"Good Cop, Bad Cop"
I'm glad to see some support for Jack Straw across the pond in the face of this latest round of Muslim extortion. Me, I've never cared much for extortion.We see this extortion racket played out over and over again. Something happens to rile up the "Muslim community." The local Muslim leader, Imam X, may be a bad actor, but he's our guy. He pays lip service to "interfaith dialogue" and whatnot, but he's not really on our side, and he doesn't have our best interests at heart. He's in it for himself, and we all know it. On the other hand, he needs our support to have legitimacy, and his need for our support gives us a certain (though limited) level of influence on his behavior. We're not particularly thrilled with Imam X, but Imam X assures us that he's the best option we can reasonably expect to get. Imam X has a maniac on a leash, and if anything happens to Imam X, we'll be left to deal with the maniac. Our options are between Imam X and a maniac. Any other leader would be unapologetically acting against our interests. Imam X at least pays lip service to our concerns, and throws us a bone now and then. (Something like the House Republican leadership, but even worse.) At every turn, Imam X gives us just enough to keep us from completely bailing out on him, but he realizes that the price of our support isn't that high, owing to the fact that we know the alternatives to Imam X are so much worse. We're expected to be grateful for his token efforts, and to happily accept the table scraps he drops to us now and then. In sum, Imam X has us by the "short hairs," and he knows it. He can count on our unwavering support so long as he knows that we're unwilling to plunge his little neighborhood into chaos. Imam X can count on the fact that we're rational actors and his conviction that we'll always accept half a loaf from him in lieu of none. In the short term, capitulation is almost always the rational decision on our part. Accordingly, whatever concerns Imam X may have, the loss of our support isn't high on the list of things that keep him up at night. Of course, this situation isn't limited to a few Imams in London. From where I sit, the whole lot of self-proclaimed "moderate" Muslim activists, along with our "friends" in the House of Saud and our "friends" running Pakistan, are other examples of "Imam X's" in their respective spheres of influence. It's just a form of extortion, a variation on the classic "Good Cop, Bad Cop" game and the "protection racket." It's a popular racket, mostly because it works so effectively. The "moderate" Muslim activists in the West are the most distasteful of the lot, IMHO. At each stage, the game is: "accept this accomodation, or else we'll be replaced by crazies." At each round, the "this" is a little larger piece of flesh than last round. "Censor the Mohammed cartoons, or else." "Get rid of Ayaan Hirsi Ali, or else." "Make the Pope apologize, or else." "Institute Shari'a law, or else." At each step, accomodation is the short-term rational choice. I wonder: is there a point at which we (the West) are no longer willing to play along with the "Good Cop, Bad Cop" game anymore? Is there a point at which we're willing, in the short term, to be irrational? In other words, is there a point at which we're no longer willing to negotiate over our fundamental principles, even if there is a significant price to pay? Is there a point at which we make our own demands? Is there a point at which we're no longer willing to accept half measures and lukewarm gestures from our supposed "allies?" Is there a point at which we will draw a line beyond which we are unwilling to go, to throw down the gauntlet and invite them to join us as we all descend together into the Hell and chaos that supposedly awaits us? If there is such a point, where does it lie? If we can never figure out when we've crossed that point, isn't our subjugation just a question of "when" rather than "if?"
Posted by: Jesusland Carlos at October 10, 2006 02:03 PM
Posted by: alex at October 10, 2006 02:14 PM
argues, it will be America (and maybe Australia) against a muslim
Europe/Africa/Asia, just based on demographics alone. The death
of true Christianity (i.e., actually believe that the only way
into heaven is through Jesus) in Europe, coupled with their impending
social welfare crunches, will only accelarate the demise of Europe.
I don't even think it will end if the Islamic countries implode
economically (like a sudden and violent version of the USSR collapse).
We'll just end up with a Somalia scenario in France.
Posted by: wooga at October 10, 2006 03:21 PM
Muslims will only have to commit one or two more cowardly crimes and it will be all on.
Posted by: Jester at October 10, 2006 03:26 PM
backwards to accomodate disfunctional islamic behaviro in Britain, I
fear that Britain has gone too far down the multicultural drain to ever
I can't get links to work:
Posted by: wooga at October 10, 2006 04:20 PM
The west plus Israel should've stopped playing that game a long time ago. As far as I'm concerned the line that you're talking about was crossed on 9/11/2001.
Posted by: Garduneh Mehr at October 10, 2006 04:41 PM
Posted by: MCPO Airdale at October 10, 2006 05:47 PM
Posted by: Jester at October 10, 2006 05:49 PM
British government that would indicate a turn around.
Posted by: Greyrooster at October 10, 2006 09:44 PM
assured that the government will come down on them with unimaginable
force, and will make the "troubles" in Northern Ireland look like a
family quarrell by comparison.
Posted by: Improbulus Maximus at October 11, 2006 07:07 AM
bat mitzvah gifts
jewish prayer book
jewish wedding gifts
Posted by: order now at January 17, 2007 11:43 PM
Posted by: iogev sdneokrax at January 28, 2007 11:15 PM
Posted by: Sten79999 at May 10, 2007 03:15 PM
Posted by: Sten71189 at May 11, 2007 04:37 AM
Posted by: Sten71504 at May 11, 2007 07:55 AM
Posted by: Sten2606 at May 11, 2007 06:14 PM
Posted by: Sten67014 at May 12, 2007 08:32 AM
Posted by: Sten56974 at May 13, 2007 05:04 AM
Posted by: Sten51271 at May 13, 2007 12:18 PM
Posted by: Sten32792 at May 13, 2007 02:04 PM
Posted by: Sten80751 at May 13, 2007 04:55 PM
Posted by: Sten14582 at May 14, 2007 04:08 AM
Posted by: Sten76108 at May 14, 2007 04:59 AM
Posted by: Sten46290 at May 14, 2007 07:54 PM
Posted by: Sten29614 at May 15, 2007 04:35 AM
Posted by: Sten17591 at May 15, 2007 11:24 AM
Posted by: Sten24641 at May 15, 2007 11:04 PM
Posted by: Sten19155 at May 16, 2007 01:52 AM
Posted by: Sten32685 at May 16, 2007 02:07 AM
Posted by: Sten64318 at May 16, 2007 07:42 PM
Posted by: Sten78640 at May 17, 2007 04:00 AM
Posted by: Sten28043 at May 17, 2007 12:55 PM
Posted by: Sten73016 at May 17, 2007 04:51 PM
Posted by: Sten49595 at May 18, 2007 04:59 AM
Posted by: Sten19719 at May 18, 2007 05:09 AM
Posted by: Sten60863 at May 18, 2007 06:10 PM
Posted by: Sten22948 at May 18, 2007 11:07 PM
Posted by: Sten72200 at May 19, 2007 02:22 AM
Posted by: Sten8430 at May 19, 2007 07:36 AM
Posted by: Sten91524 at May 19, 2007 05:31 PM
Posted by: Sten91838 at May 19, 2007 09:59 PM
Posted by: Sten70122 at May 20, 2007 11:45 AM
Posted by: Sten40138 at May 21, 2007 01:02 AM
Posted by: Sten59853 at May 21, 2007 07:46 AM
Posted by: Sten87305 at May 21, 2007 04:24 PM
Posted by: Sten42775 at May 22, 2007 01:00 AM
Posted by: Sten97424 at May 22, 2007 09:57 AM
Posted by: Sten9112 at May 22, 2007 04:48 PM
Posted by: Sten50343 at May 23, 2007 06:26 PM
Posted by: Sten75179 at May 23, 2007 08:57 PM
Posted by: Sten94355 at May 24, 2007 04:56 AM
Posted by: Sten2889 at May 24, 2007 10:56 AM
Posted by: Sten54250 at May 25, 2007 07:10 PM
Posted by: Sten25542 at May 26, 2007 11:37 AM
Posted by: Sten42946 at May 27, 2007 03:29 AM
Posted by: Sten39279 at May 27, 2007 08:33 PM
Posted by: Sten48881 at May 28, 2007 11:22 AM
Posted by: Sten60186 at May 28, 2007 12:12 PM
Posted by: Sten13263 at May 28, 2007 01:03 PM
Processing 0.01, elapsed 0.0126 seconds.
15 queries taking 0.0051 seconds, 67 records returned.
Page size 55 kb.
Powered by Minx 0.7 alpha.