Support




Contact
Powered by
Movable Type

Salon: A Little Reminder: Roman Polanski Drugged, Raped, and Sodomized a 13-Year-Old Girl, In Case That's Still a Crime

Good piece:

Roman Polanski raped a child. Let's just start right there, because that's the detail that tends to get neglected when we start discussing whether it was fair for the bail-jumping director to be arrested at age 76, after 32 years in "exile" (which in this case means owning multiple homes in Europe, continuing to work as a director, marrying and fathering two children, even winning an Oscar, but never -- poor baby -- being able to return to the U.S.). Let's keep in mind that Roman Polanski gave a 13-year-old girl a Quaalude and champagne, then raped her, before we start discussing whether the victim looked older than her 13 years, or that she now says she'd rather not see him prosecuted because she can't stand the media attention. Before we discuss how awesome his movies are or what the now-deceased judge did wrong at his trial, let's take a moment to recall that according to the victim's grand jury testimony, Roman Polanski instructed her to get into a jacuzzi naked, refused to take her home when she begged to go, began kissing her even though she said no and asked him to stop; performed cunnilingus on her as she said no and asked him to stop; put his penis in her vagina as she said no and asked him to stop; asked if he could penetrate her anally, to which she replied, "No," then went ahead and did it anyway, until he had an orgasm.


Can we do that? Can we take a moment to think about all that, and about the fact that Polanski pled guilty to unlawful sex with a minor, before we start talking about what a victim he is? Because that would be great, and not nearly enough people seem to be doing it.

Also worth reading at Salon is this older review of the "documentary" Roman Polanski: Wanted and Desired, a documentary only in the Michael Moore sense of it, a cheerfully mendacious bit of agitprop.

Because on one side you have bastards who think we should have a more continental view of the forcible (or "merely" statutory) rape and sodomization of a 13-year-old child, and on the other side, people aren't telling you what was hinky about the judge's actions, I'll tell you about the judge.

The judge, because he was worried about how Hollywood would react to a star director going to jail on one side and public reaction to him setting Polanski free on the other, actually attempted to script the sentencing phase of the prosecution of Polanski. He fed the prosecution lines, told them they should ask for X number of years in jail. He fed the defense lines, told them they should say "No jail time" and etc. And then, per his script, he would come up with a Solomon-like decision that would, he hoped, if the prosecution and defense said their lines properly, make it look like he had come to the only reasonable decision and so he shouldn't be criticized by anyone.

The prosecutor, I think, ultimately bailed on this stage-managing of a sentencing and dropped dime on the judge, although initially he was willing to play along. Hey, it's a judge-- you do what he wants. Most of the time.

The defense was willing to play along because what the judge wanted was, ultimately, to give Polanski a slap on the wrist, which is of course what they wanted.

The prosecutor didn't seem to mind the slap on the wrist either -- it's LA, after all, and celebrities (especially at that time) just didn't go to jail.

Polanski fled when he got the impression that maybe the judge was having second thoughts about the slap-on-the-wrist thing. See, the judge had let Polanski to off to Europe to direct a movie even during the sentencing phase (this is LA, remember: Art before justice), and a photograph was published showing Polanski having a gay old time at an Octoberfest when he was 1) supposed to be working and 2) supposedly about to face a judge for the forcible rape and sodomization of a 13-year-old girl. That made the judge look bad -- it was his goal to come out of this seeming like he hadn't given Polanski any special favors, etc. -- and he did probably start to think about giving Polanski more time than the script called for.

At any rate, while that was egregiously unethical behavior by the judge -- scripting a sentencing hearing with both counsels reciting the lines he'd given them, playing out an already-agreed-upon sentence like a stage play to trick the public into thinking thy were witnessing a live court case -- he was taken off the case when the prosecutor dropped dime on these antics, and, in any event, the judge never got to rule on the sentence at all as Polanski fled.

Further, the judge seemed to be working for Polanski's interests the whole time -- he wanted a slap on the wrist, something like 90 days not even in a jail per se but some kind of halfway-house sort of deal. He just wanted to arrange it so it didn't look like he was going easy on Polanski.

(Oh: And it's bizarre he fed them these lines, as it's pretty much what they'd ask for without the script. The judge's behavior was just plain weird, but it seems to have had no effect at all on anything.)

One can make a reasonable case that Polanski had reason to flee given this weirdness with the judge, but, again, the judge was then removed from the case and he had every opportunity to negotiate his return to the American criminal justice system.

At the end of the day: He forcibly (or at least statutorily) raped and sodomized a 13-year-old girl and we're supposed to get all weepy about his plight because in the interim he's delivered such major cultural contributions as Frantic and Pirates!

Oh, Here's My Proposal: Because the judge tried to stage-manage the trial and so it wasn't really "justice" at that point but a scripted faux reality show, we give Polanski a pass on any additional charges he might get for being a fugitive from justice.

So, we toss that stuff. Done. The judge acted badly, so we don't prosecute for actions that one can reasonably say were connected to the judge's bad behavior.

Now, we simply proceed to sentencing him for drugging, raping, and sodomizing a 13-year-old child, as should have been done 32 years ago, rather than letting him vamp off to Europe to direct a movie.


Posted by: Ace at 01:58 PM



Comments

1 It's not my fault you're unemployed and apparently have been so for several years, dickhead.

Take it up with your president.

Posted by: ace at September 29, 2009 02:01 PM (d6tLI)

2 Hollywood morality, you see.

Posted by: nickless at September 29, 2009 02:02 PM (MMC8r)

3 That first comment had already been trollbusted, right?  He didn't really think that "good piece" meant anything other than "nice essay," right?

Posted by: Troll Watch at September 29, 2009 02:03 PM (yK/Nm)

4 Well, when I get caught raping and sodomizing a 13 yr old girl, I'll go on the view and Whoopie will help get me off, again.

Posted by: Jack at September 29, 2009 02:04 PM (bvDV5)

5

Well, when I get caught raping and sodomizing a 13 yr old girl, I'll go on the view and Whoopie will help get me off, again.

I see what you did there.

Posted by: Dr. Crabington at September 29, 2009 02:05 PM (pEaV5)

6 What crime?

Posted by: Charlie Gibson at September 29, 2009 02:05 PM (FcR7P)

7 Details, details.  What about The Narrative?!?!?!

Posted by: Hollywood Scum (All of Whom Vote Donk, BTW) at September 29, 2009 02:05 PM (prBaA)

8 Uh, I don't think that's the real hc.

Unless, of course, his hash has changed.

...or the comment has already been trollbusted.

Posted by: OregonMuse at September 29, 2009 02:06 PM (TnUnj)

9 No the first comment was genuine as far as I know.

I trollbusted it now to get at Honest Cloud's real source of bitterness, his chronic unemployment.

Posted by: ace at September 29, 2009 02:06 PM (d6tLI)

10 Copy cat.

Posted by: John Philips at September 29, 2009 02:06 PM (IhQuA)

11 But, but, but Debra Winger told me Polanski was a nice guy!

Posted by: Wyatt Earp at September 29, 2009 02:06 PM (eSkB4)

12 Didn’t they sort of "rape" the prisoners at abu Ghraib prison … and they took pictures, just like Roman Polanski did with the 13 year old. Now we have the proof that abu Ghraib prison really wasn’t that bad .. they were just trying to do their “Roman Polanski” thing.

Posted by: Neo at September 29, 2009 02:06 PM (tE8FB)

13 and the other excuse used;," also seems to believe that a child with an unpleasant stage mother could not possibly have been raped: "The 13-year old model 'seduced' by Polanski had been thrust onto him by her mother, who wanted her in the movies." Oh, well, then! If her mom put her into that situation, that makes it much better! Shore continues: "The girl was just a few weeks short of her 14th birthday, which was the age of consent in California. (It's probably 13 by now!) Polanski was demonized by the press, convicted, and managed to flee, fearing a heavy sentence."

Wow, OK, let's break that down. First, as blogger Jeff Fecke says, "Fun fact: the age of consent in 1977 in California was 16

stunningly disgusting, I mean really does this mean a mother can sell her daughter for sex and it would be OK for the mother and the rapist, as long as the daughter is 13+ some to 18? wth is the matter with them.

and thank you Kate Harding for pointing out the disgusting lack of values , with these apologists!

Posted by: willow at September 29, 2009 02:06 PM (GkYyh)

14

But isn't it true that sodomizing a thirteen year old is only a reprehensible and criminal act....in a case involving a Catholic priest?

 

 

Posted by: steve at September 29, 2009 02:07 PM (nd0uY)

15 Genuine, huh?  Lord Obama have mercy!

Posted by: Troll Watch at September 29, 2009 02:07 PM (yK/Nm)

16 This is what really gets you about liberal's defense of Polanski.
Even now, after 30 years, I would bet money the guy gets 6 months to a year in club fed if he returns. With good behavior he's out in time for spring time in Paris, plus he gets his American Visa renewed and can get one more big cash in from Hollywood before he croaks while screwing his 15 year old mistress.

Posted by: Rocks at September 29, 2009 02:08 PM (Q1lie)

17 A 13 yr old girl for a 44 yr old guy? Yeah, we can do that...

Posted by: ACORN San Diego at September 29, 2009 02:08 PM (FcR7P)

18 This is going to touch a nerve with clod. The real clod. He was defending the hell out of Roman in the last Polanski thread. Of course clod is our resident Gary Glitter so he's just looking out for his own.

Posted by: TheQuietMan at September 29, 2009 02:09 PM (1Jaio)

19 Wow, Salon actually called it rape rape. I'm glad our media still has some integrity.

Posted by: Tattoo DePlane at September 29, 2009 02:09 PM (rrxDo)

20 How about we just send his sack back to California to rot in prison and the rest of him can stay in Europe.

Posted by: Roy at September 29, 2009 02:09 PM (cB77O)

21 I take it this girl didn't have a father in her life or if she did he wasn't much of a man.

Posted by: polynikes at September 29, 2009 02:11 PM (m2CN7)

22 The 13 yr old girl... from El Salvadore I guess?

Posted by: Johan at September 29, 2009 02:11 PM (vhLeK)

23 I see no problem with what he did.

Posted by: ACORN Worker at September 29, 2009 02:11 PM (Bm9nz)

24 Only you can save child rapists from justice.  Take the pledge.  Together.

Posted by: Will Ferrell at September 29, 2009 02:12 PM (GtYrq)

25 Seriously.  I wrote a similar piece last night when they were interviewing a jackass who supported him.

This combined with instant fanboys of Michael Jackson makes me want to start choking people out.

Q: I love his music/films so who cares what he did to children?
A: I choke you now.


Posted by: johnny_p at September 29, 2009 02:12 PM (ldoxy)

26 And to think, some thought the Left's (and virtually every Dem in Congress) defense of ACORN (underage prostitutes) was just a knee jerk reaction.  Well yea, there's that too.  But the Left really has no problem with this - that's why they support abortion w/o parental consent or notification for 12 yr olds.  Whoopi - this isn't rape rape.  WTF!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Posted by: MDr at September 29, 2009 02:12 PM (ucq49)

27

How old is Opies oldest daughter?  12 I believe.

Here is a test for liberals.

If, NEXT YEAR, a 45 year old man were to get Malia Obama drunk give her pills and had sex with her, then, anally sodomized her, then ran from justice to Europe and an opulent life style, including Hollywierd honors.

 

What should his punishment be?.

Posted by: gus at September 29, 2009 02:12 PM (Vqruj)

28
I wish Hollywood would explain the diference between 'rape' and 'RAPE-rape', the whole thing is very confusing.

Posted by: Dang Straights - Imaginary Racist at September 29, 2009 02:12 PM (Haq+B)

29 Even now, after 30 years, I would bet money the guy gets 6 months to a year in club fed if he returns. With good behavior he's out in time for spring time in Paris, plus he gets his American Visa renewed and can get one more big cash in from Hollywood before he croaks while screwing his 15 year old mistress.

I bet he gets the book thrown at him because he was a fugitive for 30 years and he becomes Hollywood's favorite cause clbre until he dies from assrape in 2013.

Posted by: tachyonshuggy at September 29, 2009 02:13 PM (TXp3z)

30 "sodomization"?

Is that a real word?

Posted by: runninrebel at September 29, 2009 02:14 PM (i3PJU)

31

Let's remember another thing, while we're at it: Rape isn't a crime against a person -- well, it is, yeah, obviously -- but legally, it's a crime against the state. It's not like the now-grown-up-13-year-old girl has a lawsuit that she can drop if she wants. Her wishes don't matter, because legally, she's not the entity who was wronged. It was the state.

And if the state still says this rotten bastard should spend some time in a harsh prison enviroment, then good for the state.

Posted by: FireHorse at September 29, 2009 02:14 PM (Vl5GH)

32

 He was defending the hell out of Roman in the last Polanski thread.

So this is what our country is coming to. We have people actually defending the rape of a 13 year old girl by a 40+ year old man. My God, that's just sick. Well, the only consolation will be when the judge gives him 10 years for the rape and another 10 for felony flight. 

Posted by: Bill R. at September 29, 2009 02:15 PM (EhlQq)

33 THE LORD GOD ALMIGHTY .IS COMING .WITH .VENGENGES

There are pills for that.

Posted by: John Philips at September 29, 2009 02:16 PM (IhQuA)

34 Hell's bells. If waiting a sufficient amount of time is all it takes to be exonerated, or let off the hook, for a crime...let's just let everyone who has been imprisoned for 30 years OUT. Same thing.

These disgusting Hollywood libs rally to this pervert's side for what reason again? Because he's one of them? And that's supposed to negate the crime. Gawd, how they make me sick.

Posted by: Twinks at September 29, 2009 02:16 PM (wjosM)

35

Look.  I'm not big on this idea that the longer the sentence necessarily equate to the quality of justice.

I would think a week with the biggest, meanest maximum security inmate with a proclivity for violent sodomy would be appropriate justice in this case.

Hey.  But that's me.  I'm a forgive and forget type of guy. 

Posted by: Hussein the Plumber at September 29, 2009 02:16 PM (RkRxq)

36 I don't understand why non SoCons would care. What does this have to do with taxes?

Posted by: Johnathan E. at September 29, 2009 02:16 PM (dQdrY)

37
I think we all need to realize this is not a problem with the far left.

Watch the ACORN tapes again if you need a refresher course.


The far left is misguided,  sure.  And it's also evil.

Posted by: Dang at September 29, 2009 02:16 PM (6L3mJ)

38 honest cloud at September 29, 2009 02:15 PM (EjZyj)

The implication being, that as a left winger, you don't care about a guy drugging and sodomizing children?

Posted by: lorien1973 at September 29, 2009 02:16 PM (IhQuA)

39 ACE,
you seem to be under mistaken impression that left cares about morals or right or wrong. Have you not seen how ACORN's advice on establishing child sex slave brothels have been reinterpreted as "insignificant, distracting and smearing". Or the blog entry that you posted the other day where it was posted that Afghan's situation was elevated just for rhetoric and political "machoism". Not one commenter seemed to be bothered by it. The scum with the views like that believes nothing, value nothing but itself. Is it really surprising that they are not defending a pedophile? Will you equally be surprised when tomorrow these subhumans will advocate sharia with its prepubescent pedophile marriage and bacha bazi pederast culture? Stretch of imagination? Well Bambi already appointed a (gay?) pedophile as safe schools czar.

Please don't misunderstand me. We need analysis like yours to expose them, but what's more is we need to start thinking, which is past due, what do we do this degenerate philosophy.

Posted by: Mongol at September 29, 2009 02:17 PM (gtZwa)

40 Same people who were defending Letterman regarding his comments about Palin's 14 year old daughter.

Posted by: huerfano at September 29, 2009 02:17 PM (xfmkp)

41

and since when does NO, mean it's really Yes when they Like the rapist?

hell where is N.O.W? have they said anything at all NOW and Violence Against Women

well no i don't see anything on it

Posted by: willow at September 29, 2009 02:18 PM (GkYyh)

42

The Fearless Vampire Killers (starring Sharon Tate) was a really strange movie. Worth watching.

Posted by: Tinian at September 29, 2009 02:18 PM (7+pP9)

43 I bet he gets the book thrown at him because he was a fugitive for 30 years and he becomes Hollywood's favorite cause clbre until he dies from assrape in 2013.

Posted by: tachyonshuggy at September 29, 2009 02:13 PM (TXp3z)


6 months to a year is getting the book thrown at you in California. Don't forget he's a first time offender according to the law. Plus he's a fine upstanding member of the community, of Hollywood anyway.


Posted by: Rocks at September 29, 2009 02:18 PM (Q1lie)

44 >>I don't understand why non SoCons would care. What does this have to do with taxes?

Hey, tell you what: You tell me you don't want me in the coalition and I'll leave and start voting Democratic and boosting them with the blog, okay?

You have a fucking 25% slice of the electorate and all you can think of is purging the people who vote with you because they don't think exactly like you do.

Idiot.

Posted by: ace at September 29, 2009 02:19 PM (d6tLI)

45 Polanski should be jailed and put in the general population of the worse prison in America for the rest of his days, end of story!!

Posted by: 'Nam Grunt at September 29, 2009 02:20 PM (1siCY)

46 Family Guy got this story pretty close.

*neighbor boy tied up in Griffin basement with Stewie interrogating him about his missing tricycle*

Lois walks in.

Lois: What are you doing?

Stewie: Playing house.

*Lois stares*

Stewie: Roman Polanski's house.

Posted by: WTFCI at September 29, 2009 02:21 PM (GtYrq)

47 Where's the proof douchenozzle? Don't you have some brown skinned person to harass and deny healthcare?

Unfortunately no, we have an imbecile like you, and I hope you suffer the rest of your life with nothing!

Posted by: 'Nam Grunt at September 29, 2009 02:22 PM (1siCY)

48 I think the only acceptable sentence is execution.

Posted by: Dack Thrombosis at September 29, 2009 02:22 PM (P33XN)

49 I don't understand why non SoCons would care. What does this have to do with taxes?

So "non SoCons" don't care about justice?

Posted by: lorien1973 at September 29, 2009 02:22 PM (IhQuA)

50 honest cloud at September 29, 2009 02:18 PM (EjZyj)

Are you normally off the deep end or is today special?

Posted by: lorien1973 at September 29, 2009 02:23 PM (IhQuA)

51 The only good movie Polanski made was Chinatown.  If you will recall John Huston's character had an incestuous relationship with his daughter, Faye Dunaway's character.  Roman was just living his art.

Posted by: huerfano at September 29, 2009 02:23 PM (xfmkp)

52 "Now, we simply proceed to sentencing him for drugging, raping, and sodomizing a 13-year-old child, as should have been done 32 years ago, rather than  and now letting him vamp off to Europe to direct a movie", a gritty realistic prison film, about an old fugitive from justice on a child-rape charge and his prison experiences.

Doubtless it will be a dramatic masterpiece of suspense and realistic terror, something that makes Rosemary's Baby look like a Disney flick.

Fool. Should've done your time decades ago, when you were stronger.  Of course, you were prettier then, so maybe I'm wrong.

Posted by: Arbalest at September 29, 2009 02:23 PM (7CMP3)

53
Ace,  is it just me or is the whole honest cloud thing getting old?

Really old.

Posted by: Dang at September 29, 2009 02:24 PM (6L3mJ)

54 58,

Hahahaha, how about me breaking your hip?

Posted by: 'Nam Grunt at September 29, 2009 02:24 PM (1siCY)

55

non socons don't care about children that get damaged , or hurt>? what we don't have children?

is this a trick ?

Posted by: willow at September 29, 2009 02:25 PM (GkYyh)

56

6 Well, when I get caught raping and sodomizing a 13 yr old girl, I'll go on the view and Whoopie will help get me off, again.

I realize this has already been commented on, but I do want to say that if your taste is 13 year old girls, Whoopi wouldn't even come close to getting you off.  On the other hand, Whoopi didn't elaborate on what her definition of "rape rape" is, but plying with drugs and/or alcohol usually meets most peoples' definition.  Also not taking "no" for an answer.  Isn't that what Gloria Steinem said about Bill the alleycat and Kathleen Willey, "She said no and he stopped, no harm, no foul"

And one more time, he would be going to jail as a 76 year old man.  Well, I'd like to have seen him do it much sooner, but it's not my fault he didn't.

Posted by: Mangas Colorados at September 29, 2009 02:25 PM (lOWnQ)

57

In many parts of the world girl's dad and/or uncles would have flown to europe conducted a P.E. class and free surgery for Roman.

Posted by: Huckleberry at September 29, 2009 02:25 PM (s2bW4)

58 Hey, tell you what: You tell me you don't want me in the coalition and I'll leave and start voting Democratic and boosting them with the blog, okay?
What a weird response. My point has always been to throw no one out as long as they are aiming the same direction. Defensive much?

Posted by: Johnathan E. at September 29, 2009 02:26 PM (dQdrY)

59 Hahahaha, how about me breaking your hip?

Posted by: 'Nam Grunt at September 29, 2009 02:24 PM (1siCY)

Take me, Grunt!

Posted by: honest cloud at September 29, 2009 02:27 PM (EjZyj)

60 A 13 year-old girl? Eww, yucky!

Posted by: Michael Jackson at September 29, 2009 02:28 PM (FcR7P)

61 here is an incomplete list of messages being sent.
1. The crime is not so severe that time can't make it go away.
2. Famous people get to break the laws as long as their art is "important."
3. Running is a good way to avoid jail.
4. Raping a 13 year old is not that big a deal.
5. "Artistic" people have an excuse because they are "different."

Gawsh- imagine if he had done this to a dog.  They would be calling for his head.

Posted by: johnny_p at September 29, 2009 02:28 PM (ldoxy)

62

wouldn't any caring person of any age care about someone getting hurt? no-matter your political party? 

, it must be a trick,  ok that question is making me crazy.

Posted by: willow at September 29, 2009 02:28 PM (GkYyh)

63 "I would think a week with the biggest, meanest maximum security inmate with a proclivity for violent sodomy would be appropriate justice in this case."

I tend to agree. But his visa must not be reinstated.

Posted by: mare at September 29, 2009 02:28 PM (X1fsj)

64 >>>> 1. it was consensual sex. no force was used.

Hey dipshit, go read the trial transcripts before you embarrass yourself even more.

Posted by: runninrebel at September 29, 2009 02:28 PM (i3PJU)

65 Whoopi Goldberg says that drugging and sodomizing a 13 year old girl isn't really "rape rape."

So, if you're looking for a chaperone for a middle school dance, I think you might not want to call Whoopi Goldberg.

Posted by: V the K at September 29, 2009 02:28 PM (PLvLS)

66 No, I'm not defensive, I'm just sick of hectoring douchebags like you, who never shut the fuck up about their strong belief that I am not quite right with Jesus, or at least not sufficiently so.

Posted by: ace at September 29, 2009 02:28 PM (d6tLI)

67

it is a crime in the US, so Polanski should serve some time. But I don't think this is like some maniac raping a young girl.

um?

Posted by: Dr. Crabington at September 29, 2009 02:28 PM (pEaV5)

68 1. it was consensual sex. no force was used.

She was drugged. And knocked out. The victim called it rape.

2. 13 is actually legal in some societies.

Not in this one. Stoning people for having sex is legal in some societies too, does that make it okay here?

The lengths some of you people go thru to defend evil just amazes me.

Posted by: lorien1973 at September 29, 2009 02:28 PM (IhQuA)

69 Another rule:

If you're white and wealthy, it's not rape.

Posted by: ace at September 29, 2009 02:29 PM (d6tLI)

70 it is a crime in the US, so Polanski should serve some time. But I don't think this is like some maniac raping a young girl.


Posted by: palin steele (the only non-partisan on AoSHQ) at September 29, 2009 02:25 PM (VDj74)

you are a horrible person.

Posted by: willow at September 29, 2009 02:29 PM (GkYyh)

71 Gawsh- imagine if he had done this to a dog come out against teh ghey marriage   They would be calling for his head.

FIFY

Posted by: V the K at September 29, 2009 02:29 PM (PLvLS)

72

IS palin steele retarded?

She said no repeatedly. She did not want the sex and expressed it.

 

He deliberately gave her drugs and booze so she couldn't fight back.

He forced both vaginal and anal sex on her.

 

Rapist. Case closed.

Posted by: lurker at September 29, 2009 02:29 PM (AqLUZ)

73 At the end of the day: He forcibly (or at least statutorily) raped and sodomized a 13-year-old girl

If it was established that he drugged her, isn't it automatically "force?"  Or is there some other term for it - confinement, perhaps?  Anyway, it seems to me it's more than statutory. 

It's ironic that the same libs that are so concerned about the torture of terrorists are not at all concerned about what Polanski did, which amounts to torture by any definition I take seriously. 

Posted by: Y-not, bored silly at September 29, 2009 02:30 PM (sey23)

74 sock-puppet off!

Posted by: Y-not at September 29, 2009 02:30 PM (sey23)

75

 1. it was consensual sex. no force was used.

She said no.  Repeatedly.  Just because you can't fathom someone saying "No" to having an old man's cock stuck in their ass, doesn't mean she consented. 

2. 13 is actually legal in some societies.

It's illegal in CA, where and when it happened.

Must you simply argue with everything posted here, dum dum?


Posted by: wiserbud at September 29, 2009 02:30 PM (wWwJR)

76 It wasn't rape, he was just filling her with Art.

Posted by: ace at September 29, 2009 02:31 PM (d6tLI)

77 66,

Y'know dumdum it's kind of scary how you traitorous liberals always take up for the most disgusting, perverted individuals that ever lived, guess that's your mo as you have proven many times, but you will beswept out with the trash too!

Posted by: 'Nam Grunt at September 29, 2009 02:31 PM (1siCY)

78 Aww... Jonathan E is passive-aggressive.

That's cute.

Posted by: runninrebel at September 29, 2009 02:31 PM (i3PJU)

79 OK, I'm lazy, but could someone PLEASE PLEASE PLEASE find what the liberal gasbags, who are now defending Polanski, said about the Duke lacrosse players? We'll all thank you for it!

Posted by: Matt at September 29, 2009 02:31 PM (jjZc+)

80

@77

that's really well spelled. Hey, is that a puppet?

Posted by: Dr. Crabington at September 29, 2009 02:31 PM (pEaV5)

81 what do we do this degenerate philosophy

It defeats itself.  It's like a rat.  You know they are there, but you just don't see or find them unless you're looking for them.

Watch Breitbart talking to Peter Robinson from May of this year.  Breitbart is asked how he came to design and work for Arianna Huffington and how that work peaked and ended with huffingtonpost.com.  Breitbart hints that it was his plan all along.  Give celebrities the microphone and allow them to destroy their own credibility.

They will purge themselves.

ACORN will follow a similar tract.  The leadership is corrupt, but the people that follow them around have to start asking questions about how long the leadership lead them into the desert.  In the real world you run out of other people's money.  In the ACORN world their leadership is taking them far from a supply of fresh water.

Posted by: WTFCI at September 29, 2009 02:32 PM (GtYrq)

82 Posted by: palin steele (the only non-partisan on AoSHQ) at September 29, 2009 02:31 PM (VDj74)

You just made my point, you realize this, don't you?

Posted by: lorien1973 at September 29, 2009 02:32 PM (IhQuA)

83 1. it was consensual sex. no force was used.

Drugs? Booze? No force was needed and according to the victim it was never consensual.


2. 13 is actually legal in some societies.

Who gives a shit about some societies? He didn't rape anyone in some societies he raped her in California.

 
it is a crime in the US, so Polanski should serve some time. But I don't think this is like some maniac raping a young girl.

Posted by: palin steele (the only non-partisan on AoSHQ) at September 29, 2009 02:25 PM (VDj74)

Oh is that what "rape-rape" is? When the rapist is a maniac about it? As long as he's calm it's just statutory rape?

Anything you say Whoopi, idiot.


Posted by: Rocks at September 29, 2009 02:33 PM (Q1lie)

84 Y-Not,

My point is that whether it's forcible or "merely" statutory it's still an egregious crime.

One is more egregious, obviously. But both are heinous.

Since there was never a trial -- Polanski copped a (generous) plea to a lesser charge -- you can't say, with a jury to back you up, that it was forcible rape.

So I'm hedging. I think it was rape. Alas, no jury decision, no testing of facts. But we do know he pled guilty to unlawful sex with a minor.

Posted by: ace at September 29, 2009 02:33 PM (d6tLI)

85 THERE IS NO REASON TO DEFEND POLANSKI. Sick bastard

Posted by: Dagny at September 29, 2009 02:33 PM (CQ+8V)

86

jeezus,  this sucks.

Posted by: willow at September 29, 2009 02:33 PM (GkYyh)

87 The French would let him walk for rape, and yet look into what Frank Abagnale has to say about the French Penal System in his book Catch Me If You Can (let alone Papillon!).  How screwed up are the French?

Posted by: dfbaskwill at September 29, 2009 02:33 PM (7Gs5S)

88

It's kind of odd to think that before this past week or two, pretty much the only thing I knew about John Phillips was that Polanski came at him in a rage thinking that he was the one who killed Sharon Tate out of revenge, after Polanski slept with his wife Michelle just before the murders.  Geez, I can't believe how tame that gossip seems now.

(And of course Tate's real killer, Susan Atkins, just died, too.)   

Posted by: Mary at September 29, 2009 02:33 PM (hAPKU)

89 my point is, people have different standards.

Posted by: palin steele (the only non-partisan on AoSHQ) at September 29, 2009 02:31 PM (VDj74)

I'm glad we are clear that your standards do not preclude a guy drugging and raping children. I think that says quite a bit about you.

Posted by: lorien1973 at September 29, 2009 02:34 PM (IhQuA)

90 92 OK, I'm lazy, but could someone PLEASE PLEASE PLEASE find what the liberal gasbags, who are now defending Polanski, said about the Duke lacrosse players?

I don't know what she said initially, but Whoopi did actually demand that Sharpton apologize to the Duke lacrosse players. 

Not that that excuses in any way what she's saying about this case. 

Posted by: Y-not at September 29, 2009 02:34 PM (sey23)

91 Ace, I love your idea about letting him out of the flight charges...it negates the argument that he "had" to flee because of the judge's actions.  (I know, not legally possible, but let's pretend here).  Now let him stand for the original charges and take his medicine.  In prison.  Anally.  Forcibly.  Repeatedly. 




Posted by: Minka at September 29, 2009 02:34 PM (e7d18)

92 Anyone buying the Swiss police story?  Em, he flew in Zurich.  We knew about it.  He was wanted.  So we picked him up?

Tell me this is the Swiss trying to get Hollywood Swiss bank account holders to turn themselves in to the IRS.

Posted by: WTFCI at September 29, 2009 02:35 PM (GtYrq)

93 I hate to be a wet towel but...

Personally, I think Polanski should pay (and I don't care that Chinatown was an awesome movie) but the most (only?) important person involved is the woman who was his victim that night, who is asking that the case be dismissed. If that's her wish I think we all ought to respect that, even though we disagree with it.

The bigger issue here, I think, is extradition laws and treaties.

Posted by: LikeATimeBomb at September 29, 2009 02:35 PM (J6xq2)

94 68,

I realize it will never happen, but you would be begging for me to stop if it ever did sissy!!!!!

Posted by: 'Nam Grunt at September 29, 2009 02:35 PM (1siCY)

95 Posted by: ace at September 29, 2009 02:33 PM

Gotcha.  Thx.

Posted by: Y-not at September 29, 2009 02:35 PM (sey23)

96
Where is Gloria Steinem on all this?

"He's on our team so leave him alone" again?

That's not misguided,  it's evil.  They are scum.  They hate conservatives more than they want any kind of justice.  Every day they wake up looking for a way to make conservatives angry.  No matter what they have to support or ignore they will do anything that they believe will anger conservatives.  Whether it's supporting child rape or prostitution.  Freeing convicted cop killers.  Ignoring murderous dictators' past crimes or future plans.  Go against conservatives every day and in every way.  No matter where that leads.

Posted by: Dang at September 29, 2009 02:35 PM (6L3mJ)

97

is this a trick ?

Posted by: willow at September 29, 2009 02:25 PM (GkYyh)

Could be shades of grey. People might just be SoCons without realizing it. What morals does one adopt? Where did they come from?

Posted by: Johnathan E. at September 29, 2009 02:35 PM (dQdrY)

98 Why debate what does or doesn't constitute rape? Remember, Polanski pled guilty. The trial is over. It's done.

Posted by: Dack Thrombosis at September 29, 2009 02:36 PM (P33XN)

99 @81 or that.  Either one.  I was thinking of Vick.  The only thing that could make these f#$%^#$%^ lunatics defend him even more is if it was a boy.

Posted by: johnny_p at September 29, 2009 02:36 PM (ldoxy)

100

I don't understand why non SoCons would care. What does this have to do with taxes?

You, sir, are a douchebag.

Posted by: Eleven at September 29, 2009 02:37 PM (7DB+a)

101 Jeebus H. Christ.  Dum Dum, you've outdone yourself again!  How do you manage it?  You're better than the White Queen thinking 6 impossible things before breakfast, because you not only do that, you post your impossibly stupidass musings out where everyone can see!   As a Harvard grad, I'm sure you were introduced to the theory that "no means no," some time along the torturous route of your alleged education, but here you are, being even more of a twatwad than you ever have been before.  I stand in awe of you.  Yes, I am actually standing up because you have surpassed the bounds of complete dumbassery and I am in total and complete awe of you.

Posted by: ushie at September 29, 2009 02:37 PM (1kwr2)

102 Well, gee, when you put it that way...

Posted by: Tommy V at September 29, 2009 02:38 PM (/PwQS)

103

@41 Johnathan: 

Libertarians can be on the right side of this issue.  Polanski violated that girls rights and the law should deal him harsh punishment.    

 

Posted by: California Red at September 29, 2009 02:39 PM (MOEti)

104 116 fact is, a lot of girls willingly consent to sex

I believe the whole point is that a 13 year old cannot consent, nor can a person who as has been drugged.

Posted by: Y-not at September 29, 2009 02:39 PM (sey23)

105

my point is, people have different standards.

And my standards are that anyone who sees no harm in drugging and raping a 13-year-old girl is a pathetic, digusting, worthless piece of shit who deserves to be in jail. 

And hey, whaddya know?  The state of California agrees with me!

Serioulsy, dum dum, why do you bother?  Do you take some perverse pleasure in all the abuse?  Do you pull a piece of twine tighter and tighter around your tiny little micro-dick when you read the repsonses you recieve?

 

 

 

Posted by: wiserbud at September 29, 2009 02:39 PM (wWwJR)

106 You're telling me she had a qualude and champaigne and still said no? that's an inconsistent story. either she wasn't drugged or she didn't say no.

Posted by: palin steele (the only non-partisan on AoSHQ) at September 29, 2009 02:34 PM (VDj74)


The drugs and booze made her less able to resist, physically and mentally, it didn't turn her into a mute. She stated she said no, repeatedly. So she was drugged and she said no. Dummy.



Posted by: Rocks at September 29, 2009 02:40 PM (Q1lie)

107 Dumdum is actually defending raping and sodomizing a 13 year old girl?

I guess when you're exclusively experienced with inflatable women, the idea of one saying no is just impossible to cogitate.

Posted by: V the K at September 29, 2009 02:40 PM (PLvLS)

108

how come these lying hoes aren't stigmatized and put in jail? their crime is just as serious as rape.

You've actually said something I agree with for once.  Except you forgot about the part where he pled guilty. 

So nice try but you're still an idiot.

Posted by: Eleven at September 29, 2009 02:41 PM (7DB+a)

109 Unless his hash has changed, this is HC's real hash.

honest cloud  (4dCEv)

Why you let crap like this stand Ace, is beyond me:

1. it was consensual sex. no force was used.

2. 13 is actually legal in some societies.

it is a crime in the US, so Polanski should serve some time. But I don't think this is like some maniac raping a young girl.

Posted by: palin steele (the only non-partisan on AoSHQ) at September 29, 2009 02:25 PM (VDj74) 

Trolls are ruining this site.





Posted by: Tami at September 29, 2009 02:41 PM (VuLos)

110 important person involved is the woman who was his victim that night, who is asking that the case be dismissed. If that's her wish I think we all ought to respect that, even though we disagree with it.

If she wanted him to die, that would not be part of the punishment equation. It's not how the system works. Victims don't define how the criminal is punished or not punished.

Posted by: lorien1973 at September 29, 2009 02:42 PM (IhQuA)

111
Seriously Ace,  when do you take your megaphone away from the scum.

Posted by: Dang at September 29, 2009 02:42 PM (6L3mJ)

112

You're telling me she had a qualude and champaigne and still said no? that's an inconsistent story. either she wasn't drugged or she didn't say no.

First: it's "Quaalude" and "Champagne" dumbass

Secondly: The two aren't mutually exclusive. You can be wasted and still saying no but can't do anything to stop it. How stupid are you?

Posted by: Dagny at September 29, 2009 02:42 PM (CQ+8V)

113 Jack Nicholson.

Posted by: comatus at September 29, 2009 02:42 PM (+Fcaz)

114 Trolls' damage would be limited if some of you weren't insistent on responding to every single stupid thing they say.

Posted by: ace at September 29, 2009 02:42 PM (d6tLI)

115 Two different situations, Dum Dum.  Man, the only thing that could open your mind is a backhoe.

Posted by: ushie at September 29, 2009 02:42 PM (1kwr2)

116 Ace,

I can't wrap my head around why you let perverts like dumdum and HC post here, no amount of blue language from morons is worse then their thoughts in type!

Posted by: 'Nam Grunt at September 29, 2009 02:43 PM (1siCY)

117 Trolls are ruining this site.

Sock puppeting -really- makes it hard to tell real comments from fake ones. And that's sad, cuz you really could imagine the actual person posting the fake comments sometimes.

Posted by: lorien1973 at September 29, 2009 02:43 PM (IhQuA)

118 @likeatimebomb, as someone here already pointed out, this was/is a crime against the state, not a civil matter.  The  victim does not have a legal say in whether it is prosecuted or not.  And while I can understand that she wishes to put that part of her life behind her, this is not about her.  It is about the crime(s) Polanski committed. 

Posted by: Minka at September 29, 2009 02:43 PM (e7d18)

119 >>>Could be shades of grey. People might just be SoCons without realizing it. What morals does one adopt? Where did they come from?

From your mother, when I was fucking her up her squeakhole, dickhead.

Next question?

Posted by: ace at September 29, 2009 02:44 PM (d6tLI)

120

If you didn't realize that LIBTARDS have no moral values.


You realize it after this thread.

Posted by: gus at September 29, 2009 02:44 PM (Vqruj)

121 BECAUSE I CAN'T BAN PEOPLE

Posted by: ace at September 29, 2009 02:44 PM (d6tLI)

122 how come these lying hoes aren't stigmatized and put in jail? their crime is just as serious as rape.

The falsely accused have to file a complaint.  I'm guessing they take the high road and give the accuser a break.  She'll carry around the phony claims her whole life.  It's enough punishment.

Even the prosecutors drop it despite the fact that such claims would clearly constitute lying to law enforcement officers.  But if there is no crime can you lie to investigators about the details of no crime?

Posted by: WTFCI at September 29, 2009 02:45 PM (GtYrq)

123

Tami

he's evil.

Posted by: willow at September 29, 2009 02:45 PM (GkYyh)

124 @126 Tami

Trolls are ruining this site.

No--they're actually "brainwashing" us in a really good sense.  They have torn the scales from my eyes.

I used to think the left were just misguided or stupid, but thanks to these trolls, I now see them for what they truly are:  evil, subhuman vermin.

Posted by: MikeO at September 29, 2009 02:45 PM (WvolZ)

125 138 BECAUSE I CAN'T BAN PEOPLE

Then make their comment section blank every time they post ANYTHING!

Posted by: 'Nam Grunt at September 29, 2009 02:46 PM (1siCY)

126 You're telling me she had a qualude and champaigne and still said no? that's an inconsistent story. either she wasn't drugged or she didn't say no. 

Posted by: palin steele (the only non-partisan on AoSHQ) at September 29, 2009 02:34 PM (VDj74)

That's your iron clad defense asshole?  So all it takes is getting the drugs and alcohol into them and then your home free because at that point any "no" response could not be taken seriously right.

Your a piece of shit. 

 

Posted by: Roadking at September 29, 2009 02:46 PM (ke8Ln)

127

And now for the rest of the story ......

Salon's  in trouble now.  Protesters, led by one of their biggest special interest groups, sheep, are sore from the Left's stimulus package, and would like a little relief/down time.  They want rape (not rape rape) to be recognized as a generally acceptable past time of the "civilized" Left. 

In breaking news, suits have been filed in federal court, asking for statuatory relief from one, Abe Haze. 

Posted by: MDr at September 29, 2009 02:47 PM (ucq49)

128

Dum Dum scrawled:  "Have you EVER watched Japanese porn? throughout intercourse, the girl constantly whines "yamate" which means "stop", yet she actually wants the intercourse to continue.

Did I just blow your mind?"

 No, stupid thing, you did not blow my mind.  There is a DIFFERENCE between porn and real life.  You see, porn, especially Japanese porn, is not real.  There are very few tentacles involved in sex in real life.  Second, you are the stupidest creature posting here, and that includes honest cloud, who is so incredibly stupid he makes the fillings in my teeth ache and I now have to scroll past his comments or I can't eat my supper.  You, Dum Dum, are the ne plus ultra, the creme de la creme, the supreme pinnacle of stupid, and you should not be proud of that.

Posted by: ushie at September 29, 2009 02:47 PM (1kwr2)

129 Whoopie Goldberg is only defending him because he's a fellow Joo.

Posted by: runninrebel at September 29, 2009 02:47 PM (i3PJU)

130 ok if they can't be banned can all of us just put that guy on mental ignore indefinately?

Posted by: willow at September 29, 2009 02:47 PM (GkYyh)

131
133 Ace,

I can't wrap my head around why you let perverts like dumdum and HC post here, no amount of blue language from morons is worse then their thoughts in type!

Amen.  This crap is really old.  I can see having a half way intelligent troll with some actual ideas about a topic but this is just contrarian garbage.

I'm taking a break.  Later.

Posted by: Dang at September 29, 2009 02:48 PM (6L3mJ)

132 Posted by: palin steele (the only non-partisan on AoSHQ) at September 29, 2009 02:47 PM (VDj74)

What's your point? Polanski admitted to raping the girl. Where is your confusion?

Posted by: lorien1973 at September 29, 2009 02:48 PM (IhQuA)

133

Butt-fucking children is wrong?  Who knew?!?!?!

Has anyone advised Andrew Sullivan?

Posted by: NAMBLA (the "B" stands for "Butt") at September 29, 2009 02:48 PM (prBaA)

134 If that's her wish I think we all ought to respect that, even though we disagree with it.

Then rich people can pay to have the crime go away like Kennedy. That isn't justice and its not fair. Don't you care about "fair" the most?

Posted by: Dagny at September 29, 2009 02:49 PM (6gwfI)

135 There are very few tentacles involved in sex in real life.

ushie at September 29, 2009 02:47 PM (1kwr2)

Speak for yourself.

Posted by: Cthulu at September 29, 2009 02:49 PM (IhQuA)

136 Whoopie Goldberg is only defending him because he's a fellow Joo.

I thought it was because he was black.

Posted by: harrison at September 29, 2009 02:49 PM (Gv4O0)

137 BECAUSE I CAN'T BAN PEOPLE

Posted by: ace at September 29, 2009 02:44 PM (d6tLI)

Wait...Didn't you post a little while ago about how some IP addresses were accidentally banned and you were trying to work it out? 

Posted by: Tami at September 29, 2009 02:49 PM (VuLos)

138 Posted by: palin steele (the only non-partisan on AoSHQ) at September 29, 2009 02:49 PM (VDj74)

Yeah. When the guy admits to raping the girl and then flees the country to avoid punishment. I can see where his guilt or innocence can be indeterminate.

Posted by: lorien1973 at September 29, 2009 02:51 PM (IhQuA)

139 Skimming through California case law, the age of consent has been 18 years since the 1930s - probably longer .

Posted by: Blake at September 29, 2009 02:51 PM (Dh6Nf)

140 How long do you think it will take some bubba to get at Roman if he does end up serving time?

I'd say within the week.

Posted by: runninrebel at September 29, 2009 02:52 PM (i3PJU)

141

It was the 70s. They still knew butt-f*cking children was wrong. Now, not so much.

Poor NAMBLA, all this attention has to have all the pervs upset.

Posted by: Dagny at September 29, 2009 02:53 PM (eGqNX)

142 Ace,

It's your house, but I think I speak for the majority here that these two assholes dumdum and HC should not be able to spew their liberal BS here!

Posted by: 'Nam Grunt at September 29, 2009 02:53 PM (1siCY)

143 I'm only responding to Dum Dum today because I'm in a horrible mood and I need a cat toy to bat around.  Which is all that it's good for, anyway.

Posted by: ushie at September 29, 2009 02:53 PM (1kwr2)

144

I hope you guys realize  rape is not a black-white issue. Say you're at a bar, and you and a chick both drink throughout the night.

This one is, idiot. She was 13 years old. She cannot say yes. Secondly, how the hell is he gonna pick up a 13 year old in a bar? Where do people like you come from?

Posted by: Bill R. at September 29, 2009 02:54 PM (EhlQq)

145 @159 runninrebel

How long do you think it will take some bubba to get at Roman if he does end up serving time?

I'd say within the week.

When he does, we need to establish a defense fund for that bubba.

Posted by: MikeO at September 29, 2009 02:54 PM (WvolZ)

146

If that's her wish I think we all ought to respect that, even though we disagree with it.

Her wish is irrelevant. He already pled guilty. He fled to avoid sentencing.

Posted by: Bill R. at September 29, 2009 02:56 PM (EhlQq)

147 hell where is N.O.W?

I expect they'll be kicking Kate out for writing the Salon piece.

Posted by: HeatherRadish at September 29, 2009 02:57 PM (NtiET)

148 Roman Polanski not only pled guilty, he was convicted. He is guilty, and until his sentence is served, he is a worse criminal than ever, getting away.

"Oh, Here's My Proposal: ...we give Polanski a pass on any additional charges he might get for being a fugitive from justice."--Ace

a pass on any additional charges... "The Rangel Rule, as with Geithner, regardless of what one is guilty of, if you're "important" no law applies to you, no penalties are ever levied regardless of how many times you repeatedly break a law. Given Polanski's example, no matter how long one evades justice, forget and forgive.

The victim, grown and wanting it all behind her where she's been able to put it so far as she can, has no more legal say now in whether he should serve his sentence as she had when the sentence was delivered by the court. She has the right to express herself prior to sentencing. But can you imagine victims being given the legal right/responsibility to sentence or forgive sentencing? More often than not, there'd be guilty heads rolling without the option to request a retrial.

Posted by: maverick muse at September 29, 2009 02:57 PM (F1b/5)

149

Libtards have always postured themselves as morally superior.

NOTHING could be further from the truth.  They support every kind of filth known to man.

 

Libtards tell us Muhammads sexual proclivities.

Posted by: gus at September 29, 2009 02:58 PM (Vqruj)

150 omfg.

Posted by: willow at September 29, 2009 02:58 PM (GkYyh)

151 maverick muse,

I get the strong feeling that you simply do not read what I write, so please don't address further comments to me.

Since you do not do me the courtesy of reading my words before objecting, I do not see why I should be burdened having to read your words, either.

Posted by: ace at September 29, 2009 02:59 PM (d6tLI)

152 Wait, this article appeared where? In Salon?

Posted by: DelD at September 29, 2009 03:01 PM (rC+/c)

153 All right, whatever, trollbusting isn't working.

Trollbusters, rather than changing the words of HC's and now Palin Steele's posts, can we just delete them?

I know I have that authorization... do you guys? If you can edit I assume you can delete.

So we'll just start deleting them.

It would HELP if some of you weren't DETERMINED to respond to EACH AND EVERY comment these guys make.

Posted by: ace at September 29, 2009 03:01 PM (d6tLI)

154 Re: Banning HC and Palin Steele

I'm not big on banning wholesale. I think it has more to do with the individual troll's cycle of usefulness. These two played the role of idiot foil for a while, but now they've run out of standard stupid and are trying to improvise stupid. And they're both too stupid to pull that off.

They've gone full retard. They've jumped the shark.

Posted by: runninrebel at September 29, 2009 03:03 PM (i3PJU)

155 Meh.  I like to use trolls as punching bags on occasion.  Lately, HC and PS have been so over-the-top that it should be impossible to take them at all seriously except as objects of your best creative writing beat down.  Otherwise, just scroll right on by.

Posted by: Fred at September 29, 2009 03:04 PM (fcfPV)

156 It would HELP if some of you weren't DETERMINED to respond to EACH AND EVERY comment these guys make.

I agree and I'll stop and I suggest everyone else does, but delete them for sure, they'll go away sooner or later once they see they have no platform.

Posted by: 'Nam Grunt at September 29, 2009 03:04 PM (1siCY)

157

I don't understand why non SoCons would care. What does this have to do with taxes?

Because they pay taxes to law enforcement with the expectation that they will prevent their daughters from being raped, or at least make an example out of people who do.

Don't want to imprison rapists? Fine. I want a 33% tax cut with which to purchase a gun, and a concealed carry permit.

Posted by: Entropy at September 29, 2009 03:05 PM (IsLT6)

158

I see that some people cannot handle any differing views on the matter.

Yes. Some of us are pretty inflexible on the subject of raping children.  Even those of us who aren't card carrying members of the SoCon fringe.

See?  That was like a two-fer!

Posted by: Fred at September 29, 2009 03:06 PM (fcfPV)

159

Ace @75. It has been my experience over the years that even non-belivers have enough moral compass to recognize malum in se.

Don't let folks like that get you down.

Posted by: Scott J. at September 29, 2009 03:06 PM (/bVuS)

160

So we'll just start deleting them.

Already deleting them in my mind.

Not to be a fly, but when comments reference other comments by number, will this be affected?

Posted by: FireHorse at September 29, 2009 03:10 PM (Vl5GH)

161 What a weird response. My point has always been to throw no one out as long as they are aiming the same direction. Defensive much?

Posted by: Johnathan E.

I'm fairly confident that you're not aiming in the same direction as the rest of us.

Posted by: flenser at September 29, 2009 03:11 PM (xeP0T)

162

As someone else pointed out, if this were Father Roman Polanski of the Archdiocese of say, Boston, who had done this, you can bet the reaction from liberals everywhere would be exactly the opposite -- though just as raucous.

Posted by: Minnie Rodent at September 29, 2009 03:12 PM (2Y+xz)

163

I think the T.B. works great.  My favorite was when Dum Dum proudly proclaimed that he had made a dildo out of Leggos.  heh

But I'm sure it must be tedious and tiresome.

Posted by: Eleven at September 29, 2009 03:12 PM (7DB+a)

164

Obama's Justice Department blocks the deportation in 3, 2, 1...

Posted by: Max Entropy at September 29, 2009 03:12 PM (uuZjB)

165

I fear for a civilization that contains people who believe drugging a 13 year old and vaginally and anally raping him/her against his/her will is OK. And those people who come to the defense of the pervert who did it are morally bankrupt.

We are Sodom and Gomorrah. We are Rome.

Posted by: ParanoidGirlInSeattle at September 29, 2009 03:12 PM (RZ8pf)

166

Re: Banning HC and Palin Steele

Ace lacks the technical skillz to go all Charles Johnson/NSA-roving-wiretap on their asses.

They're not even HC and Palin Steele! Morons. 3/4 of their posts are sockpuppets and you're all going ban happy. You dweebs are gonna accidentally ban Wiserbud or someone. (Or maybe even someone).

The people who shout 'don't feed the trolls' are the ones feeding the trolls.

We never had to go around banning 99.9% of our trolls (except a few who were exceptionally lewd) before we had churchladies complaining about hooker titles and trying to post "First!", I don't see anything's changed now.

It don't work anyway. Erg has been banned like 57 times. But we deal with him just fine. Nobody ever had to ban most of the ones who are long gone now.

Posted by: Entropy at September 29, 2009 03:12 PM (IsLT6)

167 "FYM,WIWFHUHS,D. NQ", or "From your mother, when I was fucking her up her squeakhole, dickhead.  Next question?", is nice, but I still prefer "FYNQ."

Posted by: Sharkman at September 29, 2009 03:13 PM (prBaA)

168

Lately, HC and PS have been so over-the-top that it should be impossible to take them at all seriously except as objects of your best creative writing beat down.

Yes... and 95% of that "over-the-top" to which you are referring, I'm relatively certain is sockpuppetry and troll-busting comment changing.

Correct me if I'm wrong.

But I don't think the real HC actually ran around all week long talking about his underage male immigrant prostitute ring.

Posted by: Entropy at September 29, 2009 03:16 PM (IsLT6)

169

I know I've been guilty of sockpuppeting those two plagues on humanity, but I'll swear it off. From now on there's not a cloud in the sky, or a dum-dum in the candy dish.

Just keep zipping their comments, though; I tempt easily.

Posted by: Sort-of-Mad Max at September 29, 2009 03:17 PM (ERJIu)

170 I mean really does this mean a mother can sell her daughter for sex and it would be OK for the mother and the rapist, as long as the daughter is 13+ some to 18? wth is the matter with them.

Hey, it's the ACORN way. But they might suggest that you use imported slaves instead of family members.

Posted by: I R A Darth Aggie at September 29, 2009 03:20 PM (1hM1d)

171

Ace @ 153

Thank you!  I like coming here.  I like reading the posts.  But I'm morning-sick enough without having to stomach those two pieces of trash.  Thanks for bringing the hammer down.

Posted by: Mouse at September 29, 2009 03:21 PM (5cUJG)

172 I'm with Tami, Dang and others:  HC and PS should be outta here. Their comments are reprehensible, indefensible and downright disgusting.

That they are allowed to spew forth this vile nonsense is a detriment to this site.  Regardless if they actually represent real people, or are just fabrications designed to provoke, they have outlived their usefulness.

 I'm sick of them.

Posted by: Derak at September 29, 2009 03:21 PM (xSXRA)

173

74 sock-puppet off!

Oh, I dunno, I'm "bored silly" of dum-dum's obtuseness myself.

As for Polanski, defending him is just gross, like defending Charles Manson. A little part of me feels like summoning the aliens from ID4 when I read what humans can be capable of.

Posted by: David Ross at September 29, 2009 03:22 PM (94eYr)

174 Darth, i'm so blown away by this topic and responses, i have nothing left to say.

Posted by: willow at September 29, 2009 03:22 PM (GkYyh)

175

Anyway if you want trolls to bash I can always come up with something.

I used to be a lizard, remember.

And I'm not obnoxious all the time.

Posted by: David Ross at September 29, 2009 03:24 PM (94eYr)

176 What do you think the odds are we can get Polanski to be Charlie Manson's cellmate?

Posted by: I R A Darth Aggie at September 29, 2009 03:25 PM (1hM1d)

177 I don't post a lot of comments, but I do read them. That said, Palin Steele or whatever is an obvious troll who adds nothing to the discussion.

NEEDS MOAR GLOBAL PERMABAN

Posted by: AndrewGurn at September 29, 2009 03:25 PM (BX9uS)

178 lorien 117, dum-dum was always easy to spot because s/he had VD. I mean, in his/her IP hash. That I know of.

Posted by: David Ross at September 29, 2009 03:27 PM (94eYr)

179 But I'm morning-sick enough without having to stomach those two pieces of trash.

Congrats, Mouse!

Posted by: HeatherRadish at September 29, 2009 03:27 PM (NtiET)

180

Trolls are ruining this site.

.....

 

..........

Granted, this is a rather simple point of basic human decency.

But you have 150 commentors agreeing with you, and the TWO that are fruit loops are cannot be tolerated and are ruining the whole site?

I just do not like this as a precedent.

Posted by: Entropy at September 29, 2009 03:28 PM (IsLT6)

181

I like coming here.  I like reading the posts.  But I'm morning-sick enough without having to stomach those two pieces of trash.  Thanks for bringing the hammer down

mazel tov ,healthy and wise and stuff.

Posted by: willow at September 29, 2009 03:30 PM (GkYyh)

182 willow,

When it comes to the trolls, keep in mind two things:

1. the best filters are betwixt your ears. Use them, as it will lower your blood pressure to an acceptible level.

2. if you feed the troll, you get to take s/he/it home.

That is all. Carry on.

Posted by: I R A Darth Aggie at September 29, 2009 03:30 PM (1hM1d)

183 Entropy,

I don't think the HC on this thread is the real HC...unless he's changed his hash and his typical style of writing.

palin steele (the only non-partisan on AoSHQ) at September 29, 2009 02:25 PM (VDj74)

That is the real palin steele.  He's beyond redeemable and nothing anyone says to any of the trolls changes the way they think.  NOTHING.

Normally I wouldn't care.  But lately thread after thread becomes their attention whoring and responses to their idiotic postings (and then comes the sockpuppeting of them...which is, sometimes, funny).  I understand it's hard not to respond to them but then it just becomes a thread about them.  What's the point?  I can go to DU or KOS if I wanted to read that crap repeatedly.

Posted by: Tami at September 29, 2009 03:31 PM (VuLos)

184 Posted by: 'Nam Grunt at September 29, 2009 03:04 PM

Agreed, hard to stomach poison that's best not served. Responsible adults don't leave poison down for the unwitting cat.

Now, please pass the biscuits.

Posted by: maverick muse at September 29, 2009 03:31 PM (F1b/5)

185 PS. where the hell is my damn sammich and beer? and why do I have a credit charge of $4,876.53???

;-)

Posted by: I R A Darth Aggie at September 29, 2009 03:32 PM (1hM1d)

186

Entropy, me neither. We have our disagreements but it would suck to see you banned. You're not obnoxious all the time.

HC on the other hand...

Posted by: David Ross at September 29, 2009 03:33 PM (94eYr)

187

Roman should do time and he needs a cell mate close to his own age.

I say put him in with Charlie Manson and watch the fun. 

 

Posted by: Larsen E. Whipsnade at September 29, 2009 03:33 PM (6BgmB)

188 Wrong is wrong. There is no gray area.

Posted by: Bosk at September 29, 2009 03:33 PM (pUO5u)

189 What do you think the odds are we can get Polanski to be Charlie Manson's cellmate?
Posted by: I R A Darth Aggie

Ha! Fatal attraction

Posted by: maverick muse at September 29, 2009 03:34 PM (F1b/5)

190

I R A Darth Aggie

Where's Dahmer when he could have performed at least one socially redeeming act?

Think Abe Haze might violate the gag order and get tossed in with Roman & Jeffrey?  Yummy thought!

 

Posted by: MDr at September 29, 2009 03:34 PM (ucq49)

191 Darth. correct and wise, i know it , and  am now determined to use my mental ignore function. it's not really fair that ace would have to babysit this site, every minute because( I )can't act like  a grown up and take responsibility for my own stuff..

Posted by: willow at September 29, 2009 03:36 PM (GkYyh)

192 Polanski was smart to flee before sentencing.  He continued his career.  I won at trial and still lost my career.

Posted by: Fatty Arbuckle at September 29, 2009 03:38 PM (is97c)

193 Darth, OH? er sammich was yummy, sorry i forgot it twas yours, Beer? um hmm. under the pillow on the couch. well, are you saying you don't like the new chair,? It's  yours btw, sorry it's slightly pinkish. and dining room table what !!you want to sit on the floor with the sammich?

Posted by: willow at September 29, 2009 03:39 PM (GkYyh)

194

That is the real palin steele.  He's beyond redeemable and nothing anyone says to any of the trolls changes the way they think.  NOTHING.

So?

A) Trolls are part of the internets. Period end of story. You can go full on Chucky and ban half the eastern seaboard from sunup to sunset and still your work would not be done.

B) Commentors around here use to brag about how we got rid of all our trolls without banning them, which I find a much bigger accomplishment. And this was achieved mostly by having fun with them. Mocking them. Sockpuppeting them. Absolutely not ever being disturbed by them or getting pissed off by them (unless you were having fun beating them down).

Whining for a ban is food. Don't like, ignore. You get one's like erg, he'll certainly be back if you ban. He probably brags on lefty sites how many times he's been banned. That is the goal.

And of course, there's a problem of now it seems we've got a lot of new people who seem to be offended most by the aforementioned sockpuppets.....

Besides, they keep us apprised of moment by moment state-of-the-art DU talking points without me having to go there.

Posted by: Entropy at September 29, 2009 03:39 PM (IsLT6)

195

It also helps to not be really, really horrified and disgusted with what the trolls say.

You're giving them just what they want.

Posted by: Eleven at September 29, 2009 03:40 PM (7DB+a)

196 Serioulsy, dum dum, why do you bother? Do you take some perverse pleasure in all the abuse? Do you pull a piece of twine tighter and tighter around your tiny little micro-dick when you read the repsonses you recieve?

HEY!!!

Posted by: David Carradine, swinging in the closet, roped tied around his dick at September 29, 2009 03:40 PM (xGIqT)

197 The same people that tell us what a terrible place this country is, now want us to believe that being "exiled" is a horrible punishment.

fuck em'

Posted by: Rickshaw Jack at September 29, 2009 03:40 PM (iQFPz)

198

HeatherRadish and Willow,

Thanks! :-)

Posted by: Mouse at September 29, 2009 03:47 PM (5cUJG)

199 Why doesn't everyone just ignore the trolls?  They'll go away eventually when they discover no one is paying attention to them.

Posted by: Jewells at September 29, 2009 03:48 PM (l/N7H)

200 Entropy,

Trolling is one thing. Hijacking EVERY. SINGLE. THREAD. is another. Look at the last stats Maetenloch posted - honest cloud was the number one prolific commenter last week.

The comments section are what drive this site. Make that unenjoyable, and participation will drop. Readership will follow.

If I put as many posts up in a single thread as this clod douche does, several of you would be bitching at me. So when he does it on every thread in which he posts, why is it that it's everyone else's fault for responding? He's becoming the content. I'm not okay with that.

Further, that turning the other cheek shit is for Quakers. Deputize some more trollbusters if need be and hound this idiot off the site.

Posted by: Empire of Jeff at September 29, 2009 03:49 PM (xGIqT)

201

@41 Johnathan: 

Libertarians can be on the right side of this issue.  Polanski violated that girls rights and the law should deal him harsh punishment. 

Posted by: California Red at September 29, 2009 02:39 PM (MOEti)

I couldn't agree more. I find it fascinating that the Right and Left are falling on opposite sides of this issue. I really don't understand how the difference could be -- simply -- political ideology.

Posted by: Johnathan E. at September 29, 2009 03:50 PM (dQdrY)

202 Kate Harding deserves a Pulitzer Prize for commentary.

Posted by: NJconservative at September 29, 2009 03:50 PM (/Ywwg)

203

It also helps to not be really, really horrified and disgusted with what the trolls say.

You're giving them just what they want.

Exactly.

Besides, where do you draw the line?

I'm actually really horrified and disgusted by this (genuine moron addition):

What do you think the odds are we can get Polanski to be Charlie Manson's cellmate?

Normally I just wouldn't say anything. But that's vile, I find nothing humorous within 50 miles of Sharon Tate. To me, hell, that's as bad or worse then our troll's quasi-pedo defense.

And for what ever little it is worth (I am on your side here), Palin Steele is actually technically right in some sense of a fashion.

At 13 it is NOT pedophilia anymore. That doesn't mean it's right, (nor is fucking rape of anyone, non-statutory) but it's not really actual pedophilia. If not for his being a goddamn idiot, he might have actually made a half of a nuanced point out of that. As it is he just flops around alot and makes a fool of himself. I fail to see how anyone might justify this, but if he wasn't totally incompitent he might have made an arguable case for mitigating it slightly.

Posted by: Entropy at September 29, 2009 03:50 PM (IsLT6)

204 #128: tentacles are so involved in sex in real life.

Posted by: An Octopus at September 29, 2009 03:51 PM (p05LM)

205

"All that is necessary for evil to triumph, is for good men to do nothing."

Any relevance to this post or the constant hijacking?

Posted by: MDr at September 29, 2009 03:51 PM (ucq49)

206 All that is necessary for evil to triumph, is for good men to do nothing."

And cigarettes. Evil smokes, you know.

Posted by: Empire of Jeff at September 29, 2009 03:54 PM (xGIqT)

207 Minka,

I understand that, and I understand that Polanski shouldn't get a pass because he's "respected" and "did good work" anymore than Teddy should have.

I just don't think the discussion here needs to be whether or not he should go to jail (technically he probably should, and my morals tell me he should, but the amount of damage and attention it will bring to a woman who has long since tried to put this out of her life and said she doesn't want this to happen should give us all pause), but rather whether people ought to be defending him.

They shouldn't of course, what he did was vile and wrong and indefensible and he should have spent many years in jail, but given that he took advantage of a crappy extradition system in 1978 and given that the global system is STILL shit (shocking, right?) I just wonder if this is more trouble than it's worth to bring a man to jail whom even his personal victim, 31+ years after doesn't want to, in the process sucking up a lot of resources, money, time, and the emotional health of Miss Geimer.

Anyway. Sorry for the length post, but in conclusion, Ace, I'm not so sure this was a wise post on the blog's part in that it served as an open invitation to trolls to say some truly heinous stuff. I understand we're not exactly a "family place" here, but what essentially amount to defenses of rape (whether sock puppeted or true) are beyond the pale.

A discussion on why, exactly, it took so long to get the international arrest warrant out, why the extradition process blows so much, why he was allowed to escape in the first place, those would all seem to be more bountiful in terms of legit conversation, maybe?

Posted by: LikeATimeBomb at September 29, 2009 03:56 PM (J6xq2)

208 Could you at least automatically highlight the troll & disruptor comments in Coward Yellow or Commie Red, so those of us who don't care for them can identify them more easily and not waste time reading their tripe & drivel?

Of course, nuking them would be a better option.

Posted by: backhoe at September 29, 2009 03:56 PM (J/pYN)

209 I understand what you're saying Entropy.  And I completely agree about not going full-on Chucky.  But if the mocking and sockpuppeting of these two hasn't made them go away yet, nothing will.  Yes, I can scroll past their posts...and then past the responses to their posts...and then past some of the sockpuppeting of their posts...and then past their responses to other's posts about their stupid post and pretty soon it's 'ok, what the hell was this thread about'?

It's Ace's house...he can do what he thinks is right. 

(And we get the state of the art DU talking points daily from the MSM.) 

Posted by: Tami at September 29, 2009 03:57 PM (VuLos)

210 I hate to state the obvious, but he hasn't actually been convicted of anything. The plea deal is suspicious and does not count as a conviction.

The guys certainly smells like a scumbag but 13-year old girls are not known for their 100% truthfulness. He fled sentencing, but should be allowed to enter a new plea and let the courts decide what to do with the guy.

The orgasmic moral-outrage around her is a little strange. This shit happens all the time. it's unfortunate but true.

The warrant is good. The guy is a fugitive, and best case scenario, is a statutory rapist. Let the courts do what they do. That's what they're there for. Who cares if a bunch of Hollywood elitist want this guy to be let off the hook?

I don't see why we're all spastic about this.

Posted by: Tommy V at September 29, 2009 03:57 PM (/PwQS)

211

Further, that turning the other cheek shit is for Quakers. Deputize some more trollbusters if need be and hound this idiot off the site.

Oh hell no - I'm not calling on anyone to turn the other cheek.

I'm asking them to deal with him vigilante style without invoking The Man.

Posted by: Entropy at September 29, 2009 04:01 PM (IsLT6)

212

Ah, a calming wit   h/t IMAO

A special daily prayer:

Lord, give me the patience to explain things to liberals who can have their minds change, the strength to punch in the face those who cant, and the wisdom to know the difference.

Posted by: MDr at September 29, 2009 04:01 PM (ucq49)

213

They say truly heinous stuff whenever and wherever they want.  This place has been dealing with trolls for years. 

What's the big deal now all of a sudden?  Nervous Nancies from LGF?

Frightened Francisses from Nancy France?

Posted by: Eleven at September 29, 2009 04:04 PM (7DB+a)

214

Re banning trolls:

I've been guilty of engaging them once or twice in the short time I've been posting here.  I agree with Entropy for the most part.  Trolls allow us to see the liberal mindset at its most base level.  Hiding anonymously behind a screen name gives them the courage to say what is exactly in their dark little hearts.  Troll busting and beatdowns are teh funny, too. 

Trolls, are by definition, contrarians.

That said, I'm still at a loss as to why anyone would defend the actions of a child rapist or those who would facilitate it.  Is it really what they truly believe, or is it simple contrarianism?  I mean Ace was pretty even handed in his assessment of this whole thing, yet the troll twists himself into a pretzel to forgive the base crime by suggesting that since it's acceptable in some cultures, then we are the Neanderthals.

I think I just answered my own question.  Engaging in moral relativism is a fucked up way to lead your life.

Posted by: The Outlaw in the Heavenly Hall at September 29, 2009 04:06 PM (E0EDC)

215

I hate to state the obvious, but he hasn't actually been convicted of anything. The plea deal is suspicious and does not count as a conviction.

My understanding is he has been convicted but not sentanced. He pled guilty. He madea settlement with the victim out of court which is also an admission of guilt. And it probably wasn't even just statutory but both statutory (a minor) and a VIOLENT forceable rape.

As for moral outrage.... well wtf, you got Woopie saying it was a "rape" but not like a "rape-rape" you know, just sort of like a goofy "love-rape".

How can you not be outraged? How do you f'n respond to this lunacy without exasperation?

It's Ace's house...he can do what he thinks is right. 

True.

But Ace is kind of a pleaser. He'll probably do whatever most people ask him to.

Posted by: Entropy at September 29, 2009 04:07 PM (IsLT6)

216 TommyV at 210 wrut:

210 I hate to state the obvious, but he hasn't actually been convicted of anything. The plea deal is suspicious and does not count as a conviction.

I hate to state the obvious, but he has actually been convicted of something. The plea deal is something he agreed to, and it counts as a conviction.

And in California, we have mandatory sentences for such things--in this case, something like 8 years.

Posted by: Otis Criblecoblis at September 29, 2009 04:13 PM (325uj)

217

And in California, we have mandatory sentences for such things--in this case, something like 8 years.

Wouldn't he be sentenced based upon guidelines that existed when he originally pled guilty?

Posted by: Ghost of Lee Atwater at September 29, 2009 04:24 PM (sXLx/)

218

Good piece.

That's what Roman Polanski said.

Posted by: Michael Scott at September 29, 2009 04:41 PM (3wl7s)

219 Trolls are a fact of life on the internet and we've handled them pretty well in the past through mockery, sock-puppeting and ignoring them. And the occasional troll does spice things up a bit and keep the moron-on-moron fratricide down.

But every so often you get a troll who's prolific and just will not quit until they've jacked every thread. I think honest cloud has reached that point. He's posting 50+ comments a day and they're pretty much all insults with little argument. HC needs to be troll-busted into oblivion.

Posted by: Mtenloch at September 29, 2009 04:43 PM (H1/x2)

220

 You dweebs are gonna accidentally ban Wiserbud

BRING IT, BEYOTCHES!!!

Posted by: wiserbud at September 29, 2009 04:44 PM (wWwJR)

221 It's probably already been mentioned here; if it has, it bears repeating:

It's "rape," not "abuse." Fucking a child is rape, and those who do it should be punished as rapists. Oh, and "fondling" a kid is rape, too. Nonconsensual sex--no matter the age or gender--is fucking rape, and any euphemisms meant to "soften" the offense ought to be unambiguously called out as such.

Posted by: railwriter at September 29, 2009 04:47 PM (XcsD4)

222 Ushie posted:

"No, stupid thing, you did not blow my mind. There is a DIFFERENCE between porn and real life. You see, porn, especially Japanese porn, is not real. There are very few tentacles involved in sex in real life."


Wait a minute??!!! You mean all that tentacle sex hentai thing is MADE UP?? Your ice holes are destroying all my cherished beliefs. I am going to have stop reading this stupid site.

On a more serious note: Two of the favorite lies about this are

a) The age of consent was 14 at the time, and she was almost there and

b) He didn't realize she was that young.

Patterico nicely demolishes both pieces of bullshit

a) Age of consent in California has been 18, since 1911, at least according the SCotUS, who, one would hope, know whereof they speak, and

b) Polanski admitted under oath, at the plea hearing, that he knew that the girl was 13.

Oh, I see from some fuckwit upthread now that "A plea deal is not an actual conviction."

Jeebus Christmas on a crutch, can we get trolls with an IQ of AT LEAST 70 or so??

David

Posted by: David was here at September 29, 2009 04:49 PM (Qv4UP)

223 As I pointed out, he plead guilty with the terms of a plea deal that was changed. If you're going to count his plea deal as a conviction (personally, if the judge changed the terms of the plea, I think he should be allowed to change his plea) what you're all freaking out about is "unlawful sexual intercourse" and not the details you guys have been describing.

You guys aren't talking about that, you're talking as if he was convicted of what the young woman said in her testimony. That he was convicted of 2nd degree rape or something. He wasn't convicted of that. (You crazy bastards are actually putting me in a position to defend what is - at the very least - a statutory rapist!)

Let the law do what it does. The guys had a good warrant, they nabbed him, let the process work. Why is this so special? I don't get it.

The self-righteous masturbation occurring at 2 of my favorite sites is ridiculous.

These kinds of crimes happen all the time!!!!!

All the fucking time!!!!!

You guys do not go into spasms every time a woman is raped so what the fuck is going on that this has you guys freaking out over?

Seriously. It's strange. The sanctimony of how outraged you are and your obvious sense of superiority of other people not being outraged enough is eye-rolling.

Let the guy seek re-trial, change his plea, and let the law take its course.

Posted by: Tommy V at September 29, 2009 04:52 PM (/PwQS)

224

Good piece.

That's what Dummy said.

Posted by: Michael Scott at September 29, 2009 04:55 PM (3wl7s)

225

The self-righteous masturbation occurring at 2 of my favorite sites is ridiculous.

Physician, heal thyself.

Posted by: andycanuck at September 29, 2009 05:00 PM (3wl7s)

226 Sorry, guys, I'm not a troll. Been on this site a long time. I just don't get what all the moral outrage is about and I don't feel comfortable with the sense of superiority on these threads.

If he did what he is accused of, OF COURSE, its horrible. OF COURSE, you let the law take its course.

You guys are spasing out over this like it matters what other people think. Like other people not agreeing with you on this somehow adds doubt to the heinousness of his actions.

I don't get it. If I am going to freak out over this, how many things during the day am i going to freak out over? It will never stop.

If he did what he is accused of, I don't need someone to affirm to me that he needs to answer to the law. What the hell does someone else's opinion have to do with it? This isn't an election. I'm not trying to sway votes here.

And again, while I mispoke a bit, the context of my writing was pretty clear. What he plead guilty to, and what you guys are claiming he plead guilty to, are not the same thing. And I personally believe if the judge changed the deal, then he should be allowed to change his plea.

But frankly, I don't care. i don't need you guys, or Polanski's defenders to explain to me what's right and what's wrong.

Polanksi has to answer to the law. It's the most obvious thing in the fucking world. What's the debate about?

Next.

Posted by: Tommy V at September 29, 2009 05:03 PM (/PwQS)

227 I have a pretty bad feeling that roman pedolanski's ass kissers would be offended at this and demand death by lethal injection if it were glenn beck or rush limbaugh or Zip from weasel zippers were caught raping an underage girl

Posted by: FatSweatyJewintights at September 29, 2009 05:07 PM (5oK9d)

228

These kinds of crimes happen all the time!!!!!

I think the freakout is over the fact that there are large numbers of people willing to defend his crime.

It's disturbing to see widespread social acceptance of child rape, even if that view is in the minority.

Posted by: Warden at September 29, 2009 05:08 PM (QoR4a)

229

Tyranny of the minority - here we go again.  The Left slowly advanced every minority (numbers, friend) position in this country.  Basically, STFU, it's not PC.  And we let it happen.  Don't worry about G20 protesters shutting down/damaging property - no biggie: that's YOUR problem.  Takes time to consult a PC rule book before you speak.  No problem.  That's YOUR problem.  Don't like trolls hijacking threads, wasting everyone's time.  Well it's YOUR fault, not the trolls.  They're the minority, that must above else not only be pampered, but given free reign.  Your rights - subjugated to theirs.

It's YOUR fault, not the trolls.  They have no responsibility, and hence should face NO consequences, for being less than civil, participating in this Republic's discourse.

 

Posted by: MDr at September 29, 2009 05:08 PM (ucq49)

230 I just wonder if this is more trouble than it's worth to bring a man to jail

In which case we ought to cut Charlie Manson & his "family" loose.

Oh, Sirhan Sirhan while I'm thinking about it.

According that "Polanski Scale of Justice", they've paid for their crimes a dozen-fold.

Posted by: I R A Darth Aggie at September 29, 2009 05:13 PM (1hM1d)

231 It was forcible rape:

".... it has long been recognized that in order to establish force within the meaning of section 261, subdivision (2), the prosecution need only show the defendant used physical force of a degree sufficient to support a finding that the act of sexual intercourse was against the will of the [victim]. (People v. Young (1987) 190 Cal.App.3d 248, 257258 [235 Cal.Rptr. 361] . . . .)

Posted by: Blake at September 29, 2009 05:14 PM (Dh6Nf)

232 And again, while I mispoke a bit, the context of my writing was pretty clear. What he plead guilty to, and what you guys are claiming he plead guilty to, are not the same thing. And I personally believe if the judge changed the deal, then he should be allowed to change his plea.

He plead guilty to knowingly having sex with an underage girl. That's bad enough. Lots of people have been sent to jail for years for just that. From the girl's account it seems pretty clear that he's guilty of much worse. Why should he be treated better than your average priest or teacher guilty of stat-rape?

And he had his chance to change his plea, but chose to flee the country instead.

And on the morality scale anyone who hasn't raped a 13 year-old actually is better than Roman Polanski. It's not just a pose - we really are morally better than he is and we judge him as being a bad man.

Posted by: Mtenloch at September 29, 2009 05:14 PM (H1/x2)

233 Guys, it's pretty obvious to me that PoS is not a troll -- he is a spoof.  He's saying whatever retarded shit ("Champagne and drugs and she still said no?  Impossible!"  Come on guys, that's a dead giveaway!) that he thinks will get the most outraged response from you guys.  He's probably running off to Kos or Ball Juicers and posting your reactions to his nonsense -- and they're probably all having a big laugh over your busting veins.

When did "Do Not Feed The Trolls" become bad advice?  Never, that's when.

Posted by: Bender Bending Rodriguez at September 29, 2009 05:22 PM (r4j1P)

234

Actually I think P.S. is either socially retarded or on some kind of medication or both.  I used to think he/she/it was some kid taking the piss but I think it might be someone who has some mental health issues.

I don't think a kid taking the piss would be this persistent.

Posted by: Eleven at September 29, 2009 05:31 PM (7DB+a)

235 If he did what he is accused of, OF COURSE, its horrible. OF COURSE, you let the law take its course.

You'd have to be a real knucklehead to think that he didn't do what he is accused of.

Posted by: Blake at September 29, 2009 05:34 PM (Dh6Nf)

236

You'd have to be a real knucklehead to think that he didn't do what he is accused of.
Convicted of.

Posted by: andycanuck at September 29, 2009 05:36 PM (3wl7s)

237

But frankly, I don't care. i don't need you guys, or Polanski's defenders to explain to me what's right and what's wrong.

Polanksi has to answer to the law. It's the most obvious thing in the fucking world. What's the debate about?

Next.

Well..... for one thing, there are people who are arguing that he doesn't have to answer to the law.  What's your point?

Next?

Posted by: Eleven at September 29, 2009 05:37 PM (7DB+a)

238 235 If he did what he is accused of, OF COURSE, its horrible. OF COURSE, you let the law take its course.

You'd have to be a real knucklehead to think that he didn't do what he is accused of.

I wonder if Tommy V thinks OJ was guilty or murdering Nicole and Ron. Just a theory I have, but thinking OJ is innocent seems to be an indicator of all kinds of odd thinking.

Posted by: Mtenloch at September 29, 2009 05:43 PM (H1/x2)

239 Well, no surprise hollywood supports a child-rapist, they must be out of cop-killers to love.  Polanski is a poster boy for the death penalty.  As for the arguement that what he did wasn't so bad - how many of the libs saying that would be ok with someone raping their 13 or 15 year old kids? 

Posted by: BattleofthePyramids at September 29, 2009 06:04 PM (GxOzW)

240 From your mother, when I was fucking her up her squeakhole, dickhead.

Next question?

Posted by: ace at September 29, 2009 02:44 PM (d6tLI)

Stay classy.

Posted by: Johnathan E. at September 29, 2009 06:21 PM (dQdrY)

241

Guys, it's pretty obvious to me that PoS is not a troll -- he is a spoof.  He's saying whatever retarded shit ("Champagne and drugs and she still said no?  Impossible!"  Come on guys, that's a dead giveaway!)

The problem is, I have no idea what he actually said and what Trollbusters made him say. I'd write him off as a definite absolute sockpuppet/satire/spoof, but for the possibly one of our trollbusters is just tweakin him.

Posted by: Entropy at September 29, 2009 06:31 PM (cok/k)

242 229

Tyranny of the minority - here we go again.  The Left slowly advanced every minority (numbers, friend) position in this country.  Basically, STFU, it's not PC.  And we let it happen.  Don't worry about G20 protesters shutting down/damaging property - no biggie: that's YOUR problem.  Takes time to consult a PC rule book before you speak.  No problem.  That's YOUR problem.  Don't like trolls hijacking threads, wasting everyone's time.  Well it's YOUR fault, not the trolls.  They're the minority, that must above else not only be pampered, but given free reign.  Your rights - subjugated to theirs.

It's YOUR fault, not the trolls.  They have no responsibility, and hence should face NO consequences, for being less than civil, participating in this Republic's discourse.

 

Posted by: MDr at September 29, 2009 05:08 PM (ucq49)

 

  You know, it always amuses me when some whining douchebag starts bleating about their RIGHT to not be exposed to trolls.  On the internet.  Where trolling was invented & perfected.

  You want non-interference with your brilliant rants?  Deliver them in front of the bathroom mirror in your underwear. 

  Trolls are part of the internet environment.  If you can't take a little troll exposure, maybe the AoSHQ isn't the place for you.  In other words:  Fucking nut up or shut up. 

Posted by: Russ from Winterset at September 29, 2009 06:35 PM (7n7Br)

243 Mtenloch :

Why should he be treated better than your average priest or teacher guilty of stat-rape?

I think you're making my point here, Maetenloch. Do you guys freak out like this over the priest scandal or every teach nearly every month that is accused or convicted of stat-rape?

What makes this so special? Because the Hollywood community supports this guy? So? What difference does that make? Is he somehow EXTRA guilty because he has supporters in Hollywood?

And on the morality scale anyone who hasn't raped a 13 year-old actually is better than Roman Polanski.

I don't think you're getting off thinking you're morally better than Polanski. I think you're getting off thinking you're morally superior to anyone that is not sufficiently outraged.

I think there is something clearly psychologically afoot with his defenders. They're not dealing with what he is accused of. They're rationalizing it away, choosing to believe their impression of Polanksi rather than what the facts might be.

But I think there is something psychologically afoot going on here as you guys seem to be competing at who is the most outraged - not by Polanski's actions - but by the lack of outrage of others.

Posted by: Tommy V at September 29, 2009 06:35 PM (/PwQS)

244 They're the minority, that must above else not only be pampered, but given free reign.  Your rights - subjugated to theirs.

It's YOUR fault, not the trolls.  They have no responsibility, and hence should face NO consequences, for being less than civil, participating in this Republic's discourse.

Umm... dude...

Just to point out... you have no right not to be offended, and being "less then civil" is not a crime.

What constitutes 'civil' is so utterly subjective you'll be coming after me next.

Posted by: Entropy at September 29, 2009 06:39 PM (cok/k)

245

@244

 

Any problem with hijacking loons?

Posted by: MDr at September 29, 2009 06:44 PM (ucq49)

246

@244

Civility is your/Left's battle cry for we lowly knucle draggers to STFU?  Right?

Posted by: MDr at September 29, 2009 06:46 PM (ucq49)

247

@244

Any fifth column training?  False flag?  Or just the reasoned voice of Durant?

Posted by: MDr at September 29, 2009 06:48 PM (ucq49)

248

@244

'civil' is your side's latest attempt to muffle us.  Get the the subtle dig.  Apparently not.  And we're well aware who has issued gag orders.

Posted by: MDr at September 29, 2009 06:52 PM (ucq49)

249

Ace - you are an attorney, right?  Putting everything of the plea bargain on the record makes that the record that a reviewing court has to use.  Having it scripted means that the positions of the attorneys and what they are agreeing to is on the record.

I don't doubt a lot of coaching is done, but I did clerk for a judge on the Wayne County Circuit Court Criminal Division, (Michigan) and all pleas followed a script to make sure that they were done properly and would not be open to attack by the state court of appeals.

Pleas were stopped when a defendant went off of script.  It was either done correctly or it went to trial.

Now, I am sure that more was done here in the way of scripting, but it is either done correctly so that the record is legally unassailable or it is not done.  No judge seriously wants to see a remand.

Posted by: Mikey NTH at September 29, 2009 06:56 PM (TUWci)

250 "My understanding is he has been convicted but not sentanced. He pled guilty."

Yes.  This is my understanding of the posture of the case as well.  Someone is not convicted until they are sentenced: the conviction is part of the judgment and sentence entered against them by the court.

"He madea settlement with the victim out of court which is also an admission of guilt."

Most civil settlements do not contain any concession of liability, let alone an admission to specific facts.  Even if this were the case, a civil settlement agreement--a document created for the specific purpose of litigation, or in this case for forestalling it--is not going to be admissible in criminal court on a whole number of different evidentiary grounds.

"And in California, we have mandatory sentences for such things--in this case, something like 8 years."

"Wouldn't he be sentenced based upon guidelines that existed when he originally pled guilty?"

Not only would he be, he has to be.  The substantive law applicable to a criminal case is the law in effect on the date of the offense.  To apply subsequent changes in the law is ex post facto and therefore unconstitutional.  Mandatory sentencing statutes are largely creations of the 80's and 90's, so while I don't know for certain, I would guess they don't apply here.

Posted by: Dave J. at September 29, 2009 06:57 PM (DCQ0q)

251

@244

@244

@244

@244

Yikes.

And we're well aware who has issued gag orders.

I'm not, and have no idea what you're talking about.

Posted by: Entropy at September 29, 2009 07:03 PM (cok/k)

252

Disclosure:

I let the Kos Kids, Huff & Postures, and entropy's drive me from the "field" several years ago.  OK, Bush's New entitlement programs (No Child Left Behind & Medicare drugs for all), Campaign Finance Reform, etc (spending & lost freedoms) had something to do with it.

I was a coward.  I'll freely admit it.  Beaten down by the Left, disappointed in Bush, but not strong enough to stand and deliver.

But I'm not actually a newbie to this site or others, as some might suspect. I have been here and elsewhere, before I bowed out.  First got involved during Prez Zippers problems. 

I learned to recognize well, the barking moonbats vs the seemingly reasonable entropies vs that exceedingly rare species of the opposition that one could actually reason with.  You might not win all your arguements, but you'd at least get a few draws, after a civil disagreement.

Guess I've had too many years, and too many beers.  Maybe I'm just mis-remembering.

Posted by: MDr at September 29, 2009 07:06 PM (ucq49)

253

Yes.  This is my understanding of the posture of the case as well.  Someone is not convicted until they are sentenced: the conviction is part of the judgment and sentence entered against them by the court.

Well...uh... no. They are convicted, then they are sentanced. I'm no lawyer but unless you are, I think that's how it works.

Also, I do not believe the judge has to honor the plea deal anyway. I don't think you can go back and change your plea just because he doesn't honor the deal... he doesn't have to.

The prosecution can make a deal to charge you with less crimes, or a lesser crime, and the prosecution can request a more lenient sentancing, and the judge usually honors it, but I don't think they have to. They're not part of any deals.

Posted by: Entropy at September 29, 2009 07:08 PM (cok/k)

254

@ 251

Pick one point, again.  Feign ignornace.  I know the game.

Posted by: MDr at September 29, 2009 07:09 PM (ucq49)

255

You know... I usually don't  bother to correct people when they do this.

But in this case, it kind of proves my point.

Posted by: Entropy at September 29, 2009 07:11 PM (cok/k)

256

Feign ignornace. 

OK. You got me. At least some of my ignorance is feigned. I'm less ignorant on why we're arguing than you are. Trust me.

But not most of it, I assure you.

Posted by: Entropy at September 29, 2009 07:13 PM (cok/k)

257

I will cut you some slack.

First, 1 question:

So you think I should be banned from commenting here, MDr, since I'm a troll?

Posted by: Entropy at September 29, 2009 07:14 PM (cok/k)

258

Posted by: LikeATimeBomb at September 29, 2009 02:35 PM (J6xq2)

The crime is against the State of California.  The state takes care of justice for crimes against its citizens.  Why?  To keep the wronged from going after their own revenge/justice.  Blood fueds are bad for any society, and if the state cannot or will not pursue justice, then individuals and their kin will do it.

Posted by: Mikey NTH at September 29, 2009 07:14 PM (TUWci)

259 "Well...uh... no. They are convicted, then they are sentanced. I'm no lawyer but unless you are, I think that's how it works."

Yes, I am, and a prosecutor at that.  It's possible that other jurisdictions do things differently, but every criminal disposition that I've ever seen here in Florida enters conviction (either adjudication of guilt or the ubiquitous Floridian legal concept of the withhold of adjudication, but that's a tangent) and imposes sentence in the same order, often in the same line of the same order as to each count. 

Being made a convicted felon is a PART of a felony sentence, because it imposes civil disabilities independent of any other punishment (i.e., loss of your right to vote, own firearms, serve on a jury, etc.).  You can't make yourself a convicted felon simply by entering a plea without subsequent judicial action pursuant to that plea.

"Also, I do not believe the judge has to honor the plea deal anyway. I don't think you can go back and change your plea just because he doesn't honor the deal... he doesn't have to."

Generally speaking, no, but if a court doesn't accept a negotiated plea, a defendant MAY have grounds to withdraw the plea.  Different jurisdictions have differing rules on this, both in their rules of criminal procedure and as defined by case law.  In short, I don't know what the law is on this issue in California, and neither do you, so it may not be so perfectly cut-and-dried.

Posted by: Dave J. at September 29, 2009 07:23 PM (DCQ0q)

260

@ 257

Answer my questions first

Posted by: MDr at September 29, 2009 07:26 PM (ucq49)

261

@ 260

My bad. Accusations.  Assertions.  Be prepared to bring some creds.

Posted by: MDr at September 29, 2009 07:31 PM (ucq49)

262

So, what, now I have to provide credentials to avoid banning?

Recall that was my point in the first place. You start banning people for being "uncivil" or "not adding to the debate" and next thing you know you'll come for me.

After me, you'll turn into LGF.

I'm further to the right then Ace is. I've been posting here for, hell, I dunno, at least '04 I think. I'm a libertarian, Reagan/Goldwater conservative.

But apparently I'm also a member of the left/DKos who uses gag orders as a weapon and who is "seemingly semi-reasonable" but really looking to silence everyone with claims of 'civility' or some such. And I'm banned.

Not only am I arch-conservative, I frequently advocate attacking the left, the idea that we're basically in an ideological existential war with them, and using their own (alinsky-ite) tactics against them. I'm no wuss and no defeatist. No moderate. Sure as bloody hell NOT the one calling for 'civility' or appeasement.

But the moment you start creating subjective standards upon which to eliminate people from 'reasonable discussion' you've signed a suicide pact.

And yeah... you're not the first person to blatantly assume I was a DKOS Axelturf troll just on 1 single disagreement.Which, again, speaks directly to why many people need to take a chill pill vis-a-vis banning and trolls and witches and whatnot.

What ever happened to "Sticks and Stones"? Apparently that was a local thing? Nowhere else in the country are children taught that words can never hurt them?

Cuz I can tell you, as a culture, this wisdom is nowhere to be found.

Posted by: Entropy at September 29, 2009 07:54 PM (cok/k)

263

Ace says:  "continuing to work as a director, marrying and fathering two children..."

I guess he couldn't get that 13 year old out of his mind, when he married two children.  What a scum bag.  Three kids whose lives are ruined by this scum bucket.  So, Ace, exactly how many girls/women/boys did the guy end up marrying.

Posted by: TimothyJ at September 29, 2009 08:27 PM (IKKIf)

264

@ 262

Answer my accusations/assertions.  You're playing HC's game.

Sorry, I've been gone awhile.  Had to eat & see O'reilly.  Heard a rumor that Lanny Davis would be on.  I thought no way the Left would become that desperate.

Posted by: MDr at September 29, 2009 09:16 PM (ucq49)

265

@ 264

Creds?  Those can wait.  Answer/respond first.

Posted by: MDr at September 29, 2009 09:19 PM (ucq49)

266

219:

Agreeing with you does not violate my self-imposed /ignore on that-which-shall-not-be-named.  I agree with you.

Posted by: societyis2blame at September 29, 2009 09:19 PM (rPDD/)

267

93:

Fortunately our justice system sees it differently.  It's not only about the present victim, its about the next one.

In a nutshell, if Polanski hadn't fled, took his sweetheart plea, then raped another child a year later, what would the police tell that kid's parents ? "Sorry, the victim forgave him so we let him go."

Prosecutors might ask a victim if they are willing to testify, and elect to prosecute or not based on the problems of proof a refusal to testify may present, but the question of whether the victim wishes the perp to be prosecuted or not isn't really a relevant issue - see Violence, Domestic.

All too often the victims of rape and domestic violence have seemingly nonsensical impulses to forgive their violators and/or blame themselves.  The system's aim is to protect the other 13 year old potential victims, more so than vindicating the present victim.  Therefore, her wishes at this stage are moot, in that her testimony clearly established non-consensual sex (in case Whoopi's still confused, that's Rape Rape). 

To my knowledge, the victim in this case has never claimed her testimony was fabricated in any way, and her desire to let this go stems from wanting to avoid a horrible memory and the media feeding frenzy, not because the situation was somehow misunderstood and Polanski did not in fact rape her.

Posted by: societyis2blame at September 29, 2009 09:41 PM (rPDD/)

268

Age of Conan CD Key
Call of Duty II CD Key
Company of Heroes CD Key
Counter - Strike CD key: http://www.cdkeyexpress.com
Diablo 2 CD Key: http://www.cdkeyexpress.com
Grand Theft Auto IV CD Key
Guild Wars CD Key
Nexon Cash for MapleStory: http://www.cdkeyexpress.com
Red Alert 3 CD Key
StarCraft CD Key
The Godfather II CD Key
Titan Quest CD Key
WarCraft3 CD key: http://www.cdkeyexpress.com
Warhammer Online CD key
http://www.cdkeyexpress.com


Burberry scarf: http://www.scarves-store.com
silk scarf: http://www.scarves-store.com

Posted by: jason at September 29, 2009 10:39 PM (bjyab)

269

Entropy

We're not done.  We'll finish this when you get back.  You'll have plenty of time to consider, then respond to my asserations/accusations.

One over-arching question is why would you defend the nearly indefensible, repeatedly (Honest Cloud)?  It's not a matter of - better 100 guilty men (trolls) go free (unbanned) that to falsely imprison (ban) one man (troll).  There's plenty of other sites where he could continue his barking moonbat thread jackings.  Is his continued interruptions & distractions of the opposition's discourse that important? There's more, but here's a start. 

feign ignorance - stall - change the subject - stall - ask a question before answering one - stall - parse - stall

Posted by: MDr at September 29, 2009 11:19 PM (ucq49)

270

Some people like LV handbags,Some people like Chanel handbags,but most popel have been keeping an eye on cheap fashion brand handbags .we often talk about all kinds of designer handbags with my friends,most of my friends also like cheap fashion brand handbags.We admire cheap fashion brand handbags designer who often be able to design so many stylish handbags.We want to be a handbags designer in the future too. In our store onlineyou can buy all series of cheap fashion brand handbagsinclude: Louis Vuitton,LV Luggage,LV Wallets,LV Agendas,LV Belts,LV Shoes,LV Accessories,Gucci,Gucci Wallets,Gucci Shoes,Marc Jacobs handbags,Marni handbags,Miu Miu handbags,Mulberry handbags,Prada handbags,Thomaswylde handbags,TOD handbags,Bottega Veneta handbags,D&G handbags,Dior handbags,YSL handbags,Coach handbags

Posted by: steve at October 13, 2009 11:28 AM (/SPtx)

271 I like the UGG boot that makes me happy and warm winter.And I think women's ugg boot is a good choice this year.

Posted by: godugg at October 15, 2009 09:10 AM (nSzGJ)

Posted by: retailike at October 17, 2009 12:10 PM (zFgZJ)

Posted by: nike coo lshox at October 18, 2009 08:01 AM (+xhtv)

274

Anti-shoes (sometimes called Antishoes) are a style of unisex sheepskin boots lined with wool on the inside and with a tanned outer surface. MBT M.Walk often have a synthetic sole, although this is not universal. Swissmasai have been considered a fashion trend since the early 2000s. The terms MBT Shoes, MBT Lami Brich have been used as generic terms for sheepskin boots in Australia since the 1970s, when they first appeared in advertising and other publications on mbt online .

Posted by: mbt online at October 20, 2009 08:01 AM (oTWIb)

275 The Classic Cardy UGG Boot has a light, flexible outer sole along with a protective suede heel guard giving UGG Australia fans the prospect of an all season UGG Boot .Women's Ugg Boots Classic Cardy Free shipping!High quality!

Posted by: Roben at October 20, 2009 09:26 AM (F7aRx)

276 UGG Classic Cardy Boot makes me different form the other girls. The UGG Bailey Button Boot is a good choice for female. If you want to be more attractive this winter,the UGG boots will make your dream come true.

Posted by: uggs boots on sale at October 21, 2009 10:36 PM (m+5Ku)

277 UGG Classic Tall is one of our brand's heritage styles. The UGG Classic Tall features genuine twin-face sheepskin for refreshing comfort.UGG Classic Tall Sheepskin boots are the taller version of UGG Australia's signature luxury sheepskin boot.UGG Classic Tall is a classic article for autumn and winter seasons. It has become a new favorite for fashionable ladies.

Posted by: ugg classic tall at October 22, 2009 08:49 AM (Anvud)

Posted by: replica handbags at October 24, 2009 11:27 PM (o4b/d)

Posted by: fdsfds at October 27, 2009 12:20 PM (8kvkz)

Posted by: ugg boots at October 27, 2009 04:05 PM (pgfU2)

Posted by: aka at October 27, 2009 05:26 PM (dO3dc)

Posted by: australia ugg at October 27, 2009 06:07 PM (c6EK2)

283 Our website htttp://www.widelybuy.com provide many kinds of UGG Boots.For example,the UGG Classic Tall,Ugg Classic Short,Ugg Ultra Short,Ugg Sundance and so on.In order to meet your demands as possible.We will give you the best service to satisfy your request.We also will give you the reasonable price on the basis of equality and mutual benefits.Free shipping fee and no tax 1 week to you door!

Posted by: xlzhengnan at October 29, 2009 11:13 PM (+SJA7)

284 i like the article!thank you!!

Posted by: classic cardy boots ugg at October 30, 2009 10:41 AM (xTjoi)

Posted by: sadfasdf at October 31, 2009 09:03 AM (+XZc1)

Posted by: airforceoneshop at November 03, 2009 04:17 PM (LHCCE)

Posted by: ugg boots cheap at November 05, 2009 09:23 AM (XeJfl)

288 UGG Classic Tall is one of our brand's heritage styles. The UGG Classic Tall features genuine twin-face sheepskin for refreshing comfort.UGG boot Sheepskin boots are the taller version of UGG Australia's signature luxury sheepskin boot.UGG Classic Tall is a classic article for autumn and winter seasons. It has become a new favorite for fashionable ladies.

Posted by: ugg classic tall at November 05, 2009 10:02 PM (Lhqv8)

Posted by: ttrtrtrert at November 06, 2009 12:47 AM (wYEI1)

290 Come to our website for shopping with high quality and best service! There have new products,MBT M. Walk
and MBT Lami,Welcome everybody to buy it.

Posted by: mbt shoes at November 08, 2009 10:24 AM (QhfLM)

291 UGG Classic Tall is one of our brand's heritage styles. The UGG Classic Tall features genuine twin-face sheepskin for refreshing comfort.UGG boot Sheepskin boots are the taller version of UGG Australia's signature luxury sheepskin boot.UGG Classic Tall is a classic article for autumn and winter seasons. It has become a new favorite for fashionable ladies.

Posted by: ugg classic tall at November 09, 2009 02:32 AM (06Lli)

Posted by: ugg at November 11, 2009 02:37 AM (ly6Oi)

293 one day i went shopping outside,and in an ed hardy store,I found some kinds of ed hardy i love most they are: Ed hardy Ed hardy ed hardy clothing ed hardy clothing ed hardy hats ed hardy hats ed hardy belts ed hardy belts ed hardy kids ed hardy kids ed hardy caps ed hardy caps ed hardy bags ed hardy bags ed hardy purses ed hardy purses ed hardy sunglasses ed hardy sunglasses ED Hardy Mens Hoodies ED Hardy Mens Hoodies Ed Hardy Womens Tops Ed Hardy Womens Tops Ed Hardy Womens Shoes Ed Hardy Womens Shoes ED Hardy Swim Trunks ED Hardy Swim Trunks Thanks of your infomation i have read it is very help full for me.

Posted by: ed hardy at November 11, 2009 03:19 AM (amVaT)

Posted by: ugg boots at November 12, 2009 03:55 AM (IeIJx)

295 I love Women's UGG Classic Cardy Boots 5819 very much.The Women's UGG classic tall boots makes me carzy this year.And aslo the new design UGG Bailey Button Boots is aslo a good choice in 2009.

Posted by: UGG Bailey Button Boots at November 12, 2009 07:24 AM (vcvB5)

296 nike dunk sb

Do anything needed to support an idea, a good idea usually brings good results, doing


business is like that.http://www.dunksky.com/.This site has always been on

Posted by: nike dunk sb at November 14, 2009 02:55 AM (APB+g)

297 buy [url=http://www.reviewups.com/]discount ugg shoes[/url]
[url=http://www.reviewups.com/]cheap ugg shoes[/url]
[url=http://www.reviewups.com/]cheap ugg[/url]
[url=http://www.reviewups.com/ugg-coquette-casual-shoes-c-22]ugg rainier[/url]
[url=http://www.reviewups.com/]buy ugg[/url]
[url=http://www.reviewups.com/]ugg usa[/url]
[url=http://www.reviewups.com/]discount ugg boots[/url]
[url=http://www.reviewups.com/ugg-classic-short-c-1]ugg 5825[/url]
[url=http://www.reviewups.com/]ugg shoes sale[/url]
[url=http://www.reviewups.com/ugg-sundance-c-5]ugg sundance[/url]
[url=http://www.reviewups.com/]ugg shoes[/url]
[url=http://www.reviewups.com/]cheap ugg boots[/url]
[url=http://www.reviewups.com/ugg-classic-tall-c-3]ugg 5815[/url]
[url=http://www.reviewups.com/]ugg sale[/url]
[url=http://www.reviewups.com/]ugg uk[/url]
[url=http://www.reviewups.com/ugg-knightsbridge-c-27]ugg knightsbridge[/url]
[url=http://www.reviewups.com/]womens ugg boots[/url]
[url=http://www.reviewups.com/]ugg boots[/url]
[url=http://www.reviewups.com/]ugg australia[/url]
[url=http://www.reviewups.com/ugg-classic-cardy-c-2]ugg 5819[/url]from usa

Posted by: cheap at November 14, 2009 06:17 AM (s7MB5)

298 one day i went shopping outside,and in an gucci shoes store,I found some kinds of gucci shoes i love most they are: ed hardy ed hardy links of london links of london Gucci shoes Gucci shoes Gucci boots Gucci boots Gucci Mens Shoes Gucci Mens Shoes Gucci Mid Cut Shoes Gucci Mid Cut Shoes Gucci High Cut Shoes Gucci High Cut Shoes Gucci Womens Shoes Gucci Womens Shoes Gucci Womens Boots Gucci Womens Boots cheap Gucci shoes cheap Gucci shoes street lighting street lighting buy wow gold buy wow gold cheap wow gold cheap wow gold Thanks of your infomation i have read it is very help full for me.

Posted by: Gucci Womens Shoes at November 16, 2009 03:43 AM (7ECvT)

299 If you are looking for buying a quality pair of warm sheepskin boots you really need to try the ugg classic tall boots. The quality of the it means that they will last 4 or 5 times as long as the cheaper copies and the level of comfort they provide to the wearer is much higher.So when it comes to you finding a pair of ugg boots that will match up to any outfit in your wardrobe then it is worth considering investing money in a pair of Ugg classic tall this

Posted by: ugg classic tall at November 16, 2009 07:16 AM (yMGAk)

Posted by: nike shoes at November 17, 2009 06:51 AM (f9Cxq)

301 Silver Pure pure-silver pieces links of london Earring , including ornaments links of london Earrings , bracelets, and bangle with faceted claret links of london Pendants . For converse disguise effete stones and links of london Pendant . Elizabeth Galton links of london Silver Chain , Creative Director Links of mellifluous nuggets accented with revolving charms links of london sweetie bracelet . Key pieces carry gold and diamond Execution ribbon links london Friendship Bracelets , a deposition armlet with three growth charms links of london friendship bracelet , and a sphere ribbon of London creating a luxe iconic chief essence appropriate For Flutter & Wowlinks london new arrival , Elizabeth took the non-stop icon of penchant C the congeniality links of london Bracelet which she has scheduled much pay honor to and awareness.link of london and an emphasis on freshness. links of london sale Traffic is down at many locations, links of london jewelry but the company has been able to compensate by raising prices, links london Olive Garden.

Posted by: links of london Sweetie Bracelets at November 17, 2009 08:34 PM (amVaT)

302 You exchange authentic and mean prices UGG Ultimate Short boots .Many individuals ask where to get sizeable ugg boots at a great cost without getting ripped off. There they can be assured that the inventive and the best australian ugg. Wish you can buy your favourite ugg boots. This kind of spaces to find a trusted and established dealer of d UGG Mayfaire boots .Ensure You should always show your ugg gumboot wisely and ensure that you are made in Australia.Some people buy online because There bags of ugg boots exchange the best eminence.You are ready to buy ugg boots online,and ugg boots promote online worth authentic boots are reduction and real ugg boots and of this you can buy UGG Bailey Button boots .It is the ugg gumboot you buy is authentic but you must elect the mass which has good status then you may buy the ugg boot you like.

Posted by: ugg boots at November 18, 2009 01:09 AM (amVaT)

303 links of london is the best online links london stores where you can buy the cheapest links of london jewellery and links london jewelry . Our huge selection of Ed hardy and ed hardy clothing

Posted by: links of london at November 19, 2009 02:33 AM (amVaT)

304

one day i went shopping outside,and in an ed hardy store,I found some kinds of ed hardy i love most they are: Ed Hardy Ed Hardy ed hardy clothing ed hardy clothing ed hardy shoes ed hardy shoes ed hardy hats ed hardy hats ed hardy jeans ed hardy jeans ed hardy belts ed hardy belts ed hardy kids ed hardy kids ed hardy hoodies ed hardy hoodies ed hardy caps ed hardy caps ed hardy swimwear ed hardy swimwear ed hardy bags ed hardy bags ed hardy purses ed hardy purses ed hardy t shirts ed hardy t shirts ed hardy sunglasses ed hardy sunglasses ED Hardy Swimwear ED Hardy Swimwear ED Hardy Swim Trunks ED Hardy Swim Trunks ED Hardy Mens T-Shirt ED Hardy Mens T-Shirt ED Hardy Mens Tops ED Hardy Mens Tops Thanks of your infomation i have read it is very help full for me. ED Hardy Mens Hoodies ED Hardy Mens Hoodies ED Hardy Mens Jeans ED Hardy Mens Jeans ED Hardy Mens Swim Trunks ED Hardy Mens Swim Trunks ED Hardy Mens Underwear ED Hardy Mens Underwear ED Hardy Mens Shoes ED Hardy Mens Shoes ED Hardy Womens Swimwear ED Hardy Womens Swimwear ED Hardy Womens T-Shirt ED Hardy Womens T-Shirt ED Hardy Womens Tops ED Hardy Womens Tops ED Hardy Womens Tanks ED Hardy Womens Tanks ED Hardy Womens Hoodies ED Hardy Womens Hoodies ED Hardy Womens Jeans ED Hardy Womens Jeans ED Hardy Womens Shoes ED Hardy Womens Shoes street lighting street lighting buy wow gold buy wow gold cheap wow gold cheap wow gold ed hardy ed hardy links of london links of london Gucci shoes Gucci shoes buy wow gold buy wow gold Thanks of your infomation i have read it is very help full for me.

Posted by: ed hardy at November 19, 2009 07:36 PM (7ECvT)

305 The report says lack of water in the future may result in several problems. A&F Men A&F Men It may increase health problems.A&F Women A&F Women Lack of water often means drinking waters not safe.A&F Bags A&F Bags Mr. Engelman says there are problems all over the world because of diseases,A&F Caps A&F Caps such as cholera, which are carried in water.Abercrombie Men Abercrombie Men Lack of water may also result in more international conflict.Abercrombie Women Abercrombie Women Countries may have to compete for water in the future.A&F Women Polos A&F Women Polos Some countries now get sixty percent of their fresh water from other countries.Men A&F Polos Men A&F Polos This is true of Egypt, the Netherlands, Cambodia, Syria, Sudan, and Iraq.A&F Men Polos A&F Men Polos And the report says lack of water would affect the ability of developing to improve their economies.Women A&F Tanks Women A&F Tanks This is because new industries often need a large amount of water when they are beginning

Posted by: londonoflinks at November 20, 2009 12:38 AM (amVaT)

306 It was a very nice idea! Just wanna say thank you for the information you have shared. Just continue writing this kind of post. I will be your loyal reader. Thanks again.

Posted by: ed hardy belts at November 23, 2009 02:58 AM (amVaT)

Posted by: mbtshoesbuy at November 23, 2009 05:19 AM (bNNim)

308 Attention, class. Here's a logic question for you: If it's true that everyone loves Nightfall Ugg Boots Nightfall Ugg Boots Nightfall Ugg Boots a deal, and Black Friday offers the best deals of the year, then is it safe to assume that folks will go ugg boots on sales ugg boots on sales ugg boots on sales into a state of high-grade hysteria the day after Thanksgiving? The answer is: duh, of course. Though over a week away, Black Friday is already igniting the Search box. ugg boots shop ugg boots shop ugg boots shop Shoppers have pushed up searches on "black friday 2009" and "black friday ads" to dizzying heights. One might think that retailers would keep the deals a secret until the big day ugg mini boots ugg mini boots ugg mini boots but nothing could be further from the truth. classic cardy ugg boots classic cardy ugg boots classic cardy ugg boots

Posted by: mxc at November 23, 2009 07:58 PM (amVaT)

309

Nike Air Max 90 <a href="http://www.airmax-shox.com/7-air-max-90">Nike Air Max 90</a>

Air Max 90 <a href="http://www.airmax-shox.com/7-air-max-90">Air Max 90</a>

Nike Max 90 <a href="http://www.airmax-shox.com/7-air-max-90">Nike Max 90</a>

Max 90 Shoes <a href="http://www.airmax-shox.com/7-air-max-90">Max 90 Shoes</a>

Posted by: Rena at November 25, 2009 07:27 AM (vMNKh)

Posted by: cheap Tiffany Silver Jewelry at November 25, 2009 11:59 PM (QN9Ge)

311

<a href="http://www.discountMbt.com/">Mbt</a> enjoy good quality,<a href="http://www.discountMbt.com/Mbt-sport-c-5.html">Mbt Sport</a> and <a href="http://www.discountMbt.com/Mbt-mwalk-c-2.html">Mbt walking shoes</a> save you up to 81%

Posted by: MBT shoes at November 27, 2009 02:15 AM (hA/vq)

Posted by: MBT shoes at November 27, 2009 03:05 AM (5bAIk)

313 The proper function of man is to live, but not to exist.ugg classic cardyConquer fear of death and you are put into possession of your life. ugg classic tallThere is a time to speak and a time to be silent. ugg knightsbridgefree shippingmbt cheap
mbt sale
mbt uk
mbt shoes cheap
MBT M.Walk

Posted by: reviewups at November 27, 2009 04:10 AM (xUZwC)

314

It is a great idea especially for relatively new blogs. Id like to try this.

ugg bailey button Just got my ugg classic mini! They are absolutely beautiful, and the quality is just amazing. No wearing them in, no blisters just absolutely snug strait out of the box.

Everything dynamic and very positively!

Posted by: ugg bailey button boots at November 28, 2009 02:12 AM (e/fuI)

Posted by: mbts at November 30, 2009 08:02 PM (Gcyqp)

316 hot news for brand shoes online store ,do you want to win more discount ?and popular for younger,and nike air maxwith top quality A ,come on all air max shoes with lowest price for highest quality !

Posted by: nike air max at December 01, 2009 09:42 PM (OKj2x)

317 ou won't overlook the designer when getting a handbag. With ereplicastock's beautiful louis vuitton handbags,Fendi handbags, Prada purses and other designer ladies hand bags, you can obtain to be a trendsetter. louis vuitton launched his firm after gaining experience making luggage and trunks for Napolon III. A century and a half later, his namesake brand is the anchor of the world's largest luxury-goods company. louis vuitton has affirmed itself over the past decades as a world leading brand name in the fashion industry.

Posted by: HAPPY at December 03, 2009 05:24 AM (5Ewaz)

318 The cheap ugg boots sale for women are stylish, they are comfortable and whats more, they keep your feet. theres a pair of fellow sufferers,ugg australia uk to complement your personal preferences, why do we not take the traditional high discount ugg boots on salefor cold winter?
As a matter of fact, with the passing time, the love for ugg usa is increasing among girls in this modern world. The growing demand for these womens ugg made the manufacturers UGG Boots Sale to revamp the looks of these boots with different hues.come our website and buy a pair of ugg uk.UGG Classic Cardy are popular as shoes for cowboys. The SHOES close the whole parts of the foot. The ugg cardy are important to protect your feet from any dangerous things during your walking activities. There are many oatmeal ugg available in the Market and if you are interested to get one you can directly go to the store that sells it.

Posted by: reviewups at December 03, 2009 08:49 AM (OKj2x)

319 The best software online shop: http://www.software-hotbuy.com/ .

Posted by: Microsoft Office 2007 at December 03, 2009 08:57 AM (IE1Dh)

320 Browse through our catalogue of hundreds of ed hardy clothing,Ed hardy Shirt,Ed hardy ... Buy Ed Hardy today for a gift, for a friend, or for yourself.

ED HARDY Online Shop,Ed Hardy Store by Christian Audigier,coach handbags,rolex watches.We supply cheapest Newest ed hardy discount 2009 Commodity New styles.

ed hardy sale at AJ Wright The popular French designer, Christian Audigier has.

Posted by: 45464645rhnjgjnygj at December 03, 2009 10:49 PM (5Ewaz)

321

Last weekend, I ordered chocolate Ugg Classic Cardy hoping they wouldn't show marks as much as my beige ugg cardy boots and waterproofed them when I first got them. They look so much cleaner than my old beige ugg boots, I wear my Whooga's all year round, they don't make my feet sweat as much as my older pair. I'm very impressed with how they are holding up to my abuse, very well made. My only suggestion to everyone is keep them dry and out of the mud.Ugg Classic Cardy!

Posted by: ugg classic cardy at December 04, 2009 12:40 PM (npwAH)

322 Yves Saint Laurent Sandals

Posted by: Yves Saint Laurent Sandals at December 07, 2009 02:02 AM (QN9Ge)

Posted by: uggboots at December 07, 2009 10:30 AM (Cooh2)

324

It is so nice.Thank you for sharing.Good work.

Posted by: Rena at December 08, 2009 10:40 PM (vMNKh)

325 [url=http://www.discountMbt.com/]Mbt[/url] will be beneficial to your health. buy [url=http://www.discountMbt.com/]discount Mbt shoes[/url] at our website. [url=http://www.discountMbt.com/Mbt-chapa-c-6.html]Mbt Chapa[/url] is just $87.

Posted by: mbt shoe at December 09, 2009 01:23 AM (A8YEN)

326 As the business grows, rolex replica has also jumped into an international brand. It is worth mentioning that, swiss rolex replica is the ancestor of today's brand-oriented, in order to protect the quality and brand name will be printed on their products, the history of fashion in the world, is the first one first. replica watch paypal replica rolex paypal replica watches paypal

Posted by: rolex explorer ii at December 10, 2009 03:05 AM (2EZnI)

Posted by: ugg bailey button boots at December 10, 2009 08:36 AM (M80fF)

328 Today ugg boots online have become a phenomenon.Every winter,the ugg classic crochet are one of the hottest goods in the market all over the world.So now don't be hesitation,own a pair of ugg usa immediately.

Posted by: ugg boots sale at December 10, 2009 03:26 PM (I3/dZ)

Posted by: Lacoste shoes at December 12, 2009 10:26 PM (/3s/N)

330 Being the prom queen cheap Pandora or just Pandora sale to look Pandora discount different, unique, discount Pandora fabulous and cheap Pandora sale classy is discount Pandora sale every high cheap Pandora sale school teens discount Pandora sale dream. There are Pandora UK different prom dress designs pandora jewellery out there that pandora jewelry suit your thomas sabo preferences. You thomas sabo jewellery can choose thomas sabo sale to have that thomas sabo UK princess looks cheap thomas sabo with typical ball thomas sabo on sale gowns and tiaras thomas sabo discount or look sweet and discount thomas sabo innocent with cheap thomas sabo on sale simple dress discount thomas sabo on sale gown designs or to have that cute,fun cheap thomas sabo sale and flirty looks. 50s fashion prom discount thomas sabo sale dress inspired is what you are looking for.

Posted by: Pandora at December 13, 2009 02:35 AM (T4LMC)

Posted by: replic watches paypal at December 14, 2009 01:46 AM (PJeKS)

Posted by: wholesale jewelry at December 20, 2009 03:38 PM (1dySH)

333 Life lies in sports.The Air max wants to offer you great comfort while you doing sports.Cheap nike air max shoes is on sale now.The Air max 90 and Nike air max 95 is a good nike shoes for you.You can Buy nike max here,Discount air maxs and Cheap nike air max 2009 waiting for you.

Posted by: Air max at December 21, 2009 02:44 AM (GlhVb)

Posted by: Christian Louboutin Boot at December 21, 2009 10:33 AM (QN9Ge)

Posted by: wholesale jewelry at December 28, 2009 05:52 AM (1dySH)

Posted by: Christian Louboutin on sale at December 29, 2009 03:35 PM (QN9Ge)

337 Cheap replica rolex and tag heuer watches,replica watches of rolex rolex watches replica,buy patek philippe Buy replica watches,fake watches and tag heuer watches.

Posted by: tag heuer at January 01, 2010 12:45 PM (nUnK8)

338 replica rolex rolex and tag heuer watches,replica watches of rolex rolex watches replica,buy patek philippe Buy replica watches,fake watches and tag heuer watches.breitling watches breitling watches at low price.

Posted by: rolex at January 06, 2010 03:08 PM (TspGB)

Posted by: ugg shoes|timberland uk|ugg boots|87415555.com.cn at January 06, 2010 06:17 PM (qzq48)

340 [url=http://www.discountmbt.com/]mbt shoes sale[/url]-buy the collection of [url=http://www.discountmbt.com/]Mbt shoes[/url] & [url=http://www.discountmbt.com/]Mbt[/url] sport white,save you up to 85%

Posted by: mbt at January 07, 2010 08:30 PM (eAu83)

341  Mbt trainers85% off, $87 only. Yes, Mbt sport white, Mbt m  walk are on sale. www.discountmbt.com

 

Posted by: mbt at January 07, 2010 08:31 PM (eAu83)

342 Un total de once comunidades autnomas estn este jueves en alerta naranja Christmas gift ugg tall boots (riesgo importante) por nevadas y bajan las temperaturas en toda Espa09a, segn la Agencia Estatal de Meteorologa (AEMET). En concreto, se Christmas gift ugg napoule sandal trata de Aragn, Cantabria, Castilla-La Mancha, Catalu09a, Christmas gift timberland classic boots Madrid, Navarra, Comunidad Valenciana, Galicia, Pas Vasco, Asturias y Murcia. La cota de nieve bajar a menos de 200 metros en el CantbricoLa Pennsula Ibrica est bajo dos borrascas y un anticicln que crearn un pasillo que permitir el paso de una corriente de aire muy fro, como la que est provocando un temporal de fro glaciar en Europa, aunque es esperan que el fro que suframos no sea tan intenso como en otros pases. An as, se espera que las bajas temperaturas se mantengan hasta el domingo. La cota de nieve baja en el Cantbrico a menos de 200 metros

Posted by: El temporal de fro y nieve pone en alerta a once comunidades autnomas ugg boots|ugg uk|timberlan at January 09, 2010 03:18 AM (tWrEP)

343 Buy rolex watches,tag heuer watches and replica patek philippe patek philippe watches,replica audemars piguet> replica breitling watches breitling watches,chanel watches chanel watches watches replica montblanc watches.Rolex fake watches and replica watches brands,replica rolex: breitling watches,replica tag heuer: tag heuer, replica rolex: replica rolex replica cartier watches: cartier watches,replica omega watches: omega watches,replica panerai watches: panerai watches,replica armani watches: armani watches,replica audemars piguet: audemars piguet,replica bvlgari watches: bvlgari watches,replica chanel watches: chanel watches,replica gucci watches: gucci watches,replica movado watches: movado watches,replica montblanc watches: montblanc watches,replica patek philippe: patek philippe on sale.replica watches and replica watches.

Posted by: rolex at January 10, 2010 09:34 PM (OO9Jx)

344 Cheap tag heuer watches,rolex watches that replica watches,fake watches and tag heuer watches,replica breitling breitling watches,cheap replica rolex cartier replica cartier watches,replica omega omega watches and panerai replica panerai watches replica armani armani watches,cheap audemars piguet audemars piguet watches,bvlgari watches replica chanel watches replica gucci gucci watches and movado watches replica montblanc montblanc watches sale patek philippe watches for us.

Posted by: rolex at January 14, 2010 10:07 PM (GTMOj)

345 Mbt shoes is the first physiological footwear that has a positive effect on the whole body, Mbt sport 2 men Mbt chapa black are on sale.Mbt chapa sale promotion. http://www.mbt-lami.com

Posted by: mbt shoes at January 15, 2010 01:10 AM (eAu83)

346 It is a nice post.Thank you for sharing.

Posted by: Nike Air Max 90 at January 15, 2010 01:21 AM (KDETp)

Posted by: chi hair irons at January 17, 2010 04:38 PM (9oETl)

348 Good replica watches and buy replica watches and replica rolex replica replica tag heuer watches,buy replica replica omega watches and breitling watches replica breitling watches sale at lowest prices.

Posted by: replica watches at January 24, 2010 03:04 AM (ioa0w)

349 Welcome to our website,and you will enjoy the sunshine service. Let's abandon all the worry,and enjoy the happy shopping travel.All the replica watches paypal and replica watches are most in fashion boutique this year.rolex replica and rolex replica paypal and the replica rolex paypal show your chaming temperament. In addtin, the fake watches paypal and the other fake rolex paypal make you mold your unique glamour this winter.The swiss rolex replica have the high quality but low price. replica watch paypal and replica rolex have all the style and cheapest price replica rolex watches. Enjoying the fun of net purchase! replica rolex We will supply you the perfect service and after sale support system. Our honest will bring you absolute satisfaction.

Posted by: replica watches paypal at January 27, 2010 11:22 PM (+29Vi)

350 The resistant is In a crowded promote that curious charily the slender line between Ed Hardy Clothing sale fashionable and plenty of it significant that it currently stocks products that petition to Ed Hardy Sale 197 million. Announced some remarkable numbers Discount Ed Hardy after the goal teenagers who watched us try on a budget act Cheap Ed Hardy Clothing I m confident they ll fondness that expansion Discount Ed Hardy Clothing looked well-able, as American Eagle had a Ed Hardy Tops good range of that overdo can be chalked up to my dad Ed Hardy Jeans who was in the mass myself Ed Hardy Hoodies payments money and traditional. Same-pile sales Ed Hardy T Shirts meanwhile, were up more than 32 Ed Hardy Swimwear year over year to him, me, and the signal Ed Hardy Kids While other retailers are responding to Ed Hardy Christian Audigier The circle is intensely protecting its image as a Ed Hardy Kids Clothing strain, and, as a significance Ed Hardy Kids T Shirts it s getting slighted big time by its once cultlike Christian Audigier ever-loyal fan corrupt.Fashion week

Posted by: Cheap Ed Hardy at January 28, 2010 02:32 AM (1Ejby)

Posted by: air max shoes at January 28, 2010 05:03 AM (JOSIc)

352 Buy rolex replica watches and replica watches replica replica watches and replica rolex watches patek philippe watches and fake watches and breitling watches,replica tag heuer: tag heuer,replica cartier watches: cartier watches,replica omega watches: omega watches at lowest prices.

Posted by: replica rolex at January 29, 2010 03:28 PM (h+uyA)

353 , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
, , , ,

Posted by: at February 01, 2010 01:23 PM (vm3jg)

354

<a href="http://www.mbt-uk.net/">Mbt shoes</a>,Would you want to experience the wonderful feeling in
 <a href="http://www.mbt-uk.net/mbt-lami-c-23.html">Mbt Lami</a> or <a href="http://www.mbt-uk.net/mbt-mwalk-c-24.html">MBT walk</a>?

Posted by: mbt shoes saler at February 04, 2010 03:21 AM (eAu83)

355 [url=http://www.discountmbt.com/mbt-changa-c-15.html]MBT Changa[/url] and [http://www.discountmbt.com/mbt-chapa-c-6.html]Mbt Chapa[/url] are first choice of [url=http://www.mbt-uk.net/]Mbt shoes[/url].

Posted by: mbt shoes saler at February 04, 2010 03:22 AM (eAu83)

356 Certainly watches are Replica Watches used to help people record rolex Watches time, but rolex watches nowadays its functions have enlarged. Replica watches are now tag heuer Watches not only objects that tag heuer watches can tell you what time it is, they are also a status symbol. You should not feel strange when you find someone wearing a watch on his wrist, but use the cell phone to tell time. In that situation, the watch is just showing its luxurious function cartier watches. It is normal and cartier watches perhaps also happens to you. .If asked that among the watches of various brands, which one can suit your taste? There is no doubt that most people will choose Rolex. Whichever social class you are in, it is naturally Rolex was known breitling Watches and cherished breitling watches for a long time. However, the elements do not usually enter the market alone, always come with the price tag up to the hand. For this reason, many people, especially men, their dreams of luxury Rolex watches are buried in omega Watches his heart omega watches. What should I do? Rolex watches are simply stunning worn by the rich and famous, right? No, this world is not the world's richest men, is the world of each. All are equal before the search of luxury and be men's watches respected. Within men's watches, the law, when consumers are in the market, women's watches they should women's watches receive the same treatment. This is the real reason why replica Rolex watches are ladies watches ladies watches more welcome than Rolex. Because in this world are not difficult to understand that the rich are much less than people with low income, you agree with me? You are forced to nod and say with certainty that is the reality. These low-income people do not have enough money to save every month. They can not afford such luxury Rolex watches

Posted by: replica watches at February 04, 2010 03:23 AM (YOuVm)

357 [url=http://www.mbt-uk.net/]Mbt shoes[/url]enjoy good quality,[url=http://www.mbt-lami.com/mbt-sport-c-3.html]Mbt Sport[/url] and [url=http://www.mbt-lami.com/mbt-mwalk-c-1.html]Mbt walking shoes[/url] save you up to 64%

Posted by: mbt shoes saler at February 04, 2010 03:31 AM (eAu83)

358 [url=http://www.mbt-uk.net/]Mbt shoes[/url] are on promotion now,[url=http://www.mbt-lami.com/mbt-mwalk-c-1.html]Mbt walking shoes[/url] and [url=http://www.mbt-lami.com/mbt-lami-c-2.html]Mbt Lami[/url] are on sale.

Posted by: mbt shoes saler at February 04, 2010 03:53 AM (eAu83)

359 Would you like the discount [url=http://www.mbt-uk.net/]Mbt shoes[/url]? [url=http://www.mbt-uk.net/mbt-lami-c-23.html]MBT Lami [/url] are up to 63% off and [url=http://www.mbt-uk.net/mbt-mwalk-c-24.html]Mbt m walk[/url]v up to 63% off .

Posted by: mbt shoes saler at February 04, 2010 03:54 AM (eAu83)

360 [url=http://www.mbt-uk.net/]Mbt shoes[/url] include [url=http://www.mbt-uk.net/mbt-mwalk-c-24.html]Mbt m walk[/url]  and [url=http://www.mbt-uk.net/mbt-lami-c-23.html]Mbt lami shoes[/url],all of them are designer shoes

Posted by: mbt shoes saler at February 04, 2010 03:55 AM (eAu83)

361 [url=http://www.mbt-uk.net/]Mbt shoes[/url] are known as antishoe,[url=http://www.mbt-uk.net/mbt-lami-c-23.html]Mbt lami shoes[/url]v and [url=http://www.mbt-uk.net/mbt-chapa-c-17.html]Mbt chapa shoes[/url] are included.

Posted by: mbt shoes saler at February 04, 2010 03:55 AM (eAu83)

362 Welcome to buy [url=http://www.mbt-uk.net/]Mbt shoe[/url] ,[url=http://www.mbt-uk.net/mbt-chapa-c-17.html]Mbt chapa shoes[/url] and [url=http://www.mbt-uk.net/mbt-sport-shoes-c-15.html]Mbt Sport Shoes[/url]  enjoy top quality and free shipping.

Posted by: mbt shoes saler at February 04, 2010 03:56 AM (eAu83)

Posted by: airmax at February 04, 2010 04:25 PM (Eu9Vs)

364 Cheap replica watches and replica watches 100% copy replica watches of the previous omega watches model: the famous Manchester Logo is located at 3 and the cartier watches chronograph 45-minute breitling watches at 9 with orange figures. Football fans can use the very special 45-minute chronograph to measure the halves of a football match. Black patek philippe hour hand and minute hand features yellow luminescent coating. The hour makers, chronograph audemars piguet and the first 15-minute scale of the tag heuer chronograph counter is montblanc watches presented in eye-catching rolex red. Bright Yellow movado watches tones are found on the minute track, date bvlgari watches rolex on sale.

Posted by: replica watches at February 05, 2010 06:06 AM (0uEN8)

Posted by: may at February 06, 2010 06:36 PM (Eu9Vs)

366 this replica watches replica watchWhoever wants replica watches timekeeper that does the job of a tachometer will be crazy for. The operation is performed by the copied replica rolex 's bezel. The Daytona also applies automatic movement C just one of many breitling watches characters and functionalities that ensures the precision of time. Originally created to measure lap time and the cartier watches overall time of a race, Rolex Daytona replica omega watches timepieces can measure elapsed time for omega any sporting event. The power of this breitling replica item is made possibly by its internalized perpetual rotor mechanism. Known for its precision, this special Rolex replica cartier watch model only has to be set once to the cartier watches standard time of the owner's choice. Once rolex watches being created, it updates itself during time changes, making upkeep of the replica's time setting replica watches nonexistent. Even though these replica watches were made for sporting events, (specifically those involving laps or circuits), it's not so adversible to put them tag heuer in water since they are not fake watches waterproof. Even thought most of the time, the replica watches do not bear the tag heuer same functionalities as the original ones, they are still the most desirable alternatives of the expensive real models.

Posted by: replica watches at February 06, 2010 11:58 PM (KbTNE)

367 Factors Replica Watches About The Rolex replica watches Oyster The Oyster is so closely get in touch with Rolex, and it is inevitably that some people think these are the only Replica watches Rolex manufacture. Others suppose that there is a single Oyster watch. But as a matter of fact, the name Oyster does not actually meant for a rolex Watches particular watch you can buy rolex watches or even to a series but to a type of case that available in some of the Rolex ranges. History The Oyster case was first released in 1926. The objective was to protect the workings of the watch from dust and moisture. Early watches were far from waterproof. The Oyster tag heuer Watchescase was an tag heuer watches innovative design to eliminate these problems. It had a new double locking crown that screwed into place. It has been compared to the hatch on a submarine. Like a submarine, the Oyster case was waterproof. In 1927 Mercedes Gleitze swam the English breitling Watches Channel breitling watches . Before she set off she was presented with a Rolex Oyster. When she arrived, the watch was still working perfectly. The resulting publicity gave the new case a massive boost. Why is it called Oyster? Legend has it that Hans cartier Watches Wilsdorf cartier watches, who invented the Oyster, chose the name because the new case reminded him of the difficulty he had experienced prising open oysters at dinner. Since then the Oyster has further, particularly advanced. Many Oyster watches today are omega Watches perpetual-self-winding, in other omega watches words, it does not require to expose the mechanism to the outside world in order to wind it. The Osyter Perpetual is one of the toughest, most durable, most reliable watches (under truly adverse conditions). It is probably the best mechanical watch money can buy.

Posted by: replica watches at February 07, 2010 11:12 AM (TUJDt)

368 Watches really Replica Watches are a great fashion replica item. This is because watch manufacturers such as Emporio Armani understand their customers wants and needs and rolex Watches know that rolex watches there is a big market for tag heuer Watches fashion tag heuer watches and designer movado watches in the UK. The number of people that demand these fashion watches has grown enormously over the past few years as people all want to have their own unique personality. Buying a watch can be a breitling watches long breitling Watches process. This is because there are so many watches to choose from that people cartier watches can spend a whole lot of time making their decision. One brand that is always popular is Emporio Armani. This is because Emporio Armani are one of the best fashion brands in the UK and they therefore offer customers some of the best fashion omega Watches available watches on omega the market. There are millions mens Watches of watches for a customer to choose when it comes to a watch. It's quite easy to make the right watch purchase decision. Or you just need to know what famous watch brands are and you may find what you like at once. Emporio Armani watches have been very popular for many mens Watches years.Women's watches Emporio Armani is a brand for style sense and mens Watches fashion which it shows in his range of fashion watches. No matter what watch brand you choose, it can be sure that the watch you are going to wear would show some of your personality.

Posted by: replica watches at February 09, 2010 11:00 AM (fa8ya)






Processing 0.16, elapsed 0.1702 seconds.
15 queries taking 0.0186 seconds, 377 records returned.
Page size 309 kb.
Powered by Minx 0.7 alpha.

MuNuvians
MeeNuvians
Polls! Polls! Polls!
Frequently Asked Questions
The (Almost) Complete Paul Anka Integrity Kick
Top Top Tens
Greatest Hitjobs

The Ace of Spades HQ Sex-for-Money Skankathon
A D&D Guide to the Democratic Candidates
Margaret Cho: Just Not Funny
More Margaret Cho Abuse
Margaret Cho: Still Not Funny
Iraqi Prisoner Claims He Was Raped... By Woman
Wonkette Announces "Morning Zoo" Format
John Kerry's "Plan" Causes Surrender of Moqtada al-Sadr's Militia
World Muslim Leaders Apologize for Nick Berg's Beheading
Michael Moore Goes on Lunchtime Manhattan Death-Spree
Milestone: Oliver Willis Posts 400th "Fake News Article" Referencing Britney Spears
Liberal Economists Rue a "New Decade of Greed"
Artificial Insouciance: Maureen Dowd's Word Processor Revolts Against Her Numbing Imbecility
Intelligence Officials Eye Blogs for Tips
They Done Found Us Out, Cletus: Intrepid Internet Detective Figures Out Our Master Plan
Shock: Josh Marshall Almost Mentions Sarin Discovery in Iraq
Leather-Clad Biker Freaks Terrorize Australian Town
When Clinton Was President, Torture Was Cool
What Wonkette Means When She Explains What Tina Brown Means
Wonkette's Stand-Up Act
Wankette HQ Gay-Rumors Du Jour
Here's What's Bugging Me: Goose and Slider
My Own Micah Wright Style Confession of Dishonesty
Outraged "Conservatives" React to the FMA
An On-Line Impression of Dennis Miller Having Sex with a Kodiak Bear
The Story the Rightwing Media Refuses to Report!
Our Lunch with David "Glengarry Glen Ross" Mamet
The House of Love: Paul Krugman
A Michael Moore Mystery (TM)
The Dowd-O-Matic!
Liberal Consistency and Other Myths
Kepler's Laws of Liberal Media Bias
John Kerry-- The Splunge! Candidate
"Divisive" Politics & "Attacks on Patriotism" (very long)
The Donkey ("The Raven" parody)
News/Chat