Support




Contact
Powered by
Movable Type

A Proposed GOP List Of Principles

Naturally MSNBC is calling this a "Purity Test" but it strikes me that at some point a party has to stand for something and this seems like reasonable ground for agreement to me.

(1) We support smaller government, smaller national debt, lower deficits and lower taxes by opposing bills like Obama’s “stimulus” bill;

(2) We support market-based health care reform and oppose Obama-style government run healthcare;

(3) We support market-based energy reforms by opposing cap and trade legislation;

(4) We support workers’ right to secret ballot by opposing card check;

(5) We support legal immigration and assimilation into American society by opposing amnesty for illegal immigrants;

(6) We support victory in Iraq and Afghanistan by supporting military-recommended troop surges;

(7) We support containment of Iran and North Korea, particularly effective action to eliminate their nuclear weapons threat;

( We support retention of the Defense of Marriage Act;

(9) We support protecting the lives of vulnerable persons by opposing health care rationing and denial of health care and government funding of abortion; and

(10) We support the right to keep and bear arms by opposing government restrictions on gun ownership;

This is from a proposed RNC resolution. Candidates who want party support would have to sign off saying they agree with 8 of the 10 points. Obviously implementing this will provide some challenges in judging who meets some of the criteria but it's an interesting idea. Also, I might allow 7 of 10 to be the line but that's details.

More importantly, it's quite a good list. Abortion is handled particularly well (public financing is a good place to draw the line, while not casting out pro-choice Republicans as heretics).

The resolution hasn't been formally submitted but the more I think about it the more I like it. Yes, these are broad policy statements that have room for fudging but it's not just for office holders. I'd bet each of these items, couched in these terms, test well with voters.

Candidates could run around with this in most parts of the country and say, "if you are on board with 8 of these items, then you can be comfortable voting for me because so am I." Again, I'd like to see maybe 7, especially if you are going to use it to get votes, give people more reason to agree with you.

FTR-I'm 9.5 out of 10 (I'm not sold on a big troop increase as the key to victory in Afghanistan).

I see from some comments one of the things I like about this idea is annoying some...it doesn't cover every idea and isn't very specific. That would be a purity test (and it would vary by person). This list is a set of principles that a lot of people can agree on, it's a big tent but with some very strong anchors. If you get much beyond this in terms of policy positions, you get into fights. This sets up some ground rules, a frame work to win elections. We can fight the specifics out later but right now we need some solid guideposts laying out the boundaries and we can deal with the specifics later.

Another good way this is a good idea...it's built to allow people to opt out within certain bounds. A lot of people may not be in favor of DoMA or some other point. No problem. As long as you are with us most of the time, it's ok to disagree at other points.

Think how hard it is to get a group of friends to decide on what restaurant to eat at and then what movie to see. That's a small, self-selected group and unanimity is almost always impossible. A big political movement (at least one that wants to win) is going to have disagreements. That's fine, pick your heresies, just be with us a significant amount of the time.

Posted by: DrewM. at 02:39 PM



Comments

1 I thought they were gonna leave Obama out of it.

Posted by: FUBAR at November 23, 2009 02:40 PM (eRJUD)

2 I don't see anything about killing hippies. I'm sure that was just an oversight.

Posted by: Dr. Spank at November 23, 2009 02:42 PM (GGgoa)

3 More importantly, it's quite a good list. Abortion is handled particularly well (public financing is a good place to draw the line, while not casting out pro-choice Republicans as heretics).

Why? If someone only has to support 7-8/10, why can't we have a solid pro-life position in there?

Posted by: Johnny at November 23, 2009 02:45 PM (xVKXy)

4 I hope Newt stays away from this so it doesn't get tainted.

Posted by: Buzzsaw at November 23, 2009 02:45 PM (tf9Ne)

5 Where is the constitutional amendment about throwing out all the libtards?

Posted by: Rickshaw Jack at November 23, 2009 02:45 PM (XZl3t)

6 Sounds good to me.

Posted by: RarestRX at November 23, 2009 02:46 PM (rmNST)

7 Eight out of ten for me. I wish the RNC would hire people to hand out little cards with this printed on it to voters in swing districts. Put a header like "If you agree with seven of these principles, you should vote Republican." It might even give the RNC something useful to do for a change.

Posted by: joncelli at November 23, 2009 02:46 PM (RD7QR)

8 Oh, and we need something about mandating nationwide open carry for all citizens 18 and older. Because there's no way we're going to win in Massachusetts.

Posted by: joncelli at November 23, 2009 02:47 PM (RD7QR)

9 The party needs principles.  But I am going to concentrate on individual candidates from now on anyway.  Dede Scozzfava put an end to any contributions I would ever give to the GOP in the future.

Posted by: kimbal at November 23, 2009 02:47 PM (0qE3W)

10 I like it.. mostly..

I don't like the Defense of Marriage bit (I think that is a state issue and the federal government has no business going there)  and I also am not sold on big troop surges in Afghanistan.. but otherwise I think it's a good list.

Posted by: Chi-Town Jerry at November 23, 2009 02:47 PM (f9c2L)

11 (9) We support protecting the lives of vulnerable persons by opposing health care rationing and denial of health care and government funding of abortion; and

There *has* to be something about opposing the judicial usurpation of legislative powers, most notably like in Roe v Wade...

Posted by: 18-1 at November 23, 2009 02:48 PM (7BU4a)

12 Why? If someone only has to support 7-8/10, why can't we have a solid pro-life position in there?
Posted by: Johnny

Um, because it would be 7, 8 out of 11 points then.

Posted by: Iskandar at November 23, 2009 02:48 PM (u1pln)

13 Most of the elected republicans can't even agree with this list. That's the problem.

Posted by: lorien1973 at November 23, 2009 02:48 PM (IhQuA)

14 Do I get any love out of this?

Posted by: The Constitution at November 23, 2009 02:48 PM (5aa4z)

15 There is nothing in here about Hobos, Trannys or Val-U-Rite.

I can't get behind that.

Posted by: The Chewbacca Defense at November 23, 2009 02:49 PM (YMZjg)

16 Do I get any love out of this?

2nd and 10th amendments, baby.

Posted by: joncelli at November 23, 2009 02:49 PM (RD7QR)

17 (2) We support market-based health care reform and oppose Obama-style government run healthcare; (3) We support market-based energy reforms by opposing cap and trade legislation; (5) We support legal immigration and assimilation into American society by opposing amnesty for illegal immigrants; (9) We support protecting the lives of vulnerable persons by opposing health care rationing and denial of health care and government funding of abortion; and (10) We support the right to keep and bear arms by opposing government restrictions on gun ownership;

Well .... these would be more succinctly covered by stating that we honor the Constitution and its clear restrictions on the federal government.

(4) We support workers’ right to secret ballot by opposing card check;

This doesn't go far enough. Closed shops are disgustingly un-American and need to be stopped. Unions are destructive and criminal elements in our midst. Further, there needs to be a real push to stop union representation on the Federal Reserve boards, which is one of the most repulsive facts of our monetary system that I have ever come across.

(5) We support legal immigration and assimilation into American society by opposing amnesty for illegal immigrants;

This is worded by squishes who don't have the guts to state the obvious and the necessary. There is no need to temper an opposition to the treasonous idea of amnesty (and the much worse notion of offering the slime paths to citizenship). A good start would be to not write "illegal immigration" in this, but state "illegal aliens, which is exactly what they are. They are not immigrants, since a guy who busts through our border today in no way falls into the idea of being an "immigrant" of any kind, though he would be termed such by this sort of linguistic idiocy.

If they want to show some difference in opinion between immigration policy and illegal alien policy, then properly wording both would be a good start.

Does anyone else find it odd that The Constitution is not mentioned in any of these bullets?

Posted by: progressoverpeace at November 23, 2009 02:50 PM (A46hP)

18

Bad list.  Too much emphasis on what the GOP opposes.  Like it or not, they're already painted as the party of 'no'.

With a little work it could be pretty good.

Posted by: BadgerHawk at November 23, 2009 02:50 PM (/O094)

19 So "platform" == "purity test" now eh?  That sword cuts both ways.

Posted by: Purple Avenger at November 23, 2009 02:51 PM (jwrRG)

20
Why? If someone only has to support 7-8/10, why can't we have a solid pro-life position in there?

Posted by: Johnny at November 23, 2009 02:45 PM (xVKXy)


Especially when a solid majority, by any standard measured, want more restrictions on abortion then currently exist in the current Casey framework.

Posted by: 18-1 at November 23, 2009 02:51 PM (7BU4a)

21

I think this needs to have spokespeople behind it to give it a face.  It would be interesting to see videos promoting this pairing Republicans of different factions, like the videos of Pelosi and Gingrich promoting global warmerism or G.H.W. Bush and Bill Clinton promoting charitable causes.  That kind of marketing would go a long way to demonstrating that these principles are meant to be unifying;  besides, without recognizable faces associated with it, it's not going to be read outside the inner circle of political wonks.

Posted by: stuiec at November 23, 2009 02:51 PM (Ate22)

22 Works for me--with this change to no. 1:

We support smaller government, smaller national debt, lower deficits and lower taxes by opposing  repealing bills like Obama’s “stimulus” bill.

Smaller means what, a $600 billion porkulus instead of a $787 billion porkulus?

Small government, GOP. Step up to it!

Posted by: PJ at November 23, 2009 02:51 PM (Qpxxz)

23 Need to add absolute support of the Constitution as written and amended then they can not even mention abortion.

Then it needs to go to 9 of 11 with the Constitution being a litmus test since they are supposed to take an oath saying the same thing.

Posted by: Vic at November 23, 2009 02:51 PM (CDUiN)

24 Not a big fan of saying we oppose, we oppose, we oppose.  While I do oppose all of those things, it comes off to me as not having better ideas. 

Posted by: AndrewsDad at November 23, 2009 02:52 PM (C2//T)

25 Um, because it would be 7, 8 out of 11 points then.

Posted by: Iskandar at November 23, 2009 02:48 PM (u1pln)

No. Replace the federal funding intem with an outright ban on it apart from extraordinary circumstances (IE: life of the mother is in danger).

Posted by: Johnny at November 23, 2009 02:52 PM (xVKXy)

26 What about starting up the F-22 Raptor fight again?

Posted by: nevergiveup at November 23, 2009 02:52 PM (0GFWk)

27
So "platform" == "purity test" now eh?  That sword cuts both ways.

That was the first thing I thought when I read the purity "response".  Isn't this nothing more than a Party platform from the days of yore?

Posted by: Vic at November 23, 2009 02:53 PM (CDUiN)

28 (1) We support smaller government, smaller national debt, lower deficits and lower taxes by opposing bills like Obama’s “stimulus” bill;

How about tightening this up a bit:

(1) We support smaller government, smaller national debt, lower deficits and lower taxes by opposing bills like Obama’s “stimulus” bill. Specifically, we propose legislation that the federal budget cannot be increased above the rate of inflation until the federal debt has been paid off.

Posted by: 18-1 at November 23, 2009 02:53 PM (7BU4a)

29
11) We don't apologize to Democrats

12) We will not be held at gunpoint by political correctness.


Posted by: a.k.a. at November 23, 2009 02:54 PM (bLZ8Q)

30
13) No special rights or extra-rights for any group.

Posted by: a.k.a. at November 23, 2009 02:55 PM (bLZ8Q)

31 These aren't principles. This is a list of "where we say we stand today on ten issues".

Posted by: t-bird at November 23, 2009 02:58 PM (FcR7P)

32 #9 is just plain silly.  Anyone who passed Econ. 101 knows that there is rationing in health care.  The issue is who or what forces do the rationing.

Posted by: Gerry at November 23, 2009 02:58 PM (cSBta)

33 I think it would be stronger as a "set of principles" if they left out Obama's name.  Mentioning him, especially up-front, sounds like they're reacting to public opinion shifting.

Put "We believe X, Y, and Z" first, then include "for example, we oppose Obama's 'stimulus' bill" later.  The first section should remain constant for several election cycles, the second section gets updated as events warrant.

Posted by: HeatherRadish at November 23, 2009 02:58 PM (NtiET)

34 We need something about having railguns mounted on dinosaurs.  Frank J.'s been a leading advocate on this important issue.

Posted by: Cicero at November 23, 2009 02:58 PM (QKKT0)

35 It's a good start, but the RNC peeps need to call Glenn Beck's 9/12 peeps for a final draft.

Posted by: vai2112 at November 23, 2009 02:59 PM (9eb2k)

36 I like the abortion treatment.  Please don't ruin our chances of victory with an abortion plank that alienates 35% of potential voters. 

d'après Prager, most abortions (statistically) are immoral; some are not.  Keep abortion legal; sensitize more people to the moral dimension of abortion, and when that happens, we can move forward.

Posted by: ParisParamus at November 23, 2009 03:00 PM (NPtVh)

37 Translations:

(1) We support smaller government, smaller national debt, lower deficits and lower taxes by opposing bills like Obama’s “stimulus” bill;

--just like the good old Bush days. Also, as anyone knows, you don't reduce government spending during a recession. Unless you';re a fucking knucklehead.


(2) We support market-based health care reform and oppose Obama-style government run healthcare;


--insurance oligopoly subsidies forever!


(3) We support market-based energy reforms by opposing cap and trade legislation;


--cap 'n trade is "market-based" you fucking idiots


(4) We support workers’ right to secret ballot by opposing card check;

--we prefer employers to bully employees with termination if employees vote for union rep[resentation (read: we hate workers; we hate ourselves)


(5) We support legal immigration and assimilation into American society by opposing amnesty for illegal immigrants;


--Mexicans!!


(6) We support victory in Iraq and Afghanistan by supporting military-recommended troop surges;

--even if achieving "victory" (which we could never define, anyway) means bankrupting the country


(7) We support containment of Iran and North Korea, particularly effective action to eliminate their nuclear weapons threat;

--you mean, like Bush did, invading Iraq to give Iraq to Iran? Non-pereil strategy, there.


( We support retention of the Defense of Marriage Act;

--Fags!!


(9) We support protecting the lives of vulnerable persons by opposing health care rationing and denial of health care and government funding of abortion; and

--I oppose abortion, unless I knock-up the neighbor's wife


(10) We support the right to keep and bear arms by opposing government restrictions on gun ownership;

--don't worry, knuckleheads. Nobody's gonna take you gun away.

Posted by: Jacob Javitz at November 23, 2009 03:00 PM (RdKK8)

38 I would like to propose a principle, "We believe that the Juicebox Media needs a nap." Say Goodnight Keithy! lol

Posted by: vai2112 at November 23, 2009 03:01 PM (9eb2k)

39 11) We support smoking hot babes
12) We eat bacon and hobo stew
13) We support any new items added by ace

Posted by: wHodat at November 23, 2009 03:01 PM (+sBB4)

40
14) We do not seek the approval of Democrats for any of the items on this list of principles; we are done trying to please our political enemies; and we are done allowing our political enemies write the rules.

Posted by: a.k.a. at November 23, 2009 03:02 PM (bLZ8Q)

41

Summary:

We support opposing the liberal platorm.

 

 

Posted by: polynikes at November 23, 2009 03:02 PM (m2CN7)

42 Wow... The RNC proposes a sensible platform that can entice swing voters, and people here start bitching that their pet cause isn't addressed, or, they try to impose what the media is already calling it- a purity test.

Look, this is good guidance, and potentially a good marketing tool to improve electoral chances in 2010. Don't spoil it by internal division.

Posted by: XBradTC at November 23, 2009 03:03 PM (y0E9v)

43

More importantly, it's quite a good list. Abortion is handled particularly well (public financing is a good place to draw the line, while not casting out pro-choice Republicans as heretics). -

So you can throw out one of the three most basic rights; Life, Liberty and the Pursuit of Happiness, and still not be a heritic?

Posted by: teej at November 23, 2009 03:03 PM (QdUKm)

44 I agree with some of the commenters above. I especially have concerns that all these issues may be important, but they are not equally important. For example, if the candidate is 9/10 but the one he/she disagrees with is the one about low taxes and small government, well that's a dealbreaker for me and I won't be sold just because the candidate is pro-life. This is my big beef with guys like Huckabee.

Posted by: Steve H in AZ at November 23, 2009 03:05 PM (2mqge)

45 Wow... The RNC proposes a sensible platform that can entice swing voters, and people here start bitching that their pet cause isn't addressed, or, they try to impose what the media is already calling it- a purity test.

It can already entice swing voters by allowing people to not match up with the list 100%. There's no need to water down the issues themselves.

Posted by: Johnny at November 23, 2009 03:05 PM (xVKXy)

46 You know what? That's a real nice list. Reminiscent of Contract With America. So whats to keep the bastards from wiping their RINO asses with it once they are back in power, just like they did with the CWA? Humm?

Posted by: maddogg at November 23, 2009 03:06 PM (OlN4e)

47

Lose Nos. 8 and 9 and you have a grand slam

This is not the electoral cycle to fight cultural wars again, and those 2 points are huge red flags waving in front of the bull

Posted by: Trump at November 23, 2009 03:06 PM (M7Awp)

48 So close to a pro-freedom platform, then we have to get involved in voluntary inter-person agreements with DOMA. Dumb.

We abdicated the sanctity of marriage when we handed it to the state in the first place. And a million gay marriages in the county records will never alter the vows taken as a covenant between a man, a woman, and their god.

So unless you think salvation is a communal deal and you can't make it to eternity unless your neighbors are all saved, I just don't get the religious angle.

And no, I don't care if it's a winner in the polls right now. Historically it will be the loser, and will look stupid.

I will never understand how others people's choices, and my nose getting in between them, is important enough for a plank of a platform. Idiocy.

Posted by: Morgan at November 23, 2009 03:06 PM (LZqTk)

49 It's good enough. It's not perfect.

 Personally, I'm not keen on the Defense of Marriage Act thing - I just don't think it's a federal issue.  The abortion compromise probably works - it's one thing to not use public resources for abortion, and quite another thing to ban abortion.  I'm personally against it, but at least in early stages, it should probably be up to the parents.

I wish we could add "Support efficient government by opposing all unionization of federal, state, or local government employees, or any persons who hold any form of professional license (e.g. teachers)."

Posted by: CatoRenasci at November 23, 2009 03:06 PM (EBXTK)

50 A position list that takes its form from the current litany of Democrats' priorities? In random order? How very RNC.

The hammering on "we support [...] by" is a stupid Mission Statement tic; the "we support by opposing" construction it forces on half the thing, just to make it look like Republicans are keen to "do something," is a fucking mess.

A plain list of what Republican voters want legislators to do, based on how polls rank voter priorities, would do the job perfectly. I guess that's why the RNC won't make one.

For one, DoMA wouldn't be on it, so the Beltway-fantasy "Republican base" wouldn't be satisfied.

Posted by: oblig. at November 23, 2009 03:06 PM (aK/MY)

51 I like the abortion treatment.  Please don't ruin our chances of victory with an abortion plank that alienates 35% of potential voters. 

Except the near fiscal anarchy most of you libertarian turds propose is a lot more likely to alienate potential voters. It's strange how the issues we must compromise on are always the issues you fuckers match up with the liberals on. It's almost as if you expect everybody else to compromise except you.

Posted by: Johnny at November 23, 2009 03:09 PM (xVKXy)

52
Yeah, Trump's right.

We need to keep being pussies and shy away from the third-rail issues such as killing unborn babies and granting special right to a fringe group.

Posted by: a.k.a. at November 23, 2009 03:09 PM (bLZ8Q)

53 So you can throw out one of the three most basic rights; Life, Liberty and the Pursuit of Happiness, and still not be a heritic?

Posted by: teej at November 23, 2009 03:03 PM (QdUKm)

I prefer the Constitutional formulation:

Life, Liberty, and Property.

Not that our courts, or governments, have any respect for these ...

Posted by: progressoverpeace at November 23, 2009 03:10 PM (A46hP)

54
...and here come the hand-wringers.

These are the same bed-wetters who get their panties in a bunch over Ann Coulter and whine about her driving away moderates.

Posted by: a.k.a. at November 23, 2009 03:11 PM (bLZ8Q)

55

This list is so flaccid, just the lamest reaction to Donk initiatives.

Where is  Reform of Government?  No new legislation until unwinding 50 years of clusterflocking us has begun.

Government adminstration staffs, at every level, in every corner, slashed 50%, just because we say so.

GOP needs to be refounded, call 'em WhigsDevolved.

Posted by: gary gulrud at November 23, 2009 03:11 PM (nf+jy)

56 I will never understand how others people's choices, and my nose getting in between them, is important enough for a plank of a platform. Idiocy.

Posted by: Morgan at November 23, 2009 03:06 PM (LZqTk)

Then you should have been the first to holler when  'other people'  stick their noses in and try to change a 2500 year old definition.

Posted by: polynikes at November 23, 2009 03:11 PM (m2CN7)

57 (6) We support victory in Iraq and Afghanistan by supporting military-recommended troop surges following through on US commitments

Posted by: Neo at November 23, 2009 03:12 PM (tE8FB)

58

Drew, I suspect some of our so-cons will call you out for cherry-picking your list in that only 3 issues (abortion, marriage, immigration) are arguably from that side of the fence.  For me personally, it's pretty spot-on.

2 and 10 seem to overlap a bit.  I'd make "oppose government funding for abortion" a stand-alone and throw the overlapping parts of 10 into 2.

Abortion:  I'm personally against it*, but I can live with pro-choice Republicans like Rudy.  There are other issues on the table such as limited government and national security that impact the whole society, not just the unborn, and the latest abortion-funding-amendment fiasco shows that many pro-lifers prefer a 100% pro-life rating over defeating a healthcare bill that runs counter to (at least) points 1, 2, 5 and 9.

Defense of Marriage Act:  I support it, but don't think it's important enough to be part of a litmus test for candidates.

* As an adoptee who knows my birth family, I know that if Roe had come down in 1968 I wouldn't be here.  I have some skin in that game.  So if anyone would like to take issue with my ability to live with Rudy on this, you need to tell me what personally important issues you'd compromise for the good of the party.

Posted by: societyis2blame at November 23, 2009 03:12 PM (rPDD/)

59

Personally, I'd support a platform that promises to vote no on everything for 3-7 years, but I guess that doesn't sell well.

 

Re: DOMA, isn't supporting that, in fact, leaving marriage up to the states, in that it says one state doesn't have to recognize another state's marriages if the break that states rules? Maybe it should be phrased as a defense of federalism, but it isn't a federal gov't power grab, to my knowledge.

Posted by: Randy at November 23, 2009 03:12 PM (zQKSr)

60 What about the solving the problem of $50+ trillion in unfunded Medicare, Medicaid and SS liabilities?  Funny how there's no mention of this.

Posted by: rockhead at November 23, 2009 03:12 PM (RykTt)

61

(4) needs to be expanded to a general principle of privacy in elections. For instance, the West Coast GOP needs to support signature hashing for public petitions - to protect signatories from harassment.

And it's a bit heavy on opposition; not enough specifics on what the GOP should do. (3) can name-check modern nuclear-fission reactors. For instance.

I'm not getting into Iraq or Afghanistan... I don't know enough.

One of them overreached: (9). (9) should read "we oppose government rationing". Because every agency which pays the bills has to have a Death Panel - to make the call to ration care for moribund patient X, or else they fail to help viable patients A, B, and C. Our argument is that this call should be made between the doctors, families, and the entity paying the freight. Our objection is to the government being that Single Payer. This list of principles would inject the government into there and concedes the Democrats' point for a cheap political gain, a gain that will evaporate in days.

Otherwise it's a good list. It's to the Left of me, and I'm not even Conservative.

Posted by: Zimriel at November 23, 2009 03:13 PM (9Sbz+)

62

I prefer the Constitutional formulation:

Life, Liberty, and Property.

Not that our courts, or governments, have any respect for these ... -

Yessir, I just always took pursuit of happiness to mean pursuit of property, possibly due to how it was phrased in the constitution. Thanks for the clarification.

Posted by: teej at November 23, 2009 03:13 PM (QdUKm)

63

 Jacob Javitz at November 23, 2009 03:00 PM (RdKK

 

Don't you have work to do, erg???

Posted by: Sort-of-Mad Max at November 23, 2009 03:13 PM (ERJIu)

64 The purpose of this is to de-demonize Republicans.  And yes, anyone living in a blue state knows how necessary that is.

(G-d, how I am not looking forward to Thanksgiving in this respect...)


Posted by: ParisParamus at November 23, 2009 03:14 PM (NPtVh)

65
I will never understand how others people's choices, and my nose getting in between them, is important enough for a plank of a platform. Idiocy.

Umm, you gay marriage fucktards are the ones grabbing me by the nose and pulling me in between you by demanding government (which represents the people) endorsement of your perversion. By all means find some quack church to marry you. I don't want marriage in the government at all. But I find it interesting that libertarians want smaller government, except when a pet issue like gay marriage shows up, and then they suddenly want yet another government entitlement EXPANDED.

Posted by: Johnny at November 23, 2009 03:15 PM (xVKXy)

66

just don't call it a contract

GOP broke the last one, and are reaping the whirlwind today

Posted by: Jones at November 23, 2009 03:15 PM (KOkrW)

67

58 correction:

Not "Drew's List", but his positions in agreement therewith.

Posted by: societyis2blame at November 23, 2009 03:16 PM (rPDD/)

68

And if you read between the lines you'll see written plainly, "And setting up death camps for dissenters, boy."

Posted by: maureen dowd at November 23, 2009 03:16 PM (2qU2d)

69

Naturally MSNBC is calling this a "Purity Test"

 

pure, like their all-caucasian line-up of talking heads?

 

Posted by: Jones at November 23, 2009 03:16 PM (KOkrW)

70
 Personally, I'm not keen on the Defense of Marriage Act thing - I just don't think it's a federal issue.

Then you should be all for DOMA, since, IIRC, it's purpose is to prevent states from having to recognize gay marriages performed in another state.

Posted by: Johnny at November 23, 2009 03:17 PM (xVKXy)

71 DOMA is a slam-dunk. We need a few of those.

Posted by: Luca Brasi at November 23, 2009 03:18 PM (YmPwQ)

72

 you need to tell me what personally important issues you'd compromise for the good of the party. -

None, absolutly zero. Not the type of person to put "the good of the party", any party, above my principles. Compromising, a little further to the left, a little further away from the constitution, each go 'round, is how we got into this freaking mess in the first place.

Posted by: teej at November 23, 2009 03:19 PM (QdUKm)

73 Why, it's almost like a Contract With America... how'd that work out for us?

The problem with the GOP ain't the principles, it's the principals...

Posted by: Richard McEnroe at November 23, 2009 03:19 PM (JJpmw)

74

MSNBC

"Where Obama's record isn't the only thing that gets our White Out"

Posted by: Jones at November 23, 2009 03:19 PM (KOkrW)

75 The problem with the GOP ain't the principles, it's the principals...

Posted by: Richard McEnroe at November 23, 2009 03:19 PM (JJpmw)

 

ah dude- I saw what ya did there

Posted by: Jones at November 23, 2009 03:20 PM (KOkrW)

76

Hmmm, part of me likes this list, part of me, the one with the cojones, thinks this is rather weak. Too much "opposition", not enough direction.

How about something along these lines: "We reject the notion of man-made global warming. It should not become the basis for any law or regulation until it has been proven to exist."

"We support a balanced federal budget. We will propose no new laws that increase spending. Period."

"We support the traditional familial unit of one father and one mother as the best environment in which to raise children. The parents are the ultimate arbiters and instructors, not schools."

Posted by: BackwardsBoy at November 23, 2009 03:25 PM (ZGhSv)

77 A good list- tax cuts for everyone needs to be added, but otherwise great.
Although by next fall it may be so bad that an agenda that calls for smallpox-infested blankets for children would do well vs. the Democrats.

Posted by: jjshaka at November 23, 2009 03:25 PM (qt/va)

78 Ergie's on board with all those fabulous programs. Douchenozzle?

Posted by: nikkolai at November 23, 2009 03:27 PM (My1PP)

79 This is a nice list, but I hope they massage the format a bit for marketing purposes. It would really be better to see it stated as a positive affirmation of principles, followed by an action item. Example:

Principle: We support market-based energy reforms.
Action: We support the raising of some governmental restrictions on the construction of new safe nuclear plants, and on drilling for oil within certain U.S. lands. We also oppose "top down" styles of federal programs like Cap and Trade.

They shouldn't be saying that they "support" X by "opposing" Y all the time. Positive statements.

Posted by: mr.frakypants at November 23, 2009 03:27 PM (PonvG)

80 If we used my 11 we could get rid of 8 and 9.

Posted by: Vic at November 23, 2009 03:27 PM (CDUiN)

81

I can support all ten of these. As far as abortion goes, I realize it's the law of the land but that doesn't mean the taxpayers have to pay for it. DoMA: only reason for asking it to be shot down is for bennies. Both parties should get a job, marriage is between a man and a woman, nothing else. There is no such thing as gay marriage. AfPak: only way to win is by a surge tailored for that theater. Losing is not really an option. I support healthcare reform but not in the form the dems are trying to shove down our throats. The immigration issue should be a common sense thing, I'll never understand how people can be for illegal immigration and all the problems that come with it. Not to mention that many friends I have had to do it legally, why should someone get a pass because of geography? 

The question is, how many RINOs  who are already in office will buy into that?  And do we have a feasible alternative without electing a straight out lib in their place? 

Posted by: Bill R. at November 23, 2009 03:29 PM (EhlQq)

82 school choice

Posted by: jcp at November 23, 2009 03:31 PM (DHNp4)

83 I don't like the Defense of Marriage bit (I think that is a state issue and the federal government has no business going there) 

Posted by: Chi-Town Jerry at November 23, 2009 02:47 PM (f9c2L)

The main reason for the DoMA is because it would cost taxpayers millions every year to pay benefits to these people if they hold a federal job. The feds do not get involved in marriage other than that.

Posted by: Bill R. at November 23, 2009 03:33 PM (EhlQq)

84

There's a difference between platform and policy.

What would get votes, IMO, is if we mention the Constitution, that we don't mention any politician by name (like Obama), and that we get rid of the comparative adjectives. "Small-er" government is Red Toryism; it's weak, and it concedes the field to the Left. We need more Thatchers in 2010, not Heaths. A clear statement of principles, and not mush, is for the platform.

But that means you have to keep the expression of those principles to tangible policy; and these policies should be appealing to the maximum number of voters.

progressoverpeace #17, I'd like employee unions banned from any organisation which the government pays for. 18-1 #28, I agree with not overspending until we have at least the deficit under control (because other countries would like to have confidence in our fisc again). But for these we might not be able to get votes.

(Of course SEIU could always mount a series of crippling strikes over the next year, and if that happens then progressoverpeace #17 becomes electable. America doesn't remember what it's like to live under union rule. I was born in the UK in the 1970s. I remember.)

Posted by: Zimriel at November 23, 2009 03:34 PM (9Sbz+)

85 We support smaller government, smaller national debt, lower deficits...

FAIL. We need to work toward NO debt and NO deficits. You can't continue to spend more money than you take in FOREVER.

We support legal immigration and assimilation into American society...

FAIL. Immigrants are NOT assimilating because there is no incentive for them to do so and because there are so many of them that they form self sustaining communities. We need to halt immigration for 25 years or more, except for special cases, in order to allow the current immigrants to be absorbed and assimilated.

Posted by: obama is a traitor at November 23, 2009 03:36 PM (Qt4Y7)

86 Pretty good list. I think everyone can add an 11th - tort reform, school vouchers, elimination of certain departments of the government. But, this seems to be the broader strokes type of approach one takes. Are you going to have variances from person to person - sure. But, you can support 6 of 10, that is o.k.

Posted by: Mallamutt at November 23, 2009 03:36 PM (V9SYy)

87

BackwardsBoy 76 "We reject the notion of man-made global warming. It should not become the basis for any law or regulation until it has been proven to exist."

Do that and you're "politicising science". Even though you're right, remember: you want ammunition for your side, not for theirs.

The platform is right to talk up energy and the market, and not to mention carbon.

Posted by: Zimriel at November 23, 2009 03:37 PM (9Sbz+)

88 The main reason for the DoMA is because it would cost taxpayers millions every year to pay benefits to these people if they hold a federal job. The feds do not get involved in marriage other than that.

Posted by: Bill R. at November 23, 2009 03:33 PM (EhlQq)

The feds also use marriage as one of the bases for our immigration policy - as it is family-oriented. This is why marriage is extremely important at the federal level, even though it is a state issue. Could you imagine the insanity that would follow if polygamy were recognized (as it is more traditional and rational than gay marriage, it would necessarily have to follow any "Equal Protection" arguments for gay marriage)? The impact on our society would be absolutely unbelievable, and detrimental in the extreme.

Posted by: progressoverpeace at November 23, 2009 03:40 PM (A46hP)

89 I'm hardly a good Republican....  but my most compelling reason to support the GOP is the pro-life issue.

This list is lame if it doesn't even include the pro-life position.  I mean, come on, at least let people opt out of opposition to infanticide....  but to just leave it off the list altogether?!?!  At least offer some guidance as to what the correct position is.

And then you look at what they DO include....  "card check" and "defense of marriage"...  which matter, sure, but seem remarkably less urgent than protecting infants from being ripped apart in the womb and tossed in a dumpster. 

Posted by: blip at November 23, 2009 03:40 PM (XjICS)

90 What does McCain score? A three?

Posted by: libbyt at November 23, 2009 03:41 PM (Ca8yw)

91 I don't think Ron Paul could sign to more than 7 of them.

Posted by: Doc Merlin at November 23, 2009 03:42 PM (4fuqq)

92 NO welfare for immigrants. If you can't make it on your own, sorry, but you'll have to go home and make room for someone more capable - maybe even an American.

Posted by: obama is a traitor at November 23, 2009 03:43 PM (Qt4Y7)

93 My platform:

1)  Ordered Liberty







That is all.

Posted by: toby928 at November 23, 2009 03:45 PM (PD1tk)

94

TERM LIMITS!

2 SENATE

4 HOUSE

10 YRS FEDERAL BENCH UP TO AND INCL SCOTUS

Posted by: Jones at November 23, 2009 03:46 PM (KOkrW)

95 Was #8 supposed to come out as smiley?

test

Posted by: Gerry at November 23, 2009 03:47 PM (cSBta)

96 1 and 7 really shouldn't be negotiable, and the only reason not to make the no to amnesty mandatory is the same thinking that got us the tuck rule.  Generally this is not strong enough and I don't see how it requires better behavior from the squishes we currently have issues with.

And if it's just talk, it's worthless anyway.

Posted by: Methos at November 23, 2009 03:48 PM (CoDwG)

97 So, national security isn't that important any more. Huh. Except for Afghanistan, Iran, Iraq and North Korea, anti-terrorism and projecting military power around the world is no longer an election issue. Maybe I'm living in the past (and by "the past" I mean 2004) but I thought the Republicans owned this issue. OK, fine. Count me in, GOP, but know that we agree on only 4 out of 10 points.

Posted by: FireHorse at November 23, 2009 03:48 PM (Vl5GH)

98

They shouldn't be saying that they "support" X by "opposing" Y all the time. Positive statements.

I totally agree.  2010 can be won...BIG...with three positive statements.

1.  Victory in Afghanistan.

2.  Energy independence.

3.  Fiscal discipline.

Posted by: Circa (Insert Year Here) at November 23, 2009 03:52 PM (B+qrE)

99 There's definitely some items missing from that list of principles.

(11) We support decriminalizing of Valu-Rite Vodka, cigars, and recreational hobo-strangling;
(12) We oppose ALL portrayals of lesbians on film and video unless they're smokin' hot;
(13) We want all government jobs to be made salary-less (if it's such a goddamned noble cause, why do you want to be paid for it?)
(14) We want a giant space-based laser system to protect Earth from asteroids, and also to use to fry uppity foreign creeps and scare the pants off the Chinese;
(15) Supreme Court justices have to wear CLOTHES under their robes!  No more judicial "tentpole" incidents!

Posted by: Trimegistus at November 23, 2009 03:54 PM (qTRp0)

100 That list of principles would need to include something about judges, and something about jobs.

Posted by: Onlooker at November 23, 2009 03:54 PM (M3hG/)

101 New and improved list.

1. We will kill terrorists and anyone near said terrorists, can't be to safe, recent scientificy studies have reported mice can transfer terroristic tendencies though close contact with andrew sullivan.

B. We won't piss on you and tell you that its raining, unless you're an attractive female and into that kind of thing, then please send me an email.

4. There is only one rule in fight...er our america, leave us, our wallets, our heath care, and our neighbors kids lunch bag with however many cookies his fat ass wants to eat alone.

Kill hippies and prosper.

Posted by: evil libertarian at November 23, 2009 03:55 PM (VycFM)

102 The main reason for the DoMA is that if fractures the Democratic coalition (Rich White Lib vs Poor Blacks).

Posted by: Jean at November 23, 2009 03:58 PM (3WbbL)

103

Pick a hard number, re how many points a GOP candidate or representative must support.  Then add an 11th point - any incumbent (that doesn't continue to adhere to) or candidate that does not meet the minimum requirements will get zero support, of any type from the GOP, and may face open opposition from the GOP & its coffers.

Don't want any more Arlen Specters.

Posted by: MDr at November 23, 2009 03:59 PM (ucq49)

104 This is why marriage is extremely important at the federal level, even though it is a state issue. Could you imagine the insanity that would follow if polygamy were recognized (as it is more traditional and rational than gay marriage, it would necessarily have to follow any "Equal Protection" arguments for gay marriage)? The impact on our society would be absolutely unbelievable, and detrimental in the extreme.

Posted by: progressoverpeace at November 23, 2009 03:40 PM (A46hP)

Didn't think about that when I posted but, yeah, that's true. Still trying to figure out the "equal protection" part when they already have the same rights to marry as anyone else. Marriage is between a man and a woman and they can get married same as straight people, just not to someone of the same gender, as that would not fall under the definition of marriage

Posted by: Bill R. at November 23, 2009 03:59 PM (EhlQq)

105

51 and 65:  Reagan Rule, please.  Someone who might agree with you on 70-80% of what you say should not be referred to as a turd, fucktard, etc...

Posted by: societyis2blame at November 23, 2009 04:02 PM (rPDD/)

106 Real Energy Jobs in America, Today (Rephrase Drill here/Drill Now)

Posted by: Jean at November 23, 2009 04:02 PM (mtAmx)

107

Zimriel #87

The platform is right to talk up energy and the market, and not to mention carbon.

I would say rather we should talk up energy as a security issue and as a balance of trade issue.  Remind people every chance we get that we are sending $700 Billion a year overseas (to some countries that actively support our enemies).  Building clean energy here makes sense as long as a free market can support it. 

The last time I saw Boehner talk about global warming he looked like an idiot.  We can simply say promoting American produced energy that is cleaner is good for our country even though the jury is still out on whether man affects the climate or not.  (or some such bullshit like that.. (8 )


Posted by: Chi-Town Jerry at November 23, 2009 04:03 PM (f9c2L)

108 Still trying to figure out the "equal protection" part when they already have the same rights to marry as anyone else. Marriage is between a man and a woman and they can get married same as straight people, just not to someone of the same gender, as that would not fall under the definition of marriage

Posted by: Bill R. at November 23, 2009 03:59 PM (EhlQq)

I agree with you. I'm not saying that the "Equal Protection" arguments for gay marriage make any sense, but that is what many are pushing and that is what many state courts have been ruling on - either explicitly or with it in the background - and what many legislatures have been basing their arguments on.

Posted by: progressoverpeace at November 23, 2009 04:05 PM (A46hP)

109 Reducing Taxes Creates Jobs (It is the Economy, stupid)

Posted by: Jean at November 23, 2009 04:07 PM (tTdaQ)

110

If the Republican Party sticks to these principles, then sign me up as a Republican!

 

Posted by: unknown jane at November 23, 2009 04:07 PM (5/yRG)

111 The problem I have with a set of stated principles like these is that I don't trust anyone running on them to follow through with them once in office.  For instance, every time Texas is about to elect a governor, all the candidates (the serious ones, anyway) swear up and down that border security is by gosh the most important thing to them and if they're elected, we may have to physically restrain them from marching down to the border themselves to stem the flood of illegals.  And once they're elected, the issue is dropped until the next election season.  Same with most of these crap-weasels.  Just because they've figured out what lines to parrot to get people to vote for them doesn't mean squat to me.

Posted by: Cautiously Pessimistic at November 23, 2009 04:08 PM (30xKW)

112 Zim, good point on the ammunition thing. The thing that bugs me is that science has already been politicized by the numerous laws and regulations that are based on the theory of global warming.

Posted by: BackwardsBoy at November 23, 2009 04:08 PM (ZGhSv)

113 Unconditional Victory and Eternal Vigilance (get your historic national security and messianic messages all-in-one)

Posted by: Jean at November 23, 2009 04:11 PM (Scxfk)

114 Incomplete but at least its a decent start. Number 8 bothers me, but for a different reason than the usual hip modern squishy conservative holds. The Defense of Marriage Act puts marriage in the hands of the federal government even slightly, and the founding fathers rejected that for good reason.

Posted by: Christopher taylor at November 23, 2009 04:11 PM (PQY7w)

115

Its a good start.  But like I told my 16 year old high school sweetheart, "You have to show me that you mean it if you want me to believe it." 

 

Posted by: California Red at November 23, 2009 04:11 PM (7uWb8)

116 Re: DOMA, isn't supporting that, in fact, leaving marriage up to the states, in that it says one state doesn't have to recognize another state's marriages if the break that states rules?

No, DOMA section 3 contains a federal definition of marriage which says "the word `marriage' means only a legal union between one man and one woman as husband and wife, and the word `spouse' refers only to a person of the opposite sex who is a husband or a wife."

This takes what was a state issue--who is lawfully married--and makes it a federal issue.  For example, in places where gay marriage is lawful like Massachusetts and Iowa, the married couple is treated as individuals for the purposes of filing federal taxes, receiving federal benefits, etc.

So, if I (a federal employee) were to marry a guy where it is lawful to do so, I couldn't put my husband on my employer-provided health insurance, he wouldn't get automatic access to my pension if something were to happen to me, etc. Even though the state recognizes my (hypothetical) lawful marriage, my employer--because of DOMA--cannot.

DOMA is an abrogation of federalism. You can say it's a conservative principle, sure. But it sure as hell doesn't comport with federalism.

Posted by: Gabriel Malor at November 23, 2009 04:13 PM (Mi2wf)

117 I'm disappointed because it didn't say anything about being rid of fuckwits like Michael Steele.

Posted by: Captain Hate at November 23, 2009 04:13 PM (oObEM)

118  The main reason for the DoMA is because it would cost taxpayers millions every year to pay benefits to these people if they hold a federal job. The feds do not get involved in marriage other than that.

That is one of the fuckin' lousiest excuses for discrimination ever. Hey, we should discriminate against lawfully married gays because it saves money! (Incidentally, we could also save money by discriminating against lawfully married mix-raced couples too. Or lawfully married white couples. Or lawfully married couples with kids. The savings are endless!!!)

Posted by: Gabriel Malor at November 23, 2009 04:16 PM (Mi2wf)

119

typical politicians use a page of words when all they needed to say was we support life,liberty and the pursuit of happiness. 

 

 

Posted by: unseen at November 23, 2009 04:20 PM (aVGmX)

120 I agree with some of the others here that say this list needs to be re-ordered a bit. And with some wording changes. Mainly dropping out a lot of the "we oppose" stuff. The "party of no" meme is pretty prevalent with the uninformed, so we need to get away from leaving that impression. Here's my take on the list (trying to remember the K.I.S.S. rule as much as possible):

1. We support the original role of the federal government as imagined and detailed by our founders in the Constitution. We support small government, no national debt, no deficits and low taxes. In order to work towards those goals, we propose to cut all unnecessary and/or wasteful federal programs and scale back entitlements, looking to phase them out at the federal level in the future.

2. We believe our national security is extremely important. Therefore, we support victory in Iraq and Afghanistan by granting our military and commanders on the ground our full confidence as well as all of the resources they need to ensure victory.

3. We support containment of Iran and North Korea, particularly effective action to eliminate their nuclear weapons threat. We will not shrink from taking strong action in order to ensure our safety, nor will we take any options off the table.

4. We believe that the American people are smart enough to make the right choices for their families. Therefore, we support market-based health insurance reforms that keep insurance purchases private and keep your health decisions between yourself and your doctor. We also support measures to negate the unfair tax advantages large corporations receive in order to provide health insurance by offering to extend those same tax benefits to those who purchase insurance on their own.

5.  As with health insurance, we trust the American people to make the best decisions for their communities; therefore, we support market-driven energy reforms that happen naturally over time. We also support state efforts to tap into their natural resources in order to supply the nation with domestic energy sources. We also support efforts to explore safe and efficient alternative energy sources, such as nuclear power.

6. We support workers' rights to a secret ballot as well as state efforts to reform local voting regulations in order to protect against fraudulent voting in elections.

7. We support protecting the lives of vulnerable persons; therefore we cannot support any form of government imposed health care rationing or government imposed denial of health care. We also cannot support government funding of abortion.

8. We support the Tenth Amendment of the Constitution, and subsequently, the right of the people of each state to decide issues not specifically delegated to the Congress for themselves. Therefore, we support the right of each state to determine appropriate laws in regards to abortion and same-sex unions, as well as any other "social" issues that may arise in the future. We support the Defense of Marriage Act, as it provides additional protection to the individual states against judicial activism.

9. We support legal immigration and assimilation into American society. We welcome all who desire to come into our country via the appropriate legal processes and are willing and able to contribute to the betterment of our society. We also support strengthening the security of our borders as well as enforcing current immigration laws by enforcing status checks for employment and heavily penalizing businesses and other organizations who do not comply with the law.

10. We support the right to keep and bear arms by opposing government restrictions on gun ownership as listed in the Second Amendment to the Constitution


I re-ordered them to present the biggies first (fiscal responsibility followed by national security) then put in general domestic issues followed by the social ones. I think it's important to stress to people that the party wants to let people make the best decisions for themselves and their communities, so I put in some "shout-outs" to the 10th Amendment. If the bottom line is that we're looking for a general list of things that most reasonable people can agree with (and not get too into specific policy, as the average person doesn't follow politics like we AOSHQ morons do), then I think these are good starting points that clarify each position as far as we can without getting into purity tests.

Posted by: Mandy P. at November 23, 2009 04:20 PM (MK6Kx)

121 It's a good start and quite tame. Chop out the silly "support by opposing" language and just identify what to support. It's obvious that the opposite of what is supported will be opposed. I'm in the fold easily, 9 of 10. 

Posted by: Meremortal at November 23, 2009 04:21 PM (7FgWm)

122

FWIW, I only disagree with 3 of those, and I still consider myself a centrist Democrat.

 

The abortion statement is one of the ones that bother me, and, honestly, you're not going to fool me into thinking the Republican party is suddenly kind of pro-choice because of the careful wording there. I think agree with those who have said it might as well be a stronger pro-life statement. Why alienate your pro-life base when you really, really can't win over people like me anyway on that issue?

Posted by: Dora Suarez at November 23, 2009 04:21 PM (0/Svj)

123

72:

If your position is "I won't compromise on anything" you need to find a country where everyone agrees with everything you say.

The problem with the "no compromise" mentality in a democracy is that, unlike your Country of One, compromise will be forced on you by people who disagree with you, whether you like it or not.  You can either participate in the process to make the product better, grant yourself the moral authority to disobey because you won't compromise your principles, or simply sulk in your philosophical purity while doing the things you don't want to do.

The whole idea of "re-founding" sounds great, but how does anyone propose to accomplish this ?

 

 

Posted by: societyis2blame at November 23, 2009 04:24 PM (rPDD/)

124 how about we will pass no bill that does not have 80% approval.

Posted by: unseen at November 23, 2009 04:27 PM (aVGmX)

125 Posted by: Dora Suarez at November 23, 2009 04:21 PM (0/Svj)

Just curious as to why the abortion statement bothers you? If you believe in small government, then it's only logical to allow the states to decide the issues for themselves. It's also only logical to deny federal funding of what is an elective medical procedure. We're not in the business of funding rhinoplasty or breast implants. Why should we be forced to fund a procedure to eliminate a condition (I hate that language, but that's unfortunately part of politics) that is entirely preventable?

Posted by: Mandy P. at November 23, 2009 04:27 PM (MK6Kx)

126 This takes what was a state issue--who is lawfully married--and makes it a federal issue. For example, in places where gay marriage is lawful like Massachusetts and Iowa, the married couple is treated as individuals for the purposes of filing federal taxes, receiving federal benefits, etc.

Posted by: Gabriel Malor at November 23, 2009 04:13 PM (Mi2wf)

There is a federal definition of "immediate family" (which obviously includes marriage in it - though the Immigration and Nationality Act does not specify marriage, since its basic definition was so obvious to everyone at the time that it didn't warrant any explanation) and it is used for our immigration policy.

For example, from the INA:

(A) (i) an ambassador, public minister, or career diplomatic or consular officer who has been accredited by a foreign government recognized de jure by the United States and who is accepted by the President or by the Secretary of State, and the members of the alien's immediate family;

(i) is the fiancee or fiance of a citizen of the United States 3bb/ (other than a citizen described in section 204(a)(1)(A)(viii)(I) ) and who seeks to enter the United States solely to conclude a valid marriage with the petitioner within ninety days after admission;

I think we can all agree that "fiance" requires a definition of marriage - again, something that was universally accepted at the time of this writing and needed no explanation.

(G) (i) a designated principal resident representative of a foreign government recognized de jure by the United States, which foreign government is a member of an international organization entitled to enjoy privileges, exemptions, and immunities as an international organization under the International Organizations Immunities Act (59 Stat. 669) 22 U.S.C. 288, note, accredited resident members of the staff of such representatives, and members of his or their immediate family;

Why do you ignore this impact of "marriage" and "family" at the federal level, and in one of the most contentious issues of our time?

Posted by: progressoverpeace at November 23, 2009 04:28 PM (A46hP)

127 This takes what was a state issue--who is lawfully married--and makes it a federal issue.

Gabe,

It was a state issue when marriage meant one specific thing for the entire country since its founding.

Start playing with that definition, then you inevitably start playing with what is and isn't 'a state issue'.

It wasn't federalists who opened this box up.

Posted by: DrewM. at November 23, 2009 04:33 PM (FCWQb)

128 Good start, but lots of things need fixing.

We need to build a big coalition that emphasizes the primacy of personal freedom, fiscal responsibility, or national security.  If HillBuzz.org is reflective of how libs are currently thinking we have an excellent chance of building a coalition of with a strong libertarian agenda.  So I'd scrap 8 and anything that looks like a social conservative agenda.

A national energy policy that focuses on state-of-the-art nuclear energy.

Something explicit about enforcing the borders is badly needed.

Reducing the deficit and debt is a weak and tepid response.  We need to fix the damn thing and pass a constitutional amendment that will never allow this kind of stuff to happen again.






Posted by: Mr. Peabody at November 23, 2009 04:33 PM (EFQfG)

129 progressoverpeace, don't even attempt to go down that road with me. The portions of the INA you just quoted are from INA Ss 101(a)(15) defining those who are  NOT immigrants within the meaning of the Act.

Posted by: Gabriel Malor at November 23, 2009 04:33 PM (Mi2wf)

130

At FireFifty we have been working from a different set of principles:

Ethics For the duration of our service, we swear that we will put our country and our constituents ahead of everything but our family and our faith.

Fiscal Sanity We will restore fiscal sanity to the Federal government. We will spend fewer actual dollars in 2011 than DC does in 2010

Fighting Smart We have soldiers on the field of battle. We will not jeopardize our warriors for political gain.

Our Children We will not wait any longer to for DC to fix our schools. Full school choice now.

Individual Rights We will advance the American ideal of individual liberties and we will not discriminate for or against any American.

Rule of Law We will either enforce the law or change the law through the democratic process.

http://bit.ly/6FECON

Of course everyone likes their own lists but I really think that people are completely, absolutely disgusted with monetary corruption and stupid sexual pecadillos.  We have to start with ethical representatives.

 

 

Posted by: motionview at November 23, 2009 04:33 PM (DtSf1)

131 I just listened to Mitch McConell on Hannity. He thought it was pretty shrewd that the LA whore held out for $300M. He refused to call it a bribe. Principled meh. He can fuck himself with Pelosi's cock as far as I'm concerned.

Posted by: Barbarian at November 23, 2009 04:34 PM (EL+OC)

132 Posted by: Gabriel Malor at November 23, 2009 04:13 PM (Mi2wf)

Your attempt to dismiss the federal impact of the definition of marriage in various states sounds suspiciously similar to your denial of the obvious meaning of 'natural born citizen', written at a time when American dual-citizenship was totally rejected, only to have you (and those who argue law as you) claiming that dual citizens are automatically included in the class of 'natural born citizens' even though they were specifically excluded at the time of the writing.

By your own arguments with the 'natural born citizen' clause, you would be the first in line to claim that because Massachusetts extends marriage to polygamists (as that will happen, eventually) that their "immediate family" are welcome as immigrants under the existing INA - which is, of course, insane.

Posted by: progressoverpeace at November 23, 2009 04:36 PM (A46hP)

133 129 progressoverpeace, don't even attempt to go down that road with me. The portions of the INA you just quoted are from INA Ss 101(a)(15) defining those who are NOT immigrants within the meaning of the Act.

Posted by: Gabriel Malor at November 23, 2009 04:33 PM (Mi2wf)

Those were just random examples pulled to prove that "marriage" has a very important federal meaning. Do you deny that "marriage" has a federal meaning?

Posted by: progressoverpeace at November 23, 2009 04:37 PM (A46hP)

134  Gabe,

It was a state issue when marriage meant one specific thing for the entire country since its founding.

Start playing with that definition, then you inevitably start playing with what is and isn't 'a state issue'.

It wasn't federalists who opened this box up.

Drew, the states had different definitions of marriage from the very beginning. The most obvious (and slightly squicktastic) is that in some states (*cough*California*cough*) it is lawful to marry a first cousin and in other states (*cough*Arkansas*cough*) it is not.

Just because the definition of marriage is different in the states, there isn't a reason for the national government to iron it out. As far as the national government was concerned, a lawful marriage is a lawful marriage. If you couldn't marry your cousin in your home state, you could go do it somewhere else. It was all the same to the national government.

That changed with gay marriage. Suddenly, it was decided that this decision--what is or is not a lawful marriage--was too important to let the states decide. So the national government overrode what was traditionally a state decision.

Squirm all you want. That's an abrogation of federalism. Own it.

Posted by: Gabriel Malor at November 23, 2009 04:38 PM (Mi2wf)

135 Drew, the states had different definitions of marriage from the very beginning. The most obvious (and slightly squicktastic) is that in some states (*cough*California*cough*) it is lawful to marry a first cousin and in other states (*cough*Arkansas*cough*) it is not.

Really? That's the line you're going with?

Ok, I will resubmit my comment with a clarification...

It was a state issue when marriage meant one specific thing (one man and one woman) for the entire country since its founding.

Start playing with that definition, then you inevitably start playing with what is and isn't 'a state issue'.

It wasn't federalists who opened this box up.

Want to try again?

Posted by: DrewM. at November 23, 2009 04:41 PM (FCWQb)

136 Gabe,

It was a state issue when marriage meant one specific thing for the entire country since its founding.

Start playing with that definition, then you inevitably start playing with what is and isn't 'a state issue'.

It wasn't federalists who opened this box up.

Posted by: DrewM. at November 23, 2009 04:33 PM (FCWQb)


No shit. DOMA doesn't define federal marriage, it reiterates it. It prevents any state from attempting, solely, to force a change in that definition. Is every word supposed to be up for grabs because the Founders didn't write a dictionary too?

Posted by: Rocks at November 23, 2009 04:41 PM (Q1lie)

137 Mandy P., partly it bothers me because I know the actual position of most Republicans is much stronger than that, so I read it as the one where the Republicans re-affirm that they are pro-life while trying to pretend not to. So on that level I disagree with what I think it means rather than what it says. But also, since I am 100% pro-choice, and see all these little bobbles and restrictions as part of the ongoing effort to chip away at abortion rights by whatever means possible, the individual merits of each little restriction frankly don't matter to me. Besides, I don't think abortion is purely elective the way, say, plastic surgery is. If a person is pregnant, she either has to have medical care for pregnancy and childbirth, or for an abortion. Withdrawing federal money for the latter is meant to express disapproval for it, which I don't share.

Posted by: Dora Suarez at November 23, 2009 04:41 PM (0/Svj)

138 Gabriel Malor, like a lot of people tending left, needs to pick up a dictionary and look up the word "discrimination." See, discriminating is not in and of its self bad. I discriminate against murderers and rapists, and their acts. So do most people, I expect. That's proper because they are horrible people who've done horrible things.

But there's another level: I discriminate against yams because I think they taste lousy. I discriminate in favor of redheaded girls because I think they are prettier. Those aren't bad forms of discrimination either. Having a "discriminating palate" for example, used to be considered a virtue.

Discrimination is simply favoring one thing over another, for whatever reason. It only because bad if your reasons are unethical. It only is illegal if your reasons for discriminating are illegal.

Thus, picking "slugger" Bob to play on your baseball team ahead of geeky Joe is discrimination, but not somehow a horrible act.

The argument never given by the gay "marriage" advocates is why we should have this. It's always "well what could it hurt?" in the end, and that's not enough.

Posted by: Christopher taylor at November 23, 2009 04:42 PM (PQY7w)

139 There's an awful lot of the "smaller government" rhetoric that always gets brushed aside with "Well, but this is crucial!!!"

The only question I need my representatives to wrestle with is: Is this the approach that is the smallest possible government intervention to provide the desired outcomes? Or does it at least set the stage for the same?

Or, hell. In today's politics, does it at least avoid making it illegal to be responsible for oneself.

Posted by: Al at November 23, 2009 04:43 PM (0lyUI)

140 I support all but 8 and 9.  I must be a liberal.

Posted by: doug at November 23, 2009 04:45 PM (jCwj+)

141 FTR- I find the argument Gabe makes in 134 to be one of the most disingenuous out there and I say that as someone who would vote for same-sex marriage.

To pretend that redefining marriage in this way is really just a tweak, something that happens all the time is really annoying.

If people want to argue for same-sex marriage they really should be upfront about what they are trying to do.


Posted by: DrewM. at November 23, 2009 04:46 PM (FCWQb)

142

The GOP could forego specific platform items for now. Republicans could just say, "The Democrats got their way. Here we are."

Posted by: FireHorse at November 23, 2009 04:48 PM (Vl5GH)

143 Posted by: Gabriel Malor at November 23, 2009 04:38 PM (Mi2wf)

States didn't have different definitions of marriage. It was the union of  one man and one woman, everywhere. They had different restrictions added to that definition, but the same definition. Things weren't suddenly changed with the advent of "gay marriage", which is exactly why there is such moaning and gnashing of teeth over this. It was just supposed to suddenly change and everyone was to just roll over. Allowing the redefinition of a word as basic as marriage with the fall of a gavel.

Posted by: Rocks at November 23, 2009 04:49 PM (Q1lie)

144
Not sure how to word this, but I'd add a statement that requires Congress and the Senate need to live with the same mandates and laws that they impose on their constituencies. 




Posted by: Mr. Peabody at November 23, 2009 04:50 PM (EFQfG)

145 Christopher, read what I wrote again and try not to let your prejudices carry you off. I didn't write anything about why gay marriage should be lawful because that's not the point of this discussion. We're talking about whether and why some lawful marriages should be given federal credit and others not.

Now, one commenter suggested that we should discriminate between lawful marriages because it saves money. I suggested that was reprehensible and leads to absurd results.  And the truth is, that's not the real reason people are interested in discriminating against lawful gay marriages.  That may be a nice little side benefit, but we all know that's not the real reason they're trying to keep the federal benefits of all other lawful marriages in this country away from gays.

Posted by: Gabriel Malor at November 23, 2009 04:50 PM (Mi2wf)

146 C Taylor, exactly. What is the argument for government regulation of same sex relationships? Marriage as a heterosexual relationship has economic (replacement ratio) and public health (genetic diversity) roles for government regulation, what are those roles for government on the gay side. And then, are they essential.

Posted by: Jean at November 23, 2009 04:52 PM (5ddCw)

147 You can have every other benefit America has to offfer.Marriage is between a man and a woman.

Posted by: steevy at November 23, 2009 04:52 PM (AqFZj)

148 To pretend that redefining marriage in this way is really just a tweak, something that happens all the time is really annoying.

If people want to argue for same-sex marriage they really should be upfront about what they are trying to do.

You give the game away, Drew. You're fine with states making "just tweaks." But if a state were to do something drastic, well, we can't have that. Must impose a federal definition. Byebye federalism.

Posted by: Gabriel Malor at November 23, 2009 04:53 PM (Mi2wf)

149 Withdrawing federal money for the latter is meant to express disapproval for it, which I don't share.

Posted by: Dora Suarez at November 23, 2009 04:41 PM (0/Svj)

I'm opposed to abortion; however the reasons I don't want federal money given for it have less to do with my personal disapproval than my promotion and support of limited federal government. That includes what we spend our money on. The vast majority of what our federal dollars are spent on is completely inappropriate. In keeping with those principles of limited government and fiscal responsibility, something like abortion should be left to the states to decide if they want to fund it. The rest of the country should be left out of it altogether. 

And again, if you believe in the Constitution and limited government, you should be all for letting the states decide these issues. If you are 100% pro-choice, as you say, then you are free to either lobby your state to change its laws to reflect your values, or you are free to vote with your feet and move to a state that is more reflective of those values. That's the point behind limiting the federal government. You don't like things here, there's always somewhere else you can go. As it stands now, if you don't like things in one state, there's not really anywhere you can go to escape it because the feds are so involved that they've done their best to make each state into carbon copies.

And of course, there's the question of why one would vote for a party or candidate who's 80-90% against most of what they are personally for versus voting for a party where you may not agree with one or two things, but you're getting the vast majority of what you want. Personally, fiscal responsibility and national security are the biggies. The social issues are a whole heck of a lot less important when we've got a collapsing economy and our people and homeland are being threatened.

Posted by: Mandy P. at November 23, 2009 04:57 PM (MK6Kx)

150 Gabe, if you want government to regulate same sex relationships then give it a reason to do so: public health (don't think you want to go there), economic (ok, gay marriages pay more Social Security taxes, that what is fair, unless the adopt and raise three kids), any others?

Posted by: Jean at November 23, 2009 04:57 PM (tTdaQ)

151 But if a state were to do something drastic, well, we can't have that. Must impose a federal definition. Byebye federalism.

You are arguing for this kind reverse federalism that I'm not familiar with. Just because a state says something has a definition, I'm not sure where the idea the federal government has to live with that definition comes from. Again, it never needed to be addressed at the federal level because the definition was esentially the same everywhere.

I've never said the federal government "must impose" a definition of any sort. My point is they are empowered to.

I'm not sure how saying the states can have one definition but the federal government has another violates the principle of federalism. It strikes me as well within the concept.

BTW-Without DoMA people in a state like Texas or Maine would be forced to subsidized 'marriages' of federal workers (or others covered by the cases we are talking about) married in other states. What federalist principle mandates that?


Posted by: DrewM. at November 23, 2009 05:03 PM (FCWQb)

152 Now, one commenter suggested that we should discriminate between lawful marriages because it saves money.

And you condemned it for being discrimination. Which means you aren't quite square on the concept yet. Discrimination for monetary reasons is perfectly reasonable if it isn't unethcial. That's why I buy cheaper products when they aren't of lower quality.

Your problem is you presume - without probably even considering it - that discrimination against gay marriages is unethical. Certainly you do so without bothering to make the argument.

Posted by: Christopher taylor at November 23, 2009 05:04 PM (PQY7w)

153 Gabe, if you want government to regulate same sex relationships then

In America the national government is supposed to have a reason for forbidding us from doing stuff.  We're not supposed to have to beg the government for permission.

I'm actually interested to know what the reason is for discriminating between lawful marriages. I'm talking about Lawful Iowa Marriage A (a guy and a girl) and Lawful Iowa Marriage B (girl and a girl). They're both lawful marriages. So why should the federal government discriminate between them? In law-speak, I'm looking for the rational basis here.

Posted by: Gabriel Malor at November 23, 2009 05:04 PM (Mi2wf)

154

Mandy P., in retrospect it may have been a better to decide this issue state-by-state rather than at the federal level. However, if federal funds pay for childbirth but not abortion for indigent women, then to me it's not a limited goverment issue, it's about expressing disapproval. (And probably another reason I still identify as a Democrat is that I don't oppose limited welfare or healthcare benefits for the indigent, at either the federal or state level. Smaller is good, but libertarian minimalism is too little for me).

I've had no problem voting for Republicans at the national level for quite some time now, for the reasons you mention. But I would have voted for Hilary Clinton if she'd won the Dem nomination.

Posted by: Dora Suarez at November 23, 2009 05:05 PM (0/Svj)

155 And just to clarify, I don't think we should be paying for people's pregnancies either. I'd prefer a total phasing out of all entitlement programs at the federal level. If the states would like to have safety nets for their people (like SS, Medicare, Medicaid, Welfare, WIC, etc), then it is the responsibility of the people of each state to work out the details and then pay for it themselves. But these programs should never have been allowed at the federal level. It is not the responsibility of the country as a whole to make sure someone has a nice retirement or can pay for their eggs and milk. These things are personal responsibilities.

Posted by: Mandy P. at November 23, 2009 05:06 PM (MK6Kx)

156 You give the game away, Drew. You're fine with states making "just tweaks." But if a state were to do something drastic, well, we can't have that. Must impose a federal definition. Byebye federalism.

Posted by: Gabriel Malor at November 23, 2009 04:53 PM (Mi2wf)


So, the word marriage was undefined prior to DOMA? How could the writer's have called it the Defense of Marriage Act if marriage had no definition?

Defining marriage was never the sole purview of the state governments any more than definining the word gold is. There is probably no defintion of the word gold in any federal law. But I'll guarantee you that if Mass decides to pass a law that says gold and copper are they same things the fedral government is not going to accept equal amounts of copper or gold as payment for your taxes. And a week later the most die hard federalist gold dealer that ever lived in Mass will be pushing for a Defense of Gold Act from his Senator.

Posted by: Rocks at November 23, 2009 05:07 PM (Q1lie)

157 But if a state were to do something drastic, well, we can't have that. Must impose a federal definition. Byebye federalism.

Posted by: Gabriel Malor at November 23, 2009 04:53 PM (Mi2wf)

What the heck are you talking about? Full Faith and Credit makes the issue of a state doing something drastic, at the state level, to a long, nationally accepted definition into a federal issue. IF one state started issuing driver's licenses to 10 year olds, you can bet your butt that it would become federal, since Full Faith and Credit would be in jeopardy - and that "tweak" would be much less than gay marriage and the consequences that would follow it.

I'm still waiting for you to explain how federal law, such as:

(i) is the fiancee or fiance of a citizen of the United States 3bb/ (other than a citizen described in section 204(a)(1)(A)(viii)(I) ) and who seeks to enter the United States solely to conclude a valid marriage with the petitioner within ninety days after admission;

doesn't depend on state definitions of marriage.

Posted by: progressoverpeace at November 23, 2009 05:12 PM (A46hP)

158 And probably another reason I still identify as a Democrat is that I don't oppose limited welfare or healthcare benefits for the indigent, at either the federal or state level. Smaller is good, but libertarian minimalism is too little for me.

That's where we differ, Dora. And it's a big one which, as you say, is probably why you still identify as a Democrat. The problem is, if you insist on federal intervention in these areas, then there will never be small government or fiscal responsibility at that level. The best the feds can ever do is to present a cookie-cutter solution to a problem because it's absolutely impossible for them to tackle each and every concern at that level. At best, you get a band-aid over the problem. And as we've seen over the past century, at worst you get rampant fraud, unforseen increases in expense, severe mismanagement, and an ever expanding federal reach into our personal lives.

Posted by: Mandy P. at November 23, 2009 05:14 PM (MK6Kx)

159 In America the national government is supposed to have a reason for forbidding us from doing stuff.  We're not supposed to have to beg the government for permission.

I'm actually interested to know what the reason is for discriminating between lawful marriages. I'm talking about Lawful Iowa Marriage A (a guy and a girl) and Lawful Iowa Marriage B (girl and a girl). They're both lawful marriages. So why should the federal government discriminate between them? In law-speak, I'm looking for the rational basis here.

Posted by: Gabriel Malor at November 23, 2009 05:04 PM (Mi2wf)


So, refusing to give someone something is the same as forbidding them? Just because IOWA decides something is lawful it places no burden on the federal government. This is one odd argument you have got going here. It's a violation of federalism for the feds to reiterate the defintion of marriage because that is reserved to the states but it's just fine for states to decide what the feds must do for their citizens all on their own? Huh?

Posted by: Rocks at November 23, 2009 05:16 PM (Q1lie)

160 I'm not sure how saying the states can have one definition but the federal government has another violates the principle of federalism. It strikes me as well within the concept.

Drew, federalism modernly (oddly, what would have been the anti-federalists in founding era) is the idea that some areas of governance are properly reserved to the states and others properly reserved to the national government. Generally, the federalist position has been that the national government is supposed to be a limited government with most of the rights and responsibilities of governance kept in the hands of the states and localities and individuals.

Traditionally, marriage and family has been a state concern. Other traditional state concerns have been real property, public health, education, inheritance, professions, etc. (there are many others). Traditional national concerns have been national security, immigration, and foreign policy.

Of course, much has shifted in recent years, with state's rights being trod on by an ever-more pervasive national government.

I've never said the federal government "must impose" a definition of any sort. My point is they are empowered to.

Empowered to where? They get that power in the Constitution, do they? That is a radical departure from long-standing arrangement of power between the national government and the states. How long-standing? Very: "[T]he whole subject of the domestic relations of husbandand wife, parent and child, belongs to the laws of the States and not to the laws of the United States.” In re Burrus,136 U.S. 586, 593-94 (1890). "[T]here is no federal law of domestic relations, which is primarily a matter of state concern.” De Sylva v. Ballentine,351 U.S. 570, 580 (1956).

BTW-Without DoMA people in a state like Texas or Maine would be forced to subsidized 'marriages' of federal workers (or others covered by the cases we are talking about) married in other states. What federalist principle mandates that?

Love the scare quotes around 'marriages.' You mean lawful marriages between federal workers? What about 'em? People in Texas and Maine must also "subsidize" the marriages of federal workers they might not like to. Like for example, the marriages of mixed-race couples. Or the super-expensive marriages of people with eight kids.

The federalist principle you're looking for is that federal taxes go to pay for federal spending whether the taxpayer personally supports it or not. How could it be otherwise? Imagine if the 52% could opt out of paying for the Iraq War. They'd love that idea.

Posted by: Gabriel Malor at November 23, 2009 05:28 PM (Mi2wf)

161 I think it should be more specific re state rights AND it should be  alittle more speciifc re small govt.....it should add we want small govt in all areas [state, fed and local]

Posted by: AJ Lynch at November 23, 2009 05:29 PM (kdDs8)

162 Full Faith and Credit makes the issue of a state doing something drastic, at the state level, to a long, nationally accepted definition into a federal issue. IF one state started issuing driver's licenses to 10 year olds, you can bet your butt that it would become federal, since Full Faith and Credit would be in jeopardy

Your law-fu is weak, progressoverpeace. The states do not recognize each others' drivers licenses because of FF&C. They recognize each others' licenses because of reciprocity. FF&C does not require them to do anything with respect to drivers licenses.

Similarly, FF&C has thus far not been implicated by marriage licenses. See the bevy of poor unfortunates in Oklahoma who cannot get divorce decrees because the state refuses to recognize their marriages as an example.

Posted by: Gabriel Malor at November 23, 2009 05:39 PM (Mi2wf)

163  So, refusing to give someone something is the same as forbidding them? Just because IOWA decides something is lawful it places no burden on the federal government. This is one odd argument you have got going here.

Rocks, you're avoiding my argument. The states have traditionally had authority over family matters including what constitutes a lawful marriage. The federal imposition in that arena by DOMA trenches on that state authority and is therefore an abrogation of the principle of federalism so frequently espoused by conservatives.

That's my argument. Now, you can try and tell me that marriage isn't traditionally a state issue. (You'd be wrong.) You can try and tell me that DOMA doesn't actually impinge on state authority. (Also wrong.) But it's not an odd argument.

FWIW, I think Drew's got the best tack. He's explaining in so many words why DOMA is a justifiable exception to the normal principles of federalism.

Posted by: Gabriel Malor at November 23, 2009 05:44 PM (Mi2wf)

164

Dora Suarez (#154): A different way to look at the two scenarios you contrast (indigent abortion v. childbirth) is to prioritize them. In a publicly funded system, with budget limitations, it becomes important to rank health care concerns according to medical necessity.

As long as "life begins at birth" holds, it follows that the official view is of abortion is that it is essentially a cosmetic procedure ie. not a medical necessity in most cases. Where would you rather see the money spent, on a medically unnecessary procedure, or on neo-natal care?

Sadly, once the public option has been up and running for a few years, and governments start running into financing walls as health care eats up a bigger and bigger piece of their budgets, the argument will be that abortion for the indigent is the better place to put the money, because it negates having to spend on obstetrics later.

Posted by: Marty at November 23, 2009 05:53 PM (c+sVx)

165 Traditionally, marriage and family has been a state concern.

Yes and traditionally marriage has been a man and a woman. Keep that tradition and none of this is an issue.

As to your point about proper spheres, yes that's true but where there's a nexus between state and federal regulations, benefits, etc, the federal government can certainly have it's own input.

Your argument would be stronger if the federal government got into the business of issuing marriage licenses. That would be an out and out usurpation and violation of federalism.

Again, states do not get  to force their changes onto citizens of other states (either by privileges and immunities or forcing them to subsidize those decisions through the federal treasury).

I don't get this idea that only one half of the equation can be changed. You want the federalist tradition to be held to at all times (I say it is) but you also want to be free to change the basic definition of marriage. You simply can't change something so fundamental and then demand no one react to it.

I like the cites from 1890 and 1956...no one at those points in time would have conceived of the idea of same sex marriage. Also, perhaps if you had something post Great Society when in fact family makeup did very much become a federal issue, that would be great.

As for mixed race marriages.

First, race was not a historical element of marriage, the sex of the participants always was.

Second, you get a court to get you a version of Loving (they picked that case because of the name, right?) and you'll be set. My guess is that will be sooner than later.

This really comes down to the idea that you want to game the system. The definition of marriage can be changed, either legislatively (it might somewhere, someday) or judicially but in your mind that's where any changes have to end. All other traditions and understandings have to remain in place.

Sorry but it doesn't work that way.

Also, don't pretend that the federal government has never gotten involved in marriage. The whole Utah wanting to become a state controversy turned on the Mormons definition of mariage.


Imagine if the 52% could opt out of paying for the Iraq War.

And they are welcome to try to get their representatives to cut off that funding. Just as the supporters of DoMA were able to convicnce Congress and Clinton to pass it.

Posted by: DrewM. at November 23, 2009 05:56 PM (FCWQb)

166 Alright. Enjoying the discussion, but I have to run to the office. Emergency. Day off. Not supposeda mix.

Posted by: Gabriel Malor at November 23, 2009 06:01 PM (Mi2wf)

167 needs to be boiled down, the "by opposing" language removed, etc.  i.e., simpler and positiv-er

Posted by: hannitys_hybrid at November 23, 2009 06:05 PM (zpqa2)

168 Your law-fu is weak, progressoverpeace.

Law is not my thing. Logic is. It is a shame that logic has very little place in law.

The states do not recognize each others' drivers licenses because of FF&C. They recognize each others' licenses because of reciprocity. FF&C does not require them to do anything with respect to drivers licenses.

It was just an example, Gabe - as I'm sure you know. Pick anything that has been nationally agreed on, using FF+C, and use that. Frankly, given the insane interpretations of Commerce that people regularly accept and the importance of autos, I find it hard to believe that some court would not quickly put driver's licenses under FF+C if that issue came to a head.

Similarly, FF&C has thus far not been implicated by marriage licenses. See the bevy of poor unfortunates in Oklahoma who cannot get divorce decrees because the state refuses to recognize their marriages as an example.

Posted by: Gabriel Malor at November 23, 2009 05:39 PM (Mi2wf)

"Thus far" isn't a good legal argument, so far as I am concerned. I know how our courts rule and what sorts of idiocy they are easily susceptible to. This is what happens when courts become totally untrustworthy, as they are.

And you still haven't addressed the marriage/immigration issue, which is odd, since immigration is one of the hottest topics of the day and one of the most important regarding the future of our nation.

Posted by: progressoverpeace at November 23, 2009 06:09 PM (A46hP)

169 That is one of the fuckin' lousiest excuses for discrimination ever. Hey, we should discriminate against lawfully married gays because it saves money! (Incidentally, we could also save money by discriminating against lawfully married mix-raced couples too. Or lawfully married white couples. Or lawfully married couples with kids. The savings are endless!!!)

Posted by: Gabriel Malor at November 23, 2009 04:16 PM (Mi2wf)

I don't see it as discrimination. There is no such thing as "gay marriage", and the people have backed that principle up every time they've been allowed to do so. Everyone has the right to marry, but two people of the same gender cannot marry each other. This definition has not been questioned for thousands of years until now. Fuck em!

Posted by: Bill R. at November 23, 2009 06:10 PM (EhlQq)

170

Something has to be done about voting accuracy.  Voter motor is a mess.  The computer glitches are a mess. Absentee ballots are a mess.     Here in WA state, just last year, to vote: you went to your local school, little old ladies looked you up in the registered voter book and checked your license, you signed your name to verify you were a resident. Now all voting is abentee ballot---who knows what happens to it. 

Posted by: mel at November 23, 2009 06:23 PM (RsriB)

171 And probably another reason I still identify as a Democrat is that I don't oppose limited welfare or healthcare benefits for the indigent, at either the federal or state level.

I disagree with the concept of welfare in most cases, but at least at the state level, welfare isnt illegal and unconstitutional. And, since it avoids the federal middleman and bureaucracy it actually is more efficient in helping those in need (cut less out by one less step in the process).

And I agree, voting accuracy and rampant, gross, almost universal fraud is destroying our democracy one ballot at a time.

Posted by: Christopher taylor at November 23, 2009 06:35 PM (PQY7w)

Posted by: 干燥剂 at November 23, 2009 06:43 PM (4amjx)

Posted by: prescription glasses at November 23, 2009 06:48 PM (4amjx)

Posted by: ink cartridges at November 23, 2009 06:48 PM (4amjx)

175

I have a problem with the RNC issuing a list of directives that its candidates must follow---and that 8 of 10 is the minimum they must follow.  It all seems so clinical.  And the Steele-led RNC is an inept and brain-dead operation right now---I can't imagine them making any headway with this.

Specifically, I have issues with a few of the 10---namely the DOMA requirement.  It's bad enough that conservatives need the Republican party as a vehicle to elect true conservatives into office.  Do we really need more of the Bush-era "compassionate" conservatism, where the federal government somehow can dictate conservative ideals on the citizenry?  Why can't issues like gay-marriage be left to the states where it belongs.  I don't think this is a road the Republican party wants to follow after the last eight (six) years.

Also:

We support victory in Iraq and Afghanistan by supporting military-recommended troop surges

Crikey!  Talk about painting yourself into a corner.  I understand the endgaame here, but this needs to be clarified a bit more.  Actually, a LOT more.   It makes it sound like that the party's policy decisions in Af-Pak and Iraq are solely at the behest of the military.  Not sure I'd want to sign up for that without all the facts, especially with regards to Afghanistan.

 

Posted by: John G. at November 23, 2009 07:08 PM (j4xgZ)

176 actually, i think that one on immigration could use some tweeking. i think we should limit immigration from the countries that have in recent years supplied an over abundance of their citizens to this country. why? because if we are supposed to be all about diversity then we should be more diverse when it comes to new immigrant demographics. instead about half of our immigrants come from one particular region of the world. i'd really like to see some icelanders leave a mark upon american culture. it would be nice to enter some estonian customs into our cultural lexicon. and what about increasing immigration from little benin? i mean, we could really use some of benin-ians over here.

Posted by: mistress quickly at November 23, 2009 07:09 PM (M4IOE)

177 Rocks, you're avoiding my argument. The states have traditionally had authority over family matters including what constitutes a lawful marriage. The federal imposition in that arena by DOMA trenches on that state authority and is therefore an abrogation of the principle of federalism so frequently espoused by conservatives.

That's my argument. Now, you can try and tell me that marriage isn't traditionally a state issue. (You'd be wrong.) You can try and tell me that DOMA doesn't actually impinge on state authority. (Also wrong.) But it's not an odd argument.

FWIW, I think Drew's got the best tack. He's explaining in so many words why DOMA is a justifiable exception to the normal principles of federalism.

Posted by: Gabriel Malor at November 23, 2009 05:44 PM (Mi2wf)

No, Gabe, I'm not. The definition of marriage, that being one man and one woman, has never been the sole purview of the state governments.  The definition of marriage isn't a "family matter". The definition of marriage was and is universally accepted. The fact that some states wish to change that has no bearing on anyone else and should not force any requirements on the federal government simply because no one saw any need to carve it in stone in the Constitution. Federalism would demand that States be allowed to use bodies of water in their state as they see fit. It doesn't require that the federal government recognize a bathtub as a pond simply because IOWA says it is and make it eligible for EPA matching funds.

Anti-polygamy laws? You can say they are unconstitutional and anti-federalist but you can't deny they clearly established the federal government, and everyone else for that matter, considered marriage to be the union of one man and one woman. No one questioned the idea that the federal government would only recognize marriage as it had always been defined. DOMA didn't impose a thing. It simply reiterated what had always been accepted. 

By your criteria for federalism a state could recognize polygamy tommorrow and if the fedral government passed a law saying they would not pay benefits for more than one spouse it would be abandoning federalism.

So, no marriage is not and never has been soley a state issue and because of it DOMA does not impinge upon some non-existant state authority to define words for anyone except the state government.


Posted by: Rocks at November 23, 2009 07:26 PM (cqSxb)

178

Actually, I like Mandy's version the best -- I'd back that platform, and I'm still self identifying as a moderate independent/classical liberal.

DOMA may infringe on federalism, but right at the moment I can see where it may be the only thing standing in the way of worse problems down the road.  Sorry gay people, nothing personally against you, but I can see problems with immigration issues ala Europe (polygamy) and the Roman Polanskis that walk amongst us riding in on your coattails (without your approval of course) and causing all manner of grief.  Perhaps there is a way to recognize civil unions between adults of the same gender and still close the door on the scenarios I described?  Then I don't have a problem with gay marriage as it doesn't concern me -- it will have to be thought out; what I see now is a lot of emotional reaction from both sides of the arguement.

Posted by: unknown jane at November 23, 2009 07:46 PM (5/yRG)

179 So how does Reagan stack up to the GOP Ten Commandments List?


1) Reagan left a much bigger government than he found and nearly tripled the national debt. In doing so, he doubled the payroll tax to "save" Social Security.

2) Health care did not exist when Reagan was president. Unless you count leeches.

3) Cap and Trade hadn't been invented by 1989, but the Acid Rain Treaty did.

4) Reagan was a union executive for a really long time.

5) Reagan granted amnesty to something like 6 million illegals. All at once.

6) Reagan wasn't really big on getting into wars that he couldn't get out of.

7) Reagan sold arms to Iran.

Reagan was Hollywood and a close friend of Rock Hudson's. I'm sure he'd support gay marriage if it had been invented at the time.

9) With what legislation did Reagan defend anyone from abortion? Abortion actually went up in a pretty significant way during the Reagan administration. Besides, he didn't get along with his own kids, let alone anyone else's.

10) Reagan shot a man in Reno just to watch him die.

Wow. According to the GOP list, Ronald Reagan was the worst Republican ever!

Posted by: IamJustSaying at November 23, 2009 07:49 PM (QNwYd)

180 Incidentally, I would suggest that this list is more reactive and defensive than showing leadership. It's more "here's what Democrats do, and we don't agree" rather than "here's what we'd do and believe in."

And other than number 10, your Reagan list is the dumbest thing I've seen since I watched my cat run into a window this morning chasing a bird outside.

Posted by: Christopher taylor at November 23, 2009 08:17 PM (PQY7w)

181 It is silly to tie this to Reagan.

You can't separate him (or any leader) from his time.

Reagan's presidency would have been very different if he didn't have to deal with the Soviets. Killing that monster made any other heresies irrelevant.

Posted by: DrewM. at November 23, 2009 08:26 PM (FCWQb)

182 Attention, class. Here's a logic question for you: If it's true that everyone loves Nightfall Ugg Boots Nightfall Ugg Boots Nightfall Ugg Boots a deal, and Black Friday offers the best deals of the year, then is it safe to assume that folks will go ugg boots on sales ugg boots on sales ugg boots on sales into a state of high-grade hysteria the day after Thanksgiving? The answer is: duh, of course. Though over a week away, Black Friday is already igniting the Search box. ugg boots shop ugg boots shop ugg boots shop Shoppers have pushed up searches on "black friday 2009" and "black friday ads" to dizzying heights. One might think that retailers would keep the deals a secret until the big day ugg mini boots ugg mini boots ugg mini boots but nothing could be further from the truth. classic cardy ugg boots classic cardy ugg boots classic cardy ugg boots

Posted by: mxc at November 23, 2009 08:35 PM (amVaT)

Posted by: china wholesale at November 23, 2009 08:38 PM (z4dwF)

184 The principles would be a good start for the Conservative Party.  The 'Big Tent' Republican Party is dead.

Posted by: Rewrite! at November 23, 2009 08:58 PM (gSxol)

185 if there's not at least one in there about jesus, then this isn't the republican party i know.

Posted by: mkf at November 23, 2009 09:16 PM (PEYMB)

Posted by: jason at November 23, 2009 09:29 PM (x70Q/)

187

"This is from a proposed RNC resolution"

Yeah? Then it is about as serious as Geithner's claiming that the US Gov't favors a strong dollar.  The only thing the RNC can ever seriously offer is:

1. We promise to be ever so slightly less statist than the other guys.

2. Please don't call us racists or nazis, we'll give you free shit, or at least stand aside while it is given to you. 

3. Per our glorious leader Steele - we hide with pride.

Posted by: Fa Cube Itches at November 23, 2009 09:34 PM (vupGF)

188

"I might allow 7 of 10 to be the line but that's details."

Sweet - the GOP can have McCain/Someone Else Who's Against The Party's Stated Position Almost 30% Of The Time  2012: The Reckoning.

Posted by: Fa Cube Itches at November 23, 2009 09:38 PM (vupGF)

189 24 Not a big fan of saying we oppose, we oppose, we oppose.  While I do oppose all of those things, it comes off to me as not having better ideas.

Anybody want to explain to me how we can get to smaller government without opposing an awful lot of crap?  Lets face it we'll never be the "Implement the Kitchen Sink Party".  We can be the "You Can Figure Out How You Want to Spend Your Own Money Party".

Posted by: Kazinski at November 24, 2009 01:08 AM (HPhbp)

Posted by: sdsd at November 24, 2009 12:01 PM (7cvUu)

191 Chipotle Mexican Grill links of london jewellery . The fast food at these casual links of london eateries feels slow, links london jewelry thanks to organic ingredients cheap links of london , custom combos, link of london and an emphasis on freshness. links of london sale Traffic is down at many locations, links of london jewelry but the company has been able to compensate by raising prices, links london Olive Garden. links of london Charms More food for less money hits the sweet spot these days, links of london Charm which makes the family-style portions at this casual Italian chain a hit with diners. links of london Necklaces Olive Garden is a division of Darden Restaurants, links london Necklace which also operates Red Lobster, links of london Bracelets Longhorn Steakhouse, links london Bracelet and a few smaller chains. links of london Sweetie Bracelets Olive Garden has been the best performer of the bunch, links london Sweetie Bracelet with same-store sales down slightly but overall sales up, links of london Friendship Bracelets thanks to about 35 new outlets links of london Sweetie Watches that have opened over the past year links london Friendship Bracelet

Posted by: links of london at November 24, 2009 08:08 PM (amVaT)

Posted by: Joan at November 24, 2009 08:53 PM (/s/lF)

193 The greatest feeling for any online casino gambling player comes with winning a prize. Though most players enjoy the fun side of online casino gambling entertainment, winning adds the cherry on top. Leading online casinos ensure that each player is a winner by offering top class casino games in a futuristic environment, coupled with unmatched jackpot and casino bonus codes. These world class USA online casinos have gone one step by giving USA based players and other players across the world an opportunity to share in thrilling USA promotions, making these sites the best online casinos to play at. In addition players can find great online slot machines resources, betting systems websites and Online Texas Holdem Poker sites! also check out the new currency exchange rates news sites.

Posted by: frbkil at November 25, 2009 05:40 AM (AaiSV)

194 wow power leveling wow power leveling street lamps street lamps World of Warcraft power leveling World of Warcraft power leveling wow power leveling

Posted by: wow power at November 25, 2009 07:29 PM (amVaT)

195 The proper function of man is to live, but not to exist.ugg classic cardyConquer fear of death and you are put into possession of your life. ugg classic tallThere is a time to speak and a time to be silent. ugg knightsbridgefree shippingmbt cheap
mbt sale
mbt uk
mbt shoes cheap
MBT M.Walk

Posted by: reviewups at November 27, 2009 05:02 AM (xUZwC)

196 The quality of two styles UGG winter boots are not much distinction. GHD hair styler in the texture and quality, the "metal scutcheon" slightly better than "nylon scutcheon".In fact, UGG boots uk just classifies products from model and grade basically.It doesn`t mind. However, judging with years of experience, the metal scutcheon has never been forged ugg cardy. Even being forged out" similar styles, it is still impossible to match metal scutcheon. ghd styler Cost? Process capability? I am not very clear. As long as I see "classic cardy" when I stock, I always will take them without any authentication. However, it is necessary to pay some attention to the "nylon scutcheon".

Posted by: ugg boots uk at November 27, 2009 07:55 PM (EITjJ)

197

It is a great idea especially for relatively new blogs. I’d like to try this.

ugg bailey button Just got my ugg classic mini! They are absolutely beautiful, and the quality is just amazing. No wearing them in, no blisters just absolutely snug strait out of the box.

Everything dynamic and very positively!

Posted by: ugg bailey button boots at November 28, 2009 01:38 AM (e/fuI)

Posted by: beijing massage at November 29, 2009 04:54 AM (SWlF1)

199 Pretty much look like casual clogs, loafers, moccasins and cheap ugg boots cheap ugg boots .This kind of items makes ugg become ugg boots australia ugg boots australia prevalent now. The data are also convenient creep on designs like They are ugg classic cardy ugg classic cardy to people who have all varieties of marvelous footwear options. For ugg shoes ugg shoes kids you do have great comfort in irksome ugg from Australia.The class of ugg shoes is parallel ugg boots for sale ugg boots for sale its boots. Without shafts don't look like Sullivan, Kohala and Parker. Ladies ugg ultra tall and loafers include Crawford, There are also a focal addition to the world. Check ugg boots women ugg boots women or not feel overstaffed on your feet anymore in iciness but pounce and summer look. They have to be damaged with scarves and Jones. are so cute to take your outcome out right with an infant Ugg. Believe it out. All ugg sheepskin boots ugg sheepskin boots

Posted by: ugg shoes at December 01, 2009 07:25 PM (amVaT)

200 hot news for brand shoes online store ,do you want to win more discount ?and popular for younger,and nike air maxwith top quality A ,come on all air max shoes with lowest price for highest quality !

Posted by: nike air max at December 01, 2009 10:01 PM (OKj2x)

Posted by: reviewups at December 02, 2009 02:34 AM (fZN4w)

202 Chanel (42) nike jordan Shoes GUESS (29) nike jordan Shoes GUCCI (75)nike jordan Shoes LV (75) nike jordan Shoes man Wallet (20) nike jordan Shoes COACH (73)nike jordan Shoes Burberry (10) nike jordan Shoes Chloe ( nike jordan Shoes DG (19)nike jordan Shoes Prada (3)Watchs (169)

Posted by: Wholesale Cheap nike shoes at December 03, 2009 01:17 AM (jAjfk)

203  buy wow gold buy wow gold cheap wow gold cheap wow gold ed hardy ed hardy links of london links of london Gucci shoes Gucci shoes buy wow gold buy wow gold Thanks of your infomation i have read it is very help full for me.

Posted by: ed hardy at December 03, 2009 03:08 AM (amVaT)

204 Everything dynamic and very positively!
Ugg Classic Cardy,discount, free shipping!

Posted by: ugg classic cardy at December 03, 2009 06:20 AM (ftu8y)

205 The cheap ugg boots sale for women are stylish, they are comfortable and what¡¯s more, they keep your feet. theres a pair of fellow sufferers,ugg australia uk to complement your personal preferences, why do we not take the traditional high discount ugg boots on salefor cold winter?
As a matter of fact, with the passing time, the love for ugg usa is increasing among girls in this modern world. The growing demand for these womens ugg made the manufacturers UGG Boots Sale to revamp the looks of these boots with different hues.come our website and buy a pair of ugg uk.UGG Classic Cardy are popular as shoes for cowboys. The SHOES close the whole parts of the foot. The ugg cardy are important to protect your feet from any dangerous things during your walking activities. There are many oatmeal ugg available in the Market and if you are interested to get one you can directly go to the store that sells it.

Posted by: reviewups at December 03, 2009 10:09 AM (OKj2x)

Posted by: uggs at December 03, 2009 11:36 AM (4bpxl)

Posted by: replica rolex at December 09, 2009 08:36 AM (GTzkw)

208 I recommend you go to online store, there have a lot of ugg boots sale,If you want to buy a pair of cheap ugg boots uk.More and more people choose ugg boots uk. So you know that ugg series of the most famous is the ugg boots.air jordan shoes,air jordans,cheap ugg boots

Posted by: bailey ugg boots at December 10, 2009 03:04 AM (SHgAa)

209 Today ugg boots online have become a phenomenon.Every winter,the ugg classic crochet are one of the hottest goods in the market all over the world.So now don't be hesitation,own a pair of ugg usa immediately.

Posted by: ugg boots sale at December 10, 2009 05:01 PM (I3/dZ)

Posted by: Lacoste shoes at December 13, 2009 12:50 AM (/3s/N)

211 The terms "fashionable" thomas sabo charms sale and "unfashionable" thomas sabo charms UK were employed cheap thomas sabo charms to describe thomas sabo charms on sale whether someone thomas sabo charms discount or something discount thomas sabo charms fits in with cheap thomas sabo charms on sale the current discount thomas sabo charms on sale or even not cheap thomas sabo charms sale so current, popular discount thomas sabo charms sale mode of thomas sabo charm sale expression. However, more thomas sabo charm UK so in the cheap thomas sabo charm modern era thomas sabo charm on sale items termed 'not thomas sabo charm discount so current' may discount thomas sabo charm indeed fit into cheap thomas sabo charm on sale the term 'Retro.' Retro discount thomas sabo charm on sale fashion allows cheap thomas sabo charm sale rule shifts, such discount thomas sabo charm sale as 'old is suddenly Thomas Sabo Charm Carriers new,' thus fashionable. The Thomas Sabo Charm Carrier term "fashion" is frequently used in a positive sense

Posted by: thomas sabo charms sale at December 15, 2009 12:41 AM (amVaT)

212 one day i went shopping outside,and in an ed hardy store,I found some kinds of ed hardy i love most they are Your website is really good Thank you for the information Ed Hardy Active Wear Ed Hardy Active Wear Ed Hardy Mens T-Shirt Ed Hardy Mens T-Shirt Ed Hardy Mens Tops Ed Hardy Mens Tops Ed Hardy Swim Trunks Ed Hardy Swim Trunks Ed Hardy Mens Underwear Ed Hardy Mens Underwear Ed Hardy Tops Ed Hardy Tops Ed Hardy caps Ed Hardy caps Ed Hardy Kids Ed Hardy Kids Ed Hardy Sunglasses Ed Hardy Sunglasses Ed Hardy Bags Ed Hardy Bags Ed Hardy SPECIALS Ed Hardy SPECIALS Ed Hardy Belts Ed Hardy Belts Ed Hardy Swim Trunks Ed Hardy Swim Trunks Ed Hardy Mens Underwear Ed Hardy Mens Underwear Ed Hardy Mens Shoes Ed Hardy Mens Shoes Thanks of your infomation i have read it is very help full for me.

Posted by: links of london at December 16, 2009 10:23 PM (yBT00)

213

We are professional aion kinah store online. we provide cheap aion kinah to each loyal and reliable customer, each of them is able to Buy kinah aion here. Aion Account | Aion CD Key | Aion Epic | aion Abyss point power leveling | Aion Abyss Point Leveling | Aion Kinah | Aion Power Leveling | FFXI Gil | FFXI Item | FFXI CD Key | FFXI Power Leveling | lineage2 adena | Lineage2 Power Leveling | Metin2 Yang | metin2 Power Leveling | Aion Kinah | Buy Aion Kinah | Buy Kinah | Cheap Aion | Kinah Aion Kinah EU |

Posted by: Aion Kinah at December 18, 2009 06:25 AM (8Zm3d)

Posted by: wholesale jewelry at December 18, 2009 10:50 PM (1dySH)

215 Shopping for a Rolex watch online can tag heuer make the job Rolex Watches easier but you Replica Watches also have to be patek philippe wary about the reputation of the dealer Chanel Watches and the brand of Breitling Watches watch you are audemars piguet getting. The more mont blanc watches considerable you are, the less danger you would come to armani watches when buying a Omega Watches gold watch online.

Posted by: rolex at December 20, 2009 07:01 AM (/pchr)

216 Buy rolex Fake Watches and Replica Watches brands,rolex watches rolex watches, Replica rolex watches, replica rolex: replica rolex,replica rolex: replica breitling watches,replica tag heuer: replica tag heuer,replica cartier watches: replica cartier watches,replica omega watches: replica omega watches,replica panerai watches: replica panerai watches,replica armani watches: replica armani watches,replica audemars piguet: replica audemars piguet,replica bvlgari watches: replica bvlgari watches,replica chanel watches: replica chanel watches,replica gucci watches: replica gucci watches,replica movado watches: replica movado watches,replica montblanc watches: replica montblanc watches,replica patek philippe: replica patek philippe on sale.

Posted by: fake watches at December 20, 2009 07:08 AM (/pchr)

Posted by: wholesale jewelry at December 20, 2009 11:44 PM (1dySH)

218 rolex Replica Watches It may be breitling Replica Watches necessary to cartier Replica Watches accurately determine omega Replica Watches the value of a wristwatch. Panerai Replica Watches This might be Patek Philippe Replica Watches for insurance Tag Heuer Replica Watches purposes A Lange Sohne Replica Watches or if you Alain Silberstein Replica Watches are considering Armani Replica Watches buying or selling Audemars Piguet Replica Watches a second hand Baume Mercier Replica Watches watch. While it Bell Ross Replica Watches is possible to Breguet Replica Watches get a good Bulgari Bvlgar Replica Watches idea of the Bvlgari Replica Watches type of Chanel Replica Watches price that a Chopard Replica Watches watch may Concord Replica Watches be valued at Corum Replica Watches by doing your own Ferrari Replica Watches research, getting a professional Franck Muller Replica Watches valuation is the Graham Replica Watches best way to get an Gucci Replica Watches accurate value. Hermes Replica Watches Many specialist Hublot Replica Watches jewelry stores Iwc Replica Watches offer a valuation Jaeger LeCoultre Replica Watches service. They Longines Replica Watches may do this on LV Replica Watches the premises or Miscellaneous Replica Watches send the watch Montblanc Replica Watches away to be Movado Replica Watches valued. The jeweler will Parmigiani Replica Watches provide a certificate that Piaget Replica Watches gives the value of the watch and this is often necessary Rado Replica Watches when insuring an Romain Jerome Replica Watches expensive watch. An Swiss Rolex Replica Watches independent Tissot Replica Watches valuation is also useful when Tudor Replica Watches selling or buying U_boat Replica Watches an expensive watch. Ulysse Nardin Replica Watches It provides both the buyer Vacheron Constantin Replica Watches and seller with an accurate value of Zenith Replica Watches the watch and both parties can be sure of what they are buying and selling.Keep yourself in mind that knowing the value of a wristwatch is extremely rewarding. It is an interesting subject. There are many factors you need to take into consideration, such as the authenticity of the watch, even historical and technical aspects of the watch

Posted by: replica watches at December 22, 2009 03:54 AM (WZM54)

219 Make sure Rolex that you tag heuer know the facts Rolex Watches of the Replica Watches watch like the cost, patek philippe the warranty Chanel Watches and the quality Breitling Watches of the watch. It is also audemars piguet of the essence to take memo of the shipping montblanc watches services armani watches presented by Omega Watches the company selling the replica watches watch online.It is fake watches difficult to select from amongst rolex watches the replica breitling watches hundreds replica rolex of watch replica cartier watches images displayed on numerous websites. However, replica tag heuer you ought replica omega watches to restrict your choice to replica panerai watches the replica armani watches watch replica patek philippe that meets your budget.

Posted by: rolex at December 22, 2009 04:09 AM (27ZWQ)

220 Rolex Rolex that you tag heuer know the facts Rolex Watches of the Replica Watches watch like the cost, patek philippe the warranty Chanel Watches and the quality Breitling Watches of the watch. It is also audemars piguet of the essence to take memo of the shipping montblanc watches services armani watches presented by Omega Watches the company selling the replica watches watch online.It is fake watches difficult to select from amongst rolex watches the replica breitling watches hundreds replica rolex of watch replica cartier watches images displayed on numerous websites. However, replica tag heuer you ought replica omega watches to restrict your choice to replica panerai watches the replica armani watches watch replica patek philippe on sale.

Posted by: fake watches at December 22, 2009 04:19 AM (27ZWQ)

221 200912.23c1hjh
Great everyday boot for the winter. I wear them for any outside work or just walking the dogs. Comfortable, warm and waterproof.
http://www.uggs100.com Thank you.

Posted by: Eric at December 23, 2009 08:08 AM (jAziw)

222 Sale rolex watches,tag heuer watches and replica rolex watches,replica watches replica breitling watches breitling watches,chanel watches chanel watches replica patek philippe patek philippe watches,replica audemars piguet watches replica montblanc watches for sale.

Posted by: rolex watches at December 23, 2009 07:24 PM (yGkQ2)

223 Tag fake watches and replica watches replica tag heuer watches,buy replica rolex watches and replica rolex breitling watches breitling watches at low prices.

Posted by: fake watches at December 23, 2009 07:26 PM (yGkQ2)

224 Replica rolex watches,tag heuer watches and replica rolex watches,replica watches replica breitling watches breitling watches,chanel watches chanel watches replica patek philippe patek philippe watches,replica audemars piguet watches replica montblanc watches for men and women.

Posted by: tag heuer at December 24, 2009 08:44 PM (Bp0xg)

Posted by: SSSSSS at December 25, 2009 11:41 AM (tmR5i)

Posted by: uggs at December 25, 2009 12:25 PM (tFu69)

227 Replica fake watches and replica watches brands,rolex watches rolex watches, replica rolex: replica rolex,replica rolex: breitling watches,replica tag heuer: tag heuer,replica cartier watches: cartier watches,replica omega watches: omega watches,replica panerai watches: replica panerai watches,replica armani watches: replica armani watches,replica audemars piguet: replica audemars piguet,replica bvlgari watches: replica bvlgari watches,replica chanel watches: replica chanel watches,replica gucci watches: replica gucci watches,replica movado watches: replica movado watches,replica montblanc watches: replica montblanc watches,replica patek philippe: replica patek philippe sale.Replica rolex watches and tag heuer watches, rolex watches,Replica Watches replica watches,patek philippe patek philippe Watches,audemars piguet audemars piguet,Omega Watches: omega watches,replica Cartier Watches cartier watches,Breitling Watches breitling watches,Chanel Watches: chanel watches,armani watches: armani watches,iwc watches iwc watches,mont blanc watches montblanc watches.

Posted by: rolex at December 25, 2009 12:53 PM (nRNCD)

228 Cartier and Marni are great brands you can trust in.Cartier Handbags are very popular with the high celebrities who are attracted by its fashion design.Marni Handbags also is a hot item for these people.When talking about the UGG Classic Short,you must be familiar with the UGG Bailey Button and UGG Cheap Ultra Short Le.

Posted by: dsf at December 25, 2009 08:14 PM (MwSK6)

229 New Home in Turkey are the ideal company with whom to view, select and to buy your property in Turkey.
Based in Alanya, with many years experience in the construction, development, investment and selling property overseas.
 
A property in Alanya, the ideal choice for all year use, and if you require, also for all year rental income. We have a rental management department that can look after your clients every need.
 
A little further along the coast is Side, with its history, protected beaches, ancient Roman ruins making a property in Side a good all round choice.
 
Belek, the golfing capital of Turkey, with over 10 top class, courses currently in play, designed by top class players, making a property in Belek an ideal home for a golfing holiday.
If you are looking for a city resort, a mix of luxury shopping, bustling nightlife and beaches then a property in Antalya would be the right choice for you.
 
We also cater for clients seeking a property on the Aegean coast.
Offering a different lifestyle to the Mediterranean coast, a property in Bodrum is also a popular choice.

Posted by: Hürriyet ilan at December 26, 2009 04:54 PM (5EMJp)

230 We sell rolex and tag heuer watch, rolex watches,Rolex replica watches,replica patek philippe Watches,replica audemars piguet,Omega Watches omega watches,replica Cartier cartier watches,Breitling breitling watches,replica chanel watches,armani watches: armani watches,iwc watches iwc watches,montblanc montblanc watches Replica.Cheap fake watches and replica watches on sale,rolex watches rolex watches, watches replica rolex,replica breitling watches,replica tag heuer: tag heuer,replica cartier watches: cartier watches,replica omega watches: omega watches,replica panerai watches: replica panerai watches,replica armani watches: replica armani watches,replica audemars piguet: replica audemars piguet,replica bvlgari watches: replica bvlgari watches,replica chanel watches: replica chanel watches,replica gucci watches: replica gucci watches,replica movado watches: replica movado watches,replica montblanc watches: replica montblanc watches,replica patek philippe: replica patek philippe sale for people.

Posted by: replica watches at December 27, 2009 11:48 AM (52U6J)

Posted by: wholesale jewelry at December 28, 2009 06:11 AM (1dySH)

232

our team is one that keeps its word! Once you're

satisfied with your order,

Posted by: fake Breitling Watches at December 28, 2009 08:51 AM (aHNmr)

Posted by: jerry at December 28, 2009 08:46 PM (lheux)

Posted by: aglik at December 29, 2009 09:48 AM (nVm+l)

235

Prescription Glasses For Him Wearing a pair of fashinable cheap glasses will make women more charming, make girls more beautiful. Glasses Frames Advisor will offer you free ideas and teach you the skills on prescription glasses, and how to get cheap glasses online. More medical companies sell glasses also now.

I received my new glasses this morning and I could not be more happy with the product that you provided for me at such a ridiculously low cost . . . very nice eyeglasses frames and the prescription is exact. I can assure you that this is the only way I will be buying my glasses in the future.

More online retailer sells cheap ink cartridges  and desiccant also at present.

 

Posted by: eyeglasses at December 29, 2009 09:36 PM (KxNUm)

236 M4A Converter for Mac is a professional Mac audio converter and also a video to audio converter for Mac. It can convert between all audio formats with super conversion speed and high output quality.M4A Converter for Windows, M4A to MP3 Converter for Mac,The best M4A Converter Mac enables you to do a lot editing about your output audio fileM4A to M4R Converter for Mac,M4A to WMA Converter for Mac,M4A to WAV Converter for Mac,M4A to AAC Converter for Mac,MOV to M4A Converter for Mac,AVI to M4A Converter for Mac,MPEG to M4A Converter for Mac,M4V to M4A Converter for Mac,FLV to M4A Converter for Mac,

Posted by: ekkyyo at December 30, 2009 01:34 AM (sFIS+)

237 الريم شات الريم دردشة الريم شات الريم شات الريم الريم منتديات الريم منتدى الريم شات ريم شات بنات وبس شات سعودي شات كويتي شات اماراتي شات قطري شات مصري شات عراقي شات سوري شات Ùلسطيني شات لبناني الاسلامية موقع منتديات صور مركز تحميل شات عماني شات الاردن شات اليمن ادب وشعر ازياء وموضه العاب المواقع النسائية قبائل واسر برامج طب وعلاج رياضة منتدى كويتيات سياحة ÙˆØ³ÙØ± منتديات عالم حواء منوعات التعليم خدمات مجانية تكنولوجيا وانترنت شات الشله المطبخ قصص الانبياء شات الخليج شات صوتي يوتيوب شات البحرين شات الحب دردشة عيون شات تعب قلبي شات الرياض شات الود شات الود شات قلوب شات التحليه شعبي كوم شاهد اون لاين شبيك لبيك شات العين شات القطي٠سعودي كول شات تبوك ترجمة قوقل نت لوق اغاني شعبيه طرب توب موالي mawaly Ùيس بوك شات تعار٠شات بنات نجد شات القصيم مكسات دلع نجد شات برق بنات ÙÙ† العاب شمس شات بنات جده شات عشق دردشة دلع الحان mp3 شات مصراوي سكس قصص محارم شات جازان شات غلاي شات حلا السعوديه شات عشق دردشة عشق

Posted by: ahj hgvdl at December 30, 2009 02:09 PM (Ny9tT)

238 Cheap replica rolex and tag heuer watches,replica watches of rolex rolex watches replica,buy patek philippe Buy replica watches,fake watches and tag heuer watches.

Posted by: tag heuer at January 01, 2010 06:05 AM (nUnK8)

239 ··PTFE · Teflon··Autai PTFE & Teflon Product Co.,Ltd. Site Map Page 1 - Generated by www.xml-sitemaps.com ··PTFE · Teflon·· PTFE Teflon Product · · PTFE Rod, PTFE Sheet, PTFE Tubing, PTFE Hose · PTFE Sheet · PTFE Rod · Teflon Sheet · Teflon Rod ··PTFE · Teflon·· We will add more Teflon and PTFE news. Technology for Molded PTFE Sheet or Molded Teflon Sheet ··AuTai PTFE Materials Co.,Ltd. ·· Honor ·What is PTFE ? · What is Teflon ? · · PTFE Rod · Teflon Rod · Autai PTFE Materials Co.,Ltd. ··PTFE Rod ·· AuTai Extruded PTFE Rod Manufacturer ··PTFE Rod · Teflon Rod ·· Filling Teflon Rod, PTFE Rod Manufacturer ·· Teflon Rod ·· Autai Molded Teflon Rod Manufacturer · PTFE Bar · Teflon Stick · Teflon Bar · PTFE Stick Manufacturer · PTFE Sheet · PTFE Sheets · Teflon Sheet · Teflon Sheets · PTFE Film · Skived PTFE Film Manufacturer · Film Teflon · PTFE Sheet · Skived PTFE Sheet Manufacturer - Sheets Teflon · Teflon Sheet · Molded Teflon Sheet Manufacturer - Sheets PTFE · PTFE Tubing · Teflon Tubing · Molded Teflon and PTFE Tubing Manufacturer · PTFE Tubes · Teflon Tubes · Molded PTFE Teflon Tubes · PTFE Bush · Teflon Bush · PTFE bushes, Teflon bushes · PTFE Tube · Teflon Tube · PTFE Tubes, Teflon Tubes · PTFE Hose · Teflon hose · PTFE hoses, Teflon hoses · PTFE Seal · Teflon Seal · PTFE Seals, Teflon Seals · PTFE Packing · Teflon Packing - Gland PTFE Packings, Braided Teflon Packings · PTFE Sealant · Teflon sealant · PTFE Joint sealant, Teflon Jointing sealant · PTFE Washer · Teflon Washer · PTFE washers, Teflon washers · PTFE Part · Teflon Part · PTFE Parts, Teflon Parts · Nylon Rod · Polyamide Rod - Nylon Rods, Polyamide Rods · Polyethylene Rods · UHMWPE rods · Polyethylene Rod, UHMWPE Rod · Delrin Rod · Acetal Rod · Delrin rods · Acetal Rods ·url · add · submit · link · addurl · search · add url · submit url · url submit · add url submit ··PTFE · Teflon··Autai PTFE & Teflon Product Co.,Ltd. · Teflon Plate · Teflon Block - PTFE Plate, PTFE Block · Nylon Rods · Polyamide Rods - Nylon Rod, Polyamide Rod · Polyamide Rod, 6 Nylon Rod, 6 Polyamide Rod · 66 Nylon Rod · Polyamide Rod · · 1010 Polyamide Rod · Nylon Rod · · plastic rod · Polyethylene Rod, plastic Rods · Polyethylene plastic rods · Polyethylene Rods · plastic Rods · UHMWPE rod · UHMWPE Rod · UHMW Rod      PTFE/ 5 pages ··PTFE·· Autai PTFE Materials Co.,Ltd. ·· PTFE Rod ·· Autai PTFE Materials Co.,Ltd. ·· PTFE Sheet ·· Autai PTFE Materials Co.,Ltd. ·· PTFE Tubing ·· Autai PTFE Materials Co.,Ltd. · PTFE Seal · PTFE Packing · Autai PTFE Materials Co.,Ltd.

Posted by: ptfe, teflon at January 02, 2010 03:56 AM (7OhqD)

Posted by: ãäÊÏì at January 02, 2010 06:51 PM (oNhQT)

Posted by: Wholesale Cheap nike shoes at January 03, 2010 03:04 AM (T4sbS)

242 When heard of winter, cold may come in your mind at once.if you are ready for the coming of winter,you should never be afraid of it.it is not difficult for us that if you protect your feet well,you will fell warm and comfortable.so you should get several shoes help you spend the cold winter.UGG Boots can be done.for many individuals,ugg boots provide the perfect insulation and comfort for the winter months.ugg boots are both warm and comfortable.these two factors are extremely important,no matter what amount of time you are going to be spending out in the weather.ugg boots are made out of a material that is water resistant, meaning that no water,and no cold air,can get into your boots.they will keep in the warmth of your feet,because of their outer shell and their inner linings. once you slip your feet into a pair of these boots,they will be warm and toasty until it is time to take them off.you will be able to take advantage of the great warmth that ugg boots offer.

Welcome to buy UGG Boots in our website,we offer the UGG Australia boots are with top quality:
*features genuine twin-face sheepskin for refreshing comfort
*feature a soft foam insole covered with genuine sheepskin
*have a molded EVA light and flexible outsole designed for amazing comfort with every step.
*you can enjoy free shipping worldwide in our website.
*1 week delivery to your door
*sometimes you can get a special discount from our company by email


Our customers are always satisfied with such kind of UGG Boots and our high service!
 please Contact Us shoeugg.com

Posted by: bootshotsale at January 03, 2010 06:25 AM (sN+ng)

243 what's the main point of the boots?the answer is to keep your feet warm.If you by one pair of boots put them on,especially in winter,you'll feel very tenderness and comfortable.they can make your feet warm.and youll find its really fashionable.you can tie-in each kind of clothes with them and still looks beautifull.

The ugg boots will definitely make you noticeable in a fashion-conscious crowd,and more importantly,is the fact that these boots are indeed quite comfortable to wear. these boots have been popular with swimmers and surfers since the 1970s and are regularly worn by surfers in california.the design of the boot with its sheepskin results in considerable thermostatic benefits.


We sell real UGG Australia Boots in our website.You must be satisfied with our UGG Boots when you receive your order.The UGG Boots you get will have these advatages:
*100% authentic sheepskin for unrivalled comfort
*a durable molded rubber outsole.
*The wrap around lace feature adds a fashionable touch with wooden beads at the end
*A removable and replaceable sheepskin insole gives extra comfort and warmth.
*Insole is made of sheepskin,latex. please Contact Us fineugg.com

Posted by: bootshotsale at January 03, 2010 06:26 AM (sN+ng)

244 Sheepskin and ugg boots are a casual type of boot. Ugg boots are exceptionally warm and are great for cold weather (up to -30 degrees Fahrenheit)If you are looking for warmth while trudging around the house or the city, a sheepskin or ugg boot will be ideal.For girls and women, ugg boots look fantastic with tight-legged jeans tucked into them, or with short skirts paired with opaque tights or bare legs. For guys, ugg boots work great with jeans, and give a very casual, or rugged look, depending on the jeans or the shirt you wear with your ugg boots.

Do you have a pair of UGG Boots?If not,you must will buy a piar in our website.As we offer the best sevice and favourable price.what's more,we charge the shipping fee.So,you just need to pay the fee of boots,and will receive our UGG boots in one week.It is very easy to have your own UGG Boots.Come on!

Our UGG Boots are all with top quality:
*features genuine twin-face sheepskin
*our signature UGG woven label
*feature a soft foam insole covered with genuine sheepskin
*have a molded EVA light and flexible outsole designed for refreshing comfort with every step
 please Contact Us e-ugg.com

Posted by: bootshotsale at January 03, 2010 06:28 AM (sN+ng)

245 Everywhere you go now you find that the ugg boot has become the latest fashion new arrival cheap trend. now days it seems that you can not walk pass any window display of any shoe or fashion clothing store with seeing a pair of these trendy boots in them. it does not matter where ever you are in the world you will find ugg boots. these boots are both hot and trendy and certainly do not need to be worn in cold weather only. many people have found, that one pair of ugg boots is not enough.

We have been seller of UGG Boots for many years.Our customers are satisfied with our products as we offer the real UGG Australia Boots:
*100% authentic sheepskin for unrivalled comfort
*soft genuine sheepskin heel padding
*cushioning insole,flexible fabric-trimmed midsole.
*Lightweight molded EVA traction outsole
*Free shipping
*One week to your door
*If you dont like what youve received, simply return it!
please Contact Us:bootshotsale.com

Posted by: bootshotsale at January 03, 2010 06:28 AM (sN+ng)

246 The little things in life are the most tag heuer Watches important to me. And when it relates to fashion,cartier Watches that statement couldn't be truer. It's the small accessories on a getup that defines someone, and more importantly omega Watchesallows them get noticed. GUCCI watches allow a person to have that bit of luxury and the touch of uniqueness, movado Watches while still performing the most important function of accurate timekeeping.

Posted by: Replica Watches at January 06, 2010 12:55 AM (A1YtX)

247 replica rolex rolex and tag heuer watches,replica watches of rolex rolex watches replica,buy patek philippe Buy replica watches,fake watches and tag heuer watches.breitling watches breitling watches at low price.

Posted by: rolex at January 06, 2010 01:01 AM (TspGB)

Posted by: ugg shoes|timberland uk|ugg boots|87415555.com.cn at January 06, 2010 08:28 PM (qzq48)

249

<p>Nice <a href="http://www.hotshoeszone.com">UGG Classic Cardy</a>on sales in our  store, welcome to our shop</p>.

<p>cheap <a href="http://www.uggsbootssaleonline.com/">UGG Classic Tall</a>on sales in our store, welcome to our  shop</p>.

 

 

Posted by: cheap uggs at January 07, 2010 12:00 PM (SGOsE)

250 Is a watch a piece of jewelry? Yes. Replica Watches Have you experienced that when you rolex Watches are looking for a new pair of diamond earrings you are in most cases wouldn't settle for a simulated diamond? And it is possible that when you are breitling Watches shopping around for a gold necklace, you do not prefer something that is gold plated. Do you know why?

Posted by: Replica Watches at January 07, 2010 08:54 PM (z4ioQ)

251 DVD Converter for Mac is a powerful DVD converter Mac OS X software to rip DVD to all popular video and audio formats with various customized settings and convert video among all popular video and audio formats with perfect 1:1 ratio on Mac. In fact, the DVD Converter for Mac is a Video and DVD Converter for Mac Ultimate. Watch DVD movies on your iPod anywhere and anytime. Then you need Xilisoft DVD to iPod Converter for Mac. The Mac DVD to iPod converter is designed to rip and DVD to iPod Converter for Mac users, such as converting DVD to MP4/MPEG-4 video and audio formats like MP3 and M4A. All of these can be played on all kinds of iPods like iPod nano, iPod classic, iPod touch, and iPhone. DVD to AVI Converter for Mac is a Mac DVD to AVI converter specially designed for Mac OS X users to convert DVD to AVI(Xvid) video files and MP3, AAC audio files with excellent output quality. DVD to DivX Converter for Mac software directory lists the most popular Mac DivX DVD converter software that can help you rip convert DVD to DivX file. DVD to 3GP Converter for Mac is a powerful converter for Mac users to convert DVD to 3GP(3G2) for video cell phones and other portable players. DVD to MPEG Converter for Mac software directory lists the most popular Mac DVD MPEG Converter software that can help you rip convert DVD to MPEG file

Posted by: sxdgbsd at January 09, 2010 12:42 AM (+ycd9)

252 Replica rolex watches Replica rolex gmt master ii watches Replica rolex daytona watches Replica rolex day date watches Replica rolex cellini watches Replica rolex cellini Replica rolex daytona Replica rolex cellini Replica rolex daytona Replica rolex cellini Replica rolex milgauss Replica rolex datejust Replica rolex sea dweller Replica rolex cellini Replica rolex milgauss Replica rolex submariner Replica rolex cellini Replica rolex classic Replica rolex submariner Replica rolex yachtmaster Replica rolex milgauss Replica rolex submariner Replica rolex submariner Replica rolex datejust Replica rolex day date Replica rolex submariner Replica rolex datejust Replica rolex air king watches Replica rolex cellini Replica rolex cellini Replica rolex submariner watches Replica rolex gmt master ii Replica rolex submariner Replica rolex submariner Replica rolex daytona Replica rolex datejust Replica rolex daytona Replica rolex datejust Replica rolex cellini Replica rolex day date Replica rolex cellini Replica rolex cellini Replica rolex cellini Replica rolex submariner Replica rolex daytona Replica rolex datejust Replica rolex cellini Replica rolex milgauss Replica rolex daytona Replica rolex classic Replica rolex daytona Replica rolex cellini Replica rolex datejust Replica rolex gmt master ii Replica rolex datejust Replica rolex submariner Replica rolex datejust Replica rolex daytona Replica rolex daytona Replica rolex daytona Replica rolex cellini Replica rolex daytona Replica rolex gmt master ii Replica rolex yachtmaster Replica rolex yachtmaster ii Replica rolex submariner Replica rolex day date Replica rolex classic Replica rolex explorer Replica rolex yachtmaster Replica rolex cellini Replica rolex daytona Replica rolex daytona Replica rolex submariner Replica rolex milgauss Replica rolex daytona Replica rolex milgauss watches Replica rolex classic Replica rolex explorer watches Replica rolex day date Replica rolex submariner Replica rolex daytona Replica rolex datejust Replica rolex submariner Replica rolex cellini Replica rolex datejust Replica rolex explorer Replica rolex yachtmaster Replica rolex yachtmaster watches Replica rolex cellini Replica rolex datejust Replica rolex daytona Replica rolex yachtmaster ii Replica rolex datejust Replica rolex datejust Replica rolex gmt master ii Replica rolex yachtmaster Replica rolex submariner Replica rolex daytona Replica rolex datejust Replica rolex gmt master ii Replica rolex prince Replica rolex cellini Replica rolex cellini Replica rolex datejust Replica rolex gmt master ii Replica rolex daytona Replica rolex daytona Replica rolex gmt master ii Replica rolex gmt master ii Replica rolex classic watches Replica rolex gmt master ii Replica rolex explorer ii watches Replica rolex prince watches Replica rolex yachtmaster ii Replica rolex air king Replica rolex day date Replica rolex day date Replica rolex yachtmaster ii Replica rolex gmt master ii Replica rolex gmt master ii Replica rolex daytona Replica rolex datejust Replica rolex air king Replica rolex day date Replica rolex day date Replica rolex day date Replica rolex day date Replica rolex day date Replica rolex datejust Replica rolex classic Replica rolex datejust Replica rolex yachtmaster ii Replica rolex datejust Replica rolex gmt master ii Replica rolex day date Replica rolex air king Replica rolex datejust Replica rolex gmt master ii Replica rolex day date Replica rolex datejust Replica rolex gmt master ii Replica rolex yachtmaster ii Replica rolex day date Replica rolex day date Replica rolex submariner Replica rolex cellini Replica rolex daytona Replica rolex day date Replica rolex datejust Replica rolex datejust Replica rolex gmt master ii Replica rolex sea dweller Replica rolex gmt master ii Replica rolex day date Replica rolex day date Replica rolex daytona Replica rolex day date Replica rolex day date Replica rolex submariner Replica rolex gmt master ii Replica rolex datejust Replica rolex day date Replica rolex explorer ii Replica rolex datejust Replica rolex datejust Replica rolex day date Replica rolex yachtmaster ii Replica rolex datejust Replica rolex day date Replica rolex day date Replica rolex day date Replica rolex datejust Replica rolex day date Replica rolex day date Replica rolex yachtmaster ii Replica rolex day date Replica rolex day date Replica rolex datejust Replica rolex datejust watches Replica rolex air king Replica rolex day date Replica rolex yachtmaster ii Replica rolex air king Replica rolex day date Replica rolex cellini Replica rolex datejust Replica rolex gmt master ii Replica rolex submariner Replica rolex air king Replica rolex air king Replica rolex datejust Replica rolex prince Replica rolex day date Replica rolex yachtmaster ii Replica rolex day date Replica rolex day date Replica rolex datejust Replica rolex datejust Replica rolex sea dweller watches Replica rolex yachtmaster Replica rolex gmt master ii Replica rolex air king Replica rolex yachtmaster ii Replica rolex air king Replica rolex air king Replica rolex gmt master ii Replica rolex day date Replica rolex day date Replica rolex air king Replica rolex gmt master ii Replica rolex yachtmaster ii Replica rolex sea dweller Replica rolex gmt master ii Replica rolex air king Replica rolex day date Replica rolex gmt master ii Replica rolex explorer ii Replica rolex day date Replica rolex day date Replica rolex gmt master ii Replica rolex yachtmaster ii Replica rolex air king Replica rolex day date Replica rolex submariner Replica rolex day date Replica rolex day date Replica rolex air king Replica rolex air king Replica rolex air king Replica rolex cellini Replica rolex yachtmaster ii watches Replica rolex day date Replica rolex datejust Replica rolex air king Replica rolex gmt master ii Replica rolex datejust Replica rolex daytona Replica rolex datejust Replica rolex daytona Replica rolex cellini Replica rolex gmt master ii Replica rolex classic Replica rolex day date Replica rolex datejust Replica rolex day date Replica rolex datejust Replica rolex day date Replica rolex cellini Replica rolex datejust Replica rolex sea dweller Replica rolex gmt master ii Replica rolex datejust Replica rolex gmt master ii Replica rolex gmt master ii Replica rolex gmt master ii Replica rolex day date Replica rolex yachtmaster ii Replica rolex prince watches Replica rolex datejust Replica rolex datejust Replica rolex daytona Replica rolex day date Replica rolex yachtmaster Replica rolex daytona Replica rolex watches Replica rolex gmt master ii Replica rolex cellini Replica rolex gmt master ii Replica rolex day date Replica rolex gmt master ii Replica rolex datejust Replica rolex gmt master ii

Posted by: replica rolex watches at January 09, 2010 01:08 AM (Bwmcr)

253 Un total de once comunidades autnomas estn este jueves en alerta naranja Christmas gift ugg tall boots (riesgo importante) por nevadas y bajan las temperaturas en toda Espa09a, segn la Agencia Estatal de Meteorologa (AEMET). En concreto, se Christmas gift ugg napoule sandal trata de Aragn, Cantabria, Castilla-La Mancha, Catalu09a, Christmas gift timberland classic boots Madrid, Navarra, Comunidad Valenciana, Galicia, Pas Vasco, Asturias y Murcia. La cota de nieve bajar a menos de 200 metros en el CantbricoLa Pennsula Ibrica est bajo dos borrascas y un anticicln que crearn un pasillo que permitir el paso de una corriente de aire muy fro, como la que est provocando un temporal de fro glaciar en Europa, aunque es esperan que el fro que suframos no sea tan intenso como en otros pases. An as, se espera que las bajas temperaturas se mantengan hasta el domingo. La cota de nieve baja en el Cantbrico a menos de 200 metros

Posted by: El temporal de fr¨ªo y nieve pone en alerta a once comunidades aut¨®nomas ugg boots|ugg uk|timberlan at January 09, 2010 07:06 AM (tWrEP)

254 loving rolex and tag heuer watches,replica watches of rolex rolex watches replica,buy patek philippe Buy replica watches,fake watches and tag heuer watches.breitling watches breitling watches replica at lowest price for you.

Posted by: rolex at January 09, 2010 11:16 PM (P6vJc)

255 Buy rolex watches,tag heuer watches and replica patek philippe patek philippe watches,replica audemars piguet> replica breitling watches breitling watches,chanel watches chanel watches watches replica montblanc watches.Rolex fake watches and replica watches brands,replica rolex: breitling watches,replica tag heuer: tag heuer, replica rolex: replica rolex replica cartier watches: cartier watches,replica omega watches: omega watches,replica panerai watches: panerai watches,replica armani watches: armani watches,replica audemars piguet: audemars piguet,replica bvlgari watches: bvlgari watches,replica chanel watches: chanel watches,replica gucci watches: gucci watches,replica movado watches: movado watches,replica montblanc watches: montblanc watches,replica patek philippe: patek philippe on sale.replica watches and replica watches.

Posted by: rolex at January 10, 2010 08:15 AM (OO9Jx)

256 Birleþim eðitim merkezi, açýköðretim kursu, kpss kursu ve dgs kursu hizmeti vermekte olan bir eðitim kurumudur.

Posted by: Hürriyet ilan at January 10, 2010 06:28 PM (gG3zg)

257 In the cold weather, the UGG boots are considered as the best shoes.More and more people like wearing the UGG boots such as the UGG Classic Metallic 5812.With its development ,the UGG boots have lauched different kinds of boots into the fashion market,including the UGG Classic Short Boots and the UGG Women's Highkoo.However,in the fashion world,if you want to be more attractive and elegant,the beautiful shoes are not enough.You have to choose the best stylish handbag to match your shoes.Therefor,the designer replica handbags are very necessary.If you want to buy the best designer cheap handbags,i would like to introduce two famous brand handbags to you.I think there must be one handbag is your favorite.One is the famous brand Versace Handbags,the other is the Ferragamo Handbags.Both of them are the famous brand in the world.Their quality are very good.

Posted by: beiji at January 12, 2010 03:34 AM (VnMVv)

258 high rolex and tag heuer watches patek philippe patek philippe watches,replica audemars piguet> replica breitling watches breitling watches,chanel watches chanel watches watches replica montblanc watches and panerai watches.

Posted by: rolex at January 12, 2010 08:37 AM (On3I8)

259 Have you have ever heard the term "runescape accounts"? How about, "runescape gold"? They have many names, but they are all the same. Although I know exactly what a macro is in Runescape, I thought I would do some research and see what a macro was outside of runescape gold for sale. Macroing in runescape accounts for saleBasically, when you use a buy runescape gold, you are using a program that will play the game for you. There are many different types of these, such as; Mining Bots, Woodcutting Bots, Attacking Bots, but they all do the same thing, get levels. This is against the rules of runescape quests help. Jagex bans thousands of accounts a month due to these cheats. I cannot tell people enough, cheating is NOT the answer. If people would just do the work themselves, then there would be no problem. Macroing outside of runescape power leveling:As I promised, I researched and this is what I found; "A macro is a way to automate a task that you perform repeatedly or on a regular basis. It is a series of runescape money making commands and actions that can be stored and run whenever you need to perform the task. You can record or build a macro, and then play the macro to automatically repeat the series of commands or actions."

Posted by: runescape accounts at January 12, 2010 08:33 PM (u4ah6)

260

YS0114A3 However mean your life is,meet it and live it ;do not shun it and call it hard cheap nike shox  names.It is not so bad as you are.It looks poorest when you are cheap jordan shoes  richest.The fault-finder will find faults in paradise.Love your nike acg shoes sale  life,poor as it is.You may perhaps have some sale nike air max shoes  pleasant,thrilling,glorious hourss,even in a poor-house.The setting sun is reflected from the discount mbt lami shoes  windows of the alms-house as brightly as from the rich man's abode;the http://www.nikeaf1jordanshoes.com/  snow melts before its door as early in the spring.I do not see ed hardy shoes wholesale  but a quiet mind may live as contentedly there,and have as cheering thoughts,as in a palace.

Posted by: shop ed hardy clothing at January 13, 2010 10:15 PM (neRE8)

261

YS0114A1 Looking up at the stars, I know quite well That, for all cheap ugg sundance ii boots they care, I can go to hell,But on earth indifference is the leastWe have to dread from man or beast.How should we like it were  ugg adirondack boots sale  stars to burn.With a passion for us we could not return?If equal ugg coquette clearance sale affection cannot be,Let the more ugg liberty boots wholesale loving one be me.Admirer as I think I am Of stars that do not give a discount ugg elsey boots  damn,I cannot, now I see them ,sayI missed one terribly all day.Were all ugg sienna miller boots sale stars to disappear or dieI should learn to look at an empty http://www.uggsnowbootsbest.com/  sky And feel its total dark sublime, Though this might take me a little time.

Posted by: ugg liberty boots at January 13, 2010 10:16 PM (neRE8)

262

YS0114A2 No man or woman is worth your tears,and the one who ed hardy coats  is ,won't make you cry.The worst ed hardy hoodies  way to miss someone is to be sitting ed hardy men jeans  right beside them knowing you can't have  moncler jackets  them.Never frown,even when you are sad,because you never know who is falling in love with your ugg sundance II boots  smile.To the world you may be one person,but to one person you may be the http://www.edfashionclothes.com/  world.I love you not because of who you are,but because of who I am when I am with you.

Posted by: shop ed hardy clothing at January 13, 2010 10:17 PM (neRE8)

263 Buy tag heuer watches,Rolex Watches so important that replica watches,fake watches and tag heuer watches,replica breitling breitling watches,cheap replica rolex cartier replica cartier watches,replica omega omega watches and panerai replica panerai watches replica armani armani watches,cheap audemars piguet audemars piguet watches,bvlgari watches replica chanel watches replica gucci gucci watches and movado watches replica montblanc montblanc watches sale patek philippe more important roles in our lives.

Posted by: rolex at January 14, 2010 04:59 AM (RtqsX)

264 Cheap tag heuer watches,rolex watches that replica watches,fake watches and tag heuer watches,replica breitling breitling watches,cheap replica rolex cartier replica cartier watches,replica omega omega watches and panerai replica panerai watches replica armani armani watches,cheap audemars piguet audemars piguet watches,bvlgari watches replica chanel watches replica gucci gucci watches and movado watches replica montblanc montblanc watches sale patek philippe watches for us.

Posted by: rolex at January 14, 2010 08:43 AM (GTMOj)

265 Advantages of Prescription Sunglasses
If you have a vision problem that requires corrective prescription glasses, you have several choices when it comes to prescription sunglasses. Prescription sunglasses are available for virtually any eyeglasses lens prescription, including bifocal and progressive lenses options if you are presbyopic and need lenses to help you read that magazine or book at the pool. These types of prescription sunglasses also can help you if you need reading glasses only or if you wear contact lenses to correct only your distance vision and still need that additional boost for reading.

Posted by: glasses at January 15, 2010 10:16 AM (id+eQ)

Posted by: za at January 15, 2010 10:55 PM (klIuA)

267 more important than style rolex and tag heuer watches for sale.replica patek philippe watches audemars piguet watches on sale.replica breitling watches and omega watches sale replica montblanc watches on the dial cartier watches and cheap panerai watches for bvlgari watches sports watches might be worth a look.

Posted by: rolex at January 16, 2010 07:44 AM (LM4pO)

Posted by: tag heuer at January 17, 2010 10:37 AM (9p60s)

Posted by: chi hair irons at January 17, 2010 05:15 PM (9oETl)

270 Welcome to the fashion handbags house.We are pleased to offer you feminine Fendi Handbags,do you like it?Don't worry,there are other brands handbags,such as Lancel Handbags,which are my favourite,so I especially recommend them to you.And how about Coach Handbags?We are very familiar with this brand hadnabgs.Maybe you seldom heard the Yves Saint Laurent Handbags that are very perfect.I also like the red Burberry Handbags.

Posted by: 123 at January 17, 2010 08:05 PM (bCWDb)

Posted by: ugg boots sales at January 21, 2010 10:28 AM (R6WrP)

272 we are the chinese wholesalers,u will see product as MAC ,china phone,china mobile phone.china cellphone in our site .we are strong Introduction the wholesale NFL,mbt shoes ,wholesale Christian louboutin,wholesale abercrombie,moncler jacketsnokia mobile phone ,good luck best apple iphone or apple ipod nano and HTC touch Diamond in our site ,Just look for I900 OMNIA ro Motorola AURA ,Wedding Dresses , Bride dress ,fashion Wholesale , NFL Jerseys ,ed hardy come here .It`s a good choice to buy wholesale from trademic.

Posted by: chinese wholesalers at January 22, 2010 01:06 AM (VopoC)

273 <a href="http://www.uggone.com" target="_blank">UGG Boots</a>
<a href="http://www.uggone.com" target="_blank">Authentic UGG Boots</a>
<a href="http://www.uggone.com" target="_blank">UGG Australia</a>
<a href="http://www.uggone.com" target="_blank">sheepskin boots</a>

Posted by: ugg boots at January 22, 2010 01:26 AM (UzX7V)

274

[يوتيوب]

يوتيوبمنتدياتموقع يوتيوبمقاطع يوتيوبدردشةمدونة يوتيوبd,jd,fيو تيوبyoutubeيوتيوباليوتيوبخريطة يوتيوبÙوريوتيوب طيور الجنه

يوتيبشبكة يوتيوبموقع اليوتيوبمون لايتمنتديات يوتيوبيوتيوب Ùيديويوت يوبيوتوبتراÙيانيوتيوب منوعيوتيوب ياسر القحطانييوتيوبدليل يوتيوب

يوتيوب اسلامييوتيوب الشعريوتيوب اÙلام كرتوناÙÙ„Ø§Ù…Ø§Ù„Ø¹Ø§Ø¨Ø§Ù„Ù…Ø±Ø£Ø©Ù…Ø³Ù„Ø³Ù„Ø§ØªØ¨Ø±Ø§Ù…Ø¬ØªÙØ­ÙŠØ· سيارات Ø§Ø²ÙŠØ§Ø¡ Ø¨Ù„وتوث;">الويب سايتاستضاÙÙ‡Ø§Ù„Ø§Ø±Ø´ÙŠÙØ¯Ø±Ø¯Ø´Ø© صوتية -خليجي كام

بلياردوبروكسي -بروكسيات -اغاني -طرب  -trailer - avatar - nokia n97 -paranormal activity -2012 - xbox 360 - n95 8gb

مسلسل عاصي  - ÙˆÙ† بيس 423  - كي٠تجعل الشخص يحبك -ترجمة قوقل -برنامج ÙŠÙØªØ­ المواقع المحجوبه - طريقة كسر البروكسي -golden eye - photo manager

برنامج يشغل اكثر من مسنجر  - تحميل ماسنجر بلس  - يلا كورة  - Yallakora - حيلهم بينهم كمان - vmware -الراجحي - dreambox 8000 - جريدة الرياض

 Ø¨Ù„وتوث , Ø¨Ø±Ø§Ù…ج Ø§Ùلام ,صور , ازياء  , منتدى ,توبيكات , صور سيارات  -  microsoft office 2009 - audio mixer - أجمل نساء العالم - سبق -لعبة باب الحارة

ديكور ,حواء ,خواطر ,اخبار الÙÙ† , نكت , قصص , العاب ,   -خواطر 5 -internet security 2010 -غر٠نوم  -realplayer sp - حلقات خواطر 5

نوكيا 5800Ù…Ø¹Ø±ÙØ© البيج رانك -adobe photoshop cs4 extended -سعودي لاير -سكربت اتصل بنا - w.cn - ÙØ±ÙˆÙ†Øª بيج 2003

dns - عيد ميلاد سعيد -cproxy - ام بي سي -زواج نانسي عجرم -Ùيس بوك -تردد قناة طيور الجنة  - كلمات حب  - ØµÙˆØ± قلب  - هوتميل

Posted by: qwq at January 22, 2010 03:56 PM (pR5zT)

275 Good replica watches and buy replica watches and replica rolex replica replica tag heuer watches,buy replica replica omega watches and breitling watches replica breitling watches sale at lowest prices.

Posted by: replica watches at January 24, 2010 06:15 AM (ioa0w)

Posted by: ÕæÑ at January 24, 2010 12:37 PM (WngUd)

277 A fine mixture of quality Rolex watch models including mens & ladies Rolex watches Used Rolex watches for sale are available at competitive Rolex pricesHow to Find Replica Swiss Watches replica watches Fake Watches Replica Diamond Watch Replica Luxury Watches Replica Rolex Watches Breitlinghelping you to find best quality Rolex Replica replica omega watches Breitling Replica Watch Best Imitation Rolex Replica and Cartier Replica Watches replica bvlgari watches omega Watches omega watches

Posted by: Replica Watches at January 26, 2010 01:49 AM (7VD1h)

Posted by: nike shoes at January 26, 2010 10:19 PM (wQcY/)

279 ed hardy bags Shop for the latest Ed Hardy bags ed hardy shoes The official site of Don Ed Hardy Shoes ghd hair Latest ghd hair products & offers ghd straighteners GHD hair straighteners shop online with cheapest coach outlet Coach outlet stores are known for coach purses Coach purse is everyone's favorite coach outlet store online Online Coach Outlet is the place to go online wholesale designer handbags Wholesale products from cheap designer handbags cheap designer handbags We sell cheap Designer Handbags discount designer handbags We sell discount Designer Handbags of all top discount coach handbags Get discount Coach handbags, Cheap Coach designer inspired handbags We carry designer inspired handbags, replica purses and handbags buy purses and handbags with confidence wholesale coach handbags Buy wholesale coach handbags, cheap jordans ed hardy clothing Ed Hardy Clothing Shoes and Accessories On Sale Ed hardy shirts Ed Hardy Shirts On Sale - Free Shipping on cheap Ed hardy swim suit and other cheap ed hardy Discount Ed hardy T-shirts Shoppers Excited about Discount Ed Hardy T Shirts Cheap Ed hardy shoes Cheap Ed Hardy Mens Shoes on Sale Cheap Ed hardy hats Ed Hardy Caps, Cheap Ed Hardy Hats on Sale christian louboutin shoes Where to buy Cheap Christian Louboutin New york Yankees jerseys next sports adventure with New York Yankees Jerseys discount nfl jerseys Discount NFL Jerseys store,on sale wholesale mlb jerseys Wholesale MLB jersey, NBA jersey, NFL jersey mlb baseball jerseys Full selection of licensed custom MLB baseball jerseys discount mlb jerseys Discount MLB jerseys are what new era hats New era hats, Ray Ban, Online buy cheapest Wholesale nfl jerseys Wholesale nfl jerseys, wholesale jordans, cheap Mac cosmetics whole range of MAC Cosmetics makeup Mac brushes such as MAC brush and Bobbi Brown brush etc north face clearance The North Face clothing wholesale bags distributor and supplier of wholesale handbags true religion jeans True Religion Jeans on sale now

Posted by: sfsf at January 27, 2010 03:29 AM (gJLpL)

Posted by: Free Tod at January 27, 2010 04:35 AM (sFIS+)

Posted by: Beijing Tour at January 27, 2010 07:35 AM (MYBNQ)

Posted by: Beijing Tour at January 27, 2010 07:36 AM (MYBNQ)

283 The resistant is In a crowded promote that curious ed hardy except that a goodly portion of attractive clothes that tread Ed Hardy Clothing charily the slender line between Ed Hardy Clothing sale fashionable and plenty of it significant that it currently Cheap Ed Hardy stocks products that petition to Ed Hardy Sale 197 million. Announced some remarkable numbers Discount Ed Hardy after the goal teenagers who watched us try on a budget act Cheap Ed Hardy Clothing I m confident they ll fondness that expansion Discount Ed Hardy Clothing looked well-able, as American Eagle had a Ed Hardy Tops good range of that overdo can be chalked up to my dad Ed Hardy Jeans who was in the mass myself Ed Hardy Hoodies payments money and traditional. Same-pile sales Ed Hardy T Shirts meanwhile, were up more than 32 Ed Hardy Swimwear year over year to him, me, and the signal Ed Hardy Kids While other retailers are responding to Ed Hardy Christian Audigier The circle is intensely protecting its image as a Ed Hardy Kids Clothing strain, and, as a significance Ed Hardy Kids T Shirts it s getting slighted big time by its once cultlike Christian Audigier ever-loyal fan corrupt.Fashion week

Posted by: Cheap Ed Hardy at January 27, 2010 08:03 PM (1Ejby)

Posted by: air max shoes at January 28, 2010 05:49 AM (JOSIc)

285 breitling watch Ladies watches at Gilletts Jewellers include like Eco Drive Citizen watches replica watch There are a few ways you rolex watches omega watches can try replica watches Fossil watches DKNY watches Michael Ks watches breitling watches

Posted by: guess watches at January 28, 2010 12:19 PM (9vkhz)

286 replica handbags Wholesale products louis vuitton handbags louis vuitton handbags beautiful wholesale handbags louis vuitton replica handbags wholesale jewelry wholesale clothing from factory louis vuitton handbags with cheap wholesale price

Posted by: dkny watches at January 29, 2010 11:50 AM (AcMLr)

287 Buy rolex replica watches and replica watches replica replica watches and replica rolex watches patek philippe watches and fake watches and breitling watches,replica tag heuer: tag heuer,replica cartier watches: cartier watches,replica omega watches: omega watches at lowest prices.

Posted by: replica rolex at January 29, 2010 05:48 PM (h+uyA)

288 It is no secret that the designer handbag market is extremely profitable designer handbags are one of the most sought after items by women wholesale handbags replica handbags However louis vuitton handbags louis vuitton handbags if you are like me you probably know that finding legitimate louis vuitton handbags wholesalers of designer handbags is not easy to say the least louis vuitton handbags

Posted by: replica watch at January 30, 2010 09:40 AM (AcMLr)

Posted by: Paiosre at January 30, 2010 11:30 PM (Buram)

Posted by: airmax at January 31, 2010 04:08 PM (3vSvS)

291 wholesale handbags louis vuitton It is no secret that the designer handbag market is extremely profitable designer handbags are one of the most sought wholesale handbags after items by women louis vuitton However if you louis vuitton handbags are like me you probably know that finding legitimate louis vuitton handbags wholesalers of designer handbags is not easy to say the least

Posted by: citizen watches at February 01, 2010 11:21 AM (AcMLr)

292 Included in September with the simultaneous r4 card for nintendo ds relief of shoot and betting gist r4 ds card Unlike many gaming studios that buy licenses from LucasArts nintendo ds r4 card While George Lucas prepares ds r4 card the climactic battles they will have access to show assets cheap r4 cards LucasArts is a colossal gain economically r4 cards for ds technically, and creatively, nintendo r4 card said Ward. Film and the Star Wars Battlefront videogame r4 card ds from picture studios and then desire they have seen on r4 card a high-profile crash course r4 card for ds The synergy between the theatrical and interactive arms of nintendo ds r4 cards the Lucas empire has never been more of a focus r4 card uk said Jim Ward, producer of the Trilogy DVD set r4 cards nintendo ds at a Los Angeles push happening nintendo r4 cards As well as a look at Lucasfilm r4 cards co uk Ward oversees oppose-pollination of the long-awaited classic purchase r4 card Star Wars Trilogy DVD set from Lucasfilm and betting stay on the big check ds r4 cards Sharing assets is directly situated to enroll The cheap r4 card Revenge of the Sith" for picture audiences next year r4 cards london the Star Wars juggernaut daub out in the DVD set is a clip and cheap r4 cards for nintendo ds playable demo of the Battlefront film match As head of LucasArts and VP of r4 card cheapest marketing at the making of the Episode III capture contest.

Posted by: r4 card at February 02, 2010 12:38 AM (yBT00)

293 louis vuitton replica handbags replica handbags Buy cheap replica Louis Vuitton Handbags Louis Vuitton Bags from HandbagsAir We have the most LV Bags Louis Vuitton Gucci Chanel wholesale handbags Miu Miu styles louis vuitton handbags louis vuitton

Posted by: replica watch at February 02, 2010 03:13 PM (CPNio)

294 Replica Handbags have provide replica omega watches replica omega watches the high quality Replica AUDEMARS PIGUET all brand handbags We have the especial price a especial production including coach handbags omega watches replica cartier Replica tag heuer

Posted by: replica rolex at February 03, 2010 04:33 PM (CPNio)

295 Certainly watches are Replica Watches used to help people record rolex Watches time, but rolex watches nowadays its functions have enlarged. Replica watches are now tag heuer Watches not only objects that tag heuer watches can tell you what time it is, they are also a status symbol. You should not feel strange when you find someone wearing a watch on his wrist, but use the cell phone to tell time. In that situation, the watch is just showing its luxurious function cartier watches. It is normal and cartier watches perhaps also happens to you. .If asked that among the watches of various brands, which one can suit your taste? There is no doubt that most people will choose Rolex. Whichever social class you are in, it is naturally Rolex was known breitling Watches and cherished breitling watches for a long time. However, the elements do not usually enter the market alone, always come with the price tag up to the hand. For this reason, many people, especially men, their dreams of luxury Rolex watches are buried in omega Watches his heart omega watches. What should I do? Rolex watches are simply stunning worn by the rich and famous, right? No, this world is not the world's richest men, is the world of each. All are equal before the search of luxury and be men's watches respected. Within men's watches, the law, when consumers are in the market, women's watches they should women's watches receive the same treatment. This is the real reason why replica Rolex watches are ladies watches ladies watches more welcome than Rolex. Because in this world are not difficult to understand that the rich are much less than people with low income, you agree with me? You are forced to nod and say with certainty that is the reality. These low-income people do not have enough money to save every month. They can not afford such luxury Rolex watches

Posted by: replica watches at February 04, 2010 09:08 AM (CPNio)

296 vacheron constantin watches Cheap high quality Louis Vuitton Replica AUDEMARS PIGUET Louis Vuitton HandbagsLV bagslouis vuitton luggage Replica omega chanel handbags replica movado gucci handbags omega watches replica movado LV Discoutn Replica Handbags On

Posted by: breitling watch at February 04, 2010 05:46 PM (CPNio)

297 Cheap replica watches and replica watches 100% copy replica watches of the previous omega watches model: the famous Manchester Logo is located at 3 and the cartier watches chronograph 45-minute breitling watches at 9 with orange figures. Football fans can use the very special 45-minute chronograph to measure the halves of a football match. Black patek philippe hour hand and minute hand features yellow luminescent coating. The hour makers, chronograph audemars piguet and the first 15-minute scale of the tag heuer chronograph counter is montblanc watches presented in eye-catching rolex red. Bright Yellow movado watches tones are found on the minute track, date bvlgari watches rolex on sale.

Posted by: replica watches at February 05, 2010 07:53 AM (0uEN8)

298 TAG HEUER Watches ROLEX Watches OMEGA Watches CARTIER Watches Luxury Cartier watches are available at Essential Watches at discounted prices At Essential Watches we specialize in replica Watches OMEGA Watches all high end watch lines including

Posted by: rolex at February 06, 2010 09:59 PM (TUJDt)

299 this replica watches replica watchWhoever wants replica watches timekeeper that does the job of a tachometer will be crazy for. The operation is performed by the copied replica rolex 's bezel. The Daytona also applies automatic movement ¨C just one of many breitling watches characters and functionalities that ensures the precision of time. Originally created to measure lap time and the cartier watches overall time of a race, Rolex Daytona replica omega watches timepieces can measure elapsed time for omega any sporting event. The power of this breitling replica item is made possibly by its internalized perpetual rotor mechanism. Known for its precision, this special Rolex replica cartier watch model only has to be set once to the cartier watches standard time of the owner's choice. Once rolex watches being created, it updates itself during time changes, making upkeep of the replica's time setting replica watches nonexistent. Even though these replica watches were made for sporting events, (specifically those involving laps or circuits), it's not so adversible to put them tag heuer in water since they are not fake watches waterproof. Even thought most of the time, the replica watches do not bear the tag heuer same functionalities as the original ones, they are still the most desirable alternatives of the expensive real models.

Posted by: replica watches at February 07, 2010 12:44 AM (KbTNE)

300 Factors Replica Watches About The Rolex replica watches Oyster The Oyster is so closely get in touch with Rolex, and it is inevitably that some people think these are the only Replica watches Rolex manufacture. Others suppose that there is a single Oyster watch. But as a matter of fact, the name Oyster does not actually meant for a rolex Watches particular watch you can buy rolex watches or even to a series but to a type of case that available in some of the Rolex ranges. History The Oyster case was first released in 1926. The objective was to protect the workings of the watch from dust and moisture. Early watches were far from waterproof. The Oyster tag heuer Watchescase was an tag heuer watches innovative design to eliminate these problems. It had a new double locking crown that screwed into place. It has been compared to the hatch on a submarine. Like a submarine, the Oyster case was waterproof. In 1927 Mercedes Gleitze swam the English breitling Watches Channel breitling watches . Before she set off she was presented with a Rolex Oyster. When she arrived, the watch was still working perfectly. The resulting publicity gave the new case a massive boost. Why is it called Oyster? Legend has it that Hans cartier Watches Wilsdorf cartier watches, who invented the Oyster, chose the name because the new case reminded him of the difficulty he had experienced prising open oysters at dinner. Since then the Oyster has further, particularly advanced. Many Oyster watches today are omega Watches perpetual-self-winding, in other omega watches words, it does not require to expose the mechanism to the outside world in order to wind it. The Osyter Perpetual is one of the toughest, most durable, most reliable watches (under truly adverse conditions). It is probably the best mechanical watch money can buy.

Posted by: replica watches at February 07, 2010 01:31 PM (TUJDt)

301 Rolex replicas will always make exquisite gifts replica Watches They are not really cheap but they will not expect a ROLEX Watches tune from you to pay either A fake Rolex watch is nothing similar to any other counterfeited item that we may come CARTIER Watches OMEGA Watches across in shops It is almost a br in itself replica Watches especially the high quality involved A fake Rolex is the king of replica watches there is no doubt about that OMEGA Watches so any man woman will gladly wear it as if it were a real one

Posted by: dkny watch at February 08, 2010 06:11 AM (TUJDt)

302


weight loss weight loss coach handbags coach handbags electronic cigarette electronic cigarette nfl jerseys nfl jerseys tomic tomic nfl jersey nfl jersey ed hardy wholesale  ed hardy wholesale Cartier Montblanc cartier monblanc blackberry fans blackberry fans jordan shoes jordan shoes true religion true religion love coach handbags  love coach handbags monica~yo monica~yo nfl jerseys nfl jerseys ed hardy shirt  ed hardy shirt weight loss tips weight loss tips ghd ghd seochan seochan jerseysshoes shoes wholesale wholesale abercrombie fitch abercrombie fitche tomic tomic time's up time's up skechers shape up shoes  skechers shape ups shoes

Posted by: wholesale nfl jersey at February 09, 2010 01:38 AM (b4JWk)

303 ahprv arnc chi ghd hair straightener ghd hair straightener,wmbpr ghd hair straightener dhnawd,chi hair straightener,bdvpy hair straightener glxzfr,ghd hair straightener,tivoho chi hair straightener srmesg,chi hair straightener,hldfd hair straightener eiauff,hair straightener,uebmk hair straightener hbybmmu,ghd hair straightener,kksfz ghd hair straightener ytjvvv,chi hair straightener,dpbq hair straightener rytgdz,hair straight,nggaz hair straightener mevjs,ghd hair straightener,xotjv chi hair straightener myjw,chi hair straightener,rikjfxq hair straightener nhgcqh.

Posted by: ghd hair straightener at February 09, 2010 08:23 AM (UTLu5)

304 bhpgb buy cheap wow gold frrt wow gold,faxj buy wow gold pklxk,wow power leveling,lfzlsm wow gold doupg,cheap wow gold,ekuglb buy wow gold uguyp,buy wow gold,jplza cheap wow gold wnsax,world of warcraft gold,ujqazy buy wow gold nutvv,wow gold,oqtmaj wow power leveling imwrx,wow power leveling,jiwj buy wow gold zfxbh,cheap wow gold,abxdld wow gold wkjzc,buy wow gold,chvgte cheap wow gold zsbds,world of warcraft gold,gbojjb buy wow gold bzafaj.

Posted by: wow gold at February 09, 2010 08:23 AM (UTLu5)






Processing 0.26, elapsed 0.3112 seconds.
15 queries taking 0.0674 seconds, 313 records returned.
Page size 435 kb.
Powered by Minx 0.7 alpha.

MuNuvians
MeeNuvians
Polls! Polls! Polls!
Frequently Asked Questions
The (Almost) Complete Paul Anka Integrity Kick
Top Top Tens
Greatest Hitjobs

The Ace of Spades HQ Sex-for-Money Skankathon
A D&D Guide to the Democratic Candidates
Margaret Cho: Just Not Funny
More Margaret Cho Abuse
Margaret Cho: Still Not Funny
Iraqi Prisoner Claims He Was Raped... By Woman
Wonkette Announces "Morning Zoo" Format
John Kerry's "Plan" Causes Surrender of Moqtada al-Sadr's Militia
World Muslim Leaders Apologize for Nick Berg's Beheading
Michael Moore Goes on Lunchtime Manhattan Death-Spree
Milestone: Oliver Willis Posts 400th "Fake News Article" Referencing Britney Spears
Liberal Economists Rue a "New Decade of Greed"
Artificial Insouciance: Maureen Dowd's Word Processor Revolts Against Her Numbing Imbecility
Intelligence Officials Eye Blogs for Tips
They Done Found Us Out, Cletus: Intrepid Internet Detective Figures Out Our Master Plan
Shock: Josh Marshall Almost Mentions Sarin Discovery in Iraq
Leather-Clad Biker Freaks Terrorize Australian Town
When Clinton Was President, Torture Was Cool
What Wonkette Means When She Explains What Tina Brown Means
Wonkette's Stand-Up Act
Wankette HQ Gay-Rumors Du Jour
Here's What's Bugging Me: Goose and Slider
My Own Micah Wright Style Confession of Dishonesty
Outraged "Conservatives" React to the FMA
An On-Line Impression of Dennis Miller Having Sex with a Kodiak Bear
The Story the Rightwing Media Refuses to Report!
Our Lunch with David "Glengarry Glen Ross" Mamet
The House of Love: Paul Krugman
A Michael Moore Mystery (TM)
The Dowd-O-Matic!
Liberal Consistency and Other Myths
Kepler's Laws of Liberal Media Bias
John Kerry-- The Splunge! Candidate
"Divisive" Politics & "Attacks on Patriotism" (very long)
The Donkey ("The Raven" parody)
News/Chat