1

Fake but accurate!

2 They're scientists, ace.

You just wouldn't understand.

3 This story has got to get legs larger than the blogs. This is the death of the global warming cult.

4 The best part of this post is your thanks to Jackstraw.  Hope you're planning on commenting again.  

5 They're fudging the data to get the desired result.

Because a metric fuckload of euros is at stake.

The fact that they're scientists just means that they're too clever by half, and thus, inclined to insert comments in code and such.

Just ask Columbo about scientists.  He'll tell you.

6

Posted by: Alex at November 23, 2009 04:58 PM (Tr7vq)

i disagree, i think the manmade global warming "debate" will go on as long as the evolutionary theory "debate" has raged on

7 OT: SarahPalinUSA    Ft Bragg soldiers, their families & supporters: we can't thk u enough for selfless service to country. Millions of proud Americans honor u


I just like posting that

8

Posted by: BumperStickerPlover at November 23, 2009 05:00 PM (ruzrP)

Scientists follow their own cults & assumptions over common sense and what is looking them in the eye, my gf is about to get her Major on Biology and her worship of Scientists annoys the hell out of me. these are the same people who for years couldn't decide if Pluto was a planet or not

9 #6: You are probably right. I was working under the assumption of intellectual honesty. How dumb of me!

10 A small article in the Sacramento Bee (maybe an AP or other service feed) says that the scientists who wrote the hacked e-mails are saying that the "discovered" information (content of e-mails, etc.) was changed before being disseminated. They continue that this doctored information is now being used to support the heresies and paranoid fantasies of skeptics and global warming deniers.

11

I'm praying the leakers are holding stuff back, the way Breitbart does, in order to get these A-holes to lie and thus inculpate themselves further.  Then, BAM!!!! he will whack their peepees.

Whatever they do they will not be able to hide the decline of their own reputations.

 

12

Posted by: Alex at November 23, 2009 05:03 PM (Tr7vq)

right, just like Washington you can't count on Scientists using common sense

13 Obama's failure to get the Chinese onboard and this may kill it - Inhofe as a Chairman in 2010 and it is done. A nice perp walk for some of these clowns would make a nice visual.

14 When I was in school, starting with the desired result and going backwards to derive the data was called "dry labbing," and it was considered cheating if a student did it. The scientific nomenklatura appear to think they are exempt from such petty rules. But, as #5 points out, there is a lot of money at stake.

15 Because a metric fuckload of euros is at stake.

The imperial fuckload is banned by trade treaty.

16 anyone can report how LGF and Charles are reacting to this?

17 I like this part:

UPDATE2: Commenter Eric at the Climate Audit Mirror site writes:

==== ===== =======

From documents\harris-tree\recon_esper.pro:

; Computes regressions on full, high and low pass Esper et al. (2002) series,
; anomalies against full NH temperatures and other series.
; CALIBRATES IT AGAINST THE LAND-ONLY TEMPERATURES NORTH OF 20 N
;
; Specify period over which to compute the regressions (stop in 1960 to avoid
; the decline
;

Note the wording here “avoid the decline” versus “hide the decline” in the famous email.

18 I agree this story needs to get beyond the blogs.  The New York Times is too ethical to run any story involving stolen papers that don't come from the Pentagon, so they're out.  Any ideas how to get more traction here?  Other than just going over to globalwarmingcult.com and leaving a bunch of "ha ha you lose" posts?

19

They did the same thing with the second hand smoking studies. They had to adjust the statistical confidence ratios in order to show a correclation. But of course it was for a good cause.

Fuck them.

20

Posted by: ManeiNeko at November 23, 2009 05:05 PM (KPgt9)

Scientists follow ethics rules that they learned in their Science classrooms as much as Journalists follow ethics rules they learned in their Journalism classrooms

21 That's a big point of mine:  They aren't using temperature data, they're using temperature spin.

When you step away from actual collected data, you've damn well got to justify any alterations you make, and they not only won't justify it, they won't tell you what adjustments there were.

It's less science than push polling.

22 Ace, this "hide the decline" bit actually sounds worse than it is.  The problem is that the dataset that they were using is a temperature reconstruction based on proxy data.  After they apply their smoothing techniques, it turns downward at the end, diverging from the actual measured temperatures.  Now, whether or not there are flaws in the surface temperature measurements (I think there is a pretty clear case that there are, and the leaked emails seem to hint that they realize this too), I think they can quite easily explain that they chose to use ACTUAL MEASUREMENTS rather than reconstructions from tree rings or whatever and we lose this argument without ever getting to the real problems.

We need to wisely pick our fights on this.  It seems to me that the really damaging stuff is their collusion to hide data, suppress alternative views, tweak data (0.15 to reduce the ocean blip) and destroy emails to avoid FOI requests. 

23 >>>When I was in school, starting with the desired result and going backwards to derive the data was called "dry labbing," and it was considered cheating if a student did it.

My chemistry teacher referred to it as "adding in the Finaggeler's Constant."

However you spell finaggleer.

24

They're not scientists, they're artificial adjusters.

 

25
It's a shame the Journal of Irreproducible Results is no longer being published: these guys belong there.

26 Oh, shit!

27

Thanks to JackStraw

I figured he was dead ...

or lost at sea.

Seriously, where's that guy been?

 

 

28

We're just so happy that people are talking about global warming, even if it's brought on by a joke.

29 DaveS:

Why only add in the raw data through 1960?

Why add the raw data at all? They are already adding an "adjusted" series of data based on the raw data.

They are adding in this particular superfluous data set to get the shape of the chart they want.

Furthermore, they are deleting emails that discuss doing this, in order to illegally evade FOIA requests.

I am picking my fights. I have picked this one.

30

"A nice perp walk for some of these clowns would make a nice visual."

Yes, especially if it were a walk toward a scaffold, guillotine or fiery pit.   If wasting nearly a trillion of the world's wealth isn't deserving of at least a long day roasting on a spit, I don't know what is.

31

5...Because a metric fuckload of euros is at stake

We're talking about science here and it is important to be precise. I think the more accurate term is metric fuckton.

32 @21 That's a big point of mine:  They aren't using temperature data, they're using temperature spin.

They have to adjust the data though.  Stations use differing data collection techniques, and some experience urban warming etc.... they have to adjust it to get some numbers that are compatible.  The problem is that this adds an extra layer of abstraction where there is room to introduce... er, errors.  And, my understanding is that they aren't completely upfront about which stations are included, excluded, adjusted, etc., to produce their final datasets, which I think is one of the things McIntyre has been on them about. 

Feel free to correct me if I totally misrepresented something.

33 8

Posted by: BumperStickerPlover at November 23, 2009 05:00 PM (ruzrP)

Scientists follow their own cults & assumptions over common sense and what is looking them in the eye, my gf is about to get her Major on Biology and her worship of Scientists annoys the hell out of me. these are the same people who for years couldn't decide if Pluto was a planet or not

Posted by: YRM at November 23, 2009 05:02 PM (xNw7B)

Pluto was a planet???

34

ace, #23,

I used to be a chemist, and I much enjoyed the comment of a colleague about an experimentalist whose yields tended always to exceed 90%:

"Yeah, he's kind of a thumb-on-the-balance guy."

35 You've heard of insurance adjusters?  These guys are data adjusters.  And this is their theme song: 

http://tinyurl.com/blfqfw

36 Scientists? Lying suckers of cock.

37 You keep using that word - asymptotically - I do not think it means what you think it means. The word you are looking for is 'exponentially'.

38 Sloppy sloppy sloppy, you just can't let your source code fall into the wrong hands.  I'm gonna remind all the guys here to stop sending source to each other via e-mail when they get back from Thanksgiving.

39

19, nails it. What other policy-shaping "science" has also been so manipulated?

CFCs and the ozone perhaps?

40

Good story.  Good find.

This will not kill the global warming cult.  It's a religion.  It would be nice for them, if they had scientific proof; but no such thing is required for them to continue to do what it is they do.

Much like if the Shroud of Turin is positively proven to be the genuine article-- many Christians would rejoice, and most atheists would yawn or snicker.  Don't ask me about what the Muslims would do, it's too obvious.  Such a small number of minds would be changed by such a monumental discovery that the demographic can be safely ignored.

No, this is not about science; this is about self-hatred of a small number of humans writ large.  Like the MSNBC racism story preceding, nearly every leftist position proceeds like this:

1) I hate myself for reason X

2) I'm better than everyone else

3) Therefore, everyone else must be much worse with regards to X than I am

4) I must stop everyone else from doing/thinking/whatever X, even if it means I have to do more of it to make that happen.

Changing the facts of global warming does not change the fact that the global warming cultist hates himself.  Therefore, his behavior will change not even a little bit.

On the other hand, it is teabaggingly delicious to be vindicated in my long-held belief that there is no evidence for AGW.  You too, I presume.

41 I think they can quite easily explain that they chose to use ACTUAL MEASUREMENTS rather than reconstructions from tree rings or whatever and we lose this argument without ever getting to the real problems.

Nope. The divergence is vitally important a) because it shows the proxies are tracking something other than temperature (i.e. if it's wrong now, it could easily have been wrong in the past),  and b) even the Hockey Team claims that it never splices real temperature data onto proxy reconstructions.

The f*cking lying shitbags.

42
anyone can report how LGF and Charles are reacting to this?

Posted by: YRM at November 23, 2009 05:05 PM (xNw7B)

By My Calendar Creationists !!

43

I think the more accurate term is metric fuckton.

...fucktonne.

44 I'm looking for the Left to suddenly embrace the British meanings of words.

For example, take the word "Fix" .  There's "fix" in the sense of "to correct or repair" and then there's "fix" in the sense of "hold in one place, to make immovable"

The Downing Street memo provides an example:

The memo had a section that MI6 Head Richard Dearlove  that "the intelligence and facts were being fixed [by the U.S.] around the policy" of removing Saddam Hussein from power, which was taken by the Lefty types to show that US intelligence on Iraq prior to the war was deliberately falsified, rather than simply mistaken.

Fixing facts around something around a policy is not the same thing as falsifying.  You're simply making those pieces axiomatic.  They're a given.  They're fixed.

Now, nearly five years after this "fixing" of facts came out, the Left will, I'd bet, discover that the Brits - especially the Climate Guy Science Brits - use language differently than us dumb Amurkins.

.

45 Who is going to nominate Steve McIntrye for a Nobel?

46 DaveS:

Let me tell you something. When you massage data an awful lot, as pollsters must do (and I don't even mean trying to skew a poll -- I mean adjusting for demographic groups) it's a game of whack a mole. One adjustment tends to create a new problem somewhere else. So you adjust that. Which creates a new problems.

Etc.

The reason for the "divergence" is that they are massaging data so much -- for example, to elminate the Medieval Warm Period. Which they admit in emails -- they are in fact seeking to do.

So an adjustment there causes a problem somewhere else, and fixing that problem causes another one... until... well, they get to the end and now their charts are so massaged they are radically diverging from real temperature records.

So they add in raw temperatures -- through 1960 only! - a data series that has no business being in there (and if it is -- why only through 1960) because doing that gives them the upward slant at graph's end they want.

You know what, DaveS? If their models cannot accurately model CURRENT temperatures, and keep showing a decline where raw termperatures seem to indicate a modest increase, maybe they should work on fixing their models themselves, rather than adding extraneous data sets into them to fix all the problems caused by their constant massaging.

47

Posted by: the real joe at November 23, 2009 05:12 PM (AuKbo)

100% agree

Good story.  Good find.

This will not kill the global warming cult.  It's a religion.  It would be nice for them, if they had scientific proof; but no such thing is required for them to continue to do what it is they do.

Much like if the Shroud of Turin is positively proven to be the genuine article-- many Christians would rejoice, and most atheists would yawn or snicker.  Don't ask me about what the Muslims would do, it's too obvious.  Such a small number of minds would be changed by such a monumental discovery that the demographic can be safely ignored.

great analysis, I agree wholeheartedly

48 this is disturbing:

; It puts the lotion on its skin
; it does this whenever its told
;or else the polar ice caps will melt
; drowning tens of millions of people in the process
;

Oh.My.indeed.

49 These global warming scientists can go to H-E-double hockey sticks!

50

they are massaging data so much

I think that is something behind which we can all get.

51 So to review.

There has been no warming in 10 years.

The last two years show cooling.

The 90s were not the warmest decade in recent history - that would be the 30s.

The earth was warmer in the medieval ages with no apparent sign of an apocalypse, and only recently recovered from the Little Ice Age.

Global Warming researchers spend much of their time manipulating data to make it fit the graphs they want, trying to censor researchers that disagree with them, and creatively rejecting requests to see their data.

Oh, and we are about to destroy the economy because global warming is beyond question and going to kill us all.

Makes perfect sense IN BIZZARO WORLD.

52 "hide the decline" does not sound worse than it is. The fact is, these supposed "Models" depart radically from observed temperatures in the past few decades (precisely the ones that are supposedly key evidence).

So to get the models to accord with the actual record, they are forced to add goofy shit into them.

Like... um, well, like raw temperature data, when the adjusted data is already in the model, and only, for some bizarre reason, through 1960.

53 They have to adjust the data though.  .... they have to adjust it to get some numbers that are compatible.  The problem is that this adds an extra layer of abstraction where there is room to introduce... er, errors. 

That's what I'm saying.  They aren't taking thermometer readings, they're taking extrapolations and adjustments of thermometer readings, interpolations, wild ass guesses, and eliminating readings they think are 'off' for some reason.  That, alone, is a wide enough window for bias or deception.

Add to that the need for results to 'conform' and a system that is pretty much without the oversight that peer review would provide, and anything that comes out of that process is not worth trusting.

54

DaveS,

I have seen these maneuvers aplenty and until demonstrated otherwise, I believe these criminals simply do the following:

They plug their data into their favorite statistical software program and massage things until they get what they want.  We have already seen how the hocky stick is a complete fraud manufactured from an N of ten carefully selected tree rings. 

To refute these very damaging revelations, the criminals would have to open their data sets for review.  They have been unwilling to do so to this point, with some laughably suggesting that the dog ate their homework and the data is "lost."

Enough.  Would anyone here fly on an airplane or live next to a nuclear reactor contructed with similar methods?  Of course not.

55

Via TheDrunkablog:

 

Update III: The Harry_Read_Me.txt file examined at Devil's Kitchen

 

You have got to look at this. It is the worst thing yet. The file is ongoing notes about intractable problems with their modeling programs. It's all worthless.

56 The Opocalypse  is nigh.

57 Are you questioning the science? Heretics!

<continues hammering round peg into square hole>

58

1) I hate myself for reason X

2) I'm better than everyone else

3) Therefore, everyone else must be much worse with regards to X than I am

4) I must stop everyone else from doing/thinking/whatever X, even if it means I have to do more of it to make that happen.

Posted by: Truman North at November 23, 2009 05:13 PM (e8YaH)

Now you tea baggers are hacking my files too! Quick, to the ManBearPig Jet!

59 @Ace:
Why only add in the raw data through 1960?

Why add the raw data at all? They are already adding an "adjusted" series of data based on the raw data.

My understanding is that the data up to 1960 and 1981 are different data sets, and smoothing adds an artificial decline in temperatures.  They are padding the end with numbers to allow them to get smoothed trends on the datasets... it seems reasonable to use actual temperature data to do that.  Any "actual temperature data" is adjusted... unadjusted data would be useless.

The methodology for those adjustments could significantly impact the surface record and should be under intense scrutiny.

60

Does this mean we can start using our own fossil fuel resources now?

61 Aren't scientists supposed to build from observation to conclusion, rather than conclusion to observations?

Well, you are supposed to start with a hypothesis. (we're doomed!)  Its just that you have to be ready to reject it if the data doesn't support it. (oops, maybe not)

62 They are cherry-picking which data

In what way was research conducted a decade ago that "cherrypicked" data? And in what way did the presentation of these data fatally controvert "AGW"?

There was no cherrypicking. The data were presented in such a way to defend the discussion of test results.

In no way do the data even remotely offer knuckleheads their own tendentious uses to declaim AGW.

Not even John Assrocket, who is a mighty, mighty knucklehead.

63 These "scientists" were telling each other to delete incriminating e-mails that may be subject to FOIA requests. That's criminal as is defrauding taxpayers of their tax money. Let the show trials begin.

64 Sure glad that George Bush isn't around anymore.  "Now we can have REAL science".

65

"Conclusions 1st!  Observations 2nd!"

The Red Queen, if she were a 'scientist', n' stuff

66 Bear in mind: The modern era is the ONLY era where we can compare these models to ACTUAL OBSERVED TEMPERATURES.

They don't care much if their records show it was very cold in, oh, say, 900 AD. Who the fuck can check that? Who knows?

What they DO care about is when their models claim that in the only era in which true readings are availble, the temperatures are several degrees away from what we know them to be.

That... sorta looks bad. Makes you doubt the entire model, eh, when the one period you can check the model against observed results shows the model to be...um, utterly wrong.

So they are attempting to "hide" that. They don't want it noted that their models -- without this deus ex machina intervention -- are BADLY WRONG in the one era we can check them against with full confidence.

So they... start adding in essentially RANDOM data, choosing whichever winds up hiding the fact they're going wrong in the modern era. They find one set of data -- raw temperature through 1960 -- and add that in.

The decline is hidden. THe model now "looks" -- but only LOOKS -- okay.

But it only looks that way because they added in superflous, shouldn't-be-in-there data that just happened to manipulate other stuff enough to get the model to match reality (sort of -- close enough for government work, at least).

67

Enough.  Would anyone here fly on an airplane or live next to a nuclear reactor contructed with similar methods?  Of course not.

Posted by: Circa (Insert Year Here) at November 23, 2009 05:20 PM (B+qrE)

Really, when has that ever caused a problem?

68 Global warmism is to science as professional wrestling is to sports.

69 it seems reasonable to use actual temperature data to do that.

No. Splicing of real data onto a proxy is a no-no. Even the Hockey Stick Team agreed (publically) it shouldn't do that.

It certainly shouldn't do it to hide an inconvenient divergence which shows their proxies are crap.

70 Here's a link to some goodies from the soon-to-be-infamous Harry_Read_Me.txt file:

http://tinyurl.com/y8obouq

71 @46 ace: The reason for the "divergence" is that they are massaging data so much -- for example, to elminate the Medieval Warm Period. Which they admit in emails -- they are in fact seeking to do.

I think they are two entirely different questions.  In this case, the divergence is because the dataset runs out and their smoothing algorithm causes a decline when there are no trailing values... again, that's my understanding.

But you're right, they clearly are trying to minimize the MWP, and deemphasize the differences in "ocean blips" and "land blips" and tweaking variables to make the charts look the way they want them to look.  That's why I was suggesting it might be better to focus on those specific instances, rather than the "decline"--I just think they can make a compelling argument to defuse that one at least partially, and media cycles on this will be precious if they exist at all.

72 They had to massage the data thoroughly to guarantee happy ending for the Goracle.

73 The main problem here is that there is no way to be sure what the fucking temperature was before modern gauges were produced. So they have to use tree ring and ice core "proxies" that you can jack around until you get the results you want. Therefore they are basing a .7 deg rise above a historical  SWAGed number and then trying to tell us to give up our productivity and money on the assumption that there SWAG is right.  As we all know AGW is just a power grab built on garbage.

74 Erg is back with a new hash and nick.

And still angling for the AGW Scam for Wealth Redistribution.

75 69 @Waterhouse

No. Splicing of real data onto a proxy is a no-no. Even the Hockey Stick Team agreed (publically) it shouldn't do that.
Don't confuse my argument for endorsing the technique.  I'm just saying that in a media war--which this will become if we are lucky--we don't do any damage, because they can probably make a compelling argument that it is all a misunderstanding of their language.

76 0.000380

77 68 Global warmism is to science as professional wrestling Michelle Obama is to sports a beauty pageant.

Posted by: WalrusRex at November 23, 2009 05:25 PM (xxgag)

FIFY

78 They were just using proto matter, like on the Genesis planet. Ask Spock, he knows!

79 If you are deliberately telling your model to put very little weight on some proxies, and much more weight on others -- all to "eliminate" the Medieval Warm Period -- you are going to have problems if it should happen to turn out that the present day's proxies are like the MWP's. In other words, you dialed the "tweaks" on the MWP to show "cool." When the present day's proxies are similar, they will also become "cool," and you don't want that -- you want the MWP cooler than the proxies really show it to be, and the modern era warmer.

So you gotta hide that decline.

80

Anybody happen to know what language or tool that is?

81

A funny Althouse site comment: 

Palladian said...

What do you want to bet that when Sullivan returns home at night and puts the beagles to bed, he slips on his CPAP mask and connects the hose to a tank of nitrous oxide, inhales deeply and shrieks "Mommy! Mommy! Baby wants to fuck!" before stuffing a piece of fabric clandestinely cut by a Sullivan operative from one of Palin's returned RNC-funded skirts into his mouth and smacking the shit out of his trembling boyfriend who's unwillingly donning the "costume".

11/23/09 3:36 PM  

82 They massaged the data and we got a happy ending.

83
Flaming Douche Bag

The charges against Alexandra Kerry have been dropped due to insufficient evidence.

84 The problem is this: their methods are akin to Julia Child cooking a sauce after nipping at the sauterne for a couple of hours.

They know where they're trying to get to, and they'll just toss in a little of this and a little of that and - voila! - out comes a chart that looks like what they want it to look like.

If you start suggesting that maybe the soup was too watery but adding sawdust isn't the right way to thicken it, they'll throw the spoon at you.

The means by which they get their numbers should be wholly public and open to broad discussion, not the province of half a dozen guys sitting around calling everyone else names.

85 380

86 For an extensive history , definition , and use of the word trick , wade through Real Climates spin on this . For shits and giggles , have a peek at this . Keep banging the drum morons , this is huge .

87 Ace is right on the money here. This stuff stinks to a high standard deviation of heaven. And need we remind everyone that these lientists are merely generating models? Not a falsifiable prediction, like how many amperes does it take to generate a voltage of one volt across a resistance of one ohm. Your electrical law can be tested directly. Not this.

Climatology like astronomy is an observational science, and as such cannot be taken as concretely as other sciences. A century ago the best observers and theoreticians argued about whether distant nebulae were in our own galaxy or were galaxies themselves. Until observations proved otherwise one could believe either... the Great Debate between Shapley and Hubble was a debate. Just that. Eventually better observation changed people's minds. But what if entire political arrangements had been based on the obsolete view? Unlikely with astronomy, but with climatology that is what many demand. Already many warming models have proved incorrect... so why demand the entire planet be subject to a new Panopticon of rules and regulations when these models can neither be falsified easily nor have proven correct so far?

This is just an excuse for warmed-over Marxism in a coat of biodegradable green paint.

88 Sorry #72, didn't see ya there.

89

I think this is all about the same thing:

My god people, have you just been skipping over everything I've posted from that HARRY_READ_ME.txt file!?!?

The data itself is a HUGE unknown, even to the researchers themselves as they attempt to decode what's gone before.

Sure, the emails indicate the possibility (and certainty in some cases) of fraud. That one file PROVES HOW UNRELIABLE THE DATA ITSELF IS!!

They "lost" the original data?? I believe it now. v2.10 was run with a ****ton of code that was undocumented, made no sense and was FULL of bugs. Is v3.0 better when half the data from 1980 on is SYNTHETIC?!? Or when it used the output from the buggy 2.10 version (which is all they had) to produce NEW data?!?!

This is a ****ing joke. The emails are FAR from the most damning thing in this. I can't wait for somebody familiar with the code to start going over it and seeing how many "So we'll just gloss over that entirely ;0)" instances exist.

[h/t Kate at SDA]

90 Piltdown man part 2.

I love it.

91

In what way was research conducted a decade ago that "cherrypicked" data? And in what way did the presentation of these data fatally controvert "AGW"?

Someboy find me the link on the hockey stick to shut this clown up.

92 It wasn't a "trick-trick".

93 68 Global warmism is to science as professional wrestling is to sports.

Posted by: WalrusRex at November 23, 2009 05:25 PM (xxgag)

Well put, and even that is giving a lot to these fools. At least professional wrestling never lobbied to be an Olympic sport, while the global warming lunatics propose that their religion should rule the world.

As an aside, anyone who takes models of complex systems as "proof" of anything deserves exactly the hell that they get. How many econometric models predicted the credit crisis? And econometric models have better brains, more money and a simpler system to model.

These global warming frauds all need to be brought up on charges. They have carried out a true "crime against humanity" in the most literal sense.

As to the argument about data manipulation (smoothing, etc.) any "science" that picks and chooses between data sets, based on some arbitrary context, is totally worthless if not outright destructive. We had the same sort of silliness with valuations of companies, where the geniuses have various models for valuation and pick and choose among them to get the highest valuation possible, but throwing out valuation models that yield ridiculous valuations. There is no standard process for these determinations and they are rendered useless as such.

94 As George Takei says: "Oh my."

Howard Stern fan, are we?

95 82 They massaged the data and we got a happy ending.

Posted by: polynikes at November 23, 2009 05:32 PM (m2CN7)

Your ending you dirty American pigdog, will not be so happy.

Mine? Oh mine will be delightful.

96
The charges against Alexandra Kerry have been dropped due to insufficient evidence.

Posted by: a.k.a. at November 23, 2009 05:32 PM (knCw3)

Laws are only important and need apply if your not a fellow traveler.

97 I surprised that the desired results aren't just hard-coded.

98 The weather stations collecting the "warming" data have been sited in some *ahem* unusual places, to say the least.  Like in the middle of a freaking asphalt parking lot, and next to building exhaust fans.

Check the pic at the link for one of the parking lot locations.

99 I hope you all realize you can stop this fraud by buying laptop batteries.

100 maybe they should work on fixing their models themselves

They can't. The raw temperature data (what of it hasn't been memory-holed) they could use to run back the clock and kludge their models to match the world is garbage too, pre-poisoned via mis-positioning of temperature stations, etc. There's no information outside the inconvenient ice cores that show high variability independent of human action, and CO2 trailing temperature.

The good news/bad news is that the Consensus has been made up of true enough believers in Warming Forever that they didn't think to poison the temp data in the right way to hide cooling. So now they have a problem.

101

Anybody happen to know what language or tool that is?
The guys commenting on the HARRY_READ_ME.TXT mention FORTRAN at least once.

102

Found it.

Here, erg.

Choke on it.

http://minx.cc/?post=292910

103 >> I surprised that the desired results aren't just hard-coded.



int main(int argc, char **argv)
{
      printf("Global warming will kill you all!\n");

      return 0;
}

104 Posted by: palin steele at November 23, 2009 05:30 PM (UEEex)

sometimes i actually miss that banned racist

105 Consider this, as well:

These CRU people loathe, LOATHE, the 'deniers.'

All for doubting them.

IOW, the possibility that there is NO warming is absolute heresy.

What if their projections were to show such a thing?  Become heretics themselves?  They can't, they're committed, admitting no warming would upset their worldview.  So they change data, variables, weights, interpretations.

They've lost perspective-- they are totally focused on their predetermined conclusion.  They're zealots.

That, on top of everything else, makes them sources not to be trusted.

106 87 Ace is right on the money here. This stuff stinks to a high standard deviation of heaven. And need we remind everyone that these lientists are merely generating models? Not a falsifiable prediction, like how many amperes does it take to generate a voltage of one volt across a resistance of one ohm. Your electrical law can be tested directly. Not this.

Actually, I would argue that their models are falsifiable. They presented a series of projections that showed varying warming trends for the foreseeable future. None showed the cooling trend we are in now.

So, their models have been falsified. I understand on the policy front why this isn't the end of the story, but in real SCIENCE it would be. Your model failed to predict the observed behavior therefore your theory is, at best, incomplete. Come back when you can accurately forecast average temperatures in 10 years, and we will test your analysis again.

107 about 300 - 2500 ppm and higher

108

Come one fellows, we need to let them eat too, they need to be able to make a living, even if it's in the pretend sciences!

Pretending never hurt anybody, they write long emails, so they are good scientists.

I've known a few PhDs that would not object to this behavior at all, they woul dhave to fuckin problem with it, and would love to be the center of attention, and with the awards and grants and notoriety.

They are quislings, Lysenkoites...it's all over the place, you have no idea.

Like I've been saying for a while, a long time, peopl eave no fucking idea how bad it is in the modern University. Not just speech codes and the like, but shit like this...it's all over the place. Lots of money and presitge at stake, and important people to have lunch with other very important effete douchebags.

109 The weather stations collecting the "warming" data have been sited in some *ahem* unusual places, to say the least.  Like in the middle of a freaking asphalt parking lot, and next to building exhaust fans.

Check the pic at the link for one of the parking lot locations.

Posted by: TXMarko at November 23, 2009 05:37 PM (48nrr)

Yea, funny about that ain't it? I remember seeing a pick awhile back of monitoring equipment placed atop an asphalt roof in direct sunlight right near the exhaust of air exchanger units.

110

Come back when you can accurately forecast average temperatures in 10 years, and we will test your analysis again.

10 days, even.

111 Laws are only important and need apply if your not a fellow traveler.

Posted by: Blazer at November 23, 2009 05:36 PM (+FzLa)

You are right about the laws, however, I have to say the roasting all eternity in hell thing is somewhat worse then a few years in club fed.

112 Throwing Rocks at the Moon

113 HERETICS!!!

Upon your passing, Mother Gaia (PBUHer) shall be waiting for you at the <s>pearly</s> <b>hemp</b> gates in order to banish you to <s>hell</s>  <b>a sporting event</b>.

114

You know what scares me about pretend science? Just what other stuff have these guys been pretending/lying about to get the desired results and just how many of them work at CERN ?

115 I think they can quite easily explain that they chose to use ACTUAL MEASUREMENTS rather than reconstructions from tree rings or whatever and we lose this argument without ever getting to the real problems.

Wait, if the actual temperature measurements from recent years doesn't match the treering proxy data for those years, doesn't that deligitimize the use of the treering data from any years?

116 HERETICS!!!

Upon your passing, Mother Gaia (PBUHer) shall be waiting for you at her pearly hemp gates in order to banish you to hell a hot dog eating contest.

And which one of you deniers messed up my HTML?!?  Mother Gaia is going to put you on double secret probation!

117

43 / Andycannuck:

I think the more accurate term is metric fuckton.

"...fucktonne."

Good catch, they are, after all, Brits.

Ah, what the hell.

You say fucktonne, I say fuckton. Let's call the whole thing off.

118 Nice try deniers.  The debate is already over.

119 Forgive me if this has already been mentioned, but if you read the e-mails afterward the "hide the decline" one, at least one of the participants seems to have pretty big concerns for the ethics of all of this for something that was merely taken out of context.

In fact, and my memory may be failing me here, but I believe he says something to the effect of "this is a political thing we shouldn't be doing."

120 Just what other stuff have these guys been pretending/lying about to get the desired results and just how many of them work at CERN ?

No comment.

121
@114:  Speaking of CERN, they created the first collisions there today.

122 I assume that, even in the epic battle to contrive the slightest evidence of professional malfeasance as the final cosmic controvention of AGW, there are persons here who know that the data were not discarded, omitted, fabricated, but that one climatologist attempted to jazz-up a journal graphic to support a discussion of research.

That's all., And the associated emails demonstrate the very heated debate with colleagues who didn't think that was such a good idea.

That's it.

123 Come back when you can accurately forecast average temperatures in 10 years, and we will test your analysis again.

I'll be encourage if they can model last year's average temps from 10 year old data. 

True story, I had a boss years ago who was convinced that he could write a program to predict the markets to the extent that he could trade index option futures (I think).  To do this, he ordered all the market info for as far back as possible and wrote an elaborate analysis system.  He kept inserting various fudges until it worked for all past time frames.  But when he ran if for the future and waited, mostly wrong.  Back to the program with another month of data, more fudges, new predictions and again, failure.

This went on for years but he never could get it to work.  Large scale systems of near infinite variables are hard to model, duh.

A trend is a trend, until its not.

124 >Just what other stuff have these guys been pretending/lying about to get the desired results and just how many of them work at CERN ?

>No comment.

125

Though it is most  unladylike for me to say this, I would like to take these climatologists'  "hockey sticks" and wrap them  around their greedy, dishonest necks.  Based on  this farcical, spurious "data"  we're supposed to send our economy and lifestyles back to the thirteenth century?   I don't think so.

And if you need a really good laugh, how about Pinch Sulzberger, Bill Keller and all the rest of those kumquats at the New York Times, refusing to cover any of the contents of these emails because they are " stolen property."  Funny it didn't bother the NYT to publish the stolen Pentagon Papers, or stolen intelligence  information that put our guys in Iraq in danger. 

126 Of course they were using whatever data and models they had to come up with to reach a pre-defined conclusion.  It was obvious well before the release of this stuff.

But the much greater question is: Why did they feel the need to say there is global warming?  The answer to that question is the end game.

127

102 Circa

Ha!!!!  I was just looking for that!!!

On a side note......I think Ive got this global warming model code thing figuredout

100 IF <DataSubsetBS>=Incinerate the World

200 THEN <OutPutToGraph>="hockeystick"

300 ELSE<OutPutToGraph> ="hockeystick"

400 REM "note to CRU peers.... I've got that pesky decline thingy covered here, hey its better than redrawing the graph with whiteout and #2 pencil"

500 <END>

128 Does this mean we can start farting again?

129 I would like to say the existence of Global Warming is as sure as the existence of myself. And I would like to further note that the scientific consensus in favor of both of our existence should settle the matter, irrespective of a few, what do you call them? Ah yes, e-mails.

130 Erg's not ready to abandon his Church of Redistribution of Wealth yet.

He's drank the kool-aid and is asking for more.

131 #115 Thread truth winner!  Ding Ding Ding!

132 Does this mean the tour bus will no longer smell of ass?

133 Minnie Rodent

Live or dead ?

134
Does this mean I won't have to become a cannibal after all ?

135 Erg left to go fill his shinebox with rocks after reading #112. He thinks if he can hit it just right it will pull us a little further from the sun and stop glowball worming.

136 >>>True story, I had a boss years ago who was convinced that he could write a program to predict the markets to the extent that he could trade index option futures (I think). To do this, he ordered all the market info for as far back as possible and wrote an elaborate analysis system. He kept inserting various fudges until it worked for all past time frames. But when he ran if for the future and waited, mostly wrong. Back to the program with another month of data, more fudges, new predictions and again, failure.

This is a scam that investment-con-artists use. They claim they have a formula that "predicts" -- retroactively - all market moves in the past 100 years.

Um, well of course you do. You know what the market did. It is not hard to write a program which emphasizes certain variables, ignores others, etc., to "predict" what is already known.

In fact, I'm pretty sure this is all automated. Feed in variables and stuff into a program, and it will supply you with an algorithm to "predict" it all.

Doesn't mean it actually predicts into the future. it only "predicts" what already happened, becasue the algorithm was created to do that and only that.

137 380

Posted by: Parts per Million of CO2 in the Atmosphere at November 23, 2009 05:32 PM (s2bW4)

I'm trying help by only exhaling every third breath.

138 They were trying to fix a trend line?  How do they 'know' which part of the trend line is the wrong one?  They have absolute faith in their model when it's doing what they want, but they add in a 'fix' to eliminate when it's not.

Their pre-assumption is hotter.  Anything to the contrary?  Kill it.

The irony is the 'wrong' part of their projections is the one that is becoming reality.

139

137 "I'm trying help by only exhaling every third breath"

Don't forget to throw a few rocks at the moon tonight too!

140

Think about the Left's approach to "all" - the ends justify the means.  Anything, virtually anything, done (the means) justifies the results (ends), "our betters", deem optimal, for animal, mineral, and vegetable.

In the aristocracy's or totalitarian's (Communist/Marxist/Socialist) view, they are the chosen, the annoited; when all others are relegated to a meager existence, they alone, deserve their (priviledged) dachas.

141 Hey Al!

We are are sending you a self-addressed stamped box.  Please place your trophy in there and drop it in you local mailbox.

142

Dan-O, It is mostly FORTRAN with plotting by IDL, though some Matlab routines are also used.  Yeah, exactly.  So instead of

int main(int argc, char **argv)
{
      printf("Global warming will kill you all!\n");

      return 0;
}

it's more like

program weknowbest

       IF (warmenist.gt.0) THEN

       nuance = express_doubt(real_data)

       ELSE

       GOTO canned_results

143

"anyone can report how LGF and Charles are reacting to this?"

I just HAD to stop by and take a peek.

Ok, I'm the sort who will slow down to look at a car wreck, too.

CJ is DEFENDING the Alarmist liars.

'Nuf said.

144

I'm trying help by only exhaling every third breath.

That's what happened to Mark Mangino.

145 In Berlin I said,

This is the moment when we must come together to save this planet. Let us resolve that we will not leave our children a world where the oceans rise and famine spreads and terrible storms devastate our lands.

Suck it, Moses!  Am I good or what!?

146
A SERVER WAS HACKED DAMIT

147

From above comment link about comments in the code:

The bit that made me laugh was this bit. Anyone into programming will burst out laughing before the table of numbers

OK... that much is true. They wrapped the size limits on the variable.

I lol'd.

148 motionview @ 142:  Are you sure?  I don't use fortran a lot, but I've never seen semicolons for comments.  And I use matlab and have never seen that either

149

@133 - Bill D. Cat

AGW - dead.

Manbearpig - dead, roasted over a bonfire.  (Using up some carbon credits, here)

CRU  Climate Study Grant Money -  dead.

NYT - dead, after their Chilean or Chinese or whatever sugar daddy  loses patience and cuts off the emergency funds.

150

From above comment link about comments in the code:

The bit that made me laugh was this bit. Anyone into programming will burst out laughing before the table of numbers

OK... that much is true. They wrapped the size limits on the variable.

I lol'd.

 

This is not just a smart military blog--it's a nerdy coder blog, too.

 

151 Oh, nevermind, that is IDL I guess

152 They should have hired me for the programming. I almost never put comments in, especially not really stupid ones like that.

This just goes to show you that documentation kills.

153 Enough.  Would anyone here fly on an airplane or live next to a nuclear reactor contructed with similar methods?  Of course not.


Come fly with us, tovarisch. Soviet Russian air travel very safe. Our pilots forbidden to drink within 24 feet of airplane.

154

The oceans are too rising wing-nuts !

I have to keep moving my mattress underneath the Santa Monica pier farther away from the waterline every month !

155 I find the code is entirely nontroversial and I'm a web programmer, damn it!

156

Look away from those e-mails.  They are forbidden!!!

The ritual updinging of my comments may now resume as usual.

157 @149 - Minnie Rodent ,

Lotta big dead animals .

158 If only the decline in warming were true http://data.giss.nasa.gov/gistemp/graphs/

Damn, knuckleheads. Damn.

159 Aren't scientists supposed to build from observation to conclusion, rather than conclusion to observations? They are cherry-picking which data are supposed significant according to which sets result in the conclusions they've already decided.

I think that is right on.

I remember from high school chem when some kids would change the data they received to fit pre-conceived notions about what the results should be.  It looks like they grew up to become AGW scientists.  Back then, it was just fudging data so that the h20 concentration in tomatoes was 80% and not the more-difficult-to-believe 95%.

We all do it to some degree; it's like a "fact check" to see if it fits with broader theory.  It sometimes leads to very erroneous conclusions.  Like geocentric theory, when the planets supposedly followed crazy patterns in order to fit with the pre-conceived notion of an earth-centered solar system.

So unless DaveS is correct about a glitch in the graphing (which I've seen before due to a computer fitting the curve to a certain pattern it chooses)... at best, they are doing bad science in order to "make their results look better to the teacher".  Worst, they are playing an active role in a global scam.

160 According to SNL, who featured Algore to promote his book, unless we promote his greed global warming ideas, we are doomed.  Doomed I tell ya.  Doomed.

But SNL also had a funny stupid ad about the movie 2012 featuring, you guessed it, Sarah Palin in the 2012 election for president.

I guess when you are radical left-tards,  you don't know if 2012 is the end of the world, it will Obama fault.  Since she will not be in office till Jan 13.  But leftards do not deal in reality.  Just lies and realy stupid ideas.

161

I'll bet there are some really entertaining meetings going on at the editorial offices of Scientific American right now!  They have at least one, and usually several, politically correct commentaries in every issue, but I'll bet the commentary on this one is "muted".

If you want to see a good institution gone bad, SciAm is a perfect example.  Near the end of the last Presidential campaign, they featured an analysis by someone that "proved" that during such and such time period, the percentage of non-positive media articles on Obama was higher than those on McCain, thereby proving that the media was not biased in the election.

If you didn't pay attention to the time period cited, that sounded impressive.  But if you checked like I did, you found that the time period was from months earlier, before the nominees were picked, when the media was pulling for McCain and Hillary!  They used it as if was a head-to-head McCain coverage vs. Obama coverage comparison, but it was actually the coverage of McCain vs. any conservative, compared to the coverage of Hillary! vs Obama , when she was still "inevitable"!

They cannot be trusted on any subject that is even slightly politically sensitive, IMHO, and since they are loading up the mag with more and more of that, it is rapidly evolving into a psuedo-science propaganda rag.  They love to talk about anyone else's "psuedo-science" by the way, their favorite of course being Christian fundies, by they are in fact bending science to their religious beliefs every bit as much.

 

162

printf("Global warming will kill you all!\n");

That's not even FORTRAN! (Is it?)

That's C.

I've never dicked with FORTRAN ever.

I wonder if I'd be able to read any of it without creating a giant project for myself....

163 What we've got here is the Wizard of CRU. 

They are not crooks, or at least they didn't intend to be. 

They're amateurs.  They're making it up as they go along. 

There wouldn't be anything wrong with that if they weren't trying to dictate policy from behind a facade of infallibility.

164 .........and what the hell happened to the next ice age?  Does it not scare people enough to make money off of?

Here is an idea. Travel coach you damn, dishonest, creep.

165
A.G.

once they accepted that first dollar of grant money it became a scam.

166 "Hide the decline" sounds a lot like "hide the salami", except no lubricant.

167 This is the reason I have always thought of those fucktards in Priuses to be fools....Drill baby, Drill...

168 I wonder if anyone has asked the alGore about this yet?

169 If only the decline in warming were true http://data. giss. nasa. gov/ gistemp/ graphs/

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!

You're peddling Hansen's garbage?

Go do your homework and come back when you've found a trustworthy data source.

170
Does this mean I can get off the couch with Nancy now ?

171 "Why only add in the raw data through 1960?"

I believe something was added to years after 1960 in order to "hide the decline."

172 Bakken, baby!

173 Hey Charlie, buddy.  Take a big slobbery lick of my nasty globally warmed ass!

174 I admit linking to the communist organization NASA.

175

NASA GISS data... Nope. Fail.

Search "nasa giss data error"... then go throw rocks at the moon.

176 "Hide the decline" sounds a lot like "hide the salami", except no lubricant.

Posted by: Dr. Spank at November 23, 2009 06:28 PM (GGgoa)

Lubricant?  Does that work?

177 Does this mean I can get off the couch with Nancy now ?  Posted by: Newt Gingrich

Only if you stay in the doghouse.

178
Hide the decline ?


I like to play "Hide the Al Glines"

179 176 "Hide the decline" sounds a lot like "hide the salami", except no lubricant.

Posted by: Dr. Spank at November 23, 2009 06:28 PM (GGgoa)

Lubricant?  Does that work?

Oh My!!!

180

"I'll bet there are some really entertaining meetings going on at the editorial offices of Scientific American right now!  They have at least one, and usually several, politically correct commentaries in every issue, but I'll bet the commentary on this one is "muted"."

You meant to say "ignored".

And consequently, there will be a focus on protecting data, especially data such as this, which was so sensitive, and important to large grants and research junkets.

These people are such assholes.

181

Hey Newt - kiss my corona, bitch!

182 "Because they're not scientists. They are political advocates with some math and science degrees."

I'll do you one better here, Ace, to make it timely.

They're investors putting out a false prospectus to solicit funds. In some industries that would be a crime. Political activism is considered acceptable and people will complain yet accept it because it's just a "game." Fraud, however, isn't.

These actors have committed not just intellectual/academic fraud but also financial fraud.

183

161

 

Not only "Scientific American" but "National Geographic".  NG used to be my favorite magazine until it drove off the cliff.

184 You guys should watch the History Channel.  I know you guys are thinking I am a fool, but it has a story about planning for the first one with Homeland Security and local fire companies response teams.   They talk about people fleeing to West Virginia after the attack on DC.  They describe how you go from having a family diner of 4 one night, to having 400 people as guests. 

185 @119 "at least one of the participants seems to have pretty big concerns for the ethics of all of this for something that was merely taken out of context."

That kind of lends credence to the "disaffected whistle-blower" theory of how this info got leaked, duznit?  As opposed to "the boo-hoo we were unethically hacked by evil deniers" story, I mean. 

186 Even I couldn't pull off this shit.

187

Except for the conspiracy aspects of the contents of FOIA2009.zip, exactly why was all this stuff secret in the first place ?

Likewise, if the part of the theory that says this was put together as part of the review to Steve McIntyre's FOIA request (last email was Nov 12, 2009), exactly what contained with FOIA2009.zip, aside from the embarrassing conspiracy perpetrated by CRU employees, were the CRU officials trying to protect by denying the request on Nov. 13, 2009.

Finally, the legal department of CRU found nothing strange reading this material that obviously reveals many unethical, if not illegal, acts by CRU employees ?

188

Ace, the auumption you are making for rhetorical effect is that these 'scientists' are in fact worried at all about the scientific method.  They sold their soul back around 1974 to whatever alarmist cult of the day was the soup du jour in moonbat ville so long as the bats were slinging grants and block funding to their alma mater.  Global famine, warming, cooling, warming, killer bees, meteor strikes, peak oil, peak water all of these doom cults have one thing in common there is nothing positive ever put on the balance sheet when the calculus is ran, and all of the issues coincidentally require the exact same solution-the finishing off of the COMIntern's work from circa '36-'50 in the form of strangling th4e American consumer spirit and economic growth.....

 

there is not a single hysteria that does not have as its 'solution' spend a lot of federal money, squash a business, trust in your bueracratic overlords and be happy.

The forgotten part of Ike's farewell was the warning about:

"In this revolution, research has become central; it also becomes more formalized, complex, and costly. A steadily increasing share is conducted for, by, or at the direction of, the Federal government.

Today, the solitary inventor, tinkering in his shop, has been overshadowed by task forces of scientists in laboratories and testing fields. In the same fashion, the free university, historically the fountainhead of free ideas and scientific discovery, has experienced a revolution in the conduct of research. Partly because of the huge costs involved, a government contract becomes virtually a substitute for intellectual curiosity. For every old blackboard there are now hundreds of new electronic computers.

The prospect of domination of the nation's scholars by Federal employment, project allocations, and the power of money is ever present and is gravely to be regarded.

Yet, in holding scientific research and discovery in respect, as we should, we must also be alert to the equal and opposite danger that public policy could itself become the captive of a scientifictechnological elite.

It is the task of statesmanship to mold, to balance, and to integrate these and other forces, new and old, within the principles of our democratic system -- ever aiming toward the supreme goals of our free society. "

Ike had an instinctive grasp of the disparate and competing forces tugging at our collective freedom because he ran a herd of cats through the ETO in ww2.....

Hippies love the phrase 'military-industrial complex" because their attention span is too short to realize he made a damning indictment of their games in academia and the science academy.

189 183 Iamnotanalcoholic  Racist anti-Irishman!!!!   I think the people from NG mag was texting a message and they didn't see the road signs telling them to turn right.  Instead they turned left, ran through the guard rail, and screamed WWWEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE!!!!!

190 sherlock @161
Meh. SciAm. I had to quit reading that crap ten years ago. Way, way PC.

136 >>>True story, I had a boss years ago who was convinced that he could write a program to predict the markets to the extent that he could trade index option futures... But when he ran if for the future and waited, mostly wrong. Back to the program with another month of data, more fudges, new predictions and again, failure.
...
This is a scam that investment-con-artists use. They claim they have a formula that "predicts" -- retroactively - all market moves in the past 100 years.

You know what the market did. It is not hard to write a program which emphasizes certain variables, ignores others, etc., to "predict" what is already known.
...
Doesn't mean it actually predicts into the future. it only "predicts" what already happened, becasue the algorithm was created to do that and only that.

Exactly. At least an observational science like astronomy can point to a "ladder of distances" to establish scale in the universe, and that ladder does indeed adjust as new knowledge arises... presumably most astronomers would not swear that the current state of knowledge is set immutably. Far from it. Only ten or fifteen years ago, the state of astronomical knowledge about the universe entirely missed dark energy, which according to contemporary cosmology makes up about two thirds of the entire mass-energy of the universe. Two thirds. Completely unimagined less than a generation ago. And the recently discovered acceleration of the universe's expansion entirely inverts the standard, rationally accepted, "consensus" point of view that prevailed back in the 1980s, that the universe would likely slow expansion, and contract again to a Big Crunch.

Think of that. Just a couple of new observations made in the last decade or two have utterly upended the "consensus" view of the fate of the universe from Big Crunch to Big Rip or endless expansion.

Back to the subject at hand... climate. These "lientists" have the nerve to demand we restructure the global economy and live under dictatorial rule regarding all human activity that even so much as produces a whiff of fucking carbon dioxide, when the simplest new observations could prove them entirely wrong? And their predictions concern a system extremely nonlinear, with variables orders of magnitude larger in number than in something like astronomy? And far more subject to uncertainties and misinterpretation?

How anyone could have fallen for this crap, even ten years ago, is astonishing. The deliberate deceit revealed in these memos and computer code is just icing on the cake.

191 Am I feeling a little hot to you?

192

Hide the Decline:

in temperatures

in jobs

in the value of our dollar

in Obama's ratings

in transparency and truth in govt.

193 If Ace would just swallow, his pride, I would be happy to explain all of these complex issues.

194 Well I guess it would depend on how drunk you were when you read it.

195 @159 A.G

So unless DaveS is correct about a glitch in the graphing (which I've seen before due to a computer fitting the curve to a certain pattern it chooses)... at best, they are doing bad science in order to "make their results look better to the teacher".  Worst, they are playing an active role in a global scam.

Again, I want to be clear... I think they are doing both.  My difference on this is simply a matter of which battles are think are more likely to be winners in a media tit-for-tat on the matter.  From the get go, focus has been on the "trick" to "hide the decline", allowing the perpetrators to provide a somewhat reasonable sounding explanation (which most people won't understand or care to understand at all), and allowing them to avoid any discussion whatsoever of the fact that they were trying to have editors fired, making up adjustments to make the charts look right in their mind, deleting emails, etc.

196

Finally, the legal department of CRU found nothing strange reading this material that obviously reveals many unethical, if not illegal, acts by CRU employees ?

 

You're talking about lawyers, right?  'Nuff said.

197 I liked this comment from one of their programmer's emails:

As far as I can see, this renders the station counts totally meaningless. It also means that we cannot say exactly how the gridded data is arrived at from a statistical perspective - since we're using an off-the-shelf product that isn't documented sufficiently to say that.

198 I'm already involved in a nasty discussion about this on JREF.

199 >>>I remember from high school chem when some kids would change the data they received to fit pre-conceived notions about what the results should be. It looks like they grew up to become AGW scientists. Back then, it was just fudging data so that the h20 concentration in tomatoes was 80% and not the more-difficult-to-believe 95%.

And the system of falsifying data worked wonderfully for me, until the big lab in AP Chemistry, where I was supposed to measure various values for chemicals *without knowing what those chemicals were and therefore what the right answers were."

And, at that time, I sort of learned my lab skills had... um, not developed adequately during my years of faking data.

Go figure.

200 I admit linking to the communist organization NASA. raving lunatic "Dr." James Hansen's heavily-manipulated data.

FTFY, you mushheaded clown.

201 With any data set, large or small, it's possible to fit an arbitrary function that describes the data set accurately, put can't predict anything outside of the data set.

202 And, at that time, I sort of learned my lab skills had... um, not developed adequately during my years of faking data.

Go figure.


You just needed to cheat harder. Idiot.

203 Three little words:  "FOLLOW THE MONEY."  Those that are getting, or will get the money, are the ones that need to be researched themselves as to why they chose this path.  Even they know its a false trail.

204

//11/23/09  -- ENTROPY

//This is a comment I wrote to comment on stuff. 

#INCLUDE snark.h

Int Main{

//I'm quoting this bit to reply to it later

They should have hired me for the programming. I almost never put comments in, especially not really stupid ones like that.

This just goes to show you that documentation kills.

Exactly! // my reply

I always hated to have to comment on the obvious just to have comments, at any rate. // here I am musing

For instance:

//created this check to prevent upper bounds errors //created that comment to explain the file you asked for more comments on

if(xarg <= LIMIT_VAL){ //checking to see if xarg is less then limit, then proceed

Return 1;

}Else{ // if it's not

xarg = LIMIT_VAL; //limiting it. WTF did you think?

Return 1;

}//endif

return 0; //dunno WTF that would even happen so let's fail it just in case

}//end of comment

205 You just needed to cheat harder. Idiot.

It's not cheating unless you get caught ........

206

Offtopic, but awesome...  Check this out: 

A live webcam of the CERN large hadron collider.  It is pretty cool, check it out.

207 Why do people believe that computers cannot lie. the same thing applies to programs that can "change the vote" in voting computers. As the blue dogs says. "See the numbers for yourself, numbers do not lie."  People are stupid to believe this C***. Most will!

208

Back then, it was just fudging data so that the h20 concentration in tomatoes was 80% and not the more-difficult-to-believe 95%.

So the teacher hacked your data.  As far as I'm concerned, then, tomatoes are 80% H20.

209 Right, and when scientists say they are going to "pressure journals" not to publish certain heretics other scientists, they mean...oops, sorry, they do mean they're trying to suppress the truth.

210 Prescription Glasses Prescription Sunglasses Cheap Glasses Discount Glasses Reading Glasses prescription glasses glasses frame glasses frames prescription sunglasses safety glasses reading glasses prescription eyeglasses prescription lenses glasses eyeglasses medical companies medical companies medical companies 防爆电加热器 电加热器 加热器

211

In my recent interview, quoted extensively at LGF, I proved my innocence by giving the reasons that I am innocent.  Just like Michael Mann did.

212 #206: LOL

213

How come that bastard gets to use east asian fonts in his comments but mine get turned into goddamn wingdings?

�o‚½‚ç–Ú!

214

158 If only the decline in warming were true http://data.giss.nasa.gov/gistemp/graphs/

Damn, knuckleheads. Damn.

Posted by: Jacob Javitz at November 23, 2009 06:22 PM (MwCPr)

And at this site we find: Please address questions about the figures to Dr. Sato or to Dr. James Hansen.

Damn, knuckelhead. Just, damn.

215 Its not a lie, if you believe it.

216 "Ace, this "hide the decline" bit actually sounds worse than it is.  <b>The problem is that the dataset that they were using is a temperature reconstruction based on proxy data.</b>  After they apply their smoothing techniques, it turns downward at the end, diverging from the actual measured temperatures."

let's make up data

217 S Weasel points out something that is wierd in these emails... they all seem to know each other, by first name. All the warmy scientists around the world. Its like a tight knit family of zealots. Sort of Fred Phelphsy, as it were.

218 It's always been known that the scientific gang has always been a tight group. They will try to push out anyone who is a radical to their way of "Seeing" things. They are the worse group when it comes acceptance. They meet each other all the time at many functions. ( that they do not have to pay for.)

219

Honestly who cares about the hacked e-mails? There is a larger issue that needs to be debated regarding "climate change".

 Anyone that believes that a possible temperature increase of 3/4 of a degree 50 years from now represents an end times disaster scenario is just shit nuts. Furthermore, anyone who claims that this potentially mild and gradual increase should justify draconian population controls, economy killing emissions reductions, and the commitment of trillions of dollars to "combat" is too stupid to even debate. 

 

 

 

  

220 Scientists Caught with Pants Down on Climate Change Edition of Cheaters TV Show: http://tinyurl.com/ykf2aue

221

And, great, that glasses asshole thinks they were framed! Listen glasses, the guy's admitted that they're real, already. Duh.

222 I don't recognize that programming language.

223 If only the decline in warming were true

Oh, dear.  You really must see how the GISS data is "produced."  It certainly isn't by measurement:
http://tinyurl.com/yamntu9

AGW has always been a joke.  As many here have pointed out, the models are all junk because they can't take historical climate data and "predict" known data from following years (eg, loading in measurements from the 1940s and getting the correct results for 1960s).

And of course there is the fact that their fundamental underlying hypothesis is provably wrong.  They say small changes in the total amount of CO₂ in the atmosphere cause by human activities result in huge, global weather effects.  However, ice core data has shown the CO₂ level in the atmosphere in the past to have been 6 to 20 times higher than now (the increase sometimes taking place in as little as 30 years), without any of their doomsday scenarios occurring.  No further argument against AGW is necessary. 

224 Since 1998 the global temperature has reduced, although some say its still getting warmer and some claim it's "plateaued" so it is exactly the same as it was in 1998. Sorry guys. Cooler = cooler, no matter how much you stamp your foot and grit your teeth.

And that data which shows the oceans (and the atmosphere) are cooler than the land? That sort of proves the claim that all the temperature stations are near roads and in cities, thus giving false reads.

Whatever warming there was (and it strongly appears that it was much less then the warmies claimed it was), it ended and wasn't dangerous to begin with. Your house of cards is falling to pieces.

I wouldn't be at all surprised to find this happening with other long held, dearly loved, and "consensus" theories in the near future.

225 Read the e-mails!

Read the e-mails!

226 discount nike air yeezy china wholesale online discount ugg boots在线营销 网络营销 ugg bootsDiscount storeugg bootugg boots nike free shoeschina wholesaleugg womennike air yeezys nike air yeezy oneNew Nike Air Yeezy china wholesale shoes china wholesale market china wholesale women ugg boots

227 In what way was research conducted a decade ago that "cherrypicked" data? And in what way did the presentation of these data fatally controvert "AGW"?

There was no cherrypicking. The data were presented in such a way to defend the discussion of test results.

Try reading Loehle's reconstruction of the hockey stick model without the tree ring proxies or, more recently Steve McIntyre's debunking of Briffa's Yamal tree ring reconstruction. 

228 Read the discount e-mails!

Read the discount e-mails!

229 So uh... you come here often?

230 Doh. Wrong thread.

231 #222: I don't recognize that programming language.

Posted by: Gerry at November 23, 2009 07:55 PM (cSBta)

qbasic from microsoft uses semicolons the way real scripting languages use octothorpes.

232

I wouldn't be at all surprised to find this happening with other long held, dearly loved, and "consensus" theories in the near future.

It's been happening in the field of Anthropology for quite some time. The migration of Early Americans from Asia to America is wild guesswork based on ancient pieces of broken spear points and small fragments of human bones.

233

They know what it is at Climate Audit. And what I gathered from there was that these reconstructions are built the same way -- all tree-ring guesswork and other proxies from whenever to 1880 or so. Then a mix of tree-ring guesses, other proxies, and surface measurements from then until 1960. And after 1960 no trees to be found, because the trees all show declining temperatures while the other records show warming.

Without the trees, the MWP is still present and the current warming is no big deal. The trees are absolutely vital to their entire scheme**. But they know that the trees do not show the recent warming well. So they include the bit that hides MWP, and don't include the bit that indicates they don't have a 100% grasp of what is actually going on with the tree rings.

Briffa (he's in the emails) was praised (by the other guys in the emails) for his Yamal calculations -- because they are the only modern tree series to show the current warming. But even that required a LOT of fudging -- take away ONE TREE and the whole thing falls apart. Yamal in the last part of the 20th Cent is pretty much only based on fewer trees than would make up one side of a football play, so this is the same as saying the whole result depends on 10% of the sample. That's indicative of a weighting problem. Another indication the Yamal series is crap is that it apparently doesn't match the local temperature records. This is where the AGW's true pseudoscientific roots are clearly exposed -- look up the concept of tele-connection and tell me that isn't a load of crap along the lines of phrenology and Chariot of the Gods bullshit. Yamal's trees are apparently attuned via tele-connection to the rest of the world's trees more than they are to their own local conditions.

Polar Urals, which is a much better sampling with many more trees, does not show either a hockey stick or a complete disconnect from local conditions. Oddly enough, same guys were involved I think. But no hockey stick means no interest in pursuing the data.

Go to Climate Audit, they get into mind-numbing detail over there on all of this stuff.

 

**There is one other thing that shows a hockey stick with no MWP -- lake sediments from Finland. However, the only way this works is if you TURN IT UPSIDE DOWN (!!!!!) and ignore the authors' warning that the last half of the 20th century is bogus due to construction and other human activity that mucked with the sediment. While one of the release emails indicates the 'team' was aware of this error, there has been absolutely no correction or retraction with regards to this mistake.

234 I fee like I'm getting fucked like that poor chicken.

235 Why do people believe that computers cannot lie.

Beats me.

236 The ice is NOT gonna break!

237 burberry scarf | CD Keys

238

This is the real troubling aspect.  What if all their "adjusting" "smoothing" "normalizing" and outright fudging is actually hiding a cooling trend?  In the 1970's some scientists were actually predicting cooling.  If this AGW scam is hiding a cooling trend (a real catastrophe),  the perps should be shot.

One can do some general reading of history to discover what a cool planet does to human agriculture. 

239 What is the green house index for phlogiston?  Yeah, that's it.

240 Yes, when my data and techniques are irreproachable, I too send emails to my colleagues to hide my data and destroy correspondence.

Plus, somebody leaked this. Probably a tech or researcher who just couldn't keep living a lie.

241 Computers can't lie. Computer operators, however....

242

If this AGW scam is hiding a cooling trend (a real catastrophe),  the perps should be shot.

It doesn't matter.

If we were or are in such a trend, you can't do a damn thing about it.

243

If we were or are in such a trend, you can't do a damn thing about it. Posted by: Entropy

Yep, and we can't do anything about a warming trend either. 

244

Entropy, after giving this some thought, if we knew that a cooling trend was in the works, agriculturists and other plant scientists would be able to plan and develop food crops that will grow in a cool climate.  We could prepare for colder winters.    

245

, if we knew that a cooling trend was in the works, agriculturists and other plant scientists would be able to plan and develop food crops that will grow in a cool climate.

They do that anyway.

They are not, in anticipation of the coming Great Warmening, all sitting on their asses and playing Freecell, I hope.

But fact is, we allready have the technology to produce all the food we need and then some as it is. Cold or warm. The US is a major exporter of food, and we could grow a LOT more. We pay farmers as it is NOT to grow stuff to keep the prices artificially high and avoid food gluts.

We could certainly beef up our energy production in anticipation of greater heating requirements. But we already know we need to do that, and won't. And we can always do it 2 minutes too late and suffer only mildly, all things considered.

There's not much to prepare for, really. I live in Chicago. You'll Florida wusses will learn to live with it.

As for stocking canned goods under your bed like they told you to do in the 70's... well I assume you still have all the pork n' beans you shoved under your mattress for Y2k no?

246

Fact is, if they were screaming Global Cooling, right or wrong, I'd be accusing them of fear mongering just the same as now.

247

And even as it is, food gluts and Volcanic Doom and all, those chipper little agriculturalists are scheming up sinister ways to grow random crap in artic tundra, space stations, and sea floors, just because it's whats they do.

And cuz they think it will Solve World Hunger or something if they teach eskimos to grow avacados.

248 and yet the only thing regarding the enviroment on MSNBC.COM is the headine "Co2 Levels On the Rise".    This from a network that had Al Gore preaching about being green all week.  I can't wait for Inhofe investigations to blow this whole  scheme out of the water.  I am sure everyone saw him dismisss the junior "Senator" from Ca.  That was so awesome. 

249 DaveS, I disagree with you about where we should place our efforts on this.

We should attack this AGW hoax from all angles. None of this work is any good at all. Every model should be scrapped. All the data, the raw direct data and the raw proxy data should be re-examined and where possible remeasured.

None of it should be shoved into modeling software. Why?

Because you don't need to do that and it only leads to trouble. The data alone can show the connection, whatever it may be, between CO2 levels and temperature levels. Do we need to use models to show how in North America the temperature is affected by the calendar?

I do not rail against statistics in Science. It is a valid and powerful tool. I've used it many times. But few things in Science are equally ripe for abuse.

The best thing to do is plot the raw data, with the error bars included, and then let the Scientists scream at each other for 20 years. By then Al Gore and most hippies will be dead.

A self-cleaning oven.

250 Do any of you suspect Algore knew of this science cabal? In on the fudging of data to make the graphs? Or do you think he just accepted the output without prejudice

251 250 Do any of you suspect Algore knew of this science cabal? In on the fudging of data to make the graphs? Or do you think he just accepted the output without prejudice

Posted by: kmiller1k at November 24, 2009 03:02 AM (n5ruu)

The guy who thinks that it's "millions of degrees" at the Earth's core? I don't think Gore is smart enough to light an LED bulb with his IQ. He is the epitome of the useful idiot. He should still go to jail, anyway, because he knows that he doesn't know anything. Gore's only talent is that he is totally impervious to embarrassment and humiliation - which seems to be the great strength of many on the left.

The big question is what the retards on the SCOTUS who ruled that global warming was real, anthropogenic, and CO2-based (among other idiocies) should be subject to. Clearly, they are too dumb to be trusted with any decision of import - not that that's news ...

252

It's been happening in the field of Anthropology for quite some time. The migration of Early Americans from Asia to America is wild guesswork based on ancient pieces of broken spear points and small fragments of human bones.

I've been casually following this, and the changes are starting to show up in even state-run museums. The "ice-free corridor" is disappearing (because it never existed), and there are even the occasional, grudging, references to pre-Clovis populations.

253

I agree with the post.  Ingenuous explanations like padding a polynomial smoothing function are inadequate to explain the email narrative.

The fact is the data end of many tree-ring series ended in 1980, padding would have carried forward from that point, to 2020, the tail discarded.  Anyway, the tail direction can be selected by choice of polynomial.

Here the last 20 years of the data are replaced.  The PCM construct is filled not with data but 'temperature measurements' of unknown provenance.

254 Ïáíá ÔÇÊ ÇáÔáå ÏÑÏÔÇÊ ÇáÎáíÌ ÏÑÏÔÇÊ ÇáÓÚæÏíå ÏÑÏÔÉ ÚÑÈíå ãäÊÏì ÑæÍÇäíÇÊ ÌÓÑ ÇáÊæÇÕá ÇÏÈíÇÊ ÔÑÝÇÊ ÇáÇÒÇåíÑ ÏæÇÆÑ ÖæÁ ÇáÊÑÝíÉ ÔÈÇÈíÇÊ ÇáÚÇÈ ÊæÈíßÇÊ ÔÇÊ ÕæÊí ÓÍÑ ÇáÚÇáã ÊÚáã ÇááÛÉ ÇáÇäÌáíÒíÉ ÕæÑ ãíÓí ÕæÑ ÇÛÑÈ ÓíÇÑÉ Ïáíá ÇáÒæÌÉ ÇáäÇÌÍÉ åäÏ ÇáÈáæÔí ÇÕÇáå äÕÑí Ñäíä ÇáÍíÇÉ ÇáÒæÌíå ÓÚæÏí ßÇã ÏÑÏÔÉ ÕæÊíÉ ÔÇÊ ÇáÔáå ÏÑÏÔÉ ÇáÔáÉ alshellah ahj ãäÊÏíÇÊ ÃÓáÇãíÉ ãäÊÏíÇÊ ßæßÊíá ãäÊÏíÇÊ ÈÑÇãÌ ãäÊÏíÇÊ ÔÈÇÈ ßæá ãäÊÏíÇÊ ÇáÇÏÈíÉ ãäÊÏíÇÊ ÇáÇÌÊãÇÚíÉ msn - yahoo - Gmail - Skype - Paltalk ãäÊÏíÇÊ ÇÝáÇã ãäÊÏíÇÊ ÇáÌæÇá ãäÊÏíÇÊ ÇáÔáÉ ÊÍãíá ÌÇÝÇ ãÇÓäÌÑíÇÊ ÇáÚÇÈ ÔÇÊ ÓÚæÏí ÓÚæÏí ßÇã ÇáíßÓÇ ÔÇÈß ÔÇÊ ÊÚÈ ÞáÈí ÔÇÊ ÇáÓÇåÑ ÔÇÊ ÇáÛáÇ ÓÚæÏí ßæá ÕæÑ ÓßÓ ÔÇÊ ãÌäæäß ÔÇÊ ÈÑÞ ãæÇáí ÔÇÊ ÇáÑíÇÖ ÔÇÊ ÌÏå ÔÇÊ ÇáÞÕíã ÔÇÊ ÈäÇÊ ÇáÓÚæÏíå ÔÇÊ ÍíÇÊí ÛíÑ äÊ áæÞ ÒæÇÌ ãÓíÇÑ ÔÇÊ ÍáÇ ÍáÇ ÇáÓÚæÏíå ÔÇÊÇÊ ÏÑÏÔÇÊ ÏÑÏÔÉ ÇáÔáÉ ÏÑÏÔÉ ÇáÍÈ ÏÑÏÔÉ ÇáÎáíÌ ÔÇÊ ÇáæÏ ÔÇÊ ÕæÊí ÇáÎíÇá

255

All this interest in the hoax-proving e-mails, yet no one will look at the "instrumental" temperature record compiled by Phil Jones .... WHY?

Why will no one even LOOK at it.

I believe the HADCRUt database is still available online.  Just go look at the data for January 1860 in the HADCRUt database.  See what it is and compare it to what it claims to be, i.e. a "Global" "Average" temperature.  Just go look for God's sake.  Somebody; anybody.

256 Yeah anthropology is about as sketchy a science as sociology. The people involved have their agendas. Here's the thing though: I think many branches of science are working in this sort of pattern.

Look, however you happen to believe about the theory of evolution, consider this: do you think if data showed that evolution didn't work or wasn't possible, that it was in error, how many scientists would admit it? How many would massage the data and change the wording and adjust the theory until that square block fit through the round hole?

257 ãäÊÏíÇÊ ãæÞÚ ÍæÇÁ ááÈäÇÊ ááÈäÇÊ ÇÓÊÖÇÝÉ ÈäÇÊ ÇáÓÚæÏíÉ ÈäÊ ÓÚæÏíÉ ãØíÑ ÇáäæÇÏÑ íæÊíæÈ ÚÇáã ÇáÍÈ ÇáÍíÇÉ ÇáÒæÌíÉ åæÇãíÑ ãáæß ÇáÚÑÈ ÊÝÓíÑ ÇáÇÍáÇã ÕæÑ ßÊÈ ÔÇÊ ãÚáæãÇÊ ÇáÚÇÈ ÈäÇÊ ÈË ãÈÇÔÑ ØÈÎ ÇáÚÇÈ ØÈ äßÊ ÏÑæÓ Ïáíá ãÇÓäÌÑ ÌæÇá ÞÕÕ ÓÊáÇíÊ ÓßÑÈÊÇÊ ÔÚÑ ÑÓÇÆá ÈÑäÇãÌ ÊÑÌãÉ ÊÍãíá ÇÝáÇã ÔÇÊ ÕæÊí ÇÝáÇã ÈäÇÊ ÇáÚÇÈ ááÈäÇÊ ÝÞØ áÚÈÉ ÌÏíÏÉ ÈÑæßÓí Óãæ ÇáÍÈ áíá ÇáÍÈ ÝæÑßÓ ÈáÇß ÈíÑí ÊæÈíßÇÊ ÈäÇÊ ÔÇÊ ÈäÇÊ ÔÇÊ ÇáÑíÇÖ

258 Rolex watches    A.Lange & Sohne watches   Alain Silberstein watches   Audemars Piguet watches   Baume & Mercier watches   Bell&Ross watches   Blancpain watches   Breguet watches   Breitling  watches   Bvlgari watches   Cartier  watches

259 The proper function of man is to live, but not to exist.ugg classic cardyConquer fear of death and you are put into possession of your life. ugg classic tallThere is a time to speak and a time to be silent. ugg knightsbridgefree shippingmbt cheap
mbt sale
mbt uk
mbt shoes cheap
MBT M.Walk

260 Many years ago, the West's fashion is full of west wild color in general with ugg boots, and it was popular for many young girls to wear like this: dress with a fringed jacket, denim shirt, blue jeans, Western-style boots and a cowboy hat on head. But now ugg boots uk with frilly blouses and skirts are very popular, many women are willing to match feminine clothing with ugg cardy in the pursuit of special effects in ugg boots uk shop.

261

It is a great idea especially for relatively new blogs. I’d like to try this.

ugg bailey button Just got my ugg classic mini! They are absolutely beautiful, and the quality is just amazing. No wearing them in, no blisters just absolutely snug strait out of the box.

Everything dynamic and very positively!

262 With christian louboutin super -insincere wow power leveling grey suede ankle boots.The outlay is a certain christian louboutin discount for every event.you can World of Warcraft Gold it is very reduced. Sport a brace of christian louboutin sale and be the most sexy and street lights princess. links of london is the best online links london stores where you can buy the cheapest links of london jewellery and links london jewelry . Our huge selection of Ed hardy and ed hardy clothing your edhardy.com good With

263 hot news for brand shoes online store ,do you want to win more discount ?and popular for younger,and nike air maxwith top quality A ,come on all air max shoes with lowest price for highest quality !

264 Buy discount ugg shoes
cheap ugg shoes
cheap ugg
ugg rainier
buy ugg
ugg usa
discount ugg boots
ugg 5825
ugg shoes sale
ugg sundance
ugg shoes
cheap ugg boots
ugg 5815
ugg sale
ugg uk
ugg knightsbridge
womens ugg boots
ugg boots
ugg australia
ugg 5819free shipping

265 The perfect combination of any one louis vuitton product with other may bring you unexpected surprises and joys. For more information on the louis vuitton sale please pay attention to our website, we will serve you with high quality products and outstanding service... Seeing the following content, you may find the answers to the questions above. Maybe there really exists some louis vuitton outlet .

266 high quality replica watches of well known brands - Jacob & Co, TAG Heuer, Cartier, Panerai and much more. *If you want to buy replica watch, you have come to the right place! We are leading supplier of all kinds of REPLICA WATCHES. The leading name in luxury watches, rolex watches has been the pre-eminent symbol of performance and prestige for over a century. Rolex men's and ladies' watches omega watches Sale is a Discount Omega Watches Store.We Offer Cheap Omega Replica Watches With Best Quality And Other Replica Brand Watches For Sale.

267 Everything dynamic and very positively!
Ugg Classic Cardy,discount, free shipping!

268 The cheap ugg boots sale for women are stylish, they are comfortable and what¡¯s more, they keep your feet. theres a pair of fellow sufferers,ugg australia uk to complement your personal preferences, why do we not take the traditional high discount ugg boots on salefor cold winter?
As a matter of fact, with the passing time, the love for ugg usa is increasing among girls in this modern world. The growing demand for these womens ugg made the manufacturers UGG Boots Sale to revamp the looks of these boots with different hues.come our website and buy a pair of ugg uk.UGG Classic Cardy are popular as shoes for cowboys. The SHOES close the whole parts of the foot. The ugg cardy are important to protect your feet from any dangerous things during your walking activities. There are many oatmeal ugg available in the Market and if you are interested to get one you can directly go to the store that sells it.

269

ÊæÈíßÇÊ ¡ ÃäÇÔíÏ ØíæÑ ÇáÌäå ¡ÞÕÇÆÏ ßÊÇÈíå ¡ ÞÕÇÆÏ ãÓãæÚå ¡ ÎæÇØÑ ¡ ÞÕÕ ÑæÇíÇÊ ¡ÃÒíÇÁ ¡ ÝÓÇÊíä  ¡ ãßíÇÌ ¡ ÎáØÇÊ ¡ ÊÓÑíÍÇÊ ¡ ÏíßæÑ ¡ ÏíßæÑÇÊ ¡ ÍáæíÇÊ ¡ ãÚÌäÇÊ ¡ äÇÏí ÇáåáÇá ¡ äÇÏí ÇáäÕÑ ¡ äÇÏí ÇáÇÊÍÇÏ ¡ ÓíÇÑÇÊ ¡ ãæÏíáÇÊ ÓíÇÑÇÊ ¡ÃÒíÇÁ ÇÏã ¡ Åäãí ¡ÃÝáÇã Çäãí ¡ ÕæÑ ØÈíÚíå ¡ ÓíäãÇ ¡ ÇÝáÇã ¡ ãÓáÓáÇÊ ÑãÖÇäíå ¡ ÕæÑ ÝäÇäíä ¡ ÕæÑ ããËáíä ¡ ÕæÑ ãØÑÈíä ¡ ãÓáÓá ÚÇÕí ¡ ÒÝÇÊ ¡ ÇÛÇäí ÈÏæä ãæÓíÞì ¡ ßáãÇÊ ÇÛÇäí  ¡ ãÇÓäÌÑ ¡ ÓßÑÈÊÇÊ ¡ ËíãÇÊ ãÇÓäÌÑ ¡ ÈÑÇãÌ ááãÇÓäÌÑ ¡ ÕæÑ ãÇÓäÌÑ ¡ ÕæÑ ÈäÇÊ ááãÇÓäÌÑ ¡ ÕæÑ ÔÈÇÈ ááãÇÓäÌÑ  ¡ ÊæÈíß ¡ äßÇÊ ¡ ÊæÈíßÇÊ ÇÛÇäí ¡ ÊæÈíßÇÊ ßÑÊæäíå ¡ ÊæÈíßÇÊ ãáæäå ¡ ÈÑÇãÌ ÝæÊæÔæÈ ¡ ÎáÝíÇÊ ááÊÕãíã ¡ ÕæÑ ááÊÕãíã ¡ ÎÇãÇÊ ¡ ÝáÇÊÑ ¡ ÇßÔä ¡ÝáÇÊÑ ¡ ÓßÑÇÈÒ ¡ ÎØæØ ¡ ÈÇÊÑä ¡ ÝÑÔ ¡ ÌáÊÑ ¡ ÓæíÊÔ ¡ ÝáÇÔ ¡ ãáÝÇÊ ãÝÊæÍå ¡ ãáÝ ãÝÊæÍ  ¡ ÌæÇá ¡ ÈÑÇãÌ ÌæÇá ¡ ËíãÇÊ ÌæÇá ¡ ÇáÚÇÈ ÌæÇá ¡ ÈáæÊæË ¡ äÛãÇÊ ÌæÇá ¡ íæÊíæÈ ¡ ÑÓÇÆá ¡mms ¡ sms ¡ ãÓÌÇÊ ¡ æÓÇÆØ ÇÛÇäí ¡ ÈÑÇãÌ ßãÈíæÊÑ ¡ ÇáÚÇÈ ßãÈíæÊÑ ¡ ÇáÚÇÈ ÈäÇÊ ¡ ãäÊÏì ¡ ãäÊÏíÇÊ ¡ æÊáæãäí Ýíß ¡ ÔÈßÉ æÊáæãäí Ýíß

ßáãÇÊ ÃÛÇäí ÎÇáÏ ÚÈÏÇáÑÍãä ßáãÇÊ ÇáÈæã ÎÇáÏ ÚÈÏÇáÑÍãä ßáãÇÊ ÇáÈæã ÑæÍ ÑæÍí
ÃáÈæã ÎÇáÏ ÚÈÏÇáÑÍãä ÞáÈß ßÈíÑ ÃÛÇäí ÃáÈæã ÎÇáÏ ÚÈÏÇáÑÍãä ÞáÈß ßÈíÑ ßáãÇÊ ÃÛÇäí ÃáÈæã ÎÇáÏ ÚÈÏÇáÑÍãä ÞáÈß ßÈíÑ
ÃáÈæã ÎÇáÏ ÚÈÏÇáÑÍãä ÝÑÍÉ áÞÇäÇ ÃÛÇäí ÃáÈæã ÎÇáÏ ÚÈÏÇáÑÍãä ÝÑÍÉ áÞÇäÇ ßáãÇÊ ÃáÈæã ÎÇáÏ ÚÈÏÇáÑÍãä ÝÑÍÉ áÞÇäÇ
ÃáÈæã ÎÇáÏ ÚÈÏÇáÑÍãä ÚÞÏ æÓæÇÑ ÃÛÇäí ÃáÈæã ÎÇáÏ ÚÈÏ ÇáÑÍãä ÚÞÏ æÓæÇÑ ßáãÇÊ ÃáÈæã ÎÇáÏ ÚÈÏÇáÑÍãä ÚÞÏ æÓæÇÑ
ÃáÈæã ÎÇáÏ ÚÈÏÇáÑÍãä ÇáÈæã ÎÇáÏ ÚÈÏÇáÑÍãä ÓÇãÑíÇÊ - ãä íÓÏ ÈãßÇäå ßáãÇÊ ÃÛÇäí ÇáÈæã ÓÇãÑíÇÊ - ãä íÓÏ ÈãßÇäå
ÃáÈæã ÎÇáÏ ÚÈÏÇáÑÍãä ÇáÈæã ÎÇáÏ ÚÈÏÇáÑÍãä ÈÞÇíÇ ÌÑæÍ ßáãÇÊ ÃÛÇäí ÇáÈæã ÈÞÇíÇ ÌÑæÍ
ÃáÈæã ÎÇáÏ ÚÈÏÇáÑÍãä ÕÝÍÉ ÌÏíÏÉ ÃÛÇäí ÃáÈæã ÎÇáÏ ÚÈÏÇáÑÍãä ÕÝÍÉ ÌÏíÏÉ ßáãÇÊ ÃáÈæã ÎÇáÏ ÚÈÏÇáÑÍãä ÕÝÍÉ ÌÏíÏÉ
ÃáÈæã ÎÇáÏ ÚÈÏÇáÑÍãä ÇáÈæã ÎÇáÏ ÚÈÏÇáÑÍãä ÅÝÑÇÞ ßáãÇÊ ÃÛÇäí ÇáÈæã ÎÇáÏ ÚÈÏÇáÑÍã ÅÝÑÇÞ
ßáãÇÊ ÃÛäíÉ Ôáæäß ÍÈíÈí ¡ ÊÍãíá ÃÛäíÉ Ôáæäß ÍÈíÈí ¡ Ôáæäß ÍÈíÈí ¡ ßáãÇÊ ÇÛÇäí ÇáÈæã ãÇÌÏ ãåäÏÓ 2009
ßáãÇÊ ÇáÈæã ÇáæÓãí 2009 ßáãÇÊ ÃÛÇäí ÇáÈæã ãÇáß Íá 2009þ
ßáãÇÊ ÇÛäíÉ ÇáÝäÇäå Óãíå ÇáÎÔÇÈ ÚÇíÒÇß ßÏå ßáãÇÊ ÇÛäíÉ Óãíå ÇáÎÔÇÈ ÚÇíÒÇß ßÏå 2009
ßáãÇÊ ÇÛÇäí ÑÇÔÏ ÇáãÇÌÏ 2009 ßáãÇÊ ÌÏíÏ ÑÇÔÏ ÇáãÇÌÏ 2009 ÌãíÚ ÇÛÇäí ÑÇÔÏ ÇáãÇÌÏ ßáãÇÊ ÇÛÇäí ÑÇÔÏ 2009
ßáãÇÊ ÇÛÇäí ÇáÝäÇä ÚÈÏ ÇáãÌíÏ ÚÈÏÇááå ßáãÇÊ ÇÛÇäí ÇáÈæã ÑæÍí ÊÍÈß ßáãÇÊ ÇÛäíÉ ÑæÍí ÊÍÈß ßáãÇÊ ÇÛäíÉ ãÓãæÍ ßáãÇÊ ÇÛäíÉ Úíä ßáãÇÊ ÇÛäíÉ ãä Çæá ÇÝÑÍ ßáãÇÊ ÇÛäíÉ ÍÈÇíÈäÇ
ÃÛäíÉ ÚÇÏ ÚíÏß ÍÈíÈí ¡ ÊÍãíá ÃÛäíÉ ÚÇÏ ÚíÏß ¡ ßáãÇÊ ÃÛäíÉ ÚÇÏ ÚíÏß ÍÈíÈí ¡ ÃÛÇäí ÑÇÔÏ ÇáãÇÌÏ
ÃÛäíÉ íÇÔÑØí ¡ ÊÍãíá ÃÛäíÉ íÇÔÑØí ¡ ßáãÇÊ ÃÛäíÉ íÇÔÑØí ¡ íÇÔÑØí ßáã ÍÈíÈí
ÒÝÇÊ ÏíÇäÇ ÍÏÇÏ ÈÏæä ãæÓíÞì ¡ ÒÝÇÊ ÏíÇäÇ ÍÏÇÏ ¡ ÒÝÇÊ ÃÛÇäí ÏíÇäÇ ÍÏÇÏ 2009þ
ßáãÇÊ ÃÛäíÉ ÇäÇ ÇäÓÇäå ßáãÇÊ ÃÛÇäí ÇáÈæã íÇÑÇ 2009 ÊÍãíá ÃÛäíÉ ÃäÇ ÇäÓÇäå
ÒÝÉ ÃÛäíÉ Îáí Úíäß ÊäÇÙÑ ¡ ÒÝÉ Îáí Úíäß ÊäÇÙÑ ¡ ÒÝÇÊ ÚÑÇíÓ ¡ ÒÝÇÊ ÚÑæÓ ¡ ÒÝÇÊ 2009
ßáãÇÊ ÃÛÇäí ÃÑæì 2009 ßáãÇÊ ÇáÈæã ÛÕÈ Úäß 2009 ÇáÈæã ÇÑæì ÛÕÈ Úäß 2009þ
ÃÛäíÉ ãäÊ ÑÇíÞ ÈÏæä ãæÓíÞì ¡ ÊÍãíá ÃÛäíÉ ãäÊ ÑÇíÞ ÈÏæä ãæÓíÞì
ÒÝÉ ãÐåáå ¡ ÒÝÉ ÃÛäíÉ ãÐåáå ¡ ÒÝÉ ÃÛÇäí ãÍãÏ ÚÈÏå 2009 ¡ ÒÝÉ ãÐåáå ãÍãÏ ÚÈÏå
ÃÛäíÉ íÇÛÏÇÑå ¡ ßáãÇÊ ÃÛäíÉ íÇÛÏÇÑå ¡ ÊÍãíá ÃÛäíÉ íÇÛÏÇÑå ¡ íÇÛÏÇÑå ¡ ÃÛÇäí ÑÇÔÏ ÇáãÇÌÏ 2009
ÃÛäíÉ ÇÚÐÑíäí ÈÏæä ãæÓíÞì ¡ ÊÍãíá ÃÛäíÉ ÇÚÐÑíäí ÈÏæä ãæÓíÞì ¡ ÊÍãíá ÃÛÇäí ÈÏæä ãæÓíÞì
ÃÛäíÉ ÃÓÇÝÑ Úäß ÈÏæä ãæÓíÞì ¡ ÊÍãíá ÃÛäíÉ ÃÓÇÝÑ Úäß ÈÏæä ãæÓíÞì
ÇÛÇäí ÈÏæä ãæÓíÞì ¡ ÚÒå íÇÞáÈí ãä Çáåã ¡ ÇÛäíÉ ÚÒå ÈÏæä ãæÓíÞì ¡ ÇÛÇäí ÑÇÔÏ ÇáÝÇÑÓ ÈÏæä ãæÓíÞì
ÒÝÉ Øá ÇáÞãÑ ¡ ÒÝÉ ÃÛäíÉ Øá ÇáÞãÑ ¡ ÒÝÉ Øá ÇáÞãÑ 2009 ¡ ÒÝÉ ÃÛäíÉ Øá ÇáÞãÑ 2009
ÑÝÉ ÃÛäíÉ ÇáãÔßáå ÃÛäíÉ ÇáãÔßáå ÈÏæä ãæÓíÞì ÃÛäíÉ ÇáãÔßáå ÈÕæÊ ãæÖí ÃÛÇäí ÈÕæÊ ãæÖí
ÃÛäíÉ ÛÇÈ ÕæÊß ÈÏæä ãæÓíÞì ¡ ÊÍãíá ÇÛäíÉ ÛÇÈ ÕæÊß ÈÏæä ãæÓíÞì ¡ ÃÛÇäí ÝÇÑÓ ãåÏí ÈÏæä ãæÓíÞì
ÒÝÉ íÇÞãÑ Óáã ¡ ÒÝÇÊ ÅÓáÇãíå ¡ ÒÝÇÊ ÎáíÌíå ¡ ÒÝÇÊ ÃÛäíÉ ÇÞãÑ Óáã ¡ ÒÝÇÊ ÈÏæä ãæÓíÞì
ÇÓÑÇÑ ÇáÚíæä . ãÍãÏ ÚÈÏå . ÈÏæä ãæÓíÞì ÒÝå ÑæÚå
ÒÝÉ ÃÛáì ÚÑæÓ ¡ ÒÝÉ ÃÛäíÉ ÃÛáì ÚÑæÓ ¡ ÒÝÇÊ ÚÑÇíÓ ¡ ÒÝÇÊ ÒæÇÌ
ßáãÇÊ ÇáÈæã ÇáÝäÇäå íÇÑÇ 2009 áÇáì ÎáíÌíå ßáãÇÊ ÇÛäíÉ ÇäÇ ÇäÓÇäå ßáãÇÊ ÇÛäíÉ Èßá Ôí ÊÌÐÈ ßáãÇÊ ÇÛäíÉ ÊÐßÑ íæã ßáãÇÊ ÇÛäíÉ ÑÇÛÈå ãäí ßáãÇÊ ÇÛäíÉ ÓßÑ ÒíÇÏå ßáãÇÊ ÇÛäíÉ Óáãæáí ßáãÇÊ ÇÛäíÉ ãÇÑæ
ßáãÇÊ ÇÛäíÉ ÑÇÔÏ ÇáÝÇÑÓ Ôí ËÇäí ¡ ßáãÇÊ ÇÛäíÉ Ôí ËÇäí ¡ ßáãÇÊ ÇáÈæã, ÑÇÔÏ ÇáÝÇÑÓ Ôí ËÇäí
ÃÛäíÉ æíä ÇÍÈ Çááíáå ÈÏæä ãæÓíÞì ¡ ßáãÇÊ ÃÛäíÉ æíä ÇÍÈ Çááíáå ¡ ÃÛÇäí ãÍãÏ ÚÈÏå 2010
ÃÛäíÉ ÊÞæì ÇáåÌÑ ÈÏæä ãæÓíÞì ¡ ÊÍãíá ÃÛäíÉ ÊÞæì ÇáåÌÑ ÈÏæä ãæÓíÞì
ÒÝÉ äæÑ ÇáÔãÓ ¡ ÒÝÉ ÃÛäíÉ äæÑ ÇáÔãÓ ¡ ÒÝÇÊ ááÚÑÇíÓ
ÃÛäíÉ ãÔÊÇÞ ÞÇáæáí ÈÏæä ãæÓíÞì ¡ ÊÍãíá ÃÛäíÉ ãÔÊÇÞ ÞÇáæáí ÈÏæä ãæÓíÞì ¡ ÃÛÇäí ÈÏæä ãæÓíÞì
ÒÝÉ áÇ ÊÞæáæä ¡ ÒÝÉ ÃÛäíÉ áÇ ÊÞæáæä ¡ ÒÝÇÊ ÃÛÇäí ãÍãÏ ÚÈÏå ¡ ÒÝÇÊ ãÍãÏ ÚÈÏå
ÃÛÇäí ãÇÌÏ ãåäÏÓ ÈÏæä ãæÓíÞì ÃÛäíÉ ÓÊ ÇáÍÈÇíÈ ÈÏæä ãæÓíÞì ¡ ÊÍãíá ÃÛäíÉ ÓÊ ÇáÍÈÇíÈ ÈÏæä ãæÓíÞì
ÃÛÇäí ãÇÌÏ ãåäÏÓ ÃÛäíÉ ÝæÞ ÇáÔæÞ ÈÏæä ãæÓíÞì ÊÍãíá ÃÛäíÉ ÝæÞ ÇáÔæÞ ÈÏæä ãæÓíÞì
ÇÛäíÉ ÇßËÑ ãä Çæá ÈÏæä ãæÓíÞì ÇÛäíÉ ÇÍáÇã ÈÏæä ãæÓíÞì ÇÛäíÉ ÇßËÑ ãä Çæá
ÃÛäíÉ ÍÈíÈí ÇÓÝ ÇÒÚÌÊß ÈÏæä ãæÓíÞì ¡ ÃÛÇäí ÎÇáÏ ÚÈÏÇáÑÍãä ÈÏæä ãæÓíÞì
ÒÝÉ ÞãÑ æÇÍáì ÒÝÇÊ ÑæÚå ÒÝÉ ÈÕæÊ ÚíÓì ÇáãÇÌÏ ÒÝå ÈÇÓã ÓÇÑåþ
ÒÝÉ Çááå íÇÍáæå ¡ ÒÝÉ ÇáÃãíÑå ÓÇÑå ¡ ÒÝÇÊ ÅÓáÇãíå ¡ ÒÝÉ Çááå íÇÍáæå ÈÏæä ãæÓíÞì
ÇÛäíÉ ÏáæÚÊí ÈÏæä ãæÓíÞì ÒÝÉ ÇÛäíÉ ÏáæÚÊí ÈÏæä ãæÓíÞì ÇÛäíÉ ÇáÝäÇä ÑÇÔÏ ÇáãÇÌÏ ÒÝå Íáæå
ÃÛäíÉ ÑæÍ æÑæÍ ÈÏæä ãæÓíÞì ¡ ÊÍãíá ÃÛäíÉ ÑæÍ æÑæÍ ÈÏæä ãæÓíÞì ¡ ÃÛÇäí ÃÕÇáå ÈÏæä ãæÓíÞì
ÇÛäíÉ ÎÇíäå ÈÕæÊ åäÏ ÇáÈáæÔí ÈÏæä ãæÓíÞì
ÒÛÇÑíÏ ÒÛÑæØå ÒÛÑæÊå ÒÛÑæÊå Øæíáå ÒÛÑæÊå ÞÕíÑå
ÇÛäíÉ ÌíÈå íÚäí ÇÌíÈå áæ ßÇä ÊÍÊ ÇáÍÑÇÓå ÈÏæä ãæÓíÞì
ÃÛäíÉ ÃäÇ ÍÈíÈí ÈÏæä ãæÓíÞì ¡ ÃÛÇäí ÝÇÑÓ ãåÏí ÈÏæä ãæÓíÞì ¡ ÊÍãíá ÃÛäíÉ ÃäÇ ÍÈíÈí ÈÏæä ãæÓíÞì
ÇÛäíÉ áÇíÞ Úáíß ÇáæÑÏ ÒÝÉ áÇíÞ Úáíß ÇáæÑÏ ÇÛäíÉ áÇíÞ Úáíß ÇáæÑÏ ÈÏæä ãæÓíÞì ÒÝÉ áÇíÞ Úáíß ÇáæÑÏ ááÚÑÇíÓ
æíáÇå ÖÇÞ ÇáÕÏÑ æãÇ ÐßÑ íÓÃá Úáí ÈÏæä ãæÓíÞì
ÃÛäíÉ Ìäå Ìäå ÈÏæä ãæÓíÞì ¡ ßáãÇÊ ÃÛäíÉ Ìäå Ìäå ¡ ÊÍãíá ÃÛäíÉ Ìäå Ìäå ÈÏæä ãæÓíÞì
ÒÝÇÊ ÃÛÇäí ãÍãÏ ÚÈÏå 2009 ¡ ÒÝÉ ÚÐÈÉ ÇáÃØÈÇÚ ¡ ÒÝÇÊ ãÍãÏ ÚÈÏå ¡ ÒÝÉ ÚÐÈÉ ÇáÇØÈÇÚ 2009
ÒÝÉ ÃãæÊ ÈÍÈß ¡ ÃÛäíÉ ÃãæÊ ÈÍÈß ÈÏæä ãæÓíÞì ¡ ÒÝÇÊ ÚÈÏÇáãÌíÏ ÚÈÏÇááå 2009 ¡ ÒÝÇÊ ÃÛÇäí ÚÈÏÇáãÌíÏ ÚÈÏÇááå 2009 ¡ ÒÝÉ ÃÛäíÉ ÃãæÊ ÈÍÈß 2009þ
ÃÛäíÉ ÊÚÈ ÞáÈí ÈÏæä ãæÓíÞì ¡ ÃÛÇäí äæÇá ÇáßæíÊí ÈÏæä ãæÓíÞì ¡ ßáãÇÊ ÃÛäíÉ ÊÚÈ ÞáÈí
ÇÛÇäí ÇáÌÓãí ÈÏæä ãæÓíÞì ¡ ÇÛäíÉ ÝÞÏß ÈÏæä ãæÓíÞì ¡ ÇÛÇäí ÇáÌÓãí ÝÞÏß ÈÏæä ãæÓíÞì
ÇÛäíÉ ÇÌíß íÓáã ÑÇÓß æÔáæä ãÇÌíß ÈÏæä ãæÓíÞì
ÇáÞæÓ ÞæÓß æÇáÓåÇã ÓåÇãß ÈÕæÊ ØÞÇÞå ÈÏæä ãæÓíÞì ÇÛäíå ÌÏíÏå ÇÛäíå 2009
ÇÛäíÉ ÕÏÝå áíÇÑÇ ÈÏæä ãæÓíÞì ÇÛäíÉ ÕÏÝå æãä Èíä ßá ÇáäÇÓ ÍÈíÊß ÈÇáÏÝ
ÃÛÇäí ÃÍáÇã ÈÏæä ãæÓíÞì ¡ ÃÛÇäí ÇáÈæãÇÊ ÃÍáÇã ¡ ÃÛÇäí ÇÍáÇã ÈÏæä ãæÓíÞì 2009 ¡ ÃÛÇäí ÈÏæä ãæÓíÞì
ÃÛäíÉ íÇáí Úáì ÇáÈÇá ÈÕæÊ ãæÖí ¡ ÒÝÉ íÇááí Úáì ÇáÈÇá ÈÏæä ãæÓíÞì ¡ ÃÛÇäí ãæÖí ÇáÔãÑí ÈÏæä ãæÓíÞì
ÇÛäíÉ ÇäÊ ØíÈ ÈÏæä ãæÓíÞì ÇÛäíÉ äæÇá ÈÏæä ãæÓíÞì ÇÛäíÉ ÇäÊ ØíÈ ÇÛäíÉ äæÇá ÇáßæíÊíå ÇäÊ ØíÈþ
ÃÛäíÉ íÚÌÈäí ÇáÒÚá ÈÏæä ãæÓíÞì ¡ ÊÍãíá ÃÛäíÉ íÚÌÈäí ÇáÒÚá ÈÏæä ãæÓíÞì ¡ ÃÛÇäí äæÇá ÇáßæíÊíå ÈÏæä ãæÓíÞì
ÃÛäíÉ Èíä ÃíÏí ÈÏæä ãæÓíÞì ¡ ÃÛäíÉ Èíä ÇíÏíÇ ÈÏæä ãæÓíÞì ¡ ÃÛÇäí ãÇÌÏ ãåäÏÓ ÈÏæä ãæÓíÞì
ÃÛäíÉ áíáí Çáã ÈÏæä ãæÓíÞì ¡ ÃÛäíÉ áíáí Ãáã ÈÏæä ãæÓíÞì
ÒÝÉ ÇÍáì ÚÑæÓ ÑÇÔÏ ÇáãÇÌÏ ÈÏæä ãæÓíÞì
ÃÛäíÉ Þæá Ããíä ÈÏæä ãæÓíÞì ¡ ÒÝÉ Þæá Çãíä ÈÏæä ãæÓíÞì ¡ ÒÝÇÊ ÚÈÏÇáãÌíÏ ÚÈÏÇááå ¡ ÒÝÉ Þæá Çãíä
ÃÛäíÉ íÇÞáÈí ÈÏæä ãæÓíÞì ÊÍãíá ÃÛäíÉ íÇÞáÈí ÈÏæä ãæÓíÞì ÃÛÇäí ãÇÌÏ ãåäÏÓ ÈÏæä ãæÓíÞì
ÇÛäíå ãÑÊÇÍ æáÇ íÊÕäÚ ÞáÈß ÇáÑÇÍå ÈÏæä ãæÓíÞì ¡ ÊÍãíá ÇÛäíå ãÑÊÇÍ æáÇ íÊÕäÚ ÞáÈß ÇáÑÇÍå ÈÏæä ãæÓíÞì ¡ ÃÛÇäí ÃÍáÇã 2009
ÒÝÉ ÃÍáì ãä ÇáÞãÑ ¡ ÒÝÉ ÃÛäíÉ ÃÍáì ãä ÇáÞãÑ ¡ ÒÝÉ ÃÛÇäí ÑÇÔÏ ÇáÝÇÑÓ ¡ ÒÝÇÊ ÃÛÇäí ÑÇÔÏ ÇáÝÇÑÓ
ÃÛäíÉ ÇäÇ æÎáí ÈÏæä ãæÓíÞì ¡ ÊÍãíá ÃÛäíÉ ÇäÇ æÎáí ÈÏæä ãæÓíÞì
ÃÛäíÉ ÇáÇ íÇãØæáå ÕÈÑí ÈÏæä ãæÓíÞì ¡ ÊÍãíá ÃÛäíÉ ÇáÇ íÇãØæáå ÕÈÑí ÈÏæä ãæÓíÞì
ÃÛäíÉ áæ íÞæáæä ÇäÊí Íáæå ÈÏæä ãæÓíÞì ¡ ßáãÇÊ ÃÛäíÉ ÅäÊí Íáæå ¡ ÃÛÇäí ÑÇÈÍ ÕÞÑ ÈÏæä ãæÓíÞì
ÃÛäíÉ ÃÌãá ÅäÓÇäå ¡ ÃÛäíÉ ÃÌãá ÅäÓÇäå ÈÏæä ãæÓíÞì ¡ ÊÍãíá ÃÛäíÉ ÃÌãá ÅäÓÇäå ÈÏæä ãæÓíÞì
ÒÝÉ ÇáÓäÏÑíáÇ ¡ ÒÝÉ ÃÛäíÉ ÇáÓäÏÑíáÇ ¡ ÒÝÇÊ ÅÓáÇãíå ¡ ÒÝÇÊ ÚÑÇíÓ
ÃÛäíÉ äÇæíáß Úáì äíå ¡ ÒÝÇÊ ÃÍáÇã ¡ ÒÝÇÊ ÃÛÇäí ÃÍáÇã ÈÏæä ãæÓíÞì ¡ ÒÝÇÊ ÃÝÑÇÍ
ÃÛäíÉ åáí áÇ ÊÍÑãæäí ãäå ÈÏæä ãæÓíÞì ¡ ÃÛÇäí ÑÇÔÏ ÇáãÇÌÏ 2009 ÈÏæä ãæÓíÞì ¡ ÃÛäíÉ åáí áÇ ÊÍÑãæäí ãäå
ÃÛäíÉ ÃÈí ÍÈß ãÚí íßÈÑ ÈÏæä ãæÓíÞì ¡ ÊÍãíá ÃÛäíÉ ÃÈí ÍÈß ãÚí íßÈÑ ÈÏæä ãæÓíÞì ¡ ÃÛÇäí ÈÏæä ãæÓíÞì 2009
ÃÛäíÉ ÇäÊ ãäÊ ÇäÓÇä ÃßËÑ ÈÏæä ãæÓíÞì ¡ ÊÍãíá ÇäÊ ãäÊ ÇäÓÇä ÃßËÑ ÈÏæä ãæÓíÞì ¡ ÃÛÇäí ÚÈÏÇáãÌíÏ ÈÏæä ãæÓíÞì
ÇÛäíÉ ÇáÚäÈ ÇáÚäÈ ÃÛÇäí ÚÈíÑ ÇáÊÑßí ÃÛäíÉ ÇáÚäÈ ÈÕæÊ ÚÈíÑ ÇáÊÑßí ÃÛÇäí ØÞÇÞÇÊ
ÃÛäíÉ ÊÍÓ Ýíäí ÈÏæä ãæÓíÞì ¡ ÊÍãíá ÃÛäíÉ ÊÍÓ Ýíäí ÈÏæä ãæÓíÞì ¡ ÃÛÇäí ÃÍáÇã ÈÏæä ãæÓíÞì ¡ ÃÛäíÉ ÊÍÓ Ýíäí ÃÍáÇã ÈÏæä ãæÓíÞìþ
ÃÛÇäí ÃÍáÇã ÈÏæä ãæÓíÞì ¡ ÃÛÇäí ÇáÈæãÇÊ ÃÍáÇã ¡ ÃÛÇäí ÇÍáÇã ÈÏæä ãæÓíÞì 2009 ¡ ÃÛÇäí ÈÏæä ãæÓíÞì
ÃÛäíÉ æÇááå æÇÍÔäí ãæÊ ÈÏæä ãæÓíÞì ¡ ÊÍãíá ÃÛäíÉ æÇááå æÇÍÔäí ãæÊ ÈÏæä ãæÓíÞì ¡ ÃÛÇäí ãÇÌÏ ãåäÏÓ ÈÏæä ãæÓíÞì
ÒÝÉ ÏÞæ ÇáãÒÇåÑ¡ ÒÝÇÊ ãÕÑíå ¡ ÒÝÉ ÃÛäíÉ ÏÞæ ÇáãÒÇåÑ ¡ ÒÝÇÊ ÃÛÇäí ãÕÑíå
ÇÛäíÉ Ûäæ áÍÈíÈí ÈÏæä ãæÓíÞì ÇÛäíÉ ÚÈÏ ÇáãÌíÏ ÚÈÏÇááå ÈÏæä ãæÓíÞì ÇÛäíÉ Ûäæ áÍÈíÈí
ÃÛäíÉ Çáíæã ØÇáÚ ÞãÑ ¡ ÒÝÉ Çáíæã ØÇáÚ ÞãÑ ¡ ÒÝÇÊ ÚÈÏÇáãÌíÏ ÚÈÏÇááå ¡ ÒÝÉ Çáíæã ØÇáÚ ÞãÑ ÈÏæä ãæÓíÞì ¡ ÒÝÇÊ ÚÈÏÇáãÌíÏ ÚÈÏÇááå ÈÏæä ãæÓíÞìþ
ÃÛäíÉ äæÑ Úíäí ÈÏæä ãæÓíÞì ÃÛäíÉ ÍÈäÇ íÇ äæÑ Úíäí áÇ íÖíÚ ÃÛÇäí ÑÇÔÏ ÇáãÇÌÏ ÈÏæä ãæÓíÞì
ÒÝÇÊ ØÞÇÞÇÊ ÈÏæä ãæÓíÞì 2009 ¡ ÒÝÇÊ ØÞ ÈÏæä ãæÓíÞì 2009 ¡ ÊÍãíá ØÞÇÞÇÊ 2009 ¡ ÊÍãíá ØÞÇÞÇÊ ÈÏæä ãæÓíÞì 2009þ
ÒÝÇÊ ÌÏíÏå ÒÝå ÈÕæÊ ÑæÚå ÒÝå ßÇãáå ÒÝÇÊ 2009þ
ÒÝÇÊ ÃÛÇäí ÑÇÔÏ ÇáãÇÌÏ ÒÝÇÊ ÈÇáÇÓãÇÁ ÒÝÇÊ ÃÛÇäí ÑÇÔÏ ÇáãÇÌÏ ÈÇáÇÓãÇÁ ÒÝÇÊ ÑÇÔÏ 2009
ÃÛäíÉ ÑæÍ æÑæÍ ÈÏæä ãæÓíÞì ¡ ÃÛÇäí ÃÕÇáå ÈÏæä ãæÓíÞì ¡ ÃÛäíÉ ÑæÍ æÑæÍ ¡ ÃÛÇäí ÈÏæä ãæÓíÞì
ßáãÇÊ ÇÛÇäí ÇáÈæã åíÝÇÁ æåÈí ÇáÌÏíÏ ÈÇÈÇ Ýíä 2010 ßáãÇÊ ÇÛÇäí åíÝÇÁ æåÈí ÇáÌÏíÏå ÈÇÈÇ Ýíä æáãÇ ÊÛíÈ ÇáÔãÓ
ÃÛäíÉ ÇáÍßÇíå ÈÏæä ãæÓíÞì ¡ ÊÍãíá ÃÛäíÉ ÇáÍßÇíå ÈÏæä ãæÓíÞì
ÇÛäíÉ ÅäÏãÇÌ ÇáÇÑæÇÍ ÈÏæä ãæÓíÞì ¡ ßáãÇÊ ÃÛäíÉ ÅäÏãÇÌ ÇáÇÑæÇÍ ¡ ÃÛäíÉ ÅäÏãÇÌ ÇáÇÑæÇÍ ¡ ÃÛÇäí ÝÇÑÓ ÈÏæä ãæÓíÞì
ÃÛäíÉ ÚÒÇå ÈÏæä ãæÓíÞì ÊÍãíá ÃÛäíÉ ÚÒÇå ÈÏæä ãæÓíÞì ÊÍãíá ÃÛÇäí ÑÇÔÏ ÇáÝÇÑÓ ÈÏæä ãæÓíÞì
ÇÛäíÉ ÚÓì ÏÇíã äßæä ÇÍÈÇÈ ÇÛäíÉ ÚÈÏ ÇáãÌíÏ ÚÈÏ Çááå ÇÛäíå ÈÏæä ãæÓíÞì
ÇÛäíÉ ÑÞÕåã æÔÚááåã ¡ ÇÛäíÉ ÑÞÕåã æÔÚááåã ÈÏæä ãæÓíÞì ¡ ÑÞÕåã æÔÚááåã Úáì ÇáãÓÑÍ Ôæíå Ôæíå
ÇÛäíÉ ãä íÞæá Çäí áÛíÑß ÇÛäíÉ ÑÇÔÏ ÇáãÇÌÏ ÇÛäíå ÈÏæä ãæÓíÞì ÇÛäíå Íáæå
ÃÛäíÉ áÇ ÊÎÇÝ ãä ÇáÒãÇä ÈÏæä ãæÓíÞì ¡ ÊÍãíá ÃÛäíÉ áÇ ÊÎÇÝ ãä ÇáÒãÇä ¡ ÃÛÇäí ÃÕÇáå ÈÏæä ãæÓíÞì
ÇÛäíÉ ÑäíÊ áß Ñäå ÈÏæä ãæÓíÞì ¡ ÊäÒíá ÇÛäíÉ ÑäíÊ áß Ñäå ÈÏæä ãæÓíÞì ¡ ÇÛäíå ÑäíÊ áß Ñäå
ÇÛäíÉ Ýí ãäÊåì ÇáÑÞå ÈÏæä ãæÓíÞì ,ßáãÇÊ ÇÛäíÉ Ýí ãäÊåì ÇáÑÞå ÈÏæä ãæÓíÞì ,ÇÛäíÉ ÑÇÈÍ ÕÞÑ ÈãäÊåì ÇáÑÞå ÈÏæä ãæÓíÞì
ÇÛäíÉ æÇááå ÇÍÈß ÈÏæä ãæÓíÞì ,ßáãÇÊ ÇÛäíÉ æÇááå ÇÍÈß ,ÇÛäíÉ æÇááå ÇÍÈß ÈÕæÊ ÇÔæÇÞ ,ÇÛäíÉ æÇááå ÇÍÈß ÈÏæä ãæÓíÞì ,ÇÛäíÉ ÇáÝäÇä íæÓÝ ÇáÚãÇäí æÇááå ÇÍÈß
ÃÛäíÉ ÕÏÝå ÈÏæä ãæÓíÞì ¡ ÊÍãíá ÃÛäíÉ ÕÏÝå ÈÏæä ãæÓíÞì ¡ ÃÛÇäí íÇÑÇ ÈÏæä ãæÓíÞìþ
ÒÝÉ ÇÍáì äåÇÑ ¡ ÒÝÉ ÎØæÉ ÎÌá ¡ ÒÝÇÊ ÑÇÔÏ ÇáãÇÌÏ 2009 ÒÝÉ ÃÛäíÉ ÃÍáì äåÇÑ ¡ ÒÝÉ ÃÛäíÉ ÎØæÉ ÎÌá
ÃÛäíÉ ÇáÃãÇßä ÈÏæä ãæÓíÞì ¡ ÊÍãíá ÃÛäíÉ ÇáÃãÇßä ÈÏæä ãæÓíÞì ¡ ÊÍãíá ÃÛÇäí ãÍãÏ ÚÈÏå ÈÏæä ãæÓíÞìþ
ÃÛÇäí ãÍãÏ ÚÈÏå ÈÏæä ãæÓíÞì ¡ ÃÛäíÉ ÅÎÊáÝäÇ ÈÏæä ãæÓíÞì ¡ ßáãÇÊ ÃÛäíÉ ÅÎÊáÝäÇ
ÒÝÇÊ ÍÓíä ÇáÌÓãí ÒÝÇÊ ÇáÌÓãí ÒÝÇÊ ÍÓíä ÇáÌÓãí ÈÏæä ãæÓíÞì
ÒÝÉ ÑÔæ ÇáæÑæÏ ¡ ÒÝÇÊ ÓæÑíå ¡ ÒÝÇÊ ÃÛÇäí ÓæÑíÇ ¡ ÒÝÉ ÃÛäíÉ ÑÔæ ÇáæÑæÏ
ÃÛäíÉ ÊßÝæä ÈÏæä ãæÓíÞì ¡ ÊÍãíá ÃÛäíÉ ÊßÝæä ÈÏæä ãæÓíÞì ÃÛÇäí ÈÏæä ãæÓíÞìþ
ÃÛäíÉ ÎÇíäå æãÇ ÊäÕÝí ÈÏæä ãæÓíÞì ÊÍãíá ÇÛäíÉ ÎÇíäå æãÇ ÊäÕÝí ÃÛÇäí ãÛÑÈíå ÈÏæä ãæÓíÞì
ÃÛäíÉ ÇáÍÈ ÎÇáÏ ÈÏæä ãæÓíÞì ¡ ÃÛÇäí ÈÏæä ãæÓíÞì ¡ ÃÛäíÉ ÇáÍÈ ÎÇáÏ
ÇÛäíÉ ÇäßÓÑÊ ÇáÔíÔå ÈÏæä ãæÓíÞì ¡ ÇäßÓÑÊ ÇáÔíÔå ÈÏæä ãæÓíÞì ¡ ÇäßÓÑÊ ÇáÔíÔå
ÇÛäíÉ ÇãíÑÉ ÇáæÑÏ ÈÏæä ãæÓíÞì ÒÝÉ ÇãíÑÉ ÇáæÑÏ ÈÏæä ãæÓíÞì ÇÛäíÉ ÇáÝäÇä ãÍãÏ ÚÈÏå ÒÝå ÑÇÆÚå
ÇÛäíÉ Þæã æÏÑÌ áí æÇÑÞÕ ÞÏÇãí ÈÏæä ãæÓíÞì ¡ ÊÍãíá ÃÛäíÉ Þæã æÏÑÌ áí æÇÑÞÕ ÞÏÇãí ÈÏæä ãæÓíÞì ¡ ÃÛÇäí ÇáØÞÇÞå ÇáÚäæÏ ÈÏä ãæÓíÞìþ
ÃÛÇäí ÇáíÇÒíå ãÍãÏ ÈÏæä ãæÓíÞì ¡ ÃÛäíÉ ÈÑÞ áãÚ ÈÏæä ãæÓíÞì ¡ ÃÛäíÉ ãÊÛíÑ Úáí ÈÏæä ãæÓíÞì ¡ ÃÛäíÉ ÊåÏÏäí ÈÏæä ãæÓíÞì
ÃÛäíÉ ÇäÇ ÕÇÍí áåã ÈÏæä ãæÓíÞì ¡ ßáãÇÊ ÃÛäíÉ ÃäÇ ÕÇÍí áåã ¡ ÃÛÇäí ÑÇÔÏ ÇáãÇÌÏ ÕæÊíå ÈÏæä ãæÓíÞì
ÃÛäíÉ íáæãæäí ÍÈíÈí Ýíß ÈÏæä ãæÓíÞì ÃÛÇäí ÑÇÔÏ ÇáãÇÌÏ ÈÏæä ãæÓíÞì2009 ÇáÈæã äæÑ Úíäí ÈÏæä ãæÓíÞì ÃÛÇäí ÈÏæä ãæÓíÞìþ
ÒÝÇÊ ÇáÚÑæÓ 2009 ¡ ÒÝÇÊ ááÚÑæÓ 2009 ¡ ÒÝÇÊ ÎáíÌíÉ ááÚÑæÓ 2009 ¡ ÒÝÉ ÚÑæÓ 2009
ÃÛäíÉ ØÇáÚå ãä ÈíÊ ÃÈæåÇ ÈÏæä ãæÓíÞì ¡ ÃÛäíÉ ØÇáÚå ãä ÈíÊ ÇÈæåÇ ÈÕæÊ ãÇÌÏ ãåäÏÓ ¡ ÃÛÇäí ÈÏæä ãæÓíÞì
ÃÛäíÉ ãÚÌÈå ÈÏæä ãæÓíÞì ¡ ÃÛÇäí ÈÏæä ãæÓíÞì ¡ ÃÛäíÉ ãÚÌÈå 2009 ÈÏæä ãæÓíÞì
ÇÛäíÉ æÔ ÌÇå ÈÏæä ãæÓíÞì ¡ ÊÍãíá ÇÛäíÉ æÔ ÌÇå ÈÏæä ãæÓíÞì ¡ ÇÛÇäí ÇáÈæã äæÑ Úíäí ÈÏæä ãæÓíÞì
ÒÝÉ ÛäÊ ÇáÇÔÚÇÑ ÒÝÇÊ 2009 ÒÝå ßÇãáå ÒÝå ÌÏíÏå
ÃÛäíÉ ÚÔÇä ÇáÍÈ ÈÏæä ãæÓíÞì ¡ ßáãÇÊ ÃÛäíÉ ÚÔÇä ÇáÍÈ ¡ ÊÍãíá ÃÛäíÉ ÚÔÇä ÇáÍÈ ¡ ÇÛÇäí ÑÇÔÏ ÇáãÇÌÏ ÈÏæä ãæÓíÞì
ÃÛÇäí ÕæÊíå ÈÏæä ãæÓíÞì ¡ ÃÛäíÉ ãÔßáÊí ÇåæÇå ÈÏæä ãæÓíÞì ¡ ÃÛÇäí ÒíÏ ÇáÒÇíÏ ÈÏæä ãæÓíÞì
ÒÝÇÊ ÚÑÇÆÓ ÒÝÉ ÃãíÑÉ ÇáæÑÏ ÊÍãíá ÒÝÉ ÃãíÑÉ ÇáæÑÏ ÊÍãíá ÒÝÇÊ ÅÓáÇãíå
ÒÝå ÔÚÑíå ÒÝå ÈÕæÊ ÑæÚå ÒÝÇÊ ÔÚÑíå ÒÝå ÈÕæÊ ÚÈÏÇááå ÇáÓÚÏí
ÒÝÇÊ ßæíÊíå ¡ ÒÝÇÊ ãÕÑíå ¡ ÒÝÇÊ åäÏíå ¡ ÒÝÇÊ ÇÓáÇãíå ¡ ÒÝÇÊ ÊÑßíå ¡ ÒÝÇÊ ÇäÌáíÒíå ¡ ÒÝÇÊ ÈÍÑíäíå ¡ ÒÝÇÊ ÓÚæÏíå
ÒÝÉ ÇÞÈáÊ ÇÍáì ÇáÈäÇÊ ÍÓíä ÇáÌÓãí ÒÝå ÑæÚå
ÃÛäíÉ áÞíÊ ÛíÑß ÈÏæä ãæÓíÞì ¡ ÊÍãíá ÃÛäíÉ áÞíÊ ÛíÑß ¡ ÃÛÇäí ÊÇãÑ ÍÓäí ÈÏæä ãæÓíÞì ¡ ÃÛÇäí ÈÏæä ãæÓíÞì
ÃÛäíÉ ÓæÇåÇ ÞáÈí íÇ ÍÈíÈí æÍÈß ÈÏæä ãæÓíÞì ¡ ÊÍãíá ÇÛäíÉ ÓæÇåÇ ÞáÈí íÇ ÍÈíÈí æÍÈß ¡ ÇÛÇäí ÈÏæä ãæÓíÞì
ÒÝå ÇáÈÏÑ áÑÇÔÏ ÇáãÇÌÏ ÈÏæä ãæÓíÞìþ
ãÄËÑÇÊ ÕæÊíå ¡ ÒÛÇÑíØ ¡ ÒÛÇÑíØ ÇÝÑÇÍ ¡ ÒÛÇÑíØ ááÒÝÇÊ ¡ ÒÛÇÑíØ ÈÏæä ãæÓíÞì ¡ ÒÛÑØå
ÃÛÇäí ÇáÈæã ÑæÍ ÑæÍí ÈÏæä ãæÓíÞì ¡ ÃÛäíÉ ÎáÕ ÍäÇäß ÈÏæä ãæÓíÞì ¡ ÃÛÇäí ÚÈÏÇáãÌíÏ ÚÈÏÇááå ÈÏæä ãæÓíÞì
ÇÛäíÉ ÇáÍÈ ÎÇáÏ ÈÏæä ãæÓíÞì ,ÇÛäíÉ ÑÇÔÏ ÇáãÇÌÏ ÈÏæä ãæÓíÞì ,ÇÛäíå ÇáÍÈ ÎÇáÏ ÈÏæä ãæÓíÞì
ÒÝÇÊ ÍÓíä ÇáÌÓãí ¡ ÒÝÇÊ ÃÛÇäí ÍÓíä ÇáÌÓãí ¡ ÒÝÉ ÍáæÉ æÇãæÑå ááÌÓãí ¡ ÒÝÇÊ ÃÛÇäí ÍÓíä ÇáÌÓãí ÈÏæä ãæÓíÞì
ÇÛäíÉ ãáíæä ÎÇØÑ ÈÏæä ãæÓíÞì ,ßáãÇÊ ÇÛäíÉ ãáíæä ÎÇØÑ ,ÇÛäíÉ ÚÈÏ ÇáãÌíÏ ÚÈÏ Çááå ãáíæä ÎÇØÑ , ÊÍãíá ÇÛäíÉ ãáíæä ÎÇØÑ ÈÏæä ãæÓíÞìþ
ÃÛäíÉ ÇáÞæÓ ÞæÓß ÈÏæä ãæÓíÞì ÊÍãíá ÃÛäíÉ ÇáÞæÓ ÞæÓß ÈÏæä ãæÓíÞì ÃÛÇäí ÚÈÏÇáãÌíÏ ÚÈÏÇááå ÈÏæä ãæÓíÞì
ÇÛäíÉ íÇÍÈäí áß ÈÏæä ãæÓíÞì ,ßáãÇÊ ÇÛäíÉ íÇÍÈäí áß ÈÏæä ãæÓíÞì ,ÇÛäíÉ ãÇÌÏ ÇáãåäÏÓ íÇÍÈäí áß ÈÏæä ãæÓíÞì ,ÊÍãíá ÇÛäíÉ íÇÍÈäí áß ÈÏæä ãæÓíÞì
ÃÛäíÉ íÛÇÑ ÞáÈí ÈÏæä ãæÓíÞì ¡ ÊÍãíá ÃÛäíÉ íÛÇÑ ÞáÈí ÈÏæä ãæÓíÞì ¡ ÃÛÇäí ÑÇÔÏ ÇáãÇÌÏ ÈÏæä ãæÓíÞì ¡ ÃÛäíÉ íÛÇÑ ÞáÈí ÑÇÔÏ ÇáãÇÌÏþ
ÃÛäíÉ ÇáÏäíÇ Íáæå ÈÏæä ãæÓíÞì ¡ ÃÛÇäí äÇäÓí ÚÌÑã ÈÏæä ãæÓíÞì ¡ ßáãÇÊ ÃÛäíÉ äÇäÓí ÚÌÑã
ÃÛÇäí ÈÏæä ãæÓíÞì ÊÍãíá ÇÛäíå íÚÔÞäí ÈÏæä ãæÓíÞì ÇÛäíå íÚÔÞäí
ÃÛÇäí ÇáØÞÇÞå ÇáÚäæÏ ¡ ÃÛÇäí ÒæÇÌ ÈÏæä ãæÓíÞì ¡ ÃÛÇäí ÇáØÞÇÞå ÇáÚäæÏ ÈÏæä ãæÓíÞì ¡ ÇÛÇäí ÃÚÑÇÓ ÈÏæä ãæÓíÞìþ
ÇÛäíÉ ãÇÈäßÓÑ ÕÇÈÑ ÈÏæä ãæÓíÞì ¡ ÃÛäíÉ ãÇÈäßÓÑ ÕÇÈÑ ÈÕæÊ ãÇÌÏ ÈÏæä ãæÓíÞì ¡ ãÇÈäßÓÑ ÕÇÈÑ ÈÏæä ãæÓíÞì
ÇÛäíÉ íÇÍÙ Úíäß ÈÏæä ãæÓíÞì ¡ ßáãÇÊ ÇÛäíÉ íÇÍÙ Úíäß ¡ ÃÛÇäí ÚÈÏÇáãÌíÏ ÚÈÏÇááå ÈÏæä ãæÓíÞì
ÇÛÇäí ÈÏæä ãæÓíÞå ÇÛäíÉ Çáãåáí ãÇíæáí ÇÛÇäí ãÍãÏ ÇáÒíáÚí ÇÛäíå ÈÏæä ãÓíÞì
ÃÛäíÉ ÊáÝÊ ÇáäÇÓ áÇãÑíÊ ÈÏæä ãæÓíÞì ¡ ÊÍãíá ÃÛäíÉ ÊáÝÊ ÇáäÇÓ áÇãÑíÊ ÈÏæä ãæÓíÞì
ÒÝÉ ÎÐåÇ ÇãÇäå ¡ ÃÛäíÉ ÎÐåÇ ÃãÇäå ÈÏæä ãæÓíÞì ¡ ÒÝÇÊ ÈÏæä ãæÓíÞì ¡ ÒÝÉ ÎÐåÇ ÃãÇäå ÈÏæä ãæÓíÞì
ÃÛäíÉ Çáí áÞì ÇÍÈÇÈå ÈÏæä ãæÓíÞì ¡ ÊÍãíá ÃÛäíÉ Çáí áÞì ÇÍÈÇÈå ÈÏæä ãæÓíÞì
ÃÛäíÉ ÇáÑíÔ ÈÏæä ãæÓíÞì ¡ ÇÛÇäí ÑÇÔÏ ÇáãÇÌÏ 2009 ÈÏæä ãæÓíÞì ¡ ÃÛÇäí ÇáÈæã äæÑ Úíäí ÈÏæä ãæÓíÞì
ÇßÈÑ ãÌãæÚÉ ÇÛÇäí ÈÏæä ãæÓíÞì 2009 ¡ ÇÛÇäí ÈÏæä ãæÓíÞì áÌãíÚ ÇáÝäÇäíä ¡ ÇÛÇäí ÈÏæä ãæÓíÞì ááÊÍãíá
ÇÛäíÉ Çáíæã ØÇáÚ ÞãÑ ÇÛäíå ÈÏæä ãæÓíÞì ÇÛäíå Íáæå
ÃÛäíÉ Úáì ßËÑ ÇáÓäíä ÈÏæä ãæÓíÞì ÃÛÇäí ÑÇÔÏ ÇáãÇÌÏ 2009 ÈÏæä ãæÓíÞì ÊÍãíá ÃÛäíÉ Úáì ßËÑ ÇáÓäíä
ÇÛäíÉ æÇááå æÇÍÔäí ÒãÇäß ÈÏæä ãæÓíÞì ¡ ßáãÇÊ ÇÛäíÉ æÇááå æÇÍÔäí ÒãÇäß ¡ æÇááå æÇÍÔäí ÒãÇäß ÈÏæä ãæÓíÞìþ
ÃÛÇäí äæÇá ÇáßæíÊíå ÈÏæä ãæÓíÞì ÃÛäíÉ ãä ÇáÈÏÇíå ÈÏæä ãæÓíÞì ¡ ÃÛäíÉ áíÔ ÃÒÚá Úáíß ÈÏæä ãæÓíÞì ¡ ÃÛäíÉ ÓÇãÍÊß ÈÏæä ãæÓíÞì
ÒÝÉ ããÔÇåÇ ÍÑíÑ ¡ ÒÝÉ ÃÛäíÉ ããÔÇåÇ ÍÑíÑ ¡ ÒÝÇÊ ÃÛÇäí ÍÓíä ÇáÌÓãí 2009 ¡ ÒÝÇÊ ÇáÌÓãí ááÚÑÇíÓ
ÒÝå ÑæÚå ÒÝÇÊ ÌÏíÏå ÒÝå ÈÕæÊ Óáæã ÇáÓáæã
ÃÛäíÉ ÓÇÚÇÊ ÈÏæä ãæÓíÞì ¡ ÊÍãíá ÃÛäíÉ ÓÇÚÇÊ ÈÏæä ãæÓíÞì ¡ ÃÛÇäí ÑÇÔÏ ÇáãÇÌÏ ÈÏæä ãæÓíÞì
ÃÛÇäí ÇáÈæã äæÑ Úíäí ÈÏæä ãæÓíÞì ÃÛäíÉ æíáÇå ÈÏæä ãæÓíÞì ÊÍãíá ÃÛäíÉ æíáÇå ÈÏæä ãæÓíÞì
ÃÛäíÉ íÇÓáÇã Úáíßã íÇáÓÚæÏíå ¡ ÃÛÇäí ÑÇÔÏ ÇáãÇÌÏ ÈÏæä ãæÓíÞì ¡ ÃÛäíÉ íÇÓáÇã Úáíßã íÇÓÚæÏíå ÈÏæä ãæÓíÞì
ÃÛÇäí ÈÏæä ãæÓíÞì ÃÛäíÉ ãÑÍÈÇ ÈÞÏæã Îáí ÈÏæä ãæÓíÞì ¡ ÊÍãíá ÃÛäíÉ ãÑÍÈÇ ÈÞÏæã Îáí ÈÏæä ãæÓíÞì
ÃÛäíÉ Çå ãäß ãäÞåÑ ¡ ÊÍãíá ÃÛäíÉ Çå ãäß ãäÞåÑ ¡ ßáãÇÊ ÃÛäíÉ Çå ãäß ãäÞåÑ ¡ ÌÏíÏ ÃÛÇäí ÑÇÔÏ ÇáãÇÌÏ
ÃÛäíÉ ÃäÇ ÍÈíÈí ÈÏæä ãæÓíÞì ¡ ÃÛÇäí ÝÇÑÓ ãåÏí ÈÏæä ãæÓíÞì ¡ ÊÍãíá ÃÛäíÉ ÃäÇ ÍÈíÈí ÈÏæä ãæÓíÞì
ÃÛäíÉ ÈáÇ ÍÈ ÈáÇ æÌÚ ÞáÈ ÈÏæä ãæÓíÞì ¡ ßáãÇÊ ÈáÇ ÍÈ ÈáÇ æÌÚ ÞáÈ ¡ ÃÛÇäí ÑÇÔÏ ÇáãÇÌÏ 2009 ÈÏæä ãæÓíÞìþ
ßáãÇÊ ÇÛäíÉ ÇäÇ ãä ÍÞí ÇÛíÑ ááÝäÇä ÑÇÔÏ ÇáãÇÌÏ 2010 ßáãÇÊ ÇáÈæã ÑÇÔÏ ÇáãÇÌÏ 2010 ßáãÇÊ ÇÛÇäí ÇáÝäÇä ÑÇÔÏ ÇáãÇÌÏ 2010þ
ßáãÇÊ ÇÛäíÉ ÇáÈíÊ ãÇíÓæì ÈÏæäß ÓÚÏ ÇáÝåÏ 2010 ¡ ÇÛäíÉ ÇáÈíÊ ãÇíÓæì ÈÏæäß 2010
ÇÛÇäí ÈÏæä ãæÓíÞì ¡ ÇÛÇäí ÒÝÇÊ ÈÏæä ãæÓíÞì ¡ ÇÛÇäí ØÞÇÞÇÊ ÈÏæä ãæÓíÞì ¡ ÇÛÇäí ÝäÇäííä ÈÏæä ãæÓíÞì ¡ ÊÍãíá ÇÛÇäí ÈÏæä ãæÓíÞì
ÒÝÇÊ ÚÑÇíÓ ¡ ÃÛÇäí ÒÝÇÊ ¡ ÒÝÇÊ ááÃÝÑÇÍ ¡ ÒÝÇÊ ÃÛÇäí ÅÓáÇãíå ¡ ÒÝÇÊ 2010
ÇÛäíÉ áÈíå íÇáÍÏ ÇáÌäæÈí ¡ ßáãÇÊ ÇÛäíÉ ÑÇÔÏ ÇáãÇÌÏ áÈíå íÇáÍÏ ÇáÌäæÈí ¡ ßáãÇÊ ÇÛäíÉ áÈíå íÇáÍÏ ÇáÌäæÈí
ãÄËÑÇÊ ÕæÊíå ááÒÝÇÊ ¡ ÇÕæÇÊ ØÈíÚíå ááÒÝÇÊ ¡ ÇÕæÇÊ ÈÔÑíå ááÒÝÇÊ ¡ ÇÕæÇÊ ãäæÚå ááÒÝÇÊ

ÇáÈæã ãäí ÇãÑÔÇ ÓäÉ Çæáí ÍÈ 2010 , ÇÛäíÉ Çí ÔæÞ , ÇÛäíÉ ÈÏÇáß ÇáÝ , ÇÛäíÉ ÊÈí ÊÞäÚäí , ÇÛäíÉ Íáã Çæ Úáã

ÇÛäíÉ ÇáãæÚÏ ÇáÖÇíÚ ¡ ßáãÇÊ ÇÛäíÉ ÇáãæÚÏ ÇáÖÇíÚ ¡ ÊÍãíá ÇÛäíÉ ÇáãæÚÏ ÇáÖÇíÚ ¡ ÇáãæÚÏ ÇáÖÇíÚ ÑÇÔÏ ÇáãÇÌÏ æíÇÑÇ ¡ ÇÛäíÉ ÇáãæÚÏ ÇáÖÇíÚ ÑÇÔÏ ÇáãÇÌÏ æíÇÑÇ

ÇÛäíÉ ÛÑÞÇä áÑÇÔÏÇáãÇÌÏ¡ÇÛäíÉ ÑÇÔÏÇáãÇÌÏæÍÓíä ÇáÌÓãí¡ÇÛäíÉ ÛÑÞÇä¡ÛÑÞÇä2010

270 discount ugg boots
ugg boots outlet
cheap ugg outlet
cheap ugg boots
ugg classic tall
ugg bailey button
ugg rainier
ugg classic cardy
ugg classic crochet
ugg classic mini
ugg classic short
ugg classic tall
ugg nightfall
ugg sundance
ugg ultra short
ugg ultra tall
ugg boots 5389

271 Wholesale Rubber Bangles Jewelry | Cuff Links Tiffany Best | Jewelry Tools Luxury | Wholesal Stainless Steel Cufflink | Carbon Fiber Bangle Luxury | Zircon Bangle Luxury | Fashion bracelets Fashion | Key_Chain Best | Wholesal Stamping Rings | Wholesal Casting Pendant | Wood Cufflink Yiwu | Casting Earring Cheap | Magnet Necklace Luxury | Laser Earring Best | Bracelet Fashion | Leather Bangles | Earrings Tiffany Cheap | Wood Bangles Luxury | Line Earring Cheap | Tiffany Necklace Frank-Gehry Fashion | Business Card Holder Best | Laser Pendant Wholesale | Stainless Steel Rings Yiwu | Tie Clip Yiwu | Wholesale Plating Bangle Jewelry

272 $75 Replica Rolex Watches sale, Our site provides Rolex replica,  replica Rolex Watches, replica breitling, replica Cartier, replica Omega, Tag Heuer Watches. . .more than 100 famous rolex brands"
rolex air king
rolex datejust
rolex day date

273 Today ugg boots online have become a phenomenon.Every winter,the ugg classic crochet are one of the hottest goods in the market all over the world.So now don't be hesitation,own a pair of ugg usa immediately.

274 We supply authentic discount Lacoste Shoes
Lacoste Trainers
New Lacoste
Lacoste Sale
Mens Lacoste
camden lacoste trainers
lacoste trainers shoes
lacoste camden retro
camden lacoste trainers
lacoste carnaby shoes
lacoste carnaby retro
lacoste shoes sale
New Lacoste shoes
Lacoste shoes online
cheap Lacoste shoes
Lacoste shoe
mens lacoste shoes
Lacoste Shua Lace
Black Lace shoes
white Lace shoes
lacoste swerve shoes
White Lacoste shoes
Lacoste shoes sale
Cheap Lacoste shoes
Lacoste Women Shoes
Women Lacoste Shoes
Lacoste Shoes online
on line, cheap price,Top quality,Free shipping!

275 Laser Earring Fashion | Wholesale Small Necklace Jewelry | Carbon Fiber Pendant Wholesale | Bracelet | Wholesal Corrosion Pendant | Titanium Bracelet Best | Carbon Fiber Bangle | Links of London Jewelry Cheap | Corrosion Rings Wholesale | Plating Cufflink Luxury | Corrosion Cufflink Yiwu | Leather Bangle Yiwu | Wood Cufflink Wholesale | Stainless Steel pendant Fashion | Rings Tiffany Best | Cutting Rings | Wood Bangles Best | Stainless Steel Pendants | Dior Jewelry Yiwu | Wholesal Zircon Cufflink

276 Shopping for a Rolex watch online can tag heuer make the job Rolex Watches easier but you Replica Watches also have to be patek philippe wary about the reputation of the dealer Chanel Watches and the brand of Breitling Watches watch you are audemars piguet getting. The more mont blanc watches considerable you are, the less danger you would come to armani watches when buying a Omega Watches gold watch online.

277 Buy rolex Fake Watches and Replica Watches brands,rolex watches rolex watches, Replica rolex watches, replica rolex: replica rolex,replica rolex: replica breitling watches,replica tag heuer: replica tag heuer,replica cartier watches: replica cartier watches,replica omega watches: replica omega watches,replica panerai watches: replica panerai watches,replica armani watches: replica armani watches,replica audemars piguet: replica audemars piguet,replica bvlgari watches: replica bvlgari watches,replica chanel watches: replica chanel watches,replica gucci watches: replica gucci watches,replica movado watches: replica movado watches,replica montblanc watches: replica montblanc watches,replica patek philippe: replica patek philippe on sale.

278 Watches Hermes Fashion | Replica Seiko Watches | Watches Breitling Fashion | Replica Breitling Watches | Replica Tissot Watches | Maurice Lacroix Replica Watches | Gucci Belt Replica Watches | Chanel Replica Watches | Watches Roger Dubuis Fashion | Replica Roger Dubuis Watches | Replica Ulysse Nardin Watches | Ebel Replica Watches | Watches Corum Fashion | Replica Emporio Armani Watches | Replica Rolex Watches | Watches Rolex Fashion | Concord Replica Watches | Replica Swiss Watches | Aigner Replica Watches | Richard Mille Fake Watches

279 rolex Replica Watches It may be breitling Replica Watches necessary to cartier Replica Watches accurately determine omega Replica Watches the value of a wristwatch. Panerai Replica Watches This might be Patek Philippe Replica Watches for insurance Tag Heuer Replica Watches purposes A Lange Sohne Replica Watches or if you Alain Silberstein Replica Watches are considering Armani Replica Watches buying or selling Audemars Piguet Replica Watches a second hand Baume Mercier Replica Watches watch. While it Bell Ross Replica Watches is possible to Breguet Replica Watches get a good Bulgari Bvlgar Replica Watches idea of the Bvlgari Replica Watches type of Chanel Replica Watches price that a Chopard Replica Watches watch may Concord Replica Watches be valued at Corum Replica Watches by doing your own Ferrari Replica Watches research, getting a professional Franck Muller Replica Watches valuation is the Graham Replica Watches best way to get an Gucci Replica Watches accurate value. Hermes Replica Watches Many specialist Hublot Replica Watches jewelry stores Iwc Replica Watches offer a valuation Jaeger LeCoultre Replica Watches service. They Longines Replica Watches may do this on LV Replica Watches the premises or Miscellaneous Replica Watches send the watch Montblanc Replica Watches away to be Movado Replica Watches valued. The jeweler will Parmigiani Replica Watches provide a certificate that Piaget Replica Watches gives the value of the watch and this is often necessary Rado Replica Watches when insuring an Romain Jerome Replica Watches expensive watch. An Swiss Rolex Replica Watches independent Tissot Replica Watches valuation is also useful when Tudor Replica Watches selling or buying U_boat Replica Watches an expensive watch. Ulysse Nardin Replica Watches It provides both the buyer Vacheron Constantin Replica Watches and seller with an accurate value of Zenith Replica Watches the watch and both parties can be sure of what they are buying and selling.Keep yourself in mind that knowing the value of a wristwatch is extremely rewarding. It is an interesting subject. There are many factors you need to take into consideration, such as the authenticity of the watch, even historical and technical aspects of the watch

280

movado watches

omega watches

oris watches

Panerai watches

Patek Philippe watches

281 Replica rolex watches,tag heuer watches and replica rolex watches,replica watches replica breitling watches breitling watches,chanel watches chanel watches replica patek philippe patek philippe watches,replica audemars piguet watches replica montblanc watches for men and women.

282 Replica fake watches and replica watches brands,rolex watches rolex watches, replica rolex: replica rolex,replica rolex: breitling watches,replica tag heuer: tag heuer,replica cartier watches: cartier watches,replica omega watches: omega watches,replica panerai watches: replica panerai watches,replica armani watches: replica armani watches,replica audemars piguet: replica audemars piguet,replica bvlgari watches: replica bvlgari watches,replica chanel watches: replica chanel watches,replica gucci watches: replica gucci watches,replica movado watches: replica movado watches,replica montblanc watches: replica montblanc watches,replica patek philippe: replica patek philippe sale.Replica rolex watches and tag heuer watches, rolex watches,Replica Watches replica watches,patek philippe patek philippe Watches,audemars piguet audemars piguet,Omega Watches: omega watches,replica Cartier Watches cartier watches,Breitling Watches breitling watches,Chanel Watches: chanel watches,armani watches: armani watches,iwc watches iwc watches,mont blanc watches montblanc watches.

283 We sell rolex and tag heuer watch, rolex watches,Rolex replica watches,replica patek philippe Watches,replica audemars piguet,Omega Watches omega watches,replica Cartier cartier watches,Breitling breitling watches,replica chanel watches,armani watches: armani watches,iwc watches iwc watches,montblanc montblanc watches Replica.Cheap fake watches and replica watches on sale,rolex watches rolex watches, watches replica rolex,replica breitling watches,replica tag heuer: tag heuer,replica cartier watches: cartier watches,replica omega watches: omega watches,replica panerai watches: replica panerai watches,replica armani watches: replica armani watches,replica audemars piguet: replica audemars piguet,replica bvlgari watches: replica bvlgari watches,replica chanel watches: replica chanel watches,replica gucci watches: replica gucci watches,replica movado watches: replica movado watches,replica montblanc watches: replica montblanc watches,replica patek philippe: replica patek philippe sale for people.

284 Audio Converter Mac,Mac Audio Converter£¬Real Audio to MP3 Converter , Mac MP3 WMA Converter,Mac WMA Converter iTunes,Mac iPod Audio Converter,MP3 Splitter for Mac,

285 M4A Converter for Mac is a professional Mac audio converter and also a video to audio converter for Mac. It can convert between all audio formats with super conversion speed and high output quality.M4A Converter for Windows, M4A to MP3 Converter for Mac,The best M4A Converter Mac enables you to do a lot editing about your output audio fileM4A to M4R Converter for Mac,M4A to WMA Converter for Mac,M4A to WAV Converter for Mac,M4A to AAC Converter for Mac,MOV to M4A Converter for Mac,AVI to M4A Converter for Mac,MPEG to M4A Converter for Mac,M4V to M4A Converter for Mac,FLV to M4A Converter for Mac,

286 Cheap replica rolex and tag heuer watches,replica watches of rolex rolex watches replica,buy patek philippe Buy replica watches,fake watches and tag heuer watches.

287

ãäÊÏíÇÊ ÇÛáíß-ÇÝáÇã ãÕÑíÉ-ãäÊÏíÇÊ ÍÈ ÈäÇÊ-ÔÇÊ ÍÈ ÈäÇÊ-ÇÝáÇã
åäÏíÉ-ÇÛÇäí ÍÒíäå-ÔÇÈß-ÇÝáÇã ÚÑÈíÉ-ÇÝáÇã ÇÌäÈíÉ-ÏÑÏÔÉ
ÈäÇÊ-ÈáæÊæË
ÔÈßÉ ÇÛáíß-ÕæÑ
ÔÈßÉ ÇÛáíß-ÇáÚÇÈ ÇÛáíß-ÇÝáÇã
ßÑÊæä-ÇÝáÇã
ããäæÚÉ-ÌÑÍæß
íÇÞáÈí

288

íæÊíæÈ ÝÖÇÆÍ   ÊæÈíßÇÊ ÑæãÇäÓíÉ

äß äíãÇÊ ÊæÈíßÇÊ  äß äíãÇÊ 

ÊæÈíßÇÊ ÌÑÍ   ÇÓãÇÁ ÈäÇÊ  Çíãæ ÎæÇØÑ 2010

ãæÏíáÇÊ ÝÓÇÊíä ÓåÑÉ ÍÑÝ m

ÝÓÇÊíä ÎØæÈÉ 2010  ÎæÇØÑ ÑæãÇäÓíÉ  ÇáÚÇÈ ÈäÇÊ ááÊÍãíá  ãáÇÍÙÇÊ ááÌæÇá

ÊæÈíßÇÊ 2010

 ÊæÈíßÇÊ Íáæå  æÓÇÆØ 2010 ÇÎÊÕÇÑÇÊ ÇØÇÑÇÊ æÑæÏ  

ßÇÓÈÑ 2010  ÊæÈíßÇÊ ÑæÚå  ÞÕÇÆÏ ÍÒíäå

ÎáÝíÇÊ ãÓä  ÎæÇØÑ ÍÒíäÉ  ÔÚÑ ÑæãÇäÓí  ÕæÑ ÇÒíÇÁ 2010  ÕíÏ ÇáØíæÑ

ÊæÈíßÇÊ ßÈÑíÇÁ  ÊæÈíßÇÊ ÔãæΠ ÊæÈíßÇÊ ÚÒå

ÊæÈíßÇÊ Çáã  ÊæÈíßÇÊ Ìãíáå

  ÊæÈíßÇÊ ááãÇÓäÌÑ 

 

 ÚÈÇíÇÊ 2010 - ÊæÈíßÇÊ ÔæÞ

ÇÒíÇÁ ÍæÇãá  ÑÓÇÆá ÛíÑå  ÕæÑ ÔÈÇÈ  ÊæíæÊÇ 2010  æÓÇÆØ ÌÏíÏå

 -  ÍãÏÇä ÈÑíÊÔ  - ÇÍáì ÇáÕæÑ  íæÊíæÈ ÇáÔÚÑ

ãæÇÖíÚ ÚÇãÉ - ÇÎÈÇÑ - ÔÚÑ - ÚÇáã ÍæÇÁ - ÝÓÇÊíä - ãßÔÇÊ - ÝÓÇÊíä ÓåÑÉ 2009 - ÕæÑ - ÕæÑ Çäãí

íæÊíæÈ - ÏÑæÓ ÝæÊæÔæÈ - æÓÇÆØ - ÈÑÇãÌ - ãäÊÏíÇÊ - ÊæÈíßÇÊ ãÇÓäÌÑ - ÝÓÇÊíä 2010 - ÕæÑ ãÇÓäÌÑ -ÇáÚÇÈ ÈäÇÊ  

  ãÏæäÇÊ ÇáÇÚÖÇÁ  ÑæÇíÇÊ

ãäÊÏì ÌÇÈÑ ÇáÞÍØÇäí

ÇáÍáÈÉ

ÊÍãíá ÕæÑ

ãæÞÚ

ÊæÈíßÇÊ ÌÏíÏå

ÊæÈíßÇÊ ÍÈ

ÔÚÑ ÝÑÇÞ

  ÊæÈíßÇÊ ãÖÍßÉ  ÊæÈíßÇÊ ÕÏÇÞÉ

ÊæÈíßÇÊ åã æÍÒä

289 UGG cardy
Ugg Australia
Ugg Shoes Sale
Bailey Button
ugg boots
Ugg classic cardy
UGG cardy
Ugg Australia
Ugg Shoes Sale
Bailey Button
ugg boots

290 Good rolex and tag heuer watches,replica watches of rolex rolex watches replica,buy patek philippe Buy replica watches,fake watches and tag heuer watches.breitling watches breitling watches at low prices.

291 VOB Converter for Mac os x is really a great software which can help you convert vob files on Mac to various video formats such as mp4, avi, mov, mpeg-4 etc. It is an all-in-one mac vob converter that can both convert vob video files on your hard drive and convert vob files on dvd disc. The VOB Converter for Mac is an excellent conversion software for Mac users to convert VOB files to almost all popupar video and audio formats including MOV, AVI, WMV, MPEG, M4V, 3GP, and so on which respectively for iPod, iPhone, Apple TV, PSP, Zune, Creative Zen, various video mobile phones and other popular players.VOB Converter for Mac, VOB Converter for Mac

292 Replica breitling watches Replica breitling navitimer watches Replica breitling classic watches Replica breitling chrono superocean Replica breitling bentley motors watches Replica breitling chrono cockpit Replica breitling classic Replica breitling classic Replica breitling superocean heritage Replica breitling air wolf watches Replica breitling montbrillant Replica breitling navitimer Replica breitling chrono cockpit watches Replica breitling bentley gmt watches Replica breitling super avenger watches Replica breitling montbrillant watches Replica breitling cockpit watches Replica breitling colt automatic watches Replica breitling bentley motors Replica breitling classic Replica breitling avenger skyland watches Replica breitling chronomat watches Replica breitling classic Replica breitling skyracer watches Replica breitling chrono superocean watches Replica breitling chrono avenger watches Replica breitling certifie watches Replica breitling avenger seawolf watches Replica breitling co axial watches Replica breitling colt quartz watches Replica breitling colt gmt watches Replica breitling colt oceane watches Replica breitling emergency mission watches Replica breitling navitimer world watches Replica breitling classic Replica breitling certifie Replica breitling classic Replica breitling classic Replica breitling navitimer Replica breitling chrono superocean Replica breitling classic Replica breitling classic Replica breitling navitimer Replica breitling navitimer Replica breitling chronomatic watches Replica breitling classic Replica breitling classic Replica breitling classic Replica breitling chrono cockpit Replica breitling classic Replica breitling montbrillant Replica breitling bentley motors Replica breitling classic Replica breitling cockpit Replica breitling cockpit Replica breitling air wolf Replica breitling pit watches Replica breitling chronomat Replica breitling air wolf Replica breitling classic Replica breitling classic Replica breitling classic Replica breitling classic Replica breitling navitimer Replica breitling classic Replica breitling colt gmt Replica breitling chrono cockpit Replica breitling montbrillant Replica breitling chrono avenger Replica breitling chrono cockpit Replica breitling bentley motors Replica breitling air wolf Replica breitling classic Replica breitling air wolf Replica breitling bentley motors Replica breitling bentley motors Replica breitling bentley motors Replica breitling bentley motors Replica breitling bentley motors Replica breitling classic Replica breitling classic Replica breitling watches Replica breitling chronomat Replica breitling chronomat Replica breitling certifie Replica breitling navitimer Replica breitling certifie Replica breitling navitimer Replica breitling montbrillant Replica breitling chronomat Replica breitling air wolf Replica breitling montbrillant Replica breitling classic Replica breitling air wolf Replica breitling navitimer Replica breitling bentley motors Replica breitling montbrillant Replica breitling super avenger Replica breitling classic Replica breitling navitimer Replica breitling classic Replica breitling chronomat Replica breitling navitimer Replica breitling bentley gmt Replica breitling bentley gmt Replica breitling emergency mission Replica breitling bentley motors Replica breitling bentley motors Replica breitling watches Replica breitling montbrillant Replica breitling emergency mission Replica breitling navitime Replica breitling certifie Replica breitling montbrillant Replica breitling colt oceane Replica breitling chrono superocean

293 Buy rolex watches,tag heuer watches and replica patek philippe patek philippe watches,replica audemars piguet> replica breitling watches breitling watches,chanel watches chanel watches watches replica montblanc watches.Rolex fake watches and replica watches brands,replica rolex: breitling watches,replica tag heuer: tag heuer, replica rolex: replica rolex replica cartier watches: cartier watches,replica omega watches: omega watches,replica panerai watches: panerai watches,replica armani watches: armani watches,replica audemars piguet: audemars piguet,replica bvlgari watches: bvlgari watches,replica chanel watches: chanel watches,replica gucci watches: gucci watches,replica movado watches: movado watches,replica montblanc watches: montblanc watches,replica patek philippe: patek philippe on sale.replica watches and replica watches.

294 Have you have ever heard the term "runescape accounts"? How about, "runescape gold"? They have many names, but they are all the same. Although I know exactly what a macro is in Runescape, I thought I would do some research and see what a macro was outside of runescape gold for sale. Macroing in runescape accounts for saleBasically, when you use a buy runescape gold, you are using a program that will play the game for you. There are many different types of these, such as; Mining Bots, Woodcutting Bots, Attacking Bots, but they all do the same thing, get levels. This is against the rules of runescape quests help. Jagex bans thousands of accounts a month due to these cheats. I cannot tell people enough, cheating is NOT the answer. If people would just do the work themselves, then there would be no problem. Macroing outside of runescape power leveling:As I promised, I researched and this is what I found; "A macro is a way to automate a task that you perform repeatedly or on a regular basis. It is a series of runescape money making commands and actions that can be stored and run whenever you need to perform the task. You can record or build a macro, and then play the macro to automatically repeat the series of commands or actions."

295 hostgator coupon - hostgator review - hostgator reseller coupon - fatcow review - fastdomain review - hostmonster coupon - hostmonster review - fastdomain coupon - fatcow coupon - bluehost coupon - bluehost review

296 Hair Straightener
chi hair straightener
chi flat irons
chi iron
best hair straightener
ceramic hair straightener
flat iron
pink chi hair
chi hair irons
ghd
Pink GHI Hair
GHD
GHD MK4
GHD MK5
Pink GHD
Pink GHI Hair
CHI Flat Irons
Hair Straightener
chi hair irons
chi hair straightener
best hair straightener
chi hair iron
pink chi hair
chi hair irons
Pink GHI Hair
Pink GHD
GHD
Nike Kobe Shoes
Nike Lebron Shoes
discount nike shox shoes

297 Good replica watches and buy replica watches and replica rolex replica replica tag heuer watches,buy replica replica omega watches and breitling watches replica breitling watches sale at lowest prices.

298 nike air max 360 shoes
womens air max
nike air max
womens air max
nike air max 360 shoes
air max
kids air max 90
kids air max classic BW
kids air max 360
kids air max 97
nike air max 180
nike air max 2009
nike air max 2010
nike air max 360 shoes
nike air max 87
nike air max 88
nike air max 89
nike air max 90
nike air max 91
nike air max 93
nike air max 95
nike air max classic BW
nike air max ltd
nike air max TN
womens air max 2007
womens air max 2009
womens air max 87
womens air max 90
womens air max 91
womens air max 95
womens air max 97
womens air max classic BW

299 breitling watch Ladies watches at Gilletts Jewellers include like Eco Drive Citizen watches replica watch There are a few ways you rolex watches omega watches can try replica watches Fossil watches DKNY watches Michael Ks watches breitling watches

300 replica handbags Wholesale products louis vuitton handbags louis vuitton handbags beautiful wholesale handbags louis vuitton replica handbags wholesale jewelry wholesale clothing from factory louis vuitton handbags with cheap wholesale price

301 Buy rolex replica watches and replica watches replica replica watches and replica rolex watches patek philippe watches and fake watches and breitling watches,replica tag heuer: tag heuer,replica cartier watches: cartier watches,replica omega watches: omega watches at lowest prices.

302 It is no secret that the designer handbag market is extremely profitable designer handbags are one of the most sought after items by women wholesale handbags replica handbags However louis vuitton handbags louis vuitton handbags if you are like me you probably know that finding legitimate louis vuitton handbags wholesalers of designer handbags is not easy to say the least louis vuitton handbags

303 cheap online shopping/ hot holiday toys/ discount electronic stores/ best selling toys/ department stores online/ deluxescan/ inwdigg

304 nike max
air max shoes
nike air max
nike max shoes
air max 1
nike air max 1
air max 2
nike air max 2
air max 89
nike air max 89
air max 90
nike air max 90
air max 91
nike air max 91
air max 95
nike air max 95
air max 97
nike air max 97
air max 180
nike air max 180
air max 360
nike air max 360
air max 2003
nike air max 2003
air max 2009
nike air max 2009
air max ltd
nike air max ltd
air max tn
nike air max tn
air max tailwind
nike air max tailwind
womens air max 1
womens air max 90
womens air max 95
womens air max BW
womens air max LTD
womens air max TN
womens air max 360
womens air max 2003
womens air max 2007
womens air max 2009

305 wholesale handbags louis vuitton It is no secret that the designer handbag market is extremely profitable designer handbags are one of the most sought wholesale handbags after items by women louis vuitton However if you louis vuitton handbags are like me you probably know that finding legitimate louis vuitton handbags wholesalers of designer handbags is not easy to say the least

306 âÌÏÇ, âÌÏÇ, âÌÏÇ, âÌÏÇ, âÌÏÇ, âÌÏÇ, âÌÏÇ, âÌÏÇ, âÌÏÇ, âÌÏÇ, âÌÏÇ, âÌÏÇ, âÌÏÇ, âÌÏÇ, âÌÏÇ, âÌÏÇ, âÌÏÇ, âÌÏÇ, âÌÏÇ, âÌÏÇ,
ëÌÉÎÉÎÇ, õÂÏÒËÁ, õÂÏÒËÁ , ëÌÉÎÉÎÇ ,

307 louis vuitton replica handbags replica handbags Buy cheap replica Louis Vuitton Handbags Louis Vuitton Bags from HandbagsAir We have the most LV Bags Louis Vuitton Gucci Chanel wholesale handbags Miu Miu styles louis vuitton handbags louis vuitton

308 DVD Converter for Mac is a powerful DVD converter Mac OS X software to rip DVD to all popular video and audio formats with various customized settings and convert video among all popular video and audio formats with perfect 1:1 ratio on Mac. In fact, the DVD Converter for Mac is a Video and DVD Converter for Mac Ultimate. Watch DVD movies on your iPod anywhere and anytime. Then you need Xilisoft DVD to iPod Converter for Mac. The Mac DVD to iPod converter is designed to rip and DVD to iPod Converter for Mac users, such as converting DVD to MP4/MPEG-4 video and audio formats like MP3 and M4A. All of these can be played on all kinds of iPods like iPod nano, iPod classic, iPod touch, and iPhone. DVD to AVI Converter for Mac is a Mac DVD to AVI converter specially designed for Mac OS X users to convert DVD to AVI(Xvid) video files and MP3, AAC audio files with excellent output quality. DVD to DivX Converter for Mac software directory lists the most popular Mac DivX DVD converter software that can help you rip convert DVD to DivX file. DVD to 3GP Converter for Mac is a powerful converter for Mac users to convert DVD to 3GP(3G2) for video cell phones and other portable players. DVD to MPEG Converter for Mac software directory lists the most popular Mac DVD MPEG Converter software that can help you rip convert DVD to MPEG file DVD to MOV Converter for mac is the one that you have been looking for. Using this software, you can quickly load dvd files and convert them to mov on mac/os x system DVD to MP4 Converter for Mac is an excellent Mac DVD to MP4 ripper, DVD to MP4 Mac converter to fulfill your needs of ripping DVD to MP4 and AVI videos DVD to PSP converter for Mac is a very professional Mac DVD to PSP converter. It is a powerful PSP conversion tool for Mac OS users to rip DVD to PSP MP4 for playback on PSP players. DVD to Youtube Converter Mac

309 Replica Handbags have provide replica omega watches replica omega watches the high quality Replica AUDEMARS PIGUET all brand handbags We have the especial price a especial production including coach handbags omega watches replica cartier Replica tag heuer

310 Certainly watches are Replica Watches used to help people record rolex Watches time, but rolex watches nowadays its functions have enlarged. Replica watches are now tag heuer Watches not only objects that tag heuer watches can tell you what time it is, they are also a status symbol. You should not feel strange when you find someone wearing a watch on his wrist, but use the cell phone to tell time. In that situation, the watch is just showing its luxurious function cartier watches. It is normal and cartier watches perhaps also happens to you. .If asked that among the watches of various brands, which one can suit your taste? There is no doubt that most people will choose Rolex. Whichever social class you are in, it is naturally Rolex was known breitling Watches and cherished breitling watches for a long time. However, the elements do not usually enter the market alone, always come with the price tag up to the hand. For this reason, many people, especially men, their dreams of luxury Rolex watches are buried in omega Watches his heart omega watches. What should I do? Rolex watches are simply stunning worn by the rich and famous, right? No, this world is not the world's richest men, is the world of each. All are equal before the search of luxury and be men's watches respected. Within men's watches, the law, when consumers are in the market, women's watches they should women's watches receive the same treatment. This is the real reason why replica Rolex watches are ladies watches ladies watches more welcome than Rolex. Because in this world are not difficult to understand that the rich are much less than people with low income, you agree with me? You are forced to nod and say with certainty that is the reality. These low-income people do not have enough money to save every month. They can not afford such luxury Rolex watches

311 vacheron constantin watches Cheap high quality Louis Vuitton Replica AUDEMARS PIGUET Louis Vuitton HandbagsLV bagslouis vuitton luggage Replica omega chanel handbags replica movado gucci handbags omega watches replica movado LV Discoutn Replica Handbags On

312 Special Cheap Discount Wedding Collection list:
Cheap Wedding Dresses
Cheap Wedding Gowns
Beach Wedding Dresses
Color Wedding Dresses
Plus Size Wedding Dresses
Wedding Dresses Styles
Special Occasion Dresses
Cocktail Dresses
Party Dresses
Prom Dresses
Mother of the Bride Dresses
Flower Girl Dresses
Bridesmaid Dresses
Cheap Bridal Gowns Wedding Dresses,Buy Custom Wedding Dresses Online,Cheap Wedding Bridesmaid Dresses Online,Cheap Mother of the Bride Wedding Dresses,Cheap Flower Girl Dresses for Less,Hawaiian Summer Beach Wedding Dresses,Cheap Plus Size Wedding Dress,Black or Red Wedding Dresses,Vintage Modest Wedding Dresses,Women Special Occasion Dresses Plus,Cheap Custom Made Prom Dresses Online,Inexpensive Cheap Cocktail Dresses Online,Cheap Women Evening Party Dresses

313 Cheap replica watches and replica watches 100% copy replica watches of the previous omega watches model: the famous Manchester Logo is located at 3 and the cartier watches chronograph 45-minute breitling watches at 9 with orange figures. Football fans can use the very special 45-minute chronograph to measure the halves of a football match. Black patek philippe hour hand and minute hand features yellow luminescent coating. The hour makers, chronograph audemars piguet and the first 15-minute scale of the tag heuer chronograph counter is montblanc watches presented in eye-catching rolex red. Bright Yellow movado watches tones are found on the minute track, date bvlgari watches rolex on sale.

314 nike max
air max shoes
nike air max
nike max shoes
air max 1
nike air max 1
air max 2
nike air max 2
air max 89
nike air max 89
air max 90
nike air max 90
air max 91
nike air max 91
air max 95
nike air max 95
air max 97
nike air max 97
air max 180
nike air max 180
air max 360
nike air max 360
air max 2003
nike air max 2003
air max 2009
nike air max 2009

315 TAG HEUER Watches ROLEX Watches OMEGA Watches CARTIER Watches Luxury Cartier watches are available at Essential Watches at discounted prices At Essential Watches we specialize in replica Watches OMEGA Watches all high end watch lines including

316 this replica watches replica watchWhoever wants replica watches timekeeper that does the job of a tachometer will be crazy for. The operation is performed by the copied replica rolex 's bezel. The Daytona also applies automatic movement ¨C just one of many breitling watches characters and functionalities that ensures the precision of time. Originally created to measure lap time and the cartier watches overall time of a race, Rolex Daytona replica omega watches timepieces can measure elapsed time for omega any sporting event. The power of this breitling replica item is made possibly by its internalized perpetual rotor mechanism. Known for its precision, this special Rolex replica cartier watch model only has to be set once to the cartier watches standard time of the owner's choice. Once rolex watches being created, it updates itself during time changes, making upkeep of the replica's time setting replica watches nonexistent. Even though these replica watches were made for sporting events, (specifically those involving laps or circuits), it's not so adversible to put them tag heuer in water since they are not fake watches waterproof. Even thought most of the time, the replica watches do not bear the tag heuer same functionalities as the original ones, they are still the most desirable alternatives of the expensive real models.

317 Factors Replica Watches About The Rolex replica watches Oyster The Oyster is so closely get in touch with Rolex, and it is inevitably that some people think these are the only Replica watches Rolex manufacture. Others suppose that there is a single Oyster watch. But as a matter of fact, the name Oyster does not actually meant for a rolex Watches particular watch you can buy rolex watches or even to a series but to a type of case that available in some of the Rolex ranges. History The Oyster case was first released in 1926. The objective was to protect the workings of the watch from dust and moisture. Early watches were far from waterproof. The Oyster tag heuer Watchescase was an tag heuer watches innovative design to eliminate these problems. It had a new double locking crown that screwed into place. It has been compared to the hatch on a submarine. Like a submarine, the Oyster case was waterproof. In 1927 Mercedes Gleitze swam the English breitling Watches Channel breitling watches . Before she set off she was presented with a Rolex Oyster. When she arrived, the watch was still working perfectly. The resulting publicity gave the new case a massive boost. Why is it called Oyster? Legend has it that Hans cartier Watches Wilsdorf cartier watches, who invented the Oyster, chose the name because the new case reminded him of the difficulty he had experienced prising open oysters at dinner. Since then the Oyster has further, particularly advanced. Many Oyster watches today are omega Watches perpetual-self-winding, in other omega watches words, it does not require to expose the mechanism to the outside world in order to wind it. The Osyter Perpetual is one of the toughest, most durable, most reliable watches (under truly adverse conditions). It is probably the best mechanical watch money can buy.

318 replica Watches Mens ROLEX Watches Ladies Replica Cartier Watches Sale BREITLING Watches Discounted at Online Cartier Retailer CARTIER Watches Fake Cartier Watches are the hottest OMEGA Watches the latest design in our TAG HEUER Watches

319 kevih lgci chi ghd hair straightener ghd hair straightener,gpqvv ghd hair straightener okbgld,chi hair straightener,ahkvn hair straightener scvgsn,ghd hair straightener,fjdvuj chi hair straightener etjmqm,chi hair straightener,tcbnb hair straightener empbuf,hair straightener,fipso hair straightener tcgjkhu,ghd hair straightener,ynzoh ghd hair straightener ojkfmt,chi hair straightener,sfcl hair straightener hptbei,hair straight,nmfxv hair straightener fvpbj,ghd hair straightener,lemwz chi hair straightener iphe,chi hair straightener,smwdsoo hair straightener gkdpem.

320 uhxkk buy cheap wow gold grvv wow gold,dzsk buy wow gold qvqkr,wow power leveling,bfexzx wow gold fbhrh,cheap wow gold,ukyisn buy wow gold vgzkw,buy wow gold,jqqbh cheap wow gold vaolk,world of warcraft gold,juucgj buy wow gold ofxwc,wow gold,ecyzhv wow power leveling iybte,wow power leveling,zubl buy wow gold aqbno,cheap wow gold,xbhknu wow gold mlxxs,buy wow gold,pusqge cheap wow gold tttel,world of warcraft gold,fdrooa buy wow gold jzjuwm.