Support




Contact
Powered by
Movable Type

ClimateGate gets real legs - London Times reports on CRU's thrown away raw data

Hey, this bag is empty, where did that kitteh run off to?

SCIENTISTS at the University of East Anglia (UEA) have admitted throwing away much of the raw temperature data on which their predictions of global warming are based.

It means that other academics are not able to check basic calculations said to show a long-term rise in temperature over the past 150 years...

Their data ditching is actually old, high profile coverage of it and its implications, not so old.

I've stated elsewhere, that we (the world) if its serious about pissing a few trillion bucks down a rathole over this AGW thing, needs to take out an insurance policy against doing that foolishly. I'm willing to spend a couple of billion dollars recollecting and reconstructing this "lost data" from scratch to make sure I'm not cratering the world economy for no reason.

Another billion or two in the context of possibly pissing away trillions is pretty cheap term insurance. Copenhagen should have only one outcome if the public is to get a warm fuzzy there is real science going on here -- resolve to darken the skies with planes full of data collection teams and resolve to get comprehensive raw data analyzed and regenerated within the next 6 months.

Here's your chance Barak -- let the public know you're serious about verifiable science.

Posted by: Purple Avenger at 11:25 AM



Comments

1 Define "much."

Posted by: ParisParamus at November 29, 2009 11:28 AM (zL+qc)

2 The raw data is still out there. It is in ship's logs, weather station reports, etc.

It will be a bitch to gather and organize, but so what?

Better that than letting these criminals get away with the biggest con ever.

Posted by: eman at November 29, 2009 11:29 AM (eSNGZ)

3 Define "much."

The inconvenient parts mostly ;->

Posted by: Purple Avenger at November 29, 2009 11:31 AM (C8YWz)

4 Jones was not in charge of the CRU when the data were thrown away in the 1980s
-----------------

Oh, so he's totally trustworthy and his work is valid.

Posted by: arhooley at November 29, 2009 11:32 AM (GKXA7)

5 Re posted from the minaret thread

This line from the article is killer.

In a statement on its website, the CRU said: “We do not hold the original raw data but only the value-added (quality controlled and homogenised) data.”

Posted by: Buzzsaw at November 29, 2009 11:32 AM (tf9Ne)

6
But they kept the data from those 3 trees, right?

Because that shit is important.

Posted by: Scopes, the talking monkey at November 29, 2009 11:32 AM (hGfZu)

7 In a statement on its website, the CRU said: “We do not hold the original raw data but only the value-added (quality controlled and homogenised) data.”

Data. now fortified with vitamins, minerals, and lies.

Posted by: ParisParamus at November 29, 2009 11:34 AM (zL+qc)

8

So I just finished watching the local Fox/ABC morning talk shows. Wallace on Fox didn't mention it. He was more concerned about a couple crashing the White House Dinner. ABC did bring it up, for a while, and although I was expecting George Will to jump on it, he just seemed lame and un-informed.

Jesus H....

Posted by: HH at November 29, 2009 11:35 AM (+jvXp)

9 Mann-made global warming, indeed.

Posted by: random at November 29, 2009 11:35 AM (eLppP)

10 I would like to use my custom value-added data to calculate the value of my 401(k). I am sure the brokerage house won't mind.

Posted by: NJConservative at November 29, 2009 11:35 AM (/Ywwg)

11 We had all the data in a big pile on a desk and then a gust of hot wind blew it out the window where it landed in a puddle of melted glacier and then was gulped down by starving Polar Bears.

For real.

Posted by: eman at November 29, 2009 11:36 AM (eSNGZ)

12
The revised figures were kept, but the originals — stored on paper and magnetic tape — were dumped to save space when the CRU moved to a new building.

hahahaha!

This is a joke, right? They shoulda said they got cold one night and decided to burn the paper in the fireplace.


Posted by: Scopes, the talking monkey at November 29, 2009 11:37 AM (hGfZu)

13 NASA has been systematically throwing out historical data from its global summaries in much the same way. It has recalculated these summaries 16 times, always to the effect of making the past colder and the present warmer. Typically, in such an adjustment, NASA will suddenly find a series of thermometer readings from central Africa or Kansas in the 1940s suspect and then drop the same from the data set. No meaningful reason given.

On a related note, the explanation for the NIWA (New Zealand's Climategate)  alterations make no sense at all. They appear to say it is OK to alter present day thermometer readings to reflect the relocation of weather stations well over a hundred years ago. It goes without saying that the movement of a weather station a few hundred yards would best be noted in a footnote and the raw data suffice. Only a fool uses an estimate when raw data is available.

Posted by: pat at November 29, 2009 11:37 AM (Jr9Wl)

14
CRU you keep using this word "data". I do not think it means what you think it means

Posted by: Buzzsaw at November 29, 2009 11:39 AM (tf9Ne)

15 8,

Yep. Those assholes need an Inside-the-Beltway angle or it just didn't happen.

Posted by: eman at November 29, 2009 11:39 AM (eSNGZ)

16 The oceans are rising. No, wait -- that's George Monbiot's tears.

Posted by: arhooley at November 29, 2009 11:41 AM (GKXA7)

17
Any moron-estimates for how much space the data took up?

More than 1000 cu ft? (a 10x10x10 room?)


Posted by: Scopes, the talking monkey at November 29, 2009 11:42 AM (hGfZu)

18 You can find raw data here : http://tinyurl.com/ycockov

Posted by: Dr. Spank at November 29, 2009 11:42 AM (muUqs)

19

Oh, and on the same ABC program, Paul Krugman really doesn't seem to care how much debt we go into. We only have to pay the interest. And as long as it seems we are creating jobs, so much the better.

And he actually held is own against Will. Which goes to show how lame Will was in that segment.

Damn that pisses me off!!!

Posted by: HH at November 29, 2009 11:43 AM (+jvXp)

20
Who is stupid enough to believe they really are that pressed for space at UEA?




Posted by: Scopes, the talking monkey at November 29, 2009 11:44 AM (hGfZu)

21

The truth is just too inconvenient and there is little profit in it.

Posted by: lan sing at November 29, 2009 11:45 AM (cEOZd)

22 HA!!

How can these tools at the CRU claim to be objective scientists when they didn't bother to keep their original data? What, nobody could back 'em up on disks or put the boxes of hard copy in the back storage room? Yeah, right, whatever. This is further proof that those global warmers don't have a scientific leg to stand on. Either they destroyed the data to prevent peer review fact checking/duplication, or they are lying through their teeth to avoid having to surrender the data and get called on their politically correct BS. Either way, I call 'em all frauds and liars. They are welcome to prove me wrong any time...by coming up with the original data.

Posted by: exdem13 at November 29, 2009 11:45 AM (lYKj1)

23 and what is funny is how many on the left are starting to claim that all of this is nothing but a plan to distract from Copenhagen Treaty Bullshit, including a certain Climate Expert and failed jazz musician
http://tinyurl.com/ykl23tg

copy & paste to your browser.


Posted by: eddiebear at November 29, 2009 11:45 AM (DZb+g)

24 Jones and his colleagues say this temperature rise is “unequivocally” linked to greenhouse gas emissions generated by humans.
--------------
Hmm, when you pronounce "unequivocally" carefully, it has six syllables. SIX. Can we argue with this?

Posted by: arhooley at November 29, 2009 11:47 AM (GKXA7)

25 Paul Krugman really doesn't seem to care how much debt we go into. We only have to pay the interest.

Sounds like a creative financing sub-prime loan.  Those worked out real good, eh?

Posted by: Purple Avenger at November 29, 2009 11:49 AM (C8YWz)

26

I'm willing to spend a couple of billion dollars recollecting and reconstructing this "lost data" from scratch to make sure I'm not cratering the world economy for no reason.

Anyone truly on the side of real Science would agree. My only caveat is that all data, code and methodologies be made 100% public. If this had be the case from the start, there would be little to debate right now.

I would add that those who conspired to hide or delete data must be censured and have no part in the future of climate science, other than perhaps a lesson taught to students on how to discredit oneself and one's profession.

Posted by: krakatoa at November 29, 2009 11:49 AM (hQbvm)

27 First of all, once published, scientists (ie ACTUAL ones) are supposed to make all their data publically available.   I believe they are legally obligated to do so if the data was generated using Federal grant money.

>>Here's your chance Bara[c]k -- let the public know you're serious about verifiable science.

Who says its about science?


Posted by: looking closely at November 29, 2009 11:50 AM (KNy97)

28 "Please note: none of what I wrote above changes my opinion that “CRU-gate” is an absolutely phony scandal, deliberately trumped up and distorted to sabotage the Copenhagen climate summit meeting." Charles Johnson

Fuck you all wait until I make a couple Moby comments using racial slurs like I did at HotAir. That will show you!

Posted by: Kilgore Trout at November 29, 2009 11:51 AM (whG5F)

29 "Here's your chance Barak"

Barak? as in an Anglicization of Baruch? ooh, you filthy anti-Semenite! Leave Baruch alone!

Posted by: Sporadic Small Arms Fire at November 29, 2009 11:51 AM (MBxH4)

30
Did anyone happen to see the look on Krugman's face when this was brought up by Steph this morning? Dude looked like he took a bite out of his coffee cup and was getting ready to choke.

I was shocked that Steph even mentioned it too.

Posted by: Blazer at November 29, 2009 11:52 AM (+FzLa)

31 So the story is, these guys claimed to have proof of a world ending calamity but they didn't think keeping that was important?

You know, if you act like a lying douche tool, you shouldn't be surprised when people treat you like a lying douche tool.

Posted by: DrewM. at November 29, 2009 11:52 AM (FCWQb)

32 My only caveat is that all data, code and methodologies be made 100% public.

Just got an flash email from the Vampires Union local 314.  They definitively stated that "sunshine" is a really bad thing.

Posted by: Purple Avenger at November 29, 2009 11:53 AM (C8YWz)

33 Here's a question for those that say this is a nontroversy.

Would you fly on a plane whose maintenance and safety records had value added data?

Posted by: Buzzsaw at November 29, 2009 11:54 AM (tf9Ne)

34

Slightly OT, please forgive me but this is serious,,

 

Can anyone recommend a good ointment?,, My ears are raw from scrapeing the sides of doors when I walk through.

 

OsamaHusseinIslamObama 2012'

(the terrorist-Uighur-ACORN-media choice)

-It's never too early to campaign-

Posted by: Barry Soetoro (D-King OF The World!!) at November 29, 2009 11:55 AM (YwfvI)

35 "Here's your chance Barak -- let the public know you're serious about verifiable science."

Jesus... The word 'serious' and 'Barak' in the same sentence.
The only thing Barak is 'serious' about is himself, and cratering the American economy and he's doing quite well at both.

Posted by: Gmac at November 29, 2009 11:56 AM (5iy+N)

36 Yeah, Barry is all about "verifiable science".  Just ask about all those "jobs saved or created".

Posted by: GarandFan at November 29, 2009 11:56 AM (ZQBnQ)

37 Climate change "deniers"=Creationists!!!1!!!! Charles Johnson told me so!!!!!

"This is a perfect example of a point I’ve made several times: the convergence of tactics and talking points between climate denial groups and creationists. They both use cherry-picked data, they both employ pseudo-scientific language to make outrageous claims that sound convincing to gullible people, they both compile lists of skeptical “scientists” that turn out to be packed with ringers, frauds, and people who never signed in the first place, and they both use quote mining.

And they are very often the same people."

Posted by: Kilgore Trout at November 29, 2009 11:56 AM (whG5F)

38 What did CRU do with Ace?

Posted by: Dr. Spank at November 29, 2009 11:56 AM (muUqs)

39 Just ask about all those "jobs saved or created".

I think there was a lot of "value add" in that jobs saved data.

Posted by: Purple Avenger at November 29, 2009 11:57 AM (C8YWz)

40

Blazer, I saw that moment too. But Will dropped the ball. Mr.stastic,(and he always has one or more), just let it drop. He could have NAILED Krugman, and he didn't..

He had his chance and didn't take it. Never mentioned peer review, bad data, anything.

Again, just lame.

Posted by: HH at November 29, 2009 11:59 AM (+jvXp)

41 I really wish people would stop using "Climategate" and instead use "Warmaquiddick" or if you must "Climatequiddick" even if that's more awkward.

But it is getting more momentum and coverage - outside the US.

Posted by: Christopher Taylor at November 29, 2009 11:59 AM (PQY7w)

42

Wasn't there an email that said something like "I'd rather delete the raw data than realease it"?

Posted by: lan sing at November 29, 2009 12:00 PM (cEOZd)

43 37

"This is a perfect example of a point I’ve made several times: the convergence of tactics and talking points between climate change denial groups and Dems writing bills creationists. They both use cherry-picked data, they both employ pseudo-scientific language to make outrageous claims that sound convincing to gullible people, they both compile lists of skeptical “scientists” that turn out to be packed with ringers, frauds, and people who never signed in the first place, and they both use quote mining.

FIFY

Posted by: Buzzsaw at November 29, 2009 12:02 PM (tf9Ne)

44

#18

Damn, Dr Spank,  I was expects some pron, not the REAL data.

You know your posting at AoSHQ,  right?  We expect a little more over here than facts!

Posted by: Kemp at November 29, 2009 12:02 PM (2+9Yx)

45 Ha ha, the CRU is acting like ACORN now!

Posted by: logprof at November 29, 2009 12:02 PM (I3Udb)

46 Buzzsaw, would you be operated on by a surgeon whose certifications, grades, and resume had value added data?

Posted by: arhooley at November 29, 2009 12:06 PM (GKXA7)

47
Buzzsaw, would you be operated on by a surgeon whose certifications, grades, and resume had value added data?

Posted by: arhooley at November 29, 2009 12:06 PM (GKXA7)





If so, you're gonna love government run health care.

Posted by: Blazer at November 29, 2009 12:08 PM (+FzLa)

48 If this data actually shows the earth is actuallly cooling then would they be telling us to burn more fossil fuels?  No.  They would claim that fossil fuels were causing the cooling.  Seems the scientists put their bets on the wrong horse. 

Posted by: lan sing at November 29, 2009 12:10 PM (cEOZd)

49 I forget, is it Nittany Lions, or Nittany Lie-in's? Calling Dr. Spanier Dr. Easterling Dr. Spanier!

Posted by: dr kill at November 29, 2009 12:11 PM (KXVFz)

50

So what's the difference between CRU and Oh, say Enron?

Anyone?

 

Posted by: HH at November 29, 2009 12:11 PM (+jvXp)

51 He scienced me with blindness.

Posted by: ParisParamus at November 29, 2009 12:12 PM (zL+qc)

52 You ever wonder what would happen if a politician came along and without ever mentioning global warming ran on a campaign of raising taxes on all energy you used, capping the amount of energy you could use, forcing people to outfit their house to use less energy, pledged to the UN to mandate the United States would use 50% less energy in 10 years, and went around saying he would bankrupt US industries such as coal and oil?

Posted by: Mr. Pink at November 29, 2009 12:12 PM (whG5F)

53 George Monbiot has been silent since November 23. It'll be interesting when he comes forth again.

Posted by: arhooley at November 29, 2009 12:12 PM (GKXA7)

54 A lot of reporters have a lot invested in the current global warming science. They're not going to give up on it easily. Ace made the point before that people, in general, don't like to admit when they're wrong (see Obama), but they will change their mind easier if they feel like they have been deceived. It will be interesting to see if and when the media turns on these "scientists".

Posted by: Dr. Spank at November 29, 2009 12:13 PM (muUqs)

55 44

#18

Damn, Dr Spank, I was expects some pron, not the REAL data.

You know your posting at AoSHQ, right? We expect a little more over here than facts!

Posted by: Kemp at November 29, 2009 12:02 PM (2+9Yx)


Or at least a good rickroll. I haven't had one of those for a couple of days.

Posted by: The Dread Pirate Neck Beard at November 29, 2009 12:13 PM (z85uT)

56 Did they have ACORN help them too........

Posted by: FU52 at November 29, 2009 12:13 PM (+PFSk)

57 Does the same company that makes Valu Rite Vodka also make Valu Added Data?

Posted by: Buzzsaw at November 29, 2009 12:13 PM (tf9Ne)

58

This is how serious science is done nowadays, post-modern science, where there is no reality.

Just what politicians want. Go figure that those fuckers would end up benefiting from post-modernism. Go fuckin figure that the years of brainwashing kids results in this shit.

I'd like to string these assholes up on the next windmill going up.

And no surprise that this bit of post-modern liberal stupidity had the Kennedy's not buying in by refusing windmill construction, yet promoting it.

That's how it has always gone. Lysenkoism is alive and well. Figures.


Posted by: Rev. Dr. E. Buzz Miller at November 29, 2009 12:13 PM (CHf6r)

59 If this data actually shows the earth is actuallly cooling then would they be telling us to burn more fossil fuels?  No.  They would claim that fossil fuels were causing the cooling.

See also, "The Coming Ice Age", vintage mid-to-late 1970s.

First rule of eco-scares: the problem is always that we're rich and free. The solution is always to enslave and impoverish us.

Posted by: Rob Crawford at November 29, 2009 12:15 PM (n2wxa)

60 Free Money!!!!!!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QkzRZxKw6GY&feature=related

Posted by: Mathew Lesko at November 29, 2009 12:16 PM (whG5F)

61 "Science will not intrude on public policy" -- Vice President Al Gore

Posted by: Duncan Donetz at November 29, 2009 12:16 PM (XeAEF)

62 Yahooooooooooooooo!!!!!!
http://tiny.cc/gxpny

I hate trying to link on here.

Posted by: Mathew Lesko at November 29, 2009 12:17 PM (whG5F)

63 "....resolve to darken the skies with planes full of data collection teams and resolve to get comprehensive raw data analyzed and regenerated within the next 6 months."

Why? Are you telling me you would believe any conclusion they drew from any data? If so, would you care to buy a bridge?

Seriously. If you lot are just looking for a fig leaf that will let you go along to get along, have at it. Kindly leave free men and women the hell out of it, though.

Posted by: Ken at November 29, 2009 12:24 PM (rQI8i)

64 #37 - Is that an actual quote from CJ? Has the guy been asleep for two weeks? He's shown definitive proof that it's the climate "scientists" who've been cherry-picking data, employing pseudo-scientific language (and methods) and making outrageous claims, and he's blaming creationists?

Hide the decline, Charles.

Hide it on your singularity-approaching pointless irrelevant blog.

Posted by: Waterhouse at November 29, 2009 12:28 PM (Ta/V3)

65 As somebody who is a budding participant in the peer-reviewed process and has to jump through hoops to get something published in a peer-reviewed journal (as well as accepted at various conferences), the actions of these researchers aggravates me to no end.  They've not only violated the trust of the public, they have violated the ethics of their profession.  Their manipulations of the data (e.g., intentionally using timeframes for analysis that support their hypotheses and ignoring those that don't), lack of rigor with their methodology, and biased analysis taints those of us trying to do things the right way and advance knowledge in a fashion beneficial to the public (and, in my situation, the government and business community).

Of course, this is just the impact of the behavior of these climate researchers on the research community.  The larger impact of their unethical behavior on trying to change and influence the economic policies of this country and the rest of the world through the implementation of garbage like cap-and-trade legislation is even more criminal.  I expect an empty suit like Al Gore to be a moron about most of these issues, but those that have been trained on the ethical and appropriate manner to go about conducting research should know better.  Perhaps if these researchers left their Left-wing bias and agenda at the door they wouldn't find themselves compromising their professional ethics. Then again, the flawed peer-reviewed process contributes to this type of behavior, too.

Posted by: Slappy at November 29, 2009 12:31 PM (ljvjO)

66

I think next April I will toss all of my receipts and 1099's and file my tax return with "value-added" numbers.

Okay, value-subtracted then.

Bonus: An Editorial Photoshop to pass around concerning AGW "Peer Review"

 

Posted by: Walsingham at November 29, 2009 12:35 PM (gFYz6)

67

I am surrounded by moonbats who get their news from the "news"paper.  Sssssh - they don't suspect a thing!  I love to watch their childish, innocent faces as they read every day about how compassionate they are, and how important their trivial sacrifices are to saving the world.

Now, what is the best way to capture and store their tears when the time comes that their gods in the media tell them the horrible truth?  I want to be able to enjoy a sip now and then.

Posted by: sherlock at November 29, 2009 12:38 PM (ktKOD)

68

Slappy, I am sorry to inform you that I have not trusted scientists, their research, or their findings for a very long time.  If a lie will make them money, they do. 

 

 

Posted by: lan sing at November 29, 2009 12:40 PM (cEOZd)

69

This "lost data" is a big fat effing lie - my opinion by the way.  The data is there in the actual program that added all the so called corrections, unless they "lost" the programming also, and all that is left is the printout. 

The raw data was alledgedly lost in the eighties and all they claim to have is the "corrected, massaged, or altered" numbers.  That means they had entered it into computers over twenty years ago.  This data is still there and can be extracted, or they should be able to - if they were willing.  All their temperature data could have been stored on a few tape reels, and they needed more space? Bullshit.

Lost? No. Thrown away accidentally on purpose? YES.        

Posted by: Pelayo at November 29, 2009 12:44 PM (wwQxi)

70

Why? Are you telling me you would believe any conclusion they drew from any data?

If I personally looked at the methods and results and found them credible, I would believe them. If I saw the same flaky shit as today, I wouldn't.  I have enough general scientific training to make that determination for myself.

I want to hear real data speak, not politicians or scientists with vested financial interest in a particular outcome.  Hard data is apolitical.

Posted by: Purple Avenger at November 29, 2009 12:44 PM (C8YWz)

71 65: You said it all, man. Nice to see someone in the scientific community come out and plainly state why cheating in the name of good intentions is ALWAYS a bad idea.

Posted by: exdem13 at November 29, 2009 12:44 PM (lYKj1)

72

This data is still there and can be extracted, or they should be able to - if they were willing. 

Not really, even if you have the programs that did it.  Example - the average of two numbers can't be used to regenerate the original two numbers if you don't have both of them anymore (with one original and the average, you could calculate the missing one, but not with two missing). 

A lot of their correctionstransformations would introduce a similar irreversible loss of original information.

Posted by: Purple Avenger at November 29, 2009 12:53 PM (C8YWz)

73 Ummm.. well, you see, it's like this.. My data was all ready to bring to school, and then my dog jumped up on the table and ate it!


Posted by: Chi-Town Jerry at November 29, 2009 12:53 PM (tDm8K)

74 Ehh, I've been blogging this locally for a week and my known Republican commenters are being very quiet.   I'm afraid it's too late - the warmists have been sending out speakers like Sen John Warner and a retired admiral to tell veterans that this warming thing is a threat to national security.   Plus the same local radio stations that carry Rush have been filled with Ad Council tripe about shrinking glaciers and shit for years now.

Most people are not very sciencey and don't want to look stupid.  

Posted by: cassandra at November 29, 2009 12:54 PM (gH4PS)

75 68 Slappy, I am sorry to inform you that I have not trusted scientists,

and I never will.

I will always blame them

For the death of my son.

Posted by: James T sing at November 29, 2009 12:40 PM (cEOZd)

Posted by: AmishDude at November 29, 2009 12:59 PM (ItSLQ)

76 Oh yeah, and if we collect new data, we may want to put the weather collection instruments away from air conditioning units!

Posted by: logprof at November 29, 2009 01:02 PM (I3Udb)

77

Goddamn it!  This is a NONTROVERSY!  The unholy alliance between CHISTIANISTS, CREATIONISTS, and DENIALISTS is the only story here.

Purple Avenger and all you mouth-breathing, knuckle-dragging commenters on this STORMFRONT sponsored blog are hereby banned from the internet.

Oh yeah, don't forget to check out the great deals at Amazon.

Buy a calender, too.

Posted by: 2 Buck Chuck at November 29, 2009 01:06 PM (JK1hx)

78 I wonder what the reaction is from people who think the media is a right wing establishment. Is the coverup government forced? Or still just big corporations running the world?

None of the people I know that are "media is too right wing" tools have an answer for me. I suppose I could go over to fark or DU, but I just took a shower.

Posted by: Jay in Ames at November 29, 2009 01:06 PM (LJaVO)

79 Ken:  Why? Are you telling me you would believe any conclusion they drew from any data?...

Seriously. If you lot are just looking for a fig leaf that will let you go along to get along, have at it. Kindly leave free men and women the hell out of it, though.

As PA pointed out, raw data is apolitical.

If we are not willing to assess the evidence from a proper skeptical scientific perspective, then we accomplish nothing in this whole exercise, and we confirm the AGW fetishist's claim that we are unreasonable players, unworthy of a voice in the debate.

Remember, the first hurdle in a renewed debate for them is to prove AGW exists in any statistically relevant manner.

Next they must prove that even the effects of that warming is a net "bad" thing demanding action to attempt to stimy it.

Finally they must prove that their proposed solution would work.

They haven't done any of these, and frankly, I don't think their chances are high on any individual point, much less all three under which action would be required.

 

Posted by: krakatoa at November 29, 2009 01:11 PM (hQbvm)

80 Slappy, I am sorry to inform you that I have not trusted scientists, their research, or their findings for a very long time.  If a lie will make them money, they do.

Posted by: lan sing at November 29, 2009 12:40 PM (cEOZd)

Believe me, I understand the sentiment.  The pressure among researchers to get grant money for research and tenure is strong and in order to get money for their research and earn tenure some do forget their ethics and obligations to the research community and public when gatering data, analyzing the data, and writing up their analysis of their research.  My personal experience with social scientists and social science research in various business disciplines is that the vast majority do not do this, but enough do likely engage in this type of behavior to warrant skepticism among those reviewing their results.  I've always questioned the effectiveness, fairness, and quality of the peer-reviewed process and this incident involving the CRU provided evidence for several of the concerns I have voiced online and offline to others in the past.

Posted by: Slappy at November 29, 2009 01:11 PM (ljvjO)

81 71 65: You said it all, man. Nice to see someone in the scientific community come out and plainly state why cheating in the name of good intentions is ALWAYS a bad idea.

Posted by: exdem13 at November 29, 2009 12:44 PM (lYKj1)

Thank you.  The first time I'm pressured to engage in the type of unethical behavior that many of these climate researchers did, I'm done with the profession or at least will drop the research portion of my job responsibilities and focus on only teaching, which I enjoy and find very rewarding anyway.

Posted by: Slappy at November 29, 2009 01:12 PM (ljvjO)

82

A lot of their correctionstransformations would introduce a similar irreversible loss of original information.

Which was undoubtably the whole idea, no?

Posted by: sherlock at November 29, 2009 01:14 PM (ktKOD)

83 Most people are not very sciencey and don't want to look stupid.  

Posted by: cassandra at November 29, 2009 12:54 PM (gH4PS)

Yeah, but they know a con when they see one.  Look, lots of people bought into this scam and they will be reluctant to admit that they were buying into a cult.

I don't expect a quick turnaround on this.  Ultimately, the pushback will come from scientists in other fields.  Simply, if you're in chemistry, you are going to demand more funding instead of it going to that fraud.

Other fields: statistics, meteorology, for example, who have changed their research focus to jump on the AGW funding bandwagon will fall away.

The mocking will happen.  I intend to use the phrase "hide the decline" whenever possible.  Be patient.

Posted by: AmishDude at November 29, 2009 01:14 PM (ItSLQ)

84

C'mon gang - all you have to do is a little digging to get to the bottom. This is nothing short of a world-wide power grab and the unthinking and uncritical press is being lead around by the nose.

Check out AGW defenders such as Climate Progress (''The Web's most influential climate-change blogger'' says Time Magazine) and you'll find familiar names such as Podesta and Daschle. Dig a little deeper and you'll find our old friend Soros sponsoring or bankrolling a multitude of groups and ''think tanks'' (such as the Center for American Progress, the Center for American Progress Fund and the Open Society Institute and Fenton Communications) influencing scientists and politicians alike.

This is nothing short of another grand scheme to further enrich and empower Soros. He put his POS (Puppets of Soros) out there to push the case for AGW (or Climate Change if you want) while he gets wealthier selling carbon indulgences and more powerful manipulating politicians world wide.

Posted by: greyseal53 at November 29, 2009 01:18 PM (SAowk)

85 No reputable scientist would throw away their original data.  Of course, this was never about science, its the same type of "religion" as islam.  Use whatever means necessary to achieve your tyrannical control.

Posted by: Guy Fawkes at November 29, 2009 01:22 PM (DIYmd)

86 No reputable scientist would throw away their original data.

Posted by: Guy Fawkes at November 29, 2009 01:22 PM (DIYmd)

Exactly.  You're supposed to keep your original data so that other researchers can conduct replication studies and verify your results, if they want to.  Then again, if you don't want to open yourself and your results up to the scrutiny of other researchers -- especially if you've manipulated the data or been selective with your use of it -- throwing the data away makes complete sense.

Posted by: Slappy at November 29, 2009 01:34 PM (ljvjO)

87 There was a story about Climaquiddick in the local paper.  The "mainstream/consensus" scientist was saying that the CRU models were not the only means of "proving" "climate change" since there's also observation of ice, ocean acidity, blah blah.  He lost me though, when he tossed out the canard about fossil fuel producers backing the "deniers."  When that becomes the stock defense, they're clearly on the run.

Posted by: logprof at November 29, 2009 01:42 PM (I3Udb)

88

"Example - the average of two numbers can't be used to regenerate the original two numbers if you don't have both of them anymore (with one original and the average, you could calculate the missing one, but not with two missing)".

Because the CRU methodology is clouded in mystery I can only make an educated guess about what they did.  Each data point (temperature) was one number apparently multiplied by something or a number was added to it.  If I were to correct a thermometer reading because it was an unshielded thermometer, I should have that correction factor in the formula. I still say if the raw data cannot be extracted from the program, then they have lost more than just the raw data - they have "lost" the formula too. 

If they were simply averaging temperatures from two or three stations, that is one thing.  If they are actually altering the reading based on some "factor" they pulled out of their fundament, that is another problem.

If their "correctionstransformations" formulas are also lost I can only reject their whole body of work. 

Posted by: Pelayo at November 29, 2009 01:53 PM (wwQxi)

89

Maybe another crack in the dam:

http://tinyurl.com/yzan26w

Seems Dr. Mann might have some 'splaining to do about "Mann-Made" warming...

Posted by: greyseal53 at November 29, 2009 01:54 PM (SAowk)

90 Why do you all hate polar bears?

Posted by: TexasJew at November 29, 2009 01:54 PM (/Cl2F)

91

You're supposed to keep your original data so that other researchers can conduct replication studies and verify your results, if they want to.

What ever made you come to this preposterous conclusion?  I think you've been infected with a fever of some sort sir, or perhaps you were dropped on your head as an infant.  Clearly you're not thinking straight whatever the cause.  I think you should be check for a "brain cloud"

Posted by: Purple Avenger at November 29, 2009 01:58 PM (C8YWz)

92 89

Maybe another crack in the dam:

http://tinyurl.com/yzan26w

Seems Dr. Mann might have some 'splaining to do about "Mann-Made" warming...

Posted by: greyseal53 at November 29, 2009 01:54 PM (SAowk)

It's just going to be a cover-up.

Academics always cover up for each other.

Penn State should have fired the little prick's ass years ago when Inhofe nailed his tree-ring data as bullshit. The asshole claimed that the temperatures in 1000 AD - when Greenland was actually green, and Newfoundland was mild and warm - were actually lower than they are today.

The best way to nail Mann will be to get him for perjury. He lied all over the place under oath.

Scumbag POS.

Posted by: TexasJew at November 29, 2009 02:00 PM (/Cl2F)

93 87 He lost me though, when he tossed out the canard about fossil fuel producers backing the "deniers."  When that becomes the stock defense, they're clearly on the run.
Posted by: logprof at November 29, 2009 01:42 PM (I3Udb)

People know not to start that sort of crap around me. Would not be prudent.

Posted by: TexasJew at November 29, 2009 02:05 PM (/Cl2F)

94

I think the Penn investigation of Mann is just pro-forma ass covering.  He'll be officially cleared of any wrong doing because there were enough degrees of separation between him and the initial sources of data he used to provide cover and shove any blame elsewhere.

Maybe they'll bust him for inflating some expense report by $10 or some trivial nit like that so they can say they did something about it.

Posted by: Purple Avenger at November 29, 2009 02:05 PM (C8YWz)

95 No need to spend one dime! If the data did not go against the grain it would not have been flushed, and that is more telling than any revisiting of the data. Hell, BO will just fudge the data anyway: same clowns the 2nd time, same result as the first. Flush the entire argument!

Posted by: Rob in Katy at November 29, 2009 02:12 PM (PiTBB)

96 Non-troversy.  This is just a distraction created by holocaust climate change deniers who are in cahoots with pro-Glenn Beck racist anti-vaccination creationists.

Posted by: Chas. Johnson-Kilgore-Sharmuta, Esq. at November 29, 2009 02:13 PM (uHvsp)

97

Maybe they'll bust him for inflating some expense report by $10 or some trivial nit like that so they can say they did something about it.

Posted by: Purple Avenger at November 29, 2009 02:05 PM (C8YWz)

Penn State used to be a great (actual) energy school with a good Petroleum Engineering and geology department, and the best coal school in the nation.

Texas, UWisconsin (with a great sedimentology dept.) and Penn State has produced the majority of America petroleum geologists, historically.

I was taught years ago by the Pet Engineering department head when he was down in Austin collaborating on a project and I was his geology student assistant. I visited the school later and was very impressed with the level of technology and expertise.

The fact that they now employ these pathetic "climate science" bullshit artists is tragicomic. Worthless Lysenkoists.

Posted by: TexasJew at November 29, 2009 02:13 PM (/Cl2F)

98

The current state of climatology is about as scientific as Astrology or Phrenology. 

Michael E. Mann's Wikepedia page is tagged as needing citations and references, much like his work I suppose.

Posted by: Pelayo at November 29, 2009 02:15 PM (wwQxi)

99 The only data I care about these days is range to target and windage & elevation.

Posted by: Old Hippie Vet at November 29, 2009 02:16 PM (3IZGh)

100
7 ParisParamus

Data. now fortified with vitamins, minerals, and lies.

And sanitized for your protection!

Posted by: Golem14 at November 29, 2009 02:17 PM (2X8VA)

101 Palins book; 11 crack journalist/researchers.

University of East Anglia; not so much.

Posted by: Bubba Thudd at November 29, 2009 02:21 PM (bFy4C)

102 Why do you all hate polar bears?

They taste nasty.

Posted by: Rob Crawford at November 29, 2009 02:22 PM (n2wxa)

103

Buzzsaw @43:

Charles is an utter fool (not news, that), and is incredibly, embarrassingly thin-skinned. (neither is that news)

I had an exchange with him the other day, my first ever at Little Brown Shitballs, and when he said something similarly stupid, I explained to him how he'd not only misstated my point, but had badly misstated his own.

Poof. Comment deleted. "Good day to you, SIR!" in its place, and just like that, he flushed his own idiotic comment down the memory hole.

On the bright side, it only took me two comments, total, to get banned, which has to be a near record. That guy can't understand normal thinking.

Posted by: Patton at November 29, 2009 02:47 PM (xvN1A)

104 Don't worry. The raw climate data wasn't thrown away - that would be wasteful. It was recycled into "saved or created jobs" that the Porkulus allegedly brought us. All of those phantom districts and the non-existent jobs that recovery.gov is yapping about ... that's just climate data being reused (to save time, money and energy). Of course, after the newly massaged numbers (for the specific purposes of showing that jobs are appearing) were posted on recovery.gov, the circulating climate data was, once again, recycled. I'm not sure where they sent it, now, but keep an eye out in crossword puzzles and lotteries - which tend to be terminal stops on the data recycling circuit.

It's all about recycling. You know, green data. Why expend energy gathering new data when we have all of this old data hanging around?

Posted by: progressoverpeace at November 29, 2009 02:48 PM (A46hP)

105

Does the same company that makes Valu Rite Vodka also make Valu Added Data?

Valu-Rite Data!!!! I love it and hereby decree this part of the AoSHQ Stylebook.

Okay, it's the whole stylebook, and who am I to write it, but still, it's funny and stuff.

Posted by: Mama AJ at November 29, 2009 02:48 PM (Be4xl)

106 Re: Scopes at #6
It was only one tree.

Posted by: cbullitt at November 29, 2009 02:50 PM (g5ih3)

107

None of this matters of course, because we are all racist thanks to PA misspelling you-know-who's name in the post.

Therefore, global warming is real.

Posted by: Mama AJ at November 29, 2009 02:52 PM (Be4xl)

108 I find the data deleting very strange. I have several researchers as consulting clients and they have every piece of data they've ever collected. Even the data on punch cards, 9 track tapes and 5 1/4 inch floppies has been carried forward to newer media. Their data is their academic life. I don't understand...

Posted by: KF at November 29, 2009 03:01 PM (/wrw/)

109 I find the data deleting very strange. I have several researchers as consulting clients and they have every piece of data they've ever collected. Even the data on punch cards, 9 track tapes and 5 1/4 inch floppies has been carried forward to newer media. Their data is their academic life. I don't understand...
Posted by: KF

Well, it looks like Notebook Burning Day is cancelled this year.

Posted by: eman at November 29, 2009 03:06 PM (eSNGZ)

110

Oh, my fellow morons-uh!  You seem troubled-uh.  You seem angry-uh.  The Devil Internets is sneaky-uh.  The Devil Internets makes his words sound so sweet to your ears-uh.  But you must resist his tempting ways-uh!  The Church of Climatology needs your help-uh.  You must be strong-uh.  Send whatever money you can spare to help us fight the Devil Internets and his sneaky, lying ways-uh! 

Act now-uh!  Polar bears have died because of your sins-uh.  We can't let the polar bears die in vain, can we-uh?  Bless you my morons-uh, I know you will do the right thing-uh and send us all the money you can spare-uh.  Gaia needs all the Fortran programmers we can buy-uh.  Together we can save the world-uh. 

Follow me in my travels to New York, then San Francisico, then Bali, then the Riviera, then The Bahamas, then Australia.  That's the start of our crusade to fight the the Devil Internets and his followers the Denialists-uh.  It's a sacrifice, I know, but a sacrifice I must make for Gaia and her children-uh. 

Give now-uh and Gaia bless you all-uh!

Posted by: marmo, High Priest, Church of Climatology at November 29, 2009 03:17 PM (7Y8qQ)

111 Can we have our goddamned light bulbs back now?

Posted by: FUBAR at November 29, 2009 03:29 PM (Lq+ym)

112 Oh, and, I'd pay for a "The science is settled" t-shirt.

Posted by: FUBAR at November 29, 2009 03:31 PM (Lq+ym)

113

A polar bear screaming, "I'm a star! Don't you know who I am? I'm Knut and I need some meth, NOW, assholes!" ate our data just like AGW has forced other polar bear populations to become cannibals.

Posted by: professor jones at November 29, 2009 03:40 PM (2qU2d)

114 I "HEART" CO2

Posted by: ParisParamus at November 29, 2009 03:47 PM (zL+qc)

115 @DanRiehl @EdMorrissey Jason Blair, Dan Rather, OJ, Michael Mann, and Al Gore walk into a bar...

Posted by: ParisParamus at November 29, 2009 03:50 PM (zL+qc)

116

A brief history of climate hysteria at Tim Blair's MSM blog. And check out his whole site today, it's got a tonne of stuff at it.

Posted by: andycanuck at November 29, 2009 03:54 PM (2qU2d)

117

I've been wondering about any unintended consequences of requiring publicly funded research data and software to be open, or released under some sort of academic/non-profit license.  I know the recipients of the funding would resist;  in addition to publishing papers most if not all research universities also develop intellectual property that leads to patents, licenses, commercialization, and more money flowing back to the universities.  Currently the deal is that if the IP is developed with US Gov $, the government gets to freely use the IP but does not get any of the license fees etc. There are no strings on public disclosure of the funded research data or software.  That's a pretty good deal for the grantees. 

Should we be pushing for a general requrement that if you want public funding for your research you have to agree to open source research?  Raw data completely public and open source software?

Posted by: motionview at November 29, 2009 03:56 PM (is1tF)

118

41 I really wish people would stop using "Climategate" and instead use "Warmaquiddick" or if you must "Climatequiddick" even if that's more awkward.

I prefer Warmerloo.

Posted by: starboardhelm at November 29, 2009 04:14 PM (SgSfB)

119 Posted by: motionview at November 29, 2009 03:56 PM (is1tF)

This really shouldn't impact on all publicly funded research, as that is not the issue here, but on all research that is the basis for huge changes in public policy. I wouldn't care if the CRU data and research were all privately funded, when they started using it to push for trillions in cost to our economies and expanding the role of government in our lives is when all of their data and methods should have been forced into the public arena.

Posted by: progressoverpeace at November 29, 2009 04:16 PM (A46hP)

120

"Skewed Science" a National Post article by a statistician about French researchers who came to the "wrong" conclusions also being given the finger by CRU.

A French scientist’s temperature data show results different from the official climate science. Why was he stonewalled? Climate Research Unit emails detail efforts to deny access to global temperature data

Posted by: andycanuck at November 29, 2009 04:22 PM (2qU2d)

121 "No need to spend one dime! If the data did not go against the grain it would not have been flushed, and that is more telling than any revisiting of the data. Hell, BO will just fudge the data anyway: same clowns the 2nd time, same result as the first. Flush the entire argument!"

Perzackly. Why bother giving the same suspects (or some equally bad set of cannibals) another bite at the apple? The mischief lies in this: The research will help guide "public policy" (in other words, it will direct the amount and use of money stolen at gunpoint from thee and me and our children and grandchildren). Who do you think is going to be involved in the new data collection, analysis, and interpretation?

You say you have sufficient scientific expertise to know whether there are shenanigans, Avenger, and I believe you, but knowing whether or not they are shenanigans doesn't do diddly boo to stop Congress, the administration, the UN, and various Quango busybodies from snatching up a false flag, shouting "Hurrah," and leading us into the New Stone Age (in which ninety percent of us are dead). Your argument boils down to "but if the right people are in charge, everything will be hunky dory!" No sale.

Posted by: Ken at November 29, 2009 04:32 PM (rQI8i)

122 But the glaciers are still melting and polar bears drowning!  Because of global warming!  Caused by CO2 produced by man! No other causes or contributing factors are plausible at all -- not even that the earth has been warming for the past 10,000 years and atmospheric CO2 lags temperture rises, not precedes them.  2500 scientists signed a letter!  See, we have all these studies that show this will happen, even though it isn't now.  And it'll all be baaad, see, longer growing seasons and palm trees and bikinis in Canada is Bad!  We have computer models that say so! Uh, yes, from CRU, uh, well sure, they can't even predict the past, but, um, you can't replicate the results because the polar bears ate the data . . . damn.  Do your own study then, and we'll peer review it.  No, you can't have a grant, either.

Posted by: Warmolyte at November 29, 2009 04:33 PM (SgSfB)

123 Reproducible results. That's what makes it science. Not peer review, not grant money, not Ed Begley. Hard to reproduce the results when the data are kept secret has been deliberately thrown away, innit?

Posted by: Chicagorefugee at November 29, 2009 04:44 PM (DcrPj)

124 I suggest Science was killed by the CRU Cabal, in the Laboratory, with the eraser.

Posted by: Hasbro at November 29, 2009 05:00 PM (5zA/v)

125 I still have my data from Penn State on the behavior of small parasitic wasps toward their caterpillar hosts from 1976.  I spent hours at a time documenting every activity/movement so others could document any behavior mutations created by diesel exhaust (yeah, really!).  We never found any, but my work was meticulous and free of any bias. I had to create my computer analysis on punch cards and everything.  Michael Mann was probably fudging his high school grades at the time!

Posted by: dfbaskwill at November 29, 2009 05:06 PM (ympAm)

126

Should we be pushing for a general requrement that if you want public funding for your research you have to agree to open source research?  Raw data completely public and open source software?

Sure. The IP arguments are pretty weak -- patents also require public disclosure of your technique and design.

Posted by: Rob Crawford at November 29, 2009 05:16 PM (n2wxa)

127 PA: "...resolve to darken the skies with planes full of data collection teams and resolve to get comprehensive raw data analyzed and regenerated within the next 6 months."

Caveat needed: No party that has contributed to or based any research upon NASA/Hansen, the CRU/Jones et al., or IPCC material may participate in this forensic regeneration.

Furthermore, latitude, longitude, altitude, and location history of every data collection device or item must be documented. Any site whose history cannot be readily verified must be excluded from the data pool.

I'm sure there are other insurance caveats to this suggested pursuit, PA. These are just two of the most obvious I could append. Nevertheless, I'm disinclined to believe anything that comes from climate science. These frauds have done great damage to the discipline of science since their exercise clearly wasn't yet was reflexively defined as such. I don't believe there's been a bigger scientific fraud in history. On the upside, I think we've averted a catastrophe... the trillion dollar swindle, economic redistribution, and socially oppressive policy promulgated by crooks.

Jail is too good for these criminals whether we get to the "truth" or not.

Posted by: AnonymousDrivel at November 29, 2009 05:17 PM (5zA/v)

128 SCIENTISTS at the University of East Anglia (UEA) have admitted throwing away much of the raw temperature data on which their predictions of global warming are based.

Was that wrong? Should I not have done that? I tell you, I gotta plead ignorance on this thing, because if anyone had said anything to me at all when I first started here that that sort of thing is frowned upon... you know, cause I've worked in a lot of climate research labs, and I tell you, people do that all the time.

Posted by: Phil "George Costanza" Jones at November 29, 2009 05:29 PM (4iIhs)

129 Just remember, it's not a lie if you believe it.

Posted by: Phil 'George Castanze" Jones at November 29, 2009 05:32 PM (4iIhs)

130 Hi, my name is Phil, I'm soon to be unemployed and I will shortly be living with my parents.

Posted by: Phil 'George Castanza' Jones at November 29, 2009 05:40 PM (4iIhs)

131 Hey! Has anyone seen my keys? I can find them. The key chain has a picture of Al Gore. Let me know if you find them.

thxkbai

Posted by: CRU at November 29, 2009 05:45 PM (4iIhs)

132

Been lurking over at the climateprogress.org site (known Soros front) and reading the postings over there from the pseudo-scientists who are all chanting "Science is settled! Science is settled!" and slamming anyone who posts to the contrary as ''deniers", "contrarians", "disinformers" and of course "skeptics". One of the more appalling posts:

"The fact is that the peer-reviewed scientific literature is self-correcting. So yes, disinformers occasionally get their nonsense through the review -- and real climate scientists sometimes make small mistakes[!] that are largely tangential to their conclusions, but that disinfomers pounce on as proof the whole theory is flawed." - edits mine.

Their disingenuousness: "For the record (re: #224), both McIntyre and Watts are associated with the Heartland Institute, an advocacy group. One wonders where the genuine scientific skeptics are." ?? This from a site with an easily discernible Soros taint. Like they have no point of advocacy...

And then of course the various attacks by the moderator and his buddies:

"Those who repeat falsehoods that have been long-debunked in the scientific literature are the anti-scientific disinformers." - [JR aka Joe Romm]

"I'm skeptical you've read the extensive debunkings of the crap pushed out by the disinformers." - [JT aka Joe Romm]

"Please, your lack of knowledge isn’t useful." - [dhogaza]

"Most AGW denier scientists are either not very good at real science or they are dishonest." - [Ian Forrester]

"The Earth's warming in recent decades is "unequivocal" -- your "explanation" was laughable. Since you deny that which is "unequivocal," you are a pure disinformer and not welcome here. There are lots of useful things to have a dialogue about, but that ain't one of 'em." - [JR aka Joe Romm]

Posted by: greyseal53 at November 29, 2009 05:45 PM (SAowk)

133 You.. can publish anything.. and never have to worry about anyone figuring out its a steaming pile of shit.

You say.. "Phil.. how can I publish a steaming pile ... without anyone figuring it out?"

First.. publish. Publish any old piece of shit.

Now.. you say, "Steve.. what do I say when they come to my door and say, 'You.. your paper is interesting. Can I see the data & see if I can reproduce the results'?"

Four simple words. Four simple words in the English language: "I deleted lost the data!" My bad. KTHXBAI.

Posted by: Phil 'Steve Martin' Jones at November 29, 2009 05:57 PM (4iIhs)

134 They're calling them 'disinformers?'

Interesting.

From realclimate.org comments:

#15

Global warming deniers and skeptics have gone too far in confusing the public about the climate change. Here is bold proposal for how we can stop them while placing the issue of global warming at the center stage of media attention.

In the United States and other countries, climate change misinformation legislation is clearly necessary to finally put, and keep, the seriousness of global warming at center stage. An ingenious dynamic of this legislation is that it would not even need to pass and be signed into law to have much of its intended effect.

An unapologetically draconian Climate Change Misinformation Act (CCMA) would make it illegal for media corporations and large organizations to deny, or provide a podium for individuals to deny, the reality and seriousness of global warming. The bill would be based on our longstanding precedents prohibiting individuals and corporations from, for example, practicing medicine and law without a license, prohibiting individuals and corporations from making false advertising claims, and protecting the public health, as through the banning of cigarette ads on television.

The Climate Change Misinformation Act would, of course, allow peer-reviewed professional scientific journals to challenge established scientific findings on global warming. It would also allow individuals to deny, and self-publish material denying, global warming. The legislation would, however, prohibit corporations and large organizations from challenging the established scientific consensus on global warming, and require the courts to impose severe financial and other penalties, including the imprisonment of top officers and executives, for transgressions.

A Climate Change Misinformation Act would undoubtedly evoke massive attacks from Conservatives aligned with Big Business and from Liberals wishing to defend free speech rights. However, that is the point and strategy of proposing CCMA. In order to attack the bill, its opponents would need to show that global warming is not happening, that it is not caused by humans, that it does not represent a serious threat to civilization as we know it, and that it does not need to be strongly and quickly addressed. In fact, opponents of CCMA would be powerless to attack the bill without reopening, and keeping open, the public debate over the seriousness of global warming. Once global warming is finally and strongly back in the national spotlight, legions of scientists armed with a mountainous arsenal of overwhelming evidence would have a captive audience eager to hear exactly how perilous a threat we face from climate change.

I can think of no other way to help the global public sufficiently appreciate the magnitude of the threat we and our progeny face than to make illegal corporate and organizational misinformation on climate change. If we opt to refrain from taking this drastic, but absolutely realistic and rational step, the world’s people will quite understandably continue to conclude that the climate crisis is not very serious.

In 1970, the U.S. Congress enacted the Public Health Cigarette Smoking Act banning cigarette ads on TV and radio to protect the pubic health. Neither cigarette manufacturers, nor tobacco growing organizations, nor their agents, were considered proper countervailing authorities to the Surgeon General on the question of cigarettes and the public health.

Indeed, that limitation on the free speech rights of cigarette manufacturers is minor in comparison to limitations on not only free speech rights but various rights of commerce and industry related to agents deemed more harmful to the public health, such as cocaine, LSD, etc. The principle at play regarding the public health risk of both drugs like nicotine and of climate change is the same; there must be a sole and final authority for that decision, and it is the government’s duty to determine who that authority ultimately is. A Climate Change Misinformation Act would establish an organization like the IPCC as the sole and final authority on the public health risks of climate change.

We now have laws that prohibit manufacturers from making false claims about products as trivial as nutritional supplements. Generations to come would never understand or forgive us if we fail to enact laws prohibiting corporations from making false claims about a climate crisis that is endangering civilization, as we know it. They would very rightly view us as completely immoral and cowardly. I hope we will decide to love our children and grandchildren more than we fear the few who, from ignorance, stupidity or immorality, are standing in the way of our safeguarding the welfare of our descendants for generations to come.

Comment by George

Posted by: lauraw at November 29, 2009 06:05 PM (DbybK)

135 London Times??

Posted by: Charlie Gibson at November 29, 2009 06:23 PM (QECjC)

136 Shut up and believe us already!  You climate denier scum!

Posted by: Phil Jones at November 29, 2009 06:24 PM (yjDfo)

137

119 progressoverpeace

I'm thinking about going forward.  I would also like to see that private data, but I wouldn't want to force private companies to release data and software.  However, we can make that a requirement for getting government funding to release the data and source.  Most if not all of the data going into the IPCC reports came from publications which came from research grants that were funded by governments.

Posted by: motionview at November 29, 2009 06:28 PM (is1tF)

138

Reproducible results. That's what makes it science. Not peer review, not grant money, not Ed Begley. Hard to reproduce the results when the data are kept secret has been deliberately thrown away, innit?

Chicagorefugee

Dead on.  Isn't that the Chicago way.

Posted by: motionview at November 29, 2009 06:30 PM (is1tF)

139 @134: Sure that site ain't realclimatechangeNAZIS.borg?

So their easy answer is the repeal of the Bill of Rights? Great.

Posted by: CoolCzech at November 29, 2009 06:31 PM (QECjC)

140 Climate Change Misinformation Act? But of course. What could go wrong?

Posted by: Lawyers and Politicians (BIRM) at November 29, 2009 06:34 PM (5zA/v)

141

Claims that are "unverifiable", such as the claim that God exists, are not science.

Moral of the story:  if you throw away your data, you are no longer making claims that have a scientific basis because they are unverifiable.

It's a case of "the dog at my homework, but I really did it all 100% correctly and you must believe me or I'll get very, very angry with you".

Liars!  It should be called "The East Anglia Socialist Liars Club".

Posted by: Chas at November 29, 2009 06:34 PM (yjDfo)

142

 I hope we will decide to love our children and grandchildren more than we fear the few who, from ignorance, stupidity or immorality, are standing in the way of our safeguarding the welfare of our descendants for generations to come.

Wow, we're racist and now we don't love our children enough!

1. Racist

2. Don't love the kids enough

3. ???

4. Profit!!

Posted by: Mama AJ at November 29, 2009 07:41 PM (Be4xl)

143 In the interests of saving Our Mother Gaia, I say we round up all the carbon-emitters at CRU and turn them into soylent green.

Posted by: ol_dirty_/b/tard at November 29, 2009 08:30 PM (Z0bVg)

144 So their easy answer is the repeal of the Bill of Rights?

SILENCE!  You are not allowed to speak!!

Posted by: ReelKlimatgruppen SS at November 29, 2009 08:34 PM (h8OgN)

145

ClimateGate gets real legs - London Times reports on CRU's thrown away raw data

No they didn't.

Posted by: Charles Johnson at November 29, 2009 08:46 PM (i0WE5)

146 The <a href="'http://www.jordand1.com"">NikeAir jordan shoe'>NikeAir jordan shoe</a>  designed specifically for Penny Hardaway. It features a leather and synthetic combination upper for durability and stability on the court, plus a Phylon? midsole for added air time and a visible heel airbag to rock your ride through the entire game. It also has a non-marking rubber outsole for traction.

Posted by: jordan shoes at November 29, 2009 08:54 PM (m1NP8)

147 The NikeAir jordan shoe designed specifically for Penny Hardaway. It features a leather and synthetic combination upper for durability and stability on the court, plus a Phylon? midsole for added air time and a visible heel airbag to rock your ride through the entire game. It also has a non-marking rubber outsole for traction.

Posted by: jordan shoes at November 29, 2009 08:56 PM (m1NP8)

148

Homework, yea the dog ate my homework.

Any more recipes for cooking the books?

Paperwork? Please call the Rose Law Firm in Arkansas.

Posted by: chicocano at November 29, 2009 09:05 PM (2n5cq)

149 I would but I shredded the number. By accident. And we lost the backup, for 2 years, then it showed up on my desk, somehow.

Posted by: Christopher Taylor at November 29, 2009 09:18 PM (PQY7w)

150 Does the REAL Charles Johnson post here? Noted the post above and it's the headline on his latest denial of the scandal.

Posted by: Andy Pandy at November 29, 2009 09:28 PM (HqGZw)

151

It's very simple really. If the data proves your hypothesis, you keep it. You send copies of it to everyone, including the NYT. You shout "BooYa!" to all your detractors.

However, if the data disproves your hypothesis, your computer is suddenly out of storage space because you must employ a gargantuan program that  massages, coerces, distorts, convolutes, and catalytically morphs it into something that does support your hypothesis, so you have to dump the raw data to make space to run your data manipulation program.  Perfectly understandable.... if you are a liar.

Anyone defending this either has an alternative agenda or is an idiot. Unfortunately, those are not parallel lines...

 

Posted by: Carmelita at November 29, 2009 09:58 PM (gq1Fx)

152

Age of Conan CD Key
Aion Online CD key
Champions Online CD Key
Call of Duty II CD Key
Company of Heroes CD Key
Counter - Strike CD key: http://www.cdkeyexpress.com
Diablo 2 CD Key: http://www.cdkeyexpress.com
Fallout 3 CD Key
Grand Theft Auto IV CD Key
Guild Wars CD Key
Nexon Cash for MapleStory: http://www.cdkeyexpress.com
Red Alert 3 CD Key: http://www.cdkeyexpress.com
StarCraft CD Key: http://www.cdkeyexpress.com
The Godfather II CD Key
The Sim 3 CD Key
Titan Quest CD Key
WarCraft3 CD key: http://www.cdkeyexpress.com
Warhammer Online CD key
World Of Warcraft CD Key
http://www.cdkeyexpress.com

Burberry scarf: http://www.scarves-store.com
silk scarf: http://www.scarves-store.com

Posted by: jason at November 30, 2009 01:10 AM (CXrQF)

153

Welcome to buy Mbt shoes,Mbt Sport and Mbt walking shoes all enjoy top quality and free shipping.

Posted by: mbt at November 30, 2009 02:57 AM (s2zMt)

Posted by: weight loss tips at November 30, 2009 03:25 AM (nqrE2)

155 the "Thrown Away Data" whas not dumped to hide anything.
The reson the data was dumped was due to the fact that it was "Redundant" they had cross checked the data they colelcted with other sources, as well as cross checking the results they got with other Independent groups and found the data to be the same as the other data. So they din not need to keep it since all the SAME data was avalible elsewhere.

You want DATA?
I got DATA!

If you like you can do your own calculations on climate change:

http://www.realclimate.org/index.php/data-sources/

Posted by: Solitaire at November 30, 2009 08:45 AM (7byJL)

156 Read the emails, Solitaire. read them before you post again or read a single line at RealClimate.org.

For your own sake, read them. Because obviously you have not.

Posted by: Christopher Taylor at November 30, 2009 02:51 PM (PQY7w)

157 hot news for brand shoes online store ,do you want to win more discount ?and popular for younger,and nike air maxwith top quality A ,come on all air max shoes with lowest price for highest quality !

Posted by: nike air max at December 01, 2009 10:02 PM (OKj2x)

Posted by: reviewups at December 02, 2009 02:35 AM (fZN4w)

159

  Everything dynamic and very positively!ugg classic cardy discount, free shipping!

Posted by: ugg classic cardy at December 03, 2009 05:58 AM (ftu8y)

160 The cheap ugg boots sale for women are stylish, they are comfortable and what¡¯s more, they keep your feet. theres a pair of fellow sufferers,ugg australia uk to complement your personal preferences, why do we not take the traditional high discount ugg boots on salefor cold winter?
As a matter of fact, with the passing time, the love for ugg usa is increasing among girls in this modern world. The growing demand for these womens ugg made the manufacturers UGG Boots Sale to revamp the looks of these boots with different hues.come our website and buy a pair of ugg uk.UGG Classic Cardy are popular as shoes for cowboys. The SHOES close the whole parts of the foot. The ugg cardy are important to protect your feet from any dangerous things during your walking activities. There are many oatmeal ugg available in the Market and if you are interested to get one you can directly go to the store that sells it.

Posted by: reviewups at December 03, 2009 10:12 AM (OKj2x)

161 tiffanys earrings are well known for their highest quality and characteristic designs. tiffany Bracelets,Tiffany Earrings,Tiffany Rings,and much more!Buy tiffany Jewelry today for a gift, for a friend, or for yourself. Nearly every graceful lady or trendy girl has at least ever dreamed of buying antique tiffany jewelry as a gift for herself, intimate friends or her beloved.

Posted by: good8785 at December 03, 2009 11:06 PM (38UOe)

162 MoreTiffany is a famous tiffany jewelry Shop which sell directly Tiffany Rings, Earrings, Necklaces, Pendants, Bracelets, Bangles, Accessories. Tiffanyline is a discount tiffany jewellery online store, everybody can afford tiffany jewellery as a memorable jewelry gift. Save up to 60% on affordable cheap tiffany jewelry, beautiful discount tiffany rings, tiffany necklaces,tiffany Pendants, tiffany earrings and tiffany Bracelets. Discounted tiffany Sale Outlet provides hundreds of designer Tiffany Ring, necklaces and other jewelry in wholesale price. Tiffany specializes in.

Posted by: gfrbfthh at December 04, 2009 02:45 AM (38UOe)

163

ÊæÈíßÇÊ ÇÛäíÉ ÇáÈíÊ ãÇíÓæì ÈÏæäß ÓÚÏ ÇáÝåÏ 2010 ¡ ÊæÈíßÇÊ ÇáÈíÊ ãÇíÓæì ÍíÇÊí ÈÏæäß 2010 ¡ ÊæÈíßÇÊ ÇÛÇäí ÓÚÏ ÇáÝåÏ 2010 ¡ ¡ÊæÈíßÇÊ ßáãÇÊ ÇÛäíÉ ÇáÈíÊ ãÇíÓæì ÍíÇÊí ÈÏæäß ááÝäÇä ÓÚÏ ÇáÝåÏ 2010 .

..
ÊæÈíßÇÊ Ôáæäß ÍÈíÈí ¡ ÊÍãíá ÊæÈíßÇÊ Ôáæäß ÍÈíÈí ¡ ÊæÈíßÇÊ ÇÛÇäí ãÇÌÏ ãåäÏÓ 2009 ¡ ÊæÈíßÇÊ ÇáÈæã ãÇÌÏ ãåäÏÓ Ôáæäß ÍÈíÈí

..
ÊæÈíßÇÊ ÇÛäíÉ ÇäÇ ãä ÍÞí ÇÛíÑ ááÝäÇä ÑÇÔÏ ÇáãÇÌÏ 2010 ÊæÈíßÇÊ ÇÛäíÉ ÇäÇ ãä ÍÞí ÇÛíÑ 2010 ÊæÈíßÇÊ ÇáÈæã ÑÇÔÏ ÇáãÇÌÏ 2010

.
ÊæÈíßÇÊ ÇÛäíÉ ÑÇÔÏ ÇáÝÇÑÓ Ôí ËÇäí ¡ ÊæÈíßÇÊ ÇáÈæã ÑÇÔÏ ÇáÝÇÑÓ Ôí ËÇäí ¡ ÊæÈíßÇÊ ÇÛäíÉ

.
ÊæÈíßÇÊ ááãÓä ÊæÈíßÇÊ ÎáíÌíå ÊæÈíßÇÊ ÔÚÑíå ÊæÈíßÇÊ ááãÈÏÚ ãÍãÏ Èä ÝØíÓ ÊæÈíßÇÊ ÇáÔÇÚÑ ÇáÞØÑ ãÍãÏ ÊæÈíßÇÊ ãäæÚå ÊæÈíßÇÊ Íáæå ÊæÈíßÇÊ ááãÇÓäÌÑ

.
ÊæÈíßÇÊ ááãÇÓäÌÑ , ÊæÈíßÇÊ ãÇÓäÌÑ ãáæäå , ÊæÈíßÇÊ ÑæãÇäÓíå ’ ÊæÈíßÇÊ ÍÒíäå , ÊæÈíßÇÊ ÍÈ , ÊæÈíßÇÊ ÝÑÇÞ , ÊæÈíßÇÊ ãäæÚå ááãÓä , ÊæÈíßÇÊ ÌÏíÏå ááãÓä .

.
ÊæÈíßÇÊ ááãÓä ÊæÈíßÇÊ ÏáÚ ÊæÈíßÇÊ ÝÑÍ ÊæÈíßÇÊ Íáæå ÊæÈíßÇÊ ãäæÚå

.
ÊæÈíßÇÊ ÇáÈæã ÚÈÏÇááå ÇáÑæíÔÏ 2009 ÊæÈíßÇÊ ÃÛÇäí ÇáÝäÇäå ÚÈÏÇááå ÇáÑæíÔÏ ÊæÈíßÇÊ ãÇÓäÌÑ

.
ÊæÈíßÇÊ ãäæÚå ÊæÈíßÇÊ ÚÊÇÈ ÊæÈíßÇÊ ÍÈ ÊæÈíßÇÊ ÑãäÓíå ãÚ ÕæÑ ÑãÒíå ÊæÈíßÇÊ ááãÇÓäÌÑ ÊæÈíßÇÊ 2009 ÊæÈíßÇÊ Íáæå

.
ÊæÈíßÇÊ ãÇÓäÌÑ ÕæÑ ãÇÓäÌÑ åáÇáíå ÊæÈíßÇÊ äÇÏí ÇáåáÇá ÊæÈíßÇÊ åáÇáíå ÕæÑ ãÇÓäÌÑ ááåáÇá

.
ÊæÈíßÇÊ ÌÑæÍ ÊæÈíßÇÊ ÝÑÇÞ ÊæÈíßÇÊ ÛÏÑ ÊæÈíßÇÊ Íáæå ÊæÈíßÇÊ ááãÓä ÊæÈíßÇÊ Þæíå ÊæÈíßÇÊ ÑæÚå ÊæÈíßÇÊ ãÇÓäÌÑ ÊæÈíßÇÊ ÌÏíÏåþ

.
ÊæÈíßÇÊ ááãÓä ÊæÈíßÇÊ ÍÒä ÊæÈíßÇÊ ÏãæÚ ÊæÈíßÇÊ ÇáãÍÈíä ÊæÈíßÇÊ ÝÑÇÞ

.
ÊæÈíßÇÊ ááãÓä ÊæÈíßÇÊ Þæíå ÊæÈíßÇÊ ÚÒÉ äÝÓ ÊæÈíßÇÊ ÝÑÇÞ ÊæÈíßÇÊ ááÈäÇÊ ÊæÈíßÇÊ ááãÇÓäÌÑ

.
ÊæÈíßÇÊ ÇáÇÓÑÇÑ, ÝåÏ ÇáãÓÇÚÏ, 2009

.
ÊæÈíßÇÊ ãÇÓäÌÑ ÊæÈíßÇÊ ßÑÊæäíå ÊæÈíßÇÊ ßÑÊæä ÕæÑ ãÇÓäÌÑ ßÑÊæäíå ÊæÈíßÇÊ æÕæÑ ÑÓæã ãÊÍÑßå

.
ÊæÈíßÇÊ ãÇÓäÌÑ ÊæÈíßÇÊ ÃÛÇäí ãÍãÏ ÚÈÏå ÊæÈíßÇÊ ÃÛÇäí ÃÈæ äæÑå ÊæÈíßÇÊ ÇáÈæã ãÍãÏ ÚÈÏå

.
ÊæÈíßÇÊ ãÇÌÏ ÇáãåäÏÓ ÊæÈíßÇÊ æáíÏ ÇáÚÇØÝå ÊæÈíßÇÊ ÚÑÇÞíå ÊæÈíßÇÊ ÇáÝäÇä ãÇÌÏ ÇáãåäÏÓ ÊæÈíßÇÊ ãÓä

.
äßÇÊ áÔåÑ ÑãÖÇä ¡ äßÇÊ ÑãÖÇäíå ¡ ÊæÈíßÇÊ ÑãÖÇäíå ¡ ÊæÈíß ÔåÑ ÑãÖÇä ¡ äíß äíã ÑãÖÇäí

.
ÊæÈíßÇÊ ÔæÞ ÊæÈíßÇÊ æáå ÊæÈíßÇÊ ÑãÇäÓíå ÊæÈíßÇÊ ÇÔæÇÞ ÇæÈíßÇÊ ÑæÚå ÊæÈíßÇÊ ÍÈ ÊæÈíßÇÊ ááãÇÓäÌÑ ÊæÈíßÇÊ Íáæå

.
ÊæÈíßÇÊ ÚÊÇÈ ÊæÈíßÇÊ ãÇÓäÌÑ ÊæÈíßÇÊ ÍÒä ÊæÈíßÇÊ Çáã ÊæÈíßÇÊ ÞåÑ

.
ÊæÈíßÇÊ ÇáÈæã ÊÑßí ÊæÈíßÇÊ ÃÛÇäí ÊÑßí 2009 ÊæÈíßÇÊ ÃÛÇäí

.
äßÇÊ ááãÓä ÊæÈíßÇÊ ãäæÚå ÊæÈíßÇÊ ááÚØáå ÊæÈíßÇÊ Íáæå ááÇíÌÇÒå äßÇÊ áØáÇÈ äßÇÊ ÑæÚå ÊæÈíßÇÊ ááãÇÓäÌÑ äßÇÊ ÌÏíÏå äßÇÊ ØáÇÈþ

.
ÊæÈíßÇÊ ÊÎÑÌ æ äÌÇÍ ÊæÈß ÊÎÑÌ æäÌÇÍ ÊæÈßÇÊ ÊÎÑÌ æäÌÇÍ ÌÏíÏÉ ÊæÈíßÇÊ Úä ÇáäÌÇÍ æ ÇáÊÎÑÌ ãáæäå æ Íáæå ÈÇáÕæÑ æ ãÚ ÇáÕæÑ ááãÇÓäÌÑ æ ááãÓä ÊæÈíßÇÊ ÈãäÇÓÈÉ ÇáäÌÇÍ æ ÇáÊÎÑÌ

.
ÊæÈíßÇÊ ÝäíÉ ÊæÈíßÇÊ ÍÈ ÊæÈíßÇÊ ÌÑÍ ÊæÈíßÇÊ ãÑÚÈÉ ÊæÈíßÇÊ ÊÑÝíåíÉ

.
ÊæÈíßÇÊ ááãÓä ÊæÈíßÇÊ Úä ÇáÇÎÊÈÇÑÇÊ ÕæÑ ááÇÎÊÈÇÑÇÊ ÊæÈíßÇÊ ÌÏíÏå ÊæÈíßÇÊ Íáæå

.
ÊæÈíßÇÊ ÃÛÇäí ÇáæÓãí ÊæÈíßÇÊ ÇáÈæã ÇáæÓãí - ÊÖÍß æÇäÇ áÌáß ÇãæÊ

.
ÊæÈíßÇÊ ááãÓä ÊæÈíßÇÊ ÎíÇäå ÊæÈíßÇÊ Þæíå ÊæÈíßÇÊ ÍÈ ÊæÈíßÇÊ ÝÑÇÞ

.
ÊæÈíßÇÊ ÃÔÚÇÑ ÓÚÏ ÚáæÔ ÊæÈíßÇÊ ÇáÔÇÚÑ ÓÚÏ ÚáæÔ ÊæÈíßÇÊ ÃÔÚÇÑ 2009

.
ÊæÈíßÇÊ ááãÓä ÊæÈíßÇÊ ÇáÒãä ÇáÌãíá ÊæÈíßÇÊ ÞÏíãå ÊæÈíßÇÊ Çã ßáËæã

.
ÊæÈíßÇÊ ÇáÈæã ÚÈÇÓ ÇÈÑÇåíã 2009 ÊæÈíßÇÊ ÇÛÇäí ÚÈÇÓ ÇÈÑÇåíã 2009 ÊæÈíßÇÊ ãÓä ÇÛÇäí ÚÈÇÓ ÇÈÑÇåíã ÊæÈíßÇÊ 2009 áÇÛÇäí ÚÈÇÓ ÇÈÑÇåíã

.
ÊæÈíßÇÊ ÑÇÔÏ ÇáãÇÌÏ ÊæÈíßÇÊ ÇÛÇäí ÑÇÔÏ ÇáãÇÌÏ ÊæÈíßÇÊ ÇáÈæã ÑÇÔÏ ÇáãÇÌÏ ÊæÈíßÇÊ ÇÛäíÉ ßËÑ ÇáÓäíä ÊæÈíßÇÊ ÇáÈæã ÑÇÔÏ ÇáãÇÌÏ 2009þ

.
ÊæÈíßÇÊ ÓÊ ÇáÍÈÇíÈ ÊæÈíßÇÊ ááÃã ÊæÈíßÇÊ ÑæÚå ÊæÈíßÇÊ ááãÇÓäÌÑ ÊæÈíßÇÊ Íáæå

ãÓÌÇÊ ãäæÚÉ ãÓÌÇÊ æÓÇÆØ ãÊÚÏÏÉãÓÌÇÊ mms ãÓÌÇÊ ÎáíÌíå ãÓÌÇÊ ÌÏíÏå
ãÓÌÇÊ ÍÈ ãÓÌÇÊ ÇÔÊíÇÞ ãÓÌÇÊ æÓÇÆØ ãÊÚÏÏåÜmms ãÓÌÇÊ ÔæÞ ãÓÌÇÊ ÑæÚå
ãÓÌÇÊ ÝåÏ ÇáãÓÇÚÏ ãÓÌÇÊ ÇáÔÇÚÑ ÝåÏ ÇáãÓÇÚÏ ãÓÌÇÊ ÓÚæÏíå ãÓÌÇÊ Íáæåþ
ãÓÌÇÊ ÇáÈæã ÑÇÔÏ ÇáãÇÌÏ ãÓÌÇÊ æÓÇÆØ ãÊÚÏÏå ãÓÌÇÊ ÇáÓäÏÈÇÏ ãÓÌÇÊ 2009
ãÓÌÇÊ æÓÇÆØ ãÓÌÇÊ ÑæÚå ãÓÌÇÊ ÌæÇá ãÓÌÇÊ ÝÑÇÞ ãÓÌÇÊ Çáã ãÓÌÇÊ ÍÒíäå ãÓÌÇÊ Þæíå ãÓÌÇÊ ÌÏíÏå ãÓÌÇÊ ÝÑÇÞ
ãÓÌÇÊ ÇáÔÇÚÑ ÇáÞØÑí ÇÈä ÝØíÓ ãÓÌÇÊ ÇÈä ÝØíÓ ãÓÌÇÊ ÎáíÌíå ãÓÌÇÊ ÑæÚå
ãÓÌÇÊ ÍÒä ãÓÌÇÊ ÝÑÇÞ ãÓÌÇÊ ÈäÇÊ ãÓÌÇÊ Íáæå ãÓÌÇÊ ãäæÚå ãÓÌÇÊ 2009
mms ÑæãÇäÓíå æÍÈ ÑÓÇÆá æÓÇÆØ ÍÒíäå
ãÓÌÇÊ æ ÑÓÇÆá ÍÈ ÑæãÇäÓíÉ 2009 - ÑÓÇíá ÇáÍÈ ááÌæÇá ÑæãäÓíå
æÓÇÆØ ÃäÇÔíÏ æÓÇÆØ ÌæÇá ÕæÊíå æÓÇÆØ ÃäÇÔíÏ ÝíÏíæ
ãÓÌÇÊ æÓÇÆØ ÝíÏíæ ãÓÌÇÊ ÍÈ ãÓÌÇÊ ÍÒä ãÓÌÇÊ ÑæÚå
ÑÓÇÆá ÚÊÇÈ ÑÓÇÆá ÍÈ ÑÓÇÆá ÑÓÇÆá ãäæÚå ÑÓÇÆá ÌÏíÏå ÑÓÇÆá ÛÑÇã ÑÓÇÆá ÑæÚå
ÕæÑ æÓÇÆØ ãÓÌÇÊ Øæíáå ãÓÌÇÊ mms ãÓÌÇÊ ÍÈ ãÓÌÇÊ ÚÊÇÈ
ãÓÌÇÊ ÛÑÇã ãÓÌÇÊ ÍÈ ãÓÌÇÊ æÓÇÆØ ãÊÚÏÏå ãÓÌÇÊ ÝÑÇÞ ãÓÌÇÊ ãäæÚå ãÓÌÇÊ Íáæå
ãÓÌÇÊ æÓÇÆØ ÃÛÇäí ÇÍáÇã 2009 ÑÓÇÆá æÓÇÆØ ÇáÈæã ÇÍáÇã åÐÇ ÇäÇ 2009
ÕæÑ æÓÂÆØ ÑæÚå,æÓÂÆØ ÔæÞ,æÓÂÆØ ãäæÚå,æÓÂÆØ ÛíÇÈ,ÕæÑ æÓÂÆØ ÍÒä
ãÓÌÇÊ ÍÈ ãÓÌÇÊ ÍÈ æÛÑÇã ãÓÌÇÊ ÍÈ 2009 ãÓÌÇÊ ÍÈ Þæíå ãÓÌÇÊ ÍÈ æÛÒá
æÓÇÆØ ÇáÈæã ÇáæÓãí 2009 æÓÇÆØ ÃÛÇäí ÇáÈæã ÇáæÓãí 2009 æÓÇÆØ ÇáÈæã ãÇáß Íá
ãÓÌÇÊ ÍÒíäå ãÓÌÇÊ ãÈßíå ãÓÌÇÊ æÓÇÆØ ãÓÌÇÊ ÝÑÇÞ ãÓÌÇÊ ÍÓÑå æÇáã ÕæÑ ãÈßíå ãÓÌÇÊ mms
æÓÇÆØ ááÔÇÚÑ ÇáãÈÏÚ ÝåÏ ÇáãÓÇÚÏþ(
ÑÓÇÆá ÚíÏ ÇáãíáÇÏ ÚÈÇÑÇÊ ÚíÏ ãíáÇÏ ÑÓÇÆá ÊåäÆÉ ÚíÏ ÇáãíáÇÏ ãÓÌÇÊ ÑÓÇÆá ÚíÏ ÇáãíáÇÏ
ãÓÌÇÊ ÓÝÑ ÑÓÇÆá ááãÓÇÝÑ ãÓÌÇÊ ÑÓÇÆá ááÓÝÑ ãÓÌÇÊ 2009 ááãÓÇÝÑ ãÓÌÇÊ 2010
ÑÓÇÆá ÝÑäÓíå ãÓÌÇÊ ÝÑäÓíå ÑÓÇÆá ÈÇááÛÉ ÇáÝÑäÓíå ãÓÌÇÊ ÈÇááÛå ÇáÝÑäÓíå
ãÓÌÇÊ ÛÑÇãíå ÑÓÇÆá ÛÑÇãíå æÓÇÆØ ÛÑÇãíå ãÓÌÇÊ ÛÑÇã ÑÓÇÆá ÛÑÇã æÓÇÆØ ÛÑÇã
ÑÓÇÆá ÕÈÇÍíå ãÓÌÇÊ ÕÈÍ ÑæãÇäÓíå ÑÓÇÆá ÕÈÇÍ ãÓÌÇÊ ÕÈÇÍíå ãÓÌÇÊ ÕÈÇÍ
ÑÓÇÆá ááÊÎÑÌ ãÓÌÇÊ ááÊÎÑÌ ÑÓÇÆá ÊåäÆÉ ÈÇáÊÎÑÌ ãÓÌÇÊ ÊÎÑÌ
ãÓÌÇÊ æÓÇÆØ ãÓÌÇÊ ÍÈ ãÓÌÇÊ ÝÑÇÞ ãÓÌÇÊ Þæíå ãÓÌÇÊ åÌÑ ãÓÌÇÊ ãäæÚå ãÓÌÇÊ Íáæå
ÕæÑ æÓÇÆØ ááäÌÇÍ ÕæÑ æÓÇÆØ ááÊÎÑÌ ÑÓÇÆá æÓÇÆØ ááäÌÇÍ ÑÓÇÆá ááÊÎÑÌ
ÑÓÇÆá ÍÈ ÑÓÇÆá ÍÈ Íáæå ÑÓÇÆá ÌÏíÏå ÍÈ ÑÓÇÆá ÍÈ 2010 ãÓÌÇÊ ÍÈ ãÓÌÇÊ ÌÏíÏå ÍÈ
ÑÓÇÆá ÔÚÑíå ÑÓÇÆá ÞÕÇÆÏ ÔÚÑíå ãÓÌÇÊ ÔÚÑíå ÑÓÇÆá ãÓÌÇÊ ÔÚÑ
ãÓÌÇÊ æÏÇÚ ÑÓÇÆá æÏÇÚ æÓÇÆØ æÏÇÚ ãÓÌÇÊ æÏÇÚíå ÑÓÇÆá æÏÇÚíå æÓÇÆØ æÏÇÚíå
æÓÇÆØ ÑæãÇäÓíå mms ÍÈ æÚÔÞ æÓÇÆØ ÔæÞ ~ ãÔÊÇÞ áß íÇÑæÍí æíäß ¿þ
ãÓÌÇÊ mms ãÓÌÇÊ ÍÈ ãÓÌÇÊ ÛÑÇã ãÓÌÇÊ ÑãÇäÓíå ãÓÌÇÊ æÓÇÆØ ãÊÚÏÏå ãÓÌÇÊ ÌÏíÏå
æÓÇÆØ ÃÛÇäí ÚÈÏÇááå ÇáÑæíÔÏ 2009 æÓÇÆØ ÇáÈæã ÇáÝäÇä ÚÈÏÇááå ÇáÑæíÔÏ 2009
ÕæÑ æÓÂÆØ ÑæÚå,æÓÂÆØ ÍÒä ,æÓÂÆØ äÕÍ ,æÓÂÆØ ááÌæÇámms
ãÓÌÇÊ äÕíå ãÓÌÇÊ ÞÕíÑå áÑãÖÇä ãÓÌÇÊ ÑæÚå áÑãÖÇä ,ãÓÌÇÊ 2009 ãÓÌÇÊ Íáæå áÑãÖÇä ãÓÌÇÊ ãäæÚå áÑãÖÇä ãÓÌÇÊ ÊåäÆå áÑãÖÇä ãÓÌÇÊ ÌÏíÏå
ãÓÌÇÊ ÞÕíÑå ãÓÌÇÊ ááÌæÇá ãÓÌÇÊ ÌÏíÏå ãÓÌÇÊ áÔåÑ ÑãÖÇä ÇáãÈÇÑß ãÓÌÇÊ 2009 ãÓÌÇÊ ÑãÖÇä 1430 ãÓÌÇÊ ÌÏíÏå ãÓÌÇÊ Íáæå
ãÓÌÇÊ Íáæå
ãÓÌÇÊ ÔæÞ
ãÓÌÇÊ ááÒæÇÌ ¡ ÑÓÇÆá ááÒæÇÌ ¡ ãÓÌÇÊ ÊåäÆå ÈÇáÒæÇÌ ¡ ÑÓÇÆá ÊåäÆå ÈÇáÒæÇÌ ¡ æÓÇÆØ ÊåäÆÉ ÈÇáÒæÇÌ
ãÓÌÇÊ ÇÚÊÐÇÑ , ãÓÌÇÊ ÇÚÊÐÇÑ ÌÏíÏÉ , ãÓÌÇÊ ÇÚÊÐÇÑ ÞæíÉ 2009 ãÓÌ ÇÚÊÐÇÑ, ÑÓÇÆá ÇÚÊÐÇÑ, ÑÓÇíá ÇÚÊÐÇÑ, sms ÇÚÊÐÇÑ
ãÓÌÇÊ ÃÔÚÇÑ ÍÇãÏ ÒíÏ ¡ ÑÓÇÆá ÞÕÇÆÏ ÍÇãÏ ÒíÏ ¡ æÓÇÆØ ÃÔÚÇÑ ÍÇãÏ ÒíÏ ¡ æÓÇÆØ ÞÕÇÆÏ ÍÇãÏ ÒíÏ ¡ ÃÔÚÇÑ ÍÇãÏ ÒíÏ mms
ãÓÌÇÊ æÓÇÆØ ãÓÌÇÊ ÔæÞ ãÓÌÇÊ Íäíä ãÓÌÇÊ ãäæÚå áÔæÞ ÕæÑ ãÚÈÑå ãÓÌÇÊmms ãÓÌÇÊ Íáæåþ
æÓÇÆØ ÍÈ mms ÑæãÇäÓíå ãÓÌÇÊ ÚÔÞ æÓÇÆØ ÛÑÇã ~ ÃÍÈß íÇÈÚÏ ÚãÑí æÚíäíþ
æÓÇÆØ ÃÓÇãí ÈäÇÊ
ÑÓÇÆá ÑæãäÓíÉ ãÓÌÇÊ ÑæãäÓíÉ æÓÇÆØ ÑæãäÓíÉ ÑÓÇÆá ÑæãÇäíÓÉ ãÓÌÇÊ ÑæãÇäíÓÉ æÓÇÆØ ÑæãÇäíÓÉ
æÓÇÆØ 2009 ¡ æÓÇÆØ mms ¡ æÓÇÆØ ÑæãäÓíå ¡ ÑÓÇíá æÓÇÆØ ¡ æÓÇÆØ Çã Çã ÇÓ ¡ æÓÇÆØ ÍÈ ¡ æÓÇÆØ ÚÊÇÈ ¡ æÓÇÆØ ÔæÞ
ãÓÌÇÊ ááÚíÏ 2010 ¡ ãÓÌÇÊ ÇáÚíÏ 2010 ¡ ãÓÌÇÊ ááÇÚíÇÏ 2010þ
ÑÓÇÆá æÓÇÆØ ááÚíÏ Mms ¡ ÕæÑ æÓÇÆØ ÇáÚíÏ ¡ æÓÇÆØ ááÚíÏ 2009
ÑÓÇÆá sms ÑÓÇÆá äÕíå ÑÓÇÆá ÌÏíÏå ÑÓÇÆá ÐæÞ ,ÑÓÇÆá ÊåäÆå ÈÚíÏ ÇáÝØÑ ,ÑÓÇÆá ãäæÚå áÚíÏ ÇáÝØÑ ÑÓÇÆá 2009ÑÓÇÆá Íáæå áÚíÏ ÇáÝØÑ
ãÓÌÇÊ äÕíå ãÓÌÇÊ sms ãÓÌÇÊ ÞÕíÑå áÚíÏ ÇáÝØÑ ãÓÌÇÊ ÊåäÆå ááÇÚíÇÏ ãÓÌÇÊ ÞÕíÑå áÚíÏ ÇáÝØÑ ãÓÌÇÊ ÌÏíÏå ãÓÌÇÊ 1430 ãÓÌÇÊ Íáæå ááÚíÏþ
ÚÈÏå 2009 ãÍãÏ ÚÈÏå æÇÍÔäí ÒãÇäß ÔÑíØ ãÍãÏ ÚÈÏå 2009
ãÓÌÇÊ æÓÇÆØ ãÓÌÇÊ ÑæÚå ãÓÌÇÊ ááÇãÊÍÇäÇÊ ÇßÈÑ ãßÊÈå áæÓÇÆØ ÇáÇãÊÍÇäÇÊ ãÓÌÇÊ æÓÇÆØ ÑæÚå ãÓÌÇÊ ááÈäÇÊ ãÓÌÇÊ áÔÈÇÈ
æÓÇÆØ ááÚíÏ ¡ æÓÇÆØ ÚíÏ ÇáÝØÑ ¡ æÓÇÆØ ÚíÏ ÇáÇÖÍì ¡ æÓÇÆØ ÊåäÆå ÈÇáÚíÏ ¡ ÑÓÇíá æÓÇÆØ ááÚíÏ ¡ æÓÇÆØ mms ááÚíÏ
æÓÇÆØ ÌæÇá ááÚíÏ 2009 ¡ ÑÓÇÆá ÌæÇá ááÚíÏ ãÕæÑå 2009 ¡ ÕæÑ æÓÇÆØ ááÚí009 ¡ æÓÇÆØ ÇáÚíÏ ÌÏíÏå
ÑÓÇÆá mms ÑÓÇÆá ÇÓãÇÁ æÓÇÆØ ÈÃÓãÇÁ
ãÓÌÇÊ ááÚíÏ ãÕÑíå ãÓÌÇÊ ãÕÑíå ãÓÌÇÊ ÚíÏ ãÕÑíå ÑÓÇÆá ãÕÑíå ááÚíÏ ÑÓÇÆá ááÚíÏ ãÕÑíå
ãÓÌÇÊ ááÚíÏ ãÓÌÇÊ æÓÇÆØ ãÓÌÇÊ æÓÇÆØ ááÚíÏ ãÓÌÇÊ ÊåäÆå ááÚíÏ ãÓÌÇÊ Íáæå ááÚíÏ ãÓÌÇÊ æÓÇÆØ áÚíÏ ÇáÝØÑþ
æÓÇÆØ ÚíÏ ÇáÝØÑ 2009 ¡ æÓÇÆØ ÊåäÆå ÈÚíÏ ÇáÝØÑ ¡ æÓÇÆØ ÇáÚíÏ ¡ ÑÓÇÆá æÓÇÆØ ÇáÚíÏ ¡ æÓÇÆØ ÚíÏ ÇáÝØÑ
æÓÇÆØ ÕæÊíå ¡ æÓÇÆØ ÕæÊíå ááÚíÏ ¡ æÓÇÆØ ÕæÊíå ÅäÔæÏÉ ÊÞÈá Çááå ¡ æÓÇÆØ ÕæÊíå ÃÞÈá ÇáÚíÏ
ãÓÌÇÊ æÓÇÆØ ãÓÌÇÊ Íáæå ãÓÌÇÊ ÊåäÆå ãÓÌÇÊ ááÚíÏ æÓÇÆØ ÑÓÇÆá ááÚíÏ æÓÇÆØ mms ãÓÌÇÊ ãÓÌÇÊ ÌÏíÏå ãÓÌÇÊ2009 ãÓÌÇÊ ÐæÞ áÚíÏ ÇáÝØÑ
ÑÓÇÆá æÓÇÆØ ááÚíÏ ãÓÌÇÊ ááÚíÏãÓÌÇÊ ÌÏíÏå áÚíÏ ÇáÝØÑ ãÓÌÇÊ 2009 ãÓÌÇÊ ãäæÚå áÚíÏ ÇáÝØÑ ãÓÌÇÊ ÑæÚå ááÚíÏ ãÓÌÇÊ ÊåäÆå ÈÚíÏ ÇáÝØÑ
ãÓÌÇÊ äÕíå ãÓÌÇÊ áÚíÏ ÇáÝØÑ ãÓÌÇÊ ÞÕíÑå ãÓÌÇÊ ÌÏíÏå ãÓÌÇÊ2009 ãÓÌÇÊ áÚíÏ ÇáÝØÑ ãÓÌÇÊ ÊåäÆå ÈÚíÏ ÇáÝØÑ ãÓÌÇÊ Íáæåþ
ãÓÌÇÊ æÓÇÆØ ÑæãäÓíÉ æÓÇÆØ ÍÈ æÓÇÆØ 2009
ãÓÌÇÊ ÍÒä ãÓÌÇÊ ÝÑÇÞ ãÓÌÇÊ Ãáã ãÓÌÇÊ æÓÇÆØ ãÊÚÏÏå ãÓÌÇÊ ÑæÚå ãÓÌÇÊ ÊÈßí
æÓÇÆØ ÕÏÇÞå ¡ æÓÇÆØ ááÇÕÏÞÇÁ ¡ ÑÓÇíá æÓÇÆØ ÕÏÇÞå ¡ ÑÓÇíá æÓÇÆØ ááÇÕÏÞÇÁ ¡ ÑÓÇÆá ÃÕÏÞÇÁþ
ãÓÌÇÊ æÓÇÆØ ãÊÚÏÏå æÓÇÆØ ÇáÝäÇä ãÍãÏ ÚÈÏå æÓÇÆØ æÇÍÔäí ÒãÇäß æÓÇÆØ ÇÈæ äæÑå 2009
æÓÇÆØ ÃäÇÔíÏ ¡ æÓÇÆØ ÇäÇÔíÏ ¡ æÓÇÆØ äÔíÏ ¡ æÓÇÆØ ÃäÇÔíÏ ÅÓáÇãíå ¡ äÛãÇÊ ÃäÇÔíÏ äÛãÇÊ äÔíÏ
æÓÇÆØ ÇáÈæã ãÍãÏ ÚÈÏå 2009 ÑÓÇÆá æÓÇÆØ ÃÛÇäí ãÍãÏ ÚÈÏå æÓÇÆØ ÇáÈæã ãÍãÏ ÚÈÏå æÍÏß
ãÓÌÇÊ æÓÇÆØ ãÊÚÏÏå ãÓÌÇÊ æÓÇÆØ ááÈäÇÊ æÓÇÆØ ÍÒíäå æÓÇÆØ ÝÑÇÞ æÓÇÆØ ÍÒÊ æÓÇÆØ Þæíå æÓÇÆØ ÝÑÇÞ æÓÇÆØ ÌÏíÏå æÓÇÆØ ãäæÚå æÓÇÆØ Íáæå ááÈäÇÊ
ãÓÌÇÊ Úä ÇáÃÈ æÇáÃã ãÓÌÇÊ æÓÇÆØ ãÊÚÏÏÉ mms ãÓÌÇÊ ÈÇáÚÑÈí ãÓÌÇÊ ÈÇáäÌáíÒí ãÓÌÇÊ Íáæå
æÓÇÆØ ÇÛÇäí ¡ æÓÇÆØ ÇÛÇäí ãÇÌÏ ãåäÏÓ ¡ æÓÇÆØ ÇáÈæã ãÇÌÏ ÇáãåäÏÓ ÇÐßÑíäí 2009þ
ÃÛÇäí æÓÇÆØ ÈÏæä ãæÓíÞì ¡ ÃÛÇäí ÈÃÕæÇÊ ÔÈÇÈ ÈÏæä ãæÓíÞì ¡ æíÝÇÊ ÈÃÕæÊ ÔÈÇÈ ÈÏæä ãæÓíÞì
æÓÇÆØ ÕæÊíå ¡ æÓÇÆØ ÕæÊíå ÈÏæä ãæÓíÞì ¡ æÓÇÆØ ÕæÊ ÈÏæä ãæÓíÞì ¡ æÓÇÆØ ÝíÏíæ ¡ ãÞÇØÚ æÓÇÆØ ÕæÊíå
æÓÇÆØ mms + ãÓÌÇÊ sms ÕæÑ æÓÇÆØ ÑæÚå æÓÇÆØ ÎØíÑå æÓÇÆØ ÍÒä ÕæÑ æÓÇÆØ ÝÑÇÞ æÓÇÆØ ãäæÚå
æÓÇÆØ ÕæÊíå æÓÇÆØ ÝíÕá ÇáíÇãí ÊÍãíá æÓÇÆØ ÝíÕá ÇáíÇãí æÓÇÆØ ÇáÔÇÚÑ ÝíÕá ÇáíÇãí æÓÇÆØ ÔÚÑíå æÓÇÆØ ãäæÚå áÝíÕá ÇáíÇãí æÓÇØ ÌÏíÏå æÓÇÆØ ÕæÊíåþ(
æÓÇÆØ áÃÛäíÉ ÈÊãæä æÓÇÆØ ÃÛÇäí ÇáíÓÇ 2009
æÓÇÆØ 2009 æÓÇÆØ ÝíÏíæ ÕæÑ æÓÇÆØ ÝíÏíæ ÇßÈÑ ãÌãæÚÉ æÓÇÆØ ÇßÈÑ ãÌãæÚÉ ÑÓÇÆá
æÓÇÆØ ÃÛÇäí ÈÕæÊ ÈäÇÊ ¡ ÃÛÇäí ÈÕæÊ ÈäÇÊ ÈÏæä ãæÓíÞì ¡ æÓÇÆØ ÇÛÇäí ÈÏæä ãæÓíÞì
æÓÇÆØ ÇÛäíÉ ÇäÇ ãä ÍÞí ÇÛíÑ ¡ æÓÇÆØ ÇäÇ ãä ÍÞí ÇÛíÑ ÑÇÔÏ ÇáãÇÌÏ ¡ æÓÇÆØ ÇÛÇäí ÑÇÔÏ ÇáãÇÌÏ ¡ æÓÇÆØ ÇäÇ ãä ÍÞí ÑÇÔÏ ÇáãÇÌÏ
æÓÇÆØ ÃäÇÔíÏ ÊÍãíá æÓÇÆØ ÃäÇÔíÏ ÝíÏíæ æÓÇÆØ ÃäÇÔíÏ ááÊÍãíá æÓÇÆØ ÝíÏíæ ÃäÇÔíÏþ
ÃÛÇäí æÓÇÆØ ÈÏæä ãæÓíÞì ¡ ÊÍãíá æÓÇÆØ ÇÛÇäí ÈÏæä ãæÓíÞì ¡ æÓÇÆØ æíÝÇÊ ÈÏæä ãæÓíÞì
æÓÇÆØ ÝíÏíæ ÈÏæä ãæÓíÞì æÓÇÆØ ÃÛÇäí ÝíÏíæ ÈÏæä ãæÓíÞì ÃÛÇäí ÝíÏíæ ÈÏæä ãæÓíÞì
æíÝÇÊ ÈÃÕæÇÊ ÈäÇÊ ¡ ÃÛÇäí ÈÃÕæÇÊ ÈäÇÊ ÈÏæä ãæÓíÞì ¡ æÓÇÆØ ÈÃÕæÇÊ ÈäÇÊ ÈÏæä ãæÓíÞì
ÊÍãíá æÓÇÆØ ÕæÊíå ÈÏæä ãæÓíÞì æÓÇÆØ ÃÛÇäí ÈÏæä ãæÓíÞì æÓÇÆØ ÕæÊíå
ÑÓÇÆá ÑÓÇÆá æÓÇÆØ ááÌæÇá ÑÓÇÆá æÓÇÆØ mms ÑÓÇÆá æÓÇÆØ ãÊÍÑßå ÑÓÇÆá æÓÇÆØ ãÊÍÑßå mms 2009þ(
ãÌãæÚÉ æÓÇÆØ ÈÏææä ãæÓíÞì (ÌÏíÏ)þ
ÃÛÇäí æÓÇÆØ ÕæÊíå ¡ ÃÛÇäí æÓÇÆØ ÕæÊíå ÈÏæä ãæÓíÞì ¡ æÓÇÆØ ÕæÊíå ÈÏæä ãæÓíÞì ¡ æíÝÇÊ ÕæÊíå ÈÏæä ãæÓíÞìþ
æÓÇÆØ ÝíÏíæ ÇÛäíÉ ÇÐßÑíäí ¡ æÓÇÆØ ÝíÏíæ ÇÛäíÉ ÇÐßÑíäí 2010 ¡ æÓÇÆØ ÝíÏíæ ÇÛäíÉ ÇáÈæã ÇÐßÑíäí
æÓÇÆØ ÚÔÑ Ðí ÇáÍÌå ¡ æÓÇÆØ íæã ÚÑÝå ¡ ÑÓÇÆá ááÍÌ ¡ ÑÓÇÆá æÓÇÆØ ááÍÌ ¡ æÓÇÆØ ááÍÌ ¡ ÑÓÇÆá íæã ÚÑÝå ¡ ãÓÌÇÊ íæã ÚÑÝå
æÓÇÆØ ÝíÏíæ ÂÎÑ ÝÑÕÉ ãÇÌÏ ÇáãåäÏÓ 2010 ¡ æÓÇÆØ ÝíÏíæ ÂÎÑ ÝÑÕÜÉ 2010 ¡ æÓÇÆØ ÝíÏíæ ãÇÌÏ ÇáãåäÏÓ 2010
æÓÇÆØ ÕæÊíå ÃÔÚÇÑ ÈÏæä ãæÓíÞì ¡ æÓÇÆØ ÝíÏíæ ÈÏæä ãæÓíÞì ¡ æÓÇÆØ ÕæÊíå ÃäÇÔíÏ ÈÏæä ãæÓíÞì
ÕæÑ æÓÇÆØ ãÓáÓá ÚÇÕí ¡ ÕæÑ mms ãÓáÓá ÚÇÕí ¡ ÕæÑ ÑÓÇÆá æÓÇÆØ ãÓáÓá ÚÇÕí

ÊæÈíßÇÊ ¡ ÃäÇÔíÏ ØíæÑ ÇáÌäå ¡ÞÕÇÆÏ ßÊÇÈíå ¡ ÞÕÇÆÏ ãÓãæÚå ¡ ÎæÇØÑ ¡ ÞÕÕ ÑæÇíÇÊ ¡ÃÒíÇÁ ¡ ÝÓÇÊíä  ¡ ãßíÇÌ ¡ ÎáØÇÊ ¡ ÊÓÑíÍÇÊ ¡ Ïíᑥ ¡ ÏíßæÑÇÊ ¡ ÍáæíÇÊ ¡ ãÚÌäÇÊ ¡ äÇÏí ÇáåáÇá ¡ äÇÏí ÇáäÕÑ ¡ äÇÏí ÇáÇÊÍÇÏ ¡ ÓíÇÑÇÊ ¡ ãæÏíáÇÊ ÓíÇÑÇÊ ¡ÃÒíÇÁ ÇÏã ¡ Åäãí ¡ÃÝáÇã Çäãí ¡ ÕæÑ ØÈíÚíå ¡ ÓíäãÇ ¡ ÇÝáÇã ¡ ãÓáÓáÇÊ ÑãÖÇäíå ¡ ÕæÑ ÝäÇäíä ¡ ÕæÑ ããËáíä ¡ ÕæÑ ãØÑÈíä ¡ ãÓáÓá ÚÇÕí ¡ ÒÝÇÊ ¡ ÇÛÇäí ÈÏæä ãæÓíÞì ¡ ßáãÇÊ ÇÛÇäí  ¡ ãÇÓäÌÑ ¡ ÓßÑÈÊÇÊ ¡ ËíãÇÊ ãÇÓäÌÑ ¡ ÈÑÇãÌ ááãÇÓäÌÑ ¡ ÕæÑ ãÇÓäÌÑ ¡ ÕæÑ ÈäÇÊ ááãÇÓäÌÑ ¡ ÕæÑ ÔÈÇÈ ááãÇÓäÌÑ  ¡ ÊæÈíß ¡ äßÇÊ ¡ ÊæÈíßÇÊ ÇÛÇäí ¡ ÊæÈíßÇÊ ßÑÊæäíå ¡ ÊæÈíßÇÊ ãáæäå ¡ ÈÑÇãÌ ÝæÊæÔæÈ ¡ ÎáÝíÇÊ ááÊÕãíã ¡ ÕæÑ ááÊÕãíã ¡ ÎÇãÇÊ ¡ ÝáÇÊÑ ¡ ÇßÔä ¡ÝáÇÊÑ ¡ ÓßÑÇÈÒ ¡ ÎØæØ ¡ ÈÇÊÑä ¡ ÝÑÔ ¡ ÌáÊÑ ¡ ÓæíÊÔ ¡ ÝáÇÔ ¡ ãáÝÇÊ ãÝÊæÍå ¡ ãáÝ ãÝÊæÍ  ¡ ÌæÇá ¡ ÈÑÇãÌ ÌæÇá ¡ ËíãÇÊ ÌæÇá ¡ ÇáÚÇÈ ÌæÇá ¡ ÈáæÊæË ¡ äÛãÇÊ ÌæÇá ¡ íæÊíæÈ ¡ ÑÓÇÆá ¡mms ¡ sms ¡ ãÓÌÇÊ ¡ æÓÇÆØ ÇÛÇäí ¡ ÈÑÇãÌ ßãÈíæÊÑ ¡ ÇáÚÇÈ ßãÈíæÊÑ ¡ ÇáÚÇÈ ÈäÇÊ ¡ ãäÊÏì ¡ ãäÊÏíÇÊ ¡ æÊáæãäí Ýíß ¡ ÔÈßÉ æÊáæãäí Ýíß

Posted by: aseel at December 06, 2009 12:29 PM (Aolv2)

164 discount YSL Platform Pumps&Slingbacks

Posted by: discount YSL Platform Pumps&Slingbacks at December 07, 2009 12:32 AM (QN9Ge)

Posted by: uggboots at December 07, 2009 11:18 AM (Cooh2)

166 Today ugg boots online have become a phenomenon.Every winter,the ugg classic crochet are one of the hottest goods in the market all over the world.So now don't be hesitation,own a pair of ugg usa immediately.

Posted by: ugg boots sale at December 10, 2009 05:05 PM (I3/dZ)

Posted by: Lacoste shoes at December 13, 2009 12:57 AM (/3s/N)

Posted by: wholesale jewelry at December 17, 2009 06:11 AM (1dySH)

Posted by: wholesale jewelry at December 21, 2009 08:57 AM (1dySH)

Posted by: Christian Louboutin Boot at December 21, 2009 11:14 AM (QN9Ge)

171 Life lies in sports.The Air max wants to offer you great comfort while you doing sports.Cheap nike air max shoes is on sale now.The Air max 90 and Nike air max 95 is a good nike shoes for you.You can Buy nike max here,Discount air maxs and Cheap nike air max 2009 waiting for you.

Posted by: Air max at December 22, 2009 03:27 AM (4IbkR)

Posted by: htrhvbn at December 27, 2009 04:44 AM (sFIS+)

Posted by: wholesale jewelry at December 28, 2009 02:27 AM (1dySH)

174 Cheap replica rolex and tag heuer watches,replica watches of rolex rolex watches replica,buy patek philippe Buy replica watches,fake watches and tag heuer watches.

Posted by: tag heuer at January 01, 2010 08:43 AM (nUnK8)

175 replica rolex rolex and tag heuer watches,replica watches of rolex rolex watches replica,buy patek philippe Buy replica watches,fake watches and tag heuer watches.breitling watches breitling watches at low price.

Posted by: rolex at January 06, 2010 06:41 AM (TspGB)

Posted by: ugg shoes|timberland uk|ugg boots|87415555.com.cn at January 06, 2010 08:35 PM (qzq48)

177 Good rolex and tag heuer watches,replica watches of rolex rolex watches replica,buy patek philippe Buy replica watches,fake watches and tag heuer watches.breitling watches breitling watches at low prices.

Posted by: rolex at January 07, 2010 12:07 PM (GeXL2)

178 Un total de once comunidades autnomas estn este jueves en alerta naranja Christmas gift ugg tall boots (riesgo importante) por nevadas y bajan las temperaturas en toda Espa09a, segn la Agencia Estatal de Meteorologa (AEMET). En concreto, se Christmas gift ugg napoule sandal trata de Aragn, Cantabria, Castilla-La Mancha, Catalu09a, Christmas gift timberland classic boots Madrid, Navarra, Comunidad Valenciana, Galicia, Pas Vasco, Asturias y Murcia. La cota de nieve bajar a menos de 200 metros en el CantbricoLa Pennsula Ibrica est bajo dos borrascas y un anticicln que crearn un pasillo que permitir el paso de una corriente de aire muy fro, como la que est provocando un temporal de fro glaciar en Europa, aunque es esperan que el fro que suframos no sea tan intenso como en otros pases. An as, se espera que las bajas temperaturas se mantengan hasta el domingo. La cota de nieve baja en el Cantbrico a menos de 200 metros

Posted by: El temporal de fr¨ªo y nieve pone en alerta a once comunidades aut¨®nomas ugg boots|ugg uk|timberlan at January 09, 2010 07:17 AM (tWrEP)

179 Buy rolex watches,tag heuer watches and replica patek philippe patek philippe watches,replica audemars piguet> replica breitling watches breitling watches,chanel watches chanel watches watches replica montblanc watches.Rolex fake watches and replica watches brands,replica rolex: breitling watches,replica tag heuer: tag heuer, replica rolex: replica rolex replica cartier watches: cartier watches,replica omega watches: omega watches,replica panerai watches: panerai watches,replica armani watches: armani watches,replica audemars piguet: audemars piguet,replica bvlgari watches: bvlgari watches,replica chanel watches: chanel watches,replica gucci watches: gucci watches,replica movado watches: movado watches,replica montblanc watches: montblanc watches,replica patek philippe: patek philippe on sale.replica watches and replica watches.

Posted by: rolex at January 10, 2010 03:22 PM (OO9Jx)

180 high rolex and tag heuer watches patek philippe patek philippe watches,replica audemars piguet> replica breitling watches breitling watches,chanel watches chanel watches watches replica montblanc watches and panerai watches.

Posted by: rolex at January 12, 2010 10:35 AM (On3I8)

181 Cheap tag heuer watches,rolex watches that replica watches,fake watches and tag heuer watches,replica breitling breitling watches,cheap replica rolex cartier replica cartier watches,replica omega omega watches and panerai replica panerai watches replica armani armani watches,cheap audemars piguet audemars piguet watches,bvlgari watches replica chanel watches replica gucci gucci watches and movado watches replica montblanc montblanc watches sale patek philippe watches for us.

Posted by: rolex at January 14, 2010 06:55 PM (GTMOj)

182

ããáßÉ ÑæÍí  

íæÊíæÈ ÝÖÇÆÍ   ÊæÈíßÇÊ ÑæãÇäÓíÉ

äß äíãÇÊ ÊæÈíßÇÊ  äß äíãÇÊ 

ÊæÈíßÇÊ ÌÑÍ   ÇÓãÇÁ ÈäÇÊ  Çíãæ ÎæÇØÑ 2010

ÑÓÇÆá ÍÈ  ÑÓÇáÉ ÍÈ

ãæÏíáÇÊ ÝÓÇÊíä ÓåÑÉ ÍÑÝ m

ÝÓÇÊíä ÎØæÈÉ 2010  ÎæÇØÑ ÑæãÇäÓíÉ  ÇáÚÇÈ ÈäÇÊ ááÊÍãíá  ãáÇÍÙÇÊ ááÌæÇá

ÊæÈíßÇÊ 2010

 ÊæÈíßÇÊ Íáæå  æÓÇÆØ 2010 ÇÎÊÕÇÑÇÊ ÇØÇÑÇÊ æÑæÏ  

ßÇÓÈÑ 2010  ÊæÈíßÇÊ ÑæÚå  ÞÕÇÆÏ ÍÒíäå

ÎáÝíÇÊ ãÓä  ÎæÇØÑ ÍÒíäÉ  ÔÚÑ ÑæãÇäÓí  ÕæÑ ÇÒíÇÁ 2010  ÕíÏ ÇáØíæÑ

ÊæÈíßÇÊ ßÈÑíÇÁ  ÊæÈíßÇÊ ÔãæÎ  ÊæÈíßÇÊ ÚÒå

ÊæÈíßÇÊ Çáã  ÊæÈíßÇÊ Ìãíáå

  ÊæÈíßÇÊ ááãÇÓäÌÑ 

 

 ÚÈÇíÇÊ 2010 - ÊæÈíßÇÊ ÔæÞ

ÇÒíÇÁ ÍæÇãá  ÑÓÇÆá ÛíÑå  ÕæÑ ÔÈÇÈ  ÊæíæÊÇ 2010  æÓÇÆØ ÌÏíÏå

 -  ÍãÏÇä ÈÑíÊÔ  - ÇÍáì ÇáÕæÑ  íæÊíæÈ ÇáÔÚÑ

ãæÇÖíÚ ÚÇãÉ -ÇÎÈÇÑ ãËíÑÉ-ÔÚÑ- ÎæÇØÑ-ÞÕÕ-ÑæÇíÇÊ-ÚÇáã ÍæÇÁ-ÏíßæÑ-ÇÒíÇÁ -ÝÓÇÊíä -ÇáÕÍÉ-ÕæÑ-ÕæÑ Çäãí-äßÊ-ãßÔÇÊ- æÙÇÆÝ

 íæÊíæÈ- ßæÑÉ-  ÓíÇÑÇÊ- ÕæÑ ÊÕãíã  -ÏÑæÓ ÝæÊæÔæÈ-ÈÑÇãÌ ßãÈíæÊÑ -  ãäÊÏíÇÊ  - ÎáÝíÇÊ  -ÊæÈíßÇÊ-ÕæÑ ãÇÓäÌÑ  - ÇáÚÇÈ ßãÈíæÊÑ-ÑÓÇÆá æÓÇÆØ  -ÇáÚÇÈ ÈäÇÊ  

  ãÏæäÇÊ ÇáÇÚÖÇÁ 

ãäÊÏì ÌÇÈÑ ÇáÞÍØÇäí

ÇáÍáÈÉ

ÊÍãíá ÕæÑ

ãæÞÚ

ÊæÈíßÇÊ ÌÏíÏå

ÊæÈíßÇÊ ÍÈ

ÔÚÑ ÝÑÇÞ

  ÊæÈíßÇÊ ãÖÍßÉ  ÊæÈíßÇÊ ÕÏÇÞÉ

ÊæÇÞíÚ

ÊæÈíßÇÊ åã æÍÒä

ÎæÇØÑ

Posted by: ãäÊÏì at January 16, 2010 06:05 PM (hsEpp)

Posted by: chi hair irons at January 17, 2010 05:16 PM (9oETl)

184 Good replica watches and buy replica watches and replica rolex replica replica tag heuer watches,buy replica replica omega watches and breitling watches replica breitling watches sale at lowest prices.

Posted by: replica watches at January 24, 2010 06:40 AM (ioa0w)

Posted by: air max shoes at January 28, 2010 05:52 AM (JOSIc)

186 breitling watch Ladies watches at Gilletts Jewellers include like Eco Drive Citizen watches replica watch There are a few ways you rolex watches omega watches can try replica watches Fossil watches DKNY watches Michael Ks watches breitling watches

Posted by: guess watches at January 28, 2010 12:23 PM (9vkhz)

187 replica handbags Wholesale products louis vuitton handbags louis vuitton handbags beautiful wholesale handbags louis vuitton replica handbags wholesale jewelry wholesale clothing from factory louis vuitton handbags with cheap wholesale price

Posted by: dkny watches at January 29, 2010 11:57 AM (AcMLr)

188 Buy rolex replica watches and replica watches replica replica watches and replica rolex watches patek philippe watches and fake watches and breitling watches,replica tag heuer: tag heuer,replica cartier watches: cartier watches,replica omega watches: omega watches at lowest prices.

Posted by: replica rolex at January 29, 2010 06:05 PM (h+uyA)

189 It is no secret that the designer handbag market is extremely profitable designer handbags are one of the most sought after items by women wholesale handbags replica handbags However louis vuitton handbags louis vuitton handbags if you are like me you probably know that finding legitimate louis vuitton handbags wholesalers of designer handbags is not easy to say the least louis vuitton handbags

Posted by: replica watch at January 30, 2010 09:45 AM (AcMLr)

Posted by: airmax at January 31, 2010 04:10 PM (3vSvS)

191 wholesale handbags louis vuitton It is no secret that the designer handbag market is extremely profitable designer handbags are one of the most sought wholesale handbags after items by women louis vuitton However if you louis vuitton handbags are like me you probably know that finding legitimate louis vuitton handbags wholesalers of designer handbags is not easy to say the least

Posted by: citizen watches at February 01, 2010 11:29 AM (AcMLr)

Posted by: õÂÏÒËÁ at February 02, 2010 01:39 PM (vm3jg)

193 louis vuitton replica handbags replica handbags Buy cheap replica Louis Vuitton Handbags Louis Vuitton Bags from HandbagsAir We have the most LV Bags Louis Vuitton Gucci Chanel wholesale handbags Miu Miu styles louis vuitton handbags louis vuitton

Posted by: replica watch at February 02, 2010 03:20 PM (CPNio)

194 Replica Handbags have provide replica omega watches replica omega watches the high quality Replica AUDEMARS PIGUET all brand handbags We have the especial price a especial production including coach handbags omega watches replica cartier Replica tag heuer

Posted by: replica rolex at February 03, 2010 04:43 PM (CPNio)

195 Certainly watches are Replica Watches used to help people record rolex Watches time, but rolex watches nowadays its functions have enlarged. Replica watches are now tag heuer Watches not only objects that tag heuer watches can tell you what time it is, they are also a status symbol. You should not feel strange when you find someone wearing a watch on his wrist, but use the cell phone to tell time. In that situation, the watch is just showing its luxurious function cartier watches. It is normal and cartier watches perhaps also happens to you. .If asked that among the watches of various brands, which one can suit your taste? There is no doubt that most people will choose Rolex. Whichever social class you are in, it is naturally Rolex was known breitling Watches and cherished breitling watches for a long time. However, the elements do not usually enter the market alone, always come with the price tag up to the hand. For this reason, many people, especially men, their dreams of luxury Rolex watches are buried in omega Watches his heart omega watches. What should I do? Rolex watches are simply stunning worn by the rich and famous, right? No, this world is not the world's richest men, is the world of each. All are equal before the search of luxury and be men's watches respected. Within men's watches, the law, when consumers are in the market, women's watches they should women's watches receive the same treatment. This is the real reason why replica Rolex watches are ladies watches ladies watches more welcome than Rolex. Because in this world are not difficult to understand that the rich are much less than people with low income, you agree with me? You are forced to nod and say with certainty that is the reality. These low-income people do not have enough money to save every month. They can not afford such luxury Rolex watches

Posted by: replica watches at February 04, 2010 09:30 AM (CPNio)

196 vacheron constantin watches Cheap high quality Louis Vuitton Replica AUDEMARS PIGUET Louis Vuitton HandbagsLV bagslouis vuitton luggage Replica omega chanel handbags replica movado gucci handbags omega watches replica movado LV Discoutn Replica Handbags On

Posted by: breitling watch at February 04, 2010 06:02 PM (CPNio)

197

Toyota faced <a href=http://www.mywholesale-bag.com/category-14-b0-Prada+Handbags.html>Prada Handbags</a>pressure Thursday as the government opened a probe of brake problems with the Prius, a crown jewel of its lineup. <a href=http://www.mywholesale-bag.com/category-12-b0-Louis+Vuitton.html>Louis Vuitton Handbags</a> The beleaguered automaker <a href=http://www.mywholesale-bag.com/category-9-b0-Gucci+Handbags.html>Gucci Handbags</a>said it was "too soon" to decide<a href=http://www.mywholesale-bag.com/category-7-b0-ED+Hardy+Handbags.html>ED Hardy Handbags</a> whether to add the hybrid to the millions <a href=http://www.mywholesale-bag.com/category-5-b0-DG+Handbags.html>D&G Handbags</a>cars it has recalled. Some owners of the <a href=http://www.mywholesale-bag.com/category-4-b0-Coach+Handbags.html>Coach Handbags</a> 2010 Prius have reported their<a href=http://www.mywholesale-bag.com/category-1-b0-Chanel+Handbags.html>Chanel Handbags</a> brakes do not always engage immediately when they press the brake pedal, or that the brakes have an inconsistent feel. The<a href=http://www.mywholesale-bag.com/>Handbags</a> National Highway Traffic Safety Administration said it would assess the scope of the problem and the safety risk to about 37,000 cars that <a href=http://www.mywholesale-bag.com/>Cheap Handbags</a>could be affected. The investigation comes as safety <a href=http://www.mywholesale-bag.com/>Cheap Handbags</a>questions surround Toyota, which has already issued broad recalls for millions of its best-selling vehicles, including the Corolla and Camry, because of gas pedals that can become stuck.

Posted by: bgfhg at February 05, 2010 02:15 AM (REILP)

Posted by: fashion news at February 05, 2010 02:16 AM (ARptk)

199

Toyota was [url=http://www.alltopshoes.com]Nike Dunks[/url]one of the first companies to mass-market a hybrid that [url=http://www.alltopshoes.com]Nike SB[/url]combines an electric motor with a gas engine, [url=http://www.alltopshoes.com]Nike Dunk[/url] introducing the Prius in Japan in 1997 and to the world in 2001. Its high gas mileage made it popular among environmentally conscious drivers, especially when gas prices spiked two years ago. But the complexity of the Prius, a highly  [url=http://www.alltopshoes.com/product_3.html]Nike Dunk High[/url] computerized car, has led to  [url=http://www.alltopshoes.com/]Nike Dunk Low[/url] problems in the past. In 2005, the company [url=http://www.alltopshoes.com/product_19.html]Nike Air Force 1[/url]  repaired 75,000 of them to fix software glitches that [url=http://www.alltopshoes.com/product_19.html]Air Force 1 Shoes[/url]  caused the engine to stall. It has  [url=http://www.alltopshoes.com/product_21.html]Puma Shoes[/url]also had trouble with headlights going out. In the case of the gas pedal[url=http://www.alltopshoes.com/product_15.html]Bape Shoes[/url] problems, Toyota has insisted the trouble is mechanical, not electronic.

 

For the Prius brakes, [url=http://www.tradeshoes9.com]Wholesale jordan shoes[/url]Mike Omotoso, senior manager of global powertrain for J.D. Power & Associates, said the culprit is a software glitch in the computer that controls[url=http://www.tradeshoes9.com]Wholesale jordans[/url] the brakes. The problem, he said, occurs as the Prius switches between using its electric motor and internal combustion engine to power the car. Whichever motor is powering the car also runs the brakes, he said, but[url=http://www.tradeshoes9.com]Wholesale air max[/url] the brakes give out momentarily[url=http://www.tradeshoes9.com]Wholesale air max[/url] in the transition. "It's almost like a circuit interruption, because [url=http://www.tradeshoes9.com]Wholesale nike jordans[/url]when you switch, there's a short pause like a second or less," he said. "The system should be reprogrammed[url=http://www.tradeshoes9.com]Wholesale nike shox[/url] where the braking power is applied for a split second longer" on the motor that was powering the car, he said. Separately, Ford Motor Co. plans to fix 17,600 Mercury Milan and Ford Fusion[url=http://www.tradeshoes9.com]Wholesale nike shoes[/url] gas-electric hybrids because of a software problem that can give drivers the impression that the brakes[url=http://www.tradeshoes9.com]Wholesale nike dunks[/url] have failed. The automaker says the problem occurs in transition between two [url=http://www.tradeshoes9.com]Wholesale air force ones[/url]braking systems and at no time[url=http://www.tradeshoes9.com]Wholesale air force 1[/url] are drivers without brakes.

Posted by: bgfhg at February 05, 2010 02:17 AM (REILP)

200 Cheap replica watches and replica watches 100% copy replica watches of the previous omega watches model: the famous Manchester Logo is located at 3 and the cartier watches chronograph 45-minute breitling watches at 9 with orange figures. Football fans can use the very special 45-minute chronograph to measure the halves of a football match. Black patek philippe hour hand and minute hand features yellow luminescent coating. The hour makers, chronograph audemars piguet and the first 15-minute scale of the tag heuer chronograph counter is montblanc watches presented in eye-catching rolex red. Bright Yellow movado watches tones are found on the minute track, date bvlgari watches rolex on sale.

Posted by: replica watches at February 05, 2010 08:06 AM (0uEN8)

201

ed hardy bags Shop for the latest Ed Hardy bags ed hardy shoes The official site of Don Ed Hardy Shoes ghd hair Latest ghd hair products & offers ghd straighteners GHD hair straighteners shop online with cheapest coach outlet Coach outlet stores are known for coach purses Coach purse is everyone's favorite coach outlet store online Online Coach Outlet is the place to go online wholesale designer handbags Wholesale products from cheap designer handbags cheap designer handbags We sell cheap Designer Handbags discount designer handbags We sell discount Designer Handbags of all top discount coach handbags Get discount Coach handbags, Cheap Coach designer inspired handbags We carry designer inspired handbags, replica purses and handbags buy purses and handbags with confidence wholesale coach handbags Buy wholesale coach handbags, cheap jordans ed hardy clothing Ed Hardy Clothing Shoes and Accessories On Sale Ed hardy shirts Ed Hardy Shirts On Sale - Free Shipping on cheap Ed hardy swim suit and other cheap ed hardy Discount Ed hardy T-shirts Shoppers Excited about Discount Ed Hardy T Shirts Cheap Ed hardy shoes Cheap Ed Hardy Mens Shoes on Sale Cheap Ed hardy hats Ed Hardy Caps, Cheap Ed Hardy Hats on Sale christian louboutin shoes Where to buy Cheap Christian Louboutin New york Yankees jerseys next sports adventure with New York Yankees Jerseys discount nfl jerseys Discount NFL Jerseys store,on sale wholesale mlb jerseys Wholesale MLB jersey, NBA jersey, NFL jersey mlb baseball jerseys Full selection of licensed custom MLB baseball jerseys discount mlb jerseys Discount MLB jerseys are what new era hats New era hats, Ray Ban, Online buy cheapest Wholesale nfl jerseys Wholesale nfl jerseys, wholesale jordans, cheap Mac cosmetics whole range of MAC Cosmetics makeup Mac brushes such as MAC brush and Bobbi Brown brush etc north face clearance The North Face clothing wholesale bags distributor and supplier of wholesale handbags true religion jeans True Religion Jeans on sale now

Posted by: coach at February 06, 2010 02:29 AM (MFAQh)

Posted by: may at February 06, 2010 07:35 PM (Eu9Vs)

203 TAG HEUER Watches ROLEX Watches OMEGA Watches CARTIER Watches Luxury Cartier watches are available at Essential Watches at discounted prices At Essential Watches we specialize in replica Watches OMEGA Watches all high end watch lines including

Posted by: rolex at February 06, 2010 10:08 PM (TUJDt)

204 this replica watches replica watchWhoever wants replica watches timekeeper that does the job of a tachometer will be crazy for. The operation is performed by the copied replica rolex 's bezel. The Daytona also applies automatic movement ¨C just one of many breitling watches characters and functionalities that ensures the precision of time. Originally created to measure lap time and the cartier watches overall time of a race, Rolex Daytona replica omega watches timepieces can measure elapsed time for omega any sporting event. The power of this breitling replica item is made possibly by its internalized perpetual rotor mechanism. Known for its precision, this special Rolex replica cartier watch model only has to be set once to the cartier watches standard time of the owner's choice. Once rolex watches being created, it updates itself during time changes, making upkeep of the replica's time setting replica watches nonexistent. Even though these replica watches were made for sporting events, (specifically those involving laps or circuits), it's not so adversible to put them tag heuer in water since they are not fake watches waterproof. Even thought most of the time, the replica watches do not bear the tag heuer same functionalities as the original ones, they are still the most desirable alternatives of the expensive real models.

Posted by: replica watches at February 07, 2010 02:20 AM (KbTNE)

205 Factors Replica Watches About The Rolex replica watches Oyster The Oyster is so closely get in touch with Rolex, and it is inevitably that some people think these are the only Replica watches Rolex manufacture. Others suppose that there is a single Oyster watch. But as a matter of fact, the name Oyster does not actually meant for a rolex Watches particular watch you can buy rolex watches or even to a series but to a type of case that available in some of the Rolex ranges. History The Oyster case was first released in 1926. The objective was to protect the workings of the watch from dust and moisture. Early watches were far from waterproof. The Oyster tag heuer Watchescase was an tag heuer watches innovative design to eliminate these problems. It had a new double locking crown that screwed into place. It has been compared to the hatch on a submarine. Like a submarine, the Oyster case was waterproof. In 1927 Mercedes Gleitze swam the English breitling Watches Channel breitling watches . Before she set off she was presented with a Rolex Oyster. When she arrived, the watch was still working perfectly. The resulting publicity gave the new case a massive boost. Why is it called Oyster? Legend has it that Hans cartier Watches Wilsdorf cartier watches, who invented the Oyster, chose the name because the new case reminded him of the difficulty he had experienced prising open oysters at dinner. Since then the Oyster has further, particularly advanced. Many Oyster watches today are omega Watches perpetual-self-winding, in other omega watches words, it does not require to expose the mechanism to the outside world in order to wind it. The Osyter Perpetual is one of the toughest, most durable, most reliable watches (under truly adverse conditions). It is probably the best mechanical watch money can buy.

Posted by: replica watches at February 07, 2010 01:43 PM (TUJDt)

206 Offering Replica Cartier Watches With High Quality ROLEX Watches The hot Cartier Replica Watches ROLEX Watches TAG HEUER Watches replica Watches ROLEX Watches CARTIER Watches the latest Cartier Fake Watches are supplied with lowest price

Posted by: tag heuer watch at February 08, 2010 06:25 AM (TUJDt)

207 ujyiw rutf chi ghd hair straightener ghd hair straightener,pbbui ghd hair straightener yyhgia,chi hair straightener,vgegk hair straightener dpprpv,ghd hair straightener,pxxgrr chi hair straightener ntvvto,chi hair straightener,dqvny hair straightener zkjarn,hair straightener,phjdk hair straightener aqyqdne,ghd hair straightener,eekle ghd hair straightener foilgu,chi hair straightener,pmxu hair straightener vjjbfy,hair straight,xhqcc hair straightener heflv,ghd hair straightener,vbmxg chi hair straightener xzej,chi hair straightener,jbljytx hair straightener lysvur.

Posted by: ghd hair straightener at February 09, 2010 08:31 AM (UTLu5)

208 dydjz buy cheap wow gold tiex wow gold,jeeo buy wow gold iovfu,wow power leveling,tiksdi wow gold lrtwb,cheap wow gold,motovn buy wow gold axker,buy wow gold,ythtt cheap wow gold oqiwn,world of warcraft gold,nzzmjp buy wow gold dvzed,wow gold,erzghy wow power leveling wajzv,wow power leveling,xxjr buy wow gold mgasl,cheap wow gold,opulzw wow gold kyghp,buy wow gold,ojzmxq cheap wow gold rgryi,world of warcraft gold,xeduzw buy wow gold enpaqe.

Posted by: wow gold at February 09, 2010 08:32 AM (UTLu5)






Processing 0.15, elapsed 0.1603 seconds.
15 queries taking 0.012 seconds, 217 records returned.
Page size 256 kb.
Powered by Minx 0.7 alpha.

MuNuvians
MeeNuvians
Polls! Polls! Polls!
Frequently Asked Questions
The (Almost) Complete Paul Anka Integrity Kick
Top Top Tens
Greatest Hitjobs

The Ace of Spades HQ Sex-for-Money Skankathon
A D&D Guide to the Democratic Candidates
Margaret Cho: Just Not Funny
More Margaret Cho Abuse
Margaret Cho: Still Not Funny
Iraqi Prisoner Claims He Was Raped... By Woman
Wonkette Announces "Morning Zoo" Format
John Kerry's "Plan" Causes Surrender of Moqtada al-Sadr's Militia
World Muslim Leaders Apologize for Nick Berg's Beheading
Michael Moore Goes on Lunchtime Manhattan Death-Spree
Milestone: Oliver Willis Posts 400th "Fake News Article" Referencing Britney Spears
Liberal Economists Rue a "New Decade of Greed"
Artificial Insouciance: Maureen Dowd's Word Processor Revolts Against Her Numbing Imbecility
Intelligence Officials Eye Blogs for Tips
They Done Found Us Out, Cletus: Intrepid Internet Detective Figures Out Our Master Plan
Shock: Josh Marshall Almost Mentions Sarin Discovery in Iraq
Leather-Clad Biker Freaks Terrorize Australian Town
When Clinton Was President, Torture Was Cool
What Wonkette Means When She Explains What Tina Brown Means
Wonkette's Stand-Up Act
Wankette HQ Gay-Rumors Du Jour
Here's What's Bugging Me: Goose and Slider
My Own Micah Wright Style Confession of Dishonesty
Outraged "Conservatives" React to the FMA
An On-Line Impression of Dennis Miller Having Sex with a Kodiak Bear
The Story the Rightwing Media Refuses to Report!
Our Lunch with David "Glengarry Glen Ross" Mamet
The House of Love: Paul Krugman
A Michael Moore Mystery (TM)
The Dowd-O-Matic!
Liberal Consistency and Other Myths
Kepler's Laws of Liberal Media Bias
John Kerry-- The Splunge! Candidate
"Divisive" Politics & "Attacks on Patriotism" (very long)
The Donkey ("The Raven" parody)
News/Chat