| Support
Contact
| URGENT: McChrystal Report Says He Needs More Troops Within Year or Afghanistan Likely LostAs he promised, of course: He would dedicate the troops necessary for victory to Afghanistan. Because he was all about winnin' that war. Comments1
Barry's decision here will decide his fate. He will be removed from office under arrest.
Posted by: eman at September 21, 2009 12:28 AM (kdRQ7) Posted by: eman at September 21, 2009 12:29 AM (kdRQ7) 3
And it turns out cancelling the Polish/Czech third site wasn't a very bright idea either:
Our Missile-Defense Race Against Iran: The Bush-era plan was the best of the realistic alternatives. Posted by: stuiec at September 21, 2009 12:30 AM (f0O9k) 4
I reckon there's no reason to think that Dear Leader, after the Long Summer on the Threshold of Hell, will suddenly make a good decision.
Lord help our troops. Posted by: Pug Mahon at September 21, 2009 12:31 AM (yiNoG) 5
We HAVE TO get out of Afghanistan!!! NBC (and BHO?) are now comparing our occupation to the USSR's -- seriously.
Posted by: Rewrite! at September 21, 2009 12:31 AM (UaSIe) 6
Yeah, that would be great if McChrystal actually let the troops kill the bad guys, instead of making them wait 42 minutes for permission to fire. Posted by: Dang Straights at September 21, 2009 12:32 AM (mA8+S) 7
Failure? obama's mission: accomplished.
Posted by: BrassMonkey at September 21, 2009 12:32 AM (Pvnob) 8
He will send a token increase, declare himself the greatest war-time president evah and call it a day.
Posted by: kefka at September 21, 2009 12:33 AM (udoJ3) 9
THE TELEGRAPH: President Barack Obama is beginning to look out of his depth. Barack Obama is an eloquent, brainy and likeable man with a fascinating biography. He is not George Bush. Those are great qualities. But they are not enough to lead America, let alone the world.
Posted by: Rewrite! at September 21, 2009 12:34 AM (UaSIe) 10
@5. Perfect. That way they can admit defeat AND blame Booosh.
Posted by: Pug Mahon at September 21, 2009 12:34 AM (yiNoG) Posted by: Lost Shaker Assault at September 21, 2009 12:37 AM (s+0uF) 12
This will somehow be referenced and critiqued in an episode of Law and Order in about 3..2 ... never.
Posted by: Tom in Korea at September 21, 2009 12:37 AM (nS7nk) 13
Why don't we just send congress in with some ammo, some rifles and let them fight the freaking war. They seem so intent on armchairing it, I think it would do them some good to get in the sh*t and crack a few rounds at the bad guys.
Posted by: UGRev at September 21, 2009 12:38 AM (uhjTJ) 14
I have no idea what I'm doing.
Posted by: The Prez at September 21, 2009 12:39 AM (muUqs) 15
So the Taliban take over again, no big deal. What's the worst that could happen?
Posted by: Madeleine Albright at September 21, 2009 12:39 AM (jgwoG) 16
He won't send more troops, the left has his ass on Health Care and will use it to beat him into raising another white flag. I noticed Bob Woodward wrote that article, it looks like a real journalist may be on Obama's ass from the MSM. This house of cards could be folding soon.
Posted by: robtr at September 21, 2009 12:41 AM (H60q6) 17
Ooh, ooh, I know! We can just give all our nuclear weapons to Karzai and let him fight the taliban forces in Pakistan! Peace and unicorns for all!
/libtard Posted by: Methos at September 21, 2009 12:41 AM (EMHaT) 18
And for his next trick, bamatard will call Germany, Italy, and Japan and apologize for winning the wars and tell them that we surrender. This traitor needs to be led out in handcuffs and his wife in a large cage. Posted by: BrassMonkey at September 21, 2009 12:42 AM (Pvnob) 19
I take a contrary position:
Screw Afghanistan. Nuke from orbit. Wondering if we're serious about overseas contigency operations? Solved. Taliban HQ in impenratible terrain? Solved! World Heroin Problem? Solved? ... Discuss. Posted by: randomguy at September 21, 2009 12:44 AM (B5RxW) Posted by: eddiebear at September 21, 2009 12:45 AM (w/7ds) 21
And for his next trick, bamatard will call Germany, Italy, and Japan
and apologize for winning the wars and tell them that we surrender.
I do expect some form of either apology or supplication in regards to that to be coming up someday in the future. Maybe not an outright apology, but some sort of "Americans brutually raped and murdered your countrymen during world war II, and even though I wasn't born then and this totally isn't about me, I'm sorry on behalf of all Americas" Posted by: Tom in Korea at September 21, 2009 12:45 AM (nS7nk) 22
A-stan? Is that like ACORN? Yet another distraction, something I've never heard of, so it can't be that important to the people. You say we have troops over there? Shut mah mouth! This if probably a problem I inherited. You know, I wasn't born when Afghanistan was established. So I hope you aren't trying to hold me responsible. That would be... racist.
Posted by: Barack, Lord of the Flyswatters at September 21, 2009 12:46 AM (AZGON) 23
The Commander in Chief has sent out an URGENT order for white flags.
HEY BARRY! LET'S SEE YOU VOTE "PRESENT" ON THIS ONE! Posted by: GarandFan at September 21, 2009 12:47 AM (ZQBnQ) 24
I'm in way over my head.
Posted by: The Prez at September 21, 2009 12:48 AM (muUqs) Posted by: randomguy at September 21, 2009 12:50 AM (B5RxW) 26
I can't believe this arrogant asshole of a President was out today trying to sell another government program when he is losing a f**cking war! You would think he would have been maybe saying to Americans, you know what we have a deathly problem here, I am going to put the rest of this socialist crap on hold until we get it figured out. I guess that would have been to much like Bush! Posted by: robtr at September 21, 2009 12:52 AM (H60q6) Posted by: Rewrite! at September 21, 2009 12:54 AM (UaSIe) Posted by: railwriter at September 21, 2009 12:54 AM (MMyTT) 29
Look everyone, President Toonces can be the Commander-in-Chief!
Posted by: SlaveDog at September 21, 2009 12:54 AM (W+E+o) 30
Oh great, just when I was thinking about getting a job over there.
Posted by: DesertSage at September 21, 2009 12:55 AM (ChQr5) 31
McChrystal has just out-flanked Commander Dumbshite.
Barry O, starts making gurgling noises about no more troops for Afghanistan, and McChrystal cuts him off at the knees with a well-timed leak to Bob Woodward. So now Barry is stuck. He can deny the request which everyone now knows is coming, and look like wimp (which is always bad news for wimpy Democrat presidents), or he can acquiesce and send another brigade or two. My guess is that Barry sends in more soldiers, because that what Democrat presidents always do when push comes to shove, mainly because they're so terrified of looking weak on national security. BTW, the firestorm that followed the canceling of the Polish missile deal seems to have caught Barry and Co flatfooted. So they'll look for a quick way to boost their security bonafides, by showing that Barry is the Fighting Obama. In other words, look for him to appear on the South Lawn in a Rough Rider costume next week. Posted by: DelD at September 21, 2009 12:55 AM (rC+/c) 32
I am still looking for something this president's done right - I mean not just run his mouth, not just smiled for the cameras and TOTUSed a canned pitch, but actually followed through on.
Okay, he's let the military whack a couple terrorists, and he almost-kinda-sorta opened up more stem-cell research (which I would consider a good thing.)
Not much else.
Posted by: mrkwong at September 21, 2009 12:57 AM (G8Eo0) Posted by: vaeriax at September 21, 2009 12:58 AM (jM7jR) 34
In other words, look for him to appear on the South Lawn in a Rough Rider costume next week.
Posted by: DelD at September 21, 2009 12:55 AM (rC+/c) I don't agree with you, the left has him by the balls on Health Care. If the left bails it fails and I believe the left will use it and he will fold. Posted by: robtr at September 21, 2009 12:59 AM (H60q6) 35
I can't believe this arrogant asshole of a President was out today trying to sell another government program... BELIEVE it. He and the Liberals/Socialists/Communists/Radicals coalition are making and milking multiple crises. They literally keep saying as much. We're in a blitzkrieg of crises, spending, taxing, regulation, monetization of debt and TAKEOVERS. Try to keep up.
Posted by: Rewrite! at September 21, 2009 12:59 AM (UaSIe) Posted by: SlaveDog at September 21, 2009 12:59 AM (W+E+o) 37
I'm all for holding Bammy's feet to the fire on winning Afghanistan. But is anyone else sick & g*d*amn tired of seeing "confidential" military reports that telegraph to the enemy the conditions for defeating us -- even if those conditions are political?
Posted by: Purple Fury at September 21, 2009 12:59 AM (5XyzC) 38
#37: that is, sick of seeing those "confidential" reports splashed across the front pages of the legacy media.
Posted by: Purple Fury at September 21, 2009 01:00 AM (5XyzC) 39
My guess is that Barry sends in more soldiers, because that what
Democrat presidents always do when push comes to shove, mainly because
they're so terrified of looking weak on national security.
*cough* Iran embassy hostages *cough* *cough* Somalia *cough* Posted by: Methos at September 21, 2009 01:01 AM (EMHaT) 40
this scares the shit out of me. cause even though the prez used to call afghanistan the "good war" most liberals besides liberman are against more troops. which is sad because military decisions should not be about politics. glad that the GOP supports the troop increase and said so on the sunday shows, i just pray that the prez does not screw this up and supports our military generals. he doesnt want to have the lbj legacy.
Posted by: brittney at September 21, 2009 01:02 AM (gYYbD) 41
My college grades? Horrendous.
Posted by: The Prez at September 21, 2009 01:02 AM (muUqs) 42
#37: that is, sick of seeing those "confidential" reports splashed across the front pages of the legacy media.
Posted by: Purple Fury at September 21, 2009 01:00 AM (5XyzC) Yeah , I agree to a point. It seems the reason it was done is to Call Obama Out. He has to either send the troops or tell his Commander in the field, nah I don't want to. McCristal put him in the wringer and now Woodward is turning it. Posted by: robtr at September 21, 2009 01:04 AM (H60q6) 43
Prezidenting is hard!
Posted by: Barry the Prez at September 21, 2009 01:05 AM (kdRQ7) 44
I don't agree with you, the left h
I don't agree with you, the left has him by the balls on Health Care. If the left bails it fails and I believe the left will use it and he will fold. Posted by: robtr at September 21, 2009 12:59 AM (H60q6) I disagree. Very few leftists are marching in the streets to protest our involvement Afghanistan. Yes, they'd like to end the Afghan war, but it's not a priority for them. So they just pretend it doesn't exist. Right now Barry needs to shore up his national security credentials, and sending more troops to Afghanistan is political freebie. The right will support him, and the left will shrug their shoulders. Barry needs a freebie right now, and he'll take this one. Posted by: DelD at September 21, 2009 01:06 AM (rC+/c) 45
Purple Fury, if the laziest media ever didn't post classified information about our armed forces, what topics could they possibly report on? I mean, besides ACORN being super-cool about helping child prostitution rings, the NEA steering artists to produce Obama-loving works on the taxpayer dime, St. Barry selling out Eastern Europe to the Ruskies and every other freakin' thing Teleprompter Jesus does, the MSM have absolutely nothing to report on lately. Posted by: KingShamus at September 21, 2009 01:06 AM (8n1j5) 46
sick of seeing those "confidential" reports splashed across the front pages of the legacy media.
Lesser evil I'm afraid. The other option is to keep quiet while Barry grinds up our people for no purpose at all. I just had a happy thought. You know how plugs told us to gird our loins because the world would test Obama in a manufactured crisis? And it wouldn't be obvious that he'd dealt with the crisis in "the right way" so all the automatons on Barry's email list would be called on to argue in his defense? For all the disaster we are already facing at his hands, that call has not yet gone out. Posted by: Methos at September 21, 2009 01:06 AM (EMHaT) 47
One thing for certain now though is that if he doesn't send troops the Taliban knows they won the war.
Posted by: robtr at September 21, 2009 01:07 AM (H60q6) 48
This is very depressing. I sincerely hope that Obama eventually concludes that doing the right thing for our national security actually lines up with his best interests, politically. Otherwise, I'm afraid that his waffling instincts may really harm the effort in Afghanistant. He had been doing the smart thing in Iraq - keep quiet and don't snatch defeat from the jaws of victory so I had some hope he'd actually live up to his previous promises about Afghanistan. Jim Geraghty is right, all of Barack Obama's statements come with an expiration date.
Posted by: Jill at September 21, 2009 01:08 AM (seIgT) 49
I disagree. Very few leftists are marching in the streets to protest
our involvement Afghanistan. Yes, they'd like to end the Afghan war,
but it's not a priority for them. So they just pretend it doesn't exist.
Um, we don't send 40k more troops to Afghanistan without funding them. Which doesn't happen unless Nancy Pelosi allows it to be voted on. And you're apparently assuming his blather this morning about not being convinced that there was any strategic purpose served in sending more troops was cover for when he eventually makes the decision. I think he has made the decision and is just dragging his feet about making it publicly. Posted by: Methos at September 21, 2009 01:11 AM (EMHaT) 50
I don't think ol' Plugs is prescient, I just think he talks self-importantly.
Posted by: wonder hmmm at September 21, 2009 01:11 AM (ygrGf) 51
My guess is that Barry sends in more soldiers, because that what
Democrat presidents always do when push comes to shove, mainly because
they're so terrified of looking weak on national security.
*cough* Iran embassy hostages *cough* *cough* Somalia *cough*
Posted by: Methos at September 21, 2009 01:01 AM (EMHaT) -------- And in both cases Carter and Clinton paid for not sending in more troops. Carter was bounced from office in large part because of the hostage crisis, and the Battle of Mogadishu happened in late 1993, and we all knew what happened to Clinton's Democrat Congress in 1994. So, next week, Barry O denies McChrystal's request for more troops, and then Afghanistan goes completely to hell in mid-2010. Can you imagine the RNC political ads? I'm sure Axelrod and Rahm can. Posted by: DelD at September 21, 2009 01:14 AM (rC+/c) 52
Right now Barry needs to shore up his national security credentials, and sending more troops to Afghanistan is political freebie. The right will support him, and the left will shrug their shoulders. Barry needs a freebie right now, and he'll take this one.
Posted by: DelD at September 21, 2009 01:06 AM (rC+/c) That really depends on whether his political cynicism outweights his unhinged leftist ideology. And i seriously doubt it does. And also, your argument works in the opposite direction as well - the right will not take it to the streets on any foreign policy decision, as long as there are no terror acts inside the mainland. And the public opinion is with him on this one. So he can end both wars in the midst of O-commie-care debate with zero political fallout. Posted by: some generic name at September 21, 2009 01:15 AM (YELfQ) 53
Obama is everything we thought he would be and more.
This has actually turned out to be a blessing in disguise. Keep it up Barry, you fucking looser. You in fact have not won, you have initiated the biggest FAIL in modern times. Our nation will survive despite your assault on it and you will be relegated to the shit pile of irrelevant wanna bee's. We who matter have found a common voice and we are saying.... SCREW YOU and the acorn you rode in on. Posted by: Leatherneck at September 21, 2009 01:18 AM (gu2WT) 54
If we abandon Afghanistan, India and Pakistan will fight a nuclear war. Pakistan will lose.
Posted by: eman at September 21, 2009 01:19 AM (kdRQ7) 55
And you're apparently assuming his blather this
morning about not being convinced that there was any strategic purpose
served in sending more troops was cover for when he eventually makes
the decision. I think he has made the decision and is just dragging
his feet about making it publicly.
Posted by: Methos at September 21, 2009 01:11 AM (EMHaT) He might be dragging his feet, but if McChrystal asks for it, he'll eventually have to acquiesce. Democrat President's ask for big trouble when they contradict the desires of their field commanders. Barry's on the ropes and sending more troops is the default position. He doesn't have to expend any political capital on it. It might not be what he wants, but he'd be stupid not to do it. Posted by: DelD at September 21, 2009 01:19 AM (rC+/c) 56
Can you imagine the RNC political ads? I'm sure Axelrod and Rahm can.
I expect to hear a lot of the argument about how the Republicans' politicization of the war is demeaning to the troops and disrespectful of the dead. Which won't actually work, and probably backfire further. The problem is, I think Axelrod and Rahm would think that it might work. No, that it must work. To think otherwise opens both of them up to the truth about why liberals get thrown out of national offices whenever they do the things they really want to do to our country. Posted by: Methos at September 21, 2009 01:20 AM (EMHaT) 57
He doesn't have to expend any political capital on it. It might not be what he wants, but he'd be stupid not to do it.
I do believe you have just made my point. Posted by: Methos at September 21, 2009 01:23 AM (EMHaT) 58
hey dum dum, found a job for you!! report to your local recruiter (not the navy one though, stay away from that one) Posted by: navycopjoe at September 21, 2009 01:24 AM (169SA) 59
But...but...if Obama sends more troops, Cindy will not be pleased. She's liable to do something drastic like chain herself to the Washington Monument. He will send some troops, but not enough. This will put off the defeat temporarily, and O will try to get reelected before disaster strikes. Posted by: Meremortal at September 21, 2009 01:26 AM (LnEk1) 60
Despite what his inclinations may be and despite what pressure he's getting from the party, he's going to send more troops if for no other reason than if Democrats lose this, it's going to be decades before they live this down. If they lose this and the Taliban takes over, this will still be in people's minds in the 2052 election. No matter how deluded some people may be, for him to spend the campaign saying we aren't doing enough in Afghanistan and need to go after Bin Laden . . . and then lose it all--it would be the albatross to beat all albatrosses.
Posted by: AD at September 21, 2009 01:27 AM (pp4Wg) 61
We are in the midst of the perfect storm. And President Barack Hazelwood is at the helm.
Posted by: Soap MacTavish at September 21, 2009 01:27 AM (554T5) 62
I do believe you have just made my point.
Posted by: Methos at September 21, 2009 01:23 AM (EMHaT) Sadly, you may well be correct. Barry O might be just stupid enough, just callow and inexperienced enough to ignore McChrystal. Posted by: DelD at September 21, 2009 01:32 AM (rC+/c) 63
My fear is that he'll put in some more troops.
Just not enough. He'll try to split it down the middle and it will be a half assed measure that will get good guys killed, without getting the job done. Posted by: XBradTC at September 21, 2009 01:33 AM (NimeM) 64
So, next week, Barry O denies McChrystal's request for more troops, and then Afghanistan goes completely to hell in mid-2010. Can you imagine the RNC political ads? I'm sure Axelrod and Rahm can.
Posted by: DelD at September 21, 2009 01:14 AM (rC+/c) Absolutely. He's fucked if he throws in the towel. Posted by: El Duende at September 21, 2009 01:33 AM (LnF5D) 65
Maybe he ask the Poland and Czechoslovakia to send in some troops.
Posted by: YIKES! at September 21, 2009 01:34 AM (tFrIQ) 66
65 Maybe he ask the Poland and Czechoslovakia to send in some troops.
Posted by: YIKES! at September 21, 2009 01:34 AM (tFrIQ) LOLOLOLOLOLOL! Posted by: randomguy at September 21, 2009 01:54 AM (B5RxW) 67
FLASHBACK, FLASHBACK, FLASHBACK
(link in my screenname) Iraq Obama's Stance on Iraq Barack Obama will work with his military commanders to responsibly end the war in Iraq. Obama will refocus our resources on al Qaeda in Afghanistan and finish the fight with the terrorists who attacked us on 9/11 Resurgent Al Qaeda in Afghanistan: The decision to invade Iraq diverted resources from the war in Afghanistan, making it harder for us to kill or capture Osama Bin Laden and others involved in the 9/11 attacks. Nearly seven years later, the Taliban has reemerged in southern Afghanistan while Al Qaeda has used the space provided by the Iraq war to regroup, train and plan for another attack on the United States. 2007 was the most violent year in Afghanistan since the invasion in 2001. The scale of our deployments in Iraq continues to set back our ability to finish the fight in Afghanistan, producing unacceptable strategic risks. Posted by: liontooth at September 21, 2009 01:56 AM (rEPj1) 68
sorry for the question, its not like Afghan gets the same coverage that Iraq did under Bush - what the hell is going on, when did we suddenly find ourselves in an Iraq pre surge situtaion - did Bush leave office and the Taliban's recruitment go throught the roof? Pakistan reports as if AQ is getting smoked like a cheap cigar??? When was the big shift? Posted by: x11b1p at September 21, 2009 02:03 AM (K3MWP) 69
We won the war in Afghanistan once, we should have left then. It's not a country, it's just a place where armys go to die.
The Brits learned that, the Soviets learned that. Just as the French did in Viet Nam.
Just an endless war fueled by muslems and heroin.
We should just buy all the heroin they can produce and dump it in the ocean, save a lot of lives and probably cost less.
Posted by: apachewarrior37 at September 21, 2009 02:04 AM (h2BD3) 70
Well put, number 69.
Posted by: rawmuse at September 21, 2009 02:07 AM (0ubGS) 71
My information is that we have enough to kill every terrorist in Afghanistan several times over. It is this nation building BS that is killing us.
Posted by: rawmuse at September 21, 2009 02:09 AM (0ubGS) 72
69 We won the war in Afghanistan once, we should have left then. It's not a country, it's just a place where armys go to die. The Brits learned that, the Soviets learned that. Just as the French did in Viet Nam. Just an endless war fueled by muslems and heroin. We should just buy all the heroin they can produce and dump it in the ocean, save a lot of lives and probably cost less.
Posted by: apachewarrior37 at September 21, 2009 02:04 AM (h2BD3) Why not throttle the snake at both ends and just destroy every poppy farm/farmer we come across? Posted by: Jim in San Diego at September 21, 2009 02:13 AM (H7Rlw) 73
69 We won the war in Afghanistan once, we should have left then. It's not a country, it's just a place where armys go to die. The Brits learned that, the Soviets learned that. Just as the French did in Viet Nam. Just an endless war fueled by muslems and heroin. We should just buy all the heroin they can produce and dump it in the ocean, save a lot of lives and probably cost less.
Posted by: apachewarrior37 at September 21, 2009 02:04 AM (h2BD3) Um, I actually totally agree with you up until the end (have debated this in other threads quite recently) .... BUT .... I think dumping hundreds of tons of opium in the ocean is almost as bad a suggestion as paying the taliban for the privilege of doing so. We need to leave the place, and deal with it without boots on the ground. It's a no win situation. Posted by: randomguy at September 21, 2009 02:13 AM (B5RxW) 74
Best DVD Creator Help you convert movies to DVD and burn DVD movie to DVD disc, DVD folder and ISO files, being played on portable or home DVD players. QuickTime Converter Posted by: fewr at September 21, 2009 02:23 AM (dUUbd) 75
44
I disagree. Very few leftists are marching in the streets to protest our involvement Afghanistan. Yes, they'd like to end the Afghan war, but it's not a priority for them. So they just pretend it doesn't exist. Right now Barry needs to shore up his national security credentials, and sending more troops to Afghanistan is political freebie. The right will support him, and the left will shrug their shoulders. Barry needs a freebie right now, and he'll take this one. No, the Leftards aren't marching in the street yet. But the Leftards sitting in Congress have announced their opposition to more troops. They're not going to shrug their shoulders -- they are hearing bad things from their hard-Left supporters, and their support for more troops won't be a freebie. Posted by: stuiec at September 21, 2009 02:25 AM (f0O9k) 76
where is the agent orange when you need it? Posted by: x11b1p at September 21, 2009 02:25 AM (K3MWP) 77
54
If we abandon Afghanistan, India and Pakistan will fight a nuclear war. Pakistan will lose.
If we abandon Afghanistan, it becomes the base for the Taliban to arm and train for their attacks on Pakistan. Pakistan's democratic government collapses under the strain, their military is subverted from inside by Taliban sympathizers, and Pakistan falls. The resulting Afghanistan-Pakistan merged Taliban state then declares war on India and it devolves into a nuclear war. Meanwhile, in Iran... Posted by: stuiec at September 21, 2009 02:32 AM (f0O9k) 78
55 He might be dragging his feet, but if McChrystal asks for it, he'll eventually have to acquiesce. Democrat President's ask for big trouble when they contradict the desires of their field commanders. Barry's on the ropes and sending more troops is the default position. He doesn't have to expend any political capital on it. It might not be what he wants, but he'd be stupid not to do it. Remember "General Betray-Us?" I wonder if the new MoveOn.org ad will ask, "Is the General is smoking McChrystal?" Posted by: stuiec at September 21, 2009 02:41 AM (f0O9k) 79
Can't you let a brother eat his waffle in peace...you know, being President is kind of a hard job...I got alot on my plate (like this waffle)...
Posted by: Barry O Da Media Ho at September 21, 2009 02:47 AM (uZYdF) 80
It is this nation building BS that is killing us.
Exactly. Democracy, Communism or any other form of government won't work where there is no tradition of national government.
Now if we just admit we're only there to keep the Taliban contained and not "win" anything it can be used as a training ground for our military. Let the Peace Corps and all the other NGOs have their wet dreams there.
If they act up? Well, that's the beauty of air power.
Posted by: apachewarrior37 at September 21, 2009 03:02 AM (h2BD3) 81
"They" meaning the Taliban, not the NGOs. Then again...
Posted by: apachewarrior37 at September 21, 2009 03:05 AM (h2BD3) 82
Sorry about destroying the country and stuff. I was distracted because I spent over 8 months trying to pick a dog for my kids.
Posted by: President Shithead at September 21, 2009 03:15 AM (aUsM0) 83
Democracy, Communism or any other form of government won't work where there is no tradition of national government. Apache, Western countries did not have a tradition of national goverment at their formation, they borrowed it from Greeks and Romans. Posted by: Decaf at September 21, 2009 04:58 AM (0Vl/B) 84
Il Deuces Soros plan for the U.S.
Item 1: Cancel further purchases of top line fighter aircraft (to save less money than thrown away with ACORN). Item 2: Cancel ready to be implemented missile defense Item 3: Declare wars over and leave the Stan and Iraq Item 4: Cut military troop levels by 50% Item 5: Eliminate nuclear arsenal Item 6: Surrender U.S. sovereignty to the U.N. controlled by third world communist shitholes. Posted by: Vic at September 21, 2009 06:15 AM (CDUiN) 85
Now, now, everybody! Obama did say, after all, that the war wouldn't end with King George signing a peace treaty with Gen. Grant aboard the Missouri (or something like that).
What he didn't mention was the Missouri sinking. Posted by: CoolCzech at September 21, 2009 06:28 AM (QECjC) 86
If we abandon Afghanistan, it becomes the base for the Taliban to arm and train for their attacks on Pakistan. Pakistan's democratic government collapses under the strain, their military is subverted from inside by Taliban sympathizers, and Pakistan falls. The resulting Afghanistan-Pakistan merged Taliban state then declares war on India and it devolves into a nuclear war. Ooooo, nice cliffhanger. I already know the ending too; chaos, doom, & terror. AWSOME!!! Posted by: a contractor weasel at September 21, 2009 06:31 AM (blNMI) 87
The key is the characterization in the story of the information as Confidential, versus a classification of Secret. Confidential distribution on material this explosive basically says Leak Me, whereas Secret means leak only to the NY Times. Posted by: Jean at September 21, 2009 06:36 AM (AD+pW) 88
No cloud or dum-dum on an overnight topic. I guess Axelrod doesn't pay time and a half?
Posted by: Jean at September 21, 2009 06:46 AM (AD+pW) 89
The thing I said when this first came up is that if he is planning on a policy of abandonment that he needs to do it all at once. We dont need troops in there getting killed just for the purpose of providing him political cover.
On another score, it really wouldnt matter if the Taliban took back over this region IF we took steps to cut off their funding. If it were not for Syria, Iran, Saudi Arabia, and a few odds and ins here and there they and Al Quida would be nothing more than third rate shit heads oppressing people in their own neighborhoods.
What we need to be doing is stopping the flow of money to these assholes and closing our borders. But none of the current politicians have the balls to do that. Posted by: Vic at September 21, 2009 06:48 AM (CDUiN) 90
No cloud or dum-dum on an overnight topic. I guess Axelrod doesn't pay time and a half?
I'm busy watching the Japanese DJIA and polls! Hmmmmm pollllllllllsss Posted by: Dum Dum at September 21, 2009 06:58 AM (nS7nk) 91
My guess is that he knows his popularity and credibility are reeling, and that he doesn't need to add being seen as soft on terror to his list of image problems (another 'distraction'), especially after the promises he made on the campaign trail. But he will have to use some political capital from the hard left to get any more troops. So, as a ditto to one of the comments above, I think this will end up being some sort of stupid, half baked, politically driven compromise situation. Obama will ask for more troops than he knows he will get, and Pelosi et al will knock that number back down. Like they are playing poker or something. And you're right, good guys will get killed as a result of the dithering. Posted by: RM at September 21, 2009 07:07 AM (1kwr2) 92
Well, if there is a silver lining...Obama has set the bar pretty fucking low for the next owner of the nuclear stockpile. Assuming there is one (president...I assume the nuclear stockpile will be fine).
Posted by: Knaws at September 21, 2009 07:20 AM (H9yZ/) 93
Item 1: Cancel further purchases of top line fighter aircraft (to save less money than thrown away with ACORN). Item 2: Cancel ready to be implemented missile defense Item 3: Declare wars over and leave the Stan and Iraq Item 4: Cut military troop levels by 50% Item 5: Eliminate nuclear arsenal Item 6: Surrender U.S. sovereignty to the U.N. controlled by third world communist shitholes.
Item 7. Destroy the family unit and force children to turn their parents in to the government for transgressions against the state. Item 8. Shut down opposition media. Posted by: Knaws at September 21, 2009 07:25 AM (H9yZ/) 94
Last week, barry-o said he would not be 'rushed' into a decision in regards to astan. Rushed? Eight months is rushed? A line from Patton, "if he needed 48 hours to make up his mind, he didn't need to command troops" or something like that. This is just political dithering, testing the wind. As someone above said, he will send in some, but not enough, just for political cover.
Posted by: Artruen at September 21, 2009 07:35 AM (L+dBi) 95
...he was all about winnin' that war.
Well, sure...but, y'see, that was just that "Campaign Trail Rhetoric" thing I had goin' on, there... Now, y'know, um...ah...it's like, I'd haveta actually do something...send some troops, an' guns an' stuff... Can't be doin' that - ol' Hugo or maybe the mullahs or even Putin might not like me so much, if I started in doin' stuff like that. Gotta keep some perspective, here, y'knowhatImean? Posted by: IWonDaPrez at September 21, 2009 07:42 AM (7UlOZ) 96
"McChrystal provides extensive new details about the Taliban insurgency, which
he calls a muscular and sophisticated enemy that uses modern propaganda
and systematically reaches into Afghanistan's prisons to recruit
members and even plan operations."
Last night, listening to the news coverage of the NYC FBI-cia raid on the Afghan wannabomber, I asked exactly where they plan on putting these terrorists now if not GITMO. The only logical reason to close GITMO is to plant all the terrorists into the US prison system, "to recruit members and even plan operations." Posted by: maverick muse at September 21, 2009 07:46 AM (F1b/5) 97
Why don't we just "salt" the Afghanistan poppy fields? Nothing grows where salt has been dumped. Seawater.
Posted by: Corona at September 21, 2009 07:48 AM (+xghX) 98
Good morning. I just skimmed the morning paper. Headline reads: Obama say decision of Afghan troops can wait. Governing is hard. Posted by: Tinian at September 21, 2009 07:54 AM (7+pP9) 99
O/T John Fund (WSJ) was just on F&F and said that there will be big news breaking later today about people in the WH with ties to ACORN. I thought Breitbart said this blockbuster was NOT about ACORN. Posted by: Rush Babe at September 21, 2009 07:54 AM (LKkE8) 100
No offense to McChrystal, but didn't he know the numbers he would need when he took over and changed how things were done? And we can all agree right now the our president isn't going to approve more troops. Especially with many coming out saying it's not a winnable war. Makes you wonder if it was all planned. At least now we have "saved" that awful war money and can apply it directly to the debt. bwahahahahahah.
Posted by: Trish at September 21, 2009 07:57 AM (0U5Kd) 101
Item 7. Destroy the family unit and force children to turn their parents in to the government for transgressions against the state. Item 8. Shut down opposition media.Meanwhile, back on the homefront: Having destroyed the economy, the workforce, all effective separation between the legislative and executive branches of Gubmint, the effectiveness of constitutional restraints on Gubmint regulation and procedure, and striving ever harder towards the fiscal fantasy-land of "spreading the wealth" to those who work the least but whine the loudest and vote the straight D-ticket most faithfully (and frequently) - Item 9. Declare all people welcome, regardless of origin or intent, and remove all restrictions against anyone wishing to cross any U.S. border. -After all, why shouldn't we allow the whole world to share in the crash-and-burn failure that will be the future of the once-proud U.S.A. under the Glorious Rule of The Obamanation & Co.? Posted by: J.S.Bridges at September 21, 2009 08:00 AM (7UlOZ) 102
I'll uh get around to erm investigating uh whether or not to send more troops to the good war where bomb innocent kids, after I get around to reading about um ACORN which I have uh never heard of.... //Barry Posted by: Barack T. Ogabe at September 21, 2009 08:01 AM (3KXye) 103
101 -- Hey, J.S. Are those bullet points the commie goal list for the US published in the 1962 Congressional Record? They look to be tweaked a little, but pretty damn close to the list I saw.
Posted by: Rush Babe at September 21, 2009 08:02 AM (LKkE8) 104
99 RB, It could well be that Barry's "director of message", the head of the NEA, and ACORN are all in bed. Posted by: Barack T. Ogabe at September 21, 2009 08:03 AM (3KXye) 105
//socks
Posted by: sven10077 at September 21, 2009 08:03 AM (3KXye) 106
91 RM, It is why after reflection I find myself agreeing with George "you damn kids in your jeans" Will on the issue. Hard enough to lose friends when you know we're doing everything we can....unbearable when you know we aren't. Posted by: sven10077 at September 21, 2009 08:06 AM (3KXye) 107
The thought of American victory makes Obama want to puke, even without any emporors or aircraft carriers. Posted by: Cincinnatus at September 21, 2009 08:07 AM (lj1oN) 108
"Very few leftists are marching in the streets to protest our involvement Afghanistan."
Now that we are on board with the good war, the only marching we do is because we are in basic & AIT, you chickenhawks. Posted by: 223rd Protest BN (Provisional) at September 21, 2009 08:07 AM (Fi5Js) 109
108 223d Protest Bn(provisional), Hooah.... try levitating AQ with your mid and destroying the opfor with happy harmony waves. Posted by: General Billy "Batshit" Ayers at September 21, 2009 08:11 AM (3KXye) 110
USA Today is in fullcourt press mode on trying to sell Obamacles' vision of rocket defense as "brilliant". They use Russia's proclamation that the policy is "sensible" as "proof". Posted by: sven10077 at September 21, 2009 08:13 AM (3KXye) 111
Thanks again Fifty Two Percenters, you god damned retards.
Posted by: UncleFacts Summoner of Meteors, Overseer of Burghers at September 21, 2009 08:14 AM (vZVv7) 112
The US should start buying all the poppy crops and make some high octane ethanol with it. (I'm pretty sure my SUV would like that).
Posted by: Jimmy'sAttackRabbit at September 21, 2009 08:35 AM (4E2B6) 113
Why doesn't the CIA just introduce AIDS and crack cocaine to the Afghanis to oppress them, like they did with the blacks?
Posted by: Rev. Jeremiah Wright, the intellectual wellspring from which Obama flowed at September 21, 2009 08:43 AM (qzgbP) 114
Additional example of Affirmative Action failure...
Posted by: Mr. Pissed at September 21, 2009 08:46 AM (KZKfb) 115
Listen, you assholes, if anyone of you mentions LGF over here, I am going to ban you over there. Got that? Posted by: Charles at September 21, 2009 08:47 AM (2+9Yx) 116
Barry will respond to his need to look tough on military matters by firing McChrystal for insubordination for leaking the story. Then teh One will install a new General and give him three months to analyze the situation and come up with a recommendation. Oh yeah, and he will give lots of long-winded speeches and interviews saying that he is C-in-C and must not take this shit from anyone in his command, and the Past Tense Media will run lots of navel-gazing stories questioning whether McChrystal's action showed signs of racism.
Posted by: Z as in Jersey at September 21, 2009 08:48 AM (ftVJU) 117
No cloud or dum-dum on an overnight topic. I guess Axelrod doesn't pay time and a half? They've got to coordinate and get ready for the Briebart drop. They'll be back with the approved spin in a couple of hours.
Posted by: 141Driver at September 21, 2009 08:50 AM (bgelV) 118
I am beginning to wonder if the troop surge in A-stan is related to the Taliban or more of an assessment as to what the situation will look like after a strike on Iran by Israel.
A natural reaction from Iran will be to further destabilize A-stan. Might also be part of the missile defense analysis; if we know Israel's going all in - then Iran's development timetable is about to be subject to an external reprogramming, reducing the schedule risk associated with the other BMD options. Posted by: Jean at September 21, 2009 09:00 AM (L64A6) Posted by: Jean at September 21, 2009 09:02 AM (L64A6) 120
Wasn't Afghanistan the right war to fight? Well at least it was during the campaign ... Of course, we now learn that didn't mean anything at all.
Posted by: bill-tb at September 21, 2009 09:05 AM (iiiMw) 121
A-stan was the PC war to fight during Bush. Now it can be called a failure and blamed on Bush. DUH one only inherited it. Not that he ever fixed anything you know. It was a failure due to somebody else's poor planning and isn't any fault of his because he really didn't do anything to fix it.
Posted by: harleycowboy at September 21, 2009 09:12 AM (JKGfQ) 122
@119 12:00 PM EST
Posted by: Unrepentant Capitalist Pig at September 21, 2009 09:22 AM (8yb5W) 123
When are all the lefty trolls going to volunteer to go to Afghanistan?
After all, the assure all us chickenhawks that Afghanistan was the war that REALLY mattered, not Bush's illegal war in Iraq. Posted by: Warden at September 21, 2009 09:26 AM (KXbGD) 124
When are all the lefty trolls going to volunteer to go to Afghanistan? They have no interest in a war in Afghanistan either. That was just a handy campaign slogan to throw around so they didn't seem soft on national defense to the squishy middle who would be uncomfortable with a 100% pacafist party line. Now that they are in charge, they want to do just enough to kick the Afghanistan can down the road so they can't get blamed with anything that goes bad. Afghanistan is really highlighting that "The One" has no idea what he is doing. Posted by: Mallamutt at September 21, 2009 09:35 AM (V9SYy) Posted by: Neo at September 21, 2009 10:05 AM (tE8FB) 126
so TOTUS'
Posted by: ginaswo/MiM at September 21, 2009 10:17 AM (YL/8+) 127
sorry need coffee! so TOTUS comments Sunday about being 'skeptical' about more troops resulted in someone leaking the report? Does TOTUS have a CLUE how things work in the WH yet? Gee whodathunk a totally inexperienced person could be so clueless? oh yeah we did, carry on and God Bless the Troops and their families...
Posted by: ginaswo/MiM at September 21, 2009 10:19 AM (YL/8+) 128
I wonder if Charlie Rangel is going to push for the Draft to be re-instated now that Democrats are running things?
Posted by: Darth Randall at September 21, 2009 10:20 AM (oLULt) 129
What is more likely: Obama with his Leftist, anti-war bent and beliefs will commit to a multi-decadenal projection of American power, will increase troop levels in Afghanistan to where they are needed to destroy the enemy, will commit military force to the region to decisively destroy the Taliban - and do all of this contrary to the wishes of his radical base and the Democrats in Congress OR He will half-ass this for another year or so, will figure out some way of withdrawing troops, while declaring some sort of honorable retreat or redeployment meme and declare he fulfilled his campaign promise to win in Afghanistan? I think we have the answer to the query. Posted by: catmman at September 21, 2009 10:52 AM (BCSpK) 130
Historical caveat: Generals never have enough boots on the ground. Every American general of the 20th century has always been dissatisfied with the number of troops available. (Okay, the generals in charge of booting Castro's "aid workers" out of Grenada were satisfied with their allotment, but that is the obvious exception to the rule.)
Having mentioned that, i would say that Teh Obamessiah's recent foreign policy (mis)statements give little proof that he is prepared to stick it out in Afghanistan for 4 years, and do the heavy lifting to crush the Taliban and keep Pakistan from changing status to hostile instead of allied. Unlike Iraq, there are no agreements to keep US forces in-country, so he can always declare victory and beat feet from Afghanistan if something goes wrong. Posted by: exdem13 at September 21, 2009 10:54 AM (lYKj1) 131
We should definitely spend more lives and treasure in Afghanistan because the Afghanis are so worthy of our assistance. And they do so want us to remain as guests in their country. The Russians killed 1-2 million and did not destroy the enemy, although our support did insure that the radical islamists would win. It may be too late for us to succeed in Afghanistan, the Afghanis see us as occupiers not liberators, that window has been shut and nailed down. The BIG problem is that only 1 out of 3 Americans approve of the war in Afghanistan. The 1 out of 3 that do are not enough to elect a government that will do what they want.
Posted by: John ryan at September 21, 2009 11:01 AM (gj3cv) 132
To put it in perspective keeping in mind that every loss is important, we have lost 841 warriors in the past eight years which is about the same amount we lost in one day training for the D-day invasion. The Soviet Union admits to 14500 KIA in that ten year war and the number is probably higher. For the same reason we should have not withdrawn from Beruit after the bombing or Somalia, we should not withdraw from Afghanistan, in addition to the strategic proximity to Iran. If we withdraw it will only embolden Al Queda and every other terrorist organization and terrorist state. Those in those terrorist states that are presently covertly assisting us will likely abandon that assistance. Withdrawing would be a big mistake that would haunt us down the road. Posted by: international law groupie at September 21, 2009 11:07 AM (m2CN7) 133
My sockpuppet should be brought before the world court and be sentenced to life in prison.
Posted by: polynikes at September 21, 2009 11:08 AM (m2CN7) Posted by: polynikes at September 21, 2009 11:11 AM (m2CN7) 135
Fear not. /s
The WH has announced that they're going have their own group of 'experts' study the situation in Afghanistan, then they'll listen to what the Area Commander has to say. I shit you not. Posted by: CPT. Charles at September 21, 2009 11:18 AM (lYKj1) 136
"As he promised, of course: He would dedicate the troops necessary for victory to Afghanistan. Because he was all about winnin' that war." "What, you thought I meant an AMERICAN victory??!!" Posted by: Obi Wan Obammy at September 21, 2009 11:19 AM (+3fAP) 137
Purple Fury, I agree. I did not like it when the CIA leaked against President Bush. I do not like someone at the Pentagon leaking now. I also saw a leak that supposwedly McCrystal will quit if his plan is not approved. I don't like that either. Its an attempt by soldiers to get their plans approved not on the merits but because of potential political fall-out. Its a bad road to start on. Posted by: Bob from Ohio at September 21, 2009 11:23 AM (ROFkf) 138
Posted by: harleycowboy at September 21, 2009 09:12 AM (JKGfQ) TOTUS was never serious about winning in AFG - every statement he ever made about AFG during the campaign showed that he KNEW NOTHING about the conflict. His posture on AFG is just that - political posturing. AFG was the club that he used to beat up on Iraq so he could still look hawkish (appeasing the squishy middle that he needing to get to 52%) and at the same time currying favor with the traitor leftists. It was a cynical strategy that combined with the economic meltdown and McLame as the other nominee, put him over the top. As much as I understand the strategic and symbolic value of holding the line in AFG, the night he won I knew he was going to f*ck the troops there and I sadly wondered if it would be better get all our guys out of there. No service members should be asked to fight and die for this POS CinC who cares nothing for their struggle, their sacrifice or their honor. I listened to him blather on yesterday about having the "right strategy" - more posturing. The man has no clue what he's doing and is too egotistical to submit to the counsel of his betters in the military. That's going to get more Americans killed. I really hope that McChrystal can prevail but I have zero confidnce in the Zero to pull any kind of victory out of this. Posted by: muggedbyreality at September 21, 2009 11:26 AM (eUGzR) 139
High sales lv handbagsexpectations are the key to every coach handbagsthing. If you wait, all that happens is that you get older.Remember cheap chanel handbagsthat the future is neither ours nor wholly not ours. So that ann corinnawe may neither count on it as sure to come nor abandon hope of d & g handbagsit as certain not to be. Posted by: jimm choo bags at September 21, 2009 01:13 PM (ZjHFL) 140
Obama can do what he likes and the left will support him no matter what. He owns the black vote, the union vote, the welfare vote, the ACORN child sex slavery vote, and with stimulus spending scheduled for the next few years he knows he will have plenty of money to buy the next elections. As for Afghanistan, look for Obama to hand the problem over to the UN this week in his speeches, and gradually draw down the US troops there. Of course, the Taliban and Al-Qaida will be back in power in 6 months, but Obama will not care. Posted by: BattleofthePyramids at September 21, 2009 01:16 PM (6MRvi) 141
Age of Conan CD Key
Posted by: jason at September 21, 2009 10:17 PM (H9ZIu) 142
If you are a Mac user owning a iPod, this iPod to Mac Transfer is a must-have software to simplify your digital life. It enables you to transfer music files to iPod without iTunes, and transfer songs from iPod to Mac. If you wonder how to move songs from your iPod to your Mac, or how to copy songs from iPod to Mac, this iPod Transfer to Mac is the best solution.iPod Transfer for Mac,
Posted by: sdfgsdf at September 24, 2009 10:47 PM (E6tGG) 143
Some people like LV handbags,Some people like Chanel handbags,but most popel have been keeping an eye on cheap fashion brand handbags .we often talk about all kinds of designer handbags with my friends,most of my friends also like cheap fashion brand handbags.We admire cheap fashion brand handbags designer who often be able to design so many stylish handbags.We want to be a handbags designer in the future too. In our store online,you can buy all series of cheap fashion brand handbags,include: Louis Vuitton,LV Luggage,LV Wallets,LV Agendas,LV Belts,LV Shoes,LV Accessories,Gucci,Gucci Wallets,Gucci Shoes,Marc Jacobs handbags,Marni handbags,Miu Miu handbags,Mulberry handbags,Prada handbags,Thomaswylde handbags,TOD handbags,Bottega Veneta handbags,D&G handbags,Dior handbags,YSL handbags,Coach handbags Posted by: steve at October 13, 2009 01:56 PM (QTj8h) 144
High Replica Handbags | Replica Louis Vuitton Handbags | replica fashion Handbags| fendi handbags| designer handbags replica| replica Chanel Handbags| designer replica handbag| replica purses| Replica Louis Vuitton Luggage| Hermes Birkin Handbags| Replica Gucci handbags Louis Vuitton,LV Luggage,LV Wallets,LV Agendas,LV Belts,LV Shoes,LV Accessories,Gucci,Gucci Wallets,Gucci Shoes,Marc Jacobs handbags,Marni handbags,Miu Miu handbags,Mulberry handbags,Prada handbags,Thomaswylde handbags,TOD handbags,Bottega Veneta handbags,D&G handbags,Dior handbags,YSL handbags,Coach handbagsLouis Vuitton LV Luggage LV Wallet Chanel Gucci Alexander Wang Fendi Balenciaga Chloe Marc Jacobs Miu Miu Mulberry Jimmy Choo Hermes Loewe Coach Cartier Valentino Bottega Veneta Burberry Dior Prada Marni YSL Versace Dolce&Gabbana Goyard Givenchy Thomas Wylde Luggage Shoes Collection Belts Collection Bracelets Louis Vuitton :: Gucci Handbags :: Chanel Handbags :: Hermes Birkin :: Posted by: replica handbags at October 25, 2009 12:29 AM (o4b/d) 145
How about this good stuff!
<a href="http://mybondagediary.sensualwriter.com">my bondage diary</a> <a href="http://naughtybondagegirls.sensualwriter.com">naughty girls bondage</a> <a href="http://girlsinbondage.sensualwriter.com">girls in bondage</a> <a href="http://bondagegirls.sensualwriter.com">bondage girls</a> <a href="http://analbondage.sensualwriter.com">anal bondage</a> <a href="http://womeninbondage.sensualwriter.com">women in bondage</a> <a href="http://hardcorebondage.sensualwriter.com">hardcore bondage</a> <a href="http://bondagefuck.sensualwriter.com">bondage fuck</a> <a href="http://sashagreybondage.sensualwriter.com">sasha grey bondage</a> <a href="http://bondagesexslaves.sensualwriter.com">bondage sex slaves</a> Posted by: skinthetic at November 04, 2009 04:11 AM (wEYuj) 146
[url=http://example.com]example2[/url]
Posted by: skinthetic at November 04, 2009 04:12 AM (wEYuj) 147
do expect some form of either apology or supplication in regards to
that to be coming up someday in the future. Maybe not an outright
apology, but some sort of "Americans brutually raped and murdered your
countrymen during world war II, and even though I wasn't born then and
this totally isn't about me, I'm sorry on behalf of all Americas"<a href=http://example.com>example4</a>
Posted by: skinthetic at November 04, 2009 04:16 AM (wEYuj) 148
Item 7. Destroy the family unit and force children to turn their parents in to the government for transgressions against the state. Item 8. Shut down opposition media.Meanwhile, back on the homefront: Having destroyed the economy, the workforce, all effective separation between the legislative and executive branches of Gubmint, the effectiveness of constitutional restraints on Gubmint regulation and procedure, and striving ever harder towards the fiscal fantasy-land of "spreading the wealth" to those who work the least but whine the loudest and vote the straight D-ticket most faithfully (and frequently) - Item 9. Declare all people welcome, regardless of origin or intent, and remove all restrictions against anyone wishing to cross any U.S. border. -After all, why shouldn't we allow the whole world to share in the crash-and-burn failure that will be the future of the once-proud U.S.A. under the Glorious Rule of The Obamanation & Co.? my bondage diarynaughty girls bondagegirls in bondagebondage girlsanal bondagewomen in bondagehardcore bondagebondage fucksasha grey bondagebondage sex slaves Posted by: skinthetic at November 04, 2009 04:18 AM (wEYuj) Posted by: ttrtrtrert at November 12, 2009 02:12 AM (Cvumc) 150
Hi! znDfpYD
Posted by: KAtxvL at November 12, 2009 02:43 PM (L37bi) 151
Last weekend, I ordered chocolate Ugg Classic Cardy hoping they wouldn't show marks as much as my beige ugg cardy boots and waterproofed them when I first got them. They look so much cleaner than my old beige ugg boots, I wear my Whooga's all year round, they don't make my feet sweat as much as my older pair. I'm very impressed with how they are holding up to my abuse, very well made. My only suggestion to everyone is keep them dry and out of the mud.Ugg Classic Cardy! Posted by: ugg classic cardy at December 05, 2009 08:30 AM (0qX3R) 152
For some fake watches time fake watches now, the Casio Pathfinder PAG40B 2v watch has been zealously chased after. If you are hunting for a watch that has a type of sport/outdoor type of look while at the same time replica watch perfect replica watch for a formal occasion. Then you should look replica watches no replica watches further than the casio pathfinder PAG 40 model.The introduction of the PAG 40 models was to improve on the basic pathfinder concept by providing altitude measurements replica that replica could be taken up to 32,800 feet. These models watches also have a larger display panel with a dual level display screen. Its also got some cool features such as an alarm, backlight, compass, altimeter, stop watch breitling watch and breitling watch even a thermometer.breitling watches You can breitling watches expect to have the battery life up to about 1 and a half years in duration.These features and more, make this pag40 models a breitling valuable tool that can provide that extra margin of assurance when you are out and about in the outdoors.. knowing that your adventures will be safe and successful.The Casio Pathfinder PAG40B-2V is a very cartier watch accurate cartier watch and as mentioned previously... it has lots of features. Its also surprisingly easy to use considering all cartier watches the cartier watches features and functions that it has. Many consumers cartier that have wore this watch have said that its like having a weather station attached to their wrist! Perhaps movado watch the only movado watch thing that you miss is on this pathfinder is a GPS feature.movado watches Some of movado watches the things that have not impressed me is the fact that its very chunky! The strap also have a lot movado to be desired for. The problem is the watchband is very omega watch thick omega watch and stiff.The price tag is also a little on omega watches the high omega watches side too, so that might put you off purchasing the watch. I believe the price tag is somewhere in the reign of about $200.Finally, this Casio Pathfinder omega is a watch for those who frequently engaged in outdoor activities, such as adventurers. The Casio Pathfinder offers superior accuracy, reliability, rugged good and superb comfort; it replica rolex also rolex provides a lot of useful information to get you headed in the right direction. rolex watch Are you rolex watch looking for easy info? Get one Casio Pathfinder now! So... what rolex watches do you rolex watches think ahout a watch like the Casio G-shock Mudman Gw9000A-1? As far rolex as I am concerned, it is really a distinctive type of watch. Do you wondering why do I say that? The Mudman Gw9000A-1 by Casio is tag heuer watch mud tag heuer watch, dust and shock resistant enough to survive whatever Mother tag heuer watches Nature tag heuer watches throws your way. Solar power and multi-band atomic tag heuer timekeeping make this a great watch for keeping time on the trail.Its comfortable and sporty and also features other things such as date and month display and has an impressive water resistant depth of up to 660 feet (200 Meters). What else does TISSOT this watch tissot have up its sleeve? Well... Its also features an alarm, back light, a stopwatch, thermometer, world time to name TISSOT Watch a few tissot watch more. This particular Casio watch has been called the toughest watch in the TISSOT Watches world and TISSOT Watches the reason for this is because it is mud and GUCCI shock resistant. Its Also water resistant of up to 200M in depth. This watch is virtually indestructible.The GUCCI Watch Gshock gucci watch Mudman has also got great looks. Its attractive GUCCI Watches but gucci watches is not gaudy looking. The buttons on the watch are actually covered with a rubber lining to keep dirt from entering it. Of course this is very useful if you are working in MOVADO muddy conditions.A couple of things that you may not like about this watch is that its got a rubber watchband attached to it. The alarms that are built into this watch could have been MOVADO Watch sounded a movado watch little louder too. But then again, there are some good things about this watch such MOVADO Watches as the movado watches fact that you dont have to PANERAI worry about PANERAI batteries... or wearing an uncomfortable watch or worried about its durability in outdoor activities.On a final note, the Casio Gshock Mudman Solar PANERAI Watch Gw9000A-1 is so PANERAI Watch far one of the great products from Casio. G-Shocks are known to be reliable, extremely durable and in their own way good looking. These watches are made for PANERAI Watches the PANERAI Watches most extreme environments and will take excessive ARMANI abuse without failure. Trust me, it can be your best friend.So... what do you think ahout a watch like ARMANI Watch the ARMANI Watch Casio G-shock Mudman Gw9000A-1? As far as ARMANI Watches I am ARMANI Watches concerned, it is really a AUDEMARS PIGUET distinctive AUDEMARS PIGUET type of watch. Do you wondering why do I say that? The Mudman Gw9000A-1 by Casio is mud, dust AUDEMARS PIGUET Watch and shock resistant AUDEMARS PIGUET Watches enough to AUDEMARS PIGUET Watches survive whatever Mother Nature throws your way. Solar power and multi-band atomic timekeeping make this BVLGARI Watches a great BVLGARI Watches for keeping time on the trail.Its comfortable and sporty and also features other things such as date and month display and has an impressive BVLGARI Watch water BVLGARI Watch resistant depth of up to 660 feet (200 Meters). What else BVLGARI does this watch have up its sleeve? Well... Its also features an alarm, back light, a stopwatch, thermometer, world time CHANEL Watches to name CHANEL Watches a few more. This particular Casio watch has been called CHANEL Watch the CHANEL Watch toughest watch in the world and the CHANEL reason for this is because it is mud and shock resistant. Its Also water resistant of up to 200M in depth. This watch is virtually FRANCK MULLER Watch indestructible FRANCK MULLER Watch.The Gshock Mudman has also got great looks. Its attractive FRANCK MULLER Watches but is FRANCK MULLER Watches not gaudy looking. The buttons on the watch are actually covered with a rubber FRANCK MULLER lining to FRANCK MULLER keep dirt from entering it. Of course this is very useful if you are working in muddy conditions.A couple of things that you may not like about HUBLOT this watch is that its got a rubber watchband attached to it. The alarms that are built into HUBLOT Watch this HUBLOT Watch could have been sounded a little louder too. But then again, there are HUBLOT Watches some HUBLOT Watches good things about this watch such as the fact that you dont have to IWC worry about batteries... or wearing an uncomfortable watch or IWC Watch worried IWC Watch about its durability in outdoor activities.On a final note, the Casio Gshock Mudman Solar Gw9000A-1 is so far one of the great products IWC Watches from IWC Watches Casio. G-Shocks are known to be reliable, LONGINES extremely durable and in their own way good looking. These watches are LONGINES Watch made for LONGINES Watch the most extreme environments and will LONGINES Watches take LONGINES Watches excessive abuse without failure. Trust me, it can be your best friend.Collect enough information, LV Watch and LV Watch make sure the websites selling Swiss replicas are reliable. As you see, the business of replicas is booming, and more LV Watches and more LV Watches detailers want to get big profit from MONT BLANC that MONT BLANC. You will possibly come across poor sites that offer poor service or give you no response. Thus it is strongly MONT BLANC Watch recommended MONT BLANC Watch that enough information about the sites should be MONT BLANC Watches collected MONT BLANC Watches, such as their web design and product PATEK PHILIPPE photos PATEK PHILIPPE. Have a good look at one specific replicas photos in detail, PATEK PHILIPPE Watch and check PATEK PHILIPPE watch that if it features the same that you have expected PATEK PHILIPPE Watches from the original PATEK PHILIPPE Watches Though the duplicated one costs you only a small fraction of the money that you have to pay for an original timepiece, nobody is pleased to spend every penny on any item with RADO Watch offending rado watch look and poor quality. A top quality Swiss replica should be RADO Watches accurate duplicate RADO Watches of the original with finest materials, advanced movements, superior working dials, RADO etc. That really deserves you investment. Read their customer feedback carefully. TUDOR If TUDOR possible, try to have a chat with their online service. You see, if the retailers are trustable, TUDOR Watch they TUDOR Watch will try their best to win every customers trust and attention. TUDOR Watches They TUDOR Watches will be pleased to deal with any problem from their customers.Do ZENITH remember not to make payment by WU, bank wire or money order. When you make online order, you should ZENITH Watch have ZENITH Watch preparation of being cheated. Apparently, sending money directly to the ZENITH Watches account of the ZENITH Watches retailer is really dangerous. Make order with credit card PANERAI could be OK since if you receive no response, you can contact with your card PANERAI Watch bank and PANERAI Watch deal with the deal. Never go for replica models if you know PANERAI Watches little or PANERAI Watches none about the luxurious designer ones. Only if you collect PARMIGIANI enough information about the authentic, you could happy with your shopping. PARMIGIANI Watch If not PARMIGIANI Watch, you will lose your hard earned money. It is only buying from reliable sources will get you the right replcia Swiss watch. Surely you want to be more stylish with your new watch. In PARMIGIANI Watches order not PARMIGIANI Watches to let yourself down, remember those dos and donts.
Posted by: caonimagebi at February 20, 2010 06:05 PM (fNK71) 153
great success abroad rolex daytona tag heuer slr Nevertheless Italians who like everything rare and elegant met Adolf Langes successors with open arms rolex sea dweller tag heuer formula 1 monaco At the same time numerous American collectors bought up the new made in Germany watches air king The first collection of 1994 consisted only of four models Lange I which now is produced in cases of three different sizes classic Arkade Saxonia and Pour It Merite with tourbillion which is not produced nowadays Then lineups 1815 and Cabaret Langematik ( the first A fake rolex watches Lange Sohne automatic winding watch) were produced tag heuer link These watches were described as accurate elegant and peculiar like all other A monaco Lange&Sohne watches Datograph presented in 1999 amazed the public by its perfect design and mechanical solutions fly-back day date carrera replica tag heuer accurate minute counter tag heuer monza rolex explorer column ratchet wheel Langematik Perpetual is the first A autavia Lange & Sohne wristwatch with perpetual calendar This watch features a unique zero-reset mechanism for correcting for date and moon phase displays carrera Collection set Luna Mundi produced by ALange & Sohne company consists of two watches depicting moon rolex golf watch datejust
Posted by: caobm,.bi at February 27, 2010 11:17 PM (3toZA) 154
شات
الشرقيه دردشة الشرقية شات الحب الشلة شات رورو شات عيون
شات روح
شات
الساحر شات احساس شات قمر شات
الحلا شات العين شات
الوناسه دردشة الود شات عشق دردشة
بنت الخليج شات دلع نجد شات شات سعودي دردشة
غلاك دردشة كتابية شات غلا
الروح شات دلع شات
صرقعة الدردشات شات
عسولة شات الخليج شات
الريم شات حبي كتابي دردشة شات
الفيس بوك شات القصيم شات
عاتبوها شات تعب قلبي شات برق دردشه
مملكه شات كول دردشة
الوله شات الروح شات
خليجي شات القلوب شات عين
الغلا شات الخيال شات فله شات
كتابي عسل شات ياهي قويه شات
بنوتة دردشة برق دردشة
الريم شات عربي شات
كازنوفا شات سعودي عز شات
ملاك المملكة شات كتابي دردشة
عسل شات الشوق شات
الشرقيه شات الرياض شات كام شات غزل شات
القمر شعبي كوم شات الشله دردشة طال السكوت ترحب بكم سعودي كام دليل امير دردشة صوتية شات سعودي زواج مسيار دردشة
الشلة نت
لوق اجابات قوقل موالى طرب توب شات عسل كملنا
بلوت شات الرياض قلوب دليل سكس شات الود شات الملك
شات
الخليج شات تعب قلبي شات الغلا
شات الحب
جازان
نيوز عيادات المركز الاستشاري تنظيف
اسنان ازالة الشعر تنظيف
البشره عمليات التجميل شات كتابي شات سعودي دردشة صوتية شات صوتي شات كويتي شات صوتي شات الشله الشله السعوديه دردشة شات كتابي شات سعودي شات قلوب شات السعودية شات تعب قلبي شات قلوب السعودية دردشة قلوب السعودية
الشات السعودي قلوب شات القلوب شات السعودي rg,f الشات شات قلوب السعوديه شات الشله
Posted by: Salman at March 14, 2010 06:06 PM (Nx39h) 155
<a href=http://www.shopping-replica.com/>replica handbags</a> | <a href=http://www.watches365.org/>designer handbags</a> | <a href=http://www.bagsreplicashop.com/>replica handbags</a> | <a href=http://www.replicabagcenter.com/>designer replica handbags</a> | <a href=http://www.buytopreplica.com/>fake handbags</a> | <a href=http://www.buytopreplica.com/>designer replica handbags</a> | <a href=http://www.buycheapwatches.org/>replica handbags</a> | <a href=http://www.bagsreplicashop.com/marc-Jacobs.html>Marc Jacobs handbag</a> | <a href=http://www.replicabagcenter.com/yves-saint-laurent.html>Yves Saint Laurent handbag</a> | <a href=http://www.buytopreplica.com/replica-Lancel-Handbag.html>Replica Lancel bag</a> | <a href=http://www.bagsreplicashop.com/Bally.html>cheap replica Bally</a> | <a href=http://www.bagsreplicashop.com/miumiu.html>wholesale MiuMiu replica bag</a> | <a href=http://www.buytopreplica.com/replica-Lancel-Handbag.html>Replica Lancel </a> | <a href=http://www.bagsreplicashop.com/chanel.html>Replica Chanel</a> | <a href=http://www.replicabagcenter.com/gucci.html>Fake Gucci bag</a> | <a href=http://www.buytopreplica.com/replica-Mulberry-Handbag.html>cheap replica Mulberry</a>
Posted by: shijin at April 11, 2010 03:11 AM (fQKpJ) Posted by: shijin at April 11, 2010 03:14 AM (fQKpJ) Posted by: snfae at April 12, 2010 04:31 AM (WOCBb) 158
.................................................................................................
......................................................................................... ........................................................................................... ............................................................................................................ ................................................................................................... .................................................................................................. ................................................................................................... ....................................................... ................................................................................................. .............................................................................. Posted by: Arslanian at April 18, 2010 02:40 PM (tU389) Posted by: shijin at April 20, 2010 11:26 PM (vwV2R) 160
M2TS File Converter is a magic M2TS Converter which can fastly convert M2TS format to various popular video and audio files, with such professional M2TS Video Converter, you are able to edit M2TS files, Merge M2TS, Cut M2TS so that you can enjoy your M2TS videos on portable devices!
Posted by: ruth at April 28, 2010 11:14 PM (8PNbT) 161
chanel handbag chanel handbags replica Gucci Bags replica handbags Louis Vuitton handbags Discount replica handbags Louis Vuitton handbags Discount designer handbags Replica louis vuitton handbags and many more designers.Money Back Guarantee. Free Shipping.Offering Cheap knock off handbags
Posted by: HANDBAGS at May 12, 2010 09:22 PM (oAXo+) 162
replica handbags
replica shoes replica rolex China wholesale wholesale China wholesale china wholesale electronics china wholesale replica Juicy bracelets replica Pandora beads NFL jerseys Posted by: 59dollar at May 26, 2010 03:49 AM (0kEjO) 163
Lately I have been thinking about losing weight, what do you think I should read first?
fast way to lose belly fat
food that burns belly fat
how to lose stomach fat fast
how to lose weight on your stomach
Posted by: Madison at May 30, 2010 12:46 AM (BAlgz) 164
QuickTime Converter is the most professional quicktime video converter to convert quicktime with superfast speed and high output quality.MOV to iPhone,MTS to QuickTime
Posted by: sdf at May 31, 2010 04:52 AM (pVO8m) 165
Another summer is coming, so you have to get some fresh new looks for beach parties, picnics and all the rest of the warm weather fun.
Cheap Nike Air Force One shoes Cheap Nike Air Force 1 shoes Cheap Nike Air Max shoes Cheap Nike Air Max Tn shoes Cheap Nike Air Rift shoes On iofferitems.com, we provide you a lot of shoes with many different colors and various designs, including Nike Air Max 90 shoes. Cheap Nike Dunk SB Cheap Nike Shox shoes Cheap nike Cheap jordan shoes Posted by: nike air max 90 at July 01, 2010 10:27 PM (Ts9zU) 166
shape ups
gucci shoes men mbt shoes women ugg boots sale shape ups skechers handbags online christian louboutin shoes ugg boots ugg boots sale skechers shape ups reebok easytone mbt shoes women cheap gucci gucci boots women mbt sandals MBT Tataga ugg cardy ugg classic cardy skechers shape ups reebok easytone mbt shoes women christian louboutin boots christian louboutin online cheap handbags Brand Handbags handbags sale ugg sandals ugg boots uk mbt shoes ugg boots uk Posted by: cheap handbag at July 16, 2010 11:34 AM (lKUL1) 167
..........................Thank you
شات - شات كتابي - منتديات - مركز تحميل - شات فلسطين - دردشة فلسطين - ماسنجر - فيديو كليب - دليل مواقع Posted by: شات at August 09, 2010 04:55 AM (zDGBV) 168
Nike World Cup a number of its stars, please take the one called "kicked out of the legendary" ad, but with the downturn in the <strong><a href="http://www.trade161.com/mbt-sport-shoes-c-563.html">MBT Sport shoes </a> performance of World Cup stars, the ad also increasingly demonstrated the power of the spell resistance grams of "Just Do It" messages, also put on a "Just Don't Do It" the banter mean.Return joking banter, the strongest <strong><a href="http://www.trade161.com/mbt-shuguli-c-564.html">MBT Shuguli </a> reputation of the world football is a collective of four players returned, frustrated at the World Cup, it is iron fact. Messi is not a ball into Argentina in the 1 / 4 final by Germany 4-0 in the massacre, C Luo scored 1 goal, Portugal 1 / 8 finals eliminated by Spain, Kaka is not a ball into, Brazil 1 / 4 finals to be reversed out of the Netherlands, Rooney is not a ball into England in the 1 / 8 finals by <strong><a href="http://www.trade161.com/mbt-sapatu-shoes-c-669.html">MBT Sapatu shoes</a> Germany 4-1 in the massacre. Four collective slump is behind their team failed to merge into a truly overall combat effectiveness, but like France and Italy, the problem is more serious, Anelka burst foul language on the Domenech was subsequently expelled from the team, Posted by: mbt shoes at August 09, 2010 02:34 PM (1ma7x) 169
led the complete division of the <strong><a href="http://www.trade161.com/mbt-salama-shoes-c-659.html">MBT Salama shoes </a> French team, so how can a team fighting? Italy is like warm water being slowly boiled frogs died, quietly grow old, die in silence. imbalance in the team that he no solution, but Dunga Although abide by the tenets of European soccer will be a deep imprint on the team who utilitarian, but know what to do in the face of a sudden death. Perhaps the only German team Lufkin impressive, in the injured Michael Ballack will be fairly young <strong><a href="http://www.trade161.com/mbt-mwalk-c-567.html">MBT M.WALK</a> team to build offensive, but in the end only to begin with. And their respective teams into the finals of the Bosque and Van Marwijk, seems to mention the out of color, Posted by: mbt shoes at August 12, 2010 11:05 AM (F3tpt) 170
I feel honored and privileged after reading your posts.You know,summer is coming! chaussures homme online .The chaussures homme
nike will become fashionable soon.We offer chaussures homme nike,all kinds,all colors available.You can also find homme chaussure in our shop,including hommes chaussures,Nike Shox NZ,Nike Shox R4.Best wishes to you! Posted by: layy at August 20, 2010 07:41 PM (Ai95S) 171
http://carolinescomedy.ning.com/profiles/blogs/dog-potty-indoor-dog-potty#40847 indoor dog potty, http://carolinescomedy.ning.com/profiles/blogs/dog-potty-mat-how-to-potty#16202 dog potty mat, http://carolinescomedy.ning.com/profiles/blogs/dog-potty-clay-training-pot#36390 dog potty clay, http://carolinescomedy.ning.com/profiles/blogs/potty-training-a-small-dog#37304 potty training small dog, http://carolinescomedy.ning.com/profiles/blogs/housebreaking-dog-potty#17435 dog potty,
Posted by: Dog Potty Mat at August 24, 2010 03:08 PM (hhKFh) 172
My friendS told me that this blog is competitive. i will continue to read.
Posted by: cheap clothes online at September 03, 2010 08:54 AM (WtFzz) 173
I have never read such a wonderful article and I am coming back tomorrow to continue reading.
Posted by: discount clothes at September 03, 2010 08:55 AM (WtFzz) 174
The article is worth reading, I like it very much. I will keep your new articles.
Posted by: discounted designer handbags at September 03, 2010 08:57 AM (WtFzz) 175
This article is informative and interesting,I enjoy reading it.
Posted by: retro jordans at September 03, 2010 08:59 AM (WtFzz) 176
It is my pleasure to read this page,I look forward to reading more.
Posted by: discount jordan shoes at September 03, 2010 09:00 AM (WtFzz) 177
I really like this website , and hope you will write more ,thanks a lot for your information.
Posted by: cheap designer clothing at September 03, 2010 09:01 AM (WtFzz) 178
Good post.You did a good work,and offer more effective imformation for us!Thank you.
Posted by: cheap designer clothes at September 03, 2010 09:02 AM (WtFzz) Processing 0.11, elapsed 0.1409 seconds. |
MuNuvians
MeeNuvians
Polls! Polls! Polls!
Dale's ECB Election Projection Federal Review Real Clear Politics Rasmussen Reports Gallup Zogby FoxNews Polls Sabato/Crystal Ball Frequently Asked Questions
The (Almost) Complete Paul Anka Integrity Kick
Primary Document: The Audio
Paul Anka Haiku Contest Announcement Integrity SAT's: Entrance Exam for Paul Anka's Band AllahPundit's Paul Anka 45's Collection AnkaPundit: Paul Anka Takes Over the Site for a Weekend (Continues through to Monday's postings) George Bush Slices Don Rumsfeld Like an F*ckin' Hammer Top Top Tens
Democratic Forays into Erotica New Shows On Gore's DNC/MTV Network Nicknames for Potatoes, By People Who Really Hate Potatoes Star Wars Euphemisms for Self-Abuse Signs You're at an Iraqi "Wedding Party" Signs Your Clown Has Gone Bad Signs That You, Geroge Michael, Should Probably Just Give It Up Signs of Hip-Hop Influence on John Kerry NYT Headlines Spinning Bush's Jobs Boom Things People Are More Likely to Say Than "Did You Hear What Al Franken Said Yesterday?" Signs that Paul Krugman Has Lost His Frickin' Mind All-Time Best NBA Players, According to Senator Robert Byrd Other Bad Things About the Jews, According to the Koran Signs That David Letterman Just Doesn't Care Anymore Examples of Bob Kerrey's Insufferable Racial Jackassery Signs Andy Rooney Is Going Senile Other Judgments Dick Clarke Made About Condi Rice Based on Her Appearance Collective Names for Groups of People John Kerry's Other Vietnam Super-Pets Cool Things About the XM8 Assault Rifle Media-Approved Facts About the Democrat Spy Changes to Make Christianity More "Inclusive" Secret John Kerry Senatorial Accomplishments John Edwards Campaign Excuses John Kerry Pick-Up Lines Changes Liberal Senator George Michell Will Make at Disney Torments in Dog-Hell Greatest Hitjobs
The Ace of Spades HQ Sex-for-Money Skankathon A D&D Guide to the Democratic Candidates Margaret Cho: Just Not Funny More Margaret Cho Abuse Margaret Cho: Still Not Funny Iraqi Prisoner Claims He Was Raped... By Woman Wonkette Announces "Morning Zoo" Format John Kerry's "Plan" Causes Surrender of Moqtada al-Sadr's Militia World Muslim Leaders Apologize for Nick Berg's Beheading Michael Moore Goes on Lunchtime Manhattan Death-Spree Milestone: Oliver Willis Posts 400th "Fake News Article" Referencing Britney Spears Liberal Economists Rue a "New Decade of Greed" Artificial Insouciance: Maureen Dowd's Word Processor Revolts Against Her Numbing Imbecility Intelligence Officials Eye Blogs for Tips They Done Found Us Out, Cletus: Intrepid Internet Detective Figures Out Our Master Plan Shock: Josh Marshall Almost Mentions Sarin Discovery in Iraq Leather-Clad Biker Freaks Terrorize Australian Town When Clinton Was President, Torture Was Cool What Wonkette Means When She Explains What Tina Brown Means Wonkette's Stand-Up Act Wankette HQ Gay-Rumors Du Jour Here's What's Bugging Me: Goose and Slider My Own Micah Wright Style Confession of Dishonesty Outraged "Conservatives" React to the FMA An On-Line Impression of Dennis Miller Having Sex with a Kodiak Bear The Story the Rightwing Media Refuses to Report! Our Lunch with David "Glengarry Glen Ross" Mamet The House of Love: Paul Krugman A Michael Moore Mystery (TM) The Dowd-O-Matic! Liberal Consistency and Other Myths Kepler's Laws of Liberal Media Bias John Kerry-- The Splunge! Candidate "Divisive" Politics & "Attacks on Patriotism" (very long) The Donkey ("The Raven" parody) News/Chat
|