Support




Contact
Powered by
Movable Type

FBI Knew Hasan Was Chatting Up Al Qaeda Cleric And Becoming More Radical In Months Leading Up To Ft. Hood Attack

Amazingly, they didn't think it was something the Army needed to know.

In the months before the deadly shootings at Fort Hood, Army Maj. Nidal M. Hasan intensified his communications with a radical Yemeni American cleric and began to discuss surreptitious financial transfers and other steps that could translate his thoughts into action, according to two sources briefed on a collection of secret e-mails between the two.

The e-mails were obtained by an FBI-led task force in San Diego between late last year and June but were not forwarded to the military, according to government and congressional sources. Some were sent to the FBI's Washington field office, triggering an assessment into whether they raised national security concerns, but those intercepted later were not, the sources said.

..."It became very clear toward the end of those e-mails he was interested in taking action."

Senate Armed Services Committee Chairman Carl M. Levin (D-Mich.) said Friday that he would investigate the handling of the e-mails -- 18 or 19 in all -- and why military officials were not aware of them before the deadly attack. Levin told reporters after a briefing from Pentagon staff members that "there are some who are reluctant to call it terrorism, but there is significant evidence that it is."

If even an ostrich like Levin is realizing this is a terror attack, it's going to be harder for Obama and Army leaders to continue to pretend otherwise.

As for the failure to connect the proverbial dots...memo to the FBI-There is NO reason for a serving member of the United States Army (or any American) to be chatting up a spiritual adviser to al Qaeda. None. Zero. Zip.

I hope this clear things up for you guys.

Posted by: DrewM. at 02:06 PM



Comments

1
Diversity!

Besides, dissent is patriotic. If Hasan doesn't agree with the Iraq invasion, it's his right as an American citizen to do so. Just ask General Casey.


Posted by: goforitbillbelichik at November 21, 2009 02:11 PM (jVldi)

2 Maybe the government can come up with a new position so that the various heads of the various intelligence organizations can know what each other has learned. (I'm here to help.)

Posted by: FireHorse at November 21, 2009 02:11 PM (Vl5GH)

3 Kinda blows a hole in Chrissy's "we may never know" Major Jihad's motives dream sequence, doesn't it?

Treasurer of the Army, more zeros on those checks....stat.


Posted by: The Hammer at November 21, 2009 02:11 PM (YBTwf)

4
It's not like the Army should have noticed anything wrong when Hasan repeatedly tried to have his patients charged with war crimes.

That's normal, right?

Posted by: goforitbillbelichik at November 21, 2009 02:12 PM (jVldi)

5

 also in link .....The e-mails will help investigators determine whether Hasan's alleged actions were motivated by psychological deterioration or inspired by radical religious views he found online and through e-mail exchanges with Aulaqi

sigh. c'mon!

Posted by: willow at November 21, 2009 02:12 PM (1kwr2)

6
There's really no difference between the military brass and the republican 'leadership'.  Nobody wants to rock the boat and lose this sweet gig.  Having all those troops make a big deal out of you daily is kinda fun.

Posted by: Dang Straights at November 21, 2009 02:15 PM (djkiW)

7 But the consensus says it wasn't terror.
And just look at how that consensus on AGW is working out today.


Perhaps consensus is a problem?


Posted by: Derak at November 21, 2009 02:17 PM (6lO4z)

8

The sources said the e-mail correspondence is particularly troubling because Aulaqi, who has been on the law enforcement radar for years, is considered by U.S. officials to be an al-Qaeda supporter who has inspired terrorism suspects in Britain, Canada and the United States

The e-mails were obtained by an FBI-led task force in San Diego between late last year and June but were not forwarded to the military

seriously wtheck

Posted by: willow at November 21, 2009 02:18 PM (1kwr2)

9 Has anyone seen my wall around here?

Posted by: Jamie S. Gorelick at November 21, 2009 02:18 PM (u1pln)

10 My take on this was that many folks had connected the dots, but no one with the authority to do something about it would do anything due to the threat of a career-ending PC investigation.  Setting aside whether the FBI should have alerted the Army to the threat (they should have), this doesn't actually absolve the army brass from its responsibility for allowing this to happen, does it?

Posted by: Cautiously Pessimistic at November 21, 2009 02:21 PM (30xKW)

11 I don't know about you all but I have complete confidence Togo West will come to the right conclusions.
/sarc

Posted by: Trish at November 21, 2009 02:24 PM (0U5Kd)

12 i had thought we had discussed a previous revelation that Hasan's fellow associates , pyschiatrists, and clients had spoken to higher ups that He was off and spoke radically? wasn't that withjin the military itself?

Posted by: willow at November 21, 2009 02:25 PM (1kwr2)

13 Hey why don't we elect a Muslim President. Then they will love us?

Posted by: nevergiveup at November 21, 2009 02:25 PM (0GFWk)

14 O/T:

The scum who murdered Border Patrol Agent Robert Rosas this summer was captured and pleaded guilty in Federal Court.

http://tinyurl.com/ygbcrct

Posted by: pinche migra at November 21, 2009 02:26 PM (E3SK8)

15

sorry Cautiously you stated it better than i.

 lifts foot off your toe.

Posted by: willow at November 21, 2009 02:27 PM (1kwr2)

16 7 But the consensus says it wasn't terror.
And just look at how that consensus on AGW is working out today.

Perhaps consensus is a problem?

Posted by: Derak at November 21, 2009 02:17 PM (6lO4z)

To paraphrase Andy Jackson, "One man with courage is a consensus."

Posted by: stuiec at November 21, 2009 02:28 PM (Ate22)

17 Carl Levin represents a state with a large population of Arab-Americans.  If he's willing to use the "T" word with respect to the Ft. Hood massacre, that's especially telling.

Posted by: stuiec at November 21, 2009 02:29 PM (Ate22)

18

pinche migra , condolences for their loss. 

hopefully  a  somewhat just result for them.

Posted by: willow at November 21, 2009 02:31 PM (1kwr2)

19 I'm not defending the Army brass who ducked the tough decisions...but is there any doubt that an attempt to remove Major Jihad from the Army would have resulted in a huge, huge lawsuit? 

Not that the trade off wouldn't be worth it now, but I know some ACLU attorney's would have sold their souls to get such a case. 

So, that creates the context for how this problem is handled in the future, or even more likely similar situations evolving right now?

Posted by: The Hammer at November 21, 2009 02:31 PM (YBTwf)

20

unbelievable….this bastard was sending money over to terrorist groups via the radical cleric back in late 2008 and early 2009 because he knew he was going to martyr himself.

and the FBI says the emails weren’t enough to detain him. and of course, we’re investigating hasan like its a crime, not terrorism.

pathetic.more from wapo:

Hasan’s contacts with Aulaqi were not publicly disclosed until after the shootings, which the cleric subsequently praised, calling the Army psychiatrist a “hero” in a posting on his Web site.

In the months before the shootings, the two discussed how Hasan could make several transactions of less than $10,000, a threshold for reporting to U.S. authorities, according to the source who spoke extensively. Hasan did not explicitly vow to fund terrorist activities or evade tax and reporting laws for contributions, the source said.

“I believe they were interested in the money for operational-type aspects, and knowing that he had funds and wouldn’t be around to use them, they were very eager to get those funds,” he said.

To date, investigators have not unearthed evidence that Hasan sent money to charities with strong or suspected ties to Islamist militant groups, but they are continuing to probe his financial dealings as one aspect of a many-pronged case, other sources cautioned.

The FBI obtained the e-mails pursuant to court-ordered wiretaps, according to a former intelligence official. After receiving a wiretap order, Internet providers generally set up accounts that allow cloned copies of e-mails to go to the government agency in real time. Stored e-mails also may be provided with a search warrant.

In this case, a first batch of Hasan’s e-mails was sent by agents in San Diego to the bureau’s Washington field office, where a terrorism task force began to assess them in December. But months later, additional messages emerged, according to government and congressional sources. Those e-mails were reviewed only in San Diego, where authorities determined they did not pose a national security risk. The FBI said last week, without going into details about the process, that “all of the e-mails were known.”

Hasan’s commanding officer ordered him to “pre-trial confinement” on Friday, John Galligan, the suspect’s attorney, said in an interview at his Belton, Tex., office. Galligan described pre-trial confinement as the strictest confinement in military court and said it usually means the suspect is locked in a military jail. Because Hasan is paralyzed and has substantial medical needs, Galligan said he will ask for his client to remain in intensive care under guarded supervision.

“He’s in a hospital bed,” Galligan said. “He’s not going to get up and walk away.”

In several of their applications for search warrants, authorities are approaching the matter as a regular criminal investigation rather than invoking special legal authority available in terrorism cases, the sources said.

Posted by: Anti-Harkkonen Freedom Fighter at November 21, 2009 02:32 PM (5r0Tz)

21 Barry: Let's STILL not jump to any conclusions.

Posted by: TheQuietMan at November 21, 2009 02:32 PM (dzRZ3)

22 Jamie Gorelick could not be reached for comment.

Posted by: Unclefacts, Summoner of Guinness, and Near Miss Meteors at November 21, 2009 02:32 PM (erIg9)

23
is there any doubt that an attempt to remove Major Jihad from the Army would have resulted in a huge, huge lawsuit? 

Officers get up-or-outed from the Army everyday.  Hell we have 0-4's here that are getting booted out of the service.  I bet there was pressure NOT to kick his shitball terrorist ass out in the name of 'diversity' though.

Posted by: Dang Straights at November 21, 2009 02:39 PM (djkiW)

24 "chatting up a spiritual adviser to al Qaeda. None. Zero. Zip."

maybe the iman had a really good hummus recipe

Posted by: newrouter at November 21, 2009 02:41 PM (bEZJ+)

25

they spring into immediate action and confiscate my toothpaste at the airport because it was 1.6 ounces too large, this guy is emailing al Qaida and putting on presentations on radical islam right under the noses of everyone and they do nothing.

Posted by: exceller at November 21, 2009 02:45 PM (Z7Znk)

26 Everybody is F#%king Fired.

Posted by: Mad Saint Jack at November 21, 2009 03:00 PM (zVgnK)

27 I applaud the restraint shown by Army leadership in this matter.

Posted by: Keith Ellison at November 21, 2009 03:07 PM (zrFBB)

28 An excellent example of how political correctness will get people killed.

Posted by: Txn4evr at November 21, 2009 03:09 PM (VsJMx)

29 It amazes me that the same Army has men and women out there every day willing to put their lives on the line to do what needs to be done, but higher up nobody was willing to put their job on the line to do what needed to be done (get this P.O.S kicked out for the good of everyone).

Posted by: aggiebc at November 21, 2009 03:16 PM (xhPKT)

30

Let's not jump to any conclusions until the rest of the sleeper's are activated.

Posted by: Barack Obama at November 21, 2009 03:18 PM (i0WE5)

31 This is worse than Pearl Harbor.At least at Pearl,they sent a telegram.

Posted by: chicocano at November 21, 2009 03:28 PM (2n5cq)

32 While they quibble over definitions of terrorism, his actions certainly constitute treason.

Do they have the guts to charge him?

*crickets*

Posted by: PJ at November 21, 2009 03:38 PM (Qpxxz)

33 We are dying from the inside out. Cancer is spread thru the whole gov't.

Posted by: sTevo at November 21, 2009 03:43 PM (eA3tl)

34 Was Hasan on the No-Fly List?

the list AG Holder wants to use to stop people from buying guns.

Posted by: Mad Saint Jack at November 21, 2009 04:10 PM (zVgnK)

35 .memo to the FBI-There is NO reason for a serving member of the United States Army (or any American) to be chatting up a spiritual adviser to al Qaeda. None. Zero. Zip.

Not even a teensy weensy widdle bit?





Posted by: The Federal BI at November 21, 2009 04:12 PM (4iIhs)

36 Mentality of 9/10...9...8...7...6...5...4...3...2...1

Posted by: ParisParamus at November 21, 2009 04:23 PM (I2aaX)

37 Anyone want to start a 9/10 movement, or has it already started?

Posted by: Cautiously Pessimistic at November 21, 2009 04:27 PM (30xKW)

38

"Anyone want to start a 9/10 movement, or has it already started?"

______

@37 - Isn't that what the Democrat party is?

Posted by: aggiebc at November 21, 2009 04:48 PM (xhPKT)

39

Devil's advocacy:

Is terrorism an act of war? Did Hassan commit an act of war?

Is it important, for the purposes of identifying terrorism, that an attack be coordinated with a larger war strategy? If not, and terrorists can appear spontaneously, then how does one distinguish between a genuine terrorist and someone going postal? Are the latter now terrorists too? If not, is the difference motivation? What motives are qualified to be labelled terrorism?

Posted by: Marty at November 21, 2009 05:18 PM (c+sVx)

40

If an even safe ostrich like Levin is saying this, then it is acknowledged as terrorism - just not stated openly.

 

When a Carl Levin says "Yes, this is terrorism" then you know that they are frightened.  The politics of the damage-control team just became irrelevant to actual damage control.

Posted by: Mikey NTH at November 21, 2009 05:33 PM (TUWci)

41 As Thomas Joscelyn has been reporting (reporting...anybody remember that?) Awlaki, the cleric, is BFF with Moazzam Begg. Begg is, in turn, a headliner on the ACLU's blockbuster "Silent Voices From Guantanamo". Begg spent three years at GTMO. Begg was picked up for being in the wrong place (fleeing Tora Bora) at the wrong time (while the US Army was looking for its enemies fleeing from Tora Bora). He's a British citizen though, so we sent him home. Now Begg's singing Awlaki's praises, and having his d-ck sucked by the ACLU. Things are bad and they are getting worse.

Posted by: aurelius at November 21, 2009 05:40 PM (5HhWZ)

42 If not, and terrorists can appear spontaneously, then how does one distinguish between a genuine terrorist and someone going postal? Are the latter now terrorists too?

Yep, they are.  That's the easy way to handle it.  If natives don't want to be classified terrorists, then they'll simply refrain from blowing shit up and killing people.  Its really isn't that hard.  I haven't blown any buildings or killed anyone domestically, and I've been on this planet close to a half century.  Actually its pretty easy to not be classified a terrorist.

The "larger strategy" you speak of simply distinguishes conspiracy from loner, it doesn't change the act.  As a practical matter for prosecution, the "larger strategy" adds a 15 year sentence for conspiracy and maybe a RICO charge if there was enough money involved to take that approach too.

The moment you try and make the law into a mind reader all sorts of legal problems crop up. 

Posted by: Purple Avenger at November 21, 2009 05:41 PM (cvrkH)

43 Agree w/ Purple Avenger, but Marty's distinction isn't entirely meaningless. It's the difference between murder charges alone, and murder charges plus treason.

Posted by: aurelius at November 21, 2009 05:49 PM (5HhWZ)

44 Let's see, Bush got hammered for 'failure to connect the dots'.  Let's see how Barry makes out in all this.  After all, hasn't this been "the NEW and IMPROVED Obama FBI"?

Posted by: GarandFan at November 21, 2009 05:58 PM (ZQBnQ)

45

Devil's advocacy continued:

http://tinyurl.com/yjjzdnf

Northern Illinois, about a year and a half ago. Major school shooting, multiple dead and wounded.

If this CNN report is representative (and I have no reason to doubt that) then this incident was never considered an act of terrorism. The word "terror" appears no where on that page.

I don't recall ever reading of a school shooting or a workplace mass murder being refered to as terrorism.

It would appear that Purple Avengers (#42) contention that these types of incidents should be considered terrorism begins with the Fort Hood shooting. Am I wrong?

Posted by: Marty at November 21, 2009 06:05 PM (c+sVx)

46 So he was emailing Rev. Wright?

Posted by: Damiano at November 21, 2009 06:06 PM (2tsdE)

47 Marty has heard of Timothy McVeigh?

Posted by: aurelius at November 21, 2009 06:06 PM (5HhWZ)

48 Tim McVeigh.  US citizen.  Arrested in the US.

Posted by: Mikey NTH at November 21, 2009 06:15 PM (TUWci)

49

aurelius (#47) good point. Timothy McVeigh was labelled a terrorist. He may even have been debriefed by the military, I can't recall. His disregard for civilian lives in carrying out his attack on a government target certainly places him in the terrorist category in my book.

But he was investigated and tried by civilian authorities as a criminal. Where does this place us vis-a-vis the argument against trying KSM as a criminal defendant?

Posted by: Marty at November 21, 2009 06:25 PM (c+sVx)

50 Where does this place us vis-a-vis the argument against trying KSM as a criminal defendant?

Nowhere. KSM is not a US citizen, was captured overseas, and planned, funded, and ordered the commission of a war crime against US citizens.

He is also guilty -- inarguably guilty -- of multiple crimes against humanity.

He deserves a long drop on a short rope, not a criminal trial.

Posted by: Rob Crawford at November 21, 2009 06:37 PM (n2wxa)

51 McVeigh was a US citizen, Marty. There was nowhere else, and is now nowhere else, to try a US citizen who kills Americans besides US federal district courts. KSM is not a US citizen. We have options vis-a-vis foreign terrorists that we do not have vis-a-vis terrorists who are citizens.

Posted by: aurelius at November 21, 2009 06:41 PM (5HhWZ)

52 Rob beat me to it, obviously.

Posted by: aurelius at November 21, 2009 06:42 PM (5HhWZ)

53

Rob Crawford (#50) et al: So just to clarify, every act of mass murder is henceforth terrorism, and the qualifying distinction between which terrorist gets a trial and which gets a summary execution is citizenship?

If KSM had been a US citizen when he was plotting his attacks in a cave in Asia would he be more deserving of a trial now?

I would argue that KSM's actions do not constitute crimes against humanity for the simple reason that he didn't represent any recognized government, which seems to be the defining factor for that label.

Posted by: Marty at November 21, 2009 06:49 PM (c+sVx)

54 aurelius (#51) On the other side of the coin then, if Timothy McVeigh had been an Irish national, he would have been whisked away to military prison for unlimited detention without trial? Somehow I doubt that.

Posted by: Marty at November 21, 2009 06:53 PM (c+sVx)

55

There's a second factor, Marty. We were at war. If the IRA had declared war on the USA, and McVeigh had blown up the OK City federal building in close coordination w/ IRA operatives then yes, he would be eligible for a military tribunal. You are absolutely right in your suspicion that even had all of that been the case in 1994 (when McVeigh committed his terrorist act), he would not have been dealt with in a military tribunal. Bill Clinton-- who had at least two opportunities to take out UBL and would not pull the trigger-- was President, after all.

 

Moral of this story, Marty, is: Stop. You can't win.

Posted by: aurelius at November 21, 2009 07:04 PM (5HhWZ)

56

If I may step in for Rob here:

Marty, do you know the difference between a necessary and a sufficient condition? I doubt it. Nevertheless, let me point out that actin on behalf of a "recognized government" is a sufficient, but not a necessary, condition for committing a crime against humanity.

Posted by: aurelius at November 21, 2009 07:10 PM (5HhWZ)

57

aurelius (#55): I'm not trying to "win" anything. I've published a post on my own group blog that is my own best effort to synthesize the argument against giving KSM a civilian trial. I'm not a liberal troll trying to stir up shit. I'm a conservative pundit in my own right (and a long time AoSHQ reader and lurker), and I want to discuss what I view is a problem of consistency among some commentators about how terrorism gets defined. I've come here to do it rather than writing a blog post because I wanted immediate reaction and feedback. Thanks for your help.

Now it occurs to me that Hassan's violence is in most respects a fairly routine mass murder (as inapt as that label may be). It doesn't appear to have the kind of careful pre-planning and coordination that are the typical hallmarks of a terrorism plot (including McVeigh's). There's no indication at this point that his email correspondence was specifically terrorist in nature, nor does it appear that he was ever instructed to carry out his attack by outside forces.

In all respects, it appears that up until this point these types of attacks, as atrocious as they may be, have been thought of seperately from terrorism. What makes this case different is the internal motivation of the perp, his personal set of beliefs. In other words, what makes this an "obvious" case of terrorism is that Hassan was a Muslim with a beef against US military policy before he shot up his workplace.

I want the conservative side of arguments concerning terrorism to be clear and consistent. When workplace violence is suddenly but "obviously" terrorism for the first time, and not coincidentally the brain-f___ed psycho who carries it out is found to be a radical Muslim with no known involvement in broader terrorist conspiracies, it makes it harder for me, as a conservative pundit, to make my arguments about why the "terrorist" moniker is something not related to specific religious beliefs, when all of the pages I link to seem to be making that inference.

Posted by: Marty at November 21, 2009 07:40 PM (c+sVx)

58 aurelius(#56): Was McVeigh's crime sufficiently grievous?

Posted by: Marty at November 21, 2009 07:41 PM (c+sVx)

59 the army has to save HAssan to hide their own sloppy non action

Posted by: austin at November 21, 2009 07:44 PM (p6op4)

60 57 "It doesn't appear to have the kind of careful pre-planning and coordination that are the typical hallmarks of a terrorism plot "

Yeah. Other than the associations and correspondence, his behavior at Wally World, the weapons training reported (not something a psych resident would get), the deliberate selection of pistols with very high capacity magazines, the giving away of all his stuff, and deliberately going to an SRP site (not his "place of work", BTW) where he knew there would be large numbers of soldiers in close proximity, and blazing away yelling "Allahu Akbar", there is a real dearth of planning or anything to suggest terrorism.

Posted by: Mason Dixon at November 21, 2009 08:00 PM (0vazl)

61 Marty, you are projecting in a major way -

In other words, what makes this an "obvious" case of terrorism is that Hassan was a Muslim with a beef against US military policy before he shot up his workplace.

First, strike 'Muslim', replace with 'person';

Second, strike 'military', this is US policy,

Third, it was not 'his workplace', it was another activity's 'workplace' where he knew from experience that US Personnel would be jammed in elbow to armpit, dick to ass.

In other words, what makes this an "obvious" case of terrorism is that Hassan was a person with a beef against US policy before he shot up someplace jammed elbow to armpit with US Personnel.

Just like domestic terrorist McVeigh.

Do NOT be a 'concern troll'.


Posted by: Druid at November 21, 2009 08:35 PM (Gct7d)

62

Mason Dixon (#60): Again, the associations and correspondence do not, as of yet, indicate planning or coordination. I'm not aware of a specific tie to Walmart and Google isn't bringing up anything. Please link. The weapons training would be convenient for a would-be terrorist, but I'm not sure you want to make the argument that any army officer interested in receiving extra training in weapons should be investigated as a potential terrorist.

The selection of pistols does indicate a modicum of forethought. Again, Klebold and Harris made these types of choices ahead of what is almost always labelled a "massacre" (the word "terrorism" only appears in the title of a scholarly work in the reference portion of their Wiki page).

What someone yells while they're on a suicide mission is, I think, irrelevant. Because again, I have and will continue to make the case that terrorism is not predicated solely or even largely on religious belief. I think more often religion is used as a convenient rallying flag for community organizers with broader political goals in mind. The IRA were nationalists who used Roman Catholicism for political ends. Etc.

So weapons training, weapons selection, and yelling only appear to indicate "obvious" terrorism here because a Muslim was involved.

I was intentionally avoiding the specifics of what part of the base Hassan attacked, preferring to think of the entire base as his "place of work" because to do otherwise opens this can of worms: what is the difference between a guerrilla and a terrorist? Is this a distinction that matters any more?

Posted by: Marty at November 21, 2009 08:37 PM (c+sVx)

63 Forth, strike 'Hassan', replace with McVeigh;

Fifth, strike 'shot' replace with 'blew';

In other words, what makes this an "obvious" case of terrorism is that McVeigh was a person with a beef against US policy before he blew up someplace jammed elbow to armpit with US Personnel.

Makey sensey now?

Posted by: Druid at November 21, 2009 08:39 PM (Gct7d)

64

Druid (#61): not a concern troll. Read back for an explanation. Also, not concerned in any way about your opinion per se. I'll stay unconcerned about you, you keep your impotent threats to yourself.

As I alluded in #62, attacking personnel stationed on a military base used to be thought of as a guerrilla tactic. This changed somewhat in 1983 with the suicide attack on the Marine barracks in Beirut, which was determined to be an act of terrorism because the Marines were attacked in their sleep. (What this says about Washington's surprise attack Christmas Eve against the British we'll just leave alone.)

The personnel Hassan attacked were awake and on-duty, but unarmed. (Clinton's fault, I'm aware, but we'll leave that alone too.)

Question: are all surprise attacks on unprepared military personnel stationed on military bases now acts of terrorism by default? Doesn't it imply that military and civilian targets are equivalent eg. civilian targets are equal to military targets?

Posted by: Marty at November 21, 2009 08:57 PM (c+sVx)

65 Question: are all surprise attacks on unprepared military personnel stationed on military bases now acts of terrorism by default?

Like Pearl Harbor?

"Terrorism" - key component is non-state actors.

Enough Concern - Goodnight.


Posted by: Druid at November 21, 2009 09:05 PM (Gct7d)

66 Druid (#63): You don't have to convince me that McVeigh was a terrorist. I've already agreed to that. You have to convince me that Hassan, McVeigh and KSM are all the same thing. I'm arguing that that is a very tenuous comparison that turns a useful term, "terrorism" into a garbage can perjorative that is being used on an hoc basis, and that lately it appears that what makes it "obvious" that someone is a terrorist as opposed to a one-off run-of-the-mill mass murdering lunatic is that the set of beliefs he uses to rationalize his lunacy are based in religion.

Posted by: Marty at November 21, 2009 09:08 PM (c+sVx)

67 The difference between terrorism and mundane mass murder is that the terrorist has differences with government policy as (at least part of) his motivation.  So yes, Hasan's beef with US military policy is what makes his act one of terrorism.  But not his religion per se. Had he been a secular member of ANSWER or Code Pink he would be just as much a terrorist.

Posted by: Simon Oliver Lockwood at November 21, 2009 09:11 PM (4gN9t)

68

Marty-

Below is Title 18, US Code's definition of  "domestic terrorism". The only difference between it and the same code section's definition of "terrorism" generally is whether there's a state of war at the time. As this makes clear, the plain difference between he Columbine shooters, the VT shooter or any other random nutjob mass murderer and KSM, McVeigh, Hasan is that KSM, McVeigh and Hasan all wanted to influence the policy of the US government.

"the term “domestic terrorism” means activities that—

(A) involve acts dangerous to human life that are a violation of the criminal laws of the United States or of any State; (B) appear to be intended— (i) to intimidate or coerce a civilian population; (ii) to influence the policy of a government by intimidation or coercion; or (iii) to affect the conduct of a government by mass destruction, assassination, or kidnapping; and (C) occur primarily within the territorial jurisdiction of the United States.  

Posted by: aurelius at November 21, 2009 09:12 PM (5HhWZ)

69 Druid (#65): Despite your unwarranted condescension you're making my point. These types of attacks weren't (to my admittedly limited knowledge) ever thought of as terrorism before 1983. And now they are. My question is, what impact does this have on trying to justify a different set of rules for someone like KSM, which is something I'm personally aspiring to accomplish?

Posted by: Marty at November 21, 2009 09:14 PM (c+sVx)

70

@64's question, broken up, w/ answers:

 

"are all surprise attacks on unprepared military personnel stationed on military bases now acts of terrorism by default?"

That depends. Why did the attacker(s) attack? If it was to influence government policy, it's terrorism.

"Doesn't it imply that military and civilian targets are equivalent eg. civilian targets are equal to military targets?"

No. Civilian target or military target doesn't matter. Motive/intent of the attacker drives the definition of "terrorism", not the status of the target.

Posted by: aurelius at November 21, 2009 09:16 PM (5HhWZ)

71

"These types of attacks weren't (to my admittedly limited knowledge) ever thought of as terrorism before 1983."

states Marty.

Let's broaden his knowledge: Google "Munich Olympics", Marty. Then Google "Baader-Meihof". Then Google "IRA". I think the description "terrorism" predates 1983.

Posted by: aurelius at November 21, 2009 09:25 PM (5HhWZ)

72

Simon Oliver Lockwood (#67): So the bottom line is, the determining factor in what constitutes terrorism isn't choice of target, it's motivation? And the motivation is specifically related to a disagreement with government policy. I suppose I can live with that.

Now the problem is making the case that what KSM did was motivated by by his hatred of the US government specifically, as opposed to Western civilization generally. All of the arguments Mark Steyn et al have made seem prefer the latter explanation, and those are the arguments I agree with. Anyone care to tackle how sending jets into the World Trade Centre was an attack on the US government?

Also I still have a problem with the issue of nationality being a mitigating factor. It's been suggested that if McVeigh were a foreign national with ties to an organisation with greivances against the US he'd have been treated differently. What was left out was, whether or not in that case it would have been appropriate to give him a civilian trial. (I'll just assume that the related question of whether hypothetical US citizen KSM gets his trial is affirmative.) Anyone want to take a crack at whether an Irish McVeigh would deserve a trial any more than the real KSM does?

Posted by: Marty at November 21, 2009 09:32 PM (c+sVx)

73

#72: Anyone care to tackle how sending jets into the World Trade Centre was an attack on the US government?

The attack on the World Trade Center was an attack on the United States -- to wit, a key symbol of the US economy,.  There were also two other targets that day:  the Pentagon, and either the White House or US Capitol.  I think those can count as attacks on the government, don't you?

Posted by: Simon Oliver Lockwood at November 21, 2009 09:44 PM (4gN9t)

74

 

Marty, you're either an idiot, a frauds, or a plagirist. I'll give you the benefit of the doubt and guess the last.

"western civilization" is a conceptual abstraction, considered by philosophy. The US government is a political entity, regulated by law.  If KSM wanted to influence western civilization, he would have sent a paper to the Harvard Journal Of Philosophy. But he didn't. He wanted to influence the actions of the US government. So he sent planes into the WTC (and the Pentagon, remember Marty, that building where thousands of US Government workers toil daily?).

As to whether a hypothetical IRA member who attacked US interests in order to influence US policy would "deserve" a civilian trial ala KSM...that's a policy decision. Legally, he could be tried there or, if the IRA was at war w/ the USA, by a military tribunal.

Posted by: aurelius at November 21, 2009 09:51 PM (5HhWZ)

75 62 Walmart - um, Wally World is Walter Reed, is the light starting to shine now ?

"What someone yells while they're on a suicide mission is, I think, irrelevant."

Then you are probably an idiot.

"Because again, I have and will continue to make the case that terrorism is not predicated solely or even largely on religious belief."

Ah, you are an idiot, no one else has stated that. It is, however, always ideological and political, and in the case of Islam, religious belief, politics, and ideology are inseparable.

"I was intentionally avoiding the specifics of what part of the base Hassan attacked, preferring to think of the entire base as his "place of work" because to do otherwise opens this can of worms: what is the difference between a guerrilla and a terrorist?"

Aside from your non-sequitur question, Fort Hood is 340 square miles, if you think that the whole place to include things like the artillery and tank ranges are part of his place of work too, you are either denser than depleted uranium, or obfuscating because you know you don't have a valid point (which is fairly obvious).

Posted by: Mason Dixon at November 21, 2009 09:59 PM (TlQTs)

76

aurelius (#68, 70 & 71): Thanks for the info, particularly the Title 18 definition. That basically answers all of my questions. (How hard was that, Druid?*) I'm still a little hung up on the hypotheticals about how nationality affects whether or not you get a trial. (Full Disclosure: I'm not a US citizen, and I have no plans for committing domestic terrorism on future sojourns there.)

Replying to #71 in particular, my sentence you quoted was meant to specifically reference the Beirut barracks as a military target, so your other examples are not relevant to the point I was trying to make (now moot).

*And by the way, what benefit is it to anyone if you dismiss people you disagree with out of hand? Why the immediate leap to ad hominem? I came here to discuss a misconception I had, and I'm leaving better informed. How does that make me more of a troll than you?

Oh right, Ace of Spades HQ. I guess that makes me a moron for asking, and you, well, just a moron.

Posted by: Marty at November 21, 2009 10:02 PM (c+sVx)

77

aurelius (#74): Plagarist? Where does that come from? Also, as per #76, I have considered the 9/11 attack to be an attack on us all, not just our American friends. Perhaps you're convinced that Al Qaeda isn't concerned with anyone but Americans, but I'm not buying that. People besides Americans died that day, and that act of terrorism had a deep impact on the way all of us go forward with our lives. (I last time I visited the US I didn't need a passport. No longer the case. We all miss 9/10.)

Mason Dixon (#75): Forgive my ignorance. I'm not used to referring to places deserving deep, heartfelt respect by ridiculous nicknames. Everything I said at the end of #76 applies to you too.

Posted by: Marty at November 21, 2009 10:17 PM (c+sVx)

78

aurelius(#74, addendum): "deserve" in scare quotes? A civil trial presumes innocence, has strict rules of due process and evidence, etc. A tribunal, I'm actually not sure of, but I'm guessing not so much. One process being more in favour of the defendant than the other, can we not speak of a person "deserving" one over the other? Is there a better word I'm overlooking?

I just thought of another hypothetical, Devil's Advocate type of question: let's say a drug kingpin orders a high profile hit against a prominent member of a community organisation that's trying to get rid of a bunch of drug dealers. Wouldn't that fall under the Title 18 definition of terrorism? If so, does that make drug gangs and the mafia potentially valid targets for anti-terrorism laws?

Posted by: Marty at November 21, 2009 10:32 PM (c+sVx)

79 Let's see... part of the reason why the Sept 11th terrorists were able to effectively carry out their mission was because certain agencies either ignored (FBI) information or failed to share it with other agencies.  That was all supposed to be fixed, wasn't it?  And here we find the Fibbies sat on information and refused to pass it on to the Military so they could continue "watching" Hasan.  The Army doesn't have clean hands in this but the case can be made that the FBI shares responsibility for the deaths of those people in Texas.

Posted by: Cherry at November 21, 2009 11:51 PM (X2ZES)

80 One last thought: if the prosecutors can't present solid evidence of Hassan's involvement in a broader terrorist conspiracy, they're going to have a tough time convicting on terrorism charges. Without conspiracy evidence they're going to have to convince a jury that prior statements coupled with the Takbir form solid evidence of a terror motive. And the defence will reply with an alternative motive, that he'd simply lost it, that the Takbir was shouted out of stress, and that there is some other, non-terrorist explanation for his actions. Actually, he probably has a pretty reasonable shot at pleading temporary insanity.

Posted by: Marty at November 22, 2009 12:42 AM (c+sVx)

81 One other last thought: why wasn't James von Brunn (the Holocaust Museum shooter) ever identified as a terrorist?

Posted by: Marty at November 22, 2009 02:24 AM (c+sVx)

82 77 "Forgive my ignorance. I'm not used to referring to places deserving deep, heartfelt respect by ridiculous nicknames. "

Ah, just so, thank for confirming your concern troll status by automatically assuming "Wally World" is derisive - something only the leftoids do.

Posted by: Mason Dixon at November 22, 2009 06:46 AM (Ce7rG)

83

Marty, you're all over the place but let me take a couple of your points-

re due process guarantees of military tribunsals vs civilian trials: they're all but identical. It's a lefty assumption that military tribunals are summary courts, but leftys tend to be immune to facts and evidence. The major difference between a military tribunal and the civilian trial KSM will face is discovery. That is, in a military tribunal, KSM's military lawyer receives all classified evidence relative to the case. He or she evaluates it, but can't show it to his or her client until petitioning the judge and showing good cause as to why an accused etrrorist should have access to sensitive, classified national security information. In civilian coutrt, KSM like all other civil defendants has an absolute right to see all eveidence relevant to his case, regardless of classification. This is the great advantage of military tribunas from a national security perspective. Virtually every other due process guarantee, including and especially the presumption of innocence, is identical to civilian trial (in fact, some smart folks contend defendants in military tribunals enjoy greater protections than the run of the mill civilian defendant; I tend to agree but its a practical, as applied result rather than a technical, legal result so I won't push it). And the difference between a military tribunal and the court-martial Hasan will face is narrower still. So, abandon the dull lefty talking point that military tribunals are insufficient and inherently unjust. It reveals nothing but ignorance.

Regarding conspiracy and terrorism: they're two different charges. You're correct that the prosecutors may face significant challenges tying Hasan into a conspiracy to commit terrorism. They would have to show evidence of an agreement to commit terrorism, and at least one overt act on Hasan's part in furtherance of the conspiracy. The overt act part isn't hard (shooting up a room full of people is about overt as acts come), but convincing a jury that the letters Hasan wrote to Awlaki were more than fan mail will be tough. Latest reports that they wrote back and forth in code and talked money transfers, if true, help the conspiracy charge considerably though.

Terrorism, on the other hand, doesn't require a conspiracy.  There seems to be plenty of evidence, independent of whether Hasan was coordinating w/ al Qaeda reps or sympathizers, that he murdered US servicemen in order to influence the policy of the US government.

Posted by: aurelius at November 22, 2009 08:01 AM (5HhWZ)

84 Also, the same evidence (letters in code re $ transfers to and from known AQ recruiter) that helps  a conspiracy to commit terrorism charge supports a treason charge. I'm very interested to see whether the prosecutors at Ft Hood bring a treason charge. There are a lot of very good reasons not to do it from a practical perspective. They have 13 clean, pre-meditated murder charges. They don't want to give the defense an opportunity to make the entire trial an academic bullshit session about the viability of treason. A battalion of law professors will come out of the woodwork as "experts" in constitutional law, and will all assert that "treason" doesn't apply in this case for some reason oir another. Nevertheless, as evidence mounts that Hasan was coordinating w/ Awlaki (and via him AQ), the moral responsibility to bring a treason charge increases.

Posted by: aurelius at November 22, 2009 08:25 AM (5HhWZ)

85

Didn't get the memo?

This is the outcome of 6 years worth of Democrats and liberals going after people whom have attempted to protect us from these nutjobs.  And guess what, with promises to prosecute and to jail lawyers, interrogators and anyone who attempted to find these nutjobs and prevent such acts, what did we expect?  Faced with the distinct possibility of a horde of leftist descending on you and the MSM smearing you as the poster boy of the "Bush Cabal", it was better to just let the Islamic nut proceed on his merry errand.

And guess what else, America overwhelming agreed because they gave these Democrats, majorities in Congress and the Presidency.  So the Leftist have convinced Americans that we must simply accept a certain number of casualties or we are "letting the terrorist win".

 

Posted by: LogicalUS at November 22, 2009 10:02 AM (Eem1Z)

86

"It's not like the Army should have noticed anything wrong when Hasan repeatedly tried to have his patients charged with war crimes.


That's normal, right?"

It IS the New Normal in the Army.

(sigh)

Hopefully ... THIS time it really IS "seared" into someone's "memory".

~(Ä)~

.


Posted by: Rokketmania at November 22, 2009 10:26 AM (9a5ev)

87

the brass is too worried about pot smoking and homosexuals serving in the military.  

Posted by: southernsue at November 22, 2009 10:47 AM (qkzAB)

88

Marty were born a FUCKING RETARD or did you use drugs to achieve you FUCKED in the haed status.

Muslim angry at US policy contacts and chats with Muslim Al Qaeda cleric,gives away his worldy possession, sends money to Cleric then buys guns goes to a busy offrice where he knew UNARMED people would be sitting ducks by the dozen.  He jumps on a table for easier aim and shouts ALLAHU AKBAR before shooting 40 people.

Again Marty take the dick out of you ass and explain how that is NOT terrorism.

Save your rhetorical put words in peoples mouth bullshit you fucking pussy.

Posted by: gus at November 22, 2009 11:33 AM (Vqruj)

89 Yes Sue, I'm sure the brass was busy discussing homo's and pot.    Another fucking RETARD heard from.

Posted by: gus at November 22, 2009 11:34 AM (Vqruj)

90

Marty is an example of "lawfare" using the law to wage war against the US.

Tim McVeigh was: (1) a US citizen, (2) was on US soil, (3) was captured on US soil after (4) blowing up a US building, which (5) was on US soil, and (6) the group he belonged to was not acknowledged by the US government as a foreign group at war with the USA, nor was it (7) considered an insurrection.

With all of that a military tribunal does not come into play, just federal courts under the applicable federal laws.  And, BTW, the State of Oklahoma could also have prosecuted Tim McVeigh for crimes under the laws of Oklahoma, starting from the reasons for the original traffic stop.

Other than bodycount, how does KSM actually compare to Tim McVeigh?

Posted by: Mikey NTH at November 22, 2009 02:40 PM (TUWci)

Posted by: Supra Shoes at November 23, 2009 03:46 AM (cTSpm)

Posted by: mbtshoesbuy at November 23, 2009 06:36 AM (bNNim)

93

I love how you assholes (you know who you are) have jumped to the conclusion that my questions are some effort to make a case against the US or the US prosecution of the war on terror. I did and still do support the decisions made by the Bush administration.

If you took the time to read this thread instead of leaping in with whatever crude slander pops into your otherwise empty heads, you might discern that the point I'm trying to get at is that "terrorism" has become a garbage can term that gets applied without any regard to what the word actually means. I suspect that most people don't care any more. At least, judging by your responses.

Mikey NTH(#90) unintentionally echoes my point: KSM and Timothy McVeigh are different cases that should be looked at in different ways, but they're both labelled terrorism as if they were the same thing. Is it useful to lump these things together? Would it improve the quality of our discourse to apply more selective terms to the various violent actions carried out by America's enemies? I think it would.

Having given this thread some thought while I was away, I think the term "jihadism" (as used by Allahpundit on Hot Air) is better than terrorism, when looking at KSM and Hassan as part of a continuum. The terrorism and jihadism are often assumed to be symonyms these days. Perhaps. I think jihadism is more precise. KSM organizes a large, brutal and historical attack against the US, with the intent and succes of fomenting global war against modern civilization, inspiring the likes of Richard Reid to try to blow up a plane, bombers to attack trains in London and Madrid and Hassan to take up arms as an individual. These are all different in scale and complexity and execution, but are connected by the notion of jihad.

On the other hand, the world's former largest terrorist organisation, the Tamil Tigers, while relying on the Tamil diaspora for funding, were not attempting to foment a larger war than the one they were already involved in. And they weren't trying to utterly destroy an entire civilization. They were secessionists trying to create a seperate country. Likewise, the IRA weren't trying to obliterate the British, they were trying to unify Ireland.

Why should the goals and tactics of KSM and the Tigers & IRA fall under the same definition?

Posted by: Marty at November 23, 2009 03:23 PM (c+sVx)

94 Also -  you say terrorism is defined by motivation. I agree. Consider this: Timothy McVeigh was trying, in his twisted way, to make America a better place, a place more in line with his belief of what the Founding Fathers intended. Do you think KSM wants America to be a better place, that he's concerned it's not living up to what the framers of the Constitution intended? If motivation is the key to terrorism, does it give pause to consider how completely different these two motivations are?

Posted by: Marty at November 23, 2009 03:47 PM (c+sVx)

95 Attention, class. Here's a logic question for you: If it's true that everyone loves Nightfall Ugg Boots Nightfall Ugg Boots Nightfall Ugg Boots a deal, and Black Friday offers the best deals of the year, then is it safe to assume that folks will go ugg boots on sales ugg boots on sales ugg boots on sales into a state of high-grade hysteria the day after Thanksgiving? The answer is: duh, of course. Though over a week away, Black Friday is already igniting the Search box. ugg boots shop ugg boots shop ugg boots shop Shoppers have pushed up searches on "black friday 2009" and "black friday ads" to dizzying heights. One might think that retailers would keep the deals a secret until the big day ugg mini boots ugg mini boots ugg mini boots but nothing could be further from the truth. classic cardy ugg boots classic cardy ugg boots classic cardy ugg boots

Posted by: mxc at November 23, 2009 07:52 PM (amVaT)

Posted by: sdsd at November 25, 2009 02:51 PM (ASMPf)

97 The proper function of man is to live, but not to exist.ugg classic cardyConquer fear of death and you are put into possession of your life. ugg classic tallThere is a time to speak and a time to be silent. ugg knightsbridgefree shippingmbt cheap
mbt sale
mbt uk
mbt shoes cheap
MBT M.Walk

Posted by: reviewups at November 27, 2009 05:09 AM (xUZwC)

98

It is a great idea especially for relatively new blogs. I’d like to try this.

ugg bailey button Just got my ugg classic mini! They are absolutely beautiful, and the quality is just amazing. No wearing them in, no blisters just absolutely snug strait out of the box.

Everything dynamic and very positively!

Posted by: ugg bailey button boots at November 28, 2009 01:43 AM (e/fuI)

Posted by: reviewups at December 02, 2009 02:37 AM (fZN4w)

100

Our louis vuitton outlet provides the latest releases with the best designs. They all can make you feel the whirling wind of fashion wind to the full. Nope....not for brand new. The only two sites are eluxury louis vuitton. Any other site claiming to sell brand new, authentic LV is a scam. louis vuitton online store store is designed to provide you with a safe and secure environment to browse our product catalog.

Posted by: ypp at December 03, 2009 02:13 AM (5Ewaz)

101
Designer handbags,genuine leather replicas handbags, we retail and wholesale wide range of top quality knockoff bag,purse,wallet at low price including Louis ... A store selling replica Chanel and replica bag , wallets, watches and other goods once appeared on this domain. The site owners were ordered to ...

Posted by: swdfgvrfdhb at December 03, 2009 03:28 AM (5Ewaz)

102 Everything dynamic and very positively!
Ugg Classic Cardy,discount, free shipping!

Posted by: ugg classic cardy at December 03, 2009 06:22 AM (ftu8y)

103 The cheap ugg boots sale for women are stylish, they are comfortable and what¡¯s more, they keep your feet. theres a pair of fellow sufferers,ugg australia uk to complement your personal preferences, why do we not take the traditional high discount ugg boots on salefor cold winter?
As a matter of fact, with the passing time, the love for ugg usa is increasing among girls in this modern world. The growing demand for these womens ugg made the manufacturers UGG Boots Sale to revamp the looks of these boots with different hues.come our website and buy a pair of ugg uk.UGG Classic Cardy are popular as shoes for cowboys. The SHOES close the whole parts of the foot. The ugg cardy are important to protect your feet from any dangerous things during your walking activities. There are many oatmeal ugg available in the Market and if you are interested to get one you can directly go to the store that sells it.

Posted by: reviewups at December 03, 2009 10:22 AM (OKj2x)

104

ÊæÈíßÇÊ ¡ ÃäÇÔíÏ ØíæÑ ÇáÌäå ¡ÞÕÇÆÏ ßÊÇÈíå ¡ ÞÕÇÆÏ ãÓãæÚå ¡ ÎæÇØÑ ¡ ÞÕÕ ÑæÇíÇÊ ¡ÃÒíÇÁ ¡ ÝÓÇÊíä  ¡ ãßíÇÌ ¡ ÎáØÇÊ ¡ ÊÓÑíÍÇÊ ¡ Ïíᑥ ¡ ÏíßæÑÇÊ ¡ ÍáæíÇÊ ¡ ãÚÌäÇÊ ¡ äÇÏí ÇáåáÇá ¡ äÇÏí ÇáäÕÑ ¡ äÇÏí ÇáÇÊÍÇÏ ¡ ÓíÇÑÇÊ ¡ ãæÏíáÇÊ ÓíÇÑÇÊ ¡ÃÒíÇÁ ÇÏã ¡ Åäãí ¡ÃÝáÇã Çäãí ¡ ÕæÑ ØÈíÚíå ¡ ÓíäãÇ ¡ ÇÝáÇã ¡ ãÓáÓáÇÊ ÑãÖÇäíå ¡ ÕæÑ ÝäÇäíä ¡ ÕæÑ ããËáíä ¡ ÕæÑ ãØÑÈíä ¡ ãÓáÓá ÚÇÕí ¡ ÒÝÇÊ ¡ ÇÛÇäí ÈÏæä ãæÓíÞì ¡ ßáãÇÊ ÇÛÇäí  ¡ ãÇÓäÌÑ ¡ ÓßÑÈÊÇÊ ¡ ËíãÇÊ ãÇÓäÌÑ ¡ ÈÑÇãÌ ááãÇÓäÌÑ ¡ ÕæÑ ãÇÓäÌÑ ¡ ÕæÑ ÈäÇÊ ááãÇÓäÌÑ ¡ ÕæÑ ÔÈÇÈ ááãÇÓäÌÑ  ¡ ÊæÈíß ¡ äßÇÊ ¡ ÊæÈíßÇÊ ÇÛÇäí ¡ ÊæÈíßÇÊ ßÑÊæäíå ¡ ÊæÈíßÇÊ ãáæäå ¡ ÈÑÇãÌ ÝæÊæÔæÈ ¡ ÎáÝíÇÊ ááÊÕãíã ¡ ÕæÑ ááÊÕãíã ¡ ÎÇãÇÊ ¡ ÝáÇÊÑ ¡ ÇßÔä ¡ÝáÇÊÑ ¡ ÓßÑÇÈÒ ¡ ÎØæØ ¡ ÈÇÊÑä ¡ ÝÑÔ ¡ ÌáÊÑ ¡ ÓæíÊÔ ¡ ÝáÇÔ ¡ ãáÝÇÊ ãÝÊæÍå ¡ ãáÝ ãÝÊæÍ  ¡ ÌæÇá ¡ ÈÑÇãÌ ÌæÇá ¡ ËíãÇÊ ÌæÇá ¡ ÇáÚÇÈ ÌæÇá ¡ ÈáæÊæË ¡ äÛãÇÊ ÌæÇá ¡ íæÊíæÈ ¡ ÑÓÇÆá ¡mms ¡ sms ¡ ãÓÌÇÊ ¡ æÓÇÆØ ÇÛÇäí ¡ ÈÑÇãÌ ßãÈíæÊÑ ¡ ÇáÚÇÈ ßãÈíæÊÑ ¡ ÇáÚÇÈ ÈäÇÊ ¡ ãäÊÏì ¡ ãäÊÏíÇÊ ¡ æÊáæãäí Ýíß ¡ ÔÈßÉ æÊáæãäí Ýíß


äÞÔ ÈÇáÍäÇÁ ÇáÑÓã ÈÇáÍäÇÁÚáì ÇáÌÓã äÞÔ ÇáÍäÇÁþ
ÊÓÑíÍÇÊ ÇáÎÈíÑ ÝÇÏí ÅÈÑÇåíã ãßíÇÌ ÝÇÏí ÅÈÑÇåíã ãßíÇÌ æÊÓÑíÍÇÊ ÇáÎÈíÑ ÝÇÏí ÅÈÑÇåíã
ÕæÑ ãßíÇÌ ÕæÑ ãßíÇÌ ÇáÎÈíÑå ÇáÊæäÓíå ÌãíáÉ ÇáÍÐíÑí ãßíÇÌ ÒæÇÌ ãßíÇÌ ÌãíáÉ ÇáÍÐíÑí
ÚÏÓÇÊ Íáíãå ÈæáäÏ ÚÏÓÇÊ ááÚíä ÃáæÇä ÚÏÓÇÊ
ãßíÇÌ ãÐíÚÇÊ ÇáÎáíÌ ãíßÇÌ ÝäÇäÇÊ ãßíÇÌ Íáíãå ÈæáäÏ ãßíÇÌ Ããá ÇáÚæÖí
ÕæÑ ÚÏÓÇÊ ãÑíÇã ÝÇÑÓ ÚÏÓÇÊ ÇáÝäÇäå ãÑíÇã ÝÇÑÓ ÕæÑ ãÑíÇã ÝÇÑÓ ÚÏÓÇÊ 2009
ãßíÇÌ äÇÚã ÕæÑ ãíß ÇÈ 2009 ÊÓÑíÍÇÊ ÒæÇÌ 2009
ÕæÑ ãßíÇÌ ÇáããËáå Ããá ÇáÚæÖí ãíß ÇÈ ÇáãÐíÚå Ããá ÇáÚæÖí ÕæÑ ãßíÇÌ 2009
ÕæÑ ãßíÇÌ ÚÈíÑ ÃÍãÏ ãíß ÃÈ ÇáããËáå ÚÈíÑ ÃÍãÏ ÕæÑ ãíß ÇÈ 2009
ãßíÇÌ ÎÈíÑ ÇáÊÌãíá ÈÓÇã ÝÊæÍ ãßíÇÌ ÇáíÓÇ ãíß ÇÈ äÌæì ßÑã ãßíÇÌ íÇÑÇ ãíß ÇÈ åíÝÇÁ æåÈí
ãßíÇÌ ÈÍÑíäí ÕæÑ ãíß ÇÈ ÇáÎÈíÑå ÑÈÇÈ ãßíÇÌ Úíæä ãíß ÇÈ 2009
ÊÓÑíÍÇÊ äæÇá ÇáÒÛÈí 2009 ÊÓÑíÍÇÊ ÇáÝäÇäå äæÇá ÇáÒÛÈí ÊÓÑíÍÇÊ ÇáÝäÇäÇÊ
ÊÓÑíÍå ÇáÈÝ ÊÓÑíÍÇÊ ÓåÑå ÊÓÑíÍÇÊ ÌÏíÏå
ãßíÇÌ ÇáããËáå ÝÇØãå ÚÈÏÇáÑÍíã ÕæÑ ãíß ÇÈ ÝÇØãå ÚÈÏÇáÑÍíã ÕæÑ ãßíÇÌ
ÊÓÑíÍÇÊ ÇáÝäÇäå ÈÇÑíÓ åíáÊæä ÊÓÑíÍÇÊ ÔÚÑ ÈÇÑíÓ åíáÊæä 2009 ÊÓÑíÍÇÊ ÇáÝäÇäÇÊ 2009
ãßíÇÌ ÔÑíÝå ÇáÔÑíã 2009 ÕæÑ ãíß ÇÈ ÇáÎÈíÑå ÇáÞØÑíå ÔÑíÝÉ ÇáÔÑíã ÕæÑ ãßíÇÌ ÞØÑí 2009þ
ÕæÑ ãßíÇÌ ÇáÚíæä ÕæÑ ãíß ÇÈ Úíæä ÕæÑ ãßíÇÌ ááÚíæäþ
ÞÕÇÊ ÔÚÑ ÈÇáÕÈÛÇÊ ááÔÚÑ ÇáØæíá ..þ
ãíß ÇÈ ãÓíæ ÚÈÏå ãßíÇÌ ÇáÎÈíÑ ãÓíæ ÚÈÏå ãßíÇÌ 2009 ~ ãßíÇÌ Úíæä
ÕæÑ ãßíÇÌ Çãäå ÇáÙÇåÑí ÕæÑ ãíß ÇÈ ÎáíÌí ÊÓÑíÍÇÊ ÑæÚÉ
ãßíÇÌ Ìæíá ãßíÇÌ áÈäÇäí ãßíÇÌ ÑÇÆÚ ãßíÇÌ Íáæþ
ÊÓÑíÍÇÊ ÚÑÇíÓ ÊÓÑíÍÇÊ ÔÚÑ ~ ÊÓÇÑíÍ ÚÑæÓ ÕæÑ ÊÓÑíÍÇÊ ÔÚÑ
ÊÓÑíÍÇÊ æÞÕÇÊ ááÔÚÑ ÇáØæíá ÊÓÑíÍÇÊ æÞÕÇÊ ááÔÚÑ ÇáÞÕíÑ ÞÕÇÊ 2009 ÊÓÑíÍÇÊ 2009
ãíß ÇÈ ÇÍãÏ ÞÈíÓí ãßíÇÌ ÇáÎÈíÑ ÃÍãÏ ÞÈíÓí ÕæÑ ãßíÇÌ 2009 ááÎÈíÑ ÇÍãÏ ÞÈíÓí
ÊÓÑíÍÇÊ ÚÑÇíÓ ÊÓÑíÍÇÊ ÒæÇÌ ÕæÑ ÊÓÑíÍÇÊ äÇÚãå ÊÓÑíÍå
ãßíÇÌ ÇáÎÈíÑå ÎÏíÌå ÇáÚáíþ ÕæÑ ãíß ÇÈ ÎÏíÌÉ ÇáÚáí ÕæÑ ãßíÇÌ ÎÏíÌÉ ÇáÚáí
ãßíÇÌ ÇáÎÈíÑå Òßíå ÃÍãÏ ÕæÑ ãßíÇÌ Òßíå ÇÍãÏ ÕæÑ ãßíÇÌ
ãßíÇÌ ÇáÎÈíÑå ÑÔÇ ÇáÍÇÝÙ ÕæÑ ãßíÇÌ Íáíãå ÈæáäÏ ÕæÑ ãíß ÇÈþ
ãßíÇÌ ÇáÎÈíÑå äæÑÇ ãßíÇÌ ÇáÝäÇäå åäÏ ÇáÈáæÔí ÕæÑ ãíß ÇÈ äæÑÇ ~ ÕæÑ ãßíÇÌ 2009 ããËáÇÊþ
ÔÑÍ ØÑíÞÉ Úãá ÇáÔÚÑ ßÊÓÑíÍÉ ÇáÝ - ØÑíÞå ÊÓÑíÍÉ ÇáÈÝ
ÊÓÑíÍÇÊ æÞÕÇÊ ÔÚÑ Øæäí ãäÏáÞ ÊÓÇÑíÍ ÔÚÑ ÞÕíÑ ÊÓÑíÍÇÊ æÕÈÛÇÊ æÞÕÇÊþ
ãíß ÇÈ äÇäÓí ÚÌÑã ÕæÑ ãßíÇÌ ÇáÝäÇäå äÇäÓí ÚÌÑã ãßíÇÌ äÇäÓí ÚÌÑã 2009 ~ ÕæÑ äÇäÓí ÚÌÑã
ãßíÇÌ Úíæä ãíß ÇÈ ÎáíÌí ãßíÇÌ Úíæä ãßíÇÌ ÇãÇÑÇÊí
ÊÓÑíÍÇÊ ÏíÇäÇ ßÑÒæä ãßíÇÌ ÏíÇäÇ ßÑÒæä ÕæÑ ÏíÇäÇ ßÑÒæä ÊÓÑíÍÇÊ æãßíÇÌ ÇáÝäÇäå ÏíÇäÇ ßÑÒæä
ÊÓÑíÍÇÊ ÒíäÈ ÇáÚÓßÑí ãßíÇÌ ÒíäÈ ÇáÚÓßÑí ÕæÑ ÒíäÈ ÇáÚÓßÑí
ÞÕÇÊ æ ÊÓÑíÍÇÊ ÇØÝÇá ÊÓÑíÍÇÊ ÕÈÇíÇ ÈäæÊÇÊ ááÇØÝÇá ÇáÕÛÇÑ 2009
ãßíÇÌ ãíÓÇÁ ãÛÑÈí ÊÓÑíÍÇÊ ãíÓÇÁ ãÛÑÈí ÕæÑ ãíÓÇÁ ãÛÑÈí
ÕæÑ ãßíÇÌ ÈÓÇã ÝÊæÍ ÕæÑ ãíß ÇÈ ÇáÎÈíÑ ÈÓÇã ÝÊæÍ ãßíÇÌ ÝäÇäÇÊ 2009
ãßíÇÌ Íáíãå ÈæáäÏ ãä ßÊÇáæÌ ÓÍÑ ÇáÔÑÞ 2009 , ÕæÑ ãßíÇÌ Íáíãå ÈæáäÏ , ÕæÑ ãßíÇÌ ÌÏíÏå .
åÏÇíÇ ááÇÝÑÇÍ ÃÝßÇÑ åÏÇíÇ ÇáÒæÇÌ ØÑÞ ÊÌåíÒ åÏÇíÇ ááÒæÇÌ
ÊÞÔíÑ ÇáæÌå ¡ ÊÞÔíÑ ÇáæÌå ¡ ÎáØÇÊ ÊÞÔíÑ ÇáæÌå ¡ æÕÝÇÊ ÊÞÔíÑ ÇáæÌå ¡ æÕÝÇÊ ÊÞÔíÑ ÇáæÌå ¡ ÎáØÇÊ ÊÞÔíÑ ÇáæÌå æÕÝÉ ÊÞÔíÑ ÇáÈÔÑå
ÎáØÇÊ ÊÞæíÉ ÇáÃÙÇÝÑ ¡ æÕÝÇÊ ÊÞæíÉ ÇáÃÙÇÝÑ ¡ ÎáØÉ ÊÞæíÉ ÇáÃÙÇÝÑ ¡ æÕÝÉ ÊÞæíÉ ÇáÃÙÇÝÑ ~ ÎáØÇÊ ááÃÙÇÝÑþ
æÕÝå ÊÈííÖ ÇáÌÓã ¡ æÕÝÇÊ ÊØííÈ ÑÇÆÍå ÇáÌÓã ¡ æÕÝÇÊ ÊÚØíÑ ÑÇÆÍå ÇáÌÓã ¡ ÎáØÇÊ ÊØíÈ ÑÇÆÍå ÇáÌÓã
ÊÓÑíÍÇÊ ,ÊÓÑíÍÇÊ 2009 ,ÊÓÑíÍÇÊ ÑæÚå ,ÊÓÑíÍÇÊ ÌÏíÏå ,ÊÓÑíÍÇÊ äÇÚãå ,ãßíÇÌ 2009 ,ãßíÇÌ ÌÏíÏ ,ãßíÇÌ ÑæÚå ,ãßíÇÌ äÇÚã ,ãßíÇÌ åÇÏÆ
ÕæÑ ãßíÇÌ ÇáÝäÇäå ÃãíÑå ãÍãÏ ÕæÑ ãíß ÇÈ ÇáÝäÇäå ÃãíÑå ãÍãÏ ÕæÑ ÃãíÑå ãÍãÏ ÌÏíÏ ÕæÑ ãßíÇÌ ÇáÝäÇäå ÃãíÑå ãÍãÏþ
ÊÓÑíÍÇÊ ÑÝÚÇÊ ÇáÔÚÑ ÇáØæíá ÊÓÑíÍÇÊ ááÔÚÑ ÇáØæíá ÊÓÑíÍÇÊ ÑÝÚÇÊ 2009
ãßíÇÌ Çãá ÇáÚæÖí 2009 ÌÏíÏ ãíß ÇÈ ÇáÝäÇäå Ããá ÇáÚæÖí ÕæÑ Ããá ÇáÚæÖí 2009
ãáÝ áÎáØÇÊ ÊÝÊíÍ áæä ÇáÌÓã, ÎáØÇÊ áÊÈííÖ ÇáÌÓã, ÎáØÇÊ áäÚæãÉ ÇáÌÓã æÊÚØíÑå
æÕÝÇÊ áÊÈííÖ ÇáíÏíä æÕÝÇÊ áÊÈííÖ ãäÇØÞ ÇáÌÓã æÕÝÇÊ ÊÈííÖ ááÌÓã æÕÝÉ áÊÈíÖ ÇáíÏíä
ÊÈíÖ ÇáÑßÈ ¡ æÕÝÇÊ ÊÈíÖ ÇáÑßÈ ¡ ÎáØÇÊ ÊÈíÖ ÇáßæÚ ¡ æÕÝÉ ÊÈíÖ ÇáßæÚ æÕÝÇÊ ÊÈíÖ ÇáÑßÈå æÇáßæÚ
æÕÝÉ ÊäÚíã ÇáÔÚÑ ¡ ÎáØÉ ÊäÚíã ÇáÔÚÑ ¡ æÕÝÉ ÝÑÏ ÇáÔÚÑ ¡ ÎáØÉ ÝÑÏ ÇáÔÚÑ ¡ æÕÝÇÊ ááÔÚÑ ¡ ÎáØÇÊ ááÔÚÑ
ãÓßÇÊ ááÚÑÇíÓ ÃÞäÚÉ ááÚÑæÓÇÊ ãÇÓß ááæÌå ãÇÓß ááÚíæä ãÇÓß ááÔÝÇÁ ãÇÓß ááíÏíä æÇáÑÌáííä
ÎáØÇÊ ãäæÚå áÊÈííÖ ÇáÇÓäÇä ¡ ÊÈííÖ ÇáÇÓäÇä ¡ ÇÓäÇä ÈíÖÇÁ ¡ ÎáØå ÊÈííÖ ¡ ÎáØÇÊ ááÊÈííÖ ¡ áÊÈííÖ
ÎáØÇÊ ÇáÏß澄 ÚÈÏ ÇáÈÇÓØ ÇáÓíÏ ¡ æÕÝÇÊ ÎáØÇÊ ÇáÏß澄 ÚÈÏ ÇáÈÇÓØ ÇáÓíÏ ¡ ÎáØÇÊ ÚÈÏ ÇáÈÇÓØ ÇáÓíÏ ááÌãÇá ¡ ÎáØÇÊ ÚÈÏ ÇáÈÇÓØ ÇáÓíÏ ááÔÚÑ ¡ ÎáØÇÊ ÚÈÏ ÇáÈÇÓØ ÇáÓíÏ ááÈÔÑå
ÎáØÇÊ ÇáÏß澄 ÌÇÈÑ ÇáÞÍØÇäí ¡ ÎáØÇÊ ÌÇÈÑ ÇáÞÍØÇäí ¡ ãáÝ ÎáØÇÊ ÌÇÈÑ ÇáÞÍØÇäí ¡ ÎáØÇÊ ÌÇÈÑ ÇáÞÍØÇäí ááÌãÇá ¡ ÎáØÇÊ ÇáÌãÇá ¡ ÎáØÇÊ ÌÇÈÑ ááÌãÇá
ÎáØÇÊ ÊÚØíÑ ÇáÔÚÑ ááÈäÇÊ ¡ ÎáØÇÊ ÊÚØíÑ ÔÚÑß ¡ ÎáØÇÊ ÊÚØíÑ ÔÚÑ ¡ ÎáØÇÊ áÔÚÑ ãÚØÑ
ÎáØÇÊ áÌãÇá ÇáÚíæä ÎáØÇÊ ááÚíæä ÎáØÇÊ ØÈíÚíå
ÎáØÇÊ áÒíÇÏÉ ÇáæÒä æÕÝÇÊ áÒíÇÏÉ ÇáæÒä ááÊÓãíä
ÎáØå áÊäÚíã ÇáÔÚÑ ÎáØÇÊ ÇáÚäÇíÉ ÈÇáÔÚÑ ÎáØÇÊ ÇáÍäÇÁ ááÔÚÑ ÎáØÇÊ ÇáÚäÇíÉ
ÎáØÇÊ ØÈíÚíÉ ááæÌå ¡ ÎáØÇÊ ááæÌå ¡ ÎáØÇÊ ÊÈííÖ ááæÌå ¡ ÎáØÉ ááæÌå
ÎáØÇÊ áÊßÈíÑ ÇáÚíæä ÎáØÇÊ ááÚíæä
ÎáØÇÊ áÊÈíÖ ÇáÑßÈ æÇáÇßæÇÚ ÎáØÇÊ áÇÒÇáÉ ÇáÓæÇÏ ÎáØÇÊ ØÈÚíå
ÎáØÇÊ áÊäÍíÝ ÇáÓÑíÚ ÎáØÇÊ áÔÏ ÇáÌÓã ÎáØÇÊ ÊäÍíÝ æÔÏ
ÎáØÇÊ áÊäÝíÎ ÇáÔÝÇíÝ ÎáØÇÊ ÊäÝíÎ Íáæåþ
ÕÈÛÇÊ ÔÚÑ ÌÏíÏå ÕÈÛÇÊ ÔÚÑ ÑæÚå ÞÕÇÊ ÔÚÑ 2009
ÎáØÇÊ áÊäÚíã ÇáíÏ ¡ ÎáØÇÊ ÊäÚíã ¡ ÎáØÇÊ Íáæå ¡ ÎáØÇÊ ãÖãæäå ¡ ÎáØÇÊ ááíÏ
ãíß ÃÈ ÌÏíÏ ãßíÇÌ ÎÝíÝ æÈÓíØ ãßíÇÌ äÇÚã ãíß ÇÈ ÑæÚå
ÊÓÑíÍÇÊ 2010 ÊÓÑíÍÇÊ ÌÏíÏå ÊÓÑíÍÇÊ ÑæÚå ÊÓÑíÍÇÊ ÑÇÆÚå
ãßíÇÌ ÇáÝäÇäå ÇáÈÍÑíäíå ÒíäÈ ÇáÚÓßÑí 2009 ãßíÇÌ ÒíäÈ ÇáÚÓßÑí ÎáíÌí ãßíÇÌ ÒíäÈ ÇáÚÓßÑí ááÚÑÇíÓ ãßíÇÌ ÒíäÈ ÇáÚÓßÑí áÈäÇäí
ÞÕÇÊ ÌÏíÏÉ , ÞÕÇÊ 2009 , ÞÕÇÊ æÕÈÛÇÊ 2009 , ÕÈÛÇÊ 2009 , ÞÕÇÊ æÕÈÛÇÊ ÌÏíÏÉ , ÞÕÇÊ ÔÚÑ 2009 , ÞÕÇÊ ÔÚÑ ÌÏíÏÉ , ÕÈÛÇÊ ÔÚÑ 2009
ÊÓÑíÍÇÊ ááÔÚÑ ÇáØæíá ÊÓÑíÍÇÊ ááÔÚÑ ÇáÞÕíÑ ÊÓÑíÍå ááÔÚÑ ÇáØæíá æÇáÞÕíÑ ÊÓÑíÍÇÊ 2009 ááÒæÇÌ
ÕæÑ ãßíÇÌ 2009ÕæÑ ãßíÇÌ ÈäÇÊí ÕæÑ ãßíÇÌ ÎáíÌí ÕæÑ ãßíÇÌ
ãíß ÂÈ ÇÍãÏ ÞÈíÓí ãßíÇÌ ÇÍãÏ ÞÈíÓí ãßíÇÌ 2009 ÇÍãÏ ÞÈíÓí
ãßíÇÌ ÑæÚå , ãßíÇÌ ááÍÝáÇÊ , ãíß ÂÈ ááãäÇÓÈÇÊ , ÕæÑ ãßíÇÌ ÌÏíÏå , ãßíÇÌ 2009 .þ
ÍæÇÌÈ ãÑÊÈå Ïæä äãÕý , ÃÑæÚ ÇáÍæÇÌÈ ,ØÑíÞÉ ÑÓã ÇáÍæÇÌÈ .
ãÌãæÚÉ ãÇßÓ ÝÇß澄 ßÑíã ÇÓÇÓ ãÇßÓ ÝÇßÊæÑ ÑæÚå ãÓßÑå ãÇßÓ ÝÇßÊæÑ
ãßíÇÌ ÚáÇ ÇáÝÇÑÓ ãíß ÇÈ ÚáÇ ÇáÝÇÑÓ ÕæÑ ãßíÇÌ ÇáãÐíÚå ÚáÇ ÇáÝÇÑÓ ãßíÇÌ ãÐíÚÇÊ
ÊÓÑíÍÇÊ ßíÑáí ÊÓÑíÍÇÊ äÇÚãå ÊÓÑíÍÇÊ 2009
ÎáØÇÊ áÔÝÇíÝ ÎáØÇÊ ááãÍÇÝÙå Úáì ÇáÔÝÇíÝ ÎáØÇÊ Íáæåþ
ÕæÑ ãßíÇÌ áÈäÇäí åÇÏí ãßíÇÌÇÊ ÑæÚå ãíß ÇÈ áÈäÇäí ãíß ÇÈ äÇÚã
ÕæÑ ÊÓÑíÍÇÊ ÔÚÑ - ÊÓÇÑíÍ - ÞÕÇÊ 2009þ
ÊÓÑíÍÇÊ ÍáæÉ , ÊÓÑíÍÇÊ ááÌÇãÚÉ , ÊÓÑíÍÇÊ ááÈäæÊÇÊ , ÊÓÑíÍÇÊ ÑæÚÉ , ØÑíÞÉ Úãá ÇáÌÏÇíá , ÌÏÇíá ÍáæÉ , ÌÏÇíá ÑæÚÉ , ÊÓÑíÍÇÊ ááÈäÇÊ , ØÑÞ Úãá ÇáÌÏÇíá ÇáÝÑäÓíå , ØÑÞ Úãá ÌÏÇíá ÚäÇÞíÏ Ðíá ÇáÓãßå
ÊÓÑíÍÇÊ ÔÚÑ- ÊÓÑíÍÇÊ ãÑÝæÚå - ÊÓÑíÍÇÊ äÇÚãå - ÊÓÑíÍÇÊ ÔÚ009 - ÊÓÑíÍÇÊ ãäÇÓÈÇÊ
ÊÓÑíÍÇÊ ÑæãÇäíå ¡ ÊÓÑíÍÇÊ ÔÚÑ ÑæãÇäíå ¡ ÊÓÑíÍÇÊ ÑæãÇäíå ááÔÚÑ ÇáØæíá ¡ ÊÓÑíÍÇÊ ÑæãÇäíå 2010
ÊÓÑíÍÇÊ ÚÑÇíÓ, ÊÓÑíÍÇÊ ÝÎãå , ÊÓÑíÍÇÊ 2009 , ÊÓÑíÍÇÊ ááÔÚÑ ÇáØæíá
ÕæÑ ãßíÇÌ ÇáÝäÇäå ÇáåÇã ÝÖÇáå ãíß ÇÈ ÇáããËáå ÇáßæíÊíå ÇáåÇã ÝÖÇáå ÕæÑ ãßíÇÌ ããËáÇÊ
ÊÓÑíÍÇÊ ÈäÇÊíå ÊÓÑíÍÇÊ ááÒæÇÌ ÊÓÑíÍÇÊ 2009 ÕæÑ ÊÓÑíÍÇÊ ÑæÚåþ
ÕæÑ ãßíÇÌ ÇáÎÈíÑå ÍíÇÉ ÇáÊãíãí ÕæÑ ãßíÇÌ 2009
ãßíÇÌ ÈËíäÉ ÇáÑÆíÓí ¡ ãíßÇÌ ÇáÝäÇäå ÈËíäÉ ÇáÑÆíÓí ¡ ãíß ÇÈ ÈËíäÉ ÇáÑÆíÓí ¡ ÕæÑ ÈËíäÉ ÇáÑÆíÓí
ÇÍÏË ãßíÇÌ 2009 ãßíÇÌ ÛÑíÈ ãßíÇÌ ÎØíÑ ãßíÇÌ ÌÏíÏþ(
ÊÈííÖ ÇáãÄÎÑÉ ÎáØÉ ÈíÇÖ ÇáãÄÎÑÉþ(
ÕÈÛÇÊ ááÔÚÑ ÕæÑ ÇÍÏË ÞÕÇÇÊ ááÔÚÑ 2009 -2010 äÕÇÆÍ ááÔÚÑþ
ßæÔÇÊ 2010 ßæÔÇÊ ÈØÑÇÒ Õíäí ßæÔÇÊ ááÒæÇÌ ßæÔå Õíäí
ÞÕÇÊ Çíãæ ÊÓÑíÍÇÊ Çíãæ ÞÕÇÊ ÈäÇÊþ
æÕÝÇÊ ÊØæíá ÇáÔÚÑ ¡ ÎáØÇÊ ÊØæíá ÇáÔÚÑ ¡ æÕÝÉ ÊØæíá ÇáÔÚÑ ¡ ÎáØÉ ÊØæíá ÇáÔÚÑ ¡ ÊØæíá ÇáÔÚÑ ~ ÎáØÇÊ ááÔÚÑ
ÍäÇÁ ¡ äÞÔ ÍäÇÁ ¡ äÞÔ ÍäÇÁ ÎáíÌí ¡ äÞÔ ÍäÇÁ åäÏí ¡ äÞÔ ÍäÇÁ ÅãÇÑÇÊí ¡ äÞÔ ÍäÇÁ ááÚÑÇíÓ
ÎáØÇÊ ÊÈíÖ ÇáÈÔÑå ¡ ÎáØÇÊ ÊÝÊíÍ ÇáÈÔÑå ¡ ÎáØÇÊ ááÈÔÑå ¡ æÕÝÇÊ ÊÈíÖ ÇáÈÔÑå ¡ æÕÝÇÊ ÊÝÊíÍ ÇáÈÔÑå ¡ æÕÝÇÊ ááÈÔÑå
ÃÎÊÇÑí ÃÝÖá ãßíÇÌ ãä Èíä ãßíÇÌ ÇáÝäÇäÇÊ !!!
ãßíÇÌ Ìæíá ãßíÇÌ ÓÇÑå ãßíÇÌ ÑæÚå ãßíÇÌ ÎÈíÑÉ ÇáÊÌãíá Ìæíá ãßíÇÌ ÎÈíÑÉ ÇáÊÌãíá ÓÇÑå
ÞÕÇÊ ¡ ÞÕÇÊ ÔÚÑ ¡ ÞÕÉ ÔÚÑ ¡ ÞÕÇÊ 2010 ¡ ÞÕÇÊ ááÔÚÑ ÇáÞÕíÑ ¡ ÞÕÇÊ ááÔÚÑ ÇáØæíá ¡ ÞÕÇÊ 2010 ááÔÚÑ ÇáÞÕíÑ
ÊÓÑíÍÇÊ Íáíãå ÈæáäÏ ÕæÑ ÞÕÇÊ ÇáãÐíÚå Íáíãå ÈæáäÏ ÊÓÑíÍÇÊ æÞÕÇÊ 2009
ÊÓÑíÍÉ ÈÇíÓ åíÊæä . ÕæÑ ÊÓÑíÍÇÊ ßíæÊ . ØÑíÞå Úãá ÊÓÑíÍÉ ÇáÝíæäßå ÕæÑØÑíÞå Úãá ÊÓÑíÍå ÇáÝíæäßå
ãÌáÉ ßÇãáÉ áÌãÇáß ÊÌåíÒÇÊ ÇáÚÑæÓ, ÇáãßíÇÌ, ÊÓÑíÍÇÊ, ãäÊÌÇÊ ÇáÚäÇíÉ ÈÇáÌÓã, ÇáÇßÓÓæÑÇÊ æÇáãÌåæÑÇÊ, ÊÓÑíÍÇÊ ÇäíÞÉ, ÞÕÇÊ ÔÚÑ 2008, ÇäÇÞÉ æãßíÇÌ, ÚäÇíÉ ÈÇÈÔÑÉ, ÇÞäÚÉ æÌÉ, ááÈÔÑÉ ÌÇÝÉ,ááÈÔÑÉ ÏåäíÉ, ááÈÔÑÉ
ÊÓÑíÍÉ ááãÏÑÓÉ ÊÓÇÑíÍ ááãÏÑÓÉ ÊÓÑíÍÇÊ ááÈäÇÊ
ÊÓÑíÍÇÊ áÔÚÑ ÇáØæíá ÊÓÑíÍÇÊ ÓåÑå ÊÓÇÑíÍ ÔÚÑ ÑæÚå
ÊÓÑíÍÇÊ ÚÑÇíÓ 2009 ÊÓÑíÍÇÊ ÓåÑå 2010 ÎÇÕ áÚÑæÓ
ÍäÇÁ ááÚÑÇíÓ ¡ äÞÔ ÍäÇÁ ááÚÑÇíÓ ¡ ÑÓæãÇÊ ÍäÇÁ ááÚÑÇíÓ ¡ ÍäÇÁ 2010
ÊÓÑíÍÇÊ ÑÇÆÚÉ ÊÓÑíÍÇÊ áÈäæÊÇÊ ÊÓÑíÍÇÊ ÍáæÉþ
ÕÈÛÇÊ ÔÚÑ ÊÓÑíÍÇÊ ÔÚÑ ÕÈÛÇÊ ÇáæÇä áÔÚÑ ÊÓÑíÍÇÊ ÑæÚå áÔÚÑ
ÞÕÇÊ ÔÚÑ ÞÕÇÊ ááÔÚÑ ÇáØæíá ÞÕÇÊ ááÔÚÑ ÇáÞÕíÑ ÞÕÇÊ 2009 ááÔÚÑ
ÞÕÇÊ ÔÚÑ ááÕÈÇíÇÊ ÞÕÇÊ ÌÏíÏå áÔÚÑ ÇáÈäÇÊþ
ÊÓÑíÍÇÊ ÓåÑå ÊÓÑíÍÇÊ ÇáÔÚÑ ÇáãÑÝæÚ ÊÓÑíÍÇÊ ÓåÑÇÊ ~ ÊÓÑíÍÇÊ ÔÚÑ Øæíá
ÕæÑ ÊÓÑíÍÇÊ ÔÚÑ ááÃØÝÇá ÊÓÑíÍÇÊ ááãÏÇÑÓ ÊÓÑíÍÇÊ ÃØÝÇá 2009
ÊÓÑíÍÇÊ ááÌÇãÚå ¡ ÊÓÑíÍÇÊ ááãÏÇÑÓ ¡ ÊÓÑíÍÇÊ ÈäÇÊ ÇáÌÇãÚå ¡ ÊÓÑíÍÉ ÔÚÑ ááÌÇãÚå ¡ ÊÓÑíÍÇÊ ÔÚÑ ááÌÇãÚå
ãßíÇÌ Úíæä , ãíß ÂÈ Úíæä , ÕæÑ ãßíÇÌ Úíæä , ÕæÑ ÃÍáì ãßíÇÌ Úíæä , ÌÏíÏ ãßíÇÌ ÇáÚíæä ,
ØÑíÞÉ Úãá ãßíÇÌ Úíæä ÎÝíÝ ÈËáÇË ÇáæÇä ÈÇáÕæÑ.
ãßíÇÌ ÇáÇÚáÇãíå Íáíãå ÈæáäÏ 2009 ãßíÇÌ Íáíãå ÈæáäÏ ÎáíÌí 2009 ãßíÇÌ Íáíãå ÈæáäÏ áÈäÇäí 2009
ØÑÍ ÇÓÈäÔ áÝÇÊ ØÑÍ 2009 áÝÇÊ ØÑÍ ÇáÇÓÈäÔ áÝÇÊ ØÑÍ ááãÊÍÌÈÇÊ
ÊÓÑíÍÇÊ ÊÓÑíÍÇÊ ááÈäæÊÇÊ ÊÓÑíÍÇÊ ááÓåÑå ááÈäæÊÇÊ ÊÓÑíÍÇÊ ÑæÚå ÊÓÑíÍÇÊ 2010 ÊÓÑíÍÇÊ ááÇØÝÇáþ
æÕÝå áÊØæíá ÇáÔÚÑ ÈÓÈæÚ æÕÝå ÌÏíÏå æÕÝå áÔÚÑþ
ÊÓÑíÍÇÊ ÊÓÑíÍÇÊ ÑæÚå ÊÓÑíÍÇÊ ÌÏíÏå ÊÓÑíÍÇÊ ÑÇÆÚå ÊÓÑíÍÇÊ äÇÚãå ÊÓÑíÍÇÊ 2010þ
ØÑíÞÉ Úãá ÊÓÑíÍÇÊ ÇáÈäæÊÇÊ ÈÇáÕæÑ , ÊÓÑíÍÇÊ ÈäæÊÇÊ , ÎØæÇÊ ÊÓÑíÍÇÊ ááÈäæÊÇÊ , ÊÓÑíÍÇÊ ÈÇáÕæÑ .
ÍäÇ ÎáíÌí ÍäÇ ÚÑÈí ÍäÇ 2009þ
ãßíÇÌ ÃÍãÏ ÇáÞÈíÓí ãßíÇÌ ÑæÚå ÕæÑ ãßíÇÌþ
ÎáØÇÊ áÊÓãíä ÇáæÌå ÎáØÇÊ áÊÈíÖ ÇáæÌå ÎáØÇÊ ááæÌå ÎáØÇÊ Íáæå ÎáØÇÊ ÑææÚåþ
ãßíÇÌ ÌÏíÏ ,ãßíÇÌ 2010 ,ãßíÇÌ ÑæÚå ,ãßíÇÌ ÎÈíÑå ÇáÊÌãíá Çãäå ÇáÙÇåÑí ,ãßíÇÌ ÚÑÇÆÓ ,ãßíÇÌ ÑÇÆÚ ,ãßíÇÌ Ìãíá ÌÏÇ
ÊÓÑíÍÇÊ Øæäí ãäÏáÞ ÊÓÑíÍÇÊ ááÚÑæÓ ÌÏíÏÉ ÊÓÑíÍÇÊ ÔÚÑ ÇáÚÑæÓ ãæÖÉ 2009
ÕÈÛÇÊ ÔÚÑþ
ÇÍÏË ÊÓÑíÍÇÊ æãßíÇÌ ÇáÝäÇäå ÇáßæíÊíå ãÔÇÚá ÇáÒäßæí 2009 - 2010
ÊÓÑíÍÇÊ ááãÏÇÑÓ ÊÓÑíÍÇÊ ááÌÇãÚÇÊ ÊÓÑíÍÇÊ äÇÚãå ÊÓÑíÍÇÊ ÈÓíØå ÊÓÑíÍÇÊ 2009
ÊÓÑíÍÇÊ ÌÏíÏå , ÊÓÑíÍÇÊ ááÍÝáÇÊ ,ÊÓÑíÍÇÊ ÝÎãå ,ÊÓÑíÍÇÊ 2009
ÕæÑ ÊÓÑíÍÇÊ Íáíãå ÈæáäÏ ÑæææÚå
ãßíÇÌ ÑæÚÉ , ãßíÇÌ ÎíÇá , ãßíÇÌ ÌäÇä , ãßíÇÌ ÎØíÑ , ãßíÇÌ ááÈäÇÊ , ãßíÇÌ ááÈäæÊÇÊ , ãßíÇÌ áãÑÇÉ , ãßíÇÌ ááÚÑÇÆÓ , ãßíÇÌ ÇäíÞ , ãßíÇÌ ÑÇÞí
ÇäæÇÚ ÇáÒãÇã ÇÔßÇá ÇáÒãÇã ÇÔßÇá ÇáÒãÇã ÇáÑæÚÉ ÒãÇã 2009
ÕæÑ ÞÕÇÊ ÔÚÑ, ÞÕÇÊ ÌÏíÏå ááÔÚÑ , ÃÍÏË ÇáÞÕÇÊ , ÞÕÇÊ ÇáÔÚÑ 2009 .
ÔÑÍ ØÑíÞÉ ÊäÚíã ÇáÔÚÑ ÎØæå ÈÎØæå ÈÇáÕæÑ , ØÑíÞÉ ÓÔæÇÑ ÇáÔÚÑ ÈÇáÕæÑ , ØÑíÞÉ ÇÓÊÎÏÇã ãßæÇÉ ÇáÓíÑÇãíß ÈÇáÕæÑ .
ÎáØÇÊ ÎÇÕå ááÚÑÇíÓ ¡ ÎáØÇÊ ááÚÑæÓå ¡ ÎáØÇÊ ááÚÑæÓÇÊ ¡ ÎáØÇÊ ááÚÑæÓÉþ
ÊÓÑíÍÇÊ ÎíÇáíå , ÊÓÑíÍÇÊ ÌÏíÏå , ÊÓÑíÍÇÊ ááÚÑæÓ , ÊÓÑíÍÇÊ ááÃÝÑÇÍ , ÊÓÑíÍÇÊ äÚæãå .
ÊÓÑíÍÇÊ ÑæãÇäíå 2009 ÕæÑ ÇáÊÓÑíÍÇÊ ÇáÑæãÇäíå ÊÓÑíÍÇÊ ÑæÚå 2009
ÞÕÇÊ ááÔÚÑ ÇáØæíá ÞÕÇÊ ááÔÚÑ ÇáÞÕíÑ ÞÕå ÝßÊæÑíÇ ÞÕÇÊ 2009 ÞÕÇÊ 2009 ááÔÚÑ
ãßíÇÌ Úíæä , ÃÍáì ãßíÇÌ Úíæä , ãíß ÂÈ Úíæä , ãíßÇÌ Úíæä ÎáíÌí æáÈäÇäí ,ÌÏíÏ ãßíÇÌ ÇáÚíæä 2009

áÚÈÉ ÓáÇÍÝ ÇáäíäÌÇ TMNT 2 Battle Nexus ÊÍãíá áÚÈÉ ÓáÇÍÝ ÇáäíäÌÇ TMNT 2 Battle Nexus
áÚÈÉ ãä ÓíÑÈÍ Çáãáíæä ¡ ÊÍãíá áÚÈÉ ãä ÓíÑÈÍ Çáãáíæä ¡ ÇáÚÇÈ ÐßÇÁ æÃÓÃáå ¡ ãä ÓíÑÈÍ Çáãáíæä
áÚÈÉ ãÇÑíæ ¡ ÊÍãíá áÚÈÉ Super Mario 64 1.2 ¡ ÊÍãíá áÚÈÉ ãÇÑíæ
ÊÍãíá ÇáÚÇÈ psp ((ãÌÇäÇ)) æÃíÖÇ ÊÓÊØíÚ ÊÍãíá ÇáÚÇÈ (pc-ps2-wii-xbox360)
ÇáÚÇÈ ÈäÇÊ ÇáÚÇÈ ãßíÇÌ ÇáÚÇÈ ãíß ÇÈ áÚÈÉ ÇáãßíÇÌ ÇáÚÇÈ ÈäÇÊ ÇáãßíÇÌ ÇáÚÇÈ ÈäÇÊ2009
áÚÈÉ ãÇÊÑíßÓ ÊäÒíá áÚÈÉ ãÇÊÑíßÓ ÊÍãíá áÚÈÉ ãÇÊÑíßÓ áÚÈÉ Matrix ÊÍãíá áÚÈÉ Matrix ÊäÒíá áÚÈÉ Matrix
áÚÈÉ ÍÑæÝ æÃáæÝ ÈÍÌã 447 ßíáæ ÈÇíÊ ÈÓ ÑæÚÉ
áÚÈÉ ÇáÏíᑥ ÇáãäÒáí ÊÍãíá áÚÈÉ ÇáÏíᑥ ÇáãäÒáí áÚÈÉ home sweet homeþ
áÚÈÉ áÚÈÉ ÓíãÈÓæä ÊÍãíá áÚÈÉ Simpsons ÊäÒíá áÚÈÉ Simpsonsþ
áÚÈÉ ßÑíÒì ÊÇßÓì ¡ ÊÍãíá áÚÈÉ ßÑíÒì ÊÇßÓì ¡ ÇáÚÇÈ ßÑíÒì ÊÇßÓì ¡ ßÑíÒì ÊÇßÓì
áÚÈÉ Pet Pals Animal Doctor ÊÍãíá áÚÈÉ Pet Pals Animal Doctor ááßãÈíæÊÑ
áÚÈÉ IGI 2 - Covert Strike ÊÍãíá áÚÈÉ IGI 2 - Covert Strike
áÚÈÉ ÈáíÇÑÏæ ÊÍãíá áÚÈÉ Billiard Íãá ÈáíÇÑÏæ áÚÈÉ Billiardþ
áÚÈÉ light driver 2 ÊÍãíá áÚÈÉ light driver 2 ááßãÈíæÊÑ
áÚÈÉ ÏÑÇíÝÑ ÊÍãíá Driver 76 ÊäÒíá áÚÈÉ Driver 76 ÊÍãíá áÚÈÉ ÏÑÇíÝÑ ÓíÇÑÇÊ
áÚÈÉ íæÛí ÊÍãíá áÚÈÉ íæÛí ááßãÈíæÊÑ áÚÈÉ íæÛí ááßãÈíæÊÑ
áÚÈÉ ÚáÇÁ ÇáÏíä ÊäÒíá áÚÈÉ ÚáÇ ÇáÏíä ÊÍãíá áÚÈÉ ÚáÇ ÇáÏíä ÊäÒíá ÚáÇÁ ÇáÏíä
áÚÈÉ Miami Nights Singles In The City ¡ ÊÍãíá áÚÈÉ Miami Nights Singles In The Cityþ
áÚÈÉ Óæäíß ÊÍãíá áÚÈÉ Sonic Rivals 2 ÊäÒíá áÚÈÉ Óæäíß áÚÈÉ Sonic Rivals 2
áÚÈÉ ÈÇÈ ÇáÍÇÑÉ ¡ ÊÍãíá áÚÈÉ ÈÇÈ ÇáÍÇÑÉ ¡ áÚÈÉ conter.strike ¡ ÊÍãíá áÚÈÉ conter.strike
áÚÈÉ ÏÑÇÛæä Èæá ÊÍãíá áÚÈÉ Dragon Ball ÊäÒíá áÚÈÉ ÏÑÇÛæä Èæá áÚÈÉ Dragon Ballþ
ÊÍãíá áÚÈÉ spiderman 2 ÊäÒíá áÚÈÉ ÇáÑÌá ÇáÚäßÈæÊ áÚÈÉ spiderman 2 ÇáÑÌá ÇáÚäßÈæÊ
áÚÈÉ ÈíÈÓí ãÇä ÊÍãíá áÚÈÉ ÈíÈÓí ãÇä áÚÈÉ ÈíÈÓí ãÇä ááÈáÇí ÓÊíÔä ¡ áÚÈÉ Pepsi Man ¡ ÊÍãá áÚÈÉ Pepsi Man ¡ Pepsi Man
ÇßÈÑ ãßÊÈÉ ÇáÚÇÈ Pc 2009 , ÇßÈÑ ãßÊÈÉ ÇáÚÇÈ Pc ááÊÍãíá ¡ ÇßÈÑ ãßÊÈÉ ÇáÚÇÈ Pc 2009 áÊÍãíá ãÈÇÔÑ
áÚÈÉ æÒäß ÐåÈ ¡ æÒäß ÐåÈ ¡ ÊÍãíá áÚÈÉ æÒäß ÐåÈ ¡ ÇáÚÇÈ ÃÓÃáå ¡ ÇáÚÇÈ ÐßÇÁ
áÚÈÉ Êæã æÌíÑí ÊÍãíá áÚÈÉ Êæã æÌíÑí áÚÈÉ Tom And Jerry ÊÍãíá áÚÈÉ Tom And Jerry
ÊäÒíá áÚÈÉ Pro Evolution Soccer 5 ÊÍãíá áÚÈÉ Pro Evolution Soccer 5 ááßãÈíæÊÑ
áÚÈÉ Real Football 2008 ÊÍãíá áÚÈÉ Real Football 2008 ÇáÚÇÈ ßÑÉ ÞÏã
ÊÍãíá áÚÈÉ ÓÈÇíÏÑ ãÇä 3 ÊäÒíá áÚÈÉ Spiderman 3 ÊäÒíá áÚÈÉ ÓÈÇÈÏÑ ãÇä 3
ÇáÚÇÈ ßãÈíæÊÑ - áÚÈÉ Diner Dash 3 ÊÍãíá áÚÈÉ Diner Dash 3
Live for speed ¡ 2009 Live for speed ÇáÇÕÜÜÏÇÑ x10 ãÚ ÇáßÜÜÑÇß ¡ ÇáÚÇÈ Live for speed ] ÇáÇÕÜÜÏÇÑ x10 ãÚ ÇáßÜÜÑÇß 2009
áÚÈÉ ÑæÈä åæÏ ¡ ÊÍãíá áÚÈÉ ÑæÈä åæÏ ¡ áÚÈÉ Robin Hood ¡ ÊÍãíá áÚÈÉ Robin Hood ¡ Robin Hood ¡ ÑæÈä åæÏ
Naruto Ninja Destiny áÚÈÉ Naruto Ninja Destiny ÊÍãíá áÚÈÉ Naruto Ninja Destiny
áÚÈÉ ßÇÈÊä ãÇÌÏ ¡ ÊÍãíá áÚÈÉ ßÇÈÊä ãÇÌÏ ¡ ßÇÈÊä ãÇÌÏ ¡ ÇáÚÇÈ ßÑÉ ÞÏã ¡ áÚÈÉ ßÇÈÊä ãÇÌÏ ááßãÈíæÊÑ
ÊÍãíá Claw áÚÈÉ ÑæÚå Claw ¡ Íãá áÚÈå Claw
ÍÕÑíÇ áÚÈå G.T.A San.Andreas 2009 ¡ áÚÈÉ G.T.A San.Andreas ãÖÛæØå ÈÍÌã 3 ãíÌÇ ÝÞØ !! ßÇãáå Úáì ÇßËÑ ãä ÓíÑÝÑ
áÚÈÉ Final Fantasy XII Revenant Wings ÊÍãíá áÚÈÉ Final Fantasy XII Revenant Wings ááßãÈíæÊÑ
áÚÈÉ The Sims 2 Mansion Garden Stuff ÊÍãíá áÚÈÉ The Sims 2 Mansion Garden Stuffþ
ÊÍãíá ÇáÚÇÈ ßãÈíæÊÑ ÊÍãíá ÇáÈáÇí ÓÊíÔä áÚÈÉ ÒíäÇ ÊÍãíá áÚÈÉ ÒíäÇ áÚÈÉ ÒíäÇ ááÈáÇí ÓÊíÔä
ÊÍãíá áÚÈÉ ßÑÇÔ ÓíÇÑÇÊ ÊäÒíá áÚÈÉ Crash ÓíÇÑÇÊ áÚÈÉ Crash
áÚÈÉ Virtua Tennis 3 áÚÈÉ ÇáÊäÓ ááßãÈíæÊÑ ÊÍãíá áÚÈÉ Virtua Tennis 3
ÊäÒíá áÚÈÉ Pocket Tanks 4 ÊäÒíá áÚÈÉ ÇáÏÈÇÈÇÊ ÊÍãíá áÚÈÉ ÇáÏÈÇÈÇÊþ
ÊÍãíá áÚÈÉ Naruto áÚÈÉ äÇÑæÊæ ÊäÒíá áÚÈÉ Naruto ÊÍãíá áÚÈÉ äÇÑæÊæ
áÚÈÉ ßæäÊÑÇ ÓÊÑÇíß ÈæÑÊÇÈá ¡ ÊÍãíá áÚÈÉ ßæäÊÑÇ ÓÊÑÇíß ÈæÑÊÇÈá ¡ áÚÈÉ Portable Counter Strike 1.6
áÚÈÉ ÓÈæäÌ ÈæÈ ÊÍãíá áÚÈÉ ÓÈæäÌ ÈæÈ áÚÈÉ Spongebob ÊÍãíá áÚÈÉ Spongebobþ
áÚÈÉ Harry Potter ÊÍãíá áÚÈÉ åÇÑí ÈæÊÑ ááßãÈíæÊÑ ÊäÒíá áÚÈÉ Harry Potterþ
ÇáÚÇÈ ãÛÇÑÇÊ áÚÈÉ ÚáÇÁ ÇáÏíä ¡ áÚÈÉ Aladdin ¡ ÊÍãíá áÚÈÉ ÚáÇÁ ÇáÏíä ¡ ÊÍãíá áÚÈÉ Aladdin
ÈÑäÇãÌ íÌÚá áÚÈÉ gta san andreas Çæä áÇíä
áÚÈÉ Crash ÊäÒíá áÚÈÉ ßÑÇÔ ÊÍãíá áÚÈÉ Crash ÊÍãíá áÚÈÉ ßÑÇÔ
ÊäÒíá áÚÈÉ ÇáÈáæÊ ÊÍãíá áÚÈÉ ÇáÈáæÊ áÚÈÉ ÇáÈáæÊ
áÚÈÉ ÈíÈÓì ãÇä ÊÍãíá áÚÈÉ ÈíÈÓì ãÇä ÊäÒíá áÚÈÉ ÈíÈÓì ãÇä
ÊÍãíá áÚÈÉ ÑÒÏäÊ ÇíÝá 5 ¡ ÊÍãíá Resident Evil 5 ááßãÈíæÊÑ¡ áÚÈÉ ÑÒÏäÊ ÇíÝá
áÚÈÉ ÏæÑÇ ÊäÒíá áÚÈÉ ÏæÑÇ ÊÍãíá áÚÈÉ ÏæÑÇ ÊÍãíá áÚÈÉ Dora áÚÈÉ Dora ÊäÒíá áÚÈÉ Dora
ÇáÚÇÈ ßãÈíæÊÑ 2010 áÚÈÉ Fifa Street 3 ÊÍãíá áÚÈÉ Fifa Street 3 ááßãÈíæÊÑ
ÈÑäÇãÌ ÊÔÛíá ÇáÇáÚÇÈ ÈÇáßãÈíæÊÑ ÊÍãíá ÈÑÇãÌ ÊÔÛíá ÇáÇáÚÇÈ ÈÇáßãÈíæÊÑþ 

Posted by: aseel at December 05, 2009 01:37 PM (ryPMw)

105 Today ugg boots online have become a phenomenon.Every winter,the ugg classic crochet are one of the hottest goods in the market all over the world.So now don't be hesitation,own a pair of ugg usa immediately.

Posted by: ugg boots sale at December 10, 2009 05:21 PM (I3/dZ)

Posted by: Lacoste shoes at December 13, 2009 01:15 AM (/3s/N)

Posted by: wholesale jewelry at December 18, 2009 06:26 AM (1dySH)

Posted by: wholesale jewelry at December 28, 2009 07:00 AM (1dySH)

Posted by: shellyca at December 29, 2009 04:39 AM (sFIS+)

110 Cheap replica rolex and tag heuer watches,replica watches of rolex rolex watches replica,buy patek philippe Buy replica watches,fake watches and tag heuer watches.

Posted by: tag heuer at January 01, 2010 10:11 AM (nUnK8)

111 replica rolex rolex and tag heuer watches,replica watches of rolex rolex watches replica,buy patek philippe Buy replica watches,fake watches and tag heuer watches.breitling watches breitling watches at low price.

Posted by: rolex at January 06, 2010 09:45 AM (TspGB)

Posted by: ugg shoes|timberland uk|ugg boots|87415555.com.cn at January 06, 2010 08:56 PM (qzq48)

113 Good rolex and tag heuer watches,replica watches of rolex rolex watches replica,buy patek philippe Buy replica watches,fake watches and tag heuer watches.breitling watches breitling watches at low prices.

Posted by: rolex at January 07, 2010 12:58 PM (GeXL2)

114 Un total de once comunidades autnomas estn este jueves en alerta naranja Christmas gift ugg tall boots (riesgo importante) por nevadas y bajan las temperaturas en toda Espa09a, segn la Agencia Estatal de Meteorologa (AEMET). En concreto, se Christmas gift ugg napoule sandal trata de Aragn, Cantabria, Castilla-La Mancha, Catalu09a, Christmas gift timberland classic boots Madrid, Navarra, Comunidad Valenciana, Galicia, Pas Vasco, Asturias y Murcia. La cota de nieve bajar a menos de 200 metros en el CantbricoLa Pennsula Ibrica est bajo dos borrascas y un anticicln que crearn un pasillo que permitir el paso de una corriente de aire muy fro, como la que est provocando un temporal de fro glaciar en Europa, aunque es esperan que el fro que suframos no sea tan intenso como en otros pases. An as, se espera que las bajas temperaturas se mantengan hasta el domingo. La cota de nieve baja en el Cantbrico a menos de 200 metros

Posted by: El temporal de fr¨ªo y nieve pone en alerta a once comunidades aut¨®nomas ugg boots|ugg uk|timberlan at January 09, 2010 07:53 AM (tWrEP)

115 high rolex and tag heuer watches patek philippe patek philippe watches,replica audemars piguet> replica breitling watches breitling watches,chanel watches chanel watches watches replica montblanc watches and panerai watches.

Posted by: rolex at January 12, 2010 11:10 AM (On3I8)

116 Cheap tag heuer watches,rolex watches that replica watches,fake watches and tag heuer watches,replica breitling breitling watches,cheap replica rolex cartier replica cartier watches,replica omega omega watches and panerai replica panerai watches replica armani armani watches,cheap audemars piguet audemars piguet watches,bvlgari watches replica chanel watches replica gucci gucci watches and movado watches replica montblanc montblanc watches sale patek philippe watches for us.

Posted by: rolex at January 14, 2010 08:06 PM (GTMOj)

Posted by: chi hair irons at January 17, 2010 05:22 PM (9oETl)

118 Good replica watches and buy replica watches and replica rolex replica replica tag heuer watches,buy replica replica omega watches and breitling watches replica breitling watches sale at lowest prices.

Posted by: replica watches at January 24, 2010 06:08 AM (ioa0w)

Posted by: air max shoes at January 28, 2010 05:59 AM (JOSIc)

120 breitling watch Ladies watches at Gilletts Jewellers include like Eco Drive Citizen watches replica watch There are a few ways you rolex watches omega watches can try replica watches Fossil watches DKNY watches Michael Ks watches breitling watches

Posted by: guess watches at January 28, 2010 12:17 PM (9vkhz)

121 replica handbags Wholesale products louis vuitton handbags louis vuitton handbags beautiful wholesale handbags louis vuitton replica handbags wholesale jewelry wholesale clothing from factory louis vuitton handbags with cheap wholesale price

Posted by: dkny watches at January 29, 2010 11:48 AM (AcMLr)

122 Buy rolex replica watches and replica watches replica replica watches and replica rolex watches patek philippe watches and fake watches and breitling watches,replica tag heuer: tag heuer,replica cartier watches: cartier watches,replica omega watches: omega watches at lowest prices.

Posted by: replica rolex at January 29, 2010 05:44 PM (h+uyA)

123 It is no secret that the designer handbag market is extremely profitable designer handbags are one of the most sought after items by women wholesale handbags replica handbags However louis vuitton handbags louis vuitton handbags if you are like me you probably know that finding legitimate louis vuitton handbags wholesalers of designer handbags is not easy to say the least louis vuitton handbags

Posted by: replica watch at January 30, 2010 09:39 AM (AcMLr)

Posted by: airmax at January 31, 2010 04:18 PM (3vSvS)

125 wholesale handbags louis vuitton It is no secret that the designer handbag market is extremely profitable designer handbags are one of the most sought wholesale handbags after items by women louis vuitton However if you louis vuitton handbags are like me you probably know that finding legitimate louis vuitton handbags wholesalers of designer handbags is not easy to say the least

Posted by: citizen watches at February 01, 2010 11:19 AM (AcMLr)

126 louis vuitton replica handbags replica handbags Buy cheap replica Louis Vuitton Handbags Louis Vuitton Bags from HandbagsAir We have the most LV Bags Louis Vuitton Gucci Chanel wholesale handbags Miu Miu styles louis vuitton handbags louis vuitton

Posted by: replica watch at February 02, 2010 03:12 PM (CPNio)

127 Replica Handbags have provide replica omega watches replica omega watches the high quality Replica AUDEMARS PIGUET all brand handbags We have the especial price a especial production including coach handbags omega watches replica cartier Replica tag heuer

Posted by: replica rolex at February 03, 2010 04:30 PM (CPNio)

128 Certainly watches are Replica Watches used to help people record rolex Watches time, but rolex watches nowadays its functions have enlarged. Replica watches are now tag heuer Watches not only objects that tag heuer watches can tell you what time it is, they are also a status symbol. You should not feel strange when you find someone wearing a watch on his wrist, but use the cell phone to tell time. In that situation, the watch is just showing its luxurious function cartier watches. It is normal and cartier watches perhaps also happens to you. .If asked that among the watches of various brands, which one can suit your taste? There is no doubt that most people will choose Rolex. Whichever social class you are in, it is naturally Rolex was known breitling Watches and cherished breitling watches for a long time. However, the elements do not usually enter the market alone, always come with the price tag up to the hand. For this reason, many people, especially men, their dreams of luxury Rolex watches are buried in omega Watches his heart omega watches. What should I do? Rolex watches are simply stunning worn by the rich and famous, right? No, this world is not the world's richest men, is the world of each. All are equal before the search of luxury and be men's watches respected. Within men's watches, the law, when consumers are in the market, women's watches they should women's watches receive the same treatment. This is the real reason why replica Rolex watches are ladies watches ladies watches more welcome than Rolex. Because in this world are not difficult to understand that the rich are much less than people with low income, you agree with me? You are forced to nod and say with certainty that is the reality. These low-income people do not have enough money to save every month. They can not afford such luxury Rolex watches

Posted by: replica watches at February 04, 2010 09:00 AM (CPNio)

129 vacheron constantin watches Cheap high quality Louis Vuitton Replica AUDEMARS PIGUET Louis Vuitton HandbagsLV bagslouis vuitton luggage Replica omega chanel handbags replica movado gucci handbags omega watches replica movado LV Discoutn Replica Handbags On

Posted by: breitling watch at February 04, 2010 05:42 PM (CPNio)

130 Cheap replica watches and replica watches 100% copy replica watches of the previous omega watches model: the famous Manchester Logo is located at 3 and the cartier watches chronograph 45-minute breitling watches at 9 with orange figures. Football fans can use the very special 45-minute chronograph to measure the halves of a football match. Black patek philippe hour hand and minute hand features yellow luminescent coating. The hour makers, chronograph audemars piguet and the first 15-minute scale of the tag heuer chronograph counter is montblanc watches presented in eye-catching rolex red. Bright Yellow movado watches tones are found on the minute track, date bvlgari watches rolex on sale.

Posted by: replica watches at February 05, 2010 07:49 AM (0uEN8)

Posted by: may at February 06, 2010 07:43 PM (Eu9Vs)

132 TAG HEUER Watches ROLEX Watches OMEGA Watches CARTIER Watches Luxury Cartier watches are available at Essential Watches at discounted prices At Essential Watches we specialize in replica Watches OMEGA Watches all high end watch lines including

Posted by: rolex at February 06, 2010 09:56 PM (TUJDt)

133 Factors Replica Watches About The Rolex replica watches Oyster The Oyster is so closely get in touch with Rolex, and it is inevitably that some people think these are the only Replica watches Rolex manufacture. Others suppose that there is a single Oyster watch. But as a matter of fact, the name Oyster does not actually meant for a rolex Watches particular watch you can buy rolex watches or even to a series but to a type of case that available in some of the Rolex ranges. History The Oyster case was first released in 1926. The objective was to protect the workings of the watch from dust and moisture. Early watches were far from waterproof. The Oyster tag heuer Watchescase was an tag heuer watches innovative design to eliminate these problems. It had a new double locking crown that screwed into place. It has been compared to the hatch on a submarine. Like a submarine, the Oyster case was waterproof. In 1927 Mercedes Gleitze swam the English breitling Watches Channel breitling watches . Before she set off she was presented with a Rolex Oyster. When she arrived, the watch was still working perfectly. The resulting publicity gave the new case a massive boost. Why is it called Oyster? Legend has it that Hans cartier Watches Wilsdorf cartier watches, who invented the Oyster, chose the name because the new case reminded him of the difficulty he had experienced prising open oysters at dinner. Since then the Oyster has further, particularly advanced. Many Oyster watches today are omega Watches perpetual-self-winding, in other omega watches words, it does not require to expose the mechanism to the outside world in order to wind it. The Osyter Perpetual is one of the toughest, most durable, most reliable watches (under truly adverse conditions). It is probably the best mechanical watch money can buy.

Posted by: replica watches at February 07, 2010 01:27 PM (TUJDt)

134 TAG HEUER Watches The best Rolex replica one can find is undoubtedly the Swiss Rolex replica These replica watches to the well BREITLING Watches TAG HEUER Watches known quality that Swiss products have proved in than one field Rolex replicas produced in Switzerl are so close to the genuine Rolex timepieces that you will hardly see the difference As the recipient he she will never feel wronged by having OMEGA Watches replica Watches been offered a watch replica like that As long as it looks like the iginal has the great effect on his her personality as well as on the viewers your baby will not complain a moment about it Meover a watch like that will also be reliable do its job with flying colours ROLEX Watches years

Posted by: rolex replica at February 08, 2010 06:08 AM (TUJDt)

135 twdne zupj chi ghd hair straightener ghd hair straightener,mqmyx ghd hair straightener xlblfc,chi hair straightener,wusmq hair straightener dpdxgs,ghd hair straightener,bmlmip chi hair straightener pvsdts,chi hair straightener,epjto hair straightener zzxhxl,hair straightener,riglv hair straightener pfpamnq,ghd hair straightener,ibsuu ghd hair straightener ikykfd,chi hair straightener,bgbq hair straightener bpsgyh,hair straight,wnfmo hair straightener bjihw,ghd hair straightener,ufamt chi hair straightener dpgj,chi hair straightener,nnksmye hair straightener pkceiw.

Posted by: ghd hair straightener at February 09, 2010 08:29 AM (UTLu5)

136 ywpwc buy cheap wow gold xttu wow gold,ztmc buy wow gold dzukv,wow power leveling,rvohix wow gold erlhk,cheap wow gold,amzvdv buy wow gold jjehc,buy wow gold,qdqss cheap wow gold xymdx,world of warcraft gold,rggphj buy wow gold cqvdp,wow gold,wyappt wow power leveling juxer,wow power leveling,qptp buy wow gold kxocg,cheap wow gold,vgcpzy wow gold dmgxb,buy wow gold,hzxghd cheap wow gold flnab,world of warcraft gold,nviiai buy wow gold mtygut.

Posted by: wow gold at February 09, 2010 08:30 AM (UTLu5)

137 replica Watches ROLEX Watches replica Watches Replica watches come to the aid of those people who are smart enough to know both the value of a Rolex CARTIER Watches OMEGA Watches the impact that CARTIER Watches a good imitation Rolex can have

Posted by: omega watch at February 09, 2010 02:29 PM (fa8ya)

138 Watches really Replica Watches are a great fashion replica item. This is because watch manufacturers such as Emporio Armani understand their customers wants and needs and rolex Watches know that rolex watches there is a big market for tag heuer Watches fashion tag heuer watches and designer movado watches in the UK. The number of people that demand these fashion watches has grown enormously over the past few years as people all want to have their own unique personality. Buying a watch can be a breitling watches long breitling Watches process. This is because there are so many watches to choose from that people cartier watches can spend a whole lot of time making their decision. One brand that is always popular is Emporio Armani. This is because Emporio Armani are one of the best fashion brands in the UK and they therefore offer customers some of the best fashion omega Watches available watches on omega the market. There are millions mens Watches of watches for a customer to choose when it comes to a watch. It's quite easy to make the right watch purchase decision. Or you just need to know what famous watch brands are and you may find what you like at once. Emporio Armani watches have been very popular for many mens Watches years.Women's watches Emporio Armani is a brand for style sense and mens Watches fashion which it shows in his range of fashion watches. No matter what watch brand you choose, it can be sure that the watch you are going to wear would show some of your personality.

Posted by: replica watches at February 09, 2010 04:32 PM (fa8ya)






Processing 0.14, elapsed 0.2011 seconds.
15 queries taking 0.0834 seconds, 147 records returned.
Page size 201 kb.
Powered by Minx 0.7 alpha.

MuNuvians
MeeNuvians
Polls! Polls! Polls!
Frequently Asked Questions
The (Almost) Complete Paul Anka Integrity Kick
Top Top Tens
Greatest Hitjobs

The Ace of Spades HQ Sex-for-Money Skankathon
A D&D Guide to the Democratic Candidates
Margaret Cho: Just Not Funny
More Margaret Cho Abuse
Margaret Cho: Still Not Funny
Iraqi Prisoner Claims He Was Raped... By Woman
Wonkette Announces "Morning Zoo" Format
John Kerry's "Plan" Causes Surrender of Moqtada al-Sadr's Militia
World Muslim Leaders Apologize for Nick Berg's Beheading
Michael Moore Goes on Lunchtime Manhattan Death-Spree
Milestone: Oliver Willis Posts 400th "Fake News Article" Referencing Britney Spears
Liberal Economists Rue a "New Decade of Greed"
Artificial Insouciance: Maureen Dowd's Word Processor Revolts Against Her Numbing Imbecility
Intelligence Officials Eye Blogs for Tips
They Done Found Us Out, Cletus: Intrepid Internet Detective Figures Out Our Master Plan
Shock: Josh Marshall Almost Mentions Sarin Discovery in Iraq
Leather-Clad Biker Freaks Terrorize Australian Town
When Clinton Was President, Torture Was Cool
What Wonkette Means When She Explains What Tina Brown Means
Wonkette's Stand-Up Act
Wankette HQ Gay-Rumors Du Jour
Here's What's Bugging Me: Goose and Slider
My Own Micah Wright Style Confession of Dishonesty
Outraged "Conservatives" React to the FMA
An On-Line Impression of Dennis Miller Having Sex with a Kodiak Bear
The Story the Rightwing Media Refuses to Report!
Our Lunch with David "Glengarry Glen Ross" Mamet
The House of Love: Paul Krugman
A Michael Moore Mystery (TM)
The Dowd-O-Matic!
Liberal Consistency and Other Myths
Kepler's Laws of Liberal Media Bias
John Kerry-- The Splunge! Candidate
"Divisive" Politics & "Attacks on Patriotism" (very long)
The Donkey ("The Raven" parody)
News/Chat