Ex-Peacenick Hostage Won't Testify Against Terrorist Captors
I don't know whether to admire former hostage in Iraq Norman Kember for his principled stand or to think the worst about him for believing in those same principles which I think are misguided at best and evil at worst. The thought that one shouldn't testify against terrorists because they might receive the death penalty is so foreign to me that I'm speechless.BBC News:
Former British hostage Norman Kember has said he is unlikely to testify at any trial over his kidnapping in Iraq.... Mr Kember told Channel 4 News he had been informed there had been arrests but said he faced a "moral dilemma" as he was against the death penalty. The 74-year-old, who was opposed to the US-led action in Iraq, said he "can understand" what motivated the gang.I take that back. Norman Kember is a first rate asshole. Clearly the modern peace movement is less about peace and more about hatred of the West and all it stands for.
Clearly, he is not on our side.
Posted by: Fred Fry at November 08, 2006 09:35 AM
spread of evil is the symptom of a vacuum. whenever evil wins, it is
only by default: by the moral failure of those who evade the fact that
there can be no compromise on basic principles. Ayn Rand (1905 - 1982), Capitalism: The Unknown Ideal, 1966
Posted by: Privateer6 at November 08, 2006 10:16 AM
Posted by: Howie at November 08, 2006 10:51 AM
But just for the record. What's wrong with allowing a convicted terrorist to rot in jail forever? Do we really need to hang everybody?
Posted by: Professor von Nostrand at November 08, 2006 12:49 PM
Posted by: Jeff Bargholz at November 08, 2006 01:35 PM
Processing 0.0, elapsed 0.0051 seconds.
15 queries taking 0.0039 seconds, 13 records returned.
Page size 8 kb.
Powered by Minx 0.7 alpha.