Support




Contact
Powered by
Movable Type

Senator Voinovich Laments Southernors in GOP

Don't let the door hit you in the ass on the way out:

"We got too many Jim DeMints and Tom Coburns," Sen. George Voinovich (R-Ohio) told the Columbus Dispatch. "It's the southerners."

Voinovich, a native Clevelander who retires after the 2010 election, continued after the southern elements of the GOP.

"They get on TV and go 'errrr, errrrr,'" he said. "People hear them and say, 'These people, they're southerners. The party's being taken over by southerners. What they hell they got to do with Ohio?'"

Since when did Republicans care where you were from as long as you were for lower taxes and limited national government, standing up for all ten parts of the Bill of Rights, free markets, and a sane foreign policy? What the hell is wrong with this guy?

Click over to read John's entire reply with video of Voinovich crying over his opposition to sending John Bolton to the UN.

(Although, John is wrong about whether Oklahoma is a southern state. True, it's at the crossroads between the South-proper, the Midwest, and the Southwest but Oklahoma has much more in common with southern states like Texas, Louisiana, and Arkansas than it does midwestern states like Missouri, Illinois, Kansas, and Iowa.)

And let's be honest. The problem with the GOP certainly isn't too many DeMints and Coburns. Not. One. Bit. Squishy, weepy Voinovich, though...he won't be missed.

More [DrewM.]: Below the fold, Voinovich demonstrates what he thinks 'real' Republicans should do when they get on TV...cry like an 8 year old who was just told they have to go to bed early.

Posted by: Gabriel Malor at 09:38 AM



Comments

1 Senator Voinovich, sir....

Come down here and say that to me.

Otherwise, have a nice, tall glass of STFU.

Posted by: Well Hung Chad at July 28, 2009 09:41 AM (d+kiR)

2

Ohio. I've seen Ohio.

Corn fever. It's like cave madness. A particular neurosis brought on by prolonged sensory depravation.

We really ought to just spray the whole damn place with VX nerve gas or somethin and put up some signs.

And make sure Voinobitch is there when you spray.

Posted by: Entropy at July 28, 2009 09:42 AM (IsLT6)

3 Isn't this the same fool that cried like a baby? 

Posted by: Sue at July 28, 2009 09:42 AM (Jol77)

4

Good riddance, jerk.

Posted by: t.ferg at July 28, 2009 09:43 AM (nF4Jh)

5 Another fine example of Representative government. Not gonna miss this pissant one bit.

Posted by: bill-tb at July 28, 2009 09:43 AM (iiiMw)

6

Maybe they should have extra senators from states outside the south and the south could just go away, like they tried to 140 years ago, eh George?

Posted by: huerfano at July 28, 2009 09:43 AM (knHvu)

7 I blame Waffle House.

-

Posted by: BumperStickerist at July 28, 2009 09:44 AM (ruzrP)

8

As I said in the other thread;

 

Can anyone here at AOS justify coninued suport for the Republican Party?

 

This ass-clown is the A-Number sample of what is wrong with the Republican Party.

 

He needs to find a ladder so he can climb up on it and kiss my ass.

Posted by: Vic at July 28, 2009 09:44 AM (CDUiN)

9 A person who says "What they got to do" shouldn't admonish others for "errr." Thank GOD for southern Republicans.

Posted by: Rightwingsparkle at July 28, 2009 09:44 AM (HUERw)

10 what a dickweed. beat it loser.

Posted by: exceller at July 28, 2009 09:44 AM (jx2Td)

11 Is he related to Sir Arlen of PA? Sure sounds familiar.

Posted by: Jay in Ames at July 28, 2009 09:44 AM (UEEex)

12

"They get on TV and go 'errrr, errrrr,'"

He sounds like a betwetting lib that's afraid of aggression unless it's passive aggression. 

Posted by: yinzer at July 28, 2009 09:45 AM (/Mla1)

13

"They get on TV and go 'errrr, errrrr,'"

 

Is he talking about Barry sans the royal teleprompter?

Posted by: TheQuietMan at July 28, 2009 09:46 AM (1Jaio)

14 Doesn't sound like Voino is a big tenter, huh?

Posted by: nickless at July 28, 2009 09:47 AM (MMC8r)

15

Is he talking about Barry sans the royal teleprompter?

No, that's more like "uhhhh, uhhhh". 

Posted by: yinzer at July 28, 2009 09:47 AM (/Mla1)

16 and another thing, when I travel down from Michigan to Ohio on business, you will immediately notice that towards the southern half of ohio there is a noticable southern drawl in a lot of the average working guys down there. so it looks like Voinivich doesn't even no his own state

Posted by: exceller at July 28, 2009 09:48 AM (jx2Td)

17 Palin will kick yr ass , man up or get out of the way douche.

Posted by: mbruce at July 28, 2009 09:48 AM (t/GDA)

18 You could solve a lot of problems in Oiho by dumping Cleveland. Can't we lease it to Canada or something?

Posted by: Dave in Texas at July 28, 2009 09:49 AM (E9Biy)

19

Good Riddance.  Hey maybe now Ohio can get a real Conservative as a senator.  After having Dewine gone, (member of the gang of 14) and Voinovich not seeking reelection, it would be nice.

And if he's complaining about too many southerner, gee maybe he should have been more of an actual conservative so he could have been more prominent instead of always being one of the senators mentioned as a fencesitter for important legislation.

Posted by: buzzion at July 28, 2009 09:50 AM (Lrsi6)

20 Don't let the door hit you on the way out, Voinobitch.

People like you and Lincoln Chafee are the reason why the Republicans couldn't do jack-squat with a majority on simple things like getting John Bolton approved as UN representative.

Posted by: Brandon In Baton Rouge at July 28, 2009 09:50 AM (Uj4rV)

21

'These people, they're southerners. The party's being taken over by southerners.

 

Before Barry got elected the last 3 Democrat presidents were from the south

Slick Willie, Jimmah and LBJ. Was the Dim party taken over by southerners?

Posted by: TheQuietMan at July 28, 2009 09:50 AM (1Jaio)

22 18 You could solve a lot of problems in Oiho by dumping Cleveland. Can't we lease it to Canada or something?

Posted by: Dave in Texas at July 28, 2009 09:49 AM (E9Biy)

Cleveland, Cinci, Youngstown, Akron, Columbus...  all of the moderate to big cities in that state are shitholes.  I guess that goes for most urban areas in the country though.

Posted by: yinzer at July 28, 2009 09:51 AM (/Mla1)

23

And let's be honest. The problem with the GOP certainly isn't too many DeMints and Coburns. Not. One. Bit. Squishy, weepy Voinovich, though...he won't be missed.

And thats the truth. As a southerner, I stand with my Okie brothers.

Posted by: maddogg at July 28, 2009 09:54 AM (OlN4e)

24

The south is taking over?  Good thing I held onto my confederate money!

I, as a PA resident, am getting sick of these northeast republicans. They strayed away from their roots. Northeast republicans used to be socially liberal/libertarian and fiscally conservative. Now they are just socially liberal and fiscally liberal. They truely are Democrats. As someone from PA who has had Arlen Specter as his Senator since 1980, I can speak from experience that there is no difference between Republicans and Democrats in my state(except Pat  Toomey and Tom Corbett).

Instead our only options in the northeast are big government democrats and big government republicans. That is why we can't win elections up here. If we had fiscally conservative Republicans we could sweep back much of the north east, including ohio, pa, at least a few seats in new york, new hamshire, and maine. 

Posted by: Ben at July 28, 2009 09:55 AM (wuv1c)

25 Can anything or anyplace be worse than Youngstown?

Posted by: Jim in San Diego at July 28, 2009 09:55 AM (H7Rlw)

26

Just another manifestation of Ohio State being impotent in bowl games.

That and Voinovich is an asshole.

Posted by: Circa (Insert Year Here) at July 28, 2009 09:55 AM (B+qrE)

27 When are the pansies from the Midwest going to come down south and play them some football in September? oh, yeah, that's right, you won't 'cause you don't want all your A-#1 corn-fed linemen hanging over the benches puking their guts up 5 minutes into the game 'cause it's 110F and 85% humidity down on the field.

Squishy little pussies.

Posted by: I R A Darth Aggie at July 28, 2009 09:56 AM (1hM1d)

28 Sometimes you just have to shake your head in wonderment. Are we really that fractured as a party? ... or are the Rino's starting to feel the fear of encroaching conservatism?

Voinovich is a prime example of why this party took a nose dive. He, and others like him, are apparently just too dumb to see it.

I sense a growing conservative sentiment nationwide as we are hopefully waking up to the disasters of liberalism.

Voinovich can take a flying leap.

Posted by: Twinks at July 28, 2009 09:56 AM (Nt1Z9)

29 Y'know, there are some parts of the Southern character that I'm not crazy about, but I'd take a Southerner in Congress or POTUS over a Northern "elite" any day of the week. Even the most venal and criminally twisted Southerner has the honor to stand toe-to-toe when he stabs you, rather than stabbing you in the back and slinking away like a dog.

Posted by: IllTemperedCur at July 28, 2009 09:56 AM (btril)

30 'Southerner'........  just sayin.


Posted by: redc1c4 at July 28, 2009 09:56 AM (d1FhN)

31 Mr Voinovich, as a southerner I'd just like to say

y'all can go fuck yourself.

Posted by: TC at July 28, 2009 09:57 AM (DYJjQ)

32

Ass clown

 

ass clown (ás kloun) n.:

one, who, through the fault of his parents conception, is a skid mark in society's collective underwear

Posted by: Vic at July 28, 2009 09:57 AM (CDUiN)

33 Since when did Republicans care where you were from as long as you were for lower taxes and limited national government, standing up for all ten parts of the Bill of Rights, free markets, and a sane foreign policy?

Those are the items everyone can agree with, but we and the rest of the country get distracted from these core items when the social cons in the south push the crazy issues like intelligent design, gay marriage, Obama's birth certificate, etc.. It is the crazy social con items that may have people in other parts of the country frustrated with the GOP.

Posted by: ray at July 28, 2009 09:58 AM (ve72s)

34

some parts of the Southern character

I'll be polite--What the fuck does that mean, you fucking condescending douchebag?

Posted by: Circa (Insert Year Here) at July 28, 2009 09:58 AM (B+qrE)

35

  bias based on color = bad

Bias based on actions = bad

bias based on accents and residency* = GREAT! AWESOME!

 

 

* The only time this is a good thing is when you are judging Michigan because Ohio doesn't give a damn about the whole state of Michigan.  We're from O-HI-O!

 

 

Posted by: momma at July 28, 2009 10:00 AM (penCf)

36

social cons in the south

You are an asshat, too.  Tell me how any of those three issues you mentioned are in any way concentrated in the South.  PROP 8--HELLO!!!

Posted by: Circa (Insert Year Here) at July 28, 2009 10:00 AM (B+qrE)

37 Hopefully Demint and Coburn tell Geo to GFHS.  In a nice southern gentlemanly manner of course.

Posted by: MAJHAM at July 28, 2009 10:01 AM (c2P97)

38

Just another manifestation of Ohio State being impotent in bowl games.

Ohio State is 0-9 vs. the SEC in bowl games.  Impotent indeed...

Posted by: Idfaciam at July 28, 2009 10:01 AM (TFB19)

39

Those are the items everyone can agree with, but we and the rest of the country get distracted from these core items when the social cons in the south push the crazy issues like intelligent design, gay marriage, Obama's birth certificate, etc.. It is the crazy social con items that may have people in other parts of the country frustrated with the GOP.

Yes. That's why these northeastern republicans like Specter, Snowe, or Voinobitch always vote fiscally conservative and....hey, hey, wait a fuckin a minute!

You're the rainbow sprinkler chick aren't ya?

The metal oxides oozing out of our politicians are making them socially conservative.

Posted by: Entropy at July 28, 2009 10:04 AM (IsLT6)

40

Ray-33...so you're saying going full bore socialism so you can be enlightened is better than debating the merits of gay marriage, which a majority of the population opposes, or believe in creationism, which a large large majority of Americans believe.

Every socially conservative issue, has at its roots, issues of freedom, security, and/or prosperity. 

You sir, are the issue. 

Posted by: The Hammer at July 28, 2009 10:04 AM (YBTwf)

41 Cleveland!

http://tinyurl.com/c2pjjx

at least they're not Detroit!

Posted by: Dave in Texas at July 28, 2009 10:05 AM (E9Biy)

42

When are the pansies from the Midwest going to come down south and play them some football in September? oh, yeah, that's right, you won't 'cause you don't want all your A-#1 corn-fed linemen hanging over the benches puking their guts up 5 minutes into the game 'cause it's 110F and 85% humidity down on the field.

Squishy little pussies.

And they'll of course be coming up to the Midwest in November right?  You know when the chance of snow is pretty good.  Nice cold days where maybe, where your speedy little receivers can't catch a ball because their hands are frozen.

 

Posted by: buzzion at July 28, 2009 10:06 AM (Lrsi6)

43 41 Cleveland!

http://tinyurl.com/c2pjjx

at least they're not Detroit!

I'll refer to the old Yakov Smirnov joke on the subject.

"Every country has city they make fun of.

In United States, it's Cleveland.

In Soviet Russia, it's Cleveland."

Posted by: Brandon In Baton Rouge at July 28, 2009 10:07 AM (Uj4rV)

44

Assclown has competition:

http://tinyurl.com/m698cc

Bill Maher when asked by Wolf Blitzer if Palin has a political future: "I wouldn't put anything past this stupid country." Blitzer asked him if he wants to clarify his statement: "I don't need to clarify. It is."

Posted by: momma at July 28, 2009 10:07 AM (penCf)

45

I guess this dick has never been in Southern Ohio, were the rednecks roam!  Makes WVA look sophisticated, shit it is WVA.

So wasn't it those "Southerns" who gave the senate GOP the majority years ago?  Dickhead how did you like them when they made you a committee chairman? 

AMF! Adios MF!

Kemp

Posted by: Kempermanx at July 28, 2009 10:07 AM (qvT/A)

46

And they'll of course be coming up to the Midwest in November right?  You know when the chance of snow is pretty good.  Nice cold days where maybe, where your speedy little receivers can't catch a ball because their hands are frozen.

 

Posted by: buzzion at July 28, 2009 10:06 AM (Lrsi6)


Not an issue because the Big Ten teams only play each other in November, not out-of-conference teams.

Posted by: Brandon In Baton Rouge at July 28, 2009 10:08 AM (Uj4rV)

47

#34

As a South Carolinian, I'd like to know what the fuck he meant by that as well.

Posted by: MikeinAmman at July 28, 2009 10:08 AM (Yd1S+)

48 Two nations occupying one space. This will not end well.

Posted by: Scott J. at July 28, 2009 10:08 AM (/bVuS)

49 Circa, your reasoned response does wonders for your "argument". Why, you are a bastion of  intelligent and civil discourse. By your immeasurable logic, the senators from CA should be pushing a ban on gay marriage for the nation as we speak. Wait, they aren't? Hmmmm, it is primarily the GOP politicians in the south pushing the social con agenda, and the rest of the nation, even though they support fiscally conservative principals, continues to elect crazy donks? I wonder why... perhaps because they don't agree with crazy social con agenda.

Posted by: ray at July 28, 2009 10:09 AM (ve72s)

50 Senator Voinavich decries reality, not Southernors.  South is where Americans have been moving for the last 30 years.

People are chasing free markets.  Naturally they move to where they can pursue their self interests and retain as much of their property as possible.

Who was right on the auto bailouts?  Senator Corker and Senator Shelby.  Who was right on the bank bailouts?  Senator Corker and Senator Shelby.

While most of the Senate has rolled up like a tumbleweed on behalf of the most powerful interests in DC and NYC, it has been Southerners that have been staking out the terrain on free markets and responsibility.

People are moving to Texas.  They are moving to Oklahoma.  They are moving to Tennessee.  They're chasing jobs and job creation.  Will these Senators ever fucking get it?

Posted by: WTF Capital Investments at July 28, 2009 10:10 AM (GtYrq)

51

Bill Maher when asked by Wolf Blitzer if Palin has a political future: "I wouldn't put anything past this stupid country." Blitzer asked him if he wants to clarify his statement: "I don't need to clarify. It is."

I agree with Bill.  Although for probably completely different reasons.

Posted by: Monica Conyers at July 28, 2009 10:10 AM (/Mla1)

52

/sockpuppet

 

Posted by: yinzer at July 28, 2009 10:11 AM (/Mla1)

53 Ray and the Big Tent Rinos, or democrat lite.

Posted by: huerfano at July 28, 2009 10:11 AM (knHvu)

54

@8

No, I am so sick and tired of this shit. I live in the south, and the RNC is constantly asking me for money.  I am sick and tired of these 85 year old so called conservatives who shit in their depends diapers everytime a conservative stands up and talks about anything conservative that is controvesial.  Its almost like the RHINOS had a teleconference call this weekend to talk about how to attack conservatives and pass this health care bill - I am sure Frum and Brooks were the moderators.

Posted by: 12 Inch Middle Finger at July 28, 2009 10:11 AM (n2vBd)

55

#35

momma, you thinking about this statement, dickhead might be making a coded racial statement here. 

His problem in Ohio are the Black voters who moved to the state FROM THE SOUTH, in the 30's. So dickhead is a racist!  Sounds like good liberal logic to me.

RACIST!

Kemp

 

Posted by: Kempermanx at July 28, 2009 10:11 AM (qvT/A)

56

I'm a native Californian that has lived in New England, Texas,  Washington state, and now Alaska, and have traveled to 44 states. I hate, really fucking HATE the way that many people from the coasts and upper midwest talk about southerners.

It's really the last socially acceptable bigotry. Folks that would gasp with horror if someone used a racial slur think nothing of making fun of our southern bretheren. Usually they throw "christian" or "red stater" in there, too. It's infuriating.

The worst offenders are from New England, New York City and LA. 

 

Posted by: Log Cabin at July 28, 2009 10:12 AM (QX9EE)

57 Hmmmm, it is primarily the GOP politicians in the south pushing the social con agenda,

How exactly are these politicians "pushing the social con agenda"?

Posted by: WTF Capital Investments at July 28, 2009 10:12 AM (GtYrq)

58

By your immeasurable logic

GOLLLLEEEEE...we only teach Genesis in schools in the south, no states north of the Masey-Dixie or west of Mississippi have gay marriage bans and Lou Dobbs wears a Johnny Reb suit on CNN while talking about Obama's birth certificate.  YEEHAAAAA!!!!

I'd check my definition of "logic" if I were you, dickhead.

Posted by: Circa (Insert Year Here) at July 28, 2009 10:13 AM (B+qrE)

59 Its almost like the RHINOS had a teleconference call this weekend to talk about how to attack conservatives and pass this health care bill - I am sure Frum and Brooks were the moderators.

Voinivich isn't a fool.  He's building the political cover to vote with the Democrats.  If you don't hear him talking about the things he WANTS to pass and is just complaining about other people's proposals then you know he's trying to stand on two broken legs.

Posted by: WTF Capital Investments at July 28, 2009 10:15 AM (GtYrq)

60

41 Cleveland!

http://tinyurl.com/c2pjjx

 
I think the site of the next Hobo-Hunters convention has been located!  Sign up now!

Posted by: yinzer at July 28, 2009 10:15 AM (/Mla1)

61 Groin-itch would never have been more than a worthless city councilman or Cuyahoga county back-bencher if his young daughter hadn't been killed by some idiot in a van when he ran against that douche Kucinich for mayor of Cleveland; that got him a sympathy vote from all the old crones that would normally vote for the diminutive cocksucker and was enough to barely put him over the top and kickstart his political career.  But he's been a Rino squish in every sense of the word and has never met a tax increase he hasn't supported.  The lack of a primary challenger shows the poor state of the Repub party in Ohio.  He can't leave to soon.

Posted by: Captain Hate at July 28, 2009 10:15 AM (U1nHn)

62

He also is probably not happy that all these "Southern" states are also "right to work" states. 

How you union dickheads like the smell of our WORKING asses, bitch?

Kemp

Posted by: Kempermanx at July 28, 2009 10:16 AM (qvT/A)

63 "John is wrong about whether Oklahoma is a southern state."

No.

Posted by: Olaf at July 28, 2009 10:16 AM (gfmug)

64

How exactly are these politicians "pushing the social con agenda"?

This is easy, WTF--if you disagree about anything the libs want on the social scene then you pushing an agenda. 

Posted by: Circa (Insert Year Here) at July 28, 2009 10:18 AM (B+qrE)

65 Oops. Wrong one!

http://tinyurl.com/cu69xe

Posted by: Dave in Texas at July 28, 2009 10:19 AM (E9Biy)

66 I'll really miss Voinovich. He's my kind of Republican and he should be your kind, too.

You know I'm right because I graduated from Harvard Law. See what we've done to the country? Only I and the Voinovich's of the world can perpetuate current success. We is so smrt.

Posted by: David Frum at July 28, 2009 10:19 AM (f0k1U)

67

Not an issue because the Big Ten teams only play each other in November, not out-of-conference teams.

Eh, late October isn't really much nicer you know.  And they do occasionally play out of conference games then.

Its still a ridiculous thing to claim.

Posted by: buzzion at July 28, 2009 10:19 AM (Lrsi6)

68 Before the Civil War, Michigan and Ohio went to war over Toledo and the surrounding area.

Make no mistake.  Michigan won.

Posted by: Ezra Klein at July 28, 2009 10:19 AM (+1+ZL)

69 #33 we and the rest of the country get distracted from these core items when the social cons in the south push the crazy issues like intelligent design, gay marriage, Obama's birth certificate, etc.. It is the crazy social con items that may have people in other parts of the country frustrated with the GOP.

Posted by: ray at July 28, 2009 09:58 AM (ve72s)

 

I live on the north side of Chicago and I'm a social con. And the Republicans had as "moderate" and harmless (just like you like) a candidate run in 2008 and he got his ass handed to him. Crazy social cons like Reagan kicked ass in 2 elections and still has a legacy in this country.

Posted by: TheQuietMan at July 28, 2009 10:20 AM (1Jaio)

70

49...again, Ray, you're indicating you'll accept socialized healthcare, state-run auto and banking industry, much higher tax rates, out of contol spending, and foreign policy that exchanges hugs and shakes with thug-dictators and roague regimes while giving our traditional allies the heisman. 

You'll accept all of this so you can say you didn't vote with those crazy social cons and their fundamentalist views. 

Obviously that's your call, but your immeasurable logic has us all teetering on the edge of the statist abyss.

Tell me, Ray, what's more of a travesty, that a 16yr old girl can't get an abortion on demand without telling her parents or that we're about to turn over 1/6th of the economy to a statist president?  Tell me, Ray, if your conservative dems are so economically smart, why are they being bought off on a bill that is so obviously socialistic? 

Yes, the price of your abortions on demand and gay marriage is about to go way way up. 

Posted by: The Hammer at July 28, 2009 10:20 AM (YBTwf)

71 Actually, I agree completely with Voinovich.  The problem with the US is there are far too many southern folk in it.  Y'all oughta kick us out of union or something.  Just be sure Texas is one of the states you set free banish.

Posted by: Cautiously Pessimistic at July 28, 2009 10:20 AM (ltwze)

72

He also is probably not happy that all these "Southern" states are also "right to work" states. 

How you union dickheads like the smell of our WORKING asses, bitch?

You're probably right.  The Rust Belt was running a protection racket for the first half the 20th century.  They all knew it.  It's been broken by, TADA, mother fucking competition.  Now they're bitching about it.  All they had to do was read the fucking reports from the Chicago Federal Reserve and the Cleveland Federal Reserve which were producing quarterly warnings that amounted to "Hey fucking local industrialists, are you fucking awake, you are killing your own industries"

Posted by: WTF Capital Investments at July 28, 2009 10:21 AM (GtYrq)

73 f**king sock puppet..

and I went to bed last night thinking I should change that before I forgot too.


Posted by: Dave C at July 28, 2009 10:21 AM (+1+ZL)

74 The greatest golfer of all time is from Ohio.   A sport that requires mental toughness, skill and intelligence and most of all integrity. 

Michael Vick is a southern football player.  

Checkmate.


Posted by: alppuccino at July 28, 2009 10:22 AM (nwXF9)

75 You know what's worse than Southerners?

Southern Jews, Chinese, and Indians.

Posted by: Stalin Peele at July 28, 2009 10:23 AM (MMC8r)

76
Michael Vick is a southern football player.  

Checkmate.


Posted by: alppuccino at July 28, 2009 10:22 A

RAAAASIST!!!!!!!!!!11!!eleventy!!

Posted by: Dave C at July 28, 2009 10:24 AM (+1+ZL)

77 40. Not at all. The issue is getting enough of a turnout to win elections and get a majority. The GOP is failing in that arena. Perhaps some Americans who are not social cons see the GOP as compassionate social cons. The GOP hasn't been fiscally conservative for quite some time, they aren't leftist socialists, but they are a kind of moralistic soft socialism. The GOP will never regain national power with their agenda and track record for the last 8 years, even as the corrupt democrats create an epic failure. I'll still pull the GOP lever, but I do not expect different election results until they push more libertarian principles and hide the social con populist items in the back. (and I do blame the south for this perception, I live in the south and see the social con items all the time in local and state GOP politics.)

Posted by: ray at July 28, 2009 10:24 AM (ve72s)

78

Checkmate.

George Washington was a southerner.

Barack Obama is from Illinois.

Checkmate with a counterclockwise swirl.

Posted by: Circa (Insert Year Here) at July 28, 2009 10:24 AM (B+qrE)

79 70. Your comment attribution to my position is an epic failure.

Posted by: ray at July 28, 2009 10:25 AM (ve72s)

80

and I do blame the south for this perception, I live in the south and see the social con items all the time in local and state GOP politics

Don't let the door hit you.  I hear things are just great in Berkeley.

Posted by: Circa (Insert Year Here) at July 28, 2009 10:27 AM (B+qrE)

81 Squishy, weepy Voinovich, though...he won't be missed.

I'm sure the Dems will welcome Voinovich's replacement.

Posted by: Little Sarah the Quit Bull at July 28, 2009 10:27 AM (i31Zq)

82

The Last General of the Confederacy to surrender in the war was Stand Waite, a Cherokee Indian who led an army drawn primarily from the Five Civilized Tribes in what later became Oklahoma.

Quantrill's Raiders used what became Oklahoma as a safe haven as well.

 

The Indians tended to side with the South because of their emphasis on States' Rights and soveriegnity. Ironicly, the South offered the Indians of the Territory Equal treatment, more Independence, and even the option of Statehood in the future- the Indian Territory showed promise as a buffer between the Union and the Confederacy.

Oklahoma is a Southern State, if you doubt it, ask a few.

Posted by: Gerry Owen at July 28, 2009 10:28 AM (oGv5F)

83 Circa, you are hysterically inept. Thanks for the laughs.

Posted by: ray at July 28, 2009 10:29 AM (ve72s)

84

Sadly that guy is my senator and Dennis Kucinich is my congressman. Sucks to be me. 

Important though, is that his demographic: northern ohio in 60's - really look down their noses at a southern accent. Down home-ism's are not seen as being insightful. I was born in Cincinnati and it took while to adjust. In Southern Ohio they talk slower and are a lot more polite - northern ohio's are nice once you get to know em. Just not as open. Also - northern ohioans don't think they have an accent - but they really do. It grated in my ears for the first couple years I lived here.

Palin had issues in the north because her delivery reminded these types of Edie McClurg.  It will continue to be a problem if she doesn't fix it.

Posted by: joe at July 28, 2009 10:29 AM (YwBI6)

85

Finally, Ray, your points would hold more merit if your moderate, enlightened R's and your wise, logical conservative D's got the issues of freedom, limited government, free markets, etc right when they voted on those issues.  But, they don't. 

See CnT, TARP, Stimulus, etc. 

So, we not only don't get any of the things you abhore, we get none of the things you profess to support. 

But, again, you didn't vote with those 'tards down south.  So you've got that going for you.

Posted by: The Hammer at July 28, 2009 10:29 AM (YBTwf)

86 Can we get John Bolton to show up at George's retirement party?  It'd be great to see him cry and shit his pants at the same time.

Posted by: sixpckr at July 28, 2009 10:29 AM (ZCAzS)

87

Oklahoma Oh, Ohio where the corn is high as a R-I-I-I-INO's eye!

Posted by: andycanuck at July 28, 2009 10:29 AM (l1f4+)

88 I'll be polite--What the fuck does that mean, you fucking condescending douchebag?

I was referring to the very small subset of racist Southerners who are in fact, practically extinct. I should have been more specific, or better yet, silent, to avoid besmirching a lot of good people when that was not my intent. You're absolutely right to call me on that and I apologize.

Posted by: IllTemperedCur at July 28, 2009 10:30 AM (btril)

89 Oh man , this thread is gonna' be great .
Southerner here.

Posted by: aubrey at July 28, 2009 10:30 AM (wb68R)

Posted by: muffy at July 28, 2009 10:31 AM (o2bkq)

91

Circa, you are hysterically inept.

And you, in the face of countervailing facts, ignore them.  Methinks thou art a Moby.

Posted by: Circa (Insert Year Here) at July 28, 2009 10:31 AM (B+qrE)

92

74 The greatest golfer of all time is from Ohio.   A sport that requires mental toughness, skill and intelligence and most of all integrity. 

Michael Vick is a southern football player.  

Golfer, Republican

Football player, felon democrat.

Checkmate that bitch.

Let's have a contest, name the only state that DIDN'T sign the Declaration of Independence, a hint the Hudson river runs through it.

Another contest, name the Yankees who wrote the  Declaration of Independence and the Constitution?  Waiting, Waiting, BLULER!

Kemp


 

Posted by: Kempermanx at July 28, 2009 10:32 AM (qvT/A)

93

I was referring to the very small subset of racist Southerners who are in fact, practically extinct.

The South never...NEVER had a monopoly on that category.

Posted by: Circa (Insert Year Here) at July 28, 2009 10:32 AM (B+qrE)

94

Barack Obama is from Illinois.

Checkmate with a counterclockwise swirl.


Prove it. 

Jenga!

Posted by: alppuccino at July 28, 2009 10:32 AM (nwXF9)

95 Senator Never-Heard-of-Him is now on my shit list. As a proper Southern lady, I sparingly use crass words like "shit," but I'll make an exception for him.

Posted by: Girl Thursday at July 28, 2009 10:34 AM (8ToST)

96 Checkmate.


Posted by: alppuccino at July 28, 2009 10:22 AM (nwXF9)

I'll see your Checkmate and raise it with a Jerry Springer Mayor of Cincinnati top that.

Posted by: polynikes at July 28, 2009 10:34 AM (m2CN7)

97

Barack Obama is from Illinois.

Actually, he'll be counted as from Hawaii, which EVERYONE knows is the MOST Southern state in the nation, check a map.

We're not claiming him.

Kemp

Posted by: Kempermanx at July 28, 2009 10:35 AM (qvT/A)

98

Prove it. 

Jenga!

Watch it, Ray will accuse you of pushing a social con agenda from a survival bunker adjacent to Bull Conner's grave.

Posted by: Circa (Insert Year Here) at July 28, 2009 10:35 AM (B+qrE)

99 94

Barack Obama is from Illinois.

Checkmate with a counterclockwise swirl.


Prove it. 

Jenga!

Well, he ran as a citizen of Illinois and, frankly, most of us would run from Illinois if we were stuck there, too.

Posted by: Brandon In Baton Rouge at July 28, 2009 10:37 AM (Uj4rV)

100

Hey guys take it easy. Don't rag on cleveland too much, they have the rock and roll hall of fame. Where else are you going to see pants and t shirts worn by music legends. Or a tamborine from Sonny and Cher. It's a f'ing national treasure.

Take pity on Ohio for the following reaosns

1. Browns and Bengals

2. Reds and Indians

3. Toledo

4. Dying Industry

5. The Flats in Cleveland

6. East Cleveland

7. North, South and West Cleveland, generally any part of the mistake on a lake

8. Lake effect snow storms in the winter

9. Akron and Canton

10. Sherrod Brown

11. The fact that it is essentially Pennsylvania and Indiana's Taint

12. Massive declinein population

13. Lebron James can't wait to get the F out of there

14. They voted for Obama despite the fact his policies will help destroy whatever industry they had left

15. Voinavich

 

On the upside though

they aren't that shithole michigan, and they do have southern ohio with is essentially northern kentucky. As a matter of fact I think the Cinnci Airport is in Kentucky.  

We should use cleveland to test our aging nuclear weapons to see if they work. The only thing is that it would probably improve the overall quality of life in that shithole.

Posted by: Ben at July 28, 2009 10:37 AM (wuv1c)

101

I dont think any of you guys are asking the really important question here, which is how does this help my children pay for my hooker?

Let's focus here, people.

Now, who's got money?

Posted by: Entropy at July 28, 2009 10:38 AM (IsLT6)

102 you know how I know the Big 10 is gay? Because they have 11 teams and don't play a championship and like to suck cock.

Posted by: Flying Jackos at July 28, 2009 10:38 AM (k7SeR)

103 In support of a portion of ray's point... most of the moderate to even liberal people that I know (and I know a lot of them) have one problem and one problem only with the GOP: the social con agenda. Regardless of how much it actually affects policy making once they are elected, these folks are scared to death -- rightly or wrongly -- that all of these church-going people with regional accents are going to try to make them teach creationism in their schools, completely ban abortion at the Federal level and put teh gays in concentration camps. Now, you and I know that that sort of thing isn't going to happen, but as long as we put up with those in our party who really would use the government to push their morality, this is going to be a problem.

Look at it like this: fiscal responsibility, individual liberty and strong foreign policy sells very well with the American people, excepting something like 15% of the population that are hardcore liberals. The problem with us getting to 50% in elections is that there are also a large group of people -- say half that remainder -- who can't stomach the thought of the aforementioned perceived social con agenda. That keeps them away. Educating the social cons that liberty is actually a better solution to their gripes than legislating morality eliminates that holdback, making things not only winnable but very very winnable.

Posted by: mr.frakypants at July 28, 2009 10:40 AM (PonvG)

104 Weepy fucktard, get cancer already.

Posted by: thegreatsatan at July 28, 2009 10:41 AM (84Z4m)

105 This southerner lived and worked in Cincy for a short time . While working there a young black criminal broke a bottle of Wild Irish Rose over my head because I had the gall to ask him for his ID. 
Ohio is full to the brim with racial harmony . Sarc.

Posted by: aubrey at July 28, 2009 10:41 AM (wb68R)

106

102 you know how I know the Big 10 is gay? Because they have 11 teams and don't play a championship and like to suck cock.

WINNER! Is that you "Tom"?

Kemp

Posted by: Kempermanx at July 28, 2009 10:42 AM (qvT/A)

107

I was reared in Cleveland, did my undergrad in Indiana and grad in Chicago. I knew Voinibitch back when he was still a Calfee lawyer in Cleveland before he was mayor. I worked for Lugar in ’76 when he was elected to the Senate while I lived in Indy (and he was still the Indy mayor).

Either they changed or I did. Because of them and their squish, I have been a Texan for twenty years and it is very painful to visit my relatives up north -- nothing but the dead and dying back in my little town because of these two RINOs and their progeny. Sarah Palin has a bigger set of balls than these two combined.

PS I also know Nicklaus. And, it’s all about Jack….

Posted by: Oneyedman at July 28, 2009 10:42 AM (A2uXF)

108 Voinovich. WTF kinda name is that?

Posted by: Corona at July 28, 2009 10:42 AM (+xghX)

109 Pitchfork - check.
Tar - check
Feathers - check
Map to Voino - Vonoi - Vinooibivitch's office - check
Y'all wanna ride in the back of the truck?  Pack a lunch.

Posted by: Nimrod at July 28, 2009 10:45 AM (Vy2E5)

Posted by: muffy at July 28, 2009 10:45 AM (o2bkq)

111

#108

Slovene-Serbian American.

Whatever the fuck that is.  Sounds like he's a bastard.  Looks like he's proving it everyday.

Kemp

Posted by: Kempermanx at July 28, 2009 10:46 AM (qvT/A)

112 As a northerner, let me say, screw Voinovich, that kind of geographic bigotry is the bread and butter of the democratic party, it has no place in the gop.

Posted by: LikeATimeBomb at July 28, 2009 10:47 AM (J6xq2)

113 85. Thanks for the civil reply. I agree, if only the "moderates" were in fact more libertarian in philosophy, but they aren't, so they don't vote that way either. "Moderate" in this age is just another name for liberal lite, regardless of party affiliation.

I have consistently pulled the R lever accepting the crap in hopes of getting at least some of the good. But there has been little, if any good from the R's in many years, but we still get the crap. I got feed up with them two years ago and stopped supporting them other than to vote. From what I have seen, I blame the soc con agenda. My opinion has apparently angered some here, oh well. Again, thanks for the civil reply.

Posted by: ray at July 28, 2009 10:47 AM (ve72s)

114 Voinovich is about the dumbest piece of crap in the GOP.

Posted by: Dan F at July 28, 2009 10:47 AM (iMg5k)

115

103...well said, but who is legislating their morality? 

allowing and paying for abortion on demand--morality issue

acknowledgement of gay marriage--morality issue

can't drive suv's because it destroys the planet--morality issue

 

Most of these morality issues come to a head because the left and the government force them on us, not the other way around. 

I could go on but you get the point.  Morality issues have 2 and only 2 sides.  You can't vote present.  If you won't vote for a pro-life candidate, for example, you are by extension pro-abortion.  I don't see a way around it.

 

 

Posted by: The Hammer at July 28, 2009 10:47 AM (YBTwf)

116

This post should lead to a interesting overnight thread.

which states suck the most, and which are the best and why

Posted by: Ben at July 28, 2009 10:47 AM (wuv1c)

117

Can anyone here at AOS justify coninued suport for the Republican Party?

 

Voinovich is leaving. Coburn and DeMint are staying. Jeffords left, Specter left, the two ditzes from Maine are aging.

 

And NOW, when all this is happening, you want to entertain the 3rd Party Delusion???

Posted by: Curmudgeon at July 28, 2009 10:48 AM (ujg0T)

118

114 Voinovich is about the dumbest piece of crap in the GOP.

Aren't you forgetting Lindsy Graham?

Kemp

 

Posted by: Kempermanx at July 28, 2009 10:48 AM (qvT/A)

119

In support of a portion of ray's point... most of the moderate to even liberal people that I know (and I know a lot of them) have one problem and one problem only with the GOP: the social con agenda.

Abject nonsense.  The current state of play has absolutely nothing to do with the social questions and everything to do with the liberals turning 51% of the electorate into non-taxpaying dependents of the federal government. 

To wit--if the social cons were so Naziesque about imposing their views, I'm sure they would show up as more than 2% of this:

NBC News/Wall Street Journal Poll conducted by the polling organizations of Peter Hart (D) and Bill McInturff (R). June 12-15, 2009. N=1,008 adults nationwide. MoE ± 3.1.

.

"Let me list some issues that have been proposed for the federal government to address. Please tell me which one of these items you think should be the top priority for the federal government. [See below.]" If more than one: "Well, if you had to choose just one, which do you think should be the top priority?"

.

    % Job creation and economic growth 31 The deficit and government spending 19 Health care 16 National security and terrorism 14 The wars in Iraq and Afghanistan 9 Energy and the cost of gas 5 Social issues such as abortion and same-sex marriage 2 All equally (vol.) 3 Unsure 1

Some of you are falling intot he trap the media lays for the country:  The Social Cons are coming for you!!!!  It's bullshit, pure and simple.

Posted by: Circa (Insert Year Here) at July 28, 2009 10:49 AM (B+qrE)

120 103. Thanks for the cover. My oven mitts where starting to get hot holding this position by myself.

Posted by: ray at July 28, 2009 10:49 AM (ve72s)

121 I'll see your Checkmate and raise it with a Jerry Springer Mayor of Cincinnati top that.

OK, that one stung a little.

Posted by: alppuccino at July 28, 2009 10:49 AM (nwXF9)

122

We tried once and despite heroic sacrifice we were held in a union against the will of the people concerned and probably against the intent of the Founders.

So, if we are so terrible and embarassing, let us go. 

Lee surrendered, we didn't!

 

 

 

Posted by: fred t at July 28, 2009 10:51 AM (S5ioo)

123 Circa, you are starting to look like an agent of progressives in an attempt to make conservatives look hostile and unreasonable. The GOP will never regain a majority using your tactics.

Posted by: ray at July 28, 2009 10:53 AM (ve72s)

124 Ohioan here.

Voinovich is an embarrassment.

Didn't like him as governor, don't like him as senator.

Unbelievable.

As an Ohioan, I apologize to all southerners.  Not only for his stupid remarks, but for inflicting this turd on the nation.

Posted by: tsj017 at July 28, 2009 10:53 AM (4YUWF)

125 To the esteemed Senator from Ohio: Go fuck yourself, sir.

Indiana's taint

I like that a lot. Suck it Ohio!

Posted by: Angry Beaver at July 28, 2009 10:53 AM (7sVL1)

126

113..Ray, if my posts were too pointed or personal, I apologize.  I really mean that.  I post and read here because it's a venting mechanism for the frustration of our political times. 

IMO, we're at the edge and Obamacare is the last stand.  That results in some impassioned and perhaps, misguided bantering.  

Posted by: The Hammer at July 28, 2009 10:53 AM (YBTwf)

127

Oklahoma isn't the South.  Some in Oklahoma will tell you otherwise, but it isn't.  The South ends somewhere in Arkansas, which is the true redneck/Southern transition state.  You have the hillbilly necks from Tenn, the cajun necks from LA, the normal neck from Miss, all transitioning to the cowboy necks of Oklahoma and Texas as you drive across Arkansas on I-40.

Don't get me wrong, this isn't bashing the South or Oklahoma.  I wouldn't live anywhere else!

Grim in Tulsa (formerly of Arkansas, Florida, Georgia, and South Carolina).

 

Posted by: Grim at July 28, 2009 10:54 AM (gyNYk)

128 I've lived in Louisiana,  NYC and upstate NY and now Texas.  The most important thing to know is that Louisiana , at least south Louisiana has the most beautiful girls per capita.   

Posted by: polynikes at July 28, 2009 10:54 AM (m2CN7)

129

In support of a portion of ray's point... most of the moderate to even liberal people that I know (and I know a lot of them) have one problem and one problem only with the GOP: the social con agenda.

I'll call bullshit on their problem.  If the social con agenda was deemphasized or completely removed they still would not vote GOP.  They see that as a sort of safe tactic to be critical of or even perhaps believe it to be true.  It would not change their voting if gone, they would find some new excuse or just not have a reason.

Posted by: buzzion at July 28, 2009 10:56 AM (Lrsi6)

130

128 I've lived in Louisiana,  NYC and upstate NY and now Texas.  The most important thing to know is that Louisiana , at least south Louisiana has the most beautiful girls per capita. 

Must be the French heritage.  Quebec has some good lookers also.

Kemp

Posted by: Kempermanx at July 28, 2009 10:56 AM (qvT/A)

131 If the social con agenda was deemphasized or completely removed they still would not vote GOP.  They see that as a sort of safe tactic to be critical of or even perhaps believe it to be true.

Yep, I hear this all the time. "I'd go Republican if it weren't for those mean old Christianists! I really am a libertarian at heart!" Scratch one of those types and what do you find? A liberal.

Posted by: Angry Beaver at July 28, 2009 10:58 AM (7sVL1)

132 The South never...NEVER had a monopoly on that category.

Absolutely true. Another reason that I should have kept my big mouth shut.

Posted by: IllTemperedCur at July 28, 2009 10:59 AM (btril)

133 Oh, lookee: Little Rayray @ 33 wandered over from Chuckie Johnson's place.

Yes, yes. We all know how there were all those polls that showed how millions of Democrats and moderate Republicans were dying to vote for McCain except for his support for the crazy side of " intelligent design, gay marriage, Obama's birth certificate."

Wait! McCain didn't support any of that, in fact: He was even for stem-cell research.

So, uh, I guess that means you are full of shit. You and all those sideways buttplugs that keep telling everyone how it's the social issues that are killing the GOP need to crawl back to your favorite Democrat plantation whence you came.

Posted by: jimmuy8 at July 28, 2009 11:00 AM (EOPB+)

134

Circa, you are starting to look like an agent of progressives in an attempt to make conservatives look hostile and unreasonable. The GOP will never regain a majority using your tactics.

Ray, frankly YOU look like an agent of the Left.

The "social issues" that you are so scared of are in fact, winners. The overwhelming majority of people DO NOT WANT marriage redefined and homosexual relationships raised to the exact same status as marriages, and they otherwise are tolerant of (or frankly, bored to death with) same sex relationships.

The overwhelming majority also find the practice of late term abortion (abortions in a time period when many premature babies are born and still go on to otherwise normal lives) sickening. Even when they otherwise accept early term abortions.

WHY do you buy into the boogeymen the Left have created?

Moreover, having been tricked into voting for "fiscal conservative, social liberals" who turn out to be *anything but* fiscal conservatives, I am sick of squishes like Voinovich. The last real fiscal conservative social liberal I can think of was CA Governor Pete Wilson, and even he was hard core social con on issues like illegal aliens.

 

Posted by: Curmudgeon at July 28, 2009 11:01 AM (ujg0T)

135 The Hammer -- My point was that the moderates and even non-hardcore liberals I know (and read) have a bug up their ass about people with religion. I don't disagree that the statist social libs certainly legislate their preferred morality -- they do.

But to cherry-pick an issue from your list: gay marriage. From a liberty standpoint, two people should be able to enter into a contract if they want to. Hell, four people should as long as no one is being coerced. While a large portion of Americans think it's immoral -- making it unpopular -- I've not heard a rational, coherent argument against it. Claims that legalizing gay marriage will hurt non-gay marriage are ludicrous. They have no basis in fact. And as to the government "forcing" it on anyone, I'm not sure how exactly anyone is being forced to do anything by making it legally recognized? If you're against it, how is dealing with someone who is "gay married" different than dealing with someone who is just married to someone you can't stand for any other reason? To me, it doesn't seem to be any different.

My point here is that while you can couch these things in terms of morality, I think it's a fatal political mistake. Morality is society's way of encoding wisdom for the long haul. It's not always going to be right. And, if we're talking policy, we can use morality as a guide to start with, but we need to make sure that our moral positions have the force of reason behind them. Then, you present the reasoned argument -- not the moral one -- and you pick up double digits of percentages of voters.

Posted by: mr.frakypants at July 28, 2009 11:01 AM (PonvG)

136

Ben #100 is bringing teh funny.

Oh, and why do most of the most annoying liberals live in yankeeland?

 

Posted by: nikkolai at July 28, 2009 11:03 AM (4EBUu)

137

Sir, I object to your slanderous attack on the sovereign state of Missouri, a proud member of the Confederate States of America.

Posted by: General Sterling Price C.S.A. at July 28, 2009 11:03 AM (6BgmB)

138 What a bigoted asswipe this Voinovich is.

I've only been to Ohio once, Dayton, last summer for a couple of days. If I'd known at the time how easy it is to register and cast a vote there, I would've taken a few minutes to do that.

Everyone we encountered was very friendly. The Air Force Museum is way cool. Poor Dayton was depressed though with the GM plant closing.

Oklahoma City and my city, San Antonio, have the lowest unemployment rates in the nation. There are quite a few Ohioans moving down this way.


Posted by: stace at July 28, 2009 11:04 AM (g/wgk)

139 Voinavitch is making fun of the way we Southerners talk? Sheesh, has this guy ever listened to Obama and Gibbs?

Funny how so many Northerners make fun of the South, and then they all move down here.

Posted by: William Teach at July 28, 2009 11:04 AM (7yTel)

140

Circa, you are starting to look like an agent of progressives in an attempt to make conservatives look hostile and unreasonable.

You're a Moby.  You come in here, piss on the rug, get called on it and call me unreasonable.

30 states have gay marriage bans.  Creationism has been a point of contention  for school curricula in multiple states, not just in the South (Note:  I personally do not endorse the teaching of intelligent design, but evolution sure isn't perfect.)  The Obama birth certificate issue is certainly not a solely southern issue or even a social con issue, if you can demonstrate differently, do so.

If that is "unreasonable"--then you are a lib.  QED.

Posted by: Circa (Insert Year Here) at July 28, 2009 11:04 AM (B+qrE)

141 130

128 I've lived in Louisiana,  NYC and upstate NY and now Texas.  The most important thing to know is that Louisiana , at least south Louisiana has the most beautiful girls per capita. 

Must be the French heritage.  Quebec has some good lookers also.

Kemp


Depends what part of the state you're in. 

Southwest LA, towards Lafayette, is the heart of Cajun country, which is French-Canadian in origin. 

Southeast LA, in and around New Orleans, tends to be a mix of Cajun and "Yat", with "Yat" being mainly of Italian stock AFAIK.  ("Yats" tend to sound a lot like extras from Goodfellas.)

Posted by: Brandon In Baton Rouge at July 28, 2009 11:05 AM (Uj4rV)

142

Little Rayray @ 33 wandered over from Chuckie Johnson's place.

Ah--all becomes clear.  I shall now ignore the revealed Moby.

Posted by: Circa (Insert Year Here) at July 28, 2009 11:06 AM (B+qrE)

143

I'll call bullshit on their problem.  If the social con agenda was deemphasized or completely removed they still would not vote GOP.  They see that as a sort of safe tactic to be critical of or even perhaps believe it to be true.  It would not change their voting if gone, they would find some new excuse or just not have a reason.

Bingo. The heirs of Nelson Rockefeller were never really conservative, and still are not. They repeat the lamestream media *lie* that "the GOP is too far socially right-wing" even as it becomes clear that the Democrat Party has gone full bore Commiecrat, to which their silence is deafening.

That said, I am a realist. An abortion ban will never happen. I live in Cali, which is pro-choice until the end of time, and should the judicial monstrosity of Roe be overturned, 24 hour drive thru abortion mills will spring up on the major roads on the borders of Cali and the northeastern states. That is just the way it is.

Still, I welcome pro-life support.

Posted by: Curmudgeon at July 28, 2009 11:06 AM (ujg0T)

144 Curmudgeon and Circa -- I don't think that Ray and I are actually buying into the notions that the social con agenda is a real problem. However, the perception of the social con agenda by the large mushy middle is a huge problem. There are several ways to fix that:

1) Get the media to start telling the truth and not ginning up hysteria every time someone who is Southern Baptist runs for office.
Prognosis: Not going to happen. The MSM represents part of that hard core 15% I mentioned upthread.

2) Find some way to win without the mushy middle.
Prognosis: If you can do math, you know how this one comes out.

3) Do what I suggested upthread and attempt to analyze the reasoning behind social con moral positions, either letting them fall by the wayside if they don't pass rational muster or truly presenting them as arguments for the one American value that cuts across the demographics: liberty.
Prognosis: Grim, but since it's within our own party, we at least have a shot at having an effect.

Posted by: mr.frakypants at July 28, 2009 11:09 AM (PonvG)

145 From what I've seen, the social cons are no more apt to press their morality on people than the fucking leftards press their lack of same on us. Fuck them I say. I'll take a moral man over a San Francisco leftard any day. Go take a look at the Folsum Street festival and tell me you prefer their "morality". Yeah, those damn social cons are really scary people. Its not the social cons who do the partial birth abomination. Its not the social cons who will tell the old people they are too expensive to keep alive. Its not the social cons pushing communism lite on the country. Its not the social cons sucking up to third world murderers. Its not the social cons going around the world telling our enemies we are sorry for our greatness. Horse shit.

Posted by: maddogg at July 28, 2009 11:10 AM (OlN4e)

146 as one of those "southern Ohio" people with a southern drawl, I am constantly lamenting Senator Joinovich. I will be happy to see the ass-end of him. I have been begging Ken Blackwell to run for his seat in 2010. I would settle for a true conservative instead of this powellesque embarassment.

Posted by: krukke1 at July 28, 2009 11:11 AM (GMn5O)

147

mr. fraky: I see your point, and I am all for soft-pedaling issues where they are not winners (e.g., abortion in hedonistic California). After all, California went abortion on demand back in 1967, under then Governor Reagan no less.

But all I can say to McCain and Voinovich and Chaffee and Jeffords and the like is good riddance, don't let the door hit you on the way out.

Posted by: Curmudgeon at July 28, 2009 11:13 AM (ujg0T)

148 As a Southern transplant living in Ohio, this is just one more reason to bail out at the first good opportunity. 

The other reasons?  Taxes.  Taxes.  And Taxes.  Oh yeah, and the crappy weather.  But taxes are what's been pushing me over the edge for years, finally my OH-native wife sees it the same way. 

And who was responsible for a great deal of that?  Why, then-Gov. Voinovich, thank you very little.  Republicans had complete control of State govt. for about 14 years and in that time turned Ohio into one of the 5 highest-taxed states in the country.  So heck, why NOT vote Dem?  In this state, it truly has not mattered for a long time. 

Good riddance, he lost my vote a long time ago anyway.  Maybe we can get a real conservative to run for once.

Posted by: Pat C at July 28, 2009 11:14 AM (hbIdj)

149 Circa -- are you saying that there are "open questions" as to O's birthplace? Seriously? I didn't know birth certificatism was alive and well here.

Posted by: mr.frakypants at July 28, 2009 11:14 AM (PonvG)

150

Yep, I hear this all the time. "I'd go Republican if it weren't for those mean old Christianists! I really am a libertarian at heart!" Scratch one of those types and what do you find? A liberal.

Yeah, its that they don't want to get thrown in as a liberal.  They want to be seen as non-conformist in the political sphere for whatever reason.  But when its time for them to throw down its no question.

From a liberty standpoint, two people should be able to enter into a contract if they want to. Hell, four people should as long as no one is being coerced. While a large portion of Americans think it's immoral -- making it unpopular -- I've not heard a rational, coherent argument against it. Claims that legalizing gay marriage will hurt non-gay marriage are ludicrous. They have no basis in fact. And as to the government "forcing" it on anyone, I'm not sure how exactly anyone is being forced to do anything by making it legally recognized? If you're against it, how is dealing with someone who is "gay married" different than dealing with someone who is just married to someone you can't stand for any other reason? To me, it doesn't seem to be any different.

Yes two people should be able to enter into a contract.  If the state want to recognize it they have that right.  Now why does it need to be called marriage?  Why do you want to give the state the power to redefine a word that has meaning outside of their jurisdiction?  I don't think it will hurt non-gay marriages.  I see it as step 1 in attacks on the traditional institutions of our country like churches.  And you may say that it would never happen, but the legalization of gay marriage and calling it marriage can be used as the first step.  The effort to legalize it in New Jersey, I believe, had it killed because of the language that protected churches from not having to perform the ceremonies.  You want legal recognition for your gay love, you should be able to have that but it doesn't need to be called marriage.  You want to stand in front of a guy and your friends and family and say you will never love another ass but his, you can do that too, and hell you can do it right now and no one will stop you.  You can even call eachother husband and I won't care.  But the word marriage has a meaning to most people and government shouldn't have the right to redefine it.

Posted by: buzzion at July 28, 2009 11:15 AM (Lrsi6)

151

What they hell they got to do with Ohio?'"

Using this imbecillic 'logic' one could as what Senator Tears has to do with anything?

I mean really, what does Ohio have to do with tax cuts? What does Ohio have to do with an out of control judiciary?

Considering Ohio sent this blathering boob to the Senate one must ask why Ohio still has Senatorial Privileges...

Posted by: Jay at July 28, 2009 11:16 AM (/ZX77)

152

From what I've seen, the social cons are no more apt to press their morality on people than the fucking leftards press their lack of same on us. Fuck them I say. I'll take a moral man over a San Francisco leftard any day. Go take a look at the Folsum Street festival and tell me you prefer their "morality". Yeah, those damn social cons are really scary people. Its not the social cons who do the partial birth abomination. Its not the social cons who will tell the old people they are too expensive to keep alive. Its not the social cons pushing communism lite on the country. Its not the social cons sucking up to third world murderers. Its not the social cons going around the world telling our enemies we are sorry for our greatness. Horse shit.

Bingo! maddog for the thread win. Having grown up in the vicinity of Sodom City West, I once believed in the New Right boogeyman the Left foisted on the American Public. But upon a closer look, the boogeyman is a lot less frightening than the death cult indoctrination starting in childhood the the Left has in store for us.

Posted by: Curmudgeon at July 28, 2009 11:16 AM (ujg0T)

153

Circa -- are you saying that there are "open questions" as to O's birthplace? Seriously? I didn't know birth certificatism was alive and well here.

I am not saying that--never have--it's a stupid issue in my view.  But to blame its perpetuation on southern social cons is simply wrong and that's what ray did.

Posted by: Circa (Insert Year Here) at July 28, 2009 11:18 AM (B+qrE)

154 Senator Coburn is MY Senator. I voted for him and I would support him if he got a walking cane and whipped Voinovich like a dog on the floor of the Senate. There's certainly precedent for it. Coburn is a baby-deliverin', TARP-hating, gun-totin' son of a gun.

Posted by: Verity Kindle at July 28, 2009 11:18 AM (Qg1tF)

155 Not One Red Cent

Posted by: richard mcenroe at July 28, 2009 11:19 AM (fz2NR)

156 buzzion: I don't see why the government needs to call it marriage. Have them call it a partnership. In time, most people will just start calling it marriage anyway -- it's simpler and less awkward than bullshit about "partners" and "partnerships." I mean, are we talking about people or businesses? And make not mistake, whatever the government decides to do or recognize most folks will calling two dudes or two chicks who get partnerized "married" within thirty years anyway. It's just the way society's going. The government can either change with the people or get left behind.

I am amused, though, how people always refer to teh gays as loving the ass (which they do), but don't routinely refer to their straight friends as "loving the cooch" (or whatever) when talking about their relationships. While I'm sure it IS all about the sex when they're younger, just like it is for the rest of us, the marriage thing is more about love and how you feel about the other person as a person. I don't really know anyone about whom I could say "he got married for the pussy."

Posted by: mr.frakypants at July 28, 2009 11:23 AM (PonvG)

157 Circa -- ah. Misread your post. Sorry.

Posted by: mr.frakypants at July 28, 2009 11:23 AM (PonvG)

158 Nice recruiting there GOP. Did you advertise for a winner or a whiner? Do you know the difference. Ohio has much much better, Ken Blackwell anyone?

Posted by: Carmelita at July 28, 2009 11:24 AM (gq1Fx)

159 Dear Everyone:

Sorry.

Sincerely,
a native Ohioan

Posted by: Filly at July 28, 2009 11:25 AM (lsiux)

160 so, it was the social agenda, not the indiscriminate spending when placed in charge of things that hurt the Rs?  doubtful but nice try. 

Posted by: ed at July 28, 2009 11:26 AM (Urhve)

161 maddog and Curmudgeon -- Of course you're right. The social con agenda/issues are not the danger that the mushy middle thinks they are. And the socialist/death agenda of the hard core leftists is horribly destructive -- systemically destructive. But a real, actual fact is that the middle sees it differently. Clearly, the way we're going things now is not effective in this regard. So what are we going to do about that? What is in our power to change? Only the message that our side presents. So, I'll add another bullet point to my three suggestions from above:

4) Strengthen outlets that give an accurate presentation of the views of both sides and their relative likelihood to actually be made into controlling law. In other words, work to establish and grow media outlets that are fair to our viewpoint until they meet or exceed the legacy media in trust and penetration with the general public.
Prognosis: Possible. Ongoing. Will take years, but worth fighting for.

Posted by: mr.frakypants at July 28, 2009 11:28 AM (PonvG)

162

The worst offenders are from New England, New York City and LA. 

And let the record show, those areas are the most highly concentrated enclaves of self-important shitheads in recorded history. I would rather have lunch with almost any high-school dropout from the South that had real-world experience and skills than the most highly educated snotty prick from the Upper East Side that most likely couldn't open a beer can by himself.

Geographical lineage means shit as far as I'm concerned. Having a 212 area code doesn't make you a royal family heir.

Posted by: UGAdawg at July 28, 2009 11:29 AM (thedx)

163 Cocksucker!

Posted by: Mr Wu at July 28, 2009 11:30 AM (PD1tk)

164

"Can't we all just get a long?"  Rodney King, felon

Posted by: Kempermanx at July 28, 2009 11:30 AM (qvT/A)

165 Voinovich is still just sore that LSU KICKED OHIO STATE'S *** in the BCS Championship Game a few years ago.

Posted by: Paradigm Shift at July 28, 2009 11:30 AM (/s5j6)

166

I don't really know anyone about whom I could say "he got married for the pussy."

Tom Brady disagrees.

Posted by: UGAdawg at July 28, 2009 11:31 AM (thedx)

167

I am amused, though, how people always refer to teh gays as loving the ass (which they do), but don't routinely refer to their straight friends as "loving the cooch" (or whatever) when talking about their relationships.

Well I just do it as kind of a joke.  And you could say that part of it stems from the gay culture perhaps.  "We're here, we're queer."  Its just such a big thing for the culture to emphasize the sexuality.

I don't see why the government needs to call it marriage. Have them call it a partnership. In time, most people will just start calling it marriage anyway -- it's simpler and less awkward than bullshit about "partners" and "partnerships." I mean, are we talking about people or businesses? And make not mistake, whatever the government decides to do or recognize most folks will calling two dudes or two chicks who get partnerized "married" within thirty years anyway. It's just the way society's going. The government can either change with the people or get left behind.

I don't agree.  I think that in the legal sense their should be the emphasis on the difference between marriage and whatever legal term is used, like civil unions.  Hell I'm even all for all legal unions gay or straight being termed civil unions, because that term has no meaning to other organizations like churches.  And yeah most people will still say they are married.  They may even have a ceremony that isn't by a justice of the peace.  But the legal distinction would still be important in my eyes.  It also eliminates the concern about attacking traditional institutions, and giving the advocates the legal equality they claim they want.  I say claim because I see them as similar to your earlier reference to the people who say its the social con agenda they don't like.  There's actually more than what they claim publicly going on.

Posted by: buzzion at July 28, 2009 11:33 AM (Lrsi6)

168 ed -- nope. The middle is willing to accept that kind of spending. They'll leave it, too, as long as the economy is fine. The indiscriminate spending hurt Republican turnout though, which, when coupled with losing several points of the middle due to misguided perceptions about social conservatives was more than enough. When you're running neck and neck in a national race, and three percent of last time's supporters stay home because you're spending like drunken sailors, and the other side has unprecedented turnout due to a one-time event (first black President evah!), you need every single percentage point from the middle that you can get.

Posted by: mr.frakypants at July 28, 2009 11:33 AM (PonvG)

169 Tears are manly, dammit. Just ask Ray and frakypants.

Posted by: Senator Voinovich (RINO-Oh) at July 28, 2009 11:35 AM (l1f4+)

170

#163 I'm glad I taught you that word, Wu. And it sure fits this case. Fits it like a glove.

Posted by: Al Swearengen at July 28, 2009 11:37 AM (l1f4+)

171 I cried when they canceled my subscription to Jugs magazine for trying to pay in crusty socks. I'm just pathetic that way.

Posted by: mr.frakypants at July 28, 2009 11:38 AM (PonvG)

172

Considering Ohio sent this blathering boob to the Senate one must ask why Ohio still has Senatorial Privileges...

Posted by: Jay at July 28, 2009 11:16 AM (/ZX77)

Sherrod "Mr Connie Schultz" Brown makes the situation even worse; think "younger version of Durbin".

Posted by: Captain Hate at July 28, 2009 11:44 AM (U1nHn)

173

if the fraky analysis is correct, why did the Dems recruit and run conservative dems (or at least pretend conservative Dems), many of whom ran to the right of their Republican opponents?  certainly, they made an issue of the fiscal stewardship of the R's and the R's had no response.  and, I would add, many of the sc issues are winners-welfare reform, illegal immigration, affirmative action, opposition to gay marriage are all issues where the majority of americans prefer the "social con" side of the coin.  As the dems are realizing, it's all about the economy and the R's didn't do a good job with it.

Posted by: ed at July 28, 2009 11:44 AM (Urhve)

174 And one more thing: You know how social issues are supposed to be a big loser?
Yeah, they are every time we run away crying "don't be so mean to me." When we stand up and fight back, we win. See, e.g. Carrie Prejean.

Posted by: jimmuy8 at July 28, 2009 11:45 AM (EOPB+)

175 Hammer, you are fine, and a good commenter. I understand the obamacare concerns, it is the exact opposite of what is needed to improve cost efficiency in the health care industry. If it somehow passes, it will be a disaster. Yes, social con republican politicians will vote against it, and for that I am happy. But it is the southern inspired social con agenda that keeps there from being more republican politicians to vote against it. That is my position from living in the heart of the south.

Hell, the extremist responses on this thread make the point, summarized it has been "you don't like the southern inspired soc con agenda, then go fk yourself"  I will never vote for a liberal, and I'll still vote republican as the lesser of two evils, but I don't expect them to regain power with some of the attitudes I see on this thread.

Posted by: ray at July 28, 2009 11:47 AM (ve72s)

176

summarized it has been "you don't like the southern inspired soc con agenda, then go fk yourself" 

That is a lie.  Liar.

Posted by: Judean People's Front at July 28, 2009 11:49 AM (B+qrE)

177 Btw, was "chaos" draining Voinovich's balls when he was making that speech?

Posted by: Captain Hate at July 28, 2009 11:51 AM (U1nHn)

178

summarized it has been "you don't like the southern inspired soc con agenda, then go fk yourself" 

That is a lie.  Liar.

Sorry...should have taken off the sockpuppet.

You're still a liar, Ray and a coward unwilling to address any of the facts I presented above.  Liar.

Posted by: Circa (Insert Year Here) at July 28, 2009 11:52 AM (B+qrE)

179

 But it is the southern inspired social con agenda that keeps there from being more republican politicians to vote against it.

You are utterly and spectacularly full of shit.

The Republicans after the 2004 elections had 55 Senate seats and proceeded to grow the government faster than at any point since 1969.

Subsequently, after the 2008 elections the Republicans had 40 Senate seats.

You can point to no, that is zero, polling indicating what you're blathering about has any semblance of truth.

You are an unmitigated liar.

Posted by: Jay at July 28, 2009 11:52 AM (/ZX77)

180 Apologies to all Southerners for the comments of this crybaby sack of shit.  Northerners like Voinovich make me embarrassed to be a Yankee (well, technically a border stater for most of my life).  I can't wait to retire so I can move to Texas where people understand the principles of individual liberty that made the country great.

Posted by: Reiver at July 28, 2009 11:54 AM (Yi1Sk)

181 What, pray tell, are
Southernors?

Posted by: Gerry at July 28, 2009 11:56 AM (Cd7AG)

182

 But it is the southern inspired social con agenda

Ronald Reagan instituted the "Mexico City Policy"

He was quite unpopular, wasn't he?

Posted by: Jay at July 28, 2009 11:57 AM (/ZX77)

183 When someone asks me where I am from.  I ALWAYS say S.E. Ohio. As far from Cleceland as you can get. If it was not for Cleveland, Ohio would be a solid Red State. Cleveland belongs to New York. Any NY poeple want it?? Glad to give it to you... You must also take Voinovich with you.

Posted by: Mystry at July 28, 2009 11:58 AM (dIHlE)

184 Voinkovich.

Posted by: Carlos at July 28, 2009 12:01 PM (ULGDc)

185

Sorry, I actually *don't* think ray is lying. I think he truly believes it. I have met a good many people in my own family who believe in the fundamentalist boogeyman.

However, ray *still* can't answer something all too many of us have noticed: how so many so-called "fiscal cons social libs" are NOT fiscal cons. I have not seen one on the national level. On the state level, I have not seen one since Pete Wilson, and that was 11 years ago. (OK, he tried to run for President in 1996, maybe he can be sort of national).

 

Posted by: Curmudgeon at July 28, 2009 12:02 PM (ujg0T)

186 Didn't some boob in these pages insist a short while ago that we needed to keep electing folks like Voinovich?

Posted by: Bender at July 28, 2009 12:07 PM (pLTLS)

187 Rephrase: I have met a good many people, including most of those in my own family, who believe in the fundamentalist boogeyman. Oops.

Posted by: Curmudgeon at July 28, 2009 12:07 PM (ujg0T)

188

What, pray tell, are Southernors?

They're evil, social-con robots sent from the future to burn down big tents that win Republicans elections.

Posted by: andycanuck at July 28, 2009 12:09 PM (l1f4+)

189 Bender  I am quite sure that it was not anyone from Ohio who blogs on AoS. Cleveland is another country until itself.

Posted by: Mystry at July 28, 2009 12:10 PM (dIHlE)

190 Is that guy crying?

Posted by: tachyonshuggy at July 28, 2009 12:12 PM (TXp3z)

191 Are you mr.frakypants? Where is mr.frakypants?

Posted by: RNO-850 series Model 101 at July 28, 2009 12:12 PM (l1f4+)

192 fiscal con/social lib is a fantasy-if you are the latter, you are going to be for more spending.  it holds true for Rs and Ds.  the social lib Rs are big spenders and there are no fiscal cons in the Ds. 

Posted by: ed at July 28, 2009 12:17 PM (Urhve)

193 Wow, so "social liberals" hate Southerners, Alaskans, the Military, White Folks, Christians, amd the Boy Scouts.

How Open, Affirming, Tolerant, and Accepting of the Frackers.

Posted by: CoolCzech at July 28, 2009 12:26 PM (kzhuA)

194 Ohio is a state that people move away from (same for Michigan). South Carolina is a state that people move to.

Posted by: Scipio at July 28, 2009 12:30 PM (01fwJ)

195

But it's okay to hate the hater, CoolCzech. Just like our liberal brothers and sisters do. And isn't it "Frakyrs"?

Posted by: andycanuck at July 28, 2009 12:30 PM (l1f4+)

196 Sorry. mr.frakypants was actually working for a while there.

You know what's awesome? Calling someone a liar and a coward when you think they're wrong. Then again, circa said that he thinks ray is an agent provocateur, so perhaps he thinks he has learned a secret truth that the rest of missed.

There are a host of reason that we only have 40 Senate seats now. Foremost is fiscal irresponsibility. I never said that the perception of the SocCon agenda was worth more than a few percentage points. But that's all it takes.

ed -- "sc issues are winners-welfare reform, illegal immigration, affirmative action, opposition to gay marriage are all issues where the majority of americans prefer the "social con" side of the coin"

Welfare reform, stopping illegal immigration and affirmative action are not what we're talking about here. Those are held by pretty much all conservatives and most libertarians. They are rationally supported issues with mainstream appeal. What I and (I think) ray are talking about is how a very small group of conservatives with little actual policy-making power are blown out of proportion and used to scare the middle. And it works. Now, what are we going to do about it?

And just to be clear, when I say "social conservative agenda," I'm talking about the group of notions that the middle has that the leaders of the Republican party, those church-going, regional-accent-wielding hicks, want to: put the Bible and prayer in schools, outlaw all abortions everywhere for everyone for any reason, put teh gays in the back of the bus. Clearly, this is inaccurate. However, there ARE people who call themselves Republicans and conservatives who DO believe this stuff, and they are loud and proud of it. I personally know people like this, so please don't say they do not exist. The problem is that the MSM and Dems have done a fantastic job of presenting to this microdot of folks to the politically uninterested as representative of all of us.

Posted by: mr.frakypants at July 28, 2009 12:30 PM (PonvG)

197 If it was not for Cleveland, Ohio would be a solid Red State. Cleveland belongs to New York. Any NY poeple want it?? Glad to give it to you... You must also take Voinovich with you.

Posted by: Mystry at July 28, 2009 11:58 AM (dIHlE)

Toledo's pretty fucking bad too, and Clodumbus has been infiltrated with lefties for quite a while.

Posted by: Captain Hate at July 28, 2009 12:37 PM (U1nHn)

198 Ray, what is your nick over at LGF?

Posted by: maddogg at July 28, 2009 12:38 PM (OlN4e)

199

Entdripy

"been to ohio..."

Bite me.

Native Ohioan, hate Voinobitch.

Let' have the names of your illustrious senators.

 

Posted by: BenZacharia at July 28, 2009 12:40 PM (ilThe)

200 183 When someone asks me where I am from.  I ALWAYS say S.E. Ohio. As far from Cleceland as you can get. If it was not for Cleveland, Ohio would be a solid Red State. Cleveland belongs to New York. Any NY poeple want it?? Glad to give it to you... You must also take Voinovich with you.

Posted by: Mystry at July 28, 2009 11:58 AM (dIHlE)

No  thanks.  New York has enough loons.

Posted by: Scipio at July 28, 2009 12:42 PM (01fwJ)

201

Ohio is a state that people move away from (same for Michigan). South Carolina is a state that people move to.

Yes, and my part of SC is crawling with Ohio transplants. I wish we could put border control checkpoints on I-77 and I-26.

Posted by: Ghost of Lee Atwater at July 28, 2009 12:47 PM (sXLx/)

202

Calling someone a liar and a coward when you think they're wrong.

Yeah. Only a bunch of hicks would do that.

Posted by: GOP-850 series Model 101 at July 28, 2009 12:54 PM (l1f4+)

203

Scopio,

How's your version of Clintonesq chief executive doing?

"SE Ohio..."

What county of Ohio Klan country?

http://tinyurl.com/6xf77w

Posted by: BenZacharia at July 28, 2009 12:56 PM (ilThe)

204 andycanuck -- "Yeah. Only a bunch of hicks would do that."

I don't get your implication... Are you picking on me because I spelled out what it is that middle-roaders and liberals see when they look at conservatives? To be clear, I was saying that it's shitty of Circa to call ray a liar and a coward. Ray's trying to make a point that he thinks is correct. Circa called him a liar, imputing Moby motives to him. Circa also called him a coward because he hadn't addressed every one Circa's objections and insults. Shockingly, I think that's shitty.


Posted by: mr.frakypants at July 28, 2009 01:01 PM (PonvG)

205 I used to consider myself a "Voinovich" republican- WAY back when he was mayor of Cleveland.  He was able to work with an incredibly hostile city council to pull that place together after the default of Kucinich's craptastic rule over the city.

As governor he actually responded to a letter I had written to him concerning high speed rail, even when Kucinich at that time as a congressman, did not.

Since though, Voinovich has done too many things to indicate that his brain's been circling the drain and is about to vanish into the pipework.

If you ever want a great example of how one man can build a coalition to save a city- look up the better and saner days of Mr. Voinovich's career, particularly concerning his dealings with a Mr. George Forbes, then head of said hostile city council.

What the hell happened to this guy?

Woosh.

Posted by: WTGOhio at July 28, 2009 01:10 PM (Gzns3)

206

No, mr.frakypants, #204, I was just pointing out the irony of you insulting others while bitching about being insulted. [Sorry for the sockpuppet; my IE cut out while posting and when I reposted, I didn't fix the sockpuppet.]

BTW, in Canada, today's Conservative Party and the former Progressive Conservative Party were everything you want the GOP to be and we were still called Nazis and religious psychos by the MSM. Appeasement and calling a good chunk of your base 'hicks' isn't going to change that just getting GOPers staying at home like they did in '08 for McCain.

Posted by: andycanuck at July 28, 2009 01:11 PM (l1f4+)

207 Voinovich is a raging pussy with delusions of adequacy.

Posted by: MCPO Airdale at July 28, 2009 01:12 PM (l51zO)

208 ray - blow me.

Posted by: MCPO Airdale at July 28, 2009 01:14 PM (l51zO)

209 Actually, I wasn't insulting him, or casting aspersions on his character. I first sarcastically said that what he had done was "awesome." I have now modified that to saying it is, unsarcastically, "shitty." At no point did I say anything about Circa personally, unlike Circa, who claimed that Ray was both a liar and coward. Hopefully the difference is clear.

Posted by: mr.frakypants at July 28, 2009 01:15 PM (PonvG)

210

BTW, in Canada, today's Conservative Party and the former Progressive Conservative Party were everything you want the GOP to be and we were still called Nazis and religious psychos by the MSM.

Another threadwinner. To all republicans tired of smeared by the lamestream media--repeat after me: "THEY'RE ONLY GOING TO HATE ME/US ANYWAY...."

What to do:

1. Smear back. Only you have the truth, so it isn't really smearing. When they start crying, "Waaaaah! You're questioning my patriotism!", you have hit paydirt, and dig harder.

2. Opt out. See how many products of the lamestream media you can opt out of. This explains why newspapers die. This is not entirely possible. A successful boycott of the phony global warming backer GE CEO is not likely. However, I sure as hell don't have to buy McClatchy Newspapers or buy girly bath products for my wife at commie Anita Roddick's "The Body Shop". I can go elsewhere.

Posted by: Curmudgeon at July 28, 2009 01:18 PM (ujg0T)

211 When I was a young man I worked for a land surveyor in the deep south . The most racist drunk asshole in the company was an Ohio transplant. The guy was an embarrassment. 
There's a big horse race in my area . The Elloree trials . It's kind of a spring training for thoroughbreds and quarter horses and widely attended . The obnoxious guy with the 4x6 battle flag in the back of his truck was the aforementioned Ohio asshole. Most southerners of my acquaintance appreciate the battle flag and have some affection for it but we don't fly it to avoid giving offence as most of us have black friends . Of course , whenever someone like Skippy Gates makes the news I'm tempted to rethink that philosophy.
Finally, one of my favorite hunting buddies and a fine woodsman is a native of Ohio. He retired from the Air Force in Sumter and has raised his sons and made his home here . Guys like that are always going to be welcomed .

Posted by: aubrey at July 28, 2009 01:21 PM (wb68R)

212

Here is Mark Steyn writing about Arnold Schwartzenegger. I think he sums up the social liberal/ fiscal conservative pretty well.

 A “social liberal/fiscal conservative” is not necessarily a girly-man, more of a pre-op transsexual.

...
But the reality is that almost every “socially liberal, fiscally conservative” politician turns out to be fiscally liberal — in the same way that, if you mix half a pint of vanilla ice cream with half a pint of horse manure, it’s not hard to figure which taste will predominate.

Posted by: Mikki at July 28, 2009 01:26 PM (OrnQy)

213 Did you know McCain had an affair, Curmudgeon?

Posted by: The New York Times at July 28, 2009 01:27 PM (l1f4+)

214 Honestly, that sounds better than the improper grammar he was using in that speech.  "err" sounds like a thought is coming, saying""We got too many Jim DeMints and Tom Coburns," sounds like your most educated thoughts have already been spoken.

- angry southerner

Posted by: Doctor B at July 28, 2009 01:29 PM (bXUQ5)

215
The proper response is not "Don't let the door hit you in the ass." it is

KISS MY REBEL ASS!

Posted by: Guvnah at July 28, 2009 01:48 PM (Rg8DN)

216 yes, all of you racist bible-thumpers please confine yourself to the south, i give you ten years before you start owning slaves again....

Posted by: DruggyBear at July 28, 2009 01:49 PM (K2aR3)

217

Southrons ( fuck that yankee Websters )  have carried the water for the Republicant party for years;only to have yankees vote in the Olympia Snowes, Susan Collins and the Arlen Spectums and Voinobitches to screw us. A job well done, bluebellies.

Please have the guts to purge your  fuckups. And stay where you live, we don't like carpetbaggers too much down here.

Posted by: saintsfan at July 28, 2009 01:54 PM (NjanH)

218 Shouldn't he be representing San Francisco?

Posted by: Thomas Jackson at July 28, 2009 01:55 PM (B8gqF)

219 What an effin wimp!!  George, GO HOME YOU COWARDLY FOOL.

Posted by: Richard Romano at July 28, 2009 01:58 PM (TivDR)

220

well, if illegal immigration, affirmative action, opposition to gay marriage and welfare reform weren't social con issues, am I somehow to think that the Repub squishes were the ones pushing the issues and Snowe/Collins/Graham/Spector/Voino were all rock ribbed in pushing for them?  Am I forgetting Arnie as well-is he strong on any of these issues?  Or are social con issues simply the ooga booga god stuff? 

Posted by: ed at July 28, 2009 02:02 PM (Urhve)

221   IS THERE ANYONE FROM THE MIDDLE HERE THAT CAN VERIFY WHAT FRAKYPANTS AND RAY ARE TELLING US YOU BELIVE?

Cause I don't believe they know you that well.

Anyone?

Posted by: klrtz1 at July 28, 2009 02:06 PM (Q5asM)

222

Ray, Frankypants

The gay marriage issue is being forced on us by liberals, the media (BIRM), and liberal judges intent on making everyone recognize as an equal, M/M or W/W marriage to M/W.  We're not allowed to think it's immoral or we're biggots, homophobs, etc.  The left is intent on forcing all of us to agree with them.  They make it an issue. 

Gays, as buzzion so elequently answered in 150, don't need our permission to do what they do when they do.  But, they should need permission to rewrite hundreds of years of moral and civil code because they want it that way.  Remember, the burden of proof for a rational reason is on the side asking for the change, not the status quo.  It's amusing to me that those who screamed the loudest in the 60's and 70's that you can't legislate morality are forcing as much of their moraility on us they can as fast as they can.

The data on abortion is not kind to the left.  It is rarely, and I mean rarely, used for cases of rape, incest, mother's health.  It is stastically undeniable that it's birth-control.  I happen to believe the state forcing me to sanction that type of birth control is worth voting against. 

Name 1 significant social issue in the last 50 years where the wise moderates have compromised to the right side of the issue.  Affirmitive action, abortion, amnesty, gay marriage...the moderates all always seem to vote for the compromise that makes the left happy. 

Posted by: The Hammer at July 28, 2009 02:15 PM (YBTwf)

223 The straw man of social liberal/fiscal con is a red herring. There are social cons like Huckabee who are not the fiscal conservatives. Different morality pushing, same fiscal results. How about just plain the government stays out of my life, money and business? Why put up with either side's morality pushing? You can not win a majority by alienating gen-y, libertarians and social moderates. Yes, we will have a red south, which is why I like living here, but not a red federal government, which unfortunately trumps having a red state. 

FYI, to the fisherman, the blogs I frequent are Powerline, here, Gateway Pundit, Patterico's, Jawa Report, Hot Air, Red State, and a handful of minor libertarian blogs. I stopped visiting LGF when he went off the deep end and started banning everyone last year.

Posted by: ray at July 28, 2009 02:16 PM (ve72s)

224

LEAVE VOINOVICH ALONE!!! LEAVE HIM ALONE!!!

(sobs/blubbers)

Posted by: mikeyslaw at July 28, 2009 02:20 PM (QMGr1)

225 What the hell happened to this guy?

Woosh.

Posted by: WTGOhio at July 28, 2009 01:10 PM (Gzns3)

He was never that fucking good; he just kept getting elected because he was better than the lunatics he ran against or replaced, but he never faced a primary challenge against a real conservative.  Everybody knows what a fucking nutjob Kucinich is but Celeste was like a northern version of Slick (complete with a lesbian wife) in terms of being complete human garbage.  George got his ass kicked when he ran against Metzenbaum, including the weird charge that Howard was soft on child-porn (he probably was but that's a claim that can earn you a lot of ridicule from the likes of brain-dead John Glenn unless you've got a video of him sodomizing an infant).  There was a lot to criticize a cocksucker like Metzenbaum, who made his fucking jack from operating goddamn parking lots (a nice cash bidness if you know what I mean) and then sticking the wood to anybody else who wanted to improve their lot in life.  But Voinovich took a powder on that, probably because he was illegally steering so much business to his POS brother, Paul, who's now dead and is probably the reason George is retiring since he can't benefit from any more kickbacks.

Posted by: Captain Hate at July 28, 2009 02:23 PM (U1nHn)

226

"We're moving closer to a point where we can hold insurance companies accountable," House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, a Democrat, told reporters, repeating her frequent prediction that once a bill hits the floor for a vote "it will win."  From Hot Air link

"We're moving closer to a point where we can hold every subject under our rule insurance companies accountable," House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, a Democrat, told reporters, repeating her frequent prediction that once a bill hits the floor for a vote "it will win."

FIFY, Nan.

 

You see, moderates, at some point, they will come for something you find worth fighting for. 

Posted by: The Hammer at July 28, 2009 02:24 PM (YBTwf)

227 And they'll of course be coming up to the Midwest in November right? You know when the chance of snow is pretty good. Nice cold days where maybe, where your speedy little receivers can't catch a ball because their hands are frozen.

Sure. FSU and Miami get the occasional trip to Bah-ston College every couple of years. Actually, FSU goes every-other-year seeing as they're division rivals.

A shame the Big Teneleven is allergic to going on the road in football - most big, out of conference games happen at home. They always play the ACC in basketball home-and-home.

Ironically, they usually get their asses handed to them in that sport as well.

Posted by: I R A Darth Aggie at July 28, 2009 02:30 PM (1hM1d)

228 222. My immediate snap responses:

Regarding the gay marriage issue, just get the government out of marriage. Adults can enter into civil contracts recognized by the state. "Marriage" is a religious ceremony/sacrament with requirements established by the religion without interference from the state.

Abortion is a balance of the rights of the mother vs. the unborn fetus/baby. Mother's rights predominate up to viability, when then the unborn baby's rights predominate except in cases of possible severe health/death of the mother. It's not what I would prefer, but it is a balanced compromise.

I am not a moderate, but I understand the GOP needs to not drive them all away if it wants a national majority in congress. It can gain converts and win by emphasizing the areas of fiscal policy, liberty, defense, and conservation.


Posted by: ray at July 28, 2009 02:30 PM (ve72s)

229

223--Ray " How about just plain the government stays out of my life, money and business?"

Agree completely.  Tell B to the O to leave my SUV, thermostat, light bulbs, health care and food pantry alone.  Tell liberal judges to stop tryying to force me to recognize as equal M/M and W/W v M/W marriages.  Tell liberal judges to stop forcing me to sanction abortion as birth control.  Tell the pro-ams that people here illegally shouldn't be here in the first place and certainly shouldn't get my tax dollars as an enabler to remain here.

Again, all of these are issues becuase the left is pushing them on us, not the other way around. 

Posted by: The Hammer at July 28, 2009 02:30 PM (YBTwf)

230 A shame the Big Teneleven is allergic to going on the road in football - most big, out of conference games happen at home. They always play the ACC in basketball home-and-home.

Ironically, they usually get their asses handed to them in that sport as well.

Posted by: I R A Darth Aggie at July 28, 2009 02:30 PM (1hM1d)

No "usually" about it; the Big Televen has lost the ACC challenge every year.

Posted by: Captain Hate at July 28, 2009 02:35 PM (U1nHn)

231

Circa also called him a coward because he hadn't addressed every one Circa's objections and insults.

Hey, asshat junior--I called him a liar because he is one.  Compare and contrast:

From Ray:  "but we and the rest of the country get distracted from these core items when the social cons in the south push the crazy issues like intelligent design, gay marriage, Obama's birth certificate, etc.. It is the crazy social con items that may have people in other parts of the country frustrated with the GOP."

Here's what I said in reply:  You are an asshat, too.  Tell me how any of those three issues you mentioned are in any way concentrated in the South.  PROP 8--HELLO!!!

Mutilated into this later by Ray:  summarized it has been "you don't like the southern inspired soc con agenda, then go fk yourself" 

That.  Is.  A.  Lie.

So, frakypants--in the immortal words of  Junior Soprano:  Go shit in your hat.

 

 


 

Posted by: Circa (Insert Year Here) at July 28, 2009 02:36 PM (B+qrE)

232 ray,

Not to question your truthiness, but I've not seen you in the AoS HQ comments before. And I've been here from nearly the beginning. So when you claim to frequent the top conservative blogs like you're running down a list you lose some credibility.

And even if you are a conservative (and I doubt it) you'd do well not to buy the MSM's line that conservatives are all the things you've mentioned above. Most of us just want a less intrusive federal government for all the reasons articulated by Publius* all those years ago. But it's nice to see you warming so nicely to the Liberal talking point.

BTW, isn't it funny that gay pride parades (like those documented by Zombie) aren't representative of the Left? And the Mexican separatists only represent a Leftist fringe? Ditto those in favor of reparations?

Funny how it's only social cons (as defined by ray) who represent the larger movement and cost it votes.

*Granted, most people haven't read the Federalist Papers. But most of the lessons therein have been absorbed into the conservative conscience through long experience and common sense.

Posted by: Nom de Blog at July 28, 2009 02:37 PM (0craS)

233 Senator Never-Heard-of-Him is now on my shit list. As a proper Southern lady, I sparingly use crass words like "shit," but I'll make an exception for him.

Posted by: Girl Thursday


If you make a a decent mint julep, I might be in love.

Posted by: I R A Darth Aggie at July 28, 2009 02:43 PM (1hM1d)

234

 we and the rest of the country get distracted from these core items when the social cons in the south push the crazy issues like intelligent design, gay marriage, Obama's birth certificate, etc..

I see that California has been overrun by social-cons.

Posted by: flenser at July 28, 2009 02:50 PM (4rlX1)

235 When we southerners reintroduce slavery in ten yrs.I have dibs on Druggy Bear.
I can't wait to see his fat ass sweating in my cotton field .
He's probably whackin' it to that fantasy .

Posted by: aubrey at July 28, 2009 02:51 PM (wb68R)

236 besides, Jim DeMint and Tom Coburn are creationists. Voinovich is just trying to save his party from theocratic anti-science zealots.

Posted by: charles johnson at July 28, 2009 02:57 PM (HWySf)

237

Welfare reform, stopping illegal immigration and affirmative action are not what we're talking about here. Those are held by pretty much all conservatives and most libertarians. They are rationally supported issues with mainstream appeal. What I and (I think) ray are talking about is how a very small group of conservatives with little actual policy-making power are blown out of proportion and used to scare the middle.

 

 Opposition to gay marriage is a least as widespread as opposition to affirmative action and illegal immigraton. And probably more widespread than support for wefare reform. This stupid bullshit about how social-con issues are dragging down the GOP needs a stake driven through its heart. They're the only thing keeping the party afloat.

Posted by: flenser at July 28, 2009 02:58 PM (4rlX1)

238

194 Ohio is a state that people move away from (same for Michigan). South Carolina is a state that people move to.

Yeah, but they have to come through Charlotte to get to Myrtle Beach, and the fuckers are always on the phone and in some beat up rusted car.  You guys ever heard of airplanes? or MAPS?

The only ones worse are the West Virginia rednecks, they can't read and usually miss the exit so they are lost for days trying to get on US 74. In there defense, they will get drunk though. Usually at the 7 11 buying beer and cigs, at 8 am.

Please remember the NAACP still has a boycott on SC, why don't you fuckers go to Lake Michigan?

Cause its on fire?

Kemp

Posted by: kempermanx at July 28, 2009 03:00 PM (2+9Yx)

239 Oklahoma isn't the South. Some in Oklahoma will tell you otherwise, but it isn't.

I would tend to agree. I haven't found any evidence that the restaurants in Okieland serve sweet tea.

It's a southern thing. Y'all wouldn't understand.

Posted by: I R A Darth Aggie at July 28, 2009 03:01 PM (1hM1d)

240 why don't you fuckers go to Lake Michigan?

I don't claim to speak for Midwesterners, because I'm not originally from here; but the Great Lakes can be nice in their own way, but there's nothing like the force of the ocean.

Posted by: Captain Hate at July 28, 2009 03:03 PM (U1nHn)

241

My point was that the moderates and even non-hardcore liberals I know (and read) have a bug up their ass about people with religion. I don't disagree that the statist social libs certainly legislate their preferred morality -- they do.

They are called "bigots" and we don't need to pander to bigots. 



But to cherry-pick an issue from your list: gay marriage. From a liberty standpoint, two people should be able to enter into a contract if they want to.

You don't know the meaning of the word liberty. Two people should not be able to enter into a contract "if they want to" A contact is not between two people. A contract is with the larger society.

 While a large portion of Americans think it's immoral -- making it unpopular -- I've not heard a rational, coherent argument against it.

Then you badly need to open your eyes and hears and knock off the idiotic libertarian fantasy that your own beliefs are "rational" and "coherent" and not based on silly "morality".

Posted by: flenser at July 28, 2009 03:04 PM (4rlX1)

242

the rest of the nation, even though they support fiscally conservative principals, continues to elect crazy donks? I wonder why... perhaps because they don't agree with crazy social con agenda.

The rest of the nation supports the Demorats because they are fiscally liberal.

The only fiscally conservatve politicans in this country are also social conservatives. For some reason faux libertarians like you never come to grips with that basic reality.

Posted by: flenser at July 28, 2009 03:09 PM (4rlX1)

243 Where is Preston Brooks when you need him? http://geeitscoldinhere.blogspot.com/2009/07/cane-enabled.html

Posted by: Cold Eye at July 28, 2009 03:15 PM (IXyXX)

244 No "usually" about it; the Big Televen has lost the ACC challenge every year.

D'oh! So much for the vaunted superiority of the Yankee ubermench.

Posted by: I R A Darth Aggie at July 28, 2009 03:15 PM (1hM1d)

245 yes, all of you racist bible-thumpers please confine yourself to the south, i give you ten years before you start owning slaves again....

Posted by: DruggyBear at July 28, 2009 01:49 PM (K2aR3)

 

The only thing you should look into owning is a brain.

Posted by: TheQuietMan at July 28, 2009 03:18 PM (1Jaio)

246 I R A Darth Aggie,

The Big East -- ACC Challenge didn't go too well for the Yanks either. But at least the Big East won a time or two in the mid-80s.

That said, a Big 12 -- ACC Basketball Challenge would be lopsided too.

Posted by: Nom de Blog at July 28, 2009 03:31 PM (0craS)

247 229. Hammer, we agree on most points with regard to desired policy outcomes. Getting to those outcomes will only be possible with the control a majority provides. The GOP will not get a majority without some more gen-y's, libertarians, social moderates and minorities than it got the last couple of election cycles. The difference in gaining the necessary converts is in what they perceive as the GOP's real priorities and agenda.

234. Yeah, how is that issue helping the GOP in CA win elections there? Did they gain anything other than a bunch of bad press and protests. It was a pyrrhic victory.

242. Huckabee and Bush were fiscally conservative?

Posted by: ray at July 28, 2009 03:57 PM (ve72s)

248

Huckabee and Bush were fiscally conservative?

Depends who you compare them to. Like, compared to the bunch in power now, they look like Milton Freidman.

Posted by: Sort-of-Mad Max at July 28, 2009 04:02 PM (ERJIu)

249

Huckabee and Bush were fiscally conservative?

Mount Rainer is the tallest mountain on Earth?

 

how is that issue helping the GOP in CA win elections there?

You make seattle slow seem like a brain surgon. Do you deny that it is a fact that social conservative issues are more popualr in Califrnia than is the Republican Party? When you say 'yes", the next question wll be "what issues are really making the GOP unpopular, since gay marrige is not one of then?".

Posted by: flenser at July 28, 2009 04:05 PM (5Ntwc)

250 248. I understand, but if the GOP has to compromise somewhere, I would much prefer the second to the last place they comprise be the area of fiscal conservatism.

Posted by: ray at July 28, 2009 04:08 PM (ve72s)

251

I would much prefer the second to the last place they comprise be the area of fiscal conservatism.

Has any libertarian ever wondered why neither parry is much interested in fiscal conservatism? Considering that libertarians believe that there are masses of fiscally conservative people in the country it seem like an obvious question.

Posted by: flenser at July 28, 2009 04:14 PM (5Ntwc)

252 249. Your post is another example of what repels rather than attracts. The insults only tarnish, they never help. To answer the question, I don't know why the GOP continues to fail in CA, I don't live there. I do know the decline started with their great pyrrhic victory with proposition 187. Surely the prop 8 victory will reward them to an equal degree.

Posted by: ray at July 28, 2009 04:21 PM (ve72s)

253

I do know the decline started with their great pyrrhic victory with proposition 187.

The great pyrrhic victory with proposition 187? You are no libertarian, Mr Moby. Stop pretending to be one.

Posted by: flenser at July 28, 2009 04:22 PM (5Ntwc)

254 251. I am sure they have wondered, and they still haven't found a solution to the issue. The majority of people only seem to pay attention to the fiscal issues when the economy is in the ditch, or they perceive one of the parties is doing something major that will put it in the ditch. We are in one of those periods, doubly so.

Posted by: ray at July 28, 2009 04:25 PM (ve72s)

255 Circa: I see you bring the charm that wins the elections. Good on you.

flenser: There's a difference between pandering and not giving your enemy ammunition. In fact, that's one of the major topics here that Ace came down on and took a lot of flack for. There are better ways to present ourselves, and part of that is pinpointing the negotiable stuff that puts a lot of people off. Is there a better way we can present this so as to actually, like, win an election? And sorry I didn't put on my legal hat -- a contract is a binding agreement between parties. Obviously, that contract is only as binding as the force of the society behind it.

If this is how you guys deal with people in general in your lives ... wow. Kind of stunning. On the other hand -- you must be hell on wheels when arguing with enemies as opposed to people who probably share your policy goals. And charming. I'm sure you're charming, too.

Posted by: mr.frakypants at July 28, 2009 04:27 PM (pffBj)

256 253. Calling it what it was doesn't mean i don't agree with its sentiments, because I do. I am strongly supportive of border security and ssn job verification, but that doesn't change history. Your instincts appear in need of calibration. I still don't know what moby implies, please educate me on the term.

Posted by: ray at July 28, 2009 04:28 PM (ve72s)

257 255. Nice, I really enjoy a well done mildly sarcastic compliment. Yes, some are charming as charmin.

Posted by: ray at July 28, 2009 04:38 PM (ve72s)

258 ray -- a "moby" is someone who goes to a political website, pretending to agree with their point of view, but then attempting to sow discord.

Look, I realize this is AoSH and everything, and we love to snack on hobo brains and baptize our illegitimate babies in Valu-Rite. It's not debate club. But it bugs me that someone can't try to make a legitimate argument without being called a liar or a coward, or told that they don't the meaning of the word liberty, or any of a host of other insults. Some people here either need an education in how one is supposed to treat their allies, or, more likely, some rejiggering of their threat detectors. Recognize allies -- don't shoot at them. Save your bullets for the bad guys. And hobos.

Posted by: mr.frakypants at July 28, 2009 04:41 PM (pffBj)

259

a contract is a binding agreement between parties. Obviously, that contract is only as binding as the force of the society behind it.

In other words, a contract is betwwen two or more parties and the society they are a part of. For some reason libertarains, like liberals, think that society does not get to decide which contracts it ought to be a part of.

you must be hell on wheels when arguing with enemies as opposed to people who probably share your policy goals.

ray does not share my policy goals. He's a liberal.

As for real libertarians, it's worth arguing with them because they don't seem to grasp that their means and their goals contradict one another, and in theory they can be made to see this. At least if they are even half as rational at they like to thnk.

Posted by: flenser at July 28, 2009 04:44 PM (5ykPS)

260

I still don't know what moby implies

A moby is the sort of person who goes around saying "I don't know what moby means".

Your instincts appear in need of calibration.

Something you would only say if you understood the term moby.

 

Posted by: flenser at July 28, 2009 04:47 PM (5ykPS)

261

it bugs me that someone can't try to make a legitimate argument without being called a liar or a coward, or told that they don't the meaning of the word liberty, or any of a host of other insults.

Libertarians don't know the meaning of the word "liberty". That is not an insult. It's a fact. Libertarians are to liberty as liberals are to wealth. They know they want it but they are clueless as to where it comes from. They think that people are born with it, sort of like a invisable appendage.

Some people here either need an education in how one is supposed to treat their allies

Act lke an ally and I'll reconize you as one. Defend a troll like ray and I won't. The substance of what he said was addressed and rejected. It is a lie to suggest that southern conservatives are more big governement than other conservatives.

If you want to disagree with the substance of the rebuttals that were given to ray, go ahead.

Posted by: flenser at July 28, 2009 04:53 PM (5ykPS)

262

there aren't that many "real" libertarians.  mostly, you have the pot legalizers, who are like the liberals who only think about abortion, and the neo nazis (Ron Paul's base).  throw in a few academics who write against the State while on the public dime and you've pretty much got them covered.  the ones who call themselves libertarians but still find a way to vote D are just morons.

Posted by: ed at July 28, 2009 04:55 PM (Urhve)

263

I am sure they have wondered, and they still haven't found a solution to the issue. The majority of people only seem to pay attention to the fiscal issues when the economy is in the ditch

 

Well, yes. So what price the belief that the American electrorate are crying out for fiscally conservative/socially liberal leadership? How is it that some people keep telling themselves this in spite of the mountains of evidence to the contrary?

 

A couple of years ago the Big Libertarian Idea was to move to NH and take over that state and elect real libertarians to Congress. What happened? It's almost like the number of real libertarians in America could fill one small town.  

Posted by: flenser at July 28, 2009 04:59 PM (5ykPS)

264 Ron Paul isn't a neo-Nazi. Can people on the right stop talking like frickin' moonbats?

Posted by: flenser at July 28, 2009 05:00 PM (5ykPS)

265

he might not be-he certainly wasn't too careful in his choice of associations or newsletter editors. 

Posted by: ed at July 28, 2009 05:07 PM (Urhve)

266 flesner -- I don't think the electorate is really crying out for anything. Basically, around 65-70% people pay no attention to politics or national issues unless there is a major election imminent, or something is going really badly -- like a fiscal crisis. Then, they read some headlines and go with their gut. Usually their gut says: it something bad is happening to me, it because of the people currently in charge. And thus the political world turns.

When I say that people in general support fiscal responsiblity, what I mean is that when put to a question and asked to think about, a large majority of people do support it. However, they don't actively support it. Only when pressed and when the issue is presented fairly. The rest of the time, they don't give a shit.

And, you might have to put me knowledge, but I was under the impression that "liberty" was a condition. A continuum along which states of being can exist. There a large number of external and internal factors that dictate where along that continuum any particular individual falls, including (but not limited to) the government they live under, how much and what type of material resources they have, how clearly they think and how much personal skill they possess. Your definition may vary.

Also, I wasn't defending ray's original statement that the stuff that looks bad comes from Southern social conservatives. The later stuff and the silly jumping-to-conclusions attacks was that upon which I first commented.

Posted by: mr.frakypants at July 28, 2009 05:09 PM (pffBj)

267

Circa: I see you bring the charm that wins the elections. Good on you.

Care to address the point?  Coward.

Posted by: Circa (Insert Year Here) at July 28, 2009 05:11 PM (B+qrE)

268 I met the SOB in DC at a party and refused to shake his hand.  The guy is a real dick.  I am glad he's leaving and his toady Dewine lost.  Hopefully Ohio conservatives will find their soul this election cycle.

Posted by: Dan at July 28, 2009 05:14 PM (qfb86)

269 "Libatarians" who vote 'D' ( Bill Maher)  only call themselves libatarians so they can pay for 5 dollar tranny hookers without the threat of being arrested. 

Posted by: Dave C at July 28, 2009 05:20 PM (Gb2DO)

270

Charlie Crist is a Southerner ... and I'll be Voin likes him.

 

I bet he likes him a lot.

 

Especially Charlie's tan.

Posted by: HondaV65 at July 28, 2009 05:22 PM (8X9tr)

271

I am originally from Oklahoma, currently live in the People's Republic of Illinois.  When I moved to Memphis a decade or two ago, my wife was commenting to some of the locals that "My husband is from the south, he is from Oklahoma."  Their response was "Oh, honey, that's not the south."  Their thinking is that Oklahoma was Indian Territory during the War of Northern Aggression, so it can't be the south.

However, you can get grits in restaurants in the morning and sweet tea in most places, so it is almost a southern state.

Posted by: Bill H at July 28, 2009 05:24 PM (d4GA0)

272 The fiscally conservative/socially liberal is a crock and a myth.  It will never work.

The socially liberal side will always outweigh the fiscally conservative side. 

There will always be more social programs that need money/spending. 

More is the operative word there.

Posted by: Dave C at July 28, 2009 05:27 PM (Gb2DO)

273

I was under the impression that "liberty" was a condition.

Liberty to do what? Every school of thought has a different answer to that question, including libertarians, who want people to be free to behave as libertarians think they should and not free to behave as libertarians think they should not.

The later stuff and the silly jumping-to-conclusions attacks was that upon which I first commented.

Once rays inital assertions were debunked, we moved on the the "later stuff" aka name calling, as is SOP around here.

Posted by: flenser at July 28, 2009 05:31 PM (i9lIc)

274 As to whether Oklahoma is a southern state. As an Okie, I say no. Maybe in the south-east corner you could make that mistake, or so I've heard, never been there, but where I live Southern accents are rare, and most people here tend to identify Oklahoma as it's own unique place, not south or Midwest.

Posted by: RowBoat at July 28, 2009 05:33 PM (+H+eO)

275 I'd vote for Foghorn Leghorn if he'd cut taxes.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-LCsiWL6gn0#t=3m50s

Posted by: dorkafork at July 28, 2009 06:56 PM (LIM+2)

276

I'm planning on moving to the Tampa area, I have friends in Clearwater.

I'm fucking tired of having to watch what I say and to be politically correct in Central Ohio.

Blacks are blacks, whites are whites and mexicans are mexicans, ese.

Posted by: ErikW at July 28, 2009 09:36 PM (hKtiw)

277

Look at it like this: fiscal responsibility, individual liberty and strong foreign policy sells very well with the American people

 

Yes, that's why the Democoms have total control of government - because the American people want fiscal responsibility. And they voted against the GOP because Bush was a darn theocon who wanted us to have sex only once a week in the missionary position.

Posted by: flenser at July 28, 2009 09:37 PM (7xYOc)

278 flenser - what is funny is you lie about what other people say. I never said southern conservatives are more big government that other conservatives. There is nothing even close to stating a belief in those words. That you state such a lie at the very end as a justification for your irrational comments from the beginning demonstrates immaturity. You never once addressed the substance of what I said. How does your epic fail taste?

Posted by: ray at July 28, 2009 10:50 PM (ve72s)

279 Oklahoma is part of the Plains States, not the South.

Other states not in the South:
Texas -- It exists unto itself.
Louisiana -- It would be Southern if not for the Creole influence.
Florida -- Below Tampa is Northern Cuba and that's not Southern.

Posted by: Nom de Blog at July 29, 2009 02:49 PM (0craS)

280

Dave, Entropy, yinzer, Brandon, et al:

FUCK YOU. Do not blame all of us native Ohioans for the likes of Voinovich (a RINO) or that fucking moonbat Kucinich. We Ohio conservatives (especially in the Cleveland area) are painfully aware of the fact that we are being suffocated in a democratic stronghold: http://tinyurl.com/mg3fgt

Some of your own states have their fair share of assclowns, past and present. Case in point: John Murtha (PA), Al Franken (MN), Nancy Pelosi (CA), Robert Byrd (WV), Ted Kennedy (MA), Ernest Hollings (SC)Jimmy Carter (GA), Keith Ellison (MN, and a radical MUSLIM, no less) John Edwards (NC), John Conyers (MI), Sheila Jackson Lee (TX),Slick Wille Clinton (AK), and last but certanly not least, OBAMA (IL).

There's lots of glass houses out there.

Posted by: SFC MAC at July 29, 2009 03:44 PM (cuNX0)

281

@Ben,

Don't like Cleveland?  Things could be worse....like Pittsburgh.  

Pittsburgh Is Dead to Me!
TONY DEL PRETE, GIBSONIA

Paying homage to Romero’s latest money fest, it’s time to admit it, all you yinzer zombies:
Pittsburgh is dead. I know it’s a stake in the heart, but we are not America’s most livable city, nor the city of champions. That occurred a generation ago, when Dawn of the Dead debuted. No, today we’re more like an ongoing high school reunion, with nothing but faded memories of the glory days and the prospect of life in the land of the dead.

But what can we expect from a town where Donnie Iris is considered a rocker and the hokey-pokey an anthem; where prominent mouthpieces (sorry, Myr’n) promote Pittsburghese; where potholes outnumber the people; and where the populace responds to the boom of fireworks like Pavlov’s dogs?

With the second-oldest county in the U.S. at our core, it’s unfair to blame the many optimists trying to revive Picksburgh. The reality is that until all of the provincial, stubborn bigots of the Steel City’s legacy die off, this city will continue its slide toward becoming a ghost town. And if we continue to live in the past, then we can’t expect or envision much of a future. Personally, I don’t hold out much hope. So I’ll offer some resuscitation strategies of my own while planning where I’ll retire once my kids grow up (and hopefully move away).

First, let’s replace the dinosaurs around town with, well, dinosaurs. We can erect likenesses of the ’70s Stillers on every corner. (Hell, for a couple of bucks or a Primanti’s sandwich, we might be able get some of the real guys to stand there.) That way, when people mumble about the Immaculate Reception to kids who could care less, at least they’ll have some idea of what’s going on inside the rotting brains of Steeler Nation. The Pirates and Penguins will be represented with holographs of their players — which, to most Pittsburghers, never existed anyway.

During the day, various unemployed workers could collect turn-signal bulbs, ashtrays and other unused items from drivers, which can be sold to pay for fire and police protection. In school, children would be reminded that “ain’t” ain’t a word, but yinz need to study for a test ’n ’at. Both newspapers would reformat to become all opinion, all the time. Television stations will drop their “World in a Minute” segment to devote even more time to weather reports. Target, Wal-Mart and TJ Maxx would be the cornerstone of Plan F.

Then, each evening after work, giant speakers would blast the hokey-pokey — “You put the right wing in, you kick the left wing out …” This could be followed by the Chicken Dance, which would mesmerize jaywalkers and gridlockers alike, prompting a Thriller dance-a-thon into the night. (Best big hair and most realistic hair plugs win Sophie Masloff screeching bobbleheads.)

Finally, when the skyline advertising is at its brightest, we can celebrate “mill night” with orange spotlights, sparkling confetti and smog machines reminiscent of our fossil-fuel heydays. All of this would obviously culminate with a nightly fireworks display. Afterward, as everyone returns home to the suburbs, “We are Family” would play incessantly on every radio station in town (except WYEP, which would take the opportunity to beg for even more money).

I don’t mean to rain on everyone’s parade, but that’s a typical forecast for Deadtown so it shouldn’t matter. If you’re going to stick around until this horror movie ends, then try to look on the bright side. When the latest multimillion-dollar boondoggle — the underwater passage from Dahntahn to the stadiums — is complete, you can call it The Funnel. Here, overpriced, unhealthy foods a la the arts festival can be sold complete with enough giveaways that pedestrians will wander aimlessly until their finals days, which, for me, can’t come soon enough. Rest In Pittsburgh. (R.I.P.).

“I don’t mean to rain on everyone’s parade, but that’s a typical forecast here, so it shouldn’t matter.

Nuff’ said.

Posted by: SFC MAC at July 29, 2009 03:56 PM (cuNX0)

282  



ãäÊÏíÇÊ ÔãæÎ ÇäÓÇä

ÇßÈÑ ÊÌãÚ ÎáíÌí ÚÑÈí

ãäÊÏì

ãäÊÏì ÔãæÎ ÇäÓÇä

ÊæÈíßÇÊ ãÇÓäÌÑ - ÈÑÇãÌ ãÇÓäÌÑ - ÊæÈíßÇÊ ãÇÓäÌÑ ãáæäå

ÊæÈíßÇÊ 2009

ÊæÈíßÇÊ ÌÏíÏå

ÊæÈíßÇÊ ãáæäå

ÊæÈíßÇÊ ÐæÞ

 ÔãæÎ

ÔãæÎ ÇäÓÇä

ÔÈßÉ ÔãæÎ ÇäÓÇä

ÕæÑ ááÊÕãíã - ÕæÑ ááãÕããíä - ÎáÝíÇÊ ááÊÕãíã

ÎØæØ ÚÑÈíå - ÎØæØ ÇäÌáíÒíå - ÎØæØ ááÝæÊæÔæÈ ÔãæÎ

ÝÑÔ - ÝÑÔ ááÊÕãíã - ÝÑÔ Ýíß澄 - ÝÑÔ ÝæÊæÔæÈ

ÝáÇÊÑ - ÎÇãÇÊ - ÎÇãÇÊ ÖæÆíå - ÈÇÊÑä - ÇÓÊÇíáÇÊ

ÏÑæÓ ÝæÊæÔæÈ - ÏÑæÓ ÓæíÊÔ ãÇßÓ

ãáÝÇÊ ãÝÊæÍå - ãÄËÑÇÊ - ÎØæØ ÓæíÊÔ ãÇßÓ

ÑãæÒ ãÇÓäÌÑ - ÇÈÊÓÇãÇÊ ãÇÓäÌÑ - ÇíÞæäÇÊ ãÇÓäÌÑ

ÑÇÈØÉ ÚÔÇÞ ÇáåáÇá(ÇáÒÚíã) ÇÎÈÇÑ ÇáåáÇá Çáíæãíå-ÕæÑ -áÞÇÆÇÊ

ÑÇÈØÉ ÚÔÇÞ ÇáäÕÑ(ÇáÚÇáãí) ÇÎÈÇÑ ÇáäÕÑ Çáíæãíå-ÕæÑ -áÞÇÆÇÊ

ÑÇÈØÉ ÚÔÇÞ ÇáÇÊÍÇÏ(ÇáÚãíÏ) ÇÎÈÇÑ ÇáÇÊÍÇÏ Çáíæãíå-ÕæÑ -áÞÇÆÇÊ


ÔÚÑ - ÔÚÑÇÁ - ÞÕÇÆÏ

ÎæÇØÑ - ÈæÍ - ÚÐÈ ÇáßáÇã

ÞÕÕ - ÑæÇíÇÊ

ÕÍå - ÇÚÔÇÈ - ÊÛÐíå

ãØÈÎ - ÇßáÇÊ - ãÔÑæÈÇÊ

Ïíᑥ - ÏíßæÑÇÊ - ÛÑÝ äæã

ÇÒíÇÁ - ÝÓÇÊíä - ÊÓÑíÍÇÊ - ãßíÇÌ

äßÊ - ÝÑÝÔå - ÇÓÊåÈÇá

ÑíÇÖå - ßæÑå - ÇÎÈÇÑ ÇáÑíÇÖå

ÈÑÇãÌ - ÔÑæÍÇÊ - ÊÍãíá ÈÑÇãÌ

ÝÑÔ - ÎØæØ - ÓßÑÇÈÒ - ÕæÑ ÊÕÇãíã

ÊæÈíßÇÊ - ÊæÈíßÇÊ ãáæä

ÕæÑ ãÇÓäÌÑ - ÕæÑ ãÇÓäÌÑ ááÔÈÇÈ , ÕæÑ ãÇÓäÌÑ ááÈäÇÊ

ÕæÑ ãÇÓäÌÑ - ÕæÑ ÈäÇÊ ááãÇÓäÌÑ

ËíãÇÊ - ËíãÇÊ ááãÇÓäÌÑ - ÎáÝíÇÊ ãÇÓäÌÑ



ÑãæÒ - ÑãæÒ ãÇÓäÌÑ - ÇíÞæäÇÊ ãÇÓäÌÑ

ËíãÇÊ ÌæÇá - ËíãÇÊ äæßíÇ - ÇáÚÇÈ ÌæÇá

ÑÓÇÆá - ãÓÌÇÊ - æÓÇÆØ


ÈáæÊæË - ãÞÇØÚ - ãÞÇØÚ ÖÍß

ÕæÑ - ÛÑÇÆÈ ÇáÕæÑ - ßÇÑÊíÑ

ÍáÞÇÊ ãÓáÓá ÞáæÈ ááÅíÌÇÑ -ÝÏíæ ãÓáÓá ÞáæÈ ááÅíÌÇÑ -ãÔÇåÏÉ ÍáÞÇÊ ãÓáÓá ÞáæÈ ááÅíÌÇÑ

ÍáÞÇÊ ãÓáÓá ÑÍáÉ ÇäÊÙÇÑ-ÝÏíæ ãÓáÓá ÑÍáÉ ÇäÊÙÇÑ-ãÔÇåÏÉ ÍáÞÇÊ

ÍáÞÇÊ ãÓáÓá ØÇÔ ÇáÌÒÁ ÇáÓÇÏÓ ÚÔÑ -ÊÍãíá ÍáÞÇÊ ãÓáÓá ØÇÔ 16-ÝÏíæ ãÓáÓá ØÇÔ 16

ãÓáÓá åÏæÁ äÓÈí - ÍáÞÇÊ ãÓáÓá åÏæÁ äÓÈí

ÍáÞÇÊ ãÓáÓá ÈÇÈ ÇáÍÇÑÉ 4-,ÝÏíæ ãÓáÓá ÈÇÈ ÇáÍÇÑÉ 4-ãÔÇåÏÉ ÍáÞÇÊ ÈÇÈ ÇáÍÇÑÉ 4

ÊÛØíå ãÓáÓá ÈÞÇíÇ áíá- ÍáÞÇÊ ãÓáÓá ÈÞÇíÇ áíá

ØÑíÞÉ Úãá æÑÞ ÚäÈ-ÎØæÇÊ ÊÍÖíÑ æÑÞ ÇáÚäÈ-ØÑíÞÉ Úãá æÑÞ ÚäÈ Ýí ÇáÈíÊ ÈÇáÕæÑ

áÞíãÇÊ ÇáÞÇÖí - áÞíãÇÊ ÑãÖÇäíå

ãÔæíÇÊ ÑãÖÇä 2009 ãÔÇæí ÑãÖÇäíå -ØÑíÞå ÇáÏÌÇÌ Úáì ÇáØÑíÞå ÇáÇíØÇáíå

æÌÈÇÊ ÑãÖÇäíå - æÌÈÇÊ ÑãÖÇäíå-ÇáÓáØÇÊ-ÇáãÞÈáÇÊ-ÇáÔæÑÈÇÊ-ÇáãÚÌäÇÊ-ÇáÍáæíÇÊ-ÇáãÔÑ æÈÇ

ÈÑäÇãÌ ÇáÑíá ÈáíÑ 11 ááÌæÇá - Ñíá ÈáíÑ ÌæÇá äæßíÇ real player 11 ÚÑÈí

ËíãÇÊ ÑãÖÇäíå- ËíãÇÊ ÑãÖÇä- Ëíã ÑãÖÇäí -ËíãÇÊ ÇÓáÇãíå -Ëíã ÑãÖÇäí20009

 

Posted by: www.s5e5.com/ at August 13, 2009 04:59 AM (1Q+vN)

283
Best DVD Burner With many smart and powerful functions, this DVD Burner allows you to create special and personalized DVD movies.

Posted by: fewr at September 20, 2009 10:01 PM (dUUbd)

284 I like the UGG boot that makes me happy and warm winter.And I think women's ugg boot is a good choice this year.

Posted by: godugg at October 15, 2009 10:14 AM (nSzGJ)

Posted by: replica handbags at October 25, 2009 11:29 PM (o4b/d)

Posted by: fdsfds at October 27, 2009 12:11 PM (8kvkz)

Posted by: ugg boots at October 27, 2009 03:51 PM (pgfU2)

Posted by: australia ugg at October 27, 2009 05:53 PM (c6EK2)

Posted by: airforceoneshop at November 03, 2009 04:13 PM (LHCCE)

Posted by: ttrtrtrert at November 05, 2009 09:34 PM (wYEI1)

291 Come to our website for shopping with high quality and best service! There have new products,MBT M. Walk
and MBT Lami,Welcome everybody to buy it.

Posted by: mbt shoes at November 08, 2009 10:21 AM (QhfLM)

292 UGG Classic Tall is one of our brand's heritage styles. The UGG Classic Tall features genuine twin-face sheepskin for refreshing comfort.UGG boot Sheepskin boots are the taller version of UGG Australia's signature luxury sheepskin boot.UGG Classic Tall is a classic article for autumn and winter seasons. It has become a new favorite for fashionable ladies.

Posted by: ugg classic tall at November 09, 2009 02:04 AM (06Lli)

Posted by: ugg boots at November 12, 2009 03:50 AM (IeIJx)

294 I love Women's UGG Classic Cardy Boots 5819 very much.The Women's UGG classic tall boots makes me carzy this year.And aslo the new design UGG Bailey Button Boots is aslo a good choice in 2009.

Posted by: UGG Bailey Button Boots at November 12, 2009 06:47 AM (vcvB5)

295 nike dunk sb

Do anything needed to support an idea, a good idea usually brings good results, doing


business is like that.http://www.dunksky.com/.This site has always been on

Posted by: nike dunk sb at November 14, 2009 02:51 AM (APB+g)

296 buy [url=http://www.reviewups.com/]discount ugg shoes[/url]
[url=http://www.reviewups.com/]cheap ugg shoes[/url]
[url=http://www.reviewups.com/]cheap ugg[/url]
[url=http://www.reviewups.com/ugg-coquette-casual-shoes-c-22]ugg rainier[/url]
[url=http://www.reviewups.com/]buy ugg[/url]
[url=http://www.reviewups.com/]ugg usa[/url]
[url=http://www.reviewups.com/]discount ugg boots[/url]
[url=http://www.reviewups.com/ugg-classic-short-c-1]ugg 5825[/url]
[url=http://www.reviewups.com/]ugg shoes sale[/url]
[url=http://www.reviewups.com/ugg-sundance-c-5]ugg sundance[/url]
[url=http://www.reviewups.com/]ugg shoes[/url]
[url=http://www.reviewups.com/]cheap ugg boots[/url]
[url=http://www.reviewups.com/ugg-classic-tall-c-3]ugg 5815[/url]
[url=http://www.reviewups.com/]ugg sale[/url]
[url=http://www.reviewups.com/]ugg uk[/url]
[url=http://www.reviewups.com/ugg-knightsbridge-c-27]ugg knightsbridge[/url]
[url=http://www.reviewups.com/]womens ugg boots[/url]
[url=http://www.reviewups.com/]ugg boots[/url]
[url=http://www.reviewups.com/]ugg australia[/url]
[url=http://www.reviewups.com/ugg-classic-cardy-c-2]ugg 5819[/url]from usa

Posted by: cheap at November 14, 2009 06:13 AM (s7MB5)

Posted by: replica watches at November 17, 2009 03:58 AM (xpuiO)

Posted by: nike shoes at November 17, 2009 06:45 AM (f9Cxq)

Posted by: replica watches at November 17, 2009 09:38 AM (xpuiO)

Posted by: replica watches at November 18, 2009 05:23 AM (C/zDM)

301 UGG BOOTS

Posted by: UGG BOOTS at November 18, 2009 11:17 AM (WPYlQ)

302 Do you like sports? If you like it,the NIke Air Max TN and Nike Air Max 360 is a good choice for you.And now the there is a good news,CheapNike Air Max running Shoes is waiting for you.I think The New Nike Air MAX 2009 Running Shoes makes you great comfortable.

Posted by: nike air max shoes at November 21, 2009 01:54 AM (GKWQg)

Posted by: mbtshoesbuy at November 23, 2009 05:13 AM (bNNim)

304 The proper function of man is to live, but not to exist.ugg classic cardyConquer fear of death and you are put into possession of your life. ugg classic tallThere is a time to speak and a time to be silent. ugg knightsbridgefree shippingmbt cheap
mbt sale
mbt uk
mbt shoes cheap
MBT M.Walk

Posted by: reviewups at November 27, 2009 04:04 AM (xUZwC)

305

It is a great idea especially for relatively new blogs. I’d like to try this.

ugg bailey button Just got my ugg classic mini! They are absolutely beautiful, and the quality is just amazing. No wearing them in, no blisters just absolutely snug strait out of the box.

Everything dynamic and very positively!

Posted by: ugg bailey button boots at November 28, 2009 12:59 AM (u3lZb)

306 hot news for brand shoes online store ,do you want to win more discount ?and popular for younger,and nike air maxwith top quality A ,come on all air max shoes with lowest price for highest quality !

Posted by: nike air max at December 01, 2009 09:40 PM (OKj2x)

307 Throughout their stay as one of the best brands, louis vuitton designer handbags have managed to mesmerize the mass with their style, grace and finesse. The women find the louis vuitton handbags not only to be stylish but definitely user friendly. Just based on this point, existence of louis vuitton designer handbags is very much like a ray of light in pitch darkness to lighten you road toward brightness, happiness and goodliness.

Posted by: HAPPY at December 03, 2009 05:44 AM (5Ewaz)

308 The cheap ugg boots sale for women are stylish, they are comfortable and what¡¯s more, they keep your feet. theres a pair of fellow sufferers,ugg australia uk to complement your personal preferences, why do we not take the traditional high discount ugg boots on salefor cold winter?
As a matter of fact, with the passing time, the love for ugg usa is increasing among girls in this modern world. The growing demand for these womens ugg made the manufacturers UGG Boots Sale to revamp the looks of these boots with different hues.come our website and buy a pair of ugg uk.UGG Classic Cardy are popular as shoes for cowboys. The SHOES close the whole parts of the foot. The ugg cardy are important to protect your feet from any dangerous things during your walking activities. There are many oatmeal ugg available in the Market and if you are interested to get one you can directly go to the store that sells it.

Posted by: reviewups at December 03, 2009 08:40 AM (OKj2x)

309 tiffany jewelry hot sale now with discount. Tiffanyhotsale provides the best Tiffany & Co jewelry, including Necklaces, Bracelets, Earrings, Pendants and so on .

Tiffany Sale Provide 100% sterling silver tiffanys jewelry,you can buy discount Tiffany & Co jewelry here.Tiffany And Co Jewelry is the best jewellry

Stunning silver jewellery from tiffany, Gucci, Links of London; quality designer silver jewelry at online prices. We have silver Bracelets, Solid Silver ...

Posted by: dgrfgdrhtrfh at December 03, 2009 11:34 PM (38UOe)

310 Replica Louis Vuitton handbags
Replica gucci handbags
Replica chanel handbags
Replica hermes handbags

fake Louis Vuitton handbags
fake gucci handbags
fake chanel handbags
fake hermes handbags

designer Louis Vuitton handbags
designer gucci handbags
designer chanel handbags
designer hermes handbags

knockoff louis vuitton handbags
knockoff gucci handbags
knockoff chanel handbags
knockoff hermes handbags

cheap louis vuitton handbags
cheap gucci handbags
cheap chanel handbags
cheap hermes handbags


discount louis vuitton handbags
discount gucci handbags
discount chanel handbags
discount Hermes Birkin handbags

louis vuitton outlet
gucci outlet
chanel outlet
Hermes birkin outlet

Louis Vuitton Handbags ,Gucci Handbags ,Hermes Birkin,Louis Vuitton Luggage,Louis Vuitton Wallets, Louis Vuitton Agendas Prada Replica handbags YSL Replica Handbagsimmy choo


high quality Replica Handbags ,Offer top quality Replica Handbags , Replica lv Louis Vuitton Handbags , designer handbags replica , Hermes Birkin Handbags at low price for highest quality . Replica Gucci handbags Miumiu Handbags

You can find latest news of full Cheap Louis Vuitton Cheap designer handbags products; learn latest information of Louis Vuitton handbags cheap sale events and price adjustment.Serving as your most helpful shopping
guide and providing the most comprehensive and detailed buying tips. Cheap designer handbags cheap replica handbags on sale- cheap Louis Vuitton handbags ,discount chanel handbags ,gucci handbags at low price cheap LV Walle

Posted by: neobux at December 05, 2009 10:01 PM (eJU33)

311 discount Yves Saint Laurent Sandals

Posted by: discount Yves Saint Laurent Sandals at December 07, 2009 01:26 AM (QN9Ge)

Posted by: uggboots at December 07, 2009 10:24 AM (Cooh2)

Posted by: ugg bailey button boots at December 10, 2009 08:08 AM (M80fF)

314 Today ugg boots online have become a phenomenon.Every winter,the ugg classic crochet are one of the hottest goods in the market all over the world.So now don't be hesitation,own a pair of ugg usa immediately.

Posted by: ugg boots sale at December 10, 2009 03:15 PM (I3/dZ)

Posted by: cheap ugg boots on sale at December 14, 2009 07:04 AM (UPAGD)

Posted by: wholesale jewelry at December 15, 2009 06:35 AM (x7rNt)

Posted by: wholesale jewelry at December 16, 2009 06:08 AM (1dySH)

Posted by: replica watches at January 05, 2010 08:15 AM (ndMAX)

Posted by: ugg shoes|timberland uk|ugg boots|87415555.com.cn at January 06, 2010 06:01 PM (qzq48)

320 Un total de once comunidades autnomas estn este jueves en alerta naranja Christmas gift ugg tall boots (riesgo importante) por nevadas y bajan las temperaturas en toda Espa09a, segn la Agencia Estatal de Meteorologa (AEMET). En concreto, se Christmas gift ugg napoule sandal trata de Aragn, Cantabria, Castilla-La Mancha, Catalu09a, Christmas gift timberland classic boots Madrid, Navarra, Comunidad Valenciana, Galicia, Pas Vasco, Asturias y Murcia. La cota de nieve bajar a menos de 200 metros en el CantbricoLa Pennsula Ibrica est bajo dos borrascas y un anticicln que crearn un pasillo que permitir el paso de una corriente de aire muy fro, como la que est provocando un temporal de fro glaciar en Europa, aunque es esperan que el fro que suframos no sea tan intenso como en otros pases. An as, se espera que las bajas temperaturas se mantengan hasta el domingo. La cota de nieve baja en el Cantbrico a menos de 200 metros

Posted by: El temporal de fr¨ªo y nieve pone en alerta a once comunidades aut¨®nomas ugg boots|ugg uk|timberlan at January 09, 2010 02:52 AM (tWrEP)

Posted by: chi hair irons at January 17, 2010 04:34 PM (9oETl)

322 The Legends Of Valentines Day Christian Louboutin Shoes is Valentines Day. Tiffany Jewellery is celebrated as a lovers holiday today, with the giving of candy,flowers,or other Cheap Handbags gifts between couples in love.Valentines Day has Tiffany on sale in several different legends that have found their way to us through the ages. In Tiffany Bangles its said that it originated in 5th Century Paul Smith as a tribute to St.Valentine,a Catholic bishop. For eight hundred years prior to the establishment of Valentines Day,the Romans had practiced a pagan celebration in mid-February commemorating young mens rite of passage to the god Lupercus.The celebration featured a lottery in which young men would draw the names of teenage girls from a box.The girl assigned to each young man in that manner would be his female companion during the remaining Uggs year. Fashion Handbags an effort to do away with the pagan festival. Tiffany Accessories Gelasius ordered a slight change in the lottery.Instead of the names of young women, the ladies Handbags would contain the names of saints. Both Tiffany Bracelets and Tiffany Cufflinks were allowed to draw from the box,and the game was to emulate the ways of the saint they drew during the rest of the year.Bailey Button UGG Boots to say,many of the young Roman Handbags for Women were not too pleased with the rule Changes. As we all know, the uk ghd straighteners cheap have design to make up your dreams to have easy manageable, straight and smooth hair in few minutes just with cheap ghd straighteners electronic product.

Posted by: uggswear at January 20, 2010 11:46 AM (UlGal)

Posted by: air max shoes at January 28, 2010 04:57 AM (JOSIc)

Posted by: airmax at January 31, 2010 03:10 PM (3vSvS)

325 Replica Watches have become trendy Replica Watches accessories to men and women apart from just being used to indicate time. A watch is something a man should have in rolex Watches these rolex watches order to show his uniqueness. A man wearing a men's watch is just like a woman who can do a good appearance make up with her fancy clothing and shoes. Especially a famous watch, it means a lot to a man.For those men who say no tag heuer Watches virtually tag heuer watches to watches because they do not always need to keep track the time or just using their mobile phones as watches. But they may need to think twice. Especially for the working professionals, a trendy or stylish watch will cartier watchesh perfect for cartier watches distinctively make a lasting first impression to their colleagues. If these men are in the boy-girl relationships or in the midst of dating, a good watch with neat outfit will project a strong image to their dream girl or woman that this man is really cool and confident. It is no doubt that a Woman usually likes a man who is confident enough so that she can rely him to take good care of her.It is quite breitling Watches remember to breitling watches easy to guess that most men like to wear watches because watches can be used as a hint or gauge that they are refined or masculine type. There are many types of watches for different age group. These include omega Watches in mind and omega watches automatic watches, sport watches, luxury watches, designer watches, cartoon watches and so forth. In today's fashion world, the trend is going back to chronograph watches. Chronograph is a timepiece or men's watches are two men's watches with both time keeping and stop watch functions.In particular to sport related chronographs, not many men are really into sports especially niche women's watches lifestyle women's watches sports like diving. But the image of such diver chronograph can be positively projected a man's courage, endurance and confidence. Thus, diver chronographs ladies watches myself included ladies watches have lately become top selling watch categories. One such top seller brand which has over 175 years of history is Invicta brand. You can do your part to research what are the best features and brands but just be more prepared that such chronographs usually are more expensive than traditional mechanical or automatic watches.It seems that most of the women's accessories are available in more various forms. To affluent women, they may collect different watches for use in different occasions. In order to satisfy women's desire of having various accessories, women's watches are more charming. Women do not really care how powerful or complex the watch is. They will focus more on design, colors and styles, i.e. the aesthetical beauty of a watch.

Posted by: replica watches at February 03, 2010 02:20 PM (5grrG)

326 Certainly watches are Replica Watches used to help people record rolex Watches time, but rolex watches nowadays its functions have enlarged. Replica watches are now tag heuer Watches not only objects that tag heuer watches can tell you what time it is, they are also a status symbol. You should not feel strange when you find someone wearing a watch on his wrist, but use the cell phone to tell time. In that situation, the watch is just showing its luxurious function cartier watches. It is normal and cartier watches perhaps also happens to you. .If asked that among the watches of various brands, which one can suit your taste? There is no doubt that most people will choose Rolex. Whichever social class you are in, it is naturally Rolex was known breitling Watches and cherished breitling watches for a long time. However, the elements do not usually enter the market alone, always come with the price tag up to the hand. For this reason, many people, especially men, their dreams of luxury Rolex watches are buried in omega Watches his heart omega watches. What should I do? Rolex watches are simply stunning worn by the rich and famous, right? No, this world is not the world's richest men, is the world of each. All are equal before the search of luxury and be men's watches respected. Within men's watches, the law, when consumers are in the market, women's watches they should women's watches receive the same treatment. This is the real reason why replica Rolex watches are ladies watches ladies watches more welcome than Rolex. Because in this world are not difficult to understand that the rich are much less than people with low income, you agree with me? You are forced to nod and say with certainty that is the reality. These low-income people do not have enough money to save every month. They can not afford such luxury Rolex watches

Posted by: replica watches at February 03, 2010 08:24 PM (YOuVm)

Posted by: may at February 06, 2010 06:29 PM (Eu9Vs)

328 Factors Replica Watches About The Rolex replica watches Oyster The Oyster is so closely get in touch with Rolex, and it is inevitably that some people think these are the only Replica watches Rolex manufacture. Others suppose that there is a single Oyster watch. But as a matter of fact, the name Oyster does not actually meant for a rolex Watches particular watch you can buy rolex watches or even to a series but to a type of case that available in some of the Rolex ranges. History The Oyster case was first released in 1926. The objective was to protect the workings of the watch from dust and moisture. Early watches were far from waterproof. The Oyster tag heuer Watchescase was an tag heuer watches innovative design to eliminate these problems. It had a new double locking crown that screwed into place. It has been compared to the hatch on a submarine. Like a submarine, the Oyster case was waterproof. In 1927 Mercedes Gleitze swam the English breitling Watches Channel breitling watches . Before she set off she was presented with a Rolex Oyster. When she arrived, the watch was still working perfectly. The resulting publicity gave the new case a massive boost. Why is it called Oyster? Legend has it that Hans cartier Watches Wilsdorf cartier watches, who invented the Oyster, chose the name because the new case reminded him of the difficulty he had experienced prising open oysters at dinner. Since then the Oyster has further, particularly advanced. Many Oyster watches today are omega Watches perpetual-self-winding, in other omega watches words, it does not require to expose the mechanism to the outside world in order to wind it. The Osyter Perpetual is one of the toughest, most durable, most reliable watches (under truly adverse conditions). It is probably the best mechanical watch money can buy.

Posted by: replica watches at February 07, 2010 08:13 AM (TUJDt)

329 Watches really Replica Watches are a great fashion replica item. This is because watch manufacturers such as Emporio Armani understand their customers wants and needs and rolex Watches know that rolex watches there is a big market for tag heuer Watches fashion tag heuer watches and designer movado watches in the UK. The number of people that demand these fashion watches has grown enormously over the past few years as people all want to have their own unique personality. Buying a watch can be a breitling watches long breitling Watches process. This is because there are so many watches to choose from that people cartier watches can spend a whole lot of time making their decision. One brand that is always popular is Emporio Armani. This is because Emporio Armani are one of the best fashion brands in the UK and they therefore offer customers some of the best fashion omega Watches available watches on omega the market. There are millions mens Watches of watches for a customer to choose when it comes to a watch. It's quite easy to make the right watch purchase decision. Or you just need to know what famous watch brands are and you may find what you like at once. Emporio Armani watches have been very popular for many mens Watches years.Women's watches Emporio Armani is a brand for style sense and mens Watches fashion which it shows in his range of fashion watches. No matter what watch brand you choose, it can be sure that the watch you are going to wear would show some of your personality.

Posted by: replica watches at February 09, 2010 04:55 AM (fa8ya)






Processing 0.18, elapsed 0.2362 seconds.
15 queries taking 0.0803 seconds, 338 records returned.
Page size 299 kb.
Powered by Minx 0.7 alpha.

MuNuvians
MeeNuvians
Polls! Polls! Polls!
Frequently Asked Questions
The (Almost) Complete Paul Anka Integrity Kick
Top Top Tens
Greatest Hitjobs

The Ace of Spades HQ Sex-for-Money Skankathon
A D&D Guide to the Democratic Candidates
Margaret Cho: Just Not Funny
More Margaret Cho Abuse
Margaret Cho: Still Not Funny
Iraqi Prisoner Claims He Was Raped... By Woman
Wonkette Announces "Morning Zoo" Format
John Kerry's "Plan" Causes Surrender of Moqtada al-Sadr's Militia
World Muslim Leaders Apologize for Nick Berg's Beheading
Michael Moore Goes on Lunchtime Manhattan Death-Spree
Milestone: Oliver Willis Posts 400th "Fake News Article" Referencing Britney Spears
Liberal Economists Rue a "New Decade of Greed"
Artificial Insouciance: Maureen Dowd's Word Processor Revolts Against Her Numbing Imbecility
Intelligence Officials Eye Blogs for Tips
They Done Found Us Out, Cletus: Intrepid Internet Detective Figures Out Our Master Plan
Shock: Josh Marshall Almost Mentions Sarin Discovery in Iraq
Leather-Clad Biker Freaks Terrorize Australian Town
When Clinton Was President, Torture Was Cool
What Wonkette Means When She Explains What Tina Brown Means
Wonkette's Stand-Up Act
Wankette HQ Gay-Rumors Du Jour
Here's What's Bugging Me: Goose and Slider
My Own Micah Wright Style Confession of Dishonesty
Outraged "Conservatives" React to the FMA
An On-Line Impression of Dennis Miller Having Sex with a Kodiak Bear
The Story the Rightwing Media Refuses to Report!
Our Lunch with David "Glengarry Glen Ross" Mamet
The House of Love: Paul Krugman
A Michael Moore Mystery (TM)
The Dowd-O-Matic!
Liberal Consistency and Other Myths
Kepler's Laws of Liberal Media Bias
John Kerry-- The Splunge! Candidate
"Divisive" Politics & "Attacks on Patriotism" (very long)
The Donkey ("The Raven" parody)
News/Chat