| Support
Contact
| George Will on A-Stan v. Uncle J on baseballEqually freaking worthless to anyone looking for intelligent, informed commentary. Up next Will on sub-machine guns and Uncle J on bow ties. Also for free, and worth the money Matthew Yglesias on anything. Comments1
Please make the ads stop!! FOR THE LOVE OF GOD PLEASEEEEEEE....
Thank you,
Enron Diego
Posted by: enron diego at September 01, 2009 12:19 AM (NqVjl) 2
I'd like to believe that George Will is being crazy like a fox, wants to provide Obama some "conservative cover" to let Obama do what his natural instincts dictate he should, and then watch Obama's poll numbers dive even lower.
Of course, in reality, he's probably just been recently snubbed from some cocktail party and needs to bolster his credentials with the NYC-DC elites, and this will get him an invite to the next party. Posted by: Tom in Korea at September 01, 2009 12:20 AM (nS7nk) 3
I'm waiting on his 10,000 word essay on the whimsy of cooking meth.
Posted by: Jim in San Diego at September 01, 2009 12:31 AM (H7Rlw) Posted by: ol_dirty_/b/tard at September 01, 2009 12:35 AM (AXjWZ) 5
I couldn't care less about George Will and baseball, but the dreaded Thread Truncation of Death has destroyed the ONT and everything else that looks good.
Posted by: arhooley at September 01, 2009 12:40 AM (aBtds) 6
I'm waiting for Wills' autobiographical accounts of screwing Desiree Cousteau in a hot tub in the 1970s when he was a porn star.
Posted by: TexasJew at September 01, 2009 12:55 AM (aUsM0) 7
Uncle Jimbo -- Dude. Let's stop throwing people overboard, eh? I know this new interwebs thing is all awesome and such, and we get to shout here and be all bad ass and say f^(& you to all those jerks who got to set policy before, but here's the thing: there are such things as conservative ideals. Once we had awesome tall men -- RWR and WFBjr -- to define them. Back when only they could get air time, they set the pace. Now, we can all get air time. Also, Messrs RWR and WFBjr are dead. So we get to say whatever the f%& we want. Boo - f@#$ing - yah. Except, here's the thing. Someone who grew up under WFBjr, and who helped nurture RWR into saving the f#%#ng world -- may have something to say about, as Governor RWR put it in his 1976 campaign, "our foreign policy program for the coming administration." David Brooks -- confirmed douche. Peggy Noonan -- awesome, awesome supporter whose admiration for the glories of the gloriousness of the potential of the oval office have somewhat blinded her recently. David Frum -- really; I refuse to admit into the presence of my thought. HOWEVER: George Will? Right about everything, 89.2 percent of the time, always. He was to the RIGHT OF RWR on arms control and missile defense. George Will is always right. And if not, he's always right the f%^& there. So let me, for George Will, give you a big STFU. If he's talking, God damn it, you listen, and don't dick back. Otherwise, big fan. But old Tory MP George Will has a much bigger c&*k than you do, so STFU and take that slap across your jaw. Posted by: Shep at September 01, 2009 12:56 AM (wnMoI) 8
Otherwise, big fan. But old Tory MP George Will has a much bigger c&*k than you do, so STFU and take that slap across your jaw. Posted by: Shep at September 01, 2009 12:56 AM (wnMoI) Do you have weird dreams about George Will? Posted by: Jim in San Diego at September 01, 2009 12:59 AM (H7Rlw) 9
Posted by: Shep at September 01, 2009 12:56 AM (wnMoI) Yep, this Will bashing is growing mighty fuck'n old. If you disagree with him, fine, deconstruct his argument but don't piss all over him. Posted by: lowandslow at September 01, 2009 01:00 AM (GZitp) 10
I think I read about this somewhere before. Some obscure blog called AoSHQ, maybe?
Posted by: Methos at September 01, 2009 01:01 AM (b34Vz) 11
You know, maybe I came across too harsh. George Will has been a solid conservative over the years. This is true.
I'm not sure if that means he's correct in this instance. Maybe what I hope is actually the truth of the matter, rather than the cynical idea about him wanting to hit up parties. Posted by: Tom in Korea at September 01, 2009 01:03 AM (nS7nk) 12
Why don't we just relocate the prawns to Afghanistan?
Posted by: Crusty at September 01, 2009 01:04 AM (qzgbP) 13
OMG!
After reading Will's plan ("from offshore, using intelligence, drones, cruise missiles, airstrikes and small, potent special forces units, concentrating on the porous 1,500-mile border with Pakistan"), I have only one thing to say: The MacNamara Line. Posted by: Casey at September 01, 2009 01:04 AM (3XY88) Posted by: TexasJew at September 01, 2009 01:04 AM (aUsM0) Posted by: Casey at September 01, 2009 01:07 AM (3XY88) 16
And Shep, no one is right all the time. George is just one more voice on the landscape and sounds like he just wants to lose with fewer casualties in the near term. Unless your willing to watch more Americans die in our streets, you must see that his 'strategy' is as UJ said, utterly worthless.
Posted by: Methos at September 01, 2009 01:08 AM (b34Vz) 17
Wasn't this Oberleutnant Murtha's (D, Crook, PA) plan? To pull out of Iraq and fight it from "over the horizon".
Posted by: Pocono Joe at September 01, 2009 01:15 AM (G37hT) 18
Sorry Shep, but Uncle Jimbo is right. I know dick all about this. I need to be slapped every once in a while.
Posted by: George Will at September 01, 2009 01:17 AM (5V/kc) 19
Almost all of the "conservative" talking heads were initially dismissive of the Town Hall Meeting protestors. The few that weren't - Limbaugh, Steyn, Levin and (yes) Hannity proved themselves to me. Will, Krauthammer and a number of others were not as clarvoyant as they imagined themselves to be. They spun into smug condescension and derision of these people. It was the average hardworking and decent American who saved us from a terrible disaster, and not our self-proclamed "oracles" from inside the Beltway. Posted by: TexasJew at September 01, 2009 01:19 AM (aUsM0) 20
First of all, the bitch slapping was alegorical. I refuse to imagine any of the images I may accidentally have evoked. More to, and especially to, the point: I'm not arguing that George Will is always right (even though I suggested that, in italics, above; that was exuberance; my apologies). My point was this, and just this: George Will has been a keeper of the conservative torch since there was a torch to keep conservative. Yes, he's sometimes wrong. Sometimes very wrong. (I could dig up a column or two of his in the wake of Reykjavik that would prove this.) But in the vastness of things, he's not only been right, but the beacon of right. For the right, and the Right. So if he now says, as the culmination of what he's been throat-clearing about, since 2002, that our entire aggressive strategy might have been something that a free people, who love liberty first and foremost might want to thing about, ... well, I think that our response might be, not to write him out, but to take seriously the ideas of a leader of the conservative world. If we want to matter again, and want to win again, perhaps we should make our ideas coherent again. And doing that will require thinking hard about things we take for granted. Not blowing off our leaders. Posted by: Shep at September 01, 2009 01:22 AM (wnMoI) 21
People need to quit sucking Will's dick. Does he do some good work? Sure. Is he wrong on this? Fuckin' A. He rates a kick in the nuts here. He's old enough to remember the last few times we were forced to cut and run, as well as the consequences. Have a problem with the mission, that's fine, let's find a better way to complete the mission. Pants pissers should be asked to leave the room. Obama is a slimy cunt, but the mission and the troops come first. All this does is give heart to our enemies.
Posted by: carl hungus at September 01, 2009 01:25 AM (dwjQ+) 22
I don't want a rep as a basher of our team, however when a brilliant member of our team, who has done tons of good over many years on many topics, decides to opine on something he knows dick about, and in doing so gives ammo to the ass bandits who tried to lose Iraq and would love to lose A-Stan, shouldn't I call him out for stepping on his Georgeson with his spikes? (apologies to all the gods of punctuation).
George should STFU about A-Stan and discuss the history of pinstripes as a baseball metaphor about Wall Street and stay out of arguments that make him seem stupid. Cordially, Uncle J Posted by: Uncle Jimbo at September 01, 2009 01:29 AM (jo56i) 23
Well Shep, thanks for the cover, but I know DICK ALL about what goes on over there and how to help. Really. And I say that with all due respect to myself. Posted by: George Will at September 01, 2009 01:30 AM (5V/kc) 24
George will isn't my leader. He's just another swinging dick, albeit a published swinging dick. I don't owe him shit.
Posted by: carl hungus at September 01, 2009 01:31 AM (dwjQ+) 25
Texas Jew: You wrote: Almost all of the "conservative" talking heads were initially dismissive of the Town Hall Meeting protestors. The few that weren't - Limbaugh, Steyn, Levin and (yes) Hannity proved themselves to me. Will, Krauthammer and a number of others were not as clarvoyant as they imagined themselves to be. They spun into smug condescension and derision of these people. It was the average hardworking and decent American who saved us from a terrible disaster, and not our self-proclamed "oracles" from inside the Beltway. Here's Mark Steyn, tonight, from NRO-Corner: Rich, Kathryn et al, I'm less hostile to the George Will column. It seems to me we have no very clear war aims in Afghanistan, which is never a good position to be in. Are we "nation-building"? With US commanders talking about ending Afghanistan's "culture of poverty", it sounds like it. Yet, even assuming you could build a nation in any meaningful sense of the word on Afghan soil, such a nation would be profoundly uncongenial to us. Are we there just to quarantine al Qaeda in their Pakistani redoubts and whack any bad guys who wander in range? That might be worthwhile, but is a tough sell to Nato forces who (excepting Brits, Canucks and a couple of others) operate under ludicrously constrained rules of engagement. So the "nation-building" facade is necessary to square it with the multilateral types. The much misunderstood British strategy in Afghanistan was, by contrast, admirably clear-sighted, and worked (for them) for over a century. They took a conscious decision not to incorporate the country formally within the Indian Empire because they didn't want a direct British land border with Russia. So instead they were content with a highly decentralized semi-client state and a useful buffer between the British Empire and the Tsars, a set-up that worked well (from London's point of view) for over a century until it all fell apart in the Sixties when Moscow started outbidding the Brits for the loyalty of various factions - or what passes for loyalty in that part of the world. The British strategy was cold and calculated and, if you care about Afghan child mortality rates and women's rights, very unprogressive. But it was less deluded than asking western troops to die in pursuit of the chimera of ending a "culture of poverty" while in reality providing multilateral window-dressing for the country's slippage back to warlordism and Sharia. What are the goals here? Maybe the President could tell us. Or are we just going to (to cite the definitive film on the subject) Carry On Up The Khyber? Now: will we write Mark Steyn off as well? I overstated my case -- true facts -- when I said that George Will is never wrong. Of course he is. I was, perhaps, over-expressive. But: are you, is Uncle Jimbo, going to write George Will off? You shouldn't. We shouldn't. We can't. If we wish to win the country again -- which is the only way to keep in free -- we have to respond to, and account for, the wisdom of our greatest living statesmen, not dismiss them out of hand. So George Will's not one of our greatest living statesmen? Awesome. Name another, and what he thinks. Or STFU about my analysis of the current situation.
Posted by: Shep at September 01, 2009 01:31 AM (wnMoI) 26
Will is entitled to his opinion as is any other columnist.
Past administration did drive Taliban out and things started to get worse as the feckless Paki's ceded more control of the Pashtun lands. to them....in spite of the billions provided in US aid. As long as Pstan is next door...Taliban will have a safe haven. BHO lacks the desire and fortitude for a real war and is more concerned about perception vs. reality. Astan is not a country in a true sense, but a collection of tribes. If the Afghanistani's want a democracy, give them guns and let them fight for it. If they won't die for their own, why should we ? The IRAQ war made much more sense from a strategic perspective. I don't believe we should "cut and run", the democrat approach to security, but we should be very skeptical about wasting the lives of our troops and resources in a sink hole. IRAQ as a democracy is an irritant to Syria and Iran, it has oil, population, and was a viable country in spite of Sadam. Astan- little infrastructure, almost no institutions and a bunch of warring tribes- exoprt of value herion... Astan is a democracy - big deal. Posted by: John at September 01, 2009 01:33 AM (6FYZ6) 27
Greatest living statesman?
Posted by: carl hungus at September 01, 2009 01:33 AM (dwjQ+) 28
George Will has been beyond his "sell date" for over a couple of decades now. He might have done good at points in the past, but now I see him as just another face in the barking pundit crowd that's allowed to sit at the cool kids table as long as he promises to remain ineffective, or even damaging to most elements of conservatism.
Posted by: Jim in San Diego at September 01, 2009 01:35 AM (H7Rlw) 29
27 Greatest living statesman?
Posted by: carl hungus at September 01, 2009 01:33 AM (dwjQ+)
Don't stop him - he's on a roll..
Posted by: TexasJew at September 01, 2009 01:36 AM (aUsM0) 30
The most effective way to get them is using SF to gather intelligence, the Rangers to patrol in small, lethal, teams to find them. Then air cav and air assault by helicopter troops go where needed to kill them. Throw in some AH-1 Cobras and A10's to kill them when the group together.
Find Fix Fight The only large forces we need is one's to guard the air fields and bases. But what to I know. I am not a DC cocktail party guest wannabees. Posted by: hous bin pharteen at September 01, 2009 01:40 AM (Eom7x) 31
Damn, Unc, you are stirrin' the pot today.
FWIW, I was fine with your questions about Glen Beck. Odd how people levelled the nasty for you daring to ask a question. Now we are seeing the same shit happen regarding George Will. Somebody even drug out the homo crap early in the thread. I know he's not a tactical genius. Probably short on logistics, armaments and everything else you mil folks know. But he understands the obvious: with quitters in charge, you will not win. Shit, even I can understand that. And I know less about baseball than George Will. Posted by: K~Bob at September 01, 2009 01:41 AM (WtrwW) 32
25 Huge fan of Steyn and he makes some good points.
As I said in another post, we let politics drive the military and hand-cuff our soldiers with reducuilous rules of engagement that further put their lives at risk. Perhaps it would be better and cheaper to station a few thousand predators in place over Astan and Pastan and "forget" about nation building. Posted by: John at September 01, 2009 01:41 AM (6FYZ6) 33
Uncle J -- So George Will knows dick about A-stan. Why? He never served there? Did he know dick about Poland in 1978? He never served in the Fulda Gap. Did he know dick about the arms arrangements under Kissinger in 1974-77? He was never part of detente. Did he know dick about the Panama Canal; I've never seen him in one of those hats. Did he know dick about ... you see my point. You may or may not have local knowledge about A-stan. You may or may not be right or wrong about your particular point -- your take on his article. Are you right to be dismissive of George Will? I think you're wrong to be dismissive, and I -- (just for bona fides sake) want desperately for us to get the damned country back -- think that you are hurting this country's safety when you refuse to admit the possibility of wisdom in behalf of one the paragons of conservative wisdom. If the Right is going to win again, you'll have your voice, but you'll also have to do a lot of STFU if your first response to George Will's thoughts are STFU. Posted by: Shep at September 01, 2009 01:45 AM (wnMoI) 34
You're right, it's a master-stroke, leave, then we'll win!
George Will looks like he needs to take a big Christmas shit, it looks painful. Posted by: carl hungus at September 01, 2009 01:52 AM (dwjQ+) 35
Well, this thread got weird in a hurry. Posted by: TexasJew at September 01, 2009 01:53 AM (aUsM0) 36
Leave George Will alone you denim wearing proles.
Posted by: Ted Kennedy's Gristle Encased Head at September 01, 2009 01:55 AM (6fZqs) Posted by: Shep at September 01, 2009 01:55 AM (wnMoI) 38
Steyn has a good point....
Posted by: Tom in Korea at September 01, 2009 02:00 AM (nS7nk) 39
Slightly off topic, but I wanna know, after two of the deadliest months we've ever had in Afghanistan, where all the anti-war protests are...
...perhaps Burning Man? Posted by: g at September 01, 2009 02:06 AM (FAYNo) 40
George should STFU about A-Stan and discuss the history of pinstripes as a baseball...
Uncle J, I am honestly curious though - Even if we dismiss Will what about Anthony Cordesman? Cordesman explicitly states that Obama is starving the war effort. 1. Do you think we should continue a large strategic presence in Afghanistan even if Obama purposely denies necessary personnel and equipment? 2. What could Obama do that would lead you to believe it is a bad idea to maintain the large presence? Posted by: Iskandar at September 01, 2009 02:13 AM (uAJI5) 41
Succinct, and brilliantly accurate.
Posted by: Douglas at September 01, 2009 02:28 AM (uU+Ss) 42
If we pull out of Afghanistan, there will be Splodydopes detonating at malls all over the country within 5-7 years.
These people understand only one thing - firepower. To them, weakness is something to be exploited. Period. We made the same mistake in not responding strongly to the embassy bombings in Africa and OBL was emboldened by that. He was similarly emboldened by the abrupt Somalia pullout. How many times can you beg a pack of hyenas to attack you before they take a serious shot at it? Maybe an Afghan pullout wouldn't be the final straw, maybe it'll be the next betrayal or retreat, or the one after that, but it will sure as the sun rises tomorrow, be something that makes their decision for them that the Americans are pussied up enough again that a major attack plan gets green lighted and set in motion. Posted by: Purple Avenger at September 01, 2009 02:32 AM (65kCE) 43
Shep: while I certainly wouldn't put Will in the same dumpster as Brooks and Frum, he has not had his good fastball in 20 years or so, and the column at hand is just more evidence of this.
Now is not the right time to write a column that, whatever its motivation, only serves to give aid and comfort to the Left. Nevertheless, I am not going to throw him under the Moron bus. I am merely going to continue to ignore him utterly. Posted by: Otis Criblecoblis at September 01, 2009 02:53 AM (hvQmW) 44
George Will is the only honest conservative writer in the country.
Posted by: Dum Dum at September 01, 2009 02:56 AM (nS7nk) Posted by: Dum Dum at September 01, 2009 02:57 AM (nS7nk) 46
I'll stand with Will and Steyn on this one.
Either (a) decide realistically what you're going to do, marshal the troops and materiel, and do it or (b) declare victory and go home. There was once a rational fragment to the Dem party that made the argument that Iraq was a blunder because it caused us to take our eye off the ball in A'stan. They were right, at least insofar as the inability of the Bush DoD to manage two small wars (for that's what they were, and are) simultaneously. If we aren't willing thoroughly to reevaluate the strategy and commit 110% of the resources needed to do the job completely, then it's fruitless to run around playing Whack-A-Beard indefinitely. Posted by: mrkwong at September 01, 2009 02:59 AM (G8Eo0) 47
If we had a CIC in office worth a darn, Will would be wrong.
But we don't, and he isn't. Posted by: rawmuse at September 01, 2009 03:20 AM (NnkKB) 48
Even if we dismiss Will what about Anthony Cordesman? Cordesman explicitly states that Obama is starving the war effort.
Posted by: Iskandar at September 01, 2009 02:13 AM (uAJI5) There's no doubt that The Precedent is trying to sabotage the war effort in Afghanistan. That's what traitors do. Ever since it became public knowledge that we were mirandizing detainees in Afghanistan it was clear that the Washington junta's attack on the military was coming into full swing. But Afghanistan is important. Not to build a governemt, there - I couldn't care less about nation-building for them; that isn't our job. The importance of Afghanistan is its placement between the two most problematic nuclear pieces of the arab/persian/muslim world. Will's problem is that he doesn't turn his focus to where the real fight is - in Washington. Cheney fired the first big shots, very bluntly stating that The Precedent and his administration are acting against the security interests of the US, but people like Will and others were supposed to follow through, not call for a surrender on the war front. The Precedent wants the US to suffer and he is perfectly happy to just take this nation apart. If he is allowed to cause these problems and get reactions that endanger us all, then we will lose. The Precedent is a political suicide bomb who wants to take the US down with him. I would just note for those who had problems with military personnel filing eligibility cases against The Precedent - this sort of situation is exactly why they did it, and this is also exactly the sort of situation that John Jay was worried about when he called for only natural-born citizens to be Commander-in-Chief. I would just add that a pullout from Afghanistan would be looked at, in the arab/persian/muslim world, as such a stupendous win on their part that we'd have jihadis crawling out of the woodwork, everywhere. Nothing gets those savages excited like the idea that they're winning. Posted by: progressoverpeace at September 01, 2009 03:35 AM (A46hP) 49
Please make the ads stop!!
Please don't. I'd rather Ace get more ads than another worthless weblog award. As long a Ace makes some money off this "smart milblog", I don't care if they even advertise this crap. Posted by: Che Pizza at September 01, 2009 03:36 AM (4iIhs) 50
Slightly off topic, but I wanna know, after two of the deadliest months we've ever had in Afghanistan, where all the anti-war protests are...
Hopefully, they're taking a shower - with soap this time. Posted by: Che Pizza at September 01, 2009 03:45 AM (4iIhs) 51
George Will and the other puffed up, blue-blood, sneering, bow-tie-wearing, country club shitheels in Washington can kiss my rebel dick. I'm tired of the corduroy sport coat Republican eggheads. The manicured, pedicured intellectual conservatives, living behind high walls and locked gates. Arguing about we peasants' lives like they are discussing an ant farm. All these assholes that looked down their noses through their smart glasses at the Tea Party Movement will not be forgotten. We know that they will heap scorn on honest everyday Americans right along with their liberal cocktail party buddies. I'm surprised that sour-faced old schoolmarm Will took time out from bemoaning bluejeans and clinking cocktail glasses with other Washington snobs to actually write. All Afghanistan needs for victory is full mobilization, loose rules of engagement, and a President that doesn't give a flying fuck what the NYT or the filthy terrorist bastards think. This President has a sick fetish for Islam and beats off to the New York Times when he isn't whackin' it to his own picture. This war will be lost at home, here, in the halls of Washington. By filthy old hippies and communists. Just like Vietnam. But I'm simple. Posted by: sifty at September 01, 2009 03:48 AM (xCLnT) Posted by: sifty at September 01, 2009 03:48 AM (xCLnT) 53
Ysterday i bought a rolex watches to my father,he was very like it He asked me hou can there be so much money to buy so expensive watch ,I told he ,this is a replica watches but it's better than a real rolex watches and omega watches bad and it is also very durable and beautiful but the price it's a lot cheaper. Posted by: omega watches at September 01, 2009 03:50 AM (4iQSK) 54
If we pull out of Afghanistan, there will be Splodydopes detonating at malls all over the country within 5-7 years.
When I make this argument, I'm usually branded a "fear monger". Probably, by no coincidence, this is consistent w/ the MSM's take as well. They say in football that a good defense is the best offense. But IMO, terrorism is different. A good offense is the best defense. Another difference: You want all your games to be "road games". There is no home field advantage against terrorists. This is why Will is wrong. Can I call him names now? Posted by: Che Pizza at September 01, 2009 03:53 AM (4iIhs) 55
Ysterday i bought a rolex watches to my father,he was very like it He asked me hou can there be so much money to buy so expensive watch ,I told he ,this is a replica watches but it's better than a real rolex watches and omega watches bad and it is also very durable and beautiful
but the price it's a lot cheaper. Posted by: omega watches at September 01, 2009 03:53 AM (4iQSK) 56
Will's problem is that he doesn't turn his focus to where the real fight is - in Washington.
Really? I thought it was clearly implied. The Precedent wants the US to suffer and he is perfectly happy to just take this nation apart. If true why would we wish to maintain a waning land-based force then? If you believe his actions are malicious, why should we want frontline stationing of troops? Again, my previous questions: how can you expect victory over insurgents if the Admin is denying critical M/M? Is it a matter of having our combined forces tough it out for 3 more years? Second, what would Obama have to do for you to say that a insufficient force left to hang is not a good idea? Short of the ridiculous, what would he have to do to make this a non-issue; change ROE to the UN's standards? I would just add that a pullout from Afghanistan would be looked at, in the arab/persian/muslim world, as such a stupendous win Not disputed, but we aren't necessarily motivated by what the current mood of the street has been particularly the Arab Street. If we are to believe common wisdom, they hate us already. Another false impression isn't going to hinder us much. It will undoubtedly encourage more attacks of convenience and that will come as some surprise to allies like the UK but this is the path Obama has chosen if Will and/or Cordesman is to be believed. Emphasis on the past tense, has chosen. Posted by: Iskandar at September 01, 2009 03:56 AM (uAJI5) 57
Whoops. I forgot to send resources to Afghanistan.
Sorry. My bad. Hey! Look at all this money available for my health care plan! I wonder where that came from? Hmmmm...... Posted by: B. Obama at September 01, 2009 04:18 AM (4iIhs) 58
Posted by: Iskandar at September 01, 2009 03:56 AM (uAJI5) It's certainly a dilemma, as one would expect with a traitor at the top. The problem with Afghanistan is the same problem that our spy orgs are facing. But, shutting them down isn't going to help. The situations with Pakistan and Iran are too important and too sensitive to leave them a vaccum to fill. It's up to the commanders, politicians, and pundits to hit back against The Precedent, and hit back hard. I think the question is more along the lines of what level of treachery can The Precedent get to before people start calling for charges against him, publically and loudly? Posted by: progressoverpeace at September 01, 2009 04:43 AM (A46hP) 59
Peter Graff and Andrew Gray, Reuters, Aug.31,'09
"A government that is losing to a counter-insurgency isn't being outfought, it is being out-governed. And that's what's happening in Afghanistan," David Kilcullen, a senior adviser to McChrystal, told Australia's National Press Club. CBS News on Monday quoted a U.S. military officer in Afghanistan as saying one of the suspected bombers held in an attack last week that killed a U.S. soldier and wounded a CBS journalist might be linked to the Afghan government. The suspect was found with a cell phone that contained a number to the Defense Ministry in Kabul, which then sent a letter saying the wrong man had been arrested, according to the CBS report. "We think he was tied to the Ministry of Defense," Lieutenant Colonel Tom Gukeisen told the broadcaster. "Someone in that office began to put political pressure." Posted by: maverick muse at September 01, 2009 05:21 AM (F1b/5) 60
Meanwhile Gibbs blames Obama's Afghan woes on Bush, for leaving too soon.
Posted by: maverick muse at September 01, 2009 05:22 AM (F1b/5) 61
The situations with Pakistan and Iran are too important and too sensitive to leave them a vacuum to fill.
I'd agree, but we're not talking about a hypothetical administration. And we must be talking past one another. I thought Will's rubric was about an admin that actually has the will and power to starve the troops' efforts and make a mockery of it all. All the kings men must, must obey the CINC. Will and others are saying that it's not a negotiable point or one that can necessarily be won with finesse by even the greatest of military men. If Obama has made it clear that he does not want to fulfill the requirements for a successful COIN strategy, why support an endangered footprint? Again, with resigned and willful knowledge that I sound like a moronic broken record, where's the line? Posted by: Iskandar at September 01, 2009 05:31 AM (uAJI5) 62
It'll be nauseating tp see Will on Hardon next to Peggy Noonan.
But why do I get the feeling he'd rather do that than sit next to Krauthammer on Fox? Posted by: Ted at September 01, 2009 06:37 AM (kzhuA) 63
What do you expect from a Cub fan? Fuckin' pussy.
Posted by: LtE113(Mike in Chicago) at September 01, 2009 06:50 AM (3NFq/) 64
Was George Will pro- or con- button-downed collars in that whole argument about what is more conservative and what isn't?
Posted by: Tom in Korea at September 01, 2009 07:47 AM (nS7nk) 65
George Will sucked Jimmy Carter's cock. Read "The Pursuit of Happiness and Other Sobering Thoughts".
Posted by: blackrockmarauder at September 01, 2009 08:17 AM (GvgvT) 66
That damned red flashing add at the top of the page caused me to suffer an LSD flashback...took me 10 minutes to recover and post this comment.
Posted by: Mike at September 01, 2009 08:24 AM (65nBk) 67
To fight the bug, we must understand the bug. We can ill afford another Klendathu.
Posted by: Sky Marshal Tehat Meru at September 01, 2009 08:35 AM (qmw4U) 68
Fark G Willy. I've hated him since his anti-denim column. Because I'm the moron who hooks up his DSL so his doesn't have to go to the office and fire up his Corona Selectric(tm). I'm the one who unfreezes his pipes in winter, because the cheap bastard wouldn't pay for heat tape. I do his oil changes in his limo. I feed cattle so he can have a nice steak. He can blow me at the next accident scene, while I clear the wreck for him to get to his man(?))icure.
Posted by: hutch1200 at September 01, 2009 08:36 AM (lAiX2) 69
The problem is the perception of weakness in Washington emboldens our enemies and makes a sucessful COIN strategy much harder to implement. Our allies and potential allies must take into account the consequences of this debate. The conduct of free and open debate in Washington may be misinterperted in the field - ironically increasing troop requirements. I would almost give these wonks a high side accounts where the could blog away looking smart to each other. Posted by: Jean at September 01, 2009 08:39 AM (RCCZt) 70
What's all this fuss I hear about pulling out an afghan? It's terrible! It's much too warm to be sleeping under one of those! Young people today! Posted by: Emily Litella at September 01, 2009 08:44 AM (qzgbP) 71
Well, if there's one hill we're going to die on, it might as well be bringing post-modernity to Asscrackistan.
Carry on with the armed social work. This whole prudence thing is overrated anyway. Posted by: MlR at September 01, 2009 08:44 AM (op9m5) 72
If we want to matter again, and want to win again, perhaps we should make our ideas coherent again. And doing that will require thinking hard about things we take for granted. Not blowing off our leaders. What? George Will is your leader? Sorry, but I make my own choices in life based on a plethora of data. I read a lot of journalists and opinion makers and NEVER have I ever considered one of them a "leader". Everything everyone says or writes is opinion - including what I'm typing now. You lead by example. By what you actually do in life. Posted by: tcbevo at September 01, 2009 08:46 AM (/VEC5) 73
His theory is not proven, thus not guilty, of being an ass.
Posted by: hutch1200 at September 01, 2009 08:47 AM (lAiX2) 74
Will likely wants us to win, but he sure as hell has no clue how to do it.
I smell the stink of fear and over-thinking. He seems to be thinking like a baseball manager. He doesn't want to wear out his players in a 15 inning game against an unimportant team on the eve of a 4-game series against a major foe. He forgets this war is the 4-game series. Posted by: eman at September 01, 2009 08:49 AM (AKepb) 75
Cocksucker!
Posted by: Wu at September 01, 2009 08:52 AM (lAiX2) 76
Mmmmmm...more goodness -- William Jefferson files for personal chapter 7 bankruptcy...on Malkin.
Late start today...time to go make some $$$ for the man...(yes -- I am a sucker). Posted by: billygoat at September 01, 2009 08:53 AM (DrB2V) 77
Cut -N- Run makes me so horny that I want to rub my crotch up against George Wills's pant crease.
Posted by: The MEGALISCIOUS Meghan McCain at September 01, 2009 08:58 AM (VRZ7Z) 78
@55 Fire your blurb writer.
Posted by: tcbevo at September 01, 2009 08:58 AM (/VEC5) Posted by: The real Wu at September 01, 2009 09:03 AM (SwkdU) 80
If BO's just going to dick around in A'stan for appearance sake until enough American soldiers get killed that he can declare A'stan another "terrible mistake of my predecessor" then, of course, get out now.
If BO is serious about A'stan, will commit the necessary men and material and back them 100% then, of course, stay in. I know which way I'm betting BO will go. My problem with George Will is not that he's sometimes wrong, it's that he is exactly the old, effete, bow-tied Brilliantined stick-insect that the left likes in their pet conservatives. They love that for the TV viewing public he's the face of Conservatism. Posted by: The Commissar of Love at September 01, 2009 09:14 AM (ao5cQ) 81
I want to know what support the administration is giving to the troops in Afghanistan, and what the current rules of engagement are. That information has been hard to come by, although I have seen disquieting rumors and comments on several sites.
I have this silly theory that Obama never does anything GOOD for our nation, and is in fact trying to destroy it right in front of all of us. Given my theory, I ask if it is not more likely that he is arranging the Afghanistan situation in such a manner that withdrawal will be the only reasonable option, and that failure will be blamed on the military, rather than his own? I am a midwestern housewife, so am not well-versed in military matters, so all I can really do is ask what's going on over there. Maybe some of you guys know answers to my questions. If Obama has set things up so that it's impossible for our guys to succeed, then we need to know this. I don't want to wind up a year from now with lots of our guys dead, Afghanistan deteriorating, and Obama blaming it on the "limitations" of the military or the "flawed strategy" of Petraeus. Do I think Obama cynical enough to get American soldiers killed for his own political ends? You bet. Posted by: Miss Marple at September 01, 2009 09:17 AM (Vli7s) 82
Here's the full article.
http://tiny.cc/sMY3i It seems all he's saying is let's contain AQ on the Afghan/Pakistan border and forget this nation building shit over there. I'm beginning to think that might be our best option. Posted by: lowandslow at September 01, 2009 09:19 AM (GZitp) 83
I really don't believe Obama is looking for us to fail in A-stan though he may be looking for ways that provide cover for a fail. He knows its his war unlike Iraq because he accepted it as the good war in comparison. My concern is that he will purposedly ignore Iraq and let it deterioate so as to use that as cover. This will shift focus away from Afghanistan and allow him to blame Bush and repeat his meme that Iraq has always been a mistake and any stabilization was always going to be temporary.
Posted by: polynikes at September 01, 2009 09:45 AM (m2CN7) 84
George Will is the media's #1 pet conservative. Housebroken and harmless.
David Brooks is being groomed to replace him. Screw 'im. Posted by: tsj017 at September 01, 2009 09:59 AM (4YUWF) 85
The Russians are really hoping that we stay there a looooong time. The government in Kabul is as corrupt as the one we tried to keep up in Saigon. Afghanistan has NEVER had a central government that extended past the Kabul city limits. The Afghans do NOT want a central government.
Posted by: John ryan at September 01, 2009 10:26 AM (1ZaAe) 86
the grifter-in-chief doesn't give a shit abt. the military or winning wars against islam. he doesn't see a win in afgoneeston as a possibility.
he is a morale buster to the troops in the field. that is the story. my heart (and prayers) go out to our brave soldiers fighting around the world w/ this traitorous c.i.c. calling the shots. Posted by: nyc redneck at September 01, 2009 10:49 AM (xZw+6) 87
The government in Kabul is as corrupt as the one we tried to keep up in Saigon.
Which is to say, no worse than the government we keep up in Washington DC Posted by: Purple Avenger at September 01, 2009 11:00 AM (0pGdC) 88
The Soviet Union lost over 14500 in 10 years. We unfortunately have lost 813 in 8 years with a totally different result thus far. Any comparison with the Soviet Union is intellectually ignorant. Posted by: polynikes at September 01, 2009 11:11 AM (m2CN7) 89
I agree that GW is a bad messenger even if you agree with his message. why do all of the self appointed arbiters of conservatism have that same look. brooks, frum, will are all the same person. given our current Administration, getting out of Afghanistan might be a good idea. GW's column, however, isn't anything that couldn't be written by one of the America hating left.
Posted by: ed at September 01, 2009 11:11 AM (Urhve) 90
WTF is it with all these "real" conservatives and the homo-obsessed crap they trot out to argue about an article they clearly didn't read?
Fucking mobys. None of you geniuses answered the obvious question: how do you win when you don't fight to win, don't plan to win, and don't want to win? That's what we have in this Administration. Posted by: K~Bob at September 01, 2009 02:08 PM (WtrwW) 91
k-bob has it right. Will displays no strategic intelligence but does anyone think that the Administration currently directing the war effort is any brighter? more committed to victory? I would think it clear the answer is no and, with that the case, GW's rather stupid suggestion of lobbing missiles from offshore may beat the alternative. I read on another site that Holder had an inkling of the British plan to release the Lockerbie bomber in June and, of course, did nothing. Anyone still think these folks have any credibility on the issues of the War on Terror?
Posted by: ed at September 01, 2009 02:59 PM (Urhve) 92
So let's see, K-bob: the administration has no will to win, so we should advocate agreeing with it.
Brilliant. Posted by: HiHo at September 01, 2009 05:11 PM (5V/kc) 93
no, but if it has no will to win and isn't going to even try, I don't think the sacrifice of our soldiers is worth it. do we have to agree-no, and we can argue for strategies that could win and be successful. that's what Bush ultimately did with Iraq, no matter what one might think of him. one could even argue for the strategic reason that forces should stay because of Pahkeeestahn. I don't see it from this Administration and this Commander in Chief. George Will may be right but it is for the wrong reasons and it would be insenstive to note the real reason, Obama's weakness as a leader.
Posted by: ed at September 01, 2009 05:50 PM (Urhve) 94
92
So let's see, K-bob: the administration has no will to win, so we should advocate agreeing with it.
Brilliant. Posted by: HiHo at September 01, 2009 05:11 PM You can agree with them if you want. Good luck with that. Posted by: K~Bob at September 01, 2009 08:23 PM (WtrwW) 95
"I read on another site that Holder had an inkling of the British plan
to release the Lockerbie bomber in June and, of course, did nothing.
Anyone still think these folks have any credibility on the issues of
the War on Terror?"
Or even the national defense. We'll be lucky to have DC still standing in three more years. Posted by: K~Bob at September 01, 2009 08:26 PM (WtrwW) Posted by: steve frytz at September 01, 2009 10:11 PM (4o9At) 97
Age of Conan CD Key
Posted by: jason at September 01, 2009 10:12 PM (HuqRf) 98
93 ed: I'd say that before throwing in the towel because Obama's a wipe, you try to change his about who is giving him good advice and who is not: you don't just agree with the bad advice. If Obama figures out that losing in Afghanistan is a bad thing for his electoral chances and his legacy, he'll try to win.
This ain't tricky stuff. Posted by: HiHo at September 01, 2009 10:14 PM (jzUCx) 99
If I said omega watch, what do you think about ? Maybe someone can think rolex watches, ,yes.someone ask :"why ?",i told you
replica watches, online oral traditions very good ,you can to see,if you feel it good ,you can buy omega watch .The good thing shares to everybody together . Posted by: omega watch at September 01, 2009 11:17 PM (a/qJV) 100
Ysterday i bought a rolex watches to my father,he was very like it He asked me hou can there be so much money to buy so expensive watch ,I told he ,this is a replica watches but it's better than a real rolex watches and omega watches bad and it is also very durable and beautiful
but the price it's a lot cheaper. Posted by: omega watches at September 03, 2009 12:02 AM (L3m3L) 101
DO you want to buyrolex watches and omega watches ?However, too high prices .Do not worry please See here, here, there are many types of power you select the table and cheap,we will offer you ,beacouse it is replica watches .Do you want to buy ?
Posted by: omega watches at September 03, 2009 12:51 AM (L3m3L) 102
At this time ,if you have a little tired,you might to look at omega watch, replica watches.,it will bring in visual to rolex watches you the impact.because, noble + fashion¡Ù high price .With Chinese said£º It is worthy of the money.
Posted by: omega at September 03, 2009 01:11 AM (L3m3L) 103
There is a replica of almost any brand of Girard-Perregaux Replica Watches. Fake Watch The most Replica Designer Handbags replicas made are of Rolex wathces, but other brands Watches replica are IWC Watches also available. Like: Omega, replica Tag Hauer, Patek,replica Cartier, Franck Muller, replica Breitling, Corum, Omega Watch Tissot,replica Seiko, Audemars, Piguet, Replica Raymond,Philippe, Blvgari, Gucci, Replica Watches Fake Louis Vuitton Jaeger, IWC, IWC, Rado, Longines, Movado, Cartier, Chopard, Jewelry Wholesale Michhel, Oris, Citizen, and replica rolex many more. However, since these replicas are not Corum Replica Watch as nearly in demand as Replica Watch Shopping Rolex Replicas are, Movado Replica Watches they are Replica Mens Watches much harder to Fake \Watch look.replica Panerai Posted by: replica omega watches at September 03, 2009 11:14 AM (ktoia) 104
ÇÈÊÓÇãÇÊ ÌÏíÏå ááãÓäÌÑ ÈÑÇãÌ - ÔÑÍ ÈÑäÇãÌ - ÊÍãíá ÈÑäÇãÌ - ãÔÇßá ßãÈíæÊÑ ÃÒíÇÁ - ÝÓÇÊíä - ãæÖå - ÇßÓÓæÇÑÇÊ, ÌáÇÈíÇÊ - ÕæÑ ÌáÇÈíÇÊ - ãæÖÉ ÇáÌáÇÈíÇÊ - ÌáÇÈíÇÊ 2009 - ÇáÌáÇÈíÇÊ - ÇÒíÇÁ ÇáÌáÇÈíÇÊ, ÇÍÐíÉ äÓÇÆíÉ 2009 ÌÏíÏÉ ÕæÑ ÔäØ ãÇÑßÇÊ 2009 ÔäØ ááÓåÑÉ ÇáÇÍÐíÉ ÇáäÓÇÆíÉ, ãßíÇÌ 2009 -ãßíÇÌ ÇáÚíæä - ÕæÑ ãßíÇÌ, ÚØæÑÇÊ 2009 -ÕæÑ ÚØæÑÇÊ- ÌÏíÏ ÇáÚØæÑÇÊ- ãÇÑßÇÊ ÚÇáãíÉ
ÍáæíÇÊ ÇáÚíÏ ÈÇáÕæÑ-ØÑíÞÉ Úãá ÍáæíÇÊ ÇáÚíÏ ÇááÈäÇäíå -ÍáæíÇÊ ÇáÚíÏ 2009 ãÚãæá ÇáÚíÏ ÈÇáÕæÑ-ßÚß ÇáÚíÏ-ØÑíÞÉ Úãá ÇáãÚãæá ÈÇáÕæÑ ÝÑÔ ãÖíÆå ááÊÕãíã- ÝÑÔ ÅÖÇÆÇÊ ááÊÕãíã ÝÑÔ ÇáÚíÏ ááÊÕãíã- ÝÑÔ ÇáÚíÏ 2009- ãÎØæØÇÊ ááÚíÏ þ ÝÑÔ ÇáÚÇÈ äÇÑíå-ÝÑÔ ÇáÚÇÈ äÇÑíå ááÊÕãíã-fireworks brushes þ ÕæÑ ãÇÓäÌÑ áÜ ÕÞÑ æäÓãå \\ãÓáÓá Çã ÇáÈäÇÊ ÕæÑ ãÇÓäÌÑ ÞáæÈ-ÕæÑ ÞáæÈ ááãÇÓäÌÑ2009 ÕæÑ ããËáÇÊ ááãÓä-ÕæÑ ÈÇáÇÈíÖ æÇáÇÓæÏ ááãÇÓäÌÑ ÊæÈíßÇÊ ÚíÏ ÇáÝØÑ-ÊæÈíßÇÊ ÚíÏ ÇáÝØÑ2009-ÊæÈíßÇÊ ÇáÚíÏ ÊæÈíßÇÊ ááãÇÓäÌÑ ÈÃáæÇä ÈäÇÊíÉ .. æÓÇÆØ ÕæÊíå ÊåäÆå ÈÇáÚíÏ-æÓÇÆØ ÕæÊíå ááÚíÏ-ãÞÇØÚ ÕæÊ áÚíÏ ÇáÝØÑ þ æÓÇÆØ ÚíÏ ÇáÝØÑ2009-æÓÇÆØ ÊåäÆå ÈÇáÚíÏ-æÓÇÆØ ÇáÚíÏ ãÎØæØÇÊ ÇáÚíÏ2009-ãÎØæØÇÊ æÕæÑ ÇáÚíÏ-ÕæÑ æãÎØæØÇÊ ÚíÏ ÇáÝØÑ þ ÕæÑ ÈäÇÊ ÏáÚ ááÊÕãíã-ÕæÑ ÏáæÚÇÊ ááÊÕãíã2009-ÕæÑ ÏáæÚÇÊ ÇßÔä ÊÝÑíÛ ÇáÇÔßÇá-ÇßÔä ÇÒÇáå ÇáÎáÝíÇÊ ÇáÈíÖÇÁ þ Posted by: moon at September 07, 2009 12:46 AM (vAPSw) Posted by: tiffany jewelry at September 10, 2009 06:21 AM (Zd+nD) 106
DVD to MP4 Converter DVD to iPod Converter DVD Ripper Diablo 2 CD Key Diablo 2 CD Keys DVD Audio Ripper NFL Jerseys Nike Sneakers hot sneakers new styles CHI Flat Irons Nike Air Yeezy Kanye West Shoes nike zone
Posted by: jju at September 10, 2009 09:52 AM (U+b5M) 107
luxury watches reviewrolex watches reviewreplica watches reviewdesigner handbagsmiu miu handbagshermes handbagsreplica handbagsfake handbagsreplica bagsreplica handbagreplica designer handbagsdesigner handbagsknockoff handbagswholesale replica handbagshandbag replicacheap handbagreplica handbagsLV Handbagsreplica Prada handbagsLouis Vuitton handbagsReplica Louis VuittonLouis Vuitton Replicagucci HandbagsReplica gucci Handbagsgucci replica handbagsreplica guccigucci replicareplica LV handbagsLV replica handbagsPrada replica handbags
Posted by: replica handbags at September 11, 2009 03:30 AM (B6+vy) Posted by: nike sb at September 11, 2009 04:39 AM (7NhAP) 109
thank you for post..! thank you read your article makes me very happy and I wish success really very beautiful sohbet - rozet - isimlik - plaket - pano - yaka isimliði - yaka isimligi - çelenk - celenk - tabela - etiket - Forum - komik resimler - blog - blog - sohbetci - sohbetci - muhabbet - muhabbet net - muhabbet.net - slayt - slayt izle - slayt indir - forum fun - forumfun - forum - chat sohbet - sohbet - þiir - þiirler - aþk þiirleri - ask siirleri - þiir forum - aþk forum - ask forum - ask forumu - aþk forumu - siir - siirler - gurbet - gözde fm - chat - aþk - ask - sohbet - mirc - mirç - mirc indir - mirc download - mirc yukle - mirc yükle - türkçe mirc - turkce mirc - türkçe mirc - sevgi - sünger bop - sunger bob cizgi film - sünger bob izle - sünger bob - sünger bob oyunlarý - cenin - cenin nedir - msn indir - msn nickleri - msn nick - msn yükle - msn download - ayrýlýk - ayrilik - sohbet odalari - sohbet odalarý - mevlana sözleri - mevlananýn sözleri - mevlana sozleri - mevlananin sozleri - güzel sözler - guzel sozler - karikatür - karikatürler - karikaturler - resimli þiir - resimli siir -
resimli siirler - resimli þiirler - Posted by: muhabbet at September 11, 2009 10:37 PM (Q80QV) 110
cheap glasses
reading glasses cheap glasses discount glasses progressive lenses glasses prescription glasses glasses frames cheap glasses bifocal glasses prescription sunglasses cheap eyeglasses discount eyeglasses progressive glasses eyeglasses cheap glasses prescription eyeglasses 干燥剂 电加热器 电加热器 分子筛 干燥剂 medical companies Posted by: glasses at September 15, 2009 01:02 AM (Spbvu) 111
DVD to MP4 Converter DVD to iPod Converter DVD to iPod Converter for Mac DVD Ripper Diablo 2 CD Key Diablo 2 CD Keys Free DVD Ripper DVD Audio Ripper NFL Jerseys Nike Sneakers Kanye West Shoes Nike Air Yeezy CHI Flat Irons Sneakers Supra Shoes Supra Footwear
Posted by: ninja at September 17, 2009 02:29 PM (7+M+d) 112
president seems everywhere omega watches not fully focused on the
matters at hand. He's trying to keep up with the news cycle with replica watches to say. "I am angry" about omega watches sale has an economic program. But there is, so far, no clear statemen Posted by: watches at September 21, 2009 03:11 AM (dcWZu) 113
www.replicaseller.com As a professional replica watch dealer we are 100% committed to your satisfaction.
Posted by: replica watches at September 21, 2009 04:11 AM (XqWwc) 114
president seems everywhere omega replica watches
not fully focused on the matters at hand. He's trying to keep up with
the news cycle with replica watches to say. "I am angry" about
replica omega watches has an economic program. But there is, so far, no clear statement
Posted by: watches at September 22, 2009 12:42 AM (qPak8) 115
Slight unpremeditated Words are borne australian uggBy every common
Wind into the Air;ugg classic
tall,Carelessly utter'd, die as soon as born£¬uggsAnd in one instant give
both Hope and Fear£ºreplica rolex
watchBreathing all Contraries with the same Windrolex replica
According to the Caprice of the Mind.tiffany jeweley But Billetdoux are constant Witnesses£¬tiffany jeweleySubstantial Records to Eternity;fashion jewelryJust Evidenceswho the Truth confess, bags onlineOn which the Lover safely may rely£»laptop bagsThey're serious Thoughts£¬digested and resolv'd£» Posted by: iolanda at September 28, 2009 03:31 AM (S6BOV) 116
Some people like LV handbags,Some people like Chanel handbags,but most popel have been keeping an eye on cheap fashion brand handbags .we often talk about all kinds of designer handbags with my friends,most of my friends also like cheap fashion brand handbags.We admire cheap fashion brand handbags designer who often be able to design so many stylish handbags.We want to be a handbag’s designer in the future too. In our store online,you can buy all series of cheap fashion brand handbags,include: Louis Vuitton,LV Luggage,LV Wallets,LV Agendas,LV Belts,LV Shoes,LV Accessories,Gucci,Gucci Wallets,Gucci Shoes,Marc Jacobs handbags,Marni handbags,Miu Miu handbags,Mulberry handbags,Prada handbags,Thomaswylde handbags,TOD handbags,Bottega Veneta handbags,D&G handbags,Dior handbags,YSL handbags,Coach handbags Posted by: steve at October 13, 2009 11:27 PM (JsRNY) 117
UGG Boots Sale
ugg shoes ugg classic cheap ugg UGG UK bape shoes bape shoes sale cheap bape shoes UGG UK UGG boots sale UGG Classic discount UGG UGG Bailey Button UGG Amelie Suede UGG Bailey Button UGG Classic Cardy cheap UGG Cardy UGG Classic Crochet UGG Classic Mini UGG Classic Short UGG Classic Tall UGG Coquette Casual UGG Gypsy Sandal UGG Halendi Sandal UGG Hammond Slipper UGG Infant's Erin Baby UGG KnightsBridge UGG Layback Slipper UGG Lo Pro Button UGG Matala Sandal UGG Napoule Sandal UGG New Arrival 5389 UGG New Short Boots Posted by: retailike at October 17, 2009 11:58 AM (zFgZJ) 118
High Replica Handbags | Replica Louis Vuitton Handbags | replica fashion Handbags| fendi handbags| designer handbags replica| replica Chanel Handbags| designer replica handbag| replica purses| Replica Louis Vuitton Luggage| Hermes Birkin Handbags| Replica Gucci handbags Louis Vuitton,LV Luggage,LV Wallets,LV Agendas,LV Belts,LV Shoes,LV Accessories,Gucci,Gucci Wallets,Gucci Shoes,Marc Jacobs handbags,Marni handbags,Miu Miu handbags,Mulberry handbags,Prada handbags,Thomaswylde handbags,TOD handbags,Bottega Veneta handbags,D&G handbags,Dior handbags,YSL handbags,Coach handbagsLouis Vuitton LV Luggage LV Wallet Chanel Gucci Alexander Wang Fendi Balenciaga Chloe Marc Jacobs Miu Miu Mulberry Jimmy Choo Hermes Loewe Coach Cartier Valentino Bottega Veneta Burberry Dior Prada Marni YSL Versace Dolce&Gabbana Goyard Givenchy Thomas Wylde Luggage Shoes Collection Belts Collection Bracelets Louis Vuitton :: Gucci Handbags :: Chanel Handbags :: Hermes Birkin :: Posted by: replica handbags at October 25, 2009 02:59 AM (rHSDC) 119
Discount Boots
Womens UGG UGG Shoes UGG Australia UGG UK UGG USA discount ugg boots cheap ugg boots Posted by: fdsfds at October 27, 2009 11:13 AM (8kvkz) 120
discountugg boots sale
ugg shoes tall ugg boots ugg classic boots nike shox air jordan shoes nike air max nike air force one bailey button ugg rainier ugg boots ugg classic cardy ugg crochet boots ugg mini ugg classic short classic tall ugg ugg coquette ugg baby boots ugg knightsbridge ugg lo pro new ugg boots ugg short boots ugg nightfall boots ugg skimmer ugg sundance boots ultra short ugg ugg ultra tall discount ugg slippers ugg sandals ugg halendi ugg slippers ugg layback ugg matala sandal ugg napoule sandal ugg persephone tasmina ugg air force 1 shoes jordan air shoes nike shox shoes air max nike free shipping! Posted by: ugg boots at October 27, 2009 02:23 PM (pgfU2) 121
Your post very good,thanks for sharing!Are you also like these:ugg boots uk,buy ugg boots,australia ugg,cheap ugg boots,ugg boots,ugg boots sheepskin,womens ugg boots,ugg australia boots,cheap ugg boots
Posted by: australia ugg at October 27, 2009 04:16 PM (c6EK2) 122
laser engraver laser engraving machine laser cutter laser cutting machine vinyl cutter cutting plotter cnc router laser engraving laser cutter desktop laser engraver vinyl cutter laser cutting laser engraving machine laser cutting machine cutting plotter Posted by: minirouter at October 29, 2009 05:30 AM (lm3tw) 123
buy Discount Boots
Womens UGG UGG Shoes UGG Australia UGG UK UGG USA discount ugg boots cheap ugg boots air force 1 shoes nike air force air force 1 mens air force 1 boots air force onefrom usa Posted by: airforceoneshop at November 03, 2009 03:43 PM (LHCCE) 124
Come to our website for shopping with high quality and best service! There have new products,MBT M. Walk
and MBT Lami,Welcome everybody to buy it. Posted by: mbt shoes at November 08, 2009 09:56 AM (QhfLM) 125
cheap ugg
buy ugg ugg usa ugg boots ugg uk ugg australia ugg shoes ugg sale womens ugg boots discount ugg boots cheap ugg boots ugg shoes sale ugg boots sale ugg sundance ugg 5819 ugg 5815 ugg knightsbridge ugg 5825 ugg rainier Posted by: ugg at November 11, 2009 02:02 AM (ly6Oi) 126
Buy discount ugg shoes
cheap ugg shoes cheap ugg ugg rainier buy ugg ugg usa discount ugg boots ugg 5825 ugg shoes sale ugg sundance ugg shoes cheap ugg boots ugg 5815 ugg sale ugg uk ugg knightsbridge womens ugg boots ugg boots ugg australia ugg 5819free shipping Posted by: ugg boots at November 12, 2009 03:20 AM (IeIJx) 127
Hi! KaDNKym
Posted by: FYPYiuH at November 12, 2009 05:58 PM (K/kdc) 128
nike dunk sb
Do anything needed to support an idea, a good idea usually brings good results, doing business is like that.http://www.dunksky.com/.This site has always been on Posted by: nike dunk sb at November 14, 2009 02:23 AM (APB+g) Posted by: mbtshoesbuy at November 23, 2009 04:31 AM (bNNim) 130
The proper function of man is to live, but not to exist.ugg classic cardyConquer fear of death and you are put into possession of your life. ugg classic tallThere is a time to speak and a time to be silent. ugg knightsbridgefree shippingmbt cheap
mbt sale mbt uk mbt shoes cheap MBT M.Walk Posted by: reviewups at November 27, 2009 03:23 AM (xUZwC) 131
hot news for brand shoes online store ,do you want to win more discount ?and popular for younger,and nike air maxwith top quality A ,come on all air max shoes with lowest price for highest quality !
Posted by: nike air max at December 01, 2009 09:25 PM (OKj2x) 132
The cheap ugg boots sale for women are stylish, they are comfortable and what¡¯s more, they keep your feet. theres a pair of fellow sufferers,ugg australia uk to complement your personal preferences, why do we not take the traditional high discount ugg boots on salefor cold winter?
As a matter of fact, with the passing time, the love for ugg usa is increasing among girls in this modern world. The growing demand for these womens ugg made the manufacturers UGG Boots Sale to revamp the looks of these boots with different hues.come our website and buy a pair of ugg uk.UGG Classic Cardy are popular as shoes for cowboys. The SHOES close the whole parts of the foot. The ugg cardy are important to protect your feet from any dangerous things during your walking activities. There are many oatmeal ugg available in the Market and if you are interested to get one you can directly go to the store that sells it. Posted by: reviewups at December 03, 2009 07:41 AM (OKj2x) 133
<a href="http://lez.gen.tr" title="lez" target="_blank">lez</a>
<a href="http://lez.gen.tr" title="lez sohbet" target="_blank">lez sohbet</a> <a href="http://lez.gen.tr" title="lezbiyen" target="_blank">lezbiyen</a> <a href="http://gaylez.org" title="gay sohbet" target="_blank">gay Sohbet</a> <a href="http://gaylez.org" title="gay chat" target="_blank">gay chat</a> <a href="http://gaylez.org" title="gay" target="_blank">gay</a> Posted by: gay sohbet at December 05, 2009 10:26 AM (/Ygky) 134
discount ugg boots
ugg boots outlet cheap ugg outlet cheap ugg boots ugg classic tall ugg bailey button ugg rainier ugg classic cardy ugg classic crochet ugg classic mini ugg classic short ugg classic tall ugg nightfall ugg sundance ugg ultra short ugg ultra tall ugg boots 5389 Posted by: uggboots at December 07, 2009 09:52 AM (Cooh2) 135
Today ugg boots online have become a phenomenon.Every winter,the ugg classic crochet are one of the hottest goods in the market all over the world.So now don't be hesitation,own a pair of ugg usa immediately.
Posted by: ugg boots sale at December 09, 2009 06:37 PM (I3/dZ) 136
We supply authentic discount Lacoste Shoes
Lacoste Trainers New Lacoste Lacoste Sale Mens Lacoste camden lacoste trainers lacoste trainers shoes lacoste camden retro camden lacoste trainers lacoste carnaby shoes lacoste carnaby retro lacoste shoes sale New Lacoste shoes Lacoste shoes online cheap Lacoste shoes Lacoste shoe mens lacoste shoes Lacoste Shua Lace Black Lace shoes white Lace shoes lacoste swerve shoes White Lacoste shoes Lacoste shoes sale Cheap Lacoste shoes Lacoste Women Shoes Women Lacoste Shoes Lacoste Shoes online on line, cheap price,Top quality,Free shipping! Posted by: Lacoste shoes at December 12, 2009 08:34 PM (/3s/N) 137
The womens mbt Tembea is a new generation lace-up with Dual Board construction and a striking style that pays tribute to the classic sneaker. It packs in all the mbt lami shoes benefits with a fresh look and feel, striking the perfect balance between health benefits ... The discount mbt Shuguli GTX is a is a sleek and stylish professional shoe ideal for work and more formal occasions whilst delivering full waterproofing from GORE-TEX. These are especially effective for those who have to stand or walk for long periods of time ...
The mbt shoes Fanaka GTX is a sporty but rugged styled shoe that combines fashionable, casual design with all the health benefits associated with the sporting style discount mbt shoes. These are especially effective for ladies who have to stand or walk for long periods ... The black mbt Bia is a classic, professional shoe ideal for work and more formal occasions whilst delivering all the health benefits from MBT design. These are especially effective for ladies who have to stand or walk for long periods of time during work ... Posted by: gfdg at December 14, 2009 07:02 PM (iV/dV) 138
Plating Cufflink Cheap | Stone Pendants Wholesale | Carbon Fiber Pendant | Wholesal Cutting Earring | Business Cards Cheap | Earrings Yiwu | Cutting Bracelet Cheap | Stamping Necklaces Luxury | Stainless Steel Necklace | Money Clip | Wholesale Cutting Rings Jewelry | Wood Cufflink Yiwu | Fashion bracelets Yiwu | Cutting Bracelets Wholesale | Tiffanys Luxury | Wholesal Carbon Fiber Cufflink | Plating Bracelet Wholesale | Small Necklace | Business Card Holder Best | Casting Bracelets Fashion
Posted by: wholesale jewelry at December 16, 2009 07:47 PM (1dySH) 139
Watches Maurice Lacroix Fashion | Christian Dior Replica Watches | Jacob & Co Replica Watches | Watches Zenith Fashion | Christian Dior Fake Watches | Watches Omega Fashion | Patek Philippe Replica Watches | Cartier Fake Watches | Hublot Fake Watches | Alain Silberstein Replica Watches | Watches Roger Dubuis Fashion | Watches Breitling Fashion | Watches Cartier Fashion | Baume & Mercier Replica Watches | Watches Roger Dubuis Fashion | Replica Bvlgari Watches | Ulysse Nardin Fake Watches | Bulova Replica Watches | Replica Louis Vuitton Watches | Replica Concord Watches
Posted by: wholesale jewelry at December 19, 2009 10:59 PM (1dySH) 140
nike max
air max shoes nike air max nike max shoes air max 1 nike air max 1 air max 2 nike air max 2 air max 89 nike air max 89 air max 90 nike air max 90 air max 91 nike air max 91 air max 95 nike air max 95 air max 97 nike air max 97 air max 180 nike air max 180 air max 360 nike air max 360 air max 2003 nike air max 2003 air max 2009 nike air max 2009 air max ltd nike air max ltd air max tn nike air max tn Posted by: nikemax at December 20, 2009 05:05 AM (g3/iU) 141
Corum Fake Handbags | Best Hublot bags | Replica Raymond Handbags | Luxury Louis vuitton Belt handbags | Replica Technomarine Handbags | U-Boat Replica bags | Replica Roger Dubuis Handbags | Luxury Louis vuitton Belt handbags | Replica Rolex Handbags | Replica Raymond Handbags | Audemars Piguet Fake Handbags | Replica Fashion Panerai handbags | Replica Breitling Handbags | Luxury Maurice Lacroix handbags | Oris Fake Handbags | Luxury Corum handbags | Replica Fashion Swiss Army handbags | Bedat & CO Fake Handbags | Replica Piaget Handbags | Luxury A Lange & Sohne handbags | Best Emporio Armani bags | Best TAG Heuer bags | Luxury Breitling handbags | Rolex Replica bags | Best Franck Muller bags
Posted by: wholesale jewelry at December 28, 2009 07:37 AM (1dySH) 142
UGG cardy
Ugg Australia Ugg Shoes Sale Bailey Button ugg boots Ugg classic cardy UGG cardy Ugg Australia Ugg Shoes Sale Bailey Button ugg boots Posted by: ugg shoes|timberland uk|ugg boots|87415555.com.cn at January 06, 2010 04:30 PM (qzq48) 143
nike max
air max shoes nike air max nike max shoes air max 1 nike air max 1 air max 2 nike air max 2 air max 89 nike air max 89 air max 90 nike air max 90 air max 91 nike air max 91 air max 95 nike air max 95 air max 97 nike air max 97 air max 180 nike air max 180 air max 360 nike air max 360 air max 2003 nike air max 2003 air max 2009 nike air max 2009 air max ltd nike air max ltd air max tn nike air max tn air max tailwind nike air max tailwind womens air max 1 womens air max 90 womens air max 95 womens air max BW womens air max LTD womens air max TN womens air max 360 womens air max 2003 womens air max 2007 womens air max 2009 Posted by: airmax at January 31, 2010 02:31 PM (3vSvS) 144
Certainly watches are Replica Watches used to help people record rolex Watches time, but rolex watches nowadays its functions have enlarged. Replica watches are now tag heuer Watches not only objects that tag heuer watches can tell you what time it is, they are also a status symbol. You should not feel strange when you find someone wearing a watch on his wrist, but use the cell phone to tell time. In that situation, the watch is just showing its luxurious function cartier watches. It is normal and cartier watches perhaps also happens to you. .If asked that among the watches of various brands, which one can suit your taste? There is no doubt that most people will choose Rolex. Whichever social class you are in, it is naturally Rolex was known breitling Watches and cherished breitling watches for a long time. However, the elements do not usually enter the market alone, always come with the price tag up to the hand. For this reason, many people, especially men, their dreams of luxury Rolex watches are buried in omega Watches his heart omega watches. What should I do? Rolex watches are simply stunning worn by the rich and famous, right? No, this world is not the world's richest men, is the world of each. All are equal before the search of luxury and be men's watches respected. Within men's watches, the law, when consumers are in the market, women's watches they should women's watches receive the same treatment. This is the real reason why replica Rolex watches are ladies watches ladies watches more welcome than Rolex. Because in this world are not difficult to understand that the rich are much less than people with low income, you agree with me? You are forced to nod and say with certainty that is the reality. These low-income people do not have enough money to save every month. They can not afford such luxury Rolex watches
Posted by: replica watches at February 03, 2010 10:15 PM (YOuVm) 145
nike max
air max shoes nike air max nike max shoes air max 1 nike air max 1 air max 2 nike air max 2 air max 89 nike air max 89 air max 90 nike air max 90 air max 91 nike air max 91 air max 95 nike air max 95 air max 97 nike air max 97 air max 180 nike air max 180 air max 360 nike air max 360 air max 2003 nike air max 2003 air max 2009 nike air max 2009 Posted by: may at February 06, 2010 05:31 PM (Eu9Vs) 146
Factors Replica Watches About The Rolex replica watches Oyster The Oyster is so closely get in touch with Rolex, and it is inevitably that some people think these are the only Replica watches Rolex manufacture. Others suppose that there is a single Oyster watch. But as a matter of fact, the name Oyster does not actually meant for a rolex Watches particular watch you can buy rolex watches or even to a series but to a type of case that available in some of the Rolex ranges. History The Oyster case was first released in 1926. The objective was to protect the workings of the watch from dust and moisture. Early watches were far from waterproof. The Oyster tag heuer Watchescase was an tag heuer watches innovative design to eliminate these problems. It had a new double locking crown that screwed into place. It has been compared to the hatch on a submarine. Like a submarine, the Oyster case was waterproof. In 1927 Mercedes Gleitze swam the English breitling Watches Channel breitling watches . Before she set off she was presented with a Rolex Oyster. When she arrived, the watch was still working perfectly. The resulting publicity gave the new case a massive boost. Why is it called Oyster? Legend has it that Hans cartier Watches Wilsdorf cartier watches, who invented the Oyster, chose the name because the new case reminded him of the difficulty he had experienced prising open oysters at dinner. Since then the Oyster has further, particularly advanced. Many Oyster watches today are omega Watches perpetual-self-winding, in other omega watches words, it does not require to expose the mechanism to the outside world in order to wind it. The Osyter Perpetual is one of the toughest, most durable, most reliable watches (under truly adverse conditions). It is probably the best mechanical watch money can buy.
Posted by: replica watches at February 07, 2010 09:44 AM (TUJDt) 147
Watches really Replica Watches are a great fashion replica item. This is because watch manufacturers such as Emporio Armani understand their customers wants and needs and rolex Watches know that rolex watches there is a big market for tag heuer Watches fashion tag heuer watches and designer movado watches in the UK. The number of people that demand these fashion watches has grown enormously over the past few years as people all want to have their own unique personality. Buying a watch can be a breitling watches long breitling Watches process. This is because there are so many watches to choose from that people cartier watches can spend a whole lot of time making their decision. One brand that is always popular is Emporio Armani. This is because Emporio Armani are one of the best fashion brands in the UK and they therefore offer customers some of the best fashion omega Watches available watches on omega the market. There are millions mens Watches of watches for a customer to choose when it comes to a watch. It's quite easy to make the right watch purchase decision. Or you just need to know what famous watch brands are and you may find what you like at once. Emporio Armani watches have been very popular for many mens Watches years.Women's watches Emporio Armani is a brand for style sense and mens Watches fashion which it shows in his range of fashion watches. No matter what watch brand you choose, it can be sure that the watch you are going to wear would show some of your personality.
Posted by: replica watches at February 09, 2010 08:23 AM (fa8ya) Processing 0.1, elapsed 0.1075 seconds. |
MuNuvians
MeeNuvians
Polls! Polls! Polls!
Dale's ECB Election Projection Federal Review Real Clear Politics Rasmussen Reports Gallup Zogby FoxNews Polls Sabato/Crystal Ball Frequently Asked Questions
The (Almost) Complete Paul Anka Integrity Kick
Primary Document: The Audio
Paul Anka Haiku Contest Announcement Integrity SAT's: Entrance Exam for Paul Anka's Band AllahPundit's Paul Anka 45's Collection AnkaPundit: Paul Anka Takes Over the Site for a Weekend (Continues through to Monday's postings) George Bush Slices Don Rumsfeld Like an F*ckin' Hammer Top Top Tens
Democratic Forays into Erotica New Shows On Gore's DNC/MTV Network Nicknames for Potatoes, By People Who Really Hate Potatoes Star Wars Euphemisms for Self-Abuse Signs You're at an Iraqi "Wedding Party" Signs Your Clown Has Gone Bad Signs That You, Geroge Michael, Should Probably Just Give It Up Signs of Hip-Hop Influence on John Kerry NYT Headlines Spinning Bush's Jobs Boom Things People Are More Likely to Say Than "Did You Hear What Al Franken Said Yesterday?" Signs that Paul Krugman Has Lost His Frickin' Mind All-Time Best NBA Players, According to Senator Robert Byrd Other Bad Things About the Jews, According to the Koran Signs That David Letterman Just Doesn't Care Anymore Examples of Bob Kerrey's Insufferable Racial Jackassery Signs Andy Rooney Is Going Senile Other Judgments Dick Clarke Made About Condi Rice Based on Her Appearance Collective Names for Groups of People John Kerry's Other Vietnam Super-Pets Cool Things About the XM8 Assault Rifle Media-Approved Facts About the Democrat Spy Changes to Make Christianity More "Inclusive" Secret John Kerry Senatorial Accomplishments John Edwards Campaign Excuses John Kerry Pick-Up Lines Changes Liberal Senator George Michell Will Make at Disney Torments in Dog-Hell Greatest Hitjobs
The Ace of Spades HQ Sex-for-Money Skankathon A D&D Guide to the Democratic Candidates Margaret Cho: Just Not Funny More Margaret Cho Abuse Margaret Cho: Still Not Funny Iraqi Prisoner Claims He Was Raped... By Woman Wonkette Announces "Morning Zoo" Format John Kerry's "Plan" Causes Surrender of Moqtada al-Sadr's Militia World Muslim Leaders Apologize for Nick Berg's Beheading Michael Moore Goes on Lunchtime Manhattan Death-Spree Milestone: Oliver Willis Posts 400th "Fake News Article" Referencing Britney Spears Liberal Economists Rue a "New Decade of Greed" Artificial Insouciance: Maureen Dowd's Word Processor Revolts Against Her Numbing Imbecility Intelligence Officials Eye Blogs for Tips They Done Found Us Out, Cletus: Intrepid Internet Detective Figures Out Our Master Plan Shock: Josh Marshall Almost Mentions Sarin Discovery in Iraq Leather-Clad Biker Freaks Terrorize Australian Town When Clinton Was President, Torture Was Cool What Wonkette Means When She Explains What Tina Brown Means Wonkette's Stand-Up Act Wankette HQ Gay-Rumors Du Jour Here's What's Bugging Me: Goose and Slider My Own Micah Wright Style Confession of Dishonesty Outraged "Conservatives" React to the FMA An On-Line Impression of Dennis Miller Having Sex with a Kodiak Bear The Story the Rightwing Media Refuses to Report! Our Lunch with David "Glengarry Glen Ross" Mamet The House of Love: Paul Krugman A Michael Moore Mystery (TM) The Dowd-O-Matic! Liberal Consistency and Other Myths Kepler's Laws of Liberal Media Bias John Kerry-- The Splunge! Candidate "Divisive" Politics & "Attacks on Patriotism" (very long) The Donkey ("The Raven" parody) News/Chat
|