Support




Contact
Powered by
Movable Type

Actual Cost of Democratic Plans: Over $1.8 Trillion

Both of them -- the Senate plan and the House plan.

For a a long time, they have been falsely reporting the "ten year costs" by comparing ten years of revenues -- also known as higher taxes and mandates -- with only seven years of outlays.

What happens when you compare a ten-year window in which there are both revenues and layouts going on for the whole ten years?

The costs skyrocket above their advertised costs -- they double.

Each bill is routinely “scored” for its 10-year costs from 2010-19. Yet this includes several years when the spending wouldn’t yet have kicked in. According to the Congressional Budget Office, fully 99.9 percent of the Pelosi bill’s costs would hit from 2013 onward. Similarly, 98.3 percent of Reid’s spending would come after 2014.

If you start the tally when the bills’ spending would actually start (in 2013 for the House bill and 2014 for the Senate bill), then the bills’ real 10-year costs become clear — and are remarkably similar.

The CBO reports that, in their true first 10 years, the House bill would cost $1.8 trillion, and the Senate bill would cost $1.7 trillion. Pelosi would raise Americans’ taxes by $1.1 trillion over that period, while Reid would hike them by $1 trillion.

And the House bill would siphon about $800 billion from Medicare to spend it elsewhere, while the Senate bill would suck out about $900 billion.

Seniors, take notice: The already-massive cost of this catastrophe is being reduced by $800-900 billion to give your care to someone else.

Someone younger, healthier, and, coincidentally I'm sure, more inclined to vote for Barack Obama.

This whole scam is a game of taking more than a trillion dollars in benefits from a constituency that doesn't support Barack Obama very strongly (seniors) to a constituency that does vote for him, very strongly indeed (the young, the poor, minorities).

It is a fair question to ask if we are too generous to the elderly at the expense of the young. There is not a self-evident answer. Perhaps Obama and Pelosi could make that case.

But they should make that case. Those who are to be negatively impacted like this -- seniors -- should know the facts of the matter, and not be lied to constantly by the Democrats, Obama, and the head-pat media. They should hear the facts, and they should get a fair hearing themselves.

Posted by: Ace at 02:58 PM



Comments

1 This is awesome. And I don't have to lift a fucking finger.

Posted by: Jack Kevorkian at November 05, 2009 03:01 PM (/WLDq)

2 $1.8T if we're lucky.  Their original estimates for Medicare were off by a factor of 12.

Posted by: HeatherRadish at November 05, 2009 03:01 PM (NtiET)

3 Seniors, take notice:

Just curious but how many seniors read the HQ?

Other than Dave in Texas of course.

Posted by: DrewM. at November 05, 2009 03:02 PM (FCWQb)

4 Man that's a lot of siphoning and sucking.

Posted by: Rocks at November 05, 2009 03:02 PM (Q1lie)

5

Usually, with government programs, the average multiplier is closer to 15 times the original estimated costs.

 

Posted by: Mallamutt at November 05, 2009 03:03 PM (V9SYy)

6
But it's all cool. Their plan saves taxpayers $4995.95.

Posted by: Tweet beats dead horses at November 05, 2009 03:04 PM (z37MR)

7 Just curious but how many seniors read the HQ?

Other than Dave in Texas of course.

Posted by: DrewM. at November 05, 2009 03:02 PM (FCWQb)


They don't actually read it much. They just point at the headlines and go "See! See!"

Posted by: Rocks at November 05, 2009 03:04 PM (Q1lie)

8 Heather beat me to it.  Minimum 1.8T, per year, by the time we get there. Take comfort in knowing that we'd never make it.

Posted by: Herr Morgenholz at November 05, 2009 03:04 PM (5aa4z)

9 Seniors, take notice: The already-massive cost of this catastrophe is being reduced by $800-900 billion to give your care to someone else.

On a series note...that will never happen.

They are just using that as window dressing. They won't actually make the cuts, they'll just print/borrow more.

To paraphrase Sheriff Brody...We're going to need a bigger wheelbarrow.

Posted by: DrewM. at November 05, 2009 03:06 PM (FCWQb)

10 re: my #9, that should read...

On a series serious note...that will never happen.

Damn World Series from hell is still in my mind.

Thank God it's over.

Posted by: DrewM. at November 05, 2009 03:08 PM (FCWQb)

11 Wold Series?  Is that some kind of roller derby event or something?

Posted by: kefka at November 05, 2009 03:09 PM (n1uMU)

12 The Yankees win!

Posted by: Rocks at November 05, 2009 03:10 PM (Q1lie)

13 Ahha ace, knew you wanted to get rid of all the old people:  "It is a fair question to ask if we are too generous to the elderly at the expense of the young. There is not a self-evident answer. Perhaps Obama and Pelosi could make that case."

The parents of these selfish young people should have made them work for everything they got and they got too much.  Now look, the parents worked their fingers to the bone, two parents, oftimes two and three jobs and look at the thanks they get:  "maybe they are spending too much on old people?".....Wow, just wow...way to go Ace...way to go..

Posted by: curious at November 05, 2009 03:10 PM (p302b)

14

trillion is the new billion, don't you know?

and waddya mean  they should know the facts of the matter, and not be lied to constantly by the Democrats, Obama, and the head-pat media??

the murder row, inc. dem'rats are banking on the fact that gramma and gramps have not adjusted their hearing aids and can't hear when they shriek "mob!", "Nazi!" and "evil-doers!"

Posted by: laceyunderalls at November 05, 2009 03:11 PM (pLTLS)

15 They'll never cut medicare, so just add those 'cuts' to the cost of the bill, so $2.6 trillion.

Posted by: kefka at November 05, 2009 03:12 PM (n1uMU)

16 Just curious but how many seniors read the HQ?

Other than Dave in Texas of course.

Ouch.

Careful, Drew. Those dentures are sharp.

Posted by: Warden at November 05, 2009 03:13 PM (lEqfY)

17 1.8 trillion? 18 trillion? 180 trillion?
It doesn't matter. It's a RIGHT damn it!
Palomino!

Posted by: Nancy Pelosi at November 05, 2009 03:14 PM (Q1lie)

18 They'll never cut medicare

Yes they will.  And Socialist Security, and Medicaid.  There are no choices anymore.  They all need cut deeply 10 years, and eventually must be eliminated.

Posted by: Herr Morgenholz at November 05, 2009 03:14 PM (5aa4z)

19 Should be 10 years ago.  Ima idjit.

Posted by: Herr Morgenholz at November 05, 2009 03:15 PM (5aa4z)

20 Bah, those old people won't be paying us dues much longer, anyway.  Our Teleprompter Jesus promised us more than enough to make up for any members we lose to the Hope, Change, and Euthanasia centers.

Posted by: AARP at November 05, 2009 03:15 PM (VmtE9)

21

They'll essentially "cut" Medicare by the hidden rationing systems.

In the end, there will be only cripping debt, followed by chaos when the health system breaks down.

Posted by: Kratos (on the back of Gaia, scaling Mt Olympus) at November 05, 2009 03:16 PM (9hSKh)

22 In the end, there will be only cripping debt, followed by chaos when the health system breaks down.

I could keep the fucker running a while.

Posted by: Bernie Madoff at November 05, 2009 03:17 PM (5aa4z)

23 Bitching about the cost of this is politically pointless. Nobody gives one rats ass about how much anything out of Washington costs really. A trillion here, a trillion there ... maybe one day it will add up to some real money but it hasn't yet.

Death panels ...now that was political gold. That actually got people to show up to meetings and scream and yell at these fuckers. And yet, we hear nothing about how Barack Obama is going to balance his health care budget on the backs of dead seniors by cutting their benefits.

"They want to cut Medicare ... to end Medicare as we know it."

That's all you have to say. It's short, sweet, effective at explaining what Pelosi is up to, and will motivate voters (real live registered voters) to call and bitch out the Congressmen in their own district (the only strategy that is effective - same strategy they used on us with Social Security reform).

It has the distinction, by the way, of also being true.

Posted by: someguy at November 05, 2009 03:17 PM (VRJIW)

24 The Guinness Book of World Records will have to be updated for the category of the number of people financially raped at the same time.  The democrats are about to set a new record that will never be broken.

Posted by: concious, but incoherent at November 05, 2009 03:18 PM (kn+jW)

25 destroy family ties (too much work for parents, too much time in the care, custody and control of the school...

So then, they never really bond like a family from the fifties or sixties or seventies or eighties and it will be much easier to kill Mom and Dad when the time comes....lovely

Posted by: curious at November 05, 2009 03:18 PM (p302b)

26 Curbing GHG emissions through rationing medicare ....... fucking evil genius .

Posted by: Bill D. Cat at November 05, 2009 03:19 PM (vKdhq)

27 The only way AARP would have signed up to this is that they have a secret handshake that the 800 or 900 billion dollars would not actually be taken from their programs, it is just a shell game. I would like to see a Republican demanding that they cut the money from the Seniors in this bill or before it. Pass the cuts first.

Posted by: Jean at November 05, 2009 03:20 PM (7K04W)

28
Just curious but how many seniors read the HQ?

This white hair spends time in the grocery store cruising for cooter, on the beach scanning for the perfect pear shaped ass, and a few times a year visiting Rachel's, a strip club with delectable young beaver's prancing and strutting their lithe little bodies for the lecherous few. 

Who has time to read HQ? 

Posted by: Fish at November 05, 2009 03:21 PM (6mfq0)

29 This is the same strategy as the AGW Hockey Stick fiasco where Gore never overlaid the CO2 graph with the warming graph.

Posted by: krakatoa at November 05, 2009 03:21 PM (mhdbo)

30 It's alright, dead seniors and seniors living in agony, there's always me.

Posted by: The $250 Check at November 05, 2009 03:22 PM (NKMZD)

31

Just curious but how many seniors read the HQ?
Other than Dave in Texas of course.   Posted by: DrewM. at November 05, 2009 03:02 PM (FCWQb)

What's the cut off age to be a senior?

Posted by: Old Hippie Vet at November 05, 2009 03:23 PM (3IZGh)

32 Bad news out of Ft. Hood, Texas: seven dead, a dozen wounded in a mass shooting incident.  Just breaking on Fox News & local tv stations.

Posted by: stuiec at November 05, 2009 03:23 PM (rBLs5)

33 There are no death panels in this bill, you gap-toothed, inbred, hillbilly racists.

However, we have Room-temperature Committees....


Posted by: SanFranNan at November 05, 2009 03:23 PM (r8/Km)

34 Careful, Drew. Those dentures are sharp.

But when you shake his hand, you realize how soft and smooth it is. One might almost say, feminine.

Posted by: DrewM. at November 05, 2009 03:23 PM (FCWQb)

35 "I would like to see a Republican demanding that they cut the money from the Seniors in this bill or before it. Pass the cuts first."

Anytime they talk, they lose.  The Reps put their plan out there and cut off the talking point that they don't have a better way to solve the problem.  There is nothing that can be gained from any one of them opening their mouth.  Let the Dems continue to dig their own grave and let the teabaggers handle putting pressure on Congress.

Posted by: Just Another Poster at November 05, 2009 03:24 PM (NgoAe)

36 They'll essentially "cut" Medicare by the hidden rationing systems.

Yeah...if they let you die of something treatable when you're 50, you'll never need Medicare.

Posted by: HeatherRadish at November 05, 2009 03:24 PM (NtiET)

37

Someguy: Its a two-fer. Yes, you have to sceam that they are cutting medicare and medicaid. Especially for the 2010 elections, when Seniors are a higher voting block than in Presidential elections. But you need to scream deficiet because that is one of your stronger narratives for 2012.

You can glaze a voters eyes over with CBO scores, actual cost vs. projected costs,etc. etc. The average voter, however, understands the basic prinicipal that you can not, for a sustained period of time, spend more than you take in. Tie in the fact that most of our debt is held by either China or Saudi Arabia, and I think you have a real strong issue here. I often thought that  great campaign commercial for the RNC would be a picture of the chart showing the increase in our interest payments over the years, with a montage of all the really nice things that those interest payments have afforded the Saudis.

 

Posted by: Mallamutt at November 05, 2009 03:24 PM (V9SYy)

38 Sorry, I'm way past surprised anymore.

This will the final entitlement that breaks the Republic.

Not even the estimated revenue from Crap&Tax will pave over this sinkhole.

||||||||

Time to buy more ammo.

Posted by: CPT. Charles at November 05, 2009 03:25 PM (lYKj1)

39 Shep reporting "massive shooting at Ft Hood Army base"

Posted by: curious at November 05, 2009 03:25 PM (p302b)

40 OT but there's been a shooting at Ft. Hood in Texas.  So far, 7 reported dead.  Shooter in custody.

Posted by: Tami at November 05, 2009 03:25 PM (VuLos)

41 Third World, here we come.

Posted by: katya at November 05, 2009 03:26 PM (RbvF+)

42 Yeah...if they let you die of something treatable when you're 50, you'll never need Medicare. ?? Are they going to poison the weed supply ??

Posted by: Jean at November 05, 2009 03:27 PM (5ddCw)

43 en fuego

Posted by: that guy that whispers en fuego at November 05, 2009 03:28 PM (PD1tk)

44 Other than Dave in Texas of course.

Posted by: DrewM. at November 05, 2009 03:02 PM (FCWQb)

I heard somewhere that TexasJew last sucked on his momma's teet during the Civil War.

I guess it's a Texas thing.

Posted by: Not My Name at November 05, 2009 03:28 PM (pUfK9)

45 How the hell did anybody get off that many rounds on a fricking military base?

Posted by: Herr Morgenholz at November 05, 2009 03:28 PM (5aa4z)

46 Fox reporting: 2 Shooters...only one in custody. 7 dead, 12 injured.

Posted by: Tami at November 05, 2009 03:29 PM (VuLos)

47 What!?  You mean they lied about the cost!?  No way.

Posted by: The Most Hirsute Man In the World at November 05, 2009 03:29 PM (mkihu)

48 Oh sure, start posting sensitive news about Texas as I'm knocking on the Texans.  Geeze.

Posted by: Not My Name at November 05, 2009 03:29 PM (pUfK9)

49
They'll never cut medicare

Yes they will.  And Socialist Security, and Medicaid. 

Posted by: Herr Morgenholz at November 05, 2009 03:14 PM (5aa4z)

The one area that will immediately effect millions is the Veteran's medical system.  I asked my Congresscrunt what would be the impact on the VA system, and he had no answer, but with a promise to get to the truth, I am still waiting on the dweeb for an answer. Who's the critter, Ron Klein, D-Florida. 

Posted by: Fish at November 05, 2009 03:30 PM (6mfq0)

50 Fox reporting that shooters were in fatigues. Ft. Hood on lock down as are surrounding schools.

Posted by: Tami at November 05, 2009 03:32 PM (VuLos)

51 ?? Are they going to poison the weed supply ??

Too subtle.

If X% of people who need a bypass but don't get one die within six months of a heart attack, you can reduce the number of bypass procedures performed by X% by requiring those who need one to wait six months.  (And they won't be asking for any other medical procedures, either!)  Brilliant!

Posted by: HeatherRadish at November 05, 2009 03:33 PM (NtiET)

52 How the hell did anybody get off that many rounds on a fricking military base?

The arms and ammo are stored in company arms rooms....vaults. Not to mention the restrictions on storage of soldier-owned firearms.

You'd be safer from mass-shooters while unarmed in a Texas city (with shall-issue CCW) than on any Army base in the US.

Posted by: IllTemperedCur at November 05, 2009 03:36 PM (r8/Km)

53 Possibly 3 shooters, in camo.  Unknown if they were wearing "I'm with Allah" or "Infowars.com Rox!" t-shirts.

Posted by: Herr Morgenholz at November 05, 2009 03:36 PM (5aa4z)

54 #45
Believe it or not most military bases are gun free zones.

Posted by: Insurance Industry at November 05, 2009 03:37 PM (sV3Dv)

55 The only way AARP would have signed up to this is that they have a secret handshake that the 800 or 900 billion dollars would not actually be taken from their programs, it is just a shell game.

The AARP ceased to have its membership's best interests at heart some years ago.  The AARP management is interested in increasing its own wealth, period, end of story.

I know a lot of retired folks who hate that organization with a white hot passion.


Posted by: Purple Avenger at November 05, 2009 03:39 PM (HLug1)

56 Oopps #54 was mine damn you sock puppets!

Posted by: RobD at November 05, 2009 03:40 PM (sV3Dv)

57 How the hell did anybody get off that many rounds on a fricking military base?

In the late 70's it was common for gate guards to carry weapons but be issued no ammo.  If some perp wanted a nice full auto M-16, they'd drive up, stick a loaded gun in the guard's face and get one in a jiffy.  If they brought their own ammo and mags, then they'd be ready to rock.

Someone stated that bases are gun free zones.  Not all that far from the truth. 

Posted by: Purple Avenger at November 05, 2009 03:46 PM (HLug1)

58 curious,

you're kind of dumb. maybe this site is too high-level for you.

Posted by: ace at November 05, 2009 03:50 PM (NtQzs)

59 "There are no death panels in this bill."

Yes, there are. On page 1,426.

You obviously skipped reading that page, or you'd see the section labeled "Death Panel Creation and Funding." Go re-read the bill again. I've read it. You haven't.

And neither has anybody else, so it doesn't matter whether the bill contains real death panels or not.

       "They're cutting Medicare. They're killing grandma and we must stop them.
"

That would be effective. Whinging about the cost won't be effective.

Posted by: someguy at November 05, 2009 04:24 PM (VRJIW)

60 "It is a fair question to ask if we are too generous to the elderly at the expense of the young. There is not a self-evident answer. Perhaps Obama and Pelosi could make that case."

I'm all for phasing out Social Security, Medicare and Medicaid. However, the current bunch of seniors have spent their whole lives paying into this system and should continue to receive their benefits. In essence, we took their money and promised them they'd see the return in their old age. The young (myself included) should have the opportunity to pull out of these programs and need to start being a bit more self-reliant. Invest in IRAs, 401Ks and HSAs. Your health and financial well-being, while you are young AND while you are old, is YOUR responsibility, not everyone else's.

Posted by: Mandy P. at November 05, 2009 04:29 PM (MK6Kx)

61

Sorry, but I think it will cost 1.8T per year.

As a starting point.

Because Democrats don't give a shit, and they're incredibly dumb and unprincipled.


Posted by: Sen. Rev. Dr. E Buzz at November 05, 2009 04:34 PM (dh7zu)

62 Just testing.

Posted by: Pixy Misa at November 05, 2009 07:40 PM (2yngH)

Posted by: ttrtrtrert at November 06, 2009 04:12 AM (wYEI1)

Posted by: fdsfds at November 07, 2009 01:12 AM (ZxjpI)

65 Come to our website for shopping with high quality and best service! There have new products,MBT M. Walk
and MBT Lami,Welcome everybody to buy it.

Posted by: mbt shoes at November 08, 2009 10:50 AM (QhfLM)

66 Need to know before buying Lace Wig Our lace wigs are made of human hairs classified lace human hair wigs on our web. 100% Indian/Chinese remy human hair and best quality Swiss/French lace are used in lace human hair wigs. Lace human hair wig is thin, your scalp can get good breath, so you can feel comfortable just like real hair. You may find hundreds of units and almost 150+ styles of lace front wigs in our store. By using our web searcher, you may locate just the cosplay wigs you want without bitter searches. Also, you may customise full lace wigs here, all you need to do is just to follow our custom options or leave your specials in the "comments". A custom wig can be completed within 25 workdays generally. Thanks for Paypal and our Co-work World Wide Ship corporations, we can ship wigs to all over the world! Show your beauty, show your individuality, experience our wonderful service and dress you up right now!

Posted by: jason at November 08, 2009 09:55 PM (vErvF)

Posted by: ugg boots at November 12, 2009 04:29 AM (IeIJx)

68 nike dunk sb

Do anything needed to support an idea, a good idea usually brings good results, doing


business is like that.http://www.dunksky.com/.This site has always been on

Posted by: nike dunk sb at November 14, 2009 03:26 AM (APB+g)

69 BJ's Restaurants links of london . Management might be tempted to belly up and drown cheap links of london their sorrows, links of london jewellery since the majority of this chain's 89 restaurants are in links of london jewelry deep-recession states like California, Arizona, links of london sale and Florida. links london

Posted by: mxc at November 16, 2009 09:53 PM (amVaT)

Posted by: nike shoes at November 17, 2009 07:36 AM (f9Cxq)

71 UGG BOOTS

Posted by: UGG BOOTS at November 18, 2009 12:27 PM (WPYlQ)

Posted by: mbtshoesbuy at November 23, 2009 06:18 AM (bNNim)

73 Chipotle Mexican Grill links of london jewellery . The fast food at these casual links of london eateries feels slow, links london jewelry thanks to organic ingredients cheap links of london , custom combos, link of london and an emphasis on freshness. links of london sale Traffic is down at many locations, links of london jewelry but the company has been able to compensate by raising prices, links london Olive Garden. links of london Charms More food for less money hits the sweet spot these days, links of london Charm which makes the family-style portions at this casual Italian chain a hit with diners. links of london Necklaces Olive Garden is a division of Darden Restaurants, links london Necklace which also operates Red Lobster, links of london Bracelets Longhorn Steakhouse, links london Bracelet and a few smaller chains. links of london Sweetie Bracelets Olive Garden has been the best performer of the bunch, links london Sweetie Bracelet with same-store sales down slightly but overall sales up, links of london Friendship Bracelets thanks to about 35 new outlets links of london Sweetie Watches that have opened over the past year links london Friendship Bracelet

Posted by: links of london at November 23, 2009 07:41 PM (amVaT)

74 The proper function of man is to live, but not to exist.ugg classic cardyConquer fear of death and you are put into possession of your life. ugg classic tallThere is a time to speak and a time to be silent. ugg knightsbridgefree shippingmbt cheap
mbt sale
mbt uk
mbt shoes cheap
MBT M.Walk

Posted by: reviewups at November 27, 2009 04:54 AM (xUZwC)

Posted by: 0 at November 29, 2009 05:21 PM (jwOUD)

76 Everything dynamic and very positively!
Ugg Classic Cardy,discount, free shipping!

Posted by: ugg classic cardy at December 03, 2009 07:10 AM (ftu8y)

77 The cheap ugg boots sale for women are stylish, they are comfortable and what،¯s more, they keep your feet. theres a pair of fellow sufferers,ugg australia uk to complement your personal preferences, why do we not take the traditional high discount ugg boots on salefor cold winter?
As a matter of fact, with the passing time, the love for ugg usa is increasing among girls in this modern world. The growing demand for these womens ugg made the manufacturers UGG Boots Sale to revamp the looks of these boots with different hues.come our website and buy a pair of ugg uk.UGG Classic Cardy are popular as shoes for cowboys. The SHOES close the whole parts of the foot. The ugg cardy are important to protect your feet from any dangerous things during your walking activities. There are many oatmeal ugg available in the Market and if you are interested to get one you can directly go to the store that sells it.

Posted by: reviewups at December 03, 2009 09:58 AM (OKj2x)

Posted by: uggboots at December 07, 2009 11:10 AM (Cooh2)

79 Today ugg boots online have become a phenomenon.Every winter,the ugg classic crochet are one of the hottest goods in the market all over the world.So now don't be hesitation,own a pair of ugg usa immediately.

Posted by: ugg boots sale at December 10, 2009 04:47 PM (I3/dZ)

Posted by: Lacoste shoes at December 13, 2009 12:23 AM (/3s/N)

Posted by: wholesale jewelry at December 20, 2009 07:04 AM (1dySH)

Posted by: ghrafe at December 22, 2009 02:47 AM (WlzBe)

Posted by: wholesale jewelry at December 28, 2009 07:31 AM (1dySH)

Posted by: ugg shoes|timberland uk|ugg boots|87415555.com.cn at January 06, 2010 08:08 PM (qzq48)

85 Un total de once comunidades autnomas estn este jueves en alerta naranja Christmas gift ugg tall boots (riesgo importante) por nevadas y bajan las temperaturas en toda Espa09a, segn la Agencia Estatal de Meteorologa (AEMET). En concreto, se Christmas gift ugg napoule sandal trata de Aragn, Cantabria, Castilla-La Mancha, Catalu09a, Christmas gift timberland classic boots Madrid, Navarra, Comunidad Valenciana, Galicia, Pas Vasco, Asturias y Murcia. La cota de nieve bajar a menos de 200 metros en el CantbricoLa Pennsula Ibrica est bajo dos borrascas y un anticicln que crearn un pasillo que permitir el paso de una corriente de aire muy fro, como la que est provocando un temporal de fro glaciar en Europa, aunque es esperan que el fro que suframos no sea tan intenso como en otros pases. An as, se espera que las bajas temperaturas se mantengan hasta el domingo. La cota de nieve baja en el Cantbrico a menos de 200 metros

Posted by: El temporal de fr¨ھo y nieve pone en alerta a once comunidades aut¨®nomas ugg boots|ugg uk|timberlan at January 09, 2010 06:33 AM (tWrEP)

Posted by: chi hair irons at January 17, 2010 05:09 PM (9oETl)

Posted by: air max shoes at January 28, 2010 05:42 AM (JOSIc)

Posted by: airmax at January 31, 2010 04:00 PM (3vSvS)

Posted by: آèنهîيàلë‏نهيèه at February 01, 2010 01:25 PM (vm3jg)

90 Certainly watches are Replica Watches used to help people record rolex Watches time, but rolex watches nowadays its functions have enlarged. Replica watches are now tag heuer Watches not only objects that tag heuer watches can tell you what time it is, they are also a status symbol. You should not feel strange when you find someone wearing a watch on his wrist, but use the cell phone to tell time. In that situation, the watch is just showing its luxurious function cartier watches. It is normal and cartier watches perhaps also happens to you. .If asked that among the watches of various brands, which one can suit your taste? There is no doubt that most people will choose Rolex. Whichever social class you are in, it is naturally Rolex was known breitling Watches and cherished breitling watches for a long time. However, the elements do not usually enter the market alone, always come with the price tag up to the hand. For this reason, many people, especially men, their dreams of luxury Rolex watches are buried in omega Watches his heart omega watches. What should I do? Rolex watches are simply stunning worn by the rich and famous, right? No, this world is not the world's richest men, is the world of each. All are equal before the search of luxury and be men's watches respected. Within men's watches, the law, when consumers are in the market, women's watches they should women's watches receive the same treatment. This is the real reason why replica Rolex watches are ladies watches ladies watches more welcome than Rolex. Because in this world are not difficult to understand that the rich are much less than people with low income, you agree with me? You are forced to nod and say with certainty that is the reality. These low-income people do not have enough money to save every month. They can not afford such luxury Rolex watches

Posted by: replica watches at February 04, 2010 07:47 AM (CPNio)

Posted by: may at February 06, 2010 07:23 PM (Eu9Vs)

92 Factors Replica Watches About The Rolex replica watches Oyster The Oyster is so closely get in touch with Rolex, and it is inevitably that some people think these are the only Replica watches Rolex manufacture. Others suppose that there is a single Oyster watch. But as a matter of fact, the name Oyster does not actually meant for a rolex Watches particular watch you can buy rolex watches or even to a series but to a type of case that available in some of the Rolex ranges. History The Oyster case was first released in 1926. The objective was to protect the workings of the watch from dust and moisture. Early watches were far from waterproof. The Oyster tag heuer Watchescase was an tag heuer watches innovative design to eliminate these problems. It had a new double locking crown that screwed into place. It has been compared to the hatch on a submarine. Like a submarine, the Oyster case was waterproof. In 1927 Mercedes Gleitze swam the English breitling Watches Channel breitling watches . Before she set off she was presented with a Rolex Oyster. When she arrived, the watch was still working perfectly. The resulting publicity gave the new case a massive boost. Why is it called Oyster? Legend has it that Hans cartier Watches Wilsdorf cartier watches, who invented the Oyster, chose the name because the new case reminded him of the difficulty he had experienced prising open oysters at dinner. Since then the Oyster has further, particularly advanced. Many Oyster watches today are omega Watches perpetual-self-winding, in other omega watches words, it does not require to expose the mechanism to the outside world in order to wind it. The Osyter Perpetual is one of the toughest, most durable, most reliable watches (under truly adverse conditions). It is probably the best mechanical watch money can buy.

Posted by: replica watches at February 07, 2010 12:50 PM (TUJDt)






Processing 0.05, elapsed 0.0835 seconds.
15 queries taking 0.0288 seconds, 101 records returned.
Page size 106 kb.
Powered by Minx 0.7 alpha.

MuNuvians
MeeNuvians
Polls! Polls! Polls!
Frequently Asked Questions
The (Almost) Complete Paul Anka Integrity Kick
Top Top Tens
Greatest Hitjobs

The Ace of Spades HQ Sex-for-Money Skankathon
A D&D Guide to the Democratic Candidates
Margaret Cho: Just Not Funny
More Margaret Cho Abuse
Margaret Cho: Still Not Funny
Iraqi Prisoner Claims He Was Raped... By Woman
Wonkette Announces "Morning Zoo" Format
John Kerry's "Plan" Causes Surrender of Moqtada al-Sadr's Militia
World Muslim Leaders Apologize for Nick Berg's Beheading
Michael Moore Goes on Lunchtime Manhattan Death-Spree
Milestone: Oliver Willis Posts 400th "Fake News Article" Referencing Britney Spears
Liberal Economists Rue a "New Decade of Greed"
Artificial Insouciance: Maureen Dowd's Word Processor Revolts Against Her Numbing Imbecility
Intelligence Officials Eye Blogs for Tips
They Done Found Us Out, Cletus: Intrepid Internet Detective Figures Out Our Master Plan
Shock: Josh Marshall Almost Mentions Sarin Discovery in Iraq
Leather-Clad Biker Freaks Terrorize Australian Town
When Clinton Was President, Torture Was Cool
What Wonkette Means When She Explains What Tina Brown Means
Wonkette's Stand-Up Act
Wankette HQ Gay-Rumors Du Jour
Here's What's Bugging Me: Goose and Slider
My Own Micah Wright Style Confession of Dishonesty
Outraged "Conservatives" React to the FMA
An On-Line Impression of Dennis Miller Having Sex with a Kodiak Bear
The Story the Rightwing Media Refuses to Report!
Our Lunch with David "Glengarry Glen Ross" Mamet
The House of Love: Paul Krugman
A Michael Moore Mystery (TM)
The Dowd-O-Matic!
Liberal Consistency and Other Myths
Kepler's Laws of Liberal Media Bias
John Kerry-- The Splunge! Candidate
"Divisive" Politics & "Attacks on Patriotism" (very long)
The Donkey ("The Raven" parody)
News/Chat