Falling For Hamas's Media Manipulation
What makes better headlines? Is it numbing figures such as the 8,000 Palestinian rockets fired at Israel since it unilaterally withdrew from Gaza in 2005, and the 42.5 percent of Israeli children living near the Gaza border who suffer from post-traumatic stress disorder? Or is it high-resolution images of bombed-out buildings in Gaza and emotional stories of bereaved Palestinians? The last, obviously, as demonstrated by much of the media coverage of Israelís recent operation against Hamas. But that answer raises a more fundamental question: Which stories best serve the terroristsí interest? Hamas has a military strategy to paralyze southern Israel with short- and middle-range rockets while launching Iranian-made missiles at Tel Aviv. With our precision air force, top-notch intelligence and committed citizens army, we can defend ourselves against these dangers. We have invested billions of dollars in bomb shelters and early-warning systems and, together with generous U.S. aid, have developed historyís most advanced, multi-layered anti-missile batteries. For all of its bluster, Hamas does not threaten Israelís existence. But Hamas also has a media strategy. Its purpose is to portray Israelís unparalleled efforts to minimize civilian casualties in Gaza as indiscriminate firing at women and children, to pervert Israelís rightful acts of self-defense into war crimes. Its goals are to isolate Israel internationally, to tie its hands from striking back at those trying to kill our citizens and to legitimize the Jewish State. Hamas knows that it cannot destroy us militarily but believes that it might do so through the media.Continued below the fold:
One reason is the enlarged images of destruction and civilian casualties in Gaza that dominated the front pages of U.S. publications. During this operation, The Post published multiple front-page photographs of Palestinian suffering. The New York Times even juxtaposed a photograph of the funeral of Hamas commander Ahmed Jabari, who was responsible for the slaughter of dozens of innocent Israelis, with that of a pregnant Israeli mother murdered by Hamas. Other photos, supplied by the terrorists and picked up by the press, identified children killed by Syrian forces or even by Hamas itself as victims of Israeli strikes. In reporting Palestinian deaths, media routinely failed to note that roughly half were terrorists and that such a ratio is exceedingly low by modern military standards ó much lower, for example, than the NATO campaign in the Balkans. Media also emphasize the disparity between the number of Palestinian and Israeli deaths, as though Israel should be penalized for investing billions of dollars in civil-defense and early-warning systems and Hamas exonerated for investing in bombs rather than bomb shelters. [Continue reading]I read the article last night and there were three comments. Two were anti-Israel. Right now there are 580 comments, he hit a nerve it seems.
Posted by: Moshe Ben Avram at November 29, 2012 12:18 PM
Posted by: Storm Saxon's Gall Bladder at November 29, 2012 01:35 PM
"You can't handle the truth!"
Posted by: Kafiroon at November 29, 2012 04:07 PM
Posted by: Mark at November 30, 2012 10:06 AM
Processing 0.01, elapsed 0.0037 seconds.
15 queries taking 0.0026 seconds, 12 records returned.
Page size 9 kb.
Powered by Minx 0.7 alpha.