Charlie Sheen: CIA, Jews, Space Aliens Caused 9/11
Via Michelle. The best thing about this article is that it claims Sheen is a "prominent credible" whistleblower. Charlie Sheen is prominent? Charlie Sheen is credible? Charlie Sheen is a whistleblower? Charlie. Sheen. Prominent. Credible. Whistleblower. I need to let that one sink in for a bit.
Posted by: Confederate Yankee at March 22, 2006 04:16 PM
Posted by: Jesusland Carlos at March 22, 2006 04:18 PM
Posted by: Flea at March 22, 2006 04:22 PM
Posted by: Graeme at March 22, 2006 04:33 PM
Excuse me, I have to go to an Illuminati meeting via my black helicopter. It's being held at a Mena, Arkansas, airfield.
Posted by: elgato at March 22, 2006 04:38 PM
The apple truly doesn't fall far from the tree. Look at who Charlie's father is.
Posted by: Oyster at March 22, 2006 05:02 PM
Or at least something to that effect.
Posted by: a4g at March 22, 2006 05:10 PM
Posted by: jwookie at March 22, 2006 06:16 PM
Posted by: Thesaurus at March 22, 2006 06:20 PM
Posted by: davec at March 22, 2006 06:37 PM
BTW, have you all heard what Richard Belzer said the other evening on the Bill Maher show? An actual F.A.G. (reference Team America) member at work! I used all of my knowledge from the Psychology 101 class that I took decades ago to diagnose the imbecile:
Posted by: Don Miguel at March 22, 2006 06:44 PM
whats so wrong with *dating* prostitutes?
Posted by: Rubin at March 22, 2006 06:55 PM
Posted by: Richard at March 22, 2006 07:34 PM
Posted by: Leatherneck at March 22, 2006 07:57 PM
Credible=son of another actor who was president, albeit fictional.
Prominent=Man who was in a little black book of a infamous hollywood madam(with many little stars next to his name.)
Posted by: patrick at March 22, 2006 08:05 PM
Posted by: RepJ at March 22, 2006 10:00 PM
i think rush limbaugh once mentioned charlie is the guy with so much compassion for the homeless in malibu he got the city to permit the homeless to reside in the city, and when the homeless started to use charlie's property for their tents, he drove them away.
Posted by: red state voter living in a blue state at March 22, 2006 11:58 PM
Never forget that his best thinking got him to Hydie's.
Oh, and caused Denise Richards to divorce him. Maybe his contract is up, or something.
Posted by: Tom at March 23, 2006 07:15 AM
Posted by: 10ksnooker at March 23, 2006 07:17 AM
Posted by: sandpiper at March 23, 2006 09:37 AM
This "conspiracy theory" is like a snowball rolling down a mountain. It gets bigger and gains more momentum by the day.
Actress Janeane Garofalo and TV cop D'Onofrio have also come out in the last week.
So has a former congressman.
So has the former German Defense Minister, Andreas Von Beulow.
It's the new, "Who Shot JFK".
Get use to it.
Posted by: Greg at March 23, 2006 10:28 AM
Posted by: jesusland joe at March 23, 2006 10:33 AM
Posted by: dale at March 23, 2006 03:18 PM
Posted by: jesusland joe at March 23, 2006 04:41 PM
Right you can't becuase you not what you speak of.
If you can't admit 9/11 changed your rights as US Citizen then Stop basing your opinion on non facts. Until One of you can produce an actual video of the pentagon being hit but the plane that they claimed hit the building keep quiet.
Posted by: Rick at March 23, 2006 10:27 PM
Posted by: Improbulus Maximus at March 24, 2006 06:19 AM
Posted by: jesusland joe at March 24, 2006 10:21 AM
You have a right to your opinion just remember right before your final breath you chose your fate and will stand by it 100%. And your proud to be apart of this country.
Posted by: Rick at March 24, 2006 03:40 PM
Posted by: jesusland joe at March 24, 2006 07:33 PM
"9/11 LIES" Straw Man
by Jim Hoffman
Version 1.2, February 9, 2005
The Hearst-owned Popular Mechanics magazine takes aim at the 9/11 Truth Movement (without ever acknowledging it by that name) with a cover story in its March 2005 edition. Sandwiched between ads and features for monster trucks, NASCAR paraphernalia, and off-road racing are twelve dense and brilliantly designed pages purporting to debunk the myths of 9/11.
The article's approach is to identify and attack a series of claims which it asserts represent the whole of 9/11 skepticism. It gives the false impression that these claims, several of which are clearly absurd, represent the breadth of challenges to the official account of the flights, the World Trade Center attack, and the Pentagon attack. Meanwhile it entirely ignores vast bodies of evidence showing that only insiders had the means, motive, and opportunity to carry out the attack.
Read the rest of the article here:
P.S. Homeland Security chief Michael Chertoff's 25-year old cousin, Benjamin Chertoff, penned the Popular Mechanics piece on 9/11 sceptics. This represents a huge conflict of interest.
Do your own research.
Watch this video and tell me it does not raise some questions:
"9/11 Revisited: Were explosives used?"
Watch the video of this speech wich origionally aired on C-Span:
The 9/11 Commission Report: Omissions and Distortions
David Ray Griffin
Description: David Ray Griffin takes a critical look at the official 9/11 Commission Report. Professor Griffin argues that "omissions and distortions" in the report amount to a cover-up by government officials and says that the available evidence suggests that the Bush administration was complicit in the 9/11 attacks. Professor Griffin covers topics he says have been inadequately answered by the commission. These include questions surrounding the attack on the Pentagon, the way in which the World Trade Center towers collapsed, and the behavior of President Bush and his Secret Service detail following notification that a second plane had hit the WTC. The talk was hosted by the Muslim-Jewish-Christian Alliance for 9/11 Truth (www.mujca.com) and took place at the University of Wisconsin in Madison. Includes Q&A.
Author Bio: David Ray Griffin is professor emeritus at the Claremont School of Theology, where he taught for over 30 years (retiring in 2004). He has authored or edited over two dozen books, including "God and Religion in the Postmodern World," "Religion and Scientific Naturalism," and "The New Pearl Harbor: Disturbing Questions About the Bush Administration and 9/11."
MIT Engineer Explains WTC Controlled Demolition:
Posted by: Erik at March 25, 2006 06:55 AM
Posted by: Improbulus Maximus at March 25, 2006 07:21 AM
Improbulus I myself had the same feelings about couple of years ago. All that is asked of you is read up on this and not just 1 article. Educate yourself. If 1 thing of this day can cast a shadow of doubt about 9/11 investigate.
To many strange coincidences shroud this event not just the event itself but the lead up to the events and after. Either those terrorist won the jihadist lottery or something's doesn't fit in the puzzle.
Posted by: Rick at March 25, 2006 01:31 PM
"The specifics of the fires in WTC 7 and how they caused the building to collapse remain unknown at this time. Although the total diesel fuel on the premises contained massive potential energy, the best hypothesis has only a low probability of occurrence. Further research, investigation, and analyses are needed to resolve this issue." (FEMA, 2002, chapter 5)
The owner of WTC 7 admitted in a PBS documentary to "pulling" the building. "Pull it" is a demolition term for bringing down a building.
"I remember getting a call from the, er, fire department commander, telling me that they were not sure they were gonna be able to contain the fire, and I said, "We've had such terrible loss of life, maybe the smartest thing to do is pull it."
Larry Silverstein - owner of WTC 7
Putting explosives in a building takes weeks and could not have been placed between the time of the first two tower collapses and the collapse of WTC 7.
WTC7 shares all the characteristics of a controlled demolition and has yet to be explained by the government.
Millions of people all over the world question the official US government story of 9/11 for very good reasons, and namely the collapse of WTC Building 7. Don't be so quick to proclaim Charlie Sheen is stupid and wrong if you have not done any research regarding the subject. Look at what he is asking instead of just attacking Charlie Sheen's character over the internet.
If Charlie Sheen is so wrong just present evidence that proves him wrong. Challenge him on the facts not his personnal life.
Posted by: Andy White at March 25, 2006 03:56 PM
In 1962 the Joint Chiefs of Staff were going to paint a plane like a commercial airliner and swap it with a real one. Then they were gonna shoot it down and blame Castro for it. Then go to war against Cuba using this fake terrorism. The document shows that they were not opposed to killing civilians to make this plan happen.
I think maybe they finally got around to using this tactic on Sept 11, 2001.
All you have to do is read history:
Posted by: Truth for a Change at March 26, 2006 02:49 AM
And for anyone to demonize his personal life shows a deep concern to obstruct the facts that he brings up....
911 was an inside job.
Do a google search for 911 Bush and see what you get.
Wake up now, or wake up later in a POLICE STATE.
Posted by: James Powell at March 27, 2006 12:30 AM
Charlie Sheen is a nutjob.
I love Bush and teh official version of events for 911 is the truth.
The terrists knew they'd be able to fly around in the most protected airspace on the palnet without getting shot down or intercepted as they knew our air defences would be busy doing other stuff. Those terrists were smart/physcic and Charlie Sheen sleeps with protistsutes so don't listen to him.
Terrists did it because they hate our freedoms. I don't want to listen to lefties. Or Rightities. I don't read books. Or watch the news. Terrists did it.
My dad says terrirsts did it and he should know cos he went to high school. He doesn't watch the news either.
Posted by: Dean at March 27, 2006 05:33 AM
and other weird stuff he just asks for
answers your government isn't giving you.
please look at the facts and come to your own
conclusion. when was the last time your government told you something that wasn't a lie
Posted by: casaubon at March 27, 2006 06:33 AM
Here is a short list of people who spoke out before Mr. Sheen about their concerns about 9-11.
* Former head of Star Wars and air force colonel, Bob Bowman
* BYU physicist Steve Jones and Clemson engineering professor Judy Wood
* Underwriters Laboratories employee Kevin Ryan (UL Certified the Steel used in the WTC)
*Former high-level Reagan appointee and prominent conservative, Paul Craig Roberts
*Former U.S. congressman Dan Hamburg
*Former chief labor economist under George W. Bush, Morgan Reynolds
*Former high-level intelligence analysts, Ray McGovern and Wayne Madsen (who briefed presidents and vice-presidents)
If it weren't for the fact the father of Reaganomics amongst others have spoke out before Mr. Sheen... I might not continue to chuckle so much at the knee-jerk reactions to his interview.
Posted by: Doc at March 27, 2006 07:20 AM
Posted by: Fred at March 27, 2006 03:18 PM
Posted by: johnshaw at March 28, 2006 12:56 AM
Posted by: Jeff at March 28, 2006 08:26 AM
Posted by: Jake Gaeta at March 28, 2006 02:51 PM
He said nothing about Jews, about Aliens or alike.
Why this lie?
To ridicule him?
He said it looked odd to him, to him as a citizen, as a taxpayer. And i have to agree with him - there is much yet to be clarified, the iron curtain of secrecy yet to be lifted.
What has Charlie done that you attack him that much? What was wrong with what he said? Is it not allowed to believe in a conspiracy? Why is it not allowed?
Posted by: Greg at March 29, 2006 06:20 AM
Posted by: jeff at March 29, 2006 08:29 AM
Posted by: jeff at March 29, 2006 08:34 AM
Posted by: jeff at March 29, 2006 08:36 AM
Why do the ignorant and unimformed choose to attack the messenger rather than the message?
OK, so Charlie Sheen has a maybe not so clean private life, does that matter? Before you ignorent fools start bleating, take a long hard look at the evidence! The truth IS out there, maybe it's not what you want to hear, but it is there!
Oh yes, Dean, are you for real? Or perhaps it's time for your medication?
Posted by: Osmodia at March 29, 2006 10:47 AM
Posted by: thinktheunthinkable at March 29, 2006 12:19 PM
I've set up a site at BravoCharlie911.com
The intent is to give Charlie Sheen the support he so deserves, and in all likelyhood could probably use right about now. It's also hoped that the sentiments and suppoert expressed there will encourage others to step into the light as well. Pop by and leave a note of support
Posted by: Dan at March 29, 2006 06:34 PM
WHat a great country.
Posted by: john monto at March 30, 2006 01:43 PM
Posted by: Huey at March 31, 2006 01:28 AM
Processing 0.01, elapsed 0.0112 seconds.
15 queries taking 0.0062 seconds, 59 records returned.
Page size 37 kb.
Powered by Minx 0.7 alpha.