Palestinians Embracing "Victim-oriented" Hip-Hop

Awww yeeah!

Acceptence of this cultural art-form is not universal in Gaza (due to a lack of religious content), but is growing in popularity. Check out these fresh 'rhymes' from the controversial song "Watch Your back, Arabs." Sing along if you know the words:

"Where are the Arab people?

Where is the Arab blood?

Where is the Arab anger?

Where, where and where ...

Driving the coupe car

Smoking the cigar

Voting for the super star "American Idol"

And forgetting about our martyrs, wounded, prisoners. ... Have you heard the last news!?"

Where is the Arab anger? I assure you, young hip-hop artist, there is no shortage of that anywhere in the world:

h_twin_towers_02.jpg

behead.jpg

outrage1.bmp

Posted by: Good Lt. at 10:16 AM

Comments

1 The muslims are ANGRY? Whew. What a relief......I thought they were MAD

Posted by: n.a. palm at September 29, 2006 10:35 AM

2 It makes perfect sense that Palestinians would embrace Hip-hop. Hip-hop is the music world's version of the Special Olympics.

Posted by: The Dread Pundit Bluto at September 29, 2006 10:44 AM

3 "When faced with the challenge of a National 9/11 Debate, the Muckraker Report turned to the well-respected work of Professor Jones and Professor Fetzer at Scholars for 9/11 Truth. The Muckraker Report contacted Professor Fetzer and asked if he could assemble a highly qualified seven-member civilian debate team that would be willing to debate a seven-member government debate team regarding the government’s account of 9/11 events. Professor Fetzer had a team assembled in two weeks. With the civilian debate team in place, the Muckraker Report identified twenty-nine potential government debate team members to include the ten members of the 9/11 Commission and the thirteen NIST scientists responsible for the government’s “pancake theory” of collapse. Each of these potential government debate team members was mailed numerous invitations. Five of the 9/11 Commissioners had staffers contact the Muckraker Report via telephone to decline invitation due to “prior commitments”. However, the thirteen NIST scientists remained silent.

After three separate mailings of hard copy invitations to the NIST scientists, on June 8, 2006 the Muckraker Report received e-mail from NIST that said, “The project leaders of the NIST World Trade Center investigation team respectfully decline your invitations to participate in the National 9/11 Debate on September 16, 2006.” Not to be deterred, on June 20, 2006 the Muckraker Report e-mailed Michael E. Newman, NIST Director of Media Relations, and asked if there was a better date, time, and location for NIST to participate in the National 9/11 Debate.

On June 25, 2006, NIST Director of Media Relations, Michael E. Newman responded:

The members of the NIST WTC Investigation Team has [sic] respectfully declined your invitation to participate in the National 9/11 Debate. A change in venue or date will not alter that decision.

A change of venue or date will not alter that decision. Fascinating! What Newman is telling the world is that the public servants at NIST, the people paid by the U.S. taxpayers, will never, ever publicly debate their peers regarding the “pancake theory” of collapse of WTC-1, WTC-2, and WTC-7. Taxpayers should be outraged! The public needs to demand accountability. Apparently, the Gang of 13 at NIST does not believe they are accountable to the people. That needs to change, pronto! Newman has repeatedly told the Muckraker Report that NIST “stands solidly behind the collapse mechanisms for each tower and the sequences of events (from aircraft impact to collapse) as described in the report.” The truth is that NIST is hiding behind its unsustainable theory and dares not publicly debate the merits of its report."

http://www.teamliberty.net/id273.html

Posted by: Greg at September 29, 2006 10:48 AM

4 Hmmmm angry again today are we?
Yep, looks like they are having another bad day.

Posted by: Brad at September 29, 2006 10:49 AM

5 Lt.
You show a pic of the flaming twin towers.
What have the Palis to do with that?
What do the Palis have to do with "the Holocaust"?
Israel should have been created in Germany.

Posted by: Greg at September 29, 2006 10:51 AM

6 Greg:

The illustrations are for the phrase "Arab anger" not palestinian psychosis...do you READ the posts before you respond? Andthe NIST folks are obviously smarter than to be drawn into an unwinnable debate with loons whose theories will simply change every time the facts show they are loons. Kind of like the early versions that had W's brother Jeb as head of security at the twin towers...oh, wait, Jeb was kinda busy in Florida... it was that other brother... oh, wait, he left the company before 9/11...well, they planted the secret invisible explosives before he left... oh wait, he was a board member of a company that contracted for security, he actually had nothing to do with the towers...well, it was the Israelis...and the CIA made the videos and audios of OBL claiming responsibility and cavorting with the highjackers, who never really existed, it's all just special effects, just like the suicide videos some of those highjackers made... animatronics, yeah, that's it! Have you ever seen how real the figures in the Pirates of the Caribbean ride are? Disney, yeah that's it, Disney and their archconservative buddies at ABC, they made thatmovie that tried to smear Clinton, they made all those videos, too... and isn't the head of Disney a jew or something...blah, blah, blah. Get a grip and grow up.

Posted by: GeoBandy at September 29, 2006 11:13 AM

7 Greg....(or is it Bin Greg?) yer momma called and said it's time for your prozac shot.

Posted by: n.a. palm at September 29, 2006 11:15 AM

8 NIST declined because they know their BS story won't hold up to scrutiny.

Posted by: Greg at September 29, 2006 11:29 AM

9 And greg is The Jawa Report's version of the Special Olympics.

Posted by: The Dread Pundit Bluto at September 29, 2006 12:10 PM

10 Greg: Lauro Chavez...

Enough said you ambulating turd.

Posted by: Max Power at September 29, 2006 12:42 PM

11 "well-respected work of Professor Jones and Professor Fetzer"

Had me right until then.

Were Jesse MacBeth, Niaz Kahnand Lauro Chevez on their "Team"????

Posted by: Max Power at September 29, 2006 12:44 PM

12 Greg and Vinnie must have had another lovers spat.

Posted by: greyrooster at September 29, 2006 02:03 PM

13 The National 9-11 Debate has been rescheduled so that NIST will have no excuse to chicken out again.


10 March 2007 (rescheduled from 16 September 2006)
The National 9/11 Debate
Embassy Suites Hotel Airport-Convention Center
5055 International Blvd ?N. Charleston, South Carolina, United States 29418

http://www.scholarsfor911truth.org/DebatePressRelease8May2006.html

Posted by: Greg at September 29, 2006 04:03 PM

14 There's nothing to debate freakshow!

Posted by: Max Power at September 29, 2006 04:27 PM

15 There is plenty to debate.
For exapmle...
Molten steel was found in the basements of WTCs 1, 2 and 7.
WTC7 was not hit by an aircraft.
There was nothing in any of those buildings that could burn hot enough to melt steel.
Certainly not Kerosene (jet feul).

WTC7 was the first and only steel superstructure to ever come down from fire.

If it really did, insurance companies all over the world would be jacking up insurance premiums on skyscrapers.
The 9-11 Commission Report did not even mention WTC7.

We will get to the bottom of this.

9/11 Truth (video)
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-8076200333701191665

9/11 Mysteries (video)
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-6708190071483512003

Posted by: Greg at September 29, 2006 05:17 PM

16 Greg - keep flinging shit - something might stick.
Dance monkey dance!

Posted by: Max Power at September 29, 2006 09:38 PM

17 9-11 was an outside job. The truth hurts for fume-sucking morons like Greg.

Posted by: Good Lt at September 30, 2006 10:21 AM






Processing 0.01, elapsed 0.0077 seconds.
15 queries taking 0.004 seconds, 25 records returned.
Page size 15 kb.
Powered by Minx 0.7 alpha.