| Support
Contact
| Cap and Tax: How Much Will It Cost Us?Earlier today I wrote that the President told an outright lie and failed Econ 101 when he claimed that only polluters would be paying the energy tax. Now, via PowerLineBlog comes this map showing how much the Waxman-Markey cap-and-tax bill will cost: ![]() Waxman-Markey would be a very stupid bill even if it were true that 1) the earth is getting warmer, 2) human activity is mostly responsible for climate changes, and 3) a warmer earth would be a bad thing. Given that all three of these premises are false--we cannot, in fact, control the weather--Waxman-Markey is a suicidal monument to human folly.More than that, there is no evidence that Waxman-Markey will alter emissions levels enough to even be noticeable globally. While U.S. emissions are not tiny, they are a drop in a bucket compared to natural source emissions of greenhouse gases. Cap-and-tax does nothing except hamstring our economy and make environmentalists feel good. Honestly, I'd rather spend millions doing the opposite. More: And if you're into this kinda thing, Newt Gingrich talked about cap and tax on the Hugh Hewitt show today. You can catch a stream or a podcast here. Comments1
Why do they hate Texas so?
Posted by: Naan at June 23, 2009 09:13 PM (qEpn4) Posted by: Ostral B Heretic at June 23, 2009 09:14 PM (OtE8p) 3
A serious chunk of why 'the west' is green on there is called the Columbia River. Grand Coulee alone could power Seattle and Portland at peak.
Posted by: Al at June 23, 2009 09:15 PM (CyBUS) 4
So we know the bill won't do anything of note about "global warming/climate change/lurking grues" - is it possible the real intent is just to take money from moderate/conservative states and give it to left leaning ones?
Posted by: 18-1 at June 23, 2009 09:15 PM (odYmd) 5
Hmm, electoral map of 2012?
Posted by: eman at June 23, 2009 09:15 PM (NfLyl) 6
AGW is a tenet of the liberal political religion. It'd be easier to get Catholics to disabuse themselves of The Holy Trinity that to get leftys off 'global warming'. Nah, we're pretty much fucked with this bill. Posted by: Jones at June 23, 2009 09:15 PM (KOkrW) 7
Why do they hate Texas so?
Because it contains the evil warmongering BOOOOOOOSH. If he would just move to Idaho, you'd see some big ol' negatives there too. Posted by: Filly at June 23, 2009 09:15 PM (lsiux) 8
Red States, and Green States. The morons live in the green states. In the apartment downstairs!
Posted by: flooflyparisparamus at June 23, 2009 09:15 PM (59Rtb) 9
We don't know yet how this thing will play out.
Posted by: SlaveDog at June 23, 2009 09:17 PM (LDTnn) 10
"Cap-and-tax does nothing except hamstring our economy"
You say that like it's a bug, and the main feature. Posted by: someone at June 23, 2009 09:17 PM (njJQD) Posted by: loppyd at June 23, 2009 09:17 PM (UJIeT) 12
That map says all the average person needs to know to piss them off enough to maybe do something about it. I just threw up in my mouth a little. Posted by: jmflynny at June 23, 2009 09:19 PM (OfiFl) 13
Almost makes me sorry to live in Texas--for a split second.
Posted by: '80sBaby at June 23, 2009 09:20 PM (8GwWu) 14
Why do we need this? I thought that Barry's mere presence was healing the earth. Didn't his speech in Cairo stop global warming?
Posted by: TheQuietMan at June 23, 2009 09:22 PM (LFiHb) 15
Barry put the "O" in Overreach Posted by: runningrn at June 23, 2009 09:22 PM (p9lFf) 16
There is a fourth premise missing. They are assuming that human activity can reverse these effects.
Posted by: MagicalPat at June 23, 2009 09:22 PM (PUzMO) Posted by: loppyd at June 23, 2009 09:24 PM (UJIeT) 18
Oh BTW, I just want to thank all you Morons out there who will be paying for my free electricity. Finally, a reason to stay in WA state!
Posted by: runningrn at June 23, 2009 09:24 PM (p9lFf) 19
1
Why do they hate Texas so?
Because it's a state with a rapidly growing economy. This is a pretty blatant redistribution of wealth to failed states...like California. Or New York. The map makes this pretty apparent. Posted by: Fortunate Son at June 23, 2009 09:24 PM (FaLC9) 20
It benefits my state? Hah. Sorry, Pigman, still don't want it. Posted by: Emily M. at June 23, 2009 09:25 PM (mH1B1) 21
Ok, I am really not a an idiot, a moron perhaps but...would someone answer me this question:
How will this crap waste of legislation help the liberal states only? Believe me, I'm against this completely but looking at the map it looks like its written with constituencies in mind. Please elaborate. Posted by: TendStl at June 23, 2009 09:25 PM (zR1gd) 22
Yah, well I'm struggling to afford the electricy bills now. If I ain't got it, than you can't redistribute it. I guess thats what those big thinkers up in DC don't understand. Posted by: Naan at June 23, 2009 09:26 PM (qEpn4) 23
Obama simply hates the human race.
Posted by: katya at June 23, 2009 09:26 PM (oQ0vB) 24
Wait. Aren't West Virginia and Alabama already two of the poorest states in the union? I mean, sure, it appears that they will be paying huge but can we get a map that shows the return on welfare dollar? Maybe I won't feel so bad for them afterall. Posted by: jmflynny at June 23, 2009 09:26 PM (OfiFl) 25
no love for the homies in the LOL...ah well, the kuklaks here are accustomed to it
Posted by: unknown jane at June 23, 2009 09:27 PM (EpmMs) 26
Although if we really didn't have to pay for electricity...hmmmm....
Posted by: Emily M. at June 23, 2009 09:27 PM (mH1B1) 27
Lace wigs?
Posted by: Masturbatin' Pete at June 23, 2009 09:27 PM (sfRWa) 28
I'm not paying any extra taxes, I'm a senator and I worked very hard prostituting myself for votes. And call me senator.
Posted by: Barbara Boxer at June 23, 2009 09:28 PM (71Zq0) 29
If this thing passes the damage it does should be hung around the necks of the Democrats like the stinking albatross that it is and affect elections for a generation.
Posted by: Choey at June 23, 2009 09:29 PM (yX01r) 30
Lace wigs?
Posted by: Masturbatin' Pete at June 23, 2009 09:27 PM (sfRWa) Barry will be taxing those too. Posted by: TheQuietMan at June 23, 2009 09:29 PM (LFiHb) 31
Can we round up the enviromentalists and drop them off a cliff? Seriously. They're the reason we can't develop any new energies or increase nuclear power use. Or build new infrastructure. Can we pleeeeeease toss them? Pretty please? With a cherry on top?
Posted by: wherestherum at June 23, 2009 09:30 PM (rN258) 32
TendStl
Ok, I am really not a an idiot, a moron perhaps but...would someone answer me this question: How will this crap waste of legislation help the liberal states only? Believe me, I'm against this completely but looking at the map it looks like its written with constituencies in mind. Please elaborate. We're getting screwed in MA - Ed Markey's home state. Posted by: loppyd at June 23, 2009 09:30 PM (UJIeT) 33
Here's a slogan for them:
"Air conditioning and heat... Your forefathers didn't need it, and neither do you. But don't worry, we'll still have it here in DC" The GOP needs to paste this map to every possible means of conveyance. Now. Posted by: The MSM at June 23, 2009 09:30 PM (aPRDg) 34
"Oh look everybody" (claps his hands) "It looks like Christmas! I love Christmas! Barack is making every day here in America Christmas!" (jumps up and down) "Goody Goody Gumdrops, I mean Skittles!" Posted by: Pee N' Stool at June 23, 2009 09:30 PM (p9lFf) 35
28 What do you mean, you don't pay any taxes now?
Posted by: Naan at June 23, 2009 09:31 PM (qEpn4) 36
Bwahahaha! California pulls a profit for once! OK all you Gaia HATERS, get in line with the new order. California Uber Alles! Posted by: Jim From San Diego at June 23, 2009 09:31 PM (H7Rlw) 37
Damn sockpuppet... that was me at 33
Posted by: Doc at June 23, 2009 09:31 PM (aPRDg) 38
Sweet I can crank up the heat in my swimming pool and people in other states will pay for it! Posted by: ParanoidGirlInSeattle at June 23, 2009 09:31 PM (AJ4xq) 39
So how exactly does California come out ahead? I don't get it.
Posted by: chemjeff at June 23, 2009 09:31 PM (sdE7F) 40
Palosi and Reid have the votes locked up.. Consider yourself fornicated.
Posted by: Mystry at June 23, 2009 09:32 PM (dIHlE) Posted by: katya at June 23, 2009 09:32 PM (oQ0vB) Posted by: Unicle tweets at June 23, 2009 09:33 PM (Bmhek) 43
Can I hire illegals to power my human sized hamster wheel that'll run the AC and heat in my house? That's green, right?
...right? Posted by: wherestherum at June 23, 2009 09:33 PM (rN258) 44
Gabe, this is what you are up against and clusterstock is a WS venue. "Cap And Trade Will Cost Households Just $175 Annually" This is the newer article on the site: "The Climate Bill Is Now 1,201 Pages Long"
Posted by: muffy at June 23, 2009 09:34 PM (zplc6) 45
Living in a trailer is looking pretty good right now. Posted by: katya at June 23, 2009 09:34 PM (oQ0vB) 46
Fuck this bill:
Waxman can just suck up all the emissions with his huge fucking snout; starting with the huge, smelly-ass fart I'm about to lay. Posted by: Client Number 9 at June 23, 2009 09:35 PM (in8Vs) 47
I am in WA and I want to thank all the morons from elsewhere for my new windfall of $202.00. That's alot of Val U Rite. Thank you
Posted by: robtr at June 23, 2009 09:35 PM (H60q6) 48
"So how exactly does California come out ahead? I don't get it." It's NOT for you to get, it's for you to PAY. And PAY you all shall you rethuglicans (sp?)! Bwahahahah Posted by: Jim From San Diego at June 23, 2009 09:35 PM (H7Rlw) Posted by: Naan at June 23, 2009 09:35 PM (qEpn4) 50
Sorry Momma, but I will beat you to the post. WV. is #1 in getting screwed. The Buckeye state of Ohio is # 2 in getting screwed.
Posted by: Mystry at June 23, 2009 09:36 PM (dIHlE) 51
Of course the map shows that the Gaza Strip and West Bank will benefit from this draconian boondoggle. Posted by: The Great Satan™ at June 23, 2009 09:37 PM (71Zq0) 52
Every time I see waxman's pig face I think of Ned Beatty.
Posted by: newsjunkie_ky at June 23, 2009 09:37 PM (7E+oD) 53
50 Excuse me, but everything is bigger in Texas, including my share of caps to trade. Posted by: Naan at June 23, 2009 09:39 PM (qEpn4) 54
Why does California benefit? Easy: you can't expect to burden 10 million illegal immigrants with the Global Warming caused by the White Man, can you? Posted by: Unicle tweets at June 23, 2009 09:39 PM (Bmhek) 55
Based on that chart, it would seem Obama should've said that 95% of you WILL pay higher taxes.
Posted by: CDR M at June 23, 2009 09:40 PM (cvmTR) 56
So the rust belt states get it on both ends. Energy costs skyrocket, and mining for coal, etc will decline taking jobs with it.
Does that count towards the created or saved total? I mean, this bill saves a bird or something right? And 1 bird = 1,000 jobs after all. Posted by: Doc at June 23, 2009 09:40 PM (aPRDg) 57
muffy
Gabe, this is what you are up against and clusterstock is a WS venue. "Cap And Trade Will Cost Households Just $175 Annually" This is the newer article on the site: "The Climate Bill Is Now 1,201 Pages Long" I hope Boehner throws it on the floor like he did with the stimulus bill. Posted by: loppyd at June 23, 2009 09:40 PM (UJIeT) 58
Okay, I think I get it. California doesn't really come out ahead. If you read the footnote on the table, it says that the map represents electricity GENERATED within a state, but that the legislation allocates credits based on electricity CONSUMED in a state. The two aren't the same because places like California don't produce a lot of electricity, they just buy it from out of state. The same is undoubtedly true in a place like South Dakota. But if you look at the bottom line, since there aren't enough credits to go around anyway, EVERYBODY is screwed, blue states and red states alike.
Posted by: chemjeff at June 23, 2009 09:40 PM (sdE7F) 59
A quick question for the folks in Ohio, Virginia, North Carolina, Indiana, Michigan, Pennsylvania, Colorado - you know, all the states that were Bush or close in 2004 and went for the Teleprompter Messiah this time around:
So, how's Barry's ass tasting these days? But I'm sure they'll figure-out a way that this will only hit people in those states making $250K or more. Right? Posted by: DocJ at June 23, 2009 09:41 PM (zTlKP) Posted by: Unicle tweets at June 23, 2009 09:41 PM (Bmhek) Posted by: Ostral B Heretic at June 23, 2009 09:41 PM (OtE8p) 62
Let us rename it the "Economic Collapse and Civil War Bill".
Posted by: eman at June 23, 2009 09:41 PM (NfLyl) Posted by: loppyd at June 23, 2009 09:41 PM (UJIeT) 64
Waxman visits dirty whores. A man with a nose like that can't get laid any other way.
Posted by: Client Number 9 at June 23, 2009 09:42 PM (in8Vs) 65
That's funny, every time I think of Waxman's pig face, I think of...a pig.
Posted by: chemjeff at June 23, 2009 09:43 PM (sdE7F) 66
oh great! just what the rust belt needs. what a kick in the nuts this bill is gonna be.
Posted by: BlackOrchid at June 23, 2009 09:44 PM (Z1uWp) Posted by: newsjunkie_ky at June 23, 2009 09:45 PM (7E+oD) 68
Are we going to have to rely on good sensibilities of Congress to save us? That comes uncomfortably close to a humorous prediction I made almost a year ago if The One®™ were to be elected. Posted by: Jim From San Diego at June 23, 2009 09:45 PM (H7Rlw) 69
And now you know why he wants to get all this stuff done right now. He knows people are going to grumble and complain about it. But he figures that in 3-1/2 yrs time, the stupid American voting bloc who voted him in the first time will have forgotten all about it (i.e., reverted to form) and he'll be ushered in on a new wave of hope.
Posted by: chemjeff at June 23, 2009 09:46 PM (sdE7F) 70
Frankly, I can't see how this will benefit Democrats. If it does pass, they lose huge as soon as people's anuses (ani?) start bleeding from the bills. If it doesn't pass, it's still something to remind voters about come 2010 and beyond...
Posted by: Fortunate Son at June 23, 2009 09:46 PM (FaLC9) 71
They could call this the "Re-elect A Republican Congress Act". The mid-west gets clobbered hard. Which means it will likely never come to pass.
Posted by: flenser at June 23, 2009 09:46 PM (Z+YwC) 72
23 Obama simply hates the human race.
Katya, not far from it. Many leftist policies are explicitly NOT in favor of life. Abortion, euthanasia, socialized healthcare(rationed to the elderly and terminally ill) collectivism (we all eat gruel!), environmental policies that prioritize the snail darter over production of food for millions, turning crops into fuel (who cares about the price of tortillas,eh?). And this cap-n-tax...humans need heat to survive? Since when? Oh, they will pay. Trust me. Gosh. Seems to me most of their policies are decidedly not in favor of human-type life. Posted by: Derak at June 23, 2009 09:47 PM (QnM78) 73
Since we are talking about insanity: "NAR Chief Blames Objective Appraisers For Keeping Home Sales Down"
Posted by: muffy at June 23, 2009 09:47 PM (zplc6) 74
So, 52%. Obama's gonna fix things, huh? Fix the economy? Fix jobs? Pay your mortgage? Put gas in your cars? Save your houses? Etc, etc. How's that working for you? Hope you're happy now. Posted by: katya at June 23, 2009 09:47 PM (oQ0vB) 75
I am from Ohio. I want nukes and I want then now! That shoud lower my cap and trade taxes.. Dammit, where is a shovel reactor when you want one!
Posted by: Mystry at June 23, 2009 09:47 PM (dIHlE) 76
Of all people to reconfigure the economy of the United States of America: Henry Waxman. Dear God in heaven, giving that power to a corrupt, wardheeling nitwit: have we lost our fucking minds? Posted by: Brown Line at June 23, 2009 09:49 PM (+FnS5) Posted by: loppyd at June 23, 2009 09:49 PM (UJIeT) 78
70
Frankly, I can't see how this will benefit Democrats.
Here is how it will benefit Democrats. 1. Cap-and-tax passes. Electricity bills go up. 2. Compliant MSM dutifully runs stories in the winter time about poor freezing Grandma who can't afford to pay her electricity bill. 3. Democrats rail against "big oil", "big electricity", etc., and demand that government "do something" to help Grandma. 4. Climate change panel meets again: guess what, it's worse than we thought! Global warming is going to ravage the planet much sooner than everyone thought! 5. Given the combination, Obama has "no choice" but to nationalize the power companies, to force them to use green energy and to prevent Grandma from freezing. After all, he's still cleaning up from Bush's mess. Posted by: chemjeff at June 23, 2009 09:50 PM (sdE7F) 79
"75
I am from Ohio. I want nukes and I want then now! That shoud lower my
cap and trade taxes.. Dammit, where is a shovel reactor when you want
one!
Posted by: Mystry at June 23, 2009 09:47 PM (dIHlE)" My friend, the engineer, recently told us that there are not enough engineers that know how to build a nuclear reactor for electricity so they are rolling a lot of them out of retirement, he said the same about space engineers. When I challenged them he said there are not enough American engineering students and the foreign ones, who used to stay are now going back to their own countries where they can make a lot of money and are treated like gold. I was a little shocked to hear that. Posted by: muffy at June 23, 2009 09:52 PM (zplc6) 80
Really, this entire affair comes straight from the pages of Atlas Shrugged. The collapse of Western civilization. All we need now is some Rearden Steel.
Posted by: chemjeff at June 23, 2009 09:52 PM (sdE7F) 81
Seems to me that emissions from Washington, D.C. are the real problem...
Posted by: t-bird at June 23, 2009 09:52 PM (FcR7P) 82
chemjeff,
As part of my 12-step "stop being so damn cynical" plan, I can't believe that people are so blinded by reality and brainwashed that this wouldn't come around and bite Democrats in the ass...eventually, people are going to be fed up with the media and their endless cheerleading. Hell, the NYT might not even be around to cheerlead when the effects of this bill are felt by voters. Posted by: Fortunate Son at June 23, 2009 09:53 PM (FaLC9) 83
The ideal world foe a liberal would be the one depicted in "Logan's Run".
Posted by: steevy at June 23, 2009 09:53 PM (xB9W8) 84
#80
Ah, so right. In the end, there will be only chaos! And damn the person on MM's site that took my phrase! You'll be hearing from Sony soon. Posted by: Kratos (on the back of Gaia, scaling Mt Olympus) at June 23, 2009 09:54 PM (otlXg) 85
Not sure if this is old news but, seems like Obama sent the Mullahs a letter prior to the election and got mocked for it in the Ayatollahs speech. This is why he didn't want to speak strongly against them at the beginning.
Unbelievable "Prior to this month's disputed presidential election in Iran, the Obama administration sent a letter to the country's supreme leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, calling for an improvement in relations, according to interviews and the leader himself. " "On the one hand, they [the Obama administration] write a letter to us to express their respect for the Islamic Republic and for re-establishment of ties, and on the other hand they make these remarks. Which one of these remarks are we supposed to believe? Inside the country, their agents were activated. Vandalism started." Obama - useful idiot Posted by: TendStl at June 23, 2009 09:55 PM (zR1gd) 86
Earlier today I wrote that the President told an outright lie and
failed Econ 101 when he claimed that only polluters would be paying the
energy tax.
Easy fix. Have the EPA designate CO2 as a pollutant.. everyone who breaths will be paying the energy tax.. So he's mostly right. Posted by: Dave C at June 23, 2009 09:55 PM (q7RK5) 87
Let us rename it the "Economic Collapse and Civil War Bill". It fits since Barry thinks he's Abe Lincoln v.2.0. By the way, Barry, I hear "Our American Cousin" is playing down at Ford's Theatre. Why don't you fucking go there and watch it, bitch. Sit in the box with the bunting. Posted by: jaleach at June 23, 2009 09:56 PM (gHrZU) 88
I got a reach around from Barry once!
Posted by: Larry Sinclair at June 23, 2009 09:56 PM (dmHKB) 89
Have the EPA designate CO2 as a pollutant.. Good grief, don't give him any more ideas. Posted by: katya at June 23, 2009 09:57 PM (oQ0vB) Posted by: newsjunkie_ky at June 23, 2009 09:57 PM (7E+oD) 91
I can't find a hard number, it's all comparitive numbers, but if 334 mil, is 3.3% then Indiana's projected 2009 revenue is about 10 billion, and the cap in trade is gonna cost indiana the equivalent of 10% of ti's internal tax revenue, (couldn't find good numbers for overall, but I didn't look very hard) so if we lose 3/4 a billion in GDP, what is that gonna add up to in tax revenue and what is that gonna do to the poor and rural area's in the city?
Posted by: Douglas at June 23, 2009 09:58 PM (uU+Ss) 92
I'm sure China, India, Brazil, and South Africa will be glad to follow our example once we show them that we're willing to commit first. Right? Right? <crickets>
Why is it the left doesn't care about solving a problem, but as long as the solution gives them warm fuzzies( but nothing else) they're okay with it. Posted by: I have a Jalen Rose jersey at June 23, 2009 09:58 PM (qIT/g) 93
#86 another fix is just give him a Phd from MIT in Environmental Engineering.
OOOOOh! He's sooooo smart! Swoon! Posted by: torabora at June 23, 2009 09:58 PM (dmHKB) 94
Posted by: muffy at June 23, 2009 09:52 PM (zplc6)
I'm not surprised. It all comes down to the public schools yet again. I see a lot of kids entering the university who want to become engineers. Lots of 'em. If they all finished we'd be up to our eyeballs in engineers. But they don't. A few of them, it's because they think being an engineer means being able to retire at age 30, and they quickly learn that's not reality. But a great many of them are earnest, and they are simply not well prepared. They THINK they are well prepared, because they always got A's in their highschool classes, and then they wonder why they fail first semester calculus. It is disheartening and disillusioning. You can see that they have the analytical mind and an inkling of talent that could become an engineer some day, but there are only so many setbacks a person can take. Plus, all of their business major friends are getting A's in their classes while they do nothing but play X-box all day. It is no big surprise then that a large number of potential engineers go on and do something else. Hence we have to import them from India and China. Posted by: chemjeff at June 23, 2009 09:58 PM (sdE7F) 95
Somebody stole your trademarked saying on another blog? That ain't cool.
(I'm looking at you, Methos.) Posted by: Kratos Has a Vendetta de Blog at June 23, 2009 09:58 PM (1Bods) 96
Look at how hard this is gonna hit America's breadbasket in general.
Posted by: Douglas at June 23, 2009 09:59 PM (uU+Ss) Posted by: Matt at June 23, 2009 09:59 PM (/yNyd) 98
Can anyone explain how any state can "benefit" from taking a ton of money and shitting it right down the crapper?
Posted by: AndrewsDad at June 23, 2009 09:59 PM (OJ6xy) 99
I can't believe that people are so blinded by reality and brainwashed
that this wouldn't come around and bite Democrats in the ass.
You forget the narrative. Democrats always have pure intentions. It's those eeeeeeeeeeeevil corporations and those eeeeeeeeeeeeeevil Republicans who are always spoiling their grand plans for salvation. Posted by: chemjeff at June 23, 2009 10:00 PM (sdE7F) 100
A quick question for the folks in Ohio, Virginia, North Carolina, Indiana, Michigan, Pennsylvania, Colorado - you know, all the states that were Bush or close in 2004 and went for the Teleprompter Messiah this time around:
You are forgetting that we will also pay for the electricity used by O voters in Ohio. This map doesn't add in the extra fee that our utility comps are already adding to bills to pay for 'low income' people. They are going to raise that fee in a month or so. They will raise it again and again if this bill goes through. Our gas coop. is sending announcements with every bill about how much hidden fees are in this thing. Fees, not taxes.
PS Im from Ohio and we aren't getting a nuclear power plant. The tree huggers have all rushed to Columbus to make sure of that. Posted by: momma at June 23, 2009 10:01 PM (penCf) Posted by: '80sBaby at June 23, 2009 10:01 PM (8GwWu) 102
Just FYI, the CBO does NOT, anywhere, estimate the costs of the equipment that must be installed to meet the proposed "Cap". If you think that CBO's estimates even remotely reflect what the reality will be, you're fooling yourself. CBO's "cost" estimates do not include ANY actual costs. Everyone seems very concerned with the "Trade" part of the "Cap & Trade" legislation. My advice: don't worry about it -- the "Cap" will force a complete collapse of the U.S. economy. Posted by: Eyas at June 23, 2009 10:02 PM (pVKFE) 103
It is not a question of how it helps Democrats. Democrats think in terms of how much they can do without it hurting them. Right now, they are accountable to no one. With the press on their side providing propaganda and cover and with rigged elections, Democrats have little to fear at the ballot box. Obama and the Democrats need to fuck up really really big for it to hurt them, unfortunately. Posted by: Unicle tweets at June 23, 2009 10:03 PM (Bmhek) 104
Indiana went Obama, but they still kept Mitch Daniels.
Posted by: Douglas at June 23, 2009 10:04 PM (uU+Ss) 105
You forget the narrative. Democrats always have pure intentions. It's
those eeeeeeeeeeeevil corporations and those eeeeeeeeeeeeeevil
Republicans who are always spoiling their grand plans for salvation.
Yeah, but when that artfully crafted narrative is desperately played over and over like a broken record in a pathetic attempt to try and bolster support for destructive policies, it has to start getting stale. Sooner or later. Hopefully sooner, before it can do much damage. If not, I'll meet you at the Gulch. I'll be the guy making cars. Posted by: Fortunate Son at June 23, 2009 10:04 PM (FaLC9) 106
#95
You don't wanna see what happens when I have a vendetta against somebody. That bastard Helios found out the hard way. Posted by: Kratos (on the back of Gaia, scaling Mt Olympus) at June 23, 2009 10:04 PM (otlXg) 107
Chemjeff, my friend said that the ones from India and China are going home because they see big dollar signs. They can be a part of new startups in their own countries and have the potential to someday make huge money. They feel there are not the same opportunities here. Which is why my friend said that those guys are making more than him and honestly he is very pissed off about it. He has a degree from MIT and some of these guys have gone through lesser programs. Seriously my friends and I felt like we opened pandora's box with him the other night, like we had to talk him off the ledge. He had been given a bad revue and his Indian co worker, a helluva nice guy, who does half as much, was given a glowing review by the same boss. My friend was very upset, very upset and seriously, he had no recourse. He is now concerned that he will lose his job.
Posted by: muffy at June 23, 2009 10:05 PM (zplc6) 108
AndrewsDad,
I think the idea is that those there will be a market so that those who produce emissions will have to purchase the right to do so from those who don't produce emissions. The states that produce the emissions include Colorado, WV and Ohio (coal) and Texas and Oklahoma (oil) and they'll have to send a lot of money to whomever owns the credits. And many of those credits will belong to the net purchasers of energy because they won't need the credits for their own production. Or something. But in the end we'll all be paying more. Each and every one of us. But the people involved in the trading of the credits will reap a huge windfall. Until a bubble pops and.... Well, you get the point. Posted by: Do I Have This Right de Blog at June 23, 2009 10:06 PM (1Bods) 109
#59
So, how's Barry's ass tasting these days? I live in PA...and still the state is infested with people who seem awfully fond of tossing presidential salads. The ones that drive the SUV's, that still have fading Obama bumper stickers...those are my favorites. The only plus I see is that New York will either have to start producing it's own electricity....or cut back, and I can't think of a nicer state that deserves it....outside of California, and/or Washington. Posted by: DngrMse at June 23, 2009 10:08 PM (IzN2d) 110
This is awful. This is just fucking awful.
I was speaking the other day to a friend of mine. He does research into atmospheric chemistry. He has impeccable credentials - graduate of CalTech, trained with the nation's best. He is about as apolitical as you can get. I don't even know if he voted at all, let alone whom he voted for. And he says the science behind climate change is "soft". Which is his polite way of saying that it's "bullshit". I even asked him straight-up if cap-and-trade was necessary. He said unhesitatingly "no". At times I'm embarrassed to be a scientist because I see how much of it has been hijacked by the political agenda pushers. When Al Gore can say "the science is settled", he is actually partly right - to a large fraction of scientists, it IS settled - in their heads. And because they have impressive degrees from big-name institutions we are supposed to just follow them mindlessly. Posted by: chemjeff at June 23, 2009 10:08 PM (sdE7F) 111
Yeah, but when that artfully crafted narrative is desperately played
over and over like a broken record in a pathetic attempt to try and
bolster support for destructive policies, it has to start getting
stale.
Why? It's worked for 70 years now. Posted by: chemjeff at June 23, 2009 10:10 PM (sdE7F) 112
"Everyone seems very concerned with the "Trade" part of the "Cap &
Trade" legislation. My advice: don't worry about it -- the "Cap" will
force a complete collapse of the U.S. economy." -- Eyas above @ 102
This is exactly correct. The CBO also does not do dynamic scoring to count the incredible number of legitimate business closings (and the attendant black market openings) that Cap & Trade will cause. I wouldn't doubt a 2 or 3 percent hit to GDP every year.* The costs to small business will be inordinately high, of course. So Democrats are once again the party of and for the powerful -- as they accrue more power to themselves. *That will largely be offset by normal growth for a net of near zero. Posted by: Do I Have This Right de Blog at June 23, 2009 10:11 PM (1Bods) 113
The world is going nuts, peres hilton is just like any other angry gay male, no fun anymore, jon and Kate are getting a divorce and Al Gore is counting his money and thanking his lucky stars that GWB won.
Posted by: muffy at June 23, 2009 10:12 PM (zplc6) 114
Except in places like California (which incidentally emits the most
greenhouse gases of any state), where folks will see a benefit.
And Waxman is a representative from.....guess where? Posted by: Blacque Jacques Shellacque at June 23, 2009 10:12 PM (iC0KP) 115
Muffy I'm real sorry about your friend. Actually it may be a blessing in disguise if he gets laid off, because then maybe he can start his own business and he can make more money.
Posted by: chemjeff at June 23, 2009 10:12 PM (sdE7F) 116
Stupid sockpuppet handle.
Posted by: I Wasn't Asking, I Was Telling de Blog at June 23, 2009 10:14 PM (1Bods) 117
#79 Muffy. You are 100% Correct, Many years ago the local utility company was just about to open a nuke plant at a place called Moscow Ohio. 3 mile Island happened just before it was to open. Never happened. they changed it to a coal plant at over a billion dollars. Stupid decision. There is almost 500 million dollars in Federal money now available to start Nuke plants right now. Didn't know about that did you?
Posted by: Mystry at June 23, 2009 10:14 PM (dIHlE) 118
chemjeff, we all encouraged him to think about teaching and maybe changing the world that way. He was happy with that and my friend who is a job placement specialist is helping him polish up his resume. The idea that he can guide his own destiny was kind of difficult for us to get across to him, you know the be pro active not reactive scenario but we think he realizes that is the best thing for him to do now.
Posted by: muffy at June 23, 2009 10:14 PM (zplc6) 119
And if the Republicans were merely playing politics with cap-and-screw tax, then they would shut up about it, because they know it's going to wreck the economy. And they also know that a fucked up economy is the #1 thing that can bring Barry down. So if they were just playing politics, they'd step aside and let the Democrats slit their own throats. But I hope they don't, though, because this is too important.
Posted by: chemjeff at June 23, 2009 10:15 PM (sdE7F) 120
chemjeff,
See my #112 above. Small businesses will get creamed by this Cap & Trade horse shit unless all they do is push paper. Making anything (which an engineer would likely have to do) will get ridiculously expensive. Posted by: I'm Doubting It de Blog at June 23, 2009 10:15 PM (1Bods) 121
Plus the CBO's numbers are screwy because:
CBO has estimated those amounts for the bill as it would be implemented in 2020 (but shown in 2010 dollars). The analysis does not include the effects of other aspects of the bill, such as federalefforts to speed the development of new technologies and to increase energyefficiency by specifying standards or subsidizing energy-saving investments.
The incidence of gains and losses would beconsiderably different once the free allocation of allowances had mostly ended. Although the analysis examines the effects of the bill as it would apply in 2020,those effects are described in the context of the current economy—that is, thecosts that would result if the policies set for 2020 were in effect in 2010. Posted by: momma at June 23, 2009 10:16 PM (penCf) 122
Posted by: muffy at June 23, 2009 10:14 PM (zplc6)
Yeah, there's no rule that says you have to be unemployed before you start looking for your next job. Actually does he have a master's or a Ph.D. in engineering? If so, he can make some serious money as a professor. Posted by: chemjeff at June 23, 2009 10:16 PM (sdE7F) 123
muffy,
I'm likely to make a career change here shortly. Can you send me contact information for your job placement specialist friend? If so, send any info to namedeblog @ gmail.com (remove spaces). Posted by: Help de Blog at June 23, 2009 10:17 PM (1Bods) Posted by: chemjeff at June 23, 2009 10:18 PM (sdE7F) 125
he has his masters and his bachelor's from MIT.
Posted by: muffy at June 23, 2009 10:18 PM (zplc6) 126
Oh man this has me all worked up now. I may just finish the case of beer tonight.
Posted by: chemjeff at June 23, 2009 10:19 PM (sdE7F) 127
Why? It's worked for 70 years now.
Well, I like to think that journalists used to have a bit more integrity in the past, but I can't argue with you about that on the academic front. But the problem with all of these policies is that, to steal the environmentalists' word, are unsustainable. Look at Social Security—the only way it's worked for 70 years is because of the mortgages it constantly takes out upon unborn generations (not to mention my generation, which will receive no benefits despite paying into the system). But it'll be bankrupt soon, and there's not a thing anyone can do about it. The same goes for all the unfunded liabilities that could be absorbed, temporarily, but the massive economic growth we've been fortunate enough to have experienced over the past fifty years. Sure, these programs can work, even for several generations. Clever schemes like withholding can even mask their effects on an individual's wallet and keep the masses in the dark about just how much is confiscated and redistributed. But when the economic engine slows down—or is starved of fuel, as cap and trade will do—the dire consequences of reckless spending that may have been protected by useful idiots in college classrooms or cheered on by a lapdog media will be impossible to ignore. Posted by: Fortunate Son at June 23, 2009 10:20 PM (FaLC9) 128
Waxman is such a jackass.
Posted by: Jimbo at June 23, 2009 10:20 PM (WI95V) 129
125
he has his masters and his bachelor's from MIT.
There are a lot of mid-sized universities that have engineering programs, that are always having problems finding engineering professors because they are in such high demand elsewhere (as you point out). In fact a lot of them will simply waive the Ph.D. requirement altogether if the person is willing to work there. Now he probably won't make 6 figures working as a university professor, but he'll be in education, he won't have to put up with all the social drama that goes along with highschool, and he'll still be doing engineering. Just a thought. Posted by: chemjeff at June 23, 2009 10:21 PM (sdE7F) 130
For the CBO to make sure that it added into its analysis that it is shown in 2010 dollars, proves that mass, mass inflation is coming our way. They know that ten bucks in 2010 will mean 30/40 bucks in 2020, right? When they say this in the context of the current economy isn't it their way of saying that this will tank our economy by 2020? Posted by: momma at June 23, 2009 10:26 PM (penCf) 131
When an engineering student stands up and says "I was told there would be no math" relax and enjoy the End of Days.
Posted by: eman at June 23, 2009 10:26 PM (NfLyl) 132
Look at Social Security—the only way it's worked for 70 years is
because of the mortgages it constantly takes out upon unborn
generations (not to mention my generation, which will receive no
benefits despite paying into the system). But it'll be bankrupt soon,
and there's not a thing anyone can do about it. The same goes for all
the unfunded liabilities that could be absorbed, temporarily, but the
massive economic growth we've been fortunate enough to have experienced
over the past fifty years.
If things keep going the way they are, SS won't ever go bankrupt. Here's why. The government can always borrow more money to prop up SS. Sure lenders may be a touch nervous now what with the out-of-control debt, but even now they are still lending. And if they aren't willing to cut us off now, when would they? Never. Long-term, though, lenders loan us money because there is a strong expectation that the government will repay the loans. They will repay the loans via tax money that is generated off of our hard work. It's OUR sweat and tears, from the hardworking, strong work ethic conservatives, that prop up socialist Ponzi schemes like SS forever. The only way SS will ever truly go bankrupt is if there is an Atlas Shrugged moment. Otherwise we will just continue to feed the beast. Posted by: chemjeff at June 23, 2009 10:27 PM (sdE7F) 133
O/T
Deadline Hollywood sells for $15 mil, and the person who sold it will get a salary. By CRIMINY!!!! (btw, Deadline Hollywood is a fascinatingly addictive blog,) First time I read it, I was like "boring" and would check in every once in a while, just if there was something I was interested in learning about, then stuff started happening on the business side, that I decided to go back to learn about what is going on, (yeah, it was "The Watchmen," can you blame me?) And I didn't know what the hell she was saying, so I started just clicking through, and she covers some seriously heavy crap that happens in the background in terms of business. My opinion good for her, rock on. Posted by: Douglas at June 23, 2009 10:29 PM (uU+Ss) 134
this sucks.
i live in pennsylvania and work in the steel industry. if you look at the dollar numbers here you will see PA, Ohio, West Virginia, Indiana, and Michigan will suffer. this will destroy what is left of the "rust belt" and finish off the cities and states that built this country. We get your coal, we make your power, we make your steel, your cars, your metals, your chemicals and this is how you repay us. Let's just send every frigging industrial job to china and india. And i am no nativist, if we lose jobs in the free market fine, but if we lose jobs because of government regulation i am not fine with that. I really think our government is going to destroy our country. Our money is going to be worthless, we won't produce anything, we are going the war of spain, england, france. Posted by: Ben at June 23, 2009 10:29 PM (f0I0I) 135
The only way SS will ever truly go bankrupt is if there is an Atlas Shrugged moment.
Eventually we aren't even going to be able to pay the interest on those loans. That's when that moment will arrive. At this rate, it's going to happen sooner or later. Posted by: Fortunate Son at June 23, 2009 10:29 PM (FaLC9) 136
Nukes have always been a big business for almost all nations that can afford them. The US because of its anti-nuke whacko's is way behind the curve. BHO is not saying anything for fear of upsetting his Liberal friends, has quietly put in place a nuke program to catch up.
Posted by: Mystry at June 23, 2009 10:32 PM (dIHlE) 137
Muffy@79
Absolutely, I have had entry level job reqs (engineering/science) open for months and I have received exactly <i>none</i> resumes from qualifed US citizens (job may require a clearance). I got buried with good resumes from India, Pakistan, etc. If I got a resume from a US citizen who didn't think Nyquist was a sports drink and could spell microcontroller, he or she would get an interview. Posted by: Jean at June 23, 2009 10:35 PM (K/N2J) 138
his comment about the polluters paying for this has to be the single most blatantly deceitful comment ever by a president. Posted by: exceller at June 23, 2009 10:36 PM (6beBT) 139
Nyquist is a high performance athletic re-hydrating beverage. Gatorade is a sports drink. /sniff
Posted by: DngrMse at June 23, 2009 10:38 PM (IzN2d) 140
Wow Jean that is so sad and really speaks to the state of things.
Posted by: muffy at June 23, 2009 10:39 PM (zplc6) 141
This BS is bad enough by itself, but... Why are these idiots pushing this, NOW, when unemployment is going through the roof and people are struggling to make ends meet as it is?
"The breakthrough came hours after President Obama at a news conference called on the House to pass the legislation, and a new EPA analysis showed that it would raise household energy costs on average only an extra $80 to $111 a year." Posted by: AES at June 23, 2009 10:40 PM (dkcp2) 142
79,
Heh, muffy my friend just graduated with his Mech Engineering degree, he got a scholarship by default. Not enough minorties signed up, not enough women, not enough poor, so the Marine white boy gets it by default. Posted by: AFlyingSquirrel at June 23, 2009 10:40 PM (ZfRY6) 143
What happened to Obama's pledge of no new taxes on anyone earning under $250,000?
(Don't answer that). Sorry for stating the incredibly obvious, but all this CO2 Cap nonsense is just a transparent excuse to raise everyone's taxes. Posted by: looking closely at June 23, 2009 10:47 PM (KNy97) 144
Jean@137 Too bad you don't have an opening that requires liberal arts or gay, lesbian, and transsexual studies.
You'd be covered up with resumes from the good ole US of A Posted by: AES at June 23, 2009 10:50 PM (dkcp2) 145
Too bad that Barry's Socialism 101 course didn't include any economic theory other than:
1) the rich can afford to pay higher taxes 2) manufacturing companies can afford to pay higher taxes 3) higher taxes don't increase unemployment 4) higher taxes are never passed on to anyone else 5) no one moves from a high tax to low tax area or country 6) everyone else gets a 'free' ride Posted by: GarandFan at June 23, 2009 10:50 PM (C3okI) 146
a new EPA analysis showed that it would raise household energy costs on average only an extra $80 to $111 a year.
It will be more than that for me each month. Pennsylvania Legislature decided that this is a great time to deregulate utilities. Electricity and nat. gas are expected to rise by 40% in December. That deregulation, coupled with the Waxman/Obama Crap & Tirade bill will have me sitting in the dark freezing my ass off next winter. Thanks 52%!!! Posted by: MCPO Airdale at June 23, 2009 10:55 PM (l51zO) 147
This is the Enron wet dream. Whay aren't the opponents in DC hammering away on that? There's a great blog post in that connection, I'm pretty sure.
Posted by: Chris at June 23, 2009 11:00 PM (8i2h4) 148
I still can't get over how much the breadbasket is projected to pay. We are being punished for not having a desert, or a freakisly convenient waterfall nearby.
Maybe he wants to make the greatplains an inland dirt desert all over again, just like in the 30's. Posted by: Douglas at June 23, 2009 11:01 PM (uU+Ss) 149
Bigger government, bigger corruption.
"Let's give them the change they need." Welcome to the age of Obama. Posted by: AES at June 23, 2009 11:06 PM (dkcp2) 150
AES - It's insane, the bosses read 10% unemployment, then I show them who is applying and I get shit on for asking to much (a hard science degree and experience writing micro-controller code and managing sensor data - and the hard part a clearable US citizen).
We are having a board meeting just to change procedures and lower job descriptions. Posted by: Jean at June 23, 2009 11:07 PM (K/N2J) 151
Let's read between the lines, the real breakthru was getting the EPA to release some BS number the spineless politicians could use as political cover.
Anyone ask why the EPA released that number instead of the Departments of Energy or Commerce. What expertise and datasets does the EPA have to conduct such a wide reaching analysis of energy consumption and cost? They are the proponent of this bullshit and they are the goto reference on costs; did the media let the fox in the hen house. Where is the "trickle down" analysis of food and transportation costs? Posted by: Jean at June 23, 2009 11:14 PM (K/N2J) 152
More fun: next week Obama is meeting with illegal alien advocates and will undoubtedly promise citizeship; and we already know about the free healthcare he's giving them. DC says we have 40 million uninsured, we have 30 million illegals. How convenient. Why, they just may vote democrat being bought off with free healthcare and citizenship given to them by the Fuehrer, at least that's what the democrats are banking on. He'll also promise access to social security for Mexican foreign nationals, all paid for by the stupid gringo. We'll even mail the check directly to Mexico. In sane countries they refer to such politicians as traitors and execute them. Posted by: The Great Satan™ at June 23, 2009 11:20 PM (71Zq0) 153
Jean@151 Exactly.
WTF happened to questioning government on real issues during the nightly damn network news programs? Posted by: AES at June 23, 2009 11:47 PM (dkcp2) 154
Mmmmmm!! I'd let Barney Frank tap and trade my butt with all his friends!
Oh... CAP and trade. That doesn't sound like as much fun. Posted by: poon at June 24, 2009 12:11 AM (i31Zq) 155
"General Electric, a top 20 source of funds for Obama in 2008,, and owner of the Obama-friendly MSNBC, already has strong ties to Democrats, but the company has bolstered that relationship, according to recently filed federal lobbying registrations. GE's transportation business has hired as a lobbyist Linda Hall Daschle, wife of Tom Daschle, the former Senate Democratic Leader and Obama's first pick to head the Department of Health and Human Services." Posted by: muffy at June 24, 2009 12:29 AM (zplc6) 156
153 Jean@151 Exactly.
WTF happened to questioning government on real issues during the nightly damn network news programs? Posted by: AES at June 23, 2009 11:47 PM (dkcp2) I'm increasingly convinced it never happened, so long as the agenda was popular or profitable. We're just unaware of the shenannigans that went on then as well. As far as I'm concerned, every hero and villain in history deserves a reconsideration based on the way we know images are manpiluated and distorted today. Posted by: MlR at June 24, 2009 12:31 AM (Bp1Wm) 157
Prepare to pay your alms for the new pinko religion. Seperation of church and state my ass.
Posted by: MlR at June 24, 2009 12:32 AM (Bp1Wm) 158
Did you guys know that I got banned from Patterico's?
I did! So here I am!!! Hi! Booosh! Boooosh! Wingers! Boosh! WIngers! Boosh! Redneck wingers!!! Posted by: poon at June 24, 2009 01:16 AM (i31Zq) 159
What happened to Obama's pledge of no new taxes on anyone earning under $250,000?
The expiration date on that promise ran out months ago. Posted by: Purple Avenger at June 24, 2009 02:42 AM (GNgO5) 160
141 (AES) said "This BS is bad enough by itself, but... Why are these idiots pushing this, NOW, when unemployment is going through the roof and people are struggling to make ends meet as it is?"
Simple. Because they can. They have to push through every irreversible change they can make before the midterms warm up. The Obamedia needs a little time to form false narratives and bury facts to mitigate Democrat losses. Nevertheless, they know that after the election they may not have such an overwhelming majority. That's why Obama and the Dem Congress seem immune to the realities of the economy and are just barrreling onwards with their agendas. They don't care. They want to make fundamental changes to the country that can't be reversed short of a civil war or revolution and they aint slowing down for nothing. Posted by: SamIam at June 24, 2009 03:14 AM (uwn4a) 161
(AES) said "This BS is bad enough by itself, but... Why are these idiots pushing this, NOW, when unemployment is going through the roof and people are struggling to make ends meet as it is?"
They are pushing this shit now because it is part of the Communist agenda. The AGW scam has never been about “saving the planet” except for a few crackpots who worship Gaia in the neo-pagan concepts. The overwhelming majority, including the U.N. scheme is nothing more than another redistribution of wealth scheme. Judging by Il Dueche’s and the Commiecrats actions since they took over they really do not give a shit about what happens to the average working man. This bill provides “energy subsidies” for their voters and screws the rest of us. Even as the mority of Americans are against this they will steam full speed ahead.
Everything about this scam has been shown to be a fraud including at least 3 cases of government entities falsifying data in order to promote their way. The real sceintific data, including temperature trends for the last DECADE show that CO2 has very little, if any impact on temperature, and fluctuations in the sun are the major cause of temperature fluctuations. In fact, we have been cooling for the past 10 years. But the politicians like pig-face Waxman can not hear that.
Does anyone have an analysis of this bill that shows why CA gets a positive while most of the rest of the country gets negative? CA does not have that much hydro and relies heavily on Gas Turbine.
Also, one wonders if this calculation takes into account the amount of electricity usage in given areas in additon to the generation mix. In the South we use a LOT of electricity for heating and cooling whereas in the North they may use fuel oil for heating but have no requirements for A/C in the Summer.
In additon, how did they balance hydrocarbon use vs electiricy? There are a lot of questions about this rip off that I would like to see answered and I would rather not down load the bill and puzzle through it myself. It has been my experience that the assholes in congress try to hide as much as possible when writing these things and it makes it hard to figure it all out.
Posted by: Vic at June 24, 2009 03:47 AM (5ynkO) 162
BTW, the reason I ask about the regional variations on use is they claim a cost of $96.67 for SC and yet say that the average utility bill will go up by 90%. My gas and electric bill total for 2008 was $1802. With a 90% increase that would go to $3420.80 (or an increase of $1621. I have a relatively new high efficiency heat pump and a modest size house of roughly 1600 sq ft. In addition, my current rate of 7.1 cents/kw is amoung the lowest in the country.
So where do they come up with this $97 bullshit?
Also, we need to keep in mind that these costs are ONLY utiltity costs and not the overall costs frm all manufactorers and buisnesses that WILL be passed on to the consumer. Posted by: Vic at June 24, 2009 04:00 AM (5ynkO) 163
One other aspect that I predicted with this AGW scam is also coming true with Pig-Face Waxman. Long ago I predicted that not only would this be simply another huge tax by creating a market for “carbon” permits out of thin air, but it would also be an influence peddling scam in which congress could reward favored groups. Already the “farm” lobby is being given great leeway. I’m sure that if the unions start squawking they will get their little piece of the action as well.
What really gets me is how Americans can be so stupid as to buy into this shit. Posted by: Vic at June 24, 2009 05:02 AM (5ynkO) 164
Isn't Alabama a poor state?
In a word, no. I think the reason for the rather high cost to the state has more to do with a Republican Governor, and both U.S. senators are Republican. The last time Alabama voted for a Dem. for President was Carter the first time he ran.
Waxman is an asshole.
Posted by: Case at June 24, 2009 05:46 AM (0K+Kw) 165
Republic of Texas, baby!
I think that the government needs to bring on more and more of this shit, and do it faster. Clean sheet and a fresh start. I figure the ROT looks just about like the red states on that map at the top of the page. Probably leaves out some of those iccky liberal states in the upper right, and definitely leaves out Hawaii and it's uber liberal policies. Posted by: Mephitis at June 24, 2009 05:49 AM (ehXLT) 166
On page 196 of the bill they specify the acceptable wattage for all lamps, everything from chandelier candelabra to work lights. If you need higher wattage (like, oh maybe, for SURGERY) you have to petition the Secretary of Energy for an exemption.
I am still going through the bill, but that is the first thing that I found that will cause a giant headache to every American. Posted by: Miss Marple at June 24, 2009 07:10 AM (Vli7s) 167
On page 196 of the bill they specify the acceptable wattage for all lamps, everything from chandelier candelabra to work lights
WOW; I guess I do need to download this bill. The above is not “cap and trade”, it is outright Fascism. Posted by: Vic at June 24, 2009 07:16 AM (5ynkO) 168
It's hard to find normal light bulbs anywhere. Actually know people who are hoarding them, enough for years. One person is saying you need an environmental clean up crew to come in should you break one. Sure, it is a joke but they then show you the back of the box versus the back of the box of the old fashioned light bulb and the difference in "instructions" is obvious.
Posted by: muffy at June 24, 2009 07:42 AM (zplc6) 169
#109 -- So do I -- and sadly, the bloom is not off the rose for a bunch of these idiots. I have to admit that every damn time I see an Obama sticker, it fills me with nauseated rage.
Posted by: CrankyProf at June 24, 2009 07:44 AM (iWw2j) 170
On page 196 of the bill they specify the acceptable wattage for all lamps, everything from chandelier candelabra to work lights
What happened to "keep the government out of my bedroom"? (I read there, I need more than 35 W to see print). Posted by: HeatherRadish at June 24, 2009 07:48 AM (NtiET) 171
1. Cap-and-tax passes. Electricity bills go up.
2. Compliant MSM dutifully runs stories in the winter time about poor freezing Grandma who can't afford to pay her electricity bill. 3. Democrats rail against "big oil", "big electricity", etc., and demand that government "do something" to help Grandma. 4. Climate change panel meets again: guess what, it's worse than we thought! Global warming is going to ravage the planet much sooner than everyone thought! 5. Given the combination, Obama has "no choice" but to nationalize the power companies, to force them to use green energy and to prevent Grandma from freezing. After all, he's still cleaning up from Bush's mess. This would be much funnier if it wasn't prophecy. Posted by: Good Lt. at June 24, 2009 08:15 AM (jH17H) 172
What happened to "keep the government out of my bedroom"?
Try one of these Obamisms as an explanation: "I won." or "I'm the President of the United States." or "Spread the wealth around." or "You ain't seen nothing yet." or "We are the change we've been waiting for." Posted by: Good Lt. at June 24, 2009 08:20 AM (jH17H) 173
Muffy. You are 100% Correct, Many years ago the local utility company
was just about to open a nuke plant at a place called Moscow Ohio. 3
mile Island happened just before it was to open. Never happened. they
changed it to a coal plant at over a billion dollars. Stupid decision.
I grew up near that plant; one of my brothers worked there for a while. The real capper on that story is that they had to buy up hundreds of acres of wooded hills to serve as ash-pits for the coal plant. Posted by: Rob Crawford at June 24, 2009 08:21 AM (ZJ/un) 174
There is more to it than the electicity calculations. Petroleum refineries get no credit rebates (or whatever they call them) and will therefore pass along the tax to the purchasers of gasoline. An extra buck or two per gallon will push more folks into the Gubmint Motors Volt. The big oil companys will decide there is no profit in refining so they'll decide to make their money from production, driving the independent refiners out of the market. Did I say a buck or two? Better plan on three or four.
Posted by: RicardoVerde at June 24, 2009 08:21 AM (JzWSG) Posted by: krakatoa at June 24, 2009 08:30 AM (f4Nx6) 176
Every step in the supply chain will increase the cost of EVERYTHING you consume if\when this goes through... Example: Chicken will cost farmer an extra 10% to raise. He raises price accordingly. Transport chicken to processing plant - +10%. Price for transport rises accordingly. Processing chicken - +10% . Price for processing rises accordingly. Transport chicken to supermarket - +10%. Price for transport rises accordingly. Supermarket operating costs - +10% . All prices rise accordingly. The 10% number is made up, but you get the point. Sure, your electric\NG bill may go up only 10%... but EVERYTHING you buy will go up 30%-50%, because energy prices affect everyone\ everything along the supply chain. It's unavoidable. Businesses do NOT pay taxes... and will not pay for cap-and-tax. YOU WILL! In reality, it's worse then the example above. That 10% is just electric\NG. Feed\fuel\paper\repairs will ALL cost more because of higher electric\NG prices. We saw a hint of how all prices rise when energy prices do when gas\diesel shot up to $4+\gal. last year... this will be MUCH worse. And all this BEFORE hyperinflation kicks in because of Porkulus\TARP\The Won's budget... This really does have the potential to colapse our ecomony if it goes through. Even more so considering the how bad the economy is right now. Talk about the worst time to implement something like this... Start buying food\fuel now people... and if you are planning to make your house more energy efficient, do it now while it's still somewhat affordable. Better safe than sorry... or starving and freezing as the case has the potential of being. You've been warned. Posted by: theBman - obviously confused and disoriented at June 24, 2009 08:32 AM (pBNEK) 177
The map is a bit misleading.
It shows where the tax is applied, not where the tax is passed along to the consumer. You folks in CA and NY will be paying too. Posted by: Neo at June 24, 2009 08:34 AM (5d1ix) 178
Presidential nominee Obama stated that his cap and trade plan would bankrupt the Coal industry. At least he's wasn't lying this time. The US produces some 6 Billion metric tons of CO2 per year. About 4 Billion of this amount comes from fossil fuel energy generation -- mostly coal.The DoE estimates the COST of Carbon Sequestration at between $100 to $300 per ton. Thus, 4 Billion tons @ $200 per ton = $800,000,000,000 to eliminate/sequester the CO2 from Coal plants. The total Revenue of the entire Coal Industry is roughly $330,000,000 per year. Notice that the total revenue of the entire industry is an entire ORDER OF MAGNITUDE smaller than the amount required to sequester the CO2 from Coal burning. Coal plants provide 50% of our nation's electricity. The sequestration costs will also essentially eliminate the production of electricity from other fossil fuels (mostly Natural Gas) -- an additional 23% of our electricity production. Thus, Cap & Trade will more or less eliminate 73% of the electricity sources in this country. At best, this will increase electricity costs by a factor of 4 or 5. That is, YOUR monthly electric bill will, at least, quadruple in price. The current average monthly residential electric bill across the U.S. is $73 per month. Under Cap & Trade the average residential electricity bill will be around $300 per month. Now, you may say, "Okay, that's a big increase; but it's not so much that I can't pay it (for the worthy cause of SAVING THE PLANET)." But, imagine you are a business owner in some industry that actually uses electricity (try to name one that doesn't). Imagine that you are, say, the FOOD production industry - which pays roughly $4 Million per year for electricity. Then, imagine that you suddenly are paying at least $16 Million per year for electricity. Or, you could be the chemical industry -- which pays about $6.5 Million per year for electricity. Now you're suddenly paying $26 Million per year. What happens to the price of your product? Let's say that, currently, 10% of the price of your product reflects your electricity costs. Under Cap & Trade, your electricity costs will be soon be reflected as 40% of the price of your product. The widgets that you sell just went from $1 per widget to $1.30 per widget overnight. -- conservatively estimated. This massive increase in price happens to ABSOLUTELY EVERYTHING produced in this country. And, not just retail stuff. Not only do your costs increase for electricity, so do your costs of buying ABSOLUTELY EVERYTHING ELSE. Your electricity costs quadruple, but the cost of ALL of your raw materials increases as well. You pay much more to make your widgets AND you also pay much more for the plastic that your widgets are made of, as well as for the cement & steel that your building is made of, the plumbing, the wiring, the tile floor, the doors, the windows, your car, your clothes, your food, and ... oh, by the way, the massive increases in salaries that ALL of your employees need as a cost-of-living increase to be able to afford their own electric bills. Each increased cost, in addition to all of your other costs, has a multiplicative effect on the price that you must charge for your products, just to stay in business Posted by: Eyas at June 24, 2009 08:49 AM (pVKFE) 179
This will bury the Democrats. All the less informed Americans will know is that their bills are going up....drastically. Couple that with the flatlined economy, unemployment and the rise in costs for nearly everything we do and buy will be the perfect storm come 2010. Even the state run media will not be able to sweet talk all this bullshit.
The dems are going DOWN. Posted by: Twinks at June 24, 2009 08:58 AM (V+x9W) 180
Eyas & theBman.
I appreciate your input here -- the numbers look pretty staggering. And I apologize ahead of time if this is all your own work. But that looks like a lot of cut & pasted data & wording. If so, I'd appreciate if you'd refer to the original source material. If it's all your own words and figures, then please source how you derive your numbers. We are on the same side of the issue, and I apologize ahead of time if my suspicions are unfounded, but this feels like spam. The last thing I want to do is start debating this with people starting out misinformed. Posted by: krakatoa at June 24, 2009 09:24 AM (f4Nx6) 181
You should always question Krakatoa... and believe it or not, i did'nt do one bit of cut and paste. I stated that my numbers are made up... the numbers in my example are irrelevent. My example is a statement of economics 101. The cost of a thing is directly and largely related to the cost of production and the supply chain. If I sell you "teh stuff®" for $1 and it costs me $0.75 to make and ship to you, I make a profit of $0.25. If suddenly my cost of doing business goes up $0.30 because, say, the energy to make "teh stuff®" goes up $0.10, the plasic to make "teh stuff®" goes up $0.10 (because it now costs my supplier more to produce the plastic), and shipping the plastic to me and "teh stuff®" to you costs $0.10 more, I can no longer sell you "teh stuff®" for $1; unless my plan is to take the fast train to OutOfBusinessVille. I have no choise but to sell you "teh stuff®" for $1.50, because a $0.25 profit does'nt buy as much as it used to... See, if just the rent on my warehouse went up, I would probably only have to increase the price to $1.10. But since energy is used in every single step in the supply chain, it has a cumulative effect. Posted by: theBman - obviuosly confused and disoriented at June 24, 2009 10:01 AM (/vN7m) Posted by: richard mcenroe at June 24, 2009 10:04 AM (fOZmY) 183
Obama is trying to centralize all power in himself. Once they do this to energy what is the next step towards Marxism.
And the GOP chirps. Posted by: Thomas Jackson at June 24, 2009 10:14 AM (B8gqF) 184
#109 -- They're not going to cut back. That's why Bari al-Taqqiyah is pushing the smart grid, so CA and NY can loot the nation's energy from generating states.
Posted by: richard mcenroe at June 24, 2009 10:15 AM (fOZmY) 185
Thanks Bman. I misread, and thought you were using actual estimates.
Agreed, that it's never too early to work on ways to protect yourself from impacts to the grid. Prepare for the worst (to the best of ones ability) and hope for the best. I gotta say however, I'm enjoying the brass balls on our president. My pre-election prediction was that a Dem president and Legislature would not be able to help itself, would descend into an orgy of taxing & spending & regulating, the likes of which would introduce a couple generations long brainwashed by the Education system & the Media into believing that Liberalism has the answer to all our woes. And God love him, Obama is fulfilling that prediction in spades. I think the firmaments are beginning to tremble, which is why Obama has spent such an unprecedented amount of time (in contemporary terms) hawking his wares to the public. When unemployment hits double-digits; when next tax-day hits and people realize Obama's tax "cut" was merely tax deferred; when it sinks in that the drastic increase in the every-day costs of living are not a bug, but a feature of Obamanomics, I suspect that not only the notoriously uninformed "independent" American voter, but quite a few lifetime (D) voters will pull the polling booth lever with their check-writing hand. Posted by: krakatoa at June 24, 2009 10:49 AM (f4Nx6) 186
No problem... What Eyas said below is worth repeating... because it can't be said loud or often enough: "This massive increase in price happens to ABSOLUTELY EVERYTHING produced in this country. And, not just retail stuff. Not only do your costs increase for electricity, so do your costs of buying ABSOLUTELY EVERYTHING ELSE. Your electricity costs quadruple, but the cost of ALL of your raw materials increases as well. You pay much more to make your widgets AND you also pay much more for the plastic that your widgets are made of, as well as for the cement & steel that your building is made of, the plumbing, the wiring, the tile floor, the doors, the windows, your car, your clothes, your food, and ... oh, by the way, the massive increases in salaries that ALL of your employees need as a cost-of-living increase to be able to afford their own electric bills. Each increased cost, in addition to all of your other costs, has a multiplicative effect on the price that you must charge for your products, just to stay in business" Truely freightening... "Agreed, that it's never too early to work on ways to protect yourself from impacts to the grid. Prepare for the worst (to the best of ones ability) and hope for the best." I look at it this way...If nothing comes of this and cap-and-tax does'nt pass, I've beat a small part of inflation by buying food at pre-inflation prices (you'd be amazed at how much you eat in a year and how long the shelf life is on most foods), and my power bill will go DOWN by a large percent by installing new windows\doors\insulation.(I live in an older house.) Granted, I can't do every window and door in 1 shot; but every one I replace helps my electric\NG bill... --- Yea, it's going to be great watching heads explode when people realize that the "tax cut" was really just a "withholding cut" for most people... Posted by: theBman - obviously confused and disoriented at June 24, 2009 11:13 AM (/vN7m) 187
Don't forget all the businesses that will just say "screw this--I'm outta here" and move more ops offshore. We could find ourselves longing for the good old days of 9% unemployment.
Posted by: stace at June 24, 2009 12:55 PM (g/wgk) 188
Krakatoa, Sorry, I got off-line right after I posted that last night. What I posted was cut-and-pasted. But from something I had put together to post on another site, at about the time that the audio of then-candidate Obama came out saying that he would bankrupt the coal industry. I thought that it was rather long anyway, so I left out some of the caveats & source cites that I had originally had in it (I also had had a few estimates about wind-power, but left that out too) It's not anything that I would take to present to Congress or anything; just some "back-of-envelope" calculations based on what I could gather from respectable (mostly ".gov") sources in about a half hour on the internet. Most questionable of what I posted (then & now) is the claim that this will immediately wipe out the electricity generating industry. Probably not -- at least, not overnight. It depends on what the "cap" will be; will there be a phase-in of ever more stringent "caps"; what the cost of tradeable credits will be compared to installing carbon sequestration equipment; whether sequestration technology allows plants to sequester whatever percentage of their CO2 emissions they want, and at what cost; etc, etc, etc. CBO, on the other hand, assumes that all of the reductions in CO2 will come from lower demand because of increased price. As if this isn't putting the effect before the cause. And as if essentials like electricity are perfectly price-elastic, right down to zero demand. And, as if zero demand for electricity by industry "X" isn't exactly the same as saying "the complete, immediate, shut-down of industry "X". It's insane. What I really wanted to get across was the part that theBMan quoted. That the presumably massive increase in energy costs is multiplicative at every stage in the production chain.
P.S. What will happen to the cement manufacturing industry? (the second biggest industrial emitter of CO2) There is no sequestration technology for cement manufacture (as far as I know). So, they'll simply be shut down by the "cap", or have their product become so cost-prohibitive by virtue of "trade" that cement becomes un-buyable. People who like to keep track of things like "Housing Starts" can quit doing so, there won't be any "Housing Starts" anymore. At least, not until a substitute for cement comes around ... can you build a home's foundation with unicorn farts?
Posted by: Eyas at June 24, 2009 09:25 PM (pVKFE) 189
Krakatoa,
I can go back & find the exact url where I got these if you want, but a google search should give you most of them (except the DoE estimate of sequestration cost, which I found somewhere on the DoE.gov website - I can try to find it if you want). I really only had one estimate: "this would increase electricity costs by a factor of 4 or 5." The rest of the calculations were just multiplying some facts (above) by this factor of four. In the original post I wrote (which I cut & pasted from), I had a caveat not to rely on my numbers as a source themselves. I put it together to give a quick, general idea of possible impact of Cap & Trade, using some real numbers just for perspective. Again, it's not meant to be relied upon. Just meant to give some idea of potential ultimate consequences, given that there's nothing to replace fossil-fuel electricity generation -- regardless whether they're put out of business overnight or over time. Posted by: Eyas at June 24, 2009 10:15 PM (pVKFE) 190
Need to know before buying lace wigs Our lace wigs are made of human hairs classified lace human hair wigs on our web. 100% Indian/Chinese remy human hair and best quality Swiss/French lace are used in lace human hair wigs. Lace human hair wig is thin, your scalp can get good breath, so you can feel comfortable just like real hair. You may find hundreds of units and almost 150+ styles of full lace wigs in our store. By using our web searcher, you may locate just the wigs you want without bitter searches. Also, you may customise lace front wigs here, all you need to do is just to follow our custom options or leave your specials in the "comments". A custom wig can be completed within 25 workdays generally. Thanks for Paypal and our Co-work World Wide Ship corporations, we can ship wigs to all over the world! Show your beauty, show your individuality, experience our wonderful service and dress you up right now!
wedding dresses wedding dress wedding gowns bridesmaid dresses bridesmaid dress Posted by: royalmewigs at June 24, 2009 10:55 PM (q1bxb) 191
I can see a lot of politicians having their asses handed to them if they have the gall to pass this travesty.
The Dems have pissed in their beds worse than the Repubs did. Posted by: Ford289HiPo at June 25, 2009 05:23 PM (WI95V) 192
<a href="http://www.shoppingedhardy.com">ED hardy shirts</a> <a href="http://www.shoppingedhardy.com">ED hardy clothing</a> <a href="http://www.shoppingedhardy.com">ED hardy jeans</a> Posted by: bxcb at June 29, 2009 02:20 AM (/fASD) 193
Give please. If you would be known, and not know, vegetate in a village; If you would know, and not be known, live in a city. Help me! Need information about: Smartparts ion paintball gun. I found only this - f4 illustrator Paintball gun. Of paintball video including mpulse introduction and aintball fantasy acampamento, esportes radicais, paintball, para pente. We also carry diversion safes and personal alarms. Thanks ;-). Honey from Indonesia.
Posted by: Honey at July 16, 2009 02:20 PM (kZgnP) Posted by: jashon at July 20, 2009 04:52 AM (YixHw) 195
UGG Boots Sale
ugg shoes ugg classic cheap ugg UGG UK bape shoes bape shoes sale cheap bape shoes UGG UK UGG boots sale UGG Classic discount UGG UGG Bailey Button UGG Amelie Suede UGG Bailey Button UGG Classic Cardy cheap UGG Cardy UGG Classic Crochet UGG Classic Mini UGG Classic Short UGG Classic Tall UGG Coquette Casual UGG Gypsy Sandal UGG Halendi Sandal UGG Hammond Slipper UGG Infant's Erin Baby UGG KnightsBridge UGG Layback Slipper UGG Lo Pro Button UGG Matala Sandal UGG Napoule Sandal UGG New Arrival 5389 UGG New Short Boots Posted by: retailike111 at October 17, 2009 02:18 AM (TBT0K) 196
discounthair straighteners
ghd hair chi hair straightener ghd straighteners chi straighteners chi hair chi hair iron hair straighteners ghd ghd hair straighteners free shipping! Posted by: hair straighteners at October 24, 2009 12:34 PM (9oMrs) 197
Discount Boots
Womens UGG UGG Shoes UGG Australia UGG UK UGG USA discount ugg boots cheap ugg boots Posted by: fdsfds at October 27, 2009 10:10 AM (8kvkz) 198
discountugg boots sale
ugg shoes tall ugg boots ugg classic boots nike shox air jordan shoes nike air max nike air force one bailey button ugg rainier ugg boots ugg classic cardy ugg crochet boots ugg mini ugg classic short classic tall ugg ugg coquette ugg baby boots ugg knightsbridge ugg lo pro new ugg boots ugg short boots ugg nightfall boots ugg skimmer ugg sundance boots ultra short ugg ugg ultra tall discount ugg slippers ugg sandals ugg halendi ugg slippers ugg layback ugg matala sandal ugg napoule sandal ugg persephone tasmina ugg air force 1 shoes jordan air shoes nike shox shoes air max nike free shipping! Posted by: ugg boots at October 27, 2009 01:10 PM (pgfU2) 199
Your post very good,thanks for sharing!Are you also like these:ugg boots uk,buy ugg boots,australia ugg,cheap ugg boots,ugg boots,ugg boots sheepskin,womens ugg boots,ugg australia boots,cheap ugg boots
Posted by: australia ugg at October 27, 2009 03:00 PM (c6EK2) Posted by: qin at October 29, 2009 12:29 PM (prEzA) 201
buy Discount Boots
Womens UGG UGG Shoes UGG Australia UGG UK UGG USA discount ugg boots cheap ugg boots air force 1 shoes nike air force air force 1 mens air force 1 boots air force onefrom usa Posted by: airforceoneshop at November 03, 2009 03:21 PM (LHCCE) 202
Come to our website for shopping with high quality and best service! There have new products,MBT M. Walk
and MBT Lami,Welcome everybody to buy it. Posted by: mbt shoes at November 08, 2009 09:38 AM (QhfLM) 203
cheap ugg
buy ugg ugg usa ugg boots ugg uk ugg australia ugg shoes ugg sale womens ugg boots discount ugg boots cheap ugg boots ugg shoes sale ugg boots sale ugg sundance ugg 5819 ugg 5815 ugg knightsbridge ugg 5825 ugg rainier Posted by: reviewups at November 10, 2009 02:55 AM (UHjri) 204
Buy discount ugg shoes
cheap ugg shoes cheap ugg ugg rainier buy ugg ugg usa discount ugg boots ugg 5825 ugg shoes sale ugg sundance ugg shoes cheap ugg boots ugg 5815 ugg sale ugg uk ugg knightsbridge womens ugg boots ugg boots ugg australia ugg 5819free shipping Posted by: ugg boots at November 12, 2009 02:56 AM (IeIJx) 205
nike dunk sb
Do anything needed to support an idea, a good idea usually brings good results, doing business is like that.http://www.dunksky.com/.This site has always been on Posted by: nike dunk sb at November 14, 2009 02:03 AM (APB+g) 206
buy [url=http://www.reviewups.com/]discount ugg shoes[/url]
[url=http://www.reviewups.com/]cheap ugg shoes[/url] [url=http://www.reviewups.com/]cheap ugg[/url] [url=http://www.reviewups.com/ugg-coquette-casual-shoes-c-22]ugg rainier[/url] [url=http://www.reviewups.com/]buy ugg[/url] [url=http://www.reviewups.com/]ugg usa[/url] [url=http://www.reviewups.com/]discount ugg boots[/url] [url=http://www.reviewups.com/ugg-classic-short-c-1]ugg 5825[/url] [url=http://www.reviewups.com/]ugg shoes sale[/url] [url=http://www.reviewups.com/ugg-sundance-c-5]ugg sundance[/url] [url=http://www.reviewups.com/]ugg shoes[/url] [url=http://www.reviewups.com/]cheap ugg boots[/url] [url=http://www.reviewups.com/ugg-classic-tall-c-3]ugg 5815[/url] [url=http://www.reviewups.com/]ugg sale[/url] [url=http://www.reviewups.com/]ugg uk[/url] [url=http://www.reviewups.com/ugg-knightsbridge-c-27]ugg knightsbridge[/url] [url=http://www.reviewups.com/]womens ugg boots[/url] [url=http://www.reviewups.com/]ugg boots[/url] [url=http://www.reviewups.com/]ugg australia[/url] [url=http://www.reviewups.com/ugg-classic-cardy-c-2]ugg 5819[/url]from usa Posted by: cheap at November 14, 2009 05:31 AM (s7MB5) 207
BJ's Restaurants links of london . Management might be tempted to belly up and drown cheap links of london their sorrows, links of london jewellery since the majority of this chain's 89 restaurants are in links of london jewelry deep-recession states like California, Arizona, links of london sale and Florida. links london
Posted by: mxc at November 16, 2009 08:22 PM (amVaT) 208
Fake Watches | Fake Watches | Replica Rolex | Fake Watches | Replica Omega | Replica Gucci | Aigner Fake Watches | Parmigiani Replica | Oris Replica | Dolce & Gabbana Watch Replica | Replica Roger Dubuis | Corum Fake | Jaeger LeCoultre Watch | Wholesale Tissot Watch | Jacob & Co Watches
Posted by: replica watches at November 17, 2009 06:30 AM (xpuiO) 209
Replica watches | Replica Breitling Watches | Replica Cartier | soccer jersey wholesale | Replica Watches | Louis Vuitton Watch | Omega Watch Replica | Daniel Roth Fake Watches | Fake Patek Philippe | Fake Swiss Chanel Ceramic | 2009 New Arrival Replica | Oris Watch | Maurice Lacroix Replica | Replica Richard Mille Watch | Fake Roger Dubuis Watches
Posted by: replica watches at November 17, 2009 08:07 AM (xpuiO) 210
Replica Rolex | Replica Rolex | Fake Watches | Replica Omega | Replica Watches | Chanel Fake Watch | Cheap Movado Watches | Rado Watch | Breitling Watches Replica | Fake Seiko Watch | Technomari Wristwatch | Replica Rado Watches | Calvin Klein Wristwatch | Replica Dkny Watches | Replica Calvin Klein
Posted by: replica watches at November 18, 2009 04:32 AM (C/zDM) 211
UGG BOOTS
Posted by: UGG BOOTS at November 18, 2009 09:43 AM (WPYlQ) Processing 0.07, elapsed 0.0785 seconds. |
MuNuvians
MeeNuvians
Polls! Polls! Polls!
Dale's ECB Election Projection Federal Review Real Clear Politics Rasmussen Reports Gallup Zogby FoxNews Polls Sabato/Crystal Ball Frequently Asked Questions
The (Almost) Complete Paul Anka Integrity Kick
Primary Document: The Audio
Paul Anka Haiku Contest Announcement Integrity SAT's: Entrance Exam for Paul Anka's Band AllahPundit's Paul Anka 45's Collection AnkaPundit: Paul Anka Takes Over the Site for a Weekend (Continues through to Monday's postings) George Bush Slices Don Rumsfeld Like an F*ckin' Hammer Top Top Tens
Democratic Forays into Erotica New Shows On Gore's DNC/MTV Network Nicknames for Potatoes, By People Who Really Hate Potatoes Star Wars Euphemisms for Self-Abuse Signs You're at an Iraqi "Wedding Party" Signs Your Clown Has Gone Bad Signs That You, Geroge Michael, Should Probably Just Give It Up Signs of Hip-Hop Influence on John Kerry NYT Headlines Spinning Bush's Jobs Boom Things People Are More Likely to Say Than "Did You Hear What Al Franken Said Yesterday?" Signs that Paul Krugman Has Lost His Frickin' Mind All-Time Best NBA Players, According to Senator Robert Byrd Other Bad Things About the Jews, According to the Koran Signs That David Letterman Just Doesn't Care Anymore Examples of Bob Kerrey's Insufferable Racial Jackassery Signs Andy Rooney Is Going Senile Other Judgments Dick Clarke Made About Condi Rice Based on Her Appearance Collective Names for Groups of People John Kerry's Other Vietnam Super-Pets Cool Things About the XM8 Assault Rifle Media-Approved Facts About the Democrat Spy Changes to Make Christianity More "Inclusive" Secret John Kerry Senatorial Accomplishments John Edwards Campaign Excuses John Kerry Pick-Up Lines Changes Liberal Senator George Michell Will Make at Disney Torments in Dog-Hell Greatest Hitjobs
The Ace of Spades HQ Sex-for-Money Skankathon A D&D Guide to the Democratic Candidates Margaret Cho: Just Not Funny More Margaret Cho Abuse Margaret Cho: Still Not Funny Iraqi Prisoner Claims He Was Raped... By Woman Wonkette Announces "Morning Zoo" Format John Kerry's "Plan" Causes Surrender of Moqtada al-Sadr's Militia World Muslim Leaders Apologize for Nick Berg's Beheading Michael Moore Goes on Lunchtime Manhattan Death-Spree Milestone: Oliver Willis Posts 400th "Fake News Article" Referencing Britney Spears Liberal Economists Rue a "New Decade of Greed" Artificial Insouciance: Maureen Dowd's Word Processor Revolts Against Her Numbing Imbecility Intelligence Officials Eye Blogs for Tips They Done Found Us Out, Cletus: Intrepid Internet Detective Figures Out Our Master Plan Shock: Josh Marshall Almost Mentions Sarin Discovery in Iraq Leather-Clad Biker Freaks Terrorize Australian Town When Clinton Was President, Torture Was Cool What Wonkette Means When She Explains What Tina Brown Means Wonkette's Stand-Up Act Wankette HQ Gay-Rumors Du Jour Here's What's Bugging Me: Goose and Slider My Own Micah Wright Style Confession of Dishonesty Outraged "Conservatives" React to the FMA An On-Line Impression of Dennis Miller Having Sex with a Kodiak Bear The Story the Rightwing Media Refuses to Report! Our Lunch with David "Glengarry Glen Ross" Mamet The House of Love: Paul Krugman A Michael Moore Mystery (TM) The Dowd-O-Matic! Liberal Consistency and Other Myths Kepler's Laws of Liberal Media Bias John Kerry-- The Splunge! Candidate "Divisive" Politics & "Attacks on Patriotism" (very long) The Donkey ("The Raven" parody) News/Chat
|