Aw, Too Cool! The Unredacted Motion to Compel Obama's Testimony

Via IreneFingIrene, the unredacted motion, below.

The original motion to compel Obama's testimony heavily redacted.

But I have the real thing, unredacted, posted in its entirety below.

I was going to say how Irene got this, but on the off, off chance that this could happen again, I won't say how she did. I mean, there is a small chance that another redacted document, maybe something more important, might come down the pike, and maybe Irene will be able to give it to us.

Suspicions This Was Deliberate: I voiced my own in the thread. Seems a lot of people are saying so.

If the court wanted this redacted -- but Blago's lawyers didn't -- they could get the accusations of Obama and bribery out there by having an "oopsie" moment.

Note the allegation is that a "public official" (Obama, they mean) was offered a bribe but declined it.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS
EASTERN DIVISION
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA )
)
v. ) 08CR888
)
) Judge James B. Zagel
ROD BLAGOJEVICH )
MOTION FOR THE COURT TO ISSUE A TRIAL SUBPOENA TO
PRESIDENT BARACK OBAMA
Now Comes Defendant Rod Blagojevich, by and through his counsels and hereby
requests this court issue a subpoena ad testificandum for President Barack Obama. In support of
said motion, defendant states the following:1
1. President Barack Obama was elected November 4, 2008 and was inaugurated January
20, 2009. Before being elected President, Mr. Obama was a United States Senator
from Illinois.
2. As a result of the election of Mr. Obama, his Senate seat was open for appointment by
Governor Rod Blagojevich.
3. The charges against Mr. Blagojevich stem from his appointment of President-elect
Obama’s vacated Senate seat.
4. According to media reports, President Obama was interviewed by two United States
attorneys and two FBI agents for two hours.2
1 Although it is the defense’s position that all tapes and sealed information be made public, to comply with the
Protective Order of April 14, 2009, portions that contain sealed information provided by the government have been
redacted. The defense, however, urges this Court unseal the entire motion. See, this court’s order dated April 14,
2010 (document 305) “Redaction, in cases where the redacted words are relevant to the case and considered in
reaching a decision, is still permitted but discouraged.” See In re Krynicki, 983 F.2d 74, 75 (7th Cir. 1992)
(“Information that is used at trial or otherwise become the basis of decision enters the public record.”) (citation
omitted). The case for redaction has to be proven not presumed. ... But it is clear that the remedy to the objection
that a portion of a statement may be misleading to the public (and the jury pool) is not redaction but disclosure of the
omitted portion. Disclosure of written material a month and a half before the beginning of trial does not come close
to presenting a significant threat that a fair jury cannot be found. The experience of the courts in cases which attract
significant news coverage has shown that pretrial news reporting is an overstated menace to fair jury trials.”
2 “Barack Obama questioned by FBI agents over Blagojevich Illinois senate seat scandal”, Toby Harnden, The
Telegraph, December 26, 2008.
Case 1:08-cr-00888 Document 327 Filed 04/22/10 Page 1 of 11
2
5. On December 19, 2009, the defense filed a Motion for Discovery. In that motion, the
defense requested all notes, transcripts, and reports generated from the government’s
interview of President Barack Obama.
6. As of today’s date, the defense has not received any notes, transcripts, or reports from
President Obama’s interview with the government.
7. The government alleges that Defendant Rod Blagojevich met “with a labor union
official who he believed to be in contact with the President-elect in regard to the
vacant Senate seat, and suggested to the labor union official that Rod Blagojevich
would appoint Senate Candidate B to the vacant Senate seat in exchange for Rod
Blagojevich being named Secretary of Health and Human Services.” (Indictment p.
101, para. 10(c)).
8. President Obama has stated publicly that he was “confident that no representatives of
mine would have any part of any deals3 related to this seat.”4
9. Yet, despite President Obama stating that no representatives of his had any part of
any deals, labor union president told the FBI and the United States Attorneys that he
spoke to labor union official on November 3, 2008 who received a phone message
from Obama that evening. After labor union official listened to the message
labor union official told labor union president “I’m the one”. Labor union
president took that to mean that labor union official was to be the one to deliver
the message on behalf of Obama that Senate Candidate B was his pick. (Labor
union president 302, February 2, 2009, p. 7).
The government alleges that Defendant Rod Blagojevich met “with a labor union
official who he believed to be in contact with the President-elect in regard to the
vacant Senate seat, and suggested to the labor union official that Rod Blagojevich
would appoint Senate Candidate B to the vacant Senate seat in exchange for Rod
Blagojevich being named Secretary of Health and Human Services.” (Indictment p.
101, para. 10(c)).

10. Labor union official told the FBI and the United States Attorneys “Obama expressed
his belief that [Senate Candidate B] would be a good Senator for the people of
Illinois and would be a candidate who could win re-election. [Labor union
official] advised Obama that [labor union official] would reach out to Governor
Blagojevich and advocate for [Senate Candidate B].. . . [Labor union official]
called [labor union president] and told [labor union president] that Obama was
aware that [labor union official] would be reaching out to Blagojevich.” (Labor
union official 302, February 3, 2009 p. 3).
3 Deal is defined as a “transaction; bargain; contract; an arrangement for mutual advantage.” Merriam-Webster
Online Dictionary. A deal requires two willing participants.
4 President-elect Barack Obama press conference, December 11, 2008.
Case 1:08-cr-00888 Document 327 Filed 04/22/10 Page 2 of 11
3
11. According to Senate Candidate B, on November, 4 2008, Senate Candidate B
spoke with labor union official about the Senate seat. Labor union official said
he spoke to Obama. Labor union official said he was going to meet with
Blagojevich and said “he was going to push Blagojevich hard on this. According
to Senate Candidate B, labor union official’s language could have been stronger
than the language that she was reporting to the government.” (Senate Candidate
B 302, December 19, 200.
12. On November 5, 2008, Blagojevich told John Harris that labor union official “talked
to Barack Obama, wants to come and see me.” Blagojevich then told Harris that
labor union official “was very explicit with me, “I talked to Barack about the
Senate seat. Can I come and see ya? Can I do it tomorrow?’ I said, sure.”
(Blagojevich Home Phone Call # 261).
13. A supporter of Presidential Candidate Obama suggested that she talk to the wife of
Governor Blagojevich about Senate Candidate B for Senator. (Valerie Jarrett
302, December 19, 200. Supporter of Presidential Candidate Obama is
mentioned in a phone call on November 3, 2008, having offered “fundraising” in
exchange for Senate Candidate B for senator (Blagojevich Home Phone Call #
149).
14. President Obama has direct knowledge to allegations made in the indictment. In
addition, President Obama’s public statements contradict other witness statements,
specifically those made by labor union official and Senate Candidate B. It is
anticipated that labor union official will be a witness for the government. His
accounts of events directly related to the charges in the indictment are contradicted by
President Obama’s public statement.
15. Even the prosecutor in this case indicated “there’s no allegation that the presidentelect
– there’s no reference in the complaint to any conversations involving presidentelect
or indicating that the president-elect was aware of it.”5
16. There are two conflicting stories and the defense has the right to admit evidence that
contradicts the government’s claims. Only President Obama can do this.
17. President-elect Obama also spoke to Governor Blagojevich on December 1, 2008
in Philadelphia. On Harris Cell Phone Call # 139, John Harris and Governor’s
legal counsel discuss a conversation Blagojevich had with President-elect
5
“Fitzgerald Press Conference on Blagojevich. Transcript.” Chicago Sun Times, Lynn Sweet, December 9, 2008.
Case 1:08-cr-00888 Document 327 Filed 04/22/10 Page 3 of 11
4
Obama. The government claims a conspiracy existed from October 22, 2008
continuing through December 9, 2008.6 That conversation is relevant to the defense
of the government’s theory of an ongoing conspiracy. Only Rod Blagojevich and
President Obama can testify to the contents of that conversation. The defense is
allowed to present evidence that corroborates the defendant’s testimony.7
18. President-elect Obama also suggested Senate Candidate A to Governor Blagojevich.
John Harris told the FBI and the United States Attorneys that he spoke to
President’s Chief of Staff on November 12, 2008. Harris took notes of the
conversation and wrote that President’s Chief had previously worked as
Blagojevich's press secretary. Obama agreed of Staff told Harris that Senate
Candidate A was acceptable to Obama as a senate pick. (Harris handwritten
notes, OOG1004463) President’s Chief of Staff told the FBI that “he could not
say where but somewhere it was communicated to him that” Senate Candidate A
was a suggested candidate viewed as one of the four “right” candidates “by the
Obama transition team.” (Rahm Emanuel 302, p. 5, December 20, 200. Harris
told Blagojevich Obama’s suggestion on November 12, 2008 (Blagojevich Home
Phone Call # 539).
19. President-elect Obama was also involved in other senate candidate choices. On
December 8, 2008, John Harris’ secretary’s call log noted President’s Chief of
Staff called at 10:47 am and wrote “needs to talk to you asap” (Harris 302,
February 20, 2009). President’s Chief of Staff told the FBI that he had a
conversation discussing the Senate seat with Obama on December 7, 2008 in
Obama’s car. President’s Chief of Staff told the FBI “Obama expressed concern
about Senate Candidate D being appointed as Senator. [President’s Chief of
Staff] suggested they might need an expanded list to possibly include names of
African Americans that came out of the business world. [President’s Chief of
Staff] thought he suggested Senate Candidate E who was the head of the Urban
6 See, Paragraph 38, Indictment entitled “Efforts to Obtain Personal Financial Benefits for ROD BLAGOJEVICH in
Return for his Appointment of a United States Senator.” The paragraph states: “Beginning in or about October
2008, and continuing until on or about December 9, 2008 . . .”
7 See, Wisconsin ex rel. Monsoor v. Gagnan, 497 F.2d 1126 (7th Cir. 1974) (holding that the state trial court
committed reversible error and violated the defendant’s Sixth Amendment right to a fair trial and compulsory
process by striking the testimony of the only corroborating witness to a phone call that related directly to the
defendant’s defense), citing Braswell v.Wainwright, 463 F.2d 1148, 1155-56 (5th Cir. 1972) (holding that “Closely
related to [the defendant’s] Sixth Amendment right is his right to a fair trial - - to due process. [The defendant] had a
right to at least present the testimony of his sole corroborating witness to the jury. That the jury might still have
returned a guilty verdict is beside the point; judgment of the credibility of witnesses is for the trier of fact.”)
Case 1:08-cr-00888 Document 327 Filed 04/22/10 Page 4 of 11
5
League and with President’s Chief of Staff’s suggestion." (President’s Chief of
Staff, 302, 12-20-0.
20. President Barack Obama has direct knowledge of the Senate seat allegation.
President Obama’s testimony is relevant to three fundamental issues of that
allegation. First, President Obama contradicts the testimony of an important
government witness. Second, President Obama’s testimony is relevant to the
necessary element of intent of the defendant. Third, President Obama is the only one
who can say if emissaries were sent on his behalf, who those emissaries were, and
what, if anything, those emissaries were instructed to do on his behalf. All of these
issues are relevant and necessary for the defense of Rod Blagojevich.
21. Tony Rezko is one of the government’s main witnesses.8 Mr. Rezko’s credibility is
extremely relevant in this trial. In many instances, Mr. Rezko is the government’s
crucial witness to prove up their allegations.9 Mr. Rezko wrote a letter to a federal
judge stating “the prosecutors have been overzealous in pursuing a crime that never
happened. They are pressuring me to tell them the “wrong” things that I supposedly
know about Governor Blagojevich and Senator Obama. I have never been a party to
any wrongdoing that involved the Governor or the Senator. I will never fabricate lies
about anyone else for selfish purposes.” (Exhibit A)
22. However, the defense has a good faith belief that Mr. Rezko, President Obama’s
former friend, fund-raiser, and neighbor told the FBI and the United States Attorneys
a different story about President Obama. In a recent in camera proceeding, the
government tendered a three paragraph letter indicating that Rezko “has stated
in interviews with the government that he engaged in election law violations by
personally contributing a large sum of cash to the campaign of a public official
who is not Rod Blagojevich. … Further, the public official denies being aware of
cash contributions to his campaign by Rezko or others and denies having
conversations with Rezko related to cash contributions. … Rezko has also stated
in interviews with the government that he believed he transmitted a quid pro quo
offer from a lobbyist to the public official, whereby the lobbyist would hold a
fundraiser for the official in exchange for favorable official action, but that the
8 The defense has requested that the government provide a witness list. To date, the government has not provided a
list of witnesses.
9 See, Counts 1, 2, and 3 of the Indictment. The Pension Obligation Bond Deal ( p. 9 (para. 7), p. 48 (para. 6)); The
Solicitation of Ali Ata (p. 9 (para. 9)), Benefits Given to Rod Blagojevich (Rezko directed or provided payments to
Rod Blagojevich’s wife) (p. 53 (para. 9 (a.), (b.), (c.))), Blagojevich used the power of the Office of the Governor to
give Rezko substantial influence over appointments to boards and commissions (p. 8 (para. 5)) (p. 13 (para. 1) (p.
42 (para. 4-5)) (p. 47 (para. 4)) (p. 53 (para. 17)).
Case 1:08-cr-00888 Document 327 Filed 04/22/10 Page 5 of 11
6
public official rejected the offer. The public official denies any such
conversation. In addition, Rezko has stated to the government that he and the
public official had certain conversations about gaming legislation and
administration, which the public official denies having had.”10
23. President Obama is the only one who can testify as to the veracity of Mr. Rezko’s
allegations above.
24. President Obama has pertinent information as to the character of Mr. Rezko.
President Obama can testify to Mr. Rezko’s reputation for truthfulness as well as his
own opinion of Mr. Rezko’s character. See, Fed. R. Evid. 405(a) and 608. Mr.
Rezko and President Obama became friends in 1990. According to President Obama,
Mr. Rezko raised as much as $60,000 in campaign contributions for Obama.11
25. Based on the relationship that President Obama and Mr. Rezko had, President Obama
can provide important information as to Mr. Rezko’s plan, intent, opportunity, habit
and modus operandi. See, Fed. R. Evid. 404(b) and 406. For example, in June 2005,
President Obama purchased a house for $1.65 million, $300,000 below the asking
price. On the same day Tony Rezko’s wife, Rita, paid full price -- $625,000 -- for the
adjoining land. In January 2006, Obama paid Mr. Rezko $104,500 for a strip of the
adjoining land. The transaction took place when it was widely known that Mr. Rezko
was under investigation.12 President Obama’s relationship with Tony Rezko is
relevant and necessary Fed. R. Evid. 404(b) and 406 evidence.
26. Regarding a Presidential subpoena, the Supreme Court has held that:
“The right to the production of all evidence at a criminal trial . . . has
constitutional dimensions. The Sixth Amendment explicitly confers upon
10 The defense has a good faith belief that this public official is Barack Obama. See, “Obama on Rezko deal: It
was a mistake”, Dave McKinney, Chris Fusco, and Mark Brown, Chicago Sun Times, November 5, 2006. Senator
Barack Obama was asked: “Did Rezko or his companies ever solicit your support on any matter involving state or
federal government? Did Al Johnson, who was trying to get a casino license along with Tony Rezko, or Rezko
himself ever discuss casino matters with you?” Senator Obama answered: “No, I have never been asked to do
anything to advance his business interest. In 1999, when I was a State Senator, I opposed legislation to bring a
casino to Rosemont and allow casino gambling at docked riverboats which news reports said Al Johnson and Tony
Rezko were interested in being part of. I never discussed a casino license with either of them. I was a vocal
opponent of the legislation.” Obama’s involvement with Tony Rezko and this legislation coincides with the
three paragraph summary the government has provided to the defense referenced above.
11
“Obama on Rezko deal: It was a mistake”, Dave McKinney, Chris Fusco, and Mark Brown, Chicago Sun Times,
November 5, 2006.
12
“8 Things you need to know about Obama and Rezko”, Tim Novak, Chicago Sun Times, January 24, 2008.
Case 1:08-cr-00888 Document 327 Filed 04/22/10 Page 6 of 11
7
every defendant in a criminal trial the right ‘to be confronted with the
witnesses against him’ and ‘to have compulsory process for obtaining
witnesses in his favor.’ Moreover, the Fifth Amendment also guarantees that
no person shall be deprived of liberty without due process of law. It is the
manifest duty of the courts to vindicate those guarantees, and to accomplish
that it is essential that all relevant and admissible evidence be produced.”
United States v. Nixon, 418 US 683, 711 (1974).
27. Although it is not commonplace to subpoena a sitting President, the Supreme Court
has noted that sitting Presidents have been subpoenaed by federal courts with
“sufficient frequency that such interactions between the Judicial and Executive
branches can scarcely be thought a novelty.” Clinton v. Jones, 520 US 681, 704, 137
L.Ed. 2d 945, 967 (1997).
28. Indeed, history is replete with cases in which Presidents have been subpoenaed or
have provided evidence in federal cases.13
29. In addition to criminal trials, Theodore Roosevelt, Harry Truman and John F.
Kennedy were defendants in civil cases involving actions prior to taking office.
Clinton v. Jones, 520 US at 692, citing People ex rel. Hurley v. Roosevelt, 179 N.Y.
544, 71 N.E. 1137 (1904); DeVault v. Truman, 354 Mo. 1193, 194 S.W.2d 29 (1946);
Bailey v. Kennedy, No. 757,200 (Cal. Super. Ct. 1960); Hills v. Kennedy, No. 757,201
(Cal. Super. Ct. 1960). President Nixon was deposed in several civil actions and
13 See, United States v. Burr, 25 F. Cas. 30 (No. 14,692d) (CC Va. 1807) (President Thomas Jefferson ordered to
comply with a subpoena duces tecum in the trial of Aaron Burr); Rotunda, Presidents and Ex-Presidents as
Witnesses: A Brief Historical Footnote, 1975 U. Ill. L. F. 1, 5-6 (referencing President Monroe’s answers to
interrogatories in the trial of an appointee, whose meetings with the President were cited as contributing factors to
accusations he received his job appointment under “intrigue and misconduct” and also references a lengthy
deposition given by President Grant in a criminal case); United States v. Nixon, 418 US 683, 41 L.Ed. 2d 1039
(1974) (The Supreme Court held that President Nixon was obligated to comply with a subpoena duces tecum in a
criminal trial); United States v. Poindexter, 732 F. Supp. 142, 145, citing to United States v. Mitchell, 385 F.Supp
1190 (D.D.C. 1974) and United States v. Haldeman, 559 F.Supp.2d 31, 80-81 (D.C. Cir. 1976) (where President
Nixon was subpoenaed by the Government and defendants in criminal trials of his appointees resulting from the
Watergate scandal); United States v. Fromme, 405 F.Supp. 578 (ED Cal. 1975) (where President Ford was
subpoenaed and deposed as a defense witness in the criminal trial of the woman accused of attempting to assassinate
him); United States v. Poindexter, 732 F.Supp. at 145 (D.D.C. 1990) (referring to President Carter’s videotaped
deposition in a criminal trial and a separate grand jury investigation); Id., at 144-46, 159-60 (where President
Reagan was ordered to testify via videotaped deposition in the criminal trial resulting from the Iran-Contra affair);
and Clinton v. Jones, 520 US at 705, citing United States v. McDougal, 934 F. Supp. 296 (ED Ark. 1996) and
United States v. Branscum, No. LRP-CR-96-49 (ED Ark., June 7, 1996) (referencing President Clinton’s compelled
testimony via videotaped deposition in two criminal proceedings, including as an impeachment witness for the
defense in the McDougal case).
Case 1:08-cr-00888 Document 327 Filed 04/22/10 Page 7 of 11
8
Presidents Lincoln, T. Roosevelt, Tyler and Adams were compelled to appear before
congressional committees. United States v. Poindexter, 732 F. Supp at 145.
30. It is well settled that the Federal Courts have subpoena power over a sitting
President. Chief Justice Marshall’s early opinion from the Burr case has
been “unequivocally and emphatically endorsed” by the Supreme Court and
other federal courts. See, United States v. Nixon, 418 US at 706; Clinton v.
Jones, 520 US at 704.
“Whatever difference may exist with respect to the power to compel the
same obedience to the process, as if it had been directed to a private
citizen, there exists no difference with respect to the right to obtain it. ...
The guard, furnished to this high officer, to protect him from being
harassed by vexatious and unnecessary subpoenas, is to be looked for in
the conduct of a court after those subpoenas have issued; not in any
circumstance which is to precede their being issued.” United States v.
Fromme, 405 F. Supp. At 582, citing United States v. Burr, at p.30.
31. The Supreme Court has consistently ruled that “the twofold aim [of criminal justice]
is that guilt shall not escape or innocence suffer.” United States v. Nixon, supra, citing
Berger v. United States, 295 US 78, 88 (1935). The Court continued, in Nixon, that
“the need to develop all relevant facts in the adversary system is both fundamental
and comprehensive. The ends of criminal justice would be defeated if judgments were
to be founded on a partial or speculative presentation of the facts. . . To ensure that
justice is done, it is imperative to the function of courts that compulsory process be
available for the production of evidence needed either by the prosecution or by the
defense.” United States v. Nixon, 418 US at 709. In sum,
[Federal precedent holds that] no person, even a President, is above the
law and that in appropriate judicial proceedings, documents and other
tangible evidence within the very office of the President may be obtained
for use in those judicial proceedings. Similarly, where the President
himself is a percipient witness to an alleged criminal act, the President
must be amenable to subpoena as any other person would be. United
States v. Fromme,405 F.Supp. at 582 (emphasis added).
32. Here, President Obama is a critical witness. All of President Obama’s testimony
would entail evidence he witnessed before he became president and does not involve
Executive Privilege. As the District Court ruled in Fromme:
Case 1:08-cr-00888 Document 327 Filed 04/22/10 Page 8 of 11
9
“Notwithstanding the burden which is imposed on the person of the
President if he is called to testify as a witness in a criminal trial, this
court has an even heavier burden to ensure a fair and a speedy trial to
the accused, with total regard for all the rights and protections afforded
an accused under the law of this land.
‘[The] allowance of the [Executive] privilege to withhold evidence that
is demonstrably relevant in a criminal trial would cut deeply into the
guarantee of due process of law and gravely impair the basic function of
the courts.’” United States v. Fromme, 405 F.Supp. at 583 (emphasis
added)(citations omitted), citing United States v. Nixon, 418 US at 712.
33. President Obama has direct and intimate knowledge of facts alleged in the indictment.
Indeed, the President is a percipient witness. United States v. Fromme, 405 F.Supp.
at 581. President Obama is a witness to the conduct alleged as well as an
impeachment witness to at least two of of the government’s critical witnesses.14

34. The defense does not take lightly the overwhelming schedule the President has and
the security constraints surrounding his testimony. A videotape deposition will
remedy both of those legitimate concerns. See, Fed. R. Crim. Pro. 15 and see also,
United States v. Fromme, 405 F.Supp. at 582 (videotape deposition “protect[s] the
accused’s rights under the Sixth Amendment of the United States Constitution while
at the same time imposing the least onerous burden on the person and the office of the
President of the United States.”).
35. The defense requests that, if this court grants a videotape deposition in lieu of in-court
testimony, defense counsel be permitted to conduct the examination of President
Obama after the government’s case in chief. See, United States v. McDougal, 103
F.3d 651 (ED Ark. 1996) and 943 F.Supp. 296 (ED Ark. 1996) (videotaped
deposition of President Clinton which took place at the White House, and because
President Clinton was called as a defense witness to impeach David Hale, the Court
ordered that President Clinton not testify until after the in-court testimony of David
Hale.).
36. The defendant has a right to put on a case and challenge the allegations the
government attempts to prove. President Obama is relevant and necessary to the
14 Joseph Aramanda is another government witness that President Obama can testify to as well. Joseph Aramanda’s
son, John Aramanda, received an internship with then-Senator Obama. Joseph Aramanda contributed $11,500 to
Obama since 2000 and John Aramanda was recommended by Tony Rezko. Internship also links Obama, Rezko,
Frank Main, Chicago Sun-Times, December 24, 2006. President Obama will be able to provide relevant information
as to Joseph Aramanda. See, para. 24 and 25, supra.
Case 1:08-cr-00888 Document 327 Filed 04/22/10 Page 9 of 11
10
defendant’s case. The defense understands that the President of the United States of
America is not a routine witness and would not request his appearance if it did not
think he was critical to the liberty of Rod Blagojevich. Whatever security or
scheduling concerns can be reduced by arranging for the most convenient
presentation of testimony. The President can testify via video conference or can be
deposed outside of court at an evidence deposition. These options would satisfy the
defendant’s fundamental right to a fair trial and security and scheduling concerns.
37. The defense requests this court grant this motion not because Rod Blagojevich was
the Governor of Illinois, but because he is a defendant in a criminal case where his
liberty and freedom are at stake. Likewise, the defense requests this court grant this
motion to issue a subpoena ad testificandum to President Obama, not because he is
the President of the United States, but rather because he is a witness necessary to Rod
Blagojevich’s Constitutional right to a fair trial. Justice requires no more and no less.
“it would be inconceivable -- in a Republic that subscribes neither to the
ancient doctrine of the divine right of kings nor to the more modern
conceit of dictators that they are not accountable to the people whom
they claim to represent or to their courts of law -- to exempt [the
President] from the duty of every citizen to give evidence that will
permit the reaching of a just outcome of this criminal prosecution.
Defendant has shown that the evidence of the . . . President is needed to
protect his right to a fair trial, and he will be given the opportunity to
secure that evidence.” United States v. Poindexter, 732 F. Supp at 159.
WHEREFORE, defendant Rod Blagojevich respectfully requests this Honorable Court
order the government turn over to the defense any and all reports generated during any and all
interviews had with President Barack Obama and issue a subpoena ad testificandum for
President Obama to appear at the trial of United States v. Rod Blagojevich.
Respectfully submitted,
/s/ Sam Adam
Sheldon Sorosky
Sam Adam
Michael Gillespie
Samuel E. Adam
Aaron Goldstein
Lauren Kaeseberg
6133 S. Ellis
Chicago, IL 60637
(773) 752-6950
Attorneys for Rod Blagojevich, Defendant

Posted by: Ace at 03:19 PM



Comments

1 I'd think was was funnier if I didn't just have to redact something that got filed in Federal Court (nothing remotely that interesting believe me) and I'm now having a heart attack while on hold with the Court to make sure this didn't happen to my stuff.

Posted by: alexthechick at April 22, 2010 03:21 PM (8WZWv)

2 I knew it, I just knew it!

Posted by: a the guy who always says "I knew it" at April 22, 2010 03:21 PM (YVZlY)

3 O'peach!

Posted by: Upscale Community Organizing Thought Criminal at April 22, 2010 03:21 PM (IhHdM)

4 I bet this is Blago's way of motivating Obama to lean on Holder to drop the charges. Beautiful.

Posted by: Ella at April 22, 2010 03:22 PM (bR58j)

5 Holy shit.

Posted by: wherestherum at April 22, 2010 03:26 PM (gofDd)

6 ....

Posted by: Vera Baker at April 22, 2010 03:28 PM (zPAwP)

7 Will this result in any news organization picking it up?

Posted by: bill-tb at April 22, 2010 03:29 PM (y+QfZ)

8 no one call the attorney's number.

Posted by: Ben at April 22, 2010 03:29 PM (wuv1c)

9
'Redacted' - I don't think that word means what they think it means.

[redacted... hey, let's not tell them what they've done! -- ace]

Posted by: Dang Straights at April 22, 2010 03:29 PM (fx8sm)

10 Whachu talking about there Willis, err, Rod...

Posted by: Barack Obama at April 22, 2010 03:29 PM (HXZOR)

11 Why are their smiley face emoti-cons in the unredacted version? Are those now acceptable in American Legal Documents?

Posted by: Ben at April 22, 2010 03:29 PM (wuv1c)

12 Okay, okay my stuff was fine since we did it right. I'm just going to lie here on my office floor for a bit.

Now to the important stuff - this is fun. Even if the Court were to deny this (I would be stunned if this was granted), it sure as hell sets up subpoenas to Rahm, et al. And it also sets a perjury trap and it's not like Fitzgerald is adverse to bringing charges for supposed process crimes.

Posted by: alexthechick at April 22, 2010 03:29 PM (8WZWv)

13 shhh, Vera. Why publicize the error? I'm going to redact your post, just because I don't want government officials alerted to this.

Posted by: ace at April 22, 2010 03:30 PM (i6ROy)

14 Yeah too bad he's a certifiable nut job and -20 in the credibility department.

Posted by: laceyunderalls at April 22, 2010 03:30 PM (pLTLS)

15 Why are their smiley face emoti-cons in the unredacted version? Are
those now acceptable in American Legal Documents?

It's the 5th Circuit Court of LOL.

Posted by: Dang Straights at April 22, 2010 03:30 PM (fx8sm)

16 IreneFingIrene = He

Posted by: IreneFingIrene at April 22, 2010 03:30 PM (JKe0g)

17 hah ,okay

Posted by: ace at April 22, 2010 03:31 PM (i6ROy)

18 This going to finally connect all the illegal dots on zero? I also think Blago is using this as a life insurance policy so that he and the wire don't od on aspirin or commit suicide by shooting themselves repeatedly in the back of the head.

Posted by: bebe's boobs destroy at April 22, 2010 03:31 PM (cniXs)

19 Too bad Republicans who break the law don't become reality show tv stars.
except for Tom Delay, but that lasted all of ten minutes.

Posted by: Ben at April 22, 2010 03:31 PM (wuv1c)

20 Hey! The courts are not the proper venue for determining the legitimacy of the President. Besides, no one has standing to compel Obama into court.

What are you, some kind of racist or something?

Posted by: Diogenes at April 22, 2010 03:33 PM (eVJ7T)

21 ace, if you really want to get all spooky, you'll have to go clean up the last thread too

Posted by: Jean at April 22, 2010 03:34 PM (JaO+v)

22 I would like to file a with the tenth circuit court of :p

Posted by: Ben at April 22, 2010 03:34 PM (wuv1c)

23
alexthechick:

Is your office in the Electric City Building?

Posted by: Ed Anger at April 22, 2010 03:34 PM (7+pP9)

24 8

Posted by: Ben at April 22, 2010 03:34 PM (wuv1c)

25 We need a Blago-hair smiley.

Posted by: HeatherRadish at April 22, 2010 03:35 PM (mR7mk)

26 No more filibuster?!

Posted by: logprof at April 22, 2010 03:35 PM (Mmw0q)

27 This whole thing was a setup from day one...
Rod and I are going to beat this rap.
But first...TICKLE FIGHT!!!!!!!

Posted by: Eric Massa (D-Ex) wearing only a towel at April 22, 2010 03:36 PM (LIIXB)

28 It's funny how even the main blog posts get the smileys. I don;t feel so bad now.

Posted by: logprof at April 22, 2010 03:37 PM (Mmw0q)

29 damn... I guess this is widely known.

maybe Blago deliberately released this with redactions that could be un-redacted. Maybe he was ordered to redact by the court, but his lawyers pulled a deliberate "Oopsie."

Posted by: ace at April 22, 2010 03:37 PM (i6ROy)

30
IreneFingIrene = He

and brown, right? I keep track of these things.

Posted by: Secret Squirrel at April 22, 2010 03:38 PM (uFokq)

31 Would he swear on the Bible or the Quoran?




Posted by: Diogenes at April 22, 2010 03:38 PM (eVJ7T)

32 It's dirty as hell, and nothing will come of it. We know Bambi is filthy with Chicago dirt; he is also shielded by his blackness. Blago will serve 2 years in a federal country club, Fitz will rack up another win, and Bambi will drag the country over a cliff, smiling all the way.

Posted by: joncelli at April 22, 2010 03:39 PM (RD7QR)

33 Ah. A mention of the long lost Tony Rezko.
I thought he'd besporting cement slippers by now...

Posted by: Gunslinger at April 22, 2010 03:39 PM (Zi+FQ)

34 Juicy stuff, but I was disappointed there wasn't also some mention of "the Nature trick."
/s

Posted by: Y-not at April 22, 2010 03:40 PM (Kn9r7)

35 Would he swear on the Bible or the Quoran?

Dreams of my Father.


Posted by: Rob Crawford at April 22, 2010 03:41 PM (IuKAf)

36 ace: The attorney that is listed as writing the motion and, with reasonable confidence, also redacted the portions will not be named by me, but he you can find him by going to...

http://www.notguiltyinchicago.com

I wish I was making this up.

Posted by: wtfci at April 22, 2010 03:42 PM (+zo63)

37 Adobe has a great retraction tool that does not allow for cut and paste, a fact likely known by Blago's law firm. I think they did this on purpose.

Posted by: Slublog at April 22, 2010 03:42 PM (qjKko)

38 Can we get a link to a news service about the DemonRats eliminating the filibuster rule?

Posted by: joncelli at April 22, 2010 03:43 PM (RD7QR)

39 8
no one call the attorney's number.

And don't think of me.

Posted by: A Pink Elephant at April 22, 2010 03:43 PM (T0NGe)

40 It is definitely the Blagojevich defense team that goofed on the redactions. The PDF at CBS 2 Chicago, the Chicago Sun-Times, and NBC 5 Chicago all use the same PDF with the same errors awesomeness.

Posted by: wtfci at April 22, 2010 03:44 PM (+zo63)

41 Adobe has a great retraction tool that does not allow for cut and
paste, a fact likely known by Blago's law firm. I think they did this
on purpose.

I concur. They used NitroPDF. They actually didn't even lock the file so you could not copy and paste from the contents.

Posted by: wtfci at April 22, 2010 03:45 PM (+zo63)

42 Wow! So Chicago IS more corrupt than New Orleans!

AND these ASSHOLES are running the country.

God help us. A new Tammany Hall, but it's more South 150 miles.

Posted by: Kemp at April 22, 2010 03:45 PM (2+9Yx)

43 okay, yeah, apparently the Chicago Sun-Times is now reporting on the redaction-goof, so you can talk about it now.

Damn, I had dreams of this happening over and over again...!

Posted by: ace at April 22, 2010 03:45 PM (i6ROy)

44 The pdf is still redacted. Still working on removing the black bars.

Posted by: Slublog at April 22, 2010 03:46 PM (qjKko)

45 There's little chance of Pres'ent Toonces actually having his narrow ass sat in the witness stand, but I do believe I'm gonna have to go slam this hard on in a door to get it to settle down...

Posted by: Unclefacts, AoSHQ Professional Debate Team at April 22, 2010 03:47 PM (erIg9)

46 You gotta love Blago. The motion mentions Obama's sweetheart deal on his house, with Rezko's help. Does Blago have a defense fund?

Posted by: Dr. Spank at April 22, 2010 03:47 PM (I1/U/)

47 19 Too bad Republicans who break the law don't become reality show tv
stars.
except for Tom Delay, but that lasted all of ten minutes.
Seriously, what did Delay do? I know the Ronnie Earle stuff was trumped up nonsense just to get him out of the leadership. It produced the funniest mugshot in history and I think that's it.

Then there was the Abramoff stuff but I don't think that there was any legal action taken against Delay. Maybe I'm wrong. I'm not saying he didn't hang out with less-than-clean people, but the legal stuff never really panned out, did it?

Posted by: A Pink Elephant at April 22, 2010 03:47 PM (T0NGe)

48 44
The pdf is still redacted. Still working on removing the black bars.

Dude you are sooooooooooo RACIST!!!!!!!

Posted by: Lemmiwinks at April 22, 2010 03:50 PM (IqfKc)

49 It's because the PDF was still redacted the I realized how the trick worked. <continues laughing my ass off>

Posted by: Alexander at April 22, 2010 03:51 PM (dFuoX)

50 How about I send TOTUS instead? You can rely on him to speak well for me.

Posted by: BHO at April 22, 2010 03:51 PM (mE7Cl)

51 #48

Dude, he meant Black Bears, not Black Bars. No one in their right mind goes to a Black Bar.

Posted by: Kemp at April 22, 2010 03:52 PM (2+9Yx)

52 much bigger deal than who blew Bill. and no one will do a frakking thing,. this is actual corruption

Posted by: mim/ginaswo at April 22, 2010 03:54 PM (qV//j)

53 "The defense has a good faith belief that this public official is Barack Obama."

<continues laughing>

Posted by: Alexander at April 22, 2010 03:58 PM (dFuoX)

54 Seriously, what did Delay do?
Not a thing so far that has been adjudicated.

Posted by: Velvet Ambition at April 22, 2010 04:06 PM (xRRov)

55 So we have a story here that is bigger than Monica Lewinski, bigger than WaterGate, bigger than Iran-Contra. What will our media do? My bet is that they will lash out at Sarah Palin, Rush, or some other conservative figure.

Posted by: Lemmiwinks at April 22, 2010 04:08 PM (IqfKc)

56 Fitzgerald has been political on this from the start. He busted Blago, someone on the outs in Illinois, to avoid snaring more prominent Dems in the State. Who has ever heard of a prosecutor doing something like this. Prosecuting Ryan, an old warhorse, wasn't exactly cutting edge.

Posted by: ed at April 22, 2010 04:14 PM (Urhve)

57 Rove, you magnificent bastard!

Posted by: gebrauchshund at April 22, 2010 04:16 PM (d7k0J)

58 I agree Ed...at the time I remember much surprise when Fitz abruptly halted his investigation to get Blago.

He is obviously protecting his powerful Dim friends.

Fitz is a creep.

Posted by: pam at April 22, 2010 04:20 PM (h8R9p)

59 Irene is abrilliant HE, quoting Black Hawk Down in his moniker.

Posted by: kevlarchick at April 22, 2010 04:26 PM (TNuqz)

60 Somehow I think the Chi just might be letting Blago do this one -- Bammy isn't exactly racking up popularity points with the folks back home who got him to where he is now. It's the same with his buddy Gino -- the Chi is letting him run for a reason. It isn't wise to snub the thugs who got you elected (and got you a cherry real estate deal, and got your wife a sweet job, and...).

Posted by: unknown jane at April 22, 2010 04:30 PM (5/yRG)

61 Obama was head (co-chair?) of Blago's re-election campaign. As I recall, there was a clip of him on tv saying "you betcha" to a "reporter" when asked if he wholly supported "Hot Rod" [yes, the reporter really used the term] Blagojevich.

Posted by: TheThinMan at April 22, 2010 04:36 PM (W3XUk)

62 Damn, kevlarchick beat me to it. I was just gonna post that's where the moniker IreneFingIrene came from (Jeremy Piven line, right?). Now I'm not a genius, just a slow one.

But you already knew that. The slow part, that is. Excuse me, while I stop digging.

Posted by: Jay in Ames at April 22, 2010 04:37 PM (UEEex)

63 While reading this, I just couldn't help butimagine the traction this entire story would have received if the president involved had been President George Bush. Wonder how many reporters would have been assigned by the MSM to this story since it's beginning?---Why do I continue to do this to myself??

Posted by: texag at April 22, 2010 04:41 PM (LBMSh)

64 Does anybody not know how this was un-redacted???

Posted by: Abby Adams at April 22, 2010 04:42 PM (pLTLS)

65 Does anybody not know how this was un-redacted???

The NY Times does not know.

Posted by: wtfci at April 22, 2010 04:59 PM (+zo63)

66 While reading this, I just couldn't help butimagine the traction this
entire story would have received if the president involved had been
President George Bush.
...Or took place in Wasilla.

Posted by: Atomic Roach at April 22, 2010 05:02 PM (Oxen1)

67 Blago, Rezko, sale of Illinois Senate Seat? Never heard of it.

Posted by: Charlie Gibson at April 22, 2010 05:05 PM (L6I86)

68 *crickets chirping*

Posted by: al-MSM at April 22, 2010 05:06 PM (L6I86)

69 Drudge? Where are you?

Posted by: Kemp at April 22, 2010 05:15 PM (2+9Yx)

70 "55 So we have a story here that is bigger than Monica Lewinski, bigger than WaterGate, bigger than Iran-Contra. What will our media do? My bet is that they will lash out at Sarah Palin, Rush, or some other conservative figure.
Posted by: Lemmiwinks at April 22, 2010 04:08 PM (IqfKc) "
They will decry the leak and not report the substance, just like with Climate gate memos.

Posted by: Randy at April 22, 2010 05:28 PM (zQKSr)

71 Geez, Ace. Even I knew IreneFingIrene is a man. Don't you read your own blog? Haha!

Posted by: not a piping plover at April 22, 2010 05:40 PM (HHtwf)

72 I watched Blago on the Apprentice. My cat has more life skills than he does.

However, I would applaud him if he (or more likely his team of smart lawyers) took down Teh Won.

Oh yeah.

Posted by: shibumi at April 22, 2010 05:42 PM (OKZrE)

73 Goddangit kevlarchick, I was THIS close to remembering it.


...

ok not really

Posted by: Dave in Texas at April 22, 2010 05:44 PM (WvXvd)

74 For those of you wondering how this can happen accidently, it's actually a pretty simple error to make. Most federal courts, including this one, require attorney filings to be done through an electronic system (ECF). In a nutshell, the attorney (or assistant) enters into a password protected system andgoes through a couple of steps to identify the document he's filing. He then identifies the PDF document on his local system to be uploaded by the court's filing system. Once that's done, the document in the court's system (and that's available online to the general public through PACER) is the PDF file that was submitted by the attorney.
By the way, it's not a hard mistake to make, especially if the attorney is not terribly tech savvy. I did the same thing about 2 months ago whenI redacted a partial social security number from an exhibit (per the court's rules) using a black out function in Adobe. It wasn't until after I'd filed it that I realized the changes I made to the PDF were open to editing even after the document was uploaded. Fortunately, my error was buried in a pile of documents and didn't have quite the audience the Blago motion has. I nearly wet myself when I discovered my error. I can't imagine what Blago's attorney is going through.
And for those of you that think it was an intentional "error", I disagree. No lawyer in his right mind would want to risk the ire of a federal court judge on a high profile case like this.

Posted by: MPH at April 22, 2010 06:06 PM (QjQyX)

75 who the fuck is 'al jolsen' and what's he got to do with this?

Posted by: poostain hussein at April 22, 2010 06:26 PM (+551V)

76 Heh, this isn't the first time PDFs have been "un-redacted". And in the same manner too. You'd think they'd learn after the first dozen or so times.

But that would require lawyers to understand technology, so...not gonna happen.

Posted by: Lone Marauder at April 22, 2010 06:40 PM (p1iaB)

77 so now they're getting called to the principal's office

Posted by: d at April 22, 2010 07:00 PM (sHgQm)

78 IP = 218.85.110.26

Posted by: spammer at April 22, 2010 09:17 PM (BlKFR)

79 B+arry a liar??!! FOR SHAME!

Posted by: torabora at April 22, 2010 09:22 PM (l1lPG)

80 "Hot Rod" !!!!ELEVENTY!!111!!!!! + B+rry????!!!! In the back seat of a limo????

Posted by: torabora at April 22, 2010 09:25 PM (l1lPG)

81 IP = 218.85.110.26

Posted by: spammer at April 22, 2010 09:29 PM (BlKFR)

82 22. However, the defense has a good faith belief that Mr. Rezko, President Obama’sformer friend, fund-raiser, and neighbor told the FBI and the United States Attorneysa different story about President Obama.

The jug eared Kenyan fuck has been telling 'different' stories since he was old enough to talk. THANK YOU 52%!!!!

Posted by: torabora at April 22, 2010 09:33 PM (l1lPG)

83 It isn't rocket science to defeat government redactions. It is funny knowing which parts they thought needed to be redacted. I imagine this is another misapplication of the Privacy Act. LOL. I made my own clean copy with better results. This is quite messy. I think that they all have some explaining to do, but politics is nasty business.

Posted by: flandan at April 22, 2010 10:34 PM (FPtHm)

84 IP = 117.28.85.189

Posted by: spammer at April 22, 2010 10:47 PM (6KF3i)

85 Well that just figures!!

Posted by: the guy who figures stuff at April 23, 2010 09:51 AM (e8T35)

86 Would he swear on the Bible or the Quoran?
Neither. Das Kapital.

Posted by: Jay Guevara at April 23, 2010 01:18 PM (OWJLB)

87 Looks like Barry's getting a taste of how they do things in Chicago. He's not the only one with sharp elbows.

Posted by: Jay Guevara at April 23, 2010 01:19 PM (OWJLB)

88 They had better pull obama's passport.....it might get to the point he he'll wanna run back to his homeland Kenya.....where he shoulda stayed.

Posted by: Yeah Sure at April 23, 2010 05:47 PM (RsbHa)

89 myjerseyspace wholesale nfl jerseys,nfl jerseys from china,Fast free shipping,We provide high quality service,Our jersey price:$15~$45

Posted by: myjerseyspace at April 30, 2010 04:19 PM (7soNf)

90 air max shoes
buy air max
air max shoes sale
cheap air max shoes
discount air max shoes
air force one shoes
nike air force one
air force one sale
air jordan
air jordan shoes
buy air jordan
air jordan sale
air yeezy shoes
nike air yeezy
air yeezy sale
nike dunk
nike dunk sale
cheap nike dunk
discount dunks
nike shox
shox shoes
buy shox shoes
alife shoes
alife shoes cheap
buy alife shoes
Shmack Shoes
Shmack Shoes sale
CR shoes
buy CR shoes
MAD shoes
air max shoes
buy air max
air max shoes sale
cheap jordan shoes
discount shoes
air force one shoes
air jordan shoes
air max shoes
air yeezy shoes
supra shoes
alife shoes
creative recreation shoes
madfoot predator shoes
shmack shoes
basketball shoes
nike dunks
nike shox
nike air force ones
cheap air force ones shoes
discount air force one
cheap air jordan
discount air jordan
cheap air max
discount air max
cheap nike dunks
discount nike dunk
cheap nike shox shoes
discount nike shox shoes
cheap alife shoes
discount alife shoes
cheap supra shoes
discount supra shoes

Posted by: sousoushoes at May 06, 2010 10:14 AM (JdueG)

91 The world is known as a small stadium.and we are professional seller of MBT Shoes Cheap and MBT Shoes Clearance sale. For more cheap mbt shoes on sale,please visit our website:http://www.bembtshoes.com Supposed that you have chance to buy a professional discount ghd Hair Straighteners, why don't you buy it right now? ghd straighteners won the championship for more than 70 years in the hair styler industry. To some extent, ghd outlet britain can be the luxurious products whereas it can't change the image in most females' heart: the best and favorite is ghd IV styler. Recently, males begin to try cheap hair straightener, doing the straight hair or curly hair.

Posted by: ghd straighteners at September 20, 2010 02:30 AM (BcwfT)

92 Hey I just cant believe my senses. Can Obama go wrong?

Posted by: kitten at October 30, 2010 08:28 AM (Cu/mc)

93 Vücudumuzda çeşitli kas ve eklem rahatsızlıkları yaşanabiliyor. Bazen uyandığımızda boynumuz tutulur, hareket ettirmekte güçlük çekeriz Orjin KremKimi zaman farkında olmadan cereyanda kalmamız sonucunda omuzlarımızda, kollarımızda, dizlerimizde ve çeşitli bölgelerimizde ıstırap veren sıkıntılı durumlar oluşur.
orjin yüz bakım seti
Orjin Hijyen ve Sağlık Ürünleri San. Tic. Ltd. Şti. sizlere doğal maddelerden oluşan rahatlatıcı masaj ve bacak bakım kremini sunmaktadır.
orjin kil maskesi
orjin sivilce akne kremi
Orjin Krem uygulanılacak bölgeye yeterince sürülerek günde iki defa sabah ve akşam 5'er dakika masaj ile deriye iyice nüfuz ettirilir.
orjin anti aging krem
orjin ağrı kremielbette güzel oldu

Posted by: orjin at December 10, 2010 06:32 PM (v78W8)

94 penis büyütücü

Posted by: penis büyütücü at December 11, 2010 07:43 PM (wVs6u)

95 Traditional books contrast to its competitors should be stay in the
trend. You can say it is very risky as compared to the technology today
but still for me traditional reading take out more impact compare to
others………….

Posted by: porno at December 21, 2010 01:40 PM (m+dbt)

96 Great posts here, keep them coming, you've done a great job with this blog!!

fix tennis elbow

Posted by: joe d at December 25, 2010 01:39 AM (4C7yc)

97
22. However, the defense has a good faith belief that Mr. Rezko, President Obama�s
former friend, fund-raiser, and neighbor told the FBI and the United States Attorneys
a different story about President Obama.


The jug eared Kenyan fuck has been telling 'different' stories since he was old enough to talk. THANK YOU 52%!!!!

Posted by: horkes at January 03, 2011 11:25 AM (BKHy/)

98 Via IreneFingIrene, the unredacted motion, below.

Posted by: Lazer Epilasyon at January 18, 2011 11:40 AM (Srv6T)

99 saglikshoop tv ürünleri Fitmax body fit Pendik erotik shop Sağlık Shop tv ürünleri tv ürünleri Medikal sağlık market tens cihazı tv ürünleri topshop ürünleri Orjin krem

Posted by: mirc at January 20, 2011 05:12 AM (zZTn+)

100 I concur. They used NitroPDF. They actually didn't even lock the file so you could not copy and paste from the contents.

Posted by: fitmax body fit at January 31, 2011 05:01 AM (uByr/)

101
We have tracked, collected, and analyzed tobacco control laws around
the country since the early 1980s, and the lists below represent only a
small percentage of the data. Learn more about our comprehensive
collection of state and local laws, covering: clean airrestrictions on youth access to tobaccotobacco advertising and promotion restrictionstobacco excise taxes, andconditional use permits

Posted by: tütüne son at February 07, 2011 03:38 PM (tNdAP)

102 Ferlycheater

Ferly'Juliansyah

Posted by: Ferlycheater at February 16, 2011 07:16 AM (hSEX/)

103 [URL=http://www.globejersey.com]nfl jerseys[/URL]
[URL=http://www.globejersey.com]nhl jerseys[/URL]
[URL=http://www.globejersey.com]nba jerseys[/URL]
[URL=http://www.globejersey.com]mlb jerseys[/URL]

[URL=http://www.globejersey.com]discount nfl jerseys[/URL]
[URL=http://www.globejersey.com]discount nhl jerseys[/URL]
[URL=http://www.globejersey.com]discount nba jerseys[/URL]
[URL=http://www.globejersey.com]discount mlb jerseys[/URL]

[URL=http://www.globejersey.com]cheap nfl jerseys[/URL]
[URL=http://www.globejersey.com]cheap nhl jerseys[/URL]
[URL=http://www.globejersey.com]cheap nba jerseys[/URL]
[URL=http://www.globejersey.com]cheap mlb jerseys[/URL]

[URL=http://www.reebokjerseyonline.com]nfl jersey[/URL]
[URL=http://www.reebokjerseyonline.com]nhl jersey[/URL]
[URL=http://www.reebokjerseyonline.com]mlb jersey[/URL]
[URL=http://www.reebokjerseyonline.com]nba jersey[/URL]

[URL=http://www.wholesaledownwear.com] Moncler Men Jackets [/URL]
[URL=http://www.wholesaledownwear.com] Moncler Women Jackets [/URL]
[URL=http://www.wholesaledownwear.com] Moncler T-Shirt [/URL]

Posted by: nfl jerseys at March 01, 2011 11:01 PM (SOsgX)

104 <a href="http://www.globejersey.com">cheap nfl jerseys</a>
<a href="http://www.globejersey.com">cheap nhl jerseys</a>
<a href="http://www.globejersey.com">cheap nba jerseys</a>
<a href="http://www.globejersey.com">cheap mlb jerseys</a>

<a href="http://www.globejersey.com">nfl jerseys</a>
<a href="http://www.globejersey.com">nhl jerseys</a>
<a href="http://www.globejersey.com">nba jerseys</a>
<a href="http://www.globejersey.com">mlb jerseys</a>

<a href="http://www.globejersey.com">discount nfl jerseys</a>
<a href="http://www.globejersey.com">discount nhl jerseys</a>
<a href="http://www.globejersey.com">discount nba jerseys</a>
<a href="http://www.globejersey.com">discount mlb jerseys</a>

<a href="http://www.reebokjerseyonline.com">nfl jersey</a>
<a href="http://www.reebokjerseyonline.com">nhl jersey</a>
<a href="http://www.reebokjerseyonline.com">mlb jersey</a>
<a href="http://www.reebokjerseyonline.com">nba jersey</a>

<a href="http://www.wholesaledownwear.com">Moncler Men Jackets</a>
<a href="http://www.wholesaledownwear.com">Moncler Women Jackets</a>
<a href="http://www.wholesaledownwear.com">Moncler T-Shirt</a>

Posted by: nfl jerseys at March 01, 2011 11:02 PM (SOsgX)

105
FerlyCheater
Ferly'Juliansyah
Remaja'Bhayangkara

Posted by: Ferly'Juliansyah at April 06, 2011 03:22 AM (Mrvc9)

106 Laptop battery

cheap Laptop Battery

High Quality Laptop Battery

Laptop Battery

cheap Laptop Battery

Posted by: laptop battery at May 06, 2011 06:41 AM (wXJ+w)

107 Its like you read my mind! You appear to know so much about this, like you wrote the book in it or something. I think that you could do with some pics to drive the message home a little bit, but other than that, this is great blog. A great read. I will certainly be back.

<a href="http://www.blackbeans.tk/">black bean time</a>
<a href="http://www.revesilkdirect.com/">silk bedding</a>
<a href="http://www.silvertiffany.org/">tiffany silver</a>

Posted by: silk bedding at May 18, 2011 02:47 AM (MB78M)

108 [url=http://www.blackbeans.tk/]black bean time[/url]
[url=http://www.silvertiffany.org/]tiffanys jewelry[/url]
[url=http://www.silvertiffany.org/]tiffany silver[/url]
[url=http://www.revesilkdirect.com]silk bedding[/url]
[url=http://WWW.revesilk.com]silk duvets[/url]

Posted by: silk bedding at May 18, 2011 02:48 AM (MB78M)

109 louis vuitton outlets louis vuitton leather bags louis vuitton monogram bags
louis vuitton monogram
canvas louis vuitton
monogram handbags damier louis
vuitton louis vuitton
wallet louis vuitton
pocketbooks low price
louis vuitton bags affordable louis vuitton
bags inexpensive louis
vuitton bags louis
vuitton handbags cheap louis vuitton outlet stores
louis vuitton handbags cheapest louis vuitton bags
louis vuitton purses louis vuitton shoulder bag
gucci bags outlet store genuine gucci bags gucci handbags sales discounted gucci handbags gucci bags authentic gucci handbags outlet gucci bags outlet cheapest gucci bags cheap gucci bags cheap gucci handbags discounted gucci bagsjingruibmq

Posted by: genuine gucci bags at June 20, 2011 02:27 AM (J9iPU)

110 In this modern and fashionable society, people are pursuing for abercrombie and fitch uk sale cool, unique, stylish and innovative. Whether it is abercrombie and fitch uk or fashion accessories all means a lot for modern society of today. Same is the case with trendy looking abercrombie sale. When these are abercrombie and fitch sale, the excitement just gets doubled. Most chic looking abercrombie and fitch are in fashion now. These are one of the favorite fashion accessories for men and women long time ago. If you have not yet tried abercrombie uk, it's time to own one and feel the difference it can make to your personality.

Posted by: abercrombie_sale at June 20, 2011 03:46 AM (ZE3lz)

111 Ho I bought a pair fashion Sacs Chloe from . Gafas Carrera Enjoy a big iscountee, Sacs Lancel high quality, Lunettes Ray Ban wonderful time shopping. Recommend good shop Borse Louis Vuitton | Ray Ban Sonnenbrillen | Sac Gucci | tn pas cher .

Posted by: mfio at June 30, 2011 11:43 AM (fMJGO)

112 still redacted the I realized how the trick worked. mulberry outlets,mulberry daria, mulberry mitzy, mulberry bag, mulberry outlet store, mulberry alexa

Posted by: mulberry bayswater at July 12, 2011 09:29 PM (voSMu)

113 I remember much surprise when Fitz abruptly halted his investigation to get Blago. mulberry mitzy, mulberry hobo, mulberry outlet, mulberry handbags

Posted by: mulberry handbags at July 12, 2011 09:30 PM (voSMu)






Processing 0.02, elapsed 0.0356 seconds.
15 queries taking 0.0203 seconds, 122 records returned.
Page size 96 kb.
Powered by Minx 0.7 alpha.

MuNuvians
MeeNuvians
Polls! Polls! Polls!
Frequently Asked Questions
The (Almost) Complete Paul Anka Integrity Kick
Top Top Tens
Greatest Hitjobs

The Ace of Spades HQ Sex-for-Money Skankathon
A D&D Guide to the Democratic Candidates
Margaret Cho: Just Not Funny
More Margaret Cho Abuse
Margaret Cho: Still Not Funny
Iraqi Prisoner Claims He Was Raped... By Woman
Wonkette Announces "Morning Zoo" Format
John Kerry's "Plan" Causes Surrender of Moqtada al-Sadr's Militia
World Muslim Leaders Apologize for Nick Berg's Beheading
Michael Moore Goes on Lunchtime Manhattan Death-Spree
Milestone: Oliver Willis Posts 400th "Fake News Article" Referencing Britney Spears
Liberal Economists Rue a "New Decade of Greed"
Artificial Insouciance: Maureen Dowd's Word Processor Revolts Against Her Numbing Imbecility
Intelligence Officials Eye Blogs for Tips
They Done Found Us Out, Cletus: Intrepid Internet Detective Figures Out Our Master Plan
Shock: Josh Marshall Almost Mentions Sarin Discovery in Iraq
Leather-Clad Biker Freaks Terrorize Australian Town
When Clinton Was President, Torture Was Cool
What Wonkette Means When She Explains What Tina Brown Means
Wonkette's Stand-Up Act
Wankette HQ Gay-Rumors Du Jour
Here's What's Bugging Me: Goose and Slider
My Own Micah Wright Style Confession of Dishonesty
Outraged "Conservatives" React to the FMA
An On-Line Impression of Dennis Miller Having Sex with a Kodiak Bear
The Story the Rightwing Media Refuses to Report!
Our Lunch with David "Glengarry Glen Ross" Mamet
The House of Love: Paul Krugman
A Michael Moore Mystery (TM)
The Dowd-O-Matic!
Liberal Consistency and Other Myths
Kepler's Laws of Liberal Media Bias
John Kerry-- The Splunge! Candidate
"Divisive" Politics & "Attacks on Patriotism" (very long)
The Donkey ("The Raven" parody)
News/Chat