| Support
Contact
| AG Eric "Nation Of Cowards" Holder Testifies About Civilian Trials For TerroristsAnd Andy McCarthy Fisks the hell out of him. A taste.6. In a civilian trial, America will see KSM for the coward that he is – Holder: "I am not scared of KSM." Submitting a war criminal to a military commission is not an exercise in fear; it is an exercise in justice. We already know all about what kind of animal KSM is, thanks to the exrtraordinary information that has come out in the military proceedings and the CIA interrogations. You could fill a book a book with it, which the 9/11 Commission did. We don't need to bear the risks of a civilian trial either to learn more about KSM or so Mr. Holder can show how brave he is.For the liberal vision of this, check out Chris Good at The Atlantic's Politics Blog (It's a "Milky Loads" free zone). Good assures us that Holder understands we are at war because, well, Holder says, "I know that we are at war". Case close, the science is settled. Good then goes on to parse the difference between the Bush and Obama approaches. But despite the Obama administration's attempts to get away from Bush's language, the war on terrorism is something that it can't get away from. Today we had Obama's top law enforcement official full embrace that ethos. If that tells us anything, it's that at critical moments of national security, the Obama administration will acknowledge this war, and it will verge into the national security realism that, while mismanaged and badly represented over the previous eight years, came to be a defining mark of the Bush worldview.Here's the thing, when the President takes this portfolio from the military and gives it to his "top law enforcement official" that's a clue that he most definitely is not treating this like a war. See if Obama thought this was a war, he'd let the m-i-l-i-t-a-r-y handle it, not the AG. Remember military commissions were not just the work of Bush and Cheney's evil dreams, they were created by Congress (something a certain junior Senator from Illinois seemed pretty happy about at one time). War. Law enforcement. Just words. Meanwhile, terrorists who kill thousands in an act of war are afforded the full panoply of rights and protections as any US citizen who steals a car. Obama, Holder and the rest of the left tell us this will awe the world, make them love us and prevent future attacks. You know, just like the trial and conviction of the first WTC bombers did. Just another example of the 'reality based community' ignoring reality. CommentsPosted by: goforitbillbelichik at November 18, 2009 12:01 PM (z37MR) 2
and it will verge into the national security realism that, while
mismanaged and badly represented over the previous eight years, came to
be a defining mark of the Bush worldview.
As opposed to the screamingly apparent competence of the current administration. Right, buddy. Got Unicorn?® Posted by: Sort-of-Mad Max at November 18, 2009 12:01 PM (aC0uO) 3
Unfortunately, the jobs created will be in the disaster recovery sector.
Posted by: joncelli at November 18, 2009 12:03 PM (RD7QR) 4
The really sick thing is that Left will spin this trial a job-creator for New York.
Hey, as far as I'm concerned KSM is shovel-ready! Posted by: Sort-of-Mad Max at November 18, 2009 12:03 PM (aC0uO) 5
What annoyed me most about the snippet I saw on Fox News was that Holder said that one of the factors that went into the decision was "the probability of success".
KSM was ready to plead guilty in a military tribunal. How much more successful does he think a civilian trial can be?
Posted by: Anachronda at November 18, 2009 12:04 PM (1OYcp) 6
Holder has good reason not to be afraid of KSM -- the Bush admin apprehended KSM and he's no longer a threat. But Holder and Obama are fools for not fearing KSM's legions of followers who are roaming around freely. Holder and Obama are putting the rest of us, (those with no security detail), at great risk. Posted by: goforitbillbelichik at November 18, 2009 12:06 PM (z37MR) 7
What goes unmentioned in the left's clamor to get these monsters up for their show trial is the terrible precedent this sets.
Not for terrorists, necessarily: but for regular Americans. If the trials are shoo-in show trials (as I think everyone left and right sort of admits), then convictions legitimize whatever tactics were taken up until that point. Tactics that are entirely appropriate for illegal enemy combatants caught on the battlefield out of uniform, but not appropriate for American civilians caught with a stolen VCR. By trying them as American civilians, they legitimize military tactics against civilian defendants. Posted by: DoDoGuRu at November 18, 2009 12:07 PM (Xdxf8) 8
You're missing the point, Drew. If you handle this in a criminal court, then -- even if he's acquitted -- you can later sue for damages in civil court. Posted by: FireHorse at November 18, 2009 12:07 PM (Vl5GH) 9
KSM was ready to plead guilty in a military tribunal. How much more successful does he think a civilian trial can be? Yeah, the successful prosecution of KSM is not what Obama and Holder have in mind. As Rush says, this trial is the prosecution of the United States, George Bush, and Western Civilization. Posted by: goforitbillbelichik at November 18, 2009 12:08 PM (z37MR) 10
Posted by: FireHorse at November 18, 2009 12:07 PM (Vl5GH)
True but then it would take resources away from KSM that he could use to find the 'real terrorists'. Posted by: DrewM. at November 18, 2009 12:09 PM (FCWQb) Posted by: awkward davies at November 18, 2009 12:11 PM (wb68R) 12
Contact your elected representatives and raise all holy hell!
I heard this morning the Republicans are circulating some legislation to stop this trial from happening. Let's beat Obama and Holder down. The American people are pissed about this! Posted by: Dave at November 18, 2009 12:12 PM (Xm1aB) 13
This decision is already biting them in the ass. Today's Rasmussen Daily Presidential tracking poll has the O-hole at -14. http://tinyurl.com/5tnd2b
Posted by: conscious, but incoherent at November 18, 2009 12:12 PM (kn+jW) Posted by: Dave at November 18, 2009 12:14 PM (Xm1aB) 15
This is a complete and total joke. The President has already tainted the jury pool by declaring, "I am confident he will be found guilty.", add to that the fact other terrorists are still being tried in military trials. This is nothing but a political farce. Well that pretty much sums up everything this jackass does so why are any of us surprised?
Posted by: Mr. Pink at November 18, 2009 12:14 PM (SqAkN) 16
Attack military personnel=military tribunal.
Attack civilians=full blown trial with the same rights as a car thief and a witness stand from which to preach a little jihad. Gee, I wonder who the future targets of terror might be. Posted by: Dave at November 18, 2009 12:16 PM (Xm1aB) 17
Imagine getting sat on the jury for this crap? What about the prosecutors safety when he goes home after the trial? What about the judge? How will KSM face his accusers other than calling on the stand CIA employees? This is beyond stupid, this is political and national suicide on TV.
Posted by: Mr. Pink at November 18, 2009 12:16 PM (SqAkN) 18
You know who else Eric Holder isn't afraid of? The CIA. I'm just trying figure out how he's gonna juggle both cases without it being politically detrimental to Obama. Posted by: goforitbillbelichik at November 18, 2009 12:16 PM (z37MR) 19
McCarthy was part of the prosecution of the 1993 WTC bombers. I believe he knows his shit.
Posted by: HeatherRadish at November 18, 2009 12:16 PM (NtiET) 20
What annoyed me most about the snippet I saw on Fox News was that
Holder said that one of the factors that went into the decision was
"the probability of success".
What bothered me about it was when I turned on Fox to watch a little of it while eating lunch they did the lead in with Lindsey F'kn Graham, friend of the terrorist crapweasel. I turned it off. The only Republicans Fox puts on with any regularity are Graham and McLame. Can you say PR for the squishes? Posted by: Vic at November 18, 2009 12:17 PM (CDUiN) 21
Where do these Affirmative Action legal beagles come from for god's sake?
Posted by: kansas at November 18, 2009 12:18 PM (mka2b) 22
Everyone on the left seems to think there will not be a plan hatched once KSM and others are imprisoned in the HeartLand. One of the largest vistories for our enemies would be to spring one of these terrorists out of a maximum security prison. I'm glad there is no plans to keep them anywhere near me. Everyone on the left also seems to think that by not doing this would make us hypocrites. I don't get it. Can somebody please explain that to me? Posted by: Jimi at November 18, 2009 12:18 PM (ZBY0f) 23
The fucking pussy ran off to Asia, specifically to avoid the heat over this travesty.
Brings up an interesting possibility--trial will be conducted sometime after O leaves office? Posted by: HeatherRadish at November 18, 2009 12:18 PM (NtiET) 24
Will this be televised? I know COURT TV is gone, but will cameras be allowed in the courtroom? Why do I suspect the Obama admin will try to televise this show trial for all the world to see? Posted by: goforitbillbelichik at November 18, 2009 12:19 PM (z37MR) 25
Yes Mr. Holder, trying the blind sheik over the first world trade center bombing worked so well at preventing the next. So glad that those perpetrators of man made disasters got the message.
Thanks again FiftyTwo Percenters, you fucking fucks. Posted by: Unclefacts, Summoner of Wicked High Temps in the Core of the Earth at November 18, 2009 12:20 PM (erIg9) 26
So, to be clear, the Left is fine with trials when the AG and the President of the United States assure them that the "defendants" will be found guilty?
Nice precedent they're setting, I'll tell you what. Posted by: Techie at November 18, 2009 12:21 PM (wVPwI) 27
Meanwhile, terrorists who kill thousands in an act of war are afforded
the full panoply of rights and protections as any US citizen who steals
a car.
Not to mention: Presumption of Innocence. Posted by: franksalterego at November 18, 2009 12:24 PM (GKyIE) 28
The New Jersey and Virginia elections scared the hell out of the administration. With "Cap-n-tax" and ObamaCare set to (G*d willing) die a merciful death in Congress and the "stimulus" already a proven failure they realize that they don't have anything to run on in 2010.
The only thing that's worked for them in the past has been to run against GW Bush- so enter the KSM Road Show soon to open for (at least) a full year "It's All Bush's Fault" orgy through the 2010 election cycle. I used to think Goebbels would be proud of the BO administration, but now I'm not so sure- I'm sure he would be more discreet in his efforts to distract the public. Posted by: Hannibal Lecter at November 18, 2009 12:24 PM (OtQXp) 29
Just think, this whole debacle could have been prevented if we'd only executed that POS. It is perfectly legal to do so. Posted by: BackwardsBoy at November 18, 2009 12:25 PM (ZGhSv) 30
Forget get all the bitching about Booosh!1!!. Shit like this is what will erode the Rule of Law. Do you know many precedents will be ignored in this farce? How many statues will be bent?
Who wants to be the judge or the appellate court that lets one of The Masterminds of 9/11 off the hook? What happens to the case law? 5 years from now, does a defendant in Federal court have to worry what comes out of this trial? Posted by: Techie at November 18, 2009 12:25 PM (wVPwI) 31
D@mn sock puppet...
Posted by: Nighthawk at November 18, 2009 12:25 PM (OtQXp) 32
I am fucking sick of this shit: "...the Obama administration will acknowledge this war, and it will verge into the national security realism that, while mismanaged and badly represented over the previous eight years, came to be a defining mark of the Bush worldview." You know what you fucking asshole, it was the fucking media and the fucking Democrats that has passed that totally unjustified judgement on GWB, not the American people! GWB apparently "bungled" a response to a type of attack that had never before confronted this country, with the "help" of an antagonistic media and a Democrat party that opportunistically jumped ship on him (and us) at the first setback, and yet he managed to stop attacks on us for 8 years. Some bungler. Hey Obama, when you learn to "bungle" as well as GWB, maybe you'll be worth more than a bucket of warm spit, but so far you show little promise of pulling it off, Genuflecter-in-Cheif!!
ps. FYBO Posted by: sherlock at November 18, 2009 12:28 PM (G9/8V) 33
"Who wants to be the judge or the appellate court that lets one of The Masterminds of 9/11 off the hook?" If you look at this from a legal standpoint they would pretty much have to let him off. Biased jury pool, the freakin President saying he is guilty and will be found guilty, waterboarding, not read his rights, ect ect. This decision can be summed up as Obama going full retard. Posted by: Mr. Pink at November 18, 2009 12:29 PM (SqAkN) 34
Well, we know that Lynn Stewart won't be able to represent KSM, though she may share a bunk with him!
Posted by: Penfold at November 18, 2009 12:29 PM (lF2Kk) 35
And what happens if any of these cases get thrown out of court on some technicality, like there isn't any evidence other than heresay -- the terrorist walks out into the streets of NY? or are they deported to where ever they got picked up? Returned to Gitmo? Given a spot in Obama's Homeland Security?
Iquiring minds want to know. Posted by: drfredc at November 18, 2009 12:30 PM (puRnk) 36
30
Forget get all the bitching about Booosh!1!!. Shit like this is what
will erode the Rule of Law. Do you know many precedents will be
ignored in this farce? How many statues will be bent?
Who wants to be the judge or the appellate court that lets one of The Masterminds of 9/11 off the hook? What happens to the case law? 5 years from now, does a defendant in Federal court have to worry what comes out of this trial?
Posted by: Techie at November 18, 2009 12:25 PM (wVPwI) Excellent points all but, in the "judgment" of the administration, they all must be set aside in consideration of the ultimate goal- maintaining power. Posted by: Nighthawk at November 18, 2009 12:30 PM (OtQXp) 37
#28
There is a not-miniscule chance that this trial will end in an acquittal for KSM. If that happens, that's a huge black eye for Obama. Posted by: looking closely at November 18, 2009 12:31 PM (PwGfd) 38
In addition to the 10 detainees named Friday, Holder is expected to send others to trials and commissions in the United States. Another, larger group of detainees is expected to be released to other countries. Some, the president has said, are too dangerous to be released and cannot be put on trial, and those detainees will continue to be imprisoned i really don't understand this why commissions for some, they don't consider ksm dangerous? Posted by: willow at November 18, 2009 12:34 PM (GkYyh) 39
I still can't get over the terrorist take away from all this: hit a soft civilian target and get a bullhorn and cushy federal court trial; hit a military target and get a secret commission at Gitmo. Not a hard choice to make if you're AQ.
Posted by: slade at November 18, 2009 12:34 PM (XsHAM) Posted by: Orenthal James Simpson at November 18, 2009 12:34 PM (6Q9g2) 41
I think this proves what we have known all along,Obama's law degree from Harvard is nothing more than a affirmative action certificate of participation.The guy doesn't know his as from a hole in the ground. Posted by: bulwark at November 18, 2009 12:35 PM (jvrmc) 42
"Who wants to be the judge or the appellate court that lets one of The Masterminds of 9/11 off the hook?" If you look at this from a legal standpoint they would pretty much have to let him off. Biased jury pool, the freakin President saying he is guilty and will be found guilty, waterboarding, not read his rights, ect ect.Exactly, but do you think The Powers That Be will let that happen? Holder and Obama have publicly promised and guaranteed a conviction. If they can't deliver, God help us all. Posted by: Techie at November 18, 2009 12:36 PM (wVPwI) 43
Meanwhile, terrorists who kill thousands in an act of war are afforded the full panoply of rights and protections as any U.S. citizen who steals a car. The car thief stands a better chance getting a longer sentence if convicted, and a better chance of being convicted, than do KSM and friends. I've had enough liberal pseudo-idealism, how about you? Posted by: Minnie Rodent at November 18, 2009 12:36 PM (PZLW0) 44
WTF? "We will see to it that KSM is afforded the same Rule of Law as ...say, ahm, GM shareholders"-EHolder
Posted by: hutch1200 at November 18, 2009 12:36 PM (ABUF9) 45
How long is this show trial going to take?
I'd expect at LEAST a year, longer if either side wants to drag things out further. That's a potentially long sideshow for the Obama administration to put on. Posted by: looking closely at November 18, 2009 12:37 PM (6Q9g2) 46
I heard the KSM and Co. have submitted their applications to the
New Black Panther Party and upon acceptance (them not being white and also down with the struggle) will have all charges dropped. Then they will be released in either South Chicago or Detroit and issued "Ceremonial" nightsticks. Problem solved. Posted by: Hugh Jasteroid at November 18, 2009 12:38 PM (lD4DZ) 47
convictions legitimize whatever tactics were taken up until that point. Tactics that are entirely appropriate for illegal enemy combatants caught on the battlefield out of uniform, but not appropriate for American civilians caught with a stolen VCR at a Tea Party Protest ftfy If you think they aren't going to justify show-trials against internal dissidents, you must believe in skittles-shitting unicorns. Posted by: Dang Straights at November 18, 2009 12:38 PM (Haq+B) 48
Hay, WAIT. Obama and everyone in his administration is saying that these guys are guilty. No if's, and's or but's. Everybody, well almost everybody is some kind of Liberal in NY. Now can he get a fair trial in NY.... Heh,heh,heh.
Posted by: Mystry at November 18, 2009 12:38 PM (kmgIE) 49
If that happens, that's a huge black eye for Obama.
I'm not sure an acquittal hurts his standing with anyone who doesn't already despise him. Posted by: HeatherRadish at November 18, 2009 12:38 PM (NtiET) 50
No, the Obama Administration has every incentive to make this one swift. Would you want to go into the mid-term elections still having failed to obtain a "conviction" for one of the Great Terrorists of our age?
Posted by: Techie at November 18, 2009 12:39 PM (wVPwI) 51
Senator Blowhard: "Mr Holdem, based on your testimony here today, are you fucking high?".
Posted by: hutch1200 at November 18, 2009 12:39 PM (ABUF9) 52
Can we start talking about impeachment now?
Posted by: Dave at November 18, 2009 12:40 PM (Xm1aB) Posted by: pam at November 18, 2009 12:40 PM (h8R9p) 54
Also, if Khalid Sheikh Muhammed is convicted and given the death penalty, how long will he rot on Death Row? What's the average stay, 17 years or something?
Posted by: Alex's Cabin at November 18, 2009 12:40 PM (AYWcM) 55
I'm not really certain here which would be scarier: letting KSM walk due to tainted evidence or other technicalities, or being convicted and sentenced in spite of the tainted evidence and other technicalities. Unless they can drag it out past 2012, which maybe they are planning on, if the POS gets off then Obam'ter and the Dems are done for at least a generation. If he gets convicted, I think it only proves it was a kangaroo court show trial to begin with. Either way, these "smart" people in charge are taking one helluva risk, with little upside for reward. Posted by: JamesLee at November 18, 2009 12:40 PM (GNi4/) 56
It makes no sense, but then I ask myself: Is Obama stupid enough to risk this all for a chance to have one of the most Hated (with a capital H) men in the world badmouth and whine about George W. Bush and Dick Cheney while in the dock?
The answer is, of course, yes. Posted by: Techie at November 18, 2009 12:43 PM (wVPwI) 57
#53
I hope that's not true. I emailed Kit Bond yesterday asking him when we can expect his apology for voting to confirm Holder. Posted by: Dave at November 18, 2009 12:43 PM (Xm1aB) 58
(holding nose) Order in the court! Please remove the defendant immediately, shave, and bathe him for chrissakes! Posted by: NYC Judge at November 18, 2009 12:43 PM (wAQA5) 59
Separately, a member of the Judiciary committee, Democrat Charles Schumer of New York, is urging the administration to reimburse the city for what he says could be $75 million in extra security costs related to the terror trials. Breitbart Posted by: willow at November 18, 2009 12:43 PM (GkYyh) 60
If the defense is granted a change of venue, I hope they move the trial to San Francisco, right in Nancy's backyard.
Posted by: conscious, but incoherent at November 18, 2009 12:44 PM (kn+jW) 61
50
No, the Obama Administration has every incentive to make this one
swift. Would you want to go into the mid-term elections still having
failed to obtain a "conviction" for one of the Great Terrorists of our
age?
Posted by: Techie at November 18, 2009 12:39 PM (wVPwI) That would be true if one of the Great Terrorists of our age was on trial. In reality, thanks to the assistance of the media, GWB, Dick Cheney, the CIA, FBI, and the entire US intelligence community will be on trial- allowing the administration to dredge up all the old worn out "failed policy of the previous administration" rhetoric which is what they need to energize the young voters who stayed home in NJ and Virginia two weeks ago. Posted by: Nighthawk at November 18, 2009 12:45 PM (OtQXp) 62
#49
Obviously there are individuals who are in the tank for Obama, and whose opinion will never change no matter what he does. But I think if the "mastermind" of 9-11 walks, there is going to be a LOT of anger at the Nobel-Peace prize-winning administration. Even if it doesn't cause his supporters to drop him, a KSM acquittal will definitely energize his opponents. Posted by: looking closely at November 18, 2009 12:45 PM (PwGfd) 63
I hope the prick walks. I really do. I hope he sues for pain/suffering and buys one of Trumps biggest condos, overlooking the hole he made. Hopefully he'll crap out the window every day. NY'ers are all about the forgiveness (barry and KSM) shit, even when it isn't asked for. Tan up KSM, the souther poverty law center is about to make you rich.
Posted by: hutch1200 at November 18, 2009 12:45 PM (ABUF9) 64
Is the NYC Visitors Bureau kapish with this decision?
I won't be traveling there during the trial. Posted by: Dave at November 18, 2009 12:45 PM (Xm1aB) 65
I predict they drag this out, and it doesn't go to actual trial before the 2012 elections.
If Obama is re-elected, the trial proceeds apace - because it's outcome doesn't matter politically to him anymore. If he's defeated, he happily hands one more unfinished huge shit sandwich he made to the incoming Republican. Posted by: FreakyBoy at November 18, 2009 12:46 PM (4s1it) 66
Folks, the real reason for the decision to use the civilian court instead of a military forum is the left's persistent goal of devaluing the military in general in relation to the civilian in general. This goes all the way back to the Vietnam War. The military is the least left-dominated institution in our society, so it is in the left's interest that it be discredited.
Posted by: sissoed at November 18, 2009 12:47 PM (XpBZo) 67
All KSM's lawyers have to do is get a couple of Muslims on the jury - instant hung jury = aquittal. No Muslim is going to vote to convict, but plenty will do their best to intimidate the other jurors into letting him off. Plus, there will be plenty of opportunities to threaten the judge, prosecutors, etc; Once this circus gets started the international left will say "the poor fellow was tortured, there is no real proof he did anything, let him go." And you can be sure Obama will let him go.
Posted by: BattleofthePyramids at November 18, 2009 12:48 PM (8HaDt) 68
"You know, a ri-yot iss an ugly ting, but I tink it's chust about time ve had vun!!"
Posted by: sherlock at November 18, 2009 12:48 PM (G9/8V) 69
pam I'm afraid Republicans might see a public trial as a gold plated club to beat Democrats with in the coming years and thus may not fight this wholeheartedly Posted by: bulwark at November 18, 2009 12:48 PM (jvrmc) 70
Sofa King and Carpet Demon took shelter from the rain. When Master Bait showed up late, he left them with a stain. Posted by: Max Power at November 18, 2009 12:48 PM (q177U) 71
Many people will probably want to think twice about attending the New Year's Eve celebration in Times Square. I know I wouldn't. Posted by: conscious, but incoherent at November 18, 2009 12:49 PM (kn+jW) 72
If he's defeated, he happily hands one more unfinished huge shit sandwich he made to the incoming Republican. Hell, I don't think barry could survive a primary race with David Duke or Perez Hilton Posted by: hutch1200 at November 18, 2009 12:49 PM (ABUF9) 73
#69
That's the only upside to the trial moving forward that I've heard mentioned. It's something I guess. Thanks. Posted by: Dave at November 18, 2009 12:49 PM (Xm1aB) 74
1. Holder gets out there with Obama and say they know KSM is guilty----Mistrial much? 2. We try them in civilian courts if they attack civilians (KSM-WTC) and military courts if they attack the military (Cole bombers) (just forget about the Pentagon) and that tells the terrorists what? Attack civilians on american soil...you got it. Posted by: dagny at November 18, 2009 12:51 PM (twCqO) 75
When, not if, KSM and his terrorists friends are released in NYC by a democrat/liberal judge will the inept Holder fall on his own sword/hang himself (in shame) or will a survivor/family member of 9-11 have to take him and his family out.
Posted by: Scrapiron at November 18, 2009 12:51 PM (1kwr2) 76
50
No, the Obama Administration has every incentive to make this one
swift. Would you want to go into the mid-term elections still having
failed to obtain a "conviction" for one of the Great Terrorists of our
age?
First of all, its not up to the Obama administration. KSM's lawyers and the judge in question will have a say too. If KSM wants to drag this out he well may get that chance. Also, if Obama were primarily interested in making this "swift" he could have allowed KSM to plead guilty as he attempted to do last year. Posted by: looking closely at November 18, 2009 12:53 PM (6Q9g2) 77
Frankly, as long they announce it beforehand, I would prefer the federal court let the bastards walk.
I'm sure the NYCPD and NYCFD will have a group of greeters present when they step foot out the courthouse. Posted by: Dave at November 18, 2009 12:54 PM (Xm1aB) 78
In a civilian trial, America will see KSM for the coward that he is..
Wasn't it Holder that called American's cowards? So, in his twisted logic, he equates all Americans with KSM. Nice. Posted by: Barbarian at November 18, 2009 12:55 PM (EL+OC) 79
How's that voting Dem all the time working out for you New Yorkers? Hmmmm? Tell you what - elect one single fucking Donkey in 2010, and my reservior of sympathy for you stupid pricks goes bone-dry... capice'? Posted by: sherlock at November 18, 2009 12:55 PM (G9/8V) 80
I thought one of them said that if he isn't convicted they still won't let him go. So what's the point? Where do these asswipes get the idea that foreigners get the protection of the US constitution? Does the loony left think we had sheep herder's children locked up and undergoing torture at Gitmo? What's all the sympathy for? Just US hating? Posted by: dagny at November 18, 2009 12:57 PM (twCqO) 81
I am sick and tired of hearing Holder call KSM a coward.
What the hell makes KSM a coward? Vicious, psycho, violent, etc. yes. Coward not so much. Posted by: Dave at November 18, 2009 12:57 PM (Xm1aB) 82
77
Frankly, as long they announce it beforehand, I would prefer the federal court let the bastards walk.
I'm sure the NYCPD and NYCFD will have a group of greeters present when they step foot out the courthouse.
Posted by: Dave at November 18, 2009 12:54 PM (Xm1aB) Along with high-potency pheremone spray, a prize boar hog, and a camcorder. Posted by: Nighthawk at November 18, 2009 12:57 PM (OtQXp) 83
this will not end well
the AG and the Present are already on record as guaranteeing convictions- I'm sure KSM's lawyer's first motion will be for for dismissal Posted by: Jones at November 18, 2009 01:00 PM (KOkrW) 84
Who wants to be the judge or the appellate court that lets one of The Masterminds of 9/11 off the hook?"
Lifetime appointments makes one a little safer in following your ideological bent, no matter how stupid it may seem to everyone else. E.G., the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals. Posted by: Mallamutt at November 18, 2009 01:00 PM (V9SYy) 85
#81
Maybe Holder means the term "coward" as a compliment, considering that he called the USA a country of cowards. #80 You do have to wonder what exactly the Holder "backup plan" is, assuming that KSM is acquitted (which again, is entirely possible). If they don't intend to let him go, then where are they going to put him? The new Guantanamo? If they aren't going to release him after a "not-guilty" verdict, then when will they EVER release him? Posted by: looking closely at November 18, 2009 01:01 PM (6Q9g2) 86
How's that voting Dem all the time working out for you New Yorkers? Hmmmm? Tell you what - elect one single fucking Donkey in 2010, and my reservior of sympathy for you stupid pricks goes bone-dry...I was born and lived in downstate NY for years. We still have many friends and family that exist there. It's hopeless. Believe me on this one. Posted by: Barbarian at November 18, 2009 01:02 PM (EL+OC) 87
Oh, have no doubt, there are federal judges with lifetime gigs who wouldn't hesitate to walk these killers if the judge thought it would blacken George W.'s eye.
No doubt about it. Posted by: Dave at November 18, 2009 01:02 PM (Xm1aB) 88
Attack military personnel=military tribunal.
Attack civilians=full blown trial with the same rights as a car thief and a witness stand from which to preach a little jihad. Gee, I wonder who the future targets of terror might be.
Posted by: Dave at November 18, 2009 12:16 PM (Xm1aB) Attack a Kindergarten = Time out. Posted by: WalrusRex at November 18, 2009 01:04 PM (xxgag) 89
Should the Pearl Harbor attackers have been afforded America rights, If not, what is ther difference. Posted by: gus at November 18, 2009 01:04 PM (Vqruj) 90
The jury pool is going to consist of people that still can't figure out what to do with that hole in midtown? Wasn't the last design, under Pataki, shaped like an Islamic Cresent?
Posted by: hutch1200 at November 18, 2009 01:06 PM (ABUF9) 91
89
Should the Pearl Harbor attackers have been afforded America rights, If not, what is ther difference.
Posted by: gus at November 18, 2009 01:04 PM (Vqruj) The only explanation I can come up with is that they started dumping massive doses of Stupid Serum into the drinking water in about 1963. Posted by: Nighthawk at November 18, 2009 01:07 PM (OtQXp) 92
The Pearl Harbor attackers were uniformed members of the armed forces of a hostile nation. Had they been captured after being shot down, they'd have been POWs and afforded the proscribed treatment.
Posted by: Techie at November 18, 2009 01:07 PM (wVPwI) 93
#83 the AG and the Present are already on record as guaranteeing
convictions- I'm sure KSM's lawyer's first motion will be for for
dismissal
They'll ask for a dismissal, but won't get it. Their #2 motion will be to have the trial taken out of NYC, arguing that the jury pool in New York is tainted because of 9-11. There is going to be a HUGE fight pre-trial in this case around evidence. Team KSM is going to try to get ALL of it (much of it classified), and try to use it to embarrass the gov't. Then Team KSM is going to get as much of it as possible knocked out, claiming it was obtained illegally, under duress from waterboarding, etc. This discovery fighting will probably drag on for months, with each side appealing and counter-appealing any decision on critical evidence. Posted by: looking closely at November 18, 2009 01:09 PM (PwGfd) 94
I don't care if we have the votes or not.
The congressional GOP should develop articles of impeachment alleging, to start, that Obama's administration is, instead of protecting Americans, actively endangering them by 1) transferring Gitmo detainees into the U.S., and 2) holding the KSM trial in NYC. Let's roll! Posted by: Dave at November 18, 2009 01:09 PM (Xm1aB) 95
Attack a Kindergarten = Time out. Attack a Christian Church = Red carpet treatment at any given Hollywood awards ceremony Posted by: Alex's Cabin at November 18, 2009 01:09 PM (AYWcM) 96
Rush is reading this thread, apparently. This case is going to get thrown out, and Wee Wee seems to be working towards that end. Posted by: Dang Straights at November 18, 2009 01:10 PM (Haq+B) 97
Military tribunals are for Obama administration leakers
Posted by: wHodat at November 18, 2009 01:11 PM (+sBB4) Posted by: Dave at November 18, 2009 01:11 PM (Xm1aB) Posted by: Dang Straights at November 18, 2009 01:14 PM (Haq+B) 100
97
Military tribunals are for Obama administration leakers
Posted by: wHodat at November 18, 2009 01:11 PM (+sBB4) ...and CIA interrogators. Posted by: Nighthawk at November 18, 2009 01:14 PM (OtQXp) 101
Doesn't the defence get to choose the jury? I imagine they can find twelve Muslims without problem. There's an aquittal right there.
Posted by: BeckoningChasm at November 18, 2009 01:14 PM (eNxMU) 102
All it takes is one, single muslim on the jury to prevent a conviction.
That's it, just one. Or a terrorist sympathizer. Posted by: Dave at November 18, 2009 01:16 PM (Xm1aB) 103
94
I don't care if we have the votes or not.
The congressional GOP should develop articles of impeachment alleging, to start, that Obama's administration is, instead of protecting Americans, actively endangering them by 1) transferring Gitmo detainees into the U.S., and 2) holding the KSM trial in NYC. Let's roll! ^^ This! Posted by: Derak at November 18, 2009 01:16 PM (0cdUt) 104
84.
The question about judges and prosecutors wasn't about their professional careers. It was a about their show-biz careers, when they and their families show up on Youtube being beheaded. Posted by: Richard Aubrey at November 18, 2009 01:17 PM (d0ih6) 105
Yeah, you think a juror or two might be concerned about getting the Daniel Pearl treatment if they vote to convict?
Posted by: Dave at November 18, 2009 01:19 PM (Xm1aB) 106
If the glove does not fit, you must acquit! I can see it now. Victory for Allah.....
Posted by: Todd at November 18, 2009 01:19 PM (LLOGQ) 107
>All it takes is one, single muslim on the jury to prevent a conviction.
or a Truther or a Bush hater or a Kos kid a DUer a Huffposter etc etc etc Posted by: Jones at November 18, 2009 01:19 PM (KOkrW) 108
Headline parody: Crime! Declared on al Qaeda: http://tinyurl.com/ydwfczh
Posted by: Justin Camp at November 18, 2009 01:19 PM (nF4Jh) 109
Several have mentioned that it will only take one Muslim on the jury to get it hung. Look at it from the other direction - if there isn't one (or more) on the jury his lawyers will be screaming mistrial for discrimination.
Posted by: Jim at November 18, 2009 01:20 PM (E725N) Posted by: Techie at November 18, 2009 01:20 PM (wVPwI) 111
21 Where do these Affirmative Action legal beagles come from for god's sake?
Posted by: kansas at November 18, 2009 12:18 PM (mka2b) The bottom of the barrel - the same place The Precedent is from. And we are really scraping it, now. Posted by: progressoverpeace at November 18, 2009 01:22 PM (A46hP) 112
The Supreme Court has ruled that you may not strike jurors based on their race or gender.
What about religion? If I'm a prosecutor in this case, I'm striking every muslim I can. Is this legal? Posted by: Dave at November 18, 2009 01:22 PM (Xm1aB) 113
Rush seems to think that the testimony will set Bush/Cheney up to get a indictment for war crimes in an international court and that's the point.
Posted by: dagny at November 18, 2009 01:25 PM (twCqO) Posted by: wHodat at November 18, 2009 01:25 PM (+sBB4) 115
It's simple:
Obama's mission is to weaken the US. Everything about it, everything that makes it exceptional, everything that makes it the greatest, most successful human experiment ever. He and his handlers want all that gone. This fucktarded farce of a trial makes things worse any way you slice it. That's not a bug, it's a feature. He's not stupid, and he's not misguided. He's a thriller-novel anti-American bad guy who won the Presidency. Yeah. . .it actually happened. Posted by: tachyonshuggy at November 18, 2009 01:26 PM (yUybe) 116
the testimony will set Bush/Cheney up to get a indictment for war crimes in an international court and that's the point. That, and every CIA and SF operator we had in-theater. This is all about justifying 9/11 and putting the U.S. on trial. Posted by: Dang Straights at November 18, 2009 01:27 PM (Haq+B) 117
He's not stupid, and he's not misguided. He's a thriller-novel anti-American bad guy who won the Presidency. Yeah. . .it actually happened. Yup. Posted by: Dang Straights at November 18, 2009 01:28 PM (Haq+B) 118
Techie, how is that different? Are you suggesting that Japanese who WERE wearing uniforms should be treated worse than Muzztards who weren't? Those who do not wear uniforms are customarily executed summarily. Posted by: gus at November 18, 2009 01:28 PM (Vqruj) 119
#113
Whose testimony? The terrorists'? Who cares? And any American agent who thinks he might be prosecuted for "torture" or whatever will claim the 5th. Gosh, I wish I could listen to Rush today. Posted by: Dave at November 18, 2009 01:28 PM (Xm1aB) 120
Terrorists on trial: Miami (AP) A Miami man convicted of plotting to destroy Chicago's Sears Tower and bomb FBI offices has been sentenced to six years in federal prison. U.S. District Judge Joan Lenard imposed the sentence Wednesday on 24-year-old Burson Augustin. Prosecutors sought the maximum 30-year sentence for Augustin. Lenard ruled that sentencing terrorism enhancements should not apply to Augustin, who was not the leader. The men were convicted in May of supporting Al-Qaida, conspiring to wage war on the U.S. and other charges. There were two mistrials, and two other men were acquitted. All denied plotting terror attacks. Posted by: TheQuietman at November 18, 2009 01:30 PM (1Jaio) 121
112 The Supreme Court has ruled that you may not strike jurors based on their race or gender.
What about religion? If I'm a prosecutor in this case, I'm striking every muslim I can. Is this legal? Posted by: Dave at November 18, 2009 01:22 PM (Xm1aB) No. They can't reject a juror just for religion - especially seeing how the feral government (and others) have just gone out of their way to claim that screaming, "Allahu akhbar!" before spraying unarmed people with bullets serves no indication of any ties to jihadism ... but, given that just about everyone in New York was there for 9/11, it would be immensely easy to ask some questions that would show bias and, thus, reject whatever jurors they want "for cause". The problem, of course, is that we would normally think that the prosecuting attorney would be the one looking to strike muslims, liberals, and other terrorist sympathizers from the jury, but the sad fact is that the prosecuting attorney and the whole of the feral government's executive branch ARE terrorist sympathizers (and worse, even) and they are going to be the ones happy to stack the jury with muslims and terror lovers. Holder will explain it by saying that he is not scared of having 6 muslims on the jury. The only solution this nation has is to forcibly eject The Precedent, Holder, and the whole fetid administration - to then prosecute all of them for treason and various other crimes against the nation. Barring that ... we are just f#cked. Look forward to a split in the nation, because that is the only light left at the end of this tunnel of stupidity and America-hate and the only way to preserve the American creed. Posted by: progressoverpeace at November 18, 2009 01:30 PM (A46hP) 122
Jon Kyle said KSM has already plead guilty and is seeking the death penalty in a military tribunal. How could he be "more likely" to get death penalty in NYC?
Posted by: wHodat at November 18, 2009 01:32 PM (+sBB4) 123
"How could you be more likely to get a conviction in a civilian court
than in a military court when Khalid Sheik Mohammad has already pled
guilty and asked for the death penalty before a military commission?"
- Jon Kyle Posted by: wHodat at November 18, 2009 01:33 PM (+sBB4) 124
Yeah. . .it actually happened.
Posted by: tachyonshuggy at November 18, 2009 01:26 PM (yUybe) Yep, it did. I would just disagree with you on one part - The Precedent is stupid. He's just lucky that any fool can destroy a complex system, especially one that has been put on the very edge of destruction as the monetary crisis has done to us. It wouldn't be tough for a 12 year old to run an aircraft carrier aground, if you gave him the helm, especially if he wanted to and if he staffed the ship with the same sort of useful idiots who populate the feral government - people who think that grounded aircraft carriers are better because you don't have to worry about navigating them and all that difficult stuff. Posted by: progressoverpeace at November 18, 2009 01:35 PM (A46hP) Posted by: Dang Straights at November 18, 2009 01:37 PM (Haq+B) 126
I hope this is the end, my heart can't take the destruction of America any longer...Obama suck scock
Posted by: Todd the guy who hate muslims, all muslims at November 18, 2009 01:37 PM (LLOGQ) 127
Holder is a snake.
Posted by: Rodent Liberation Front at November 18, 2009 01:37 PM (dQdrY) 128
Only in NYC would useful idiots put a rapist next door to the victim
then pride themselves about how they show the world their compassion.
I feel violated and raped all over again; I cannot wait to get the hell out of this miserable freak show called NYC. Mayor Mommy-Nanny could have said NO but he cares more about protecting rapists than he does for those who have been raped. Dear NYC FREAKS- I lived here for 20 years, paid a shit-load of taxes, put up with endless lairs wearing smiley-faces and when I leave my only wish to you is may you forever rot away in your own freak show sewer. Sincerely a former brain-dead liberal whose veil of provincial myopia slipped away while watching the WTC crumble into ash on 9-11-2001. Posted by: syn at November 18, 2009 01:39 PM (ZjEOd) 129
Look, the fact of the matter is that a growing portion of America is not going to stand much longer Obama's constant attack on our freedoms, and security.
Impeachment needs to be on the table, now! Posted by: Dave at November 18, 2009 01:39 PM (Xm1aB) 130
If I capture someone in Afghanistan, do I read him his rights?
Posted by: wHodat at November 18, 2009 01:40 PM (+sBB4) 131
The AG going on record presuming guilt is not a big deal,isn't every prosecutor confident the defendant is guilty?It's the president coming out with the presumption of guilt that is absolutely mind boggling Posted by: bulwark at November 18, 2009 01:43 PM (jvrmc) 132
This is so totally insane, we need to investigate Holder's Black Muslim connections.
Posted by: Rodent Liberation Front at November 18, 2009 01:46 PM (dQdrY) 133
I'm afraid I don't follow you, gus.
Should the Pearl Harbor attackers have been afforded America rights, If not, what is ther difference. The Pearl Harbor attackers were the Japanese Navy. I fail to see how they are equivalent to Al Queda. You can't and don't put POWs on trail. It'd be idiotic. Whom you DO put on trail are spies and saboteurs. Posted by: Techie at November 18, 2009 01:47 PM (wVPwI) 134
So, if they let this piece of shit go, where would they release him? Pakistan? And what is going to stop KSM from trying to represent himself using the courtroom as his personal soap box to recite the Koran? Posted by: Todd the guy who hate muslims, all muslims at November 18, 2009 01:49 PM (LLOGQ) Posted by: Techie at November 18, 2009 01:50 PM (wVPwI) 136
This sets so much bad precedent on so many levels; all of them stated above. This could change the ROE in such a way as to make the prosecution of the war more dangerous and less successful for our military. This puts the conviction of terrorists within question, which is utter bs. This puts the civilian population at risk (intimidating/influencing the jury/jusry pool perhaps? yeah, I think so). It sets the precedent for using military tactics on ordinary American civilians -- this is a biggie to me. The list goes on and on. This isn't about prosecuting terrorists; this is about trying to set precedent for future control of the populace. And it's a nasty piece of work all around. Posted by: unknown jane at November 18, 2009 01:50 PM (5/yRG) 137
If they let KSM go, they will have to put Holder and Obama in Witness Protection.
Posted by: wHodat at November 18, 2009 01:50 PM (+sBB4) 138
@130, after discharging your clip into his chest.
Posted by: Mike H at November 18, 2009 01:53 PM (cvvNY) 139
Here's the thing, this violates the precious Geneva conventions.
All of that international crap that the Left loves is being stood on its head. If KSM is a soldier, then he is a POW and we can hold him until the end of hostilities but we cannot interrogate him in any serious way. If KSM is a terrorist waging war on the US, then he is treated as either a pirate or a spy. If KSM is a civilian with legal residence in the US, then he is a criminal subject to the US justice system. But there is nothing in international law or even US law that allows us to kidnap someone from another country, bring him to the US for a civilian trial and put him in a civilian jail. I am surprised the Left is still defending this. There must be some lefty (Hitchens?) for whom this stinks. We are seeing the moral preening of the Left laid bare. Posted by: AmishDude at November 18, 2009 01:53 PM (T0NGe) 140
There's exactly one question that can even conceivably be adjudicated in civilian courts: "Are you a member of AQ?"
If you're trying guys with "exceptions to the normal rules", like habeus corpus, Miranda, etc - then you're diluting those self-same protections for the rest of us. "He's a terrorist, we can skimp on..." There have been a couple of crazies that have been charged under "terrorism" laws when more ordinary charges would have applied previous to 2001. Add this to the freaking insanity of Janet's predilection of feeling tea parties are terrorists - or at least terrorist sympathizers. This entire approach is fraught from start to finish. And that's ignoring "What do you do with an openly avowed AQ member that simply shoots a serviceman in a combat zone?" You aren't going to get convictions for "murder" on a regular basis. Essentially because "defending the homeland" is a pretty reasonable application of self-defense. We don't actually -see- this very often as we haven't historically crossed civilian and war courts very much. But avoiding this crossing is actually the central tenet of the origins of the original freaking Geneva Convention. Posted by: Al at November 18, 2009 01:59 PM (VtygY) 141
I can see a lot of prisoners in the future being shot trying to escape before our soldiers can get them back to base.
Posted by: wrg at November 18, 2009 02:11 PM (7t+Ws) 142
Let's see, McCarthy prosecuted terrorists while Holder approved their pardons for political purposes and made his money with a white shoe firm that worked on their behalf "pro bono" ie. pro-ME retainers. The latter, obviously, has much more credibility on the issue.
Posted by: ed at November 18, 2009 02:22 PM (Urhve) 143
Amal Abusumayah was paying for groceries at the Jewel store at 17117 S. Harlem Ave. in Tinley Park on Nov. 7 when she felt a sharp tug on her headscarf. When she looked at who had pulled her hijab, she saw a woman who moments before had made a derogatory comment about Islam. On Wednesday, Tinley Park police announced that Valerie Kenney, 54, has been charged with a hate crime, a felony that carries a possible sentence of up to three years in prison and a fine of up to $25,000. "I was shaken up," Abusumayah told the SouthtownStar about the Nov. 7 assault. "This is my dignity and this is my religion." Ahmed Rehab of the Chicago chapter of the Council on American-Islamic Relations said his organization has reached out to the FBI to pursue federal charges. I see. Killing 13 people while shouting Allah Akbar is nothing more than a stress related incident and tugging on a scarf is a case for the FBI. Posted by: TheQuietman at November 18, 2009 02:35 PM (1Jaio) 144
41
I think this proves what we have known all along,Obama's law degree from Harvard is nothing more than a affirmative action certificate of participation.The guy doesn't know his as from a hole in the ground.
Posted by: bulwark at November 18, 2009 12:35 PM (jvrmc) Look: an Ivy League law degree either means (1) you scored great on the LSAT or (2) you are eligible for affirmative action. That's it. Once you're in, there's no failure. None at all. Yale doesn't have grades, FGS. When you're accepted, they print your diploma. This is also the approach we get when lawyers run our system. There are some good lawyers, but they don't think like lawyers. Look at Lindsay Graham. He's a lawyer, so he approaches all problems this way, that the justice system is the answer to all of life's problems. Posted by: AmishDude at November 18, 2009 02:36 PM (T0NGe) Posted by: Unclefacts, Summoner of Wicked High Temps in the Core of the Earth at November 18, 2009 03:16 PM (erIg9) 146
Transparently the purpose of the "Show Trial" is to allow KSM to serve Obama & Eric Holder's agenda with attacks on Bush's handling of terrorists while preventing Bush/Cheney from defending themselves because that defense, of policies still in effect, will be up to Eric Holder.
Posted by: DANEgerus at November 18, 2009 03:58 PM (LMi2C) 147
Posted by: DANEgerus at November 18, 2009 03:58 PM (LMi2C)
Yes. The important part for people to remember is that the prosecution is working for the defense, and both are working against America. What we have is a "hostile prosecutor". Of course, most of us knew this when Holder was up for confirmation. All of the GOP slime who voted to confirm that dirtball should be tossed out and shunned, relegated to living on the streets where they belong, the scumbags. Posted by: progressoverpeace at November 18, 2009 04:22 PM (A46hP) 148
I've been a proponent for years of making NYC a state, and to cut them off from Upstate.
What, and give them two more liberal Senators? Posted by: Vic at November 18, 2009 04:32 PM (CDUiN) 149
I'm a recent proponent of making Texas a nation...again.
Posted by: Rodent Liberation Front at November 18, 2009 05:18 PM (dQdrY) 150
Holder: "I am not scared of KSM." How convienient, especially when you weren't the one who put yourself in harm's way to get the bastard. That was done by the CIA, the very agency you want to vicariously put on trial. Suckwad. Posted by: SFC MAC at November 18, 2009 05:25 PM (cuNX0) 151
We already know all about what kind of animal KSM is, thanks to the exrtraordinary information that has come out in the military proceedings and the CIA interrogations. Would these be the same CIA interrogations the current regime insists didn't uncover any relevant information? The ones Cheney said worked and Douchebag said didn't? None of that information would be admissible in a real court because he was under duress. This guy should be tried by a military tribunal and then hung. We did the same things to Germans in the same city in WW2. I had to laugh the other night because Bob Beckel on Hannity asked what would you do if Germans sabatoged something and Hannity gave him a pass on it. We already have precedent for this type of action. This guy was caught on a battlefield in civilian clothes. The Geneva Convention is very clear about what rights this murderer has. NONE! Posted by: Bill R. at November 18, 2009 05:39 PM (EhlQq) 152
It'd be nice if the Ivy Leaguers would just admit they view The Law as a toy, and means of totalitarian control. Justice has little to do with it in their hands.
Posted by: Rodent Liberation Front at November 18, 2009 05:44 PM (dQdrY) Posted by: jason at November 18, 2009 09:32 PM (fRLM+) 154
For most of the developing countries. abercrombie fitch Tees it is a good idea to control the population growth. abercrombie Jeans For example. abercrombie fitch Shorts China has carried out birth control for years. abercrombie Pants And this plan has a GREat effect on the world population. abercrombie Tees If the population continues to increase. abercrombie fitch Sweaters if the air and water continue to be polluted. abercrombie fitch Outerwears if we don't do something to protect wild-plant and wildlife species will be declining. abercrombie Shorts Species and biological communities have difficulty adapting to change. abercrombie Sweaters Economic opportunities and the quality of life of future generations are also put at risk. abercrombie Outerwears By protecting nature. abercrombie fitch Hoodies we protect ourselves. abercrombie Hoodies Let's unite together. abercrombie fitch Polos hand in hand we stand all across the land. abercrombie Polos We can make this world in which to live. Hand in hand. abercrombie fitch Jeans Control the population growth. Take good care of our nature. abercrombie fitch Pants To the nature, overpopulation is a big problem. More people, more pollution. abercrombie fitch Shorts And the big population is threatening the nature every second. abercrombie fitch Sweaters the rapid rise in world population is not creating problems only for the developing countries. abercrombie fitch Outerwears The whole world faces the problem that raw materials are being used up at an increasing rate and food production can not keep up with the population increase. abercrombie fitch Hoodies People in rich countries make the heaviest demands on the world's resources, its food, fuel and land, and cause the most pollution.
Posted by: london of links at November 20, 2009 02:02 AM (amVaT) Posted by: somah at November 20, 2009 12:42 PM (Zv8Md) Posted by: mm at November 22, 2009 12:11 AM (QKqJD) Posted by: mbtshoesbuy at November 23, 2009 06:25 AM (bNNim) 158
The proper function of man is to live, but not to exist.ugg classic cardyConquer fear of death and you are put into possession of your life. ugg classic tallThere is a time to speak and a time to be silent. ugg knightsbridgefree shippingmbt cheap
mbt sale mbt uk mbt shoes cheap MBT M.Walk Posted by: reviewups at November 27, 2009 04:59 AM (xUZwC) 159
دليل شات الشله دردشات الخليج دردشات السعوديه دردشة عربيه منتدى روحانيات جسر التواصل ادبيات شرفات الازاهير دوائر ضوء الترفية شبابيات العاب توبيكات شات صوتي سحر العالم تعلم اللغة الانجليزية صور ميسي صور اغرب سيارة دليل الزوجة الناجحة هند البلوشي اصاله نصري رنين الحياة الزوجيه سعودي كام دردشة صوتية ahj شات سعودي سعودي كام اليكسا شابك شات تعب قلبي شات الساهر شات الغلا سعودي كول صور سكس شات مجنونك شات برق موالي شات الرياض شات جده شات القصيم شات بنات السعوديه شات حياتي غير نت لوق زواج مسيار شات حلا حلا السعوديه شاتات دردشات دردشة الشلة دردشة الحب دردشة الخليج شات الود شات صوتي الخيال
Posted by: gfh at November 29, 2009 03:07 PM (jwOUD) 160
hot news for brand shoes online store ,do you want to win more discount ?and popular for younger,and nike air maxwith top quality A ,come on all air max shoes with lowest price for highest quality !
Posted by: nike air max at December 01, 2009 10:00 PM (OKj2x) 161
Buy discount ugg shoes
cheap ugg shoes cheap ugg ugg rainier buy ugg ugg usa discount ugg boots ugg 5825 ugg shoes sale ugg sundance ugg shoes cheap ugg boots ugg 5815 ugg sale ugg uk ugg knightsbridge womens ugg boots ugg boots ugg australia ugg 5819free shipping Posted by: reviewups at December 02, 2009 02:32 AM (fZN4w) Posted by: ugg classic cardy at December 03, 2009 06:34 AM (ftu8y) 163
The cheap ugg boots sale for women are stylish, they are comfortable and what،¯s more, they keep your feet. theres a pair of fellow sufferers,ugg australia uk to complement your personal preferences, why do we not take the traditional high discount ugg boots on salefor cold winter?
As a matter of fact, with the passing time, the love for ugg usa is increasing among girls in this modern world. The growing demand for these womens ugg made the manufacturers UGG Boots Sale to revamp the looks of these boots with different hues.come our website and buy a pair of ugg uk.UGG Classic Cardy are popular as shoes for cowboys. The SHOES close the whole parts of the foot. The ugg cardy are important to protect your feet from any dangerous things during your walking activities. There are many oatmeal ugg available in the Market and if you are interested to get one you can directly go to the store that sells it. Posted by: reviewups at December 03, 2009 10:05 AM (OKj2x) 164
discount ugg boots
ugg boots outlet cheap ugg outlet cheap ugg boots ugg classic tall ugg bailey button ugg rainier ugg classic cardy ugg classic crochet ugg classic mini ugg classic short ugg classic tall ugg nightfall ugg sundance ugg ultra short ugg ultra tall ugg boots 5389 Posted by: uggboots at December 07, 2009 11:14 AM (Cooh2) 165
Today ugg boots online have become a phenomenon.Every winter,the ugg classic crochet are one of the hottest goods in the market all over the world.So now don't be hesitation,own a pair of ugg usa immediately.
Posted by: ugg boots sale at December 10, 2009 04:57 PM (I3/dZ) 166
We supply authentic discount Lacoste Shoes
Lacoste Trainers New Lacoste Lacoste Sale Mens Lacoste camden lacoste trainers lacoste trainers shoes lacoste camden retro camden lacoste trainers lacoste carnaby shoes lacoste carnaby retro lacoste shoes sale New Lacoste shoes Lacoste shoes online cheap Lacoste shoes Lacoste shoe mens lacoste shoes Lacoste Shua Lace Black Lace shoes white Lace shoes lacoste swerve shoes White Lacoste shoes Lacoste shoes sale Cheap Lacoste shoes Lacoste Women Shoes Women Lacoste Shoes Lacoste Shoes online on line, cheap price,Top quality,Free shipping! Posted by: Lacoste shoes at December 13, 2009 12:41 AM (/3s/N) 167
المنتديات العامه @ منتديات اغانى عربيه واجنبيه @ منتديات الافلام @ منتديات البرامج والالعاب @ المنتديات الاداريه @ الشباب والبنات @ ستار اكاديمى 6 @ المنتدى الاسلامى @ المنتدى العام @ منتدى الترحيب والتهانى @ الضحك والفرفشه @ الاغانى السنجل @ الالبومات الكامله @ الكليبات العربيه والاجنبيه @ الاغانى الشعبى @ الاغانى الاجنبيه @ كلمات الاغانى @ قسم الافلام العربيه @ قسم الافلام الاجنبيه @ افلام اينيمى -كارتون @ البرامج العامه @ برامج الشات @ برامج الحمايه @ صندوق الإقتراحات @ منتدى الشكاوى @ سله المحزوفات @ [ Games] قسم الالعاب @ الحب والرومانسيه @ شباب وبنات @ قسم حــواء @ العاب الاعضاء @ الازياء والموضه @ ميكب والجمال @ المطبخ واحدث طرق الطهى @ مناقشات حول ستار اكاديمى @ صور ستار اكاديمى 6 @ فيديوهات ستار اكاديمى 6 @ الصــور @ طلبات الاشـــــراف @ الموبيلات @ نغمات MP£ @ اقسام الجيل الخامس N97 & 5800 @ قسم القصص @ موسوعة أقوال الحگمـاء @ برامج التلفزيون والمصارعه @ اخبار الفن والمطربين @ قسم عشاق محمد بــــاش @ عشاق النجمه لارا اسكندر @ منتديات عشاق الفنانين @ عشاق الاسطوره عمرو دياب @ عشاق نجم الجيل تامر حسنى @ عــآلـم MSN Messenger @ صور اسلاميه @ قسم موهوبين الشعر وكتابه الاشعار @ منتديات الجيل الثانى Symbian OS Series 60 @ قسم التطبيقات ( البرامج ) @ العاب @ قسم السمات ( الثيمات ) Themes @ منتديات الجيل الثالث S60 3rd Edition @ قسم التطبيقات ( البرامج ) الجيل الثالث @ قسم الألعاب Games الجيل الثالث @ قسم السمات ( الثيمات ) Themes الجيل الثالث @ اقسام الرياضه @ منتدى اخبار الرياضه @ قسم النادى الاهلى @ Posted by: midoelgamed at December 13, 2009 04:21 PM (QynAV) 168
Key Rings Luxury | Tie Clip Best | Gold Bracelets Cheap | Rubber Pendant Cheap | Laser Pendant Cheap | Stainless Steel Cufflink Fashion | Zircon Cufflink Cheap | Zircon Pendant Best | Key Rings | Carbon Fiber Rings | Plating Tungsten Bracelet Best | Laser Earring Best | Wholesale Necklaces Tiffany Jewelry | Stamping Bangle Wholesale | Rubber Bangle Yiwu | Wholesale Earrings Tiffany Jewelry | Gold Bracelets Cheap | Wholesal Plating Earring | Fashion Jewelry Wholesale | Plating Tungsten Bracelet Best
Posted by: wholesale jewelry at December 16, 2009 12:46 PM (1dySH) 169
منتديات اغليك-افلام مصرية-منتديات حب بنات-شات حب بنات-افلام
Posted by: aglik at December 29, 2009 09:39 AM (nVm+l) 170
Cheap replica rolex and tag heuer watches,replica watches of rolex rolex watches replica,buy patek philippe Buy replica watches,fake watches and tag heuer watches.
Posted by: tag heuer at January 01, 2010 10:16 AM (nUnK8) 171
replica rolex rolex and tag heuer watches,replica watches of rolex rolex watches replica,buy patek philippe Buy replica watches,fake watches and tag heuer watches.breitling watches breitling watches at low price.
Posted by: rolex at January 06, 2010 09:53 AM (TspGB) 172
UGG cardy
Ugg Australia Ugg Shoes Sale Bailey Button ugg boots Ugg classic cardy UGG cardy Ugg Australia Ugg Shoes Sale Bailey Button ugg boots Posted by: ugg shoes|timberland uk|ugg boots|87415555.com.cn at January 06, 2010 08:21 PM (qzq48) 173
Buy rolex watches,tag heuer watches and replica patek philippe patek philippe watches,replica audemars piguet> replica breitling watches breitling watches,chanel watches chanel watches watches replica montblanc watches.Rolex fake watches and replica watches brands,replica rolex: breitling watches,replica tag heuer: tag heuer, replica rolex: replica rolex replica cartier watches: cartier watches,replica omega watches: omega watches,replica panerai watches: panerai watches,replica armani watches: armani watches,replica audemars piguet: audemars piguet,replica bvlgari watches: bvlgari watches,replica chanel watches: chanel watches,replica gucci watches: gucci watches,replica movado watches: movado watches,replica montblanc watches: montblanc watches,replica patek philippe: patek philippe on sale.replica watches and replica watches.
Posted by: rolex at January 10, 2010 05:52 PM (OO9Jx) 174
Hair Straightener
chi hair straightener chi flat irons chi iron best hair straightener ceramic hair straightener flat iron pink chi hair chi hair irons ghd Pink GHI Hair GHD GHD MK4 GHD MK5 Pink GHD Pink GHI Hair CHI Flat Irons Hair Straightener chi hair irons chi hair straightener best hair straightener chi hair iron pink chi hair chi hair irons Pink GHI Hair Pink GHD GHD Nike Kobe Shoes Nike Lebron Shoes discount nike shox shoes Posted by: chi hair irons at January 17, 2010 05:13 PM (9oETl) 175
Good replica watches and buy replica watches and replica rolex replica replica tag heuer watches,buy replica replica omega watches and breitling watches replica breitling watches sale at lowest prices.
Posted by: replica watches at January 24, 2010 05:49 AM (ioa0w) 176
nike air max 360 shoes
womens air max nike air max womens air max nike air max 360 shoes air max kids air max 90 kids air max classic BW kids air max 360 kids air max 97 nike air max 180 nike air max 2009 nike air max 2010 nike air max 360 shoes nike air max 87 nike air max 88 nike air max 89 nike air max 90 nike air max 91 nike air max 93 nike air max 95 nike air max classic BW nike air max ltd nike air max TN womens air max 2007 womens air max 2009 womens air max 87 womens air max 90 womens air max 91 womens air max 95 womens air max 97 womens air max classic BW Posted by: air max shoes at January 28, 2010 05:47 AM (JOSIc) 177
Buy rolex replica watches and replica watches replica replica watches and replica rolex watches patek philippe watches and fake watches and breitling watches,replica tag heuer: tag heuer,replica cartier watches: cartier watches,replica omega watches: omega watches at lowest prices.
Posted by: replica rolex at January 29, 2010 05:32 PM (h+uyA) 178
nike max
air max shoes nike air max nike max shoes air max 1 nike air max 1 air max 2 nike air max 2 air max 89 nike air max 89 air max 90 nike air max 90 air max 91 nike air max 91 air max 95 nike air max 95 air max 97 nike air max 97 air max 180 nike air max 180 air max 360 nike air max 360 air max 2003 nike air max 2003 air max 2009 nike air max 2009 air max ltd nike air max ltd air max tn nike air max tn air max tailwind nike air max tailwind womens air max 1 womens air max 90 womens air max 95 womens air max BW womens air max LTD womens air max TN womens air max 360 womens air max 2003 womens air max 2007 womens air max 2009 Posted by: airmax at January 31, 2010 04:05 PM (3vSvS) 179
Certainly watches are Replica Watches used to help people record rolex Watches time, but rolex watches nowadays its functions have enlarged. Replica watches are now tag heuer Watches not only objects that tag heuer watches can tell you what time it is, they are also a status symbol. You should not feel strange when you find someone wearing a watch on his wrist, but use the cell phone to tell time. In that situation, the watch is just showing its luxurious function cartier watches. It is normal and cartier watches perhaps also happens to you. .If asked that among the watches of various brands, which one can suit your taste? There is no doubt that most people will choose Rolex. Whichever social class you are in, it is naturally Rolex was known breitling Watches and cherished breitling watches for a long time. However, the elements do not usually enter the market alone, always come with the price tag up to the hand. For this reason, many people, especially men, their dreams of luxury Rolex watches are buried in omega Watches his heart omega watches. What should I do? Rolex watches are simply stunning worn by the rich and famous, right? No, this world is not the world's richest men, is the world of each. All are equal before the search of luxury and be men's watches respected. Within men's watches, the law, when consumers are in the market, women's watches they should women's watches receive the same treatment. This is the real reason why replica Rolex watches are ladies watches ladies watches more welcome than Rolex. Because in this world are not difficult to understand that the rich are much less than people with low income, you agree with me? You are forced to nod and say with certainty that is the reality. These low-income people do not have enough money to save every month. They can not afford such luxury Rolex watches
Posted by: replica watches at February 04, 2010 08:45 AM (CPNio) 180
Cheap replica watches and replica watches 100% copy replica watches of the previous omega watches model: the famous Manchester Logo is located at 3 and the cartier watches chronograph 45-minute breitling watches at 9 with orange figures. Football fans can use the very special 45-minute chronograph to measure the halves of a football match. Black patek philippe hour hand and minute hand features yellow luminescent coating. The hour makers, chronograph audemars piguet and the first 15-minute scale of the tag heuer chronograph counter is montblanc watches presented in eye-catching rolex red. Bright Yellow movado watches tones are found on the minute track, date bvlgari watches rolex on sale.
Posted by: replica watches at February 05, 2010 07:40 AM (0uEN8) 181
nike max
air max shoes nike air max nike max shoes air max 1 nike air max 1 air max 2 nike air max 2 air max 89 nike air max 89 air max 90 nike air max 90 air max 91 nike air max 91 air max 95 nike air max 95 air max 97 nike air max 97 air max 180 nike air max 180 air max 360 nike air max 360 air max 2003 nike air max 2003 air max 2009 nike air max 2009 Posted by: may at February 06, 2010 07:30 PM (Eu9Vs) 182
this replica watches replica watchWhoever wants replica watches timekeeper that does the job of a tachometer will be crazy for. The operation is performed by the copied replica rolex 's bezel. The Daytona also applies automatic movement ¨C just one of many breitling watches characters and functionalities that ensures the precision of time. Originally created to measure lap time and the cartier watches overall time of a race, Rolex Daytona replica omega watches timepieces can measure elapsed time for omega any sporting event. The power of this breitling replica item is made possibly by its internalized perpetual rotor mechanism. Known for its precision, this special Rolex replica cartier watch model only has to be set once to the cartier watches standard time of the owner's choice. Once rolex watches being created, it updates itself during time changes, making upkeep of the replica's time setting replica watches nonexistent. Even though these replica watches were made for sporting events, (specifically those involving laps or circuits), it's not so adversible to put them tag heuer in water since they are not fake watches waterproof. Even thought most of the time, the replica watches do not bear the tag heuer same functionalities as the original ones, they are still the most desirable alternatives of the expensive real models.
Posted by: replica watches at February 07, 2010 02:13 AM (KbTNE) 183
Factors Replica Watches About The Rolex replica watches Oyster The Oyster is so closely get in touch with Rolex, and it is inevitably that some people think these are the only Replica watches Rolex manufacture. Others suppose that there is a single Oyster watch. But as a matter of fact, the name Oyster does not actually meant for a rolex Watches particular watch you can buy rolex watches or even to a series but to a type of case that available in some of the Rolex ranges. History The Oyster case was first released in 1926. The objective was to protect the workings of the watch from dust and moisture. Early watches were far from waterproof. The Oyster tag heuer Watchescase was an tag heuer watches innovative design to eliminate these problems. It had a new double locking crown that screwed into place. It has been compared to the hatch on a submarine. Like a submarine, the Oyster case was waterproof. In 1927 Mercedes Gleitze swam the English breitling Watches Channel breitling watches . Before she set off she was presented with a Rolex Oyster. When she arrived, the watch was still working perfectly. The resulting publicity gave the new case a massive boost. Why is it called Oyster? Legend has it that Hans cartier Watches Wilsdorf cartier watches, who invented the Oyster, chose the name because the new case reminded him of the difficulty he had experienced prising open oysters at dinner. Since then the Oyster has further, particularly advanced. Many Oyster watches today are omega Watches perpetual-self-winding, in other omega watches words, it does not require to expose the mechanism to the outside world in order to wind it. The Osyter Perpetual is one of the toughest, most durable, most reliable watches (under truly adverse conditions). It is probably the best mechanical watch money can buy.
Posted by: replica watches at February 07, 2010 01:18 PM (TUJDt) 184
Watches really Replica Watches are a great fashion replica item. This is because watch manufacturers such as Emporio Armani understand their customers wants and needs and rolex Watches know that rolex watches there is a big market for tag heuer Watches fashion tag heuer watches and designer movado watches in the UK. The number of people that demand these fashion watches has grown enormously over the past few years as people all want to have their own unique personality. Buying a watch can be a breitling watches long breitling Watches process. This is because there are so many watches to choose from that people cartier watches can spend a whole lot of time making their decision. One brand that is always popular is Emporio Armani. This is because Emporio Armani are one of the best fashion brands in the UK and they therefore offer customers some of the best fashion omega Watches available watches on omega the market. There are millions mens Watches of watches for a customer to choose when it comes to a watch. It's quite easy to make the right watch purchase decision. Or you just need to know what famous watch brands are and you may find what you like at once. Emporio Armani watches have been very popular for many mens Watches years.Women's watches Emporio Armani is a brand for style sense and mens Watches fashion which it shows in his range of fashion watches. No matter what watch brand you choose, it can be sure that the watch you are going to wear would show some of your personality.
Posted by: replica watches at February 09, 2010 04:11 PM (fa8ya) Processing 0.09, elapsed 0.1192 seconds. |
MuNuvians
MeeNuvians
Polls! Polls! Polls!
Dale's ECB Election Projection Federal Review Real Clear Politics Rasmussen Reports Gallup Zogby FoxNews Polls Sabato/Crystal Ball Frequently Asked Questions
The (Almost) Complete Paul Anka Integrity Kick
Primary Document: The Audio
Paul Anka Haiku Contest Announcement Integrity SAT's: Entrance Exam for Paul Anka's Band AllahPundit's Paul Anka 45's Collection AnkaPundit: Paul Anka Takes Over the Site for a Weekend (Continues through to Monday's postings) George Bush Slices Don Rumsfeld Like an F*ckin' Hammer Top Top Tens
Democratic Forays into Erotica New Shows On Gore's DNC/MTV Network Nicknames for Potatoes, By People Who Really Hate Potatoes Star Wars Euphemisms for Self-Abuse Signs You're at an Iraqi "Wedding Party" Signs Your Clown Has Gone Bad Signs That You, Geroge Michael, Should Probably Just Give It Up Signs of Hip-Hop Influence on John Kerry NYT Headlines Spinning Bush's Jobs Boom Things People Are More Likely to Say Than "Did You Hear What Al Franken Said Yesterday?" Signs that Paul Krugman Has Lost His Frickin' Mind All-Time Best NBA Players, According to Senator Robert Byrd Other Bad Things About the Jews, According to the Koran Signs That David Letterman Just Doesn't Care Anymore Examples of Bob Kerrey's Insufferable Racial Jackassery Signs Andy Rooney Is Going Senile Other Judgments Dick Clarke Made About Condi Rice Based on Her Appearance Collective Names for Groups of People John Kerry's Other Vietnam Super-Pets Cool Things About the XM8 Assault Rifle Media-Approved Facts About the Democrat Spy Changes to Make Christianity More "Inclusive" Secret John Kerry Senatorial Accomplishments John Edwards Campaign Excuses John Kerry Pick-Up Lines Changes Liberal Senator George Michell Will Make at Disney Torments in Dog-Hell Greatest Hitjobs
The Ace of Spades HQ Sex-for-Money Skankathon A D&D Guide to the Democratic Candidates Margaret Cho: Just Not Funny More Margaret Cho Abuse Margaret Cho: Still Not Funny Iraqi Prisoner Claims He Was Raped... By Woman Wonkette Announces "Morning Zoo" Format John Kerry's "Plan" Causes Surrender of Moqtada al-Sadr's Militia World Muslim Leaders Apologize for Nick Berg's Beheading Michael Moore Goes on Lunchtime Manhattan Death-Spree Milestone: Oliver Willis Posts 400th "Fake News Article" Referencing Britney Spears Liberal Economists Rue a "New Decade of Greed" Artificial Insouciance: Maureen Dowd's Word Processor Revolts Against Her Numbing Imbecility Intelligence Officials Eye Blogs for Tips They Done Found Us Out, Cletus: Intrepid Internet Detective Figures Out Our Master Plan Shock: Josh Marshall Almost Mentions Sarin Discovery in Iraq Leather-Clad Biker Freaks Terrorize Australian Town When Clinton Was President, Torture Was Cool What Wonkette Means When She Explains What Tina Brown Means Wonkette's Stand-Up Act Wankette HQ Gay-Rumors Du Jour Here's What's Bugging Me: Goose and Slider My Own Micah Wright Style Confession of Dishonesty Outraged "Conservatives" React to the FMA An On-Line Impression of Dennis Miller Having Sex with a Kodiak Bear The Story the Rightwing Media Refuses to Report! Our Lunch with David "Glengarry Glen Ross" Mamet The House of Love: Paul Krugman A Michael Moore Mystery (TM) The Dowd-O-Matic! Liberal Consistency and Other Myths Kepler's Laws of Liberal Media Bias John Kerry-- The Splunge! Candidate "Divisive" Politics & "Attacks on Patriotism" (very long) The Donkey ("The Raven" parody) News/Chat
|