Iranian President Reaffirms "Final Solution", Reveals Tehran's Weakness

Patriotism is not the last refuge of a scoundrel, antisemitism is. The great unifying theme of the Islamic world is hatred of Israel. Thus, when the President of Iran calls for a final solution for the Jewish state in the Middle East, and then reiterates that position again today, it is not simply an act of antisemitism, it is an act of desperation. It reveals the weakness of the Iranian theocracy's position.

Change is coming to the Middle East. Like the smell of ozone after a lightning strike it is in the air. The mullahs in Iran sense it is coming and they are afraid. Very afraid.

And what do those who have a stake in maintaining power do to distract the masses from their own plight? Blame the Jews.

There really is no "Middle Eastern culture", only "Middle Eastern cultures". Persian, Turks, Kurds and Assyrians speak different languages and have unique traditions and cultures. The "Arab street" does not exist, but there are "Arab streets". Hip-hop music, I am told, has become the language of protest for young Gazans, and while terrorist videos are sold in markets throughout the region sales of pornography are much higher.

But, if there is one thing that can unify the many Middle Eastern cultures and the many Arab streets, it is antisemitism. Nasser did not become an icononclastic hero in the Middle East for the Aswan project, he became a hero because he "stood up" to Israel.

Secular liberals, Islamists, nationalists, and even Christians in the Middle East all agree that Israel has no right to exist. Some realists might believe that peace with Israel is inevitable, but not that it is right. In the eyes of the secular left in the Middle East, and like their European and American counterparts, Israel is the last bastion of Wetern colonialism and imperialsim. To Islamists and nationalists it represents a sort of emasculation to the collective psyche. And to the long-oppressed Christians of the region it represents a source of destabilization used by their oppressors as another excuse to crack down on them. Israel, it is widely believed, is the source of injustice in the region.

So, when the President of Iran calls for the destruction of Israel the reaction from the street is a foregone conclusion: they will support him. He knows this. He is not stupid.

Iran has dreams of becoming a regional superpower. They seek nuclear power, for instance, not because the oil-rich nation really needs it, but because nuclear power represents something bigger. It puts Iran on par with the "big boys" of the industrialized world.

Iran's main disadvantage for a regional hegemony is that it is an Islamist nation unlike the larger Islamist movement. It is Shia, and compared to the Islamist theories of bin Laden or Zarqawi relatively progressive. So, what can the bin Ladenists and the followers of the Ayattolah agree upon? The destruction of the "Zionist entity."

More than this, the mullahs of Iran aren't simply trying to elevate themselves among the jihadis, they are trying to elevate themselves in the eyes of the the entire Middle East. The move to a theocratic state is probably not a great unifying theme among a region as diverse as the Middle East, but a move to wipe-out Israel is.

Even if it is only rhetoric, it is powerful rhetoric. It is the kind of rhetoric that unifies. It is the kind of rhetoric that moves people to admiration and adoration. It is the kind of rhetoric that gives power both within a country's own borders and beyond. And when a regime feels itself vulnurable, its first move will be to bolster its power.

Expect more anti-Israeli speeches in the future. As the tides of change sweep through the Middle East we should find such rhetoric more and more common.

The last resort of the scoundrals that dominate the region will be to verbally attack Israel.

[PS-still on blog sabbatical, but felt this needed saying]

Posted by: Rusty at 09:12 AM


1 When someone declares that it is OK to promote a Final Solution on someone else, they unknowingly make it OK for it to be promoted against themselves. I don't think Osama and friends have met Hannibal Lechter yet.

Posted by: Ernie Oporto at October 28, 2005 09:43 AM

2 The enmity between the sons of Isaac and Ishmael. This conflict has been going on for 4000 years, and it is much bigger than most even realize. The arabs view the land the Israelis occupy as their birthright and will not be satisfied until either the Israelis or themselves are all dead.

There never will be peace in the Middle East.

Posted by: Vonski at October 28, 2005 09:46 AM

3 The Iranians are not Arabs, so what is their beef with Israel? The Iranians are so stupid that they overlook the Final Solution that the Sunni Muslims have in store for them. Frankly, I think the whole bunch of them are crazy.

They have the resources and people to make a paradise out of the Middle East, just like Beirut used to be, but their stupid religion turns them into a bunch of lunatics. I know the situation can change, and I hope that is the outcome, but with the crazies in charge of the countries in the Mideast and the lack of freedom the people have to be productive, I fear for the outcome.

Posted by: jesusland joe at October 28, 2005 10:32 AM

4 Rusty forgot his blogaway transdermal patch this morning.

Posted by: Howie at October 28, 2005 11:46 AM

5 A major part of Iran's official foreign policy is to try to destroy Israel. Why is this? There are Muslim countries that have territorial disputes with Iran, Muslim countries that have fought wars against Iran, Muslim countries that supported wars against Iran, Muslim countries that have massacred Muslims (Syria, for instance, murdered 10,000 people in Hama), and Muslim countries that have occupied whole countries (Syria in Lebanon and Iraq in Kuwait).

Iran has never threatened to wipe any of these Muslim countries off the map.

Israel has done none of these things.

The only reason why Iran wants to destroy Israel is because Israel is not a Muslim country. This should give the leaders of other countries pause. Israel is only the closest and most convenient target for this kind of madness.

Curiously, the only outright criticism of Ahmadinejad's words by any Muslim or Arab politician came from a Palestinian, Saeb Erakat. The PA is usually a press office for terror gangs, but in this particular case, I need to tip my hat to Erakat for doing the right thing.

Posted by: The Left Coast at October 28, 2005 11:15 PM

6 Oops. My bad. Turkey also rejected Ahmadinejad's speech.

Posted by: The Left Coast at October 28, 2005 11:19 PM

7 Yeah, but Turkey is trying to get into the EU. Doesn't count.

Posted by: jesusland joe at October 29, 2005 02:20 PM

8 Iran is a terrorist supporting nation and a member of the UN we should have nothing to do with the UN

Posted by: sandpiper at October 29, 2005 05:44 PM

Processing 0.0, elapsed 0.0052 seconds.
15 queries taking 0.0037 seconds, 16 records returned.
Page size 12 kb.
Powered by Minx 0.7 alpha.