: HerWrath at January 17, 2013 03:30 PM
For a start you said "anti Muslim". whoa. Im intensely anti-Islam but have nothing against Muslims.As soon as you drop that distinction, well, in the UK you can go to prison for it. The trouble is that "Muslim" is used as an identifier of a community, including people born into that community whether they are practising Islam or not. The biggest victims of Islam are Muslims themselves. as soon as you acknowledge that Muslim women are the main victims of Islam then you make the distinction between being from the Muslim community and Islam itself.
Its as simple as distinguishing between Germans and NAZIs. But the arsehole of Vienna cannot make such an elementary distinction. For all his sophistry and blather he is as thick as shit.
The trouble with Gates of Vienna is that by supporting everyone who seems to be anti-Islam, including those who are anti-Muslim and those who are anti brown skin, and those who want to gas the Jews (like our friend White Devil who comments here) they hand to the Islam apologists in the media and law the perfect weapon to use against us. We all end up being tarred with the same neo-NAZI brush.
Altogether, most of the people who are anti-Muslim HELP the agencies of Islam, whether the media, Leftists or groups like CAIR. These agencies thrive on the ability to point to examples of racists who are anti-Muslim and in that way clamp down on legitimate criticism of Islam. Look how they loved it when they were able to whip us with the anomalous instance of Anders Breivic the solitary single looney anti-Muslim terrorist.
Yeah, I'll repeat that, most anti-Muslim sites, rhetoric and activity actually help Islam and further the goals of stealth jihad. Gates of Vienna is on the borderline of being part of the problem.
There is one good thing about GofV though,it does introduce people to the story of 9-11 1683.
As for Google, it seems indeed astonishing that their execs werent jailed years ago.
Posted by: Axel at January 17, 2013 04:34 PM
Posted by: Axel at January 17, 2013 04:35 PM
If there are muslims anywhere who do not agree with the tactics used by all muslim terrorists, they can prove their harmless and peacful intentions by taking up arms against the terrorists. Nothing else, no other words or actions, will satisfy us. To refuse to fight against those co-religionists is admission of compliance.
Posted by: EROWMER at January 17, 2013 05:40 PM
Posted by: eli at January 17, 2013 06:18 PM
All that kind of talk does is a) give ammunition to the dhimmis and the radical Islam fascists to slate us with and silence criticism of Islam and b) make it harder for the few Muslims who have the balls to speak out against Islam,like Jehudi Jasser or Noni Darwish, et al.
In places like Tower Hamlets inLondon most Muslims are going to be shit scared to say anything the Islamo-fascists that rule those areas dont like. Women get death threats if they dont wear a niqab.
My approach is to say Muslims and non-Muslims have a common enemy: Islam.
Posted by: Axel at January 17, 2013 06:26 PM
Posted by: Mark at January 17, 2013 07:16 PM
What I have seen lots on there are:
a) examples of "cultural enrichment" - involving not your random 12 year-old girls, but Sharia gangs, groomers etc.
b) discussions about the reasons for the downfall of Western civilisation - with most of the attention on Western "intellectuals" and academics.
Anything wrong with the above?
Posted by: Green Infidel at January 18, 2013 05:00 AM
This blog is under review due to possible Blogger Terms of Service violations and is open to authors only
Posted by: Mohammed pork be upon him at January 20, 2013 12:42 AM
Processing 0.01, elapsed 0.0048 seconds.
15 queries taking 0.0033 seconds, 18 records returned.
Page size 13 kb.
Powered by Minx 0.7 alpha.