Bob Geiger Wrong About AP Story - Will He Apologize? (Updated)
Say what you will about the liberals, but when they blow it, they blow it big.On Tuesday, Bob Geiger at the Huffington Post demanded to know if rightwing bloggers (including The Jawa Report) would be apologizing to the Associated Press for doubting their now-discredited story about the six burning Sunnis:
"It's Official: Media Body Burning Story is Bogus," crowed Newsbusters -- the wingnut National Enquirer -- who just went mad with glee proclaiming that "The news that six Sunnis were captured by Shiites, doused with kerosine [sic] and burned alive, was too sensational to not be picked up by the mainstream media. But it turns out that the event never happened. Furthermore, the Iraqi 'spokesman' relied on to give all information regarding this event is as fictional as the story itself." Newsbusters took it a step further by also concluding that NBC's decision to begin calling what's going on in Iraq a "civil war" was based in part on the "bogus" nature of that story. Flopping Aces, which seems to have started this embarrassing affair, has been running a lengthy series ominously called "Getting The News From The Enemy" while The Jawa Report really stands proud and proclaims that "It's unlikely that the Associated Press and other news agencies will issue corrections approaching the sensationalism with which they originally pushed the false stories."And today, the Iraqi government has announced that the AP's source, the supposed "police captain Jamil Hussein" doesn't work for any department of the Iraqi government. Wow, Bob, your face must be pretty crimson about now, eh? I'd also like to commend Bob Geiger for emphasizing his status as a clueless tool by quoting the same person (that would be moi) twice (from NewsBusters and The Jawa Report) without even realizing it. Update: In a long, rambling new post about "right wing trolls" sending him emails, Baghdad Bob starts to suspect that he may have made a hideous mistake:
The facts are what they are, and I'm patient enough to wait for the full story to come out -- but the spin and public-relations flackery being cited by the right-wing mouthpieces are not facts. If I need to do a retraction, I will. But pardon me if I wait for evidence above and beyond some screeching wingnut scrambling to paint the news as they wish it would be, instead of looking at the mess that Iraq truly is and contemplating the meaning of accountability.Evidently, the fact that the AP's source for the burning Sunnis story doesn't exist isn't enough evidence for Bobby. Nor does AP's admission that, rather than five mosques being burned to the ground as the originally reported, one mosque was slightly damaged.
Posted by: Michael Hampton at November 30, 2006 03:23 PM
Posted by: McGehee at November 30, 2006 03:26 PM
Posted by: Gabriel at November 30, 2006 03:48 PM
Posted by: Greyrooster at November 30, 2006 05:18 PM
Posted by: MCPO Airdale at November 30, 2006 05:25 PM
Posted by: Jeff Bargholz at November 30, 2006 05:31 PM
Welcome to the new age of Journalism, where nothing is quite what it seems, and when the truth is known, it is quickly covered over.
Posted by: Naieve at November 30, 2006 07:18 PM
Posted by: Tracy Coyle at November 30, 2006 09:26 PM
Yeah, I guess that's blowing it big. If that's the worst mistake I ever make blogging (as opposed to say, hyping a war based on false intelligence) I can pretty much live with myself.
Anyway, hope you guys are feeling really accomplished for sowing some kind of doubt about this story. I personally find myself questioning whether the Nicholas Berg was actually beheaded (that camera man was working for Zarqawi after all) and whether those contractors in Fallujah were actually killed and hung from a bridge (who filmed that: Sunnis of course, who can't be trusted.) If you guys keep this up, pretty soon you'll be able to prove in the negative that Saddam had nukes, Osama was residing in one of his palaces, that he had imminent plans to attack us with briefcase nukes, and in fact all those insurgent "attacks" the "liberal MSM" has been reporting for the last 3 1/2 years are really mobs straining to get past each other throw chocolate and roses at our soldiers' feet.
Posted by: Xanthippas at November 30, 2006 11:18 PM
Posted by: Jeff Bargholz at November 30, 2006 11:50 PM
Posted by: keb at December 01, 2006 10:44 AM
Also, notice how he and AP are trying to shift the issue away from their phantom "captain" to the "event" itself, but staying with the sociological angle (what "eyewitnesses" claim they saw), rather than the physical evidence.
Also, look for AP to stick to their guns unless continually pressured. However, you won't be seeing "Captain Jamil Hussein" coming up in any more of their reports, a tacit admission that they - to be charitable - were duped.
Posted by: clem at December 02, 2006 07:30 PM
Posted by: Jeff Bargholz at December 04, 2006 07:18 PM
Posted by: Sten19069 at April 03, 2007 02:40 PM
Posted by: Sten99620 at April 05, 2007 12:18 AM
Posted by: Sten27296 at April 06, 2007 10:16 AM
Posted by: Sten67854 at April 09, 2007 07:17 AM
Posted by: Sten72127 at April 10, 2007 11:11 AM
Posted by: Sten97256 at April 11, 2007 06:36 AM
Posted by: Sten6305 at April 11, 2007 05:00 PM
Posted by: Sten16819 at April 11, 2007 11:10 PM
Posted by: Sten65398 at April 12, 2007 07:42 AM
Posted by: Sten36441 at April 12, 2007 11:22 AM
Posted by: Sten53927 at April 12, 2007 02:24 PM
Posted by: Sten11573 at April 13, 2007 12:18 AM
Posted by: Sten5522 at April 13, 2007 09:03 AM
Posted by: Sten35568 at April 15, 2007 09:57 AM
Posted by: Sten81907 at April 15, 2007 12:57 PM
Posted by: Sten72077 at April 16, 2007 01:57 PM
Posted by: Sten21950 at April 16, 2007 02:08 PM
Posted by: Sten47000 at April 17, 2007 05:32 AM
Posted by: Sten83985 at April 17, 2007 07:29 AM
Posted by: Sten71795 at April 17, 2007 09:56 PM
Posted by: Sten75530 at April 19, 2007 05:23 AM
Posted by: Sten25925 at April 19, 2007 06:48 PM
Posted by: Sten50083 at April 20, 2007 04:17 AM
Posted by: Sten73536 at April 20, 2007 05:20 AM
Posted by: Sten36769 at April 20, 2007 01:57 PM
Posted by: Sten98078 at April 20, 2007 11:02 PM
Posted by: Sten35965 at April 21, 2007 05:59 AM
Posted by: Sten42850 at April 21, 2007 08:18 AM
Posted by: Sten29251 at April 21, 2007 04:01 PM
Posted by: Sten20996 at April 22, 2007 01:18 PM
Posted by: Sten85345 at April 23, 2007 02:28 AM
Posted by: Sten15345 at April 23, 2007 03:30 AM
Posted by: Sten41830 at April 23, 2007 05:05 PM
Posted by: Sten82704 at April 23, 2007 08:56 PM
Posted by: Sten42697 at April 24, 2007 03:24 AM
Posted by: Sten71727 at April 25, 2007 01:26 AM
Posted by: Sten37127 at April 25, 2007 04:43 AM
Posted by: Sten66906 at April 25, 2007 07:10 AM
Posted by: Sten10887 at April 25, 2007 05:43 PM
Posted by: Sten10892 at April 25, 2007 08:45 PM
Posted by: Sten9620 at April 26, 2007 04:15 PM
Posted by: Sten4642 at April 27, 2007 04:22 AM
Posted by: Sten65300 at April 27, 2007 06:33 AM
Posted by: Sten22939 at April 27, 2007 05:07 PM
Posted by: Sten26057 at April 27, 2007 09:06 PM
Posted by: Sten70339 at April 28, 2007 07:03 AM
Posted by: Sten69255 at April 29, 2007 06:48 PM
Posted by: Sten32467 at April 29, 2007 09:42 PM
Posted by: Sten66803 at April 30, 2007 03:12 AM
Processing 0.01, elapsed 0.0144 seconds.
15 queries taking 0.007 seconds, 70 records returned.
Page size 55 kb.
Powered by Minx 0.7 alpha.