| Support
Contact
| When Guilds Attack: MSM Reporters Kind Of Curious About Blogger Getting To Ask Question TodayThere's a bit of a dust up today about Huffington Post's Nico Pitney getting an invite to the White House press conference today with the assurance he'd get to ask a question. Frankly, I don't get it. Pitney has been doing yeoman's work on Iran. This isn't news to anyone following the story. Obviously the White House noticed it and reached out to a reporter/blogger who would normally not be at an event like this (though I imagine he could have gotten a credential if he'd asked). Yeah, it's a little clubby to basically give a guy a guarantee that he'd get to ask a question but so what? Obama can call on whomever he wants. He knows before he goes out there who he will pick, so what's the big deal? Yes, Obama also knew it was very likely that Pitney would ask about Iran. Again, so what? It was the story of the day and has been for a week. Now, if Obama had knowledge of what the question was, that would be different but I haven't seen anyone claim that. This strikes me as a little bit of guild jealousy. The White House press corps may think they are the only ones qualified to ask tough questions but clearly they aren't. Pitney asked a question submitted by a reader in Iran that was totally legit.Under which conditions would you accept the election of Ahmadinejad? And if you do accept it without any significant changes in the conditions there, isn't that a betrayal of -- of what the demonstrators there are working to achieveObama's answer was telling...he punted by saying it was up to the Iranians to decide. Well yes and no. They are 'debating' that now but the US is free to make an independent judgment and base its interests and actions accordingly. Again, Obama took a pass and was very passive. That was telling. Let's be honest Pitney has done more on this story than most msm reporters. I don't see the big deal in letting him follow it up this way. Plus, when the next Republican President invites Ace to ask a question, we can point to this example and tell the left to stick it. Comments1
Amateur. That's no way to kiss Presidential Ass.
Posted by: MSM Whores at June 23, 2009 03:12 PM (MMC8r) 2
DrewM, You make excellent points, but when the scuffle is between/among the MSM, a lefty blog, and this administration, I'm rooting for injuries. Posted by: MikeO at June 23, 2009 03:12 PM (hz67i) 3
But the OB spice must flow, DrewM, but only through the Guild!
Posted by: The Spinning Guild at June 23, 2009 03:12 PM (8PGHt) 4
Ace: Mr. President, exactly what steps has your administration taken to address the Scandi menace, and do you feel they've been successful?
Posted by: whatever at June 23, 2009 03:13 PM (XIXhw) 5
I don't get the uproar either. That was a good question and I agree with you about Nico. I guess it would be a problem if Obama knew the specific question but clearly, given his answer, that's not the case. Hannity just mentioned this on the air and, no surprise, muffed it.
Posted by: peterargus at June 23, 2009 03:13 PM (IK21c) 6
PRESENTly enjoying sum ice cream lolz #me
Posted by: @obamabarack_dc at June 23, 2009 03:14 PM (5aa4z) 7
They're not doing so hot in the online world anymore either
Time Spent On Many Top Newspaper Sites Is Dropping while the site belonging to the Seattle Post-Intelligencer—which is now without a print version, went from 15 minutes on average last year in May to just over 7 minutes last month. Heh! Posted by: kbdabear at June 23, 2009 03:14 PM (cGmnP) 8
"the more you ignore me, the closer i get"
Posted by: carl carlson at June 23, 2009 03:15 PM (dZ8HB) 9
Absolutely agree on the job he's done liveblogging. I find the blogging phenomenon fascinating and obviously prefer the work of the "citizen journalists' over the traditional media outlets. I particularly appreciate that bloggers are open about their partisanship. What most surprised me was, in spite of his Huffpo association, the question wasn't a gimme ...
Odd, doncha think? Posted by: dumb_blonde at June 23, 2009 03:15 PM (cAgTF) Posted by: lorien1973 at June 23, 2009 03:16 PM (IhQuA) Posted by: kbdabear at June 23, 2009 03:16 PM (cGmnP) 12
I think that this is an extension of the Jeff Gannon crap, in which the Kos Kids and the MSM pitched a fit that someone would show up to ask softball questions to Dubya instead of the "gotcha" crap they kept asking.
The accusations made against Bush, that he knew Gannon was a "plant", are actually true in this case because the White House had the HuffPo person escorted into the press pool and made sure Obama would call on them. Posted by: Brandon In Baton Rouge at June 23, 2009 03:17 PM (w0x9x) 13
Posted by: lorien1973 at June 23, 2009 03:16 PM (IhQuA)
They may have thought he'd roll over with a softball or they honestly figured here's a guy who knows more about the story than anyone else in the room, let's see what he's got and let Obama handle it. Either one fits with the outsized ego of Obama and his administration. The real test is, does he get invited back. Posted by: DrewM. at June 23, 2009 03:18 PM (iTt2X) 14
Who is this Pitney guy and what would he know about enchantment?
Posted by: Helen Thomas at June 23, 2009 03:18 PM (cGmnP) 15
Gannon...Gannon..Gannon...
Posted by: slade at June 23, 2009 03:19 PM (XsHAM) 16
Someone just sent me the link to this video again. since North Korea wasn't mentioned at all today by anyone this seem even more important, but its funny.
Posted by: muffy at June 23, 2009 03:21 PM (zplc6) 17
I've got oozing sores and a chaffed ass, all from trying to get front row seats and the priviledge to ask one of the first questions at a White House presser. Now, some blogger steals my thunder. I hope he got the clap. Posted by: MSM Reporter at June 23, 2009 03:21 PM (fDWFP) 18
It was a poorly worded question, IMHO. It allows teh Won to tap dance around it.
Had he asked, "Under which conditions would NOT you accept the election of Ahmadinejad," Obama would have had a more difficult time escaping a direct answer. Such a question to the negative would give a window into the workings of Obama's foreign policy. Posted by: Chimney Sweep #8 at June 23, 2009 03:22 PM (kIjlp) 19
Why didn't anybody ask him what flavor of ice cream enchants him?
Posted by: Mark Knobpolisher, CBS crack journalist at June 23, 2009 03:23 PM (cGmnP) 20
the press is right to be pissed. This was obviously set up and Obumbles couldn't even fake like he didn't know what was going on. The blogger was put into the main press section right before the press conference and then Barry said "I think you have a question from somebody in Iran...." Of course the blogger had no follow up and Obumbles filibustered a non-answer. This was a total farce.
Posted by: Jim King at June 23, 2009 03:23 PM (mgmnH) 21
I was all prepared to denounce this as another example of the lapdog media (if you can call HuffPo a member of the media), but the question he asked doesn't strike me as staged. Maybe Obama just mistakenly assumed the guy would throw him a softball. It would be different if he performed some ass-kissing in the form of a question, but I'm not seeing that here- the question he asked was perfectly legitimate, and one quite a few of us would've like to have seen answered... but instead the Obamatuer just answered "present" yet again. Posted by: Hollowpoint at June 23, 2009 03:24 PM (rf03a) 22
Ariana is happy, that is all that counts, dontcha know? Besides, this guy provided all the content, all the content for CNN and FOX. Without him they wouldn't have been able to give their little "now this is all unfiltered speech".
Posted by: muffy at June 23, 2009 03:24 PM (zplc6) 23
>>...here's a guy who knows more about the story than anyone else in the room, let's see what he's got and let Obama handle it.<<
I don't think so. If nothing else, I'll give the Obama team credit for knowing that their guy is a creampuff. If he's invited back--to the chagrin of O's coterie of loyal press lickspittles--I smell a fix. Posted by: General Zod at June 23, 2009 03:25 PM (XcsD4) 24
What was the question he asked? I missed it because I had a thrill up my leg and had to run to the bathroom.
Posted by: Chrissy Matthews at June 23, 2009 03:25 PM (cGmnP) 25
Jim, I think they may have moved Nico Pitney to the front but I really, from the flustered way he behaved when the president called his name, didn't think they "briefed" Nico about why he was being moved. They sure as heck briefed the prez as he had the entire back story. I almost felt nico felt the prez was sort of stepping on his toes by giving all the information he had out up front. All Nico could do is think in his mind "Oh crap, he is talking to me, really me, crap, now what question out of the thousands do I ask, oh wait, this one, this is the one most asked"
Posted by: muffy at June 23, 2009 03:28 PM (zplc6) 26
It was a poorly worded question, IMHO. It allows teh Won to tap dance around it. I doubt it- Obama would've almost certainly given the same sort of non-answer. Posted by: Hollowpoint at June 23, 2009 03:28 PM (rf03a) 27
#8 - Don't you even start. Back in college, all I had to do was drop a "I wear black on the outside, 'cause black is how I feel on the inside" on a fe-male, and I was in. Moz quotes are not to be used lightly...
Posted by: Navin R Johnson at June 23, 2009 03:28 PM (J7/Ud) 28
o/t...but the sidebar article by Christopher Badeaux laying the smack down on Andrea Sullivan is EPIC!!11!!1! Will.i.am's manager needs to take lessons from CB on how to properly pimp-slap a gay man. Come on, Ace...I know it's about Andrea, but elevate it to the center. Posted by: The Hammer at June 23, 2009 03:29 PM (YBTwf) 29
Posted by: Hollowpoint at June 23, 2009 03:24 PM (rf03a)
Yeah, I'm not even a blogger (just a guy squatting on a site someone else built) but if could have asked a question, that would have been in the mix as one of the top things I'd like to know. Posted by: Chimney Sweep #8 at June 23, 2009 03:22 PM (kIjlp) I think he would have answered the same way to your formulation. His 'it's up to the Iranians' was a prepared line he used several times to various questions. It's an evasion but a telling one. Obama may think it's a winner, I think it shows the bankruptcy of his position. Any question that provides that lays out someone's positions that clearly is a good one. It set the context for the rest of his answers. Posted by: DrewM. at June 23, 2009 03:29 PM (iTt2X) 30
YEESSSSS, Finally a good question. Obama fielded it for a error.
Posted by: Mystry at June 23, 2009 03:31 PM (dIHlE) 31
Fresh could've been easily played into a corner had someone cited the civil rights riots down south fifty years ago. That someone--those veterans of dog-attacks and firehoses, maybe?--hasn't asked Fresh how long he's going to ask the Iranian oppressed to suffer at the hands of their government staggers the mind.
Where's all the fucking liberation/workers unite rhetoric now, brothers and sisters? Yeah. That's what I thought. Posted by: General Zod at June 23, 2009 03:31 PM (XcsD4) 32
I object, Mr President! This press conference is a travesty. It's a travesty of a
mockery of a sham of a mockery of a travesty of two mockeries of a
sham.
Posted by: MSM Mellish at June 23, 2009 03:32 PM (Q1lie) 33
Any Iranians here? *chuckle* Well, of course, their requests for support was not from Iranian protesters in and of it is as it were the United States government would never have if I, uhhhhh I, had not and as far as I know that's the way it will always be. Is that clear? Posted by: Prezidizzle Obizzle at June 23, 2009 03:33 PM (aJ6rs) 34
Just think - the FCC fines resulting from allowing Ace to ask a question would certainly put a dent in the budget deficit. What network puts a 5-second delay on a Presidential press conference?
Posted by: Master Shake at June 23, 2009 03:35 PM (VmtE9) 35
"It's up to the Iranians..." How can they decide anything when the election is rigged and they're getting shot in the streets for calling bullshit on the regime? Sorry Barry, that just doesn't cut it. Voting "present" is not an option, now that your seated with the adults. Posted by: BackwardsBoy at June 23, 2009 03:35 PM (ZGhSv) 36
Plus, when the next Republican President invites Ace to ask a question,
we can point to this example and tell the left to stick it.
Let's face it, that's what I care about. Oh the questions that would be asked. Though it it's Teh Fred, I rather think we'll all end up being challenged to duels for the questions that we'd submit to be asked. Posted by: alexthechick at June 23, 2009 03:35 PM (SHHaV) 37
Guess I ought to make clear that the historic parallels between Montgomery and Tehran aren't mirror___d, and aren't intended to be; the moral imperatives contained in both scenarios are worth consideration, though.
Posted by: General Zod at June 23, 2009 03:35 PM (XcsD4) 38
I can see letting Pitney ask a question, especially from an Iranian. But someone needs to explain Sam Stein to me.
Posted by: Pablo at June 23, 2009 03:35 PM (yTndK) 39
According to Politico, it was staged;
http://tinyurl.com/ncd3ta UPDATE: Deputy press secretary Bill Burton responds: "We did reach out to him prior to press conference to tell him that we had been paying attention to what he had been doing on Iran and there was a chance that he’d be called on. And, he ended up asking the toughest question that the President took on Iran. In the absence of an Iranian press corps in Washington, it was an innovative way to get a question directly from an Iranian." Posted by: A. Weasel at June 23, 2009 03:35 PM (bqcfE) 40
Plus, when the next Republican President invites Ace to ask a question, we can point to this example and tell the left to stick it. Posted by: DrewM Dude, that assumes that El Presidente Para Siempre Barack Obama the First lets us have a Republican chief executive anytime soon. It also assumes Ace's liver will hold up for another 7 1/2 years. Posted by: KingShamus at June 23, 2009 03:35 PM (5BgCg) 41
Chimney Sweep
Had he asked, "Under which conditions would NOT you accept the election of Ahmadinejad," Obama would have had a more difficult time escaping a direct answer. Such a question to the negative would give a window into the workings of Obama's foreign policy. Had that been the question he may not have been invited. Posted by: loppyd at June 23, 2009 03:36 PM (oqAUJ) 42
I was listening as it happened and was kind of surprised that it sure seemed like a planned deal where the President and the "reporter" had arrainged before hand to have this question and I was kind of amazed they would do that but when I heard the question and it was not some sort of "President Obama, is there anyway you can think of where you could be even more awesome?" I was even more amazed.
Posted by: AndrewsDad at June 23, 2009 03:37 PM (MsyOh) 43
Ace: President Palin, in consideration of the abysmally low opinion of America following former President Obama's Carteresque performance, do you have any plans to regain the high moral ground in international affairs by briefly showing us, and the world, your absolutely delightful rack?
Posted by: sherlock at June 23, 2009 03:37 PM (h6sl7) 44
All anyone will see tonight on the evening news (they still have evening news broadcasts, right?) is a cut about how healthcare is killing us.
Posted by: mikeyslaw at June 23, 2009 03:38 PM (QMGr1) 45
I don't care that a blogger got a question, particularly, as it has been described that Pitney has been in the trenches where the chattering class hasn't; so, kudos to Pitney for the "plum" (I guess). The bothersome component is the perpetual choreography of it all. There are no spontaneous questions with follow-up. The president knows to varying degrees every body in every seat and, now, the general topic to be addressed... if not actually the questioner as an outright plant.
What's the point? Let's just let TOTUS read and answer every question without the facade of it all being an open conference. It isn't. Call it a press speech and let's quit pretending that this is some transparency where the Executive gets checked. It doesn't. Posted by: AnonymousDrivel at June 23, 2009 03:39 PM (rZ235) 46
Does the name "Jeff Gannon" ring any bells?
Posted by: flenser at June 23, 2009 03:40 PM (HDRtE) 47
Yeah, it's a little clubby to basically give a guy a guarantee that he'd get to ask a question but so what?
You're kidding me. Posted by: flenser at June 23, 2009 03:41 PM (HDRtE) 48
"Since we're on Iran, I know Nico Pitney is here from Huffington Post. THE PRESIDENT: Nico, I know that you, and all across the Internet, we've been seeing a lot of reports coming directly out of Iran. I know that there may actually be questions from people in Iran who are communicating through the Internet. Do you have a question? Q Yes, I did, I wanted to use this opportunity to ask you a question directly from an Iranian. We solicited questions last night from people who are still courageous enough to be communicating online, and one of them wanted to ask you this: Under which conditions would you accept the election of Ahmadinejad? And if you do accept it without any significant changes in the conditions there, isn't that a betrayal of what the demonstrators there are working towards? THE PRESIDENT: Well, look, we didn't have international observers on the ground. We can't say definitively what exactly happened at polling places throughout the country. What we know is that a sizeable percentage of the Iranian people themselves, spanning Iranian society, consider this election illegitimate. It's not an isolated instance -- a little grumbling here or there. There is significant questions about the legitimacy of the election. And so ultimately the most important thing for the Iranian government to consider is legitimacy in the eyes of its own people, not in the eyes of the United States. And that's why I've been very clear: Ultimately, this is up to the Iranian people to decide who their leadership is going to be and the structure of their government. What we can do is to say unequivocally that there are sets of international norms and principles about violence, about dealing with peaceful dissent, that spans cultures, spans borders. And what we've been seeing over the Internet and what we've been seeing in news reports violates those norms and violates those principles. I think it is not too late for the Iranian government to recognize that there is a peaceful path that will lead to stability and legitimacy and prosperity for the Iranian people. We hope they take it." Posted by: muffy at June 23, 2009 03:43 PM (zplc6) 49
33
Any Iranians here? Not here, but you can't walk into a Ferrari dealership in Beverly Hills without hearing a bunch of guys speaking Iranian. I'm serious Posted by: Joe Biden at June 23, 2009 03:43 PM (cGmnP) 50
Posted by: flenser at June 23, 2009 03:41 PM (HDRtE)
You do know any President can call on anyone he wants, right? Why exactly should Obama or Bush back in the day or any President be restricted to questions from whomever the major MSM outlets deign to send over? The guy asked a legit question, I don't get why anyone would be defending the MSM's self-proclaimed monopoly on questioning the President. Other than those in the MSM of course. Posted by: DrewM. at June 23, 2009 03:45 PM (iTt2X) 51
Hi initial statement about Iran is on the website also with a translation in farsi.
Posted by: muffy at June 23, 2009 03:45 PM (zplc6) 52
Yeah, it's a little clubby to basically give a guy a guarantee that he'd get to ask a question but so what? The objection is to the fact that the question was prearranged, not to the fact that it was asked by a blogger. Posted by: flenser at June 23, 2009 03:47 PM (HDRtE) 53
The media is irritated that obama knew the nature of the question he was gonna be asked, but it was still a question who's answer, when received was revealing.
Meanwhile noone's saying anything about Harris's question about the whitehouse dog, or in a question that was actually an attack saying Bush and Cheney think Obama is a treacherous? Posted by: Douglas at June 23, 2009 03:47 PM (uU+Ss) Posted by: Douglas at June 23, 2009 03:48 PM (uU+Ss) 55
Posted by: flenser at June 23, 2009 03:47 PM (HDRtE)
You have any proof that Obama knew what he was going to be asked? I haven't seen anyone make that charge. I'd love to see evidence of that kind of collusion. It would be a big story. Posted by: DrewM. at June 23, 2009 03:48 PM (iTt2X) Posted by: somejoe at June 23, 2009 03:48 PM (yP5sH) 57
You do know any President can call on anyone he wants, right? You do know that it is not normal practice for presidents to prearrange questions wth reporters, right? Actually, I guess you do know, you just don't care. Posted by: flenser at June 23, 2009 03:49 PM (HDRtE) 58
muffy
Hi initial statement about Iran is on the website also with a translation in farsi. The one where he said there is no difference between Dinnerjacket and Moussavi? Posted by: loppyd at June 23, 2009 03:49 PM (oqAUJ) 59
O/T: Wow, what a fight on closing bell between Guiterrez and Jonathon. When Guiterrez dessimated him and his arguments which Guiterrez characterized as "liberal rhetoric that doesn't work" the guy, Jonathon resorted to saying BO got elected cause Bush runined the economy. Guiterrez was amazingly effective. wow.
Posted by: muffy at June 23, 2009 03:50 PM (zplc6) 60
It may be true that the pitcher (blogger) grooved a pitch (asked a question that Obama knew would be asked) but Obama whiffed on it, so no harm done, I guess.
Posted by: AmishDude at June 23, 2009 03:51 PM (sVndz) 61
"58
muffy
Hi initial statement about Iran is on the website also with a translation in farsi. The one where he said there is no difference between Dinnerjacket and Moussavi? Posted by: loppyd at June 23, 2009 03:49 PM (oqAUJ)" There is a lot of stuff there. they put it in different sots but if you search you might find it. Posted by: muffy at June 23, 2009 03:51 PM (zplc6) 62
I haven't seen anyone make that charge. "Huffington Post's Nico Pitney says the WH called him this morning and invited him to ask his Iran questions at the news conference."
It's not a "charge", Drew. It's a fact. Posted by: flenser at June 23, 2009 03:51 PM (HDRtE) Posted by: gator at June 23, 2009 03:51 PM (yUiO3) 64
I don't know what's going on with this administration. The transparency is hard to see through. (paraphrasing martytime)
Posted by: ricky at June 23, 2009 03:52 PM (muUqs) 65
You do know that it is not normal practice for presidents to prearrange questions wth reporters, right?
Posted by: flenser at June 23, 2009 03:49 PM (HDRtE) So you are defending the MSM's monopoly. I'm sure they appreciate your support. Here's a clue, Obama also took questions from Jennifer Loven of AP, Chuck Todd of NBC, Chip Reed of CBS, Major Garret of FNC, some chick from McClatchey, another chick from some S. American outlet and a guy from Reuters (plus some others). Obama knew he was going to call on all of them before he went out there. Why is it so damning that he also knew he was going to call on Pitney as well? Again, you can defend the monopoly of the MSM to be the people who get to ask quesitons but given their performance I don't know why you would. Posted by: DrewM. at June 23, 2009 03:52 PM (iTt2X) 66
I think it's important for us on the right to support those on the left when they are doing the right thing and/or being attacked undeservedly.
We should be supporting Pitney in this. Pitney has, let's be honest, done an awesome fucking job liveblogging a revolution. He has been THE go to source for a lot of information. So, Pitney, we support you. MSM, go fuck yourself. Posted by: Sir Elliot at June 23, 2009 03:53 PM (DUNS7) 67
And from your own damn link, Drew. With Foresight of Coming Question on Iran, Obama Welcomes Huffington Post Writer
Posted by: flenser at June 23, 2009 03:53 PM (HDRtE) 68
"You! Over there. The hairy one. Yeah, you, Ewok."
Posted by: someone at June 23, 2009 03:53 PM (cdEVI) 69
All the world's a stage right now.
Posted by: gator at June 23, 2009 03:54 PM (yUiO3) 70
Posted by: flenser at June 23, 2009 03:51 PM (HDRtE)
Genius, there's a difference between knowing who is going to ask a question, see my post #65 and knowing what the question is and being prepared for it. The former is a fact of life (it's how Bush did business), the late is an ethical violation. If you can find proof that the White House and Pitney conspired to provide the question before hand you have a story. If all you got is Obama knew who he would call on before taking the stage all you have is your dick in your hand. Posted by: DrewM. at June 23, 2009 03:54 PM (iTt2X) 71
So you are defending the MSM's monopoly. I'm sure they appreciate your support. You are being more of a idiot than usual. I'm not defending the MSM, I'm attacking Obama. That is still allowed on this site I hope.
Posted by: flenser at June 23, 2009 03:55 PM (HDRtE) 72
muffy
There is a lot of stuff there. they put it in different sots but if you search you might find it. Posted by: loppyd at June 23, 2009 03:55 PM (oqAUJ) 73
The blogger asked a decent question about Iran - maybe not a perfect question, but still pretty good. A moron from the MSM asked about "The One's" smoking. OK, more bloggers, less reporters - sounds like a better press conference. And besides, wouldn't it be fun to watch Ace ask "The One" a question?
Posted by: Malamutt at June 23, 2009 03:56 PM (tdr59) 74
This strikes me as a little bit of guild jealousy. The White House press corps may think they are the only ones qualified to ask tough questions but clearly they aren't. The White House press corps are Obama's Praetorian Guard, Revolutionary Army, shock troops and Basij -- all rolled into one. With that kind of power it's totally understandable why they'd attack a questioning Pitney like a pack of wild dogs. Posted by: Tinian at June 23, 2009 03:56 PM (70sTG) 75
The objection is to the fact that the question was prearranged, not to the fact that it was asked by a blogger. There's little indication that he question was pre-arranged, though the questioner was. Given Obama's non-answer ("this is up to the Iranian people"? Really? The ones getting beaten and shot?), it doesn't seem all that likely. Certainly he expected a question about Iran, but it wasn't a question no one else would be asking; he'd be expected to have a response for it no matter who asked it- though it turned out to be another evasive non-answer. Why pre-arrange a question that you know you aren't going to answer to anyone's satisfaction? Posted by: Hollowpoint at June 23, 2009 03:57 PM (rf03a) 76
Posted by: flenser at June 23, 2009 03:53 PM (HDRtE)
So you're surprised that Obama was going to take questions on Iran? That makes one of you. Again, of course he knew the topic of Pitney's question. It's a big story, been in all the papers and blogs. What exactly is wrong with having a reporter/blogger who knows more about the story than any of the regular WH reporters come in and ask a question on this topic? Posted by: DrewM. at June 23, 2009 03:57 PM (iTt2X) 77
I agree with flenser for the most part.
I'm starting to feel like this could be another disappearing comments section.... Posted by: somejoe at June 23, 2009 03:58 PM (yP5sH) 78
Genius, there's a difference between knowing who is going to ask a question, see my post #65 and knowing what the question is and being prepared for it. Non-genius if you'd pry your lips off of Obama ass for five seconds you'd notice that the clear mesage of the the things being said is that Obama did know what the question was going to be. That's why he was able to state the first part of the question before the guy asking it could. Posted by: flenser at June 23, 2009 03:58 PM (HDRtE) 79
69
All the world's a stage right now.
Posted by: gator at June 23, 2009 03:54 PM (yUiO3) Damn right, and there's always a teleprompter in the orchestra pit for the actors on stage. Now if Biden would just remember to turn off his mike when he goes to the toilet Posted by: Barack Obama at June 23, 2009 03:59 PM (cGmnP) 80
In case you didn't notice I plosted the exchange from the WH transcript.
Posted by: muffy at June 23, 2009 03:59 PM (zplc6) 81
So you're surprised that Obama was going to take questions on Iran? Read the Fox story you linked to, you dishonest dope. I've had more rational converations with moonbats. Posted by: flenser at June 23, 2009 04:00 PM (HDRtE) 82
Non-genius if you'd pry your lips off of Obama ass for five seconds
Posted by: flenser at June 23, 2009 03:58 PM (HDRtE) Wow. Self-discredit much? Do you even read the site? I think I've spent the better part of the last week beating the shit out of Obama on this issue (and months before on every other topic) and you think I'm kissing up to him? You were more fun when you were defending von Brunn from charges of being a white supremacist. Posted by: DrewM. at June 23, 2009 04:02 PM (iTt2X) 83
Oh for chrissakes, I hear Charlie Gibson and Ann Compton on ABC News on the press conference, saying that Obama sounded more "forceful" and "tougher" on Iran
Well, I am over-fuckin-whelmed Next thing you know, Obama will really lay down the gauntlet and tell those diplomats to put their own mustard on their hot dogs Posted by: kbdabear at June 23, 2009 04:03 PM (cGmnP) 84
On the thread below this one some dude named Levi has said a mouthful.
Posted by: muffy at June 23, 2009 04:03 PM (zplc6) 85
you can defend the monopoly of the MSM to be the people who get to ask quesitons but given their performance I don't know why you would. Drew, I'm not going to stay silent while you defend the bombing of Pearl Harbor! I'm just not! Eh, bloggers on this site are acting really odd these days. Attackng Sanford, excusing Obama. Maybe the Little Green virus is spreading. Posted by: flenser at June 23, 2009 04:07 PM (HDRtE) 86
DrewM,
The WH specifically asked Pitney because they wanted a question from an Iranian. They weren't honoring his work, they were using him. Did they conspire as to what the question would be? No, they didn't need to as Obama had every intention of dancing around it no matter what it was and he did. They certainly knew what the question would be about, Iran and the election afternmath, and that there would be no follow up. The whole thing was to make Obama look tuned into what's going with the internet and Iran because he has looked so out of touch. I don't blame Pitney but it's nothing to crow about either. The Iranian asking the question never got an answer. Posted by: Rocks at June 23, 2009 04:07 PM (Q1lie) 87
You were more fun when you were defending von Brunn from charges of being a white supremacist. And you were just as dumb and dishonest then as you are now. I repeat, read your own fucking links. They contradict the line you are trying to sell us here. Posted by: flenser at June 23, 2009 04:09 PM (HDRtE) 88
DrewM.,
"Huffington Post National Editor Nico Pitney ... said the White House apparently has been reading some of the entries (Iranians had been asked by the site to submit questions to the president.)." The White House 1) had researched HuffPo, Pitney (previously non-existent), and the questions asked by Iranians via the site, 2) had moved in notable aberration this new questioner to prime seating, and 3) had Obama prefacing the question so much so that it ate up half of the content of Pitney's actual question. Did Obama know exactly, verbatim, the wording? No. But really, he didn't need to. His staff had already collated the line of questions from the Iranians and assembled an encompassing answer to Pitney's inquiry. Obama essentially knew the "parsed answer" to the question already if not actually knowing the question itself. Don't be so obtuse to flenser's gripe. Posted by: AnonymousDrivel at June 23, 2009 04:12 PM (rZ235) 89
Geez, what about "it's up to them" don't you understand?
It's up to the Iranians to peacefully vote in a new gov't. It's up to the North Koreans to peacefully vote in a new gov't. It's up to the Cubans to peacefully vote in a new gov't. It's up to the Chinese to peacefully vote in a new gov't. They need to do this without violence. The US has no interest one way or the other how another country is run as long as we can bear witness. Except for the JOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOS! Israel must do what I say! Posted by: President Barak Obama at June 23, 2009 04:14 PM (ao5cQ) 90
Posted by: Rocks at June 23, 2009 04:07 PM (Q1lie)
I don't think it's a matter of honoring his work. The 'question from an Iranian' thing maybe a stunt but Pitney was doing it before he had any clue he'd be going. Tapper does the same thing (but he knows he'll be there and likely called on). Even if you look at it as purely a question from an Iranian, I'm guessing he got dozens if not hundreds. His experience with the subject matter enabled him to select a relevant one likely to generate news as a response. I'd say he did that. If it were a softball, I'd have been Pitney up but it was a very legitimate question. It certainly compared well to the smoking and black unemployment questions. If reaching out to bloggers gets more news like this one did, I say bring it on. If it brings out a virtual blow job disguised as a question (yeah, I'm lookinig at you Mr. Enchanted from the Times), then fuck 'em. Posted by: DrewM. at June 23, 2009 04:14 PM (iTt2X) 91
I won't say this often, but i'm with the MSM on this one.
Nico Pitney apparently was ferried to the press conference by the Deputy Press Secretary. In other words, he wasn't sweating it out amongst the flies and the mosquitoes in the notorious DC Swamp. He jettisoned out of the White House, into press row, and then was #2 on the questioner list. Aren't you enchanted by this? Jeff Zeleny probably is. Posted by: WTF Capital Investments at June 23, 2009 04:19 PM (GtYrq) 92
Yeah, it's a little clubby to basically give a guy a guarantee that he'd get to ask a question but so what? Was it "clubby" enough when zero turned the teleprompter around for pitney to read from? Plus, pitney looked like he was 10yrs. old. I just really get the nails on the chalkboard feeling when in the white house press corps there is a "huff po" idiot. I guess next presser the teleprompter will be turned around for the "kos" kid. Think about the reactions if ace, or drudge, was at the bush presser. It would have been better if the question was handed over to a legitimate news site to quote from. I think chavez has a pitney too. Posted by: paranoid polly at June 23, 2009 04:19 PM (YLNjm) 93
Posted by: AnonymousDrivel at June 23, 2009 04:12 PM (rZ235)
Then go beat up Tapper and other reporters who solicit online questions. There's no way to know for sure if they wind up using one but given that news is news, odds are it's likely one of the commenters hit on a question the reporter was going to ask anyway. There are only so many legitimate choices. Guess what, when he called on the woman from the S. American outlet, he knew he was going to get a question on...wait for it....S. America. When he called on the woman from the American Urban Radio Network (which he's done before I think) he knew he was going to get a question on...black America. The only question I imagine was a surprise in terms of content was the smoking one and it was embarrassing. Posted by: DrewM. at June 23, 2009 04:20 PM (iTt2X) 94
On the thread below this one some dude named Levi has said a mouthful. No, he just wants me to give him a mouthful. I already told him he'd have to wait his turn behind Andy Sullivan. Posted by: Barack Obama at June 23, 2009 04:21 PM (VmtE9) 95
You sound like a pretty dissatisfied customer, flenser.
You know what smart customers do, don't you? Posted by: General Zod at June 23, 2009 04:23 PM (XcsD4) 96
Actually DrewM., I don't mind Pitney's question. I'd prefer that any in the peanut gallery earn their space; but observing the depths to which the legacy media pool has sunk, pedigree doesn't seem to matter anymore. Pitney's question was as pertinent as any. It's just that in this particular case, the White House and Obama were particularly vetted to the content of Pitney's material.
My gripe continues to be the idea that this whole process is enlighteningly instructive. It's so manipulated by design that it's essentially useless except as a conduit for the Executive message than an inquiry on behalf of the public of the issues of the day. The only excitement and "news" comes if there's a flub or gaffe -- a gotcha that can be looped. Press conferences in the modern age are a mirage of public scrutiny of the powers that be whether asked by Pitney the Blogger, Thomas the Wench, Cronkite the Red, or Rather the Dead. Posted by: AnonymousDrivel at June 23, 2009 04:35 PM (rZ235) 97
Wasn't this also Pitney's first press conference at the White House?
I like the more random approach to questions for the President, but this White House isn't even pretending the order is random. They seat Ed Schultz in the front row of the White House press conferences held inside. Posted by: WTF Capital Investments at June 23, 2009 04:40 PM (GtYrq) 98
Posted by: AnonymousDrivel at June 23, 2009 04:35 PM (rZ235)
Well, if you want to go on about the show nature of politics, that's fine and fun. It's been that way for a long, long time (Nixon/Kennedy in '60 is considered the start I guess). So yeah, overall that's true and I agree with you. The idea of turning reporters into celebrities of a sort (going back to Woodward and Bernstein) has done tremendous damage to the profession. That said, as a matter of theater I don't think the Pitney Incident (to coin a phrase) is an egregious or note worthy footnote in the whoring of the Media/Political Complex. Posted by: DrewM. at June 23, 2009 04:42 PM (iTt2X) Posted by: DrewM. at June 23, 2009 04:45 PM (iTt2X) 100
anyone there could have asked the question, which wasn't bad. all it would require is a little bit of knowledge, professional objectivity and a little skepticism. of course, that does put it beyond the reach of professional journalists. Posted by: ed at June 23, 2009 04:45 PM (Urhve) 101
"The White House press corps may think they are the only ones qualified to ask tough questions"
I could count the number of reporters asking 'tough questions' on 3 fingers. Does that mean we can fire all the rest of those twits? And Helen, baby, you'd be the first to go! Posted by: GarandFan at June 23, 2009 04:48 PM (C3okI) 102
Wasn't this also Pitney's first press conference at the White House? Does anyone really think that questions are taken at random- under Obama or any President in modern history? Sure, others might have done a better job of pretending they're random, and perhaps they do occasionally pick someone at random, but I suspect it's been pretty non-random all along. I can see why the MSM is upset that someone from outside their clique was brought in for the specific task of being called on, but considering that the actual question was a completely fair and relatively tough one, I don't see this as much of a scandal outside the cadre of MSM White House types. Posted by: Hollowpoint at June 23, 2009 04:49 PM (rf03a) 103
DrewM.@99,
Ugh. Well, I'm all for the ladies in the party, but that is exactly the kind of cynicism that poisons every fiber of politics. The politicos are just mocking democracy. Of course, it does give me the opportunity to promote Sarah Palin in the most respectable and wholesome manner; so, Palin/Darth Cheney '12 Posted by: AnonymousDrivel at June 23, 2009 04:53 PM (rZ235) 104
Here's a clip from Pitney's blog on Huffpo.
The White House didn't guarantee that I would be able to ask a question. But I decided that if there was even a chance, I should try to reach out to as many Iranians as possible. With the invaluable help from some readers -- Chas, Chuck, and other Iranian Americans I wish I could name because they deserve the credit -- I was able to post a message in Farsi on Twitter and have my request for questions posted late last night on Balatarin. I ended up choosing the question I did because it was one of the consensus questions that many people had suggested. Thanks also to the White House staff. They were up front about not being able to assure that a question would be asked, they never asked what the question would be, and they helped me move through the very packed briefing room when I showed up a bit late (sorry to the many toes I stepped on getting through). Posted by: Jubal Anderson Early at June 23, 2009 05:29 PM (k7Xlb) 105
Hehe....sounds like MSM Reporters are getting a little snippy because despite all of the fawning coverage of the administration that they provide, Obama continues dis them by giving credence to the notion that bloggers are seen by the administration as being legitimate journalists.
Posted by: Hellrider at June 23, 2009 06:02 PM (SZXl7) 106
Oh, like I'd call on Ace. And I wouldn't be a Republican. Or President.
You can refer to me as Conservative Emperor Aggie. My first presser would be my last. Ms. Thomas? off with her head. The rest of you? clear out, unless you want to lose your head. Posted by: I R A Darth Aggie at June 23, 2009 06:11 PM (1hM1d) 107
Yes, Mr Ace, you have a question? Yes, Mr President, with the cost of valu rite sky rocketing and the clamp down on hobo hunting, what do you propose to do with all the sober bored morons? Posted by: kempermanx at June 23, 2009 06:32 PM (2+9Yx) 108
Let's be honest Pitney has done more on this story than most msm reporters. I don't see the big deal in letting him follow it up this way. Plus, when the next Republican President invites Ace to ask a question, we can point to this example and tell the left to stick it. +1 Posted by: mike d at June 23, 2009 07:11 PM (91OXS) 109
Oh shit. A commenter didn't agree with DrewM. That is a capital crime right there.
Posted by: Ronster at June 23, 2009 08:25 PM (iMPMW) 110
no one in the modern press corpse knows the difference between asking the tough question and asking the question tough.
Posted by: jc at June 23, 2009 08:32 PM (i8c5b) 111
The question actually wasn't bad. The answer was something out of Cognitive Dissonance 101 (as are most of the answers Obama gives). But we don't care about that. We know where our bread is buttered.
Posted by: The State Run Media at June 23, 2009 08:57 PM (tK42Y) Posted by: Kevin at June 23, 2009 09:11 PM (MaJzE) 113
Need to know before buying lace wigs Our lace wigs are made of human hairs classified lace human hair wigs on our web. 100% Indian/Chinese remy human hair and best quality Swiss/French lace are used in lace human hair wigs. Lace human hair wig is thin, your scalp can get good breath, so you can feel comfortable just like real hair. You may find hundreds of units and almost 150+ styles of full lace wigs in our store. By using our web searcher, you may locate just the wigs you want without bitter searches. Also, you may customise lace front wigs here, all you need to do is just to follow our custom options or leave your specials in the "comments". A custom wig can be completed within 25 workdays generally. Thanks for Paypal and our Co-work World Wide Ship corporations, we can ship wigs to all over the world! Show your beauty, show your individuality, experience our wonderful service and dress you up right now!
wedding dresses wedding dress wedding gowns bridesmaid dresses bridesmaid dress Posted by: royalmewigs at June 23, 2009 09:18 PM (mMvPc) 114
"Mr. President, do you ever refer to your Democrat predecessor as 'Douchebama' and if not, do you think you might start?"
Posted by: Glen at June 23, 2009 10:38 PM (0sbsC) 115
Pres: Mr. Ace will you please repeat your question. I didn't hear anything after Valu-Rite Vodka. Posted by: ts at June 23, 2009 10:57 PM (xBr+X) 116
Behind the scenes at today's White House Press Room Briefing: Gibbs: The quick brown fox jumps over the lazy dog. The quick brown fox jumps... 3GS blows up with 'Poker Face." Gibbs: Que pasa? Anonymous: Bahram saghari, asshole! Gibbs: And a wonderful day to you as well, mi amigo! How can we help your cause? Anonymous: zzzzzsh 'students are taking cover' zzzzzhtz 'Basij is shooting' zzzshrktkz 'open your eyes, don't stop breathing' dzzzt.
Posted by: ErikW at June 24, 2009 02:21 AM (hKtiw) 117
Give please. Be a good listener. Your ears will never get you in trouble. Help me! There is an urgent need for sites: Online bingo gambling. I found only this - free online Bingo rooms. Online bingo games, online bingo canada,free online bingo in canada, bingo there is a online bingo deposit bonus for new players and to show our. The thought at the back online bingo is to get together all of the most excellent bingo sites. Waiting for a reply ;-), Swaley from Kenya.
Posted by: Swaley at July 17, 2009 06:14 AM (7chXj) 118
Hi. I used to think that the brain was the most wonderful organ in my body. Then I realized who was telling me this. Help me! Please help find sites for: Master nebenberuflich berlin. I found only this - halifax bank ad classical music. Tags - business credit card credit history credit score finance financial services interest rate loan mortgage philadelphia real estate unsecured loan. Merchant cash advance receive quotes from leading vendors. Thanks for the help :-(, Naaman from Brunei.
Posted by: Naaman at July 28, 2009 02:22 PM (D2H7j) 119
UGG Boots Sale
ugg shoes ugg classic cheap ugg UGG UK bape shoes bape shoes sale cheap bape shoes UGG UK UGG boots sale UGG Classic discount UGG UGG Bailey Button UGG Amelie Suede UGG Bailey Button UGG Classic Cardy cheap UGG Cardy UGG Classic Crochet UGG Classic Mini UGG Classic Short UGG Classic Tall UGG Coquette Casual UGG Gypsy Sandal UGG Halendi Sandal UGG Hammond Slipper UGG Infant's Erin Baby UGG KnightsBridge UGG Layback Slipper UGG Lo Pro Button UGG Matala Sandal UGG Napoule Sandal UGG New Arrival 5389 UGG New Short Boots Posted by: retailike at October 17, 2009 11:50 AM (zFgZJ) 120
Discount Boots
Womens UGG UGG Shoes UGG Australia UGG UK UGG USA discount ugg boots cheap ugg boots Posted by: fdsfds at October 27, 2009 10:22 AM (8kvkz) 121
discountugg boots sale
ugg shoes tall ugg boots ugg classic boots nike shox air jordan shoes nike air max nike air force one bailey button ugg rainier ugg boots ugg classic cardy ugg crochet boots ugg mini ugg classic short classic tall ugg ugg coquette ugg baby boots ugg knightsbridge ugg lo pro new ugg boots ugg short boots ugg nightfall boots ugg skimmer ugg sundance boots ultra short ugg ugg ultra tall discount ugg slippers ugg sandals ugg halendi ugg slippers ugg layback ugg matala sandal ugg napoule sandal ugg persephone tasmina ugg air force 1 shoes jordan air shoes nike shox shoes air max nike free shipping! Posted by: ugg boots at October 27, 2009 01:28 PM (pgfU2) 122
Your post very good,thanks for sharing!Are you also like these:ugg boots uk,buy ugg boots,australia ugg,cheap ugg boots,ugg boots,ugg boots sheepskin,womens ugg boots,ugg australia boots,cheap ugg boots
Posted by: australia ugg at October 27, 2009 03:19 PM (c6EK2) 123
buy Discount Boots
Womens UGG UGG Shoes UGG Australia UGG UK UGG USA discount ugg boots cheap ugg boots air force 1 shoes nike air force air force 1 mens air force 1 boots air force onefrom usa Posted by: airforceoneshop at November 03, 2009 03:27 PM (LHCCE) 124
Come to our website for shopping with high quality and best service! There have new products,MBT M. Walk
and MBT Lami,Welcome everybody to buy it. Posted by: mbt shoes at November 08, 2009 09:42 AM (QhfLM) 125
Buy discount ugg shoes
cheap ugg shoes cheap ugg ugg rainier buy ugg ugg usa discount ugg boots ugg 5825 ugg shoes sale ugg sundance ugg shoes cheap ugg boots ugg 5815 ugg sale ugg uk ugg knightsbridge womens ugg boots ugg boots ugg australia ugg 5819free shipping Posted by: ugg boots at November 12, 2009 03:02 AM (IeIJx) 126
nike dunk sb
Do anything needed to support an idea, a good idea usually brings good results, doing business is like that.http://www.dunksky.com/.This site has always been on Posted by: nike dunk sb at November 14, 2009 02:08 AM (APB+g) 127
buy [url=http://www.reviewups.com/]discount ugg shoes[/url]
[url=http://www.reviewups.com/]cheap ugg shoes[/url] [url=http://www.reviewups.com/]cheap ugg[/url] [url=http://www.reviewups.com/ugg-coquette-casual-shoes-c-22]ugg rainier[/url] [url=http://www.reviewups.com/]buy ugg[/url] [url=http://www.reviewups.com/]ugg usa[/url] [url=http://www.reviewups.com/]discount ugg boots[/url] [url=http://www.reviewups.com/ugg-classic-short-c-1]ugg 5825[/url] [url=http://www.reviewups.com/]ugg shoes sale[/url] [url=http://www.reviewups.com/ugg-sundance-c-5]ugg sundance[/url] [url=http://www.reviewups.com/]ugg shoes[/url] [url=http://www.reviewups.com/]cheap ugg boots[/url] [url=http://www.reviewups.com/ugg-classic-tall-c-3]ugg 5815[/url] [url=http://www.reviewups.com/]ugg sale[/url] [url=http://www.reviewups.com/]ugg uk[/url] [url=http://www.reviewups.com/ugg-knightsbridge-c-27]ugg knightsbridge[/url] [url=http://www.reviewups.com/]womens ugg boots[/url] [url=http://www.reviewups.com/]ugg boots[/url] [url=http://www.reviewups.com/]ugg australia[/url] [url=http://www.reviewups.com/ugg-classic-cardy-c-2]ugg 5819[/url]from usa Posted by: cheap at November 14, 2009 05:35 AM (s7MB5) 128
Replica Watches | Replica Omega | Replica watches | soccer jersey wholesale | Replica Watches | Swiss Fake Watches | Replica Gucci | Franck Muller Watches Replica | Franck Muller Watches Replica | Fake Ulysse Nardin | Philip Stein Replica Watches | Fake Bvlgari | Franck Muller Fake Watches | Wholesale Hamilton Watch | Replica Philip Stein Watches
Posted by: replica watches at November 17, 2009 03:46 AM (xpuiO) 129
nike sb high
nike dunk high nike dunk low nike dunk sb air force one nike air air force nike six rings shoes Jordan Six Rings air jordan six NBA Shoes Nike Kobe IV Shoes Nike LeBron VI Shoes supra shoes supra skytop discount puma shoes puma sandal prada shoes prada men shoes gucci shoes women gucci shoes discount gucci men obanma shoes lacoste shoes ATO Matsumoto Shoes Posted by: nike shoes at November 17, 2009 06:01 AM (DuP3Z) 130
Replica watches | Replica Rolex | Replica watches | Replica Cartier | Replica watches | Replica Chanel Watch | Patek Philippe Fake Watches | Replica Breguet Watches | Raymond Weil Watch | Chanel Fake | Longines Replica Watch | Gucci Replica | Hamilton Watch Replica | Roger Dubuis Watch | Replica Parmigiani Watches
Posted by: replica watches at November 17, 2009 07:53 AM (xpuiO) 131
Replica Omega | Replica Watches | Fake Watches | Replica Breitling Watches | soccer jersey wholesale | Replica Patek Philippe Watch | Replica Christian Dior Watch | Bulova Watches | Daniel Roth Fake | Wholesale Corum Watch | Blancpain Replica | Technomarine Watches Replica | Wholesale Michele Watch | Fake Michele | Ulysse Nardin Fake Watches
Posted by: replica watches at November 17, 2009 10:26 PM (xpuiO) 132
Replica Cartier | Replica Cartier | soccer jersey wholesale | Replica watches | Fake Cheap Rolex | Fake Frank Muller Watch | Cheap Blancpain Fake Watch | Cheap Panerai | Oris Replica Watch | Fendi Fake Watch | Hermes Fake Watch | Replica Audemars Piguet | Seiko Replica | Replica Technomari | Oris Fake Watches
Posted by: replica watches at November 18, 2009 07:46 AM (C/zDM) 133
UGG BOOTS
Posted by: UGG BOOTS at November 18, 2009 09:54 AM (WPYlQ) Posted by: mbtshoesbuy at November 23, 2009 04:09 AM (bNNim) 135
The proper function of man is to live, but not to exist.ugg classic cardyConquer fear of death and you are put into possession of your life. ugg classic tallThere is a time to speak and a time to be silent. ugg knightsbridgefree shippingmbt cheap
mbt sale mbt uk mbt shoes cheap MBT M.Walk Posted by: reviewups at November 27, 2009 02:59 AM (xUZwC) 136
hot news for brand shoes online store ,do you want to win more discount ?and popular for younger,and nike air maxwith top quality A ,come on all air max shoes with lowest price for highest quality !
Posted by: nike air max at December 01, 2009 09:17 PM (OKj2x) 137
The cheap ugg boots sale for women are stylish, they are comfortable and what¡¯s more, they keep your feet. theres a pair of fellow sufferers,ugg australia uk to complement your personal preferences, why do we not take the traditional high discount ugg boots on salefor cold winter?
As a matter of fact, with the passing time, the love for ugg usa is increasing among girls in this modern world. The growing demand for these womens ugg made the manufacturers UGG Boots Sale to revamp the looks of these boots with different hues.come our website and buy a pair of ugg uk.UGG Classic Cardy are popular as shoes for cowboys. The SHOES close the whole parts of the foot. The ugg cardy are important to protect your feet from any dangerous things during your walking activities. There are many oatmeal ugg available in the Market and if you are interested to get one you can directly go to the store that sells it. Posted by: reviewups at December 03, 2009 07:07 AM (OKj2x) 138
Replica Omega | Replica watches | soccer jersey wholesale | Fake Cheap Rolex | soccer jersey supplier | Fake Watches | Replica Omega | Replica Cartier | replica wristwatch | watches brand | replica watches | Luxury watches | replica wristwatch | Luxury watches | replica watch | replica watch | replica watch | replica watch | replica wristwatch | replica wristwatch | replica wristwatch | replica watches | replica watches | Luxury watches | watches brand | best replica watches | best replica watches | watches brand | replica watches | replica watches | replica watches | watches brand | replica wristwatch | Luxury watches | Luxury watches | Luxury watches | watches brand | best replica watches
Posted by: replica watches at December 04, 2009 11:40 AM (bsW/x) 139
discount ugg boots
ugg boots outlet cheap ugg outlet cheap ugg boots ugg classic tall ugg bailey button ugg rainier ugg classic cardy ugg classic crochet ugg classic mini ugg classic short ugg classic tall ugg nightfall ugg sundance ugg ultra short ugg ultra tall ugg boots 5389 Posted by: uggboots at December 07, 2009 09:29 AM (Cooh2) 140
Today ugg boots online have become a phenomenon.Every winter,the ugg classic crochet are one of the hottest goods in the market all over the world.So now don't be hesitation,own a pair of ugg usa immediately.
Posted by: ugg boots sale at December 09, 2009 06:07 PM (I3/dZ) 141
We supply authentic discount Lacoste Shoes
Lacoste Trainers New Lacoste Lacoste Sale Mens Lacoste camden lacoste trainers lacoste trainers shoes lacoste camden retro camden lacoste trainers lacoste carnaby shoes lacoste carnaby retro lacoste shoes sale New Lacoste shoes Lacoste shoes online cheap Lacoste shoes Lacoste shoe mens lacoste shoes Lacoste Shua Lace Black Lace shoes white Lace shoes lacoste swerve shoes White Lacoste shoes Lacoste shoes sale Cheap Lacoste shoes Lacoste Women Shoes Women Lacoste Shoes Lacoste Shoes online on line, cheap price,Top quality,Free shipping! Posted by: Lacoste shoes at December 12, 2009 07:46 PM (/3s/N) 142
The womens mbt Tembea is a new generation lace-up with Dual Board construction and a striking style that pays tribute to the classic sneaker. It packs in all the mbt lami shoes benefits with a fresh look and feel, striking the perfect balance between health benefits ... The discount mbt Shuguli GTX is a is a sleek and stylish professional shoe ideal for work and more formal occasions whilst delivering full waterproofing from GORE-TEX. These are especially effective for those who have to stand or walk for long periods of time ...
The mbt shoes Fanaka GTX is a sporty but rugged styled shoe that combines fashionable, casual design with all the health benefits associated with the sporting style discount mbt shoes. These are especially effective for ladies who have to stand or walk for long periods ... The black mbt Bia is a classic, professional shoe ideal for work and more formal occasions whilst delivering all the health benefits from MBT design. These are especially effective for ladies who have to stand or walk for long periods of time during work ... Posted by: gfdg at December 14, 2009 06:40 PM (iV/dV) 143
Small Necklace | Fashion bracelets Yiwu | Tungsten Bracelet Wholesale | Gold Necklace Fashion | Wholesale Casting Earring Jewelry | Wood Bangles Yiwu | Stainless Steel pendant Luxury | Earrings Yiwu | Stamping Necklace Luxury | Watches Yiwu | Wholesal Zircon Bangles | Laser Rings Wholesale | Plating Bangles Luxury | Casting Rings Luxury | Cutting Tungsten Bracelet Cheap | Stainless Steel Bangle Wholesale | Gold Necklace Fashion | Tungent pendant Best | Stamping Pendant Fashion | Wholesal Wood Cufflink
Posted by: wholesale jewelry at December 17, 2009 06:54 AM (1dySH) 144
Replica Watches | Replica Watches | Fake Breitling Watches | Tissot Fake | Replica Chanel | Fake Bulgari Watches | Breitling Replica Watch | Patek Philippe Watches Replica | Replica Concord Watches | Breitling Watches Replica | Cartier Fake | Bedat & CO Fake | Blancpain Watch Replica | Gucci Watches Replica | Tissot Replica Watch | Replica Franck Muller Watch | Chanel Watches Replica | Baume & Mercier Replica Watches | Piaget Watches Replica | Bulgari Watch Replica | Replica Breguet Watches | Franck Muller Fake Watches | Tissot Replica | Bedat & CO Watches Replica | Rolex Replica Watches | Replica Bedat & CO | Mont Blanc Fake Watches
Posted by: replica watches at December 19, 2009 06:58 AM (wd3Wb) 145
Technomarine Replica Watches | Ebel Fake Watches | Watches Panerai Fashion | Replica Tissot Watches | Cartier Fake Watches | Watches Gerald Genta Fashion | Franck Muller Fake Watches | Richard Mille Replica Watches | Oris Replica Watches | Bulova Replica Watches | Ulysse Nardin Fake Watches | Raymond Weil Fake Watches | Richard Mille Fake Watches | Porsche Design Fake Watches | Replica Concord Watches | Baume & Mercier Replica Watches | Watches Corum Fashion | Replica Louis Vuitton Watches | Alain Silberstein Replica Watches | Rado Fake Watches
Posted by: wholesale jewelry at December 20, 2009 10:41 AM (1dySH) Posted by: nike air max 360 shoes at December 22, 2009 07:07 PM (xnxK1) 147
Un total de once comunidades autnomas estn este jueves en alerta naranja Christmas gift ugg tall boots (riesgo importante) por nevadas y bajan las temperaturas en toda Espa09a, segn la Agencia Estatal de Meteorologa (AEMET). En concreto, se Christmas gift ugg napoule sandal trata de Aragn, Cantabria, Castilla-La Mancha, Catalu09a, Christmas gift timberland classic boots Madrid, Navarra, Comunidad Valenciana, Galicia, Pas Vasco, Asturias y Murcia. La cota de nieve bajar a menos de 200 metros en el CantbricoLa Pennsula Ibrica est bajo dos borrascas y un anticicln que crearn un pasillo que permitir el paso de una corriente de aire muy fro, como la que est provocando un temporal de fro glaciar en Europa, aunque es esperan que el fro que suframos no sea tan intenso como en otros pases. An as, se espera que las bajas temperaturas se mantengan hasta el domingo. La cota de nieve baja en el Cantbrico a menos de 200 metros
Posted by: El temporal de fr¨ªo y nieve pone en alerta a once comunidades aut¨®nomas ugg boots|ugg uk|timberlan at January 08, 2010 10:24 PM (tWrEP) 148
nike max
air max shoes nike air max nike max shoes air max 1 nike air max 1 air max 2 nike air max 2 air max 89 nike air max 89 air max 90 nike air max 90 air max 91 nike air max 91 air max 95 nike air max 95 air max 97 nike air max 97 air max 180 nike air max 180 air max 360 nike air max 360 air max 2003 nike air max 2003 air max 2009 nike air max 2009 air max ltd nike air max ltd air max tn nike air max tn air max tailwind nike air max tailwind womens air max 1 womens air max 90 womens air max 95 womens air max BW womens air max LTD womens air max TN womens air max 360 womens air max 2003 womens air max 2007 womens air max 2009 Posted by: airmax at January 31, 2010 02:10 PM (3vSvS) 149
It seems replica watches that the watch brand Porsche Design is good at creating sporty classic watches. Many of the Replica watches from it are such watches. They are especially designed for men. Some of the products manufactured today by Porsche Design range from luggage, eye-glasses, replica watches wristwatches pens, wallets and so on, all this products being best-selling items. What makes the replica watches products of this brand so popular? That is not only because of the famous reputation of the brand, but because they display the most elegant and posh replica watches fappearance, for those who appreciate style and prestige. If you have enough knowledge of products from replica watches this brand, you would understand these reasons. Defined by modern appearance and functional mechanisms, the replica watches Porsche Design brand has remained true to its intentions as to create timepieces that would meet the expectations of our modern trends and contemporary times. People nowadays seek watches with amazing designs, but at the same time, to provide many functions and to be highly reliable. In a world of speed replica watche and dynamism, Porsche Design proposes sporty watches that managed to impress with their unpretentious designs and the amazing variety of technical functions provided.
Posted by: replica watches at February 01, 2010 12:56 PM (ObITM) 150
Certainly watches are Replica Watches used to help people record rolex Watches time, but rolex watches nowadays its functions have enlarged. Replica watches are now tag heuer Watches not only objects that tag heuer watches can tell you what time it is, they are also a status symbol. You should not feel strange when you find someone wearing a watch on his wrist, but use the cell phone to tell time. In that situation, the watch is just showing its luxurious function cartier watches. It is normal and cartier watches perhaps also happens to you. .If asked that among the watches of various brands, which one can suit your taste? There is no doubt that most people will choose Rolex. Whichever social class you are in, it is naturally Rolex was known breitling Watches and cherished breitling watches for a long time. However, the elements do not usually enter the market alone, always come with the price tag up to the hand. For this reason, many people, especially men, their dreams of luxury Rolex watches are buried in omega Watches his heart omega watches. What should I do? Rolex watches are simply stunning worn by the rich and famous, right? No, this world is not the world's richest men, is the world of each. All are equal before the search of luxury and be men's watches respected. Within men's watches, the law, when consumers are in the market, women's watches they should women's watches receive the same treatment. This is the real reason why replica Rolex watches are ladies watches ladies watches more welcome than Rolex. Because in this world are not difficult to understand that the rich are much less than people with low income, you agree with me? You are forced to nod and say with certainty that is the reality. These low-income people do not have enough money to save every month. They can not afford such luxury Rolex watches
Posted by: replica watches at February 04, 2010 06:34 PM (CPNio) 151
nike max
air max shoes nike air max nike max shoes air max 1 nike air max 1 air max 2 nike air max 2 air max 89 nike air max 89 air max 90 nike air max 90 air max 91 nike air max 91 air max 95 nike air max 95 air max 97 nike air max 97 air max 180 nike air max 180 air max 360 nike air max 360 air max 2003 nike air max 2003 air max 2009 nike air max 2009 Posted by: may at February 06, 2010 04:52 PM (Eu9Vs) 152
Factors Replica Watches About The Rolex replica watches Oyster The Oyster is so closely get in touch with Rolex, and it is inevitably that some people think these are the only Replica watches Rolex manufacture. Others suppose that there is a single Oyster watch. But as a matter of fact, the name Oyster does not actually meant for a rolex Watches particular watch you can buy rolex watches or even to a series but to a type of case that available in some of the Rolex ranges. History The Oyster case was first released in 1926. The objective was to protect the workings of the watch from dust and moisture. Early watches were far from waterproof. The Oyster tag heuer Watchescase was an tag heuer watches innovative design to eliminate these problems. It had a new double locking crown that screwed into place. It has been compared to the hatch on a submarine. Like a submarine, the Oyster case was waterproof. In 1927 Mercedes Gleitze swam the English breitling Watches Channel breitling watches . Before she set off she was presented with a Rolex Oyster. When she arrived, the watch was still working perfectly. The resulting publicity gave the new case a massive boost. Why is it called Oyster? Legend has it that Hans cartier Watches Wilsdorf cartier watches, who invented the Oyster, chose the name because the new case reminded him of the difficulty he had experienced prising open oysters at dinner. Since then the Oyster has further, particularly advanced. Many Oyster watches today are omega Watches perpetual-self-winding, in other omega watches words, it does not require to expose the mechanism to the outside world in order to wind it. The Osyter Perpetual is one of the toughest, most durable, most reliable watches (under truly adverse conditions). It is probably the best mechanical watch money can buy.
Posted by: replica watches at February 07, 2010 12:36 PM (TUJDt) Processing 0.08, elapsed 0.0962 seconds. |
MuNuvians
MeeNuvians
Polls! Polls! Polls!
Dale's ECB Election Projection Federal Review Real Clear Politics Rasmussen Reports Gallup Zogby FoxNews Polls Sabato/Crystal Ball Frequently Asked Questions
The (Almost) Complete Paul Anka Integrity Kick
Primary Document: The Audio
Paul Anka Haiku Contest Announcement Integrity SAT's: Entrance Exam for Paul Anka's Band AllahPundit's Paul Anka 45's Collection AnkaPundit: Paul Anka Takes Over the Site for a Weekend (Continues through to Monday's postings) George Bush Slices Don Rumsfeld Like an F*ckin' Hammer Top Top Tens
Democratic Forays into Erotica New Shows On Gore's DNC/MTV Network Nicknames for Potatoes, By People Who Really Hate Potatoes Star Wars Euphemisms for Self-Abuse Signs You're at an Iraqi "Wedding Party" Signs Your Clown Has Gone Bad Signs That You, Geroge Michael, Should Probably Just Give It Up Signs of Hip-Hop Influence on John Kerry NYT Headlines Spinning Bush's Jobs Boom Things People Are More Likely to Say Than "Did You Hear What Al Franken Said Yesterday?" Signs that Paul Krugman Has Lost His Frickin' Mind All-Time Best NBA Players, According to Senator Robert Byrd Other Bad Things About the Jews, According to the Koran Signs That David Letterman Just Doesn't Care Anymore Examples of Bob Kerrey's Insufferable Racial Jackassery Signs Andy Rooney Is Going Senile Other Judgments Dick Clarke Made About Condi Rice Based on Her Appearance Collective Names for Groups of People John Kerry's Other Vietnam Super-Pets Cool Things About the XM8 Assault Rifle Media-Approved Facts About the Democrat Spy Changes to Make Christianity More "Inclusive" Secret John Kerry Senatorial Accomplishments John Edwards Campaign Excuses John Kerry Pick-Up Lines Changes Liberal Senator George Michell Will Make at Disney Torments in Dog-Hell Greatest Hitjobs
The Ace of Spades HQ Sex-for-Money Skankathon A D&D Guide to the Democratic Candidates Margaret Cho: Just Not Funny More Margaret Cho Abuse Margaret Cho: Still Not Funny Iraqi Prisoner Claims He Was Raped... By Woman Wonkette Announces "Morning Zoo" Format John Kerry's "Plan" Causes Surrender of Moqtada al-Sadr's Militia World Muslim Leaders Apologize for Nick Berg's Beheading Michael Moore Goes on Lunchtime Manhattan Death-Spree Milestone: Oliver Willis Posts 400th "Fake News Article" Referencing Britney Spears Liberal Economists Rue a "New Decade of Greed" Artificial Insouciance: Maureen Dowd's Word Processor Revolts Against Her Numbing Imbecility Intelligence Officials Eye Blogs for Tips They Done Found Us Out, Cletus: Intrepid Internet Detective Figures Out Our Master Plan Shock: Josh Marshall Almost Mentions Sarin Discovery in Iraq Leather-Clad Biker Freaks Terrorize Australian Town When Clinton Was President, Torture Was Cool What Wonkette Means When She Explains What Tina Brown Means Wonkette's Stand-Up Act Wankette HQ Gay-Rumors Du Jour Here's What's Bugging Me: Goose and Slider My Own Micah Wright Style Confession of Dishonesty Outraged "Conservatives" React to the FMA An On-Line Impression of Dennis Miller Having Sex with a Kodiak Bear The Story the Rightwing Media Refuses to Report! Our Lunch with David "Glengarry Glen Ross" Mamet The House of Love: Paul Krugman A Michael Moore Mystery (TM) The Dowd-O-Matic! Liberal Consistency and Other Myths Kepler's Laws of Liberal Media Bias John Kerry-- The Splunge! Candidate "Divisive" Politics & "Attacks on Patriotism" (very long) The Donkey ("The Raven" parody) News/Chat
|