PPP: "If D's Change Turnout to 08 Levels, They Win in WI."

Now my rebuttal.

Show me the indicator in early vote/absentee totals that turnout will approach 2008.

Total absentees for 08: >633,000
Total absentees for 10: >230,000
Total absentees for 12: 183,000. This includes all those bused-about early voters that were "storming the polls" for two solid weeks.

Of that total, 33,000, or just around 16%, were from Madison and Milwaukee. Identical to 2010. 84% of absentee/early in person votes reported thus far are from the rest of the state.

Total absentees from both cities hit about 35k after the statewide total # was estimated midday Friday, but no indicator theirs weren't matched by more conservative parts.

I fully expect Dane to turn out heavily to get rid of Walker. But even in Madison, total early votes: 16k. Total in 2008: 32k.

Meanwhile Republican areas are matching Dane County's intensity. Waukesha and Brookfield are reporting massive turnout, with early vote totals far, far exceeding 2010. So while they may hope for increased turnout in Milwaukee and Madison, Republicans are responding by amping up their own. The evidence is right there in my comparison of Brookfield's early votes with Milwaukee's. A city a fraction the size of the other shouldn't be turning in votes at four times the rate if the bigger city is really going to have massive turnout.

Few are buying the line of "just match 08" because it requires the Republicans to just give up and drop their numbers combined with massive turnout in Milwaukee city that has not shown up in the early indicators.

We will know in one more day how things shake out, but for now PPP's ditty about matching 08 turnout models to defeat Walker looks big on promise and short on verifiable results.

Posted by: CAC at 09:21 AM



Comments

1 Barack Obama is a stuttering clusterf*ck of a miserable tyrant.

Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) Channelling Breitbart at June 04, 2012 09:22 AM (8y9MW)

2 Isn't anyone proficient in the art of propaganda anymore?

Posted by: #2 Dzerzhinsky Square at June 04, 2012 09:23 AM (wk/79)

3 Pins and needles. I knew it was too early to celebrate. (And CAC, you need to take a vacation after tomorrow.)

Posted by: joncelli, heartless Con and all around unpleasant guy at June 04, 2012 09:23 AM (RD7QR)

4 The fall out is already beginning ...

Michigan Attorney General Bill Schuette released a letter Friday that mandated that state agencies were to end the withholding of SEIU dues from private individuals who provide home health care. "Private individuals do not transform into public employees simply by participating in taxpayer-funded programs like Medicaid," he said in the letter. "In order to comply with the law, state agencies should end the withholding of public union dues from private individuals who provide home help."

Posted by: Jesse Owens at June 04, 2012 09:25 AM (e8kgV)

5 What's the current line on vote fraud percentage?

Posted by: Soap MacTavish at June 04, 2012 09:28 AM (vbh31)

6 What the turnout from the graveyards?

Posted by: Paladin at June 04, 2012 09:29 AM (ycm4Q)

7 The Dems/unions will be stuffing the ballot boxes like so many Thanksgiving turkeys.

Posted by: Soap MacTavish at June 04, 2012 09:30 AM (vbh31)

8 Too bad Scott, all 7 of my votes are for Barrett.

Posted by: Arch Stanton at June 04, 2012 09:32 AM (0Ohos)

9
short on verifiable results.

Liberalisim in a nutshell.

Posted by: Jack at June 04, 2012 09:33 AM (wUFaM)

10 Its over.

Tom Barrett is no Barack the Magic Negro...if fact he is this elections McCain.

Posted by: H Badger at June 04, 2012 09:33 AM (n/0Nw)

11 #7 but only to a certain point. If they were already...why only 35k total votes in Milwaukee and Madison? Wouldn't you want to report a lot more, to also intimidate and discourage the other side?






Posted by: CAC at June 04, 2012 09:34 AM (lwLPG)

12 big on promise and short on verifiable results.

I'd be careful with that phrase. I think Obama has it trademarked or something.

Posted by: Purp (@PurpAv) at June 04, 2012 09:34 AM (ripmr)

13 Prediction:

Rampant "irregularities" will lose Walker the governorship; probably not by much, but enough. Conservatives will bitch and statists will sneer, but nothing will be done as a result. Green light for fraud like we've never seen - I mean blatant fraud - come November.

Please hope I'm wrong but you know this means literally everything to the statists and they, unlike most conservatives, play for keeps.

Posted by: Hope I'm Wrong at June 04, 2012 09:35 AM (B60j2)

14 "Big on promise and short on verifiabl results"

Theres alot of that goin around these days.

Posted by: Infidelswine at June 04, 2012 09:37 AM (BHG6O)

15 The State DOJ will have people in all of the larger WI cities.

Will they stop all the fraud? Not likely, but there will at least be a chance of being arrested for attempting fraud. Lot tougher to have a polling station that becomes the vote fraud center. We have shitloads of poll watchers.

Posted by: H Badger at June 04, 2012 09:38 AM (n/0Nw)

16 #13
Rampant irregularities and ballot stuffing were supposed to cost Prosser his court seat in 2011.
Far less outside scrutiny, far fewer election observers, open season for fraud.

Prosser still won by 7200 votes.

Posted by: CAC at June 04, 2012 09:38 AM (lwLPG)

17 >>>Rampant "irregularities" will lose Walker the governorship; probably
not by much, but enough. Conservatives will bitch and statists will
sneer, but nothing will be done as a result. Green light for fraud like
we've never seen - I mean blatant fraud - come November.


Oh don't be so dumb. Walker is going to win by 5%, perhaps more. Ask yourself this: why is the MSM *already* writing "How Walker won the recall" stories by the bushel? I'll tell you why: they're seeing the same REAL internals plus public polling numbers that I am. They know it's over. It's over. Walker wins. Only questions are 1.) margin; 2.) how fucking long it takes Waukesha County to report tomorrow night to put it beyond doubt.

Posted by: Jeff B. at June 04, 2012 09:39 AM (KVOrU)

18 As I had suspected. Keep yourself psyched by imagining that pulling the lever for Walker and Kleefisch is like giving Trumka a two-fisted cock punch.

GO WALKER.

Posted by: J.J. Sefton at June 04, 2012 09:40 AM (MCDCp)

19 Lot tougher to have a polling station that becomes the vote fraud center. We have shitloads of poll watchers.

The big time fraud doesn't happen at polling places.

Posted by: Purp (@PurpAv) at June 04, 2012 09:40 AM (ripmr)

20 I spent hours a day for months on end over at Althouse during te fleabaggers/Capitol occupation drama. I can't express how much I want Walker to win just to shove it up the asses of the mega-smug shitbirds who were sure the Libs would win in the end.

Posted by: Lincolntf at June 04, 2012 09:41 AM (HethX)

21 Walker is going to win by 5%, perhaps more.

That's not much when some precincts will have shown 120% participation rates.

Posted by: Purp (@PurpAv) at June 04, 2012 09:43 AM (ripmr)

22 I have an alternate turnout model for them to consider:

GOP turns out at a higher level than 2010.

Dems turnout at a lower level than 2010.

Occam's Razor seems to be a forgotten concept.

Posted by: Dave in Fla at June 04, 2012 09:43 AM (w86ft)

23 20
I spent hours a day for months on end over at Althouse during te
fleabaggers/Capitol occupation drama. I can't express how much I want
Walker to win just to shove it up the asses of the mega-smug shitbirds
who were sure the Libs would win in the end.

Posted by: Lincolntf at June 04, 2012 09:41 AM (HethX)

Months at Althouse? Dude, that's straight-up masochism.

Posted by: joncelli, heartless Con and all around unpleasant guy at June 04, 2012 09:43 AM (RD7QR)

24 Does WI still have same day registration and voting? If so expect massage fraud for union voters coming from Chicago.

If not, I will be ready Tuesday night.


1) Valu Rite, chilled? Check
2) Popcorn ready for microwave? Check
3) Pudding to dip in? Check


Anything else I need?


Posted by: Billy Bob, pseudo-intellectual at June 04, 2012 09:43 AM (hXJOG)

25 The big time fraud doesn't happen at polling places.

Don't they use the trunk of a dark blue Chevy Cavalier after the polls close for that?

Posted by: Soap MacTavish at June 04, 2012 09:44 AM (vbh31)

26 Walker went on record yesterday predicting he would "win by a large margin."

How often do you see politicians making those sorts of predictions? What might spur someone to make that sort of prediction? You think he's seen some numbers he trusts, perhaps?

Posted by: Jeff B. at June 04, 2012 09:45 AM (KVOrU)

27

CAC posts always scare me.

Here's a totally unrelated cartoon O/T for a chuckle:

http://tinyurl.com/bogx8vk

I was actually thinking about this, this morning when I reached for the universal remote.

Posted by: Wii at June 04, 2012 09:45 AM (HOOye)

28 massage fraud

Is that where they promise a happy ending but all you get is spinal manipulation?

Posted by: joncelli, heartless Con and all around unpleasant guy at June 04, 2012 09:45 AM (RD7QR)

29 19 Posted by: Purp (@PurpAv) at June 04, 2012 09:40 AM (riper)

It's going to take a hell of a lot more than a trunk full of "found" ballots to fuck with this election. The primary, which was a meaningless contest, gave Walker more votes than Barrett's and the union stooge candidate's combined.

Tomorrow is the real thing and I cannot imagine R turnout to falter. People know what's at stake here and are going to stand up to the criminality, if/when it happens.

Posted by: J.J. Sefton at June 04, 2012 09:45 AM (MCDCp)

30 Yes, and if I had a million dollars I'd be a millionaire.

Classic PPP. There is no evidence whatsoever to predict a dem turnout anywhere even close to 2008 yet they propose it. Meanwhile, every indication that Republican turnout will far exceed 2008 levels.

I predict Walker by 7.

Posted by: Bill Mitchell at June 04, 2012 09:46 AM (hlUJY)

31 Progressives used to pride themselves on their desire to help
the poor, but in Wisconsin these days they’d rather throw the poor
under the bus—a public bus, of course, with a union driver—to
protect the relatively wealthy class of workers who administer
government programs.

Posted by: Stig at June 04, 2012 09:46 AM (e8kgV)

32 I, too, have a Bold Prediction. If the course of the Sun continuesto bethe same tomorrow as it did today, the Sun will rise in the East and set in the West.

No, no, don't thank me, I go out on the limb so you don't have to.

Posted by: alexthechick at June 04, 2012 09:46 AM (VtjlW)

33 If so expect massage fraud?


You know that's when you pay for a happy ending and get nothing.

Posted by: Billy Bob, pseudo-intellectual at June 04, 2012 09:46 AM (hXJOG)

34 I'm giddy.

The blue-fisters aren't quite as popular as they had thought, and my touchdown dance borders on the sublime. Pudding, Valu-Rite, etc.

Posted by: the botnet at June 04, 2012 09:46 AM (6iGdu)

35 Yeah, but Althouse had day to day video coverage of the protests when nobody else in the media would. Really some of the best blogging I've ever seen over a long period.

Posted by: Lincolntf at June 04, 2012 09:47 AM (HethX)

36

Parents should be talking to their children, just so they understand that when a teacher drives the class to vote today (for extra credit) - don't listen to the teacher.

Vote Walker.

Posted by: Wii at June 04, 2012 09:47 AM (HOOye)

37 You all seem more concerned with FRAUD FROM CHICAGO OMG ELEVENTY! Than doing anything about it.

There are tons of pollwatchers and the state DOJ, and despite whatever fantasy numbers you have invented about thousands of ballots hiding in the Madison capitol, thats not going to happen. The city clerks themselves still have to make the numbers work and glaring irregularities won't go unnoticed. If you really think there are just vans and vans and vans of ballots, just take the ball home and give up.
But enough with the constant FRAUD FRAUD FRAUD,.


IT DIDN'T FUCKING HAPPEN IN 2011 TO THE DEGREE YOU ARE DOOMING OVER.

ITS NOT FUCKING HAPPENING TOMORROW.

Posted by: CAC at June 04, 2012 09:47 AM (lwLPG)

38 No back soaping.

Posted by: toby928© at June 04, 2012 09:47 AM (NG097)

39 Yeah, I'm not thinking fraud- unless it's such a massive scale that it triggers public outrage- is going to sway this election.

I'll go further: If the win is 7% or more for Walker, Romney Wins WI in November.

Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) Channelling Breitbart at June 04, 2012 09:47 AM (8y9MW)

40 Posted by: alexthechick at June 04, 2012 09:46 AM (VtjlW)


Unless the SGOD (sweet galaxy of doom) comes hurtling in to screw up Sol's trajectory and muss everyone's hair up.

Posted by: J.J. Sefton at June 04, 2012 09:48 AM (MCDCp)

41 I read one so-called analysis showing Walker 53 and Barrett 47 as of yesterday, but, they said, "It was within the margin of error!" What kind of crap poll has a 7% margin of error?!

Posted by: Mr_Write at June 04, 2012 09:48 AM (CLkAH)

42 I expect all out fraud with voter totals in the urban areas higher than the number of registered voters.


The union has to win this. The question is is whether or not it is within the fraud margin.

Posted by: Vic at June 04, 2012 09:48 AM (YdQQY)

43 It is a tired concern cliche that has gone nowhere and with no evidence whatsoever. Show me the race where thousands of ballots (in the last 10 years) magically appeared.

I'm not talking 1960 Chicago. I'm talking now.

If this was happening to the massive degree some of you are constantly pissing yourselves over, we would have seen it already in totals or in last years vote OR in the senate recall votes. It never materialized.

I am sick to fucking death of hearing about it.

Posted by: CAC at June 04, 2012 09:49 AM (lwLPG)

44 NY Slime is not happy. They have a story in today's paper saying WI is now in play for Willard and how, gush darn, this will take away resources from Barry's campaign.

Waaaa.

Posted by: Billy Bob, pseudo-intellectual at June 04, 2012 09:49 AM (hXJOG)

45 I stand by my earlier prediction that Walker surprises with his margin of victory tomorrow, pushing up to near 55% of the vote.

Posted by: Jeff B. at June 04, 2012 09:49 AM (KVOrU)

46 The next 48 hours will be quite a roller coaster!

Good morning and Happy Monday, Morons.

Posted by: Darth Chipmunk at June 04, 2012 09:50 AM (niW49)

47 Show me the race where thousands of ballots (in the last 10 years) magically appeared.


How about the Franken election in next door MN?

Posted by: Vic at June 04, 2012 09:50 AM (YdQQY)

48 34 I'm giddy.

The blue-fisters aren't quite as popular as they had thought, and my touchdown dance borders on the sublime. Pudding, Valu-Rite, etc.
Posted by: the botnet at June 04, 2012 09:46 AM (6iGdu)


Ickey Woods meets internet CGI baby in diapers.

Posted by: J.J. Sefton at June 04, 2012 09:50 AM (MCDCp)

49 People know what's at stake here and are going to stand up to the criminality, if/when it happens.


If it comes to that, I hope you're right. There can be no backing down on this and no waffling. We keep hearing the "hill to die on" metaphor here (which I absolutely hate, btw) and this is certainly it. Hopefully, it will be a moot point, when all is said and done. Here's to an indisputable margin of victory for Walker.

Posted by: Soap MacTavish at June 04, 2012 09:51 AM (vbh31)

50 I read one so-called analysis showing Walker 53 and Barrett 47 as of
yesterday, but, they said, "It was within the margin of error!" What
kind of crap poll has a 7% margin of error?!


It wouldn't have to. It would only need a 4% MoE, because it can be either positive or negative, and it can be on both sides of the equation. So a 4% MoE doesn't mean that Walker could lose 2 and Barret gain 2, but that Walker could lose 4 and Barret gain 4. That would set it at 49/51 Barret wins.

But that would require absolutely everything to break in Barret's favor, and that's just not happening, as evidenced by the early voting totals.

Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) Channelling Breitbart at June 04, 2012 09:51 AM (8y9MW)

51 Don't they use the trunk of a dark blue Chevy Cavalier after the polls close for that?
Posted by: Soap MacTavish at June 04, 2012 09:44 AM (vbh31)
========

I'm sure this year it will be a Volt.

Posted by: Wii at June 04, 2012 09:51 AM (HOOye)

52 Unless the SGOD (sweet galaxy of doom) comes hurtling in to screw up Sol's trajectory and muss everyone's hair up.

I did note the possibility of trajectory change as being an outlier that may interfere with my prediction. And, gah, SGOD is welcome to muss my hair. I just looked in a mirror and I am a hot mess today.

Posted by: alexthechick at June 04, 2012 09:52 AM (VtjlW)

53 >>>How about the Franken election in next door MN?

Unfortunately, Franken won that one legitimately, as the Powerline guys (who followed every legal twist and turn) unhappily confirmed at the time.

Posted by: Jeff B. at June 04, 2012 09:52 AM (KVOrU)

54 Help me Jesus I am wore out.

Posted by: mama winger at June 04, 2012 09:52 AM (P6QsQ)

55 @43

Steady now, we're just being whiners. We have been fucked before. Remember good ole Al Franken?

Posted by: Billy Bob, pseudo-intellectual at June 04, 2012 09:52 AM (hXJOG)

56 47 How about the Franken election in next door MN?
Posted by: Vic at June 04, 2012 09:50 AM (YdQQY)

Vic: That was 1,459 ballots in a race where Coleman had won by only a couple of hundred. It was a statistical dead heat going in to the election.

Walker is beating Barret by a much wider margin and has held that margin for weeks now.

Have faith.

Posted by: J.J. Sefton at June 04, 2012 09:52 AM (MCDCp)

57 How about the Franken election in next door MN?
Posted by: Vic at June 04, 2012 09:50 AM (YdQQY)
Ok, show me the link of THOUSANDS of ballots.
Not a thousand or a few hundred.

The implication by some here is that tens of thousands of ballots are going to appear.

So, where are they in other elections?
I'm all ears.

Show me a race in the last 10 years with >10k in discrepencies.

Posted by: CAC at June 04, 2012 09:52 AM (lwLPG)

58 51
Don't they use the trunk of a dark blue Chevy Cavalier after the polls close for that?

Posted by: Soap MacTavish at June 04, 2012 09:44 AM (vbh31)

========



I'm sure this year it will be a Volt.

Posted by: Wii at June 04, 2012 09:51 AM (HOOye)

Or a Prius with factory Obama bumper stickers.

Posted by: joncelli, heartless Con and all around unpleasant guy at June 04, 2012 09:53 AM (RD7QR)

59 Vic, are you channeling my posts?

Posted by: Billy Bob, pseudo-intellectual at June 04, 2012 09:53 AM (hXJOG)

60 What's the current line on vote fraud percentage?

----------

2%

Posted by: mama winger at June 04, 2012 09:53 AM (P6QsQ)

61 Total absentees for 08: >633,000

That's where the fraud was.

Posted by: t-bird at June 04, 2012 09:54 AM (FcR7P)

62 I am sick to fucking death of hearing about it.

Well, excuuuuse us for offending your sensibilities.

Posted by: Soap MacTavish at June 04, 2012 09:54 AM (vbh31)

63 The poll is just trying to cover the D's when they steal the election - which they will - probably with all those 'mystery' voters who signed the recall... the fix is in.

Posted by: Fussy at June 04, 2012 09:54 AM (Y/2U4)

Posted by: Soap MacTavish at June 04, 2012 09:54 AM (vbh31)

65 >>Unfortunately, Franken won that one legitimately, as the Powerline
guys (who followed every legal twist and turn) unhappily confirmed at
the time.

"at the time" they didn't know about the hundreds of felons who voted illegally. More illegal votes were cast than Franken's margin.

Posted by: HeatherRadish™ at June 04, 2012 09:54 AM (/kI1Q)

66 Unfortunately, Franken won that one legitimately, as
the Powerline guys (who followed every legal twist and turn) unhappily
confirmed at the time.


Posted by: Jeff B. at June 04, 2012 09:52 AM (KVOrU)

No so according to an election monitoring group in MN who did a study that found he was elected because a bunch of illegally registered felons voted for him,.

Posted by: Vic at June 04, 2012 09:54 AM (YdQQY)

67 Where are the 40,000 ballots?

That equals 2% of a vote of 2million, or what many keep pushing as the margin of fraud.
40,000.

not a few hundred or a thousand or even two or three.

It is logistically very difficult to cheat at THAT level, and I think eeyoring over FAR narrower races has made some very, very bad at basic math.

Posted by: CAC at June 04, 2012 09:54 AM (lwLPG)

Posted by: t-bird at June 04, 2012 09:55 AM (FcR7P)

69 I think we've all gone italic...

Posted by: joncelli, heartless Con and all around unpleasant guy at June 04, 2012 09:55 AM (RD7QR)

70 italics fail

Posted by: Soap MacTavish at June 04, 2012 09:55 AM (vbh31)

71 New strategy. Convince lefties that voting for Barrett is a waste of time since he won't overturn Act 10.

Better to just sit this one out and vote in a true blue progressive in 2014.

Posted by: BadgerHawk at June 04, 2012 09:55 AM (BZK4X)

72 zzz

Posted by: datsnotamore at June 04, 2012 09:55 AM (mFLsH)

73 Allen, why are you getting math on the blog? You know we've been told there would be no math on this blog.


I just pulled up the Scotus Blog live blog opinion thingy and got all excited by it is excite! Then I realized that this is evidence that my geekdom is more pathetic than previously realized. At least when I'm geeking out over the new BSG (lalalalala there are only two seasons I can't hear you lalalalala), I get to stare at all kinds of hotassery. SCOTUS opinions? Not so much.

Posted by: alexthechick at June 04, 2012 09:55 AM (VtjlW)

74 Italic? Ba fa en cul!

Posted by: J.J. Sefton at June 04, 2012 09:56 AM (MCDCp)

75 I think the DOW will drop under 12,000 today. Isn't that some kind of Mendoza line for the economy?

Posted by: Joffen, fucking sunshine patriot at June 04, 2012 09:57 AM (nUY/O)

76 Anyway, besides giving black folks BBQ, cigarettes, and cash to vote, Wisconsin's thing is student vote fraud. You vote once absentee at your parents' address (oh, look at all those absentee votes coming in from outside Dane and Milwaukee counties!) and once in person at UW-Madistan or UW-MKE or Marquette.

And I'd bet money foreign nationals--legally resident as students--are casting ballots illegally as well.

Posted by: HeatherRadish™ at June 04, 2012 09:57 AM (/kI1Q)

77 What pisses me off about the Franken cheat was the OBama agenda got done because of it. Without that steal they would not have had the 60 vote Senate and therefore no stimulus and healthscam.

Posted by: Vic at June 04, 2012 09:57 AM (YdQQY)

78 I'm sure this year it will be a Volt.
Posted by: Wii at June 04, 2012 09:51 AM (HOOye)
-----------------------------------------
No worries then. All those fake votes will burn up long before they can be counted.

Posted by: BadgerHawk at June 04, 2012 09:57 AM (BZK4X)

79 We have shitloads of poll watchers.


Posted by: H Badger at June 04, 2012 09:38 AM (n/0Nw)

-----
Standing guard in Ward 73

Posted by: mama winger at June 04, 2012 09:57 AM (P6QsQ)

80 "I'm sure this year it will be a Volt. "

No way. They can't risk such valuable cargo getting incinerated!

Posted by: reason at June 04, 2012 09:57 AM (kZVsz)

81 And of course there is never any vote fraud if nobody ever looks for it.

Posted by: Vic at June 04, 2012 09:58 AM (YdQQY)

82 Ok who screwed things up...

Not trying to get heated at you guys but you really need to do the math here. Franken was a race IF stolen, stolen by

That would be .01% of the expected turnout in Wisconsin.

I relish in numbers and statistics so it irks me when someone tosses numbers out without thinking how really large they actually are.

Posted by: CAC at June 04, 2012 09:58 AM (lwLPG)

83 "SCOTUS opinions? Not so much."

*lips crinkle*
*eyes water*
*runs out of the room, sobbing*

Posted by: Sonia Sotomayor, who thought she still had a chance with alexthechick, at June 04, 2012 09:59 AM (kZVsz)

84

Can this be the SINGLE Wisconsin Walker post from CAC for the day?

Please?

Posted by: homer at June 04, 2012 10:00 AM (RVz+w)

85 “Everybody is a genius. But if you judge a fish by its ability to climb a tree, it will live its whole life believing that it is stupid.” ― Albert Einstein

Posted by: Bonnie Parker at June 04, 2012 10:00 AM (e8kgV)

86 Ok who screwed things up...


It was me. I was trying to stuff the italics box.

Posted by: Soap MacTavish at June 04, 2012 10:00 AM (vbh31)

87 Anyway, besides giving black folks BBQ, cigarettes, and cash to vote, Wisconsin's thing is student vote fraud. You vote once absentee at your parents' address (oh, look at all those absentee votes coming in from outside Dane and Milwaukee counties!) and once in person at UW-Madistan or UW-MKE or Marquette.

And I'd bet money foreign nationals--legally resident as students--are casting ballots illegally as well.
Posted by: HeatherRadish™ at June 04, 2012 09:57 AM (/kI1Q)

Except there is an expected drop in college student dippin' this time around. Thanks to a few changes in registration rules.

Posted by: CAC at June 04, 2012 10:00 AM (lwLPG)

88 Posted by: Vic at June 04, 2012 09:57 AM (YdQQY)


True but you could also argue Bart Stupak believing SCOAMF's promise not to cum in his mouth about abortion coverage and delivering 12 house votes that would have otherwise voted against.

And Ben Nelson, and Mary Landrieux and dead Ted Stevens...

It's all a major clusterfuck. But Franken beating Coleman was probably the most visible "if only" in that disaster.

Posted by: J.J. Sefton at June 04, 2012 10:00 AM (MCDCp)

89 I suspect that Franken's illegal votes was much higher than what that one group found. But, as I said, if you are not looking for it as the process unfolds you will never find it.

Posted by: Vic at June 04, 2012 10:01 AM (YdQQY)

90 Heads up Milwaukee radio locals.

Charlie Sykes has State AG Van Hollen next.

I'll try to transcribe what is said

Posted by: H Badger at June 04, 2012 10:01 AM (n/0Nw)

91 They rose to their feet when a local teachers union head screamed that
Walker is a serial liar. And they cheered wildly when Jackson compared
Walker to segregationist Alabama governor George Wallace.

Does Jackson remember that Wallace was a Democrat?

Posted by: Jesse Owens at June 04, 2012 10:01 AM (e8kgV)

92 CAC - not sure because I haven't tracked down the verification yet - but I think the Election Board has to count absentee ballots received up through Friday, because they were late getting them out (not enough time between primary and election day) and also the Memorial Day holiday.

Posted by: mama winger at June 04, 2012 10:02 AM (P6QsQ)

93 what the heck happened?

Close races are easy to steal- I mean fractions of a point close.

Posted by: CAC at June 04, 2012 10:02 AM (lwLPG)

94 If this was happening to the massive degree some of you are constantly pissing yourselves over, we would have seen it already in totals or in last years vote OR in the senate recall votes. It never materialized.

I'm not pissing myself over fraud. I'm pretty sure the Walker lead will be too large to be beaten by ballot-stuffing that can pass the smell test.

That said, the 2011 Prosser/Kloppenburg race does nothing to support your argument. Nobody will ever know the extent of the fraud in that election because of the Brookfield votes. I cannot make an accusation because it would be impossible to prove, but I am convinced that Kloppenburg's tiny lead without the Brookfield numbers was the result of manufactured votes created by dozens of uncoordinated agents of fraud looking to keep their nefarious activities on the passing side of the smell test by responding to the AP-published returns.

The fact that the pre-Brookfield Kloppenburg margin was so tiny both comforts and disturbs. On the one hand, it means that Prosser was kicking Kloppenburg's ass. On the other hand, it means that these election thieves can create a shitload of fraudulent votes.

Posted by: FRONT TOWARD LEFT at June 04, 2012 10:02 AM (p7SSh)

95 It's all a major clusterfuck. But Franken beating Coleman was probably the most visible "if only" in that disaster.

Posted by: J.J. Sefton at June 04, 2012 10:00 AM (MCDCp)

I fully expected the so-called blue dog Dems to vote for it. I have never believed in such a thing as a conservative Dem. Not in the past 50 years.

Posted by: Vic at June 04, 2012 10:02 AM (YdQQY)

96 CAC - not sure because I haven't tracked down the verification yet - but I think the Election Board has to count absentee ballots received up through Friday, because they were late getting them out (not enough time between primary and election day) and also the Memorial Day holiday.
Posted by: mama winger at June 04, 2012 10:02 AM (P6QsQ)
I was focusing on early voting. The GAB reported numbers through mid-day Friday already received.

I expect 260-275,000 absentees filed. GAB should have an update today.

Posted by: CAC at June 04, 2012 10:03 AM (lwLPG)

97 I have an alternative happy dream for tomorrow. Walker wins by 2% after massive voter fraud is attempted, that results in a scandal of Blago proportions. The senior executives of all the public unions and many teachers go to jail.

Posted by: Dave in Fla at June 04, 2012 10:03 AM (w86ft)

98 Does Jackson remember that Wallace was a Democrat?


He's betting on most of the crowd he's inciting not to remember that inconvenient fact.

Posted by: Retread at June 04, 2012 10:03 AM (joSBv)

99 @homer - CAC made some sort of sly bet with a couple buddies that he could mess with Google and get AoS to come up above actual poll results whenever someone searched on "WI Recall Polling"

Posted by: reason at June 04, 2012 10:04 AM (kZVsz)

100 Election board is anticipating 65% voter turnout. Polls open from 7 AM to 8PM.

Posted by: mama winger at June 04, 2012 10:04 AM (P6QsQ)

101 I said it last night. Prediction is that if Barrett gets more votes than Walker, he wins. Ph.D. level PoliSci shit.

They musta went to Harvard or something.

Posted by: blaster at June 04, 2012 10:04 AM (7vSU0)

102 95 Vic

Posted by: Vic at June 04, 2012 10:02 AM (YdQQY)

Henry "Scoop" Jackson. Liberal on a lot of social issues but one of the biggest hawks on either side of the aisle and a staunch supporter of Israel. I would have to look up his stance on fiscal issues since I was a relatively clueless teen in the mid 70's.

Posted by: J.J. Sefton at June 04, 2012 10:05 AM (MCDCp)

103 >>Thanks to a few changes in registration rules.

You think the two-minutes' hate people weren't smart enough to get people to register before the deadline? The changes don't cover registering at different addresses in different counties.

What they need is a way to know that Joe Cheesehead, age 22, who gets mail at a Turtle Lake address is the same Joe Cheesehead, age 22 who gets mail at an apartment in Madison, and force them to pick one address to vote at (like that stupid woman in Indiana who who claimed she was disenfranchised when she gave poll workers a Florida ID). Or severely limit absentee voting and start dipping fingers in ink.

Gore only had about 700 more WI votes than Bush.

Posted by: HeatherRadish™ at June 04, 2012 10:05 AM (/kI1Q)

104 I have an alternative happy dream for tomorrow. Walker wins by 2% after massive voter fraud is attempted, that results in a scandal of Blago proportions. The senior executives of all the public unions and many teachers go to jail.
Posted by: Dave in Fla at June 04, 2012 10:03 AM (w86ft)

I like this one. Two birds, one stone.

Posted by: CAC at June 04, 2012 10:05 AM (lwLPG)

105 Factory orders fell for the third time in four months, dropping 0.6 percent in April, according to the Commerce Department. Economists had expected orders rising 0.2 percent.
----
Oh boy.

Posted by: Joffen, fucking sunshine patriot at June 04, 2012 10:06 AM (nUY/O)

106 "Does Jackson remember that Wallace was a Democrat?"

C'mon. It's a room full of teachers. Surely you wouldn't expect anyone in attendance to know such trivia...

Posted by: reason at June 04, 2012 10:06 AM (kZVsz)

107 Unless the SGOD (sweet galaxy of doom) comes hurtling in to screw up Sol's trajectory and muss everyone's hair up.

Posted by: J.J. Sefton at June 04, 2012 09:48 AM (MCDCp)
I have a name, you know. Coming your way at 268,428 mph.

Posted by: Andromada at June 04, 2012 10:06 AM (kSaUf)

108 I spoke to my son yesterday by phone and he said that he had clobbered a bunch of Wisconsin soldiers over there and made sure they got their absentee ballots mailed in on time. They are all R's.

Posted by: mama winger at June 04, 2012 10:07 AM (P6QsQ)

109 How about this nugget at Tepid Gas:

Pelosi declares Hilary the one to beat in '16!


...when asked about Clinton’s prospects in 2016. “She’s our shot” that year, Pelosi said.

Posted by: J.J. Sefton at June 04, 2012 10:08 AM (MCDCp)

110 Yes Jackson was OK on national defense, but I would not call him a conservative. His last year in office he had an ACU rating of 18.

Posted by: Vic at June 04, 2012 10:09 AM (YdQQY)

111 Hearing just a few anecdotes of voter irregularities via talk radio. Things like early voters finding their polling stations closed early, or early voters in Republican precincts where Dem election officials refused to witness their ballots. Seems sporadic at the moment.

Posted by: mama winger at June 04, 2012 10:09 AM (P6QsQ)

112 107 Posted by: Andromada at June 04, 2012 10:06 AM (kSaUf)


You are a stuttering local cluster of a miserable ball of helium 3.

Posted by: J.J. Sefton at June 04, 2012 10:09 AM (MCDCp)

113 110 Posted by: Vic at June 04, 2012 10:09 AM (YdQQY)


Point taken. Then again today's Dems have an ACU rating of -15 trillion (give or take)

Posted by: J.J. Sefton at June 04, 2012 10:10 AM (MCDCp)

114 Point taken. Then again today's Dems have an ACU rating of -15 trillion (give or take)

Posted by: J.J. Sefton at June 04, 2012 10:10 AM (MCDCp)

Most of them range from 0 to about 10.

Posted by: Vic at June 04, 2012 10:11 AM (YdQQY)

115 Obama is a stuttering clusterf*ck of a miserable failure.

Posted by: steevy at June 04, 2012 10:12 AM (Xb3hu)

116 Oh snap. You don't start a flame war with something made of stars, man.

Posted by: reason at June 04, 2012 10:13 AM (kZVsz)

117 WI AG on Charlie Sykes now talking about how this letter that went out identifying peoples' neighbors who had not voted in previous elections gives Dem voters some pretty good data on who to impersonate at the polls, since Voter ID was put on hold by the lefty judges.

Posted by: mama winger at June 04, 2012 10:13 AM (P6QsQ)

118 Posted by: Vic at June 04, 2012 10:09 AM (YdQQY)

And he wouldn't want to be called one either!

But he understood that decent people could disagree about many things, as long as long as they agreed on a few things, like national defense, support for our allies, etc.

Posted by: CharlieBrown'sDildo (NJConservative) at June 04, 2012 10:14 AM (nEUpB)

119 Mama, that seriously makes my blood boil. How is that sort of information not protected? Voter registration, yeah, I'm pretty sure that's public. But voter activity???

Posted by: reason at June 04, 2012 10:15 AM (kZVsz)

120 Total absentees for 08: >633,000

So didn't WI have a totalpopulation a smidge over 5 mil in '08? If so, 633k absentees seems to be comically high. They must not have had enough car trunk space.

Sort of like the old joke about why only 5k Mexicans showed up at the Alamo.

Self=Denounced

Posted by: Burn the Witch at June 04, 2012 10:16 AM (rX1N2)

121 116 Posted by: reason at June 04, 2012 10:13 AM (kZVsz)

A flame war with galaxies and stars. The irony, it is dripping.

Posted by: J.J. Sefton at June 04, 2012 10:16 AM (MCDCp)

122 ...when asked about Clinton’s prospects in 2016. “She’s our shot” that year, Pelosi said.

Posted by: J.J. Sefton at June 04, 2012 10:08 AM (MCDCp)
Looks like a trial balloon that will lead some pollster to run a 2012 match up of Mitt versus Hillary “just for fun”. It will show Hillary ahead by 7 or 8 points (regardless of what the actual numbers are).
Pelosi knows the internal numbers and is testing options for a late switch.

Posted by: jwest at June 04, 2012 10:16 AM (ZDsRL)

123 I would like to thank the public sector unions of Wisconsin for singlehandedly changing my previous high opinion of teachers into considering used car dealers as more trustworthy and deserving my support.

Posted by: Dave in Fla at June 04, 2012 10:16 AM (w86ft)

124 Obama’s direct involvement in cyber sabotage and drone assassinations
only underscores the recklessness of US imperialism as it threatens a
new war of aggression against Iran.

Posted by: Code Pink at June 04, 2012 10:17 AM (e8kgV)

125 Clinton will to old and to ugly to run in 2016

Posted by: Nevergiveup at June 04, 2012 10:17 AM (05RcU)

126 Black vote won't care. It's not a racial election. There goes a lot of D turnout.

Posted by: nickless at June 04, 2012 10:17 AM (MMC8r)

127 Gore only had about 700 more WI votes than Bush.
Posted by: HeatherRadish™ at June 04, 2012 10:05 AM (/kI1Q)
==========

The reason so many people smell voter fraud, is because it is becoming more and more reported on.

It makes a huge difference if we are talking electorate wins because the focus can be where the most damage can be done.

With total votes versus electorate, it's much harder as it has to be spread broadly.

But, with that said, the left is constantly trying to find ways around the security and integrity of voting. I cannot get that video out of my head where the left is saying, in camera, that voter fraud to them is like getting a speeding ticket, no big deal.

Hanging chads eliminated fair votes.

Absentee votes can be eliminated so easily, by the observer stating the signature doesn't match. How easy is it to make that claim? Very.

I still think Walker wins in a landslide. He has made progress in such a short period of time, and when workers were able to drop the union memberships and started seeing money back in their pockets... that is where it counts.

Posted by: Wii at June 04, 2012 10:18 AM (HOOye)

128 "Clinton will to old and to ugly to run in 2016"

Maybe she can use Nancy as her "wingman" so that, by comparison, she looks like the hot one?

Posted by: reason at June 04, 2012 10:19 AM (kZVsz)

129 Mama, that seriously makes my blood boil. How is
that sort of information not protected? Voter registration, yeah, I'm
pretty sure that's public. But voter activity???

Posted by: reason at June 04, 2012 10:15 AM (kZVsz)


------
I was not aware that this information was public record either. Name, address, voting history. So if I see that someone on the next street is registered, but has not voted in the past 3 or 4 elections, I could theoretically go cast a ballot in their name, no questions asked, no ID needed.

Posted by: mama winger at June 04, 2012 10:19 AM (P6QsQ)

130 108 I spoke to my son yesterday by phone and he said that he had clobbered a bunch of Wisconsin soldiers over there and made sure they got their absentee ballots mailed in on time. They are all R's.
Posted by: mama winger at June 04, 2012 10:07 AM (P6QsQ)
===========

Send your son our love.

Posted by: Wii at June 04, 2012 10:20 AM (HOOye)

131 OT: This week's Time Magazine unveils Obama's secret weapon that will guarantee his re-election. Are you ready? It's Joe Biden! Joe is such a consummate politician that with Joe for you, who can be against you? There's even a series of diagrams about the Biden method of backslapping during meet and greets.

If your re-election depends upon the competence, honesty, and intellect of Joe Biden you are, what is the word?, screwed up the bung hole.

I can't find it on the online edition or I would link to it.

Posted by: WalrusRex at June 04, 2012 10:20 AM (Hx5uv)

132 Posted by: Nevergiveup at June 04, 2012 10:17 AM (05RcU)

Yeah...but she's a real looker today.

Posted by: CharlieBrown'sDildo (NJConservative) at June 04, 2012 10:20 AM (nEUpB)

133 CAC ATTACK !!!

Posted by: People For the Ethical Treatment of Stripper Poll Graphics at June 04, 2012 10:20 AM (yn6XZ)

134 Posted by: Code Pink at June 04, 2012 10:17 AM (e8kgV)

Shouldn't you be doing something about those herpes sores?

Posted by: joncelli, heartless Con and all around unpleasant guy at June 04, 2012 10:21 AM (RD7QR)

135 ...when asked about Clinton’s prospects in 2016. “She’s our shot” that year, Pelosi said.
Posted by: J.J. Sefton at June 04, 2012 10:08 AM (MCDCp)
===========


This is so bizarre to me.

They basically are looking past future events, as if November is not coming.

Have they really just given up?

I hope so.

Posted by: Wii at June 04, 2012 10:21 AM (HOOye)

136 New orders for U.S. factory goods fell in April for the third time in four months as demand slipped for everything from cars and machinery to computers, the latest worrisome sign for the economic recovery.

The report showed broad weakness in a sector that has carried the economic recovery, adding to a growing body of soft economic data.

Posted by: Joffen, fucking sunshine patriot at June 04, 2012 10:22 AM (nUY/O)

137
You are a stuttering local cluster of a miserable ball of helium 3.

Posted by: J.J. Sefton at June 04, 2012 10:09 AM (MCDCp)

That's it! Your miserable little solar system out of my new galaxy when I take over.Not that you're going to be around to see it as your sad sack of a "star" that you call Sun hates you so much it'll have burnt you to a crisp by then.But you are going to get it, just you wait. 4 billion years buddy, and then, BAM! you're outta here!

Posted by: Andromada at June 04, 2012 10:22 AM (kSaUf)

138
Nobody said political activism was easy. Just ask Susan Emry, a
56-year-old mother of two living in San Luis Obispo, Calif., who decided
earlier this year to help elect progressive candidates this November.

But what’s brought her trouble isn’t her politics. It’s her branding.

The name for her initiative: “Rock the Slut Vote.”

Posted by: Code Pink at June 04, 2012 10:22 AM (e8kgV)

139 117 WI AG on Charlie Sykes now talking about how this letter that went out identifying peoples' neighbors who had not voted in previous elections gives Dem voters some pretty good data on who to impersonate at the polls, since Voter ID was put on hold by the lefty judges.
Posted by: mama winger at June 04, 2012 10:13 AM (P6QsQ)
==========

Was that the plan all along?

Posted by: Wii at June 04, 2012 10:22 AM (HOOye)

140 Send your son our love.

Posted by: Wii at June 04, 2012 10:20 AM (HOOye)

-------
I will be able to do so in person in just a couple of weeks - he's coming home on leave - YAY!

Posted by: mama winger at June 04, 2012 10:22 AM (P6QsQ)

141 "...IT DIDN'T FUCKING HAPPEN IN 2011 TO THE DEGREE YOU ARE DOOMING OVER.

ITS NOT FUCKING HAPPENING TOMORROW..." ~CAC

Yea!

Posted by: Jypsea Rose~AoSHQ Graveyard Shift at June 04, 2012 10:22 AM (iKSAz)

142 Posted by: mama wingerat June 04, 2012 10:13 AM (P6QsQ)
--------
That's what my wife said when one of those flyers showed up in our mailbox. Apart from being creepy as hell, it's basically a cheat sheet for fraud.

Posted by: BadgerHawk at June 04, 2012 10:24 AM (BZK4X)

143 Posted by: Andromada at June 04, 2012 10:22 AM (kSaUf)

You big phony! Your just some sort of brown dwarf identity thief. You misspelled Andromeda!

Posted by: J.J. Sefton at June 04, 2012 10:25 AM (MCDCp)

144 134 Shouldn't you be doing something about those herpes sores?
Posted by: joncelli, heartless Con and all around unpleasant guy at June 04, 2012 10:21 AM (RD7QR)


Wasn't that a movie? "Herpes, the Love Bug."

Posted by: J.J. Sefton at June 04, 2012 10:26 AM (MCDCp)

145 Your just some sort of brown dwarf identity thief.

Racist Heightist!

Posted by: nickless at June 04, 2012 10:26 AM (MMC8r)

146 Mornin' Arch. So what's this I hear about a free pack of smokes for every Barrett vote?

Posted by: at June 04, 2012 10:26 AM (0Ohos)

147 I can't find it on the online edition or I would link to it.
Posted by: WalrusRex at June 04, 2012 10:20 AM (Hx5uv)
========

you sure this isn't an old April Fools edition?

Posted by: Wii at June 04, 2012 10:26 AM (HOOye)

148 You big phony! Your just some sort of brown dwarf identity thief. You misspelled Andromeda!

Posted by: J.J. Sefton at June 04, 2012 10:25 AM (MCDCp)

If there is any galaxy identity fraud going on, you can bet democrats are behind it.

Posted by: jwest at June 04, 2012 10:27 AM (ZDsRL)

149 Ace & Cobs,

I'm looking for posts like the ones during the health care debacle...like:

"We don't just want to beat the progressives, we want to send a message by spanking them, kicking 'em in the nads, blacken their eyes and bloody their noses so bad they won't raise their heads again for another 100 years."

They were better than my example there...all full of fire and brimstone. They really got me through 2009-2010.

Posted by: Jypsea Rose~AoSHQ Graveyard Shift at June 04, 2012 10:29 AM (iKSAz)

150 144

Is it a coincidence tat lindsey lohan stared n the remake?

Posted by: Infidelswine at June 04, 2012 10:29 AM (BHG6O)

151 THE VETTING: RABBI ARNOLD J. WOLF, THE SOCIALIST, ANTI-ISRAEL RABBI WHO TAUGHT OBAMA WHAT HE 'KNOWS' ABOUT JUDAISM

http://www.breitbart.com/

Posted by: Nevergiveup at June 04, 2012 10:29 AM (05RcU)

152 "So if I see that someone on the next street is registered, but has not voted in the past 3 or 4 elections, I could theoretically go cast a ballot in their name, no questions asked, no ID needed."

And if that person actually wound up feeling motivated to go vote this time around...LET THE HILARITY ENSUE!

Posted by: reason at June 04, 2012 10:30 AM (XiVKO)

153 OT:
Artist turns his dead pet into flying helicopter after it is killed by a car

http://tinyurl.com/7sy3ar2

Posted by: nickless at June 04, 2012 10:30 AM (MMC8r)

154 You know, these kinds of things remind me about my Uncle Frank--he passed away last year at about 75 after a bout with cancer. He was aformer priest, a genuinely decent guy, and a standard issue Oak Park liberal. I remember thinking to myself after he passed away..."well, there's one less Obama voter."
This is what my frudging world view has come to. Is it justme who thinks these sick thoughts,or is it a symptom offin de siecle? And thekickeris, he'll stillbe in on theIllinois rolls...

Posted by: Big Fat Meanie at June 04, 2012 10:31 AM (Ec6wH)

155 Artist turns his dead pet into flying helicopter after it is killed by a car

http://tinyurl.com/7sy3ar2
Posted by: nickless at June 04, 2012 10:30 AM (MMC8r)

Myself and my 3 cats are not ammused

Posted by: Nevergiveup at June 04, 2012 10:33 AM (05RcU)

156 Not trying to get heated at you guys but you really need to do the math here. Franken was a race IF stolen, stolen by That would be .01% of the expected turnout in Wisconsin. I relish in numbers and statistics so it irks me when someone tosses numbers out without thinking how really large they actually are.

Exactly. You can only steal a close election, In 2010, Walker be Barrett by roughly 124,000 votes......or about 5.5% (give a take a few votes here and there, and a few tenths of a percentage point here and there, cause I am too damn lazy to do the exact math).

Now, 124,000 votes sounds easy to steal........but when your total voter pool is 3.4 million, it actually is quite hard. Because A) you only have a limited area to steal votes from (Not all 3.4 million live in Donk heavy areas) and B) ther is not a large enough metropolitan area to steal that many votes from (Milwuakees total population is rougly 580,000 people ---- which means to try to steal the election solely from Milwaukee, you have to find almost a 20% increase in 2010 voter turnout). Which means Barrett has to go from 209,00 vote total to a 333,000 vote total........in a county where the total votes cast in 2010 was.............341,000.

Posted by: Mallamutt, RINO President for Life at June 04, 2012 10:33 AM (OWjjx)

157 Oh a tip of the hat to the Celtics for evening up their series with that piece of shit LaBron and the Heat.

Posted by: Nevergiveup at June 04, 2012 10:34 AM (05RcU)

158 OT: This week's Time Magazine unveils Obama's secret weapon that will guarantee his re-election. Are you ready? It's Joe Biden! Joe is such a consummate politician that with Joe for you, who can be against you? There's even a series of diagrams about the Biden method of backslapping during meet and greets.
....
I can't find it on the online edition or I would link to it.


Here it is:

http://alturl.com/pqm6a


Posted by: blaster at June 04, 2012 10:34 AM (7vSU0)

159 ...and let me tell you - I could use a free pack of smokes after that blond guy and his fat friend stole every last cent I had.

Posted by: at June 04, 2012 10:37 AM (0Ohos)

160 you sure this isn't an old April Fools edition?

****

Just look for the commie red cover at the news stand.

Posted by: WalrusRex at June 04, 2012 10:48 AM (Hx5uv)

161 "I remember thinking to myself after he passed away..."well, there's one less Obama voter.""

Au contraire...

Posted by: Association of Seance-led Voter Aides, Local 13 at June 04, 2012 10:56 AM (XiVKO)

162 I hear they are already starting the recount, just to get a head start.

Posted by: Roy at June 04, 2012 11:01 AM (VndSC)

163 What was the distribution of those voting history flyers? Just blue zipcodes or all?

Posted by: Jean at June 04, 2012 11:08 AM (/FT0A)

164 Only conservatives can be on the edge of a monumental victory and still sound like they all want to slit their wrists. Of course conservatives start buying into the media moving the goalposts for a Walker victory. "Oh boy, he better win by at least 6 points or that's augers well for Obama." Bullshit. A win is a win. So far the Dems have lost in Massachusetts, New Jersey, a House race in the most Jewish district in NY, and Wisconsin in the Supreme Ct race and in trying to take back the legislature. So all the Eyeores, shut the fuck up. There is not going to be 100,000 extra votes due to voter fraud.

Posted by: Sean at June 04, 2012 11:09 AM (D5qKi)

165 Only conservatives can be on the edge of a monumental victory and still sound like they all want to slit their wrists.

-------

LOL. I've been gathering poisonous plants.

Posted by: mama winger at June 04, 2012 11:14 AM (P6QsQ)

166 Hang in there mama and have faith!

This is the equivalent of your child going into full tantrum mode in the toy aisle of Target...you have to take it in public because you have no choice.

Sooner or later that child gets back in the house after the tantrum and in private can be taken to the woodshed.

That happens tomorrow.

Posted by: H Badger at June 04, 2012 11:20 AM (n/0Nw)

167 The biggest flaw with this analysis by PPP (and their work is usually quite flawed): the assumption that every Democrat wants Walker out of office and thinks he is doing a bad job. And that's simply not the case.

Posted by: Christopher Taylor at June 04, 2012 11:39 AM (r4wIV)

168
But Intrade has Bennett up by 20%!!!!!!!!





Plaid maps.......I'm still waiting.

Posted by: In before the troll at June 04, 2012 11:42 AM (xDqit)

169
Barrett's Intrade score is even better!


Ugh, no coffee yet.

Posted by: In before the troll at June 04, 2012 11:44 AM (xDqit)

170 Now, 124,000 votes sounds easy to steal........but
when your total voter pool is 3.4 million, it actually is quite hard.
Because A) you only have a limited area to steal votes from (Not all 3.4
million live in Donk heavy areas) and B) ther is not a large enough
metropolitan area to steal that many votes from (Milwuakees total
population is rougly 580,000 people ---- which means to try to steal the
election solely from Milwaukee, you have to find almost a 20% increase
in 2010 voter turnout). Which means Barrett has to go from 209,00 vote
total to a 333,000 vote total........in a county where the total votes
cast in 2010 was.............341,000.





Posted by: Mallamutt, RINO President for Life at June 04, 2012 10:33 AM (OWjjx)


Not to mention the Dems *already* are stealing votes in those areas in *every* election.

Posted by: Oldcat at June 04, 2012 02:57 PM (z1N6a)






Processing 0.03, elapsed 0.029 seconds.
15 queries taking 0.0091 seconds, 179 records returned.
Page size 98 kb.
Powered by Minx 0.7 alpha.

MuNuvians
MeeNuvians
Polls! Polls! Polls!
Frequently Asked Questions
The (Almost) Complete Paul Anka Integrity Kick
Top Top Tens
Greatest Hitjobs

The Ace of Spades HQ Sex-for-Money Skankathon
A D&D Guide to the Democratic Candidates
Margaret Cho: Just Not Funny
More Margaret Cho Abuse
Margaret Cho: Still Not Funny
Iraqi Prisoner Claims He Was Raped... By Woman
Wonkette Announces "Morning Zoo" Format
John Kerry's "Plan" Causes Surrender of Moqtada al-Sadr's Militia
World Muslim Leaders Apologize for Nick Berg's Beheading
Michael Moore Goes on Lunchtime Manhattan Death-Spree
Milestone: Oliver Willis Posts 400th "Fake News Article" Referencing Britney Spears
Liberal Economists Rue a "New Decade of Greed"
Artificial Insouciance: Maureen Dowd's Word Processor Revolts Against Her Numbing Imbecility
Intelligence Officials Eye Blogs for Tips
They Done Found Us Out, Cletus: Intrepid Internet Detective Figures Out Our Master Plan
Shock: Josh Marshall Almost Mentions Sarin Discovery in Iraq
Leather-Clad Biker Freaks Terrorize Australian Town
When Clinton Was President, Torture Was Cool
What Wonkette Means When She Explains What Tina Brown Means
Wonkette's Stand-Up Act
Wankette HQ Gay-Rumors Du Jour
Here's What's Bugging Me: Goose and Slider
My Own Micah Wright Style Confession of Dishonesty
Outraged "Conservatives" React to the FMA
An On-Line Impression of Dennis Miller Having Sex with a Kodiak Bear
The Story the Rightwing Media Refuses to Report!
Our Lunch with David "Glengarry Glen Ross" Mamet
The House of Love: Paul Krugman
A Michael Moore Mystery (TM)
The Dowd-O-Matic!
Liberal Consistency and Other Myths
Kepler's Laws of Liberal Media Bias
John Kerry-- The Splunge! Candidate
"Divisive" Politics & "Attacks on Patriotism" (very long)
The Donkey ("The Raven" parody)
News/Chat