Liberal Blogger Admits: We Claimed to Support "The Good War" in Afghanistan as Political Strategy to Prove Our "Macho" Credentials; We Never Meant It

Yes, so I imagined. While Glenn Greenwald, for example, was accusing those on the right of being "chickenhawks" for not serving in Iraq, he was never quite able to explain why he wasn't accumulating Congressional Medals of Honor and Taliban tooth-necklaces in the war he supposedly supported, Afghanistan.

The liberal blog Hullaballoo admits what has been obvious all along.

And no, this isn't just about some seedy, nasty liberal bloggers.

It's about our lying POS POTUS, too.

Escalation is a bad idea. The Democrats backed themselves into defending the idea of Afghanistan being The Good War because they felt they needed to prove their macho bonafides they called for withdrawal from Iraq. Nobody asked too many questions sat the time, including me. But none of us should forget that it was a political strategy, not a serious foreign policy.

There have been many campaign promises "adjusted" since the election. There is no reason that the administration should feel any more bound to what they said about this than all the other committments [sic] it has blithely turned aside in the interest of "pragmatism."

But none of us should forget that it was a political strategy, not a serious foreign policy.

You claimed to support a war in which American soldiers were fighting and dying, leaving friends and limbs on the battlefield, as a cynical political strategy?

You... um... voiced support of a real serious-as-death war to cadge votes out of a duped public?

We won't forget, champ. And we won't let you forget, either.

Again we see a leftist projecting his pathological darkness on to others. They accused Bush of fighting wars for this very reason. And now, when it's safe to say so (they think), they concede: We supported a war for the reason we accused Bush of doing so for 8 years.

Via Ed Driscoll's twitter feed.

Posted by: Ace at 02:22 PM



Comments

1 They never meant it. They never mean anything they say. Unless, of course, they "We want everyone to do and think as we say." But they'll never say that.

Posted by: FireHorse at September 22, 2009 02:24 PM (Vl5GH)

2 Well, in fairness, the opposition to the other "bad" (eg Iraq) war was just political posturing as well.

Nobody to my knowledge has called President Obama on NOT bringing home all the troops from Iraq already, something that he promised to have done by now when he was a candidate.

In fact, pretty much nobody is making ANY noises about Iraq now at all.


Posted by: looking closely at September 22, 2009 02:25 PM (PwGfd)

3 Liberals lie, Obama lies, his as seen on TV doesn't work in America.

The world is watching and the world sees the truth.

Posted by: bill-tb at September 22, 2009 02:25 PM (iiiMw)

4 And I was first, and you're all a bunch of planet-rapists.

Posted by: FireHorse at September 22, 2009 02:26 PM (Vl5GH)

5 Gosh. I'm shocked. Who'da thunk.

Posted by: Hotspur at September 22, 2009 02:26 PM (c158/)

6 Well, I for one am shocked!

Posted by: TMK at September 22, 2009 02:26 PM (4SBZt)

7 Of course, they're all gung ho about fighting the very real war against expansionist block quotes.

Posted by: IllTemperedCur at September 22, 2009 02:27 PM (btril)

8 Mission Accomplished!

Posted by: Cerebral Paul Z. at September 22, 2009 02:28 PM (V2sai)

9 Congressional Medals of Honor

The Medal of Honor (as awarded through an act of congress)

It's not congresses medal, it is a mobile standard of the US Ensign worn by an individual who best represented all that America stands for in war.

Not "congressional medal of honor." but "The Medal of Honor."

Posted by: Douglas at September 22, 2009 02:28 PM (uU+Ss)

10 Surprise, surprise, surprise!

Posted by: Pvt. Barack "Gomer Pyle" Obama at September 22, 2009 02:28 PM (rC+/c)

11 @ FireHorse at September 22, 2009 02:26 PM

People who post first are the most racist of all the racists who post here. You're like an entire inbred klan of hillbillies in one dood.

Posted by: TMK at September 22, 2009 02:28 PM (4SBZt)

12 I'm shocked they would admit it. Why not pull out the old "We DID support it but Boooosh messed it up so bad we can't support it now." chestnut?

Posted by: kefka at September 22, 2009 02:29 PM (udoJ3)

13 It's always the same with leftards, lie you fat ass off to get elected then show your true colors, piss yellow. Great tap dancing Jebus I hate these weasels.

Posted by: maddogg at September 22, 2009 02:29 PM (OlN4e)

14 ... you're all a bunch of planet-rapists.
Posted by: FireHorse at September 22, 2009 02:26 PM (Vl5GH)

You say that like it's a bad thing.

(And she was askin for it...)

Posted by: Warthog at September 22, 2009 02:29 PM (WDySP)

15 Remember when the Commiecrats turned Dhimmicrats claimed that Iraq was the "bad" war, diverting attention from Afghanistan the "good" war? And that Al Quaeda (sp?) wasn't in Iraq?Well, the fact was that Al Quaeda was in Iraq. (Now Zarquawi and his goons are wiped out). The fact is also that Iraq was and is a cakewalk compared to Afghanistan. Iraq had and has an educated population, oil revenue, and an even more strategic location that Afghanistan, the back country, ever will be.Remember when the Commiecrats turned Dhimmicrats claimed the divisions between ethnic groups in Iraq were too steep to deal with? The fact is that the ethnic and tribal divisions in Afghanistan are even more severe. Indeed, the only reason the country has the boundaries that it does was that it was a neutral buffer zone between then czarist Russia and then British India. Perhaps the lines on the map need to be redrawn. That might be easier than trying to build a nation where none really existed.

Posted by: Curmudgeon at September 22, 2009 02:29 PM (ujg0T)

16 Also, despite his rhetoric to that effet, nobody who was paying attention thought for a second that Obama, the same guy who was in favor of an immediate unilateral pullout from Iraq, was going to actually escalate the war in Afghanistan.

I'm actually wondering why people think he's inclined to do it now.

If he puts in more troops, he'll "own" the war. . .something he CLEARLY has no stomach for.

He's left with maintaining the status quo (which is a losing strategy), or pulling out altogether.


Posted by: looking closely at September 22, 2009 02:29 PM (PwGfd)

17 You know, if the whole country was made up of these cowardly little dweebs, you could invade it with a pickup truck load of bulldykes armed with willow switches.

Posted by: maddogg at September 22, 2009 02:31 PM (OlN4e)

18 The Left was screaming "vietnam" the minute that troops began actions in October of 2001, and since it wasn't over by November, they were screaming quagmire. It wasn't until Bush began preparing for Iraq that suddenly Afghanistan became the uber important war to be won.

Same shit, different day

Posted by: kbdabear at September 22, 2009 02:31 PM (0Lv+U)

19 The candidate who said our troops were just "air raiding villages and killing civilians" never gave a damn about the war. We all knew it. It's win at any costs for them, because they know they'll never get called on it.

Posted by: brak at September 22, 2009 02:32 PM (7609L)

20 The comments on that Hullabaloo blog entry are, uh, interesting to say the least...

Posted by: Rajiv Vindaloo at September 22, 2009 02:32 PM (Iae5z)

21 POS POTUS lie?
*Ghasp*
Nohhh!

Posted by: Hussein the Plumber at September 22, 2009 02:32 PM (RkRxq)

22 But none of us should forget that it was a political strategy, not a serious foreign policy.

Nobody believed these lying sacks of shit to begin with. Hell, The Dems voted FOR military operations in Iraq in October and just as soon as the votes in Nov were completed they all came out in mass against it. They knew that if they showed their true colors just before an election they would get their asses handed to them.

That was the origin of the infamous “I voted for it before I was against it”.

Posted by: Vic at September 22, 2009 02:34 PM (CDUiN)

23 anyone remember when the NYT and other leftwing medai began saying "quagmire," all at once, in Afghanistan, fourth day of the war?

Remember?

The troops had to stop fighting and advancing because of a ... sandstorm. 24 hours.

a 24 hour sandstorm = quagmire.

I remember Brit Hume humiliating juan williams over that. Williams was defending the Leftwing Media's repetition of "quagmire" as justified.

"Juan, it was a SANDSTORM," Brit said. In THAT WAY he had of saying stuff.

Posted by: ace at September 22, 2009 02:34 PM (ClQSp)

24 Now, if we can just re-define patriotism to supporting Obamacare we'll be golden.

Posted by: booter at September 22, 2009 02:36 PM (eimUK)

25 Ace , you mean iraq?

Posted by: I sea kittens at September 22, 2009 02:36 PM (bAL0J)

26 I guess the moron doesn't make the connection that we try to teach every five year old,if you say things you don't mean eventually nobody believes anything you say.

Posted by: bulwrk at September 22, 2009 02:36 PM (HSJkR)

27 @ looking closely,
Cindy Sheehan, for all of her kookiness, has been consistent on this. She followed Obambi to his Hyanisport vacationthe same way that she followed Bushitler to Crawford.
There was no there there because of, wait for it, wait... media bias. She was a cudgel to beat Bush. They wouldn't dare us it against Glass JObama.

Posted by: Incredible at September 22, 2009 02:37 PM (cjk6M)

28 Glenn Greenwald? Why isn't he the same fabulous blogger who has a New York Times Best Selling Book on the
Bush Administration and its abuses of power. And he has one of the
most-read blogs on the Interent, after 9 months of blogging. And
Senators read from his blog at Senate hearings and his posts lead to
front-page news stories in major newspapers.

And isn't he the same blogger who has the softest, most velvety rectum tissue combined with buttocks of tempered steel?

Good day to you, sir!

Posted by: Rick Ellensburg at September 22, 2009 02:37 PM (rC+/c)

29 Will they be calling him "BarracksHitlersaneObomber" any time soon?

Posted by: andycanuck at September 22, 2009 02:37 PM (3wl7s)

30 a pickup truck load of bulldykes armed with willow switches.
where do i sign up?

Posted by: Maddows middle finger at September 22, 2009 02:37 PM (1B81L)

31 I love how the lefty even cavalierly tosses about the whole bit about "adjusting" campaign promises.
Why, it's almost as though they don't even get upset when THEIR side lies and postures.

Posted by: eddiebear at September 22, 2009 02:38 PM (wnU1W)

32 Sez Jim Geraghty:

>>We now know liberal bloggers never meant what they wrote about
Afghanistan. We will soon know if the president meant anything he said
about that war on the campaign trail.

Of course President Obama didn't mean it. Given all his other immediately discarded political promises, and his apparent pacifism, why is this even up for debate?

Did Obama pull out all US forces from Iraq? Nope.
Are the detention facilities at Guantanamo bay still open? Yup.
Did Obama raise taxes since taking office? Yup.

I think the better question is, now that Obama is actually POTUS and has assumed (at least nominally) responsibility for the war in Afghanistan, has he had a legitimate change of heart about American military efforts abroad?

In other words, is he going to actually be willing to expend some of his ever-dwindling political capital on this war, or is he going to let the effort atrophy, at the cost of American lives and honor?


Posted by: looking closely at September 22, 2009 02:39 PM (6Q9g2)

33 In all fairness, anyone who ever believed that anything the left said was not pure political maneuvering, at the expense of everyone and everything that normal people hold dear, is an idiot. We all know that the left are congenital liars, self-haters, and enemies of progress in all ways (except for promotingnew, twisted sexual fetishes as healthy activities for the family at dinner time). But, it is nice of them to throw the obvious in the face of the gullible fools who sold their souls for a little, temporaryalleviation of illusory white-guilt. Now those morons can have some realguilt to eat at their insides.

Posted by: progressoverpeace at September 22, 2009 02:39 PM (A46hP)

34 "The base of the Democratic party is fundamentally pacifist and isolationist"

Yet Pat Buchanan and Ron Paul somehow get lumped in with Conservatives who are supposedly "war mongers" and "free traders".

Posted by: Rocks at September 22, 2009 02:39 PM (Q1lie)

35 Hmmmm, war and peace. Probably one of those peripheral issues best left to the cables.

Posted by: msm manque at September 22, 2009 02:40 PM (5GcKk)

36 and by "win at any costs" I mean win elections, not wars. That's all they care about.

Posted by: brak at September 22, 2009 02:40 PM (7609L)

37 When I call them traitors, I don't want anyone to think I am questioning their patriotism.

Posted by: the real joe at September 22, 2009 02:40 PM (gue3j)

38 Are we still in Iraq, by the way? I mean, are we still fighting a war there? Did we lose, win, what? Cause I haven't seen any headlines blaring "quagmire," "ongoing civil war," or "another grim milestone" lately. Is no news good news?

Posted by: Jeeves at September 22, 2009 02:40 PM (tQqHI)

39 Oh, and can I "adjust" their heads if they come too close to me?

Posted by: eddiebear at September 22, 2009 02:41 PM (wnU1W)

40 Flaming skull material.

Posted by: Original Roy at September 22, 2009 02:41 PM (jV0wG)

41 In other words, is he going to actually be willing to expend some of his ever-dwindling political capital on this war, or is he going to let the effort atrophy, at the cost of American lives and honor?
Zero understands about as much about honor as a dog knows about foreplay.

Posted by: maddogg at September 22, 2009 02:41 PM (OlN4e)

42 do I mean Iraq?

Yes maybe I did... hmmm...

right. I am getting quagmire stories confused.

The NYT went full quagmire on like the 5th day of the Afghanistan war too.

But I think you'e right, I am confusing the quagmires.

Posted by: ace at September 22, 2009 02:41 PM (ClQSp)

43 Well. Here we all are. Waiting for the other shoe to drop. Waiting to finally really be able to tell if Obama is truly as bad as we thought he might be.
Hear that thunder in the distance? That's a stampede of shoes dropping.
He's fucked our friends. He's engaged who revile our senses and our morals. He has demonstrated himself to be a liar of seemingly supernatural skills.
And we hope he really isn't as bad as we think he might be.
Glenn Beck definately steps up to and sometime, on the "out there" line. But it ain't his conclusions. It's just his presentation. (imo)

Posted by: Hussein the Plumber at September 22, 2009 02:41 PM (RkRxq)

44 Somehow I'm not shocked that they would expend American lives to further their political asperations.

Posted by: Bosk at September 22, 2009 02:42 PM (pUO5u)

45 My big question is when the Precedential polling will include "traitor" as an option? I'm thinking it would garner something like 35% at this point.

Posted by: progressoverpeace at September 22, 2009 02:43 PM (A46hP)

46 So when they say if you like your private insurance you can keep it and the public option will make insurance companies more competitive is that just a strategy also?

Posted by: bulwrk at September 22, 2009 02:44 PM (HSJkR)

47 I hate hippies.

Posted by: DrewM. at September 22, 2009 02:44 PM (ur6Ar)

48 These people have no souls.

I almost wish their lie about our returning vets being on the verge of "snapping" were true, IYKWIMAITYD.

Posted by: Y-not at September 22, 2009 02:44 PM (sey23)

49 #24
Well, literally speaking, a quagmire is a sticky swamp that is difficult to pass through. So, its not much of a stretch to classify an actual sandstorm as a "quagmire" in the literal sense.

The problem is that every journalist of the baby boom is stuck in Vietnam. They have no other way of looking at American involvement in foreign conflicts, except through the prism of failed East Asian policy. That's why there has never been contemporaneous reporting on the VICTORY in Iraq.

Posted by: looking closely at September 22, 2009 02:44 PM (6Q9g2)

50 The weak horse just crapped on the Oval office rug.
I knew he was a rookie, but didn't expect him to beso farout of his league.

Posted by: Roy at September 22, 2009 02:45 PM (cB77O)

51 But none of us should forget that it was a political strategy, not a serious foreign policy.

I doubt that anyone will equate Democrat Party with 'serious foreign policy' any time soon.

Posted by: kefka at September 22, 2009 02:45 PM (udoJ3)

52 "The base of the Democratic party is fundamentally pacifist and isolationist"
Balls. The base of the Democratc Party is fundamentally in favor of subjecting the US to UN rule. Isolationist my ass.

Posted by: flenser at September 22, 2009 02:47 PM (dkBcp)

53 I never believe the left's pundits, but it's sad that their candidate so willfully lied.

Posted by: Amused Observer at September 22, 2009 02:48 PM (EbqoB)

54 Yeah you are talking about the Iraq war and the sandstorm. It was in March of 03 and you coudlnt even see more than 20 feet in front of you. Flipping chow hall food was covered in that crap.

Posted by: Mr. Pink at September 22, 2009 02:48 PM (SqAkN)

55 Cindy Sheehan, for all of her kookiness, has been consistent on this. She followed Obambi to his Hyanisport vacationthe same way that she followed Bushitler to Crawford.
That's because she's a pathetic, shameless attention whore. She would swim to New Zealand if she thought that would get her some camera time to further overplay the sympathy card.

Posted by: UGAdawg at September 22, 2009 02:48 PM (UQeEa)

56 Can the libs not find another disaffected Jim Jones to lead them to a nice island somewhere?

Posted by: Rush Babe at September 22, 2009 02:49 PM (LKkE8)

57 43
do I mean Iraq?



Yes maybe I did... hmmm...



right. I am getting quagmire stories confused.



The NYT went full quagmire on like the 5th day of the Afghanistan war too.


In detail it was Iraq that got held up by the sandstorm, and later got held for 24 hours due to the age old "outrunning your own supply lines". Right away Arnett is in Baghdad saying the halt was because the invasion was failing and they needed to reassess the whole thing, and the entire DemSM was calling it a failed invasion. Ironically Saddam believed this too and stood down the Republican Guard. The next day our guys were in the outskirts of Baghdad.

But you're correct in that the DemSM was calling Afghanistan a quagmire while we were still loading the planes for the invasion

Posted by: kbdabear at September 22, 2009 02:49 PM (0Lv+U)

58 Firehorse: . . . you're all a bunch of planet-rapists.

That would explain the dirt and scrapes on my tool. Now, do I need to go get a shot?

Posted by: Jazz at September 22, 2009 02:49 PM (hnq5i)

59 In A-stan, it wasn't the sandstorms, it was "THE BRUTAL AFGHAN WINTER" that they harped on endlessly.

Like no one ever thought to bring a sweater.

Posted by: XBradTC at September 22, 2009 02:50 PM (NimeM)

60 I can't believe that they are admitting to be the lying scum bags that they really are.

Posted by: TheQuietMan at September 22, 2009 02:50 PM (1Jaio)

61 My plan

1. Hold very public "peace negotiations"
2. ???
3. Victory!!

Posted by: Generalissimo Barry at September 22, 2009 02:51 PM (0Lv+U)

62 "THE BRUTAL AFGHAN WINTER"
Yeah I know it is not like the 10th Mountain or any of the Ranger Battallionsever trains in winter climates. Nope no sirree bob.
/

Posted by: Mr. Pink at September 22, 2009 02:52 PM (SqAkN)

63 #28 Incredible,

You can't outleft Obama. He compiled literally the most liberal voting record in the Senate for a reason.

He's clever enough NOT to speak candidly on many topics, though I suspect if you could get him to, he'd tell you that if were able to do it without paying a huge political price, he'd pull every American soldier out of Afghanistan tomorrow.

And that's the big difference between Obama and Sheehan. Sheehan has no "filter".

Although she is ideologically consistent, she's also nuts. Sheehan has served her purpose as the Left's screaming loon, and they have no further use for her. I actually feel sorry for her (though not too sorry).

Posted by: looking closely at September 22, 2009 02:52 PM (6Q9g2)

64 #57,

That's a bit much.

Posted by: Douglas at September 22, 2009 02:53 PM (uU+Ss)

65 They'll do anything, no matter how low and underhanded to get power. To the left that is the end all for everything they do. Power over people.

Posted by: Bosk at September 22, 2009 02:53 PM (pUO5u)

66 Hmm, another day, another case for... YOU LIE!

Posted by: Joe Wilson at September 22, 2009 02:54 PM (FcR7P)

67 Of all the things I've read about the Obama administration and the lying sons of bitches on the other side of the aisle, this is the most despicible. To playfully chose one conflict over another for goddamn pissing points in a shit eating political maneouver is just.....beneath contempt. That they would play such a cynical game, crybaby tactics relentlessly, lie and fucking lie some more and now look at this like it is just some kind of goddamn recalibration...Hey! We're changing our goals!
Hell isn't hot enough for cheap, miserable, clap-dripping, fucking wastes of humanity that can say shit like that and not fall down dying on the spot of soul-consuming shame.

Posted by: Lost Shaker Assault at September 22, 2009 02:56 PM (s+0uF)

68 There have been many All the campaign promises "adjusted" were lies since before the election.
FIFY

Posted by: harleycowboy at September 22, 2009 02:56 PM (JKGfQ)

69 Contempt is not a strong enough word.

Posted by: Rickshaw Jack at September 22, 2009 02:56 PM (xCcNY)

70 in afghanistan, it was this:

our guys on the ground weren't advancing because they were simply holding the enemy while the planes were obliterating them.

the pentagon said this day after day. Day after day the press noted that the battlelines weren't moving. There weren't fun arrows they could draw showing advances.

Day after day... for like six or seven days.

Then, of course, the Taliban was hollowed out and badly attrited by being blown to hell every day by daisy cutters and our troops ran roughshod over them.

So that was the afghanistan quagmire, all six or seven days of it.

The press simply did not believe that US bombers were really doing anything at all except flying around, looking pretty, and of course maybe killing civilians. (But no enemy fighters.)

Posted by: ace at September 22, 2009 02:58 PM (ClQSp)

71 61 I can't believe that they are admitting to be the lying scum bags that they really are.
Posted by: TheQuietMan at September 22, 2009 02:50 PM (1Jaio)
They see The Precedent get up and spout moronic nonsense and lie his ass off every single day without getting too much pushback on it, so they think they are all in the clear. Sure, people don't like his America-hating plans, but no one in the larger media really goes into what a total imbecile The Precedent is. Once someone is allowed to talk about "profit and earnings ratios" (demonstrating a level ofmathematicalunderstandinghovering around 7th grade)and then lecture us all on economics, finance, and the mathematical intricacies of global warming, there's really nothing that seems too obviously stupid for public consumption.

Posted by: progressoverpeace at September 22, 2009 02:58 PM (A46hP)

72 >Again we see a leftist projecting his pathological darkness on to others.

The blog's author, Digby, is actually a woman.

Posted by: BNJ at September 22, 2009 03:00 PM (vC1jc)

73 This is the reason, that, as lame as the Republicans are, I've been donating a lot (for me) of money to the GOP since 2004. There are no Republicans I know of who would try to lose a war for politics as the Dems tried to do with Iraq, or fake support for a war and then pull the rug out. This is truly evil, backstabbing our soldiers and the countries where they're fighting.

That's why I supported McCain so strongly, even with his serious flaws. The Dems are simply not an option. I wish they were--we need two acceptable parties so they can keep each other honest.

Posted by: stace at September 22, 2009 03:01 PM (g/wgk)

74 Haha! You trusted us! Got you again!

Posted by: Shorter Democrats at September 22, 2009 03:02 PM (AlKlj)

75 Contempt is not a strong enough word.~Rickshaw Jack
Lower than a snake's rectum?

Posted by: Speller at September 22, 2009 03:02 PM (eU9ZB)

76 The blog's author, Digby, is actually a woman.


Well, as I've learned from VaginaWarrior Blogs, this does not necessarily preclude her from having a penis, so - you know . . .

Posted by: Alec Leamas at September 22, 2009 03:03 PM (AlKlj)

77 Since the Taliban wore no uniforms all of the bodies had to be civilians.

Posted by: harleycowboy at September 22, 2009 03:05 PM (JKGfQ)

78 These are the kinds of posts that make this blog well worth reading.

"You claimed to support a war in which American soldiers were fighting and dying, leaving friends and limbs on the battlefield, as a cynical political strategy?"

Is there a word derogatory enough to describe these cretins?



Posted by: mare at September 22, 2009 03:05 PM (X1fsj)

79 The left never lies.
And I did NOT have relations with that Afghanistan War!!

Posted by: Obi Wan Obammy at September 22, 2009 03:06 PM (+3fAP)

80 Putrid pieces of flesh?

Posted by: harleycowboy at September 22, 2009 03:07 PM (JKGfQ)

81 But none of us should forget that it was a political strategy, not a serious foreign policy.

I guess Mark Levi was right about Beck. Hard to believe McCain being this much of a douche.

Posted by: Dr. Spank at September 22, 2009 03:08 PM (uVAgY)

82 At B5, Deebow has a post about the McChrystal leak.

The way I read Deebow, is "It wasn't Vietnam before, but Obama seems determined to make it Vietnam now." But that's just my interpretation.

Posted by: Douglas at September 22, 2009 03:08 PM (uU+Ss)

83 Oh by the way, just another area where the Alinsky left and the jihadists converge...to lie to, to cheat, and to steal from the unbeliever is absolutely fair game in theeyes of Allahinsky...

Posted by: Uncle Jefe at September 22, 2009 03:09 PM (+3fAP)

84 Mark Levin was also right about Beck. Mark Levi is my bartender..

Posted by: Dr. Spank at September 22, 2009 03:09 PM (uVAgY)

85 I hate hippies too!

Posted by: muggedbyreality at September 22, 2009 03:09 PM (eUGzR)

86 So, in what waywould this not be interpreted as "giving aid and comfort to the enemy", literally? Two witnesses? We've got millions. A couple of DNC/idiot messiah campaignmemos would really cinch the whole thing.
I guess the left could argue that they weren't intending to give aid and comfortto the enemy, but only to bring irreparable harm to America, so they could get off on that technicality.

Posted by: progressoverpeace at September 22, 2009 03:11 PM (A46hP)

87 Republicans and Independents need to repeat the phrase "But none of us should forget that it was a political strategy, not a serious foreign policy." and who said it everyday from now to 2012.

If any R or I is giving any interview at anytime on any matter they need to start it out with that phrase and which party said it and lives by it.

These arrogant shits really believe themselves untouchable to confirm what most thought about them, and now that it's confirmed,I don't view them as Americans..........................period.

Posted by: Drider at September 22, 2009 03:13 PM (HaJD9)

88 You mean "The One" made campaign promises he never intended to keep? Oh, the pain, oh the shame..I am shocked, shocked.

Posted by: Mallamutt at September 22, 2009 03:14 PM (V9SYy)

89 DARTH OBAMA: If you only knew the power of Liberalism. Obi Clinton never told you about our real position on Iraq.
DUMB LIB COLLEGE KID: He told me enough! He told me you opposed the war because you wanted to end the imperialist racist war for oil!
DARTH OBAMA: No. I only opposed the war to get elected.
DUMB LIB COLLEGE KID: No. No. That's not true. That's impossible!
DARTH OBAMA: Search your feelings, you *know* it to be true.
DUMB LIB COLLEGE KID: Nooooooooooooooooo!

Posted by: chemjeff at September 22, 2009 03:14 PM (LHRUV)

90 Obama's plan is a bit more complex:

1. Destroy America's ability to protect herself
2. Get attacked
3. Surrender
4. I'm Prez for Life!!!!11!!!!!11!!

I wish I was joking.

Posted by: shibumi at September 22, 2009 03:15 PM (OKZrE)

91 hullabaloo gets to decide for everyone what the war means? Do you believe everything you see on hullabaloo? my guess is no, this is probably the first time you ever have, probably because it supports a simplistic picture of the world that you all enjoy believing in so much.

I, and every lefty I know supported the war in afghanistan (though frequently we had problems with the confused strategies involved). Significant elements in afghanistan (as opposed to say, iraq) were involved in determined ongoing plots to kill us. foiling them is just fine. The only lefties who didn't support it were radical pacifists, and there really aren't very many of those. I have never met one. All the radicals I have personally met believe violence is sometimes appropriate.

But hey, if it makes you feel better to believe a caricature, you probably won't believe me. believe that a single liberal blogger that you regularly despise, explained in one sweeping gesture the motive behind all support for the war in afghanistan. I for one, disagree with hullabaloo.

Posted by: mars at September 22, 2009 03:17 PM (7B8S5)

92 this turdjust needs a good ass beatingthat result in pain that requires dental surgery as well as some thread for the face and a little wire for the jaw bone.

Posted by: x11b1p at September 22, 2009 03:17 PM (K3MWP)

93 Somebody needs to make a tape loop of Pelosi, Reid, Kerry, and Obama saying "the war in Afghanistan IS the War On Terror!" Shove this up those dirty leftists' asses.

Posted by: rockmom at September 22, 2009 03:20 PM (xOEA9)

94 "hullabaloo gets to decide for everyone what the war means? " well if the war got the same type of coverage from the left today like it did under bush you might have a point- welcome to our world, the world where if you disagree with obama you are a racist.

Posted by: x11b1p at September 22, 2009 03:23 PM (K3MWP)

95 I, and every lefty I know supported the war in afghanistan (though frequently we had problems with the confused strategies involved).
LOL. Lefties are known as strategic geniuses when it comes to war. Look at how you're attacking our CIA. Genius. Strategic genius, I say.
Significant elements in afghanistan (as opposed to say, iraq) were involved in determined ongoing plots to kill us. foiling them is just fine.
"Just fine". Whew! And "foiling them". You are giving, I must say.
The only lefties who didn't support it were radical pacifists, and there really aren't very many of those. I have never met one. All the radicals I have personally met believe violence is sometimes appropriate.
Er ... advocating violence against Americans isn't quite the same thing.
But hey, if it makes you feel better to believe a caricature, you probably won't believe me.
Posted by: mars at September 22, 2009 03:17 PM (7B8S5)
I don't believe you. I know that you don't believe you, either. That's the beauty of it all.

Posted by: progressoverpeace at September 22, 2009 03:23 PM (A46hP)

96 Translation for all you non-shysters out there: "We're lying sacks of shit."

Posted by: Angus Dei at September 22, 2009 03:23 PM (q+Jbb)

97 94
Somebody needs to make a tape loop of Pelosi, Reid, Kerry, and Obama
saying "the war in Afghanistan IS the War On Terror!" Shove this up
those dirty leftists' asses.

+1000

Posted by: shibumi at September 22, 2009 03:23 PM (OKZrE)

98 Not just the POTUS, but the FFLOTUS/SOSOTUS as well.

For everyone who (like me) believed that Hillary would have been
better than Obama, and that Hillary is all set to storm out because
Obama's too wussy for her, here's the sobering truth:


Clinton rebuffs general's warning on Afghanistan

NEW
YORK (AFP) – US Secretary of State Hillary Clinton pushed back against
the US military's blunt warning that the battle against insurgents in
Afghanistan would likely be lost within a year without more US troops.

Clinton's comments in an interview with PBS television late Monday came
amid reports that the Pentagon has asked General Stanley McChrystal,
the top commander in Afghanistan, to delay a request for more troops.

Clinton expressed "respect" for McChrystal's assessment that the United
States would likely lose the war in Afghanistan within a year without
more US forces.
"But I can only tell you there are other
assessments from very expert military analysts who have worked in
counter-insurgencies that are the exact opposite," she said.
Her
remarks were the latest sign of stiffening resistance within President
Barack Obama's administration to a major escalation in the US
commitment in Afghanistan, and a growing rift over the issue between
civilian leaders and the military.

Posted by: stuiec at September 22, 2009 03:24 PM (f0O9k)

99 This is no surprise to anyone with half a brain.

The only military action the left supports is humanitarian. The US military: like the Red Cross, but with tanks!

They might support the military option if invading troops were marching across, say, Pennsylvania. But I wouldn't even count on that. "We deserve to be conquered!"

Posted by: tsj017 at September 22, 2009 03:25 PM (4YUWF)

100 2
Well, in fairness, the opposition to the other "bad" (eg Iraq) war was just political posturing as well. Nobody
to my knowledge has called President Obama on NOT bringing home all the
troops from Iraq already, something that he promised to have done by
now when he was a candidate. In fact, pretty much nobody is making ANY noises about Iraq now at all.

Their quiet is a sign that they don't want to interfere with Obama as he's in the process of giving them everything their little hearts desire.

Posted by: stuiec at September 22, 2009 03:25 PM (f0O9k)

101 Posted by: mars at September 22, 2009 03:17 PM (7B8S5)

A lefty wimp naming him/herself after the god of war?

SACRILEGE!

Posted by: tsj017 at September 22, 2009 03:26 PM (4YUWF)

102 But none of us should forget that it was a political strategy, not a serious foreign policy.
The single most vile sentence I have ever read.
This is still...STILL...just a game to them.

Posted by: Circa (Insert Year Here) at September 22, 2009 03:27 PM (B+qrE)

103 It occurs to me that their retroactive support for the Revolutionary War through WWII is similarly a ruse to prove their ruffn'tumble bona fides, and not actual, you know, agreement with the use of force in those Wars.


Posted by: Alec Leamas at September 22, 2009 03:28 PM (AlKlj)

104 Posted by: mars at September 22, 2009 03:17 PM (7B8S5)

Sorry mars: bullshit. Democrats oppose the war in Afghanistan by 2-to-1. Hullabaloo is speaking for the majority on your side.

Posted by: chemjeff at September 22, 2009 03:28 PM (LHRUV)

105 Vic,
"Nobody believed these lying sacks of shit to begin with."
Unfortunately, a lot of people on the right and in the center did believe them. That's how they got the 52%.

Posted by: exhelodrvr at September 22, 2009 03:29 PM (e6fcu)

106 #99 Hilary now serves at Obama's pleasure.

Without him, she's out of Washington. . .well, unless she thinks she can pull of a successful Senate bid in MA!

So she'll either parrot whatever the White House says and like it, or forever give up hope of Federal office.


Posted by: looking closely at September 22, 2009 03:29 PM (PwGfd)

107 92
hullabaloo gets to decide for everyone what the war means? Do you
believe everything you see on hullabaloo? my guess is no, this is
probably the first time you ever have, probably because it supports a
simplistic picture of the world that you all enjoy believing in so
much.

Opposition to the war in Afghanistan began on the night of Sept. 11, 2001. As was widely noted during the Van Jones debacle, Jones went to one of the many rallies that very night to oppose a military response to the WTC/Pentagon attacks.

You may never have met a radical pacifist, but the President of the United States sat in the pews week after week as one railed from the pulpit against the United States and its military.

Posted by: stuiec at September 22, 2009 03:29 PM (f0O9k)

108 My step-son has just entered the Ranger program at Ft. Benning, the idea that this group leads our country and as a result leads these brave men sickens and terrifies me!!

Posted by: lahlon at September 22, 2009 03:29 PM (e2QyD)

109 I gotta agree with mars on this one.

While I think that a not statistically insignificant number of Dem politicians are guilty of the same thinking in their heart of hearts, I can't believe that anything close to a majority of your average liberal would agree with Hullabaloo.

Politicizing military engagements is despicable, no matter who does it, and it happens on both the left and the right.

The only constant is that doing so represents a fringe mentality that has no place in polite conversation or in serious policy debate.

But I don't think it's that much of a cudgel to wield in the coming electoral cycles, other than bringing it up as a wedge issue and forcing the Dem candidates to refute it.

That said, if DKOS and HuffPost start saying the same thing, I'll eat my words.

Posted by: krakatoa at September 22, 2009 03:30 PM (X31lJ)

110 102
Posted by: mars at September 22, 2009 03:17 PM (7B8S5)

A lefty wimp naming him/herself after the god of war?SACRILEGE!

God of war? I thought it was the nutbar with the soft center.

Posted by: stuiec at September 22, 2009 03:31 PM (f0O9k)

111 The entire Afghanistan situation sucks.
Dems pretending to support it, but only to the extent that opposing it would hurt them politically. Even if polls show a relative lack of support for the war, they know that doesn't mean voters would easily tolerate a loss, either.
On the other hand... what's a "win" even look like? Afghanistan is a "country" in much the same way that a hobo's refridgerator box is a "house". I'm concerned that the Dems are simply waiting long enough for public support to drop low enough that they can politically justify a pullout. We'll need more troops just to maintain some degree of relative stability, and it'll take years. Years and troop levels I doubt the Dems are willing to commit to.
There's a reason that Afghanistan hasn't gotten much media play- neither good nor bad news plays well for Democrats. Good news suggests we're winning, leaving little room for Dems to start calling for a pullout. Bad news means that it's going poorly on their watch. No surprise that they'd want to maintain a "middle ground" where we're neither winning nor losing.

Posted by: Hollowpoint at September 22, 2009 03:31 PM (rf03a)

112 That's why I supported McCain so strongly, even with his serious flaws. The Dems are simply not an option.

But, but we were assured by Principled Conservatives™ that there was no difference between McCain and Obama. They were quite insistent that McCain wasn't pure enough for them. I hope that decision to sit out the election paid off for them somehow because it doesn't look so good from this angle.

Posted by: Iskandar at September 22, 2009 03:33 PM (2E1fT)

113 The entire democratic party is a lie, and without lies they are nothing.

Posted by: joh at September 22, 2009 03:33 PM (jgwoG)

114 110


That said, if DKOS and HuffPost start saying the same thing, I'll eat my words.

Does Nancy Pelosi count?

WASHINGTON, Sept 10 (Reuters) - There is little support in Congress for
sending more U.S. troops to Afghanistan, the top Democrat in the House
of Representatives said on Thursday, indicating possible trouble ahead
for President Barack Obama.

Obama may decide in the coming
weeks whether to expand the size of the U.S. military force in
Afghanistan to counter insurgent violence that has reached its highest
level since the Taliban was ousted from power in late 2001.

But U.S. House Speaker Nancy Pelosi said deploying more U.S. troops could be a tough sell.


"I don't think there's a great deal of support for sending more troops
to Afghanistan, in the country or in the Congress," Pelosi said at a
news conference.

The chairman of the Senate Armed Forces
Committee, Michigan Democrat Carl Levin, said in a New York Times
interview he was not ruling out sending more troops eventually, but
insisted that the United States first expand and accelerate the
training of Afghan forces.

"I just think we should hold off on
a commitment to send more combat troops until these additional steps to
strengthen the Afghan security forces are put in motion," Levin said.


Levin raised concerns about the U.S. counterinsurgency efforts in
meetings this week with the secretaries of Defense and State and the
chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, the Times said. Levin intends to
propose improvements in a speech in the Senate on Friday.

A
troop increase could make U.S. congressional Democrats nervous at a
time when many of them already face tough prospects in next year's
midterm elections.

The U.S. Congress has a full plate of
difficult legislative business even before possible decisions on U.S.
troop levels in Afghanistan, including legislation aimed at overhauling
the U.S. healthcare system and a complicated climate-change bill.


A formal assessment of the war from U.S. Army General Stanley
McChrystal, the top U.S. and NATO commander in Afghanistan, is widely
expected to set the stage for a request by the military for more troops.

Pelosi said she had not yet seen this assessment, which was sent to the Pentagon last week.


"I hope that we will be briefed on the McChrystal (report) when the
president receives it," she said. "Perhaps next week we will see that."

White House spokesman Robert Gibbs said Obama had not yet made a decision on whether to commit additional U.S. troops.


"The president will make a decision based on what he thinks is in the
best national security interests of this country," Gibbs said.


The United States is on track nearly to double its troop presence in
Afghanistan to 68,000 by the end of this year. Other nations, mainly
NATO allies, have another 38,000 troops in Afghanistan and have been
reluctant to send more.

Some analysts believe the Afghan war
effort requires a further boost of up to 45,000 military forces along
with additional diplomats and other resources.

But with U.S.
casualties mounting, unease about the war is growing in Obama's
Democratic Party.

Posted by: stuiec at September 22, 2009 03:34 PM (f0O9k)

115 @102 - its not the war thing that attracts him her to the name - its the fact that all of Rome worshiped Mars that attracts him/her to it. It obvious that libs need to be worshiped - Obama is a prime example. I do find it odd thata liberal would choose a screen name like Mars, why not just call yourself Bush - I mean its not like the left did not charge Bush with the same types of acts that the Romans worshiped Mars for being all about.

Posted by: x11b1p at September 22, 2009 03:34 PM (K3MWP)

116 I can't believe that anything close to a majority of your average liberal would agree with Hullabaloo.

Why is this so difficult for people to believe? Democrats overwhelmingly oppose the war in Afghanistan. Here's yet another poll.

Posted by: chemjeff at September 22, 2009 03:36 PM (LHRUV)

117 107
#99 Hilary now serves at Obama's pleasure. Without him, she's out of Washington. . .well, unless she thinks she can pull of a successful Senate bid in MA!So she'll either parrot whatever the White House says and like it, or forever give up hope of Federal office.

For some people, there are worse things than being out of Washington, like aiding and abetting the defeat of one's own nation in war.

And the people for whom being out of Washington is the worst thing in the world are the very last people who should be in Washington.

Posted by: stuiec at September 22, 2009 03:36 PM (f0O9k)

118 chemjeff says....

"Sorry mars: bullshit. Democrats oppose the war in Afghanistan by 2-to-1. Hullabaloo is speaking for the majority on your side."

haha, are you retarded? the whole point of this blog post is that the war in afghanistan was supported by dems just to appear tough. Was, past tense bud. Also, if you haven't noticed we have been fighting in afganistan for several years now. In fact, even if your poll result was an old poll result, it would still dispute the thesis of the blog post. democrats who don't support the war can't be blamed for supporting it to look macho, can they? you are one confused person.


Posted by: mars at September 22, 2009 03:37 PM (7B8S5)

119 Although (keep having to clarify my comments today) I certainly don't agree with mars's caricature of those of us on the right as seeing the world simplistically.

And chem, point taken re. support of the war, but that is different from politicizing a war effort.

Now if 66% (or even more than 20%) of Dems polled said they will applaud and encourage their Pol's to lie about support of a military engagement in order for them to win an election, then yes, it would indicate this isn't a fringe mentality.

Any polling on that?

Posted by: krakatoa at September 22, 2009 03:38 PM (X31lJ)

120 103
But none of us should forget that it was a political strategy, not a serious foreign policy.


What a fracking asshole......

Posted by: Crowsting at September 22, 2009 03:38 PM (61BD9)

121 Mars (post 92), says the lefties really DO support the war in Afghanistan. Well let us see if Obama is a regular lefty or is one of the few radical pacifists like those that Mars has never met. Hmmm.

Mars: "All the radicals I have personally met believe violence is sometimes appropriate."
Me: Yep, if they could, leftist radicals would do to conservatives exactly what I would do to the radicals, if I could.

Posted by: chilloutyo at September 22, 2009 03:38 PM (RQnyj)

122 More fringe thinking from the comments over there... someone who believes inherently in the evil of the U.S., regardless of the party in power.
"Is the U.S. government a permanent war government?"-------------------Yes. It's a cornerstone of fascism.

Posted by: krakatoa at September 22, 2009 03:40 PM (X31lJ)

123 117


Why is this so difficult for people to believe? Democrats overwhelmingly oppose the war in Afghanistan. Here's yet another poll.

Bizarre.

29. Do you agree or disagree with the view that the military action being taken
in Afghanistan is necessary to protect Americans from having to fight terrorists
on U.S. soil? Dems: 49% agree, 42% disagree.

BUT

27. Do you support or oppose the U.S. war in Afghanistan? Dems: 33% support, 62% oppose.

and

28. Do you support or oppose sending additional U.S. troops to Afghanistan? Dems: 30% support, 62% oppose.

So a plurality of Democrats agree that the war is necessary to protect America, but a strong majority opposes the war and opposes sending over enough troops to win it.

It really is The Party of StupidTM.

Posted by: stuiec at September 22, 2009 03:41 PM (f0O9k)

124 > Do you believe everything you see on hullabaloo?

I never heard of it before (unless it was that one music show in the 60's). I already knew that the extent to which the far left appeared to support Afghanistan as the legitimate war, was the exact extent to which it was lying. If you and your buddies are on the left but genuinely supported the war in Afghanistan, then good on y'all.

Posted by: The Chap in the Deerstalker Cap at September 22, 2009 03:43 PM (j02xJ)

125 ANSWER, that group who brought you all the anti-Iraq protests, also held lots of anti-Afghanistan protests. They started just days after we went into Afghanistan and C-SPAN showed them all the time. Those of you who don't want to believe that the lefts support for Afghanistan was purely a political strategy are fooling yourselves.

Posted by: koopy at September 22, 2009 03:44 PM (uA+vD)

126 Ya know, as sad as it is to say, it is a bad time to be in the service.

You got our guys over there busting their humps, they are undermanned, they are apperently using a confusing ROE that has already managed to kill marines and now they have the leader of the "But none of us should forget that it was a political strategy, not a serious foreign policy." party calling the shots and the shots will be to get some General 6000 miles away from the battlefield to say that we need to have a small footprint in that region to win it, which of course will save the Democrats from sending the 40k in forces that are "urgently" being asked for.

We are fooling ourselves into believing that these fine servicemen and women are fighting a war on terror as if "we" had some say in it.

Remember, the party known as the Democrats are the party of "But none of us should forget that it was a political strategy, not a serious foreign policy." So our boys are now fighting for political strategy instead of against terrorist.

Posted by: Drider at September 22, 2009 03:47 PM (HaJD9)

127 126
ANSWER, that group who brought you all the anti-Iraq protests, also
held lots of anti-Afghanistan protests. They started just days after we
went into Afghanistan and C-SPAN showed them all the time. Those of you
who don't want to believe that the lefts support for Afghanistan was
purely a political strategy are fooling yourselves.
International ANSWER is one of the last redoubts of the actual international movement to spread Soviet Socialism worldwide. That the Soviet Union itself is no more didn't stop the True Believers from continuing their quest.

There is a strong argument to be made that William Ayers is of the same ilk (and I think he's not shy about making that argument himself). The same's true of Van Jones.

How true it is of Axelrod, Jarrett, Emmanuel and Obama remains to be seen. But the signs are not encouraging.

Posted by: stuiec at September 22, 2009 03:48 PM (f0O9k)

128 The present administration is a disgrace.

Posted by: Steve at September 22, 2009 03:49 PM (BbqXy)

129 123
"Is the U.S. government a permanent war government?"-------------------Yes. It's a cornerstone of fascism.

It doesn't occur to those people, does it, that Islamic fundamentalists are the ones using perpetual war to keep their fascist grip on what little power they have?

Posted by: stuiec at September 22, 2009 03:50 PM (f0O9k)

130 And chem, point taken re. support of the war, but that is different from politicizing a war effort.Now if 66% (or even more than 20%) of Dems polled said they will applaud and encourage their Pol's to lie about support of a military engagement in order for them to win an election, then yes, it would indicate this isn't a fringe mentality.Any polling on that?
Posted by: krakatoa at September 22, 2009 03:38 PM (X31lJ)
How would you classify broad dem support for attacking our CIA and knee-capping the US that way? Dems seem to have enjoyed lying about not going after our CIA in order to win political points, so I don't see why their obvious lying about supporting other actions to win political points would seem so out of character. The left has loved taking the US apart in the international press for years, harming our national security, all for politics. To lie about other aspects ... no big deal.
Frankly, I can't think of one issue that dems didn't lie about during the campaign. Not a one. And, outside of this admission by hullabaloo, I can't think of a single issue they're not lying about, still.

Posted by: progressoverpeace at September 22, 2009 03:50 PM (A46hP)

131 If I say that whichever twit writes the Hullaballoo blog is the leader of the Democratic Party, does that mean FOX News can make every Democrat they interview answer the question of whether they agree with this?

Posted by: WolkingsWorld.com at September 22, 2009 03:53 PM (6A5MG)

132 I am shocked, SHOCKED, that a liberal sould back away from supporting our troops in the field. Never mind the General requesting more troops is an Obama appointee. He has the balls to want to win there? Didn't he get the memo? Run away! Run away!

Posted by: Rich at September 22, 2009 03:53 PM (HpTVS)

133 I think it is important to keep in mind that to a True Pacifist, violence in never an option.

And TPs are almost always Democrats. So there is a constant percentage that is always against a military solution.

It is also true that while many Democrats are not TPs, a majority of them tend toward Pacisfism in general.

I think that accounts for much the poll disparity. They compartmentalize the questions.

That said, obviously there is some cohort that is lying. They are still on the page of the rulebook that tells them they must say they support the war to score political points, while at heart are against it because we were only getting what we deserved.
First of all 9-11 happened because George W Bush provoked the attacks.
(again from the H-boo comment section)

Posted by: krakatoa at September 22, 2009 03:53 PM (X31lJ)

134 International ANSWER is one of the last redoubts of the actual international movement to spread Soviet Socialism worldwide. That the Soviet Union itself is no more didn't stop the True Believers from continuing their quest.There is a strong argument to be made that William Ayers is of the same ilk (and I think he's not shy about making that argument himself). The same's true of Van Jones.
Posted by: stuiec at September 22, 2009 03:48 PM (f0O9k)
Nah. Van's more of a Maoist - at least according to HuffPo, asthey were trying to defend him.

Posted by: progressoverpeace at September 22, 2009 03:54 PM (A46hP)

135 122


Mars: "All the radicals I have personally met believe violence is sometimes appropriate."Me: Yep, if they could, leftist radicals would do to conservatives exactly what I would do to the radicals, if I could.

To which I add: all the radicals I have personally met believe that the US government is the enemy against whom violence is appropriate, and don't regard Islamic fundamentalist terrorists who attack Western targets, or Palestinian terrorists who murder Israeli civilians, or Maoist terrorists or narco-terrorists who murder South Americans, as appropriate targets of violence. The radicals will sometimes lay themselves down in front of bulldozers or become terrorists themselves to protect those latter groups from the evil Western imperialists. And when their favored friends murder civilians, the radicals will excuse those murders as the necessary breaking of eggs for their One World omelette.

Posted by: stuiec at September 22, 2009 03:55 PM (f0O9k)

136 haha, are you retarded? the whole point of this blog post is that the war in afghanistan was supported by dems just to appear tough. Was, past tense bud. Also, if you haven't noticed we have been fighting in afganistan for several years now. In fact, even if your poll result was an old poll result, it would still dispute the thesis of the blog post. democrats who don't support the war can't be blamed for supporting it to look macho, can they? you are one confused person.
do you really mean this or are you just saying this? Stereotyping sucks doesn't it?

Posted by: x11b1p at September 22, 2009 03:56 PM (K3MWP)

137 For Liberals, war is a political expediency. It is used to prove their manliness. The conviction to win takes second place to the desire to cut and run to save face if things are going badly.

Posted by: kingsjester at September 22, 2009 03:56 PM (OGNMa)

138 Everything liberals do is a political strategy. From welfare (vote-buying) to the "fairness doctrine" (shutting down opposition) it's all about amassing power.
The question is, what do liberals have in mind AFTER they take power? Obama is showing usa greatexample. Paying off his friends in the unions, taking over as much of the economy as possible, using the powers of government to further the liberal agenda.
Of course, in the long run, liberals have NO IDEA how to run a society. Almost everything they propose is wrong, and they blindly follow advice from failed European thinkers.

Posted by: LIghtduty at September 22, 2009 03:57 PM (kthGB)

139 I claimed to support Ron and Nicole to prove my manliness....

Sincerely,
Orenthal

Posted by: OJ Simpson-the fastest man in cell block e at September 22, 2009 03:58 PM (2Ut0s)

140 There is a strong argument to be made that William Ayers is of the same ilk (and I think he's not shy about making that argument himself).
Posted by: stuiec at September 22, 2009 03:48 PM (f0O9k)
While we're talking about Bill Ayers, it's intersting to note that the Zelaya wannabe-junta-in-exile's representative at the UN (ostensibly for Honduras) is an old terrorist bomber from the 80's - sort of the Honduran Bill Ayers. And the US government is supporting that junta-in-exile and their bomber representative while refusing visas to the legitimate Honduran representative.
Just thought I'd throw that in.

Posted by: progressoverpeace at September 22, 2009 04:00 PM (A46hP)

141 I feigned support for feeding the Ukrainians to highlight my humanity.
Dance Nikita, Dance,
Joe Stalin

Posted by: Uncle Joe-the kindest tyrant in Soviet History at September 22, 2009 04:00 PM (2Ut0s)

142 141 PoP,
If he wrote Zelya's autobio for him using nautical metaphors that Zelya never uttered it is kind of like there is a DaVinci code for Constitution ignoring American Marxists....

Posted by: sven10077 at September 22, 2009 04:02 PM (2Ut0s)

143 Frankly, I can't think of one issue that dems didn't lie about during
the campaign. Not a one. And, outside of this admission by
hullabaloo, I can't think of a single issue they're not lying about,
still.

I get that... I really do.

I just don't know any of my liberal friends who supported the Afghanistan conflict only to the extent that it advanced their political ideology to do so.

Granted, it's a small sample, and it tends to be old-school liberalism that my friends adhere to. But I think it is also true that Dem politicians are outside the leftist mainstream in their politicization of military engagements.

Maybe it's just me hoping for the best. We are in a lot worse trouble than I imagine if that school of thought represents anything more than a fringe of the left.

Posted by: krakatoa at September 22, 2009 04:02 PM (X31lJ)

144 @139 - they base everything on their magnificant intentions (hcr)- never the results (failed stimulus). results don't matter to members of congress, particularly to dems.

Posted by: x11b1p at September 22, 2009 04:02 PM (K3MWP)

145 If he wrote Zelya's autobio for him using nautical metaphors that Zelya never uttered it is kind of like there is a DaVinci code for Constitution ignoring American Marxists....
Posted by: sven10077 at September 22, 2009 04:02 PM (2Ut0s)
Now that would just be astronomically creepy. It would be a strong bit of evidence that there's something to Satanism.
I'm still trying to recover from the strange coincidence of "the butterfly effect" theoryand the actualeffect of the Florida butterfly ballots.

Posted by: progressoverpeace at September 22, 2009 04:05 PM (A46hP)

146 Wow This is despicable. Liberals are gambling with the lives of soldiers for the sake of votes. Like Ace said:
We won't forget, champ. And we won't let you forget, either.

God, I'm so angry.

Posted by: Tina48 at September 22, 2009 04:11 PM (rcAOq)

147 I just don't know any of my liberal friends who supported the Afghanistan conflict only to the extent that it advanced their political ideology to do so.Granted, it's a small sample, and it tends to be old-school liberalism that my friends adhere to. But I think it is also true that Dem politicians are outside the leftist mainstream in their politicization of military engagements.
Posted by: krakatoa at September 22, 2009 04:02 PM (X31lJ)
Okay. I understand your point. Maybe the question is better put, how many of your liberal friends knew that the idiot messiah was intentionallylying when he was acting tough about Afghanistan (you remember his talking about violating Pakistani sovereignty - which I agreed with, but knew he was full of it) but let it slide because they knew "he had to say that"?
It's tough addressingthe whole "friends" issue - I have very good friends in Israel who are Meretz folks, so Iunderstand the situation well - but with respect to political claims,I know that they know what we all know. You know?

Posted by: progressoverpeace at September 22, 2009 04:11 PM (A46hP)

148 democrats who don't support the war can't be blamed for supporting it to look macho, can they? you are one confused person.
A majority don't support it. But then, the election''s been held, hasn't it? Who would they be posturing for now? Once Zero takes his throne there's no need to pretend any longer, is there?
I think you're the confused one here and it's odd considering how obvious this is.

Posted by: spongeworthy at September 22, 2009 04:13 PM (rplL3)

149 No Blood for Oil!!!

Remember that one? "Blood for Votes," on the other hand, is perfectly fine.

Posted by: bullfrog at September 22, 2009 04:14 PM (QnVIv)

150 I just don't understand why the dems want to put us ALL in danger. If they want to endanger themselves they can go ahead.
But, when the dems are deciding my safety I get very worried. I'm not sure that if we were attacked again in our country if they would fight back.
The O hasn't paid much attention lately to foreign policy (it is not a big deal, ya know) and now that he does he is showing once again what a fool (on the hill) he is.

Posted by: hippieforlife at September 22, 2009 04:15 PM (v3pYe)

151 6 Well, I for one am shocked!

...that they ADMIT it.

Posted by: The Monster at September 22, 2009 04:15 PM (RX0J3)

152 These racist attacks on Glen Greenwald are what we should expect from fascists.

Posted by: John Charlson at September 22, 2009 04:18 PM (QV8fV)

153 Lefties hate a.n.s.w.e.r. no radical I've ever met respected them and all were very vocally annoyed that they had anything to do with the organizing of any protests. They tend to be much older, commie types. They bascially grabbed the permits fast and then played king of the protests. They represent an incredibly small number of protestors. Most lefty radicals consider them to be psuedo-stalinist throwbacks.

Posted by: mars at September 22, 2009 04:23 PM (7B8S5)

154 Motherf**rs the lot of them.

Posted by: toby928 at September 22, 2009 04:23 PM (PD1tk)

155 We won't forget, champ chump.

We won't forget, champ chimp.

FIFY. Twice, even. And hey, if the chimp moniker was good enough for Booosh, it's good enough for some pasty-faced liberal blogger.

Posted by: I R A Darth Aggie at September 22, 2009 04:23 PM (1hM1d)

156 Motherf**rs the lot of them.

There's no evidence that they'd know what to do with a Mother if they actually caught one.

Posted by: I R A Darth Aggie at September 22, 2009 04:24 PM (1hM1d)

157 Mars,

I get your point -- I really do. But since you're insisting that we're "caricaturing" the left, I'd be curious as to your thoughts on these:

Is Rush Limbaugh the "leader" of the right? Does what he says hold for all conservatives? Obama and Pelosi sure think so. Should Fox News then (as someone up there suggested) hand Hullaballoo around every Democrat's neck the way all the other alphabet channels do when it's Rush and the Republicans?

How do the "racists" among the "teabaggers" compare to ANSWER? We seem to see quite a bit of coverage of the former; not a word about the latter (oh, and I refer you to Zombietime.com for some interesting looks at ANSWER and the size of the crowds they generate).

Again, I see your point. But I hope you can see mine: it sure as hell hurts when the shoe's on the other foot, don't it?

Posted by: bullfrog at September 22, 2009 04:28 PM (QnVIv)

158 But none of us should forget that it was a political strategy, not a serious foreign policy.

Say that a little louder and into the the lapel pin please. I know a bunch of people who might be very interested in your attitude on this subject.


The base of the Democratic party is fundamentally pacifist and isolationist


I'm going to have to say no on this one. They just don't like the military spending it causes; means they have to print more money in order to have some to spread around, and even they know, by now, that they are playing with economic nitroglycerin and calling it a "shock absorber".

Posted by: MikeTheMoose at September 22, 2009 04:29 PM (0q2P7)

159 The NYT went full quagmire on like the 5th day of the Afghanistan war too.

They were warning of the Brutal Winter™ in the Graveyard of Empires™

Posted by: toby928 at September 22, 2009 04:32 PM (PD1tk)

160 This is why the Progressives should be treated as enemies of the Constitution and America. When the dust settles we should do to them what our Founders did to the Tories. Take their stuff and send them packing to any regime they want but here they're not welcome.

Posted by: USMC at September 22, 2009 04:33 PM (wDAko)

161 Now Barry knoew how Nixon felt. He inherits a war, the left is aligned against him. Only this time he is the Left. Nixon was smart enough to get re-elected to a second term with an escalation of troops.
Barry, is no Richard M. Nixon.
He's a ghetto yard smurf, on the WH lawn.

Posted by: hutch1200 at September 22, 2009 04:33 PM (+VUnP)

162 none of us should forget that it was a political strategy, not a serious foreign policy idea.
Is the MO of the modern leftist movement. All they do is shout slogans, lie, obfuscate, and demonstrate hypocrisy.
They are unserious people saying unserious things.

Posted by: Jay at September 22, 2009 04:34 PM (/ZX77)

163 76
"Lower than a snake's rectum?"
I think its lower than a snake's hemipenis, but I could be mistaken.

Posted by: lowfibass at September 22, 2009 04:37 PM (T1ZAZ)

164 All the radicals I have personally met believe violence is sometimes appropriate- Mars

Yeah, like when they personally are about to get their head blown off. But not if I'm about to get my head blown off; that's negotiable.
Selfish bastard.

Posted by: Derak at September 22, 2009 04:40 PM (zyVlH)

165 That's all it is to the liberals, politics. How can any situation be turned to a political advantage? They do it with soldier's lives or the little kid who got bit by a dog. Life and death have no meaning in their world beyond what sort of political advantage can be gained.

I always suspected such out of liberals, but it had always been one of those things that was best left unsaid. Well that mask has slipped, and it will now be interesting to see how many other liberal bloggers pick up the theme and echo it or defend it. I can almost guarantee you none will distance themselves.

These words somehow ring hollow
"On behalf of a grateful nation, for your loved ones loyal and dedicated service..."
Words spoken at the presentation of a flag at a military funeral.

Posted by: Just A Grunt at September 22, 2009 04:43 PM (pOC9r)

166 Why does this surprise you, Ace?

Why does this surprise anyone?

This is who they are. You didn't know this?

Posted by: Evan3457 at September 22, 2009 04:48 PM (PtbIm)

167 92 I, and every lefty I know supported the war in afghanistan

I notice you use past-tense here. Any reason for that?

Posted by: Original Roy at September 22, 2009 04:51 PM (ejHeB)

168 how many of your liberal friends knew that the idiot
messiah was intentionallylying when he was acting tough about
Afghanistan.

Very few I think. True they may have suspected, but they were caught up in hopey/changeyness.

It's tough addressingthe whole "friends" issue ... I know that
they know what we all know. You know?Perhaps more accurately, I know they have access to what we all know. The difference is the filters by which they get their information and their world view.Every one of them swears by NPR, and accepts that the MSM hold personal biases, but believe that by and large the Deciders don't let that bias intrude on what is reported, or how it is framed.My wife is a recovering Liberal. Ex college English Lit/comp teacher, so you can imagine how ingrained so many of the Liberal canards were. She still doesn't feel confident enough in her political knowledge (despite how frequently it is the topic of discussion), and over the many years of living in the Liberal bubble of academia, to vote for a Republican. But at least she's gotten as far as not voting at all due to her general ignorance of the issues and mistrust of politicians of any stripe.
That took years with me, and getting a job that paid enough for her to feel what it's like paying the Government four to five months of her annual income.
I spend much less time with my lib friends than I do with her, obviously. And of that time, political discussion happen infrequently. It's just not something brought up in polite company.

Posted by: krakatoa at September 22, 2009 04:56 PM (X31lJ)

169 "158
Mars,

I
get your point -- I really do. But since you're insisting that we're
"caricaturing" the left, I'd be curious as to your thoughts on these:

Is
Rush Limbaugh the "leader" of the right? Does what he says hold for
all conservatives? Obama and Pelosi sure think so. Should Fox News
then (as someone up there suggested) hand Hullaballoo around every
Democrat's neck the way all the other alphabet channels do when it's
Rush and the Republicans?

Rush doesn;t
How do the "racists" among the
"teabaggers" compare to ANSWER? We seem to see quite a bit of coverage
of the former; not a word about the latter (oh, and I refer you to
Zombietime.com for some interesting looks at ANSWER and the size of the
crowds they generate).

Again, I see your point. But I hope you can see mine: it sure as hell hurts when the shoe's on the other foot, don't it?"

bullfrog: please, are you really giving me the you guys do it so now its okay too argument? Your examples are very strange. I didn't realize that asserting that limbaugh has some kind of leadership with conservatives was controvercial? I mean, who asserts that every single conservative believes that. what lefties do believe, is that no one has the guts to call rush on his race-baiting. No one likes ANSWER, but I don't think any one would compare them to racists. I can see very well why racists get more media attention. ANSWER does not "generate" these crowds. Without the iraq war protests, years ago now, numbers at protest have plummeted. Do people of all political stripes have individuals looking to smear and demonize their opponents? of course.

But I dont like false equavalence either. you are very concerned perhaps about reverse racism, and that limbaugh not be some kind of leader, but who here called him out for his recent rant where he suggested bus's be segregated? blamed "obama's america" for some isolated incident on a bus. i never thought I would hear a modern conservative go so low as to advocate segregation in 2009, to nakedly whip up white paranoia, but the right seems to have given him a pass.....


Posted by: mars at September 22, 2009 05:01 PM (7B8S5)

170 167 -- I knew; I know; I have foreknowledge of what they will be for eternity...doesn't make it any easier to stomach each time it crosses my radar.
I truly detest, despise, and revile these people. My thoughts turn to the bloody, the brutal, and the barbaric when contemplating what I'd like to do to them.

Posted by: unknown jane at September 22, 2009 05:05 PM (5/yRG)

171 168
92 I, and every lefty I know supported the war in afghanistan

I notice you use past-tense here. Any reason for that?


Posted by: Original Roy at September 22, 2009 04:51 PM (ejHeB)
Yes, because the blog post revolves around the notion that lefties who supported the war, did so only to appear macho originally, in the past. My view is usually, but not always, more nuanced than support/oppose. I support a military presence in afganistan to slay al-qaida/taliban. I oppose the neocon drive to turn it into kansas, help rig their elections, choose their leaders, etc.. humanitarian aid is fine.

Posted by: mars at September 22, 2009 05:12 PM (7B8S5)

172 I propose that the "morons" on this blog switch from hobo hunting to hippie hunting!
After all, with the way the economy is going we'll be lucky if we aren't all hobos before the next 3 years is up, and hippies are a much more satisfactory target for vengeance imho (seeing as how nothing actually can force a person to be a hippie, other than having no soul and an extreme sense of holier than thou entitlement).

Posted by: unknown jane at September 22, 2009 05:12 PM (5/yRG)

173 The Left:
Caught campaigning in a sheepdog costume, now complaining that someone screwed the pooch.
Own it.

Posted by: Huckleberry at September 22, 2009 05:14 PM (F71c5)

174 Noboy is turning Astan into "Kansas", and quite honestly the only way to ensure that it doesn't revert is to make sure the wrong people don't get back into power. Please, the moral superiority stance only works in the antiseptic halls of academia, not in the real world. Maybe that sucks, but that's reality.
As for "nuance" please, I am a simple person -- explain what exactly was your nuanced position? That you would support a war only if it fell under your guidelines of "morality"? What are those guidelines please? Do you have any concept of what a war is really like outside of what you've read in your history books or seen on tv?

Posted by: unknown jane at September 22, 2009 05:17 PM (5/yRG)

175 This is a comment I left there:

You Leftists are pathetic dirtbags... of course I knew that the support for the AF war was just window dressing.. the Marxist Obama couldnt care less about the outcome there , his focus is on radically transforming the country into a collectivist hellhole.Well I'd say most of the people in this country are now aware that Obama is not trustwroth (at the min.) whether or not they grasp the full significance of what he's doing is another question but one that more people are awakening to everyday.The Humane Progressive totalitarian state that someone wished for above will not be tolerated in this country.

Posted by: VinceP1974 at September 22, 2009 05:18 PM (jtSNq)

176 I oppose the neocon drive to turn it into kansas, help rig their elections, choose their leaders, etc..

And now we see the sort of Leftist conspiracy paranoia that is much less of a fringe element in that movement.

Posted by: krakatoa at September 22, 2009 05:28 PM (X31lJ)

177 And how funny Krakatoa -- I'm a former Eng. Lit/Comp instructor and lived in the hallowed halls of academia for 16 years of my life. Of course, I thank my ties to the real world for not allowing me to become what so many of my erstwhile and deluded peers became.

Posted by: unknown jane at September 22, 2009 05:28 PM (5/yRG)

178 170
But I dont like false equavalence either. you are very concerned perhaps about reverse racism, and that limbaugh not be some kind of leader, but who here called him out for his recent rant where he suggested bus's be segregated? blamed "obama's america" for some isolated incident on a bus. i never thought I would hear a modern conservative go so low as to advocate segregation in 2009, to nakedly whip up white paranoia, but the right seems to have given him a pass.....
It has to do with your ignorance.
A bunch of Black kids on a school bus punch and kick the crap out of a white kid because the white kid sat in the wrong bus seat. Pre-emptively, the media and community activists declare that the Black kids didn't single out the white kid based on race -- even though the police initially said that it looked like a racially-motivated incident on its face.
Then the head of the local NAACP chapter says that the community is all wee-weed up due not to the overtly racist behavior of the kids on the bus, but the racism implied in "You lie!" It's the whites' fault, you see.
Given that background, it makes perfect sense that Rush Limbaugh would reduce the situation ad absurdam to illustrate the absurdity of the positions of the media, community activists and NAACP head. If it's the whites' fault, if the presence of the white kid on the bus was too provocative and intolerable to the Black kids because he represents "You lie!" and reminds them of how all white people hate having a Black President, why, then, for the protection of the Black kids -- to keep them from being similarly provoked in the future -- the white kids need to be put on separate busses.
That would be the logical solution -- if the media and the community activists were right about all whites being racists and no Blacks being capable of racism or racist acts.
So tell me: are the media and community activists right?

Posted by: stuiec at September 22, 2009 05:28 PM (f0O9k)

179 167
Why does this surprise you, Ace?





Why does this surprise anyone?





This is who they are. You didn't know this?

171

167 -- I knew; I know; I have foreknowledge of what they will be for
eternity...doesn't make it any easier to stomach each time it crosses
my radar.

I truly detest, despise, and revile these people. My thoughts turn
to the bloody, the brutal, and the barbaric when contemplating what I'd
like to do to them.

Posted by: unknown jane at September 22, 2009 05:05 PM (5/yRG)

wow, talk about macho fantasies....this is that demonization I'm talking about, its become that those who disagree with conservative dogma, must only do so according to some grave, deep, personality defect that borders on the sinsiter, evil, etc.. these thoughts betray a powerful, irrational current in the modern right-wing...
Obama doesn't have another reasoned opinion, he seeks the destruction of america, etc.. I know not everyone is this irrational here, but its enough people to freak me out, that's for sure.

Posted by: mars at September 22, 2009 05:35 PM (7B8S5)

180 I don't listen to Limbaugh, but I know of the bus incident (not the only one either, sadly) -- it was a glaring case of racism, and for the local NAACP to proclaim that "white racism resenting Obama" was even remotely related to this is beyond the pale.
And by the way, any lefty dipshits who might decide to take this up: I'm. not. 100%. white. Oh, and I was targeted by crackers growing up as a kid, as was my family. I know what a "racially motivated attack" looks like...and that video on the bus? Yep, that was a racially motivated attack.
By the by, I get a bit sick and tired of your insistence on only allowing "people of color" who follow your ideology and party line any sort of public voice of any importance. You want to talk about "whipping up racial paranoia and hate"? You do a really stellar job of it -- thanks a lot.

Posted by: unknown jane at September 22, 2009 05:35 PM (5/yRG)

181 177
I oppose the neocon drive to turn it into kansas, help rig their elections, choose their leaders, etc..

And now we see the sort of Leftist conspiracy paranoia that is much less of a fringe element in that movement.

how is this conspiracy theory? The stated goal of neoconservatism is to spread freedom throughout the world by using violence to produce democratic states.

Posted by: mars at September 22, 2009 05:40 PM (7B8S5)

182 Uhm, where did I say anything about Obama in my comment? The President will either do or not do...and I will gage my opinion of his performance on that. I do however find it completely disgusting that the left in this country will so blithely use the lives of our military (and discard them) in such a reprehensible fashion. I could also add that they will so blithely write off people in other countries as well. That, Mars (hmm, interesting choice of tag) is truly a hideous mindset made only the more reprehensible due to the left's arrogance that they can say such things without any fear of repercussion. That somehow this is not only "ok", but also "good".

Posted by: unknown jane at September 22, 2009 05:41 PM (5/yRG)

183 182 -- Where do you read this at? I'm not a neocon, but then again, I've read about it, and I've never seen a manifesto expressly stating this (I've never seen a manifesto actually).

Posted by: unknown jane at September 22, 2009 05:43 PM (5/yRG)

184 you are very concerned perhaps about reverse racism, and that limbaugh not be some kind of leader, but who here called him out for his recent rant where he suggested bus's be segregated? blamed "obama's america" for some isolated incident on a bus.
Nobody "called him out" for that because it never happened. Stop reading the far left sites and believing them.

Posted by: flenser at September 22, 2009 05:54 PM (ryT8f)

185 Jane, how do you know it was a racially motivated attack?

you are one of two people to comment on the bus incident. I find both responses incoherent and it would take me a long time to rebutt them. (for instance: "You want to talk about "whipping up racial paranoia and hate"? You do a really stellar job of it -- thanks a lot." really? how am i doing that?)

Incident comes along that people assume must be racially motivated. cops end up deciding it was over a seat. Rush decides it is an example of "obamas america", apparently meaning that in obamas america, black kids get to beat up white kids. how obama is responsible for that, is sort of beyond me, unless Rush thinks that obama-as-black-man's idea is for some kind of black supremacy, hence, Rush gets charged for race-baiting. it seems pretty straightforward. White people (such as myself) need to fear black people because their beating us up is now some kind national pastime thanks to obama.

I don't know anything about what the NAACP said. who listens to them anyway?

Posted by: mars at September 22, 2009 05:55 PM (7B8S5)

186 you are one of two people to comment on the bus incident.

Do you know anything about this other whan what you read at the lefty sites? Because what you think you know just ain't so.

Posted by: flenser at September 22, 2009 05:58 PM (ryT8f)

187 Obama doesn't have another reasoned opinion, he seeks the destruction of america, etc..
Posted by: mars at September 22, 2009 05:35 PM (7B8S5)
Just for shits and giggles, what is it about America that you think The Precedent actually likes. I can't recall him saying anything flattering about our nation (other than we were dumb enough to elect him) but maybe you can help me out. What did he say on his world Traitor Tour that led anyone to think that America was a decent nation, and not just the evil, mean, moneygrubbing, heartless, military colonizer he kept telling the world we were?
Don't get me wrong. I don't fault The Precedent for hating America. This isn't his country, after all, and he is very pissed about how the US and the West have so shamed his people (the third world, as he sees it) through our great productivity, wealth, and achievement, that he feels the need to exact revenge. But, aside from that obvious stuff, and the moronic things he said about capital gains taxes and how taxes are needed to inflict pain on people, instead of as vehicles for funding anything ("fairness", if you recall), what has he said he likes about our country? And don't cheat and say something like, "He likes that we have a Constitution that is easily ignored," or "He likes that Americanwhite guilt makes moron lefties so easy to push around," but tell mereal things about America that he likes and doesn't feel the need to radically change or destroy.

Posted by: progressoverpeace at September 22, 2009 06:01 PM (A46hP)

188 how is this conspiracy theory? The stated goal of neoconservatism is to
spread freedom throughout the world by using violence to produce
democratic states.

Um. You sort of make my point right there champ. (Leftist) movement-generated claptrap like that, which you trot out as an absolute article of faith.

Posted by: krakatoa at September 22, 2009 06:04 PM (X31lJ)

189 The only war that the left seems to be at all interested in fighting is their war against Beck, Rush, Palin, and the rest of us so-called right wing terrorists. Consider the following:
-The belief by the potus that this country somehow needs a "civillian army that is just as well funded as our military."
-The belief of one of potus' czars in media diversity which is actually code for trying to put conservative talk radio out of business through taxation and redistribution to public (aka government run) media.
-A near monopoly on the mainstream media which has become more of a government propaganda arm than at any other time in history.
-The use of the National endowment of the arts as a leftist propaganda arm.
-A virtual takeover of banks, the auto industry, and insurance companies (pending).
-The use of unions, community organizations, and militant left wing groups as enforcers in the workplace, town halls, and voting centers.
-Extortion and or intimidation of any opposition to left wing agendas which includes attacks on private citizens.
These are just a few of the tactics that are being employed in our own country and all have been well documented by the few remaining independent media outlets on both the internet and cable. They are also all ways in which the current government is waging a cold war against its own citizens. Consider the efforts that are going into all of these things in comparison with their efforts to win the war on terror and it is easy to see what this government's main agenda is: the destruction of this country as we have known it and the institution of a tightly controlled socialist nanny state in its place.

Posted by: Stephen at September 22, 2009 06:13 PM (ZbTBS)

190 Hey, mars, I'll help you out. The Precedent did just say,"But this is a new day. It is a new era. And I am proud to say that the United States has done more to promote clean energy and reduce carbon pollution in the last eight months than at any other time in our history."
Oops. Nevermind. That goes to my point, not yours. I guess The Precedent's anti-growth, anti-comeptitive, pro-recession plan did have some benefits ... for insane people who subscribe to Anthropogenic Catastrophic Global Warming hysteria.
P.S. I love how all the lefties have really glommed on to calling CO2 "pollution". It's kind of cute. Makes people think of smog and stuff ... LOL.

Posted by: progressoverpeace at September 22, 2009 06:15 PM (A46hP)

191 and congrats on your recovery from the academic echo-chamber, unknown jane.

Posted by: krakatoa at September 22, 2009 06:15 PM (X31lJ)

192 Those who deny and rationalize the indefensible, those who miss the obvious significance of all these markers; they mean little to Obama and his most active leftist supporters.

For them, such people are one of many "useful idiots", to be driven under the bus as soon as they're inconvenient.

Posted by: Evan3457 at September 22, 2009 06:25 PM (PtbIm)

193 The stated goal of neoconservatism is to spread freedom throughout the world by using violence to produce democratic states.Really?
Stated, just like that, "by using violence to produce democratic states"??

Posted by: Uncle Jefe at September 22, 2009 06:31 PM (+3fAP)

194 Posted by: krakatoa at September 22, 2009 06:15 PM (X31lJ)
I used to recommend 6 months on an Israeli kibbutz to cure anyone of leftist tendencies, but since the kibbutzim haveall either gone broke or capitalist in order to survive, that's not available anymore.
I learned everything I needed to know about the practical problems with leftist theories by living on kibbutzim. Growth kills all leftist ideas, since they are all formulated around static, unchangingworlds - which is why the left thinks that control can always be centralized efficiently.

Posted by: progressoverpeace at September 22, 2009 06:31 PM (A46hP)

195 What? Pacifist = war? I wondered about that. Tea and crumpets!

Posted by: martha russell at September 22, 2009 06:32 PM (XJ6Sj)

196 At the end ofJuly or start of August there were at least 2 "War Rooms" set up by the Democrats to go to war over Health Care Reform.
The only war the present Democratic Party actually will support is a war on American citizens.

Posted by: Harry O at September 22, 2009 06:43 PM (TqK7P)

197 The sad thing is that Obama will have to pull the troops out of Afghaninstan since the status quo and substantial troop increases are both out of the question to him and his liberal supporters. This will leave a safe haven and moral victory to radical islamics, and the American blood that the left disengenously bemoaned the loss of in that country will have been shed in vain. We can only hope Iraq survives and prospers as a democratic society.

Posted by: cnorton at September 22, 2009 06:48 PM (y/VCz)

198 I'll say this for Mars, the quality of our trolls is starting to look up!

Posted by: SGT Dan at September 22, 2009 07:02 PM (TtDnm)

199 Yeah, Sarge, but the quality of our trolls was, at best, Corvair-ish.
Maybe more like a busted up Big Wheel stuck up under a double-wide.

Posted by: spongeworthy at September 22, 2009 07:12 PM (rplL3)

200 No surprise, but despicable nonetheless.

Posted by: RTH615 at September 22, 2009 07:16 PM (bsFj7)

201 I knew this at the time, and we all did.

But this is what the Left *has* to do to oppose war. They've always got to have some strategic-sounding blah blah about why this particular war is wrong and should not be fought.

Uninformed listeners can draw the conclusion that Leftists know what human nature is about and that force is sometimes necessary for good to prevail. Leftists do not, however, believe this. They are 100% pacifist. All use of force is wrong. All wars are wrong.

I think Leftists realize on some deep-down level if they come out and put their total pacifism on display, they will not get new voters.

Posted by: qrstuv at September 22, 2009 08:00 PM (mMqY1)

202 I'll say this for Mars, the quality of our trolls is starting to look up!

Faint praise.

Posted by: toby928 at September 22, 2009 08:07 PM (PD1tk)

203
I don't know "mars," so I'm more or less obligated to give him the benefit of the doubt that he's one of the unwitting dupes of those who seek to hijack well-intentioned movements for their own purposes. But even that only speaks well of his naïveté.
Well-intentioned dreamers like mars typify the base of movements that aim to solve the world's ills. These people are easily duped and outmaneuvered by those crafty enough to co-opt their ideals in the quest for power. People like mars usually never even have suspicions about these interlopers and generally end up defending them anyway if they do suspect anything.

Posted by: The Band at September 22, 2009 08:44 PM (QtRBc)

204 Mars, why should we or anyone else trust what you say when the whole point of this thread is the depths to which Lefties will go to achieve their goals?


Posted by: eman at September 22, 2009 09:05 PM (kdRQ7)

205 I left the following comment at the original Hullabalo Blog:

"But none of us should forget that it was a political strategy, not a serious foreign policy. "





This sums up perfectly just exactly why the Left is the embodiment of
evil in the United States. To Leftists, Americans fighting and dying is
a political strategy, and nothing more. All life is expendable, unless
the perception of saving and preserving it (such as being AGAINST any
given war) can further the Leftist aspirations for fascism.



Evil. Pure and unrefined.

Posted by: g at September 22, 2009 09:12 PM (FAYNo)

206 g.
I appreciate your passion, but painting in absolute moral judgementwith a broad brush isn't terribly accurate or persuasive.

Posted by: krakatoa at September 22, 2009 09:50 PM (X31lJ)

207 "You claimed to support a war in which American soldiers were fighting and dying, leaving friends and limbs on the battlefield, as a cynical political strategy?"
-- Actually, Democrats in Congress also voted to invade Iraq as a domestic political calculus so they wouldn't look week in the "War on Terror" ahead of the elections.

Posted by: steve o at September 22, 2009 11:54 PM (0mw19)

208 The digby person disappeared approximately 30 comments between my first response and when I just now re-checked the comments thingie.

Such courage.

Posted by: Alec Leamas at September 23, 2009 12:52 AM (LGSqQ)

209 Age of Conan CD KeyCall of Duty II CD KeyCompany of Heroes CD KeyCounter - Strike CD key: http://www.cdkeyexpress.comDiablo 2 CD Key: http://www.cdkeyexpress.comGrand Theft Auto IV CD KeyGuild Wars CD KeyNexon Cash for MapleStory: http://www.cdkeyexpress.comRed Alert 3 CD KeyStarCraft CD KeyThe Godfather II CD KeyTitan Quest CD KeyWarCraft3 CD key: http://www.cdkeyexpress.comWarhammer Online CD key http://www.cdkeyexpress.com
Burberry scarf: http://www.scarves-store.comsilk scarf: http://www.scarves-store.com

Posted by: jason at September 23, 2009 04:50 AM (toPS+)

210 Alec Leamas : not only did it delete my comments , it also enabled comment moderation.

The left is pathetic.

Posted by: VinceP1974 at September 23, 2009 09:36 AM (jtSNq)

211 Let's see now....lied about any number of things to get elected. Got elected. Now, the "just kidding" ploy. Sorry guys, but that's fraud. Your man can't be prez anymore. Keep in mind the lying is to everyone, including you....dips.

Posted by: Your Wise Uncle Rick at September 23, 2009 11:53 PM (aEswM)

212 شات الود-الود -شات الشله -الشله -شات عالم الرمنسيه -عالم الرمنسيه -شات عسل -عسل -شات تعب قلبي -تعب قلبي -شات الغلا -الغلا -شات الخليج -الخليج -شات تعارف -تعارف -شات غرام -غرام -شات بنات القصيم -بنات القصيم -شات كوت الكويت -كوت الكويت -نت لوق -شات الحب -الحب -اربيك بوك -شات المها -المها -شات طرب توب -طرب توب -شات بنت ابوي -بنت ابوي -سعودي توب -سعودي كول -سعوديه كول -شات صوتي -شات كتابي -دردشة -شات حبي -شات مياسه -شات الساهر -الساهر -شات الحان -الحان -شات صدى الاهات -صدى الاهات -شات الورد -شات القصيم -شات بنت السعوديه -بنت السعوديه -شات قلبي -شات شلة بنات -شلة بنات -شات توك كام -شات الفاتن -خليجي كام -شات خليجي كام -شات حلا السعوديه -صيف كام -سيف العشق -دلع -شات دلع -شات بنات الرس -شات الرس -شات بنات عنيزة -شات عنيزة -منتديات -مواقع شات دردشه -مواقع شات -مواقع دردشه شات الحب العاب شات منتديات دليل
دليل دردشات
دليل حبي
دليل مواقع
العاب فلاش
يوتيوب
دردشه صوتيه
بنت ابوي
شات الوله
شات الود دردشه الود
شات عالم الرومانسية دردشه عالم الرومانسية
شات تعب قلبي دردشه تعب قلبي
شات الشله دردشه الشله
شات القصيم دردشه القصيم
شات الحب دردشه الحب
شات الرياض دردشه الرياض
دلع الكون
حبي نت
شات حبي
الكون
شات دلع
دلع
الود
الشله
الحب
شات خليجي
شات سعودي دردشه سعوديه
مواقع
شات يمني دردشه يمنيه
شات قطري دردشه قطريه
شات كويتي دردشه كويتيه
منتدى منتديات عربيه
شات بحريني دردشه بحرينيه
شات اماراتي دردشه اماراتيه
شات سعودي
اغاني
شات صوتي
شات كتابي
شات قلوب دردشه قلوب
منتديات دلع الكون
ahj

Posted by: حبي at October 01, 2009 09:58 PM (P+FIH)

213 ًً الأقسام العــامــهـ َََ @ َ الإسلام ديننا ََ @ َ المنتدى العام ََ @ َ قسم الضيافة والاهداءات ََ @ ََ حبي الثقافي والأدبي َََ @ ََحبي البسمة والترفيةَََ @ ََحــبي الأسرهـ والمجتمعَََ @ مـنـتـديـات الـتـكـنـولـوجـيـا و الـكـمـبـيـوتـر @ الـمـنـتـديـات الأداريــه @ َ بيتــ القصـــ ي ـــد ََ @ َ قسم القصص والروايات ََ @ َامســـك حــالك...!َ @ َالــبـوم الصـــور ََ @ منتدى الازياء والموضة @ منتدى الكمبيوتر والإنترنت @ مـنـتـدى التصاميم والجرافيكس @ منتدى الجوال @ منتدى السينما والفن @ منتدى الإقتراحات و الملاحظات @ ارشيف المنتدى @ منتدى الادارة الخاص @ منتدى الطبخ @ قسم الديكور @ َ مرصدنا الإخباري ََ @ َ الرسول الكريم ََ @ َ الصوتيات والمرئيات الإسلامية ََ @ منتدى الطب والصحة العامة @ َ قسم السياحة والسفر ََ @ َ الخيمة الرمضانية ََ @ مـنـتـدى المرأة @ قسم عالم الاطفال @ قسم عالم الرجل @ منتديات الأفلام والسينما @ قسم صور المشاهير @ منتدى المسلسلات والمسرحيات العربية @ منتدى الأفلام العربية @ منتدى الأفلام الأجنبية @ قسم الأفلام الهندية @ قسم أفلام الأنمي والكارتون @ مـنـتـدى المسابقات والالعاب @ منتدى برامج الفيديو وبرامج الصوتيات @ منتديات الجوال @ منتدى برامج الجوال @ منتدى البلوتوث ومسجات الجوال @ منتدى الثيمات @ منتدى النغمات @ منتدى طلبات الاشراف @ َ القرآنـ الكــريمـ ََ @ َ أخ ـبـار الـتـقـنـيـة ََ @ َ تـوظـيـف و وظـائـف ََ @ َ صرحنا التعليمي ََ @ َ المكتبة الإلكترونية ََ @ َ عذب الكلام ََ @ ََ حبي الشباب و الرياضه ًًً @ َمُلتقـى الشـبابََ @ َالرياضه و الشبابََ @ َعالم السياراتََ @ َالمرأة المسلمةََ @ الأسرة المسلمة @ قراءة القران @ بلوتوث حبي @ ًً أقسام الموقع ًًً @ ً آخر أخبار الشبكة ًُ @ َ سجن حبي ََ @ ََ حبي لتطوير المواقع ًًً @ :: نسخ المنتديـــات منزوعــة الكود :: @ :: إستايــلات النسخــة الثالثــة المجانية :: @ :: تطوير المنتديـــات :: @ .. الهاكات الخاصة بالنسخة [3.0.0+3.5.0] .. @ ..الهاكات الخاصة بالنسخة [3.6.0].. @ :: تطوير النسخة 3.7.0 :: @ .. هاكات النسخة 3.7.0 .. @ :: تطويــر النسخــة 3.8.0 :: @ .. هاكات النسخــة 3.8.0 .. @ .. الثغرات الخاصة بالنسخ التاليــة [3.0.0]-[3.5.0]-[3.6.0]-[3.7.0]-[3.8.0] @ :: الطلبــــات و المشـــاكل والحلول :: @ :: تطويــر المواقــع .. و .. السكربتات :: @ فيديوهات رياضية @ ًتفسير الأحلامًً @ َ أبــــــــــــرج ًً @ َساحة حوارََ @ عــــــــالم المسنــجــر @ ً اليــــــــ الوطني السعودي ـــوم ًً @ ًً حــبي للتصميم ًًً @ ً قسم عامـ في عــالم التصميــم ًً @ معرض تصاميم وإبـــداع الأعضــاء @ برامج التصميم و ملحقاته @ ً الفلاش والسويش ًً @ ً طلبــــات التصميــــم ًً @ ًً أنــاشيد أغاني ًًً @ َ أخبار المنتدى ًً @ ًحبي لاناشيد الأطفال ًً @ َالأناشيد العامةََ @ َ كلمات الاناشيد ََ @ ًالاغاني العامةًً @ ًالأغاني السعوديةًً @ ًالأغاني المصريةًً @ ًالأغاني العراقيةًً @ َالاغاني السوريةًً @ ًالأغاني المغربيةًً @ ًالاغاني الإماراتيةًً @ ًالاغاني اللبنانيةًً @ َالاغاني اليمنيةًً @ ًالاغاني العمانيةًً @ ًالأغاني القطريةًً @ َالاغاني الكويتيةًً @ َالأغاني البحرينةًً @ َالاغاني التونسيةًً @ َالاغاني الجزائريةََ @ َالاغاني الاردنيةََ @
شات صوتي الوله-شات صوتي مون لايت-شات صوتي كويت-شات صوتي بحر الشوق-شات صوتي رومانسي-شات صوتي حسايف-شات صوتي طعون-شات صوتي سعودي-شات صوتي المميزة-شات صوتي كويت-شات صوتي تيرا-شات صوتي لمعه-شات صوتي قطر-شات صوتي نيو موت-شات صوتي سولافة-شات صوتي حب كام-شات صوتي لمسة غرام-شات صوتي فله-شات صوتي بنت ابوي-شات صوتي ليون ايجى-شات صوتي حبي-شات صوتي شغب-شات صوتي ريماز-شات صوتي عسل-شات صوتي بنات كويت-شات صوتي عفناك-شات صوتي كارونا-شات صوتي غيوم-شات صوتي ريناز-شات صوتي خليجي-شات صوتي احبك-شات صوتي حبنا-شات صوتي لؤلؤة-شات صوتي نيومار-شات صوتي عبق-شات صوتي الياقوت-شات صوتي جرح-شات صوتي همسات الحب-شات صوتي دلع-شات صوتي عرب روم-شات صوتي ايجي روم-شات صوتي سعودي مايك-شات صوتي ندوم-شات صوتي بنات شباب السعوديه-شات صوتي ابداع-شات صوتي الرياض-شات صوتي الحب-شات صوتي بنت الامارات-شات صوتي فويس-شات صوتي ديونار-شات صوتي نيولار-شات صوتي رياض العشق-شات صوتي عراق-شات صوتي بنات الخليج-شات صوتي روعة المشاعر-شات صوتي الود-شات صوتي مافيني-شات صوتي طرب توب-شات صوتي الغلا-شات صوتي جوان-شات صوتي عرب فوكس-شات صوتي سعودي 23-شات صوتي بالتوك العرب-شات صوتي سعودي فله-شات صوتي غرف صوتية-شات صوتي فن تايم-شات صوتي نافا-شات صوتي سحر الخيال-شات صوتي ابن اليمن-شات صوتي حلاهم-شات صوتي الموعد-شات صوتي كامات السعودية-شات صوتي غرام-شات صوتي ثاره-شات صوتي حلو-شات صوتي بينى وبينك-العاب-موقع العاب-العاب حبي-العاب اجهزه-العاب اطفال-العاب سهله-العاب فضاء-العاب قتال-العاب مضحكه-العاب منوعه-العاب مسليه-العاب مثيره-العاب متميزه-العاب حركه-العاب رياضه-العاب سباق-العاب صور-العاب صوتيه-العاب تعليم الانجليزيه-العاب ذكاء-العاب طريفه-العاب تركيز-العاب اكشن-العاب بنات-العاب اكشن للبنات-العاب تلوين-العاب هانا مونتانا -العاب قص الشعر-العاب طبخ-العاب باربي-العاب ميك اب-العاب الترتيب والديكور-العاب المشاهير-العاب فلاش-صور حبي-صور-موقع صور-معرض صور-بطاقات رومانسيه-صور خلفيات لسطح المكتب-صور سيارات-صور ترحيب منتديات-صور اسلاميه-صور تصاميم-صور شروق و غروب-صور اطفال-صور طبيعه-صور رومانسيه-صور مرعبه و غريبه-صور مضحكه-صور زهور وورود-تواقيع خاصه للمنتديات-صور كارتونيه-صور حيوانات- صور لتزيين مواضيع المنتديات-صور منوعه-صور ملثمات-صور ماسنجر-شات حبي-دردشة صوتية-دردشة كتابية-دردشة-دليل دردشات-دليل مواقع-شات خليجي-اكبر شات-شات الحب الصوتي-شات حبنا-زخرف اسمك-دردشة للبنات-اكبر تجمع للبنات-شات حبي السعوديه-شات حبي خليجيه-شات حبي الخليج-شات حبي لك-شات صوتي للبنات-مركز تحميل-صوتي-كتابي-اقوى شات صوتي-اقوى دردشة صوتية-اقوى دردشة-يوتيوب-شبكة حبي-اجمل توبيكات-توبيكات بنات-افضل توبيكات-توبيكات ماسنجر-توبيكات حبي-توبيكات-موقع توبيكات

Posted by: حبي at October 01, 2009 10:02 PM (P+FIH)

214 دردشات صوتيه -شاتات صوتيه -صوتي-دردشه الحب الصوتيه-صوتيه-مواقع صوتيه-شات صوتي-شات كتابي-شات-منتدى-شات حبي-منتديات-site map-sitemap-مواقع صوتي
شات صوتي عرب توك-شات صوتي دلع-شات صوتي الشوق-شات صوتي هواها غير-شات صوتي اهل الغرام-شات صوتي الهجوله-شات صوتي شعر-شات صوتي الصوت رقه-شات صوتي سوالف ليل-شات صوتي غلا-شات صوتي شجون-شات صوتي مرح-شات صوتي نحبكم-شات صوتي كيفي-شات صوتي عيون-شات صوتي بنات لبنان-شات صوتي المغرب-شات صوتي لفته-شات صوتي بنات غير-شات صوتي توت-شات صوتي عربي-شات صوتي الملك-شات صوتي الود-شات صوتي تعب قلبي-شات صوتي بدور الخليج-شات صوتي هجران-شات صوتي مملكة المشتاق-شات صوتي غلا كام-شات صوتي ليالي فويس-شات صوتي ابعاد-شات صوتي شموع-شات صوتي نهر الدلوعات-شات صوتي عالمي-شات صوتي شمس العرب-شات صوتي بنات الحب فردوس-شات صوتي فرفشه-شات صوتي جبرني الوقت-شات صوتي سعودي كام-شات صوتي بنت العروبه-شات صوتي الخليج-شات صوتي وسام-شات صوتي الشله-شات صوتي بنات العرب-شات صوتي بحرين-شات صوتي مزنه-شات صوتي بنت 18-شات صوتي فله-شات صوتي نيومار-سعودي كول-دردشه صوتيه سعوديه-شات الحب الكتابي-اقوى الشاتات الصوتيه-اقوى شات صوتي كام-شات حبنا الكتابي
علاج آلام الظهر
علاج ألام المفاصل
علاج خشونة الركبة
علاج عرق النساء
آلام الظهر
ألام المفاصل
خشونة الركبة
عرق النساء
علاج الشعبي , طب الشعبي

Posted by: حبي at October 01, 2009 10:03 PM (P+FIH)

215 Some people like LV handbags,Some people like Chanel handbags,but most popel have been keeping an eye on cheap fashion brand handbags .we often talk about all kinds of designer handbags with my friends,most of my friends also like cheap fashion brand handbags.We admire cheap fashion brand handbags designer who often be able to design so many stylish handbags.We want to be a handbag’s designer in the future too. In our store online,you can buy all series of cheap fashion brand handbags,include: Louis Vuitton,LV Luggage,LV Wallets,LV Agendas,LV Belts,LV Shoes,LV Accessories,Gucci,Gucci Wallets,Gucci Shoes,Marc Jacobs handbags,Marni handbags,Miu Miu handbags,Mulberry handbags,Prada handbags,Thomaswylde handbags,TOD handbags,Bottega Veneta handbags,DG handbags,Dior handbags,YSL handbags,Coach handbags

Posted by: steve at October 13, 2009 01:31 PM (HYXCd)

216 Your article is very awesome. Do you know something new about NFL Jerseys? Our Chaussure de Sport is a good store provide you high quality Nike shoes. Air Max Shoes are the best selling shoes. clothing jeans are very popular among fashion girls and boys. athletic shoes can perfectly match with it. ed hardy clothing is also very popular in recent years, Chaussures Sports will lead you a fashion life. Nike shoes like nike tn,tn requin,Tn Requin and Air Shoes are very popular among young fashion girls and boys. China Wholesale are also very cheap but functional. We also provide you top quality Tennis Racquet Shop,Cheap Nike Shoes, cheap nike shox,ed hardy, Nike Chaussures ,cheap polo shirts,Polo Shirts at a reasonable prices and awesome services.

Posted by: Chaussure de Sport at April 01, 2010 10:59 PM (vr9qI)

217 China Online Shop Buy Wholesale Products China Distributor Electronic Componentsprettyimpresspretty impress Buy Toys Jewelry Shop

Posted by: China online shop at April 13, 2010 10:47 AM (RDKvw)

218 IBM 02K6928 Battery
IBM 02K7052 Battery
IBM 02K7053 Battery
IBM 02K7054 Battery
IBM 02K7055 Battery
IBM 02K7056 Battery
IBM 02K7057 Battery
IBM 02K7058 Battery
IBM 02K7059 Battery
IBM 02K7060 Battery
IBM 02K7061 Battery
IBM 08K8192 Battery
IBM 08K8193 Battery
IBM 08K8194 Battery
IBM 08K8195 Battery
IBM 08K8196 Battery
IBM 08K8197 Battery
IBM 08K8198 Battery
IBM 08K8199 Battery
IBM 08K8201 Battery
IBM 08K8214 Battery
IBM 2K6928 Battery
IBM 2P1013 Battery
IBM 40Y6799 Battery
IBM 41N5666 Battery
IBM 92P0998 Battery
IBM 92P0999 Battery
IBM 92P1000 Battery
IBM 92P1002 Battery
IBM 92P1003 Battery
IBM 92P1005 Battery
IBM 92P1009 Battery
IBM 92P1011 Battery
IBM 92P1060 Battery
IBM 92P1061 Battery
IBM 92P1069 Battery
IBM 92P1071 Battery
IBM 92P1073 Battery
IBM 92P1075 Battery
IBM 92P1076 Battery
IBM 92P1077 Battery
IBM 92P1080 Battery
IBM 92P1087 Battery
IBM 92P1089 Battery
IBM 92P1091 Battery
IBM 92P1101 Battery
IBM 92P1102 Battery
IBM 92P1119 Battery
IBM 93P5002 Battery
IBM 93P5003 Battery
IBM ASM 92P1132 Battery
IBM ASM 92P1138 Battery
IBM ASM 92P1140 Battery
IBM FRU 92P1137 Battery
IBM FRU 92P1139 Battery
IBM FRU 92P1141 Battery
IBM IB-R32L Battery
IBM IB-R40L Battery
IBM ThinkPad R50 Battery
IBM ThinkPad R50e Battery
IBM ThinkPad R50P Battery
IBM ThinkPad R51 Battery
IBM ThinkPad R52 Battery
IBM ThinkPad R60 Battery
IBM ThinkPad R60E Battery
IBM ThinkPad T30 Battery
IBM ThinkPad T40 Battery
IBM ThinkPad T40P Battery
IBM ThinkPad T41 Battery
IBM ThinkPad T41P Battery
IBM ThinkPad T42 Battery
IBM ThinkPad T42P Battery
IBM ThinkPad T43 Battery
IBM ThinkPad T43P Battery
IBM ThinkPad T60 Battery
IBM ThinkPad T60P Battery
IBM ThinkPad X40 Battery
IBM ThinkPad X41 Battery
Mitac 40006487 Battery
Mitac 40006825 Battery
Mitac 441681700033 Battery
Mitac 441681700034 Battery
Mitac 441681710001 Battery
Mitac 441681720001 Battery
Mitac 441681730001 Battery
Mitac 441681740001 Battery
Mitac 441681740003 Battery
Mitac 441681740005 Battery
Mitac 441681760001 Battery
Mitac 441681760003 Battery
Mitac 441681760005 Battery
Mitac 441681770001 Battery
Mitac 441681771001 Battery
Mitac 441681772101 Battery
Mitac 441681773001 Battery
Mitac 441681780001 Battery
Mitac 441681780003 Battery
Mitac 441681783001 Battery
Mitac 441681790002 Battery
Mitac 441685710002 Battery
Mitac 442671600002 Battery
Mitac 442671700002 Battery
Mitac 442671700003 Battery
Mitac 442673800003 Battery
Mitac 442673850001 Battery
Mitac 442677000001 Battery
Mitac 442677000003 Battery
Mitac 442677000004 Battery
Mitac 442677000005 Battery
Mitac 442677000007 Battery
Mitac 442677000010 Battery
Mitac 442677000013 Battery
Mitac 442682800001 Battery
Mitac 442682800002 Battery
Mitac 442682800004 Battery
Mitac 442682800008 Battery
Mitac 442682800014 Battery
Mitac 442682800015 Battery
Mitac 442682800018 Battery
Mitac 442682800027 Battery
Mitac 442682800030 Battery
Mitac 442682840004 Battery
Mitac 442683000001 Battery
Mitac 6903120000 Battery
Mitac 7001820000 Battery
Mitac 7009510000 Battery
Mitac 7018440000 Battery
Mitac 7018840000 Battery
Mitac 7028650000 Battery
Mitac 7035210000 Battery
Mitac 7038840000 Battery
Mitac 7044290000 Battery
Mitac 8050 Battery
Mitac 8050D Battery
Mitac 8050DC Battery
Mitac 8089 Battery
Mitac 8089P Battery
Mitac 8089X Battery
Mitac 8325 Battery
Mitac 8389 Battery
Mitac 8889 Battery
Mitac Amitech BP-8050 Battery
Mitac BP-8050(P) Battery
Mitac BP-8050(S) Battery
Mitac BP-8050 Battery
Mitac BP-8050I Battery
Mitac BP-8089 Battery
Mitac bp-8389 Battery
Mitac CGR-B Battery
Mitac E680 Battery
Mitac M500 Battery
Mitac MAM2080 Battery
Mitac Medion 8089 Battery
Mitac Medion 8089P Battery
Mitac Medion MD95062 Battery
Mitac MIM2120 Battery
Mitac MIM2130 Battery
Mitac MiNote 8050 Battery
Mitac MiNote 8050D Battery
Mitac MiNote 8050DC Battery
Mitac MiNote 8089 Battery
Mitac Minote 8375 Battery
Mitac Minote 8375P Battery
Mitac Minote 8575 Battery
Mitac MiNote 8889 Battery
Mitac MiNote 8X75 Battery
Mitac Sarasota 8889 Battery
Mitac T19SE-MSL Battery

Posted by: laptop battery at April 22, 2010 03:29 AM (uxKBS)

219 cheap nike dunks http://www.pickdunks.com

Posted by: pickdunks at April 22, 2010 09:47 PM (xKhSy)

220 cheap nike shox
[url="http://www.adikshoes.com/category-40-b0-NIKE+SHOX+R3.html]NIKE SHOX [/url]

Posted by: pickdunks at April 22, 2010 09:51 PM (xKhSy)

221 cheap nhl jersey <a href="http://www.nhl87.com/category-1-b0-NHL+JERSEYS.html"><strong>NHL JERSEYS</strong></a>

Posted by: pickdunks at April 22, 2010 09:54 PM (xKhSy)

222 <a href="http://www.hydiapearl.com/" title="jewelry">jewelry</a><a href="http://www.hydiapearl.com/" title="pearl jewelry">pearl jewelry</a><a href="http://www.hydiapearl.com/" title="silver jewelry">silver jewelry</a><a href="http://www.hydiapearl.com/" title="wedding jewelry">wedding jewelry</a><a href="http://www.hydiapearl.com/" title="Wholesale Jewelry">Wholesale Jewelry</a>

Posted by: jewelr at May 01, 2010 11:11 PM (MtW3d)

223 Voice Chat best and most beautiful chat=======
ط´ط§طھ ط­ط¨ظٹ - ظ…ظ†طھط¯ظٹط§طھ -ظ…ظ†طھط¯ظٹط§طھ ط­ط¨ظٹ -ط¯ط±ط¯ط´ط© - ط´ط§طھ ظƒطھط§ط¨ظٹ -ط´ط§طھ ط§ظ„ط­ط¨ -ط´ط§طھ -ط¯ط±ط¯ط´ظ‡ طµظˆطھظٹظ‡ ط³ط¹ظˆط¯ظٹظ‡
ط¯ط±ط¯ط´ط© ط§ظ„ط­ط¨ - ط³ط¹ظˆط¯ظٹ ظƒظˆظ„ -ط´ط§طھ طµظˆطھظٹ - ط´ط§طھ ط³ط¹ظˆط¯ظٹ - ط´ط§طھ ط¯ظ„ط¹ - طھظˆط¨ظٹظƒط§طھ - ط§ظ„ط¹ط§ط¨ ظپظ„ط§ط´ - ط§ظ„ط¹ط§ط¨

Posted by: ط­ط¨ظٹ at May 04, 2010 01:35 AM (duDiz)

224 Yes, so I imagined.

<a href=" http://www.hydiapearl.com/" title="jewelry">jewelry</a>
<a href=" http://www.hydiapearl.com/" title="pearl jewelry">pearl jewelry</a>
<a href=" http://www.hydiapearl.com/" title="silver jewelry">silver jewelry</a>
<a href=" http://www.hydiapearl.com/" title="wedding jewelry">wedding jewelry</a>
<a href=" http://www.hydiapearl.com/" title="Wholesale Jewelry">Wholesale Jewelry</a>

Posted by: hydiapearl at May 04, 2010 10:29 PM (aFEpL)

225 <a href=" http://www.hydiapearl.com/"
title="jewelry">jewelry</a>
<a href="
http://www.hydiapearl.com/" title="pearl jewelry">pearl
jewelry</a>
<a href=" http://www.hydiapearl.com/"
title="silver jewelry">silver jewelry</a>
<a href="
http://www.hydiapearl.com/" title="wedding jewelry">wedding
jewelry</a>
<a href=" http://www.hydiapearl.com/"
title="Wholesale Jewelry">Wholesale Jewelry</a>

Posted by: hydiapearl at May 04, 2010 10:32 PM (aFEpL)

226 Good luck !Very good artical.you will get good grades!really really good stuff men !!! thanks !!! It is so nice.http://www.watchestoo.com

Posted by: ishidiadi at May 19, 2010 02:22 AM (Ioilo)

227 Winpromote solutions creates and produces custom printed logo promotion items and <a href=http://www.winpromote.com/category/ >promotional products</a>, imprinted corporate gifts, tradeshow giveaways, promotion merchandise, advertising specialties, corporate gifts, and a wide variety of <a href=http://www.winpromote.com/hot-products/1.html >promotional novelty</a>.

Posted by: custom promotional prodcuts at June 03, 2010 04:11 AM (mYNod)

228 Under the help of my friend, I have got a lot of chanel J12 watches and the chanel ceramic watches is sold very cheap on a famous website. If you want to buy Chanel Watches and own plenty of chanel replica watches, you can ask me for help to get the cheap chanel watches .

Posted by: chanel watches at June 04, 2010 05:40 AM (XZziM)

229 Good post!You did a good work,and offer more effective imformation for
us!Thank you!This night, cheap air jordans free shipping,cheap
air jordans shoes it is really turning very cold. cheap
air jordans for sale,cheap air jordans for women,ed hardy
clothing,ed hardy shirts,ed hardy sale,ed hardy belts.The
wind blows; it blows onto my body which has lost all its senses.ed hardy jeans,ed hardy kids,ed hardy
swimwear,best air jordans.I smile candidly, as if mocking the
ignorance of this wind that continues to blow upon best
retro jordans,best air force ones,best nike
dunks,best air force 1,best air jordan shoes this senseless
body without spirit.best air jordans for basketball,best air
jordan 1,best air jordan sneakers I don،¯t know where I
should go. discount air jordan sneakers,discount nike air jordans,discount air force ones,discount
nike dunks I dare not go back to that empty room. I fear
remembering, fear thinking of him.discount jordan basketball shoes,discount michael jordan shoes,discount
nike shoes,discount jordans.There, our fragrant
liveliness remains.jordan air force 1,jordan air flights There, memories of our
sweetness still hold. jordan air force ones,jordan
air force fusion,jordan air shoes,jordan air fight 45 On the balcony, I
cuddled up in his arms to watch the sun set.jordan air max,jordan air
sneakers Quietly I curled in his embrace to hide from the landlord
who pressed for overdue rental.real jordan shoes,real
jordan shoes for sale And, we wiped the furniture hand in
hand...Finally,real jordan sneakers he met someone who understood his
music.real
jordans for cheap,real air jordan shoes,real
air jordan websites I had never seen him so excited. Like a child, real air
force ones,real air jordan sneakers,new
jordans for sale gave me a big silly smile.He held onto my hand,I
almost could not go on.air jordan shoes for sale,authentic jordans for sale,fake
jordans for sale I told you that I would not make you regret.wholesale
ed hardy clothing,wholesale ed hardy shirts But day
in and day out, looking at you rushing through life in such hardship,wholesale
ed hardy hats,nike air force kicks,nike exclusive kicks I really thought I
could not go on. Now, I want to make my promise come true.nike kicks for
men,nike
kicks store,nike kicks for sale,Cheap Retro Jordans,jordan 23
shoes I smiled.Robbie and I made short work of custom air
force ones,wholesale jordans from china the next goal. But
it did not count since, apparently, the goal posts wholesale
jordans free shipping,wholesale jordans paypal were too
far apart.Robbie decided to take a break,wholesale jordan shoes from china,wholesale
jordans for cheap so it was just Andrew and I.Our team might not
have done very well that night,buy
air jordans,buy nike dunks,buy air max but the team work and
entertainment value buy jordans,buy jordans from china,buy jordans for cheap will not be
soon forgotten.،°Can you do push ups?،± Maybe I could divert youth
nfl jerseys on sale,kids nfl jerseys on sale,authentic nfl jerseys on sale attention away from the
bandana.Andrew accepted the challenge,NFL
jerseys On sale,wholesale jerseys form china
and tried. He couldn't really do any. But he tried hard. It made him
tired.wholesale jerseys nfl,wholesale jerseys free shipping
was panting a little.I let him off. Then he walked from wholesale
jerseys 21,wholesale jerseys usa end of the
see-saw to the other. The board tipped one way,jordan sneakers size 15,cheap jordans size 15 then another. I couldn،¯t
remember the last time I was on the see-saw.Just then, jordan shoes size 14,big jordan shoesAndrew let out a little kiddish burp.
،°Excuse me.،± He said politely. I saw such a bright future that awaited
us. cheap
nike shoes,Retro Jordan Shoes,air jordan 12,jordan
shoes for sale We gave all our savings to the person who understood
his music.wholesale nike shox shoes,wholesale nike shox from china,wholesale nike shox for women,wholesale nike shox size 13 then and there, we really saw a
future.wholesale nike shox free shipping,wholesale nike shox deliver,custom jordans,custom
jordan shoes We saw that we would never again have to endure hunger,
custom
michael jordan shoes,custom jordan sneakers,custom nike
dunks never again be expelled.It was then that we realized, that our
wish had been custom retro jordans,custom nike shoesso simple, but which
brought us so much happiness that custom jordans,custom jordan
shoes,custom michael jordan shoes was beyond expression.They
say that the more battles a friendship survives, the stronger custom
jordan sneakers,custom retro jordans,Nike Air Jordansit
becomes. To think, it is common for friends not to see eye Retro Jordan
Shoes,custom
nike shoes eye, and battles, be it exchanges of cynicism,custom air
force ones,cheap kicks for salequibbles, or the occasional push to shove
are almost sure to come and leave dents behind. But there has been one
friendship that has not been blemished for as long as I can remember,
and this piece is written in honor of a friend who has partaken in
perhaps more aspects of my life than any other. We exchanged penalty
shots, and mine always wholesale jordans from new york,wholesale
air force ones china,wholesale jordans cheap,nike dunks high
hit the meandering goal posts.Before I finished my line,nike dunks
women,nike
dunks sb,nike dunks hith tops,nike dunks for sale andrew chucked the
ball onto the ground and tried to drag nike dunks low,nike blazer
shoes,zebra
nike blazers into the church. Then I had to follow Andrew into the
church,nike
blazers sale,nike blazers high,exclusive kicks there were some muffins in
the dining hall,exclusive kicks websites,exclusive
kicks for cheap,exclusive kicks for sale,exclusive
kicks for kids and some juice.As we stepped outside the church, exclusive
air jordans,exclusive jordans 2010,exclusive
jordan sneakers Andrew suddenly stood still, propped up his ears,exclusive
jordans for cheap,exclusive jordan fusions,Cheap Retro
Jordans and gestured me to hush. Fair enough. I gave him a head
start cheap
custom jordans,cheap air jordans,cheap retro jordans for sale
this time. Then I chased him around the only bush on the grass field, cheap retro
shoes,wholesale ed hardy clothingand there was another
time out.Time for creative thinking,wholesale ed hardy t shirts,wholesale ed hardy shirts,wholesale ed hardy shorts I thought.



Posted by: discount nike shoes at June 13, 2010 03:33 AM (IeFqI)

230 we are a professional trading company specialized in high quality with:<a href=http://www.wholesalepursehandbag.com/>Wholesale Purse Handbag</a><a href=http://www.wholesalepursehandbag.com/>Purses Handbags/a><a href=http://www.wholesalepursehandbag.com/>Cheap Purse</a><a href=http://www.wholesalepursehandbag.com/>Cheap Handbags</a><a href=http://www.wholesalepursehandbag.com/>LV Handbags</a><a href=http://www.wholesalepursehandbag.com/>Chanel Handbags</a><a href=http://www.suedepuma.com/>Suede Puma</a><a href=http://www.suedepuma.com/>Puma Shoes</a><a href=http://www.suedepuma.com/>Puma Sneaker</a><a href=http://www.suedepuma.com/>Tenis Puma</a><a href=http://www.suedepuma.com/>Puma Ferrari Shoes</a><a href=http://www.suedepuma.com/>Speed Cat shoes</a><a href=http://www.Jerseysallstar.com/>All Star Jerseys</a><a href=http://www.Jerseysallstar.com/>Cheap NFL Jerseys</a><a href=http://www.Jerseysallstar.com/>Wholesale NFL Jerseys</a><a href=http://www.Jerseysallstar.com/>NFL Football Jerseys</a><a href=http://www.hotsaleshopping.com/>Max Shoes</a><a href=http://www.hotsaleshopping.com/>Dunks SB</a><a href=http://www.hotsaleshopping.com/>Cheap Air Jordans</a><a href=http://www.hotsaleshopping.com/>New Air Jordans</a><a href=http://www.hotsaleshopping.com/>Cheap Air force one</a><a href=http://www.converseall.com/>Converse All</a><a href=http://www.converseall.com/>Converse All Star</a><a href=http://www.converseall.com/>Converse Shoes</a><a href=http://www.converseall.com/>All Star Shoes</a><a href=http://www.converseall.com/>Converse Chucks</a><a href=http://www.bonhonest.com/>New Nike Shoes</a><a href=http://www.bonhonest.com/>Cheap Nike Shoes</a><a href=http://www.bonhonest.com/>Nike Dunks/a><a href=http://www.bonhonest.com/>Nike Jordans</a><a href=http://www.bonhonest.com/>Jordans Shoes</a><a href=http://www.bonhonest.com/>Nike Shox</a><a href=http://www.bonhonest.com/>Air Max</a><a href=http://www.90max.com/>90 Max</a><a href=http://www.90max.com/>95 Max</a><a href=http://www.90max.com/>Air Max 90</a><a href=http://www.90max.com/>Air Max 95</a><a href=http://www.90max.com/>Air Max Shoes</a><a href=http://www.90max.com/>Max Shoes</a><a href=http://www.90max.com/>Nike Max</a><a href=http://www.boseearheadphones.com/>Bose Ear Headphones</a><a href=http://www.boseearheadphones.com/>Bose Headphones</a><a href=http://www.boseearheadphones.com/>Bose Earphones</a><a href=http://www.boseearheadphones.com/>Bose In-Ear Headphones</a><a href=http://www.boseearheadphones.com/>Bose On-Ear Headphones</a><a href=http://www.boseearheadphones.com/>Cheap Headphones</a>To know more our products information,kindly browse our sites

Posted by: wilshere123 at August 03, 2010 03:56 AM (ilwbX)

231 we are a professional trading company specialized in high quality with:<a href=http://www.wholesalepursehandbag.com/>Wholesale Purse Handbag</a><a href=http://www.wholesalepursehandbag.com/>Purses Handbags/a><a href=http://www.wholesalepursehandbag.com/>Cheap Purse</a><a href=http://www.wholesalepursehandbag.com/>Cheap Handbags</a><a href=http://www.wholesalepursehandbag.com/>LV Handbags</a><a href=http://www.wholesalepursehandbag.com/>Chanel Handbags</a><a href=http://www.suedepuma.com/>Suede Puma</a><a href=http://www.suedepuma.com/>Puma Shoes</a><a href=http://www.suedepuma.com/>Puma Sneaker</a><a href=http://www.suedepuma.com/>Tenis Puma</a><a href=http://www.suedepuma.com/>Puma Ferrari Shoes</a><a href=http://www.suedepuma.com/>Speed Cat shoes</a><a href=http://www.Jerseysallstar.com/>All Star Jerseys</a><a href=http://www.Jerseysallstar.com/>Cheap NFL Jerseys</a><a href=http://www.Jerseysallstar.com/>Wholesale NFL Jerseys</a><a href=http://www.Jerseysallstar.com/>NFL Football Jerseys</a><a href=http://www.hotsaleshopping.com/>Max Shoes</a><a href=http://www.hotsaleshopping.com/>Dunks SB</a><a href=http://www.hotsaleshopping.com/>Cheap Air Jordans</a><a href=http://www.hotsaleshopping.com/>New Air Jordans</a><a href=http://www.hotsaleshopping.com/>Cheap Air force one</a><a href=http://www.converseall.com/>Converse All</a><a href=http://www.converseall.com/>Converse All Star</a><a href=http://www.converseall.com/>Converse Shoes</a><a href=http://www.converseall.com/>All Star Shoes</a><a href=http://www.converseall.com/>Converse Chucks</a><a href=http://www.bonhonest.com/>New Nike Shoes</a><a href=http://www.bonhonest.com/>Cheap Nike Shoes</a><a href=http://www.bonhonest.com/>Nike Dunks/a><a href=http://www.bonhonest.com/>Nike Jordans</a><a href=http://www.bonhonest.com/>Jordans Shoes</a><a href=http://www.bonhonest.com/>Nike Shox</a><a href=http://www.bonhonest.com/>Air Max</a><a href=http://www.90max.com/>90 Max</a><a href=http://www.90max.com/>95 Max</a><a href=http://www.90max.com/>Air Max 90</a><a href=http://www.90max.com/>Air Max 95</a><a href=http://www.90max.com/>Air Max Shoes</a><a href=http://www.90max.com/>Max Shoes</a><a href=http://www.90max.com/>Nike Max</a><a href=http://www.boseearheadphones.com/>Bose Ear Headphones</a><a href=http://www.boseearheadphones.com/>Bose Headphones</a><a href=http://www.boseearheadphones.com/>Bose Earphones</a><a href=http://www.boseearheadphones.com/>Bose In-Ear Headphones</a><a href=http://www.boseearheadphones.com/>Bose On-Ear Headphones</a><a href=http://www.boseearheadphones.com/>Cheap Headphones</a>To know more our products information,kindly browse our sites

Posted by: wilshere123 at August 03, 2010 03:58 AM (ilwbX)

232 delihost okodukaikasegi futomomo tyoukyuplay gspot

Posted by: akira at August 26, 2010 06:49 AM (MBcaX)

233 [url=http://www.watchfordream.com]swiss made replica watches[/url]

Posted by: Watchfordream at August 26, 2010 11:22 PM (Wtbbj)

234 Attend annual ball ,birthday celebration, marriage ceremony ,pack yourself reday!top replica watches

Posted by: Watchfordream at August 26, 2010 11:23 PM (Wtbbj)

235 The 2010 Nike Dunk High black and orange colour shoes was released by Nike dunk recently.the whole pair of shoes is made of black leather .The leather part are full of holes which is sitable for summer wearing . And the toe part was decorated by orange cashmere leather .While the black part of the shoes is designed with black colour .This pair of Nike Dunk Hi is expect be available for sale in June .If you want to buy ir , please pay more attention!

Posted by: nike shoes at August 28, 2010 01:17 AM (fTHp5)

236 With <a href='http://www.cheapnikedunkssb.com/mens-nike-dunk-high-c-8.html'>Nike Dunk High</a>, there’s always a little give and a little take. The ‘take’ is that you get to see an interesting concept make its way on a shoe, but the ‘give’ is that you have to sacrifice some build quality with the shoe. Here’s a look at an <a href='http://www.cheapnikedunkssb.com'>Nike Dunk</a>that’s all ‘take’ and no ‘give’; designed by customizer Sharp020 and inspired by HiiDef, this <a href='http://www.cheapnikedunkssb.com/mens-nike-dunk-low-c-9.html'>Nike Dunk Low</a>custom appears as if it came straight from factory production rather than the work of a single being. Using a black 3M upper, a white base, contrast stitching on the center panel, and HiiDef’s logo on the outer heels as well as a custom inner liner, this SB Dunk design looks crisp and clean from head to toe (or we should say ‘heel’ to toe). HiiDef is a web developer for a number of well-known establishments like Super-Kix, so they’re quite deserving of this SB Dunk enshrinement. Take a look at the detailed images after the jump and let us know what you think of this custom design.via[url href='http://www.cheapnikedunkssb.com/mens-nike-dunk-high-c-8.html']Nike Dunk High[/url]

Posted by: nike dunksb at September 13, 2010 08:46 PM (HC4q6)

237 <a href='http://www.cheapnikedunkssb.com'>women nike dunk</a> has a good history with
bright red sneakers featuring black accents and the legacy continues with this Sport Red
Nike SB P-Rod 3. The suede and leather kicks are a quick strike available this month at
select SB retailers. The P-Rod 3’s ad campaign made the shoe very popular and Nike is
continuing to keep skaters and sneaker heads interested Nike Dunk High Premium Collection .
Get these while you can as these are a major release.

Posted by: nike dunksb at October 05, 2010 03:00 AM (kqpBb)

238 The inner sole sports the letter N while North is written on the tongue. The three color palettes include orange/black, purple/grey and grey/black. No word yet as to their release but <a href='http://www.picknikedunksb.com'>Nike Dunk SB</a> can be found now on eBay in sample sizes.

Posted by: nike dunk sb men at October 07, 2010 03:57 AM (kqpBb)

239 Nothing like spotting a fresh new <a href='http://www.picknikedunksb.com'>Nike Dunk Women</a>, especially when they are spotted. The Dunk Low CL East comes with an all suede mainly anthracite upper making the black mudgaurd, eyelets and heel cap even more striking. Toss in the volt accenting on the black suede and we have a very interesting kick on our hands. The white midsole is capped off by an anthracite outsole that just rounds this one out lovely. Look for <a href='http://www.picknikedunksb.com'>Nike Dunk Sb</a> drop sometime soon, probably as part of the House of Hoops East.
Apparently ‘Grand Purple’ means 95% black and 5% purple; nonetheless, this <a href='http://www.cheapnikedunkssb.com'>Nike Sb</a> has a grand purple leather upper with the heel being covered with a glossy grand purple on grand purple splatter pattern. The neon outsole and laces make this shoe a definite attention getter while the off-white midsole holds it all together. Pick them up now at <a href='http://www.cheapnikedunkssb.com'>Women Nike Sb</a> or wait patiently for a US release.

Posted by: nike dunk sb men at October 12, 2010 01:14 AM (eU8xb)

240 <a title="ظ…ط±ظƒط² طھط­ظ…ظٹظ„" href="http://upload.7ozn.com/">ظ…ط±ظƒط² طھط­ظ…ظٹظ„</a>

Posted by: classic at October 17, 2010 08:33 AM (CUmIn)

241 ظ…ط±ظƒط² طھط­ظ…ظٹظ„
ظ…ط±ظƒط² طھط­ظ…ظٹظ„ ط§ظ„طµظˆط±
ظ…ط±ظƒط² طھط­ظ…ظٹظ„ ط§ظ„ظ…ظ„ظپط§طھ
ط¨ط±ط§ظ…ط¬ ط¬ط¯ظٹط¯ط©

Posted by: classic at October 17, 2010 08:36 AM (CUmIn)

242 <p>The White/Varsity Red-Black style black and white leather along the upper with a bright red piping around the quarter panel. <a href='http://www.picknikedunksb.com'>Nike Dunk Women</a> also feature a black midsole the blends with the black leather and feeds into the white outsole.<p/>
<p> <a href='http://www.picknikedunksb.com'>Nike Dunk Sb</a> Red Black White Additional red accents are seen on the lace holes, Jumpman, and lining. Two additional colorways, a White/Black/Blue Sapphire and a Black/White pair sport a similar make-up with slight variations in the quarter panel.<p/>
<p>The <a href='http://www.cheapnikedunkssb.com'>Nike Sb</a> has drummed up quite a bit of attention. Set to re-release this weekend in larger quantities.Set to release at noon on June 5, Sneaker Bistro will be treating their clientele to a BBQ and live painting by Reme。<p/>
<p>a Long Island grafitti artist/painter. Reme will be painting a “Jones Beach” sneaker on a canvas, which will be given away to one of the people who purchased the sneaker. In addition, <a href='http://www.cheapnikedunkssb.com'>Women Nike Dunks</a> Low – Flamingospecial guest ‘MAYOR’ will be at the event. In the meantime, Sneaker Bistro put together a special display to house the <a href='http://www.cheapnikedunkssb.com'>Women Nike Sb</a> sneakers.<p/>

Posted by: More attention on nike sb at October 23, 2010 02:30 AM (yNXHz)

243 خليفي نت

Posted by: ramy at December 01, 2010 07:01 PM (O5tf9)

244 bissell carpert is good

Posted by: Bissell at January 08, 2011 06:20 AM (I1QXN)

245 منتديات
منتديات المها
منتدى المها
المها
شات المها
دردشة المها
دردشة سعوديه
منتدى
عالم حواء - ازياء - موضة - فساتين - العتاية بالبشرة والشعر
ازياء و فساتين باسكال مشعلاني - ازياء باسكال مشعلاني جديده
ازياء نجوى كرم 2010 - ازياء وفساتين نجوى كرم
مسنجر - توبيكات - توبيكات ملونه
توبيكات توبكات ملونة للماسنجر - ماسنجريات msn , توبيك , توبيكات , نكات , نكات ملونه , توبيكات ملونه , توبيكات ماسنجر , توبيكات ملونة , توبيكات للماسنجر , توبيكات جديده 2009 , توبيكات ملونه للماسنجر , توبيكات حزينه , توبيكات انجليزيه , توبيكات رومانسية , توبيكات مضحكه , توبيكات اسلاميه , توبيكات شعرية , توبيكات اغاني , توبيكات اسماء , توبيكات رياضية , توبيكات العيد المسنجر , توبكات للمسنجر , نك نيمات للمسن , الماسنجر , تحميل ماسنجر , اكسسوارات , ماسنجر بلس , ايقونات , صور رمزية ’ توبيكات , توبيكات ملونة , توبيكات متحركة , صور مسنجر , صور ماسنجر مسن , صور بنات للمسن , صور شباب , صور للماسنجر , احلى صور جديده , صور 2008 2009 , صور EMO Girl , صور متحركة حلوه للماسنجر , صور رومانسية للماسنجر , صور رمزية , صور مسنجر , صور للمسنجر
جوال - برامج الجوال - ثيمات - وسائط - sms - mms
ثيمات ,ثيمات نوكيا ,مسجات منوعة ، رسائل حب ، مسجات جب , رسائل عتاب ، شعر ، مسجات وسائط ، الوسائط المتعددة , رسائل , مسجات MMS ,رسائل SMS ,برامج الجوال ، اخبار الاتصالات والتقنية ، احدث الاجهزة
مطبخ حواء - اكلات - حلويات - معجنات
طبخ - مطبخ اكلات معجنات حلويات طريقة طبخ الذ واشهى المأكولات البحرية , تعليم طبخ , كتب طبخ , اكلات شعبية , مأكولات شعبية , اكلات مع القيمة الغذائية , اكلات مرضى السكر و الضغط , وصفات ,اطباق رئيسيه , مقبلات سلطه شوربه سلطات معجنات اطباق شعبيه اطباق عالميه اطباق رمضانيه اطباق الحميه وجبات اطفال اكلات سريعة في دقائق , تحميل كتب طبخ , اكلات شهي, اكلات صينية عراقية شامية لبنانية اردنية , اكلات سريعة فلسطينية , اكلات لذيذة رمضانية , اكلات ايطالية , اكلات سورية , اكلات سهلة , اكلات خليجية المطبخ الهندي ,المطبخ السعودي الشامي المغربي الليبي الكويتي الاماراتي البحريني العماني القطري المطبخ الايطالي المطبخ الفرنسي المطبخ اليوناني المطبخ المصري المطبخ العربي

Posted by: ahmedalm1ha at February 09, 2011 07:03 AM (Pd1/b)

246 برامج كمبيوتر - انترنت - تحميل برامج

Posted by: ahmedalm1ha at February 09, 2011 07:05 AM (Pd1/b)

247 رسائل موبايل - رسائل رومانسية
جوال - برامج الجوال - ثيمات - وسائط - sms - mms
طبخ

ازياء
طب
خواطر
شعر
قصص

نكت
توبيكات
برامج كمبيوتر
برامج جوال
صور انمي
صور

Posted by: ahmedalm1ha at February 09, 2011 07:13 AM (Pd1/b)

248 stopping rings are all the rage. For extra dazzle, <a href="http://www.foxybeads.com/"> glass pendants</a>,try a colored <a href="pandora'>http://www.ayliss.com">pandora jewellery</a> center stone, such as a green amethyst or a pink topaz, and <a href="wholesale'>http://www.ayliss.com">wholesale pandora</a> make a big statement

Posted by: wholesale beads at March 01, 2011 02:27 AM (tpiNt)

249 .......

Posted by: inthe at March 10, 2011 10:57 AM (1tb0N)

250





fivefingerflowshoes







VibramFlowShoes








Posted by: fivefinger flow shoes at March 17, 2011 05:11 AM (HO8Ui)

251 سعودي كول
شات سعودي
سعودي كول
منتدى سعودي كول
شات سعودي صوتي

Posted by: سعودي كول at April 02, 2011 01:00 AM (9/TV+)

252 prom dresses uk
prom dresses for 2011
Designer prom dresses
Bridal Dresses uk
Dresses uk
uk Dresses
UK Homecoming Dresses 2011
UK Prom Gowns 2011

UK Cocktail Dresses 2011
UK long prom dresses 2011

UK short prom dresses 2011

UK black prom dresses

UK blue prom dresses 2011

UK pink prom dresses 2011
UK red prom dresses 2011
UK white prom dresses 2011

UK yellow prom dresses 2011
UK black bridal dresses 2011
UK cheap bridal dresses 2011
UK disney bridal dresses 2011
UK red bridal dresses 2011
UK white bridal dresses 2011
UK faviana prom dresses 2011

UK jovani prom dresses 2011

UK riva prom dresses 2011
UK sherri hill prom dresses

classic short prom dresses
wedding dresses

short prom dresses

homecoming dresses
short prom dresses
ming yin
Wedding dress conference

Posted by: prom dresses uk at May 07, 2011 01:52 PM (MC6JR)

253 keep up the good work!

Posted by: fine Chloe swimwear at May 16, 2011 12:04 AM (v0DwH)

254
<a href="http://www.iweddingdressshop.com" title="wedding dress"><strong>wedding dress</strong></a>
<a href="http://www.iweddingdressshop.com" title="wedding dresses"><strong>wedding dresses</strong></a>
<a href="http://www.iweddingdressshop.com/9-wedding-dresses.html" title="bridal wedding dresses"><strong>bridal wedding dresses</strong></a>
<a href="http://www.iweddingdressshop.com/12-bridesmaid-dresses.html" title="wedding bridesmaid dresses"><strong>wedding bridesmaid dresses</strong></a>
<a href="http://www.iweddingdressshop.com/20-plus-size-wedding-dresses.html" title="plus size wedding dresses"><strong>plus size wedding dresses</strong></a>
<a href="http://www.iweddingdressshop.com/21-a-line-wedding-dresses.html" title="a line wedding dresses"><strong>a line wedding dresses</strong></a>
<a href="http://www.iweddingdressshop.com/22-ball-gown-wedding-dresses.html" title="ball gown dresses"><strong>ball gown dresses</strong></a>
<a href="http://www.iweddingdressshop.com/24-tea-length-wedding-dresses.html" title="tea length wedding dresses"><strong>tea length wedding dresses</strong></a>
<a href="http://www.iweddingdressshop.com/25-column-wedding-dresses.html" title="column wedding dresses"><strong>column wedding dresses</strong></a>
<a href="http://www.iweddingdressshop.com/34-strapless-wedding-dresses.html" title="strapless wedding dresses"><strong>strapless wedding dresses</strong></a>
<a href="http://www.iweddingdressshop.com/36-celebrity-evening-dresses.html" title="celebrity wdding dresses"><strong>celebrity wdding dresses</strong></a>
<a href="http://www.iweddingdressshop.com/37-chiffon-wedding-dresses.html" title="chiffon wedding dresses"><strong>chiffon wedding dresses</strong></a>

Posted by: a line wedding dresses at June 28, 2011 10:16 PM (dQ7va)

255

Article is very interesting,thanks for your sharing. I will necessarily add it in the selected works and I will visit this site.

<a href ="http://www.iweddingdressshop.com">wedding dress</a>
<a href ="http://www.iweddingdressshop.com">wedding dresses</a>
<a href ="http://www.iweddingdressshop.com/9-wedding-dresses">bridal wedding dresses</a>
<a href ="http://www.iweddingdressshop.com/12-bridesmaid-dresses">wedding bridesmaid dresses</a>
<a href ="http://www.iweddingdressshop.com/36-celebrity-evening-dresses">celebrity wdding dresses</a>
<a href ="http://www.iweddingdressshop.com/22-ball-gown-wedding-dresses">ball gown dresses</a>
<a href ="http://www.iweddingdressshop.com/21-a-line-wedding-dresses">a line wedding dresses</a>
<a href ="http://www.iweddingdressshop.com/24-tea-length-wedding-dresses">tea length wedding dresses</a>
<a href ="http://www.iweddingdressshop.com/34-strapless-wedding-dresses">strapless wedding dresses</a>
<a href ="http://www.iweddingdressshop.com/25-column-wedding-dresses">column wedding dresses</a>
<a href ="http://www.iweddingdressshop.com/20-plus-size-wedding-dresses">plus size wedding dresses</a>
<a href ="http://www.iweddingdressshop.com/37-chiffon-wedding-dresses">chiffon wedding dresses</a>

Posted by: a line wedding dresses at June 28, 2011 10:18 PM (dQ7va)

256
توبيكات نونو
توبيكات
توبيكات سعودي

توبيكات 2011

توبيكات بنات

العاب نونو

العاب

العاب بنات

games

شات لمني الصوتي

دردشة لمني الصوتية

شات صوتي لمني

شات صوتي

دردشة صوتية


دردشة

دردشه

شات سعودي

شات خليجي
سكر بنات

جات

شات صوتي سعودي خليجي

chat voice

ahj

خليجي الصوتي

سعودي الصوتي

دردشة صوتي

شات صوتي
دردشة صوتية
شات كتابي

شات كتابي خليجي

شات عسل الصوتي

دردشة كتابية

chat
سعودي كول
سعودي كول 6666

كول

سعودي

سعودي كول انحراف

سعودي كول بنات

سعودي كول 1994

chat saudi col ‏

شات سعودي كول

سعودي انحراف

سعودي انحراف2010

سعودي انحراف الصوتي

شات سعودي انحراف

دردشة سعودي انحراف

سعودي انحراف الصوتية

شبكة سعودي انحراف

سعودي انحراف الاصلي

سعودي انحراف كول

سعودي انحراف 2010

انحراف سعودي

saudideviation

دردشة صوتية سعوديه
دردشة صوتية سعودية


دردشة كتابية
دردشة كتابية خليجية
شات
دردشة
خاص للبنات

عرب ذوق

عرب ذوق الصوتي

عرب ذوق الصوتية

دردشة عرب ذوق

شات عرب ذوق

شبكة عرب ذوق

شات صوتي بنات


شات بنات الصوتي


دردشة بنات الصوتي


Girls Chat




شبكة عفناك

صوتية عفناك

شات عفناك

دردشة عفناك

عفناك الصوتي

دردشة عفناك

الخيال
الخيال كام
شبكة الخيال
الخيال الصوتي
الخيال الصوتية
دردشة الخيال
الخيال الصوتية
دردشة صوتية الخيال


شات سعودي خليجي

منتدى نونو

منتدى

منتديات

موقع

شبكة

نونو

Chat Nono

ahj w,jd

]v]am w,jdm

دليل مواقع ويب

دليل مواقع

دليل

مواقع

بنت كول
بنت كول الصوتي
شات بنت كول

دردشة بنت كول
شات بنت كول الصوتية

بنت كول الصوتيه
سعودي كول
صوتية سعودي كول
شات سعودي كول
دردشة سعودي كول
سعودي كول الصوتي
سعودي كول 6666
سعودي كول6666
سكر بنات
شات صوتي زين
شات صوتي ملوك
شات صوتي سعودي
شاتات صوتيه
مكتبة ماسنجر
شات صوتي حبي
شات صوتي كويت
YouTube - Broadcast Yourself.‏ , اليوتيوب نونو
صيف كام
شات صوتي كول
شات انحراف
وه بس
خريطة الموقع نونو
الرياض كول الصوتي
كامات 6666
شات المها
كامات6666
شات كامات 6666
كامات 666
كامات 66
سعودي انحراف
شاتكامات6666
سعودي احوه
شات سعودي احوه
سعودي احوه الصوتي
سعودي احوه كول
دردشة سعودي احوه
احوه سعودي
بنات احوه
دبي الصوتي
سعودي في اي بي الصوتي
شبكة الرياض الصوتي
روعة الليل
لايف كام
الخليج كام
شات كان زمان الصوتي
شات صوتي قصيمي
شات قلبي
ارجوان
شات صوتي قطري
بدور الخليج

منتدى روح

شبكة روح

روح ديزاين



تحميل ماسنجر بلس

توبيكات حزينه

توبيكات

ماسنجر

ماسنجر بلس

تحميل ماسنجر

توبيكات رومنسيه

منتديات روح
دردشة
شات سعودي
خليجي
شات صوتي
توبيك
موقع توبيكات
سعودي كول 6666
سعودي انحراف 2011

سعودي كول
سعودي انحراف

Posted by: شات صوتي at June 30, 2011 11:24 AM (CI/O9)

257 * : بترورابغ * : كيان * : المتقدمة * : سبكيم * : ينساب * : الصحراء * : المجموعة * : نماء * : اللجين * : التصنيع * : سافكو * : سابك * : بتروكيم * : كيمانول

Posted by: الطيار at July 08, 2011 02:48 PM (Oa51l)






Processing 0.05, elapsed 0.0657 seconds.
15 queries taking 0.0204 seconds, 266 records returned.
Page size 202 kb.
Powered by Minx 0.7 alpha.

MuNuvians
MeeNuvians
Polls! Polls! Polls!
Frequently Asked Questions
The (Almost) Complete Paul Anka Integrity Kick
Top Top Tens
Greatest Hitjobs

The Ace of Spades HQ Sex-for-Money Skankathon
A D&D Guide to the Democratic Candidates
Margaret Cho: Just Not Funny
More Margaret Cho Abuse
Margaret Cho: Still Not Funny
Iraqi Prisoner Claims He Was Raped... By Woman
Wonkette Announces "Morning Zoo" Format
John Kerry's "Plan" Causes Surrender of Moqtada al-Sadr's Militia
World Muslim Leaders Apologize for Nick Berg's Beheading
Michael Moore Goes on Lunchtime Manhattan Death-Spree
Milestone: Oliver Willis Posts 400th "Fake News Article" Referencing Britney Spears
Liberal Economists Rue a "New Decade of Greed"
Artificial Insouciance: Maureen Dowd's Word Processor Revolts Against Her Numbing Imbecility
Intelligence Officials Eye Blogs for Tips
They Done Found Us Out, Cletus: Intrepid Internet Detective Figures Out Our Master Plan
Shock: Josh Marshall Almost Mentions Sarin Discovery in Iraq
Leather-Clad Biker Freaks Terrorize Australian Town
When Clinton Was President, Torture Was Cool
What Wonkette Means When She Explains What Tina Brown Means
Wonkette's Stand-Up Act
Wankette HQ Gay-Rumors Du Jour
Here's What's Bugging Me: Goose and Slider
My Own Micah Wright Style Confession of Dishonesty
Outraged "Conservatives" React to the FMA
An On-Line Impression of Dennis Miller Having Sex with a Kodiak Bear
The Story the Rightwing Media Refuses to Report!
Our Lunch with David "Glengarry Glen Ross" Mamet
The House of Love: Paul Krugman
A Michael Moore Mystery (TM)
The Dowd-O-Matic!
Liberal Consistency and Other Myths
Kepler's Laws of Liberal Media Bias
John Kerry-- The Splunge! Candidate
"Divisive" Politics & "Attacks on Patriotism" (very long)
The Donkey ("The Raven" parody)
News/Chat