| Support
Contact
| Chocolate Jesus' 1000 Year Reign of Peace Cut Short at 10 MonthsThe realignment that didn't quite align. t’s hard to imagine that the 84 House Democrats from districts won by either John McCain in 2008 or President Bush in 2004 are now more inclined to support either an expensive health plan or a cap-and-trade energy plan. Already Democrats are hinting at shrinking the former and putting the latter on the backburner. (One policy that might get more attention is a second stimulus package to create more jobs.) Tuesday’s election results are a roadmap for political gridlock in Washington and a possible Democratic electoral disaster in 2010. A respected political forecasting model by Ray Fair Yale University calculates that Democrats and Republicans should split the 2010 vote because of the economy. If that scenario unfolds, then David Wasserman of the Cook Political Report, according to an interview with The Hill, thinks “Republicans will probably be winning back the House.” Did Candidate Obama really transform the American electorate a year ago? Perhaps. (Though, then again, having the economy collapse right before Election Day may have helped artificially inflate his vote totals just a bit.) But dissatisfaction at the policies of President Obama looks to have quickly transformed it right back.Dick Morris cranks out the snazzy headline "A Deathblow to ObamaCare." Polls indicate a declining level of popular approval of the Obama policies (Rasmussen shows his job approval at 46 percent), but to see actual Democrats losing or barely squeaking out victories in solidly blue states sends a far clearer message to the Democrats in Congress. Until last night, Democratic moderates, the so-called blue dogs, could bask in the light of their candidate's success in 2008. But now they must hear hoof beats behind them. The party discipline on which Obama depends to pass a health-care program that Americans reject by 42 percent for, 55 percent against (Rasmussen again) will only work if beleaguered Democratic incumbents can wrap themselves in Obama's cloak and tough out the popular criticism. But the limits of Obama's drawing power are readily apparent in the Republicans' 20-point victory in Virginia and the race in New Jersey. In the coming weeks, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi and Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid will be asking their troops to cast potentially career-ending votes for health-care changes, Medicare cuts, higher taxes and fines on the uninsured. Whether they take that risk depends on their faith in Obama's drawing power. But the votes in Virginia, in particular, show the limits of Obama's appeal. The winner, Bob McDonnell, won the attorney general's race in the last election by a few tenths of a percent over the same opponent. That he coasted to so huge a victory in the swing state of Virginia now has to send a message to red-state Democratic congressmen: Obama may be able to survive in the deep water into which he is leading his party, but you can't.Even before last night's results, "the fierce urgency of now" vis a vis healthcare was quickly becoming "the fierce urgency of next Shevouot." (That's a Jewish holiday, for you squirrel-plinkin' moonshine-drinkin' NASCAR-thinkin' rednecks ; only heard of it in Scorcese's King of Comedy myself.) Democratic Sen. Kent Conrad said he spoke with CBO Director Doug Elmendorf last week and that it sounded like “it would be quite a while” before the estimates were ready. The news makes a Christmas completion “a challenge,” Conrad said. Senate Finance Committee Chairman Max Baucus (D-Mont.) also asked Elmendorf when the estimates would be ready. So how long is a while? “I asked Mr. Elmendorf that question, and I get the same answer: We just don’t know,” Baucus said. That perception is shared on K Street.“It doesn’t sound to me that they’re ready to go. They still have moderates hanging out there,” said a former Republican Senate leadership aide turned lobbyist. In order to have a shot at a year-end bill signing, Reid would have to introduce a bill this week and wrap it up by Thanksgiving, giving House and Senate leaders the month of December to reconcile the differences between the two bills and pass the conference report through both chambers. That scenario is looking more unlikely by the day. In fact, some health care insiders who had once assumed that Reid would introduce a bill by the Veterans Day recess are now bracing for the possibility that its introduction could be delayed until after Thanksgiving. And that speculation has insiders moving the goal posts once again.And it's not just the Democrats who are put on notice. Politicians are a superstitious, cowardly lot, as Batman observed of their close relatives criminals; many Republicans have been willing to at least entertain voting for ObamaCare if it meant a better chance for their own precious political survival. But the tea leaves in New Jersey, Virginia, and NY23 (yes, there too) say that there is no benefit to one's political fortunes to voting for more big-government spending; indeed, quite the opposite seems to be the case. And so maybe that's why few Republicans, if any, will be giving the Democrats the "bipartisan" cover they crave on ObamaCare. Republicans will overwhelmingly reject the Democrats' healthcare reform measure when it is reaches the House floor, according to a key lawmaker. Rep. Kevin McCarthy (R-Calif.), who serves as deputy GOP whip, told The Hill that the number of Republicans supporting the sweeping legislation will be “very, very close to zero.” “I don’t know of a Republican out there advocating it," the lawmaker said. ... Three centrist GOP lawmakers have told The Hill that they will likely vote against the Democrats' 1,990-page healthcare measure. Republican Reps. Mark Kirk (Ill.), Mike Castle (Del.) and Joseph Cao (La.) all say that without significant changes, they will oppose the bill.Cao, I remember offhand, had earlier suggested he could very well vote for the bill. I repeat the take-away that the media doesn't want to mention: It's not just that Democrats have overwhelming majorities, including a filibuster-proof sixty votes in the Senate, in both Houses of Congress. It's not just that Obama keeps blaming the Republicans as if our votes are even needed. The dynamic here is more perverse than that. Obama wants Republicans to vote for ObamaCare so that at-risk Democrats don't have to. That is, he wants Republicans to cast an unpopular vote, putting their own re-elections at risk, so that his Democratic buddies can vote against the very same measure and increase their chances of re-election. And that is why it is so critical Republicans vote for this piece of shit: It is important that Snowe and Collins vote in favor of cloture so that Nelson and Landrieu can vote against cloture. Why does no one else notice this? Why is this never mentioned in the media? Isn't it strange that the Democrats' key to success here is that their political opponents vote for an unpopular bill so that they are disburdened of that unpleasant task themselves? Why on earth would any Republican agree to do such a thing in the spirit of "bipartisanship"? All I see happening here is the Democrats insisting that the health care bill they claim is so vitally important get passed, but without their fingerprints on it. If Democrats themselves don't have the courage to vote for this festering shit sandwich, why should Republicans exhibit courage on their behalf? Obama and the Democrats don't ask much. Only that Republicans take the political hit for their political program so that they can vote the safe Republican way on it. This has nothing to do with health care per se. What is really being asked here is not that Republicans "help" with ObamaCare, but that Republicans actually assist Democrats in being elected in 2010. Um, I personally am going to have to go ahead and decline that particular request. That seems to me -- and pardon me if I am a bit rude about this -- to be you all's fucking problem, and not ours. CommentsPosted by: Sir Gingrich of Georgia at November 04, 2009 01:46 PM (rBLs5) 2
This is the real upshot of last night- death to deathcare
Posted by: Truman at November 04, 2009 01:46 PM (e8YaH) Posted by: ace at November 04, 2009 01:49 PM (p+lWQ) 4
I sure hope the Repubs in Washington get to read this, Ace. You are, to borrow the phrase from a fellow moron, en fuego.
Posted by: BackwardsBoy at November 04, 2009 01:52 PM (ZGhSv) 5
If ObamaCare fails, the big loser is Sarah Palin.
Posted by: MSM at November 04, 2009 01:52 PM (N2wRL) 6
Why on earth would any Republican agree to do such a thing in the spirit of "bipartisanship"?
Politicians are like insecure teenagers: They want to be with the cool kids, and in DC the cool kids are liberals. Posted by: Dr. Joncelli at November 04, 2009 01:53 PM (RD7QR) 7
The Blue Dogs now know that they aren't going to be facing the bland Republican centrists they defeated last time, but are likely to face candidates who went through a contested primary in which at least one TEA Party-endorsed candidate forced the GOP side to address dissatisfaction with big government, expansion of Federal programs, huge deficits and rudderless defense and foreign policy. The Blue Dogs are going to have to provide proof of their non-Leftist bona fides or reveal themselves as having lied to their constituents about their centrism. That's not good for Nancy Pelosi, but it's good for the United States.
Posted by: Sir Gingrich of Georgia at November 04, 2009 01:53 PM (rBLs5) 8
I hate to threadjack right away, but this is important: NASA is planning to irradiate monkeys. Have they learned nothing from Planet of the Apes or Monkeyshines? Radiation + Monkeys = End of mankind! Nothing good can come of it! Radioactive monkeys cannot be trusted!
Ah, why do I even bother? No one will listen until the radioactive monkeys have destroyed us all, and then it will be too late. Posted by: Monty at November 04, 2009 01:53 PM (4Pleu) 9
Ace your logic is superb. I expect some Republican support because some Repub's are in fact Democrats.
Posted by: Pelvis at November 04, 2009 01:53 PM (LlaBi) 10
I wouldn't worry too much about blue dogs' congressional careers ending in 2010. I am sure there will be plenty of high level jobs available in the new health care bureaucracy if Obamacare passes.
Posted by: kefka at November 04, 2009 01:53 PM (n1uMU) 11
The last time Health Care reform passed it was during the Civil War
Posted by: George Stephanopoulos at November 04, 2009 01:53 PM (LdYLm) 12
And no, I didn't mean to sockpuppet that #7.
Posted by: stuiec at November 04, 2009 01:54 PM (rBLs5) 13
@8, I for one welcome our Radioactive Monkey Overlords
Posted by: Mike H at November 04, 2009 01:55 PM (LdYLm) 14
Cao, I remember offhand, had earlier suggested he could very well vote for the bill.
That's sad. Based on his family's biography, I thought he'd understand the importance of a free economy. Posted by: HeatherRadish at November 04, 2009 01:55 PM (NtiET) 15
Absolutely correct there, Ace. Heard reports last night before the polls close that Harry Reid was thinking of pushing the healthcare vote back to early 2010. If they had the votes, Reid and Pelosi would have had those votes taken already. They don't. That is why it was so important to get the initial vote done before the August recess. When that didn't happen, all bets were off.
Posted by: Mallamutt at November 04, 2009 01:55 PM (V9SYy) 16
The last time I saw my own penis, we were in the middle of the civil war
Posted by: George Stephanopoulos at November 04, 2009 01:55 PM (e8YaH) 17
NASA is planning to irradiate monkeys.
Improves their shelf-life with no refrigeration. What's not to like about that? Posted by: HeatherRadish at November 04, 2009 01:56 PM (NtiET) 18
Did anyone see Frank Luntz on Hannity last night. He had a group of Virginia voters, at the end of the question and answer session a dizzy broad said we needed Obamacare now because "PEOPLE ARE DYING". Someone that vaccuous should be made into SOYLENT GREEN............................IMMEDIATELY. Posted by: gus at November 04, 2009 01:56 PM (Vqruj) 19
Democrats = Radioactive monkeys. Posted by: BackwardsBoy at November 04, 2009 01:57 PM (ZGhSv) 20
(That's a Jewish holiday, for you squirrel-plinkin' moonshine-drinkin' NASCAR-thinkin' rednecks I always get the impression Ace is talking directly to me..... Posted by: maddogg at November 04, 2009 01:57 PM (OlN4e) 21
Did anyone see Frank Luntz on Hannity last night. He had a group of
Virginia voters, at the end of the question and answer session a dizzy
broad said we needed Obamacare now because "PEOPLE ARE DYING".
Where does Luntz get the people for these groups of his? Wherever it is, I don't ever want to go there. Posted by: kefka at November 04, 2009 01:58 PM (n1uMU) 22
This many people haven't died due to Republican policies since the Civil War
Posted by: George Stephanopoulos at November 04, 2009 01:58 PM (e8YaH) 23
Improves their shelf-life with no refrigeration. What's not to like about that? ummmm, radioactive monkey, ummmmmmmmm Posted by: The Homer at November 04, 2009 01:58 PM (V9SYy) 24
Ah, why do I even bother? No one will listen until the radioactive monkeys have destroyed us all, and then it will be too late.
If the evil radioactive monkeys destroy us, well then, we don't have to deal with the Horrible Swine Flu Pandemic to End all Pandemics. There's an upside to everything you see. Also... the headline is totally racist. And by far the best snark I've read all month. Keep up the good work Ace! Posted by: shibumi at November 04, 2009 01:58 PM (OKZrE) 25
Or me.
Posted by: BackwardsBoy at November 04, 2009 01:59 PM (ZGhSv) 26
Right on Ace. The Repubs should have learned this lesson with TARP.
How many D's voted no thinking there were R's to cover them when TARP first got rejected in the House? Many of them voted no because Pelosi had told them many Repub's would vote Yes. When it became clear during the vote that wasn't true they were scrambling like mad to get the yes vote up but it still failed. Posted by: Rocks at November 04, 2009 01:59 PM (Q1lie) 27
Better Dick Morris Headline would have been: Last night was the Death Panel for Obamacare.
Posted by: lorien1973 at November 04, 2009 01:59 PM (IhQuA) 28
@18 You tell everybody. Listen to me, Stephanopoulos. You've gotta tell them! Soylent Obama is people! We've gotta stop them somehow!
Posted by: Zombie Charlton Heston at November 04, 2009 02:00 PM (LdYLm) 29
"That is, he wants Republicans to make an unpopular vote, putting their own re-elections at risk, so that his Democratic buddies can vote against the very same measure and increase their chances of re-election." And that effete big time quisling Newt Gingrich...I'm not sure he wouldn't have led a vote for nationalized health care. That asshole. Posted by: Sen. Rev. Dr. E Buzz at November 04, 2009 02:00 PM (dh7zu) 30
If they push Health Care to 2010 then Crap and Tax is dead. The Dem House members will openly revolt if they are asked to take both those hits in 1 year, let alone an election year.
Posted by: Rocks at November 04, 2009 02:01 PM (Q1lie) Posted by: vai2112 at November 04, 2009 02:01 PM (pkOAj) 32
Newt Gingrich has done a spectacular job rehabilitating himself since instigating the civil war
Posted by: George Stephanopoulos at November 04, 2009 02:02 PM (e8YaH) 33
Did someone say Civil War???
Posted by: maddogg at November 04, 2009 02:03 PM (OlN4e) 34
Jeez already guys, you're fucking wearing me out!!! Posted by: goal post mover at November 04, 2009 02:03 PM (wAQA5) 35
Spin O Spin Wheel.
Posted by: jackie rogers jr $100,000 jackpot wad at November 04, 2009 02:03 PM (N2wRL) 36
Make the freaking Democrats OWN IT!
Posted by: GarandFan at November 04, 2009 02:04 PM (ZQBnQ) 37
@33, War, what is it good for?
Posted by: Edwin Starr at November 04, 2009 02:05 PM (LdYLm) 38
I don't care if it rains or freezes as long as I got Chocolate Jesus Melting in the high beams of my snow machine Posted by: Sarahcuda at November 04, 2009 02:06 PM (Oxen1) 39
Holy batmanshit Ace, I had never thought of that angle. This is even more reason why crapweasels like the ME sisters need to be eliminated at the primary stage OR at the very least removed from important committees where they can vote bills out of the committee. (See rule Number 9 for Senate committees) Posted by: Vic at November 04, 2009 02:06 PM (CDUiN) Posted by: FreakyBoy at November 04, 2009 02:06 PM (N2wRL) 41
Completely OT, this will piss you off. Blacks get a +130 SAT admissions advantage at Ivy Schools, and still over 50% finish in lowest rank of class. Read this shit. Er, remember BOTH The One and Michelle were affirmative action admit-tees. Posted by: Kemp at November 04, 2009 02:06 PM (2+9Yx) 42
Still looking for those references by the media to the LaMont-Libermann contest as a Democratic Civil War. I am sure I will find it soon. Posted by: Mallamutt at November 04, 2009 02:06 PM (V9SYy) Posted by: maddogg at November 04, 2009 02:07 PM (OlN4e) 44
I haven't been married to another man since the Civil war
Posted by: Barney at November 04, 2009 02:07 PM (+sBB4) 45
I was for the Civil War, before I was against it!
Posted by: John FN Kerry at November 04, 2009 02:07 PM (kn+jW) 46
I didn't think there would be anyone who could out maneuver Ross Douchehat, Rod Dreehere, Frum on the anti-Conservative pivot, but hey, old Newt, the genius who thinks every fucking kid will get smarter with a government laptop, he did it. Good job numbnuts. Posted by: Sen. Rev. Dr. E Buzz at November 04, 2009 02:07 PM (dh7zu) 47
The civil war could have been stopped were it not for a battle between Barney Frank and EJ Dionne to pronounce "SCOZZAFAVA". Little known fact, this also led to the Johnstown Flood. Posted by: Sen. Rev. Dr. E Buzz at November 04, 2009 02:08 PM (dh7zu) 48
Somehow, I am certain, that if Healthcare is defeated, it will still be the fault of...........George Bush.
Posted by: Mallamutt at November 04, 2009 02:09 PM (V9SYy) 49
squirrel-plinkin' moonshine-drinkin' NASCAR-thinkin' rednecks ; Hey what happened to your old description of us red necks as "chicken choking, corncob smoking, cousin poking rednecks". You all are leaving out most of the fun parts of being a redneck. Posted by: Happy Fellow at November 04, 2009 02:10 PM (w6nDa) 50
George Bush secretly created global warming and AIDS during the Civil War
Posted by: wHodat at November 04, 2009 02:10 PM (+sBB4) 51
You know, I disllike President Obama and his administration, also. But "Chocolate Jesus"??? C'mon, guys, that heading has a distinctly racist connotation, and, therefore, it is way out of line ..., and it was unAmerican. You don't have to get down into the sewer with the Democrats to ridicule them and to criticize them. They've left themselves open to enough legitimate criticisms already. That heading was a cheap shot, and it was beneath you. Posted by: Colin at November 04, 2009 02:12 PM (Cta0m) 52
I heard the Civil War was just a cover for Bush's wiretapping of innocent people.
Posted by: Mr. Crabington at November 04, 2009 02:12 PM (ia/06) 53
George Bush hasn't been this active since he led us into the needless imperialistic civil war
Posted by: George Stephanopoulos at November 04, 2009 02:12 PM (e8YaH) 54
33 Did someone say Civil War??? Maddog, wait till tonight! Flame this bitch! Anyone seen the Flaming Skull? Last I heard it was at a Walmart? Posted by: Kemp at November 04, 2009 02:12 PM (2+9Yx) 55
Where does Luntz get the people for these groups of his? Wherever it is, I don't ever want to go there.
Posted by: kefka at November 04, 2009 01:58 PM (n1uMU) They must be from Luntz's third cousin's bass club. A stupider collection of useless crap you couldn't find under a railroad bridge. Posted by: TexasJew at November 04, 2009 02:13 PM (1doBx) 56
Did someone say civil war?
Posted by: Cain and Abel at November 04, 2009 02:14 PM (+sBB4) 57
Did someone say civil war?
Posted by: Axl Rose at November 04, 2009 02:14 PM (e8YaH) 58
Blacks get a +130 SAT admissions advantage at Ivy Schools, and still over 50% finish in lowest rank of class. Read this shit.
My prediction? It will be viciously attacked by the academic establishment on one of two grounds: a) that the source results have been fudged or misinterpreted; or b) that the methodology used to collect the results was flawed. The same shit happened during the brouhaha over The Bell Curve more than a decade ago. The facts have been there for a long time; it's just that everyone's afraid of what they might really mean. And for people who always say that the problem stems from underfunded schools, check out this study from the Cato Institute on the Kansas City School District. Upshot: shoveling money and resources at the problem didn't do fuck-all. It's not about money or resources. Posted by: Monty at November 04, 2009 02:15 PM (4Pleu) 59
I also object to the headline, there is no way Jesus could run such a deficit.
Posted by: Mr. Crabington at November 04, 2009 02:15 PM (ia/06) 60
Can't I just eat my waffle?
Posted by: The Flaming Skull, at iHop at November 04, 2009 02:15 PM (RD7QR) 61
Ace: "Why does no one else notice this? Why is this never mentioned in the media?"
Um, shut up! That's why. Your logic is starting to concern us. We have scheduled a session for you in Room 101, so please leave your Friday afternoon open. Posted by: The Media at November 04, 2009 02:16 PM (C3uAX) 62
Why did The Biggest Loser get to visit the White House? It shoulda been me. We're practically related.
Posted by: Big Brother at November 04, 2009 02:18 PM (e8YaH) 63
Do you find Chocolate Stalin less offensive?
Posted by: kefka at November 04, 2009 02:19 PM (n1uMU) 64
Why on earth would any Republican agree to do such a thing in the spirit of "bipartisanship"? One word: PORK Posted by: Kemp at November 04, 2009 02:19 PM (2+9Yx) Posted by: Mama AJ at November 04, 2009 02:19 PM (Be4xl) 66
Waaah, my Chocolate Messiah melted and all that is left is the hard liberal nougat.
Posted by: dnc centrist messenger at November 04, 2009 02:20 PM (DIYmd) 67
That last time power hungry were selling soldiers in a human grocery store was during the civil war. Ain't that fresh.
Posted by: Sha na na na na na kneeees kneees at November 04, 2009 02:20 PM (5I0Yr) 68
I f this is failure for Sarah, fail baby fail
Posted by: Todd (the guy who thinks Gibbs swallows) at November 04, 2009 02:20 PM (LLOGQ) 69
And now, for my Special Comment: As the recriminations of the election in New York's 23rd Congressional District continue, one thing is clear, in my humble opinion. It is time for the American people to rise up and demand that justice be dealt, and that both Mr. Bush and Mr. Cheney be called to account for the war crimes they committed during the American Civil War. Mr. Bush and Mr. Cheney lead us into an unneccessary and needless war between the states based not on faulty intelligence, but intelligence that was cooked, that was stewed, that was boiled, that was friccassed, to lead us to war. The attack on Fort Sumpter. Mr. Bush, you knew the Southern States were aggitated, yet you intentionally left Union forces there, not with the intent of maintaining the peace, but to invoke bloodshed for your war of profit. Slavery, again, the North did not want to end slavery, Mr. Bush, this was not the intent behind your mad march to war. It was to enrich and benefit the anti-slavery prograganda division of Haliburton, orchastrated by your ally, Mr. Cheney. No amount of weasel words can escape the judgment of history. "A house divide"... it was a house divided Mr. Bush, divided by you, in your blind rush to escalate warfare between the gentle people of the South and Peace loving people of the North. Justice will not rest until Mr. Bush and Mr. Cheney are brought up on charges of crimes against humanity. We, as humanity, can never be whole until those who befoul us are made responsible for that befoulment. Good Night, and good luck. Posted by: Krazy Keith olberdouche at November 04, 2009 02:20 PM (V9SYy) 70
Do you find Chocolate Stalin less offensive? Slightly. Stalin had cool facial hair. I like Chocolate Mao. Sounds tasty! Posted by: Mr. Crabington at November 04, 2009 02:21 PM (ia/06) 71
Also Stalin cared about not losing wars.
Posted by: Mr. Crabington at November 04, 2009 02:21 PM (ia/06) Posted by: MSM at November 04, 2009 02:22 PM (2+9Yx) 73
As long as it isn't Chocolate Mohhammed. Boy, that would get you in trouble. And Islam is a religion of peace and love.*
* Said in compliance with federal law that requires whoever is talking about Islam to mention it is a religion of peace and love. Posted by: Mallamutt at November 04, 2009 02:23 PM (V9SYy) 74
1 That's Shevuot, you dumb goy.
Posted by: Sir Gingrich of Georgia at November 04, 2009 01:46 PM (rBLs5) Thanks for the correction, Dr. Gingrich. We peons are not worthy of your multilingualness. Shevuot always makes me hungry for cheesecake. Posted by: TexasJew at November 04, 2009 02:23 PM (1doBx) 75
Completely OT, this will piss you off. Blacks get a +130 SAT
admissions advantage at Ivy Schools, and still over 50% finish in
lowest rank of class. Read this shit.
There are tons of stupid kids in the ivies, state schools, smaller east coast schools (Honors programs tend to be reliable). College in general may be just a slight shift from the average distribution of IQs, and I think internal studies say the quality of student is decreasing across the board as more geologic societal changes produce dumber people (or the colleges turn into degree mills, combination of both). Posted by: MRI at November 04, 2009 02:23 PM (aVQo/) 76
14
Cao, I remember offhand, had earlier suggested he could very well vote for the bill.
That's sad. Based on his family's biography, I thought he'd understand the importance of a free economy. Cao is being very clear to vote for what his constituents want rather than his core beliefs. That's what happens when you win in a district that's something like D+20 in the registration. I don't fault him for it during this term. If he does get re-elected, but with scant support from the people he tried to please, I don't see him continuing to vote against his feelings. After all, these are the same people who tried to get him recalled from office in the time between beating "Dollar Bill" Jefferson in a run-off and being sworn in, not even giving him a chance to prove himself to them. Posted by: Brandon In Baton Rouge at November 04, 2009 02:23 PM (olNam) 77
So, you never heard of shevuot until Sandra Bernhard mentioned it in <i>The King of Comedy?<i>. That's all right, Ace. Neither did the Jews!
Posted by: Never Mind at November 04, 2009 02:24 PM (cOxdZ) 78
Posted by: Krazy Keith olberdouche at November 04, 2009 02:20 PM (V9SYy) Funny thing is, Iraq the Civil War was a war for oil. Thanks for endorsing domestic drilling Keithus! Posted by: Mr. Crabington at November 04, 2009 02:24 PM (ia/06) 79
It will be interesting to see what the 'Pubs have in store for the motion to recommit when Pelosi pushes that 2000pg monstrosity to the floor. They already got one by her; this one may be the final vote of no confidence for Hoyer - then a civil war erupts in the House.
Posted by: Jean at November 04, 2009 02:26 PM (vb5IK) 80
Can we go home now? Seriously, we don't even like humans.
Posted by: Morningbright, Speaker for the Unicorns at November 04, 2009 02:28 PM (SCcgT) 81
* Said in compliance with federal law that requires whoever is talking about Islam to mention it is a religion of peace and love. Well done! We will not keel you first, we will keel you last. Loves and kisses, Posted by: CAIR at November 04, 2009 02:28 PM (3du1L) 82
@59: I also object to the headline, there is no way Jesus could run such a deficit.
Pfft. You forget that Jesus has a printing press in his back pocket that can crank out loaves and fishes; none of that messing around with pesky money. Posted by: Anachronda at November 04, 2009 02:28 PM (1OYcp) 83
Blacks get a +130 SAT admissions advantage at Ivy Schools
Actually the link said +130 for Hispanics, +310 for blacks. Posted by: Mama AJ at November 04, 2009 02:28 PM (Be4xl) 84
Cao is being very clear to vote for what his constituents want rather
than his core beliefs. That's what happens when you win in a district
that's something like D+20 in the registration.
Cao isn't winning re-election. Posted by: WTFCI at November 04, 2009 02:29 PM (GtYrq) 85
83 Blacks get a +130 SAT admissions advantage at Ivy Schools What's the point spread between dark-skinned blacks and light-skinned blacks? Posted by: Dan Akroyd at November 04, 2009 02:30 PM (e8YaH) 86
Milk Chocolate Jesus' 1000 Year Reign of Peace Cut Short at 10 Months....FIFY
Posted by: FU52 at November 04, 2009 02:31 PM (U0xPt) Posted by: Colin at November 04, 2009 02:32 PM (Cta0m) 88
> That heading was a cheap shot, and it was beneath you.
Cheap shot? It's a compliment! Ask Ray Nagin. Posted by: The Chap in the Deerstalker Cap at November 04, 2009 02:32 PM (j02xJ) 89
AMBER ALERT!! A child or possibly a small Ewok, has been seen at 2:30 PM Eastern Time chasing a flaming skull in Grand Central station. If you see this skull or Ewok, please do NOT approach them, they could be drunk. Call 911 immediately. Do not try to put the flaming skull out! Posted by: NYPD at November 04, 2009 02:33 PM (2+9Yx) 90
Waaah, my Chocolate Messiah melted and all that is left is the hard liberal nougat. And nobody even knows what nougat is. Posted by: Eleven at November 04, 2009 02:36 PM (7DB+a) 91
damnit. Dick Morris says Obamacare is dead. As entertaining as he can be, this probably means it's going to pass now. (given his track record at predicting things)
Posted by: wws at November 04, 2009 02:36 PM (T1boi) Posted by: Dang Straights at November 04, 2009 02:37 PM (Haq+B) 93
Cao lives in Louisiana, and white Louisianans (particularly in the north) feel they've met their diversity quota with Jindal.
Posted by: Zimriel at November 04, 2009 02:39 PM (rtzHA) Posted by: Big McLargeHuge at November 04, 2009 02:39 PM (kmmbv) 95
I'm pessimistic that the Republicans in Louisiana will be able or willing to find something else for Cao to do, is my point here.
Posted by: Zimriel at November 04, 2009 02:40 PM (rtzHA) 96
83 Blacks get a +130 SAT admissions advantage at Ivy Schools Sorry, Mama, I was so mad I forgot the numbers. I've actually heard 1140 will get you in Princeton if your Black (Read Michelle). 1600 is perfect on old SAT. 1140, is about 60%. Posted by: Kemp at November 04, 2009 02:40 PM (2+9Yx) 97
Um, gee, I dunno guys, somehow the word, lame, just doesn't seem to quite adequately describe you dimwits. Good night, George. :-) Good-night, Gracie. ;-) Posted by: Colin at November 04, 2009 02:41 PM (Cta0m) 98
Why do all the Buzz Killingtons always have names like Colin or Christoph? I always get a picture of the Durrill character from SNL. Posted by: Eleven at November 04, 2009 02:43 PM (7DB+a) 99
Colin, you ignorant cockfag. ;-) If you promise to come back we'll never say Chocolate Jesus again. Pinky Swear. Posted by: Eleven at November 04, 2009 02:46 PM (7DB+a) 100
That heading was a cheap shot, and it was beneath you.
Um, gee, I dunno guys, somehow the word, lame, just doesn't seem to quite adequately describe you dimwits. Guess he changed his mind about it being beneath us. I'm so surprised. Posted by: Mama AJ at November 04, 2009 02:48 PM (Be4xl) 101
@97
Goodbye, concern-troll who uses pop-culture references that almost no one under the age of 70 will understand. Posted by: Big McLargeHuge at November 04, 2009 02:48 PM (kmmbv) 102
Zimriel, I think you're reading Louisiana- particularly that district- wrong.
First of all, that district is going to be rolled into Steve Scalise's district (LA-6) after the next census. Second of all, the rest of the party in the state isn't terribly fond of the greater New Orleans area, for reasons both good and bad. They tend to turn their nose up at most issues on southeast Louisiana. That's my read after having lived in Shreveport, Lake Charles, and being a New Orleans native. I don't think diversity even comes up in the discussion- bottom line is, it's not going to be worth defending the seat just for it to go away. Cao will find his way to something significant- you can bank on that. Posted by: tmi3rd at November 04, 2009 02:48 PM (MLaAD) 103
Wasn't Mark Kirk one of the cap'n'tr8ders? I don't expect him to buck the trend. Count him as a "pro" vote on 0care as well. Posted by: Zimriel at November 04, 2009 02:51 PM (rtzHA) 104
Dick Morris: "But the votes in Virginia, in particular, show the limits of Obama's appeal."
True, but Morris et al. still understate those limits. There's always the public pronouncement that Obama is personally popular but only his policies are hurting him now. I call bullshit on the narrative. I believe those "popularity" numbers to be inflated. It took a while, but people have finally come out publicly to criticize The One. The fear of the charge of "racism" kept critics quiet. An understandable but rather cowardly position. Fine. Not a wholly irrational position considering we all want to "get along"... except morons (like me) who work quite diligently to insult you for disguising the obvious. But I digress. Anyhoo, that self-muting silence worked for a while until Team Obama's policies and its consequences became apparent. Then people had an even more tangible reason to publicly denounce The One. And they did and, as we see now, at an increasing pace. Which brings us to the current dynamic -- the proclamation that Obama is still personally popular. No, he's not. Well, at least he isn't to those who are getting more attuned to the record and his chameleonic charade/tone depending on the audience he's addressing. Plus, he's likely less so than currently sold by the sycophant press. But for the sake of public appearance and the camouflage of not being perceived "a hater," those who respond to pollsters are still likely to conceal their personal dislike of The First Narcissist because now they have a real reason that they can comfortably state to oppose a disliked man. The pursuit of comity compels them to reflexively "like" a poor leader. The dislike is getting progressively deeper. * In the interest of full disclosure, I've never like Obama (amazing revelation, I know) because I don't like hustlers and thieves. So, my distaste is both personal (gut response) and practical (policy response). I dislike the man on multiple levels. More of the public is coming around to that position but some still fear public animus. Fine. As long as they ultimately opt to remove a bad actor, the headliner of a rotten troupe, from office, then style points don't matter. Posted by: AnonymousDrivel at November 04, 2009 02:53 PM (C3uAX) 105
Um, gee, I dunno guys, somehow the word, lame, just doesn't seem to quite adequately describe you dimwits. Good night, George. :-) Good-night, Gracie. ;-) Real modern pop culture reference there. How the hell is the food in the nursing home, grandpa. Posted by: Mallamutt at November 04, 2009 02:54 PM (V9SYy) 106
101 @97
Speak for yourself, dummy. If you've ever read any of Colin's comments on other websites, you would realize that he has been a Democrat's worst nightmare for the past few years. He posts under about 20 different names, but his style is distinctive. Take him on, and he will clean your clock and make you look stupid without even working up a sweat. Posted by: Trolls Anonymous at November 04, 2009 02:57 PM (Cta0m) 107
Wasn't Mark Kirk one of the cap'n'tr8ders? I don't expect him to buck the trend. Count him as a "pro" vote on 0care as well. Yeah, he did vote for cap n trade. Still, he has said he won't vote for Obamacare (he never made that statement about Cap N Trade) so until he goes back on it, give him the benefit of the doubt. Plus, he is running here in Illinois for the U.S. Senate and has a primary opponet - prob. doesn't want to give the opponet too much ammunition (a benefit from NY-23, by the way). Posted by: Mallamutt at November 04, 2009 02:58 PM (V9SYy) 108
"What's the point spread between dark-skinned blacks and light-skinned blacks?"
The mean IQ difference is about a SD, so figure it out. Posted by: JB at November 04, 2009 02:58 PM (1OoPr) 109
No, it's not even a correct reference. An attempt to sound older than 15??
Posted by: Mama AJ at November 04, 2009 02:58 PM (Be4xl) Posted by: Newt Gingrich at November 04, 2009 02:59 PM (kmmbv) 111
He posts under about 20 different names, but his style is distinctive. Take him on, and he will clean your clock and make you look stupid without even working up a sweat. You do understand that the hash mark gives you away....right. Posted by: Mallamutt at November 04, 2009 03:00 PM (V9SYy) Posted by: Mama AJ at November 04, 2009 03:01 PM (Be4xl) Posted by: Big McLargeHuge at November 04, 2009 03:02 PM (kmmbv) Posted by: Eleven at November 04, 2009 03:02 PM (7DB+a) 115
I'm not good at benefit of the doubt as you both can tell. I'll give Louisiana conservatives some slight benefit of the doubt... for tmi3rd's sake. When I come into contact with Louisianans, or read about the place, it usually involves something ugly like this. It sucks for decent people like tmi but it's depressingly common. So I'm sorry for broadbrushing your state, tmi3rd. I do think it will be difficult to overcome some of the attitudes I've seen. I hope you are involved in your local precincts, or can at least write to someone, who can get in contact with Cao and help him build bridges with Louisiana conservatives. Posted by: Zimriel at November 04, 2009 03:03 PM (rtzHA) 116
Ooops sorry Mama..
Posted by: Eleven at November 04, 2009 03:04 PM (7DB+a) 117
He posts under about 20 different names, but his style is distinctive. Take him on, and he will clean your clock and make you look stupid without even working up a sweat. Go ahead. I think all of us are waiting for a good clock cleaning. Why the delay - haven't got a talking point yet from Moveon or Kos? Posted by: Mallamutt at November 04, 2009 03:04 PM (V9SYy) 118
Aww.... wittle Cowin took his binky and went home...
Posted by: Big McLargeHuge at November 04, 2009 03:07 PM (kmmbv) 119
As usual, you're making assumptions and conjectures which aren't supported by the facts. Figure it out, dummies. Since anyone can tell that you're savvy Republicans, I'm confident that it will dawn on you ........ in 3 or 4 years. LOL Hey, wouldn't you dimwits feel more at home on Ann Coulter's website. LOL Just asking. Posted by: Trolls Anonymous at November 04, 2009 03:13 PM (Cta0m) 120
Colin - get a faster internet connection - that way you can get your material from Kos or Moveon faster. Gee, your not sweating...are you? Posted by: Mallamutt at November 04, 2009 03:14 PM (V9SYy) 121
@ 119 Hey, wouldn't you dimwits feel more at home on Ann Coulter's website. LOL
Colin, you Ann Coulter bashed on the Dick Cheney speech thread on October 22, too. I got your references, I just thought you ought to know you're repeating yourself. (Also that we can all tell when the same person posts under different names.) Posted by: VKI at November 04, 2009 03:16 PM (LZK9H) 122
Hey, wouldn't you dimwits feel more at home on Ann Coulter's website. LOL We wait this long and that is the best you got - Good God, are they on break at Moveon? Seriously, some vague, cryptic babble? Wow, my clock is just.......dusty. My 11 year old son cracks back better than that. Better run off and get someone to write some better material for you, champ. This isn't your local recreational soccer league - there is no participation trophy. Posted by: Mallamutt at November 04, 2009 03:17 PM (V9SYy) Posted by: Trolls Anonymous at November 04, 2009 03:17 PM (Cta0m) 124
"Annoy"mous?
Freudian slip, dipshit?
Posted by: grognard at November 04, 2009 03:18 PM (v0kvW) 125
As usual, you're making assumptions and conjectures which aren't supported by the facts. Your right, we assumed you had a brain. Wrong again. Our bad. Posted by: Mallamutt at November 04, 2009 03:19 PM (V9SYy) 126
Radioactive monkeys? Never heard of them. Oh, wait, there was that one. Called himself Colin (Ctaom) or something like that. Posted by: charles gibson at November 04, 2009 03:26 PM (QMGr1) 127
Bye, dimwits. I see no contest here. (Not today anyway. You dimwits must be the teenybopper wing of the Republican Party; Republicans too young, or certainly too juvenile to vote.) LOL Um, you know, on second though, the word, lame, [does] adequately describe you. LOL Posted by: Trolls Anonymous at November 04, 2009 03:27 PM (Cta0m) 128
@123:
Hint: your thorazine dosage is too low. Contact your attending physician and report the following symptoms: - making inane comments on blogs - drooling - compulsive hair-pulling - screaming the names of long-dead TV variety show hosts - uncontrollable laughter Posted by: Big McLargeHuge at November 04, 2009 03:30 PM (kmmbv) Posted by: Abbrevia-Emoticons Consolidated at November 04, 2009 03:35 PM (C3uAX) 130
So, Colin, it's okay for you to say Obama is sans testicules, but Ace calling him "chocolate" (in the great Nagin tradition) is beyond the pale? Just trying to establish the boundaries here ....
Posted by: iamfelix at November 04, 2009 03:38 PM (oXb0U) Posted by: IllTemperedCur at November 04, 2009 03:43 PM (r8/Km) 132
124 "Annoy"mous? Freudian slip, dipshit? Aw gee, dimwit, I didn't mean to annoy you. My initial comment was to let you know that some of us hardcore, conservative Republicans aren't too thrilled with the cutesy comments of racists. Racists are dinosaurs, and the sooner they become extinct, the better. Every time that they make a racial slur, they just show their ignorance. They're an embarrassment to the Republican Party, and they are a disgrace to this country. Do you get my drift, dimwit? If you disagree, you're advertising here that you're probably a real loser, who has to trash black people in a feeble attempt to compsenate for your own inadequacies. Enough said? Posted by: Trolls Anonymous at November 04, 2009 03:48 PM (Cta0m) 133
LOL.
Posted by: grognard at November 04, 2009 03:50 PM (v0kvW) 134
Let's see, a troll appears, leaves idiotic comments, then says he's leaning. Then, mysteriously, he returns. Haven't we seen this before?
Posted by: Jack Bauer's Evil Brother at November 04, 2009 03:54 PM (mDUj8) 135
Oops, that should be "leaving", not "leaning".
Posted by: Jack Bauer's Evil Brother at November 04, 2009 03:55 PM (mDUj8) 136
Let's see, a troll appears, leaves idiotic comments,
then says he's leaning. Then, mysteriously, he returns. Haven't we seen
this before?
Posted by: Jack Bauer's Evil Brother AND pretends he's a Republican .... Posted by: iamfelix at November 04, 2009 03:57 PM (vq2Nc) 137
If George Burns were actually here, he'd grind out a stogie in this punk kid's face. Piss off, "Colin".
Posted by: SGT Dan at November 04, 2009 03:58 PM (GgXZc) 138
Enough said? Posted by: Trolls Anonymous at November 04, 2009 03:48 PM (Cta0m) No. You do not get to define what is racist. Posted by: Johnathan E. at November 04, 2009 03:58 PM (dQdrY) Posted by: Big McLargeHuge at November 04, 2009 04:00 PM (kmmbv) 140
AND pretends he's a Republican ....
Posted by: iamfelix at November 04, 2009 03:57 PM (vq2Nc)
Please tell me that you're not that stupid? Geezez, but you [are] an embarrassment to Republicans. LOL LMAO Pulllleeeeeze, tell me that you are an Independent? Please???? LOL Posted by: Trolls Anonymous at November 04, 2009 04:03 PM (Cta0m) 141
tools anonymous is saying we have inadequacies the irony oh the r-rated irony
btw trolls anonymous your mommy is calling you Posted by: Newyorkconservative[There is such a creature as a new york conservative?] at November 04, 2009 04:03 PM (+OIHr) Posted by: iamfelix at November 04, 2009 04:09 PM (vq2Nc) 143
En Fuego!
Posted by: that guy that shouts enfuego! at November 04, 2009 04:10 PM (PD1tk) 144
hey colin you fucktard where were you when anita moncrief was called a race traitor? oh wait you didn't admonish the leftys who did it so why don't you go eat shit and die
Posted by: Newyorkconservative[There is such a creature as a new york conservative?] at November 04, 2009 04:10 PM (+OIHr) Posted by: I R A Darth Aggie at November 04, 2009 04:21 PM (1hM1d) 146
Um, I personally am going to have to go ahead and decline that particular request. That seems to me -- and pardon me if I am a bit rude about this -- to be you all's fucking problem, and not ours.
Damn. and they call me grumpy... ha! Posted by: Pat at November 04, 2009 04:26 PM (BH4he) 147
then a civil war erupts in the House. Posted by: Jean at November 04, 2009 02:26 PM (vb5IK) Better a civil war erupts in the House than a civil war erupts across the country. Besides, at this point, in a House civil war, which side do we root for? Posted by: RickZ at November 04, 2009 04:29 PM (is97c) 148
Well you know what they say. The candle that burns twelve thousand times as bright burns out twelve thousand times as fast. Posted by: Cincinnatus at November 04, 2009 04:37 PM (L/qBT) 149
Those Thousand Year Reichs never turn out well.
Posted by: Rodent Liberation Front at November 04, 2009 04:42 PM (dQdrY) 150
I'm back. Did you miss me, dimwits? Hey, you know, it's always easy to spot a member of the white trash wing of the Republican Party. They always use the f-word, the s-word and the a-word to express themselves, because, I suspect, those were the last new words and the biggest words that they learned how to spell before they dropped out of school in the sixth grade. (You will note that I am giving them the benefit of the doubt by hoping that they even got that far in elementary school. See what a nice guy I am?) LOL Can y'all say, G.E.D., crackers? LOL Posted by: Trolls Anonymous at November 04, 2009 04:47 PM (Cta0m) 151
Chocolate Jesus' 1000 Year Reign of Peace Cut Short at 10 Months Dayum- I thought I fucked up when my 1000 Year Reich only lasted 12 years. Posted by: Adolf the Nice at November 04, 2009 04:52 PM (q8CmE) 152
148
Well you know what they say. The candle that burns twelve thousand times as bright burns out twelve thousand times as fast. Posted by: Cincinnatus at November 04, 2009 04:37 PM (L/qBT)
THIS from a guy whose friends and neighbors gave us Dennis Kucinich? Oy vey. Posted by: Trolls Anonymous at November 04, 2009 05:08 PM (Cta0m) 153
Well you know what they say. The candle that burns twelve thousand times as bright burns out twelve thousand times as fast. Posted by: Cincinnatus at November 04, 2009 04:37 PM (L/qBT)
THIS from a guy whose friends and neighbors gave us Dennis Kucinich? Oy vey. Posted by: Trolls Anonymous at November 04, 2009 05:08 PM (Cta0m) I take it history isn't one of your strong suits. LO-fucking-L! Posted by: Bill H at November 04, 2009 05:14 PM (q8CmE) 154
Can y'all say, G.E.D., crackers? LOL And yet, you have yet to hear those 3 little letters associated with your real name. But, by all means, keep plugging away at correspondent school. Posted by: Mallamutt at November 04, 2009 05:24 PM (V9SYy) 155
I take it history isn't one of your strong suits. LO-fucking-L! Posted by: Bill H at November 04, 2009 05:14 PM (q8CmE) ??? Relevance?
Posted by: Trolls Anonymous at November 04, 2009 05:27 PM (Cta0m) 156
I'm back. Did you miss me, dimwits? I have yet to miss the razor sharp wit and logic I was promised, because none has been demonstrated. Instead, I have bland generalities, unearned snark and, in total, a pretty pathetic effort on your part. Oh, and you ran away when the incoming got a little heavy for you. So, no courage either. Once again, a liberal over promises and fails to deliver even on half. No wonder you like Obama. Except that Obama can not even deliver on half. He promised that if we passed the stimulus, unemployment would remain under 8 % - fail He promised Health Care Reform by August - fail He promised not to sign into legislation any bill that was not posted on the internet for 72 hours - fail He promised to put the health care negotiations on CSPAN - fail Obama and T.A. - 2 failing peas in a pod. Oh, you dim witted moronic attempts to look smarter than everyone else by using sophomoric LOL with every sentence - even bigger fail. Adults use words. Miley Cyrus addicted teenagers go around typing OMG and LOL. So go back to humming "Party in the USA".
Posted by: Mallamutt at November 04, 2009 05:30 PM (V9SYy) 157
Relevance? Because the poster was referring to an historical figure, not the city in Ohio, dimwit. No wonder you haven't gotten your GED yet. Posted by: Mallamutt at November 04, 2009 05:31 PM (V9SYy) 158
I'm gonna give you a pass, mutt. Lucky for you, I'm a compassionate conservastive. ;-) Posted by: Trolls Anonymous at November 04, 2009 05:40 PM (Cta0m) 159
Dims are panicking. Healthcare should be dead.
Last night, they met: THE AMERICAN REGENT http://naturalfake.wordpress.com/2009/11/04/the-american-regent Posted by: naturalfake at November 04, 2009 05:40 PM (ao5cQ) Posted by: Trolls Anonymous at November 04, 2009 05:44 PM (Cta0m) 161
@51: Heavens to Murgatroyd! Delicate sensibilities might be offended! My pussy hurts, too. Posted by: Fa Cube Itches at November 04, 2009 05:49 PM (vupGF) 162
Because the poster was referring to an historical figure, not the city in Ohio, dimwit. No wonder you haven't gotten your GED yet. Posted by: Mallamutt at November 04, 2009 05:31 PM (V9SYy)
Hmmmmm, are you sure, or are you just spoof'n me? If he has adopted Lucius's name, why didn't he just say so? There's no need to be so formal here. We're all pals here, aren't we? Sure, first names will suffice, right?. Works for me ..., you grumpy, uptight, old grouch. But thanks for the heads up, goofy. Next time, I'll be sure to recognize Lucy. Posted by: Trolls Anonymous at November 04, 2009 06:00 PM (Cta0m) 163
THIS from a guy whose friends and neighbors gave us Dennis Kucinich? Oy vey. The stupid, it burnssss us. Posted by: toby928: Process Conservative at November 04, 2009 06:12 PM (PD1tk) 164
We're so totally getting our clocks cleaned. And he isn't even breaking a sweat.
Just like he said. Posted by: Eleven at November 04, 2009 06:27 PM (7DB+a) 165
161
@51: Heavens to Murgatroyd! Delicate sensibilities might be offended! My pussy hurts, too. Posted by: Fa Cube Itches at November 04, 2009 05:49 PM (vupGF)
Oh, I get it; it makes you more of a REAL man when you use vulgar language, and when you make tacky, racist remarks, right? Oh yeah. LOL..
Posted by: Trolls Anonymous at November 04, 2009 06:27 PM (Cta0m) Posted by: Rewrite! at November 04, 2009 07:04 PM (UaSIe) 167
First (to somebody way up in the thread as I was whizzing by): the plural of "y'all," is "all y'all." That straightened out? Second: wouldn't it be just perfect when the vote count on Obamacare is made if all the Republicans voted "present'? C-Span would probably survive, but imagine Obama's head exploding. Posted by: marybel at November 04, 2009 07:30 PM (RSB5W) 168
If he has adopted Lucius's name, why didn't he just say so? Um, he did. The morons figured that one out, whereas you, the one with the intellect to rival Joe Biden, couldn't. Posted by: Bill H at November 04, 2009 07:34 PM (q8CmE) 169
165 "Oh, I get it; it makes you more of a REAL man when you use vulgar language, and when you make tacky, racist remarks, right? Oh yeah. LOL.."
Well, as a High Yellow-American, I think your use of "cracker" is racist, rather like all "asian, indian and jewish" doctors being motivated by greed. "LOL" Posted by: Dum Dum's Other IP address at November 04, 2009 08:16 PM (W64WZ) 170
Well, as a High Yellow-American, I think your use of "cracker" is racist, rather like all "asian, indian and jewish" doctors being motivated by greed.
"LOL" Posted by: Dum Dum's Other IP address at November 04, 2009 08:16 PM (W64WZ)
Whoa, are you saying that they are not? Posted by: Atrollpasinthru at November 04, 2009 08:34 PM (Cta0m) 171
I'm gonna give you a pass, mutt. Lucky for you, I'm a compassionate conservastive. ;-) Troll, on your best night, when everything is clicking, and you are totally in the zone, you couldn't keep up with me. Try again, your snark is just weak. I reject it just like every female you hit on rejects you. Posted by: Mallamutt at November 04, 2009 08:35 PM (V9SYy) 172
171 "I reject it just like every female you hit on rejects you."
Except for the ones he performs fellatio on, you mean. Posted by: Dum Dum's Other IP Address at November 04, 2009 08:40 PM (W64WZ) 173
171
I'm gonna give you a pass, mutt. Lucky for you, I'm a compassionate conservastive. ;-) Troll, on your best night, when everything is clicking, and you are totally in the zone, you couldn't keep up with me. Try again, your snark is just weak. I reject it just like every female you hit on rejects you. Posted by: Mallamutt at November 04, 2009 08:35 PM (V9SYy) 172 171 "I reject it just like every female you hit on rejects you."Except for the ones he performs fellatio on, you mean. Posted by: Dum Dum's Other IP Address at November 04, 2009 08:40 PM (W64WZ)
THIS from two goobers who have only ever been able to get dates with fat, toothless, old skanks.. Ya gotta love it, folks. LOL. Posted by: Atrollpasinthru at November 04, 2009 08:49 PM (Cta0m) 174
THIS from two goobers who have only ever been able to get dates with fat, toothless, old skanks.. Ya gotta love it, folks. LOL. Posted by: Atrollpasinthru at November 04, 2009 08:49 PM (Cta0m)
..... and even then, they had to share her at 10 times her normal rate for 2 minutes. (That's a visual, folks.) LOL Posted by: Atrollpasinthru at November 04, 2009 08:59 PM (Cta0m) 175
I betcha dum dum would luv to fellate me.
Posted by: Larry Sinclair at November 04, 2009 09:13 PM (j08TE) 176
Troll, on your best night, when everything is clicking, and you are totally in the zone, you couldn't keep up with me. - Mutt @ 8:35 Say'n it's so ain't gonna make it so, and insinuating that I'm stupid ain't gonna make you smarter than I am ...., and. oh yeah, did I mention that your wishful thinking ain't gonna put you in my league? But hey, keep huffing and puffing, you old coot. Maybe I'll get back to you during the next intermission. (But then again, maybe I won't.) LOL
Posted by: Atrollpasinthru at November 04, 2009 09:27 PM (Cta0m) 177
Your article is very interesting, I have introduced a lot of friends look at this article, the content of the articles there will be a lot of attractive people to appreciate, I have to thank you such an article.
Posted by: true religion jeans at November 04, 2009 09:40 PM (PDSin) 178
176 "Say'n it's so ain't gonna make it so, and insinuating that I'm stupid ain't gonna make you smarter than I am ...., and. oh yeah, did I mention that your wishful thinking ain't gonna put you in my league?"
True, no one can be in your league, because there is only one middle school junior varsity waterboy for the field hockey team. "LOL" Posted by: Dum Dum's Other IP Address at November 04, 2009 09:43 PM (W64WZ) 179
"Dum Dum", huh? Ya gotta admire a guy's mommy who recognized her son's limitations early.
Posted by: Atrollpasinthru at November 04, 2009 10:10 PM (Cta0m) 180
Age of Conan CD Key Burberry scarf: http://www.scarves-store.com Posted by: jason at November 04, 2009 10:32 PM (kaVxu) 181
Ace's point about Republicans voting for unpopular Democrat legislation so Democrats can safely vote against it might explain why the NY23 GOP selected, and the RNC, Steele, and Gingrich endorsed, a Republican candidate for NY23 who would be more likely to vote for unpopular Democrat legislation more often than she would vote against it. A Republican candidate who ended up endorsing her Democrat opponent. The question is, what were the Democrats going to give the NY23 GOP, the RNC, Gingrich et al, in return? Was it just for pork, or something else? Or did the Democrats simply sucker the Republicans? Posted by: davidt at November 05, 2009 12:12 AM (Gk6j6) 182
What kind of a retarded troll doesn't know what the fucking hash at the bottom of the post is? Then to try and pretend like they're smart, it's just fucking sad.
Did the "f" word give you the vapors princess? Posted by: carl hungus at November 05, 2009 01:20 AM (Ddmk1) 183
I read and enjoy this blog and the comments every day, but the "Chocolate Jesus" was offensive to me as well.
Posted by: Texmom at November 05, 2009 09:35 AM (WzN8I) Posted by: Nike air max 90 shoe at November 05, 2009 11:50 AM (ExXAe) 185
182 What kind of a retarded troll doesn't know what the fucking hash at the bottom of the post is? Then to try and pretend like they're smart, it's just fucking sad.
Did the "f" word give you the vapors princess? Posted by: carl hungus at November 05, 2009 01:20 AM (Ddmk1)
LOL - This is funny, folks. After making a complete fool out of himself at least a half dozen times already, this dimwit and sore loser, Carl (etc.), continues to try to build a consensus by posting under multiple different aliases, all of whom, of course, share his screwy opinions. Gee, go figure. LOL (Psssst, I suspect that Carl (etc.) is our resident schizophrenic here.) LOL Ummm, he sure fooled me alright. Did he fool you? (snicker, snicker) As Bugs Bunny would say ..., what a maroon. he he he he he Posted by: Atrollpasinthru at November 05, 2009 07:54 PM (Cta0m) Posted by: ttrtrtrert at November 06, 2009 05:29 AM (wYEI1) 187
Discount Boots
Womens UGG UGG Shoes UGG Australia UGG UK UGG USA discount ugg boots cheap ugg boots Posted by: fdsfds at November 07, 2009 01:07 AM (ZxjpI) 188
Come to our website for shopping with high quality and best service! There have new products,MBT M. Walk
and MBT Lami,Welcome everybody to buy it. Posted by: mbt shoes at November 08, 2009 10:46 AM (QhfLM) 189
Buy discount ugg shoes
cheap ugg shoes cheap ugg ugg rainier buy ugg ugg usa discount ugg boots ugg 5825 ugg shoes sale ugg sundance ugg shoes cheap ugg boots ugg 5815 ugg sale ugg uk ugg knightsbridge womens ugg boots ugg boots ugg australia ugg 5819free shipping Posted by: ugg boots at November 12, 2009 04:22 AM (IeIJx) 190
nike dunk sb
Do anything needed to support an idea, a good idea usually brings good results, doing business is like that.http://www.dunksky.com/.This site has always been on Posted by: nike dunk sb at November 14, 2009 03:20 AM (APB+g) 191
buy [url=http://www.reviewups.com/]discount ugg shoes[/url]
[url=http://www.reviewups.com/]cheap ugg shoes[/url] [url=http://www.reviewups.com/]cheap ugg[/url] [url=http://www.reviewups.com/ugg-coquette-casual-shoes-c-22]ugg rainier[/url] [url=http://www.reviewups.com/]buy ugg[/url] [url=http://www.reviewups.com/]ugg usa[/url] [url=http://www.reviewups.com/]discount ugg boots[/url] [url=http://www.reviewups.com/ugg-classic-short-c-1]ugg 5825[/url] [url=http://www.reviewups.com/]ugg shoes sale[/url] [url=http://www.reviewups.com/ugg-sundance-c-5]ugg sundance[/url] [url=http://www.reviewups.com/]ugg shoes[/url] [url=http://www.reviewups.com/]cheap ugg boots[/url] [url=http://www.reviewups.com/ugg-classic-tall-c-3]ugg 5815[/url] [url=http://www.reviewups.com/]ugg sale[/url] [url=http://www.reviewups.com/]ugg uk[/url] [url=http://www.reviewups.com/ugg-knightsbridge-c-27]ugg knightsbridge[/url] [url=http://www.reviewups.com/]womens ugg boots[/url] [url=http://www.reviewups.com/]ugg boots[/url] [url=http://www.reviewups.com/]ugg australia[/url] [url=http://www.reviewups.com/ugg-classic-cardy-c-2]ugg 5819[/url]from usa Posted by: cheap at November 14, 2009 06:40 AM (s7MB5) 192
BJ's Restaurants links of london . Management might be tempted to belly up and drown cheap links of london their sorrows, links of london jewellery since the majority of this chain's 89 restaurants are in links of london jewelry deep-recession states like California, Arizona, links of london sale and Florida. links london
Posted by: mxc at November 16, 2009 10:05 PM (amVaT) Posted by: mbtshoesbuy at November 23, 2009 06:04 AM (bNNim) 194
Chipotle Mexican Grill links of
london jewellery . The fast food at these casual links of london
eateries feels slow, links
london jewelry thanks to organic ingredients cheap links of london
, custom combos, link of
london and an emphasis on freshness. links of london sale
Traffic is down at many locations, links of london
jewelry but the company has been able to compensate by raising
prices, links
london Olive Garden. links of
london Charms More food for less money hits the sweet spot these
days, links of
london Charm which makes the family-style portions at this casual
Italian chain a hit with diners. links of
london Necklaces Olive Garden is a division of Darden Restaurants,
links
london Necklace which also operates Red Lobster, links of
london Bracelets Longhorn Steakhouse, links
london Bracelet and a few smaller chains. links
of london Sweetie Bracelets Olive Garden has been the best
performer of the bunch, links
london Sweetie Bracelet with same-store sales down slightly but
overall sales up, links
of london Friendship Bracelets thanks to about 35 new outlets links of london
Sweetie Watches that have opened over the past year links
london Friendship Bracelet
Posted by: links of london at November 24, 2009 07:51 PM (amVaT) 195
The proper function of man is to live, but not to exist.ugg classic cardyConquer fear of death and you are put into possession of your life. ugg classic tallThere is a time to speak and a time to be silent. ugg knightsbridgefree shippingmbt cheap
mbt sale mbt uk mbt shoes cheap MBT M.Walk Posted by: reviewups at November 27, 2009 04:45 AM (xUZwC) 196
hot news for brand shoes online store ,do you want to win more discount ?and popular for younger,and nike air maxwith top quality A ,come on all air max shoes with lowest price for highest quality !
Posted by: nike air max at December 01, 2009 09:55 PM (OKj2x) Posted by: ugg classic cardy at December 03, 2009 07:15 AM (ftu8y) 198
The cheap ugg boots sale for women are stylish, they are comfortable and what¡¯s more, they keep your feet. theres a pair of fellow sufferers,ugg australia uk to complement your personal preferences, why do we not take the traditional high discount ugg boots on salefor cold winter?
As a matter of fact, with the passing time, the love for ugg usa is increasing among girls in this modern world. The growing demand for these womens ugg made the manufacturers UGG Boots Sale to revamp the looks of these boots with different hues.come our website and buy a pair of ugg uk.UGG Classic Cardy are popular as shoes for cowboys. The SHOES close the whole parts of the foot. The ugg cardy are important to protect your feet from any dangerous things during your walking activities. There are many oatmeal ugg available in the Market and if you are interested to get one you can directly go to the store that sells it. Posted by: reviewups at December 03, 2009 09:44 AM (OKj2x) 199
discount ugg boots
ugg boots outlet cheap ugg outlet cheap ugg boots ugg classic tall ugg bailey button ugg rainier ugg classic cardy ugg classic crochet ugg classic mini ugg classic short ugg classic tall ugg nightfall ugg sundance ugg ultra short ugg ultra tall ugg boots 5389 Posted by: uggboots at December 07, 2009 11:03 AM (Cooh2) 200
Today ugg boots online have become a phenomenon.Every winter,the ugg classic crochet are one of the hottest goods in the market all over the world.So now don't be hesitation,own a pair of ugg usa immediately.
Posted by: ugg boots sale at December 10, 2009 04:28 PM (I3/dZ) 201
We supply authentic discount Lacoste Shoes
Lacoste Trainers New Lacoste Lacoste Sale Mens Lacoste camden lacoste trainers lacoste trainers shoes lacoste camden retro camden lacoste trainers lacoste carnaby shoes lacoste carnaby retro lacoste shoes sale New Lacoste shoes Lacoste shoes online cheap Lacoste shoes Lacoste shoe mens lacoste shoes Lacoste Shua Lace Black Lace shoes white Lace shoes lacoste swerve shoes White Lacoste shoes Lacoste shoes sale Cheap Lacoste shoes Lacoste Women Shoes Women Lacoste Shoes Lacoste Shoes online on line, cheap price,Top quality,Free shipping! Posted by: Lacoste shoes at December 12, 2009 11:59 PM (/3s/N) 202
Cartier Jewelry Best | Corrosion Necklace Cheap | Stamping Ring Luxury | Corrosion Cufflink Yiwu | Wholesal Money Clips | Stainless Steel Rings | Wholesale tiffany silver Jewelry | Wholesal Stamping Rings | Gold Tungsten Best | Plating Necklace Wholesale | Wholesale Stainless Steel Necklace Jewelry | Zircon Cufflink Fashion | Stainless Steel Rings | Wholesale Titanium Bracelet Jewelry | Wholesale Jewelry Tools Jewelry | Wholesal New Jewelrys | Laser Rings Fashion | Tungent pendant | Watches Luxury | Wholesale cross pendant Jewelry
Posted by: wholesale jewelry at December 18, 2009 09:56 PM (1dySH) 203
Girard Perregaux Fake Watches | IWC Fake Watches | Replica Tissot Watches | Replica Tissot Watches | Replica Emporio Armani Watches | Watches Rolex Fashion | Ulysse Nardin Fake Watches | Watches Baume & Mercier Fashion | Replica Emporio Armani Watches | Watches Bedat & CO Fashion | Jacob & Co Replica Watches | Replica TAG Heuer Watches | Parmigiani Fake Watches | Watches Swiss Fashion | Replica Raymond Watches | Michele Fake Watches | Christian Dior Replica Watches | Girard Perregaux Fake Watches | Watches Roger Dubuis Fashion | Piaget Fake Watches
Posted by: wholesale jewelry at December 20, 2009 06:26 AM (1dySH) 204
We offer high quality such as, Chanel, Louis Vuitton,
Posted by: fake Baume & Mercier Watch at December 28, 2009 07:23 PM (aHNmr) 205
Hair Straightener
chi hair straightener chi flat irons chi iron best hair straightener ceramic hair straightener flat iron pink chi hair chi hair irons ghd Pink GHI Hair GHD GHD MK4 GHD MK5 Pink GHD Pink GHI Hair CHI Flat Irons Hair Straightener chi hair irons chi hair straightener best hair straightener chi hair iron pink chi hair chi hair irons Pink GHI Hair Pink GHD GHD Nike Kobe Shoes Nike Lebron Shoes discount nike shox shoes Posted by: chi hair irons at January 17, 2010 05:03 PM (9oETl) 206
nike max
air max shoes nike air max nike max shoes air max 1 nike air max 1 air max 2 nike air max 2 air max 89 nike air max 89 air max 90 nike air max 90 air max 91 nike air max 91 air max 95 nike air max 95 air max 97 nike air max 97 air max 180 nike air max 180 air max 360 nike air max 360 air max 2003 nike air max 2003 air max 2009 nike air max 2009 air max ltd nike air max ltd air max tn nike air max tn air max tailwind nike air max tailwind womens air max 1 womens air max 90 womens air max 95 womens air max BW womens air max LTD womens air max TN womens air max 360 womens air max 2003 womens air max 2007 womens air max 2009 Posted by: airmax at January 31, 2010 03:51 PM (3vSvS) 207
Certainly watches are Replica Watches used to help people record rolex Watches time, but rolex watches nowadays its functions have enlarged. Replica watches are now tag heuer Watches not only objects that tag heuer watches can tell you what time it is, they are also a status symbol. You should not feel strange when you find someone wearing a watch on his wrist, but use the cell phone to tell time. In that situation, the watch is just showing its luxurious function cartier watches. It is normal and cartier watches perhaps also happens to you. .If asked that among the watches of various brands, which one can suit your taste? There is no doubt that most people will choose Rolex. Whichever social class you are in, it is naturally Rolex was known breitling Watches and cherished breitling watches for a long time. However, the elements do not usually enter the market alone, always come with the price tag up to the hand. For this reason, many people, especially men, their dreams of luxury Rolex watches are buried in omega Watches his heart omega watches. What should I do? Rolex watches are simply stunning worn by the rich and famous, right? No, this world is not the world's richest men, is the world of each. All are equal before the search of luxury and be men's watches respected. Within men's watches, the law, when consumers are in the market, women's watches they should women's watches receive the same treatment. This is the real reason why replica Rolex watches are ladies watches ladies watches more welcome than Rolex. Because in this world are not difficult to understand that the rich are much less than people with low income, you agree with me? You are forced to nod and say with certainty that is the reality. These low-income people do not have enough money to save every month. They can not afford such luxury Rolex watches
Posted by: replica watches at February 04, 2010 07:38 AM (CPNio) 208
nike max
air max shoes nike air max nike max shoes air max 1 nike air max 1 air max 2 nike air max 2 air max 89 nike air max 89 air max 90 nike air max 90 air max 91 nike air max 91 air max 95 nike air max 95 air max 97 nike air max 97 air max 180 nike air max 180 air max 360 nike air max 360 air max 2003 nike air max 2003 air max 2009 nike air max 2009 Posted by: may at February 06, 2010 07:13 PM (Eu9Vs) 209
Factors Replica Watches About The Rolex replica watches Oyster The Oyster is so closely get in touch with Rolex, and it is inevitably that some people think these are the only Replica watches Rolex manufacture. Others suppose that there is a single Oyster watch. But as a matter of fact, the name Oyster does not actually meant for a rolex Watches particular watch you can buy rolex watches or even to a series but to a type of case that available in some of the Rolex ranges. History The Oyster case was first released in 1926. The objective was to protect the workings of the watch from dust and moisture. Early watches were far from waterproof. The Oyster tag heuer Watchescase was an tag heuer watches innovative design to eliminate these problems. It had a new double locking crown that screwed into place. It has been compared to the hatch on a submarine. Like a submarine, the Oyster case was waterproof. In 1927 Mercedes Gleitze swam the English breitling Watches Channel breitling watches . Before she set off she was presented with a Rolex Oyster. When she arrived, the watch was still working perfectly. The resulting publicity gave the new case a massive boost. Why is it called Oyster? Legend has it that Hans cartier Watches Wilsdorf cartier watches, who invented the Oyster, chose the name because the new case reminded him of the difficulty he had experienced prising open oysters at dinner. Since then the Oyster has further, particularly advanced. Many Oyster watches today are omega Watches perpetual-self-winding, in other omega watches words, it does not require to expose the mechanism to the outside world in order to wind it. The Osyter Perpetual is one of the toughest, most durable, most reliable watches (under truly adverse conditions). It is probably the best mechanical watch money can buy.
Posted by: replica watches at February 07, 2010 12:47 PM (TUJDt) 210
Watches really Replica Watches are a great fashion replica item. This is because watch manufacturers such as Emporio Armani understand their customers wants and needs and rolex Watches know that rolex watches there is a big market for tag heuer Watches fashion tag heuer watches and designer movado watches in the UK. The number of people that demand these fashion watches has grown enormously over the past few years as people all want to have their own unique personality. Buying a watch can be a breitling watches long breitling Watches process. This is because there are so many watches to choose from that people cartier watches can spend a whole lot of time making their decision. One brand that is always popular is Emporio Armani. This is because Emporio Armani are one of the best fashion brands in the UK and they therefore offer customers some of the best fashion omega Watches available watches on omega the market. There are millions mens Watches of watches for a customer to choose when it comes to a watch. It's quite easy to make the right watch purchase decision. Or you just need to know what famous watch brands are and you may find what you like at once. Emporio Armani watches have been very popular for many mens Watches years.Women's watches Emporio Armani is a brand for style sense and mens Watches fashion which it shows in his range of fashion watches. No matter what watch brand you choose, it can be sure that the watch you are going to wear would show some of your personality.
Posted by: replica watches at February 09, 2010 03:01 PM (fa8ya) Processing 0.09, elapsed 0.0832 seconds. |
MuNuvians
MeeNuvians
Polls! Polls! Polls!
Dale's ECB Election Projection Federal Review Real Clear Politics Rasmussen Reports Gallup Zogby FoxNews Polls Sabato/Crystal Ball Frequently Asked Questions
The (Almost) Complete Paul Anka Integrity Kick
Primary Document: The Audio
Paul Anka Haiku Contest Announcement Integrity SAT's: Entrance Exam for Paul Anka's Band AllahPundit's Paul Anka 45's Collection AnkaPundit: Paul Anka Takes Over the Site for a Weekend (Continues through to Monday's postings) George Bush Slices Don Rumsfeld Like an F*ckin' Hammer Top Top Tens
Democratic Forays into Erotica New Shows On Gore's DNC/MTV Network Nicknames for Potatoes, By People Who Really Hate Potatoes Star Wars Euphemisms for Self-Abuse Signs You're at an Iraqi "Wedding Party" Signs Your Clown Has Gone Bad Signs That You, Geroge Michael, Should Probably Just Give It Up Signs of Hip-Hop Influence on John Kerry NYT Headlines Spinning Bush's Jobs Boom Things People Are More Likely to Say Than "Did You Hear What Al Franken Said Yesterday?" Signs that Paul Krugman Has Lost His Frickin' Mind All-Time Best NBA Players, According to Senator Robert Byrd Other Bad Things About the Jews, According to the Koran Signs That David Letterman Just Doesn't Care Anymore Examples of Bob Kerrey's Insufferable Racial Jackassery Signs Andy Rooney Is Going Senile Other Judgments Dick Clarke Made About Condi Rice Based on Her Appearance Collective Names for Groups of People John Kerry's Other Vietnam Super-Pets Cool Things About the XM8 Assault Rifle Media-Approved Facts About the Democrat Spy Changes to Make Christianity More "Inclusive" Secret John Kerry Senatorial Accomplishments John Edwards Campaign Excuses John Kerry Pick-Up Lines Changes Liberal Senator George Michell Will Make at Disney Torments in Dog-Hell Greatest Hitjobs
The Ace of Spades HQ Sex-for-Money Skankathon A D&D Guide to the Democratic Candidates Margaret Cho: Just Not Funny More Margaret Cho Abuse Margaret Cho: Still Not Funny Iraqi Prisoner Claims He Was Raped... By Woman Wonkette Announces "Morning Zoo" Format John Kerry's "Plan" Causes Surrender of Moqtada al-Sadr's Militia World Muslim Leaders Apologize for Nick Berg's Beheading Michael Moore Goes on Lunchtime Manhattan Death-Spree Milestone: Oliver Willis Posts 400th "Fake News Article" Referencing Britney Spears Liberal Economists Rue a "New Decade of Greed" Artificial Insouciance: Maureen Dowd's Word Processor Revolts Against Her Numbing Imbecility Intelligence Officials Eye Blogs for Tips They Done Found Us Out, Cletus: Intrepid Internet Detective Figures Out Our Master Plan Shock: Josh Marshall Almost Mentions Sarin Discovery in Iraq Leather-Clad Biker Freaks Terrorize Australian Town When Clinton Was President, Torture Was Cool What Wonkette Means When She Explains What Tina Brown Means Wonkette's Stand-Up Act Wankette HQ Gay-Rumors Du Jour Here's What's Bugging Me: Goose and Slider My Own Micah Wright Style Confession of Dishonesty Outraged "Conservatives" React to the FMA An On-Line Impression of Dennis Miller Having Sex with a Kodiak Bear The Story the Rightwing Media Refuses to Report! Our Lunch with David "Glengarry Glen Ross" Mamet The House of Love: Paul Krugman A Michael Moore Mystery (TM) The Dowd-O-Matic! Liberal Consistency and Other Myths Kepler's Laws of Liberal Media Bias John Kerry-- The Splunge! Candidate "Divisive" Politics & "Attacks on Patriotism" (very long) The Donkey ("The Raven" parody) News/Chat
|