The Limbaugh Challenge

I'm posting this editorial because I have a soft spot not only for Maha-Rushie, but also for watching someone call out the readership of the LA Times as a bunch of girly-men with skulls full of mush.

I mean, check out the following blockquote. It is a thing of beauty, and something I wish I'd written:

By lifting some typically Rushian piece of outrageous hilarity completely out of context, the distortion gang knows full well it can get you to widen your eyes and open your mouth in the universal sign of Liberal Outrage. Your scrawny chest swelling with a warm sense of completely unearned righteousness, you will turn to your second spouse and say, "I'm not a liberal, I'm a moderate, and I'm tolerant of a wide range of differing views -- but this goes too far!"
There is more untruthfulness in that statement than in a speech by President Obama. Even the commas are self-deceiving. You're not a moderate or you wouldn't be reading this newspaper. You're not tolerant of a wide range of views; you are tolerant of a narrow spectrum of variations on your views. And, whatever you claim, you still haven't listened to Rush Limbaugh.

And for those LA TIMES readers from Rio Linda, here is a synopsis of the above paragraphs the author helpfully provides:

Now let me tell you the real answer: You're a lowdown, yellow-bellied, lily-livered intellectual coward. You're terrified of finding out he makes more sense than you do.

Sure, there will be some on the right who wring their hands about appealing to the "middle" with the softer, kinder language of the perpetually clueless. Much more fun, however, will be to watch the leftists to whom this broadside is aimed scurry about trying to prove, lest they be revealed to be hypocrites, that they actually have "Rush Creds" after all.

In any event a blast with both barrels is occasionally necessary to loosen the rust embedded in the system. I hereby nominate Andrew Klavan for this weeks "Slices Like a Hammer" award.

Posted by: Jack M. at 01:47 PM

Comments

1
Is it Yorba Linda?

I thought Rush makes fun of another stupid California city...Ranch-something?

Posted by: Darling, just an entertainer at March 29, 2009 01:55 PM (PXi/y)

2 I think it's Rio Linda.

Posted by: James in H-town at March 29, 2009 01:56 PM (BL4ht)

3 Dude, The YL is 85%+ AOSHq Morons, he refers to somewhere else.....

Posted by: YL Tom at March 29, 2009 01:57 PM (sU+7Z)

4 I think it's Yorba Linda. Back in the days when I could listen regularly, that was the city he frequently named.

If he's changed it on the past year or two, I've missed it.

Posted by: Jack M. at March 29, 2009 01:57 PM (eOEgY)

5 . . . still, great article. I love Andrew Klavan. For those who don't know him, in addition to numerous novels, he wrote the screenplay of the wickedly funny "A Shock to the System" back in the early 90's.

Posted by: James in H-town at March 29, 2009 01:58 PM (BL4ht)

6 OK..I'll google it. And figure it out.

Just did. It is Rio Linda. I'll fix it.

Posted by: Jack M. at March 29, 2009 01:58 PM (eOEgY)

7 It's always been Rio Linda. I feel the need to make jokes! Although he briefly added Port Lucie after the McNuggets emergency call.

Posted by: Ella at March 29, 2009 01:58 PM (jeP9I)

8 http://tinyurl.com/ckvx5q

Looks like Huffpo is waving the flag as well.

Posted by: eddiebear at March 29, 2009 01:58 PM (4+DQc)

9
lol @ appealing to the middle

I guess that means supporting only half of the Left's anti-American policies or meeting the anti-American Leftwingers half-way on their radical policies.

Sorta like being in a parliament with Hamas and reaching across the aisle and agreeing to wipe out only half of the Israelis. You know, to be a moderate, like Snowe, Collins, and Specter.

Posted by: Darling, just an entertainer at March 29, 2009 01:59 PM (PXi/y)

10 I hereby nominate Andrew Klavin for this weeks "Slices Like a Hammer" award.

Sounds like a winner to me. Will he get a slightly used bottle of Val-u-Rite as his reward?

Posted by: I R A Darth Aggie at March 29, 2009 01:59 PM (1hM1d)

11 Great, Jack. But how about when you give a guy an award, you spell his name right?

Posted by: someone at March 29, 2009 02:00 PM (1wXl7)

12 We don't want to appeal to the middle by surrendering what we believe. The goal isn't to agree with them, it's to make them understand why they should agree with us. And I think the unflinching direct approach is the right one.

Posted by: Crusty at March 29, 2009 02:02 PM (qzgbP)

It's Rio Linda, CA that he is always referring to.

I generally agree with Limbaugh's message, but I think his delivery method sucks. I'm sure he does it to twist the Lib's tails but it probably alienates a lot of the fence sitters.

Posted by: Snorkel at March 29, 2009 02:02 PM (E+7gr)

14 dare I say it.... *Booyah*

Posted by: Terry at March 29, 2009 02:03 PM (foKte)

15 I spelled it that way on purpose, someone!

I wanted to make sure you were paying attention.

Posted by: Jack M. at March 29, 2009 02:04 PM (eOEgY)

16 "...but it probably alienates a lot of the fence sitters."

Posted by: Snorkel at March 29, 2009 02:02 PM

Seems to me there were a lot of "fence sitters" who were not alienated by the fact that Barack Obama's entire political background is full of Communists, Marxists, Socialists, terrorists and racists. So, if those people are fine with that, yet alienated by Limbaugh, I say fuck 'em.

Posted by: Michael in MI at March 29, 2009 02:12 PM (rJ83z)

17 The goal isn't to agree with them, it's to make them understand why they should agree with us.

This needs to be tattooed on a lot of foreheads--reversed, so they can read it when they check their hair in the mirror.

Posted by: HeatherRadish at March 29, 2009 02:12 PM (WocgN)

18 I hereby nominate Andrew Klavin for this weeks "Slices Like a Hammer" award.

I hereby nominate Andrew Klavin for the head of the RNC.

Posted by: elliot m at March 29, 2009 02:19 PM (13Ugm)

19

Klavan has always been recognized as America's smartest mailman.

Because of what he wrote, however, he'll also prolly be the first to get laid off.

Posted by: Tinian at March 29, 2009 02:21 PM (Ohodx)

20 Yea, it is Klavan. The Rio Lindians spell it with an I.

Posted by: elliot m at March 29, 2009 02:21 PM (13Ugm)

"...Barack Obama's entire political background is full of Communists, Marxists, Socialists, terrorists and racists. So, if those people are fine with that, yet alienated by Limbaugh, I say fuck 'em."

With a fucking chainsaw, you forgot to add. Add that and you got a threadwinnah.

Posted by: sherlock at March 29, 2009 02:22 PM (L4jPh)

22 The other city mentioned by Rush is Port St. Lucie, Florida, to which thousands of folks moved from Palm Beach, Broward, and Dade to more affordable housing. Today, this bozo paradise has the national distinction of having more nonperforming mortgages than any other geographical area in the nation. Literally hundreds of deserted homes previously populated with zero down and no credit check folks who should have been renters. Well excuse me, they were fucking renter.

Posted by: Fish at March 29, 2009 02:30 PM (CG+cG)

23 "Yea, it is Klavan. The Rio Lindians spell it with an I."

I'm not a Rio Lindian! I'm a Yorba Lindian, as everyone who read the first draft knows.

Posted by: Jack M. at March 29, 2009 02:36 PM (eOEgY)

24 On The Suicidal Futility of "Appealing to the Middle"

Argumentum ad Temperantiam

Unlike many of our forbears, today we live in a broken world based on the erroneous notion that 2 + 2 = 5 .

Why?

Because we refuse to demand recognition of the fact that 2 + 2 = 4.

Instead we think it "noble" and "moderate" to compromise with pseudo-intellectual moral adolescents who feel they can change human nature so that 2 + 2 = 6.

When this stops we will have broken the historical cycle of civilizations' rise and fall.

Posted by: goy at March 29, 2009 02:40 PM (LbGQ5)

25 It's Port St Lucy (lucie?). And I love El Rushbo!

Posted by: African queen conservative at March 29, 2009 02:43 PM (8uiy8)

26
btw, anyone see the CNN interview with Michael Steele?

It was fucking awful. The man is not fit to chair the RNC.

Posted by: Darling, just an entertainer at March 29, 2009 02:43 PM (PXi/y)

27
Here's a taste of the interview with Steele.

Posted by: Darling, just an entertainer at March 29, 2009 02:46 PM (PXi/y)

The sad thing is no lib will take up the challenge.

Posted by: Iblis at March 29, 2009 02:53 PM (9221z)

29 Snorkel: "...but I think his delivery method sucks. I'm sure he does it to twist the Lib's tails but it probably alienates a lot of the fence sitters."

To the former, Limbaugh is one of the best communicators alive today. He cannot help it if those who demonize him reflexively do so by not listening to him and by accepting the spin (which will always exist) from political hacks and outsource their own thinking. To the latter, the fence sitters are looking to be led. By default they are not thinking for themselves but counting on others to explain in little words what they should believe.

This is the whole point of Klavan's challenge.

Limbaugh leads and those on the Right need to carry the banner, too. Lead because you know what you believe. Think for yourself. Keep your principles and never back down. The middle remains fickle, unpredictable, and generally ignorant. Their duty is to become informed though, by their nature, they won't until something personally dramatic induces them to seek an alternative. The Right's duty is to be there with their own foundation of experience, history, and knowledge and teach the strays who finally become aware of the world around them.

This is subtext to Klavan's challenge.

As soon as Frum, C. Buckley, the K. Parker, and Noonan chime in on Klavan, we'll have heard from the exceptions that prove the rule.

Posted by: AnonymousDrivel at March 29, 2009 02:55 PM (swuwV)

30
Here's what Steele gives us. This is from CNN this weekend. Notice the panderer from the Florida Republican Party being a pussy next to the moonbat slandering us.

Posted by: Darling, just an entertainer at March 29, 2009 02:55 PM (PXi/y)

Good on Klavan!

Take-no-prisoners, if your not with us your against us, and fuck 'em if they can't take a joke.

Posted by: ErikW at March 29, 2009 03:06 PM (hKtiw)

32 I listened to Rush back when he was telling us not to vote for John McCain.

Talk about political clout!

Posted by: andros at March 29, 2009 03:09 PM (k39jK)

33 You say 2+2=5, I say 2+2=4. Let us reach across the aisle and agree to a compromise of 2+2=4.71 (which the conference committee will revise to 5 anyway, plus an automatic annual COLA).

Posted by: lmg at March 29, 2009 03:10 PM (A/vgC)

34 #27 - that sounded pretty good to me.

Posted by: lmg at March 29, 2009 03:15 PM (A/vgC)

35
You never listened to Rush, andros. And you're a perfect example of the turd being described in the editorial. You know nothing about Rush Limbaugh or Conservatism other than what your leftwing masters told you.

Posted by: Darling, just an entertainer at March 29, 2009 03:15 PM (PXi/y)

36 Hey, Darling,

I listen to Rush all the time!

Let's see... 5 minutes of bloviating followed by 10 minutes of ads for Gold Bond powder and "patriotic" knick knacks?

Rinse and repeat for 3 hours?

Posted by: andros at March 29, 2009 03:18 PM (k39jK)

37 Meh. Rush has that visual stigmata of the aging process. We have those toned arms. So there.
Only time will tell if her workout habits influence the culture.

Posted by: sickinmass at March 29, 2009 03:19 PM (/i4dU)

38
wow yeah that's exactly right, andros. You proved me wrong, you are a regular listener of Rush's.

Don't forget he's a druggie, too, andros.

Posted by: Darling, just an entertainer at March 29, 2009 03:20 PM (PXi/y)

39 sarc/off

Posted by: sickinmass at March 29, 2009 03:20 PM (/i4dU)

40 I generally agree with Limbaugh's message, but I think his delivery method sucks. I'm sure he does it to twist the Lib's tails but it probably alienates a lot of the fence sitters.

Yeah, all those fence sitters that put their willful ignorance on display, by studiously making sure they didn't look at what Teleprompter Jesus was really about.

And by fence sitters I mean moderates.

And by moderates I mean fucking spineless assholes.

Posted by: UncleFacts at March 29, 2009 03:22 PM (M+Vfm)

41
lmg, my problem with Steele in that interview is that he sounds like a chick-teenager and not very professional. Also, he still hasn't learned that he needs to delfect these idiotic personal irrelevant questions and use the opportunity to put some fucking knowledge on his interviewer on what it is to be a Conservative Republican.

_{holy shit Uof L is going to lose to fucking Michigan State}

Posted by: Darling, just an entertainer at March 29, 2009 03:24 PM (PXi/y)

Damn, I haven't watched CNN in a long time, so that was some surprising and ridiculous shit there.
"Do you think MLK would be proud of you, Michael Steele?"

Wow. If this network is any indication of how the majority of people feel out there, we are fucked with a garden weasel.

Posted by: gator at March 29, 2009 03:25 PM (yUiO3)

43 I generally agree with Limbaugh's message, but I think his delivery method sucks. I'm sure he does it to twist the Lib's tails but it probably alienates a lot of the fence sitters.

They sit on the fence so they can easily jump away from a fight. The squishy moderate is always the first to run away, the first to stab you in the back, the first to rat you out.

Posted by: kbdabear at March 29, 2009 03:25 PM (miw86)

44 I'm sure he does it to twist the Lib's tails but it probably alienates a lot of the fence sitters.

And I'm sure that the Libs also tend to alienate some of these fence sitters as well. How could they not, with their sanctimony and bile? So, you win some, you lose some on that score.

At some point though, is it not worth it to make fence-sitting as uncomfortable as possible? Some of these types seem to be insisting that they be fed nothing but lie after pleasant (albeit implausible) sounding lie, in order to flatter their self image. Whose aims does that kind of tactic serve, do you think?

I think that Klavan hits the nail on the head when he calls these "moderates" on their self-deception. "You're not tolerant of a wide range of views; you are tolerant of a narrow spectrum of variations on your views."

There is nothing that threatens the self image of these soi-disant stylites than to be called less than informed, to let them know that no, in fact, you have not arrived at any particular position due to the superior exercise of reason with your oh, so flexible, and wide ranging intellect.

When the default position of "the moderate" is in truth to aid and abet the growth of an ever more intrusive and coercive state, it is time to stop legitimizing such sentiments as, "Well, the trains are more punctual this way, and that's a good thing.", merely to spare the fence-sitter some discomfort.

I understand that Limbaugh is not everyone's cup of tea but there's no getting around the fact that no matter who or how delivered, the gadfly's sting will hurt. It's supposed to.

Posted by: some fucking headhunting jungle tribesman at March 29, 2009 03:30 PM (1jglO)

45 Stupid headhunting sock puppet.

Posted by: Deety at March 29, 2009 03:30 PM (1jglO)

46
>Don't, forget, he's, a, druggie, too, andros.

There. andros will understand your point better now, Darling.

Posted by: sickinmass at March 29, 2009 03:31 PM (/i4dU)

47 "Do you think MLK would be proud of you, Michael Steele?"

That right there illustrates just how deliberate CNN remains to sticking to the middle all non-partisan like.

Did the CNN talking head next ask, "So, when did you stop beating your wife?"

Posted by: AnonymousDrivel at March 29, 2009 03:32 PM (swuwV)

48 In that same Steele interview, didn't he also say that he caused that whole Limbaugh-apology ruckus on purpose? I believe his words were, "just to see where everyone stands"

I don't know if he's nuts or what. This is not the Michael Steele I knew from Hannity & Colmes.

Posted by: yambles at March 29, 2009 03:35 PM (PLAPA)

No, the little bitch then asks, "How does it feel to be on the wrong side of history?"
You know, you were wrong for voting against a black man because he's black and shit. Who cares if he is an undercover Marxist and hangs out with Nicole Brown Simpson's severed head?

I wonder what it's like to see everything through the prism of race. Must be extremely limiting.

Posted by: gator at March 29, 2009 03:36 PM (yUiO3)

50
They might as well ask, "Are you an Uncle Tom?"

Posted by: Darling, just an entertainer at March 29, 2009 03:36 PM (PXi/y)

Wow. If this network is any indication of how the majority of people feel out there, we are fucked with a garden weasel.

CNN is falling in ratings, currently about the same as MSNBC.

No worries, gator. We are less fucked than we were yesterday!

Posted by: ErikW at March 29, 2009 03:38 PM (hKtiw)

52 This is one of the most delicious outbursts I've read in a long time. Right on the money, and wonderfully cathartic to boot. Good on you, Mr. Klavan!

I'll be in my bunk.

Posted by: Tungsten Monk at March 29, 2009 03:38 PM (EEfsw)

53
What is 'the right side' of history, Americans are sick of Whitey's shit?

Posted by: Darling, just an entertainer at March 29, 2009 03:39 PM (PXi/y)

54 Next week:

Hear from liberals who took the bait.

I'm sure this group of listeners will be as random as the questioners at totus's town hall meetings.

Andros, get in line, your chance to be heard by a more moderate audience is calling

Posted by: OneEyedJack at March 29, 2009 03:40 PM (OtvQO)

55 "No, the little bitch then asks, 'How does it feel to be on the wrong side of history?'"

In conclusion CNN evolves into, if not remaining what it has been for years, a parody. Apparently, they still won't report the truth unless Saddam Hussein gives them the facts. But since that crutch is gone, what's their excuse now? That's right... they're the same team we thought they were^{TM (Dennis Green)}.

Posted by: AnonymousDrivel at March 29, 2009 03:48 PM (swuwV)

Less fucked with a garden weasel is somehow...um...uncomforting, but I hope you are right, ErikW. I really hope you are right.
Some other hard-hitting questions:
Get the herpes under control yet? Can you ride a bike now?
Still fucking animals?
House negro, does the massah let you chew his leftover gum?
How's the scat fetish going?

Posted by: gator at March 29, 2009 03:49 PM (yUiO3)

57 Oh, and andros George, shut the fuck up and get me a refill on this coffee.

I gotta say, this used to be a pretty good joint - cheap, good eats, large menu - 'till the bus boys started calling themselves "political scientists". Now the quality is for shit.

If you can't master the complicated vector calculus it must take to be a "political scientist" (heee, can't help it, that phrase just cracks my ass up) just concentrate on the moussaka would'ja?

Posted by: Deety at March 29, 2009 03:49 PM (1jglO)

58
Why doesn't it ever occur to our moderate pussies in the GOP that they are either agreeing with or taking the advice of our political enemies?

Listening to turds like Kathleen Parker, Allahpussy, and andros is like like Londerners following the advice of Hitler and leaving their lights on at night.

Even Hitler wasn't so stupid to suggest such a thing because he knew no one in London would listen to him. But the assholes in our party bend over backwards to listen to and please their political enemies.

Andros is not here to tell us how to win over fence-sitters. Andros wants to destroy his political enemies, not help us win. So if andros says Rush is bad for the GOP you can bet your life that Rush is very good for the GOP. Got that, Allahpussy?

Posted by: Darling, just an entertainer at March 29, 2009 03:50 PM (PXi/y)

59
Yowsah, yowsah, yowsah! Three bags full!

Posted by: Dang at March 29, 2009 03:50 PM (0kuJD)

60 I just want to win national elections again, Darling.

I think Rush Limbaugh costs us votes.

Posted by: andros at March 29, 2009 03:54 PM (k39jK)

61
CNN invites moonbats on segments where they discuss how the RNC should move forward? WTF???

They pull this shit all the time. All the networks do it. They invite a RINO and a moonbat to discuss the GOP.

Rick Sanchez is the biggest cocksucker of them all. Sanchez likes to quote Andrew cocksucker Sullivan as "a Republican" when Sullivan slams the GOP, which is all the fucking time because Sullivan is a cockcusking moonbat.

Posted by: Darling, just an entertainer at March 29, 2009 03:56 PM (PXi/y)

After reading the Klavan op-ed, be sure to check out other informative LA Times editorials like:

Michelle Obama's toned arms are debated. How Buff is too buff?

http://tinyurl.com/ch87t5

Posted by: adolfo_velasquez at March 29, 2009 03:58 PM (czRZm)

63
I just want the Democrats to win national elections again and again and again...

fixed, andros, for truth

Posted by: Darling, just an entertainer at March 29, 2009 03:58 PM (PXi/y)

64 This is the kind of argument we need to be making. See, it works both ways in our favour. It leaves the liberals a small window for them to snivel through. They either admit they haven't heard him, retort by saying they don't listen because he is racist, hateful or whatever, in which case he proves the author right, or they insist they have heard him at which point, they're going to have to find a decent argument.

Posted by: Ring at March 29, 2009 03:58 PM (FPnM5)

65 andros, prove it. You can't prove that Rush costs the GOP votes. I think it's just the opposite, he GETS the GOP votes. Rush is more popular than Nancy Pelosi - does she cost the Dems votes? Does Al "fuck you rong time" Franken cost the Dems votes?

Rush is like our Peyton Manning. You are like a 4th string special teams' linebacker who gets one snap a game, but of course you know what's best for the team don't you? Sit down, shut up and let the Hall of Famers handle the game.

Posted by: yambles at March 29, 2009 04:01 PM (PLAPA)

66 *tap-tap-tapping on the diner table*

Still waiting on that coffee George.

I think Rush Limbaugh costs "us" votes.

No doubt.

Posted by: Deety at March 29, 2009 04:01 PM (1jglO)

67 25 It's Port St Lucy (lucie?). And I love El Rushbo! Posted by: African queen conservative

No it's Port St. Lucie. Fish (22) was right.

http://www.cityofpsl.com/

Posted by: sis at March 29, 2009 04:04 PM (hm0CN)

68 60 I just want to win national elections again, Darling.

I think Rush Limbaugh costs us votes.

What the fuck is this "US" shit, you spineless fucking cunt?

I seem to recall telling your ass to go choke down a bowl of poison.

Posted by: UncleFacts at March 29, 2009 04:06 PM (M+Vfm)

Frankly, I don't know why Michelle's toned arms are so controversial. It takes a lot of upper body strength to stab a gin'tak all the way through a wild targ.

Posted by: adolfo_velasquez at March 29, 2009 04:08 PM (czRZm)

70 Maybe Ace should take the challenge.

Posted by: Sir Elliot at March 29, 2009 04:11 PM (DUNS7)

71 The fence sitters (AKA people who never actually vote Republican but pretend they are "free thinkers") are not the voters we want. They can go fuck themselves.

If Juan McCain, Mr. Amnesty Incarnate, the Best Friend Of The New York Times, won't motivate them to vote for the Democratic-Lite party, nothing will.

We have to recognize that the strategy of play to the bitchy center is a waste of time, because compromising values and principles is the policy of the DEMOCRATIC PARTY. Once we compromise our values and principles for political expediency, the Democrats have immediately won.

America, presented with authentic Conservative values, principles, and policies always votes conservative. Then we put belt-way assclowns incharge of the party, and they decide that Conservatism no longer works, so let's give up what actually won as elections and use what loses us elections.

It's baffling.

Posted by: Sir Elliot at March 29, 2009 04:16 PM (DUNS7)

72 I'm on a roll, so I'm just going to keep on going.

Giving into the Democratic-Lite position of "Let's pretend that nothing is wrong and not say bad things about anyone" is part of the problem. If our party's leadership simply bothered publicly calling shennanigans on the Democrats a lot of the shit that happens wouldn't happen.

Instead our congressional leadership "doesn't want to make waves" by filing ethics complaints against the Dems for their obvious near-bribe-experiences. Our Congressional leadership doesn't want to "cause trouble" by pointing out the insane level of media bias, especially in party affiliation reporting.

If our leadership would just adopt some of the tactics of Limbaugh-- that is, calling a spade a spade and calling out obvious bullshit when it is both obvious and bullshit, it would go a long way towards fixing our problems. But none of this will ever happen until the Republican Paty is a conservative party. As long as we act like Democrats we will never challenge the democrats.

And for those reasons, the folks that say Rush and his tactics are costing us votes, are absolutely full of absolutely shit. The minute even 1 conservative principle is abandoned, we have become Democrats, and the Democrats have won.

The only hope of electoral victory Republicans have is in Rush and his tactics.

Posted by: Sir Elliot at March 29, 2009 04:23 PM (DUNS7)

73 andros: "I think Rush Limbaugh costs us votes."

Ahahaha.

Define "us." The AoSHQ is pretty far Right - open to debate, of course - but cuts through the BS like a hammer whatever the ideology. If you are "us," which is to say conservative, what's with your beef of Limbaugh? Limbaugh is one of us (conservative). Espousing conservative thought is hurting us and conservatism? Bull. Shit. Unless you're them.

Limbaugh is conservative. The vast majority of commenters here are conservative. At best, you're a moby. At worst, Axelrod is your uncle and paymaster. Sure, we'd (and by we'd, I mean you'd) like to bottle him up to isolate him just like Alinsky et al. instruct, but that really hasn't worked out so well for the Right. The rest of the country is now discovering that painful truth, too.

I hope Limbaugh continues to cost "us" votes.

Posted by: AnonymousDrivel at March 29, 2009 04:26 PM (swuwV)

74 Well, I don't think Rush really matters these days.

The "base" seems determined to prop up some loser like Palin or Jindal for the slaughter in 2012.

Might as well let porky lead the party for the next four years.

What do we have to lose?

Posted by: andros at March 29, 2009 04:30 PM (k39jK)

75
They can go fuck themselves.

Agreed. With a chainsaw.

If Juan McCain...won't motivate them to vote for the Democratic-Lite party, nothing will.

So true. If anything, 2008 taught us that running a moderate is not the way to go. Yet, some in the GOP think we didn't go moderate enough. Fuck them, too. And, please no more fucking stupid advice from Libertarians. The Libertarians that actually do go out and vote, vote for the loony Libertarian candidate. Always. All the time. So fuck the Libertarians, too.

Once we compromise our values and principles for political expediency, the Democrats have immediately won.

More like false political expediency.

Posted by: Darling, just an entertainer at March 29, 2009 04:32 PM (PXi/y)

76
The only reason Rush costs conservatives votes is when they back off and apologize, thereby outing themselves as unreliable moderates.

Been visiting Booker Rising, a Black Conservative site. Commentary there is that they are watching to see how Steele is handled. They recognize that he is in over his head, but are distrustful that he will be treated fairly.

Posted by: extremism in the defense of liberty is no vice at March 29, 2009 04:34 PM (zSPR8)

77 andros, you are as transparent as Saran Wrap.

When you are honest with us, then maybe the things you say will be important.

Until then, amuse us some more.

Posted by: eman at March 29, 2009 04:38 PM (RkZLl)

78 Rush Limbaugh determines nothing in the next election or 2012.
It unfortunately comes down to the candidates and even worse, the RNC- currently led by squishes and cowards.
If we win, it will be because Obama has been an unmitigated disaster.
The trolls and leftists hammering Limbaugh are people addicted to hated of the other side so any target of notoriety will do.

P.S. andros- you smell like a fake little Republican

Posted by: jjshaka at March 29, 2009 04:41 PM (Blb0x)

79

*fuming*

Dammit, what does it take to get some fucking coffee around here?

No, he doesn't give a shit about a lousy tip. His dad owns the place, he's just filling in to help out, otherwise he thinks this is beneath him.

"What do we have to lose?" That just about sums up his attitude.

Good thing he got his degree in teaching from the community college, because no way is his pop doesn't leave this to his brother instead of him.

Posted by: Deety at March 29, 2009 04:44 PM (1jglO)

80
Well, I don't think Rush really matters these days.

Of course not. That's why, several times now, you've offered your advice to ditch Rush for the good of the GOP.

And you're not alone. Even Obama is advising his political enemies to ditch Rush.If Rush was irrelevant, like, say, Cindy Sheehan, why are so many leftwingers so concerned for the Republican party?

Posted by: Darling, just an entertainer at March 29, 2009 04:44 PM (PXi/y)

81 andros: "Well, I don't think Rush really matters these days..."

That would, of course, explain the significant increase in his audience that just happened and is continuing. Because he doesn't matter. No, his plastering a Democrat operative scheme originating at the highest levels of the TOTUS while increasing public attention and infusing the Right with the ammo and righteousness to fight is just the kind of inconsequential exposure no one notices.

And, of course, the conservatives, i.e. the proverbial "we," are just itching to attribute the terms "loser" and "slaughter" with the non-sequiter of Palin and Jindal plus the extra flavoring of ad hominizing "porky."

You really need to work on your transparency which is to say don't make it quite so clear. You've become the Special Olympics (thank you, TOTUS) of New York Times crossword puzzles.

Posted by: AnonymousDrivel at March 29, 2009 04:45 PM (swuwV)

82
We lost North Carolina and Indiana. If running a moderate broadens our tent, tell me how the fuck we lost two red states like NC and IN?

We should have won blue states if the formula for winning was a shift to the center, right? The fact is that moving towards the center, which just so happens to also be moving away from Rush Limbaugh's brand of Conservatism, cost us votes and, I believe, cost us the election to Obama.

Posted by: Darling, just an entertainer at March 29, 2009 04:53 PM (PXi/y)

83
Oh, that's right. I forgot. Because of Gov Palin being on the ticket, right, andros?

That's why McCain led in the polls after the convention, right, andros, you donkey?

Posted by: Darling, just an entertainer at March 29, 2009 04:55 PM (PXi/y)

84 Darling,

I think if we want a shot at winning in 2012, of course we should dump porky and all the hat he stands for and come up with a platform that actually appeals to Americans everywhere.

But few Republicans seem interested in winning elections anymore.

Better to be "right" than elected, I guess.

Posted by: andros at March 29, 2009 04:58 PM (k39jK)

Moving to the center, appeasing maderates makes conservatives stay home. I voted for McCain, but with trepidation. I hated 70% of his platform, and yes, he was donk-lite. .......'10-'12 is ours to lose. We need a fire breather, not a squeakholer.

And Steele has got to go. The assholes that will call it "racist" are not our voters anyway.

Posted by: barry1200 at March 29, 2009 05:02 PM (mgoDa)

86
So being wrong, or half-wrong, is a strategy for winning?

...a platform that actually appeals to Americans everywhere.

Okay, list at least 5 things for a new and improved Republican party platform that will appeal to Americans everywhere. Be specific. And if "ditching porky" is one of them, go fuck yourself.

Posted by: Darling, just an entertainer at March 29, 2009 05:03 PM (PXi/y)

87 I started this blog back in 2004 under the nickname Andros. I'm a liberal, a secular humanist...

http://liberalcitizen.blogspot.com/

The conservatives have turned into a party of "no." Nothing new to offer, if anything at all. They hope that their best chance is for Obama and the Congressional Dems to fail or be corrupted by power for the GOP to return to relevancy. That might happen, but let's hope that the country doesn't have a short memory syndrome. The huge mess we're experiencing is the result of Republican policies and conservative ideology. It hasn't been only their incompetence that reduced our country by most meaningful measures!

Posted by Andros on 3/17/2009

The Economy. Self-regulating unbridled capitalism leads to its own demise. Somebody has to be at the wheel watching the road.

Democrats come the closest to my ideology, my views, my aspirations, and the vision for the future. Clinton (and his Democratic Leadership Council) was too conservative, but I understood the big difference between Clinton and any Repub. So, I was elated he won.

Posted by Andros on 10/16/2008

Can we say "Your Full of Shit?"

Thought so!

Posted by: Travis at March 29, 2009 05:03 PM (QDPm/)

88
Wait.

So andros is not really a Mark Sanford for President in 2012 supporter???

Posted by: Darling, just an entertainer at March 29, 2009 05:07 PM (PXi/y)

89 Martin Luther King was a Republican, just like Abraham Lincoln. Liberals hate that, did Steele remember to remind him? And yes, CNN is an extremely liberal outfit that is shilling for one side.

If Steele forgot to do his job and let liberals tell history their way as they like to do, here's a good history on the subject of why MLK was a God-fearing Republican.

End of slavery, fighting Jim Crow, starting NAACP, starting black universities, all Republican.

How were Democrats treating King?

President Kennedy, through his brother Atty. Gen. Robert Kennedy, had Dr. King wiretapped and investigated by the FBI on suspicion of being a Communist in order to undermine Dr. King.

http://www.humanevents.com/article.php?id=16500

Posted by: Steele's Talking Points Memo at March 29, 2009 05:10 PM (hm0CN)

Why the hell would we want to broaden the tent? And, making it about diversity is about the most racist thing we can do....pandering like that should be beneath an intelligent conservative party. We should simply try to attract the people who understand the concepts of self-determination and limited government, regardless of any physical characteristic. UNFORTUNATELY, the public school system has brain fucked generations of people into believing this is a bad country and certain groups are owed a nice living because of their victim status. That would be everyone but you, cracker ass cracker.

The demographics are getting us, and the politicians know this. They are pandering because they can see the data, the writing on the wall, and they know their goose is cooked if they don't pander to the liberal tenets of victimization and diversity.

Maybe we're not fucked, but we are dry raped a little bit.

Posted by: gator at March 29, 2009 05:16 PM (yUiO3)

91 Mark Sanford is my choice, Darling.

If he can get South Carolina's unemployment rate a little lower than Michigan's, that is.

Otherwise, he'll be as dead in the water as Palin is now.

Posted by: andros at March 29, 2009 05:17 PM (k39jK)

92
I noticed you didn't give me 5 ways to improve the Republican party platform, andros. Why not?

Posted by: Darling, just an entertainer at March 29, 2009 05:20 PM (PXi/y)

93 One of us should go to where Andros works and tell him off. Does anyone here live near a Jersey Turnpike Men's Room?

Posted by: V the K at March 29, 2009 05:21 PM (d2fuu)

94 So andros is not really a Mark Sanford for President in 2012 supporter???

No, George is a super-smart "political scientist".

That's why he is such an effective astro-turfer.

A potent combination of perspicacity, erudition, and subtlety of mind renders him virtually undetectable by less "enlightened" morons like you or I.

But for the blazing luminosity of his insight, which cannot be hid by the bushel basket of false modesty, I seriously doubt that any one of us would have had an inkling that he may not be arguing in good faith.

That's our George, delivering the benighted from their stygian caves since 2004!

Posted by: Deety at March 29, 2009 05:22 PM (1jglO)

No worries, gator. We are less fucked than we were yesterday!

Whew.

Posted by: Garden Weasel at March 29, 2009 05:24 PM (X6Zdh)

96 Instead our congressional leadership "doesn't want to make waves" by filing ethics complaints against the Dems for their obvious near-bribe-experiences. Our Congressional leadership doesn't want to "cause trouble" by pointing out the insane level of media bias, especially in party affiliation reporting.

____

Not showing the media bias, and challenging them about it on their stations is insane and gop candidates will lose if something isn't said quickly. It's got to be done right away because the media got worse than ever last time, and purposely affected the last election worse than ever before.

This one is driving me nuts.   Until Conservatives go out every day, and show the data that 9 out of 10 journalists who donated money the last election cycle gave to the Democrats and yet admitted no bias, in fact pretended to be neutral, a lot of people I know won't believe it's happening.

Republicans have to make this an issue pronto.   Facts, figures, it's all out there but outside the blogosphere and Conservative circles the general public REALLY doesn't know. I talk to them, they won't know until Republicans start making it an issue, loudly.

Nobody likes the press, they're the first that should be taken on.

Posted by: Sane Person at March 29, 2009 05:25 PM (hm0CN)

97 That's our George, delivering the benighted from their stygian caves since 2004!

Well Deety, I feel safer just knowing he's here!

If only we had listened to him and gone with someone more liberal than John McCain! Just who could possibly be more liberal than John is something I cannot imagine, but then that just proves why we need Andros!

Posted by: Travis at March 29, 2009 05:27 PM (QDPm/)

98 andros has successfully diverted the comments from the Limbaugh challenge to talking about andros and other distractions.

If Rush gets 10 million new listeners and converts 50% to the Dark Side, the Lib Empire could collapse.

They now recognize their error in picking a fight with Rush. andros is here to do damage control and steer all talk away from direct discussion of Rush and what his support means for elections in 2010 and 2012.

Posted by: eman at March 29, 2009 05:29 PM (RkZLl)

99
Chuck Hagel in 2012!

right, andros?

Posted by: Darling, just an entertainer at March 29, 2009 05:29 PM (PXi/y)

100

Rush has more common sense in his middle finger than Obama

has in his entire "glorious, naked body".

Posted by: grizzly bare at March 29, 2009 05:30 PM (8+zL9)

101
Well, I'm hoping some of our more moderate readers and people like Allahpussy, JeffB, and Kathleen Parker can learn from andros' deception and realize Rush/Palin/Jindal are not the problem, the Democrats are the problem.

Posted by: Darling, just an entertainer at March 29, 2009 05:31 PM (PXi/y)

102 @96 Sane Person

I talk to them, they won't know until Republicans start making it an issue, loudly.

It doesn't matter. Truth cannot beat lies.

The reason our entertainment culture is so replete with examples of liars getting their comeuppance in the face of the truth is because it happens so rarely that it satisfies our sense of irony.

I admire you for trying, and I will do what little I can in real life, but barring a collapse and a ruthless housecleaning, things will continue to slide in the collectivist direction.

Posted by: MikeO at March 29, 2009 05:34 PM (4sSHg)

103 Sweet! We have a brand new troll!

Posted by: kal at March 29, 2009 05:34 PM (wfSxc)

104 OT and found in Politico via Hot Air:

"The Obama administration asked Rick Wagoner, the chairman and CEO of General Motors, to step down and he agreed, a White House official said."

Posted by: eman at March 29, 2009 05:34 PM (RkZLl)

105

Electoral college has us boned hard, too. Cali and NY are forever blue. Florida is iffy and, hell, Texas is changing rapidly.

Posted by: gator at March 29, 2009 05:35 PM (yUiO3)

106 @102 self

Crap. I meant our "cultural entertainment."

Sorry about that.

Posted by: MikeO at March 29, 2009 05:35 PM (4sSHg)

107
wow Obama's wasting no time at all acting like the fascist dictator Hugo Chavez.

Posted by: Darling, just an entertainer at March 29, 2009 05:39 PM (PXi/y)

108 Gator

That talk about "demographics" in their favor is pure liberal mind-control talking points Tokyo Rose bullshit.

They won't admit Bobby Jindal, and Sarah Palin (Steele too) represent the very diversity they love to wax poetic about, being that they count women as "minorities" too when women are 51% of the population. It's all a scam.

Hispanics and Asians from India to China (family and business oriented), African American business owners and professionals have Conservative values and all that needs to happen is for them to hear what the GOP stands for loudly and often.

This "the Demographics are made for Democrats" bullshit is just a media talking point. They're trying to keep repeating it until it becomes a self-fulfilling prophesy. Don't let it.

I thought you all listened to Rush Limbaugh. LOL Seriously, media doesn't want people to know Rush Limbaugh's been championing "diversity" through Palin and Jindal for awhile.

Keep spouting principles, and pointing out the radical leftwing socialist shift taken by Dems. People aren't born into the Communist Party in this country, and for most of them they and their ancestors didn't come here for the Communism.

Posted by: Sane Person at March 29, 2009 05:41 PM (hm0CN)

109 I'd like to see a graphic consisting of of letters cut from the New York Times arranged to state "I read this much of the the New York Times" in ransom-note style so that we can show in a single image what's being done to El Rushbo by Saul Alinski's acolytes on Pennsylvania Avenue.

And do similar graphics for each of the mainstream media outlets.

If I were the Great One I would wait until just before sweeps and incorporate the ransom note into a "Take the Limbaugh Challenge" advertising campaign.

Posted by: Steve Poling at March 29, 2009 05:46 PM (UWHTf)

110

I'm with you, man, I am. I won't give up the good fight. But, it is depressing to me that 60 some odd million people voted for teh One. Pure socialism, punish the evil rich to help the righteous poor.
I'm not worried about demographics per se, but I am worried about having no opposition to the libs with the Republicans. They are trying to outlib the libs, and it is sad to watch. I pray you are right and we can right this ship.

The demographics are on their side, though.

Posted by: gator at March 29, 2009 05:46 PM (yUiO3)

111 The truth is liberals would assume any immigrant from Italy or eastern Europe at the turn of the last century would be an automatic liberal, too.

The hard truth is this: most immigrants have to work their asses off to get ahead, and hate taxes more than anyone. And they come to America not so much for the money, but for the freedom, the stability, the respect for human rights, the opportunities she offers... I honestly believe the typical immigrant, of whatever background, typically values this country FAR more than the average liberal.

Posted by: CoolCzech at March 29, 2009 05:47 PM (iafWn)

112 Especially after Obambi gives everyone citizenship....

Posted by: gator at March 29, 2009 05:49 PM (yUiO3)

113 @105 gator

Electoral college has us boned hard, too. Cali and NY are forever blue. Florida is iffy and, hell, Texas is changing rapidly.

It's the urbanites that will destroy us. Something about living under and on top of your neighbors that leads naturally to collectivism. The underclass want handouts. The elites want to make handouts. The middle class goes along with the appeasement in hopes of being eaten last.

The one bright spot is that Dinkins made Giuliani possible, but NYC had to go through hell before they were ready for Rudy.

If the non-left wants to reclaim or even just to preserve what remains of America, we are going to have to get off the fence and embrace class warfare.

While I do believe that each man is born with some intrinsic value, how he chooses to conduct his life can more than offset that value.

Posted by: MikeO at March 29, 2009 05:49 PM (4sSHg)

114 "This "the Demographics are made for Democrats" bullshit is just a media talking point. They're trying to keep repeating it until it becomes a self-fulfilling prophesy. Don't let it."

True. The problem is, the "demographics" have forgotten the true pain of retarded leadership in the form of our bowling President, san fran and reid, due to 30 years of great prosperity. That's how they find these caustic ideas palatable.

And the media, along with axeljerk, will do anything to prevent their man from becoming a carter redux. I don't think carter had cultists, either, which is all the more troubling.

Posted by: kal at March 29, 2009 05:50 PM (wfSxc)

115 @110 gator

But, it is depressing to me that 60 some odd million people voted for teh One.

I know I'm all over the map on my postings here, but one encouraging thing is that there are plenty of otherwise reasonable boomers and older whose programming made them obligated to vote for the first major-party black candidate for POTUS.

Remember, it was President Nixon who first floated the idea of affirmative action.

Posted by: MikeO at March 29, 2009 05:55 PM (4sSHg)

116 I'm with you, man, I am. I won't give up the good fight. But, it is depressing to me that 60 some odd million people voted for teh One. Pure socialism, punish the evil rich to help the righteous poor.

Yes, that is what Obama stands for... but I think most people that voted for him were more motivated by war weariness, exacerbated by the liberal temper tantrum over Bush all those years. If Bush had just communicated with the country better, defended himself, let the people know what he was up to and why it was necessary... things might have been different. We just didn't sell ourselves well enough, and let far more aggressive Democrats steal the ball.

But you know what? What Obama is trying to do to this country will scare the bejesus out of everyone. It would take true Republican incompetence not to pick up considerable numbers of seats in 2010... and if inflation soars, Democrats will relive 1980 all over again in 2012.

Posted by: CoolCzech at March 29, 2009 05:56 PM (iafWn)

117

I'm just looking to the future a little bit. Imagine what the ACORN folk are going to do to the census. Imagine what amnesty will do for the voter rolls. Imagine a huge portion of America growing accustomed to handouts. What are the chances they are ever going to vote for someone promising to cut those benefits in any way? Population is becoming more and more centered in our liberal urban centers. Check out who's having the babies these days. If we want an honest conversation about race, that is.

The trends worry me, that's all I'm saying.

Posted by: gator at March 29, 2009 05:58 PM (yUiO3)

118 Posted by: Travis at March 29, 2009 05:03 PM (QDPm/)

You Outed the little bastard. And the DLC (moderate Dems) are not even his cup of commie tea.

He's received his training at Daily Kos, the site out to radicalize the Democrats even further every day, and make their moderate DLC a dirty word.
_______________

Come on you guys........

Here's my favorite quote I saw on a business site.

"When a Conservative fails, they dust them selves off, and try something different. When a Liberal fails, they flail around yelling the system is against me."

Dust yourselves off, Conservatives, this isn't a time to go liberal, the Electoral College and Demographics are against me. They're not. Marketing a good product to people who are about to tire of Brand Lenin is doable.

We're never, ever, ever giving up on freedom. No matter how many election cycles it takes to get it right. This is America, it's still America, it will remain America.

Posted by: Sane Person at March 29, 2009 05:58 PM (hm0CN)

119

CoolCzech, I hope you are right, but it isn't the 80's anymore. I'd be willing to put up with stagflation for a long time for a return to sane fiscal and foreign policy. Let's just hope our enemies aren't emboldened by the limp-wrister in the big house, and we make it through his term(s) moderately unscathed.

Posted by: gator at March 29, 2009 06:02 PM (yUiO3)

120 Actually it was Deety who posted the link for "George". Yeah, he is one of Axelrod's butt boys.

Posted by: Travis at March 29, 2009 06:03 PM (QDPm/)

121 "If Rush gets 10 million new listeners"

That would be a neat trick, eman, considering he only has a couple million now.

About the same as Bill O'Reilly gets each day.

Posted by: andros at March 29, 2009 06:04 PM (k39jK)

122 BREAKING:

0bama just fired the CEO of a private corporation (General Motors). And the leftists are cheering this frightening march towards fascism.

PREDICTION:

By 2011, President-For-Life Barack 0bama will be euthanizing everyone over the age of 65 in order to reduce the budget deficit, overpopulation, and our "carbon footprint," and the left-wing drones will still be cheering him on with their mouths full of "organic" Soylent Green they bought with their EBT cards at the nationalized and unionized Wal-Mart that they traveled to on their electric moped.

WE. ARE. SO. FUCKED!

Posted by: CFTW at March 29, 2009 06:07 PM (f2/ya)

123 Regarding 121, anybody hear that? It's some sort of annoying buzzing sound.

Posted by: eman at March 29, 2009 06:08 PM (RkZLl)

124 121 "If Rush gets 10 million new listeners"

That would be a neat trick, eman, considering he only has a couple million now.

About the same as Bill O'Reilly gets each day.

Hey asshole, if you're going to lie, at least attempt to do it convincingly.

Posted by: UncleFacts at March 29, 2009 06:09 PM (M+Vfm)

125
Still waiting for your advice on how to specifically improve the Republican party platform, andros.

Posted by: Darling, just an entertainer at March 29, 2009 06:10 PM (PXi/y)

126

I'll take my tampon out now and quit whining....I see I'm starting to sound like various douchenozzle trolls on this site. My bad.

I have great hope for this great nation that it is strong enough to survive a President like this and his followers.

Posted by: gator at March 29, 2009 06:12 PM (yUiO3)

127 @122 CFTW

Each radical fascist move TOTUS makes emboldens him to reach further on his next move.

I'm convinced we're going to a civilizational collapse before the Fourth of July.

Everyone has to ask himself this one simple question: Once order is lost, what form of order will we have when it returns? Will it be what we have now, or will it be Pol Pot's killing fields?

Posted by: MikeO at March 29, 2009 06:13 PM (4sSHg)

128 Well, Darling,

First, I think we need to admit America's economy will probably be booming by 2012, and the Republicans in Congress need to try to at least appear like they had something to do with it the recovery.

Posted by: andros at March 29, 2009 06:13 PM (k39jK)

129 @128 andros

. . . the Republicans in Congress need to try to at least appear like they had something to do with it the recovery.

Or, as B'rer Rabbit once said, "Please don't throw me in that briar patch!"

Posted by: MikeO at March 29, 2009 06:15 PM (4sSHg)

130 Imagine if the welfare payments don't go out in the inner cities. Riots, and, I know, I use to live there.
I think my pessimism stems from living in the 'hood in Cali too fucking long. It's not pretty, and that culture is spreading our across America.

Posted by: gator at March 29, 2009 06:16 PM (yUiO3)

131
ahhhh, yes, the new "geen economy" is gonna save us and bring everyone prosperity.

Painting schools and paying for health care for illegal aliens is gonna bring us prosperity.

And more government jobs will also be great for the economy.

Posted by: Darling, just an entertainer at March 29, 2009 06:17 PM (PXi/y)

132 128 Well, Darling,

First, I think we need to admit America's economy will probably be booming by 2012, and the Republicans in Congress need to try to at least appear like they had something to do with it the recovery.
Posted by: andros at March 29, 2009 06:13 PM (k39jK)

Oh, really? You mean, trillion dollar deficits as far as the eye can see, the Chinese bailing on American debt, runaway inflation aimed at devaluing the dollar to help pay off that debt, and the incredible rise in taxation Obama is talking about will "grow the economy," huh??

WHO'S economy, Red China's?

Posted by: CoolCzech at March 29, 2009 06:18 PM (iafWn)

133 My advice for Andros

Posted by: JavaJoe at March 29, 2009 06:19 PM (Am6n/)

134 @131: No, no, Darling, you got it all wrong:

Sitting in our living rooms with the lights out an hour at a time will save us. Don't you know anything?

Posted by: CoolCzech at March 29, 2009 06:19 PM (iafWn)

135 Alright, CoolCzech, you were talking me down off a bridge a few minutes ago. Now I'm going fetal again. You and your damned reality and facts.

Posted by: gator at March 29, 2009 06:19 PM (yUiO3)

136
If andros is right, the Specter, Snowe, and Collins will be sittin' pretty.

Of course it will take magic for the economy to be doing well in 2012 because Obama is doing exactly the opposite of what it takes to get out of a recession.

Posted by: Darling, just an entertainer at March 29, 2009 06:20 PM (PXi/y)

137
Is andros AoS' new Professor Science?

Posted by: Darling, just an entertainer at March 29, 2009 06:22 PM (PXi/y)

138 @130 gator

I live a little outside of D.C.

I can almost guarantee that the unrest is going to start in the cities. This administration is packed to the brim with idiots who have no idea of how day-to-day life happens. This is why they make the colossal fucking mistakes that they make.

Reactive targets cost money, and I have to drive a long way to get to a range that allows them.

Do you think I'll think twice about wasting the opportunity of a steady stream of free reactive targets coming out of that shithole on the Potomac?

Posted by: MikeO at March 29, 2009 06:23 PM (4sSHg)

139 Faggot ass andros is posting from Bellevue University just outside Seattle.

Just so you know...

But I'm sure he's a life long Republican.

Posted by: Warden at March 29, 2009 06:24 PM (KXbGD)

140

Sitting in our living rooms with the lights out an hour at a time will save us. Don't you know anything?

Al Gore obviously didn't get the memo.

Posted by: Andy at March 29, 2009 06:25 PM (B+HYX)

141 Darling,

Ever here of the business cycle?

There's already signs America's economy is on the mend.

I got back into the market back when the Dow hit 6500 a few weeks ago...so did a bunch of smart Republicans.

Posted by: andros at March 29, 2009 06:25 PM (k39jK)

142 Yorba Linda, California, home of the Nixon Library, I think.

As for the "moderation" issue.

Fuck moderation. The moderates get to be junior staff at the camps and go to the incinerators last after we've turned the liberals to air pollution. To quote GEN Steiner, the old SOCOM commander, "the only thing you find in the middle of the road is yellow paint and dead possums".

Mike Vanderboegh, one of the wisest men I have known, made the very well-reasoned argument that the political process has protected them from us a lot more than it has protected us from them.

Posted by: SGT Dan at March 29, 2009 06:28 PM (uetv9)

143
Millions of people in America are already fed up with Obama's incompetence and they want their voices heard in Washington.

This is why the Republicans need to hold weekly townhalls all over the country and let average Americans ask their politicians questions about what the hell is going on in Washington D.C.

I guaran-fucking-tee the videos would go viral. But the GOP is sitting on it's hands while Obama does what Bush shoulda been doing -- taking his case to the people.

Posted by: Darling, just an entertainer at March 29, 2009 06:29 PM (PXi/y)

144 141-

What do we have here? Is this the latest version of Tokyo Rose, courtesy of Move On and Acorn?

Posted by: WonderWartHog at March 29, 2009 06:29 PM (LVT6e)

145

Rush Limbaugh averages 20 million listeners.

Posted by: Dick_Nixon at March 29, 2009 06:31 PM (aE8Av)

146

This is why the Republicans need to hold weekly townhalls all over the country

Perhaps if they had some sort of organization to organize a coherent strategy. A National Committee of some sort, maybe.

Posted by: Andy at March 29, 2009 06:31 PM (B+HYX)

147
Ever here of the business cycle?

Yeah, I did.

Did you hear that Obama is going to put an end to it? Yeah, really. Obama said he's putting policies in place to "end the bubbles and busts of the economy."

Posted by: Darling, just an entertainer at March 29, 2009 06:32 PM (PXi/y)

148

Ever here (hear) of the business cycle?

There's (There are) already signs America's economy is on the mend.

So ... what are you studying there at Bellevue? English?

Posted by: Warden at March 29, 2009 06:33 PM (KXbGD)

149
And in case you need that translated, andros, it means Obama is going to institute communism.

And I find it laughable for you to sit there like a good lil' astroturfer and tout the stock market just like Obama did a few weeks ago when he saw his hopes of stealing another election in 2012 slipping away with the DJIA.

Posted by: Darling, just an entertainer at March 29, 2009 06:34 PM (PXi/y)

150 I think Andros is a old troll from RightWingNews that seems to have washed up over here. Damned shame.

Posted by: Dick_Nixon at March 29, 2009 06:34 PM (aE8Av)

151 Whoops! Bellevue University is in Nebraska.

Andros must be posting from the coffee shop where he works in Bellevue Washington.

Posted by: Warden at March 29, 2009 06:36 PM (KXbGD)

152
andros is definitely a little europeon faggot who thinks he's smarter than stupid Americans -- especially the Republican Americans.

Posted by: Darling, just an entertainer at March 29, 2009 06:37 PM (PXi/y)

153
Funny how it's a sign of economic recovery when the DJIA gains a little back to 7500 from what it's lost in the last few months, but the Democrats said we were in the 'worst economy since Herbert Hoover' when the DJIA was at 13000.

Posted by: Darling, just an entertainer at March 29, 2009 06:40 PM (PXi/y)

154 I thinking talking down to liberals and putting them in the place is the best approach. Hit them where it hurts most (their egos) if you want their attention. Liberals always seem to confuse arrogance with intelligence. Just look at who they nominate: Bill Clinton, Al Gore, John Kerry, and Obama. I'm certain that most people do not personally know four people more arrogant or self centered. In his day the media tried to tell us that Bill Clinton was intelligent. No, acting superior and highly confident is arrogance not intelligence. Same thing with Obama.

Posted by: pitythefool at March 29, 2009 06:40 PM (unZ42)

155 When unemployment was 6%, Hoovervilles were sprouting up across the landscape, but now that it's 8% everything is cool.

Posted by: liberal dumbass at March 29, 2009 06:45 PM (yUiO3)

156 The only thing missing from Androgen is talk of Limbaugh's pee-pee. C'mon, don't let us down now. Let's hear the envy. You're not going to hold back your opinions of one who "has the personal life of a devil worshiper" are you?

Klavan promises:

"Next week: Hear from liberals who took the bait."

It'll be the first time I'm actually interested in reading something from the LA Times this year. Kudos LA Times even though your outreach was unintentional.

Posted by: AnonymousDrivel at March 29, 2009 06:58 PM (swuwV)

157 What color is the sky at Bellevue U. Or is it hospital?

Cordially...

Posted by: Rick at March 29, 2009 07:08 PM (8Nw0O)

158

The same troll who confidently makes predictions about something as uncertain as the current and near-future economy is off by an order of magnitude in regards to something as concrete and easily checked as the size (20 million) of Rush Limbaugh's listening audience. Intentional stupidities such as these should be ignored.

Posted by: Bill Carson at March 29, 2009 07:11 PM (hoGdU)

159 "as the size (20 million) of Rush Limbaugh's listening audience"

That's 20 million a week, Bill.

Bill O'Reilly gets an audience about that size, too.

But Fox only pays him for the 3 million or so viewers he gets a day.

Posted by: andros at March 29, 2009 07:22 PM (k39jK)

160 20 million and growing:

http://tinyurl.com/cqxlkf

Posted by: Pat R. at March 29, 2009 07:24 PM (3rwFl)

161
Looks like this robot, andros, was only programmed to say a few things about Rush Limbaugh.

Posted by: Julio from McDonalds at March 29, 2009 07:24 PM (PXi/y)

162 We've had idiot trolls before, but this one's a doozie.

Posted by: AD at March 29, 2009 07:26 PM (IDtVZ)

163 andros, why don't you ever answer anyone's questions or acknowledge their points?

Even for a troll you're fucking pathetic.

Posted by: yambles at March 29, 2009 07:27 PM (PLAPA)

164 I still don't think you're in the class of erg, though, but at least he could spell.

Posted by: AD at March 29, 2009 07:27 PM (IDtVZ)

165 andros, why don't you ever answer anyone's questions or acknowledge their points?

For the same reason he's a Democrat. If he were capable of doing that he wouldn't hold his political views in the first place.

Posted by: AD at March 29, 2009 07:29 PM (IDtVZ)

166 andros, O'Reilly isn't on the radio anymore you fucking twat.

O'Reilly gets like 3.5million viewers on his TV show. Rush > O'Reilly.

You fail once again.

Posted by: yambles at March 29, 2009 07:30 PM (PLAPA)

167 Appeal to the middle? The party should aim for the middle and FIRE!

Posted by: Shannon at March 29, 2009 07:37 PM (v4qA1)

168 I'm really offended that people call Andros a twat. Twats are highly desireable, feel great, taste good, and purr like a kitten if you rub them the right way. They serve a purpose.

Andros is more like an asshole than a twat.

Posted by: CoolCzech at March 29, 2009 07:42 PM (iafWn)

169 I believe O'Reilly's TV show gets a bigger daily audience than Rush's radio audience, yambles.

Most people I know who listen to Rush just have him on as background noise while they work menial labor jobs anyway.

I don't think they're really listening to him.

Posted by: andros at March 29, 2009 07:43 PM (k39jK)

170
I don't think they're really listening to him.

hahaha, andros is a funny troll. So even if Rush does indeed have millions of listeners, they're not really listening to him. Hahahahaha, good one, robot.

Posted by: Darling, just an entertainer at March 29, 2009 07:48 PM (PXi/y)

171 Most people I know imaginary friends from childhood . . .

Fixed it for ya

while they work menial labor jobs

This is how Dems think. They're really incapable of doing otherwise.

Posted by: AD at March 29, 2009 07:49 PM (IDtVZ)

172 169-
What a toilet brush.

Posted by: WonderWartHog at March 29, 2009 07:53 PM (LVT6e)

173 O.K. we started out talking about Rush, then switched to Andros, but what I really want to know is how do we get rid of Steele? What is the official procedure?

Posted by: elliot m at March 29, 2009 08:02 PM (13Ugm)

174 AD,

This troll is nothing compared to the trolls from 4 or 5 years ago. I don't remember all their names but "downtownlad" and that neo-Nazi fucker "cedarford" who posts at Ann Althouse's site now were some real doozies.

Trust me when I say the troll quality is much lower these days.

Posted by: Nom de Blog at March 29, 2009 08:03 PM (fnU+z)

175 171 Posted by: AD

You do not seem to realize that the Aristoi (Liberals) think lofty thoughts for the betterment of all mankind and are therefore deserving of greater consideration.

Such rarefied reasoning can be hard for the Demos, or Proles, who are better suited for menial labor. Why else would their backs be so broad and their minds so small?

Posted by: Travis at March 29, 2009 08:05 PM (QDPm/)

176 I actually did used to catch Downtown Lad at Althouse (haven't been back there in a while).

While I knew the basics of his backstory, I didn't know he had claimed to have been a male escort. I still say in terms of sheer stupidity, I've never seen anybody, ever, who has matched erg, but that must have been something.

Posted by: AD at March 29, 2009 08:09 PM (IDtVZ)

177 Let's look at sitemeter data from two blogs, Andrew Sullivan and Hot Air, Darling:

Andrew Sullivan visits:

Total167,502,371 Average Per Day134,534 Average Visit Length3:37 Last Hour5,627 Today78,575 This Week941,735
Hot Air visits:

Total237,642,394 Average Per Day578,189 Average Visit Length0:03 Last Hour22,556 Today323,376 This Week4,047,322

According to the dittoheads, Andrew Sullivan's blog is more popular than Hot Air because he gets more visitors in a week than Hot Air gets in a day.

Must be some real "special" math Porky aught you?

Posted by: andros at March 29, 2009 08:13 PM (k39jK)

178
elliott, we did discuss Steele in this thread.

We went from Rush to Steele to Rush to then to andros.

Posted by: Darling at March 29, 2009 08:14 PM (PXi/y)

179 AD,

For the very best in trolldom, you should ask the co-bloggers to put a "Best of the Trolls" post on the main page.

That stroll down memory lane would be fun for the old timers like me (over 6 years) and for the youngsters too.

Posted by: Nom de Blog at March 29, 2009 08:18 PM (fnU+z)

180 I love the cognitive dissonance that Rush causes. I grew up when filthy books and movies where condemned out of hand and the dry was,"How do you know it's bad if you haven't read it?" The left need to be hoist upon their own petard. My answer to people that complain about Rush is "Really, I didn't know you listened to Rush? What did you hear on his show that offended you?" and "Do you really believe everything people tell you?" The intellectual uncuriousity of the modern lib is staggering,

Posted by: billhedrick at March 29, 2009 08:19 PM (txGlt)

181 There should be a way for yous guys to tell us when a vomit inducing troll is visiting.

Posted by: sybilll at March 29, 2009 08:19 PM (1+WNO)

182
According to your data, robot, it looks like Hot Air gets more visitors/week that Fagrew Sullivan.

Posted by: Darling at March 29, 2009 08:20 PM (PXi/y)

183
By the way, what's your point, robot?

Posted by: Darling at March 29, 2009 08:21 PM (PXi/y)

184
According to the dittoheads, Andrew Sullivan's blog is more popular than Hot Air because he gets more visitors in a week than Hot Air gets in a day.

Are you fucking high, andros? If Rush is so inconsequential and non-influential and has so few listeners who don't even really listen to him, why are you and Obama so concerned about Rush Limbaugh?

Posted by: Darling at March 29, 2009 08:26 PM (PXi/y)

185 "That's 20 million a week, Bill."

and Rush is on 5 days a week, which would be 4 million a day.

Just doing the math, yo.

Posted by: buster mcDissenter at March 29, 2009 08:27 PM (PgcOQ)

186

Andrew Sullivan visits:

Total167,502,371 Average Per Day134,534 Average Visit Length3:37 Last Hour5,627 Today78,575 This Week 941,735

Hot Air visits:

Total237,642,394 Average Per Day578,189 Average Visit Length0:03 Last Hour22,556 Today323,376 This Week 4,047,322

I guess 941,735 is now more than 4,047,322. It's Obama's new math.

Posted by: Tami at March 29, 2009 08:29 PM (1kwr2)

187 "According to your data, robot, it looks like Hot Air gets more visitors/week that Fagrew Sullivan."

Looks like we just had a teaching moment there, Darling.

For some odd reason, radio measures its audience by the week, other media measure it by the hour or day.

"and Rush is on 5 days a week, which would be 4 million a day."

And so is Bill O'Reilly, buster.

But he only gets paid for his daily audience of about 3 million, not the phony radio stat of a weekly "audience" of about 15 million.

Posted by: andros at March 29, 2009 08:32 PM (k39jK)

188 My guess is that Andros works at a newspaper or similarly non-profit .org.

Posted by: monkeyfan at March 29, 2009 08:36 PM (cEE8N)

189 Honestly, my guess is that we're dealing with a guy who was picked on one too many times in high school.

I don't even say that jokingly. I almost get a sick feeling from ragging on him and I've argued before this is a serious issue that gets washed under the rug, but do you suppose if we just round up the bullies and make them apologize, he'll let it go?

Seriously, dude, you're what? In your thirties now? Find a girl. Get a life. If you let it build up inside you and eat you up, they've won.

Posted by: AD at March 29, 2009 08:44 PM (IDtVZ)

190
See? Andros and a bunch of pant-wetting moonbat bloggers are smarter than the radio station owners and executives. You see, andros and company know more about the radio biz than those making a living in the radio biz.

So when the execs sign deals with Rush, Howard Stern, Alan Colmes, or Laura Ingraham they should consult andros first because their figures are all wrong.

They're doing it wrong!!! says andros. They shouldn't be calculating listenership with that fuzzy math because they're fooling themesleves and their advertisers. The advertisers are fools for not listening to andros. Wow those advertisers are fucking stupid for believing those numbers without reading some unhinged moonbat's blog on how many listeners Rush really has.

Thanks andros. Now I know fire melts steel and Rush has only about 20 listeners, thanks to the knowledge on the internet.

Posted by: Darling at March 29, 2009 08:49 PM (PXi/y)

191 >>Now I know fire melts steel and Rush has only about 20 listeners, thanks to the knowledge on the internet.

I think those 20 listeners don't really listen to him. They just have him on to arouse the ladies.

Posted by: Gyn Andros at March 29, 2009 08:58 PM (PGSXB)

192 The issue of how many listeners Rush has is kinda immaterial. The impact he has, as all media has, is subject to a force multiplier. Battlestar Galactica for instance is immensely powerful and influential on TV, but the actual numbers of watchers it has is surprisingly low. I would be surprised if the series finale drew more than 20 million watchers. Rush's impact goes beyond the folks listening to his 15 hours a week of programming, His cogent points and persuasive passion move people that don't listen to his show, and the block of people that do agree with him is such a force that Steele and the GOP ignore them at their peril.

Posted by: billhedrick at March 29, 2009 09:09 PM (txGlt)

193 According to the Pew Center for Media Research, among the best educated consumers of any broadcast media are the listeners of Rush.

"Internet news sources, National Public Radio, news magazines, and Rush Limbaugh's radio show have the best educated audiences, with each of these having at least 36% of their regular readers and listeners having graduated from college."

I listen to Rush as background noise to my menial job as a college professor.

Posted by: Milesdei at March 29, 2009 09:09 PM (FS9ko)

194
57 + 66 *tap-tap-tapping on the diner table*
Still waiting on that coffee George.

I literally choked on my drink! Thanks, and good work Deety!

Posted by: sickinmass at March 29, 2009 09:23 PM (/i4dU)

195 It looks like our friend here is a professor at Pace University:

http://tiny.cc/QzfcM

Of course...he's a lecturer, though, not even a full-time professor.

Now I'm sure that's a fine position and all, but this isn't *quite* what I have in mind when I think of the aristoi.

The academic background of a significant portion of the commenters here (much less the politicians you're ragging on) blow you out of the water.

Posted by: AD at March 29, 2009 09:46 PM (IDtVZ)

196 AD, Pace University is in NY. Andro's IP traces to Bellvue, Washington. Either he is not with Pace, or this is not the same guy.

Posted by: Gyn Andros at March 29, 2009 10:06 PM (PGSXB)

197 So, does andros measure his job performance by number of cocks sucked in a day, or in a week?

Posted by: V the K at March 29, 2009 10:08 PM (d2fuu)

198 If the same guy visits his stall on the New Jersey turnpike every day, how does andros count that? 5 cocksuckings, or one customer?

Posted by: V the K at March 29, 2009 10:09 PM (d2fuu)

199 dvd to ipod converter free dvd to ipod converter ipod video converter free ipod video converter

Posted by: aaabs at March 29, 2009 10:20 PM (54Z+t)

200 196 AD, Pace University is in NY. Andro's IP traces to Bellvue, Washington. Either he is not with Pace, or this is not the same guy.

Andros didn't deny being the former guy (something that kinda would have been expected) and this is definitely the guy who was linked to earlier (who also goes by "andros"). So, not sure what to tell you (Sabbatical? Afterall, he is only a lecturer and a temp).

Posted by: AD at March 29, 2009 10:24 PM (IDtVZ)

201
I think he's the poly-sci prof with a little time on his hands. andros probably sees infiltrating this blog as a confederate as some sort of experiment to try to teach "true" conservatism to us rethuglicans.

Posted by: Darling at March 29, 2009 10:36 PM (PXi/y)

202 Rush is fine, but for real dissection of subjects, I prefer Mark Levin's intelligent and detailed breakdowns. I have pulled a few liberal friends back from the dark side simply by asking them to listen to his show over a couple of days. It's an eye-opener for them.

Posted by: nraendowment at March 30, 2009 12:15 AM (U/8r7)

203 I happened to be visiting my dad on the day he canceled his subscription to the LA Times, which had been delivered along with the local newspaper for as long as I can remember. "Because you're too liberal!" was his answer to the douchebag who asked him the reason for canceling. The local rag had long ago been canceled...for the same reason. Damn if the old man didn't almost bring a tear to my eye that afternoon.

Posted by: Stitches at March 30, 2009 12:35 AM (KyqYb)

Posted by: dvd covnerter mac at March 30, 2009 01:40 AM (COmpT)

205 I always hated Limbaugh's guts, just like Klavan describes: without having heard anything more than some of his most outrageous comments. "Feminazi" really chapped my hide.

My brother, a paleoconservative, finally talked me into listening to one of the radio shows a couple of months ago, and I was astounded to find that I agreed with about 90% of what he said!!!!!

Good grief. I can NEVER tell any of my friends this. Like, you know, seriously. ;-)

Posted by: Beverly at March 30, 2009 03:21 AM (Jxz6r)

206 >>Damn, I haven't watched CNN in a long time, so that was some surprising and ridiculous shit there.
"Do you think MLK would be proud of you, Michael Steele?"<<

Martin Luther King was a REPUBLICAN. So, yeah, CNN asshole. Whoever you were.

Posted by: Beverly at March 30, 2009 03:26 AM (Jxz6r)

207 Republicans have to make this an issue pronto. Facts, figures, it's all out there but outside the blogosphere and Conservative circles the general public REALLY doesn't know. I talk to them, they won't know until Republicans start making it an issue, loudly.

I agree completely. I think the Rs should preface the answer to every question put to them with a statement on media bias.

Posted by: Farmer_Joe at March 30, 2009 12:26 PM (z4es9)

208

If andros is posting from a uni in Bellevue, WA, he's probably at City University: cityu.edu. Either that or Bellevue Community College. City U targets working professionals by offering night classes. BCC is nice for a Community College. I'm fairly certain CityU doesn't offer poly sci.

Being on the East Side doesn't necessarily mean one isn't conservative. I know, I'm an East Side conservative. I'm not defending andros, just pointing out that his location doesn't mean much.

Posted by: bonhomme at March 30, 2009 12:55 PM (WLhT+)

209 That's gotta be him - he even has the Head Tilt of Compassion and Concern^tm.

Posted by: Tim at March 30, 2009 03:50 PM (3Wewy)

210 George Picoulas, Pace U.

http://www.ratemyprofessors.com/ShowRatings.jsp?tid=837424

shows a 10 out of 10 for douchebagness

Posted by: Assman at March 30, 2009 03:58 PM (t5YAE)

211 "He is a new teacher at pace but i liked his class a lot he forced us to think outside of the box, he is a hard teacher but you will learn so much!!! And he is very intresting a lot of practical exsperience!!!"

outside of box = moby post at conservative blogs

also, not into box, more into cox

Posted by: Assman at March 30, 2009 04:08 PM (t5YAE)

212

Well this has been a very enjoyable waste of an hour, reading these comments. Thank you all.

@52, that's some funny stuff right there.

Now, y'all quit trying to get my hopes up that we're ever gonna get this right. Just when I start getting used to the idea of Dark Ages something like this crops up and disturbs my servitude.

Seriously though. (holds out one hand) "Reagan..." (holds out other hand) "...McCain. Gee, I'm still not sure which approach will be kindest to moderates...

Posted by: Idahoser at March 30, 2009 04:36 PM (MTwDz)

213 Another eastside conservative here...

Posted by: carl hungus at March 30, 2009 10:12 PM (U3CHY)

Posted by: wilson at June 03, 2009 10:11 AM (Jx36X)

215 iPod Manager contains the functions of iPod Music Manager, iPod video manager, iPod library manager, iPod photo manager. Both Mac users and Windows users will find proper software to manage their iPod/iPhone efficiently.

iPod Music Manager is a powerful iPod media manager, which helps transfer music from computer to iPod, transfer movies to iPod, and backup songs, videos, photos, playlist from iPod/iPhone to computer/iTunes.

iPhone Manager is a versatile iPhone file manager which helps manage iPhone music, videos, photos, playlist on Windows OS.

iPod Manager for Mac helps manage iPod on Mac OS. It is more than a iPod music manager for Mac, but a Mac iPod manager to transfer music, videos to iPod and transfer music, videos, photos, playlist from iPod/iPhone to iPod, computer, iTunes. It is a versatile iPod transfer software.

iPod to Computer Transfer is a superior iPod transfer software to transfer music, video, playlist, photos from iPod/iPhone to computer.

iPod to PC Transfer helps you transfer music from iPod to PC. It also enables you to backup songs, videos, photos, playlist from iPod/iPhone to PC/iTunes.

iPod to iTunes Transfer is a versatile iPod transfer software, which helps transfer music from iPod to iTunes library. It also helps transfer music, videos, photos between iPods, iPod and computer, iPod and iTunes.

iPod to iPod Transfer is an excellent iPod transfer software, which enables you to transfer music and video between iPod and iPod, iPod and Mac, iPod and iTunes.

iPod Copy Softwareis a multifunctional iPod transfer software, with which you can copy songs to iPod, copy music from iPod to computer, copy songs from iPod to pc, and copy iPod to iTunes.

How to Rip iPod to Computer? Is there a software to rip music from iPod to computer? You need this iPod Transfer, which is designed to rip songs from iPod to PC, it also helps transfers your iPod and iPhone music, video, playlist, photos back to PC and iTunes.

iPod Music Transfercan not only transfer music to iPod, but also copy music from iPod to iTunes. If you want to put music on iPod, transfer MP3 to iPod, or transfer music from iPod to computer, iPod Music Transfer is the perfect software, both powerful and easy to use. Do you want to copy playlist from iPod to PC, or copy iPod playlist to new iTunes? Is there a iPod playlist ratings transfer freeware?

iPod Playlist Transferis the exact software you need. It is the ideal solution to all the above mentioned questions.

Transfer CD to iPod is a multifunctional CD ripper and converter software, which helps copy CD to iPod, download CD to iPod, transfer CD to iPod.

iPod Transfer for Mac is a powerful and easy to use iPod manager software for Mac users, which helps transfer music and video between iPod and Mac, iPod and iTunes. It enables you to manage your iPod more easily on Mac OS.

Are you looking for a free iPod photo copier, or free iPod photo copy software?iPod Photo Transfer is exactly this kind of software to copy photos from iPod to PC, desktop, computer.

Mac iPod Playlist Transferis a powerful iPod transfer software, which helps copy playlist from iPod to Mac and copy iPod playlist to new iTunes? If you are looking for a iPod playlist ratings transfer freeware for Mac? Mac iPod Playlist Transfer is the ideal software.

Posted by: sfdgfsd at June 07, 2009 09:07 PM (VXe4a)

216 Hi guys. The most important thing she'd learned over the years was that there was no way to be a perfect mother and a million ways to be a good one. Help me! It has to find sites on the: Stock trading softwares. I found only this - Trading stock exchange. It's always good if the brand is trusted by you and others. It was bad enough when I went to school and it's a ton worse now. Waiting for a reply ;-), Malka from Belize.

Posted by: Malka at August 04, 2009 01:05 PM (c3vOU)

217 Wedding Dresses Cheap Wedding Dresses, Wedding Gowns

Posted by: Wedding Gowns at August 25, 2009 11:12 PM (+Q9/b)

218
Mod Converter,MOD to AVI ,MOD to MPEG,MOD to WMV ,MOD to DVD

Posted by: john810 at September 27, 2009 09:45 PM (E6tGG)

219 EZsaling.com offer you the Cheap Nike Dunk sb shoes, include the high dunk, low dunk and the newest style of dunk shoes 2009 nike dunks nike dunk sb dunk sb shoes, nike sb dunk,men's high nike dunk sb, men's low nike dunk sb, men's mid nike dunk sb, women 's high nike dunk sb, women's low nike dunk sb,high men dunk sb, men low dunk sb,mid dunk sb for men, high dunk sb women,women low nike sb, nike dunk sb. All the shoes we sold are factory direct, it is best quality with low price. All Orders Enjoy Free Shipping ! No Tax ! Shipping As a Gift

Posted by: dunk sb shoes at October 01, 2009 09:18 AM (YJ7jc)

Posted by: hihandbag at October 12, 2009 03:01 AM (k2Evn)

221 tiffany jewellery

tiffany jewelry

tiffany

tiffany uk

tiffany jewellery uk

tiffany jewellery sale

tiffany jewellery london

silver jewellery

tiffany jewellery sale

Tiffany Bracelets

Tiffany Sets

Tiffany Rings

Posted by: niuzai at October 14, 2009 01:18 AM (AhInz)

Posted by: retailike at October 17, 2009 11:15 AM (zFgZJ)

223 discounthair straighteners
ghd hair
chi hair straightener
ghd straighteners
chi straighteners
chi hair
chi hair iron
hair straighteners ghd
ghd hair straighteners
free shipping!

Posted by: hair straighteners at October 24, 2009 09:45 AM (9oMrs)

224 Discount Boots
Womens UGG
UGG Shoes
UGG Australia
UGG UK
UGG USA
discount ugg boots
cheap ugg boots

Posted by: fdsfds at October 27, 2009 08:23 AM (8kvkz)

Posted by: ugg boots at October 27, 2009 09:22 AM (pgfU2)

226 Your post very good,thanks for sharing!Are you also like these:ugg boots uk,buy ugg boots,australia ugg,cheap ugg boots,ugg boots,ugg boots sheepskin,womens ugg boots,ugg australia boots,cheap ugg boots

Posted by: australia ugg at October 27, 2009 11:42 AM (c6EK2)

227 Gowns Wedding Gowns, Plus size Wedding Dresses

Posted by: wedding gowns at October 29, 2009 05:02 AM (czYHR)

228 buy Discount Boots
Womens UGG
UGG Shoes
UGG Australia
UGG UK
UGG USA
discount ugg boots
cheap ugg boots
air force 1 shoes
nike air force
air force 1 mens
air force 1 boots
air force onefrom usa

Posted by: airforceoneshop at November 03, 2009 02:17 PM (LHCCE)

229 ��DVD

Posted by: ttrtrtrert at November 06, 2009 06:02 AM (wYEI1)

230 Come to our website for shopping with high quality and best service! There have new products,MBT M. Walk
and MBT Lami,Welcome everybody to buy it.

Posted by: mbt shoes at November 08, 2009 08:47 AM (QhfLM)

Posted by: ugg boots at November 12, 2009 01:43 AM (IeIJx)

232 Supra FootwearThe supra shoe is comfortable and can wear all day.
supra ShoesThe bestsupra.com seems to be from strong material, and have many seems all over. They are really beautifull.
Supra Skytopbestsupra.com offer Great quality shoe for a reasonable price.
Supra 2009Comfort

Posted by: ryiu at November 12, 2009 11:13 PM (jKBjA)

233 nike dunk sb

Do anything needed to support an idea, a good idea usually brings good results, doing

business is like that.http://www.dunksky.com/.This site has always been on

Posted by: nike dunk sb at November 14, 2009 01:02 AM (APB+g)

Posted by: replica watches at November 17, 2009 02:49 AM (xpuiO)

Posted by: nike shoes at November 17, 2009 05:00 AM (DuP3Z)

Posted by: replica watches at November 17, 2009 08:46 AM (xpuiO)

Posted by: replica watches at November 17, 2009 09:54 PM (xpuiO)

Posted by: replica watches at November 18, 2009 05:43 AM (C/zDM)

239 UGG BOOTS

Posted by: UGG BOOTS at November 19, 2009 08:07 AM (n0jE1)

240 mbt cheap
mbt sale
mbt uk
mbt shoes cheap
buy mbt shoes
shoes mbt sale

Posted by: mbtshoesbuy at November 23, 2009 02:28 AM (bNNim)

241 The proper function of man is to live, but not to exist.ugg classic cardyConquer fear of death and you are put into possession of your life. ugg classic tallThere is a time to speak and a time to be silent. ugg knightsbridgefree shippingmbt cheap
mbt sale
mbt uk
mbt shoes cheap
MBT M.Walk

Posted by: reviewups at November 27, 2009 01:16 AM (xUZwC)

242 hot news for brand shoes online store ,do you want to win more discount ?and popular for younger,and nike air maxwith top quality A ,come on all air max shoes with lowest price for highest quality !

Posted by: nike air max at December 01, 2009 08:47 PM (OKj2x)

243 The cheap ugg boots sale for women are stylish, they are comfortable and what��s more, they keep your feet. theres a pair of fellow sufferers,ugg australia uk to complement your personal preferences, why do we not take the traditional high discount ugg boots on salefor cold winter?
As a matter of fact, with the passing time, the love for ugg usa is increasing among girls in this modern world. The growing demand for these womens ugg made the manufacturers UGG Boots Sale to revamp the looks of these boots with different hues.come our website and buy a pair of ugg uk.UGG Classic Cardy are popular as shoes for cowboys. The SHOES close the whole parts of the foot. The ugg cardy are important to protect your feet from any dangerous things during your walking activities. There are many oatmeal ugg available in the Market and if you are interested to get one you can directly go to the store that sells it.

Posted by: reviewups at December 03, 2009 05:07 AM (OKj2x)

Posted by: replica watches at December 04, 2009 10:05 AM (bsW/x)

245 Today ugg boots online have become a phenomenon.Every winter,the ugg classic crochet are one of the hottest goods in the market all over the world.So now don't be hesitation,own a pair of ugg usa immediately.

Posted by: ugg boots sale at December 10, 2009 10:31 AM (I3/dZ)

Posted by: Lacoste shoes at December 12, 2009 04:41 PM (/3s/N)

247 Your article very interesting, I have introduced a lot of friends look at this article, the content of the articles there will be a lot of attractive people to appreciate, I have to thank you such an article
Mengembalikan Jati Diri Bangsa
Mengembalikan Jati Diri Bangsa
Web Design Murah
Febry Riyanto

Posted by: Mengembalikan Jati Diri Bangsa at December 14, 2009 08:50 AM (CKpbL)

248 The womens mbt Tembea is a new generation lace-up with Dual Board construction and a striking style that pays tribute to the classic sneaker. It packs in all the mbt lami shoes benefits with a fresh look and feel, striking the perfect balance between health benefits ... The discount mbt Shuguli GTX is a is a sleek and stylish professional shoe ideal for work and more formal occasions whilst delivering full waterproofing from GORE-TEX. These are especially effective for those who have to stand or walk for long periods of time ...
The mbt shoes Fanaka GTX is a sporty but rugged styled shoe that combines fashionable, casual design with all the health benefits associated with the sporting style discount mbt shoes. These are especially effective for ladies who have to stand or walk for long periods ... The black mbt Bia is a classic, professional shoe ideal for work and more formal occasions whilst delivering all the health benefits from MBT design. These are especially effective for ladies who have to stand or walk for long periods of time during work ...

Posted by: gfdg at December 14, 2009 04:53 PM (iV/dV)

Posted by: rolex watches at December 17, 2009 07:57 AM (EGD2i)

250 Mengembalikan jati diri bangsa Mengembalikan jati diri bangsa astaga.com lifestyle on the net astaga.com lifestyle on the net � astaga.com lifestyle on the net astaga.com lifestyle on the net astaga.com lifestyle on the net astaga.com lifestyle on the net by team 1
� by team 2 � by team 3 � by team 4 � by team 5 � by team 6 � by team 7 � wan dibsd � Tangerang Info � gilang � gilangku � gilangmu � hot comluv � Link Building � Link Building � link 1 � link 2 � link 3 � link 4 � link 5 � link 6 � Faster 1 � Faster 2 � Faster 3 � Fast Team 1 � Fast Team 2 � Fast Team 3 � Team Fast 1 � Team Fast 2 � Team Fast 3 � Riyani 1 � Riyani 2 � Riyani 3 � Sulistyo 1 � Sulistyo 2 � Sulistyo 3 � Plasa 1 � Plasa 2 � Plasa 3 � Xtra 1 � Xtra 2 � Xtra 3 �
Just 1 � Just 2 � Just 3 � � 3D Hot � 3D dobloger � blogging reviews � Gilang Blogging Reviews � copas11 � Iwan Wordpress � Iwan Wordpress 2 � Gilang Bliblog � Doblogger.Vox � Your article very interesting, I have introduced a lot of friends look at this article, the content of the articles there will be a lot of attractive people to appreciate, astaga.com lifestyle on the net I have to thank you such an article voip phones

Posted by: dobloger at December 19, 2009 07:05 PM (TkP3+)

Posted by: nikemax at December 20, 2009 02:37 AM (g3/iU)

252 Shopping for a Rolex watch online can tag heuer make the job Rolex Watches easier but you Replica Watches also have to be patek philippe wary about the reputation of the dealer Chanel Watches and the brand of Breitling Watches watch you are audemars piguet getting. The more mont blanc watches considerable you are, the less danger you would come to armani watches when buying a Omega Watches gold watch online.

Posted by: rolex at December 20, 2009 09:49 AM (/pchr)

253 Buy rolex Fake Watches and Replica Watches brands,rolex watches rolex watches, Replica rolex watches, replica rolex: replica rolex,replica rolex: replica breitling watches,replica tag heuer: replica tag heuer,replica cartier watches: replica cartier watches,replica omega watches: replica omega watches,replica panerai watches: replica panerai watches,replica armani watches: replica armani watches,replica audemars piguet: replica audemars piguet,replica bvlgari watches: replica bvlgari watches,replica chanel watches: replica chanel watches,replica gucci watches: replica gucci watches,replica movado watches: replica movado watches,replica montblanc watches: replica montblanc watches,replica patek philippe: replica patek philippe on sale.

Posted by: fake watches at December 20, 2009 09:56 AM (/pchr)

Posted by: wholesale jewelry at December 20, 2009 07:35 PM (1dySH)

255 Replica rolex watches,tag heuer watches and replica rolex watches,replica watches replica breitling watches breitling watches,chanel watches chanel watches replica patek philippe patek philippe watches,replica audemars piguet watches replica montblanc watches for men and women.

Posted by: tag heuer at December 24, 2009 08:07 PM (Bp0xg)

256 Replica fake watches and replica watches brands,rolex watches rolex watches, replica rolex: replica rolex,replica rolex: breitling watches,replica tag heuer: tag heuer,replica cartier watches: cartier watches,replica omega watches: omega watches,replica panerai watches: replica panerai watches,replica armani watches: replica armani watches,replica audemars piguet: replica audemars piguet,replica bvlgari watches: replica bvlgari watches,replica chanel watches: replica chanel watches,replica gucci watches: replica gucci watches,replica movado watches: replica movado watches,replica montblanc watches: replica montblanc watches,replica patek philippe: replica patek philippe sale.Replica rolex watches and tag heuer watches, rolex watches,Replica Watches replica watches,patek philippe patek philippe Watches,audemars piguet audemars piguet,Omega Watches: omega watches,replica Cartier Watches cartier watches,Breitling Watches breitling watches,Chanel Watches: chanel watches,armani watches: armani watches,iwc watches iwc watches,mont blanc watches montblanc watches.

Posted by: rolex at December 25, 2009 11:54 AM (nRNCD)

257 We sell rolex and tag heuer watch, rolex watches,Rolex replica watches,replica patek philippe Watches,replica audemars piguet,Omega Watches omega watches,replica Cartier cartier watches,Breitling breitling watches,replica chanel watches,armani watches: armani watches,iwc watches iwc watches,montblanc montblanc watches Replica.Cheap fake watches and replica watches on sale,rolex watches rolex watches, watches replica rolex,replica breitling watches,replica tag heuer: tag heuer,replica cartier watches: cartier watches,replica omega watches: omega watches,replica panerai watches: replica panerai watches,replica armani watches: replica armani watches,replica audemars piguet: replica audemars piguet,replica bvlgari watches: replica bvlgari watches,replica chanel watches: replica chanel watches,replica gucci watches: replica gucci watches,replica movado watches: replica movado watches,replica montblanc watches: replica montblanc watches,replica patek philippe: replica patek philippe sale for people.

Posted by: replica watches at December 27, 2009 10:01 AM (52U6J)

Posted by: wholesale jewelry at December 28, 2009 12:53 AM (1dySH)

259

<a href=http://www.jerseys-in-china.com>wholesale soccer jerseys</a>
buy <a href=http://www.jerseys-in-china.com>cheap soccer jerseys</a> from jerseys in china
<a href=http://www.jerseys-in-china.com>football shirts</a>

<a href=http://www.cnsoccerjersey.com>wholesale soccer jersey</a>
buy <a href=http://www.cnsoccerjersey.com>soccer jerseys cheap</a> from cn soccer jersey
<a href=http://www.cnsoccerjersey.com>cheap soccer jersey</a>

Posted by: soccer jersey at December 30, 2009 11:18 PM (DTQyc)

260

[url=http://www.jerseys-in-china.com]wholesale soccer jerseys[/url]
buy [url=http://www.jerseys-in-china.com]cheap soccer jerseys[/url] from jerseys in china
[url=http://www.jerseys-in-china.com]football shirts[/url]

[url=http://www.cnsoccerjersey.com]wholesale soccer jersey[/url]
buy [url=http://www.cnsoccerjersey.com]soccer jerseys cheap[/url] from cn soccer jersey
[url=http://www.cnsoccerjersey.com]cheap soccer jersey[/url]

Posted by: soccer jersey at December 30, 2009 11:18 PM (DTQyc)

261

wholesale soccer jerseys
buy cheap soccer jerseys from jerseys in china
football shirts

wholesale soccer jerseys
buy soccer jerseys cheap from cn soccer jersey
cheap soccer jersey

Posted by: soccer jersey at December 30, 2009 11:20 PM (DTQyc)

262 Cheap replica rolex and tag heuer watches,replica watches of rolex rolex watches replica,buy patek philippe Buy replica watches,fake watches and tag heuer watches.

Posted by: tag heuer at January 01, 2010 01:37 PM (nUnK8)

Posted by: replica watches at January 05, 2010 06:22 AM (ndMAX)

264 UGG cardy
Ugg Australia
Ugg Shoes Sale
Bailey Button
ugg boots
Ugg classic cardy
UGG cardy
Ugg Australia
Ugg Shoes Sale
Bailey Button
ugg boots

Posted by: ugg shoes|timberland uk|ugg boots|87415555.com.cn at January 06, 2010 11:51 AM (qzq48)

265 replica rolex rolex and tag heuer watches,replica watches of rolex rolex watches replica,buy patek philippe Buy replica watches,fake watches and tag heuer watches.breitling watches breitling watches at low price.

Posted by: rolex at January 06, 2010 04:48 PM (TspGB)

266 Gowns Wedding Gowns, Wedding Dresses China

Posted by: wedding gowns at January 11, 2010 01:31 AM (Xvudm)

Posted by: AZZ at January 18, 2010 02:21 AM (Aemi7)

268 Good replica watches and buy replica watches and replica rolex replica replica tag heuer watches,buy replica replica omega watches and breitling watches replica breitling watches sale at lowest prices.

Posted by: replica watches at January 23, 2010 09:07 PM (ioa0w)

269 Buy rolex replica watches and replica watches replica replica watches and replica rolex watches patek philippe watches and fake watches and breitling watches,replica tag heuer: tag heuer,replica cartier watches: cartier watches,replica omega watches: omega watches at lowest prices.

Posted by: replica rolex at January 29, 2010 11:15 AM (h+uyA)

Posted by: air max shoes at January 30, 2010 01:53 AM (ll36v)

Posted by: airmax at January 31, 2010 12:39 PM (3vSvS)

272 It seems replica watches that the watch brand Porsche Design is good at creating sporty classic watches. Many of the Replica watches from it are such watches. They are especially designed for men. Some of the products manufactured today by Porsche Design range from luggage, eye-glasses, replica watches wristwatches pens, wallets and so on, all this products being best-selling items. What makes the replica watches products of this brand so popular? That is not only because of the famous reputation of the brand, but because they display the most elegant and posh replica watches fappearance, for those who appreciate style and prestige. If you have enough knowledge of products from replica watches this brand, you would understand these reasons. Defined by modern appearance and functional mechanisms, the replica watches Porsche Design brand has remained true to its intentions as to create timepieces that would meet the expectations of our modern trends and contemporary times. People nowadays seek watches with amazing designs, but at the same time, to provide many functions and to be highly reliable. In a world of speed replica watche and dynamism, Porsche Design proposes sporty watches that managed to impress with their unpretentious designs and the amazing variety of technical functions provided.

Posted by: replica watches at February 01, 2010 01:55 AM (uznWB)

273

weight loss weight loss coach handbags coach handbags electronic cigarette electronic cigarette nfl jerseys nfl jerseys tomic tomic nfl jersey nfl jersey abercrombie fitch wholesale abercrombie fitch wholesale Cartier Montblanc cartier monblanc blackberry fans blackberry fans jordan shoes jordan shoes true religion true religion love coach handbags love coach handbags monica~yo monica~yo nfl jerseys nfl jerseys ed hardy shirt ed hardy shirt weight loss tips weight loss tips ghd ghd seochan seochan jerseys shoes shoes wholesale wholesale abercrombie fitch abercrombie fitche tomic tomic time's up time's up skechers shape up shoes skechers shape ups shoes

Posted by: weight loss at February 02, 2010 11:00 PM (Y5uzO)

274 The replica watches dial design replica watches 100% copy replica watches of the previous omega watches model: the famous Manchester Logo is located at 3 and the cartier watches chronograph 45-minute breitling watches at 9 with orange figures. Football fans can use the very special 45-minute chronograph to measure the halves of a football match. Black patek philippe hour hand and minute hand features yellow luminescent coating. The hour makers, chronograph audemars piguet and the first 15-minute scale of the tag heuer chronograph counter is montblanc watches presented in eye-catching rolex red. Bright Yellow movado watches tones are found on the minute track, date bvlgari watches window and the text.

Posted by: replica watches at February 03, 2010 05:54 PM (FS54P)

275 Certainly watches are Replica Watches used to help people record rolex Watches time, but rolex watches nowadays its functions have enlarged. Replica watches are now tag heuer Watches not only objects that tag heuer watches can tell you what time it is, they are also a status symbol. You should not feel strange when you find someone wearing a watch on his wrist, but use the cell phone to tell time. In that situation, the watch is just showing its luxurious function cartier watches. It is normal and cartier watches perhaps also happens to you. .If asked that among the watches of various brands, which one can suit your taste? There is no doubt that most people will choose Rolex. Whichever social class you are in, it is naturally Rolex was known breitling Watches and cherished breitling watches for a long time. However, the elements do not usually enter the market alone, always come with the price tag up to the hand. For this reason, many people, especially men, their dreams of luxury Rolex watches are buried in omega Watches his heart omega watches. What should I do? Rolex watches are simply stunning worn by the rich and famous, right? No, this world is not the world's richest men, is the world of each. All are equal before the search of luxury and be men's watches respected. Within men's watches, the law, when consumers are in the market, women's watches they should women's watches receive the same treatment. This is the real reason why replica Rolex watches are ladies watches ladies watches more welcome than Rolex. Because in this world are not difficult to understand that the rich are much less than people with low income, you agree with me? You are forced to nod and say with certainty that is the reality. These low-income people do not have enough money to save every month. They can not afford such luxury Rolex watches

Posted by: replica watches at February 04, 2010 11:29 AM (CPNio)

276 Cheap replica watches and replica watches 100% copy replica watches of the previous omega watches model: the famous Manchester Logo is located at 3 and the cartier watches chronograph 45-minute breitling watches at 9 with orange figures. Football fans can use the very special 45-minute chronograph to measure the halves of a football match. Black patek philippe hour hand and minute hand features yellow luminescent coating. The hour makers, chronograph audemars piguet and the first 15-minute scale of the tag heuer chronograph counter is montblanc watches presented in eye-catching rolex red. Bright Yellow movado watches tones are found on the minute track, date bvlgari watches rolex on sale.

Posted by: replica watches at February 05, 2010 02:00 AM (0uEN8)

Posted by: fashion news at February 05, 2010 04:29 AM (ARptk)

278 this replica watches replica watchWhoever wants replica watches timekeeper that does the job of a tachometer will be crazy for. The operation is performed by the copied replica rolex 's bezel. The Daytona also applies automatic movement �C just one of many breitling watches characters and functionalities that ensures the precision of time. Originally created to measure lap time and the cartier watches overall time of a race, Rolex Daytona replica omega watches timepieces can measure elapsed time for omega any sporting event. The power of this breitling replica item is made possibly by its internalized perpetual rotor mechanism. Known for its precision, this special Rolex replica cartier watch model only has to be set once to the cartier watches standard time of the owner's choice. Once rolex watches being created, it updates itself during time changes, making upkeep of the replica's time setting replica watches nonexistent. Even though these replica watches were made for sporting events, (specifically those involving laps or circuits), it's not so adversible to put them tag heuer in water since they are not fake watches waterproof. Even thought most of the time, the replica watches do not bear the tag heuer same functionalities as the original ones, they are still the most desirable alternatives of the expensive real models.

Posted by: replica watches at February 06, 2010 04:39 PM (KbTNE)

279 Factors Replica Watches About The Rolex replica watches Oyster The Oyster is so closely get in touch with Rolex, and it is inevitably that some people think these are the only Replica watches Rolex manufacture. Others suppose that there is a single Oyster watch. But as a matter of fact, the name Oyster does not actually meant for a rolex Watches particular watch you can buy rolex watches or even to a series but to a type of case that available in some of the Rolex ranges. History The Oyster case was first released in 1926. The objective was to protect the workings of the watch from dust and moisture. Early watches were far from waterproof. The Oyster tag heuer Watchescase was an tag heuer watches innovative design to eliminate these problems. It had a new double locking crown that screwed into place. It has been compared to the hatch on a submarine. Like a submarine, the Oyster case was waterproof. In 1927 Mercedes Gleitze swam the English breitling Watches Channel breitling watches . Before she set off she was presented with a Rolex Oyster. When she arrived, the watch was still working perfectly. The resulting publicity gave the new case a massive boost. Why is it called Oyster? Legend has it that Hans cartier Watches Wilsdorf cartier watches, who invented the Oyster, chose the name because the new case reminded him of the difficulty he had experienced prising open oysters at dinner. Since then the Oyster has further, particularly advanced. Many Oyster watches today are omega Watches perpetual-self-winding, in other omega watches words, it does not require to expose the mechanism to the outside world in order to wind it. The Osyter Perpetual is one of the toughest, most durable, most reliable watches (under truly adverse conditions). It is probably the best mechanical watch money can buy.

Posted by: replica watches at February 07, 2010 08:37 AM (TUJDt)

280 Festival Museum Nusantara astaga.com lifestyle on the net Jastika Weblog Jastika Weblog

Posted by: Jastika Weblog at February 08, 2010 09:19 PM (pB/4p)

Processing 0.13, elapsed 0.1405 seconds.
15 queries taking 0.0126 seconds, 289 records returned.
Page size 265 kb.
Powered by Minx 0.7 alpha.