| Support
Contact
| Hooo Boy: Geithner Sweetheart Deal Paid Beggar-Banks $13 Billion to Insulate Them Completely from Losses
Geithner’s team circulated a draft term sheet outlining how the New York Fed wanted to deal with the swaps -- insurance-like contracts that backed soured collateralized-debt obligations. CDOs are bundles of debt including subprime mortgages and corporate loans sold to investors by banks. Part of a sentence in the document was crossed out. It contained a blank space that was intended to show the amount of the haircut the banks would take, according to people who saw the term sheet. After less than a week of private negotiations with the banks, the New York Fed instructed AIG to pay them par, or 100 cents on the dollar. The content of its deliberations has never been made public. The New York Fed’s decision to pay the banks in full cost AIG -- and thus American taxpayers -- at least $13 billion. That’s 40 percent of the $32.5 billion AIG paid to retire the swaps. Under the agreement, the government and its taxpayers became owners of the dubious CDOs, whose face value was $62 billion and for which AIG paid the market price of $29.6 billion. The CDOs were shunted into a Fed-run entity called Maiden Lane III.It should be noted that Geithner, um, "negotiated" these very tough terms on behalf of the American taxpayer while head of the New York Fed, not as Treasury Secretary. So this counts as a Blame Bush. No wonder Wall Street had such a schoolgirl crush on him. If he gave you $13 billion, you'd be pretty sweet on him too. The Wall Street Journal meanwhile retracts any further (and past) support of TARP:
Comments1
Most corrupt administration ever. Posted by: Tushar at October 27, 2009 05:38 PM (AuqCZ) 2
I suppose we should just be glad it wasn't a $1.10 on the dollar.
Posted by: DrewM. at October 27, 2009 05:38 PM (ur6Ar) 3
I just love the new transparency this administration had brought us! Mmm mmm mmm.
Posted by: Peaches at October 27, 2009 05:39 PM (9Wv2j) 4
Hey I got a good deal. We offered .40 and the banks wanted $1.60. I got them to split the difference. Posted by: Geithner at October 27, 2009 05:42 PM (m2CN7) 5
blame Bush? yeah right. like Bush was the mastermind behind all this crap.
Posted by: exceller at October 27, 2009 05:42 PM (jx2Td) 6
Wasn't Bush the dumbest boob on the planet? Boy, that "idiot" sure turned out to be an evil genius!
Posted by: Dack Thrombosis at October 27, 2009 05:44 PM (P33XN) 7
Thank God our betters in Washington have put an end to those risky loans at the heart of the banking crisis.
Posted by: Dr. Spank at October 27, 2009 05:44 PM (TZazt) Posted by: holdren at October 27, 2009 05:45 PM (GkYyh) 9
Can't wait for all those cash for clunker defaults .
Posted by: Bill D. Cat at October 27, 2009 05:47 PM (vKdhq) 10
5 blame Bush? yeah right. like Bush was the mastermind behind all this crap.
Posted by: exceller at October 27, 2009 05:42 PM (jx2Td) I have no problem blaming Bush for this one, as it's just one more reason why his support evaporated. Obama just promoted him further.
Posted by: Jim in San Diego at October 27, 2009 05:48 PM (H7Rlw) 11
Sweetheart deals? Corruption? Never heard of it.
Posted by: Charlie Gibson at October 27, 2009 05:48 PM (IhQuA) 12
I'm kinda leaning towards no government at this point. D? R? Does it really matter?
C'mon, chaos! At least that would be more reliable and fair rather than a concerted effort to screw the little guy. Posted by: AnonymousDrivel at October 27, 2009 05:49 PM (C3uAX) 13
So this counts as a Blame Bush.
Does it? POTUS has no power to make or affect any appointments at a regional branch of the Fed. POTUS can't stop them or make them. Posted by: WTFCI at October 27, 2009 05:49 PM (GtYrq) 14
Just wait until all the malls start folding, commercial real estate is about to destroy the libs big time.
Posted by: 'Nam Grunt at October 27, 2009 05:52 PM (gS9C7) 15
POTUS has no power to make or affect any appointments at a regional branch of the Fed. POTUS can't stop them or make them Yet. I bet the coming "crisis" will get that changed. More concentration of power is a good thing, right? Posted by: Scott J. at October 27, 2009 05:53 PM (NY7mQ) 16
No wonder they are fighting tooth and nail to avoid disclosing what happened to the money. It isn't for bank solvency like they claim, its for Democrat solvency.
Posted by: Just Another Moonbat at October 27, 2009 05:54 PM (NgoAe) Posted by: Bosk at October 27, 2009 05:54 PM (pUO5u) 18
When Repubs take the WH in 2012 will they prosecute the Dems of this admin?
Of course not.
In any case time to leave for tonight. Posted by: Vic at October 27, 2009 05:54 PM (CDUiN) 19
hmmm... would bush have no power to put stipulations on how tarp was spent? None?
The fed guys I guess are independent, right? Okay. But still, strings can be put on the money. Posted by: ace at October 27, 2009 05:54 PM (eRvRI) 20
I would like to once again thank the financial genius sector of the economy for providing the communists the gun with which to blow a hole in the cranium of capitalism.
Single malt, bartender and keep them coming. Just wave an ice cube across the top, please. Posted by: Circa (Insert Year Here) at October 27, 2009 05:57 PM (B+qrE) 21
Sounds like the banks got a ROBUST deal.
Posted by: guy trying to set off fiatboomer at October 27, 2009 05:57 PM (wAQA5) 22
There should have been a massive bloody beatdown last October and none of this should ever have happened. Who knows? The markets might have hit a quick, hard bottom and corrected themselves by now. Of course, all the wrong people would have suffered in that case. /spits
Posted by: Peaches at October 27, 2009 05:57 PM (9Wv2j) 23
#14, can you elaborate on that? Including, why would a comm. mortage crisis be delayed so long, especially if the worst part of the downturn is over
(I assume the comm. mortgage crisis would equal property owners not being able to pay their mortage payments because their tenants have gone under? Yes?) Posted by: W.C. Fields at October 27, 2009 05:58 PM (V5m2M) 24
18, there's been enough lawbreaking to fill that empty jail in MT but I wouldn't hold my breath for any prosecutions: http://tinyurl.com/yllhgm6
Posted by: Scott J. at October 27, 2009 05:58 PM (NY7mQ) 25
19 hmmm... would bush have no power to put stipulations on how tarp was spent? None?
The fed guys I guess are independent, right? Okay. But still, strings can be put on the money. Posted by: ace at October 27, 2009 05:54 PM (eRvRI) Of course he could, but instead he threw up his hands and said let the pointy headed financial types take care of things, and they took care of things by making sure their golfing buddies were covered. Show trials and executions would have worked better. Posted by: Jim in San Diego at October 27, 2009 05:58 PM (H7Rlw) 26
Its good to see the WSJ come around finally. Now if only they would change their tune on amnesty, we could start talking again. Until then, I'm still giving them the Cold Shoulder.
It stings, but someone has to do it. Posted by: oLD gUY at October 27, 2009 05:59 PM (P/D33) 27
Why risk your own money at this point ?
Posted by: Bill D. Cat at October 27, 2009 06:00 PM (vKdhq) Posted by: 'Nam Grunt at October 27, 2009 06:02 PM (gS9C7) 29
Has Ace officially retracted his support of TARP? I'm convinced he has. Think he even said, "I was wrong."
BUT HAVE WE SEEN AN OFFICIAL RETRACTION?!?!?!BRAZILLION-LEVENTY!?!?!?! Posted by: Editor at October 27, 2009 06:03 PM (pUfK9) 30
Including, why would a comm. mortage crisis be delayed so long, especially if the worst part of the downturn is over
(I assume the comm. mortgage crisis would equal property owners not being able to pay their mortage payments because their tenants have gone under? Yes?) Yes to your last question. However, the reason this is being delayed is that Fannie and Freddie were not involved in commercial lending, so these mortgages were not, for the most part, outright gifts to the freakin' shiftless. Another part of it is that, as the market weakened, there were still a lot of players who were able to take advantage of falling prices and seller desperation. However, if the properties are simply sitting empty, the owners have to pay the mortgage, the insurance, the property taxes (which can be enormous). We're not just talking malls here. Take a drive through an industrial park and check out the vacancies. Office buildings, too. It's gonna be a bloodbath. Posted by: Peaches at October 27, 2009 06:03 PM (9Wv2j) 31
Peaches: There should have been a massive bloody beatdown last October and none
of this should ever have happened. Who knows? The markets might have
hit a quick, hard bottom and corrected themselves by now.
That is what many vociferously argued for in this blog. A quick, sharp correction that lays the foundation for a healthy recovery. Now all we are going to get is an anemic recovery, followed by surging inflation. Sadly, no one listens to us. If they did, there would be more bacon air fresheners stocked in Walmart. Posted by: oLD gUY at October 27, 2009 06:03 PM (P/D33) 32
So, when are the trials? We've got hundreds of people to go through, but I think we should start at sitting Congress-critters, administration officials and any ineligible, America-hating Precedents who might be loitering near the Oval Office. There's enough fraud to go around. And that WSJ excerpt made me tear up. That was a really sad story. And they still don't get it. There was no excuse for not knowing what was going to happen, at best. And the fact that not a single toxic asset was ever bought with the Toxic Asset Relief Program was a real slap in the face. (Don't hassle me about Toxic/Troubled) Oh well. For the next individualistic nation that cherishes federalism and private property rights with strictly limited roles for the various arms of government, we'll keep this in mind. This nation blew it, in a spectacular and likely suicidal way - as America certainly did declare the end of sanity and national suicide on Nov 4th of 2008. Posted by: progressoverpeace at October 27, 2009 06:04 PM (A46hP) 33
"21
Sounds like the banks got a ROBUST deal.
Posted by: guy trying to set off fiatboomer at October 27, 2009 05:57 PM (wAQA5)" Nah, a "friends of Angelo deal" is more like it. Posted by: curious at October 27, 2009 06:05 PM (p302b) Posted by: 'Nam Grunt at October 27, 2009 06:05 PM (gS9C7) 35
Why risk your own money at this point ? DING DING DING DING EFFING DING Our phrase today is "moral hazard", boys and girls. Posted by: Circa (Insert Year Here) at October 27, 2009 06:05 PM (B+qrE) 36
Another element of the commercial meltdown is that the loans are short-term (5 to 10 years, max). So, there's no negotiating or wiggle room. They come due and there's a big-ass payoff due. Unless you can re-fi the thing, you're toast. And who's going to re-fi a multi-million dollar mortgage on a vacant property? The banks will have no choice but to keep adding massive toxic assets to their balance sheets.
Posted by: Peaches at October 27, 2009 06:08 PM (9Wv2j) 37
progressoverpeace: There was no excuse for not knowing what was going to happen
Fear, plain and simple. Principles are surprisingly easy to ditch when someone points a gun at your head. Posted by: oLD gUY at October 27, 2009 06:09 PM (P/D33) 38
Only the grand children (and their children) of the 52% who voted for Obama's generational theft should have to pay this, in my humble opinion.
Posted by: The Chewbacca Defense at October 27, 2009 06:10 PM (YMZjg) 39
20 I would like to once again thank the financial genius sector of the economy for providing the communists the gun with which to blow a hole in the cranium of capitalism.
------------ I will never get why the guys who should be the biggest defenders of the free-market are so reliably against the free market during times of crisis. Is it because they secretly feel guilty for making money that they believe they have to subvert the private sector economy? Or maybe they're retards. Those are the only reasons I can think of. Posted by: KingShamus at October 27, 2009 06:11 PM (8n1j5) 40
Peach you are a Peach.
Anytime, 'Nam. I just jumped in. That was my field before I became a "ward of the state." And I'm still agog that so few people see this coming, it's just wilfull ignorance. Posted by: Peaches at October 27, 2009 06:12 PM (9Wv2j) 41
And who's going to re-fi a multi-million dollar mortgage on a vacant property?
Posted by: Peaches at October 27, 2009 06:08 PM (9Wv2j) Don't worry. The feral government will buy the property (Hey, Nanzi, raise that new VAT thing 1%, will you) and have their buddies at SEIU and the AFL-CIO manage and develop it. Those guys are geniuses. Posted by: progressoverpeace at October 27, 2009 06:12 PM (A46hP) 42
Unfortunately, Chewbacca Defense, a lot of those people aren't taxpayers but are choosing to abort.
Posted by: Speller at October 27, 2009 06:12 PM (XVde2) 43
Only the grand children (and their children) of the 52% who voted for Obama's generational theft should have to pay this, in my humble opinion. In fairness to the 52% (yes, I said it), the chief architect of the TARP criminal enterprise was Hank Paulson, Bush's Treasury Secretary. Arrest warrant number one should bear his name. Posted by: Circa (Insert Year Here) at October 27, 2009 06:15 PM (B+qrE) Posted by: 'Nam Grunt at October 27, 2009 06:16 PM (gS9C7) 45
40, oops
Posted by: 'Nam Grunt at October 27, 2009 06:16 PM (gS9C7) 46
I'm thinking it's a Ken Kesey novel.
Posted by: Speller at October 27, 2009 06:17 PM (XVde2) 47
Blame Paulsen. He bailed out his cronies.
http://pajamasmedia.com/blog/treasury-secretary-looks-out-for-his-buddies-first/ Posted by: jeff at October 27, 2009 06:17 PM (Sx9Qk) 48
"I suppose we should just be glad it wasn't a $1.10 on the dollar. "
I am guess that when you factor in what he have lost in the devalued dollar, it was more than that in "today" money Posted by: rob in houston at October 27, 2009 06:18 PM (HXZOR) 49
Ummm! This is going to get ugly.
Timmy Geithner and the Bad Assets (Not just a garage band anymore) gonna have a lot of 'splainen to do" as Ricky Ricardo used to tell Lucy. Posted by: BulgarWheat at October 27, 2009 06:18 PM (lIz5o) 50
ANAGRAM FUN: TIMOTHY GEITHNER
Inherit My Ghetto Nighttime Theory Him Tethering Toy Thirty Ho Meeting Thin Hit Geometry Mighty Tot Herein Nighty Riot Theme Hitting My Hetero Onetime Thigh Try Nighty Termite Ho Tree Hitting Homy Hey, Mothering Tit Hogtie Thirty Men Hey, Him Tottering The Toying Hermit Their Money Tight Posted by: my money tight at October 27, 2009 06:18 PM (DIYmd) 51
Sorry 46 = wrong thread.
Posted by: Speller at October 27, 2009 06:18 PM (XVde2) 52
Fear, plain and simple. Principles are surprisingly easy to ditch when someone points a gun at your head.
Posted by: oLD gUY at October 27, 2009 06:09 PM (P/D33) I understand the fear, and it was well-founded. But fear doesn't make people write crappy legislation and totally ignore the Constitution (okay - the lunatic Dem Congress ignores the Constitution for fun). But the real story about what caused the collapse couldn't even get out at the time, adn still hasn't, as evidenced by the fact that the CRA has not been repealed and when Maxine Waters tried to shake down Paulson at the very House hearings over TARP saying that she wanted 'minority and women-owned businesses' to get their share of managing the purchased toxic assets (which never, ever, ever happened, anyhow). Waters should have been run out of Washington that very day. It wasn't fear. It was a lot of ignorance and stupidity that did it, with no one acting like an adult. The House GOP (and some GOP Senators tried) against immense pressure, and they held it off for a little bit. But when much of the same Congress then wasted $800 billion for the rushed, unread Porkulus, that was just outright fraud. Anyone who was scared by The Precedent's hard sell on that is too stupid for any responsibility, at all. Posted by: progressoverpeace at October 27, 2009 06:19 PM (A46hP) 53
But, Timmy Geitner is the smartest man around. Only he can save us! Only he can save us!
Posted by: The Media at October 27, 2009 06:20 PM (V9SYy) 54
39, they forget about the free market when the forces therein start to make them pay the price for their decisions.
Posted by: Scott J. at October 27, 2009 06:20 PM (NY7mQ) 55
KingShamus@39,
Because they really don't believe in the free market. They are invested in it, either tangentially or directly, and its demise is their demise. When the going gets tough and their stakes are effected and the argument is no longer just an intellectual exercise, they'll look for their own bailout, too. Posted by: AnonymousDrivel at October 27, 2009 06:22 PM (C3uAX) 56
This has got to be the most incompetent admin. evahhh, I just laff and laff everyday at how stupid the libs are in all categories.
Posted by: 'Nam Grunt at October 27, 2009 06:24 PM (gS9C7) 57
I think the financial genii get caught up in whether something can work, rather than what the odds are that something will work. Odds that congress wouldn't pork up and pork out on a 70 gazillion dollar free money bonanza, thus negating any possible beneficial effect? About 1:1, as it turns out. And people are shocked by this because... ...I guess because they weren't paying attention. Posted by: Cautiously Pessimistic at October 27, 2009 06:25 PM (pZEar) 58
Posted by: oLD gUY at October 27, 2009 06:09 PM (P/D33) BTW, the reason why I said that it was easy to know what was going to happen was because all anyone had to do was ask Paulson where he got the $700 billion figure from. He pulled it right out of his ass, which was the tip off that he was palying the whole thing by ear. But no one ever asked him and they never put any real oversight/public disclosure/limits in, as the House GOP had been pleading for. Posted by: progressoverpeace at October 27, 2009 06:26 PM (A46hP) 59
It has all been intentional. The last administration to this one. All intentional.
Posted by: BulgarWheat at October 27, 2009 06:30 PM (lIz5o) 60
I will never get why the guys who should be the biggest defenders of the free-market are so reliably against the free market during times of crisis.
The financial sector is just one subsection of the class of rent-seeking businessmen. There is no particular reason why they should be defenders of the free market, not if it's costing them money. They are in the business of making money for themselves, period. If doing so means buying politicians and screwng the free market, don't even think of getting in their way. Posted by: flenser at October 27, 2009 06:30 PM (jVWCe) 61
The freemarket had nothing to do with this. When governments can game the system there is no freemarket. Just so you know.
Posted by: BMUELLER at October 27, 2009 06:32 PM (WB5F6) 62
Don't miss this part. The Federal Reserve has been reluctant to publish information on its efforts to stabilize the financial system since the crisis began. The Fed has loaned more than $2 trillion, yet it refuses to name the recipients of the loans, or cite the amount they borrowed, saying that doing so may set off a run by depositors and unsettle shareholders.
Posted by: flenser at October 27, 2009 06:33 PM (jVWCe) Posted by: flenser at October 27, 2009 06:34 PM (jVWCe) 64
I think Reason made a slight error. I read the linked Bloomberg article, which states that AIG wanted to offer the banks a discount of 40 cents on the dollar, which to me means they would have given them 60 cents on the dollar.
I don't know that much about finance, but even during the Resolution Trust days, weren't the S&L's and Banks forced to write-off at least some part of bad loans? Where is the media on this? The Republicans? This is a lot worse than what Geithner did on his taxes. Posted by: chris999 at October 27, 2009 06:36 PM (B/WwP) 65
progressoverpeace: It wasn't fear. It was a lot of ignorance and stupidity that did it
Ah, but they did know, so did a lot of smart posters here. I understand what you are saying, though. Ignorance and stupidity works for the Dems. But the WSJ? Come on. They knew. But the real story about what caused the collapse couldn't even get out at the time, adn still hasn't,... Which guarantees that this story is not over. There is worse to come... Posted by: oLD gUY at October 27, 2009 06:39 PM (P/D33) 66
Which guarantees that this story is not over. There is worse to come...
Posted by: oLD gUY at October 27, 2009 06:39 PM (P/D33) Big time. And you are right that many others were moved by fear. But that fear should have directed them to the idea that the most important thing to protect is our monetary system, the dollar, not the economy (this is something that Bush never really understood). I used to get incensed as people talked about economic issues with respect to TARP when it was a monetary situation. But, that's how it all leaked into the rest of the economy and led to buyouts of car manufacturers and became a big slush fund used to bully private capital to wring out cash and benefits for polticians' interests and unions. Posted by: progressoverpeace at October 27, 2009 06:46 PM (A46hP) 67
funny thing about this whole mess,....the same asshats that caused this financial train wreck are still in charge. Bernanke, Paulson, Little Timmy Geithner and the Bad Assets, Barney Frank, Christopher Dodd,.....
They are all still working on "our" behalf. Folks! We've been fleeced and they are not done yet. Posted by: BulgarWheat at October 27, 2009 06:46 PM (lIz5o) 68
I will never get why the guys who should be the biggest defenders
of the free-market are so reliably against the free market during times
of crisis.
The driving force for businessmen is maximizing their own profit. We all do this, or at least feel the temptations to do it. Some are strong enough to resist, others not so much. CEO's, welfare queens, you, me. If that means capitalism, then great. If that means rent seeking from taxpayers, that will work too. We need to keep this in mind and not be shocked whenever they do this. Posted by: oLD gUY at October 27, 2009 06:47 PM (P/D33) 69
Posted by: flenser at October 27, 2009 06:30 PM (jVWCe)
Oops, you said the same thing only better. Posted by: oLD gUY at October 27, 2009 06:48 PM (P/D33) 70
flenser: saying that doing so may set off a run by depositors and unsettle shareholders.
What galls me is that this is what needs to happen. We have isolated the banks from any adverse consequence for bad behavior. Guarantee the deposits, fine, but the banks need to be punished. If there is only reward, but no punishment then the free market dies. Which is happening as we speak. Posted by: oLD gUY at October 27, 2009 06:52 PM (P/D33) 71
I cannot stress this point enough. Wall Street writes the rules.
So, they internalize order flow. This means they take your orders, trade against them with their account, and immediately arbitrage the position off for a profit in a dark pool of liquidity, or on a market, or an option position. They actually pay discount brokers for order flow-in order to get more orders to trade against. In the OTC market, it's highway robbery. AIG should have been allowed to fail. The dominoes would have fallen then. Other entities and banks would have risen to the occasion. That's free market capitalism. Posted by: jeff at October 27, 2009 06:52 PM (Sx9Qk) 72
CDO
that would make a nice big tattoo on Timothy Geithner's rather large forehead. or a brand if you're out of ink Posted by: BulgarWheat at October 27, 2009 06:55 PM (lIz5o) 73
Geithner’s slicing through our tax money like a f'n' hammer!
Thank you, I'm here all week. Tip your waitress. Posted by: Paul Anka at October 27, 2009 06:58 PM (YMZjg) 74
progressoverpeace: the most important thing to protect is our monetary system, the dollar, not the economy
Which was once supposed to be the job of the Fed, but mission creep is insidious and goes unnoticed. Now they see themselves as guardians of the economy as a whole, which will lead to complete failure in the end. Posted by: oLD gUY at October 27, 2009 06:58 PM (P/D33) 75
The Federal Reserve is neither Federal nor is it a Reserve.
The fix was in in 1913. We've been fleeced. Posted by: BulgarWheat at October 27, 2009 07:03 PM (lIz5o) 76
A large number of otherwise sensible small-goverment conservative/libertarian types have this misty-eyed notion that Americas CEO's and Wall Street bankers all have well-thumbed copies of Adam Smith, F.A. Hayek and Milton Friedman on their desks. But a quick glance at the works of the aforementioned Smith, Hayek and Friedman would tell you that businessmen are the biggest enemy of the free market. They're not the defenders of the system, and its madness to expect them to be. Posted by: flenser at October 27, 2009 07:04 PM (jVWCe) 77
Your post very good,thanks for sharing!Are you also like these:ugg boots uk,buy ugg boots,australia ugg,cheap ugg boots,ugg boots,ugg boots sheepskin,womens ugg boots,ugg australia boots,cheap ugg boots
Posted by: australia ugg at October 27, 2009 07:10 PM (c6EK2) 78
The 2010 elections are going to go down as a historical event. It will be known as "the Great Purge"©
Posted by: Lemmiwinks at October 27, 2009 07:15 PM (IqfKc) 79
Your post very good,thanks for sharing!
Gosh, thanks!! Boots, you say? Why sure, I could use some boots... Posted by: oLD gUY at October 27, 2009 07:18 PM (P/D33) 80
This is a much bigger deal than most people realize or understand. Goldman guys are not stupid, they had apparently hedged a great deal of their exposure to AIG prior to the blowup. For example, let's say you get nervous about AIG as a going concern. You could short a shit load of stock or their debt in case they blew up. Now that happened and I suppose the Goldman guys were sitting around thinking "thank God we hedged it out and the position won't be a completer disaster". So on one hand they lose billions on the credit default swaps but make billions on their short hedges. Kind of a wash or slight loser for them. Now the phone rings and they find out they are going to made whole on the swaps! I'll bet they shit themselves! They get made whole on their losing positions and cover their short positions and a loser trade turns out to make billions! What a country! Ask yourself, why didn't the debt holders get cut down? They were being paid higher than the risk free rate because they were assuming risk! They got paid off as well at par. I'm telling you, there is a Pulitzer prize for the asking but the media is too fucking stupid to figure this out.
Posted by: dan in michigan at October 27, 2009 07:20 PM (88w67) 81
Now, don't get me wrong, I'm not advocating violence of any sort. However, if I had money, I'd be trying to establish a legitimate, secure enclave state that has sufficient natural resources and a small enough population that an independent, free State could be formed when the chaos comes. The Free State Project is, as one would expect, a clusterfuk of monumental proportions because it is leaderless and unfunded. New Hampshire, pfftt. Organizing libertarians is a contradiction in terms. How're those democrats doing?
Seriously, creating independent mini-economies is what we should be focusing on, with the initial infrastructure made affordable through current market conditions. Non-public companies moving modest industrial manufacturing of essentials to rural areas, with the intent to defy unconstitutional orders. The feds might bust down a door or two in a night, but they can't raid a town. Safely. Posted by: hobgoblin at October 27, 2009 07:21 PM (jeTn3) 82
Let me make this clear. Goldman didn't "get made whole". They made a fortune!
Posted by: dan in michigan at October 27, 2009 07:22 PM (88w67) 83
80 82 Great posts, Dan.
Posted by: Peaches at October 27, 2009 07:27 PM (9Wv2j) Posted by: BulgarWheat at October 27, 2009 07:32 PM (lIz5o) 85
Where's "here", bulgar?
Posted by: hobgoblin at October 27, 2009 07:43 PM (jeTn3) 86
"Bailout" should be like "Bankruptcy" ... but worse.
The entire concept of "Too big to fail" just points out "Hey, you're too big." 1) Everyone in the entire top tier - fired. Not "May we have your resignation, please." No, Fired. This goes along with breaking all of the contracts these individuals have with the company. That is: Golden Parachutes - cut. No exceptions. 2) Then break the company along divisional lines into completely separate companies. Then you can think about "Well, this division would use a loan." Maybe. Or, "This division should go straight into full bankruptcy. But you have to make sure that the people steering the ship have some freaking skin in the game. And aligning things in this fashion would mean any company requesting a "Bailout" is probably truly completely screwed - as opposed to just looking for the easy cash. Instead of "GM drops Saturn", we'd be hearing about how Saturn Inc. compares to Pontiac Inc. Some of these would fail - but they had better not be "Too big to fail" or we'll rinse-wash-repeat. Posted by: Al at October 27, 2009 08:54 PM (VtygY) 87
Anyone remember what Ace called those who thought maybe, just maybe, we should put some consideration into TARP before running headlong into it? Anyone? Posted by: blaster at October 27, 2009 09:02 PM (su3hy) Posted by: BulgarWheat at October 27, 2009 09:04 PM (lIz5o) 89
Nice to see the WSJ finally catch up but was it so difficult to comprehend that giving the federal government hundreds of billions of dollars to address a problem and total freedom in how to spend it was a bad idea?
Posted by: Christopher Taylor at October 27, 2009 09:29 PM (PQY7w) 90
"was it so difficult to comprehend that giving the federal government hundreds of billions of dollars to address a problem and total freedom in how to spend it was a bad idea?"
It is for liberals. Q.E.D. Posted by: Al at October 27, 2009 09:39 PM (VtygY) 91
And, apparently, the guys at Wall Street Journal. And some who panicked on the right, who will go unnamed.
Posted by: Christopher Taylor at October 27, 2009 09:52 PM (PQY7w) 92
Age of Conan CD Key Burberry scarf: http://www.scarves-store.com Posted by: jason at October 27, 2009 10:06 PM (OT4oF) Posted by: Somalia at October 27, 2009 10:26 PM (vupGF) 94
@81: "The feds might bust down a door or two in a night, but they can't raid a town. Safely." Unless you have an air force of some sort, they can. You'd also need a secure source of water, large stocks of food, and a secure means of getting information out. Otherwise, you'd be a collection of child-molesting oddball religious fanatics just begging for slap. Posted by: Fa Cube Itches at October 27, 2009 10:40 PM (vupGF) 95
"And, apparently, the guys at Wall Street Journal. And some who panicked on the right, who will go unnamed."
They may technically be Republicans or Independents. But their view of "trusting government with a huge freaking pile of cash" is liberal. Bush trusted that Paulson wasn't screwing around - and then deferred to the President-Elect. But they're all - at least fiscally - liberal. Ok, some of those that panicked might not be at heart. I was pretty panicked at the time too. (Wamu wiped a solid chunk off of me.) But even being "Pro Bailout - in principle" isn't the same as being "Pro No Strings Cash Bailout." Posted by: Al at October 27, 2009 11:50 PM (VtygY) 96
Come on, Ace, with that headline. You meant "Hooo Boy, Boy", didn't you? Posted by: Maureen Dowd at October 28, 2009 12:11 AM (2qU2d) 97
AIR Jordan Sneakers within four generations in the use of a high-durability materials [urabuck], and in order to enhance the Cheap Jordans'permeability, in the upper just like materials used, together with significant patent Nike Sneakers, the [three-quarters of Jordan Sneakers ] a more evolutionary style. The most worth mentioning is to black as the main body of the design of Cheap Sneakers to Jordan Sneakers to change the design concept, while Air Jordan has been obtained for three consecutive years [scoring] awards, and most contribute to the team [IBM Award] award. Michael Jordan shoes signs of generations four transfer from the Jordan Shoesto the tongue on the market in 1988, Cheap Jordans republished in 1999 becurse the Jordan Sneakers are hot sale in the world.Air Jordan 9 issued in 1993. Jordan Sneakers Characterized by the sole use of different languages carve the " Cheap Jordans" logo and font. Air jordan 9 is also the first dual-Jordan did not wear Jordan Sneakers on the market have Nike Sneakers, but Nike also made a pair of Jordan shoes baseball version of the AJ 9 for the game when he was wearing Cheap Nike. Cheap Jordans 9 in 1993 was luanched when air Jordan first retired. This Jordan Shoes is very simple, but the lines prominent, and Cheap Jordans 9 is a very popular shoe. Soles on some non-English letters, the word is said to be Japanese.
Louis Vuitton born, in 1821. He opened his first Buy Handbags store in Paris in 1854; it was followed 31 years later by a Buy Handbags store in London. By 1977 these two Buy Handbags stores alone were making annual sales of around $10 million. After a slow start, more Women Bags stores quickly began to be opened. By 1989 there were 130 Women Bags stores worldwide. Louis Vuitton first entered the fashion world with their luggage line, he started with Wholesale handbags travelling trunks, these were such a hit that he had to expand his Wholesale handbags factory within a few years. After Louis died in 1892, his son, Georges, took the Women Bags company to new heights, developing what is recognized as the first designer label on a product. In 1998 Vuitton entered the world of high Buy Handbags with the designs of Marc Jacobs. Today Louis Vuitton Women Bags and purses are known and recognized throughout the world as items of extreme quality, respect, prestige and luxury. The brand now have over 300 Wholesale handbags stores throughout around the world, 47 Cheap Bags of which are in Japan. The Louis Vuitton Cheap Bags usually called, the ،° Women Bags ،± has been seen on the arms of many celebrities. Nike Shoesµؤةè¼ئت¦شى·أخز¹ْNike Sneakers£¬إ¼ب»¼نشعذفدذذ¬ؤ؟¶أءث´«ح³Nike Shoesµؤ±àض¯¹³ج£¬ء¢؟ج±»صâضضذفدذذ¬µؤ¹¤زصثùخüز£¬¼¤·¢ءث½«Jordan Sneakersسëشث¶¯ذ¬µؤذ¬أوضئشىدà½ل؛دµؤءé¸ذ،£Jordan Sneakers¾¹²»¶دµؤ³¢تش£¬ضصسعشع2000ؤêةè¼ئ³ِءثزششث¶¯ذ¬خھآôµمµؤذفدذذ¬،£خق¶ہسذإ¼£¬Nike Sneakersةè¼ئ×ـ¼àJordan Shoesز²ا،؛أشع´ثت±سعNike Shoes·¢دضءثہàثئµؤJordan Sneakers£¬²¢س¦سأسعذفدذذ¬×÷خھ¸¨ضْ،£سة´ث£¬Nike Sneakersشع¹¦ؤـذشةد½طب»²»ح¬µؤشث¶¯ذ¬ب´خھJordan Sneakersبص؛َµؤNike Sneakersدآءث¼لتµµؤ»ù´،،£ دشرغµؤJordan Sneakers£¬ب«²؟زش[uCheap Jordan Shoes¶ّ³ة£¬×شب»ذخ³ة¾®ب»سذذٍµؤNike Air Jordan Retro Shoes£¬ح¬ت±³تدض³ِز»ضضذفدذذ¬µؤ¹ى¼£،£¶ّشعNike Sneakersµؤضذµ×ةè¼ئةد£¬بشب»ز²طسذ¸ك؟ئ¼¼Nike Shoes£¬¾ك±¸خآ¹ت¶ّضھذآµؤNike Sneakers¾«ةٌ،ھ،ھصâ¾حتا¶شNike Shoes×î؛أµؤ¸إتِ£، Posted by: cheap jordans at October 28, 2009 12:40 AM (/TX21) 98
POP: He pulled it right out of his ass, which was the tip off that he was palying the whole thing by ear. Kind of. They've already admitted they pulled the number out of their ass because they needed it to be so big that nobody would doubt the Federal government was devoting the resources to fix this mess. It worked, too. I suspect the reason the Treasury told AIG to pay par was that it made the bookkeeping easier. One way or the other those loans had to be made whole (as they saw it) and it was simpler to do it at the front gate rather than assess losses down the road. This is a guess but an informed one. Specualtion about Goldman's happy-time arb hijinks are amusing and I have no reason to suspect untrue. They do seem always to step out of the outhouse smelling like a rose. Posted by: spongeworthy at October 28, 2009 07:23 AM (rplL3) Posted by: supra shoes at October 28, 2009 08:49 AM (wAwtx) 100
Kind of. They've already admitted they pulled the number out of their ass because they needed it to be so big that nobody would doubt the Federal government was devoting the resources to fix this mess. It worked, too. Posted by: spongeworthy at October 28, 2009 07:23 AM (rplL3) That revelation didn't come out until long after the dastardly deed was done. The question of the size (given, especially, that it was the pargest extaordinary funding bill ever in the history of the US and was totally un-Constitutional in the lack of targeting and the wide discretion fo authority it gave to Treasury) should have been at the very center of the original debate, but it was never mentioned. Fancy that. Secondly, even this "revelation" was a lie. $700 billion was nothing. The Fed immediately dumped over $2 trillion into the system by swapping out for useless toxic assets (though we really don't know, since the Fed has fought tooth and nail to never reveal what it actually swapped the cash for), printed over a trillion directly, and lots of banks were saved by finally removing mark-to-market requirements (which allows them to work some magic with the books ... for a while). Now, don't get me wrong. Mark-to-market requirements for illiquid instruments that are susceptible to wild swings whenever a holder of specifics goes belly up and is forced into a fire sale is close to the most insane idea I have ever heard of. Mark-to-market was insane for these instruments, but it's removal presents some problems of its own in assessing the real value of the toxic assets. Thirdly, this explanation for the size of TARP, if accepted as true (which it isn't - Paulson still has no idea why he asked for that; he would have asked for more if he thought he could get it) should be grounds for imprisonment, being the greatest fraud ever perpetrated on the US. Of course, the legislation itself was totally un-Constitutional (there was nothing wrong with extraordinary efforts taken in order to save our monetary system, which Congress is charged with running and which is the most important institution to the continued existence of the federal government and our nation, but anything beyond the monetary system constituted an overreach of the federal government). And for anyone who thinks that the Fed is going to drain the system when the insane monetary inflation (now known, euphemistically, as "quantitative easing", in respectable company, though known as insane printing of currency on the street) hits the general system in a big way ... whoa, boy! That ain't gonna happen in a million years. What will happen is too scary to really talk about. Posted by: progressoverpeace at October 28, 2009 12:30 PM (A46hP) Posted by: qin at October 29, 2009 01:11 PM (prEzA) 102
buy cheap ugg boots,ugg boots,ugg australia,ugg uk on sale,ugg boots,cheap ugg boots,ugg cardy boots.ugg australia,ugg boots,ugg sale,ugg boots,ugg uk,ugg boots,ugg,ugg boots,ugg boot,ugg boots,ugg boots uk,ugg boots,ugg australia,ugg boots,ugg sale,ugg boots,ugg uk,ugg boots,ugg,ugg boots,ugg boot,ugg boots,ugg boots uk,ugg boots,Ugg Classic Cardy Boots,ugg boots,Ugg Classic Cardy Boots,ugg boots,Ugg Bailey Button Boots,ugg boots,Ugg Classic Mini Boots,ugg boots,Ugg Classic Mini Boots,ugg boots,Ugg Classic Short Boots,ugg boots,Ugg Handbags,Ugg Boots,Ugg Ultra Short Boots,ugg boots,Ugg Classic Tall Boots,ugg boots,Ugg Kids Boots,ugg boots,Ugg Classic Tall Metallic Boots,ugg boots,Ugg Nightfall Boots,ugg boots,Ugg Sundance II Boots,ugg boots,Ugg Sundance II Boots,ugg boots,Ugg Ultra Tall Boots,ugg boots,UGG Night Fall Boots,ugg boots,Ugg Classic Tall Metallic Boots,ugg boots,UGG Kids Boots,ugg boots,Ugg Classic Tall Boots,ugg boots,Ugg Classic Knit Boots,ugg boots,Ugg Handbags,ugg boots,Ugg Classic Short Bootsugg boots.
replica watches,rolex watches,replica swiss rolex watches,replica tudor watches,replica swiss rolex watches,replica rolex watches,replica watches,replica breitling watches,replica swiss rolex watches,replica cartier watches,replica rolex watches,replica omega watches,replica breitling watches,replica tag heuer watches,replica cartier watches,replica parmigiani watches,replica movado watches,replica patek philippe watches,replica panerai watches,replica rado watches,replica parmigiani watches,replica alain silberstein watches,replica tag heuer watches,replica armani watches,replica a lange and sohne watches,replica audemars piguet watches,replica alain silberstein watches,replica bvlgari watches,replica armani watches,replica d and g watches,replica audemars piguet watches,replica franck muller watches,replica bvlgari watches,replica gucci watches,replica d and g watches,replica hublot watches,replica franck muller watches,replica iwc watches,replica gucci watches,replica longines watches,replica hublot watches,replica lv watches,replica iwc watches,replica montblanc watches,replica longines watches,replica movado watches,replica lv watches,replica panerai watches,replica omega watches,replica tissot watches,replica patek philippe watches,replica tudor watches,replica rado watches,replica vacheron constantin watches,replica tissot watches,replica a lange and sohne watches,replica montblanc watches,replica watches,handbags,replica watches,watches,replica handbags,replica watches,replica rolex watches,replica handbags,watches. Posted by: replica watches at October 30, 2009 02:57 AM (t57XZ) 103
Discount Boots
Womens UGG UGG Shoes UGG Australia UGG UK UGG USA discount ugg boots cheap ugg boots Posted by: fdsfds at November 01, 2009 07:43 AM (MlIdd) 104
توبيكات ، أناشيد طيور الجنه ،قصائد كتابيه ، قصائد مسموعه ، خواطر ، قصص روايات ،أزياء ، فساتين ، مكياج ، خلطات ، تسريحات ، ديكور ، ديكورات ، حلويات ، معجنات ، نادي الهلال ، نادي النصر ، نادي الاتحاد ، سيارات ، موديلات سيارات ،أزياء ادم ، إنمي ،أفلام انمي ، صور طبيعيه ، سينما ، افلام ، مسلسلات رمضانيه ، صور فنانين ، صور ممثلين ، صور مطربين ، مسلسل عاصي ، زفات ، اغاني بدون موسيقى ، كلمات اغاني ، ماسنجر ، سكربتات ، ثيمات ماسنجر ، برامج للماسنجر ، صور ماسنجر ، صور بنات للماسنجر ، صور شباب للماسنجر ، توبيك ، نكات ، توبيكات اغاني ، توبيكات كرتونيه ، توبيكات ملونه ، برامج فوتوشوب ، خلفيات للتصميم ، صور للتصميم ، خامات ، فلاتر ، اكشن ،فلاتر ، سكرابز ، خطوط ، باترن ، فرش ، جلتر ، سويتش ، فلاش ، ملفات مفتوحه ، ملف مفتوح ، جوال ، برامج جوال ، ثيمات جوال ، العاب جوال ، بلوتوث ، نغمات جوال ، يوتيوب ، رسائل ،mms ، sms ، مسجات ، وسائط اغاني ، برامج كمبيوتر ، العاب كمبيوتر ، العاب بنات ، منتدى ، منتديات ، وتلومني فيك ، شبكة وتلومني فيك
Posted by: aseel at November 01, 2009 04:08 PM (8+0Bz) 105
buy Discount Boots
Womens UGG UGG Shoes UGG Australia UGG UK UGG USA discount ugg boots cheap ugg boots air force 1 shoes nike air force air force 1 mens air force 1 boots air force onefrom usa Posted by: airforceoneshop at November 03, 2009 04:40 PM (LHCCE) Posted by: ttrtrtrert at November 06, 2009 03:37 AM (wYEI1) 107
wholesale nike shoes
wholesale shoes wholesale nike running shoes wholesale nike basketball shoes wholesale shoes wholesale jordan shoes wholesale dunk shoes wholesale adidas shoes SEO Ugg boots UK Ugg boots 美国主机< Posted by: asd at November 08, 2009 02:31 AM (ZGh8a) 108
Come to our website for shopping with high quality and best service! There have new products,MBT M. Walk
and MBT Lami,Welcome everybody to buy it. Posted by: mbt shoes at November 08, 2009 10:44 AM (QhfLM) 109
cheap ugg
buy ugg ugg usa ugg boots ugg uk ugg australia ugg shoes ugg sale womens ugg boots discount ugg boots cheap ugg boots ugg shoes sale ugg boots sale ugg sundance ugg 5819 ugg 5815 ugg knightsbridge ugg 5825 ugg rainier Posted by: reviewups at November 10, 2009 04:04 AM (UHjri) 110
Buy discount ugg shoes
cheap ugg shoes cheap ugg ugg rainier buy ugg ugg usa discount ugg boots ugg 5825 ugg shoes sale ugg sundance ugg shoes cheap ugg boots ugg 5815 ugg sale ugg uk ugg knightsbridge womens ugg boots ugg boots ugg australia ugg 5819free shipping Posted by: ugg boots at November 12, 2009 04:19 AM (IeIJx) 111
nike dunk sb
Do anything needed to support an idea, a good idea usually brings good results, doing business is like that.http://www.dunksky.com/.This site has always been on Posted by: nike dunk sb at November 14, 2009 03:17 AM (APB+g) 112
buy [url=http://www.reviewups.com/]discount ugg shoes[/url]
[url=http://www.reviewups.com/]cheap ugg shoes[/url] [url=http://www.reviewups.com/]cheap ugg[/url] [url=http://www.reviewups.com/ugg-coquette-casual-shoes-c-22]ugg rainier[/url] [url=http://www.reviewups.com/]buy ugg[/url] [url=http://www.reviewups.com/]ugg usa[/url] [url=http://www.reviewups.com/]discount ugg boots[/url] [url=http://www.reviewups.com/ugg-classic-short-c-1]ugg 5825[/url] [url=http://www.reviewups.com/]ugg shoes sale[/url] [url=http://www.reviewups.com/ugg-sundance-c-5]ugg sundance[/url] [url=http://www.reviewups.com/]ugg shoes[/url] [url=http://www.reviewups.com/]cheap ugg boots[/url] [url=http://www.reviewups.com/ugg-classic-tall-c-3]ugg 5815[/url] [url=http://www.reviewups.com/]ugg sale[/url] [url=http://www.reviewups.com/]ugg uk[/url] [url=http://www.reviewups.com/ugg-knightsbridge-c-27]ugg knightsbridge[/url] [url=http://www.reviewups.com/]womens ugg boots[/url] [url=http://www.reviewups.com/]ugg boots[/url] [url=http://www.reviewups.com/]ugg australia[/url] [url=http://www.reviewups.com/ugg-classic-cardy-c-2]ugg 5819[/url]from usa Posted by: cheap at November 14, 2009 06:38 AM (s7MB5) 113
UGG BOOTS
Posted by: UGG BOOTS at November 18, 2009 12:10 PM (WPYlQ) Processing 0.04, elapsed 0.0528 seconds. |
MuNuvians
MeeNuvians
Polls! Polls! Polls!
Dale's ECB Election Projection Federal Review Real Clear Politics Rasmussen Reports Gallup Zogby FoxNews Polls Sabato/Crystal Ball Frequently Asked Questions
The (Almost) Complete Paul Anka Integrity Kick
Primary Document: The Audio
Paul Anka Haiku Contest Announcement Integrity SAT's: Entrance Exam for Paul Anka's Band AllahPundit's Paul Anka 45's Collection AnkaPundit: Paul Anka Takes Over the Site for a Weekend (Continues through to Monday's postings) George Bush Slices Don Rumsfeld Like an F*ckin' Hammer Top Top Tens
Democratic Forays into Erotica New Shows On Gore's DNC/MTV Network Nicknames for Potatoes, By People Who Really Hate Potatoes Star Wars Euphemisms for Self-Abuse Signs You're at an Iraqi "Wedding Party" Signs Your Clown Has Gone Bad Signs That You, Geroge Michael, Should Probably Just Give It Up Signs of Hip-Hop Influence on John Kerry NYT Headlines Spinning Bush's Jobs Boom Things People Are More Likely to Say Than "Did You Hear What Al Franken Said Yesterday?" Signs that Paul Krugman Has Lost His Frickin' Mind All-Time Best NBA Players, According to Senator Robert Byrd Other Bad Things About the Jews, According to the Koran Signs That David Letterman Just Doesn't Care Anymore Examples of Bob Kerrey's Insufferable Racial Jackassery Signs Andy Rooney Is Going Senile Other Judgments Dick Clarke Made About Condi Rice Based on Her Appearance Collective Names for Groups of People John Kerry's Other Vietnam Super-Pets Cool Things About the XM8 Assault Rifle Media-Approved Facts About the Democrat Spy Changes to Make Christianity More "Inclusive" Secret John Kerry Senatorial Accomplishments John Edwards Campaign Excuses John Kerry Pick-Up Lines Changes Liberal Senator George Michell Will Make at Disney Torments in Dog-Hell Greatest Hitjobs
The Ace of Spades HQ Sex-for-Money Skankathon A D&D Guide to the Democratic Candidates Margaret Cho: Just Not Funny More Margaret Cho Abuse Margaret Cho: Still Not Funny Iraqi Prisoner Claims He Was Raped... By Woman Wonkette Announces "Morning Zoo" Format John Kerry's "Plan" Causes Surrender of Moqtada al-Sadr's Militia World Muslim Leaders Apologize for Nick Berg's Beheading Michael Moore Goes on Lunchtime Manhattan Death-Spree Milestone: Oliver Willis Posts 400th "Fake News Article" Referencing Britney Spears Liberal Economists Rue a "New Decade of Greed" Artificial Insouciance: Maureen Dowd's Word Processor Revolts Against Her Numbing Imbecility Intelligence Officials Eye Blogs for Tips They Done Found Us Out, Cletus: Intrepid Internet Detective Figures Out Our Master Plan Shock: Josh Marshall Almost Mentions Sarin Discovery in Iraq Leather-Clad Biker Freaks Terrorize Australian Town When Clinton Was President, Torture Was Cool What Wonkette Means When She Explains What Tina Brown Means Wonkette's Stand-Up Act Wankette HQ Gay-Rumors Du Jour Here's What's Bugging Me: Goose and Slider My Own Micah Wright Style Confession of Dishonesty Outraged "Conservatives" React to the FMA An On-Line Impression of Dennis Miller Having Sex with a Kodiak Bear The Story the Rightwing Media Refuses to Report! Our Lunch with David "Glengarry Glen Ross" Mamet The House of Love: Paul Krugman A Michael Moore Mystery (TM) The Dowd-O-Matic! Liberal Consistency and Other Myths Kepler's Laws of Liberal Media Bias John Kerry-- The Splunge! Candidate "Divisive" Politics & "Attacks on Patriotism" (very long) The Donkey ("The Raven" parody) News/Chat
|