| Support
Contact
| The "Far Right" Sarah Palin?In Allah's Quotes the Day, he featured two: One an attack on the self-styled elites who do nothing to advance anything at all except their own outsized sense of self-importance, and the other the elites ragging on the "far right" Sarah Palin: Visit msnbc.com for Breaking News, World News, and News about the Economy Comments1
According to the left there's no such thing as a non-far right.
Posted by: Farmer Joe at October 05, 2009 01:24 PM (z4es9) Posted by: Stephana at October 05, 2009 01:25 PM (olUEe) 3
I'd do things with / to / for Sarah Palin that would make what Jack London did with White Fang seem tame by comparison.
... and I'd vote for her, too. Posted by: BumperStickerist at October 05, 2009 01:26 PM (ruzrP) 4
Anyone have a copy of Dum-Dum's Field Guide to Classifying Conservatives?
I believe it places a lot of weight on what Keith Olbermann thinks. Posted by: Waterhouse at October 05, 2009 01:26 PM (aoEFr) 5
Please - please - please! Some real news, for pete's sake. What is Barry wearing? We're dying here. Posted by: Hussein the Plumber at October 05, 2009 01:27 PM (RkRxq) Posted by: Lemmiwinks at October 05, 2009 01:27 PM (IqfKc) 7
they don't like the truth without it being sugar coated, suave ,dry, delayed. and especially by what they deem as a hick. (or one of the masses) we don't dare call them on anything. leave that to those crease lickers, after they have imbibed of all the freebees dinner parties and pate they can get. Posted by: willow at October 05, 2009 01:28 PM (GkYyh) 8
Re. the elitists: Two related columns "Are conservative elitists brain dead?" and a defence of Glenn Beck citing Ann Coulter.
Posted by: andycanuck at October 05, 2009 01:28 PM (2qU2d) 9
Good Lord! Palin's not wearing any pants at all in that video! How can I accurately determine her worth?
Posted by: David Brooks at October 05, 2009 01:28 PM (aoEFr) 10
Allah is a squish sonuvabitch.
Fuck him and his little plus sized pundit he follows around on Twitter. Posted by: Xploding Member at October 05, 2009 01:29 PM (J3LqR) 11
Allah, I'm sure did not defend Palin. He puts her with Beck and that horrible Jesus fellow who, historically, has done so much damage.
Posted by: Dagny at October 05, 2009 01:30 PM (Lh2ww) 12
You dont get it do you. Mainstream conservative is FAR RIGHT to these sub-morons.
Only mostly.lefty.squishy.middle.republicans are the decent ones, you know. Control of the discourse is everything to these people. And they seem to still have it. Lots and lots of libs don't like Sarah, and they can't point to a single fact or thought that led them to that conclusion, other than the fact that the MSM hates her with a white hot passion, and says she's not nice or something. Posted by: Mephitis at October 05, 2009 01:30 PM (ehXLT) 13
I will not accept the word of someone who makes political assessments by noticing how sharp a politician's pants crease happens to be. In what asinine intellectual world is that even a basis for evaluating whether or not a man has what it takes to lead the free world?
Posted by: Intrepid at October 05, 2009 01:30 PM (92zkk) 14
Allah is a squish sonuvabitch.
Fuck him and his little plus sized pundit he follows around on Twitter. So don't read him. I don't understand why people feel the need to come over here and complain about AP. Posted by: Farmer Joe at October 05, 2009 01:30 PM (z4es9) 15
I'd never die in the arms of that fish. That 'crease' in Obama's trousers is still quite intriguing though.
Posted by: David Brooks at October 05, 2009 01:31 PM (sOtz/) 16
Curiosity... Did she mention creationism. Cuz if she did, there goes the rest of the 'true conservatives". Posted by: Hussein the Plumber at October 05, 2009 01:31 PM (RkRxq) 17
Considering that that woman was standing next to the hottest guy to go anywhere near the 2008 campaign, you have to think that Brooks is an epic failure even as a down-low boyfriend. Bad test in dudes, bad taste in politics . . .
Posted by: Stealth Gay Academic Conservative at October 05, 2009 01:31 PM (NOH4w) 18
MSM/Beltway Rule #1: Conservatives can't fight back.
MSM/Beltway Rule #2: Those who violate rule #1 are extremists. MSM/Beltway Rule #3: You only have principles when you agree with us. Posted by: joncelli at October 05, 2009 01:31 PM (RD7QR) 19
And Ace is on Sarah's pac weblog and Hot Air isn't. That's gotta burn a little for AP.
Posted by: Mephitis at October 05, 2009 01:32 PM (ehXLT) 20
Sarah is the ONLY reason I sent johnny Mac a grand during the election. This is where I disagree with Rush, I think we gota go 3rd Party. Just because off the GOP elites on panel, they are not going anywhere. They are not going to give up control of the party. They control it at the local level, and pick the farm team that later run for higher office. They hate Sarah because she didn't need them to establish her brand.
Posted by: Paladin at October 05, 2009 01:33 PM (WGbtD) 21
Sarah Palin is worst that Hitler and Satan combined. She's obviously a creationist racist who doesn't believe in global warming. (Praise be upon Al Gore.) Ace, you are hereby banned from the intrawebs. Posted by: Chas. Johnson-Killgore-Sharmuta, Esq. at October 05, 2009 01:33 PM (uHvsp) 22
in my mind i now call them the champaigne, (they drink) and rape (not rape rape but rape) our minds without giving us a decent cigarette or a kiss afterwards. but a note on the dresser that sounds like this "shut up".
Posted by: willow at October 05, 2009 01:33 PM (GkYyh) 23
You have to keep in mind the left's political topography is like that New Yorker map of the world as seen from Manhattan. You have the center (Barack Obama), the right (David Brooks) and the far right (everybody to the right of David Brooks). Posted by: flenser at October 05, 2009 01:33 PM (6FxGb) 24
I will not accept the word of someone who makes political assessments by noticing how sharp a politician's pants crease happens to be. I live with 4 real guys (husband and sons). If any of them even noticed that pants had a crease, I would faint. That alone tells me a lot about Brooks. Posted by: Dagny at October 05, 2009 01:33 PM (Lh2ww) 25
fwiw, I'd bet if Sarah Palin looked like ... say ... Laura Kightlinger, telegenic but not too telegenic, then AllahPundit would be more okay with her than he is now.
Palin is an attractive woman. Allah is a self-professed beta male ... and a blogger. It's a solution that's not particularly difficult to put together. - Posted by: BumperStickerist at October 05, 2009 01:33 PM (ruzrP) Posted by: Stealth Gay Academic Conservative at October 05, 2009 01:34 PM (NOH4w) 27
I think some of these "guys" pee a little down their crease at the mere mention of Palin. Pansy assed Nancy boys the lot of them.
Posted by: mbruce at October 05, 2009 01:34 PM (sYUC7) 28
I am a bit perplexed at how either confused meaning applies to Sarah Palin. She is not "far right" ideologically -- she is solidly in the mainstream of conservativism. Exactly right. Labeling her "far right" is an attempt to smear her due to the extreme pants filling syndrome she causes the leftoids. Anyone who causes them to irrigate their loafers is someone I can vote for. I would love for her to cause a mass die off of leftoids due to loose bowel syndrome. What a tragedy that would be. It might take some (mikey moore) a couple of months to squirt out a fatal amount of their stuffing. Posted by: maddogg at October 05, 2009 01:34 PM (OlN4e) 29
In what asinine intellectual world is that even a basis for evaluating whether or not a man has what it takes to lead the free world? The same world that reports Google searches as leading economic indicators with a straight face. Posted by: Dang Straights at October 05, 2009 01:35 PM (Haq+B) 30
I love Brooksie whining that Palin was the one person responsible for the coarsening to the campaign.
The VP nominee serving as an attack dog during a presidential campaign? Who has ever heard of such a thing? Obviously that's only something someone as smart as David Brooks would know about. Posted by: DrewM. at October 05, 2009 01:35 PM (ur6Ar) 31
GEez, maddog took that notion over the top, good one dude.
Posted by: mbruce at October 05, 2009 01:36 PM (sYUC7) 32
So don't read him. I don't understand why people feel the need to come over here and complain about AP.
Say Joe, Ace made Allahpundit the centerpiece of the posting. Should Xploding Member strikeout any and all references to him? Just curious. Posted by: Heywood Jablome at October 05, 2009 01:36 PM (PMGbu) 33
Sarah Palin is worst that Hitler and Satan combined. She's obviously a creationist racist who doesn't believe in global warming. (Praise be upon Al Gore.) Ace, you are hereby banned from the intrawebs.
Posted by: Chas. Johnson-Killgore-Sharmuta, Esq. at October 05, 2009 01:33 PM (uHvsp) Sharmuta loved Sarah before Chaz told her she must hate her. Posted by: loppyd at October 05, 2009 01:37 PM (iuvp8) 34
I am soooo done with David Brooks et al. They have aligned themselves with my enemies, ergo they are my enemies as well. There are few things I despise more than some preening, pompous blue ribbon ass telling me what to do or how to think. I have a brain. I have an education. I have a job. And I have been feeding and dressing myself for a very long time. I look at Sarah Palin and I see a very accomplished, self-confident woman. What has David Brooks done? Really. What are his accomplishments? Kathleen Parker? Maureen Dowd? Paul (yes, humanoid sub-species can too be taught to read and write and I'm living proof) Krugman??? Give me a break!!! These educated elitists need to sit down and STFU! They have absolutely no clue what really matters to those of us in "flyover" country, and I doubt they really care. However, the downfall of Acorn will hopefully curtail democrat voter fraud efforts nationwide in 2010 and we can kick them all to the curb.
Posted by: katybeth at October 05, 2009 01:37 PM (Y5/bz) 35
@14 See how this thread started "In Allah's Quotes the Day...". Hence the references to Allah. No one just spontaneously read his ravings at Hot Air and came over here to bash him. Ace brought it up.
Posted by: Dagny at October 05, 2009 01:38 PM (Lh2ww) 36
Media elites on the left and right can lick my sack. Sarah's the real deal.
Posted by: Bosk at October 05, 2009 01:38 PM (pUO5u) 37
Palin, Beck, Limbaugh? How do they rate when it comes to glorious pant creases and perfectly mixed dry martinis?
Nowhere! Be gone swine! (So sayeth the elitists, who keep digging, digging, and digging.) Posted by: JBean at October 05, 2009 01:39 PM (OThsQ) 38
What has David Brooks done? Really. What are his accomplishments? He's successfully passed himself off as 'straight' *ahem* for 40+ years, so there's that. Posted by: Dang Straights at October 05, 2009 01:39 PM (Haq+B) 39
Brooks only wants to be in the good graces of the side he believes will be in power forever. They already own the people who write his paychecks so why make waves that tip your own boat.
Posted by: Beto at October 05, 2009 01:40 PM (F1b/5) 40
They detest they are not in control of the information anylonger. dismay and gnashing of teeth, hear the grinding? tee hee left and right get together to undermine the flow. why she is, she is, omg she is a commoner! really it is quite lovely. Posted by: willow at October 05, 2009 01:40 PM (GkYyh) 41
Of all the things that can be said about Sarah Palin, she certainly smoked out a shitpot full of slugs who called themselves conservatives. I hope she keeps talking just for that. These people deserve to be marginalized, imo.
Posted by: Hussein the Plumber at October 05, 2009 01:40 PM (RkRxq) 42
Whenever a libtard says "Sarah Palin, really?" just respond with "Joe Biden, really?" and begin laughing. That kills them.
Posted by: Dagny at October 05, 2009 01:42 PM (Lh2ww) 43
"Death panels" would be fine, if it wasn't a lie. Of course, it is a lie, catchy and easy to remember, but a lie nonetheless. And Republicans, like the good little parrots they are, have continually spouted it, just like they were supposed to. Posted by: JEA at October 05, 2009 01:42 PM (bWB5j) 44
Did someone say Sarah Palin doesn't wear pants? I'll have to look into that.
Posted by: Charlie Gibson at October 05, 2009 01:43 PM (wOGfT) 45
Say Joe, Ace made Allahpundit the centerpiece of the posting. Should Xploding Member strikeout any and all references to him?
I wouldn't call AP the "centerpiece" of the post. The centerpiece, IMO, is the pronouncements of the "elites". AP was mentioned once, for his role in bringing together a couple of quotes. But it seems that any mention of his name brings out the snarl in some people. Fine. Some people don't like the guy. He has a real talent for tweaking the sensitivities of his readership. He is what is known in the professional wrestling world as a "heel." People hate him, but they keep coming back to hate him. Posted by: Farmer Joe at October 05, 2009 01:43 PM (z4es9) 46
People like David Brooks are terrified that Sarah Palin will get the GOP Presidential nomination in 2012, and that they will then have to talk to... *shudder* regular people. You know, people who don't have Ivy League degrees -- and worse yet, who don't understand that only people with Ivy League degrees are competent to run the country.
Posted by: stuiec at October 05, 2009 01:43 PM (7AOgy) 47
End of life panels. End of life panels. End of life panels.
Posted by: alppuccino at October 05, 2009 01:44 PM (SAHzp) 48
Sarah Palin was the target of hysterical hatred before we knew anything unusual about her - except that she hadn't aborted Trig. So that's it. To be considered a moderate, she had to kill her baby.
Second, she did talk back to the One, which John McCain never did or would do, and that won't be forgotten. But third, and this is connected with the first point, she's extreme because she means what she says. Mitt Romney might say all the same things - and I'm sure he will if it will advantage him - but liberals don't take such offense at him because he could just as easily be saying the opposite if it was profitable. He was saying the opposite when it was profitable. But Sarah only has one version of the truth, and, like Ronald Reagan, she acts on it, cheerfully. She's pro-life, so Trig lives. She believes in clean, lean government, so she ran Alaska that way to the extent that it was within her power to do so. Nothing is more extreme than living up to your principles. There are very few Republicans who by the Palin test - do you really mean that and would you act on it? - are extremists. Posted by: David Blue at October 05, 2009 01:44 PM (WxARl) 49
Any odds on YOu tube choking bandwidth on that video? I would bet for it. They are pretty well established as lefties in my book.
Posted by: Mephitis at October 05, 2009 01:44 PM (ehXLT) 50
40
They detest they are not in control of the information anylonger. dismay and gnashing of teeth, hear the grinding? tee hee left and right get together to undermine the flow. why she is, she is, omg she is a commoner! really it is quite lovely. The only people who still get their news from TV and newspapers are all going to be dead in less than 15 years. Posted by: Lemmiwinks at October 05, 2009 01:45 PM (IqfKc) 51
Gentlemen, give David Brooks a break. Please. It's not David's fault. When he was in high school he took that career assessment test we all took and his only career options were "columnist" and "speed bump". Incredibly, he managed to fulfill both options in one position. Posted by: Dack Thrombosis at October 05, 2009 01:45 PM (P33XN) 52
I thought we had "moved on" from Mrs. Palin?
Here's the truth. The more you fete her as a leader in the GOP, the more it helps Democrats. Democrats love her. Apparently, ace, you love the Democrats. Posted by: Camille Paglia at October 05, 2009 01:45 PM (0NFKC) 53
Posted by: JEA at October 05, 2009 01:42 PM (bWB5j)
It was a "lie" (winkie-winkie) that actually brought about some changes in some statements in the proposed crap sandwich of the legislation. But Axe doesn't want us to mention that part. Guess the Olympic-sized failure caused Axe to hire some new idioturfers to go around the net and spew. Posted by: TheresaD at October 05, 2009 01:45 PM (iGCmo) 54
Actually, I ignore Allah and read Ed. I resent having to glean his ravings from the rest. I hope Michelle is paying attention to his lefty leanings before the blog goes LGF.
Posted by: Dagny at October 05, 2009 01:46 PM (Lh2ww) 55
Here's the truth. The more you fete her as a leader in the GOP, the more it helps Democrats. Democrats love her.
Really? They're doing a lousy job of expressing that. Posted by: Farmer Joe at October 05, 2009 01:46 PM (z4es9) 56
Nice to see the Mav is well into his backstabbing mode again; after energizing his pathetic campaign he has to get in a few digs about how Palin didn't work and play well together with the squishy douches that ran the fucking thing into the ground. Well done Mav; you're back in the good graces of Gregory, Frumsie, Brooksie and the rest of your reach-around buds where you can frag us conservatives who held our fucking noses and voted for a rancid piece of shit like you in November. Do us all a favor and just shut your fucking mouth and teach your slutty daughter how to act in public. Tammy Bruce is probably available for that job and sounds very willing to do it.
Posted by: Captain Hate at October 05, 2009 01:47 PM (Rrnzg) 57
What if...we got Palin, Rush, Beck, Nugent, Bolton, and Hanson to start a 3rd party together? What % of the presidential vote would it get? Discuss. Also, who else could be added to this list to create "Teh Awesome Party"? And "Bacon" is not an acceptable answer. (Yes, The Nuge is kind of out there. But he annoys the right people, so he's all right by me). Posted by: Navin R Johnson says listen to New Order at October 05, 2009 01:47 PM (J7/Ud) 58
My silk hosiery is immaculately creased, but for some reason David Brooks never notices.
Posted by: Sarah Cuda at October 05, 2009 01:47 PM (QKKT0) 59
If a democrat says something's a lie you can bet the opposite is the case.
Posted by: Beto at October 05, 2009 01:47 PM (F1b/5) 60
Katrina Van Schnitzel on any show is a reason not to watch. Throw Brooks into the mix and it's game over.
Posted by: loppyd at October 05, 2009 01:48 PM (iuvp8) 61
Ske kept the bars open late in her small town, she's a fan of ACDC and Van Halen, so much so that she named her son in part after them. She doesn't think car companies should be taken over by the government, that we should spend money we don't have on projects that don't work, that we shouldn't bow down to foreign tyrants whether in Moscow, Beijing, Riyadh or Tehran
She does say we should whenever possible, go after our energy supplies, that are soldier, sailors and airmen should be supported, that government should get out of the way of the private sector, also whenever possible. I know crazy right wing talk Posted by: ian cormac at October 05, 2009 01:48 PM (GkYyh) 62
43 JEA Please, do us all a favor and get a clue. "Death Panels" aren't a lie, they are a reality in your homeboy's little craptastic healthcare bill of BS. Along with higher taxes, lousy medical care and no funds for research. Posted by: katybeth at October 05, 2009 01:48 PM (Y5/bz) 63
catchy and easy to remember, but a lie nonetheless.
Like "over Jordan contingency committee" or "planned lack of oxygen event" Posted by: alppuccino at October 05, 2009 01:48 PM (SAHzp) 64
People hate him, but they keep coming back to hate him.
Conversely, Ace keeps linking and quoting him. Some might see a certain connectivity there. Posted by: Heywood Jablome at October 05, 2009 01:49 PM (PMGbu) 65
What if...we got Palin, Rush, Beck, Nugent, Bolton, and Hanson to start
a 3rd party together? What % of the presidential vote would it get?
Discuss.
I would guess it would pull in about 15%, almost all of it drawn away from the Republicans. Thus, the D's would have a cakewalk to victory. Posted by: Farmer Joe at October 05, 2009 01:49 PM (z4es9) 66
She tears the GOP apart. Which is good.
Posted by: Camille Paglia at October 05, 2009 01:49 PM (0NFKC) 67
The left is so dishonest and assholish. Everything is extreme right wing. They refuse to listen or to even comprehend what their opponents say. But then again, why should we expect them to invest more brainpower in understanding their opponents than their own side. These people barely understand their own ideals...look at the ones who have no idea what is even in HR3200.
Posted by: joeindc44 at October 05, 2009 01:49 PM (QxSug) 68
I love Camille Paglia's take on the media/liberal meltdown re Sarah. I think she really nails it. Same with her lashing of fake feminists and thier "problems" with Sarah.
Posted by: Vergeltung at October 05, 2009 01:49 PM (jttPx) 69
Posted by: Camille Paglia at October 05, 2009 01:45 PM (0NFKC)
Go fuck yourself; the real Camille understands the appeal of Palin. Posted by: Captain Hate at October 05, 2009 01:50 PM (Rrnzg) 70
>>It was the first and only time a prominent Republican -- or hell, a prominent anything
-- dared to stand up and clearly declare that Barack Obama was
incompetent, inexperienced, and utterly unprepared for the Presidency,
and a left-winger to boot.
In fairness, Giuliani said it too. He made fun of Obama's credentials as a "community organizer" and also his penchant for voting "present" claiming that executives have to actually make decisions. In fact, Giuliani was spot on. Posted by: looking closely at October 05, 2009 01:50 PM (PwGfd) 71
Conversely, Ace keeps linking and quoting him. Some might see a certain connectivity there.
Maybe AP has a habit of posting things that Ace wants to comment on. Posted by: Farmer Joe at October 05, 2009 01:51 PM (z4es9) 72
Read Oliphants cartoon today.
http://news.yahoo.com/comics/pat-oliphant This is exactly what GOP elites and mainstream media think of middle American conservatism. To hell with them all. Posted by: sammy316 at October 05, 2009 01:51 PM (4egiD) 73
I think if pressed for the reasons for calling Palin "far right" they'd include all the debunked claims. Eg: she banned books in the Wasilla library, she cut special needs funding, she was a member of an Alaskan secessionist party, she endorsed Buchannan, etc.
Posted by: bonhomme at October 05, 2009 01:51 PM (mKTjM) 74
Rush calling Obama a beta male at this moment.
Posted by: Dagny at October 05, 2009 01:51 PM (Lh2ww) 75
Back in my Townhall blogging days I once asked one of the ignorant trolls who called himself a “moderate” how he defined “far right” when he used that term to describe one of the other posters. Specifically, I asked him how he would differentiate someone who is “far right” from someone who is simply a conservative.
I never did get an answer.
The only people who use the term “far right” are commies and socialists. I guess tothem, anyone who is not a communist is “far right”.
Posted by: Vic at October 05, 2009 01:52 PM (CDUiN) 76
No, the reason they see her as a "far right extremist" is she's a Christian and doesn't hide or apologize for it.
Posted by: MM at October 05, 2009 01:52 PM (4LypY) 77
If 'death panels' makes Palin far-right, doesn't that mean saying 'more people will die if we don't pass my health care bill' makes Obama far-left?
Oh wait, we're supposed to forget about the greatest health-care speech ever. Posted by: Tom in Korea at October 05, 2009 01:52 PM (+gX1+) 78
uhm Dems, are so happy to see us support her, (cuz she's a lozer) they say. which is why anytime her name is mentioned they come out Trolling heavily in every blog that mentions her. Yes she's weak and if we support her for any reason we're plain silly, funny aren't they? Posted by: willow at October 05, 2009 01:52 PM (GkYyh) 79
Another example of moderation. Senator Brownback, alias Senator Swiitchback, voted against McCain-Kennedy. But that doesn't mean 'immigration reformers' will damn him as an extremist. They know that if it's close, if it ever matters, his real position is the opposite to the public one that he ultimately took. That's the kind of moderation the left can respect from conservatives.
Sarah's position is mushy on this issue. She is not a strong, clear-cut, supporter of controlling America's borders. She wants some kind of amnesty. But, whatever her position is, nobody doubts she will act on it and never switch back. That's why, even if her position is formally further to the left than the way Senator Brownback voted, the left will in time react to her and not him as an anti-hispanic racist, as in extremist. Posted by: David Blue at October 05, 2009 01:53 PM (WxARl) 80
Related: For the first time since forever, I watched Meet the Press this week. With perfectly straight faces, E.J. Dionne, Rachel Maddow and David Brooks discussed military strategy and economics. I will now jab a broken bottle through my left eye. P.S.: Yes, Maddow brought up Palin's ghostwriter being the son of Lester Maddox or something. My wife could not understand why I was screaming "JEREMIAH EFFING WRIGHT!!!!" Posted by: Circa (Insert Year Here) at October 05, 2009 01:53 PM (B+qrE) 81
"Death panels" would be fine, if it wasn't a lie. Of course, it is a lie, catchy and easy to remember, but a lie nonetheless. No, it wasn't a lie. It's a reference to many things, from boards like Britain's "NICE" that determine when people are no longer eligible for treatment, to flat-out rationing. Fer crissake, in June Obama was giving a townhall when a woman asked him if her 90-year-old mother would have been eligible for a heart transplant under his "reform" plan. According to the woman, the first doctor her mother consulted said "sorry, no, you're too old". Another doctor "recognized her love of life" and decided to take the chance. Obama's answer? We can't base these decisions on something as unmeasurable as "love of life" and that they should be made by uninvolved boards based on what's "most cost effective". THOSE ARE THE DEATH PANELS. The left is absolutely right there wouldn't be (formal) panels deciding who lives and who dies on an individual basis. Of course not. There'd be panels making "universal" policies that achieve the same results. Posted by: Rob Crawford at October 05, 2009 01:54 PM (ZJ/un) 82
I always thought Iowahawk (PBUH) got it pretty much exactly right with his posts from "T
Coddington van Voorhees". The "Establishment Conservatives" are mainly
the old-line, Ivy League, East Coast Republicans. Charles Krauthammer
is probably the least offensive of this breed; George Will another.
(Will's baseball writing is almost always more trenchant than his
political commentary, and thus has it ever been.) This fasciation with
the "brain trust" of conservatism arises from this blue-blooded,
class-conscious milieu. They find the flannel-shirted redneck
conservatives...embarassing. Useful, to be sure; but embarassing. No
one you'd want to invite for brandy and watercress sandwiches at the
club.
I call this the "Elmer Gantry" phenomenon, and both political parties suffer from it. There is always the fear that rabble-rousing populists will divert the sheeplike masses from the "true message". Often, this fear is entirely justified -- as the examples of Huey Long and Tammany Hall make manifest. The intellectuals of both parties are obsessed with "message", with ideology, with the proper rituals and forms of their respective churches. Sarah Palin is the lady who wears high-heels and a red dress as her go-to-meeting clothes; they worry that the parishoners will be too busy ogling her to hear the sermon. What's missed in all this, of course, is that American politics is more than party affiliation. Much of what drives politics is local issues: school boards, tax levies, city ordinances, and the like. What is -- and is not -- "conservative" or "liberal" depends to a high degree on where you happen to live. A "conservative" in New York City is not the same as a "conservative" in Valdosta, Georgia. A "liberal" in Licoln, Nebraska is not the same as a "liberal" in Berkeley, California. Middle America recognizes Sarah Palin as one of them. (Or, at least, the image that Palin projects.) It's not a cerebral message; it's a symbolic one. Hearth, home, family, community. A hunter, an outdoorswoman, successful in business and politics. Contrast with someone like Mitt Romney, who is all message and no image at all: most Americans probably couldn't pick him out of a line-up. It bothers the intellectuals that image can trump message this way, but this is human nature. The intellectuals will fret and secretly yearn for the day when these irritating peasants will recognize -- and listen to -- their betters. Posted by: Monty at October 05, 2009 01:54 PM (4Pleu) 83
65 What if...we got Palin, Rush, Beck, Nugent, Bolton, and Hanson to start a 3rd party together? What % of the presidential vote would it get? Discuss. WRONG! The correct answer is 14.1%. However, would it be worth starting something w/ conservative ideals that would grow with each election, or are we better off wishing the Kip Von Topsider IIIs out of the Republican party? Posted by: The McLaughlin Group at October 05, 2009 01:56 PM (J7/Ud) 84
66
She tears the GOP apart. Which is good.
The GOP needs to be torn apart. They are the Cleveland Browns of political parties. Destroy it and start over. Posted by: Lemmiwinks at October 05, 2009 01:56 PM (IqfKc) Posted by: Rob Crawford at October 05, 2009 01:57 PM (ZJ/un) 86
Ever ask any kind of liberal as to what their defination of "FAR RIGHT" is? Most will look at you and size you up as to if you are going punch them out or not. If not, the answer is some kind of vague answer as "You know, One of those kind who hates everyone and especially change, who wants to improve their rich life style on the backs of the poor." And it goes on and on and on time without end, until you really ARE ready to punch them out.
Posted by: mystry at October 05, 2009 01:59 PM (kmgIE) 87
I would never refer to her as "far right." I would refer to her as a "woman who deserves admiration for her persistent production of eggs fertilized by her virile husband, Todd."
We need a woman like that intghe White House. Posted by: Camille Paglia at October 05, 2009 02:00 PM (0NFKC) 88
More than anything or anyone else, the left hates with a white-hot passion anyone who calls them what they really are.
Start with McCarthy and Nixon, and go right on up through Limbaugh, Coulter, and Beck. And, of course, Palin. She called Obama what he is--a community organizer--and she laughed about it. It can't be allowed to stand. "She called us by our true name! We hates her, HAAAAATES her!" /Gollum Posted by: tsj017 at October 05, 2009 02:00 PM (4YUWF) 89
And Republicans, like the good little parrots they are, have continually spouted it, just like they were supposed to. Oh, ha ha ha. Ingraham had a running lop today of every administration official who said "bits and fits" over the weekend. But Republicans are the one's who parrot. Ha Ha Ha . Thanks JEA. I really needed the laugh this afternoon. Posted by: Mallamutt at October 05, 2009 02:01 PM (V9SYy) 90
as with any lefty her only value is her womb to be used for the left by the left for the left.
Posted by: willow at October 05, 2009 02:01 PM (GkYyh) 91
WRONG! The correct answer is 14.1%. However, would it be worth starting
something w/ conservative ideals that would grow with each election, or
are we better off wishing the Kip Von Topsider IIIs out of the
Republican party?
I think we're best off ignoring the Kip Von Topsiders and voting for conservatives. Posted by: Farmer Joe at October 05, 2009 02:01 PM (z4es9) Posted by: Dang Straights at October 05, 2009 02:02 PM (Haq+B) 93
Sarah Palin may be more dangerous to crooked GOP congressmen.
She will expose crooks in the government. That's why they all hate her. Posted by: wHodat at October 05, 2009 02:03 PM (+sBB4) 94
Liberals -- including liberals like David Brooks
I think you meant to say "closet" liberal. When he isn't busy fantasizing about other men's pants, David plays desperately the "conservative" at the Grey Lady, hiding his secret desires from all the world, oppressed by the stifling conformity of Manhattan. Oh, how he yearns for the day he can come out of the closet, free and fabulous, prancing a lilt of eternal liberalism, bursting forth from his true inner self... Yet, he cannot risk the opprobrium of his peers, he weeps in the small hours for his plight. Why, oh why can David not come out? He knows the Grey Lady will spurn him, reject him, he may lose his job, he will wither under the disdainful gazes of disapproving True Liberals, if he admits he is not a conservative. Once shattered, that illusion of respectability, that sinecure of "token conservative" serving the Grey Lady's teats, that single excuse for his employment, will evaporate like the scent of rare sandalwood from a pocket square in the heat of an Indian summer. Posted by: George Orwell at October 05, 2009 02:04 PM (AZGON) 95
Posted by: Monty at October 05, 2009 01:54 PM (4Pleu) Great analysis. I've thought for a long time that the "class trumps ideology" prinicple goes a long way in explaining the Brookses, Noonans, Parkers, Buckleys et al. and their gushy swoons over The One. Iowahawk's parody was so hilarious because it crystallized a deep truth. Posted by: Cicero at October 05, 2009 02:04 PM (QKKT0) 96
JEA, Honuts Clowned use the same idioms in posting
Posted by: Beto at October 05, 2009 02:04 PM (F1b/5) 97
The GOP has a serious disconnect with the vast majority of the folks who identify as republican. It is not my job to explain things to them. If they expect me to send my hard earned money to fund their projects, they'd best be dislodging their heads from their asses. People are pissed. The tea party protests were full of people like me and my family - regular, hard working Americans who have had enough. They'd best be getting themsleves out of DC and back into the real world and listen to what people are saying. I held my nose and voted for McCain BECAUSE of Palin. I definately don't want ot hear one single word from him or his "campaign" managers (the biggest collection of wankers in the US). They are part of the problem.
Posted by: katybeth at October 05, 2009 02:05 PM (Y5/bz) 98
Total sum of the planet that cares what David Brooks has to say: 1, David Brooks. Mrs. Brooks doesn't even care.
Posted by: Mallamutt at October 05, 2009 02:05 PM (V9SYy) 99
So Sarah Palin's ghostwriter accused of being a white supremacist is important, but Bill Ayers ghostwriting Obama's racist 'Dreams of My Father' is not. Riiiight. Gotcha. What a bumch of self-impo'tent turds.
Posted by: RickZ at October 05, 2009 02:05 PM (is97c) 100
Re: 57 Ooh! Coulter and Malkin should be on that list too. I mean, they're already 'on my list' (IYKWIMAIKYD), but I mean they should be on the other list I just came up with too. And zombie Reagan and Buckley would be on the list. Not that list you sick-os, but the...oh, eff it. I'm going back to work. Posted by: Navin R Johnson says listen to Black Flag at October 05, 2009 02:06 PM (J7/Ud) 101
You can't reason with Liberals when it comes to Palin. It's a strange, visceral hatred- probably based on fear. A Pastor I know said, "I don't want an ordinary person to be President" (as opposed the Havahd educated numskull we have in the WH now...)
I like Palin, but she has made a few mis-steps, such as resigning the Governorship. That made her look a little sensitive and unable to commit to the long run, damn the torpedoes. Hopefully, this won't be fatal. She can draw a lot of folks to the ballot box on our side, but the hatred is so strong for her on the left that there may be an equal and opposite draw from the left. In any case, I hope she remains in the spotlight for years to come, exploding innumerable Liberal heads along the way. Posted by: GregInSeattle at October 05, 2009 02:06 PM (B5cM9) 102
Palin does NOT support amnesty for illegals. She has only responded on this issue once to my knowledge and she gave a rather wish-washy answer that amounted to yes and no on amnesty.
One can not tell what her actual position is because she only provided an answer during the campaign when she was under the auspices of McLame who believed heavily in amnesty.
As governor she did oppose drivers licenses in Alaska for illegals. That is more than McLame or Huckabee did.
Posted by: Vic at October 05, 2009 02:07 PM (CDUiN) 103
Well said, Ace.
Posted by: Amused Observer at October 05, 2009 02:07 PM (xGXz7) 104
Wee Wee had to go after Sarah again today, with his "crazy claims about death panels" remark.
I think it's worth asking a couple of questions about that: 1) Are there in fact any provisions in the bill (which he's read from cover to cover, I assume) for any panel of people who could possibly make a decision that overrules the wishes of a patient, doctor, or family on a life-or-death issue. Such a panel is, by any measure that matters, a "death panel." 2) If there were "death panels" in the bill, does anyone actually believe that BHO would own up to it? Posted by: Farmer Joe at October 05, 2009 02:07 PM (z4es9) 105
And zombie Reagan and Buckley would be on the list. Not that list you sick-os, but the...oh, eff it. I'm going back to work. Mr. Johnson, tear up that list. Posted by: Zombie Ronald Reagan at October 05, 2009 02:08 PM (V9SYy) 106
I'd love to know if Brooks is on Jornolist. He does seem to be in-line with what the leftie trash is saying. Maybe membership is free for NYT hacks. Posted by: Dang Straights at October 05, 2009 02:08 PM (Haq+B) 107
@ 67: "They refuse to listen or to even comprehend what their opponents say." No, no, no. They listen and they understand perfectly. They're not interested in an honest debate, they're only interested in winning. Their method is character assasination, ad hominem attacks, emotional pleas separate from facts (this happens to be my theory on why liberal talk radio can't succeed - no substance to back up the emotive ranting for hours of program time). They want to bury their opponents. Perfect example is Maddow shifting the conversation to Sarah's evil ghost writer. Posted by: Scruffy McGee at October 05, 2009 02:09 PM (LI1g/) 108
Allah chingada.
Posted by: redrock at October 05, 2009 02:10 PM (VSWPU) 109
Spot on, Ace!
Posted by: Y-not at October 05, 2009 02:10 PM (sey23) 110
Ace sez: "And yet Brooks and Barack Obama's other down-low boyfriends"
ROTFLMAO. Yo, yo, dey be keepin it reel, gnome sane. Imagine Sarah Palin, it's easy if you try... Low taxes, domestic drilling and noo-coolar plants, economy goes through the roof... A guy can dream. Instead, GOP will field Chuck Hagel/Olympia Snowe ticket and their concession speech to Barry H. will be moderately lauded by Matthews and Couric and maybe even O'Reilly. Posted by: Christopher Johnson at October 05, 2009 02:11 PM (dP6Ky) 111
I am a bit perplexed at how either confused meaning applies to Sarah Palin. She is not "far right" ideologically -- she is solidly in the mainstream of conservativism.
Oh come on, ace, you should know by now that the Left considers 'mainstream conservatism' itself to be "far right". Seriously, conservatism itself is "far right" to most Leftists/liberals I know and most pundits and media members. Also, just go back to the Dubya years. They considered him to be a "far right" conservative wacko. Which, he wasn't. Over the past 8 years, mainstream conservatism has been redefined as "far right" and Far Leftism has been redefined as "moderate". This isn't perplexing at all. The Left has redefined political terms to their advantage. Posted by: Michael in MI at October 05, 2009 02:12 PM (ObTcs) Posted by: Dagny at October 05, 2009 02:12 PM (Lh2ww) Posted by: George Orwell at October 05, 2009 02:13 PM (AZGON) 114
Her too
Posted by: Dagny at October 05, 2009 02:14 PM (Lh2ww) 115
Is there a Mrs. Brooks? I don't know. Even if there is, I imagine a gay lover is on the side somewhere. Posted by: Dack Thrombosis at October 05, 2009 02:16 PM (P33XN) 116
"Death Panels" aren't a lie, they are a reality in your homeboy's little craptastic healthcare bill of BS." Really? Of course, being so knowledgeable, you can cite chapter and verse where that is in the health care bill? Posted by: JEA at October 05, 2009 02:16 PM (bWB5j) 117
There was a TV show, "Our Miss Brooks," starring Eve Arden. She was way, way more butch than David.
Posted by: George Orwell at October 05, 2009 02:18 PM (AZGON) 118
" And yet Brooks and Barack Obama's other down-low boyfriends are still stinging from the time this nasty bitch got up in front of the cafetorium and said their boyfriend ain't all that."
Can we agree that Ace is on a role insult wise? That quote above is good....real good. Posted by: mare at October 05, 2009 02:18 PM (X1fsj) 119
roll
Posted by: mare at October 05, 2009 02:18 PM (X1fsj) 120
I think you're glossing over some of the more substantive criticism of Palin, for instance what about the charge that she wore white to some of her campaign rallies.
And you also don't mention that she faked faking her pregnancy so that 5 months later people would think her daughter was faking her pregnancy to cover up the fact that Bristol wasn't pregnant 5 months earlier and Palin really was. You can't trust someone that devious, we all expect politicians to lie, but when they are not lying and you think they are and then it turns out they were telling the truth all along it breaks the bond with the people. Posted by: Kazinski at October 05, 2009 02:18 PM (HPhbp) 121
The FCCER in the stimulus bill, that's the counerpart to NICE, the Independent Medical Advisory Commission, the 600 billion dollar Medicare cut, all these things collectively add up to the 'death panels', kind of like the puzzlebox in Hellraiser, when all the tumblers lock. For the last time, she'd be three quarters of a million dollars in debt by now, if she had stayed in office, and tried to move against cap n trade, or the health care bill. No third parties are not the answer, they are not even the right question. Posted by: ian cormac at October 05, 2009 02:19 PM (GkYyh) 122
#105 OK, anybody - Someone explain it to me. I know that National Review = Van Voorhees Van Coddington (or whatever), but this is where I'm coming from when I say I like Buckley (the man himself): 1) He bucked (no pun) the establishment @ Yale and stuck a finger in the eye of the 'academic elite' before it was cool to do so. And he's a Cath-O-Lic. 2) Debated anyone on TV who was up to it w/ no teleprompters, and did so for over 30 years. 3) Helped kick the real sick-o right wingers (aka racists aka John Birchers) out of the Republican party. 4) Started his own magazine to be a voice of what he believed to be true conservative values. 5) Used to go out on his boat to international waters to go burn one when he needed to cool out. And like Regan, had at least one idiot embarrasment of a son. Where am I off here? Posted by: Navin R Johnson says listen to Black Flag at October 05, 2009 02:19 PM (J7/Ud) 123
Those same MSNBC intelligentsia were calling Obama a "Magic Negro" and pooh poohing his chances to be President a mere 20 months ago.
Posted by: Neo at October 05, 2009 02:20 PM (tE8FB) 124
the elites and the wannabes on both sides are utterly clueless as usual
Sarah is IMO not far right, I am a recovering lefty now mod Dem who voted MAC Palin. I voted for Sarah because she is real and I think she 'gets it' there was nothing about her that scared me away as being 'far right'. she represents mainstream American values, there is no far right about it.l Posted by: ginaswo/MiM at October 05, 2009 02:20 PM (kYuWU) 125
Really? Of course, being so knowledgeable, you can cite chapter and verse where that is in the health care bill? Jeeze, you leftards have to have everything spelled out or you just don't get it. Willful ignorance? The death panels are an inevitable result of cost containment. So some damn panel of government bureaucrats will have to decide who is too expensive to treat. GET IT? Posted by: maddogg at October 05, 2009 02:21 PM (OlN4e) 126
Mare , ace is da bomb.
Posted by: willow at October 05, 2009 02:21 PM (GkYyh) 127
Really? Of course, being so knowledgeable, you can cite chapter and verse where that is in the health care bill? And you ignore the example of Obama himself calling for them. Intellectually dishonest much? Posted by: Rob Crawford at October 05, 2009 02:21 PM (ZJ/un) 128
I don't get the "Camille Paglia" sockpuppet, because as someone else mentioned, the real Camille Paglia has written fairly glowing essays about Palin. Better sockpuppet to be spouting that stuff would be Dowd, or Parker, or Steinhem, or Joy Behar, etc. I believe people classify her as "far right" because of her Christian faith and the fact that she didn't abort Trig. Apparently being Christian is now considered "fringe" or something. And that just pisses me off. Posted by: ParanoidGirlInSeattle at October 05, 2009 02:22 PM (RZ8pf) 129
A lot of normal Democrats who I know, are wavering on Obama. They are starting to see him as not a "normal" person. Why his personal popularity stays as high as it does, is something pollsters do not know yet. Maybe taking a poll @ 12:00 midnight on Times Square har something to do with it.
Posted by: mystry at October 05, 2009 02:23 PM (kmgIE) 130
Uh... wouldn't the chapter and verse for the death panels be part of the stuff that they cut out the day after some mom in Alaska made a comment on Facebook?
(How come my facebook comments don't get national recognition? ;-) ) Posted by: Mouse at October 05, 2009 02:23 PM (5cUJG) 131
OK, anybody - Someone explain it to me. I know that National Review = Van Voorhees Van Coddington (or whatever), but this is where I'm coming from when I say I like Buckley (the man himself): Buckley was fine. He's the origin of the statement of preferring the governance of N random people picked from the phone book to the faculty of Harvard. It's his heirs -- by blood and by institution -- who have massively screwed up and have aligned more with their social class -- high-income northeasterners -- than with their political allies. Posted by: Rob Crawford at October 05, 2009 02:23 PM (ZJ/un) 132
I know that National Review = Van Voorhees Van Coddington (or
whatever), but this is where I'm coming from when I say I like Buckley
(the man himself):
No, I believe it should be Van Voorhees Van Coddington = Christopher Buckley, not NR as a whole. Posted by: OregonMuse at October 05, 2009 02:24 PM (TnUnj) 133
Chapter and verse: pp425-430 in the original bill.
Posted by: Dagny at October 05, 2009 02:25 PM (Lh2ww) 134
Dagny, you rock.
Posted by: Mouse at October 05, 2009 02:26 PM (5cUJG) 135
Oh joy. We get rid of one troll and another pops up. Posted by: ol_dirty_/b/tard at October 05, 2009 02:26 PM (IoUF1) 136
I am a recovering lefty now mod Dem who voted MAC Palin. I voted for Sarah because she is real and I think she 'gets it' there was nothing about her that scared me away as being 'far right'.
she represents mainstream American values, there is no far right about it.l Posted by: ginaswo/MiM at October 05, 2009 02:20 another thing that shut dems down for myself and family ( forever )was the total Hate for women that was presented, threats , "do this or else" ,sit down shut up, nasty name calling, the voter fraud, attacks on an innocent baby, etc.. Posted by: willow at October 05, 2009 02:26 PM (GkYyh) 137
Wow, Ace. You're awful hard on the Republican "elites". That's not going to help your social calendar.
Posted by: Moron Ducking for Cover at October 05, 2009 02:27 PM (qWLc4) 138
I'm not sure Camille Paglia is a sock puppet. It's almost cruel and small-minded enough to be one of the real trolls. Usually sock-puppets are nicer. ;-)
Posted by: Mouse at October 05, 2009 02:27 PM (5cUJG) 139
Ace, you hit it right on the head. The real "problem" the left has with Sarah Palin, putting all their smears and weird mythical beliefs about her aside, boils down to the fact that she committed the three moral sins of liberalism. She burst the left's bubble by belittling Obama when everyone on the left was riding high on their belief that he was the second coming of Christ, she wouldn't have an abortion and she threatened Obama's ascension to the Presidency by electrifying the right and bumping McCain ahead in the polls. From that point on the left's hatred of Sarah was absolute, limitless and irrational.
Posted by: Crusty at October 05, 2009 02:28 PM (GvSpB) 140
Oh joy. We get rid of one troll and another pops up. I know, it's like one of those "whack a mole" games or something! Of course I believe there are people out there with alerts set for anything "Palin" so they can immediately jump in and defile the comments with their hatred for her. Posted by: ParanoidGirlInSeattle at October 05, 2009 02:28 PM (RZ8pf) 141
I believe people classify her as "far right" because of her Christian faith and the fact that she didn't abort Trig. Apparently being Christian is now considered "fringe" or something. And that just pisses me off. Probably a growing movement to get the world to a place where "Christian" equals "extremist". The dream of the Left realized. Posted by: Dack Thrombosis at October 05, 2009 02:28 PM (P33XN) 142
Well, nicer or just more ridiculous.
Posted by: Mouse at October 05, 2009 02:28 PM (5cUJG) 143
@ JEA So, we conservatives stupidly mouth an untruth re: death panels? Really. So, how is it that the plans that have been out there include panels designed to cut of or deny care based on your ability to contribute to society? And how is it that the plans also advocate sending in people to help el;derly and inferm decide whther life is just too difficult to live. Never mind the stench surrounding anyone suggesting to a depressed person there are other alternatives to life. Deth Panel is catchy. Does stick. But it sticks because there is far more truth behind it than not. It stings the left for one of two reasons....1) the truth was exposed and/or 2) those few on the left who could not stomach such a thing themselves are too deluded to beliece it is true. Lastly, and most tellingly.....if it is an untruth....WHY DID BARACK AGREE TO ABANDON THEM!?!?!?!?!?!? Posted by: rightzilla at October 05, 2009 02:29 PM (rVJH4) 144
In Allah's Quotes the Day, he featured two: One an attack on the self-styled elites who do nothing to advance anything at all except their own outsized sense of self-importance,
So, Self-flagellation in Allah's blog? Posted by: nickless at October 05, 2009 02:29 PM (MMC8r) 145
#131 OK - That's what I figured. I'm middle-class, mid-west. No trust funds, no boats. I was the only guy in my fraternity who didn't have a car (I could only hit on chicks who had cars). When I see people/institutions/ ideals get slammed/berated/ picked-on by the majority, I tend to be drawn to them and want to support them (see: Palin/Israel/ The Detroit Lions). OK, eff the Lions, but you know what I'm getting at, right? Make any sense? I should seriously get back to work. Posted by: Navin R Johnson says listen to Minor Threat at October 05, 2009 02:29 PM (J7/Ud) 146
In what respect, Charlie?
Posted by: left wing loon at October 05, 2009 02:30 PM (DubCl) 147
I don't get the "Camille Paglia" sockpuppet, because...
Don't worry about it. I think this clown is probably erg, who does occasionally show up here as a celebrity sockpuppet. You can't expect him to have any actual knowledge of his aliases; he's neither very bright, nor informed. Posted by: OregonMuse at October 05, 2009 02:30 PM (TnUnj) 148
no way is that Cammilee Paglia. she's not a Palin hater, and disliked the rhetoric from her party about Palin. she might be ideologically different but not a freak like most the trolls are.
Posted by: willow at October 05, 2009 02:30 PM (GkYyh) 149
Wow, Ace. You're awful hard on the Republican "elites". That's not going to help your social calendar. No Hobo Galas in his future? Posted by: RickZ at October 05, 2009 02:31 PM (is97c) 150
I think you're glossing over some of the more substantive criticism of Palin, for instance what about the charge that she wore white to some of her campaign rallies.
Her very existence as a white woman was a dog whistle to the KKK. Everyone who misread a single work of fiction written 40 years ago knows this... Posted by: Kathleen Parker at October 05, 2009 02:32 PM (NtiET) 151
I think you're glossing over some of the more substantive criticism of Palin, for instance what about the charge that she wore white to some of her campaign rallies after labor day? oh, she must go away! Posted by: willow at October 05, 2009 02:33 PM (GkYyh) 152
Anyone not a Marxist is "far right" to these tools. Meh..
Posted by: rawmuse at October 05, 2009 02:33 PM (cuWk2) 153
Keep that clip Ace for the day when it is revealed that Bill Ayers ghost wrote BO's books. I can't wait to see Maddow explain BO's ties and her comfort level with domestic terrorists.
Posted by: booter at October 05, 2009 02:34 PM (eimUK) 154
Her very existence
as a white woman was a dog whistle to the KKK. Everyone who misread a
single work of fiction written 40 years ago knows this...
Posted by: Kathleen Parker at October 05, 2009 02:32 PM (NtiET Watership Down was about rabbits. Posted by: Typical Public School Essay at October 05, 2009 02:34 PM (qWLc4) 155
As governor she did oppose drivers licenses in Alaska for illegals. That is more than McLame or Huckabee did.
LOL, Palin is “far right”; Obama is a moderate who appoints avowed communists as advisors. Axlelrod uses everything as a propaganda ministry, including the schools and that is considered “normal” because “everybody did it before”. The irony is overwhelming. Hell he’s even got doctors in the act now with 150 of them on the WH lawn to support healthscamII. Over at Fox they have a headline to match their coverage today:
“Docs as Props” Obama Holds Doctors' Summit in Effort to Promote Health Care Overhaul President Obama is meeting with physicians from across the country Monday -- at least one from every state -- to discuss the urgency of passing sweeping health care reform legislation.
LOL, the idea was to infer that real doctors support nationlization of healthcare. As it turns out, some of these “doctors” were in on his campagn. Basically they are all Democraps that happen to be doctors (or so they say). Posted by: Vic at October 05, 2009 02:34 PM (CDUiN) 156
The more the MSM misunderestimates Sarah Palin, the better. Keep treatin' her like trash and watch what happens. It won't be shivers up the leg.
Posted by: Keith at October 05, 2009 02:35 PM (b4k2V) 157
A GOING ROGUE SWEATSHIRT WOULD BE SWEET; thinking of getting one made; I wonder if Tea Parties will evolve into Going Rogue parties..lots of potential there...the signs will definitely be out there at the future rallies.
Posted by: ParisParamus at October 05, 2009 02:36 PM (NPtVh) 158
This is what JEA wants to ignore and as stated by Sarah Palin. I have been vocal in my opposition to Section 1233 of H.R.3200, entitled “Advance Care Planning Consultation.”[1] Proponents of the bill have described this section as an entirely voluntary provision that simply increases the information offered to Medicare recipients. That is misleading. The issue is the context in which that information is provided and the coercive effect these consultations will have in that context. Posted by: polynikes at October 05, 2009 02:36 PM (m2CN7) 159
Really? Of course, being so knowledgeable, you can cite chapter and verse where that is in the health care bill? Posted by: JEA at October 05, 2009 02:16 PM (bWB5j)
Death panels hit Barry right between the eyes and sent him, the media and the rest of the left into a complete foaming at the mouth frenzy. Posted by: TheQuietMan at October 05, 2009 02:36 PM (1Jaio) 160
Death panels hit Barry right between the eyes and sent him, the media and the rest of the left into a complete foaming at the mouth frenzy.
Posted by: TheQuietMan at October 05, 2009 02:36 PM (1Jaio) And no one noticed the fucking difference. Posted by: Herr Morgenholz at October 05, 2009 02:38 PM (qWLc4) 161
What exactly is far-right? I mean, with liberalism, you can extrapolate out really easily...just keep growing the government's role, reach, and influence on your life to the n'th degree. What is far-right? Small government that only adheres to the strictist, most literal interpretation of the Constutution possible? Really, who couldn't get behind that? Posted by: reason at October 05, 2009 02:38 PM (5npD/) 162
no way is that Cammilee Paglia. she's not a Palin hater, and disliked
the rhetoric from her party about Palin. she might be ideologically
different but not a freak like most the trolls are.
Not to mention the fact that the real Paglia wouldn't be able to communicate anything in less than 1,000 words at a go. Posted by: Farmer Joe at October 05, 2009 02:39 PM (z4es9) 163
If Romney, or (anyone else) gets the R nomination, and doesn't ask her to be VP, they are a fool. And Palin would be a fool not to accept; she needs a resume boost to be plausible to independents and even Reagan Democrats. The VP slot would be that boost--forget the pride thing of being VP again. Running for P from VP would be perfect from her.
Posted by: ParisParamus at October 05, 2009 02:39 PM (NPtVh) 164
I loathe the term "far right" whether it's applied to Sarah Palin or Rush Limbaugh. Classic Conservatism isn't an extremist position!
Posted by: danishova at October 05, 2009 02:39 PM (twzzy) 165
Of course, nowhere in the bill does it specifically say "Illegals will be treated just like Citizens" But since no proof of citizenship is required to get treatment, it's the same damn thing.
Posted by: maddogg at October 05, 2009 02:39 PM (OlN4e) 166
Small government that only adheres to the
strictist, most literal interpretation of the Constutution possible?
Really, who couldn't get behind that?
Posted by: reason at October 05, 2009 02:38 PM (5npD/) Us. Posted by: FDR's Zombie Justices at October 05, 2009 02:40 PM (qWLc4) 167
Sarah Palin didn't even create the "death panels". Betsy McCaughey gets the credit for that.
Don't make me come after you Delta's again. Posted by: Double Secret Probation at October 05, 2009 02:40 PM (GtYrq) 168
"what makes her "far right"
I have hung around enough froo-froo elite Republicans in NY and Connecticut to conclude that the reason why they think Palin is 'far right' is because she did not abort her children. The female elities, in particular, want to ensure that their pimply-faced pasty-waxed sons and daughters will not be punished with a baby before their sons and daughters attain their Harvard-Yale alumni status. By the way, note that these froo-froo Republicans elites are for illegal slave trade for the same reason, they don't want their pimply-faced, pasty-waxed sons and daughters getting their fingernails dirty from cleaning the house or doing yardwork. Froo-froo Republicans are the same as Moderates-they want low taxes with socially liberal policy. Which of course is silly since it is impossible to be fiscally conservative while socially liberal; liberalism in any form requires government tax dollars no matter how fiscally cpnservative one may appear to be. Posted by: syn at October 05, 2009 02:42 PM (Qs00S) 169
Still, if it's the real Paglia I can't wait until a moron asks for a pic of her tits.
Posted by: Dack Thrombosis at October 05, 2009 02:44 PM (P33XN) Posted by: kcs at October 05, 2009 02:45 PM (/8qpd) 171
If you disagree with taxpayer funded abortion, advocate for smaller government, have cast a ballot for a Republican and enjoy wakeboarding then you're one of us.
Posted by: The Far Right at October 05, 2009 02:45 PM (GtYrq) 172
Sarah Palin took to heart the lessons of two of the finest political/children's stories ever told:
The Emperor's New Clothes, in which the young hero tells the naked truth that none of the "adults" dare to speak; and Yertle the Turtle, in which a plain turtle named Mack knocks an oppressive tyrant off his throne with a burp. Both stories lionize the average person whose ignorance (or ignoring) of social conventions permits him to do or say what needs to be said or done. Kinda like Sarah. She may or may not be "Presidential," but she is certainly an American hero. Posted by: Z as in Jersey at October 05, 2009 02:45 PM (kZT4X) 173
Rachel Maddow is a panelist on "Press the Meet"? Really???!!??? Have they booked Olberman yet? That spinning sound you hear is me.
Posted by: Tim Russert at October 05, 2009 02:47 PM (9x+LX) 174
Posted by: ParisParamus at October 05, 2009 02:39 PM (NPtVh)
I highly doubt she'd accept the VP spot again after the way she was shit on by the McCain campaign, especially if Romney got the nomination. A lot of the McCain staffers who shit on her (Murphy and McKinnon to name two) were Romney people. Posted by: ol_dirty_/b/tard at October 05, 2009 02:48 PM (IoUF1) 175
145
I was the only guy in my fraternity who didn't have a car (I could only hit on chicks who had cars). I hear ya, I hear ya. "Um, so the last bus that goes kinda near the cinema leaves at 4, we can hang out in the Bed, Bath, and Beyond next door to it for a while before the movie starts..." Sigh... Posted by: Adrian at October 05, 2009 02:49 PM (/GOJp) 176
Good work, morons, on the troll posting here. It asked for chapter and verse, and it was provided. Too bad it's mind is shut up tight, like the typical lefty.
I always LOL when they bring up the "parroting" thing, picturing in my mind their standing at the ready at their computers, sitting forward in their chairs in anticipation of the latest e-mailed spew points. Posted by: TheresaD at October 05, 2009 02:51 PM (iGCmo) 177
"Which of course is silly since it is impossible to be fiscally conservative while socially liberal; liberalism in any form requires government tax dollars no matter how fiscally cpnservative one may appear to be."
Time to put on my Libertarian hat. Disagree, socially liberal is often behavioral, which often does not cost anything to the State. For instance, living in sin. How does moving in with your girlfriend result in a tax consequence? Posted by: rawmuse at October 05, 2009 02:51 PM (cuWk2) 178
Look, I'm not in love with Romney but I do think he may be the only one that can win. Wait Women, and I would gladly give up my right to vote if all the other women would too, vote for the best looking candidate. Sorry, but that's just the way it is. We have to have a male candidate that is handsomer (barf) than big ears. I'm willing to go Romney if it gets the radical socialists out of the WH. This isn't all women, but because they are fantastically uninformed as a whole, I think it's true. Most women know way more about Hollywood gossip than they do politics or policy or economics or corruption or anything that matters. Begin bashing Posted by: Dagny at October 05, 2009 02:54 PM (Lh2ww) 179
Syn: Good point. Growing up around a lot of what was popularly referred to as "country club Republicans" their primary concern was the tax code. As long as it was low, anything else (e.g., abortion, immigration, ect.) was o.k. They were anti-communist, mainly because communism was anti-capitalist. These people were generally church goers, but only to help on the building funds, and mainly, I suspect, to make sure that the building funds were diverted to the "right" contractors. I still bump into a few of these folks today and none of them are huge Palin fans. Their primary concern is that she "draws" the wrong crowd, the pro-gun crowd, anti-abortion crowd. They have always felt that this was a needed 3rd wing of the conservative movement, but that they should be satisfied with a candidate who talk their points but does nothing about them. The social conservatives should be happy to get the annual speech about abortion on the anniversary of Roe v. Wade and, well, yea, that is about it. The social conservatives has always been the neglected part of the Republican party. When they start making noise, they get lectured about the "big tent". Social conservatives are not going to have a greater voice in the party until they let it be known that they are no longer going to be taken for granted. Plus, they need to start pointing out that on social issues, the movement is toward their side. Same on illegal immigration.
Posted by: Mallamutt at October 05, 2009 02:54 PM (V9SYy) 180
watching that msnbc video was chilling. Those were...republicans? It was a dance of the buffoons.
Posted by: frankg at October 05, 2009 02:55 PM (s+BW4) 181
Have they booked Olberman yet? No, they won't. Guy is a complete asswipe. Keith Olbermann can get along with one person in the world......namely, Keith Olbermann. Posted by: The staff at ESPN at October 05, 2009 02:58 PM (V9SYy) 182
The political left in this country has always been more enamored of the intelligentsia than the right. This, I think, is rooted in the Utopian ideals of the left; their belief that if only the lumpenproles will listen to (and obey!) their intellectual masters, then the "progressive" vision can be achieved. I think this is why people like Sarah Palin, Glenn Beck, and Rush Limbaugh so infuriate the Left -- to oppose the leftist social agenda is to do more than differ politically; it is to deliberately inhibit the salvation of the people! It is an an iniquitious thing, an evil thing. One cannot oppose the leftist agenda without actively meaning ill, in other words; no honest disagreement is possible.
Conservatives and classical liberals, on the other hand, tend to instinctively ascribe to the physician's mandate of "first, do no harm". We distrust grand social planning because it has never proven to work, and the grander the plan, the more colossal the disaster. I think that most conservatives distrust not the motives of the liberals, but their ability to carry these motives into actual policy. I may agree with my liberal friends that it's a shame that poor people do not have enough to eat; but this does not mean that I feel it is my fault that they are poor and hungry -- nor, indeed, that it is incumbent upon me to abolish poverty beyond the charity I choose to give. (Note: that I choose to give, not that I am compelled to give.) A conservative understands as a liberal does not that there is an objective reality that must be dealt with, and that this reality can only be accomodated, not "fixed" in any fundamental sense. I can help my poor friends; I cannot "solve" poverty. I can help to feed the hungry, but more hungry people will come behind t hem -- I cannot "solve" hunger. But then: I believe in God, and that God, not man, is the ultimate aribiter of all things. Posted by: Monty at October 05, 2009 02:59 PM (4Pleu) 183
Figureheads are not leaders. Figureheads represent their party, leaders represent their followers. Partys select figureheads to rubberstamp the party agenda of that which is good for the party big shots. Obama, the Bushes, Carter, Ford, Nixon, LBJ, Ike, McCain, Kerry, Gore, Dole, Dukakis, Humphry were figureheads to rubberstamp the party agenda. Once in a while a leader comes along and takes control of a party to further THEIR agenda, which may or may not coinside with all or part of the party agenda. Clinton, Reagan, JFK, Mondale, Goldwater were leaders of followers who took control of their party from the party big shots, and pushed THEIR agenda rather than the party agenda. Party big shots hate leaders and love figureheads for reasons of furthering the party agenda of that which is good for the party big shots. This is why the Democrat party big shots selected Obama over Hillary. Obama is a more compliant figurehead and would further the party agenda. Hillary would work to further the Clintons' agenda rather than the party agenda. The Republican big shots can see that Palin is a leader who would push her agenda of reform, not a potential figurehead to rubberstamp the party agenda of that which is good for the party big shots.
Posted by: davidt at October 05, 2009 03:01 PM (7VZtv) 184
1. sweeping change, even violent, is ok
2. fuck entrepreneurs, welfare for wall street 3. invade countries, get oil, the imaginary threats to Israel must be destroyed! 4. you don't have any privacy now that we abrogated your quaint 4th Amendment They will not defeat us, because they do not know us. Posted by: Farmer Joe at October 05, 2009 03:04 PM (z4es9) 185
As to the "welfare for Wall Street" charge, if you actually go to Wall Street and hang with any of those types, I am pretty sure you will discover that they are overwhelmingly Democrat. The actual investors, on the other hand will be Republican. But the heads of the firms, the brokers, the guys on the floor, the guys with nice homes in the Hamptons, largely Dem.
Posted by: rawmuse at October 05, 2009 03:05 PM (cuWk2) 186
No Hobo Galas in his future? Oh, dear, you must understand. I am not sure Mr. Ace would fit in at our Hobo Galas. First, we really don't hunt the hobos our-selfs. That is left to the domestic wait staff. We merely provide them money to acquire the means to hunt down and trap the hobos. I think they use some form of vile liquor called "Val-U-Rite" and cheap, menthol cigarettes. Second, when we cook the hobos, they are simmered in a sauce of truffles and foie gras. With a nice Napa Valley, something bottled in 1997 is best. Third, it is strictly a black tie affair. Well, except for E. Earl Huffingslate, Blog Critic, New York Times, who we permit to dress as an actual hobo himself, complete with a torn Versacce shirt and a pair of denim pants made by Levi Strauss...I think, I am sorry, I am not sure who makes his pants. Fourth, and finally, John Williams and an orchestra of 50 provide the music. I hope this help you understand our position. Ta Ta, darling, have fun at your little "blog". Posted by: Peggy Noonan at October 05, 2009 03:06 PM (V9SYy) Posted by: Mouse at October 05, 2009 03:07 PM (5cUJG) 188
The more I think about it, "Far Right" people are nothing more tham normal people who are intent with having and doing the right moral things in their lives. They want Govt. to protect them, have fire departments, good schools. Basic stuff. The Communist type of government wants everybody to swear allegiance To Them! Constitution be damned. In the USSR, how many were allowed to be party members? 20% at best? All others were peasants. Only those with special skills, and were dolice politically, Were ALLOWED to have a better life. All actions and thoughts were controlled. Does this sound like some people we know? Posted by: mystry at October 05, 2009 03:15 PM (kmgIE) 189
"Death panels hit Barry right between the eyes and sent him, the media and the rest of the left into a complete foaming at the mouth frenzy." Since theQuietMan & rightzilla obviously has not a single clue to what they support, anyone else care to answer my question? Incidentally, they're the one swho seem to be "frothing at the mouth." Posted by: JEA at October 05, 2009 03:15 PM (bWB5j) 190
Funny thing is, you don't know what you believe.
Nope. You're right. I don't. Please carry on in your accustomed manner. Posted by: Farmer Joe at October 05, 2009 03:15 PM (z4es9) 191
As for the "fuck entrepreneurs" charge, I challenge anyone to try to start a business in any Blue state, actually do the paperwork, pay the payroll taxes, observe the regulations (even the easy ones) then tell me how Democrats are helping to make this process easier. Really, try it, with something simple, like a hot dog cart or something. Then get back to me.
Posted by: rawmuse at October 05, 2009 03:16 PM (cuWk2) 192
98 Total sum of the planet that cares what David Brooks has to say: 1, David Brooks. Mrs. Brooks doesn't even care.
Posted by: Mallamutt at October 05, 2009 02:05 PM (V9SYy) He has a beard? The hell you say. Posted by: Wm T Sherman at October 05, 2009 03:20 PM (w41GQ) 193
Pundits are like movie critics. They wish they could be up on the big screen, but they aren't good enough, so they run their mouths trying to look like stars. Posted by: davidt at October 05, 2009 03:20 PM (7VZtv) 194
Really? Of course, being so knowledgeable, you can cite chapter and verse where that is in the health care bill? Where'd ya go? Looking up the ThinkProgress rebuttals, I'm sure. Posted by: 141 Driver at October 05, 2009 03:20 PM (LEynS) 195
Posted by: JEA at October 05, 2009 03:15 PM (bWB5j) I don't answer or debate half wits like you. I only mock you which is all you deserve. By the way your site sucks ass. Did you have a 4 year old design it for you? Posted by: TheQuietMan at October 05, 2009 03:21 PM (1Jaio) 196
Knock...Knock? Who's there" Sarah! Sarah Who? Sarah reason you didn't listen to me? "This is a man who can give an entire speech about the wars America is fighting and never use the word "victory," except when he's talking about his own campaign. But when the cloud of rhetoric has passed, when the roar of the crowd fades away, when the stadium lights go out, and those Styrofoam Greek columns are hauled back to some studio lot...when that happens, what exactly is our opponent's plan? What does he actually seek to accomplish after he's done turning back the waters and healing the planet? The answer -- the answer is to make government bigger, and take more of your money, and give you more orders from Washington, and to reduce the strength of America in a dangerous world. America needs more energy; our opponent is against producing it. Victory in Iraq is finally in sight, and he wants to forfeit. Terrorist states are seeking nuclear weapons without delay; he wants to meet them without preconditions. Al Qaida terrorists still plot to inflict catastrophic harm on America, and he's worried that someone won't read them their rights." Sarah Palin, 2008
Posted by: thethinmanreturns at October 05, 2009 03:21 PM (W3XUk) 197
Wanna know what exactly turned me in to an anti-Communist? Visiting family living in the USSR before the fall. Yes. That did it.
We here in the USA have absolutely no clue exactly how intrusive the Communists can be. They will tell you where you shall live, what shall be your occupation, how much you will make, how many loaves of bread per month you will be allotted. The Commie block bosses come around to make sure you don't have an extra transistor radio in your State assigned cubicle apartment. There is a good movie was make on the topic, it is called "The Lives of Others" Get it, watch it. I simply can't imagine Americans, who are accustomed to every choice life can offer, accepting this way of life. And yet, here we are. Posted by: rawmuse at October 05, 2009 03:23 PM (cuWk2) 198
"I don't answer or debate half wits like you. I only mock you which is all you deserve. By the way your site sucks ass. Did you have a 4 year old design it for you?" You wound me, sir. Seriously. You do. I would respond but swatting at flies is beneath me. Posted by: JEA at October 05, 2009 03:24 PM (bWB5j) 199
201
You "conservatives" have spent thirty years stuffing the pockets of
corporations and finance capitalists, inflating one sham economy after
another, stomping on the bill of rights, and generally taking a
wrecking ball to The American Dream.
How do I know you don't understand your "beliefs"? Because now you realize what a monstrous fascist shithole you created just when there's a black dude sitting in the Oval Office. And now it's "Oh, dear, what happened"? You're fucking stupid. !!Sarah!!2024!! Posted by: Stephen J. Gould at October 05, 2009 03:24 PM (0NFKC) Category 3.5 scream fest. Posted by: YIKES! at October 05, 2009 03:27 PM (tFrIQ) 200
In a two-party system, of course third parties are evil. That's why we need to form a new party and make the GOP *that third party*. Marginalize it. Destroy it. It's as good as dead anyway, it just needs a little help getting over the cliff. This is where Rush is wrong. Judging today's circumstances by past history. This is not 1980 or 1992. Posted by: hannitys_hybrid at October 05, 2009 03:27 PM (SqeY4) 201
To the Marxists, all private enterprise is Evil. Just look at the spit flecking hatred of it exemplified by the above posters. This is why they hate insurance companies and are presently seeking to destroy them. It is useless to try to engage them in rational discourse.
Posted by: rawmuse at October 05, 2009 03:31 PM (cuWk2) Posted by: tsj017 at October 05, 2009 03:32 PM (4YUWF) 203
I would respond but swatting at flies is beneath me. Posted by: JEA at October 05, 2009 03:24 PM (bWB5j) Dude, you came over here to vent about something or another. You could be writing you haikus for USAToday: Hand makes broad brushstrokes Or you could be writing more poetry for Ruminate. Or posting your own thoughts about global warming claptrap. You came here. Go swat yourself. Posted by: 141 Driver at October 05, 2009 03:32 PM (LEynS) 204
JEA, you were answered @158. Please work on your reading comprehension before the next testing period.
Stevie Gould/erg, please keep it up. Your mindless rantings are music to our ears. Chicago 2016, baby! Posted by: Methos at October 05, 2009 03:33 PM (dhFYq) 205
She is not "far right" ideologically -- she is solidly in the mainstream of conservativism. To a progressive, the mainstream of conservatism is extremely far right, and extremely scary. So if you go to church and have a family member in the Army, you must be a fundamentalist and an evangelical who doesn't believe in science, et cetera, et cetera. (As to her being "scary" I've assumed that the Lefties are being honest when they express a belief, an opinion or an emotion. Mind you, I make such assumptions for the purposes of simplicity, not accuracy.) Posted by: FireHorse at October 05, 2009 03:35 PM (Vl5GH) Posted by: Fina Fey at October 05, 2009 03:36 PM (F26eZ) Posted by: Farmer Joe at October 05, 2009 03:36 PM (z4es9) 208
Erg is back? The AIDS cocktail drugs worked then, at least for now.
Posted by: Dack Thrombosis at October 05, 2009 03:38 PM (P33XN) 209
How far right can you get? Barry Goldwater would be a Nazi now. Give me a fucking break. Sara is left of Barry. Fuck these people, they don't get to define the globe. Kemp Posted by: Kempermanx at October 05, 2009 03:39 PM (2+9Yx) 210
Far right brownshirts like Sarah Palin need to calm down their hateful, racist and incendiary rhetoric against our first black president before it incites violence. Posted by: Warden at October 05, 2009 03:40 PM (QoR4a) 211
JEA will never acknowledge a true answer. He will wander about, fingers in ears making a LA LA LA noise and blithering spital down his grubby chin. While they romp about like un-potty trained horde of ferrel cats the rest of the country is trying to clean their cat box. The sly ones are pulling the wool over the eyes of the dumb ones and JEA appears to be a DUMB ONE. Even if he did pull his head out of his ASS the shit is so caked into his eyes that he cannot ever hope to know the truth...HIS party is the party of distruction, taken over by the socialist arm and ANIMAL FARM is no longer a bed time story, it is reality. Posted by: rightzilla at October 05, 2009 03:43 PM (rVJH4) 212
Brooks was here.
Posted by: sloeride at October 05, 2009 03:43 PM (c3nxc) 213
When you're leaning so far left you're horizontal, everything to the right of you looks extreme.
Posted by: Christopher Taylor at October 05, 2009 03:43 PM (PQY7w) 214
Thanks for the acceptance speech vid. I'm not going to waste my time watching the other one.
Posted by: Mark at October 05, 2009 03:47 PM (O3YWR) 215
All I know is an incontrovertible truth: your America is finished. And no Sarah Palin can restore it for you.
And that makes me very happy, Farmer Joe. You are defeated. Heh heh. Keep trying, man. One of these days you'll get the hang of this trolling thing. Posted by: Farmer Joe at October 05, 2009 03:49 PM (z4es9) 216
JEA -- Jeeshhh...I thought that our usual trolls were stupid; YOU WIN!
Posted by: billygoat at October 05, 2009 03:53 PM (DrB2V) 217
Stephen J. Gould at October 05, 2009 03:40 PM (uZAum)
Uhhhh..I think you trolled yourself into a corner, Stephen. Posted by: Dr Carlo Lombardi at October 05, 2009 03:54 PM (jNerV) 218
She's not far right but she certainly has one powerful right hook. Posted by: Lisa Graas at October 05, 2009 03:55 PM (W5HYo) 219
I would respond but swatting at flies is beneath me. Posted by: JEA at October 05, 2009 03:24 PM (bWB5j) After reading the utter nonsense you write on your site I would say that nothing is beneath you. Poor Joey showing off his 3rd grade level writing skills and no one ever visits his site for fear of boring themselves to death. Posted by: TheQuietMan at October 05, 2009 03:55 PM (1Jaio) 220
ergie is wrong and doesn't even know why Posted by: Tweet says stuff in the little gray box at October 05, 2009 03:55 PM (jVldi) 221
You all probably know this one already, but I came across this quote
from Orwell yesterday. He was writing about England’s pro-Soviet
intelligentsia.
Their secret wish, he wrote, was “to destroy the old, egalitarian vision of socialism and usher in a hierarchical society where an intellectual can at last get his hands on the whip.” Posted by: Beverly at October 05, 2009 03:55 PM (jxqib) 222
Still absent from any discussion: the "far left". They're like a hypothetical particle that hasn't been observed but is posited just to balance the well-known "far right".
There's nobody to the left of Obama, and he's a "centrist", as we're repeatedly told. Posted by: Original Roy at October 05, 2009 03:55 PM (ejHeB) 223
What is wrong with you trolls? You still haven't proclaimed your support for child prostitution and raping 13-year-old girls. Get with the program!
Posted by: palin steele (the only child prostitution booster on AoSHQ)...aside from honest cloud at October 05, 2009 03:56 PM (VmtE9) 224
You're We are fucking stupid, trying to get the Olympics with this crew FIFY Posted by: Mallamutt at October 05, 2009 03:57 PM (V9SYy) 225
All I know is an incontrovertible truth: your America is finished. And no Sarah Palin can restore it for you.
And that makes me very happy, Farmer Joe. You are defeated. Posted by: Stephen J. Gould at October 05, 2009 03:40 PM (uZAum)
HA HA HA HA HA ! Incontrovertable truth because YOU SAY it is incontrovertable? Someone gimme a dry set of panties. PLEEEEZE? Posted by: rightzilla at October 05, 2009 03:57 PM (rVJH4) 226
There's nobody to the left of Obama, and he's a "centrist", as we're repeatedly told.
Yeah, but Chavez and Castro joke about being to his right. Posted by: Farmer Joe at October 05, 2009 03:57 PM (z4es9) 227
#209: and as usual it's all projection. Conservatives are "anti-science", and yet libs are the ones frakking up the scientific method for political gain (global warming), banning "scary" genetically modified crops (causing the starving of millions), and attacking medical, pharma, and energy research. I swear half these people think there's a magic witch doctor inside their Blackberry.
Posted by: Ian S. at October 05, 2009 03:58 PM (p05LM) 228
These days, if you only have rainbow sticker on your Prius, you're "far right".
Posted by: lincolntf at October 05, 2009 03:59 PM (R7wy8) 229
...and speaking of boring designs on webpages...uhhh, hello Joe? Have you looked at yours lately?...HAHAHAHHAAHAHAHHAHAHAHHAHAH!
Posted by: billygoat at October 05, 2009 04:00 PM (DrB2V) 230
"one rainbow sticker". duhh
Posted by: lincolntf at October 05, 2009 04:00 PM (R7wy8) 231
How far right is Sarah Palin? Well, she doesn't believe that 9.8% unemployment is a sign of economic recovery!
Posted by: Main Stream Media at October 05, 2009 04:01 PM (V9SYy) 232
237
How far right is Sarah Palin? Well, she doesn't believe that 9.8% unemployment is a sign of economic recovery!
Uhhhhhh -- You're not taking into account all the jobs I've saved. Posted by: Teh Won at October 05, 2009 04:03 PM (DrB2V) 233
Number 232, you forgot the banning of the use of DDT which has caused the deaths of untold millions since the 1960's and Rachel Carlson's book. Simple malaria was once defeated, now back with a vengeance.
Posted by: rawmuse at October 05, 2009 04:04 PM (cuWk2) 234
It's simple. Anyone who thinks that 12-year-old girls shouldn't have access to unlimited, taxpayer funded, late-term abortions without their parents consent is "far right".
Posted by: Bruce at October 05, 2009 04:05 PM (1Ftj8) 235
How far right is Sarah Palin? Well, she doesn't believe that 9.8% unemployment is a sign of economic recovery! How far right is Sarah Palin? She doesn't believe that crap either. Posted by: The New York Times at October 05, 2009 04:07 PM (V9SYy) 236
It's simple. Anyone who thinks that 12-year-old girls shouldn't have access to unlimited, taxpayer funded, late-term abortions without their parents consent is "far right". Well, there is something to be said about that. Posted by: Roman Polanski at October 05, 2009 04:08 PM (V9SYy) 237
I love that speech. I actually listen to it when I jog. This was probably mentioned in the comments above but I have little time to digest them all so my apologies.
I agree with all of the points Ace brings up but I would like to add a #3. The biggest applause line in her speech (apart from the "hauling greek columns back to some studio lot") was when she called out the Washington political elite. She told them she "wasn't going to washington to seek their good opinion. She was going to Washington to serve the people of this great country." David Brooks et al hate her for that most of all. She not only called out Obama and all his faults but the faults of the media establishment. One thing I've learned this election cycle is the Washington elite hold on to grudges longer than a high school cheerleader who didn't win the prom queen crown. Posted by: Trish at October 05, 2009 04:09 PM (0U5Kd) 238
How far right is Sarah Palin? Well, she doesn't think that a 14 trillion dollar deficiet leads straight to economic boom times!
Posted by: C*ntessa Brewer at October 05, 2009 04:10 PM (V9SYy) 239
One thing I've learned this election cycle is the Washington elite hold on to grudges longer than a high school cheerleader who didn't win the prom queen crown. Hey, that was a low blow! And I should have won - I was much prettier! Posted by: Katie Couric at October 05, 2009 04:11 PM (V9SYy) 240
Hi! What have a missed? I just came in from my organic garden and am about to light my bong and thought I would pop in and see what the poop is. I have been distracted by my kids who refuse to stand in the corner for time out after hurling disrespectful explatives at me. Heck I was just down at the co-op and am certainly happy to share my paychek with my president who can use it to pay for the wiithdrawl of troops from, well.....EVERYWHERE! I don't drive a prius OR a subaru. I ride a bike and am so excited to soon be getting my new rickshaw direct from the PEOPLE in red China! I am a happy chap here because finally, after years of HOPE I can give all responsibility for my life to the government and no longer have to even TRY to think. Not that thinking is my strung suit anyway!
Posted by: Bed Wetting Liberal at October 05, 2009 04:13 PM (rVJH4) 241
HERE is how the liberals define “far right”. Note that they include Fascism and Nazism as far right as always. They called the Unabomber far right. LOL, he was an anarchist. Posted by: Vic at October 05, 2009 04:21 PM (CDUiN) 242
I got used to the media playing rub-a-dub-dub in the Democrat golden shower long ago. So, I was surprised when it turned my stomach when they actually started to gargle it for Oblahblah.
Posted by: jc at October 05, 2009 04:27 PM (i8c5b) 243
Dagny @ 178
You may be right. However, the most personally offended I remember being during the primaries was when my brother-in-law couldn't believe I was a Fredhead. His rationale: That Fred looked like a mackerel and he assumed I'd pick good-looking, polished Romney. And he's an "enlightened liberal" (as he calls himself). Yes, sexism like that rules the day on the left. Posted by: Mandy P. at October 05, 2009 04:28 PM (MK6Kx) 244
Sarah's on the "far right"? If you walk away from me while I stand still, who's the one doing the moving? The far left is the segment of society that will glom onto any subject that makes no sense like man-caused climate change and animal/plant rights.
Posted by: BackwardsBoy at October 05, 2009 04:35 PM (ZGhSv) 245
Heh. Looks like ace got fed up with ergie and wished him into the cornfield.
Posted by: OregonMuse at October 05, 2009 04:46 PM (TnUnj) 246
222 Still absent from any discussion: the "far left". They're like a hypothetical particle that hasn't been observed but is posited just to balance the well-known "far right".
There's nobody to the left of Obama, and he's a "centrist", as we're repeatedly told. Posted by: Original Roy at October 05, 2009 03:55 PM (ejHeB) There is no far-left. There are just "progressives" that have different opinions, just as there are no "conservatives", there is just far-right wing-nuts. That is what my intellectual betters tell me, anyway. Posted by: Jim in San Diego at October 05, 2009 05:09 PM (H7Rlw) 247
People actually watch that shit?
Posted by: sTevo at October 05, 2009 05:23 PM (eA3tl) 248
My wife's 89 year old grandmother was talking to her doctor about her 90 year old husband's dementia. She asked the doctor for his opinion on Obamacare. The doctor said he was convinced that people like her and her husband would die from it because they wouldn't be able to justify spending money on keeping people their age alive.
Posted by: digitalbrownshirt at October 05, 2009 06:11 PM (/O0iM) Posted by: I sea kittens at October 05, 2009 06:23 PM (bAL0J) 250
In fairness, Giuliani said it too. He made fun of Obama's credentials
as a "community organizer" and also his penchant for voting "present"
claiming that executives have to actually make decisions.
In fact, Giuliani was spot on. This is why Giuliani should be Palin's VP, with explicit federalism and an "agreement to disagree" on the social issues where they differ. That ticket would absolutely annihilate the Dems. Posted by: Dave J. at October 05, 2009 06:24 PM (DCQ0q) 251
"HIS party is the party of distruction [sic]"
Try spell check: D-E-S-T-R-U-C-T-I-O-N.
Never said I was a Democrat. I think both parties suck. I think the far right and far left should be lined up and all fucking SHOT, so reasonable people can actually run this country properly instead of running it into the ground. Posted by: JEA at October 05, 2009 06:57 PM (sFL8j) 252
Dagny, lets assume that as election season arrives, the economy is still in the toilet, but we aren't in a state of disaster due to, G-d, forbid, a nuke having gone off in some American city (which would, sadly, militate against changing Presidents; yes, even Obama):
With Romney and Palin, you would have/get a very attractive conservative (or, for the doubters, non-liberal) Yin and Yang; a sum greater than the parts; a contrast that doesn't get muddled. Romney gets you: --undisputed competence to de-Obama-ize the economy, including GM (GM will loom large by then when it continues to be a basket case); --Low charisma, because, look what charismatic Obama got us!. --Enough foreign policy literacy to be credible in that sphere (and can pronounce "Dinner Jacket's real name with aplomb!). Palin gets you: the energy and excitement missing from Romney. You also get someone who can speak out on the drill-drill-drill front; and a kind of revenge-against-Obama dynamic. Of course, all bets are off if Petraeus runs.... ;-) Posted by: ParisParamus at October 05, 2009 07:13 PM (NPtVh) 253
Dave J., I like Rudy, but his dismall performance in 08 relegates him to Homeland Security or Justice Secretary.
Posted by: ParisParamus at October 05, 2009 07:15 PM (NPtVh) 254
What's far right about Sarah Palin? She's right up my alley. Haven't seen anyone yet with the guts the girl's got. She's got my vote.
Posted by: johnnymac at October 05, 2009 07:21 PM (XfHjs) 255
Silly Rabbit, "Far Right" = any restriction on abortion; only freaks are for that!
Posted by: ParisParamus at October 05, 2009 07:46 PM (NPtVh) 256
#163--This troll was over at HA today peddling the same line, that Palin should be Mittens Romneydare's VP, like she needs to carry water one more time for another clueless RINO. Countryclub GOP or lefty? or does it matter?
Posted by: louis tully at October 05, 2009 09:23 PM (Vc/xe) 257
louis tully, I am not a troll. I live in the real world. My guess is that you neither supported McCain or Romney; who did you support; did you even vote in November?
Posted by: ParisParamus at October 05, 2009 09:32 PM (NPtVh) 258
"HIS party is the party of distruction [sic]" Never said I was a Democrat. I think both parties suck. I think the far right and far left should be lined up and all fucking SHOT, so reasonable people can actually run this country properly instead of running it into the ground. JEA lost the argument with rightzilla, so he corrects her spelling. Pussy! Answer her question regarding death panels, mental midget: ...if it is an untruth....WHY DID BARACK AGREE TO ABANDON THEM!?!?!?!?!?!? Posted by: kathysaysso at October 05, 2009 09:38 PM (dz6wg) 259
I voted for Sarah, and you're right, I wouldn't vote for Romneycare or McVain if I was on Mitt's payroll, as virtually all of his supporters are. NOw run back to the National Topsider where you came from, fraud.
Posted by: louis tully at October 05, 2009 09:40 PM (Vc/xe) 260
"I think the
far right and far left should be lined up and all fucking SHOT, so
reasonable people can ..."
And that is the best example of irony I've seen all day. Posted by: Loren Heal at October 05, 2009 09:48 PM (NNLn+) 261
Louis Tully, you are the troll. I am an attorney of modest means living in NYC (so I know what won't fly).
Yeah, McCain lost by 8% of votes, but he lost the electoral college 162 to to 365, or by more than 50%, SO GET REAL. GROW UP AND GET REAL. It's people of your ilk who condemn us to Obama for 8 years (or more) with your tunnelvision as to who is electable. Sorry, Reagan is gone. The 1980's are gone. You can love Palin all you like; she isn't winning blue or purple states in 2012 as a Presidential nominee, even if she gets the nomination. Get real. Posted by: ParisParamus at October 05, 2009 09:49 PM (NPtVh) 262
Time to put on my Libertarian hat.
When your knocked -up girlfriend applies for Section 8 housing and WIC checks. Then when her maladjusted brat spends the rest of his life sponging off the taxpayer. Posted by: flenser at October 05, 2009 10:27 PM (BMOxG) 263
I always thought Iowahawk (PBUH) got it pretty much exactly right with his posts from "T
Coddington van Voorhees". The "Establishment Conservatives" are mainly
the old-line, Ivy League, East Coast Republicans. Charles Krauthammer
is probably the least offensive of this breed; George Will another.
(Will's baseball writing is almost always more trenchant than his
political commentary, and thus has it ever been.) This fasciation with
the "brain trust" of conservatism arises from this blue-blooded,
class-conscious milieu. They find the flannel-shirted redneck
conservatives...embarassing. Useful, to be sure; but embarassing. No
one you'd want to invite for brandy and watercress sandwiches at the
club.
While we're looking for another Ronald Reagan, they're looking for another William F. Buckley. Posted by: obama is a traitor at October 05, 2009 10:53 PM (Qt4Y7) 264
Fearless Predictions: Palin will win the nomination easily. Her VP will be one of the following: Fred (!), Duncan Hunter, Jim DeMint, Newt. The GOP establishment will make a deal with Soros to push a moderate 3rd candidate into the race to kneecap Palin. It won't work, as Palin wins a 3-way race due to overwhelming turnout from bitter clingers. Post-election analysis will show that the 3rd candidate actually hurt Obama more than Palin. Posted by: Moron with a Magic 8-Ball at October 06, 2009 12:00 AM (FD3EH) 265
#264: I hope you are right, but I give it a 2% chance. Watching the MSM and "liberal women" freak out during such a scenario will be a joy, but the hangover will be more Obama.
Posted by: ParisParamus at October 06, 2009 01:11 AM (5zOKN) 266
Death Panels
The media, the political elite and all the nay-sayers hated the term "death panels" because in two simple but descriptive words, Sarah Palin, summed up the end result of the proposed ObamaCare. The unwashed masses understood and rose up to take action. Save Grandma! Save Grandpa! Reminds me of an old political line .... Ma, Ma, where's my Pa? Updated: Ma, Ma, what have they done with Grandma? Sarah Palin is the single biggest threat to liberalism, the media and the elites since Ronald Wilson Reagan. She gets it. But more importantly, she can communicate it! Posted by: Jon at October 06, 2009 01:56 AM (FcIOy) 267
177
"Which of course is silly since it is impossible to be fiscally
conservative while socially liberal; liberalism in any form requires
government tax dollars no matter how fiscally cpnservative one may
appear to be."
Time to put on my Libertarian hat. Disagree, socially liberal is often behavioral, which often does not cost anything to the State. For instance, living in sin. How does moving in with your girlfriend result in a tax consequence? How does my lighting up a joint in the privacy of my own home result in higher taxes? Posted by: sean at October 06, 2009 03:49 AM (sHxOn) 268
Do you refer to the standard "managed care" of private insurance as "death panels"? In managed care, staff at a private insurance company determines which procedures they will allow individual insured persons to have. Does that make them "death panels"? Or are lies ok if we're talking about politics?
Posted by: Sally Ann Cavanaugh at October 06, 2009 07:11 AM (FRErk) 269
What makes Palin "far right" in liberals minds is her stance on abortion, which they assume comes from her being a "devout" Christian.
Liberals cannot and do not understand why anyone would object to abortion in the case of rape or incest. Unless you're a "right wing Christian who hates women" type of conservative. You see, the basic problem with liberals is that they are entirely incapable of a coherent thought. They just can't think through any argument to any logical conclusion on their own. They have to read it somewhere else, and once it's explained to them they can't see any issue any other way than the way it's been explained already. And, once they understand it, anyone who disagrees is Evil with a capital E. I had a discussion with a co-worker the day Palin became the VP pick. This co-worker hated Palin. I asked her why since she couldn't possibly know enough about her yet to hold such a strong opinion. She told me she was pro-choice and couldn't respect anyone who was "as pro-life" as Palin. She said any woman who would not make an exception for rape or incest was hateful and "didn't care about people". Now, I'm pro-abortion. Pro-choice is a stupid term. You're either for keeping abortion legal or against keeping abortion legal. I'm pro-abortion because I believe it's a privacy issue and the private medical decisions of others are nobody else's business. Period. Butt out. Mind your own damned business. And I also believe, without a shred of a doubt, that if it were men who got pregnant there would be McBortions on every street corner. Anyone who doesn't think that is true is living in their own Bizarro World. I told my co-worker that one of my favorite tactics when arguing with pro-lifers was to get them to admit they would make an exception for rape or incest. Once I did that, I had them. They lost the argument. Once you bring choice into it, you've lost whatever "pro-life" credibility you had. Whether it's the choice to end a pregnancy or get pregnant in the first place, you're pro-choice. Liberals don't understand people who stand up for a principle. So they have to demonize them to make themselves feel superior. Posted by: Jaynie59 at October 06, 2009 08:45 AM (YjQWV) 270
Sally Ann Cavanaugh, you are mistaken.
Yes, private insurers to do not provide unlimited coverage for medical procedures. But is there any doubt that appealing a government decision about paying for a procedure will be many times, if not infinitely more difficult that channging a private carrier? Is there any doubt that a law suit or other threats mean nothing to the government? Or bad publicity? That is why death panel describes a government decision concerning treatment much more so than the decision of a private insurance carrier. Posted by: ParisParamus at October 06, 2009 11:30 AM (5zOKN) 271
In 1981, Ed Hardy and his wife
formed Hardy Marks Publications. In 2004, Christian Bale licensed the rights to
produce the high-end Ed Hardy UK
line, which is based on Hardy's imagery. Prior to the Ed Hardy Clothing line, Bale was the
Head Designer at Von Dutch Originals, which marketed the imagery of Kenny
Howard. Don Ed Hardy, commented, As
demand for my artwork continues to skyrocket, I felt it was Ed Hardy Schuhe time to take on a partner
that could help me manage the demand and opportunities for the Ed Hardy Shop name. Iconix is at the
forefront of brand management and clearly has the capabilities to dramatically
grow the Ed Hardy UK business. I'm
thrilled to have them as a partner. Ed Hardy
Shirt are located in everywhere. We also believe that by owning the brand
alongside Ed Hardy Clothing, the
founder, there will be opportunities to further leverage his iconic name along
with his new artwork. Largest selection of Ed Hardy T Shirts and Ed Hardy here. Ed Hardy online GHD GHD hair straightener GHD hair straightener
Posted by: Ed Hardy at October 08, 2009 05:13 AM (QtJVJ) 272
Some people like LV handbags,Some people like Chanel handbags,but most popel have been keeping an eye on cheap fashion brand handbags .we often talk about all kinds of designer handbags with my friends,most of my friends also like cheap fashion brand handbags.We admire cheap fashion brand handbags designer who often be able to design so many stylish handbags.We want to be a handbag’s designer in the future too. In our store online,you can buy all series of cheap fashion brand handbags,include: Louis Vuitton,LV Luggage,LV Wallets,LV Agendas,LV Belts,LV Shoes,LV Accessories,Gucci,Gucci Wallets,Gucci Shoes,Marc Jacobs handbags,Marni handbags,Miu Miu handbags,Mulberry handbags,Prada handbags,Thomaswylde handbags,TOD handbags,Bottega Veneta handbags,D&G handbags,Dior handbags,YSL handbags,Coach handbags
Posted by: steve at October 12, 2009 08:55 AM (qfN/z) 273
UGG Boots Sale
ugg shoes ugg classic cheap ugg UGG UK bape shoes bape shoes sale cheap bape shoes UGG UK UGG boots sale UGG Classic discount UGG UGG Bailey Button UGG Amelie Suede UGG Bailey Button UGG Classic Cardy cheap UGG Cardy UGG Classic Crochet UGG Classic Mini UGG Classic Short UGG Classic Tall UGG Coquette Casual UGG Gypsy Sandal UGG Halendi Sandal UGG Hammond Slipper UGG Infant's Erin Baby UGG KnightsBridge UGG Layback Slipper UGG Lo Pro Button UGG Matala Sandal UGG Napoule Sandal UGG New Arrival 5389 UGG New Short Boots Posted by: retailike at October 17, 2009 12:11 PM (zFgZJ) 274
High Replica Handbags | Replica Louis Vuitton Handbags | replica fashion Handbags| fendi handbags| designer handbags replica| replica Chanel Handbags| designer replica handbag| replica purses| Replica Louis Vuitton Luggage| Hermes Birkin Handbags| Replica Gucci handbags Louis Vuitton,LV Luggage,LV Wallets,LV Agendas,LV Belts,LV Shoes,LV Accessories,Gucci,Gucci Wallets,Gucci Shoes,Marc Jacobs handbags,Marni handbags,Miu Miu handbags,Mulberry handbags,Prada handbags,Thomaswylde handbags,TOD handbags,Bottega Veneta handbags,D&G handbags,Dior handbags,YSL handbags,Coach handbagsLouis Vuitton LV Luggage LV Wallet Chanel Gucci Alexander Wang Fendi Balenciaga Chloe Marc Jacobs Miu Miu Mulberry Jimmy Choo Hermes Loewe Coach Cartier Valentino Bottega Veneta Burberry Dior Prada Marni YSL Versace Dolce&Gabbana Goyard Givenchy Thomas Wylde Luggage Shoes Collection Belts Collection Bracelets Louis Vuitton :: Gucci Handbags :: Chanel Handbags :: Hermes Birkin :: Posted by: replica handbags at October 23, 2009 11:17 AM (o4b/d) 275
Discount Boots
Womens UGG UGG Shoes UGG Australia UGG UK UGG USA discount ugg boots cheap ugg boots Posted by: fdsfds at October 27, 2009 12:24 PM (8kvkz) 276
discountugg boots sale
ugg shoes tall ugg boots ugg classic boots nike shox air jordan shoes nike air max nike air force one bailey button ugg rainier ugg boots ugg classic cardy ugg crochet boots ugg mini ugg classic short classic tall ugg ugg coquette ugg baby boots ugg knightsbridge ugg lo pro new ugg boots ugg short boots ugg nightfall boots ugg skimmer ugg sundance boots ultra short ugg ugg ultra tall discount ugg slippers ugg sandals ugg halendi ugg slippers ugg layback ugg matala sandal ugg napoule sandal ugg persephone tasmina ugg air force 1 shoes jordan air shoes nike shox shoes air max nike free shipping! Posted by: ugg boots at October 27, 2009 04:11 PM (pgfU2) 277
Your post very good,thanks for sharing!Are you also like these:ugg boots uk,buy ugg boots,australia ugg,cheap ugg boots,ugg boots,ugg boots sheepskin,womens ugg boots,ugg australia boots,cheap ugg boots
Posted by: australia ugg at October 27, 2009 06:12 PM (c6EK2) 278
Supra Shoes Mens Supra Cruizer Shoes ---Special Men's Supra Cruizer Red Shoes Mens Supra Cruizer Cool Shoes
Posted by: ugg shoes at October 28, 2009 09:56 AM (/xbwx) Posted by: ugg shoes at October 28, 2009 10:00 AM (/xbwx) Posted by: ugg shoes at October 28, 2009 10:03 AM (/xbwx) 281
replica handbags,replica handbags,replica chanel,replica handbags,louis vuitton,replica gucci,replica handbags,louis vuitton bags,replica handbags,lv handbags,replica handbags,replica louis vuitton,replica handbags,replica lv,replica handbags,louis vuitton,replica handbags,gucci handbags,replica handbags,louis vuitton,gucci bags,replica handbags,replica handbag,replica handbags,replica bags,replica handbags,louis vuitton,replica handbags,replica handbags,replica chanel,replica handbags,replica gucci,replica handbags,louis vuitton,replica louis vuitton,replica handbags,replica lv,replica handbags,louis vuitton,replica handbags,louis vuitton,louis vuitton handbags,replica handbags,louis vuitton handbags,replica handbags,louis vuitton bags,replica handbags,lv handbags,replica handbags,louis vuitton,gucci handbags,replica handbags,gucci bags,replica handbags,replica handbag,replica handbags,louis vuitton,replica bags,replica handbags.
Posted by: replica handbags at October 30, 2009 03:56 AM (t57XZ) 282
buy Discount Boots
Womens UGG UGG Shoes UGG Australia UGG UK UGG USA discount ugg boots cheap ugg boots air force 1 shoes nike air force air force 1 mens air force 1 boots air force onefrom usa Posted by: airforceoneshop at November 03, 2009 04:19 PM (LHCCE) 283
Come to our website for shopping with high quality and best service! There have new products,MBT M. Walk
and MBT Lami,Welcome everybody to buy it. Posted by: mbt shoes at November 08, 2009 10:26 AM (QhfLM) 284
cheap ugg
buy ugg ugg usa ugg boots ugg uk ugg australia ugg shoes ugg sale womens ugg boots discount ugg boots cheap ugg boots ugg shoes sale ugg boots sale ugg sundance ugg 5819 ugg 5815 ugg knightsbridge ugg 5825 ugg rainier Posted by: ugg at November 11, 2009 02:39 AM (ly6Oi) 285
Buy discount ugg shoes
cheap ugg shoes cheap ugg ugg rainier buy ugg ugg usa discount ugg boots ugg 5825 ugg shoes sale ugg sundance ugg shoes cheap ugg boots ugg 5815 ugg sale ugg uk ugg knightsbridge womens ugg boots ugg boots ugg australia ugg 5819free shipping Posted by: ugg boots at November 12, 2009 03:57 AM (IeIJx) 286
nike dunk sb
Do anything needed to support an idea, a good idea usually brings good results, doing business is like that.http://www.dunksky.com/.This site has always been on Posted by: nike dunk sb at November 14, 2009 02:57 AM (APB+g) 287
buy [url=http://www.reviewups.com/]discount ugg shoes[/url]
[url=http://www.reviewups.com/]cheap ugg shoes[/url] [url=http://www.reviewups.com/]cheap ugg[/url] [url=http://www.reviewups.com/ugg-coquette-casual-shoes-c-22]ugg rainier[/url] [url=http://www.reviewups.com/]buy ugg[/url] [url=http://www.reviewups.com/]ugg usa[/url] [url=http://www.reviewups.com/]discount ugg boots[/url] [url=http://www.reviewups.com/ugg-classic-short-c-1]ugg 5825[/url] [url=http://www.reviewups.com/]ugg shoes sale[/url] [url=http://www.reviewups.com/ugg-sundance-c-5]ugg sundance[/url] [url=http://www.reviewups.com/]ugg shoes[/url] [url=http://www.reviewups.com/]cheap ugg boots[/url] [url=http://www.reviewups.com/ugg-classic-tall-c-3]ugg 5815[/url] [url=http://www.reviewups.com/]ugg sale[/url] [url=http://www.reviewups.com/]ugg uk[/url] [url=http://www.reviewups.com/ugg-knightsbridge-c-27]ugg knightsbridge[/url] [url=http://www.reviewups.com/]womens ugg boots[/url] [url=http://www.reviewups.com/]ugg boots[/url] [url=http://www.reviewups.com/]ugg australia[/url] [url=http://www.reviewups.com/ugg-classic-cardy-c-2]ugg 5819[/url]from usa Posted by: cheap at November 14, 2009 06:19 AM (s7MB5) 288
UGG BOOTS
Posted by: UGG BOOTS at November 18, 2009 11:29 AM (WPYlQ) Posted by: mbtshoesbuy at November 23, 2009 05:22 AM (bNNim) 290
The proper function of man is to live, but not to exist.ugg classic cardyConquer fear of death and you are put into possession of your life. ugg classic tallThere is a time to speak and a time to be silent. ugg knightsbridgefree shippingmbt cheap
mbt sale mbt uk mbt shoes cheap MBT M.Walk Posted by: reviewups at November 27, 2009 04:13 AM (xUZwC) 291
hot news for brand shoes online store ,do you want to win more discount ?and popular for younger,and nike air maxwith top quality A ,come on all air max shoes with lowest price for highest quality !
Posted by: nike air max at December 01, 2009 09:43 PM (OKj2x) 292
The cheap ugg boots sale for women are stylish, they are comfortable and what¡¯s more, they keep your feet. theres a pair of fellow sufferers,ugg australia uk to complement your personal preferences, why do we not take the traditional high discount ugg boots on salefor cold winter?
As a matter of fact, with the passing time, the love for ugg usa is increasing among girls in this modern world. The growing demand for these womens ugg made the manufacturers UGG Boots Sale to revamp the looks of these boots with different hues.come our website and buy a pair of ugg uk.UGG Classic Cardy are popular as shoes for cowboys. The SHOES close the whole parts of the foot. The ugg cardy are important to protect your feet from any dangerous things during your walking activities. There are many oatmeal ugg available in the Market and if you are interested to get one you can directly go to the store that sells it. Posted by: reviewups at December 03, 2009 08:53 AM (OKj2x) 293
Last weekend, I ordered chocolate Ugg Classic Cardy hoping they wouldn't show marks as much as my beige ugg cardy boots and waterproofed them when I first got them. They look so much cleaner than my old beige ugg boots, I wear my Whooga's all year round, they don't make my feet sweat as much as my older pair. I'm very impressed with how they are holding up to my abuse, very well made. My only suggestion to everyone is keep them dry and out of the mud.Ugg Classic Cardy! Posted by: ugg classic cardy at December 04, 2009 12:26 PM (npwAH) 294
discount ugg boots
ugg boots outlet cheap ugg outlet cheap ugg boots ugg classic tall ugg bailey button ugg rainier ugg classic cardy ugg classic crochet ugg classic mini ugg classic short ugg classic tall ugg nightfall ugg sundance ugg ultra short ugg ultra tall ugg boots 5389 Posted by: uggboots at December 07, 2009 10:33 AM (Cooh2) 295
Today ugg boots online have become a phenomenon.Every winter,the ugg classic crochet are one of the hottest goods in the market all over the world.So now don't be hesitation,own a pair of ugg usa immediately.
Posted by: ugg boots sale at December 10, 2009 03:30 PM (I3/dZ) 296
We supply authentic discount Lacoste Shoes
Lacoste Trainers New Lacoste Lacoste Sale Mens Lacoste camden lacoste trainers lacoste trainers shoes lacoste camden retro camden lacoste trainers lacoste carnaby shoes lacoste carnaby retro lacoste shoes sale New Lacoste shoes Lacoste shoes online cheap Lacoste shoes Lacoste shoe mens lacoste shoes Lacoste Shua Lace Black Lace shoes white Lace shoes lacoste swerve shoes White Lacoste shoes Lacoste shoes sale Cheap Lacoste shoes Lacoste Women Shoes Women Lacoste Shoes Lacoste Shoes online on line, cheap price,Top quality,Free shipping! Posted by: Lacoste shoes at December 12, 2009 10:36 PM (/3s/N) 297
Wholesale Bracelets Tiffany Jewelry | Stamping Pendant Fashion | Zircon Rings Yiwu | Money Clip | Business Cards Cheap | Tungsten Bracelet Wholesale | Key_Chain Wholesale | Line Earring Wholesale | Cutting Bracelets Wholesale | Plating Bangles Luxury | Wholesale Earrings Tiffany Jewelry | Mont Blanc Jewelry Fashion | Wholesal Titanium Bracelet | Small Necklace Wholesale | Wood Cufflink Yiwu | Line Earring Wholesale | Cutting Bracelets Wholesale | Wholesale Tiffanys Jewelry | Stainless Steel pendant Luxury | Cuff Links Tiffany Cheap
Posted by: wholesale jewelry at December 17, 2009 07:01 AM (1dySH) 298
UGG cardy
Ugg Australia Ugg Shoes Sale Bailey Button ugg boots Ugg classic cardy UGG cardy Ugg Australia Ugg Shoes Sale Bailey Button ugg boots Posted by: ugg shoes|timberland uk|ugg boots|87415555.com.cn at January 06, 2010 06:24 PM (qzq48) 299
Un total de once comunidades autnomas estn este jueves en alerta naranja Christmas gift ugg tall boots (riesgo importante) por nevadas y bajan las temperaturas en toda Espa09a, segn la Agencia Estatal de Meteorologa (AEMET). En concreto, se Christmas gift ugg napoule sandal trata de Aragn, Cantabria, Castilla-La Mancha, Catalu09a, Christmas gift timberland classic boots Madrid, Navarra, Comunidad Valenciana, Galicia, Pas Vasco, Asturias y Murcia. La cota de nieve bajar a menos de 200 metros en el CantbricoLa Pennsula Ibrica est bajo dos borrascas y un anticicln que crearn un pasillo que permitir el paso de una corriente de aire muy fro, como la que est provocando un temporal de fro glaciar en Europa, aunque es esperan que el fro que suframos no sea tan intenso como en otros pases. An as, se espera que las bajas temperaturas se mantengan hasta el domingo. La cota de nieve baja en el Cantbrico a menos de 200 metros
Posted by: El temporal de fr¨ªo y nieve pone en alerta a once comunidades aut¨®nomas ugg boots|ugg uk|timberlan at January 09, 2010 03:29 AM (tWrEP) 300
The style rolex and tag heuer watches for sale.patek philippe, breitling watches, omega watches, cartier watches, chanel watches, audemars piguet, armani watches, iwc watches, montblanc watches, bvlgari watches, lv watches, movado watches, franck muller, parmigiani watches, hublot watches, panerai watches, longines watches, tissot watches, tudor watches, vacheron constantin, miscellaneous watches, a lange sohne, alain silberstein on sale.
Posted by: tag heuer at January 17, 2010 10:24 AM (9p60s) 301
Hair Straightener
chi hair straightener chi flat irons chi iron best hair straightener ceramic hair straightener flat iron pink chi hair chi hair irons ghd Pink GHI Hair GHD GHD MK4 GHD MK5 Pink GHD Pink GHI Hair CHI Flat Irons Hair Straightener chi hair irons chi hair straightener best hair straightener chi hair iron pink chi hair chi hair irons Pink GHI Hair Pink GHD GHD Nike Kobe Shoes Nike Lebron Shoes discount nike shox shoes Posted by: chi hair irons at January 17, 2010 04:40 PM (9oETl) 302
people also love [b][ur]=http://www.yo2underwear.com]sexy corsets on sale[/ur][/b],[b][ur]=http://www.yo2underwear.com]buy corsets&bustier[/ur][/b] are popular now
Posted by: sexy corsets on sale at January 23, 2010 04:36 AM (ByH6E) 303
Good replica watches and buy replica watches and replica rolex replica replica tag heuer watches,buy replica replica omega watches and breitling watches replica breitling watches sale at lowest prices.
Posted by: replica watches at January 24, 2010 03:21 AM (ioa0w) 304
nike air max 360 shoes
womens air max nike air max womens air max nike air max 360 shoes air max kids air max 90 kids air max classic BW kids air max 360 kids air max 97 nike air max 180 nike air max 2009 nike air max 2010 nike air max 360 shoes nike air max 87 nike air max 88 nike air max 89 nike air max 90 nike air max 91 nike air max 93 nike air max 95 nike air max classic BW nike air max ltd nike air max TN womens air max 2007 womens air max 2009 womens air max 87 womens air max 90 womens air max 91 womens air max 95 womens air max 97 womens air max classic BW Posted by: air max shoes at January 28, 2010 05:06 AM (JOSIc) 305
Buy rolex replica watches and replica watches replica replica watches and replica rolex watches patek philippe watches and fake watches and breitling watches,replica tag heuer: tag heuer,replica cartier watches: cartier watches,replica omega watches: omega watches at lowest prices.
Posted by: replica rolex at January 29, 2010 03:43 PM (h+uyA) 306
nike max
air max shoes nike air max nike max shoes air max 1 nike air max 1 air max 2 nike air max 2 air max 89 nike air max 89 air max 90 nike air max 90 air max 91 nike air max 91 air max 95 nike air max 95 air max 97 nike air max 97 air max 180 nike air max 180 air max 360 nike air max 360 air max 2003 nike air max 2003 air max 2009 nike air max 2009 air max ltd nike air max ltd air max tn nike air max tn air max tailwind nike air max tailwind womens air max 1 womens air max 90 womens air max 95 womens air max BW womens air max LTD womens air max TN womens air max 360 womens air max 2003 womens air max 2007 womens air max 2009 Posted by: airmax at January 31, 2010 03:18 PM (3vSvS) 307
Certainly watches are Replica Watches used to help people record rolex Watches time, but rolex watches nowadays its functions have enlarged. Replica watches are now tag heuer Watches not only objects that tag heuer watches can tell you what time it is, they are also a status symbol. You should not feel strange when you find someone wearing a watch on his wrist, but use the cell phone to tell time. In that situation, the watch is just showing its luxurious function cartier watches. It is normal and cartier watches perhaps also happens to you. .If asked that among the watches of various brands, which one can suit your taste? There is no doubt that most people will choose Rolex. Whichever social class you are in, it is naturally Rolex was known breitling Watches and cherished breitling watches for a long time. However, the elements do not usually enter the market alone, always come with the price tag up to the hand. For this reason, many people, especially men, their dreams of luxury Rolex watches are buried in omega Watches his heart omega watches. What should I do? Rolex watches are simply stunning worn by the rich and famous, right? No, this world is not the world's richest men, is the world of each. All are equal before the search of luxury and be men's watches respected. Within men's watches, the law, when consumers are in the market, women's watches they should women's watches receive the same treatment. This is the real reason why replica Rolex watches are ladies watches ladies watches more welcome than Rolex. Because in this world are not difficult to understand that the rich are much less than people with low income, you agree with me? You are forced to nod and say with certainty that is the reality. These low-income people do not have enough money to save every month. They can not afford such luxury Rolex watches
Posted by: replica watches at February 04, 2010 03:53 AM (YOuVm) 308
Special Cheap Discount Wedding Collection list:
Cheap Wedding Dresses Cheap Wedding Gowns Beach Wedding Dresses Color Wedding Dresses Plus Size Wedding Dresses Wedding Dresses Styles Special Occasion Dresses Cocktail Dresses Party Dresses Prom Dresses Mother of the Bride Dresses Flower Girl Dresses Bridesmaid Dresses Cheap Bridal Gowns Wedding Dresses,Buy Custom Wedding Dresses Online,Cheap Wedding Bridesmaid Dresses Online,Cheap Mother of the Bride Wedding Dresses,Cheap Flower Girl Dresses for Less,Hawaiian Summer Beach Wedding Dresses,Cheap Plus Size Wedding Dress,Black or Red Wedding Dresses,Vintage Modest Wedding Dresses,Women Special Occasion Dresses Plus,Cheap Custom Made Prom Dresses Online,Inexpensive Cheap Cocktail Dresses Online,Cheap Women Evening Party Dresses Posted by: fashion news at February 05, 2010 03:36 AM (ARptk) 309
Cheap replica watches and replica watches 100% copy replica watches of the previous omega watches model: the famous Manchester Logo is located at 3 and the cartier watches chronograph 45-minute breitling watches at 9 with orange figures. Football fans can use the very special 45-minute chronograph to measure the halves of a football match. Black patek philippe hour hand and minute hand features yellow luminescent coating. The hour makers, chronograph audemars piguet and the first 15-minute scale of the tag heuer chronograph counter is montblanc watches presented in eye-catching rolex red. Bright Yellow movado watches tones are found on the minute track, date bvlgari watches rolex on sale.
Posted by: replica watches at February 05, 2010 06:15 AM (0uEN8) 310
nike max
air max shoes nike air max nike max shoes air max 1 nike air max 1 air max 2 nike air max 2 air max 89 nike air max 89 air max 90 nike air max 90 air max 91 nike air max 91 air max 95 nike air max 95 air max 97 nike air max 97 air max 180 nike air max 180 air max 360 nike air max 360 air max 2003 nike air max 2003 air max 2009 nike air max 2009 Posted by: may at February 06, 2010 06:38 PM (Eu9Vs) 311
this replica watches replica watchWhoever wants replica watches timekeeper that does the job of a tachometer will be crazy for. The operation is performed by the copied replica rolex 's bezel. The Daytona also applies automatic movement ¨C just one of many breitling watches characters and functionalities that ensures the precision of time. Originally created to measure lap time and the cartier watches overall time of a race, Rolex Daytona replica omega watches timepieces can measure elapsed time for omega any sporting event. The power of this breitling replica item is made possibly by its internalized perpetual rotor mechanism. Known for its precision, this special Rolex replica cartier watch model only has to be set once to the cartier watches standard time of the owner's choice. Once rolex watches being created, it updates itself during time changes, making upkeep of the replica's time setting replica watches nonexistent. Even though these replica watches were made for sporting events, (specifically those involving laps or circuits), it's not so adversible to put them tag heuer in water since they are not fake watches waterproof. Even thought most of the time, the replica watches do not bear the tag heuer same functionalities as the original ones, they are still the most desirable alternatives of the expensive real models.
Posted by: replica watches at February 07, 2010 12:04 AM (KbTNE) 312
Factors Replica Watches About The Rolex replica watches Oyster The Oyster is so closely get in touch with Rolex, and it is inevitably that some people think these are the only Replica watches Rolex manufacture. Others suppose that there is a single Oyster watch. But as a matter of fact, the name Oyster does not actually meant for a rolex Watches particular watch you can buy rolex watches or even to a series but to a type of case that available in some of the Rolex ranges. History The Oyster case was first released in 1926. The objective was to protect the workings of the watch from dust and moisture. Early watches were far from waterproof. The Oyster tag heuer Watchescase was an tag heuer watches innovative design to eliminate these problems. It had a new double locking crown that screwed into place. It has been compared to the hatch on a submarine. Like a submarine, the Oyster case was waterproof. In 1927 Mercedes Gleitze swam the English breitling Watches Channel breitling watches . Before she set off she was presented with a Rolex Oyster. When she arrived, the watch was still working perfectly. The resulting publicity gave the new case a massive boost. Why is it called Oyster? Legend has it that Hans cartier Watches Wilsdorf cartier watches, who invented the Oyster, chose the name because the new case reminded him of the difficulty he had experienced prising open oysters at dinner. Since then the Oyster has further, particularly advanced. Many Oyster watches today are omega Watches perpetual-self-winding, in other omega watches words, it does not require to expose the mechanism to the outside world in order to wind it. The Osyter Perpetual is one of the toughest, most durable, most reliable watches (under truly adverse conditions). It is probably the best mechanical watch money can buy.
Posted by: replica watches at February 07, 2010 11:30 AM (TUJDt) 313
Watches really Replica Watches are a great fashion replica item. This is because watch manufacturers such as Emporio Armani understand their customers wants and needs and rolex Watches know that rolex watches there is a big market for tag heuer Watches fashion tag heuer watches and designer movado watches in the UK. The number of people that demand these fashion watches has grown enormously over the past few years as people all want to have their own unique personality. Buying a watch can be a breitling watches long breitling Watches process. This is because there are so many watches to choose from that people cartier watches can spend a whole lot of time making their decision. One brand that is always popular is Emporio Armani. This is because Emporio Armani are one of the best fashion brands in the UK and they therefore offer customers some of the best fashion omega Watches available watches on omega the market. There are millions mens Watches of watches for a customer to choose when it comes to a watch. It's quite easy to make the right watch purchase decision. Or you just need to know what famous watch brands are and you may find what you like at once. Emporio Armani watches have been very popular for many mens Watches years.Women's watches Emporio Armani is a brand for style sense and mens Watches fashion which it shows in his range of fashion watches. No matter what watch brand you choose, it can be sure that the watch you are going to wear would show some of your personality.
Posted by: replica watches at February 09, 2010 11:41 AM (fa8ya) Processing 0.21, elapsed 0.2057 seconds. |
MuNuvians
MeeNuvians
Polls! Polls! Polls!
Dale's ECB Election Projection Federal Review Real Clear Politics Rasmussen Reports Gallup Zogby FoxNews Polls Sabato/Crystal Ball Frequently Asked Questions
The (Almost) Complete Paul Anka Integrity Kick
Primary Document: The Audio
Paul Anka Haiku Contest Announcement Integrity SAT's: Entrance Exam for Paul Anka's Band AllahPundit's Paul Anka 45's Collection AnkaPundit: Paul Anka Takes Over the Site for a Weekend (Continues through to Monday's postings) George Bush Slices Don Rumsfeld Like an F*ckin' Hammer Top Top Tens
Democratic Forays into Erotica New Shows On Gore's DNC/MTV Network Nicknames for Potatoes, By People Who Really Hate Potatoes Star Wars Euphemisms for Self-Abuse Signs You're at an Iraqi "Wedding Party" Signs Your Clown Has Gone Bad Signs That You, Geroge Michael, Should Probably Just Give It Up Signs of Hip-Hop Influence on John Kerry NYT Headlines Spinning Bush's Jobs Boom Things People Are More Likely to Say Than "Did You Hear What Al Franken Said Yesterday?" Signs that Paul Krugman Has Lost His Frickin' Mind All-Time Best NBA Players, According to Senator Robert Byrd Other Bad Things About the Jews, According to the Koran Signs That David Letterman Just Doesn't Care Anymore Examples of Bob Kerrey's Insufferable Racial Jackassery Signs Andy Rooney Is Going Senile Other Judgments Dick Clarke Made About Condi Rice Based on Her Appearance Collective Names for Groups of People John Kerry's Other Vietnam Super-Pets Cool Things About the XM8 Assault Rifle Media-Approved Facts About the Democrat Spy Changes to Make Christianity More "Inclusive" Secret John Kerry Senatorial Accomplishments John Edwards Campaign Excuses John Kerry Pick-Up Lines Changes Liberal Senator George Michell Will Make at Disney Torments in Dog-Hell Greatest Hitjobs
The Ace of Spades HQ Sex-for-Money Skankathon A D&D Guide to the Democratic Candidates Margaret Cho: Just Not Funny More Margaret Cho Abuse Margaret Cho: Still Not Funny Iraqi Prisoner Claims He Was Raped... By Woman Wonkette Announces "Morning Zoo" Format John Kerry's "Plan" Causes Surrender of Moqtada al-Sadr's Militia World Muslim Leaders Apologize for Nick Berg's Beheading Michael Moore Goes on Lunchtime Manhattan Death-Spree Milestone: Oliver Willis Posts 400th "Fake News Article" Referencing Britney Spears Liberal Economists Rue a "New Decade of Greed" Artificial Insouciance: Maureen Dowd's Word Processor Revolts Against Her Numbing Imbecility Intelligence Officials Eye Blogs for Tips They Done Found Us Out, Cletus: Intrepid Internet Detective Figures Out Our Master Plan Shock: Josh Marshall Almost Mentions Sarin Discovery in Iraq Leather-Clad Biker Freaks Terrorize Australian Town When Clinton Was President, Torture Was Cool What Wonkette Means When She Explains What Tina Brown Means Wonkette's Stand-Up Act Wankette HQ Gay-Rumors Du Jour Here's What's Bugging Me: Goose and Slider My Own Micah Wright Style Confession of Dishonesty Outraged "Conservatives" React to the FMA An On-Line Impression of Dennis Miller Having Sex with a Kodiak Bear The Story the Rightwing Media Refuses to Report! Our Lunch with David "Glengarry Glen Ross" Mamet The House of Love: Paul Krugman A Michael Moore Mystery (TM) The Dowd-O-Matic! Liberal Consistency and Other Myths Kepler's Laws of Liberal Media Bias John Kerry-- The Splunge! Candidate "Divisive" Politics & "Attacks on Patriotism" (very long) The Donkey ("The Raven" parody) News/Chat
|