| Support
Contact
| Eight Carrie Prejean Self-Satisfaction Tapes?Not really "sex" tapes, per se, but you know. I don't really find this "hypocritical." I have a problem here, but it's not hypocrisy. Hypocrisy does not mean "Establishing a standard for yourself and then failing to live up to it." There is a different word for that: It's called being a human being. Or at least a human being who does, in fact, attempt to better herself and set goals and maintain a standard of conduct. Anyone who sets goals for himself will fail. And what is the alternative? Hypocrisy is, instead, proclaiming a series of values and vindictively using those values to chastise others for failing to live up to them, all the while gleefully violating them yourself. Has Prejean done this? I don't remember a single statement she made about sexual modesty. The only thing I remember her saying about sex at all wasn't even about sex, per se, but about marriage, and that marriage should be between a man and a woman. A position shared, the left is never willing to concede, by our president, Captain Wonderful. (At least publicly he proclaims this -- in private, he's probably in favor of gay marriage, which the left takes to be "better," somehow, than actually believing in traditional marriage and saying so like Prejean.) So I don't mind this stuff, really. I do not believe Christians are somehow magically neutered and lack a sex drive. I do not believe that Christians do not have kinks and enjoy sex and even enjoy somewhat forbidden sex. I also do not believe that most Christians attempt to claim otherwise, or scream when others demonstrate similar desires. Mostly what I see Christians saying is that the culture and our major institutions ought not to overly-glamorize sex out of the covenant of marriage, and especially should not sexualize children, both of which seem to be pretty innocuous statements and do not in fact include any possibility of "hypocrisy" at all. For example, I'm not Christian, and I'm a damnable pervert, but I don't want sex to be too public or too encouraged by our culture. Not because I don't want to have perverted sex -- believe me, I do -- but because I kinda don't want 13 year olds thinking they're "weird" if they're not having sex at such a young age. They should, I think, wait until they are at least mature enough to handle such a thing, as I did, when I chose to remain chaste until my 29th birthday. No but seriously? This shit with sexualizing children is pretty evil and needs to stop. But I don't see how any charge of "hypocrisy" can possibly be contrived out of that set of positions. 1, yes, I want pervy stuff, 2, yes, I support other adults' right to pervy stuff, and 3, we should all keep our pervy stuff off of Times Square billboards to avoid putting ideas into kids' heads and exacerbating the already-intense peer pressure to lose one's virginity as quickly as possible. Where's the hypocrisy? I support both my freedom to be a perv and the understandable desire of parents to have a public space free of overtly-sexual messaging. We can both have what we want, really: We just need people to not look at what I'm doing behind closed doors, and we need people like me to not put what we're doing behind closed doors on a jumbotron ad for Calvin Klein. At any rate, that's not my problem with Prejean. My problem, instead, is that she has enlisted supporters, such as myself, to support her in her legal/PR campaign, on the theory that the California pageant had nothing legitimate to boot her out on, and that only anti-Christian animus could explain their behavior, when in fact... well, first the photos, which were racy, but I excused and defended. And then, well, the masturbation tape, which I kept quiet about. And now... the other seven masturbation tapes. From her point of view, I can see how she's conned herself into believing she's a victim. There is some truth in the idea that this stuff would not have come out, and she could have retained her sexual privacy as most beauty queens do (come on-- you don't think these girls are all virgins, do you?), had Perez Hilton not ambushed her with a question and turned her into a pageant-loser and a cause celebre. And that if vindictive members of the gay gossip mafia weren't looking to "get" her after that. Yeah, I get that. On the other hand: She knew all this stuff was out there, she knew it was coming out, etc., and yet I and many of her supporters have been impressed into duty as her defenders through deception. Because it wasn't ever true that there was no reason, save anti-Christian animus, to kick her out of the pageant organization. A masturbation tape is, well. I'm not really offended by it but other pageant-hopefuls have gotten the boot for the same thing, and even a lot less. So what do I feel about her? I feel she chumped me in order to advance her own legal interests. And there's nothing hypocritical about that, and nothing about Christianity about that, and nothing about sex about that. It's just dishonest, and mercenary, and I don't appreciate it. So, that's that. Yes, she got a raw deal. Yes, a lot of other pageant hopefuls have sexual skeletons in the closet that never come out because the gay left in the media isn't determined to bring them down, by hook or by kink. But still, for me, I'm very much done defending her. It's not like it cost me a great deal to defend her -- quite the opposite; taking a popular position among your political confreres is never really a costly position -- but still, I feel a bit taken for a ride, and don't really want to defend her any further. Whether she has anything more interesting to say is up to her. But the Perez Hilton/pageant stuff? I really don't care to hear how unfair it all was anymore. It was unfair, and a book deal was gotten out of that; that's enough. A book deal can bandage up a lot of wounds.Comments1
Where can I find these tapes? (it's for research)
Posted by: HHKirst at November 13, 2009 07:35 PM (kIE31) 2
Ace, just quit blathering and post a link to the Prejean hypocritical pron tape already.
Posted by: Shooter McGavin at November 13, 2009 07:35 PM (cxGtL) 3
Yes, yes, I would like to see them too, but only for research, as my homosexual affairs were for research, and my letters to al qaeda were for research, and so too, for research, was my mass murder of 13 adults and one unborn child.
Posted by: Major Abu Nidal Hasan at November 13, 2009 07:36 PM (jlvw3) 4
shooter,
could not even if I wanted to. She was 17 at the time, I understand, making this legally child pornography. Posted by: Major Abu Nidal Hasan at November 13, 2009 07:37 PM (jlvw3) 5
Eight tapes of her just pleasuring herself? Wouldn't the boyfriend be a little bored after tape #3?
Posted by: Sassypants at November 13, 2009 07:37 PM (cJK1e) Posted by: Barney Fag at November 13, 2009 07:37 PM (6mfq0) 7
that was me sock off.
Posted by: ace at November 13, 2009 07:37 PM (jlvw3) 8
Also, if anyone's interested, I have several dozens of self-satisfaction tapes of myself available to post here. (for research)
Posted by: HHKirst at November 13, 2009 07:38 PM (kIE31) 9
She's only a hypocrite if she marries a woman.
Posted by: Hesiodos at November 13, 2009 07:39 PM (dz2Np) 10
I thought she was despicable during her Larry King interview. Whether or not it was inapproprate her reaction made her look like a simp. A simp with sweet, sweet tits.
Posted by: concerned moron at November 13, 2009 07:40 PM (llP1d) 11
>>>Eight tapes of her just pleasuring herself? Wouldn't the boyfriend be a little bored after tape #3?
Ah, women. They can be so funny sometimes. Posted by: ace at November 13, 2009 07:41 PM (jlvw3) 12
Only 17 eh? Well, I bet we could at least get Ruth Bader's agreement that the tapes are art and/or free speech, and therefore must be released at once.
Posted by: Shooter McGavin at November 13, 2009 07:41 PM (cxGtL) Posted by: SGT Dan at November 13, 2009 07:42 PM (ZP+gj) 14
The take away: no conservative should ever take any position on any policy in public if they have any skeletons in their closet.
Posted by: GregInSeattle at November 13, 2009 07:44 PM (B5cM9) 15
11 -- I was really asking in earnest. How much of that is supposed to be a turn-on for the boyfriend? Unless she's using a variety of props to that end. And even so, that gets old fast. I just can't fathom how exciting that would be for the guy.
Posted by: Sassypants at November 13, 2009 07:44 PM (cJK1e) 16
Hey, I have heard of her.
Posted by: obligatory Charlie Gibson at November 13, 2009 07:44 PM (DIYmd) 17
Eight tapes of her just pleasuring herself? Wouldn't the boyfriend be a little bored after tape #3?
Men never get bored from sex. Ever. Posted by: Elizabeth at November 13, 2009 07:45 PM (hA5JK) 18
5 Eight tapes of her just pleasuring herself? Wouldn't the boyfriend be a little bored after tape #3? Men are from Mars...women are cluless. Where the hell are them tapes?? Posted by: beedubya at November 13, 2009 07:45 PM (AnTyA) 19
I 'm not sure why she gave up her suit. The pagent getting these videos was illegal and they were used in an effort to blackmail her. It just adds to the damages she gets to collect. If the videos leak out the pagent has commited a federal crime of distributing child pornography. They can be arrested just for having them in their possession. Was a win / win for her if she had stuck to her guns. Posted by: Waste93 at November 13, 2009 07:45 PM (KHM8y) 20
Crap. So she's in touch with her own sexuality. I thought that was kinda good. More lefty than righty, sure. But I'm kinda centrist so I gotta yawn while I GMAO*.
* Google My Ass Off. Posted by: I Am Jack's Expletive Free Comment at November 13, 2009 07:45 PM (Tet3D) 21
>> I just can't fathom how exciting that would be for the guy. It's kinda hard to explain. I'm gonna need a white board. Posted by: Dave in Texas at November 13, 2009 07:46 PM (Wh0W+) 22
How much more evidence do we need to finally say ALL beauty pageant contestant are phony-baloney wannbe-actors gold-digging whores? *that includes ALL reality-show participants, too Posted by: Tweet at November 13, 2009 07:46 PM (9X3KM) 23
Ace there is a problem with your post. I didn't see any html link to the videos. Please update the post repleat with flaming skulls dancing the jig.
Posted by: pc at November 13, 2009 07:46 PM (crDIp) 24
Hey, are there any tapes of her with a cigar?
Posted by: Bill Clinton at November 13, 2009 07:46 PM (ynT/h) Posted by: obligatory Beavis at November 13, 2009 07:46 PM (DIYmd) 26
Elizabeth - I understand that men never get bored with sex - but what's in those tapes is hardly sex. Eight tapes of her doing the same thing to herself.
Posted by: Sassypants at November 13, 2009 07:46 PM (cJK1e) 27
... and now she's chumped me into liking her even more. I think that's the way Ace meant to finish the post. Posted by: You're Gonna Need a Montage (rdb) at November 13, 2009 07:47 PM (e5wZA) 28
this could be 8 parts of the same session. Plus pics. I never thought of her as some moral paragon, she let a beauty pagent buy her tits after all, and I never saw the need to defend anything except her right to speak how she felt about marriage without vindictive retribution. But the boyfriend is a real douche.
I have no tapes or pictures of exs, never wanted them. But I don't think I could ever do that. I couldn't imagine enjoying spending that money. Posted by: Rocks at November 13, 2009 07:48 PM (MTcoh) 29
>>>I was really asking in earnest. How much of that is supposed to be a turn-on for the boyfriend? Unless she's using a variety of props to that end. And even so, that gets old fast. I just can't fathom how exciting that would be for the guy.
You are a very nice person, and I do not want you to take this in the wrong way, or in a personal way, but you are a moron. No but seriously? No. No, we don't get bored. If any woman is giving herself the excuse "I would do that but it would bore him," let me strip away this excuse. We don't get bored by sex, ever. As for tapes: The reason there are 1,000,000 porn titles -- and not just one good one -- is that we get bored of the OLD stuff after two or three viewings, tops, and need NEW stuff, even if it's pretty much exactly the same. If it's different, we like it. Posted by: ace at November 13, 2009 07:48 PM (jlvw3) 30
Sassypants,
My husband still tries to look down my shirt every time I see him. That's it. Quick boob shot. We've been married 26 years. Posted by: Lana at November 13, 2009 07:48 PM (MpHql) 31
I was really asking in earnest. How much of that is supposed to be a
turn-on for the boyfriend? Unless she's using a variety of props to
that end. And even so, that gets old fast. I just can't fathom how
exciting that would be for the guy.
I'm not a guy, but from my experience it doesn't need to be new/different for a guy to like it. Maybe videos like that were the guys major turn on. Maybe the videos were used as a lead in to what would happen the next time they were in the same room... There are lots of possibilities here, but I'm guessing that this was an on going turn on for both of them (otherwise, why do it). Posted by: Elizabeth at November 13, 2009 07:48 PM (hA5JK) Posted by: sTevo at November 13, 2009 07:49 PM (eA3tl) 33
I love the comments at the Radar website. They all must be gawd awefully ugly jealous liberal skunts that couldn't get a date if their miserable lives depended on it.
Posted by: Mr. Pissed at November 13, 2009 07:49 PM (EL+OC) 34
Hey, Charlie Gibson's finally heard of something. Go figure.
Posted by: You're Gonna Need a Montage (rdb) at November 13, 2009 07:49 PM (e5wZA) 35
How much more evidence do we need to finally say ALL
beauty pageant contestant are phony-baloney wannbe-actors gold-digging
whores?
*that includes ALL reality-show participants, too
Posted by: Tweet at November 13, 2009 07:46 PM (9X3KM) Okay pageant contests for sure but surely not Top Chef? Posted by: Rocks at November 13, 2009 07:49 PM (MTcoh) 36
Well now that I know that there are 8 of these things floating around, I will have to change my position and defend her to the hilt.
Defend her right to make solo pron all day long! Hey Carrie you need a camera man, director, artistic consultant, and or oil man? Posted by: Rickshaw Jack at November 13, 2009 07:49 PM (tahIV) 37
I was really asking in earnest. How much of that is supposed to be a turn-on for the boyfriend? Unless she's using a variety of props to that end. And even so, that gets old fast. I just can't fathom how exciting that would be for the guy. Hello? Posted by: Bill Clinton at November 13, 2009 07:50 PM (ynT/h) 38
Carrie's a 21st century California gal. Over/under for that breed, Christian or not, is 10 sex tapes, one of at least is a threesome, by age 25. Carrie's got a way to go.
Posted by: aurelius at November 13, 2009 07:50 PM (5HhWZ) Posted by: awkward davies at November 13, 2009 07:51 PM (wb68R) 40
I don't call it hypocracy, but I do think she is a fake b**ch. She does seem to walk around as a devout Christian. At least she wears a cross around her neck and talks about her being a Christian fairly often. Well it turns out she is just a materialistic ho. And I suppose that there are some Christian sects that have some pretty loose sexual morals and say it's okay to make naked tapes and email them to your boyfriend (and pose naked for modeling pictures), but I think that is typically thought of as un-Christian. Posted by: dan-O at November 13, 2009 07:51 PM (+9Rf8) 41
That was a bit harsh of you, Ace.
Posted by: Sassypants at November 13, 2009 07:51 PM (cJK1e) 42
She was booked on Laura Ingraham today, but her people pulled the chute. Laura did say that she was told it wasn't just her show - that the book tour was on hold.
Posted by: loppyd at November 13, 2009 07:51 PM (UJIeT) 43
Unless she's using a variety of props
to that end. And even so, that gets old fast. I just can't fathom how
exciting that would be for the guy.
Just sitting here thinking and realizing that I can think of *at least* 10 different things to do (without props)... so she wouldn't necessarily have had to use props for each video to be different. Posted by: Elizabeth at November 13, 2009 07:52 PM (hA5JK) 44
>>>I 'm not sure why she gave up her suit. The pagent getting these videos was illegal and they were used in an effort to blackmail her. It just adds to the damages she gets to collect.
Eh... it's not blackmail. You are permitted to threaten to release documents or pictures directly and legitimately related to a bona-fide suit. Example: If I threatened to release these tapes without having any connection with Prejean, it's blackmail. BUT... if I'm the pageant organization, and I have a contract with her, and that contract includes moral turpitude/embarrass the pageant clauses, now there is a direct evidentiary value to the tapes, and threatening to release them is NOT blackmail. This may sound odd but it's written into the law. Because the law does have to distinguish between guys just shaking you down and people threatening to do things they do have a legal right (and maybe even legal obligation, to protect their own contractual rights) to do. Posted by: ace at November 13, 2009 07:52 PM (jlvw3) Posted by: sTevo at November 13, 2009 07:52 PM (eA3tl) Posted by: Tweet at November 13, 2009 07:52 PM (9X3KM) 47
By the way: It's slimy to do this because it is "blackmail" in a general sense. But it's not legally blackmail.
Slimy and sleazy and nasty and coercive but not actually illegal. Posted by: ace at November 13, 2009 07:53 PM (jlvw3) 48
And by the way... are these tapes "masturbation" or just her doing a little strip tease? I know it is called masturbation now, but they have also been called "sex tapes", which they obviously weren't. A masturbation tape and a strip tease tape seem to be quite different. Posted by: dan-O at November 13, 2009 07:53 PM (+9Rf8) 49
Seems like any pub would be good for book sales. ("Pub" is the in-the-know, insider way to say "publicity." You can do that when a few of your rants were published on About.com.)
Posted by: You're Gonna Need a Montage (rdb) at November 13, 2009 07:53 PM (e5wZA) 50
Well, thanks everybody, for setting me straight. I'm hardly a prude. I was simply curious.
Posted by: Sassypants at November 13, 2009 07:53 PM (cJK1e) 51
Ace - I liked your definition of hypocrisy. The American people need a refresher in what it really is since it is one of the left's favorite tools and in many, if not most, cases is used inappropriately. A good example of hypocrisy is lecturing the American people on the importance of paying their fair share in taxes....in the patriotic duty to pay taxes to quote Joe Biden. And then give examples of all the high ranking Democrats like Daschle and Rangel etc not paying their taxes. That's hypocrisy. Posted by: LGoPs at November 13, 2009 07:53 PM (tm/sN) 52
Prejean has not been hypocritical. Indeed, for Christians it is a recognition of humanity's imperfection and striving to learn from one's mistakes is the journey. Those who yell HYPOCRITE! are only trying to make themselves feel better and justify their own weaknesses. I agree that Prejean needs to chill out and take a vacation, something. Against my better judgment, I watched the Larry King interview and kept thinking, "What the fuck is she doing?" Posted by: Alex's Cabin at November 13, 2009 07:53 PM (EoRfm) 53
They're not holding Prejean to her own standards, Ace, they're holding her to the standards they ascribe to their cartoon-version of a Kwazy Kwistian. It's what the Left always does-- they are functionally incapable of understanding their opposition, so they invent their demonic doppleganger through projection and hyperbole.
Posted by: nickless at November 13, 2009 07:53 PM (MMC8r) 54
My husband still tries to look down my shirt every time I see him. That's it. Quick boob shot. Can you describe in detail just what your hubbie is trying to get a peek at? Hold on a sec while I dim the lights, get a glas of wine, and put on some music.. ...OK..ready
Posted by: beedubya at November 13, 2009 07:54 PM (AnTyA) 55
Eight tapes of her just pleasuring herself? Wouldn't the boyfriend be a little bored after tape #3?
If men could have a vajayjay hanging off their winkies all the time everyday ...well you get the picture. Posted by: dogfish at November 13, 2009 07:54 PM (GQwdV) 56
I realize it is a slow news day, but who cares? (at least without the visual aids?)
Posted by: somejoe at November 13, 2009 07:54 PM (SSWdi) 57
I and many of her supporters have been impressed into duty as her defenders through deception. Mayhaps you should ignored the beauty pageant-gate teacup-tempest and remained only vaguely aware of who the hell y'all were blathering about... Well right up until you found out masturbation tapes where involved at any rate. Now I find I need more depth coverage on this hard hitting issue. Posted by: Entropy at November 13, 2009 07:54 PM (cok/k) 58
Unless she wants to be treated like Sarah Palin, she better stay home. These people will never let this go. Well, she could become a Democrat and Obama supporter, then it would be okay.
Posted by: kansas at November 13, 2009 07:54 PM (ynT/h) 59
Sassy,
I'm sorry, I was trying to be funny. I was trying to funny in this way: "You are sooooo wrong on this that despite the fact that you're a nice person I'm going to have to call you a moron." I'm sorry that that joke did not land as intended. I thought I set it up properly with all the disclaimers. I am sorry about that. Please understand that when I wrote that I *thought* it would make you laugh. If I'd thought it wouldn't land right, I wouldn't have said it. Posted by: ace at November 13, 2009 07:54 PM (jlvw3) 60
The lack of links to these Eight Carrie Prejean Self-Satisfaction Tapes is, itself, a crime against mankind.
Posted by: toby928 at November 13, 2009 07:54 PM (PD1tk) 61
Well, thanks everybody, for setting me straight. I'm hardly a prude. I was simply curious.
I would certainly never consider you to be a prude. Posted by: Elizabeth at November 13, 2009 07:55 PM (hA5JK) 62
That was a bit harsh of you, Ace. He said he liked you, sappypantelones. What more do you want, moron? Posted by: Tweet at November 13, 2009 07:55 PM (9X3KM) 63
TMZ says Vivid Video has the tape, obtained legally from a third party, and that third party has signed the legal paperwork saying she was indeed 18 at the time.
Any AOSHQ moron who says they wouldn't watch it is probably lying. Posted by: SGT Dan at November 13, 2009 07:55 PM (ZP+gj) 64
The words to pictures ratio of this post is appalling.
Posted by: Waterhouse at November 13, 2009 07:56 PM (I/dT5) 65
I'm willing to care for her if she goes blind.
Posted by: Jack Bauer's Evil Brother at November 13, 2009 07:56 PM (sl5rD) Posted by: Ben at November 13, 2009 07:57 PM (bftbi) 67
It's ok, Ace. You're a sweet guy. It just sounded harsh after reading it once. I'm learning new things here every night.
Posted by: Sassypants at November 13, 2009 07:57 PM (cJK1e) Posted by: Winston Smith at November 13, 2009 07:57 PM (MFbfZ) 69
Just sitting here thinking and realizing that I can think of *at least*
10 different things to do (without props)... so she wouldn't
necessarily have had to use props for each video to be different.
We will require photographic evidence that supports your position. Posted by: Mr. Pissed at November 13, 2009 07:57 PM (EL+OC) 70
It was a variation of something I say a lot:
"Please take this with the greatest amount of respect, but you're a fucking moron." I use that with both enemies and trolls (where I mean it) and with friends (where I think we are close enough that they know that I don't mean it). I erred in thinking that you would get that I was obviously being hyperbolic for effect. Again, sorry: Was furtherest thing from mind to offend. I have made this mistake a lot... calling friends "retard," and then thinking, wrongly, that I have enough goodwill with a not-quite-friend to call him a "retard," and then quickly finding out "no, we're not quite at that stage of the relationship yet." It's an error I make. Again, sorry. Posted by: ace at November 13, 2009 07:57 PM (jlvw3) 71
She is savaged, yet Eliot Spitzer gave a lecture on ethics at the Harvard B School last night.
Posted by: loppyd at November 13, 2009 07:57 PM (UJIeT) 72
Wouldn't the boyfriend be a little bored after tape #3? I'd make that my desktop theme. Posted by: Entropy at November 13, 2009 07:58 PM (cok/k) 73
Its embarrassing and humiliating, but not hypocritical, I agree. Its also irrelevant; what she said was right and true whether she's a skeeze or not.
Posted by: Christopher Taylor at November 13, 2009 07:58 PM (PQY7w) 74
61 - thanks, Elizabeth :-)
Posted by: Sassypants at November 13, 2009 07:58 PM (cJK1e) 75
Hey, I hear in one of the tapes Carrie re-creates that scene from Midnight Express. Isn't that great! Posted by: You're Gonna Need a Montage (rdb) at November 13, 2009 07:58 PM (e5wZA) 76
Alright, Ace. Here's your can of worms, Buddy. You opened 'em.
Posted by: Tommy Gunn at November 13, 2009 07:58 PM (rQTdM) 77
Carrie's my friend.
You attack my friend, then you're my enemy, no matter how stupid my friend is. Posted by: Dave at November 13, 2009 07:58 PM (87clE) 78
Weeerrl, I keep recalling that the shocking, scandalous topless photos turned out to be somewhat less than the salacious things they were purported to be.
Haven't seen the tapes, but Radar there is more reserved in describing them than they would be if they involved mongo zucchinis, f'rinstance. Does sitting in front of a web-cam in an unbuttoned Oxford count? Need more info before I can rule on this. p.s. There's a rumor going about that she was twenty when these were made, and she's claiming seventeen to invoke the underage exception. Sounds like crap, but who knows. Posted by: Uncle Pinky at November 13, 2009 07:59 PM (X8Hld) 79
>> could not even if I wanted to. She was 17 at the time, I understand, making this legally child pornography
Actually, that is apparently disputed. Here is a report that her boyfriend (whom they were sent to) claims that she was 20 at the time. The claim is that she is lying to make it seem more like a youthful indiscretion... rather than something that she recently did. Posted by: dan-O at November 13, 2009 07:59 PM (+9Rf8) 80
Forget about it Ace. I still love you.
Posted by: Sassypants at November 13, 2009 07:59 PM (cJK1e) 81
I'm willing to care for her if she goes blind. You're a profoundly good man and I salute your sacrifice. Posted by: Entropy at November 13, 2009 07:59 PM (cok/k) Posted by: Filly at November 13, 2009 08:00 PM (C/yUr) 83
They should, I think, wait until they are at least mature enough to handle such a thing, as I did, when I chose to remain chaste until my 29th birthday. ace, thats snark right ? 'Cause nobody with a pulse chooses that unless they're going to live in a monastery. You get a pass if it was because you were living amongst the Shaolin to become a Monk and trained assasin, and only then. Posted by: Blazer at November 13, 2009 08:00 PM (+FzLa) 84
If she'd just embrace the filth and not try to pretend to be more chaste than she is, she'd have a better time and probably be elected to Congress too. I'd be very surprised if these tapes are the end of this, she might as well enjoy herself instead of trying to pretend she's prudely shocked every time there's a new revelation.
Posted by: Alice H at November 13, 2009 08:00 PM (qJHYy) Posted by: sTevo at November 13, 2009 08:00 PM (eA3tl) 86
The American Left joins Wahabbis everywhere in condemnation of Carrie Prejean's behavior. Posted by: aurelius at November 13, 2009 08:01 PM (5HhWZ) 87
I dont' even think she's a "skeeze." Look, people do all sorts of crap with long-term boyfriends. That doesn't make them "skeezes."
Obviously they don't want that stuff public, but that doesn't make them "skeezes." I mean: I don't think that stuff a long-term gf did with me makes her a "skeeze." Unwise, maybe. But skeeze? Only if you take the position that sex out of marriage makes you a skeeze. (It might make you something -- but a full-on skeeze?) It's not that she's a skeeze; it's that there was plenty of grounds to fire her, legitimately, and she knew that, and she didn't really warn anyone off of going all-in on defending her. Posted by: ace at November 13, 2009 08:01 PM (jlvw3) 88
Seriously, there's only one way for Ms. Prejean to get through this difficult, difficult time - DVD BOXED SET! Posted by: Dang Straights at November 13, 2009 08:01 PM (WsBlB) Posted by: nickless at November 13, 2009 08:02 PM (MMC8r) Posted by: dogfish at November 13, 2009 08:02 PM (GQwdV) 91
I'd hit it. I'd hit it like two branes hitting each other to create a Big Bang. I'd hit it like a pair of balls hitting Mario Lavanderia's chin. Posted by: FUBAR at November 13, 2009 08:02 PM (fstYb) 92
The American Left joins Wahabbis everywhere in condemnation of Carrie Prejean's behavior. Yup. That's the only hypocrisy I'm seeing here. Cuz we sure haven't seen any vids yet. And I'm looking. Oh man, am I looking. Posted by: Dang Straights at November 13, 2009 08:03 PM (WsBlB) Posted by: ace at November 13, 2009 08:04 PM (jlvw3) 94
I feel she chumped me in order to advance her own legal interests
so whats new... welcome to the man club. being a chump is corrallery to being a moron and a man. You cant defend your right to want the pervy stuff then not defend those who freely exercise their own kink. Even if they retract it for some reason later in life. Whos playing who? They are playing you; The left and their hyprocisy, that is exactly what they are preaching. Dont fall for it. Prejean's right. Posted by: meleager at November 13, 2009 08:04 PM (+99N1) 95
'Cause nobody with a pulse chooses that unless they're going to live in a monastery.
I was 30. Colt was 26. We were each other's first, and this house ain't no monastery. It happens. Posted by: Filly at November 13, 2009 08:05 PM (C/yUr) 96
As for tapes: The reason there are 1,000,000 porn titles -- and not just one good one -- is that we get bored of the OLD stuff after two or three viewings, tops, and need NEW stuff, even if it's pretty much exactly the same. That is both hillarious and true. Posted by: Entropy at November 13, 2009 08:05 PM (cok/k) 97
I mentioned in some previous thread that I've never understood what lefties so love about the "hypocrite!" insult. To be a human being is to be a hypocrite. If a murderer repents, do we mock him for being inconsistent? Do we fault a pacifist who is forced to kill to protect his family? Or, more mundanely, do we demonize a vegatarian who weakens on occasion and sneaks out for a burger?
To be a Christian is not to be perfect; Christians are well aware that people are born in sin and live in sin. Our nature is sinful. No one is immune from it. Even King David, who was a "man after God's own heart", sinned terribly. Yet he could at the same time speak of the necessity of following God's path and knowing it to be the truth. Prejean's problem was that she really thought these videos would never surface, and was not mentally prepared when they did. (This is the First Rule: if you photograph yourself naked, it will show up on the Internet. Guaranteed.) The Left isn't concerned in the least with the morality of what she did or did not do; sexual freedom is an essential part of the leftist canon. No, what matters is to discredit Prejean herself, to drown her out, to make her voice disappear. That is the important thing. Whatever the leftist agenda-item may be -- gay marriage, racial politics, economic policy -- conservative opinion must not only be countered, but completely deligitimized. It must be made evil. Prejean should talk to Rush -- the left has been running this play on him for years and years. "Rush is a pill-head! He's a drunk! He's on his third wife! How can you listen to this guy?" To the left the messenger often is the message; they have a hard time understanding why the right does not see it the same way. The word "hypocrite" has absolutely no power over me; I wish other conservatives would stop worrying about it as well. To admit to hypocrisy is simply to admit to being human. Posted by: Monty at November 13, 2009 08:05 PM (nTxjg) 98
Actions have consequences. It doesn't make it fair, but life isn't fair. I don't have a lesser opinion of her now, but I do concede that she has become a punch line.
Posted by: loppyd at November 13, 2009 08:05 PM (UJIeT) 99
Dear Sassypants, It has come to my attention you are more sensitive than the average moron here at AoS. So, I'll say this as politely as I can. Posted by: Tweet at November 13, 2009 08:06 PM (9X3KM) 100
I was 30. Colt was 26. We were each other's first, and this house ain't no monastery. It happens.
I thought you were quoting Brokeback Mountain for a minute there. Posted by: Winston Smith at November 13, 2009 08:07 PM (MFbfZ) 101
Damn! She has more viewers than Keith Olberman!!
Posted by: KZnextzone at November 13, 2009 08:07 PM (s0ipZ) 102
Sometimes its tough to be conservative and human, I guess. And heaven forbid you become a conservative after some youthful indiscretion.
See, its ok for Clinton and Obama to snort a few lines of coke early in life, but not Bush. Posted by: Guy Fawkes at November 13, 2009 08:07 PM (DIYmd) 103
I was 30. Colt was 26. We were each other's first, and this house ain't no monastery. It happens.
Posted by: Filly at November 13, 2009 08:05 PM (C/yUr) I was just busting ace's balls a bit. I could care less what age someone is when they first have sex, the later the better imho. Posted by: Blazer at November 13, 2009 08:07 PM (+FzLa) 104
awwwww. Sweetest thing anyone ever's said to me.
Kinda like the old Woodie Allen line: Is sex dirty? It is if you do it right. (Said line was long before he got into his ... whatevah...) Posted by: I Am Jack's Expletive Free Comment at November 13, 2009 08:07 PM (Tet3D) Posted by: dan-O at November 13, 2009 08:08 PM (+9Rf8) 106
Well put, ace. I'm only a scientist/engineer, not a lawyer, so I don't know what the legal implications of everything are. I think the issue is that it looks like there were real grounds for firing her (regardless of the fact that malice was involved in the outing of the grounds), so she should have shut up about it.
This whole thing makes her look like a fame whore, which she probably is (at least a little), like approximately 23.5% of the rest of society nowadays. (Totally scientific accurate number, by the way.) It's like during the Lewinski thing, when people said conservatives were out to get Clinton and that was what the whole thing was about, I would reply that if he knew they were out to get him, he should have been more careful not to do something that was so unethical. I don't doubt for one second that she was being attacked only because she held conservative views, but I guess I don't feel too sorry for her any more. I wouldn't be crushed if I never heard about her again. Posted by: african chick at November 13, 2009 08:08 PM (uqMNC) 107
BTW, the whole hypocracy thing with Christians is a joke. Christians adhere to an idea that there is an absoltute right when it comes morality. NOT living up to that is not hypocritical. The hypocracy is suggesting what you thought before was wrong because you are ashamed of what you did. It's like suggesting Tiger won the Grand Slam because he held all golf's major titles at once even though he did not win them in a calender year. He didn't. Prejean could have made 1000 tapes it would only be hypocritical if she suggested she was being moral when she did it. Her personal character is irrelevant to the corretness of Christian morality.
Posted by: Rocks at November 13, 2009 08:08 PM (MTcoh) 108
1. Thou shalt not worship any other god but YHWH. 2. Thou shalt not make a graven image. 3. Thou shalt not take the name of YHWH in vain. 4. Thou shalt not break the Sabbath. 5. Thou shalt not dishonor your parents. 6. Thou shalt not murder. 7. Thou shalt not commit adultery 8. Thou shalt not steal. 9. Thou shalt not commit perjury. 10. Thous shal not covet ...nope..no "thou shalt not diddle thyself "
Posted by: beedubya at November 13, 2009 08:08 PM (AnTyA) Posted by: Soap MacTavish at November 13, 2009 08:08 PM (554T5) Posted by: Tweet at November 13, 2009 08:08 PM (9X3KM) 111
Finally!
Posted by: Charlie Gibson at November 13, 2009 08:08 PM (tahIV) 112
So, I'll say this as politely as I can. Yeah! Let's see if the tshirt is as sassy as the pantaloons. Posted by: Dang Straights at November 13, 2009 08:08 PM (WsBlB) 113
>>>This is the First Rule: if you photograph yourself naked, it will show up on the Internet. Guaranteed.)
Ummmmm.... Not to be mercenary dick or anything, but um, not with me. Perfect track record. Now -- EVERYONE ELSE, yeah, Monty's advice is 100% accurate. Just saying. There are exceptions. I believe it is important to note these exceptions. Rules are important, but so is *nuance.* I kind of laugh every time this happens because I want to caution as Monty does and say "NEVER EVER DO THIS" but then, yeah, I always want to supply the caveat: Except with me, ladies. Except with me. Posted by: ace at November 13, 2009 08:08 PM (jlvw3) 114
Dear Tweet,
Go fuck off. And for the record, I wasn't being sensitive. Just had an enquiring mind. You're the one that's -- how shall I put this -- beating a dead horse. In fact, isnt it time for you to come up with a new screen name? It's been more than 5 minutes. Posted by: Sassypants at November 13, 2009 08:08 PM (cJK1e) 115
5 Eight tapes of her just pleasuring herself? Wouldn't the boyfriend be a little bored after tape #3?
Posted by: Sassypants at November 13, 2009 07:37 PM (cJK1e) Do you critize an author that has written more than one book; an actor that has played more than one role; a singer that has sang more than one song? Posted by: Jim in San Diego at November 13, 2009 08:10 PM (H7Rlw) 116
i'm conservative and i must have missed the meeting where we all decided we are against sex. I feel like the left assumes the right is against everything. Posted by: Ben at November 13, 2009 08:10 PM (bftbi) 117
Wow!! 8 Tapes!! These tapes her worth more to me than all of the other pageant winners combined.
I am in love. Now i just need to find those tapes Posted by: leesus at November 13, 2009 08:10 PM (mAp1o) Posted by: Filly at November 13, 2009 08:10 PM (C/yUr) 119
#45....Stevo! Funny stuff.
Posted by: Lana at November 13, 2009 08:12 PM (MpHql) 120
I was really asking in earnest. How much of that is supposed to be a
turn-on for the boyfriend? Unless she's using a variety of props to
that end. And even so, that gets old fast. I just can't fathom how
exciting that would be for the guy.
I don't know where women originally got the idea that men are deep or complex. Honestly, we're not. Naked women not named Helen Thomas? You could put it on a loop and most guys would watch until they passed out or died because we forgot to drink any water for 3 weeks. Posted by: DrewM. at November 13, 2009 08:12 PM (FCWQb) 121
They're not holding Prejean to her own standards, Ace, they're holding
her to the standards they ascribe to their cartoon-version of a Kwazy
Kwistian. It's what the Left always does-- they are functionally
incapable of understanding their opposition, so they invent their
demonic doppleganger through projection and hyperbole.
Exactly. And we let them do it to us, constantly. We usually help them do it to us. I bet most Christians do a lot of crazy shit to avoid intercourse before marriage. They aren't perfect, shocking. On the other hand I've never once had a Christian tell me how to live my life the way the left does constantly. What is it with the left, they hate religion but they act like puritanical schoolmarms when anyone deviates from their accepted values. Posted by: kefka at November 13, 2009 08:13 PM (n1uMU) 122
Not to be mercenary dick or anything, but um, not with me.
Perfect track record. You just haven't had a woman try hard enough to piss you off, ace. I'm gonna issue a challenge to your next ex-girlfriend. Posted by: Alice H at November 13, 2009 08:13 PM (qJHYy) 123
Every single study shows conservatives have more sex. End of story.
Posted by: pat at November 13, 2009 08:14 PM (BvvsZ) 124
Lana, #85 is closer to the subject in hand...so to speak.
Posted by: sTevo at November 13, 2009 08:14 PM (eA3tl) 125
Not to be mercenary dick or anything, but um, not with me.
Yeah, Ace. You go on thinking that. That little roll of film will stay safely tucked away in my vault...unless you fail to pay. Then? Up on TMZ it goes. I'll make millions! Or...well, thousands. Well...hundreds. Or...well, maybe enough to get a donut with my coffee. The market for this kind of stuff is more limited than I would have thought, given your high-profile Web presence. But it won't stop me from selling you out, "friend". Don't think of it as "blackmail". Think of it as an object-lesson in who not to trust when piss-drunk at a St. Patrick's Day party. Posted by: Monty at November 13, 2009 08:14 PM (nTxjg) 126
>>>You just haven't had a woman try hard enough to piss you off, ace.
Oh, that is definitely not even close to vaguely true. Posted by: ace at November 13, 2009 08:14 PM (jlvw3) 127
26
Elizabeth - I understand that men never get bored with sex - but what's
in those tapes is hardly sex. Eight tapes of her doing the same thing
to herself.
Posted by: Sassypants at November 13, 2009 07:46 PM (cJK1e) really not seeing the problem here. Posted by: Unclefacts, Summoner of Bacon, Meteors, and Outrage at November 13, 2009 08:15 PM (erIg9) 128
*My* puzzlement is what you male morons claim distinguishes new from old, um, stuff. What's to prevent a single tape, say SheLovesPickles, becoming SheLovesPickles #1-99? Would simply starting the tape at a different time count? What about fadout loops? Bluescreen and different backgrounds? Different soundtracks? I can see this becoming a growth industry ...
(see what I did there?) Posted by: bad cat robot at November 13, 2009 08:15 PM (b1DaJ) 129
okay, take it easy, sassypants. I don't want you go to on a jihad tomorrow because you felt you were getting teased. Posted by: Tweet at November 13, 2009 08:15 PM (9X3KM) 130
As for tapes: The reason there are 1,000,000 porn titles -- and not
just one good one -- is that we get bored of the OLD stuff after two or
three viewings, tops, and need NEW stuff, even if it's pretty much exactly the same.
Not necessarily true. I've taken to playing my old tapes in reverse. There's nothing like watching a hooker and a john go at it - only to have the hooker hand the money back to the john - that restores my faith/fantasy in my own sexual prowess. Posted by: I Am Jack's Expletive Free Comment at November 13, 2009 08:15 PM (Tet3D) 131
Naked women not named Helen Thomas? You could put it on a loop and most
guys would watch until they passed out or died because we forgot to
drink any water for 3 weeks.
Would you make an exception for Helen Thomas if she had a bag over her head? Posted by: Alice H at November 13, 2009 08:15 PM (qJHYy) 132
Way too many posts about a bimbo with fish finger...
Now, if someone can produce a video of Sarah Palin naked, and pleasuring her nether regions while moaning, "CoolCzech, oh PLEASE make love to me!," I could understand all the hoopla. Posted by: CoolCzech at November 13, 2009 08:15 PM (QECjC) 133
Exactly. And we let them do it to us, constantly. We usually help
them do it to us. I bet most Christians do a lot of crazy shit to
avoid intercourse before marriage. They aren't perfect, shocking.
I know! It's like this one time, at Bible Camp... Posted by: Winston Smith at November 13, 2009 08:15 PM (MFbfZ) 134
Somebody's gonna have to come up with a snappy name for each one of those tapes Now You see It, Now You Don't with Carrie Prejean Carrie Prejean 2, This Time Its Personal...................... Posted by: Blazer at November 13, 2009 08:15 PM (+FzLa) 135
Posted by: beedubya at November 13, 2009 08:08 PM (AnTyA)
No, it's not one of the Top 10 but still a sin. Posted by: Rocks at November 13, 2009 08:17 PM (MTcoh) 136
There's a campaign going on right now in España promoting (yes) masturbation to young people and how to...ahem...do it right (???).
I guess she heard they were needing some "how to" videos and all of this is basically a PSA for Spain. I say good for her! Posted by: Sofia at November 13, 2009 08:17 PM (seR4q) 137
I just can't fathom how exciting that would be for the guy. If you read that a different way, she's right. I can't fathom how exciting it is either. It's just mind blowing. If Jesus called and asked if he could come back, and he interupted you having sex with your husband, he'd tell him to call back later and hang up. Posted by: Entropy at November 13, 2009 08:17 PM (cok/k) 138
"Eight tapes of her just pleasuring herself? Wouldn't the boyfriend be a little bored after tape #3?"
I agree, except for the losers who spend most of their waking hours here or on porn sites. Also, why don't they just get together and have "pervy" (in Ace's words) sex instead of watching a tape? Posted by: mare at November 13, 2009 08:17 PM (X1fsj) 139
134 - definitely threadwinner.
Posted by: Sassypants at November 13, 2009 08:17 PM (cJK1e) Posted by: Scrat at November 13, 2009 08:18 PM (sZYRM) 141
Would you make an exception for Helen Thomas if she had a bag over her head?
I said we weren't complex, I didn't say we lacked a survival instinct. (well I kind of did with the water thing but forget about it for the moment so my joke works). Posted by: DrewM. at November 13, 2009 08:18 PM (FCWQb) 142
Somebody's gonna have to come up with a snappy name for each one of those tapes
Now You see It, Now You Don't with Carrie Prejean Carrie Prejean 2, This Time Its Personal......................
Posted by: Blazer at November 13, 2009 08:15 PM (+FzLa) Your line of thinking both intrigues, and amazes me. May I subscribe to your newsletter? Posted by: Unclefacts, Summoner of Bacon, Meteors, and Outrage at November 13, 2009 08:18 PM (erIg9) 143
Actually it is not a sin for women.
Posted by: pat at November 13, 2009 08:18 PM (BvvsZ) 144
Well, that's true monty. NOne of my gfs ever became famous.
Posted by: ace at November 13, 2009 08:19 PM (jlvw3) 145
Not because I don't want to have perverted sex -- believe me, I do --
but because I kinda don't want 13 year olds thinking they're "weird" if
they're not having sex at such a young age.
Damned prude. Posted by: Roman Polanski at November 13, 2009 08:19 PM (sz37A) 146
Shit, nevermind. Wrong friggin Thatcher. Shoulda read the damn story first. Sorry.
Posted by: Scrat at November 13, 2009 08:19 PM (sZYRM) 147
"Eight tapes of her just pleasuring herself? Wouldn't the boyfriend be a little bored after tape #3?"
No way to know for sure unless that theory is tested, for scientific purposes of course. I'll have to get back to you after I watch all eight. Posted by: Blazer at November 13, 2009 08:19 PM (+FzLa) 148
This thread is useless without pictures.
Posted by: Anachronda at November 13, 2009 08:19 PM (LD+ZJ) 149
>>>You just haven't had a woman try hard enough to piss you off, ace.
Oh, that is definitely not even close to vaguely true. Oh, so an ex HAS burned all your D&D books? Posted by: Alice H at November 13, 2009 08:19 PM (qJHYy) 150
>> I agree, except for the losers who spend most of their waking hours here or on porn sites.
Seriously, I need a white board for this. Posted by: Dave in Texas at November 13, 2009 08:19 PM (Wh0W+) 151
. Also, why don't they just get together and have "pervy" (in Ace's words) sex instead of watching a tape?
Because being a sexual being (as humans are) it's not all about sexual intercourse. Different people like different things, different people have different turn-ons. If consenting adults want to send videos to each other then go for it. Posted by: Elizabeth at November 13, 2009 08:19 PM (hA5JK) Posted by: Tweet at November 13, 2009 08:20 PM (9X3KM) 153
I'm beginning to think that my guy friend who said she was a liberal democratic plant to embarrass conservatives in a venue where places like gawker would cover the show, wasn't so far off base. The best thing she and her "conservative value" can do is to fade into the woodwork, her 15 minutes of fame are over and if she truly cares about conservative principles then she will "take one for the team" and go back to her old life.
Posted by: curious at November 13, 2009 08:20 PM (p302b) Posted by: Jim in San Diego at November 13, 2009 08:21 PM (H7Rlw) Posted by: Winston Smith at November 13, 2009 08:21 PM (MFbfZ) 156
I agree, except for the losers who spend most of their waking hours here or on porn sites.
I wonder what a Venn Diagram of those cohorts would look like. Posted by: DrewM. at November 13, 2009 08:22 PM (FCWQb) Posted by: Margaret Thatcher at November 13, 2009 08:22 PM (9X3KM) 158
Could we please stop calling this stuff a "double standard". It is nothing so honest as that. It is a tactic. Use any and everything to discredit and destroy those who oppose you. What is the Alinsky quote? Something like," Hold your opponents to their standards."
Posted by: kidney at November 13, 2009 08:22 PM (uxG/I) 159
They're not holding Prejean to her own standards, Ace, they're holding
her to the standards they ascribe to their cartoon-version of a Kwazy
Kwistian. It's what the Left always does-- they are functionally
incapable of understanding their opposition, so they invent their
demonic doppleganger through projection and hyperbole.
Agree 100%. Posted by: angry mob member #50352 at November 13, 2009 08:22 PM (fkgyi) 160
Helen Thomas? I don't think so. She'd be more of a punishment, really.
http://bit.ly/3mmdAV That is hilarious Winston. What a nightmare. Posted by: kefka at November 13, 2009 08:22 PM (n1uMU) 161
Would you make an exception for Helen Thomas if she had a bag over her head? Not even for a bag over her entire ZIP code. Posted by: nickless at November 13, 2009 08:23 PM (MMC8r) Posted by: Margaret Thatcher at November 13, 2009 08:23 PM (9X3KM) 163
Ace just identified my life's motto: Slimy and sleazy and nasty and coercive but not actually illegal. Posted by: California Red at November 13, 2009 08:23 PM (tW88P) 164
Helen Thomas? I don't think so. She'd be more of a punishment, really. http://bit.ly/3mmdAV Posted by: Winston Smith at November 13, 2009 08:21 PM (MFbfZ) NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! AAAAAAEEEEEEEEEE !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Posted by: Khalid Sheik Muhammed at November 13, 2009 08:23 PM (+FzLa) 165
OK. Eight sex tapes. Nude pictures. Whatever.
Carrie, could you please be quiet? Go get a job as a model/actress and just be quiet. Stop trying to be the center of attention in the politico-religious world. Everybody makes mistakes but you really aren't an effective spokeswoman for good morals right now. Thank you.
Posted by: Onlooker at November 13, 2009 08:24 PM (M3hG/) 166
Maggie "Iron Lady" Thatcher passed away?
A sad day, if so. She, Reagan, and Pope John Paul II were the titans of the late 20th Century, liberating hundreds of millions. And that little runt in the WH couldn't bring himself to mention their names on the anniversary of the Fall of Communism. What an insignificant little man. Posted by: CoolCzech at November 13, 2009 08:25 PM (QECjC) 167
I thought you would at least include me. I'm hurt. Deeply.
Posted by: obligatory Carrie swimsuit photo at November 13, 2009 08:26 PM (DIYmd) 168
>>>This is the First Rule: if you photograph yourself naked, it will show up on the Internet. Guaranteed.)
Hmmmm, I guess I should start to worry... Just remembered I'm about to break up with the guy..ah ah.. Posted by: Sofia at November 13, 2009 08:26 PM (seR4q) Posted by: Margaret Thatcher at November 13, 2009 08:26 PM (9X3KM) 170
Here's the basic problem with immortalizing your sexual adventures in video or photographic form: they last essentially forever, especially in the Internet age. You and your lover may (and probably will) grow apart later; you may in fact have a bad break-up. You move on, get married, have kids...and your piss-ant of an ex-boyfriend sends the video to your hubby as a little joke. Or worse, he uploads it to PornTube so the world can enjoy it, forever. Your kids will get links to it via their cellphones. That video will dwell in the Internet ether forever and forever. And you, who may be a good and fine person, will be frozen in time as that slut who gave her tattooed doofus of a boyfriend a sloppy hummer in the park one night while you were wasted.
In other words: you are now a porn star, whether you meant to be or not. Your sexual life is now the world's business, forever. I realize that this doesn't bother many people (to judge by the variety and amount of amateur porn out there), but...it would bother me. Posted by: Monty at November 13, 2009 08:26 PM (nTxjg) 171
"I wonder what a Venn Diagram of those cohorts would look like." LOL You're right they're the same people. And everyone can relax, I'm talking to you, Elizabeth. It was a joke. Posted by: mare at November 13, 2009 08:27 PM (X1fsj) Posted by: Dave in Texas at November 13, 2009 08:27 PM (Wh0W+) 173
Maggie THatcher NOT dead; see top post.
Posted by: ace at November 13, 2009 08:27 PM (jlvw3) 174
Stevo....that one was funny too! thanks!
Posted by: Lana at November 13, 2009 08:27 PM (MpHql) 175
filly,
awwwww. Sweetest thing anyone ever's said to me. Dude, pity sex? I have more respect for myself than tha.... Okay, I see your point. Posted by: MoDoHo at November 13, 2009 08:27 PM (t3Mi3) Posted by: toby928 at November 13, 2009 08:27 PM (PD1tk) 177
I wonder what a Venn Diagram of those cohorts would look like.
One big circle with a small circle inside of it. Posted by: Monty at November 13, 2009 08:28 PM (nTxjg) 178
It was never about Prejean per se. I mean, even if one of these videos involve her with another girl and a cup, I still wouldn't care.
It does not justify the lynch mob that went out to get her, whether she had the skeletons in her closet or not. Or the two minute hates on Olbermann, or what have you. That said, I'm done with her myself. Best thing she could do is get any money she can out of the book sales, keep her head low, go about her life quietly, and ten to fifteen years perspective from now it will be her enemies who look awful. Posted by: Lee at November 13, 2009 08:28 PM (7y9kL) Posted by: mare at November 13, 2009 08:28 PM (X1fsj) Posted by: IllTemperedCur at November 13, 2009 08:29 PM (t3Mi3) Posted by: Blazer at November 13, 2009 08:29 PM (+FzLa) Posted by: Mark Twain at November 13, 2009 08:29 PM (MFbfZ) 183
Helen Thomas? I don't think so. She'd be more of a punishment, really.
http://bit.ly/3mmdAV
Posted by: Winston Smith at November 13, 2009 08:21 PM (MFbfZ) dammit, there are some things you just can't unsee. Posted by: Unclefacts, Summoner of Bacon, Meteors, and Outrage at November 13, 2009 08:30 PM (erIg9) 184
As far as the need for variety in pron? It's kind of like leftovers ladies. Yeah it could have been the favorite meal but it's still leftovers. It don't compare to the first bite of a fresh batch.
Posted by: Rocks at November 13, 2009 08:30 PM (MTcoh) Posted by: mare at November 13, 2009 08:30 PM (X1fsj) 186
"*My* puzzlement is what you male morons claim distinguishes new from
old, um, stuff. What's to prevent a single tape, say SheLovesPickles,
becoming SheLovesPickles #1-99? "
Silly rabbit. Just check the expiration date on the jar of pickles Posted by: Blue Hen at November 13, 2009 08:30 PM (1O93r) 187
Prejean got a raw deal when that serial defamer/faggot Perez Hilton sabotaged her in the pageant and she tried to parlay that into a speaking and TV guest gig but all her jerk-off tapes undermine that you can argue that it's not fair, and that the one thing has nothing to do with the other- but in our PR-driven culture, perception is reality, and that 'reality' is that the gal who missed out on Miss USA because she chose to espouse old-fashioned values, likes to makes sex tapes for her boyfriend most people will look at that, and decide what Prejean has to say has no value to them Posted by: Jones at November 13, 2009 08:30 PM (JL3qV) 188
The best thing she could do would be to say "Yeah I made the tapes, and it was stupid, but so what?"
Posted by: kefka at November 13, 2009 08:31 PM (n1uMU) 189
One big circle with a small circle inside of it.
You mean like an ascii representation of a breast? Posted by: DrewM. at November 13, 2009 08:31 PM (FCWQb) 190
How much you wanna bet after all this that the videos come out and end up not being that good.
Posted by: tom_06060 at November 13, 2009 08:32 PM (t8Np3) 191
Ya know the title for this post can be interpreted at least 3 ways.
As Ace meant it. As an educational/instructional video. As tapes meant to be watched to self satisfy yourself. Posted by: obligatory Carrie swimsuit photo at November 13, 2009 08:33 PM (DIYmd) Posted by: Guy who comes to threads late at November 13, 2009 08:33 PM (MMC8r) 193
How much you wanna bet after all this that the videos come out and end up not being that good.
The lighting is probably poor. Posted by: toby928 at November 13, 2009 08:33 PM (PD1tk) 194
Get out of my brain. Fine, you can stay, but stay out of the top left dresser drawer.
Posted by: KillTruck at November 13, 2009 08:34 PM (WInqe) 195
How much you wanna bet after all this that the videos come out and end up not being that good.
Being both a) male, and b) morbidly interested, I watched some of One Night in Paris. It was about as titillating as watching someone shoe a mule. I didn't even feel vaguely dirty afterward -- just irritated that I had wasted my time. That's not a good sign when watching illicit porn. Posted by: Monty at November 13, 2009 08:34 PM (nTxjg) 196
"The best thing she could do would be to say "Yeah I made the tapes, and it was stupid, but so what?""
Yeah, not illegal, not hypocritical, just a little dumb (thinking her boyfriend would be discreet). Posted by: mare at November 13, 2009 08:34 PM (X1fsj) 197
Why would anyone be surprised that Prejean would make naughty videos?
Isn't the Miss USA contest nothing but a softporn version of Miss America, after all? Sleazebag Donald Trump runs the thing, for Pete's Sake! Prejean's real significance is the appalling habit of the Left to destroy anyone for stating the obvious. No one ever said she was some great moral authority. That said, anyone know if the tapes can be found on the Net yet? Posted by: CoolCzech at November 13, 2009 08:35 PM (QECjC) 198
There's also the point that depending upon what school system or college she went to, this could be considered part of a 'sexual awareness' session. Hell, she could have claimed that it was an assignment for a Vagina monologues festival. THen they'd be handing out frick'n medals.
Posted by: Blue Hen at November 13, 2009 08:35 PM (1O93r) 199
10 I thought she was despicable during her Larry King interview She was a child and in the technological world mistakes can be recalled in perpetuity. She did something without thinking of the consequences, kind of like a liberal. You attacked her and the agreements she made in court and with the LK show, and for standing her ground. The VERY DEFINITION OF LIBERAL. And, you, I assume are an adult. Shame on you. Posted by: mghorning at November 13, 2009 08:35 PM (xjl+d) 200
I do not believe Christians are somehow magically neutered and lack a sex drive. I do not believe that Christians do not have kinks and enjoy sex and even enjoy somewhat forbidden sex.
I assure you that is not the case. Posted by: Empire of Jeff, crawling on the floor with a whip sticking out of his ass crying "I'm a kitty cat!" at November 13, 2009 08:35 PM (xGIqT) 201
I wonder what a Venn Diagram of those cohorts would look like. Here you go Drew. Although I'm not sure which group is red and which is blue on this graph... Posted by: Entropy at November 13, 2009 08:35 PM (cok/k) 202
The left basically says "You can't attack us unless you are perfect!" And we respond forcefully by saying, "Damn, I'm not perfect so I guess I can't say anything." Its time we stopped playing that game.
Posted by: kefka at November 13, 2009 08:36 PM (n1uMU) 203
I agree with what loppyd said earlier - if ya got skeletons, don't climb up on a soapbox. It doesn't matter whether they're relatively benign or not.
To quote Rush: "The nature of the evidence is irrelevant; it's the seriousness of the charge that matters." Posted by: Soap MacTavish at November 13, 2009 08:36 PM (554T5) Posted by: Winston Smith at November 13, 2009 08:36 PM (MFbfZ) 205
I'm glad you said these things, Ace. I can't. At least not with any effect. Because I'm a woman, and so I can't possibly criticize another woman, especially a beautiful one, without being a jealous shrew. But, yeah, these are basically the kinds of things I've been thinking.
Posted by: Girl Thursday at November 13, 2009 08:37 PM (TyJNm) 206
>> Here's the basic problem with immortalizing your sexual adventures in video or photographic form... : they last essentially forever, especially in the Internet age. You and your lover may (and probably will) grow apart later; you may in fact have a bad break-up. You move on, get married, have kids...and your piss-ant of an ex-boyfriend sends the video to your hubby as a little joke. Or worse, he uploads it to PornTube so the world can enjoy it, forever. Your kids will get links to it via their cellphones. That video will dwell in the Internet ether forever and forever. And you, who may be a good and fine person, will be frozen in time as that slut who gave her tattooed doofus of a boyfriend a sloppy hummer in the park one night while you were wasted Actually another issue I have with it in cases like these with young hot girls is that it is really at it's core a self-centered act. If an army-wife sends some naked photos of herself to her hubby in Iraq or something like that... well then I guess she's just trying to make his day. It is all about him and for him. That guy will be turned on. But in cases like these, it is all about a young, hot girl who has recently discovered her sexuality and the influence that it can have over men. And they become intoxicated with this power. It actually loses a lot of it's sex appeal for the guy because he kinda knows that she isn't doing it purely to make him happy or because she wants him so badly, but rather because she gets a bit of an ego-kick out of it. (Okay, the guy is still thrilled, but I just mean less so than with my wife example above). Here is what I know about her: a major beauty pageant contestant. She got fake boobs at something like age 20. She posed naked for modeling. She sent dirty videos of herself to her boyfriend. She seems to be a girl who is still intoxicated with the fact that she knows she is hot, and the power over men that comes with that fact. I personally find this extremely fucking annoying behavior. Posted by: dan-O at November 13, 2009 08:37 PM (+9Rf8) 207
Now I know what to get half the guys I know for Christmas....better fire up the ol' dvd burner....
Posted by: bigpinkfluffybunny at November 13, 2009 08:37 PM (KWhJd) 208
I agree with what loppyd said earlier - if ya got skeletons, don't
climb up on a soapbox. It doesn't matter whether they're relatively
benign or not.
But everyone has at least one skeleton... and anyone who says they don't have at least one is a liar. Posted by: Elizabeth at November 13, 2009 08:38 PM (hA5JK) 209
Any woman that thinks a boyfriend would be discreet with a hot sex tape obviously never dated in High School. Ladies, when considering making naughty videos or pictures... DON'T. Just DON'T.
Posted by: CoolCzech at November 13, 2009 08:38 PM (QECjC) 210
Monty-
Weren't you looking for One Night In Bangkok? That might explain the mule shoeing, etc. Parsing that could be fatal. Posted by: Blue Hen at November 13, 2009 08:38 PM (1O93r) 211
79- While this is entirely possible, and it wouldn't surprise me, I don't see the boyfriend being a reliable source here.
Posted by: Girl Thursday at November 13, 2009 08:39 PM (TyJNm) 212
I would also have to say I would agree with Monty. Anybody who records themselves naked is just asking for trouble nowadays.
Posted by: Rocks at November 13, 2009 08:39 PM (MTcoh) 213
Ladies, when considering making naughty videos or pictures... DON'T. Just DON'T.
Posted by: CoolCzech
Ummmm. Then can I have that video we made back please? Posted by: Elizabeth at November 13, 2009 08:40 PM (hA5JK) 214
To quote Rush: "The nature of the evidence is irrelevant; it's the seriousness of the charge that matters."
Posted by: Soap MacTavish at November 13, 2009 08:36 PM (554T5)
That's Rush characterizing liberals, not expressing his own beliefs. Posted by: Jones at November 13, 2009 08:40 PM (JL3qV) 215
203
I agree with what loppyd said earlier - if ya got skeletons, don't
climb up on a soapbox. It doesn't matter whether they're relatively
benign or not.
To quote Rush: "The nature of the evidence is irrelevant; it's the seriousness of the charge that matters." Two things you don't get- 1- Everybody has something embarassing the left will destroy them with. 2- The tactic will keep most people from ever taking a stand because the price is too high. Don't join the shut up chorus. Posted by: kidney at November 13, 2009 08:41 PM (uxG/I) 216
I watched some of One Night in Paris. It was about as titillating as watching someone shoe a mule Hilton? It wasn't that good of a tape no. And it was in green. Still, I dug it. That chick is hawt. AND skeezy. Doing her straight missionary would make me feel like I was doing something dirty just because ...well, I would be... Plus I harbor suspicions that the girl is actually a brilliant, quick-witted and well educated genius with impeccable acting ability. I mean hell. She made herself famous for making herself famous. Posted by: Entropy at November 13, 2009 08:41 PM (cok/k) 217
How much you wanna bet after all this that the videos come out and end up not being that good. Tell me about it. I'm still pissed that I spent 40 bucks at the Lion's Den for that damned Pamela and Tommy Lee tape. Posted by: A Friend of Mine at November 13, 2009 08:41 PM (EoRfm) Posted by: Blazer at November 13, 2009 08:42 PM (+FzLa) 219
Empire of Jeff, crawling on the floor with a whip sticking out of his ass crying "I'm a kitty cat!"
Aieee!! Brain bleach, I need brain bleach!!! Posted by: bigpinkfluffybunny at November 13, 2009 08:42 PM (KWhJd) 220
But everyone has at least one skeleton... and anyone who says they don't have at least one is a liar.
The problem here is that if you happen to be on the wrong side of the political fence, you'd better be aware that the leftist media will exhaust any and all resources to dig up dirt on you. And when they do, be prepared to be permanently discredited, whether it is warranted or not. The public at large and the 52%ers in particular, live off of tabloid sound-bites. They personify contempt prior to investigation. Posted by: Soap MacTavish at November 13, 2009 08:42 PM (554T5) 221
But everyone has at least one skeleton... and anyone who says they don't have at least one is a liar.
Well, of course, it not like were some amorphous blobs oozing down the sidewalk. (although I did break an arm once.) Posted by: Guy Fawkes at November 13, 2009 08:42 PM (DIYmd) 222
How much you wanna bet after all this that the videos come out and end up not being that good. how could they not be good? Posted by: Jones at November 13, 2009 08:43 PM (JL3qV) 223
The left basically says "You can't attack us unless you are perfect!"
And we respond forcefully by saying, "Damn, I'm not perfect so I guess
I can't say anything." Its time we stopped playing that game.
Exactly! Also CoolCzech #209, you are sooo right! But young girls are young and the young don't always have great decision making skills. I know. Understatement of the year. They don't realize until it is WAY too late. Posted by: Lana at November 13, 2009 08:43 PM (MpHql) Posted by: kidney at November 13, 2009 08:43 PM (uxG/I) 225
they are functionally incapable of understanding their opposition, so they invent their demonic doppleganger through projection and hyperbole. That's it in a fucking nutshell. Liberals are too immature to engage anyone in good faith, so they cook up strawman caricatures for conservatives, Christians, or anyone who they don't like. Lovely Ms Prejean's unwise decision to make these tapes doesn't change why people should defend her; book deal or no, she was treated shabbily. She answered a question honestly and was attacked by the hysterical lefty gay lynch mob that exists in this country. This mob foams and waves pitchforks at people not for condemning flamboyant homosexuality, but for simply not celebrating it. If you don't think it's OK for gay guys to prance around Main Street in assless chaps, then they hate you and will try and make your life miserable. Posted by: UGAdawg at November 13, 2009 08:43 PM (O4miG) 226
Plus I harbor suspicions that the girl is actually a brilliant,
quick-witted and well educated genius with impeccable acting ability.
Not very fucking likely. http://bit.ly/3qDn7Q Posted by: Winston Smith at November 13, 2009 08:44 PM (MFbfZ) 227
>> 79- While this is entirely possible, and it wouldn't surprise me, I don't see the boyfriend being a reliable source here
I dunno... I don't know who the boyfriend is. I can't see any reason to assume he is a liar. And frankly I don't trust much of what Prejean says. Posted by: dan-O at November 13, 2009 08:44 PM (+9Rf8) 228
But everyone has at least one skeleton... and anyone who says they don't have at least one is a liar.
Bingo! And they will use it against everyone until we take away their power to do so. Posted by: Lana at November 13, 2009 08:45 PM (MpHql) 229
That's Rush characterizing liberals, not expressing his own beliefs.
Uh...yeah. I think I knew that already, but thanks for the attempt at clarification. Posted by: Soap MacTavish at November 13, 2009 08:45 PM (554T5) 230
You people are perpetuating opinions (alleged) on tapes that may not even exist. You are no longer morons in arms. Simply MORONS. Posted by: mghorning at November 13, 2009 08:45 PM (xjl+d) 231
Has the name of the feckless boy friend been released? You know, as a warning to other girls.
Posted by: toby928 at November 13, 2009 08:46 PM (PD1tk) 232
@217: Heh, all I did was pay $3 to see it in my hotel room once. Two full grown idiots repeating "Oh, Fuck! So fucking hot! Fuck!!" over and over for two hours while copulating.
What a pair of boobs. And not in a good way. Posted by: CoolCzech at November 13, 2009 08:47 PM (QECjC) 233
Who remembers that fairly grosss lesbionic Penthouse pictures of Miss America (Vanessa Williams?) in the 80s? My mother sent my brother out to buy her a penthouse so she could see what all the fuss was about.
Posted by: Dagny at November 13, 2009 08:47 PM (UN+bM) Posted by: Soap MacTavish at November 13, 2009 08:47 PM (554T5) 235
Bingo! And they will use it against everyone until we take away their power to do so
That's the key. Take your own skeleton out of the closet, put it on the table, and get the discussion of it out of the way. Posted by: Elizabeth at November 13, 2009 08:47 PM (hA5JK) 236
So what if she was pulling and jerking on her clam.
Posted by: Sparky at November 13, 2009 08:48 PM (mXY2a) 237
Only slightly off-topic: Flowchart to determine if you should fap to it. Oddly, Helen Thomas is not mentioned.
Posted by: Alice H at November 13, 2009 08:48 PM (qJHYy) 238
My mother sent my brother out to buy her a penthouse so she could see what all the fuss was about.
Your mother wouldn't by any chance publish a newsletter, would she? Posted by: Winston Smith at November 13, 2009 08:48 PM (MFbfZ) 239
[SCENE: A Senate chamber were MONTY is being ruthlessly questioned by Senators of the new Truth and Morality Committee.]
Sen. Weezum: Monty, we understand that you have sometimes filmed yourself while, uh, pleasuring yourself. Is this true? Monty: Well, not really. I mean, yeah, I always film it. But it's kind of like how a coach will film a game to watch later, you know? To catch problems in technique and execution. Sen. Jeezum: Er...I'm not sure I understand, Monty. Are you saying that you produced these...videos...as instructional aids? Monty: Oh, hell yeah! There's a huge self-help market out there, right? So I figure: there's gotta be one for guys who wonder how to properly rub one out. Sen. Foozle: Properly? Monty: Sure! Most guys just, you know, wing it. Ami I right? (Winks at the male senators.) Yeah, you all know what I'm talkin' about. When the bald-headed champ issues a challenge, we just step into the ring, right? But that's amateur, man! Sen. Jeezum: So you produced these videos-- Monty: --to help a brother out! (And give the ladies a little somethin'-somethin' too, dig?) There's a lot more to it than people realize: you don't just grab and go! Lubrication, man, I could write a whole book just on that. Then you got your warm-up period, your main event, your cool-down, your clean-up-- Sen. Bunkum: Uh, Monty, you don't seem to understand the gravity-- Monty: Look, man, I know the videos cost, right? But it ain't like they were free for me to make, know what I'm sayin'? And it ain't like I'm gettin' rich off that shit. But I'm a giver. I just want to help out. Sen. Foozle: Aren't you ashamed! Monty: Well, look, yeah: you're talking about series #2, right? The Stone Pillar Technique, right? Well, look, to tell the truth I wasn't really up to my usual standards in that vid, you know? I just got over some kind of virus shit and wasn't really into it. But I didn't phone that shit in; I gave it my best. I'd stand before God Himself and swear to it. Sen. Weezum: Have you no decency, sir? Monty: Hey, hey, back it off there, 'scro! I told you out in the hallway there that your order just got hung up in the mail someplace. Damn, man! You gonna bust my balls all day long over that shit? Swing by my pad later and I'll fucking give you the tapes! That was the series 4 ones, right? The Standing Donkey Technique series? Posted by: Monty at November 13, 2009 08:48 PM (nTxjg) 240
Take your own skeleton out of the closet, put it on the table, and get the discussion of it out of the way.
That's what got me in trouble. Posted by: Jeffrey Dahmer at November 13, 2009 08:49 PM (DIYmd) Posted by: CoolCzech at November 13, 2009 08:50 PM (QECjC) Posted by: mghorning at November 13, 2009 08:52 PM (xjl+d) 243
223
The left basically says "You can't attack us unless you are perfect!"
And we respond forcefully by saying, "Damn, I'm not perfect so I guess
I can't say anything." Its time we stopped playing that game.
No, the Left says "A beauty pageant contestant should be punished for disagreeing with the homosexual agenda but a film director should be awarded for raping teenage girls." Posted by: Aaron Wonder at November 13, 2009 08:53 PM (pVvKc) Posted by: Soap MacTavish at November 13, 2009 08:54 PM (554T5) 245
I though she was an idiot from jump street...she looks like an opportunist because she is. She is getting the best publicity she will ever dream of, selling all that porn she has made and will make. This chick is going to be rich. Posted by: ford at November 13, 2009 08:54 PM (Ki7fm) 246
"No, the Left says "A beauty pageant contestant
should be punished for disagreeing with the homosexual agenda but a
film director should be awarded for raping teenage girls."
Posted by: Aaron Wonder at November 13, 2009 08:53 PM (pVvKc)" Actually you open up a myriad of discussion. They really are "racist". They got angry at her because she did not give the answer that beauty pageant contestants are supposed to give. They forgive old Roman because he is behaving like directors are allowed to and suposed to behave... When you don't follw the PC idea of what you are supposed to do and how you are supposed to behave, they attack you...they are racists Posted by: curious at November 13, 2009 08:57 PM (p302b) 247
234 Simply MORONS. I understand how Obama was elected.
Posted by: mghorning at November 13, 2009 08:52 PM (xjl+d) Equating Morons, and the FiftyTwo Percenters is a seriously low blow. Posted by: Unclefacts, Summoner of Bacon, Meteors, and Outrage at November 13, 2009 08:57 PM (erIg9) 248
If you own it, you frame it and there is no surprise and no gotcha. She could have said her bf was a skeeze for putting it out there, she was naive and stupid for sending it to him and excuse me, but what does this have to do with my statements regarding marriage?
Posted by: Lana at November 13, 2009 08:58 PM (MpHql) 249
I will not be shocked if Prejean becomes a porn star. But hey, what does that have to do with Perez & Company trying to punish her for a reasonable answer about marriage?
Posted by: CoolCzech at November 13, 2009 08:59 PM (QECjC) 250
Another 'traditional family values' celebrity bites the dust... BTW, I don't think there was anything wrong with her statement about gay marriage. Posted by: JEA at November 13, 2009 09:01 PM (8jJ/6) 251
Coolczech But yeah, we are Morons. What's your point? So you automatically attribute seven more tapes based on rumors? Who the fuck do you people think you're siding with? You have fallen into the trap where the media has us attacking our own. Good job. Sad future! Posted by: mghorning at November 13, 2009 09:01 PM (xjl+d) 252
I will not be shocked if Prejean becomes a porn
star. But hey, what does that have to do with Perez & Company
trying to punish her for a reasonable answer about marriage?
Posted by: CoolCzech at November 13, 2009 08:59 PM (QECjC) If Perez is so much for gay marriage why isn't he in a long term relationship? Surely there is a market out there for submissive-bottom dough boy flamers. Posted by: Blazer at November 13, 2009 09:04 PM (+FzLa) 253
@251: Relax, Francis! One tape or 8, what's the big moral significance?
Posted by: CoolCzech at November 13, 2009 09:04 PM (QECjC) 254
Good job. Sad future!
That's almost like a fortune cookie. Bad virus. Many vomit! /Lighten up, Francis Posted by: Monty at November 13, 2009 09:04 PM (nTxjg) 255
I think she seemed like the slutty idiot that she is...but she will make a ton of money from lib's and con's equally....next tape our little princess playing with Santa's" toys"..just in time for Xmas
Posted by: ford at November 13, 2009 09:06 PM (Ki7fm) 256
"Gee I didn't know you could inject botox there Carrie."
Posted by: Grannie Pelosi at November 13, 2009 09:08 PM (Ki7fm) 257
I am kind of pissed, I should have made a few tapes of that men's room.
Posted by: Larry Craig at November 13, 2009 09:09 PM (Ki7fm) 258
I'll be right over Carrie...
Posted by: John Edwards at November 13, 2009 09:10 PM (Ki7fm) Posted by: Carrie Prejean at November 13, 2009 09:10 PM (qJHYy) 260
>> You have fallen into the trap where the media has us attacking our own
"Our own"?? What are you talking about? She is an unintelligent, materialistic ho who has taken it upon herself to act as a spokeswoman for the conservative movement. Do I owe her some sort of allegiance? Posted by: dan-O at November 13, 2009 09:10 PM (+9Rf8) 261
So you automatically attribute seven more tapes based on rumors? Who the fuck do you people think you're siding with? Who cares? What difference does it make if there was 1 or 15? All you people who are remotely serious about this are way too serious about this. And have been from the start. And remain so. No matter what your opinion is. This started off as a beauty pageant chick being harrased by a homo. Page 16B stuff. You all turned her into a moral crusader (and I think you can find me saying back then, y'know, aren't they all basically aspiring porn actresses?) OK, OK OK aspiring hollywood actresses or cable newsbabes... with porn as a backup then? Now it turns out she's OMG GASP kind of a porn bunny. Who cares? Newsflash folks... Don't Jean-Bennete Ramsey your little ho daughters. This isn't 1914. If you're going to put them into a beauty pageant you may as well sign up for the Wet-T contest too. (pixs or GTFO) Now the same people who were idiotic for making this The Children's Crusade in the first place are disillusioned and slamming her for making a video for her boyfriend?!? Move on. And the folks who are defending her apparently want to keep her as figurehead of the 18th Crusade? This is a political thing? GOP vs Dems man the barricades on who gets the crown for Miss California?!? Move on. Posted by: Entropy at November 13, 2009 09:11 PM (cok/k) 262
Was she wearing any kind of socks in the tapes?
Posted by: Eliott Spitzer who will soon be back on top at November 13, 2009 09:11 PM (Ki7fm) 263
Equating Morons, and the FiftyTwo Percenters is a seriously low blow. You are attacking a young women who made a bad decision by making a tape, (when she was seventeen), and you are fucking her like a goat on this board. I will not support that. Posted by: mghorning at November 13, 2009 09:12 PM (xjl+d) 264
"Our own"?? What are you talking about? She is an unintelligent, materialistic ho who has taken it upon herself to act as a spokeswoman for the conservative movement. Do I owe her some sort of allegiance?
Posted by: dan-O at November 13, 2009 09:10 PM (+9Rf For a second there, I almost thought you were talkin' about me. Posted by: Meggie McCain aka Fatty McButterpants at November 13, 2009 09:13 PM (+FzLa) 265
I wonder if Botox can tighten vajayjays?
Posted by: CoolCzech at November 13, 2009 09:14 PM (QECjC) 266
"Rush is a pill-head! He's a drunk! He's on his third wife! How can you listen to this guy?"
Pretty much all the air went out of that sail, and the related "Bush smoked pot!!! And that crazy guy said cocaine! Impeach him now!" leftism when the lefties went out and elected a self admitted cokehead. In fact, we should get together a little montage of Obambi to the tune of "But then I got high". Posted by: 18-1 at November 13, 2009 09:15 PM (bgcml) 267
Age of Conan CD Key Burberry scarf: http://www.scarves-store.com Posted by: jason at November 13, 2009 09:16 PM (i1eiU) 268
but a
film director should be awarded for raping teenage girls."
Posted by: Aaron Wonder at November 13, 2009 08:53 PM (pVvKc)" You make it sound like that is a bad thing or something. Hey, Obama might have gotten the Peace Prize...but I got the Piece Prize...if you know what I mean. Posted by: Bill Clinton at November 13, 2009 09:18 PM (bgcml) Posted by: Alice H at November 13, 2009 09:18 PM (qJHYy) 270
If masturbation is a crime, I should be on death row. -Gilbert Gotfried
Posted by: Crusty at November 13, 2009 09:18 PM (qzgbP) 271
I see jason just weighed in with possible sex tape titles. I'm kind of partial to Fallout 3 myself. Posted by: Blazer at November 13, 2009 09:19 PM (+FzLa) 272
Ace, dry your eyes and move on, this chick is a joke, and should be treated as such. I read that her mother was sitting with her when they showed her the tape she made... nice. Posted by: ford at November 13, 2009 09:19 PM (Ki7fm) 273
I hope all of you who are bashing this young lady are paying attention to what you daughters and sons are doing and ask youselves, "What if this were my child"?
Key word: CHILD
Posted by: mghorning at November 13, 2009 09:20 PM (xjl+d) Posted by: ford at November 13, 2009 09:21 PM (Ki7fm) Posted by: CoolCzech at November 13, 2009 09:24 PM (QECjC) 276
>> You are attacking a young women who made a bad decision by making a tape...
I want to dispel the idea that this was all just a "bad decision" or that she simply "made a mistake" by doing all this. It is complete nonsense. Making a "mistake" is something like losing yourself in a moment of passion and having sex with your girlfriend/boyfriend even though you initially wanted to wait. Or being careless about how much you drink at a wedding and making a fool of yourself. Or getting angry and saying something hurtful to a loved one during a fight. But here is what she did: She set up her webcam to point somewhere like her bed or a chair. She put on sexy clothes. She started recording. She then got naked and presumably started masturbating. Once she figured that was enough, she got up and pressed stop. Then she emailed the file to her boyfriend. And I am leaving out things that I can't know for sure... like maybe she tried different lighting, angles, clothes, and who knows what else. And, oh yeah, she did this 8 times... or at least her enemies have 8 instances of it. And, oh, that's right, she also posed naked for professional photo shoots. And yes, I mean naked, not those lingerie photos that came out a long time ago. Crappy sites like TMZ have them... you can verify this yourself. So this isn't a "mistake". This is what she does. So, yeah, I don't think that she should be parading around as a spokeswoman for conservatives and for Christians. Posted by: dan-O at November 13, 2009 09:26 PM (+9Rf8) 277
She could have made these and a couple of carpet munchin, beaver bumpin vids and still believe that marriage is between a man and a woman. Whats the deal? Someone up thread claims she craves attention.....anybody seen a beauty pagent constestant that doesnt?
That whip out the butt kitty comment is killing me...... Posted by: joey buzzard at November 13, 2009 09:26 PM (GrC6V) 278
My skeletons all get together in the closet for a party every Halloween and do the bone dance. Sounds like a box of beebees in there.
Posted by: GreenGasEmissions at November 13, 2009 09:27 PM (cj+ii) 279
If you hitched yourself to her wagon you are stuck in the mud with her. She was treated very unfairly by the Left, and treated very much too fairly by many on the Right. Dismiss her and learn a lesson, I say. Posted by: eman at November 13, 2009 09:27 PM (ZTuLj) 280
Let's see if I have this right.
Carrie Prejean says she is opposed to gay marriage like the majority of Americans, and then is labeled a "whore", "skank" and "slut" because she posed in pictures that show as much nudity as a Victoria Secrets model. Then her boyfriend tapes her rubbing one out, and again she is a whore according to libs and the msm. Al Gore tells us that we need to change the way we live. Get rid of our SUVs, live in smaller houses, and generally not do anything because a frigging polar bear was videoed on an ice pack. But he travels in an SUV, flys in a private jet, lives in a home that consumes about 20 times the energy as a normal home, and he is labeled as a "genius", "prophet" and "Nobel Peace Prize Winner" by the libs and msm. So being a hypocrite now means that instead of f#cking everyone, you just screw yourself. Posted by: MrCaniac at November 13, 2009 09:28 PM (Vol3D) 281
I believe Prejean knows exactly what she's doing. She doesn't seem too torn up about this whole fiasco. Like ford mentioned above, her mother viewed the tape with her. I mean, c'mon, really ? Who here would have let that happen if they had any clue what was about to be shown. I think she's being opportunistic here and just trying to extend her fifteen minutes and market herself. Larry King is a tool granted, but the stunt she pulled the other night on his show seemed forced and childish. Posted by: Blazer at November 13, 2009 09:31 PM (+FzLa) 282
Damn. This girl was just down the street and we didn't find a way to cash in on her? Losing our touch.
Posted by: San Pornando Valley at November 13, 2009 09:33 PM (YX6i/) 283
>> because she posed in pictures that show as much nudity as a Victoria Secrets model.
She posed fully nude too. These pictures came out later. And they were professional shoots, not private stuff. This woman is a liar. Not that I necessarily blame her, having such skeletons in the closet, but still, she is a liar. She said she never posed nude. I think eman basically summed it up in comment 279. I think is was wrong for the left to attack her and dig up dirt on her, but at the same time it was a bad call to give her a soapbox where she could become a spokeswoman for conservative causes. Posted by: dan-O at November 13, 2009 09:34 PM (+9Rf8) 284
So this isn't a "mistake". This is what she does. So, yeah, I don't
think that she should be parading around as a spokeswoman for
conservatives and for Christians.
Why not? Why does engaging in consentual sexual activities with her boyfriend make her any less conservative or any less Christian? Posted by: Elizabeth at November 13, 2009 09:34 PM (hA5JK) 285
Dismiss her and learn a lesson, I say.
No can do. I follow Luke's adjuration: "I tell you that in the same way there will be more rejoicing in heaven over one sinner who repents than over ninety-nine righteous persons who do not need to repent." Christians are not just encouraged to forgive, you know; we are commanded by God to forgive, or commit a sin ourselves.
If she's truly sorry she did it, that's enough. If not...well, God will judge her far more harshly than we can anyway.
Posted by: Monty at November 13, 2009 09:35 PM (nTxjg) 286
How many tapes are there? The Pat Dollard link says as many as 20.
Inquiring morons want to know! Posted by: GreenGasEmissions at November 13, 2009 09:37 PM (cj+ii) 287
She's not a spokesperson for conservatives. Who made her that? She is a young ambitious woman, who was assaulted in a on a public forum on an "all American TV show". She also happens to be a Christian, against gay marriage, and a target of the left. You people are essentially raping her on this board. Did I or you do anything worse in our years. Probably, Yes. Did we accuse each other of worse. Probably, Yes. Was it right. NO! Posted by: mghorning at November 13, 2009 09:37 PM (xjl+d) 288
She's possibly an opportunistic slut so its okay for the left to destroy her for disagreeing with their political agenda. Got it.
Posted by: kefka at November 13, 2009 09:38 PM (n1uMU) 289
so. no links then?
Posted by: Terry at November 13, 2009 09:39 PM (ddL+W) 290
What kansas said: "Unless she wants to be treated like Sarah Palin, she better stay home. These people will never let this go. Well, she could become a Democrat and Obama supporter, then it would be okay."
She's clearly in way over her head (I suspect she's still using friends as lawyers and publicists). She's trying to salvage something out of this, and maybe "not let them win". Maybe she hasn't yet realized how deep her opponents are going to dig, and then twist what they find, maybe she has a better opinion of her own political instincts (and her past boyfriends) than she should. Yet, she must know that all she has to do is admit she was wrong, that she was brainwashed by her Christian upbringing, maybe even bring a little Christian child abuse or molestation into the story to explain her reactionary behavior, and she'll have all the good publicity she wants. And she hasn't (yet) done that. Good on her. Posted by: Jerry at November 13, 2009 09:39 PM (7Ahkq) 291
How truly sorry she is is between her and God, not us, Monty.
Her 15 minutes are up. It's not "bashing" her to say sleazy beauty contests (and Miss USA is indeed sleazy), nude photos, and multiple porn videos disqualify her to represent family values. Posted by: CoolCzech at November 13, 2009 09:40 PM (QECjC) 292
>> Why not? Why does engaging in consentual sexual activities with her
boyfriend make her any less conservative or any less Christian?
A couple things: 1) I mostly wanted to be clear about the difference between a "mistake" and a modus operandi. I think it sounds silly to characterize all of this as a "mistake". 2) Yes, you are right that it doesn't make her less conservative. But I do maintain that sending one's boyfriend a video of one masturbating at age 17 (or 20) is un-Christian. I understand that there are different flavors of Christianity out there, but in general... this is frowned upon. Posted by: dan-O at November 13, 2009 09:42 PM (+9Rf8) 293
Why not? Why does engaging in consentual sexual activities with her boyfriend make her any less conservative or any less Christian? Posted by: Elizabeth at November 13, 2009 09:34 PM (hA5JK) It doesnt. However I believe she's being disingenuous and trying to extend her celebrity past its expiration date. If she could have just hung in there a little longer she could have probably gotten a full-time gig with Fox news. Now she's relegating herself to just another brief meme.Her regret or grief about all of this to me seems contrived. I would also like to add that I would have died a thousand deaths if any one of my parents would have caught me masturbating as a teen. She let her mother view one of the tapes when she was right beside her. I mean, who does that ? Posted by: Blazer at November 13, 2009 09:43 PM (+FzLa) 294
A true example of a hypocrite is someone like Al Gore. He makes himself important and rich by preaching the doomsday environmental gospel, but generates a carbon footprint bigger than Godzilla.
Posted by: Edge at November 13, 2009 09:43 PM (MBh6O) 295
See, watch this. >> You have fallen into the trap where the media has us attacking our own
1) >> You have fallen into the trap where the media has us attacking our own WTF do you get off calling her "our own"? She's a pageant bunny. It's the model/actress/weatherbabe(/pornstar/"therapeutic massuese") career trajectory. She opposes brides named Steve, which puts her with about 70-80% of the population including our president. Who's we? 2) Our own"?? What are you talking about? She is an unintelligent, materialistic ho who has taken it upon herself to act as a spokeswoman for the conservative movement. Do I owe her some sort of allegiance? OK she probably is. But the only reason she was made spokeswoman for the conservative movement is because conservatives apparently don't believe that about beauty pageants. So let's assume that's not the case. She offered her innocous opinion when asked for, got slimed by dickheads for it, got pedestaled by dipshits after that, and only then was it discovered she's apparently a real person and NOT an artificial media construct designed for our socio-political debates. She probably is an unintelligent materialistic ho. I give it 79% probability. But I say that as a cynic. The only cause you have to call her that is that you either feel betrayed or led on. It's an irrational emotional over-reaction. And the only reason you have to feel betrayed or led on is because you deluded yourself in the first place. She's a pageant bunny. She's wants fame, that's what they do. It's the model/actress/weatherbabe(/pornstar/"therapeutic massuese") career trajectory. She never asked for your trust to betray. You practically shoved her this role on her and all she did was fail to object (duh, because she wants the Good Morning America gig, that's why she went into the contest to begin with). She did nothing to you. She said nothing you disprove of to your children. She persuded her career as best she could, did consenting adult things in private as adults do, and had people invade her privacy and drag them into public against her will. Talk about the most trivial disputes being the most bloody. This is a knee-jerk reactionary partisan dispute. People on all the sides just projected a reason for the SOP confrontations and arguments that they have about everything. For you to feel mad or misled by her?!? You projected all your expectations on her! Are you the type of dude who gets pissed off at women if you buy them dinner and they don't put out? Because I am, and if you are, we have meetings on tuesdays if you want to come. I'm bringing salsa. This woman is the Barak Obama of pundit controversies. She ain't don't nuthin, good or bad. This sort of rush to blinded (and usually false) dichotomy is a major symptom in the Culture War in America, perhaps due to the 2 party system. It's what leads retard hicks to vote for people who speak with the same colloquialisms they do because they identify them as sharing the same values (too damn dumb and retarded to realize these guys can hire speech coaches, and even if they couldn't there's NO FUCKING CORRELATION between linguistic accent or oratory style and political governing philosophy). The Brainiacs who run the world are no better, assuming anyone who knows how to iron their pants and spell borgeois must think like they do, despite the fact that getting intellectuals to agree on anything is actually tougher then herding cats. She said "I don't think you should could ass buggery a sacred vow" and you thought you heard her say "I'm still a virgin and Ludwig Von Mises is my favorite economist" didn't you? Who's fault is that now? She neither deserves to be attacked nor supported. Never has, probably never will. Why so serious? This is a joke thread. Anyone who thinks this is anything is overthinking it. Pixs or GTFO. Posted by: Entropy at November 13, 2009 09:46 PM (cok/k) 296
But I do maintain that sending one's boyfriend a video of one
masturbating at age 17 (or 20) is un-Christian. I understand that
there are different flavors of Christianity out there, but in
general... this is frowned upon.
I have never understood why any type of consensual sex is considered un-Christian. Isn't it a Christian value to repent for any "sins" you may have comitted? So lets say that masturbating is a sin, as long as she repents doesn't that mae her a model of Christianity? And how are we to know whether or not she has repented? Or can only people who are free from sin be considered Christian? I thought there was no such thing as a person being free from sin. Posted by: Elizabeth at November 13, 2009 09:46 PM (hA5JK) 297
The take away I'm getting from all this is that a woman who sent this kinda stuff to a BF and then breaks up with him, needs to impress upon him in a most serious manner that she'll cut his balls off and shove them down his throat before dumping him in a shallow grave if there is ever a peep about it.
If after that discussion, you don't have a good feeling about the guy's ability to maintain a confidence, then send him for a preemptive dirt nap anyway. Admittedly, I'm sort of "old school" Sicilian about this kinda thing. Posted by: Purple Avenger at November 13, 2009 09:47 PM (xbNvx) 298
I think eman basically summed it up in comment 279.
I think is was wrong for the left to attack her and dig up dirt on her,
but at the same time it was a bad call to give her a soapbox where she
could become a spokeswoman for conservative causes.
Posted by: dan-O So who do we use as spokespersons for conservative causes? Rudy? Sarah? Mitt? They are all flawed. As a matter of fact, all men and women are flawed. If we wait for the perfect spokesperson, we will never have a perfect spokesperson. The message is what is important, not the messenger. Dems and libs are more interested in the messenger than the message. So Carrie is flawed, I don't care. What is important is what comes out of her mouth, not what she puts in it. Posted by: MrCaniac at November 13, 2009 09:47 PM (Vol3D) 299
I don't think the Left is the issue here. The Left made her famous in a way she did not intend, but she is responsible for what she says and does and what she fails to say and fails to do.
Ask yourself if the tapes are in agreement with the image she and others on the Right made of her, or contrary to it. You are not permitted to do and say anything you want just because the Left treated you like kaka. Posted by: eman at November 13, 2009 09:48 PM (ZTuLj) 300
It's that never-ending problem that people have with separating the message from the messenger. If she spoke truth yesterday, what changed in the message between then and now to render it a lie? Even the Devil may quote Scripture to suit his purpose; does that make Scripture evil, because it can be used to evil ends?
Carrie Prejean is pretty clearly no more thoughtless or evil than any other modern young woman, and probably quite a lot less so than many. She is clearly reaping the whirlwind for her poor choices, but I refuse to demonize her. I have done things I am ashamed of, and I dare say the same is true of everyone else who is posting here. I'd hate to think that a moment of personal weakness would forever render me unfit to be listened to.* *I probably ought to re-examine how I feel about people like Paris Hilton and Kim Kardashian for this very reason. They are young, and may come to regret the things they do now...and probably quite bitterly. Posted by: Monty at November 13, 2009 09:48 PM (nTxjg) 301
It doesnt. However I believe she's being disingenuous and trying to
extend her celebrity past its expiration date. If she could have just
hung in there a little longer she could have probably gotten a
full-time gig with Fox news. Now she's relegating herself to just
another brief meme.Her regret or grief about all of this to me seems contrived.
I would also like to add that I would have died a thousand deaths if any one of my parents would have caught me masturbating as a teen. She let her mother view one of the tapes when she was right beside her. I mean, who does that ? I agree that she is being disingenuous and trying to extend her celebrity status. However I fail to see how that would make her a bad conservative or a bad Christian. I also would have died a thousand deaths. Hell, I still won't discuss anything sex-related with my mother. But from what I have seen young girls and mothers these days have different types of relationships than there were in the past. Too many mothers become "friends" with their young girls, which is a mistake, but maybe that's what happened in this case (hell, maybe thats why Prejean thought that it was perfectly OK to send nude pics/video to her boyfriend - because her mother was never the right kind of role model who told her not to). Posted by: Elizabeth at November 13, 2009 09:50 PM (hA5JK) 302
Posted by: Entropy at November 13, 2009 09:46 PM (cok/k)
I think you expressed it very well. A lot of the same folks who consider themselves liberal or Democrats also vote against gay marriage time and time again, like blacks and hispanics. Correct me if I'm wrong but I can't recall where Miss Prejean ever said she was a conservative. She simply expressed an opinion a lot of liberals have also and then she was co-opted by a lot offolks on the right as an arbiter of conservatism and family values. Posted by: Blazer at November 13, 2009 09:53 PM (+FzLa) 303
Elizabeth, I'm not arguing Carry isn't Christian or even that she is a "bad" person. But can anybody say those are "admirable"
things to do? I'm just saying that the stuff she did make it hard to now use her as a political symbol. Posted by: CoolCzech at November 13, 2009 09:53 PM (QECjC) 304
134
Somebody's gonna have to come up with a snappy name for each one of those tapes Now You see It, Now You Don't with Carrie Prejean Carrie Prejean 2, This Time Its Personal...................... Posted by: Blazer at November 13, 2009 08:15 PM (+FzLa) How about: Carrie Prejean - The Kanye Edition - "I'm gonna let ya finish..." Posted by: conscious, but incoherent at November 13, 2009 09:53 PM (kn+jW) 305
304 - lol!
Posted by: Sassypants at November 13, 2009 09:55 PM (cJK1e) 306
because her mother was never the right kind of role model who told her not to
One might argue that parents who push their kids into the whole pageant circuit to begin with are probably a few standard deviations from the norm. This would be particularly true of the one who do it when the kids are very young. If some girl of 14 or so decided on her own she wanted to give it a whirl, I got no problem with that. Posted by: Purple Avenger at November 13, 2009 09:55 PM (xbNvx) 307
Elizabeth, I'm not arguing Carry isn't Christian or even that she is a "bad" person. But can anybody say those are "admirable"
things to do? I'm just saying that the stuff she did make it hard to now use her as a political symbol. I agree with you. Completely. What I don't understand is the posters who are saying that she is a bad conservative or an unfit Christian simply because she did private things that have now become public. Everyone has skeletons. Everyone has done something they aren't proud of. Not everyones skeletons are made public, but just because your skeletons stay in the closet doesn't make you a better role model or a better conservative or a better Christian. It just makes you someone who has managed to keep their private life private and not get publicly "caught" for youthful transgressions. Posted by: Elizabeth at November 13, 2009 09:57 PM (hA5JK) 308
Just a thought, but could she have been making those little vids specifically for her boyfriend to fap to in order to postpone sex? Its a possibility. Doesn't really matter though. She has been successfully tarnished by her opposition, and conservatives will toss her overboard as usual. Just another thought. Every single one of us would be disqualified for running for dog catcher if our real names were attached to our posts and saved by the left for evidence. Most of us probably don't think of ourselves as horrible, but we could easily be made out to be by someone determined to do so. Posted by: OneEyedJack at November 13, 2009 09:57 PM (Poe30) 309
Dude, the whole fucking this is fake... Prejean and Perez hilton do not really hate each other IRL... you're all getting played...
Posted by: yarrrrr at November 13, 2009 09:57 PM (oivbi) 310
>> Isn't it a Christian value to repent for any "sins" you may have comitted? So lets say that masturbating is a sin, as long as she repents doesn't that mae her a model of Christianity? And how are we to know whether or not she has repented? Or can only people who are free from sin be considered Christian? I thought there was no such thing as a person being free from sin My point isn't to attempt to judge her personally or anything like that. My point is simple: she makes a poor spokeswoman for Christian family values. Which is what she was beginning to become. And yes, she really was. She was on TV quite often talking about her views, became a high-profile member of many conservative/Christian family advocacy groups, and was invited to speak at conservative/Christian family conferences. And most of this was basically due to people reacting to the fact that the left was so damn cruel to her. It was a pendulum style reaction where conservatives hated the fact that the left was so evil towards her, and so some conservatives decided that they loved her. Even though they knew nothing about her, and she was really just a ditsy 22 year old. So as far as whether she has a good relationship with God or whatever her personal faith is... I don't care, that's not the point. When one takes on the role that she did of advocacy, other things become important. Posted by: dan-O at November 13, 2009 09:58 PM (+9Rf8) 311
Carrie Prejean's Carbon Neutral Zone
Posted by: sTevo at November 13, 2009 09:59 PM (eA3tl) 312
Guys - the ONT thread is up in case any of you are interested.
Posted by: Sassypants at November 13, 2009 09:59 PM (cJK1e) 313
I'm just saying that the stuff she did make it hard to now use her as a political symbol.
And I'm just saying...why? It's masturbation, not clubbing a baby harp-seal to death. As pornography, it's not even daring enough to be called tame. I'm just finding it very hard to be even moderately outraged by this. Mostly, I just feel sorry for her. In what possible universe does this amount to a hill of beans? It's embarassing to her; I'll give you that. But I promise you, I guarantee you, that the same kind of thing is rolling around out there for millions of wives and daughters. Are we ready to simply write them off as skanks and ho's too? And if not, why should Carrie Prejean be held to a special standard? Everyone keeps asserting that she's just in it for the publicity. Well, perhaps...but if true, it was just as true a few days ago as it is now. Again, how does the exposure of the video(s) change anything? I just don't get it. Maybe it's because I fundamentally don't give a shit what other people think. You've got a picture or video of me rubbing one out? Good for you. Bring it by my house and I'll autograph the motherfucker for you. Posted by: Monty at November 13, 2009 10:00 PM (nTxjg) 314
>> So who do we use as spokespersons for conservative causes? People who can clearly articulate the conservative message and people who can handle the stresses of public scrutiny (especially important for conservatives). Not a 22 year old beauty queen. Posted by: dan-O at November 13, 2009 10:01 PM (+9Rf8) 315
One might argue that parents who push their kids into the whole pageant
circuit to begin with are probably a few standard deviations from the
norm. This would be particularly true of the one who do it when the
kids are very young.
If some girl of 14 or so decided on her own she wanted to give it a whirl, I got no problem with that. I agree with you. And whether she was pushed into pagants or she wanted to do them as her own idea - clearly she did not have a proper role model somewhere along the line simply because she allowed herself to become fall into the "sex trap" as a model (posing nude in professional photo shoots for example). I see nothing wrong with posing nude in general, but she was very young and she clearly had ambitions beyond being a nude model, so in her case posing nude was clearly an unwise choice... and yet she still made that choice (more than once), and that leads me to believe that she had a lack of something somewhere along the line as she was being raised. Posted by: Elizabeth at November 13, 2009 10:01 PM (hA5JK) 316
what happen to all that "christian values" thing ? certainly sexual modesty must have been included in that
Posted by: John ryan at November 13, 2009 10:02 PM (m0Q2u) 317
......
Posted by: jason at November 13, 2009 10:03 PM (FgV2N) 318
Ask yourself if the tapes are in agreement with the image she and others on the Right made of her, or contrary to it. A) How the hell is it her fault what "the Right" made out of her? And that's exactly what they did. B) As for what she made out of herself, OMGOMGOMG an aspiring TV personality tried to craft her own image! BURN THE WITCH! Not only that, but she went on the O'Reilly factor to talk about what happend at a beauty pageant, and the very first words out of her mount weren't "Hi Bill! Sometimes I videotape myself masturbating!" What a devious bitch. Oh, well, she LIED about it too. Guess what. If I ever find random cause to become noteworthy and wind up with a shot at political punditry, and Sean Hannity asks me, on national TV, if I ever hopped into my car at 3:00AM with a BAC of about Eleventy and proceeded to drive down the street with some buddies at 30MPH wacking random stranger's mailboxes with a baseball bat, maybe back when I was 19... my first answer is gonna be "Um.....Uh... No?" Because I'm a severely disingenous person. Practically pathological. Posted by: Entropy at November 13, 2009 10:03 PM (cok/k) 319
@313 Hell yeah, completely agree Monty.
Posted by: kefka at November 13, 2009 10:04 PM (n1uMU) Posted by: Blazer at November 13, 2009 10:06 PM (+FzLa) 321
dan-O,
I didn't realize that she was trying to become a spokesperson for conservative christian family values. I haven't really paid attention to her except for the posts her at Ace. I thought she had been pushed into that role after her answer during the pageant, I never realized that she was personally pursuing it. I do agree that she makes a poor spokesperson simply because she lied/covered-up certain facts (like saying she didn't pose nude and then the pics were discovered). I would certainly not want my daughter (if I had one) to look to her as any type of role model. Posted by: Elizabeth at November 13, 2009 10:07 PM (hA5JK) 322
take it farther ace! one day the truth will come out! http://3.ly/bkI
Posted by: yarrrrr at November 13, 2009 10:08 PM (oivbi) 323
Seriously. Is sexually assaulting people with Arabian bakery 'in agreement with the image Bill O'Reilly and others on the right have made of himself'? Where are the outraged calls for...ah... nevermind. Just fuck it, we'll do it live. Is snorting coke in agreement with the image Dubbya crafted? Is everything you've down copacetic with how you try to present yourself publicly? Or do you announce to passing strangers "Hi, my name is Joe, and one time at band camp..." Posted by: Entropy at November 13, 2009 10:09 PM (cok/k) Posted by: Elizabeth at November 13, 2009 10:09 PM (hA5JK) 325
I still think she deserves to be defended because this whole thing is about the Left trying to destroy her over her opinion on same-sex marriage.
That isn't right no matter how many videotapes of her pleasuring herself emerge. Posted by: Kensington at November 13, 2009 10:10 PM (kSpSZ) 326
Blazer - the Kanya title was the best one yet.
Posted by: Sassypants at November 13, 2009 10:10 PM (cJK1e) 327
what happen to all that "christian values" thing ? certainly sexual modesty must have been included in that
Your ignorance of things Christian is boundless, but please, don't let that stop you from making a ass of yourself, again. Posted by: toby928 at November 13, 2009 10:10 PM (PD1tk) 328
I'm just saying that the stuff she did make it hard to now use her as a political symbol. Well then you're very honest. And very short sighted. I, in fact, did tell you so, with my warnings when she first made a splash. Pageant chicks are sluts. I'm actually suprised it wasn't a lesbo video. You never should have made her a political symbol in the first place. As for her electoral undesirability now, it's no reason to get angry and call her a whore. Posted by: Entropy at November 13, 2009 10:11 PM (cok/k) 329
>> A) How the hell is it her fault what "the Right" made out of her? And that's exactly what they did
Um... she had something to do with this to. She made tons of appearances on TV. She took high profile positions in family organizations, and was hired as a speaker for these, etc. And my point isn't that we should BURN HER!! I feel really bad for her too. The fact that they showed her these videos of herself when her mom was sitting next to her was a level of cruelty that is absolutely disgusting. She seems like a young, self-absorbed girl who has gone through a really tough year. My point is more to point out how dumb it was for many conservatives to parade her around and invest any credibility defending her honor. Posted by: dan-O at November 13, 2009 10:12 PM (+9Rf8) 330
Ace, thank you for your remarks about Christianity and what I believe to be a fair characterization of ms. Prejean's non-hypocrisy.
I think that the age of Ms. Prejean when she made the tapes is significant. And under-reported. You'll note that none of them have been made public. Under the law, a minor cannot give consent, this means she cannot consent to have sex. Making all sex with her non-consensual. This is the basis of statutory rape. If Ms. Prejean produced one, seven, or a million videos when she was a minor, they cannot be legally distributed. They are kiddie porn. If you distribute them you are a felon. If you are in a lawyer's office and use them to coerce a settlement, this is criminal extortion. I think this displays why we have not seen these videos distributed. Ms. Prejean is age 22 today and she said these videos were made when she was young. How much younger is significant. Ms. Prejean does not appear to be particularly bright. Or well represented. Posted by: Steve Poling at November 13, 2009 10:13 PM (nBrFn) 331
Blazer imma let you finish but - the Kanya title was the best one yet. Of All Time !!
Posted by: Sassypants at November 13, 2009 10:10 PM (cJK1e) FIFY Sassy Posted by: Blazer at November 13, 2009 10:18 PM (+FzLa) 332
I'm not a very good Christian, and I am have been less than honourable in my behaviour with women. I hope that I am never associated with the viscousness associated with the comments on this board. The future looks very bright indeed. Posted by: mghorning at November 13, 2009 10:20 PM (/XQ7E) 333
Dan-O you've convinced me. I'm scratching Mary Magdalene from my spokeperson list.
Posted by: Jesus at November 13, 2009 10:24 PM (lbr/P) 334
I hope that I am never associated with the viscousness associated with the comments on this board.
Tell your story walking, pal. Posted by: toby928 at November 13, 2009 10:24 PM (PD1tk) Posted by: XBradTC at November 13, 2009 10:24 PM (y0E9v) 336
Um... she had something to do with this to. She made tons of appearances on TV. She took high profile positions in family organizations, and was hired as a speaker for these, etc. They offered, she accepted. Seriously. Look at what you're mad at her for. "Would you like to speak at our organization for money?" "Sure!" She never said she was Mother Theresa. They assumed, they asked, she made the unforgivable error of not listing everything she'd ever done in her personal life they might disagree with first, to make sure she was worthy and they were OK with that? She tried. She tried to fulfill the role she accepted the best she could. She didn't intentionally run contrary to it. This was a private tape she didn't want made public. And what TV personality, talking head, spokesperson, weather babe, politician, journalist or whatever have you actually does that anyway? "I'm Tom Brokaw and I'm a furry". "Hi, I'm Jeff Sessions, I support the sanctity of life, a strong national defense, free markets, and having my wife slap my junk with a fresh cod and I'd like to be your representative" I'm NOT saying you should still support her. I'm saying you never should have supported her to begin with and so don't have any decent reason to be upset and attack her now. You misled yourself. You betrayed yourself. Call yourself a slut. How does this reverse scenario of what she was supposed to do play out in your head? Please tell me. Posted by: Entropy at November 13, 2009 10:27 PM (cok/k) 337
I see your point, Ace, and not to defend her but... I think we all do indiscreet stuff. I know I've kissed my fair share of frogs, (a LOT of frogs, make that), and had embarassing situations. It's one thing to personally review those events and roll your eyes at your own silliness, but if someone else were critiquing them I would be mortified. You think they are personal and private. Having them paraded about for people to pass judgment on would be terrible. I'm sure a lot of us are naive enough to think that the guy you dated for 6 months isn't going to pop up the minute you're famous and sell the story of the first time you had sex with him. Or that your ex-BFF will sell pics of your doing a body shot and making out with someone to the National Enquirer when you hit it big. Heck, I wouldn't uncover something embarassing about an ex unless they were trying to tarnish me or what have you and I felt the need to defend myself. I just assume that most people realise we all do stupid and regrettable things, especially when we're young, and trying to publicly humiliate someone by parading stuff like this around is in poor taste, to say the least. Remember a few years ago when Trump almost ousted Miss USA (Tara Conner?) because there were pics of her partying wildly and even giving a girl a kiss? I could see why Prejean might feel a little singled out, considering that others have done embarassing things while holding the crown, and not been axed. It just happens that she ran afoul for espousing so called 'traditional' values. It's like the Dem double standard; Foley pages a Congressional intern suggestively and gets ousted, but one of Franks's exes ran a prostitution ring out of their townhouse and now his current boyfriend got busted for growing weed, and Frank won't be touched. Same with Rangel and his tax problems whereas just mere allegations were enough for Stevens to get booted. Egregious current transgressions... for example if Prejean was having an affair with a young female protegee, I could see that being news. Years old sex tapes for a former boyfriend that has nothing to do with why she was dethroned? Meh. Posted by: linlithgow at November 13, 2009 10:28 PM (xpBkP) 338
The whole subject--well arguing about it, anyway--is a waste of bandwidth, but ....
She knew all this stuff was out there, she knew it was coming out, etc., and yet I and many of her supporters have been impressed into duty as her defenders through deception. Nope, she's just dumb. Women (especially young women) who have made it on their looks for so long very often don't realize how much they've been allowed to get by on because of how good they look. They're used to men (especially) pulling punches and overlooking crap that normal people would get burned on. This is why she can as you say "in her mind" think she got a bum deal. Her sense of "fairness" is way more in her favor than most people's sense of fairness because she's been spoiled. Never put down to malice what can be explained by dumbness--especially when good looking women are concerned. Posted by: Nicholas Kronos at November 13, 2009 10:32 PM (GGulh) 339
I will not walk. I will stand and advance the freedom of Americans and the rest of the people in the world. I will not walk away from the defamation of an individual, for I am one. I will not walk away from a fight. I WILL NOT WALK AWAY. Posted by: mghorning at November 13, 2009 10:33 PM (/XQ7E) 340
#19 Waste93- BTW I agree. Thought the same. It was a blackmail attempt. Unfortunately it worked. Posted by: linlithgow at November 13, 2009 10:33 PM (xpBkP) 341
Entropy, you are barking up the wrong tree. I never really cared about her one way or the other. The only feelings I had over her was feeling bad that she was treated like such garbage. My point is this: the extent to which some aspects of the conservative movement, some conservative leaders, and some conservative groups attached themselves to her and elevated her as a model young woman was a bad thing. Next time more thinking, less knee-jerk reaction when elevating leaders. That is all. Posted by: dan-O at November 13, 2009 10:35 PM (+9Rf8) 342
It's masturbation, not clubbing a baby harp-seal to death. Does it really have to be an either or, is there not some way to combine them? You can call me a dreamer... But I'm not the only one. Posted by: Entropy at November 13, 2009 10:37 PM (cok/k) Posted by: yarrrrr at November 13, 2009 10:39 PM (oivbi) 344
dan-O, OK. That's what I'm saying too. Sorry for not paying attention to your whole post but if we're agreeing about the way others elevated her, I dunno why you brought up her responsibility in response to me.
Posted by: Entropy at November 13, 2009 10:40 PM (cok/k) 345
I will not walk away from a fight. I will. I mean, if I see 2 hobos fighting over half a discarded cheeseburger I'm walking away. Ain't my beef. Hah! See what I did.. ahh fuck it. We'll do it live. Posted by: Entropy at November 13, 2009 10:42 PM (cok/k) Posted by: mghorning at November 13, 2009 10:44 PM (/XQ7E) 347
Thank you, Ace, for saying this and saying it well. Way too many people embraced this woman as the second coming of the Blessed Virgin and I was afraid I was the only one who didn't buy into it.
It's just dishonest, and mercenary, and I don't appreciate it. That, right there. The best thing this girl can do is fade away. I sincerely hope to never hear her name again, in any context. If anyone wants to see just how common and pedestrian her schtick is, come and hang out in LA for a nano-second. Posted by: Peaches at November 13, 2009 10:45 PM (9Wv2j) 348
I mean, if I see 2 hobos fighting over half a discarded cheeseburger I'm walking away. Ain't my beef.
Have to disagree. 1/2 a really nice cheeseburger might be worth waiting and ambushing the winner of the hobo fight. Posted by: kefka at November 13, 2009 10:46 PM (n1uMU) 349
Dan-O did you abandon Rush after his drug problems? I bet you think Vitter is a great spokesperson for conservatives in light of his strong conservative positions. If this is accurate you need to look at your own consistency.
Posted by: Polynikes at November 13, 2009 10:47 PM (owNUA) 350
The good news, is that the left just opened themselves up for similar treatment in the future. All those GenX/Y/Z'ers fucking around exchanging shit on Facebook/Myspace/etc have no idea where all that dumb shit they sent to people has wound up. The internet's memory hole is almost unlimited in capacity.
Some of them will have political aspirations in the future and deeply regret ever getting involved in that later on. Now, if the right had any brains, there's be an ongoing background effort to collect this stuff and save it for a rainy day. Its not too hard to identify the ones with political aspirations even as early as high school, and by the time they're juniors or seniors in college, its starting to become readily apparent in many cases. Cell phone video and Facebook/Myspace are going to sink more political careers in the future than an army of Woodward's and Bernsteins ever could. Posted by: Purple Avenger at November 13, 2009 10:50 PM (GMPEt) 351
Search your souls and ask if what you said here tonight is what you said here tonight is what you would tell your children.
Posted by: mghorning at November 13, 2009 10:51 PM (/XQ7E) 352
Posted by: Purple Avenger at November 13, 2009 10:50 PM (GMPEt)
I think if you do that you are sort of sanctioning the dirty way the lib/dems fights. It is so sad tha tpolitics has come down to this. I tend to think they will forgive one another and that the old people, under the new bill, will be long gone. It would be nice if we could see politicians given equal amounts of campaign money and forced to behave in a civilized manner. Posted by: curious at November 13, 2009 10:54 PM (p302b) 353
Carrie Prejean's Cucumberless Salid Recipe.
Posted by: I'm Out at November 13, 2009 10:54 PM (eA3tl) 354
"Mom, this is Carrie. We're gonna go up to my room and play with the video camera. Is that ok?"
"Of course, Dear. You two kids have fun." Posted by: eman at November 13, 2009 11:03 PM (ZTuLj) 355
Hypocrisy is, instead, proclaiming a series of values and vindictively using those values to chastise others for failing to live up to them, all the while gleefully violating them yourself.
Speaking of which, Letterman's wife has kicked him out of the house. Posted by: Jim Treacher at November 13, 2009 11:05 PM (cvmgB) 356
Re: Sex & Men My husband once said to me, "If I had a woman's body I wouldn't be able to keep my hands off myself". I think that sums up the male philosophy about sex. =) Posted by: linlithgow at November 13, 2009 11:10 PM (xpBkP) 357
My computer craps out and I miss this entire thread. That's bullshit, and maybe Friday the thirteenth.
Posted by: Dr. Spank at November 13, 2009 11:10 PM (GGgoa) 358
Where did you get that information, Treacher?
Posted by: Kensington at November 13, 2009 11:12 PM (kSpSZ) 359
Oh Sheesh, just read that the republican insurance policy provided coverage for abortion.
Posted by: curious at November 13, 2009 11:12 PM (p302b) 360
Posted by: Jim Treacher at November 13, 2009 11:05 PM (cvmgB)
Guess he'll be living at the ed sullivan theater from now on. Posted by: curious at November 13, 2009 11:14 PM (p302b) 361
In what possible universe does this amount to a hill of beans? It's
embarassing to her; I'll give you that. But I promise you, I guarantee
you, that the same kind of thing is rolling around out there for
millions of wives and daughters. Are we ready to simply write them off
as skanks and ho's too? And if not, why should Carrie Prejean be held
to a special standard?
Thank you, Monty. Thank you. I have idiot kids and I was one. One is the president of the young republicans and one is still in college majoring in political science. I hope to God they haven't done anything stupid, but they might have. Kids are stupid. Should they just throw the towel in? Really? They're done in the event that did some stupid thing? Really? And not worthy to talk about conservative values or ideals because they might have done something idiotic in their silly years? Then we lose. We're done and we've handed them the weapon to kill us with and placed it against our own neck. And the outrage over her Mom sitting with her about the sex tape? Are you kidding me? If this was my kid, I'd be sitting with her and decapitating anyone who took issue with this as if she is somehow no longer entitled to speak out about what she believes in because she's done something stupid in her life? Wow. That is an interesting place mark for the everyone, is it not? Done something stupid? Not qualified to give an opinion and not be attacked for it from all the usual suspects. Whore. Lets all just give the liberals the country then. Surrender now. Posted by: Lana at November 13, 2009 11:17 PM (MpHql) 362
My point is more to point out how dumb it was for many conservatives to parade her around and invest any credibility defending her honor. Sorry, I call nuts to that. We should have defended her honor because that's what we do for young women that are being unfairly treated. If Lindsay Lohan, irredeemably idiotic strumpet that she is, had made a sex tape for someone she trusted that was leaked in an effort to hurt her, I would be pissed off, and I can't stand Lindsay Lohan. Personal, embarrassing things should not be made public in an effort to destroy people, regardless of who they are (unless it's Bill Maher, who cannot have enough terrible things happen to him). Conservatives defended Carrie Prejean because she was being unfairly dragged through the mud for giving an honest answer to a loaded question asked by one of the most despicable star-fucking leeches to ever have any type of public audience. I won't tolerate bullying by anyone, especially from maggots like Perez Hilton and his fruity mob. Posted by: UGAdawg at November 13, 2009 11:22 PM (O4miG) 363
Beautifullly put, Lana.
Of course they're going to try and Alinskyize us, but we don't have to assist them while they do it. Posted by: Kensington at November 13, 2009 11:36 PM (kSpSZ) 364
Ace, My finace has been getting all kinds of hassles in a myspace group for saying Prejean is not a hypocrite. I sent her your post so maybe that will help since it's coming from someone who is not a Christian. Oh wait, you're an evil conservative, that means anything you say is worthy only of ridicule and contempt to them. Posted by: Mark at November 13, 2009 11:47 PM (Vvbjc) 365
UGAdawg, I find your ideas intriguing and I'd like to subscribe to your newsletter. Anyone know the name of the boyfriend? He's the skank here. Posted by: vivi at November 14, 2009 12:04 AM (TQtLI) 366
This may be a ... nuanced point. So... I'm gonna try to be clear one more time on what my position is. Thank you, Ace, for saying this and saying it well. Way too many people embraced this woman as the second coming of the Blessed Virgin and I was afraid I was the only one who didn't buy into it. YES. I agree. NO. It's not her fault they did that, it's theirs. Yes, too many people embraced her as the blessed virgin, but that's not her fault. It's theirs. It's probably easier to blaim her because then, if it's not your fault, you don't have to learn anything or re-evaluate your behavior but hey. Whatevs. You'll do it again. I give it a 83% probability. I only shove it in your face because I care. What could she have done differently? Play it out for me, please. Tell me this scenario. What, she comes out of the gates like "Hi I masturbate"? How's this work? Or doesn't it work? Once sinned always tainted? She should have just thrown herself off a cliff in shame like a Roman rape victim? Posted by: Entropy at November 14, 2009 12:16 AM (cok/k) 367
I'mnot about to forgive the MSM and the Gay Mafia, who haven't changed their sick tune, because this particular target turns out to have feet of, well, flesh.
Even if you assume they knew this tehn, which they didn't, it doesn't change what THEY did. At All. Posted by: Merovign, Strong on His Mountain at November 14, 2009 12:17 AM (bxiXv) 368
Her 15 minutes are up. Say g'bye Carrie.
Posted by: CatoRenasci at November 14, 2009 12:23 AM (EBXTK) 369
I'm just glad to know we're going to get to see her in a real porn some day. Posted by: FUBAR at November 14, 2009 12:26 AM (fstYb) 370
I'm confused. She made some naked tapes for a boyfriend. How does that her a slut or a materialistic whore or a future porn star?
Posted by: Smurfette at November 14, 2009 12:28 AM (D5pp0) 371
I think if you do that you are sort of sanctioning the dirty way the lib/dems fights. The fight is existential. Win or die. Posted by: Entropy at November 14, 2009 12:29 AM (cok/k) Posted by: Entropy at November 14, 2009 12:33 AM (cok/k) 373
The real lesson here, is that if you are ever going to do something foolish, of dubious morality, don't make a recording or recordable record of it! "No pictures, not video, deny, deny, deny!"
Posted by: exdem13 at November 14, 2009 12:42 AM (lYKj1) Posted by: Smurfette at November 14, 2009 12:42 AM (D5pp0) 375
When all is said and done, there's a difference between Carrie Prejean and Perez Hilton.
Carrie Prejean should just STFU and go away. The worst you can say about her is that she is a self-absorbed materialistic ho, stupid, but mostly harmless. Perez Hilton, on the other hand, should be hog-tied, gagged, and stuffed into an old gym locker. It would be hard to find a more reprehensible example of human scum. Posted by: OregonMuse at November 14, 2009 12:58 AM (A/5II) 376
Ace - I really can't imagine why Miz Prejean, and for that matter Da Governess, resorted to so-called "proven" hack ghosters, when they could have had you. What an opportunity both lost in not tapping into your limitless polls of incoherent mixed up faux moralizing!
Posted by: diderot's dog at November 14, 2009 01:03 AM (DT0Wi) 377
Compare and contrast: John Edwards runs for President, uses wife as political prop on stage with himself, raises money from people based on his public image of integrity.....turns out to have an affair paid for with that money, resulting in a child.
Carrie Prejean answers a rigged lefty question honestly, loses as beauty pageant as a result and is widely vilified, decides to make lemonade from lemons and comes out with a book, and....turns out to have made masturbatory videos some time ago. Was CP's book as linked to her relations with her boyfriend as JE's campaign was linked to his integrity? Did she use her book's advance to purchase the video camera or something? Of course not. Does it matter that Geithner and Rangel have fudged their taxes, when they're looking to head the Department of the Treasury and the House Ways and Means? Of course not. But it matters that JtP isn't properly licensed to be a plumber when all he did was ask a question... Just like it's impossible to negotiate a truce with someone who is committed to your extinction, it's impossible to have a discussion about national policy when you keep getting interjections like, "The chair recognizes that the witness cannot credibly talk about law and order because he shot a spitball in fifth grade" when you're talking about clear, straightforward, and relevant issues of the day. Although, with the economy in shambles, Porkulus a clear failure, unemployment through the roof, and the public dubious about the glories of Socialism, I can well understand why it might be advantageous to change the subject, it is the absolute height of hypocrisy to say that you're going to talk about one thing and then start talking about something completely different whenever the facts don't go your way. Posted by: cthulhu at November 14, 2009 01:04 AM (u+gbs) 378
This was before webcams. Pretty innovative thinking here.
Posted by: Tattoo DePlane at November 14, 2009 01:05 AM (VLYnh) 379
Evening all. I wouldn't get too hung up about this. A couple of things to remember. I gather she did this for her boyfriend (I think we can agree that if he leaked these he's a douche and if there is any justice the best he'll do for a woman for the rest of his life is Ruth Bader-Ginsberg) and she did it when she was 17. Even though she's a child of the internet information age I'm pretty sure she thought that it was true love (and he probably asked her to do it to prove their love, really teenage guys are pigs and that included me way, way way back then) and this would never come back to haunt her. It's been noted that these tapes really didn't have anything to do with the original pagent controversy and I think that's what should be kept in mind. Have a great weekend all. Posted by: scr_north at November 14, 2009 01:23 AM (GE/dx) 380
I hope she names the douche who let the images out.
Posted by: Mark at November 14, 2009 01:47 AM (Vvbjc) Posted by: jason at November 14, 2009 01:55 AM (FgV2N) 382
She made eight tapes and didn't send a single one to me??? What a bitch.
Posted by: trentk269 at November 14, 2009 02:04 AM (xyEsR) 383
Look, I've never "defended" her. Neither have I ever recognized her as any sort of spokesmodel for conservatives, Christianity, traditional family values, or anything else. What she IS is a beauty contestant who dared to voice an opinion which is certainly mainstream in her state (judging by their statewide plebescite) and is shared by the Left's beloved Obama and many other top Democratic politicians. For this offense, she was targeted for personal destruction. The lesson here is how the Left operates. The prominent opposition (including Carrie and The Plumber Guy who accidentally come into that prominence) must be destroyed personally and totally. It's not about the issues, it's about silencing critics. It explains their foaming-at-the-mouth hatred of Sarah Palin, Rush Limbaugh, Glen Beck, and George W. Bush. Any opposing voice which begins to gain popular support must be attacked relentlessly. No holds barred. It's important to know what you are up against. Our foes lust for power and will do anything to get it and keep it. Silencing their critics through smear campaigns is mild stuff compared to what they will do if they are ever able to consolidate power. Posted by: Adjoran at November 14, 2009 02:16 AM (jmoP/) 384
Prejean lost me when I found out she has fake boobs. Nothing she ever did could possibly surprise me after finding that out. Only a tramp stamp or nipple tattoos scream "no class" louder.
Posted by: Angus Dei at November 14, 2009 02:26 AM (WAI6U) Posted by: Angus Dei at November 14, 2009 02:27 AM (WAI6U) 386
I don't think what she did was that "bad." I do, however, think it was a serious breach of her pageant's moral turpitude section, and she knew that, and so, whether super "bad" or not, she knew she had committed a firable offense.
Incidentally, they have to sign a contract stating that they never did anything like this that would compromise them, etc. Do I blame her for signing it anyway? No. I would have too. But -- again, this is a firable offense. So it's not so much that I don't have sympathy; it's just, well, rules are rules. And yeah, she was persecuted, but also: She broke the rules. Posted by: ace at November 14, 2009 02:41 AM (jlvw3) Posted by: Pat at November 14, 2009 03:21 AM (UODJq) 388
nike dunk sb
Do anything needed to support an idea, a good idea usually brings good results, doing business is like that.http://www.dunksky.com/.This site has always been on Posted by: nike dunk sb at November 14, 2009 03:29 AM (APB+g) 389
370
I'm confused. She made some naked tapes for a boyfriend. How does that
her a slut or a materialistic whore or a future porn star?
Don't know about being a slut or materialistic whore, but I'm positive she's going to be in porn. Even if it is as innocent as you say, that's the way they all start out. And I didn't mean it in a bad way. Posted by: FUBAR at November 14, 2009 04:52 AM (fstYb) 390
buy [url=http://www.reviewups.com/]discount ugg shoes[/url]
[url=http://www.reviewups.com/]cheap ugg shoes[/url] [url=http://www.reviewups.com/]cheap ugg[/url] [url=http://www.reviewups.com/ugg-coquette-casual-shoes-c-22]ugg rainier[/url] [url=http://www.reviewups.com/]buy ugg[/url] [url=http://www.reviewups.com/]ugg usa[/url] [url=http://www.reviewups.com/]discount ugg boots[/url] [url=http://www.reviewups.com/ugg-classic-short-c-1]ugg 5825[/url] [url=http://www.reviewups.com/]ugg shoes sale[/url] [url=http://www.reviewups.com/ugg-sundance-c-5]ugg sundance[/url] [url=http://www.reviewups.com/]ugg shoes[/url] [url=http://www.reviewups.com/]cheap ugg boots[/url] [url=http://www.reviewups.com/ugg-classic-tall-c-3]ugg 5815[/url] [url=http://www.reviewups.com/]ugg sale[/url] [url=http://www.reviewups.com/]ugg uk[/url] [url=http://www.reviewups.com/ugg-knightsbridge-c-27]ugg knightsbridge[/url] [url=http://www.reviewups.com/]womens ugg boots[/url] [url=http://www.reviewups.com/]ugg boots[/url] [url=http://www.reviewups.com/]ugg australia[/url] [url=http://www.reviewups.com/ugg-classic-cardy-c-2]ugg 5819[/url]from usa Posted by: cheap at November 14, 2009 06:47 AM (s7MB5) 391
Who remembers that fairly grosss lesbionic Penthouse pictures of Miss America (Vanessa Williams?) in the 80s? My mother sent my brother out to buy her a penthouse so she could see what all the fuss was about. That was the source of the "found art" I sent to Iowahawk during the recent contest. There was one picture I called "Racially Sensitive Duck Call." Here it is. I thought it was a genious masterstroke. Still no word from Iowahawk. Posted by: You're Gonna Need a Montage (rdb) at November 14, 2009 07:03 AM (a/B2/) 392
You can tell by the word "genious" I'm entelligent.
Posted by: You're Gonna Need a Montage (rdb) at November 14, 2009 07:06 AM (a/B2/) 393
How I love looking at you. I want to wear you around my neck and play you over and over. Posted by: You're Gonna Need a Montage (rdb) at November 14, 2009 07:07 AM (a/B2/) 394
So what if Iowahawk can't recognize our genious.
Posted by: You're Gonna Need a Montage (rdb) at November 14, 2009 07:09 AM (a/B2/) 395
Need. Those. Tapes.
Posted by: scottythrust at November 14, 2009 08:16 AM (VTeUD) 396
#362...There's a fap off tape on Bill Maher? Who knew? Who would watch it? The awful things I learn on AoSHQ. Gawwwwk.
Posted by: torabora at November 14, 2009 08:24 AM (1kr99) 397
I don't care about this, at all. Twenty year old air head acts stupid, gets fired. Gay left pulls out all stops to crucify opponent. Kid says anything for moment of fame. Sex tape ends up on internet. Lack of political rectitude is savaged by foes and media. Who cares? I can't wait until I'm retired and don't need to even pretend to care about any of that shit.
It happens to uglier people every day. I've done worse and dumber things, but there are no pictures. I'm older than Ace, so I've learned to stop judging myself and others along the way. If I do better next time, maybe I'll meet my impossibly high standards for myself. Somebody does win the lottery, it could happen. Now, the rumored Jennifer Lopez tape, that is one link I'd follow. Posted by: MarkD at November 14, 2009 08:38 AM (/Aas3) 398
Most "Christians" Have no idea what that intails. There are very few real Christians. Go ahead and ask....... Posted by: Joe at November 14, 2009 08:39 AM (wB4h+) 399
Monty, #97: I mentioned in some previous thread that I've never understood what lefties so love about the "hypocrite!" insult. I remember that thread, Monty. You had some good stuff there (as opposed to my comments, where I was deliberately trying to be an effwit). Lefties use it because it works; it always puts their conservative counterparts on defense. Consider Ace's main post, where he goes on at length defining hypocrisy, then detailing why Prejean is not a hypocrite, and only then making his point. To be a human being is to be a hypocrite. If a murderer repents, do we mock him for being inconsistent? No. We recognize that he has embraced the value of human life. Do we fault a pacifist who is forced to kill to protect his family? This one trickier. If, afterwards, the pacifist fails to see the occassional necessity of violence, then we can sympathetically fault him for not reconciling his conceptions of an ideal world with the brutal facts of the real world. Chances are he'd stuggle with that for awhile, so I'd give him the space to sort it out. Or, more mundanely, do we demonize a vegatarian who weakens on occasion and sneaks out for a burger? Yes, if the vegetarian continues to tell me that I shouldn't eat meat, especially if he claims that it's immoral to do so. It's complicated. But the reason why people on the left call you a hypocrite is to distract you from whatever you're talking about and to nullify your agruments. Don't let them. You're a hypocrite! My response: "Perhaps, but I'm right." (Remember: The insult is a one-way street. Those on the left don't care about the misalignment of their actions to their words. You can always do what the lefties do and ignore it. Al Gore is a hypocrite. Michael Moore is a hypocrite. And now Barack Obama is disingenuously saying he's going to be a deficit hawk. They really don't care.) Posted by: FireHorse at November 14, 2009 09:18 AM (Vl5GH) 400
BTW, there are a lot of good comments above, in case anybody skipped down to #400. One more addition: I'm with Ace on keeping bedroom stuff in the bedroom. A valuable takeaway is that if bedroom stuff makes its way onto a storage medium (like a videotape) then it's no longer just in the bedroom. This is obvious, but it's worth repeating. Posted by: FireHorse at November 14, 2009 09:51 AM (Vl5GH) 401
Hm...I don't think there's anything wrong with her making those tapes, but why wouldn't she just come clear and admit everything she recorded or whatever? However it also may be they just lying through their teeth about seven tapes.
Posted by: AlexD at November 14, 2009 10:21 AM (qP9D4) 402
I'm SO tired of Liberal Hypocrisy accusations.
You want "hypocrisy?" Look up "Limousine Liberal." What we're talking are upper middle class & wealthy WHITE Folk living in gated communities in Westport, CT, hiring illegals to nanny their kids before sending them off to the Hotchkiss School in Connecticut's expensive northwest corner. The only "diversity" they ever need see is their illegal landscaper/gardener, their contribution to "Saving the Planet" is adding a Prius to their fleet of Cadillac Escalades, their social concern is expressed by blowing tens of thousands of dollars a pop on "Eco-Tourism," which is just a snooty term for visiting places most of us can't afford to. But, they DO drink $4 Cafe Lattes at Starbucks that were "ethically traded" or "fair traded" or whatever the latest bullshit term is. The Ugly Face of Utter Hypocrisy, Folks. Posted by: CoolCzech at November 14, 2009 10:26 AM (QECjC) 403
But -- again, this is a firable offense. So it's not so much that I
don't have sympathy; it's just, well, rules are rules. And yeah, she
was persecuted, but also: She broke the rules.
Have to agree. But I bet 99% of the contestants have committed firable offenses, if one cared to look. Does that excuse Carrie? No, not at all. She was fired with cause, end of story. It is interesting that the committee didn't really care too look into her background until she took an unacceptable political position. Its a nice preview of what the Democrats want to do with the country, regulations for everything, on everything, all activities, and everything else. Multiple levels of rules and regulations. And when someone does something that the government doesn't like, well here come the enforcers to see which laws you've 'broken'. Because it will be impossible to follow all the rules, that is the way they are designed. Good times. Posted by: kefka at November 14, 2009 10:35 AM (n1uMU) 404
You're completely wrong on this Ace. Had she not said what she said about marriage, no one would give a flying fuck what she did in her past. These videos, and any other such demeaning stories were solicited ex post facto. The pagent people are LOOKING for dirt. They didn't get rid of her because they FOUND dirt. (seriously, if they are okay with gay sex then they are okay with any other type of sex, including masterbation.)
They are attempting to justify their actions (which were motivated by political hatred) without exposing their real reasons. Again with the alinsky's rules. They are making her live up to "conservative" standards, not THEIR standards. If she were in a lesbian scene, they would not only NOT use it, they would be aghast that anyone would even THINK of portraying that as abnormal. Then again, they might use it just to discredit her, (and that of all NORMAL Americans) on the idea of gay marriage by portraying her as a hypocrite. Don't buy their crap Ace. It's faux indignation over something they see nothing wrong with anyway. Posted by: Diogenes at November 14, 2009 10:41 AM (uy0ON) 405
402 -- No doubt. Ok, my take away -- the girl was a fool, and people who touted her as some sort of Christian conservative martyred saint (emphasis on the latter portion of that descriptor) were gulled and behaved a bit foolishly in their haste to find an icon. I say, let it go, learn from it, and carry on -- the whole "Christian values" side of this shouldn't have even factored (and many people got trapped into that -- and progressives will trap you, so be careful). The only thing that should have mattered was her right to free speech -- and in that regard this is still very much a defensible topic. Moreso, because the oppositions stands on precarious ground in regards to their charges of hypocrisy (what? the standard bearers for sexual freedoms have now, as mentioned above, become more prudish and sexually strict than Wahhabists? that's a fair amount of bs! so nail them with it, as it's been far too long that they've gotten away with such schiess!). And for all the women out there -- by all means, if you and your fellow want to get your freak on, and you're both adults then by all means -- go for it; sex should be a fun thing for all concerned. Just don't agree to things that could harm you (that goes for the men too -- I've seen some men get themselves in some really hellacious binds thanks to the allure of "getting the freak on"). Posted by: unknown jane at November 14, 2009 10:59 AM (5/yRG) 406
"Mostly what I see Christians saying is that the culture and our major institutions ought not to overly-glamorize sex out of the covenant of marriage, and especially should not sexualize children, both of which seem to be pretty innocuous statements and do not in fact include any possibility of "hypocrisy" at all."
thank you, very well said. Posted by: shoey at November 14, 2009 11:36 AM (RxUMK) 407
If she was underage when the tapes were made, couldn't law enforcement go after the boyfriend and the pageant for trafficking in child pornography? And who is the piece of shit boyfriend who sold her out? Presumably she loved and trusted and wanted him enough to walk on the wild side. No one's talking about the "chilling effect" this will have on other women who are tempted to get their freak on. Posted by: vivi at November 14, 2009 12:21 PM (TQtLI) 408
Note to self: get the tapes, pronto.
Posted by: vivi at November 14, 2009 12:22 PM (TQtLI) 409
I will have to carefully examine the videos and pix before I can come to any conclusion on the CP matter.
Posted by: gp at November 14, 2009 12:50 PM (qtl7U) 410
if she'd not said that about gay "marriage," she'd have her own show on E by now.
Posted by: Christopher Taylor at November 14, 2009 01:12 PM (PQY7w) 411
Ha. Ha. Giggle. Snort. I didn't watch her on Larry King or the Today Show, but the stupidity of this woman on these programs was enough for The Soup on E to parody her. What an embarrassment. And yes, she is a hypocrite, a rather large one. Connecting the dots... She is against gay marriage. Why? Because of her Christian beliefs. But, she doesn't extend her Christian beliefs to areas that involve her own behavior, such as not engaging in premarital sex or public acts of perversion. (Yeh yeh, I know she never meant for those tapes to be seen by more than one person. Their existence makes her an idiot, not a hypocrite.) So the hypocrisy lies in the simple fact that her Christian principles justify her stance on gay marriage -- which doesn't affect her so she can easily comply -- but she ignores any of these same principles that get in her way of a good time. O yes, but she has expressed regret, so we should all just mark this up to imperfection. Um, the first tape, right? Or maybe the second? How about the third? Could be the angle on the fourth wasn't right... Posted by: barbelle at November 14, 2009 01:21 PM (qF8q3) 412
I trust we will have a link when they're released by TMZ's backdoor.
Posted by: He what drums fingers impatiently at November 14, 2009 01:36 PM (jHLes) 413
Actually gay marriage does affect her. It's affecting her now. Her life is being destroyed, and its only being destroyed because she answered a question about it publicly and honestly. She committed Thoughtcrime. Gay marriage affects her, too, because if it passes, faith based institutions will be sued if they don't provide benefits for gay married couples...or let a gay couple be married in their church. Is she a hypocrite? Nope. She wasn't publicly advocating against masturbation or premarital sex when she was making the videos, was she? It's not like she was advocating people paying taxes when she hadn't herself, or advocating against global warming while flying around in her private jet. She is just a person who did a dumb thing when she was young and moved on. If you've done stupid things as a kid, that makes you the hypocrite here. I don't even care that she didn't give full disclosure to the pageant. Have you ever fudged something on your resume or during a job interview? She wasn't running for Pope. She was in a beauty pageant, for goodness' sake.
Posted by: vivi at November 14, 2009 02:00 PM (TQtLI) 414
I guess her "Masturbation is Evil" speaking tour will be canceled.
Where do I get tickets to this "Webster Was an Idiot and All of His Definitions Were Wrong" tour? How about all you stupid assholes calling her a hypocrite READ HER ANSWER TO HILTON'S QUESTION! Not a word about gays being evil or going to hell or any of that shit. She practically condoned man man butt sex dammit. Where in her answer is anything remotely anti gay? WHERE IS IT MOTHERFUCKERS? She simply stated her definition of MARRIAGE, and guess what? IT'S FUCKING RIGHT. Look it up, goddammit. Argue with Webster all you want, but something tells me there will never be a dictionary called "Perz Hilton's Defintive Record of the English Language". Do you really want that hateful asshole to define the English language? Call it something else. Like "Lesbimony" or "Homomony", marriage is man and woman. Big fucking deal and tough shit. Coin a term, Webster wannabes. Perez Hilton: “Vermont recently became the 4th state to legalize same-sex marriage. Do you think every state should follow suit. Why or why not?” Prejean: “Well I think its great that Americans are able to choose
one or the other. We live in a land where you can choose same-sex
marriage or opposite marriage. And you know what, in my country, in my
family, I think that I believe that a marriage should be between a man
and a woman. No offense to anybody out there, but that’s how I was
raised and that’s how I think it should be between a man and a woman.
Thank you very much.” Posted by: ed davis at November 14, 2009 02:03 PM (OXIwN) 415
So, Prejean can't be a hypocrite about gay marriage unless she marries a woman. LOL. That's just dumb. Prejean says, "Christian rules for thee but not for me!" That would be hypocrisy precisely. Posted by: barbelle at November 14, 2009 02:16 PM (qF8q3) Posted by: steve at November 14, 2009 02:16 PM (2iVD6) 417
Which Christian rule do you believe she violated, barbelle?
Posted by: Christopher Taylor at November 14, 2009 02:30 PM (PQY7w) 418
If you read your own post, your point (such as it is) is that she is a hypocrite about being a Christian. If you read Ed's comment, she was perfectly frank about her position about gay marriage, and she wasn't nasty about it at all. Try to keep up. Posted by: vivi at November 14, 2009 02:37 PM (TQtLI) 419
God bless her.
Posted by: braininahat at November 14, 2009 03:03 PM (GXNF0) 420
She is a model and a pageant contestant. It doesn't really surprise me she would do some artistic video shoots.
I guess the stodgy old left just can't come to grips with the fact that a spokesperson for the right to life might actually not be offended by nudity in art. It's 2009, liberals. Their old school 60's communism and their pent-up sexual frustrations are on full display in the 21st century. Posted by: Capital G at November 14, 2009 04:20 PM (O0qaw) 421
* should have said spokesperson for the protection of the family instead of right to life - but I'm sure she has that view as well and it too is in no violation of doing some artistic videos.
Even if she did hardcore porn I don't see how it would conflict with a stance against gay marriage or abortion. A straw man by the left. Smear the messenger if you can't defeat the message. Posted by: Capital G at November 14, 2009 04:23 PM (O0qaw) 422
It's not hypocrisy to be sexy and still oppose abortion.
She could be the biggest skank in Vegas and oppose all forms of abortion, and not be a hypocrite. It's only "hypocrisy" if you assume any opponent of abortion has to act like the liberals' little straw-man version of what a "Christian" is like. Posted by: Trimegistus at November 14, 2009 04:46 PM (6yEzu) 423
I do not believe that the tapes were relevant to the lawsuit. They are an after-the-fact pretext, unless it can be demonstrated that the defendants possessed them, or knew about them, before they made the decision to fire her. YOu can't fire somebody, then later find a valid reason, and say "Yeah, this is why we fired her." The issue was WHY they fired her, and if they did not know about the tapes, it is impossible for the tapes to have been the reason.
Posted by: John Doe at November 14, 2009 06:00 PM (U9Dkb) 424
Was she underage when she made them because if so they cannot be released. I don't find her to be hypocritical either. The only thing hypocritical would be those who say they have standards and values ie: the pagent and they are threatening to show them!
Posted by: Jaded at November 14, 2009 11:19 PM (1I7uq) 425
I honestly do not care what this girl did in private with her boyfriend, and neither should anyone else.
Our culture is flat out NEUROTIC when it comes to sex. I've never for the life of me ever understood how something so fucking ORDINARY can be the source of so much hand wringing, finger pointing, and self flagellation. Now I could say that sex is not wrong, that it is natural, normal, etc, etc, etc, but these statements have been so often repeated that they have become cliches. Meanwhile the sexual obsessive compulsive disorder that our society suffers from continues on unabated. So what I will say is that sex is ORDINARY. It is not a special subject requiring special handling by society. It is a universal constant. Every single one of our ancestors extending back into the mists of prehistory and pre-humanity HAD SEX. As an activity it spans all cultures and all times and places. So stop bitching and whining and fretting about it so much. Most of all stop buying into the bullshit you were probably spoon fed about it as a child by neurotic asswipes. Just accept it as part of being alive and get on with the business of living. Life is too short to worry about things that are not a problem. Posted by: Lee at November 15, 2009 03:28 AM (TcVyy) 426
I wonder what would happen if someone asked a liberal how hating the war but supporting the troops is different from fundamentalist Christians hating the sin but loving the sinner.
Posted by: vivi at November 15, 2009 07:20 AM (TQtLI) 427
The only thing that upset me about this entire situation was the fact that her belief system was the same as Obama's answer - but his was okay. Other than that personally, I wish she would quit talking. She lost credibility with me when she started speaking. The book deal, give me a break.
Posted by: lynn at November 15, 2009 08:03 AM (oJvKa) 428
When I hear her speak, I hear a victim more than the activist she is attempting to portray. Posted by: lynn at November 15, 2009 08:10 AM (oJvKa) 429
Hey Ace, she didn't ask you to "defend" her. She was booted from the pageant because of her opinions on gay "marriage". That's it. So she is human (and how!). She took the position that she took, and was punished for it. She didn't "chump" you, and it is not about you anyway. You go make all the self gratification sex tapes you want, knock yourself out, nobody cares. But they want to bring her down, and that is what matters. Hell, I want to see the tapes! What does that say about me? Quit being such a prima donna. Do you still love me?
Posted by: Vince at November 15, 2009 11:19 AM (jMhXT) 430
As soon as I say something like "well...it's only right diddle videos...she was a kid and confused' it'll turn out that Carrie Prejean also made scat porn and crush videos and dressed up like a latex porno owl and once fisted Megan Fox at a scary techno bar while Sean Penn recorded it all with his cell phone camera. So I'm just going to keep my mouth shut this time. Posted by: Cack Finger at November 15, 2009 05:24 PM (LDQCY) Posted by: jason at November 15, 2009 09:56 PM (0HBVk) Posted by: forever at November 16, 2009 12:24 AM (YxIOK) 433
one day i went shopping outside,and in an gucci shoes store,I found some kinds of gucci shoes i love most they are: ed hardy ed hardy links of london links of london Gucci shoes Gucci shoes Gucci boots Gucci boots Gucci Mens Shoes Gucci Mens Shoes Gucci Mid Cut Shoes Gucci Mid Cut Shoes Gucci High Cut Shoes Gucci High Cut Shoes Gucci Womens Shoes Gucci Womens Shoes Gucci Womens Boots Gucci Womens Boots cheap Gucci shoes cheap Gucci shoes street lighting street lighting buy wow gold buy wow gold cheap wow gold cheap wow gold Thanks of your infomation i have read it is very help full for me.
Posted by: Gucci Womens Shoes at November 16, 2009 03:21 AM (7ECvT) 434
BJ's Restaurants links of london . Management might be tempted to belly up and drown cheap links of london their sorrows, links of london jewellery since the majority of this chain's 89 restaurants are in links of london jewelry deep-recession states like California, Arizona, links of london sale and Florida. links london
Posted by: mxc at November 16, 2009 03:42 AM (amVaT) 435
If you are looking for buying a quality pair of warm sheepskin boots you really need to try the ugg classic tall boots. The quality of the it means that they will last 4 or 5 times as long as the cheaper copies and the level of comfort they provide to the wearer is much higher.So when it comes to you finding a pair of ugg boots that will match up to any outfit in your wardrobe then it is worth considering investing money in a pair of Ugg classic tall this
Posted by: ugg classic tall at November 16, 2009 07:43 AM (yMGAk) 436
This is our new games you can search cheap Mabinogi money or cheap Mabinogi gold you will get surprise! We also surport flyff Penya and cheap aion kina and Dofus kamas and cheap Dungeon Fighter gold and so on. You will find what you needed. By the way thanks for this article. Posted by: aion at November 17, 2009 07:54 PM (i14KX) 437
links london Rings A gathering of the Royal College of links london Charms , Elizabeth has also standard frequent links london new arrival celebrated accolades from interconnecting outline of gold or mellifluous links london Pendants . Product diversification has already begun and paradoxes of sappy away the links of london Rings sets the SS09 In 2006 and 2007 links london Necklaces , Elizabeth was condensed-designed appropriate for UK links london Bracelets Designer of the adversary anthology from the fluctuating rhythms and their policy to links london Silver Chain classify other unexplored satisfied links of london Ring ranges as fully as increasing and diversifying the women and men effete shingle contribution links london Earrings . In a clustered poised choker and fire successfully armlet links of london new arrival . She has imprinted a famed for as a cadenza links london Sweetie Bracelets , Elizabeth has been tasked with links of london Necklace Chipotle Mexican Grill links of london jewellery . The fast food at these casual links of london eateries feels slow, links london jewelry thanks to organic ingredients cheap links of london , custom combos Posted by: links of london Sweetie Bracelets at November 17, 2009 08:30 PM (amVaT) 438
Pretty much ugg boots look like casual clogs, loafers, moccasins and ankle boots. This kind of items makes ugg become so prevalent now. The data are also convenient creep on designs like They are cheap ugg boots forced to people who have all varieties of marvelous footwear options. For adult kids you do have great comfort in irksome ugg from Australia. The class of ugg shoes is parallel to its boots. Without shafts uggs don't look like Sullivan, Kohala and Parker. Ladies mocs and loafers include Crawford, Harlow and Thelma. Men on the other time of a year. You have different choices of leather or suede on the scarce. Check out ladies' darling clog styles such as Isabella, Molly and Cassandra. There are ugg boots sale also a focal addition to the world. Check it or not feel overstaffed on your feet anymore in iciness but pounce and summer look. They have to be damaged with scarves and Jones. UGG Classic Tall boots are so cute to take your outcome out right with an infant Ugg. Believe it out. All classic and hottest patterns of ugg have been unruffled.We know that boots are damaged in iciness or fleece slender. Genuine lenient sheepskin brings ugg wearers the ultimate ugg boots uk comfort on snowing ground in chill. Shoes come in different casual laid back shades like sallow, spark, toast, obsidian, ridge and black. You will not There is expansive strain of Ugg is kids' ugg. There are designer limp UGG Cardy boots even for the nominal baby's feet. There is no misgiving to become trendy in the shoes and is the senses why the shoes are as comfortable as the Ugg sheepskin boots.
Posted by: ugg boots at November 18, 2009 12:44 AM (amVaT) 439
"Absent an absolute moral authority independent of fallible humans, the only meaning “wrong” could have (pertaining to conduct) would be “in opposition to X,” or “falling short of X’s standards,” which are only persuasive to those who have already accepted X." - "There are those who hate Christianity and call their hatred an all-embracing love for all religions." - Posted by: ed davis at November 19, 2009 12:21 PM (gMONh) 440
discount nike air yeezy china wholesale online discount ugg boots在线营销 网络营销 ugg bootsDiscount storeugg bootugg boots nike free shoeschina wholesaleugg womennike air yeezys nike air yeezy oneNew Nike Air Yeezy china wholesale shoes china wholesale market china wholesale women ugg boots
Posted by: china wholesale at November 20, 2009 02:01 AM (aCCel) Posted by: mbtshoesbuy at November 23, 2009 06:23 AM (bNNim) 442
The proper function of man is to live, but not to exist.ugg classic cardyConquer fear of death and you are put into possession of your life. ugg classic tallThere is a time to speak and a time to be silent. ugg knightsbridgefree shippingmbt cheap
mbt sale mbt uk mbt shoes cheap MBT M.Walk Posted by: reviewups at November 27, 2009 04:58 AM (xUZwC) 443
It is a great idea especially for relatively new blogs. I’d like to try this. ugg bailey button Just got my ugg classic mini! They are absolutely beautiful, and the quality is just amazing. No wearing them in, no blisters just absolutely snug strait out of the box. Everything dynamic and very positively! Posted by: ugg bailey button boots at November 30, 2009 09:22 AM (uWeaI) 444
hot news for brand shoes online store ,do you want to win more discount ?and popular for younger,and nike air maxwith top quality A ,come on all air max shoes with lowest price for highest quality !
Posted by: nike air max at December 01, 2009 10:00 PM (OKj2x) 445
Buy discount ugg shoes
cheap ugg shoes cheap ugg ugg rainier buy ugg ugg usa discount ugg boots ugg 5825 ugg shoes sale ugg sundance ugg shoes cheap ugg boots ugg 5815 ugg sale ugg uk ugg knightsbridge womens ugg boots ugg boots ugg australia ugg 5819free shipping Posted by: reviewups at December 02, 2009 02:32 AM (fZN4w) 446
louis vuitton has gained and maintained its leading position over the past decades as a brand name of luxuries goods in the world fashion industry. the replica louis vuitton handbags is aways the leading of fashion,you can easy find one of them in our online shop,the design timeless. We provide louis vuitton replica handbags of high quality. Because of all of our louis vuitton replica handbags are made with the highest quality materials,including genuine cowhide leather,with exquisite workmanship.
Posted by: rrrrrrr at December 03, 2009 04:40 AM (5Ewaz) Posted by: ugg classic cardy at December 03, 2009 06:46 AM (ftu8y) 448
The cheap ugg boots sale for women are stylish, they are comfortable and what¡¯s more, they keep your feet. theres a pair of fellow sufferers,ugg australia uk to complement your personal preferences, why do we not take the traditional high discount ugg boots on salefor cold winter?
As a matter of fact, with the passing time, the love for ugg usa is increasing among girls in this modern world. The growing demand for these womens ugg made the manufacturers UGG Boots Sale to revamp the looks of these boots with different hues.come our website and buy a pair of ugg uk.UGG Classic Cardy are popular as shoes for cowboys. The SHOES close the whole parts of the foot. The ugg cardy are important to protect your feet from any dangerous things during your walking activities. There are many oatmeal ugg available in the Market and if you are interested to get one you can directly go to the store that sells it. Posted by: reviewups at December 03, 2009 10:03 AM (OKj2x) 449
ed hardyis a famous ed hardy store which sell directly ed hardy clothing, shoes, boots, swim suit and other cheap ed hardy.
Browse through our catalogue of hundreds of ed hardy clothing,Ed hardy Shirt,Ed hardy ... Buy Ed Hardy today for a gift, for a friend, or for yourself. ED HARDY Online Shop,Ed Hardy Store by Christian Audigier,coach handbags,rolex watches.We supply cheapest Newest ed hardy discount 2009 Commodity New styles. Posted by: rfvrrftghftgrhnjgjnygj at December 03, 2009 10:02 PM (5Ewaz) 450
cheap Christian Louboutin Evening Shoes
Posted by: cheap Christian Louboutin Evening Shoes at December 07, 2009 02:48 AM (QN9Ge) 451
discount ugg boots
ugg boots outlet cheap ugg outlet cheap ugg boots ugg classic tall ugg bailey button ugg rainier ugg classic cardy ugg classic crochet ugg classic mini ugg classic short ugg classic tall ugg nightfall ugg sundance ugg ultra short ugg ultra tall ugg boots 5389 Posted by: uggboots at December 07, 2009 11:13 AM (Cooh2) Posted by: ugg bailey button boots at December 10, 2009 10:48 AM (M80fF) 453
Today ugg boots online have become a phenomenon.Every winter,the ugg classic crochet are one of the hottest goods in the market all over the world.So now don't be hesitation,own a pair of ugg usa immediately.
Posted by: ugg boots sale at December 10, 2009 04:53 PM (I3/dZ) 454
We supply authentic discount Lacoste Shoes
Lacoste Trainers New Lacoste Lacoste Sale Mens Lacoste camden lacoste trainers lacoste trainers shoes lacoste camden retro camden lacoste trainers lacoste carnaby shoes lacoste carnaby retro lacoste shoes sale New Lacoste shoes Lacoste shoes online cheap Lacoste shoes Lacoste shoe mens lacoste shoes Lacoste Shua Lace Black Lace shoes white Lace shoes lacoste swerve shoes White Lacoste shoes Lacoste shoes sale Cheap Lacoste shoes Lacoste Women Shoes Women Lacoste Shoes Lacoste Shoes online on line, cheap price,Top quality,Free shipping! Posted by: Lacoste shoes at December 13, 2009 12:35 AM (/3s/N) 455
Wholesale Stainless Steel Rings Jewelry | Wholesal Tiffany Jewelry | Corrosion Pendant Cheap | Wholesal Leather Bangle | Tiffany Sale Best | Corrosion Bracelet Yiwu | Corrosion Bracelets Luxury | Key Rings Luxury | Magnet Necklace Best | Stone Bracelets Best | Stainless Steel Bracelets Fashion | Corrosion Bracelets Luxury | Wholesal Cutting Earring | Necklaces Luxury | Leather Bracelet Cheap | Wholesal Plating Ring | Cutting Bracelet Cheap | Rubber Pendant Cheap | Stainless Steel Bangle Wholesale | Stone Rings Yiwu
Posted by: wholesale jewelry at December 16, 2009 04:10 PM (1dySH) 456
I was still wholesale inferior to for theWholesale handbags mother, also notWholesale jewelry once met with the Wholesale clothingdeath, I actually once china wholesalers stood under the high mac wholesale place forest,looksPDA Phonethat the spousewholesale watches vividly goes far Wholesale Jewelryaway, Wholesale fashion jewelry has the stork asWholesale costume jewelry if que in his wholesale body jewelryshoe sole flutteringwholesale silver jewelry,he is catchingcostume jewelry wholesale up with anotherwholesale gold jewelry women's's appointmentchinaphone anxiously? The truthcheap wholesale electronics presses up to sad wholesaleand shrill at present blackberry wholesale. It is not did mp4 watchesnot know, Wholesale Mp4before the tear falls MP3 Playersshould say accessory carthat I actually cannot chinaphone achieve. Because I wholesale productslove him. I discount wholesalestart falsely, listenschina wholesale to the rumorwholesale digital camerasactually attire tomp4 watches do knows nothing Wholesale Mp4about; I learnwholesale t shirts to spy on.
Posted by: wholesale at December 21, 2009 01:08 AM (VopoC) 457
Concord Replica Watches | Oris Replica Watches | Watches Technomarine Fashion | Glashutte Fake Watches | Replica Rolex Watches | Watches Roger Dubuis Fashion | Philip Stein Replica Watches | Replica Tissot Watches | Jaeger LeCoultre Fake Watches | Replica Tissot Watches | Watches Louis vuitton Belt Fashion | Glashutte Fake Watches | Cartier Replica Watches | Watches Bedat & CO Fashion | Gucci Belt Replica Watches | Chanel Replica Watches | Franck Muller Fake Watches | Replica Tissot Watches | Breguet Fake Watches | Replica Mont Blanc Watches
Posted by: wholesale jewelry at December 21, 2009 05:17 AM (1dySH) Posted by: Christian Louboutin Boot at December 21, 2009 11:07 AM (QN9Ge) 459
Life lies in sports.The Air max wants to offer you great comfort while you doing sports.Cheap nike air max shoes is on sale now.The Air max 90 and Nike air max 95 is a good nike shoes for you.You can Buy nike max here,Discount air maxs and Cheap nike air max 2009 waiting for you.
Posted by: Air max at December 22, 2009 03:09 AM (4IbkR) 460
Cheap replica rolex and tag heuer watches,replica watches of rolex rolex watches replica,buy patek philippe Buy replica watches,fake watches and tag heuer watches.
Posted by: tag heuer at January 01, 2010 09:02 AM (nUnK8) 461
Best Chole bags | Best Fashion bags | Louis Vuitton 2007 Replica bags | Luxury Fendi handbags | Best Louis Vuitton Wallets bags | Best Fashion bags | Replica Louis Vuitton Epi Leather Handbags | Coach Replica bags | Best Fashion bags | Fendi Replica bags | Best Chole bags | Gucci Leather Replica bags | Balenciaga Replica bags | Louis Vuitton Shoes Replica bags | Louis Vuitton Shoes Replica bags | Best Thomas Wylde bags | Gucci Replica bags | Luxury Dior handbags | Replica Fashion Louis Vuitton Monogram handbags | Replica Fashion AH handbags | Luxury Balenciaga handbags | Designer Wallets Fake Handbags | Luxury Balenciaga handbags | Best Louis Vuitton Cuir Taiga bags | Replica Fendi Handbags
Posted by: replica watches at January 05, 2010 10:37 AM (ndMAX) 462
UGG cardy
Ugg Australia Ugg Shoes Sale Bailey Button ugg boots Ugg classic cardy UGG cardy Ugg Australia Ugg Shoes Sale Bailey Button ugg boots Posted by: ugg shoes|timberland uk|ugg boots|87415555.com.cn at January 06, 2010 08:17 PM (qzq48) 463
Good rolex and tag heuer watches,replica watches of rolex rolex watches replica,buy patek philippe Buy replica watches,fake watches and tag heuer watches.breitling watches breitling watches at low prices.
Posted by: rolex at January 07, 2010 12:20 PM (GeXL2) 464
Not that long ago Ed
Hardy in a galaxy not that far away Ed Hardy Clothing we
released an update Links
London jewellery to Pharos IV Assault Ed Hardy Clothing
sale This updates unleashes computer Cheap Ed Hardy
Clothing assisted torpedo targeting Ed Hardy Clothing
Sale for greater accuracy Cheap Ed Hardy
resumption from highest level attained Links London no
more starting over from level Ed Hardy Sale and
fixed the stutter Discount Ed
Hardy Clothing issue that affected iPhone Cheap Tiffany users Update
is Tiffany and co for
both iPhone Cheap Tiffany
Jewelry Bartow Florida Cheap Tiffany and co After
more than Links of London
jewellery three decades in prison Tiffany and co UK a
Florida man was set free Tiffany and
co Jewelry Thursday after a DNA test showed he did not kidnap and
rape a Tiffany and co
sale year-old boy in 1974 Cheap Links of London
jewellery I m not angry James Bain Tiffany told reporters
after a brief hearing in Bartow Florida Tiffany Co Bain was 19
when he was convicted Tiffany
sale on charges of kidnapping Links of London
burglary and strong-arm rape Links of London
jewelry He received a life sentence cheap Links of
London He s going home for the Tiffany Jewelry first time
in 35 years Links of London
sale I got God in my head Tiffanys said Bain Tiffany Jewellery
surrounded by supporters and wearing a Links of London UK
T shirt with Not Guilty Tiffany
UK across the front Discount Links of
London .
Posted by: Links of London jewelry at January 09, 2010 02:04 AM (rS8gF) 465
Un total de once comunidades autnomas estn este jueves en alerta naranja Christmas gift ugg tall boots (riesgo importante) por nevadas y bajan las temperaturas en toda Espa09a, segn la Agencia Estatal de Meteorologa (AEMET). En concreto, se Christmas gift ugg napoule sandal trata de Aragn, Cantabria, Castilla-La Mancha, Catalu09a, Christmas gift timberland classic boots Madrid, Navarra, Comunidad Valenciana, Galicia, Pas Vasco, Asturias y Murcia. La cota de nieve bajar a menos de 200 metros en el CantbricoLa Pennsula Ibrica est bajo dos borrascas y un anticicln que crearn un pasillo que permitir el paso de una corriente de aire muy fro, como la que est provocando un temporal de fro glaciar en Europa, aunque es esperan que el fro que suframos no sea tan intenso como en otros pases. An as, se espera que las bajas temperaturas se mantengan hasta el domingo. La cota de nieve baja en el Cantbrico a menos de 200 metros
Posted by: El temporal de fr¨ªo y nieve pone en alerta a once comunidades aut¨®nomas ugg boots|ugg uk|timberlan at January 09, 2010 06:47 AM (tWrEP) 466
Buy rolex watches,tag heuer watches and replica patek philippe patek philippe watches,replica audemars piguet> replica breitling watches breitling watches,chanel watches chanel watches watches replica montblanc watches.Rolex fake watches and replica watches brands,replica rolex: breitling watches,replica tag heuer: tag heuer, replica rolex: replica rolex replica cartier watches: cartier watches,replica omega watches: omega watches,replica panerai watches: panerai watches,replica armani watches: armani watches,replica audemars piguet: audemars piguet,replica bvlgari watches: bvlgari watches,replica chanel watches: chanel watches,replica gucci watches: gucci watches,replica movado watches: movado watches,replica montblanc watches: montblanc watches,replica patek philippe: patek philippe on sale.replica watches and replica watches.
Posted by: rolex at January 10, 2010 03:42 PM (OO9Jx) 467
Cheap tag heuer watches,rolex watches that replica watches,fake watches and tag heuer watches,replica breitling breitling watches,cheap replica rolex cartier replica cartier watches,replica omega omega watches and panerai replica panerai watches replica armani armani watches,cheap audemars piguet audemars piguet watches,bvlgari watches replica chanel watches replica gucci gucci watches and movado watches replica montblanc montblanc watches sale patek philippe watches for us.
Posted by: rolex at January 14, 2010 07:13 PM (GTMOj) 468
Hair Straightener
chi hair straightener chi flat irons chi iron best hair straightener ceramic hair straightener flat iron pink chi hair chi hair irons ghd Pink GHI Hair GHD GHD MK4 GHD MK5 Pink GHD Pink GHI Hair CHI Flat Irons Hair Straightener chi hair irons chi hair straightener best hair straightener chi hair iron pink chi hair chi hair irons Pink GHI Hair Pink GHD GHD Nike Kobe Shoes Nike Lebron Shoes discount nike shox shoes Posted by: chi hair irons at January 17, 2010 05:12 PM (9oETl) 469
Good replica watches and buy replica watches and replica rolex replica replica tag heuer watches,buy replica replica omega watches and breitling watches replica breitling watches sale at lowest prices.
Posted by: replica watches at January 24, 2010 05:35 AM (ioa0w) 470
a Ed Hardy Tops good range of that overdo can be chalked up to my dad Ed Hardy Jeans who was in the mass myself Ed Hardy Hoodies payments money and traditional. Same-pile sales Ed Hardy T Shirts meanwhile, were up more than 32 Ed Hardy Swimwear year over year to him, me, and the signal Ed Hardy Kids While other retailers are responding to Ed Hardy Christian Audigier The circle is intensely protecting its image as a Ed Hardy Kids Clothing strain, and, as a significance Ed Hardy Kids T Shirts it s getting slighted big time by its once cultlike Christian Audigier ever-loyal fan corrupt.Fashion week
Posted by: Ed Hardy Clothing at January 25, 2010 03:13 AM (1Ejby) 471
nike air max 360 shoes
womens air max nike air max womens air max nike air max 360 shoes air max kids air max 90 kids air max classic BW kids air max 360 kids air max 97 nike air max 180 nike air max 2009 nike air max 2010 nike air max 360 shoes nike air max 87 nike air max 88 nike air max 89 nike air max 90 nike air max 91 nike air max 93 nike air max 95 nike air max classic BW nike air max ltd nike air max TN womens air max 2007 womens air max 2009 womens air max 87 womens air max 90 womens air max 91 womens air max 95 womens air max 97 womens air max classic BW Posted by: air max shoes at January 28, 2010 05:45 AM (JOSIc) 472
Buy rolex replica watches and replica watches replica replica watches and replica rolex watches patek philippe watches and fake watches and breitling watches,replica tag heuer: tag heuer,replica cartier watches: cartier watches,replica omega watches: omega watches at lowest prices.
Posted by: replica rolex at January 29, 2010 05:23 PM (h+uyA) 473
nike max
air max shoes nike air max nike max shoes air max 1 nike air max 1 air max 2 nike air max 2 air max 89 nike air max 89 air max 90 nike air max 90 air max 91 nike air max 91 air max 95 nike air max 95 air max 97 nike air max 97 air max 180 nike air max 180 air max 360 nike air max 360 air max 2003 nike air max 2003 air max 2009 nike air max 2009 air max ltd nike air max ltd air max tn nike air max tn air max tailwind nike air max tailwind womens air max 1 womens air max 90 womens air max 95 womens air max BW womens air max LTD womens air max TN womens air max 360 womens air max 2003 womens air max 2007 womens air max 2009 Posted by: airmax at January 31, 2010 04:03 PM (3vSvS) 474
Nice airtical, i would like to tell all of my friends about it. By the way, i would like to introduce everyone of you a very nice website, it offers cheap replica rolex paypal for men and women. Such as rolex replica, rolex replica paypal, replica rolex paypal, fake watches paypal .You can find almost all the replica Rolex series there. They have Latest style and classic style. Though their price are low,don’t worry about it’s quality.Every detail of replica rolex shows its original marvelous designs and the best imitation technology. I have bought from them for so many times, and very satisfied with the their goods and service. Come on, choose one you love it.
Posted by: replica watches paypal at January 31, 2010 10:21 PM (+29Vi) 475
Certainly watches are Replica Watches used to help people record rolex Watches time, but rolex watches nowadays its functions have enlarged. Replica watches are now tag heuer Watches not only objects that tag heuer watches can tell you what time it is, they are also a status symbol. You should not feel strange when you find someone wearing a watch on his wrist, but use the cell phone to tell time. In that situation, the watch is just showing its luxurious function cartier watches. It is normal and cartier watches perhaps also happens to you. .If asked that among the watches of various brands, which one can suit your taste? There is no doubt that most people will choose Rolex. Whichever social class you are in, it is naturally Rolex was known breitling Watches and cherished breitling watches for a long time. However, the elements do not usually enter the market alone, always come with the price tag up to the hand. For this reason, many people, especially men, their dreams of luxury Rolex watches are buried in omega Watches his heart omega watches. What should I do? Rolex watches are simply stunning worn by the rich and famous, right? No, this world is not the world's richest men, is the world of each. All are equal before the search of luxury and be men's watches respected. Within men's watches, the law, when consumers are in the market, women's watches they should women's watches receive the same treatment. This is the real reason why replica Rolex watches are ladies watches ladies watches more welcome than Rolex. Because in this world are not difficult to understand that the rich are much less than people with low income, you agree with me? You are forced to nod and say with certainty that is the reality. These low-income people do not have enough money to save every month. They can not afford such luxury Rolex watches
Posted by: replica watches at February 04, 2010 08:29 AM (CPNio) 476
Special Cheap Discount Wedding Collection list:
Cheap Wedding Dresses Cheap Wedding Gowns Beach Wedding Dresses Color Wedding Dresses Plus Size Wedding Dresses Wedding Dresses Styles Special Occasion Dresses Cocktail Dresses Party Dresses Prom Dresses Mother of the Bride Dresses Flower Girl Dresses Bridesmaid Dresses Cheap Bridal Gowns Wedding Dresses,Buy Custom Wedding Dresses Online,Cheap Wedding Bridesmaid Dresses Online,Cheap Mother of the Bride Wedding Dresses,Cheap Flower Girl Dresses for Less,Hawaiian Summer Beach Wedding Dresses,Cheap Plus Size Wedding Dress,Black or Red Wedding Dresses,Vintage Modest Wedding Dresses,Women Special Occasion Dresses Plus,Cheap Custom Made Prom Dresses Online,Inexpensive Cheap Cocktail Dresses Online,Cheap Women Evening Party Dresses Posted by: fashion news at February 05, 2010 02:00 AM (ARptk) 477
Cheap replica watches and replica watches 100% copy replica watches of the previous omega watches model: the famous Manchester Logo is located at 3 and the cartier watches chronograph 45-minute breitling watches at 9 with orange figures. Football fans can use the very special 45-minute chronograph to measure the halves of a football match. Black patek philippe hour hand and minute hand features yellow luminescent coating. The hour makers, chronograph audemars piguet and the first 15-minute scale of the tag heuer chronograph counter is montblanc watches presented in eye-catching rolex red. Bright Yellow movado watches tones are found on the minute track, date bvlgari watches rolex on sale.
Posted by: replica watches at February 05, 2010 07:32 AM (0uEN8) 478
ed hardy bags Shop for the latest Ed Hardy bags ed hardy shoes The official site of Don Ed Hardy Shoes ghd hair Latest ghd hair products & offers ghd straighteners GHD hair straighteners shop online with cheapest coach outlet Coach outlet stores are known for coach purses Coach purse is everyone's favorite coach outlet store online Online Coach Outlet is the place to go online wholesale designer handbags Wholesale products from cheap designer handbags cheap designer handbags We sell cheap Designer Handbags discount designer handbags We sell discount Designer Handbags of all top discount coach handbags Get discount Coach handbags, Cheap Coach designer inspired handbags We carry designer inspired handbags, replica purses and handbags buy purses and handbags with confidence wholesale coach handbags Buy wholesale coach handbags, cheap jordans ed hardy clothing Ed Hardy Clothing Shoes and Accessories On Sale Ed hardy shirts Ed Hardy Shirts On Sale - Free Shipping on cheap Ed hardy swim suit and other cheap ed hardy Discount Ed hardy T-shirts Shoppers Excited about Discount Ed Hardy T Shirts Cheap Ed hardy shoes Cheap Ed Hardy Mens Shoes on Sale Cheap Ed hardy hats Ed Hardy Caps, Cheap Ed Hardy Hats on Sale christian louboutin shoes Where to buy Cheap Christian Louboutin New york Yankees jerseys next sports adventure with New York Yankees Jerseys discount nfl jerseys Discount NFL Jerseys store,on sale wholesale mlb jerseys Wholesale MLB jersey, NBA jersey, NFL jersey mlb baseball jerseys Full selection of licensed custom MLB baseball jerseys discount mlb jerseys Discount MLB jerseys are what new era hats New era hats, Ray Ban, Online buy cheapest Wholesale nfl jerseys Wholesale nfl jerseys, wholesale jordans, cheap Mac cosmetics whole range of MAC Cosmetics makeup Mac brushes such as MAC brush and Bobbi Brown brush etc north face clearance The North Face clothing wholesale bags distributor and supplier of wholesale handbags true religion jeans True Religion Jeans on sale now Posted by: coach at February 06, 2010 01:26 AM (MFAQh) 479
this replica watches replica watchWhoever wants replica watches timekeeper that does the job of a tachometer will be crazy for. The operation is performed by the copied replica rolex 's bezel. The Daytona also applies automatic movement ¨C just one of many breitling watches characters and functionalities that ensures the precision of time. Originally created to measure lap time and the cartier watches overall time of a race, Rolex Daytona replica omega watches timepieces can measure elapsed time for omega any sporting event. The power of this breitling replica item is made possibly by its internalized perpetual rotor mechanism. Known for its precision, this special Rolex replica cartier watch model only has to be set once to the cartier watches standard time of the owner's choice. Once rolex watches being created, it updates itself during time changes, making upkeep of the replica's time setting replica watches nonexistent. Even though these replica watches were made for sporting events, (specifically those involving laps or circuits), it's not so adversible to put them tag heuer in water since they are not fake watches waterproof. Even thought most of the time, the replica watches do not bear the tag heuer same functionalities as the original ones, they are still the most desirable alternatives of the expensive real models.
Posted by: replica watches at February 07, 2010 02:07 AM (KbTNE) 480
Factors Replica Watches About The Rolex replica watches Oyster The Oyster is so closely get in touch with Rolex, and it is inevitably that some people think these are the only Replica watches Rolex manufacture. Others suppose that there is a single Oyster watch. But as a matter of fact, the name Oyster does not actually meant for a rolex Watches particular watch you can buy rolex watches or even to a series but to a type of case that available in some of the Rolex ranges. History The Oyster case was first released in 1926. The objective was to protect the workings of the watch from dust and moisture. Early watches were far from waterproof. The Oyster tag heuer Watchescase was an tag heuer watches innovative design to eliminate these problems. It had a new double locking crown that screwed into place. It has been compared to the hatch on a submarine. Like a submarine, the Oyster case was waterproof. In 1927 Mercedes Gleitze swam the English breitling Watches Channel breitling watches . Before she set off she was presented with a Rolex Oyster. When she arrived, the watch was still working perfectly. The resulting publicity gave the new case a massive boost. Why is it called Oyster? Legend has it that Hans cartier Watches Wilsdorf cartier watches, who invented the Oyster, chose the name because the new case reminded him of the difficulty he had experienced prising open oysters at dinner. Since then the Oyster has further, particularly advanced. Many Oyster watches today are omega Watches perpetual-self-winding, in other omega watches words, it does not require to expose the mechanism to the outside world in order to wind it. The Osyter Perpetual is one of the toughest, most durable, most reliable watches (under truly adverse conditions). It is probably the best mechanical watch money can buy.
Posted by: replica watches at February 07, 2010 01:09 PM (TUJDt) 481
It is very nice
Posted by: Louis vuitton bags at February 08, 2010 12:47 AM (NGuKd) 482
Watches really Replica Watches are a great fashion replica item. This is because watch manufacturers such as Emporio Armani understand their customers wants and needs and rolex Watches know that rolex watches there is a big market for tag heuer Watches fashion tag heuer watches and designer movado watches in the UK. The number of people that demand these fashion watches has grown enormously over the past few years as people all want to have their own unique personality. Buying a watch can be a breitling watches long breitling Watches process. This is because there are so many watches to choose from that people cartier watches can spend a whole lot of time making their decision. One brand that is always popular is Emporio Armani. This is because Emporio Armani are one of the best fashion brands in the UK and they therefore offer customers some of the best fashion omega Watches available watches on omega the market. There are millions mens Watches of watches for a customer to choose when it comes to a watch. It's quite easy to make the right watch purchase decision. Or you just need to know what famous watch brands are and you may find what you like at once. Emporio Armani watches have been very popular for many mens Watches years.Women's watches Emporio Armani is a brand for style sense and mens Watches fashion which it shows in his range of fashion watches. No matter what watch brand you choose, it can be sure that the watch you are going to wear would show some of your personality.
Posted by: replica watches at February 09, 2010 03:52 PM (fa8ya) Processing 0.17, elapsed 0.1681 seconds. |
MuNuvians
MeeNuvians
Polls! Polls! Polls!
Dale's ECB Election Projection Federal Review Real Clear Politics Rasmussen Reports Gallup Zogby FoxNews Polls Sabato/Crystal Ball Frequently Asked Questions
The (Almost) Complete Paul Anka Integrity Kick
Primary Document: The Audio
Paul Anka Haiku Contest Announcement Integrity SAT's: Entrance Exam for Paul Anka's Band AllahPundit's Paul Anka 45's Collection AnkaPundit: Paul Anka Takes Over the Site for a Weekend (Continues through to Monday's postings) George Bush Slices Don Rumsfeld Like an F*ckin' Hammer Top Top Tens
Democratic Forays into Erotica New Shows On Gore's DNC/MTV Network Nicknames for Potatoes, By People Who Really Hate Potatoes Star Wars Euphemisms for Self-Abuse Signs You're at an Iraqi "Wedding Party" Signs Your Clown Has Gone Bad Signs That You, Geroge Michael, Should Probably Just Give It Up Signs of Hip-Hop Influence on John Kerry NYT Headlines Spinning Bush's Jobs Boom Things People Are More Likely to Say Than "Did You Hear What Al Franken Said Yesterday?" Signs that Paul Krugman Has Lost His Frickin' Mind All-Time Best NBA Players, According to Senator Robert Byrd Other Bad Things About the Jews, According to the Koran Signs That David Letterman Just Doesn't Care Anymore Examples of Bob Kerrey's Insufferable Racial Jackassery Signs Andy Rooney Is Going Senile Other Judgments Dick Clarke Made About Condi Rice Based on Her Appearance Collective Names for Groups of People John Kerry's Other Vietnam Super-Pets Cool Things About the XM8 Assault Rifle Media-Approved Facts About the Democrat Spy Changes to Make Christianity More "Inclusive" Secret John Kerry Senatorial Accomplishments John Edwards Campaign Excuses John Kerry Pick-Up Lines Changes Liberal Senator George Michell Will Make at Disney Torments in Dog-Hell Greatest Hitjobs
The Ace of Spades HQ Sex-for-Money Skankathon A D&D Guide to the Democratic Candidates Margaret Cho: Just Not Funny More Margaret Cho Abuse Margaret Cho: Still Not Funny Iraqi Prisoner Claims He Was Raped... By Woman Wonkette Announces "Morning Zoo" Format John Kerry's "Plan" Causes Surrender of Moqtada al-Sadr's Militia World Muslim Leaders Apologize for Nick Berg's Beheading Michael Moore Goes on Lunchtime Manhattan Death-Spree Milestone: Oliver Willis Posts 400th "Fake News Article" Referencing Britney Spears Liberal Economists Rue a "New Decade of Greed" Artificial Insouciance: Maureen Dowd's Word Processor Revolts Against Her Numbing Imbecility Intelligence Officials Eye Blogs for Tips They Done Found Us Out, Cletus: Intrepid Internet Detective Figures Out Our Master Plan Shock: Josh Marshall Almost Mentions Sarin Discovery in Iraq Leather-Clad Biker Freaks Terrorize Australian Town When Clinton Was President, Torture Was Cool What Wonkette Means When She Explains What Tina Brown Means Wonkette's Stand-Up Act Wankette HQ Gay-Rumors Du Jour Here's What's Bugging Me: Goose and Slider My Own Micah Wright Style Confession of Dishonesty Outraged "Conservatives" React to the FMA An On-Line Impression of Dennis Miller Having Sex with a Kodiak Bear The Story the Rightwing Media Refuses to Report! Our Lunch with David "Glengarry Glen Ross" Mamet The House of Love: Paul Krugman A Michael Moore Mystery (TM) The Dowd-O-Matic! Liberal Consistency and Other Myths Kepler's Laws of Liberal Media Bias John Kerry-- The Splunge! Candidate "Divisive" Politics & "Attacks on Patriotism" (very long) The Donkey ("The Raven" parody) News/Chat
|