AMA Pans ObamaCare; Dems Freak Out

Democratic commentators today are hopping mad that the American Medical Association preempted the President's scheduled speech on healthcare by unequivocally stating that it opposes any healthcare reform that includes a public insurance option.

While committed to the goal of affordable health insurance for all, the association had said in a general statement of principles that health services should be “provided through private markets, as they are currently.” It is now reacting, for the first time, to specific legislative proposals being drafted by Congress.
But in comments submitted to the Senate Finance Committee, the American Medical Association said: “The A.M.A. does not believe that creating a public health insurance option for non-disabled individuals under age 65 is the best way to expand health insurance coverage and lower costs. The introduction of a new public plan threatens to restrict patient choice by driving out private insurers, which currently provide coverage for nearly 70 percent of Americans.”
If private insurers are pushed out of the market, the group said, “the corresponding surge in public plan participation would likely lead to an explosion of costs that would need to be absorbed by taxpayers.”

Typically, Democrats responded to the AMA by, well, lying about their own healthcare plan. After accusing the AMA of having Stockholm Syndrome and "collective battered wife syndrome" Kevin Drum writes:

(1) A public plan wouldn't drive out private insurers unless it turns out that private insurers are actually less efficient than the post office. In which case they'd deserve it. (2) Nor would a public plan restrict choice — unless the AMA's members deliberately tried to sabotage it by refusing to participate. (3) And there would only be a surge in signups if the public plan turned out to be a better deal, which would likely mean lower overall costs even if a greater percentage of those costs was paid for out of taxes.

He clealy hasn't even read the Democratic proposal, which includes a private plan killer:

The bill gives the Secretary of Health and Human Services authority to limit premiums and profits of health plans by forcing plans to rebate to enrollees premiums above a certain margin.
Specifically, §2704(a) is the “Requirement to provide value for premium payments.” A health plan must report how much of their premium revenues are used for clinical services, how much for “activities that improve health care quality,” and how much for “all other non-claims costs.”
§2704(b)(1) then tells the Secretary to look at how much other health plans spent on “all other non-claims costs,” and based on that survey, set an allowable percentage for this category. Plans are then required to rebate premiums if they go above this amount. This is direct (but confusing) regulation of premiums and profit margins.
I found the labeling of this section interesting. It appears that this section will be the justification for the claim that this bill reduces health care costs. Loosely phrased, it appears their argument will be “We’re reducing health care costs by forcing plans to lower their administrative costs and profits.”

Ed Morrissey explains:

The people behind this plan intensely dislike the notion of health-care providers making a profit. The bill gives these people a lever to have government decide how much profit each insurer will be allowed to get from their business. Note that this has nothing to do with the quality of care provided, nor of the costs to the government. Literally, two insurers could charge the government the same amount of money for the same procedures and services, but if one is 20% more efficient than the other, the government will penalize the more efficient insurer.

So on the one hand we have people like Kevin Drum, who persist in claiming that the proposed reform will result in increased efficiency. On the other hand, the actual text of the proposed law, which penalizes efficiency.

Posted by: Gabriel Malor at 11:38 AM

Comments

1 Do you think someone in the Whitehouse is reloading the TOTUS with a new speech?

Posted by: Jean at June 11, 2009 11:41 AM (L64A6)

2 They will get my medical records when they pry them from my cold dead hands.....

Posted by: Eric at June 11, 2009 11:42 AM (N+w6G)

3 I have spoken to a good cross section of medical personnel about this in the past few months; some were even located in Ann Arbor, the bastion of crazy liberalism. I have not found ONE person in the medical field in SE Michigan who favors this. In fact, my low key, reasonable doctor said that if this goes through, it will be a mass genocide on the elderly.

Posted by: shibumi at June 11, 2009 11:42 AM (OKZrE)

4 this is a good sign

Posted by: Shoey at June 11, 2009 11:44 AM (RxUMK)

5 I'm sure Obama's socialization of health care will save or create many jobs.

In the mortuary industry.

Posted by: 18-1 at June 11, 2009 11:45 AM (7BU4a)

6 So on the one hand we have people like Kevin Drum, who persist in claiming that the proposed reform will result in increased efficiency. On the other hand, the actual text of the proposed law, which penalizes efficiency.

Well, I haven't read the text of that Democrat law because...um...Hey! Look over there! Obama's giving another historic speech about (X)!

He's so great, isn't he?

Posted by: Kevin Drum at June 11, 2009 11:45 AM (jH17H)

7 Well, they won't do tort reform so they still have the lawyers. Who would you rather have on health care, doctors or lawyers?

Posted by: DrewM. at June 11, 2009 11:47 AM (PLGGU)

8 (1) A public plan wouldn't drive out private insurers unless it turns out that private insurers are actually less efficient than the post office. In which case they'd deserve it.

It will if employers decide to keep their money and dump their plans and employees into the lap of the gummint.

Posted by: nickless at June 11, 2009 11:49 AM (MMC8r)

Just another way this administration wants to punish all things good and productive. They have already begun to cap executive pay for those greedy wall street folks. Why should healthcare be any different? At least the physicians were able to speak out before mayhem ensues. I hope this move helps slow down this steamroller. I bet those wall street types wished they could take back their support and/or donations. I believe many of them didn't see this coming.

I think I understand that moron who posts here alot..."in the end there is only chaos".

Posted by: Trish at June 11, 2009 11:50 AM (0U5Kd)

10 Hellthcare. Spread the word... literally.

Posted by: Bat Chain Puller at June 11, 2009 11:50 AM (SCcgT)

11 Speaking of healthcare, the swine flu has been declared a pandemic.

Posted by: The Great Satan™ at June 11, 2009 11:52 AM (knIKF)

12 Why should we care what Kevin Drum says?

Seriously, I've never found him particularly insightful, intelligent, or articulate. His mutterings are indistinguishable from the current Democrat/Journo-list talking points.

Posted by: Rob Crawford at June 11, 2009 11:53 AM (ZJ/un)

13 Now we need AARP to wade into this fray.

Posted by: Jean at June 11, 2009 11:56 AM (L64A6)

14 Tasty!

Posted by: Y-not at June 11, 2009 12:01 PM (sey23)

15 I think the AMA sees Medicare/Medicaid expanded to everybody, while they become gummint employees.

Posted by: nickless at June 11, 2009 12:02 PM (MMC8r)

16 Which rational business owner would continue to provide healthcare insurance for the bulk of his employees if the government is offering it 'freely?'

A smaller market would only increase the prices of private insurance. Increasing prices would further shrink the number of private insurance customers to the point of making insurance a boutique industry.

Posted by: Chimney Sweep #8 at June 11, 2009 12:03 PM (kIjlp)

17

See, the liberal assholes will make their defense of this stupid plan so convoluted that no one will be able to attack it.

Sort of like Hillary's fucking flowcharts, made overly complex on purpose to evade criticism.

Their own little language.

"So, you expect to change the economics of the entire health care industry in a few months?"

"Look at my chart, it's right here...oh, you're too stupid to understand it, sorry."

Aren't they just so cute. these Progressive assholes do this time and time again.

Posted by: Rev. Dr. E. Joe Buzz Biden-Miller, PhD, DO, MD at June 11, 2009 12:06 PM (CHf6r)

18 We would continue to offer a set of health care options under a cafeteria type arrangement. But, the cost vice other benefits would only make sense to a small group of people - the restr would go on the "free" plan and spend their benefits on insurance, retirement, etc.

Posted by: Jean at June 11, 2009 12:07 PM (L64A6)

19
Yeah, let's ask Juan Cole what he thinks, too.

Posted by: Unicles at June 11, 2009 12:07 PM (42h7G)

20 Kevin Drum can't be blame for not reading the bill - the Jews are preventing him from doing so.

Posted by: Blogluddite at June 11, 2009 12:08 PM (fDWFP)

21 It will if employers decide to keep their money and dump their plans and employees into the lap of the gummint.

Well of COURSE, anyone with 2 brain cells to rub together realizes this will be the case. The public plan isn't about "providing an option", it is the camel's nose under the tent for outright nationalization.

Posted by: chemjeff at June 11, 2009 12:09 PM (kP58F)

22 This AMA response surprises me. I have known the AMA to be an essentially left wing organization for 20 years. Somebody woke up from their coma, it seems.

Posted by: maddogg at June 11, 2009 12:19 PM (OlN4e)

23 While I applaud the AMA for speaking out on this, and wish them lotsa luck, they started down this slippery slope when they bent over for the insurance companies years ago.

Posted by: CB at June 11, 2009 12:20 PM (9Wv2j)

24 If Zero and his cohorts were actually interested in lowering health care costs. Would they not begin with the causes of incredibly high malpractice insurance? Rein in the lawsuits which are a major cause? No, because the lawyers supporting him don't want tort reform. Its job insurance for trial lawyers, and they donate big bucks.

Posted by: maddogg at June 11, 2009 12:23 PM (OlN4e)

25 The AARP (I would never, ever join them) is in a delimma, they are big on socialist causes, but sell insurance as a major part of their business. They can go to Hell BTW.

Posted by: maddogg at June 11, 2009 12:26 PM (OlN4e)

26 so convoluted that no one will be able to attack it.

Hey single-payer socialized health care I was here first.

Posted by: Global Climate Change at June 11, 2009 12:31 PM (/QzyE)

27 24 - maddogg -- Here's the interesting thing: if healthcare becomes a govt program, aren't trial lawyers just out of luck? You usually can't sue a govt agency for being incompetent or neglectful. In fact, have trial lawyers figured out socializing this country puts them out of business? Who will be left to sue?

Posted by: MaureenTheTemp at June 11, 2009 12:31 PM (8cihe)

28 Limit liability? Rein in lawsuits? Don't be talking crazy, now.

Posted by: John Edwards at June 11, 2009 12:34 PM (knHvu)

Maureen

I'm sure the lawyers in the Zero administration will write it so that the trial lawyers will have a prominent place on the government tit row. They will still be able to sue Doctors for millions, but the taxpayer would have to pick up the tab. You gotta dance with who brung ya.

Posted by: maddogg at June 11, 2009 12:39 PM (OlN4e)

30 I love the spin from the left. Like this was ever intended to do anything other than get rid of private medical insurance.

Posted by: brian at June 11, 2009 12:43 PM (S2j/V)

I remember in Middle School the horror I felt when I learned that farmers in the old Soviet Union threw away grain because if they turned it in to the government, they would be expected to turn in that much the following year. At least, that's how it was explained to me by a teacher. There was no incentive to be efficient nor productive. Even then, my childlike mind could understand how idiotic that was...and against nature/science.

Now that horror is directed inward to the ol' U.S. of A.. What the HELL are we doing?

Posted by: TobB at June 11, 2009 12:43 PM (ZeO0M)

32 I forsee Teleprez "selling" this by making initial compromises to quell the nation's fears about socialized medicine wherein we get to keep this as is ("socialized" private choice)....for a time. Then, once instituted, it will be chipped away little by little until we arrive at the final destination: Omarxist's original plan.

Posted by: Twinks at June 11, 2009 12:45 PM (V+x9W)

33 You missed the "heads I win, tails you lose" aspect of the profit limiting. The whole concept of insurance is to share risk amongst a larger pool. Each individual policy isn't supposed to make a profit, just all of them put together.

This applies to policy years, as well -- all the premiums collected in non-earthquake years are partially offset when an earthquake happens.

So what would happen to this model if every year an earthquake didn't happen, the government made the insurance company give back a chunk of the premiums?

Posted by: cthulhu at June 11, 2009 01:08 PM (m5ie4)

34 A health plan must report how much of their premium revenues are used for clinical services, how much for “activities that improve health care quality,” and how much for “all other non-claims costs.”

Someone correct me if I'm mistaken but I was under the impression that insurance claims (clinical services etc.) and operating costs are not simply paid out of the pool of premium revenues but that the whole system kind of depends on the insurance companies' being able to invest that money and make it grow.

Instead of something like:

"Okay, we raked in $100 in premiums this month, paid $90 in claims, and our operating costs were $4, so that leaves us with a 6% profit, wheee!"

More like:

"Okay, we took in $90 in premiums this month but paid out $100 in claims and $4 in operating costs from our $1,000 fund. It's a good thing our more conservative investments are continuing to show a return even in this down time, because otherwise forget showing a profit, we wouldn't be able to pay claims at the premium rates we are currently charging."

Again, someone correct me if I'm wrong on the basic outlines here. I'd really like to know. And if I do have it right what does this mean for the congressional proposals incorrectly based on a government styled model of budgeting? i.e. Project revenue, and whack that figure up into chunks until every penny is spent, deficits are okay but surpluses are unacceptable and must be pissed away during the next round of budgeting until there is nothing left.

Posted by: Deety at June 11, 2009 01:18 PM (aVzyR)

35 I almost feel fraudulent commenting on this issue, as the gov't. already has my records (career military).

From a personal angle, I obviously don't care if the feds acquire my records since that ship done sailed. HOWEVER, I find it completely offensive that they should seek to grab EVERYONES records will he,nil he, especially as it is on it's face a violation of the 4th Amendment (you know, to that crazy document I swore to protect and defend?). This is completely as an aside to what a TERRIBLE ECONOMY KILLER this particular bill would be. As shit sandwiches go, they don't get much bigger than this.

So good on the AMA for calling a spade a spade and saying what anyone with a brain and a little (a VERY little) education can spot: this is a bad deal for all concerned, except for the bureaucrats who will be hired to run it.

But then, that's who it's intended for...

Posted by: Militant Bibliophile at June 11, 2009 01:20 PM (KvGts)

This is it. This is my line in the sand. Freedom is so precious, so rare, I will not give control of my heathcare to Obama and his minions. It took me many years to find a doctor that I trust, I have a chronic condition. I see her every month. I will not submit to some bean counter teling me I don't "need" to. I will not be sold down the river to cover a-holes who can't take care of themselves or get insurance. I'm sorry. The government will gain access to my records over my dead body.

Am I my brother's keeper?

Hell no. Not when it comes to my healthcare.

Posted by: fugazi at June 11, 2009 01:26 PM (9t8CO)

37 Oh yeah, and that whole "earthquake years" vs. "non-earthquake years" aspect that cthulu mentioned.

Where is Monty when you need him?

I really don't feel like I have a firm grasp on economic issues until they have been turned into a guitar buying and selling analogy or at the very least turned into a dramatic rendering with evil super villains and killer dialogue.

Sigh.

I am a moron.

Posted by: Deety at June 11, 2009 01:35 PM (aVzyR)

38 American doctors will be lined up next to the Wall Street guys as the next enemies of the state. And enemies of the state are anyone or group who dares to question the Marxist messiah.

Posted by: TheQuietMan at June 11, 2009 01:45 PM (1Jaio)

39 They have already begun to cap executive pay for those greedy wall street folks. Why should healthcare be any different?

Why should legal work be any different?

Want to kill this? Propose the exact same thing for lawyers.

Posted by: Amish J. Dude at June 11, 2009 01:56 PM (bZ9KY)

40 Nationalized health care penalizes specialists who don't get paid any more despite having extra training and higher liablity insurance. There is a total brain drain going on in England, their nurses and doctors have been coming and working here because the wages are so poor over there. The UK has resorted to hiring foreign health care workers whose heavily accented English results in breakdowns in communication. Socialized health care isn't working in any of the countries that currently have it, and they are all a lot smaller than the U.S. They also don't have the litigation we have (lawyers aren't allowed to advertise on t.v. in the UK or in Europe). My fellow nurses who do support socialized medicine are basically SEIU tools who have no concept how their personal income will take a dive if nationalized medicine is implemented. We nurses make decent money, and these idiots have no idea that their idolatry for Obama is going to cost them their livelihood. As for the AMA, they are basically a toothless organization. Yeah, they can take a stand against Obama, but when push comes to shove, they will choke down whatever he shoves down their throats. I do think, though, that their protest against him will leave a small red mark.

Posted by: runningrn at June 11, 2009 03:38 PM (aC/SY)

41 Doctors dont like obamas healthcare DOSE THAT TELL YOU ANYTHING?

Posted by: Spurwing Plover at June 11, 2009 03:48 PM (4EdvW)

42 I was going to use a Katrina-type disaster instead of earthquakes, but I couldn't figure out how to appropriately label such a complete clusterfark. So I switched it to something easier to conceptualize.

Posted by: cthulhu at June 11, 2009 04:28 PM (m5ie4)

43 Amish J. Dude,

As an attorney I could not agree more. Republicans should be offering legislation that mirrors anything the Democrats offer but for a favorite Liberal industry.

Hollywood should face the same regulations as Wall Street, for example.

Posted by: Nom de Blog at June 11, 2009 04:29 PM (1Bods)

44 Obama can heal you with his touch. He's God.

Posted by: Thomas Jackson at June 11, 2009 05:44 PM (B8gqF)

45 Isn't it odd that a group that is generally liberal, when faced with it's (union) members actually losing wealth and privileged turns conservative all of a sudden?

Posted by: Doom at June 11, 2009 06:09 PM (ntpwx)

46 Who cares what the American Medical Association thinks? I mean, what do a bunch of doctors know about the delivery of health care anyway?

Posted by: EyeDoc at June 11, 2009 06:35 PM (VCWvq)

47 Who cares what the American Medical Association thinks? I mean, what do a bunch of doctors know about the delivery of health care anyway?

I'm more concerned that they know something about the economics of health care delivery in this instance.

Posted by: Deety at June 11, 2009 07:18 PM (aVzyR)

Need to know before buying lace wigs Our lace wigs are made of human hairs classified lace human hair wigs on our web. 100% Indian/Chinese remy human hair and best quality Swiss/French lace are used in lace human hair wigs. Lace human hair wig is thin, your scalp can get good breath, so you can feel comfortable just like real hair. You may find hundreds of units and almost 150+ styles of full lace wigs in our store. By using our web searcher, you may locate just the wigs you want without bitter searches. Also, you may customise lace front wigs here, all you need to do is just to follow our custom options or leave your specials in the "comments". A custom wig can be completed within 25 workdays generally. Thanks for Paypal and our Co-work World Wide Ship corporations, we can ship wigs to all over the world! Show your beauty, show your individuality, experience our wonderful service and dress you up right now!

wedding dresses wedding dress wedding gowns bridesmaid dresses bridesmaid dress

Posted by: royalmewigs at June 11, 2009 09:33 PM (lmc74)

49
seokinship
银行pos机ineffable
文化衫that
T恤衫single
腻子粉as
杭州室内装修combination
杭州店面装修affection
杭州室内装饰tender
杭州搬家公司in
杭州搬家in
电雕机of
杭州植物租赁consist
缝纫机维修oneness
杭州厨师培训motion
温度记录仪order
去痘that
seojumpping
祛斑attractive
杭州google排名I
杭州网站优化and

Posted by: yjdu at June 13, 2009 12:42 PM (95cWi)

if you come omage watces,replica watches and Tag Heuer watches ,we sill give you great surprise.

the tf card memory on sale . if you want buy tf card memory, i recommend here ,the quality very good.

Posted by: omega watches at June 20, 2009 03:23 AM (WAmWn)

51 Well, they won't do tort reform so they still have the lawyers. Who would you rather have on health care, doctors or lawyers?

free classifieds
jobs part time
articles

Posted by: Nathanial Anju at July 05, 2009 05:21 AM (eYvKS)

Posted by: daytona at July 10, 2009 10:06 AM (l0iNF)

53 Could you help me. Skiing combines outdoor fun with knocking down trees with your face. Help me! It has to find sites on the: Ak47 paintball guns. I found only this - spyder shutter Paintball gun. Nation largest airsoft retailer free shipping! Price match. We also carry diversion safes and personal alarms. With respect :mad:, Lauren from Tajikistan.

Posted by: Lauren at July 16, 2009 07:02 AM (kZgnP)

54 Good afternoon. Every moment of one's existence one is growing into more or retreating into less.
I am from Palau and now study English, tell me right I wrote the following sentence: "Business financing commercial loans consultants investors aaa auto cash title arizona consider using your equity position to offer partial seller financing."

Thank

Kora.

Posted by: Kora at July 23, 2009 04:01 PM (2r5gt)

55 Excuse me. I like coincidences. They make me wonder about destiny, and whether free will is an illusion or just a matter of perspective. They let me speculate on the idea of some master plan that, from time to time, we're allowed to see out of the corner of our eye.
I am from Laos and learning to read in English, tell me right I wrote the following sentence: "Female pheromone perfume best pheromones blog."

Waiting for a reply ;-), Cindy.

Posted by: Cindy at August 05, 2009 10:46 AM (luFNf)

56 Sorry. Statistics: The only science that enables different experts using the same figures to draw different conclusions.
I am from Croatia and now teach English, give true I wrote the following sentence: "Features of credit repair software review august there are a number of different types of credit repairsoftware available today that can be found at retail locations across the nation."

Waiting for a reply

, Victorian bathroom mirrors.

Posted by: Victorian bathroom mirrors at August 11, 2009 08:20 AM (V3Xx4)

57 discounthair straighteners
ghd hair
chi hair straightener
ghd straighteners
chi straighteners
chi hair
chi hair iron
hair straighteners ghd
ghd hair straighteners
free shipping!

Posted by: hair straighteners at October 24, 2009 12:38 PM (9oMrs)

58 Discount Boots
Womens UGG
UGG Shoes
UGG Australia
UGG UK
UGG USA
discount ugg boots
cheap ugg boots

Posted by: fdsfds at October 27, 2009 10:13 AM (8kvkz)

Posted by: ugg boots at October 27, 2009 01:14 PM (pgfU2)

60 Your post very good,thanks for sharing!Are you also like these:ugg boots uk,buy ugg boots,australia ugg,cheap ugg boots,ugg boots,ugg boots sheepskin,womens ugg boots,ugg australia boots,cheap ugg boots

Posted by: australia ugg at October 27, 2009 03:05 PM (c6EK2)

This article is very interesting. Thank you very much for sharing .

inchirieri auto | fier forjat | balansoar fisher price | inchirieri masini | masini de inchiriat

Posted by: inchirieri masini at November 01, 2009 04:31 PM (Xw6IO)

62 buy Discount Boots
Womens UGG
UGG Shoes
UGG Australia
UGG UK
UGG USA
discount ugg boots
cheap ugg boots
air force 1 shoes
nike air force
air force 1 mens
air force 1 boots
air force onefrom usa

Posted by: airforceoneshop at November 03, 2009 03:23 PM (LHCCE)

63 discount Discount Boots
Womens UGG
UGG Shoes
UGG Australia
UGG UK
UGG USA
discount ugg boots
cheap ugg boots
air force 1 shoes
Nike air force
air force 1 mens
air force 1 boots
air force onefree shipping

Posted by: reviewups at November 06, 2009 02:14 AM (XxrVz)

64 Come to our website for shopping with high quality and best service! There have new products,MBT M. Walk
and MBT Lami,Welcome everybody to buy it.

Posted by: mbt shoes at November 08, 2009 09:39 AM (QhfLM)

Posted by: reviewups at November 10, 2009 02:56 AM (UHjri)

Posted by: ugg boots at November 12, 2009 02:58 AM (IeIJx)

67 nike dunk sb

Do anything needed to support an idea, a good idea usually brings good results, doing

business is like that.http://www.dunksky.com/.This site has always been on

Posted by: nike dunk sb at November 14, 2009 02:04 AM (APB+g)

68 buy [url=http://www.reviewups.com/]discount ugg shoes[/url]
[url=http://www.reviewups.com/]cheap ugg shoes[/url]
[url=http://www.reviewups.com/]cheap ugg[/url]
[url=http://www.reviewups.com/ugg-coquette-casual-shoes-c-22]ugg rainier[/url]
[url=http://www.reviewups.com/]buy ugg[/url]
[url=http://www.reviewups.com/]ugg usa[/url]
[url=http://www.reviewups.com/]discount ugg boots[/url]
[url=http://www.reviewups.com/ugg-classic-short-c-1]ugg 5825[/url]
[url=http://www.reviewups.com/]ugg shoes sale[/url]
[url=http://www.reviewups.com/ugg-sundance-c-5]ugg sundance[/url]
[url=http://www.reviewups.com/]ugg shoes[/url]
[url=http://www.reviewups.com/]cheap ugg boots[/url]
[url=http://www.reviewups.com/ugg-classic-tall-c-3]ugg 5815[/url]
[url=http://www.reviewups.com/]ugg sale[/url]
[url=http://www.reviewups.com/]ugg uk[/url]
[url=http://www.reviewups.com/ugg-knightsbridge-c-27]ugg knightsbridge[/url]
[url=http://www.reviewups.com/]womens ugg boots[/url]
[url=http://www.reviewups.com/]ugg boots[/url]
[url=http://www.reviewups.com/]ugg australia[/url]
[url=http://www.reviewups.com/ugg-classic-cardy-c-2]ugg 5819[/url]from usa

Posted by: cheap at November 14, 2009 05:32 AM (s7MB5)

Posted by: nike shoes at November 17, 2009 05:57 AM (DuP3Z)

Posted by: replica watches at November 17, 2009 08:24 AM (xpuiO)

Posted by: replica watches at November 17, 2009 11:16 PM (xpuiO)

Posted by: replica watches at November 18, 2009 04:44 AM (C/zDM)

73 UGG BOOTS

Posted by: UGG BOOTS at November 18, 2009 09:46 AM (WPYlQ)

Processing 0.19, elapsed 0.1848 seconds.
15 queries taking 0.149 seconds, 82 records returned.
Page size 83 kb.
Powered by Minx 0.7 alpha.