| Support
Contact
| David Brooks: I'm an Easily-Gulled BuffoonI'm glad we have elites to tell us po' bumpkins the way things really are. Malkin's annoyed enough to write of Brooks' "Ivy League ejaculations." She links this old but apropos Iowahawk piece mocking the effete Harvard half-assed intellectuals' embrace of Obama as "conservative." To be honest, I'm a bit exhausted by this constant Caddyshack-esque spat between the so-called elites and the grassroots. I find the elites more annoying, but I'm also getting annoyed by the excesses of the resentments-stoking on the grassroots side where every dispute mutates into an us vs. them cultural Rangnarok.* That said, if David Brooks can be so easily gulled and his supposed intellectual and cultural inferiors on the grassroots side cannot be, what purpose does he serve, exactly? Not only does he undermine the conservative cause and advance the liberal one, but he's just plain wrong along the way as he does so. And he does it with a certain amount of refined arrogance to boot.* I continue to think this is destructive. Perhaps we need some catharsis and bloodletting, but at some point we have to stop focusing on what divides the conservative movement and start focusing on dividing the liberals from the Reagan Democrats. I suppose this is the best time for the catharsis and bloodletting. But still I grow weary of the red-on-somewhat-less-red infighting.** ** Actually, now that I think of it, is it possible that the so-called elites were partly turned off to Sarah Palin not merely because she was NQOCD (Not quite our class, dear), but because she vigorously attacked a man the so-called elites were warm to precisely because he was of part of the Harvard-Princeton axis about which the world turns? Okay, now I'm getting pissed off again. Sarah Palin wasn't taken in by Obama's easy, Ivy charm. Does that make her smarter than David Brooks? Yeah, that Iowahawk piece is more true than funny, as it turns out. Comments1
You could've just put the headline up there, alone, and we'd have understood. No need to elaborate and link and all that shit.
Posted by: pendejo grande at March 03, 2009 01:59 PM (PXZI9) 2
Moderate = Triangulation. Brooks does not seem to hold any any opinion strongly except that one should not act too quickly in regards to anything. He is exactly the wrong type of person to have in a foxhole guarding your back. He should start the Neomoderate party. He, McCain, Specter, Snowe and Collins could all teach us morons how to lead a Republic.
Posted by: Locus at March 03, 2009 02:03 PM (f1vXs) 3
"Moderate" is what liars call themselves. Brooks wasn't fooled then, and he isn't surprised now.
what purpose does he serve, exactly? Not only does he undermine the conservative cause and advance the liberal one, but he's just plain wrong along the way as he does so. Right. That. Posted by: oblig. at March 03, 2009 02:09 PM (Hc34T) 4
Amazing, isn't it?
So many of us non-Ivy League, non-Beltway, drooling, Limbaugh-listening proles were able to see Obama for what he was. And our sophisticated betters fell for him like River City fell for Professor Harold Hill. Remind me again: Which side of that equation has the superiority complex? Posted by: tsj017 at March 03, 2009 02:09 PM (TBwnU) 5
AOS, buck up and stay mad. If the grassroots has the energy to maintain that level of ire, leverage it man. We have to keep the base stoked and firing emails at our elected curs in DC if we are going to turn this situation around.
Posted by: iowavette at March 03, 2009 02:12 PM (0JTac) 6
"To be honest, I'm a bit exhausted by this constant Caddyshack-esque
spat between the so-called elites and the grassroots. I find the elites
more annoying, but I'm also getting annoyed by the excesses of the
resentments-stoking on the grassroots side where every dispute mutates
into an us vs. them cultural Rangnarok."
Sorry, dude, but it's kind of important. If some of our resentments seem excessive, it's because the consequences of their dilettante embrace of Barack Obama are turning out to be pretty severe. Posted by: Kensington at March 03, 2009 02:12 PM (90mpl) 7
I have zero animosity towards elites who have earned their prosperity and success; they obviously have a role in our party. They err when they think that they should be the gatekeepers of leadership and that non-elites are not to be trusted.
Easy formula for an elite wishing to avoid being an unwanted ass: don't piss on your own party. Posted by: adamthemad at March 03, 2009 02:13 PM (kIjlp) 8
The only thing more scary than Obama’s experiment is the thought that it might fail and the political power will swing over to a Republican Party -- Stuff True Conservatives Say, Vol. 1 (unabridged) No sir! We definetly don't want him to fail.. nuh uh. Why that's incendiary! Republicans? In power? Wash your mouth, sir! Posted by: Entropy at March 03, 2009 02:13 PM (m6c4H) 9
Yo David -- Good luck putting together that coalition of the uninterested and disengaged.
Posted by: Purple Avenger at March 03, 2009 02:13 PM (Ygf78) 10
Remember this triangle?
Angle 1: Republican base Angle 2: Democratic base Angle 3: Fiscal Conservative, Socially Liberal One of these angles is always the biggest, but never larger than the sum of the other two. My advice to the political advice columnists is to keep talking. The more they do the greater Angle 3 becomes. Posted by: WTF Capital Investments at March 03, 2009 02:16 PM (AHrTm) Posted by: Goldmember at March 03, 2009 02:17 PM (8/DeP) 12
Even now this effete prick regards the Republican party as unprepared to lead. Now in a vacuum that may be a reasonable notion, but contrasted to what these leftist fucks (Obama, Pelosi, Reid, et al) are doing to our country?
When Brooks and the rest fully and unconditionally admit what feckless idiots they have been, I'll be prepared to talk peace. Posted by: Alamo at March 03, 2009 02:18 PM (Mqupr) 13
Okay, now I'm getting pissed off again. Yeah, but at least you had a good excuse to link up that classic Iowahawk piece. Posted by: Andy at March 03, 2009 02:19 PM (WsTw8) 14
David Brooks and his ilk would rather have Barack Obama in charge than a grassroots conservative. How am I supposed to agree with that position exactly? Hell, why am I even supposed to tolerate it?
And the best part? Next week, or sooner, Brooks will be back telling us all how/what we should think and shaking his head sadly when we don't take his advice. Posted by: kefka at March 03, 2009 02:20 PM (uTg5e) 15
The arrogance of Brooks, et al., was matched by the arrogant hissy fit another batch of Ivies who are lawyers and bloggers had when Pawlenty was not picked as Maverick's sidekick. And they, and other bloggers of the Axis of Defeatism, need to be called out as well.
Posted by: eddiebear at March 03, 2009 02:21 PM (wnU1W) 16
I stopped reading Brooks a long time back. I'm not surprised he hasn't gotten any smarter, because he wan't that smart to begin with. Posted by: Hammer at March 03, 2009 02:22 PM (GkYyh) 17
in his defense, he was not the only moronic supposed "conservative" or "moderate" who fell for it because obama was just so well pedigreed. doug kmiec, kenneth adelman, buckley, parker, noonan (and many more) were just as stupid. To see the centrist in obama, you just had to ignore everything he had ever written, all those he had hung out with or acknowledged as an influence in his life, his voting record and his past employment. It would seem an impossible task but they did it. Posted by: ed at March 03, 2009 02:22 PM (Urhve) 18
Hey David Brooks: THEY ARE WHO WE THOUGHT THEY WERE!!
Posted by: Dennis Green at March 03, 2009 02:22 PM (teb/C) 19
I thought the Reagan Democrats were Irish-Italian-Polish blue collar workers? And getting them on board by following the country club GOP lead is supposed to get them back? I doubt that alot. Posted by: andycanuck at March 03, 2009 02:22 PM (TpHGM) Posted by: mare at March 03, 2009 02:23 PM (X1fsj) 21
I continue to think this is destructive. Perhaps we need some catharsis and bloodletting, but at some point we have to stop focusing on what divides the conservative movement and start focusing on dividing the liberals from the Reagan Democrats. Brooks, Cumdumpster Kathleen, Peggy Noonan and the rest of the elitist pieces of shit who sided with Ø-bammy and trashed Palin can go floss their twats with concertina wire for the rest of their miserable, and hopefully short, lives. Posted by: ol_dirty_/b/tard at March 03, 2009 02:24 PM (IoUF1) 22
Moderate? That's like, er middle of the road, right? The yellow line where you always see the road kill? A moderate, one that doesn't want to stand for anything, but doesn't want to offend anyone. Usually seen at the Country Club sipping a trust fund gin and tonic. Soon, those trust funds are going to be gone and that moderate is going to be thinking, shit I might have to work. Holy Jesus, this Obama MF was not the Hope and Change I was looking for. Besides, who gives a fuck about Brooks? Just another Ghey Andi wanta be with a soft ass. Not that I would know, really. Kemp Posted by: kempermanx at March 03, 2009 02:24 PM (qvT/A) 23
Heed the words of Cato the Elder: Wise men profit more from fools than fools from wise men; for the wise men shun the mistakes of fools, but fools do not imitate the successes of the wise.
Posted by: Monty at March 03, 2009 02:26 PM (/0a60) 24
To be fair, Kathleen Parker is not an elite, never was, and never will be. She's an elite-wannabe. She has social anxiety many of the others don't face and has to do things to get in good with the A-crowd. Like sucking off the back-up place-holder on the football team-- she didn't *want* to do that, necessarily, but she had to do *something* to get invited to that party, yannow?
Posted by: ace at March 03, 2009 02:28 PM (gEsIJ) 25
If you're a bit exhausted by the elites vs. grassroots battle, you can always surrender yourself to the tender embraces of Obama-Care. We'll just pretend everybody's right and fade away from history.
David Brooks didn't battle and supported Obama. McCain didn't battle and we got Obama. Steele apologizes that he doesn't want to battle. Political Peace In Our Time sucks so far. Makes me think battling might have been important. Posted by: t-bird at March 03, 2009 02:28 PM (FcR7P) Posted by: WTF Capital Investments at March 03, 2009 02:28 PM (AHrTm) 27
To be honest, I'm a bit exhausted by this constant Caddyshack-esque
spat between the so-called elites and the grassroots. I find the elites
more annoying, but I'm also getting annoyed by the excesses of the
resentments-stoking on the grassroots side where every dispute mutates
into an us vs. them cultural Rangnarok.*
The battle cry of the unprincipled, especially when they look up and see they're on the short side of the scoreboard. Posted by: Ken at March 03, 2009 02:32 PM (arEOF) 28
...but I'm also getting annoyed by the excesses of the resentments-stoking on the grassroots side where every dispute mutates into an us vs. them cultural Rangnarok.* WTF is this? I'll tell you what it sounds like: It sounds like the moonbats when they say, "Yeah, but the Republicans do it, too." Dude, here, I'll prove it mathematically: Brooks', the Noonan's, the Frum's, etc., are 100% wrong. We, the other side, are 0% wrong on Obama. QED Posted by: Darling at March 03, 2009 02:32 PM (SdIfp) 29
Imagine just how fucking stupid you would have to not be able to see what a bullshit artist Barry is. HEY BROOKS YOU IDIOT, HE'S FROM CHICAGO. Oh, but Brooks can speak unthreateningly and be docile, quote Yeats and happy to be laughed at by cruel little liberal fuckheads. Posted by: Sen. Gov. E. Buzz Miller, PhD at March 03, 2009 02:33 PM (HGLNd) 30
Ace,
Once again you're missing the point. Our "resentments" come from the way the elites look down their noses at us and constantly profess that they know better than we do so we should just sit back and let them run things. Damn it man, this is the exact same mindset of liberalism. We, the mob, are all backwater, redneck, ignoramuses who are too stupid to wipe our own asses and they, the "intellectuals", have to take over for our own good. I for one am tired of this attitude, regardless of whether it comes from the left or the right; however it's a tad more offensive coming from people who claim to stand on the principles of our founding (ie, the peeps on "our side"), not to mention hypocritical. These are the same asshats that threw Palin to the wolves (and hell a lot of them joined in!) and spent 6 months playing the victim when they were rightfully called out by the grassroots people for supporting the liberal messiah. The same douchebags that have spent the 3 months post-election telling us that we grassroots people (the bitter clingers who are stuck in our old-fashioned principles) are the reason Republicans lost so big during this election and that we nned to be wishy-washy like them if we want to win over the "middle". Suprise, suprise! Now that Obama's all but started wearing a "Socialism Rocks!" t-shirt, we find them totally dumbfounded, writing columns that collectively whine "Bbbbbbbut he said he would govern from the center." If they'd listened to us morons they may have had a hint of all this beforehand. So, yes. I'm angry. I'm resentful. And I still want David Brooks to eat shit and die. Posted by: Mandy P. at March 03, 2009 02:33 PM (MK6Kx) Posted by: Bald Ninja at March 03, 2009 02:34 PM (4pdbX) 32
I wonder what it's like to be David Brooks and look at yourself in the mirror sporting those ridiculous glasses, elite Ivy League education and massive unearned ego knowing that you're not really very intellegent and that but for the protected confines of the NYTimes you'd be teaching philosophy to business majors at a community college? The far-left moonbat who works for my free alternative weekly and reliably spouts disproven far left talking points straight from Daily Kos and Media Matters shows more common sense and intellectual consistency than David Brooks (and actually teaches at a community college I believe). After all he was able to quickly identify Obama as a fellow traveler and supported him accordingly. Brooks is truly stupid and no veneer of an impeccible elitist education and the quoting of various obscure authors can disguise it. You can train a moron to regurgitate stuff and call it smarts but the ability to analyze a situation and draw the correct conclusions shows real smarts and Brooks is clearly a fucking idiot.
Posted by: Big E at March 03, 2009 02:34 PM (CBGRs) 33
Sarah Palin wasn't taken in by Obama's easy, Ivy charm. Does that make her smarter than David Brooks?
That proves Palin has more perceptive intuition than Brooks. Of itself, sophistry is its own weakness when becoming its own end to all things. With Obama, there is no tolerance for opposition. Hearing Brooks echo below the Obamnibus wheels will provide an interesting rhythm. His "WTF" chorus might have a catchy ring to it. It will be interesting to note the details surrounding the coming attraction as Obama rolls over the typical white woman Noonan for having presumed to have earned his favors. Posted by: maverick muse at March 03, 2009 02:34 PM (qHQmV) 34
Couple weeks ago at NRO Steyn expressed his shock that Obama was going to expand "hate crime" laws and extend affirmative action to women.
Obama had posted those policies prominently on his website for two years, and campaigned on them in the longest, most expensive, and most watched campaign ever. Steyn, a flamboyant broadway afficionado, fashion writer, foreign policy hawk, demography expert, and ex-deejay, is said to be among the highest grossing hacks in the English speaking world. Couldn't be arsed to take a 5 minute look at Obama's website to read his actual policies, which may as well have been inferred given his ultra-Marxist voting record in the Senate. Like, fuck, seriously. Posted by: Authentic Conservative at March 03, 2009 02:34 PM (Qd4zK) 35
And yet, in his piece, Brooks is still appalled by "the Rush Limbaugh brigades".
Hey, dipshit: WE WERE RIGHT ABOUT OBAMA, AND YOU WERE WRONG. Now, in a rational world, you'd think he might look at us differently after that. On another board I frequent (music, mostly lefties), I was asked after the election how our side would handle the loss. I said we'd lick our wounds, then turn on each other and drive out the weak. It's drive-out-the-weak time. Posted by: tsj017 at March 03, 2009 02:36 PM (TBwnU) 36
looks like the moderate senators of brooks' dreams aren't listening either-they are on board with all the spending.
Posted by: ed at March 03, 2009 02:39 PM (Urhve) 37
"in his defense, he was not the only moronic supposed "conservative" or
"moderate" who fell for it because obama was just so well pedigreed.
doug kmiec, kenneth adelman, buckley, parker, noonan (and many more)
were just as stupid."
That's not much of a defense; they should all go fuck themselves, and Parker should be forced to call out Sarah Palin's name while she does so. Posted by: Kensington at March 03, 2009 02:39 PM (90mpl) 38
Moderate? That's like, er middle of the road, right? The yellow line where you always see the road kill?--Kempermanx
During the campaign, I referenced that center lane designated for Left turn only. At this point, the road kill is RINO. All those lining up to eat from the Obama pork trough position themselves for slaughter. Posted by: maverick muse at March 03, 2009 02:39 PM (qHQmV) 39
"Sarah Palin wasn't taken in by Obama's easy, Ivy charm. Does that make her smarter than David Brooks?" Yes. Just based on that, a lot of people are smarter than David Brooks. Posted by: SpideyTerry at March 03, 2009 02:40 PM (DOkAL) 40
Ace, please think back to last fall and how frustrated you were about McCain ignoring the base and continuing his path to failure. Every day McCain would wiff every time Obama threw him a softball. We were on the sidelines trying to coach McCain. "Hey asshole, you're doing it wrong," we said. McCain ignored us, he gave us the finger, he told us, "I can handle it, so please fuck off, my friends." McCain was wrong; they were all wrong. We were right. This is no time to work together. This is no longer a joint effort. We need to wrest control from these losers, these failures, and start winning again. Posted by: Darling at March 03, 2009 02:40 PM (SdIfp) 41
Mr.Barnum knew whereof he spoke. Given the choice between believing a man's promises absent any proof that he'll make good on them or believing that his past behavior tends to predict his future behavior, your average fool will choose the former every time. So, good for you, Mr. Brook's that the confusion vapors you inhaled whilst your foolish arrogant head was shoved up Obama's ass have now dissipated. Congratulations. But I can't help but think that the next time a bamboozler invites you to breathe deeply, you'll still take off your common sense hat and insert your cranium. That's your right, I suppose, but I can only offer a hearty fuck you for all the others you'll no doubt try to pull in with you yet again. Posted by: TiredWench at March 03, 2009 02:40 PM (ulSJI) Posted by: tsj017 at March 03, 2009 02:41 PM (TBwnU) 43
I don't like being around lefties. Brooks does like being around lefties. He's an insipid little grandmother to the idiot Rod Dreher. They both can take their little clubby clubs where they talk softly about important things and shove them up their flabby asses. Posted by: Sen. Gov. E. Buzz Miller, PhD at March 03, 2009 02:41 PM (HGLNd) 44
He seems to be still justifying his original choice by
saying the Republican Party is currently unfit for power. I don't see why he is
still so torn. Does he really think if the other idiot won we would be in this
mess? He apparently has no analytical skills. Posted by: robtron12 at March 03, 2009 02:42 PM (gue+Q) 45
Posted by: Authentic Conservative at March 03, 2009 02:34 PM (Qd4zK)
Steyn never fell for Obama's bullshit, not once. He didn't vote for him, didn't advocate on his behalf, and never fell for the Hopenchange. Lots of conservative pundits to excoriate, but not Steyn. Posted by: Kensington at March 03, 2009 02:42 PM (90mpl) 46
"He's an insipid little grandmother to the idiot Rod Dreher."
Oh don't even get me started on this worthless douchebag. "Crunchy" con...what a tool. Posted by: Kensington at March 03, 2009 02:43 PM (90mpl) 47
To be fair, Kathleen Parker is not an elite, never was, and never will be. And some of us went to an Ivy League school and still like Palin. Posted by: MamaAJ at March 03, 2009 02:43 PM (X6Zdh) Posted by: robtron12 at March 03, 2009 02:43 PM (gue+Q) 49
David Catamite Brooks: “We moderates are going to have to assert ourselves.”
I can’t stop laughing. I can’t. This guy may be the most brilliant self-satirist since Chico Marx. Posted by: George Orwell at March 03, 2009 02:45 PM (AZGON) 50
Here's another little gem from Brooks' piece:
Those of us who consider ourselves moderates — moderate-conservative, in my case — are forced to confront the reality that Barack Obama is not who we thought he was. His words are responsible; his character is inspiring. So Brooks still hasn't really taken his head out of his ass. He's just thinking about it. "His character is inspiring." Fucking A. You don't get out much, do you, David? Posted by: tsj017 at March 03, 2009 02:45 PM (TBwnU) 51
Sorry, but I'm not in the mood right now to forgive and forget. For their betrayal (and that's what it was), let them gnash their teeth in the outer darkness for now. We will let them know when they can come inside.
Posted by: oLD gUY at March 03, 2009 02:45 PM (n1yDn) 52
Steyn has never endorsed Obama and never said a kind word about him. Please don't try to lump him in with the Frum, Buckley minor, Parker, Noonan, Kmiec cabal.
Posted by: allswell at March 03, 2009 02:45 PM (CIVfi) 53
at some point we have to stop focusing on what divides the conservative movement This is not a division in the conservative movement, it's a division in the Republican party. It's a division between the conservatives and the (for lack of a better word) liberals. And its a struggle between them to determine who will set the direction for the GOP going forward. It's not something that can be papered over. Posted by: flenser at March 03, 2009 02:48 PM (I9QB4) 54
Steyn, a flamboyant broadway afficionado, fashion writer, foreign policy hawk, demography expert, and ex-deejay, is said to be among the highest grossing hacks in the English speaking world. Couldn't be arsed to take a 5 minute look at Obama's website to read his actual policies, which may as well have been inferred given his ultra-Marxist voting record in the Senate. Dude, WTF? Posted by: Entropy at March 03, 2009 02:49 PM (m6c4H) Posted by: Kensington at March 03, 2009 02:49 PM (90mpl) 56
Brooks is still appalled by "the Rush Limbaugh brigades".
Hey, dipshit: WE WERE RIGHT ABOUT OBAMA, AND YOU WERE WRONG.--tsj017 Precisely! Every vote Obama failed to get was a direct vote AGAINST OBAMA'S RADICAL SOCIALISM because that opposition already researched and studied the detailed records. Yet, Obamanatics can not conceive of history prior to their own perception of the present moment (devolved propaganda). Posted by: maverick muse at March 03, 2009 02:49 PM (qHQmV) 57
Oooh! Oooh! A chubby club! Can I join? Posted by: andi sullivan at March 03, 2009 02:49 PM (TpHGM) 58
I thought the Reagan Democrats were Irish-Italian-Polish blue collar workers Hell, those guys were the Nixon Democrats. My dad was one of them. Revered FDR, but LBJ soured him on Donks, George McGovern finished it. People who bust their ass 8 hours a day building things get kinda grumpy about getting shaken down to support fatasses who won't work. Could happen again! Posted by: Sort-of-Mad Max at March 03, 2009 02:51 PM (ERJIu) 59
Oh, shit! That's "clubby club" not "chubby club". Fuck you, Sen. Gov. E. Buzz Miller, PhD, you teaser. 8=^( Posted by: andi sullivan at March 03, 2009 02:51 PM (TpHGM) 60
and to deflect the blame he should get for his stupidity, he is puffing about rush and the inadequacies of Republicans. he needs a good shrink
Posted by: ed at March 03, 2009 02:52 PM (Urhve) 61
There was an interesting subtext to the hostility towards Sarah Palin (and the adoration of Obama). It is the fetish many liberals and MSM commentators (but I repeat myself) have for a certain kind of intelligence: not the common-sensical kind of smarts that Palin obviously has, but rather an abstract braininess that as often as not does not translate into competence at a given job. My uncle used to call this kind of intelligence "asshole smart". Which is to say, a guy might be a professor in astrophysics but if he can't change a tire then what real use is he to the world? Abstract intelligence is laudable, but is desirable in a job candidate only when it contributes to their ability to do the job. And yet politicians as often as not hold advanced degrees in law, economics, business, and so on; and yet are some of hte most inept and deeply clueless people in society. (And we keep voting for these people; what does that say about us?) I would not think more of Sarah Palin if she could quote The Rime of the Ancient Mariner or perform differential calculus in her head. And yet there are many out there for whom this abstract ability is the main indicator of personal worth. I find this sad. I have met many people who are perhaps not the brightest bulbs and yet are wonderful people and credits to the species; whereas I have met several PhD's who are execrable human beings, complete moral abysses. Intelligence is not a moral property, nor is it often even a practical aspect of a person's ability to perform well in a given job. All things being equal it's obviously better to be smart, but all things are rarely if ever equal.
Posted by: Monty at March 03, 2009 02:52 PM (/0a60) Posted by: Knemon at March 03, 2009 02:54 PM (nxEyq) 63
at some point we have to stop focusing on what divides the conservative movement and start focusing on dividing the liberals from the Reagan Democrats.
Good idea. What's dividing the Reagan Democrats from the GOP are people like Brooks, Frum, Little Lord Buckley, etc. So we need to show the liberal Republicans the door, and then we can show the liberals in the Democratic party the door as well. It's win-win.
Posted by: flenser at March 03, 2009 02:55 PM (I9QB4) 64
He seems to be still justifying his original choice by
saying the Republican Party is currently unfit for power
The problem is, I agree with Brooks here. The current crop of halfwits, douchewhistles, and bumblefucks that are in charge of the Republican Party are unfit to lead. Hell, they're unfit to lead a cub scout to a candy store. So yes, Brooks is a twat-stain, but he's pointed out a real problem. Posted by: OregonMuse at March 03, 2009 02:55 PM (FO+YO) 65
Crunchy Con means Easily-Wedgied-and-Swirlied Paste-Eating Whiny Soft-Talking Clubby Little Douchebag to me... Posted by: Sen. Gov. E. Buzz Miller, PhD at March 03, 2009 02:55 PM (HGLNd) 66
Geez...I wonder how many more of these Obambi cockholsters will finally realize that the Unicorn and Skittles actually are the flavor of Obambi's ass??? They sold their fucking souls to put this idiot and his ilk in office and now they are suffering from "buyer's remorse"... FUCKING SUCKS TO BE YOU, David Brooks!
Hate to tell him this, but we told him so.... Posted by: Buck Naked at March 03, 2009 02:56 PM (kmEp8) 67
"The arrogance of Brooks, et al., was matched by the arrogant hissy fit
another batch of Ivies who are lawyers and bloggers had when Pawlenty
was not picked as Maverick's sidekick. And they, and other bloggers of
the Axis of Defeatism, need to be called out as well."--eddiebear
Ed Morrissey really likes/liked Pawlenty. But look what a younger version of McCain-as-turncoat-politician Pawlenty turns out to prove himself to be. McCain may well have done conservatives a huge favor by not choosing Pawlenty who promotes "new and improved" progressive defeatism. Posted by: maverick muse at March 03, 2009 02:56 PM (qHQmV) 68
That's not much of a defense; they should all go fuck themselves, and Parker should be forced to call out Sarah Palin's name while she does so.
Nice! Posted by: Jubal Anderson Early at March 03, 2009 02:57 PM (krKUp) 69
RE: Ragnarok and bloodletting What better time than now? We're still a year away from primary season for the midterms. Everybody who was not 100% on-board with the STOP-OBAMA-NOW! effort need to be kicked repeatedly when they go down. When this nightmare of an administration forces the middle to turn away from the disastrous effects of this lefty agenda writ large, that will be a perfect time to instruct them on the principles of true conservatism. The squishes offer only leftism-lite. Posted by: MikeO at March 03, 2009 02:57 PM (4sSHg) 70
Go fellate a shotgun, Brooks.
Posted by: jaleach at March 03, 2009 02:58 PM (gHrZU) Posted by: maverick muse at March 03, 2009 02:59 PM (qHQmV) 72
"Sarah Palin wasn't taken in by Obama's easy, Ivy charm. Does that make her smarter than David Brooks?" Yes. Posted by: t.ferg at March 03, 2009 03:00 PM (nF4Jh) 73
I would like to take a large brimming bowl filled with a nice Quaker granola, softened up a bit with some organic 2% and drive it right into Dave Brooks' eyeglasses, those stupid 1989 Rick Moranis glasses... But I would do it while talking softly about Russell Kirk, of course. Posted by: Sen. Gov. E. Buzz Miller, PhD at March 03, 2009 03:00 PM (HGLNd) 74
As Clemenza says,"These things gotta happen every five years or so, ten years. Helps get to rid of the bad blood." Carping amongst Republicans will be forgotten in the wake of the Obamalypse. Posted by: Buck at March 03, 2009 03:01 PM (Y2ycI) 75
Angle 1: Republican base The number of people in this country who are fiscally conservative and socially liberal could fit in phone booth. If you could even find a phone booth these days. It seems like half the so-called libertarian movement has been supporting the Never-Ending Bailout. And another quarter of it is opposed to actually cutting anything.
Posted by: flenser at March 03, 2009 03:02 PM (I9QB4) 76
It is the fetish many liberals and MSM commentators (but I repeat myself) have for a certain kind of intelligence: not the common-sensical kind of smarts that Palin obviously has, but rather an abstract braininess that as often as not does not translate into competence at a given job.
My uncle used to call this kind of intelligence "asshole smart". That's it. I have no problem with people who go to school for a lot of years and who are book-smart. But I've known, and worked with/for enough of them over the years to know that expecting them to RUN anything well is really foolish. IOW, it's the worshipers who bug me. Posted by: MamaAJ at March 03, 2009 03:02 PM (X6Zdh) 77
#63
Doubleplus 1! Posted by: George Orwell at March 03, 2009 03:02 PM (AZGON) 78
Those of us who consider ourselves moderates — moderate-conservative,
in my case — are forced to confront the reality that Barack Obama is
not who we thought he was.
That line right there is funny enough to almost make up for the whole thing! Posted by: CM at March 03, 2009 03:03 PM (f14vX) 79
Honestly, how in the HELL can someone be so stupid to not see through the Barry bullshit. He is apparently not part of the liberal establishment that knows who that asshole is yet loves him for it, Brooks must just be a lunkhead. Posted by: Sen. Gov. E. Buzz Miller, PhD at March 03, 2009 03:04 PM (HGLNd) 80
"at some point we have to stop focusing on what divides the conservative
movement and start focusing on dividing the liberals from the Reagan
Democrats"
This won't be done by obvious persuasion. It'll be done by a preference cascade as it finally sinks in what an incompetent, socialistic boob Barry is. In other words -- keep attacking him for his blunders and wrong turns. No apologies. Posted by: someone at March 03, 2009 03:05 PM (1wXl7) 81
Maybe Brooks just got some NYT social disease that messed up his head. Took a sip out of MoDo's coffee cup by mistake, or sat on the toilet after Herbert. Shit like that happens.
Posted by: Roy at March 03, 2009 03:06 PM (cB77O) 82
You know what's funny about this? These "moderate" fuckwits are always telling us how we need a "big tent", we must compromise, "reach across the aisle", blah, blah, blah. So we they and their 'Rat friends nominate the biggest moderate, compromising, reach-across-the-aisling old crank we could find. Then, when he picks a real conservative (who has actually, you know, ACCOMPLISHED SOME FUCKING THINGS in her career instead of writing memoirs and fucking around in Pakistan) as a running mate to pacify us, they ran like little bitches to Lord Teleprompter so they can bask in the glow of his pendulous man-tits.
In other words, it's not us who are intolerant of dissenting views, it's THEM. They want a big tent, but only so they can fit more liberals inside. Conservatives and those who didn't go to Ivy League schools and have actually had a real job at some point in their lives aren't welcome. It's to embarrassing for them to have to admit even being in the same party with us to the faux-intellectual mental masturabators in the salons of Paris and the Manhattan literati scene. So FUCK THEM. THEY are expendable. Sarah Palin and Rush are not. Hence my earlier graphic comment. Posted by: ol_dirty_/b/tard at March 03, 2009 03:06 PM (IoUF1) 83
there is no such thing as a fiscal conservative/social liberal. Arnold was the last one offered-how's that going, Caleefornya? didn't the three wise social Republican liberals just sign off on obama's spending?
Posted by: ed at March 03, 2009 03:07 PM (Urhve) 84
Think about it... Brooksy is the token "conservative" lawn jockey at the NYT. If he weren't a tool when he went in, he must be one by now.
Posted by: George Orwell at March 03, 2009 03:07 PM (AZGON) Posted by: David Brooks at March 03, 2009 03:07 PM (I9QB4) 86
You guys who are always busting on the Creator of Worlds need to go read his piece at Hot Air. It's very well-written and not at all wishy-washy. He doesn't deserve a lot of the criticism he gets here and a quick read will prove it. Now, the Eeyore stuff he comes by honestly. Palin is a great touchstone for this divide. If you ever passed along any crap like she doesn't believe in dinosaurs or contraception or you snickered when somebody claimed she did, you are on the other side of the divide. Whether you support her or not, that shit ain't funny, and reveals an elitist meanness that your parents should have beaten out of you as a whelp. Posted by: spongeworthy at March 03, 2009 03:07 PM (rplL3) 87
RE: ASSHOLE SMART
Brilliant. As my first boss used to say, "I never met a PhD who didn't need one." Posted by: MikeO at March 03, 2009 03:07 PM (4sSHg) 88
#50 "His character is inspiring." Fucking A. You don't get out much, do you, David? tsjo17, Brooks is fucking ghey, with jungle fever, don't you get it? Kemp
Posted by: kempermanx at March 03, 2009 03:09 PM (qvT/A) 89
Roy - he probably has sex with MoDo...that would fuck with just about anyone's head
Posted by: Buck Naked at March 03, 2009 03:09 PM (kmEp8) 90
I find this sad. I have met many people who are perhaps not the brightest bulbs and yet are wonderful people and credits to the species; whereas I have met several PhD's who are execrable human beings, complete moral abysses. I've often said some of the brightest idiots I've ever met had college degrees. Posted by: jaleach at March 03, 2009 03:11 PM (gHrZU) 91
#89
So it was hot chick-on-chick action? Posted by: George Orwell at March 03, 2009 03:12 PM (AZGON) 92
I can't speak for others but the reason I dislike the "elites" is that they aren't, well, elite. If someone is wildly intelligent and well educated, they're elite. If they can only use the right buzzwords and look good in tweed, they're not.
Look, I went to the University of Chicago, a good school. And, I'll tell you, there are two huge differences between the various students there. a) Raw intelligence. Some kids made it in because their parents spent $30k on SAT prep and elite extracurriculars. Some kids made it in because they were smart as fuck and could ace the SAT with a hangover. b) Actual education. Some kids took a ton of soft sciences and avoided all challenging classes. Other kids were smashed all day long with econometrics and honors physics. At the end of the day, both of those groups might be called elites but only one set actually was. Now, tell me, when you look at our elites, don't they most look like the kids who took a lot of SAT prep classes and loaded up on the soft social sciences? Posted by: counter at March 03, 2009 03:13 PM (SL3qo) 93
Brooks, Frum, et al, are chatters, not thinkers. They can only reflect the conventional wisdom of the moment rather than shape it.
As Kratos like to point out: In the end, there's only chaos ... and me. Posted by: the angel of death in a funny hat at March 03, 2009 03:17 PM (PD1tk) 94
In other words, it's not us who are intolerant of dissenting views, it's THEM. They want a big tent, but only so they can fit more liberals inside.
Case in point: Brent Schundler. Schundler was elected as the first Republican Mayor of Jersey City, NJ since 1917. He did not do it by being a Giuliani style Republican either, he was the real deal. You might think that the GOP would be interested in a man who can get elected, then re-elected, in a majority-minority city where only 6% of the voters are registered Republicans. You might think they'd consider him a rising star and tap him for higher office. At least you might think these things if you did not know that the one thing the liberal GOP establishment hates far more than a Democrat is a conservative.
Posted by: flenser at March 03, 2009 03:18 PM (I9QB4) Posted by: OregonMuse at March 03, 2009 03:21 PM (FO+YO) 96
Miyagi:
Now, ready?
Daniel: Yeah, I guess so. Miyagi: [sighs] Daniel-san, must talk. [they both kneel] Miyagi: Walk on road, hm? Walk left side, safe. Walk right side, safe. Walk middle, sooner or later [makes squish gesture] Miyagi: get squish just like grape. Here, karate, same thing. Either you karate do "yes" or karate do "no." You karate do "guess so," [makes squish gesture] Miyagi: just like grape. Understand? Mr. Miyagi FTW. Posted by: grognard at March 03, 2009 03:22 PM (XiVKO) 97
The gov't could knock down some serious revenue by taxing crow. Because there are a lot of motherfuckers eating it in large quantities right now.
Posted by: scottythrust at March 03, 2009 03:22 PM (VTeUD) 98
If you aren't smart, but want to be seen as such, you learn how to move about with politics and ass kissing. Michael Steele, Dave Brooks... You ever wonder why it is people like those two morons who are able to be loved by liberals? Posted by: Sen. Gov. E. Buzz Miller, PhD at March 03, 2009 03:23 PM (HGLNd) 99
Hahahaha Yeah, Obama really, really was going to be bipartisan and down-the-middle on economics issues, with 90% of his campaign money coming from far left motherfuckers. Oh my Christ this guy is reeeeeTARDED Posted by: TMF at March 03, 2009 03:25 PM (waaUg) 100
David Brooks is a cancer on the Republican party. And if somebody reads that line to mean that Brooks, like cancers, is in line for some cutting or should be irradiated or dosed with poison until he shrivels up and dies, well, I'm not an Ivy League educated supergenius, so I'm not smart enough to understand what an incendiary statement that is.
Posted by: bgates at March 03, 2009 03:29 PM (+4lg3) 101
There is a difference, in my mind, between the elites and an elitist. Some elites have talent and brains and have worked to attain their status. They have my admiration. Elitists, on the other hand, have a plan for my life and I'd just as soon live it my way, in fact I insist.
Posted by: Javems at March 03, 2009 03:32 PM (hq71Y) 102
"the Republican Party is currently unfit for power"
Who died and made David Brooks god, designating the entire Republican Party and all its members as unfit to lead? Boehner is a fit Republican leader. Palin proved herself fit for power winning Alaska's Governorship. Jindal proved the Democrats in Louisiana unfit for power, and himself fit. Limbaugh is a fit voice leading conservatism throughout America. Brooks' lament amounts to his own self condemnation. He is unfit to write, and unfit to be read. Regardless of style with focus on content, Brooks is meaningless, and misery loves company. There are many Republicans fit for power, and that they are rallying to the Constitution is proof of their sensibilities. Those chiding defeatism charge into disaster, even if by sitting still on the fence post blocking the necessary flow of resilient energy. Socialists coined the slogan, "don't be part of the problem, be part of the solution" in order to exonerate themselves from guilt of commission from their socialist cultural Marxist experiments while at the same time blaming any who dug their heels in against abuse as the culprits of omission who cause the failures embedded in Socialist meddling. It's a Socialist distractive blame game tactic to deny the record simply because it proves the fallacy of what is now hypocritically termed "liberalism". As things are, Steele and many others have mountains to scale in order to gain through experience the higher strategic ground. Positive criticism is a great teacher, whereas resonating the echo of defeatism causes destructive avalanches. True enough, to win requires the finest observation and communication skills. Perhaps Steele has a limited time frame in his current position dependent upon his own ability to overcome personal shortcomings such as VANITY. Posted by: maverick muse at March 03, 2009 03:36 PM (qHQmV) 103
Now, tell me, when you look at our elites, don't they most look like the kids who took a lot of SAT prep classes and loaded up on the soft social sciences?
counter, I agree with you 100 million percent. That's what frosts me so much about people blathering about O!'s intelligence or speaking ability and everything every said or written about the likes of MoDo; Brooks; Frum; anyone at NRO, the Atlantic, or Slate; etc and etc ad infinitum. They're simply not that bright, not in common sense and not in quality education. They can spout the buzzwords and ramble on in ways that impress English/writing professors, but they are simply dim. They're not well read, they do not have good thoughts (not in the politically correct way, but in a perspicacious way), and they don't know anything worthwhile.I'm including an adequate grasp of history and literature in that, much less science, logic, or philosophy/religion. And, seriously, to anyone who thinks Obama is a good public speaker - listen to two minutes of him reading off a teleprompter at his shiniest and then any random clip of Rush Limbaugh or Ronald Reagan. Or, if you prefer, FDR (great delivery) or Winston Churchill (somehwat choppy delivery, but absolute confidence). Those last guys have oratory down. Obama, not so much. Posted by: Ella at March 03, 2009 03:39 PM (jeP9I) 104
There sure are a lot of dumb smart people. Posted by: Warden at March 03, 2009 03:39 PM (k/lkp) 105
"Ragnarok". Cool.
Posted by: Hucklebuck at March 03, 2009 03:41 PM (oQLnX) 106
Ace: May I suggest a new title for this post? "David Brooks Recalls Conservative Principles and his Clean, Articulate, Neibuhr-esque Ass Fucking, but Mostly his Clean, Articulate, Neibuhr-esque Ass Fucking" I've taken the liberty of translating his latest lament. "You wouldn't know it some days, but there are moderates in this counrty--moderate conservatives, moderate liberals, just plain moderates. We sympathize with a lot of the things that President Obama is trying to do. We like investments in education and energy innovation. We support health care reform that expands coverage while reducing costs" I like things that sound nice. In fact, as a moderate, I'd say that's my defining characteristic and the defining characteristic of moderates in general. We like politicians who just keep talking about nice things and don't bother us with any trifles like "How will that ever work?" "But the Obama budget is more than just the sum of its parts... There is entailed in it, a promiscuous unwillingness to set priorities and accept trade-offs..." But even a moderate like me, who likes nice-sounding things, knows that some things sound... too nice. And as a moderate, that makes me moderately suspicious. Indeed, when I can, for just one moment, stop flattering Obama myself -- for instance with how amazing he is when he amazingly summarizes Neibuhr -- I start to wonder, who does this Obama think he is? "So programs are piled on top of each other and we wind up with a gargantuan $3.6 trillion budget." And it's usually right about this time, that I remember what sucks about being a moderate who is a complete whore for someone who's a good Neibuhr summarizer and says other nice things... The BILL !!! "The US has never been a society riven by class resentment. yet the Obama budget is predicated on class divide... "The U.S. has always been a decentralized nation, skeptical of top-down planning. Yet, the current administration concentrates enormous power in Washington... "The U.S. has always had vibrant neighborhood associations... but... the Obama administration... punishes civic activism and expands state intervention. The U.S. has traditionally had a relatively limited central government. But federal spending as a share of GDP is zooming..." And then I also remember another thing that sucks about being a moderate... Once we do see the bill, we start thinking about all sorts of things that we should have thought about before the election when we were too busy listening to nice, clean, articulate sounding things like Neibuhr summaries, and shunning stupid rubes whose guns and god might give us The Social Cancer. "Those of us who consider ourselves moderates... are forced to confront the reality that Obama is not who we thought he was. His words are responsible; his character is inspiring. But his actions betray a transformational liberalism that should put every centrist on notice..." It's tragic, really. Why is is that all the best Neibuhr summarizers always fuck me in the ass and then never call. I feel so... used. "Moderates now find themselves betwixt and between. On the left, there is a president who appears to be... a bold progressive liberal. On the right, there are the Rush Limbaugh brigades. The only thing more scary than Obama's experiment is the thought that it might fail and the political power will swing over to a Republican Party that is currently unfit to weild it." Oh, who am I kidding? I just can't help myself. Give me 1,000 sweet-Neiburh-talking ass fuckings! It's better than being thought of as one of those types! I live in New York! I'm cosmopolitan! I READ NEIBUHR!!!! "Those of us in the moderate tradition -- the Hamiltonian tradition that believes in limited but energetic government -- thus find ourselves facing a void. We moderates are going to have to assert ourselves. We're going to have to take a centrist tendency that has been politically feckless and intellectually vapid and turn it into an influential force. " The first task will be to block the excesses of unchecked liberalism... It will be up to moderates to raise the alarms against these ideological outrages." Well I for one am not going to take it any more! I am going to get my fellow moderates who share my lack of conviction, mushy-headedness and gullibility... my love of nice-sounding things... my love of Neibuhr... and say to all of those clean, articulate, nice-talking Neibuhr summarizers.... ... No! You will not fuck me in the ass anymore! Everyone look out! This clean, articulate smooth talker will say nice sounding things and summarize Neibuhr in ways that will make you wet, but all he really wants to do is fuck you in the ass and then not call! "But beyond that, moderates will have to sketch out an alternative vision... of a nation... in which burdens are shared broadly, rather than simply inflicted upon a small minority... a nation that does not try to build prosperity on a foundaiton of debt... that puts competitiveness and growth first, not redistribution first." Yes! We few... we band of moderates! We will stand up and articulate our vision! It will be a bold vision! It will be a courageous vision! It will be a fashionable vision! It will be the very same vision, the same philosophy and the same ideology of the rubes, racists and hicks that we actively condescended to and sought to defeat only five months ago! "Moderates are going to have to try to tamp down the polarizing warfare... face fiscal realities honestly... offer and agenda that inspires confidence by its steadiness rather than shaking confidence with its hyperactivity. "If they can do that, maybe they can lure the White House back to its best self--and someday offer respite from teh endless war of the extremes." Because maybe if the sweet-Neibuhr-talking ass fucker that I love so much can just see how I really feel... maybe he'll call me. Posted by: Guvnah at March 03, 2009 03:47 PM (Rg8DN) 107
Whatever happened to him? The NJ GOP branded him a right-wing wacko and sabotaged his run for Governor. So we lucky people in NJ got Jim McGreevy instead. McGreevy was too sleazy even for NJ and resigned when it came out that he was sucking random guys dicks in the parking lot and having the state police be his lookout. Plus appointing his boyfriend to patronage positions with the DHS. But the state GOP was spared a conservative and thats the important thing. If it seems that my hate for liberal Republicans burns hotter than a thousand suns, well, I'm just returning the favor. It cannot be overstated how much those people detest conservatives.
Posted by: flenser at March 03, 2009 03:48 PM (I9QB4) 108
There sure are a lot of dumb smart people. Perhaps judgement and intelligence run on separate tracks in the brain. Who knows. There has to be some explanation. Posted by: Eleven at March 03, 2009 03:48 PM (7DB+a) 109
You can train a moron to regurgitate stuff and call it smarts but the ability to analyze a situation and draw the correct conclusions shows real smarts and -Brooks is clearly a fucking idiot. -Big E Intelligence is not a moral property, nor is it often even a practical aspect of a person's ability to perform well in a given job. All things being equal it's obviously better to be smart, but all things are rarely if ever equal. -Monty Pssssst! Hey elites! This is what smart looks like, you twats. Posted by: Warden at March 03, 2009 03:49 PM (k/lkp) 110
Now, tell me, when you look at our elites, don't they most look like the kids who took a lot of SAT prep classes and loaded up on the soft social sciences? I sure didn't. I took "affirmative action" and my brother could run really, really fast! Posted by: Michelle Obama at March 03, 2009 03:49 PM (gQ+XA) 111
Seriously, it is not credible to pull a "I never saw this coming" on Obama. Effing blind? Posted by: blaster at March 03, 2009 03:49 PM (BiphJ) 112
RE: ASSHOLE SMART
Mark Steyn recently laughed about the British Royalty having personal grooms whose job description includes wiping the royal ass clean. That pretty well epitomizes the extremes. Marxist new guard self indulging aristocrat thug elitists expect the rest of us to be their royal ass wipers. They know how to take our wealth in order to binge and consume and devour and excrete spending but have neither the will nor the skill to wipe their own ass clean. They would that their shit be our just deserts. Posted by: maverick muse at March 03, 2009 03:50 PM (qHQmV) 113
Absolutely, Ella. Also, my definition of elite is simply brains plus education, which, frankly, has less and less to do with a take-the-easy-classes Ivy League education.
I'll give you an example, my grandpa. High school diploma, spent most of his life working on power lines. So, he's obviously not an elite, right? Well, he was nearly a genius with math, had read all the classics, and after retiring, pursued geology like a mad 17th century gentleman scientist. You'd talk to the guy and he'd blow your mind. But, to current affectations, he's a blue collar prole and David Brooks (who probably doesn't understand how a single appliance in his house works) is an elite thinker. What bullshit! Posted by: counter at March 03, 2009 03:51 PM (SL3qo) Posted by: TMF at March 03, 2009 03:53 PM (waaUg) 115
There sure are a lot of dumb smart people. Perhaps judgement and intelligence run on separate tracks in the brain. Who knows. There has to be some explanation. They're educated stupid. Not really smart at all. Posted by: Entropy at March 03, 2009 03:54 PM (m6c4H) 116
I am by no means a rocket scientist- a bit of a dope really (have to write out the 20% calculations for tips), but Ive been calling bullshit on Barry from day one.
Posted by: TMF at March 03, 2009 03:55 PM (waaUg) 117
A clear distinction between elite and elitist differentiates between the elite "finest" and the elitist "snob".
Posted by: maverick muse at March 03, 2009 03:55 PM (qHQmV) 118
"Those of us in the moderate tradition -- the Hamiltonian tradition that believes in limited but energetic government WTF?? People actually trace the tradition of Hamilton? That guy was a douchebag.. I just thought they were, you know, douchebags who weren't paying much attention. I didn't know there's a whole school of commited Douchebagism that they were aiming for. Posted by: Entropy at March 03, 2009 03:57 PM (m6c4H) 119
Brooks & Hamilton... that's so perfect. He idolozes a guy who got himself killed by getting into a duel, and then taking the high road by not shooting at his opponent. Perfect. Perfect... perfect... perfect. Posted by: Guvnah at March 03, 2009 04:07 PM (Rg8DN) 120
I went to an elite-ish undergrad school that was Republican-heavy and then to an Ivy for grad school and the big difference was the amount of their self-esteem that was invested in being thought of as smart at the Ivy. During undergrad hardly anyone I knew gave a fuck about learning for the sake of impressing other people. They just worked hard in order to meet objectives (grad school, good job, etc) and then spent the rest of their time getting drunk and trying to get laid, knowing that the rest of their lives would be full of adult responsibilities. Libtards on the other hand, tend to remain adolescent. And the thing about having a deep-seated need to be thought of as smart is that it makes you extremely vulnerable to liberal groupthink. I'm actually surpised that a pussy like David Brooks who desperately needs intellectual validation manages to cling to conservatism at all. I almost don't know whether to despise him for his squishiness or admire the fact that he tries.
Posted by: Anti-elitist elitist at March 03, 2009 04:08 PM (fkgyi) 121
I'm thinking a bumper sticker reading "So, how's that 'hope and change' working out for you?" could be a good seller.
Posted by: epobirs at March 03, 2009 04:10 PM (C6teq) 122
"Mark Steyn recently laughed about the British Royalty having personal
grooms whose job description includes wiping the royal ass clean."
Are they hiring? I haven't had a job since before Thanksgiving. Posted by: Kensington at March 03, 2009 04:10 PM (90mpl) 123
"Those of us in the moderate tradition -- the Hamiltonian tradition that believes in limited but energetic government"
I saw what he wrote! He knows nothing of my work! He means my whole fallacy is wrong. How he got to write a column in anything is totally amazing! Posted by: Alexander Hamilton at March 03, 2009 04:13 PM (90mpl) 124
What a stupid cunt...
Posted by: Aaron Burr at March 03, 2009 04:14 PM (90mpl) 125
As a Bubba oriented Republican (Auburn Grad), why can't we have knock down drag out fights between Christopher Hitchens and Rush. That would be fun! I'd boo Hitchens pretty regularly and with great enthusiasm, but I wouldn't be surprised if he made a point or two. Brooks or Parker would be road kill against Rush, and I wouldn't even want to read the box scores. If we are going to have intellectual superiors on the right could we at least get smart ones? I know stupid intellectuals worked out great for the Democrats, but do we need to copy everything they do? Posted by: Chubby Gene at March 03, 2009 04:14 PM (0udxW) 126
I know I'm late to the thread. Don't know about Brooks, but I did rad the Buckley piece pre-election and found it to be such dreck that one could hardly give him the title of "elite." Like I said before, if this is the intelligentsia that Republicans need to rely on to make the argument, it's no wonder Repubs lost the election.
Posted by: sears poncho at March 03, 2009 04:15 PM (1WJym) Posted by: RFYoung at March 03, 2009 04:18 PM (WqZCc) 128
Hoover belonged to the last century's turn deification of engineers. But his failure was in not understanding how to create what he envisioned, his every effort meddling the economic catastrophe further.
FDR took the "inherited catastrophe" and meddled it into a DECADE of suffering through federal socialism. LBJ took FDR's welfare program and gave America "comprehensive welfare reform" tied with his "Great Society" ribbon. BHO takes the lead from all of the above in order to simultaneously consume and change all things in the New World Order. Given Obama's first 100 days out-spending the nation's conglomerated deficit since inception, you still ain't seen nothin' yet! To date, nationalization has been the spoken threat. But nationalization assimilates into the New World Order where there is no individualism, only the slavery of collectivism. Given the opposition to the BHO brand of socialism, his dream is precisely too big to succeed. The higher his pride takes him, the harder the fall. Our misfortune rests in how far we permit BHO to rise, as he most certainly will take everyone down with him. Posted by: maverick muse at March 03, 2009 04:19 PM (qHQmV) 129
Guvnah... a bright and amusing moron you are. God love ya.
Posted by: scottythrust at March 03, 2009 04:20 PM (VTeUD) Posted by: spongeworthy at March 03, 2009 04:29 PM (rplL3) 131
"The current crop of halfwits, douchewhistles, and bumblefucks that are in charge of the Republican Party are unfit to lead."
Ehhhh... you're giving a broken clock too much credit. I think he thinks the Republican party is unfit to lead for a completely different reason you do. Posted by: OHNOES at March 03, 2009 04:34 PM (JOkZm) 132
"but at some point we have to stop focusing on what divides the conservative movement and start focusing on dividing the liberals from the Reagan Democrats."
Yeah, that's what we're doing. 80% of the country is sick of our overlord class. Posted by: LiveFreeOrDie at March 03, 2009 04:35 PM (q6zPc) 133
Without reading the 125+ posts above me, and therefore risking repeating a point, my immediate and lasting take on the caricature of Sarah Palin as a poorly-educated rube found its birth in the fact that she went to college at a (western) state university as opposed to the Ivy League or Annapolis or West Point. It's not difficult to prove that the prominent people in our nation are a legion of snobs.
If you haven't received an eastern education (plus maybe U of Chicago or Stanford), the cultural elite have no problem painting you as Gomer Pyle. Even citizens who are closer in IQ to Gomer than Einstein accept the notion that somebody who graduates from the University of Idaho with good grades is dumber than a plagarizing foot-in-mouth opponent who went to Yale. Having gotten an Ivy League "education" myself, I can tell you that I'd much rather have my non-Republican dad be POTUS, with his HS diploma, than 99% of my former fellow students. It's a shame that money buys influence, trumping well-grounded sense in our media-fed culture. (And it's a real shame that so many liberals have enough money to be influential.) If I had one wish, it would be... Well, OK, if I had 50 wishes, one of them would be to dispel the rumor in these United States that an "Ivy League" diploma is better than any other one when it comes to leadership, sense, and accountability. Posted by: Wittanzy at March 03, 2009 04:52 PM (wmhZ0) 134
That said, if David Brooks can be so easily gulled and his supposed
intellectual and cultural inferiors on the grassroots side cannot be,
what purpose does he serve, exactly?
Um, he sounds purty, using all them big wurds n stuf. Which makes him smarter than us and like that kinda thing. Because sure we all saw through Obama, and understand economics, and realize his dream of "more healthcare coverage, at a lower price" is just in violation of simple economic market practices... but he sounds purty. And that is what counts with today's intelligentsia; oddly the only intelligence worth noting is vocabulary. If you know all the words, you're smart. If all you know is math, logic, common sense, economics, and history; you're obviously to be lumped in with those other bumpkins and Nascar folk. So we'll use all the prety words to try this smashing new idea we've just heard of called Socialism; it makes perfect sense to us and looks like a brilliant economic model... why hasn't anyone tried this before? And why are these Conservatives throwing rocks at me and calling me names? We'l they're just rude and foolish not to embrace my new Socialism idea... how dare they. So, to answer your question: His purpose is to sound pretty... or if I were to be coarse, all he's got going for him is a pretty mouth... and we all know how far that'll get ya. Posted by: Gekkobear at March 03, 2009 04:54 PM (X0NX1) 135
He idolozes a guy who got himself killed by getting into a duel, and then taking the high road by not shooting at his opponent. All right, quit mocking poor John McCain. Posted by: flenser at March 03, 2009 04:57 PM (I9QB4) 136
The more I hear from these self-appointed elite thinkers of both political persuasions, the more I'm convinced that the true battle line of human civilization is drawn between collectivist centralizers and liberty loving individualists. May our elite betters burn in the fires of the grassroots.
Posted by: monkeyfan at March 03, 2009 05:18 PM (cEE8N) 137
No, Brooks, you are the RuPaul of the conservative movement.
Posted by: Admr. Sebastian B. O. Buniontow VI at March 03, 2009 05:22 PM (NLtVk) 138
Posted by: Kensington at March 03, 2009 02:42 PM (90mpl)
Steyn never fell for Obama's bullshit, not once. He didn't vote for him, didn't advocate on his behalf, and never fell for the Hopenchange. Lots of conservative pundits to excoriate, but not Steyn. Very cleverly worded. His enthusiasm for McCain\Palin and due diligence on Obama were insufficiently robust. He is not a conservative either. He did what many neo-cons did: publicly support McCain\Palin with limited enthusiasm while standing by and letting the Obama steam roller build momentum. There is so much dirt on Obama that these guys aren't talking about that it amounts to implicit collusion. Seriously, the fucker didn't even spend 5 minutes reading the Marxist policy and Marxist website of a Marxist poised to take over his country. Fuck him, he's useless. Posted by: Authentic Conservative at March 03, 2009 06:12 PM (Qd4zK) 139
Intelligent is knowing that the aqueous precipitation bemoistening your cranium is rain. Smart is knowing to get out of it. Posted by: Fa Cube Itches at March 03, 2009 06:44 PM (JexDm) 140
Mark Levin is calling out the elitist weenies by name today, especially Douhat, Frum, Brooks, and Derbyshire.
I don't have an Ivy League degree, in fact I didn't even finish college. Somehow I saw through Obama from the very beginning what the Very Intelligent Brooks just is beginning to see. Where is my 6 figure columnist job? Peggy Noonan, in between deciding whether to swallow or look for a kleenex is enraptured due to his talent in reading lines off a teleprompter. Noonan is a speechwriter by trade, so it would come naturally that she would judge someone not by results but how they looked reading a speech on tv. Kathleen Parker simply has jungle fever, and she'll never go back. Once these whores are kicked to the curb after they're no longer needed, rest assured like Brooks that their continued relevance and income relies on them somehow convincing us that they were with Le Resistance all along, not the first collaborators. Posted by: kbdabear at March 03, 2009 06:45 PM (miw86) 141
Thou call'st me dog before thou had'st a cause, But since I am a dog, beware my fangs.
Posted by: Immolate at March 03, 2009 06:49 PM (F2eLY) 142
Posted by: Authentic Conservative at March 03, 2009 06:12 PM
Dude, I didn't support McCain, either. I think the DOW would be, like, 2000 points higher if he were President, and the spending bill probably would have been half as big, but we'd be facing just as many bailouts and we'd probably already have amnesty (instead of threats to close down Gitmo). The overall economy would still be collapsing because the fundamentals are weak. O! is just getting us there faster. McCain was David Brooks. He's an O! fanboy. So, why blame someone for not liking the knock off better than the original? Posted by: Ella at March 03, 2009 06:55 PM (jeP9I) 143
Seriously, the fucker didn't even spend 5 minutes reading the Marxist policy and Marxist website of a Marxist poised to take over his country. Fuck him, he's useless. I don't know if this is a parody or serious. You have no ideal what your talking about. As for not 'robustly enough' getting behind McCain - fuck McCain. McCain is useless. Who the fuck COULD get robustly behind him? He lost fucking Indiana. Posted by: Entropy at March 03, 2009 06:55 PM (cok/k) 144
Hey, Ace, here's the problem. The Republican split never gets resolved because it never happens. Both sides talk and talk and never fight it out. This drama will continue until one side or another throws the other out of the party.
The Republicans must be either firmly set as the Northeastern moderate squish party or firmly set as the national home for conservatives. Trying to run it as both is fucking failing. The back-east Rockefeller Republicans who scoffed at Reagan in '76 are still running things, and they now scoff at Palin or Jindal. The biggest problem is going to be money. Until we the hardcore conservatives exercise the option to defund the party (which will be hard because a lot of us aren't wealthy), it won't listen to us. Posted by: SGT Dan at March 03, 2009 07:37 PM (Pb41/) 145
Authentic Conservative @ 138
Point taken. However, I can't get too hot and bothered about someone who couldn't get excited about McCain. He was truly the lesser of two evils. My problem with dirt bags like Brooks and the supposed conservative "intelligentsia" was that they could not rouse themselves to offer a CONSERVATIVE critique of Obama. There was plenty of meat out there. People on the internet were doing a yeoman's work reporting the truth about him. These "elites" are supposed to be plugged in and we're supposed to believe that they were snowed? Yeah, that's pretty thin Posted by: sears poncho at March 03, 2009 08:19 PM (1WJym) 146
Hahahaha Yeah, Obama really, really was going to be bipartisan and down-the-middle on economics issues, with 90% of his campaign money coming from far left motherfuckers. Oh my Christ this guy is reeeeeTARDED
Posted by: TMF at March 03, 2009 03:25 PM (waaUg) Hey, you are ignoring the 10% that came from the Saudis. Posted by: 18-1 at March 03, 2009 09:15 PM (odYmd) 147
I continue to think this is destructive. Perhaps we need some
catharsis and bloodletting, but at some point we have to stop focusing
on what divides the conservative movement and start focusing on
dividing the liberals from the Reagan Democrats.
Ace, between the Limbaugh/Steele threads and the comments to this post (which I haven't read), everyone and their dog has given this what-for, but we need to have this fight. I'd prefer it be in the 2012 primaries than now, just because of the successful template the Dems had in the '08 primaries. The left/netroots beat the center/DLC/Clinton faction, and while the PUMAs promised they'd never fall in line, enough of them did to draw a straight line from there to Election Day. However, there may not be enough left of the party by then to have that fight then, so now it must be. And like most entities who have internal squabbles between them, provided we realize that we can't win alone, and perhaps make some minor concessions to each other (we promise not to elect Rush Limbaugh RNC chair, they promise not to vote for Obama again), we'll emerge from it stronger and more unified. Sometimes that clubhouse brawl is exactly what a team needs to get fired up. So we call a players-only meeting, let out all that cathartic anger at how we're carrying their asses, and come to some realizations. Yes, if unchecked this may tear us apart. But last I checked we weren't doing so hot anyway. And if a party split happens, leaving one left party, one center party and one right party, that's not the worst thing in the world, either. Posted by: INCITEmarsh at March 03, 2009 09:31 PM (PyjdF) Posted by: remy hair at March 03, 2009 09:45 PM (8d+0+) 149
I'm slow to pipe up here, but the way I see it, this is basically a throw down of all conservative commentators to see what the new pecking order will be. Bush, like it or not, was the face of the Republican party for 8 years. Granted, he was unfairly demonized, but now that he's gone, everyone on the right is having a bit of fun poking each other to gauge reactions.
Seriously, it appears to be an attempt to establish a new pecking order. Frum, Noonan, et al. who were Bush lackeys are out pushing their own ideas. Rush is slapping down anyone who challenges his prominence. And so on and so on. Sooner or later it will all settle down and everyone will "know" who the new alpha leader of the GOP will be. Interesting. Myself? I'm line up behind the Rush/Steyn axis of evil. Posted by: slackmac at March 03, 2009 10:05 PM (ynL91) 150
Brooks needs a "high colonic" administered on reality TV. People will agree they've never seen such an ASSHOLE and will, hopefully, shun him in their daily political reading. Bitch-slapping this girly-man is a waste of our time.....consider for whom he works.....and whom he betrays. Posted by: grizzly bare at March 04, 2009 02:27 AM (8+zL9) Posted by: aaabs at March 04, 2009 05:01 AM (8d+0+) 152
Sooner or later it will all settle down and everyone will "know" who the new alpha leader of the GOP will be. And his name is Entropy. And his word is Law. Now bring me sandwiches and juiceboxes and I'll consider spairing your petty lives. Posted by: Entropy at March 04, 2009 09:51 AM (m6c4H) 153
"I grow weary of the red-on-somewhat-less-red infighting"
Ex-cuuuuuuuse me, Mr. Holier-than-thou Hobo Killer, but the somewhat-less-red assholes like Brooks, Parker, Frum Noonan, and Buckley started this. They have repeatedly stuck it in our faces. Even Jesus only told us we had to turn the other cheek ONCE. After the second smiting, we are perfectly free to defend ourselves by beating these self-appointed elitists like they were hobos marinated in cheap vodka. If our fighting back wearies you, try some lesbian bondage porn (it always gives me a pick-me-up). There's lots of channels on the Interwebs, dude. Posted by: Adjoran at March 06, 2009 12:31 PM (PbKS0) 154
SEO Directory,Free Directory,Travel directory,Sports directory,Shopping directory,Web Directory,Internet directory,Open Directory,Health directory,Link Directory,Automotive directory,Business directory,Education directory,Entertainment directory,Finance directory,Url directory
Posted by: tmd at April 20, 2009 09:32 AM (qQsGo) Posted by: Wedding Dresses at August 20, 2009 10:17 PM (syU91) 156
UGG Boots Sale
ugg shoes ugg classic cheap ugg UGG UK bape shoes bape shoes sale cheap bape shoes UGG UK UGG boots sale UGG Classic discount UGG UGG Bailey Button UGG Amelie Suede UGG Bailey Button UGG Classic Cardy cheap UGG Cardy UGG Classic Crochet UGG Classic Mini UGG Classic Short UGG Classic Tall UGG Coquette Casual UGG Gypsy Sandal UGG Halendi Sandal UGG Hammond Slipper UGG Infant's Erin Baby UGG KnightsBridge UGG Layback Slipper UGG Lo Pro Button UGG Matala Sandal UGG Napoule Sandal UGG New Arrival 5389 UGG New Short Boots Posted by: retailike at October 17, 2009 11:01 AM (zFgZJ) 157
discounthair straighteners
ghd hair chi hair straightener ghd straighteners chi straighteners chi hair chi hair iron hair straighteners ghd ghd hair straighteners free shipping! Posted by: hair straighteners at October 24, 2009 08:33 AM (9oMrs) 158
discountugg boots sale
ugg shoes tall ugg boots ugg classic boots nike shox air jordan shoes nike air max nike air force one bailey button ugg rainier ugg boots ugg classic cardy ugg crochet boots ugg mini ugg classic short classic tall ugg ugg coquette ugg baby boots ugg knightsbridge ugg lo pro new ugg boots ugg short boots ugg nightfall boots ugg skimmer ugg sundance boots ultra short ugg ugg ultra tall discount ugg slippers ugg sandals ugg halendi ugg slippers ugg layback ugg matala sandal ugg napoule sandal ugg persephone tasmina ugg air force 1 shoes jordan air shoes nike shox shoes air max nike free shipping! Posted by: ugg boots at October 27, 2009 07:33 AM (Am8nx) 159
Discount Boots
Womens UGG UGG Shoes UGG Australia UGG UK UGG USA discount ugg boots cheap ugg boots Posted by: fdsfds at October 27, 2009 07:37 AM (8kvkz) 160
Your post very good,thanks for sharing!Are you also like these:ugg boots uk,buy ugg boots,australia ugg,cheap ugg boots,ugg boots,ugg boots sheepskin,womens ugg boots,ugg australia boots,cheap ugg boots
Posted by: australia ugg at October 27, 2009 10:18 AM (c6EK2) 161
Do anything needed to support an idea, a good idea usually brings good results, doing business is like that.http://www.dunksky.com/.This site has always been on Posted by: nike dunk sb at October 30, 2009 09:15 AM (LACJ9) 162
Cheap UGG Cardy
UGG Shoes Sale UGG Australia Discount UGG boots UGG Bailey Button cheap ugg boots Posted by: gfhgyuj at November 02, 2009 09:10 AM (Rzoq5) 163
buy Discount Boots
Womens UGG UGG Shoes UGG Australia UGG UK UGG USA discount ugg boots cheap ugg boots air force 1 shoes nike air force air force 1 mens air force 1 boots air force onefrom usa Posted by: airforceoneshop at November 03, 2009 01:47 PM (LHCCE) 164
Come to our website for shopping with high quality and best service! There have new products,MBT M. Walk
and MBT Lami,Welcome everybody to buy it. Posted by: mbt shoes at November 08, 2009 08:23 AM (QhfLM) 165
cheap ugg
buy ugg ugg usa ugg boots ugg uk ugg australia ugg shoes ugg sale womens ugg boots discount ugg boots cheap ugg boots ugg shoes sale ugg boots sale ugg sundance ugg 5819 ugg 5815 ugg knightsbridge ugg 5825 ugg rainier Posted by: ugg at November 11, 2009 12:51 AM (ly6Oi) 166
Buy discount ugg shoes
cheap ugg shoes cheap ugg ugg rainier buy ugg ugg usa discount ugg boots ugg 5825 ugg shoes sale ugg sundance ugg shoes cheap ugg boots ugg 5815 ugg sale ugg uk ugg knightsbridge womens ugg boots ugg boots ugg australia ugg 5819free shipping Posted by: ugg boots at November 12, 2009 01:12 AM (IeIJx) 167
Supra FootwearThe supra shoe is comfortable and can wear all day.
supra ShoesThe bestsupra.com seems to be from strong material, and have many seems all over. They are really beautifull. Supra Skytopbestsupra.com offer Great quality shoe for a reasonable price. Supra 2009Comfort Posted by: ryiu at November 12, 2009 10:06 PM (9dQ8A) 168
nike dunk sb
Do anything needed to support an idea, a good idea usually brings good results, doing business is like that.http://www.dunksky.com/.This site has always been on Posted by: nike dunk sb at November 14, 2009 12:26 AM (APB+g) 169
buy [url=http://www.reviewups.com/]discount ugg shoes[/url]
[url=http://www.reviewups.com/]cheap ugg shoes[/url] [url=http://www.reviewups.com/]cheap ugg[/url] [url=http://www.reviewups.com/ugg-coquette-casual-shoes-c-22]ugg rainier[/url] [url=http://www.reviewups.com/]buy ugg[/url] [url=http://www.reviewups.com/]ugg usa[/url] [url=http://www.reviewups.com/]discount ugg boots[/url] [url=http://www.reviewups.com/ugg-classic-short-c-1]ugg 5825[/url] [url=http://www.reviewups.com/]ugg shoes sale[/url] [url=http://www.reviewups.com/ugg-sundance-c-5]ugg sundance[/url] [url=http://www.reviewups.com/]ugg shoes[/url] [url=http://www.reviewups.com/]cheap ugg boots[/url] [url=http://www.reviewups.com/ugg-classic-tall-c-3]ugg 5815[/url] [url=http://www.reviewups.com/]ugg sale[/url] [url=http://www.reviewups.com/]ugg uk[/url] [url=http://www.reviewups.com/ugg-knightsbridge-c-27]ugg knightsbridge[/url] [url=http://www.reviewups.com/]womens ugg boots[/url] [url=http://www.reviewups.com/]ugg boots[/url] [url=http://www.reviewups.com/]ugg australia[/url] [url=http://www.reviewups.com/ugg-classic-cardy-c-2]ugg 5819[/url]from usa Posted by: cheap at November 14, 2009 04:25 AM (s7MB5) 170
Fake Cheap Rolex | soccer jersey wholesale | Replica Watches | Replica Rolex | Replica Rolex | Girard Perregaux Watch | Mont Blanc Watches | Fake Panerai | Hamilton Fake | Concord Fake Watches | Hublot Replica Watches | Concord Watches Replica | Fake Piaget | Rado Watches | Fake Jacob & Co
Posted by: replica watches at November 17, 2009 03:45 AM (xpuiO) 171
nike sb high
nike dunk high nike dunk low nike dunk sb air force one nike air air force nike six rings shoes Jordan Six Rings air jordan six NBA Shoes Nike Kobe IV Shoes Nike LeBron VI Shoes supra shoes supra skytop discount puma shoes puma sandal prada shoes prada men shoes gucci shoes women gucci shoes discount gucci men obanma shoes lacoste shoes ATO Matsumoto Shoes Posted by: nike shoes at November 17, 2009 04:34 AM (DuP3Z) 172
soccer jersey wholesale | Replica Breitling Watches | Replica Breitling Watches | Replica Breitling Watches | replica soccer jersey | Blancpain Fake | Replica Gerald Genta | Replica Zenith | Jaeger LeCoultre Replica Watches | Swiss Chanel Ceramic Fake Watches | Piaget Watch Replica | Roger Dubuis Replica | Tudor Watch | Ebel Fake | Roger Dubuis Watches
Posted by: replica watches at November 17, 2009 10:12 AM (xpuiO) 173
Fake Watches | replica soccer jersey | Replica Rolex | Replica Watches | Replica Omega | Zenith Watches Replica | Gucci Watch | Seiko Replica Watch | Seiko Watch | Hermes Watches | Corum Watches Replica | Mont Blanc Replica Watch | Fake Technomarine Watches | Replica Breitling Watches | Ebel Watches
Posted by: replica watches at November 17, 2009 09:59 PM (xpuiO) 174
Replica Cartier | Replica watches | Replica Cartier | Replica Rolex | replica soccer jersey | Cheap Louis Vuitton Fake Watch | Replica Tissot Watches | Oris Watch Replica | Rolex Watches Replica | A.lange Sohne Watches | Replica Iwc Watch | Cheap Cartier Fake Watch | Tissot Replica Watch | Rolex Watches Replica | Cheap Omega Fake Watch
Posted by: replica watches at November 18, 2009 03:21 AM (C/zDM) Posted by: mbtshoesbuy at November 23, 2009 01:38 AM (bNNim) 176
None of us are born with a set of shoes mbt shoes on our feet, but they are infinitely important to our wellbeing. Even though the commercial shoe http://www.mbter.com industry didn't get underway during the beginnings of civilization, man is believed to have constructed footwear mbt shoes 40,000 years ago. So the question isn't whether you should buy a pair of shoes... it's how should you go about buying them!
When you're shoe shopping, the task can seem overwhelming and frustrating. You just want to try on a few pairs of shoes and then get out of the store. But the reality is that you should pick out a pair of shoes mbt shoes with a lot more care than other items of your wardrobe. After all, the health of your feet are at stake! Posted by: pigeu at November 23, 2009 11:08 PM (1aNEH) 177
The proper function of man is to live, but not to exist.ugg classic cardyConquer fear of death and you are put into possession of your life. ugg classic tallThere is a time to speak and a time to be silent. ugg knightsbridgefree shippingmbt cheap
mbt sale mbt uk mbt shoes cheap MBT M.Walk Posted by: reviewups at November 27, 2009 12:27 AM (xUZwC) 178
hot news for brand shoes online store ,do you want to win more discount ?and popular for younger,and nike air maxwith top quality A ,come on all air max shoes with lowest price for highest quality !
Posted by: nike air max at December 01, 2009 08:34 PM (OKj2x) 179
The cheap ugg boots sale for women are stylish, they are comfortable and what¡¯s more, they keep your feet. theres a pair of fellow sufferers,ugg australia uk to complement your personal preferences, why do we not take the traditional high discount ugg boots on salefor cold winter?
As a matter of fact, with the passing time, the love for ugg usa is increasing among girls in this modern world. The growing demand for these womens ugg made the manufacturers UGG Boots Sale to revamp the looks of these boots with different hues.come our website and buy a pair of ugg uk.UGG Classic Cardy are popular as shoes for cowboys. The SHOES close the whole parts of the foot. The ugg cardy are important to protect your feet from any dangerous things during your walking activities. There are many oatmeal ugg available in the Market and if you are interested to get one you can directly go to the store that sells it. Posted by: reviewups at December 03, 2009 04:14 AM (OKj2x) 180
discount ugg boots
ugg boots outlet cheap ugg outlet cheap ugg boots ugg classic tall ugg bailey button ugg rainier ugg classic cardy ugg classic crochet ugg classic mini ugg classic short ugg classic tall ugg nightfall ugg sundance ugg ultra short ugg ultra tall ugg boots 5389 Posted by: uggboots at December 07, 2009 07:30 AM (Cooh2) 181
Today ugg boots online have become a phenomenon.Every winter,the ugg classic crochet are one of the hottest goods in the market all over the world.So now don't be hesitation,own a pair of ugg usa immediately.
Posted by: ugg boots sale at December 09, 2009 03:10 PM (I3/dZ) 182
We supply authentic discount Lacoste Shoes
Lacoste Trainers New Lacoste Lacoste Sale Mens Lacoste camden lacoste trainers lacoste trainers shoes lacoste camden retro camden lacoste trainers lacoste carnaby shoes lacoste carnaby retro lacoste shoes sale New Lacoste shoes Lacoste shoes online cheap Lacoste shoes Lacoste shoe mens lacoste shoes Lacoste Shua Lace Black Lace shoes white Lace shoes lacoste swerve shoes White Lacoste shoes Lacoste shoes sale Cheap Lacoste shoes Lacoste Women Shoes Women Lacoste Shoes Lacoste Shoes online on line, cheap price,Top quality,Free shipping! Posted by: Lacoste shoes at December 12, 2009 03:22 PM (/3s/N) 183
The womens mbt Tembea is a new generation lace-up with Dual Board construction and a striking style that pays tribute to the classic sneaker. It packs in all the mbt lami shoes benefits with a fresh look and feel, striking the perfect balance between health benefits ... The discount mbt Shuguli GTX is a is a sleek and stylish professional shoe ideal for work and more formal occasions whilst delivering full waterproofing from GORE-TEX. These are especially effective for those who have to stand or walk for long periods of time ...
The mbt shoes Fanaka GTX is a sporty but rugged styled shoe that combines fashionable, casual design with all the health benefits associated with the sporting style discount mbt shoes. These are especially effective for ladies who have to stand or walk for long periods ... The black mbt Bia is a classic, professional shoe ideal for work and more formal occasions whilst delivering all the health benefits from MBT design. These are especially effective for ladies who have to stand or walk for long periods of time during work ... Posted by: gfdg at December 14, 2009 03:54 PM (iV/dV) 184
Corrosion Cufflink Yiwu | Wood Bangle | Wholesal Bvlgari Jewelry | Wholesal Stainless Steel Bracelet | Plating Bangles Luxury | Wholesal Bvlgari Jewelry | Zircon Rings Yiwu | Corrosion Bangles Wholesale | Wholesal Magnet Bracelet | Laser Earring Luxury | Stamping Bracelet Yiwu | Fashion bracelets Yiwu | Wholesal Magnet Bracelet | cross pendant | Plating Earring | Carbon Fiber Bangle Luxury | Jewelry Tools Wholesale | Necklaces Luxury | Leather Bracelet Cheap | Titanium Jewelry
Posted by: wholesale jewelry at December 16, 2009 09:22 PM (1dySH) 185
Watches Rolex Fashion | Replica Juicy Couture Watches | Watches Panerai Fashion | Replica Louis Vuitton Watches | Bedat & CO Replica Watches | Watches Maurice Lacroix Fashion | Watches Girard Perregaux Fashion | Watches Bulgari Fashion | Gucci Belt Replica Watches | Watches Piaget Fashion | Replica Concord Watches | Replica Oris Watches | Chopard Fake Watches | Watches Jaeger LeCoultre Fashion | Hublot Fake Watches | Glashutte Fake Watches | Watches Cartier Fashion | Watches Jaeger LeCoultre Fashion | Watches Daniel Roth Fashion | Replica Swiss Watches
Posted by: wholesale jewelry at December 20, 2009 04:24 AM (1dySH) Posted by: nike air max 360 shoes at December 22, 2009 01:41 PM (xnxK1) 187
nike shox for kids
nike shox monster nike shox nz nike shox nz ii nike shox oz nike shox R3 nike shox R4 nike shox R4 torch nike shox R5 nike shox TL1 nike shox TL3 nike shox Torch nike shox turb Posted by: nike high dunk at January 02, 2010 06:18 AM (8u0Dq) Posted by: GHD at January 02, 2010 06:23 AM (8u0Dq) 189
UGG cardy
Ugg Australia Ugg Shoes Sale Bailey Button ugg boots Ugg classic cardy UGG cardy Ugg Australia Ugg Shoes Sale Bailey Button ugg boots Posted by: ugg shoes|timberland uk|ugg boots|87415555.com.cn at January 06, 2010 10:08 AM (qzq48) 190
nike air max 360 shoes
womens air max nike air max womens air max nike air max 360 shoes air max kids air max 90 kids air max classic BW kids air max 360 kids air max 97 nike air max 180 nike air max 2009 nike air max 2010 nike air max 360 shoes nike air max 87 nike air max 88 nike air max 89 nike air max 90 nike air max 91 nike air max 93 nike air max 95 nike air max classic BW nike air max ltd nike air max TN womens air max 2007 womens air max 2009 womens air max 87 womens air max 90 womens air max 91 womens air max 95 womens air max 97 womens air max classic BW Posted by: air max shoes at January 28, 2010 02:04 AM (JOSIc) 191
nike air max 360 shoes
womens air max nike air max womens air max nike air max 360 shoes air max kids air max 90 kids air max classic BW kids air max 360 kids air max 97 nike air max 180 nike air max 2009 nike air max 2010 nike air max 360 shoes nike air max 87 nike air max 88 nike air max 89 nike air max 90 nike air max 91 nike air max 93 nike air max 95 nike air max classic BW nike air max ltd nike air max TN womens air max 2007 womens air max 2009 womens air max 87 womens air max 90 womens air max 91 womens air max 95 womens air max 97 womens air max classic BW womens air max ltd Posted by: air max shoes at January 30, 2010 01:11 AM (ll36v) 192
nike max
air max shoes nike air max nike max shoes air max 1 nike air max 1 air max 2 nike air max 2 air max 89 nike air max 89 air max 90 nike air max 90 air max 91 nike air max 91 air max 95 nike air max 95 air max 97 nike air max 97 air max 180 nike air max 180 air max 360 nike air max 360 air max 2003 nike air max 2003 air max 2009 nike air max 2009 air max ltd nike air max ltd air max tn nike air max tn air max tailwind nike air max tailwind womens air max 1 womens air max 90 womens air max 95 womens air max BW womens air max LTD womens air max TN womens air max 360 womens air max 2003 womens air max 2007 womens air max 2009 Posted by: airmax at January 31, 2010 11:59 AM (3vSvS) 193
It seems replica watches that the watch brand Porsche Design is good at creating sporty classic watches. Many of the Replica watches from it are such watches. They are especially designed for men. Some of the products manufactured today by Porsche Design range from luggage, eye-glasses, replica watches wristwatches pens, wallets and so on, all this products being best-selling items. What makes the replica watches products of this brand so popular? That is not only because of the famous reputation of the brand, but because they display the most elegant and posh replica watches fappearance, for those who appreciate style and prestige. If you have enough knowledge of products from replica watches this brand, you would understand these reasons. Defined by modern appearance and functional mechanisms, the replica watches Porsche Design brand has remained true to its intentions as to create timepieces that would meet the expectations of our modern trends and contemporary times. People nowadays seek watches with amazing designs, but at the same time, to provide many functions and to be highly reliable. In a world of speed replica watche and dynamism, Porsche Design proposes sporty watches that managed to impress with their unpretentious designs and the amazing variety of technical functions provided.
Posted by: replica watches at January 31, 2010 11:15 PM (uznWB) Posted by: wedding gowns at February 02, 2010 09:37 PM (3UQpc) 195
Certainly watches are Replica Watches used to help people record rolex Watches time, but rolex watches nowadays its functions have enlarged. Replica watches are now tag heuer Watches not only objects that tag heuer watches can tell you what time it is, they are also a status symbol. You should not feel strange when you find someone wearing a watch on his wrist, but use the cell phone to tell time. In that situation, the watch is just showing its luxurious function cartier watches. It is normal and cartier watches perhaps also happens to you. .If asked that among the watches of various brands, which one can suit your taste? There is no doubt that most people will choose Rolex. Whichever social class you are in, it is naturally Rolex was known breitling Watches and cherished breitling watches for a long time. However, the elements do not usually enter the market alone, always come with the price tag up to the hand. For this reason, many people, especially men, their dreams of luxury Rolex watches are buried in omega Watches his heart omega watches. What should I do? Rolex watches are simply stunning worn by the rich and famous, right? No, this world is not the world's richest men, is the world of each. All are equal before the search of luxury and be men's watches respected. Within men's watches, the law, when consumers are in the market, women's watches they should women's watches receive the same treatment. This is the real reason why replica Rolex watches are ladies watches ladies watches more welcome than Rolex. Because in this world are not difficult to understand that the rich are much less than people with low income, you agree with me? You are forced to nod and say with certainty that is the reality. These low-income people do not have enough money to save every month. They can not afford such luxury Rolex watches
Posted by: replica watches at February 04, 2010 09:21 AM (CPNio) 196
Factors Replica Watches About The Rolex replica watches Oyster The Oyster is so closely get in touch with Rolex, and it is inevitably that some people think these are the only Replica watches Rolex manufacture. Others suppose that there is a single Oyster watch. But as a matter of fact, the name Oyster does not actually meant for a rolex Watches particular watch you can buy rolex watches or even to a series but to a type of case that available in some of the Rolex ranges. History The Oyster case was first released in 1926. The objective was to protect the workings of the watch from dust and moisture. Early watches were far from waterproof. The Oyster tag heuer Watchescase was an tag heuer watches innovative design to eliminate these problems. It had a new double locking crown that screwed into place. It has been compared to the hatch on a submarine. Like a submarine, the Oyster case was waterproof. In 1927 Mercedes Gleitze swam the English breitling Watches Channel breitling watches . Before she set off she was presented with a Rolex Oyster. When she arrived, the watch was still working perfectly. The resulting publicity gave the new case a massive boost. Why is it called Oyster? Legend has it that Hans cartier Watches Wilsdorf cartier watches, who invented the Oyster, chose the name because the new case reminded him of the difficulty he had experienced prising open oysters at dinner. Since then the Oyster has further, particularly advanced. Many Oyster watches today are omega Watches perpetual-self-winding, in other omega watches words, it does not require to expose the mechanism to the outside world in order to wind it. The Osyter Perpetual is one of the toughest, most durable, most reliable watches (under truly adverse conditions). It is probably the best mechanical watch money can buy.
Posted by: replica watches at February 07, 2010 07:15 AM (TUJDt) Processing 0.09, elapsed 0.0882 seconds. |
MuNuvians
MeeNuvians
Polls! Polls! Polls!
Dale's ECB Election Projection Federal Review Real Clear Politics Rasmussen Reports Gallup Zogby FoxNews Polls Sabato/Crystal Ball Frequently Asked Questions
The (Almost) Complete Paul Anka Integrity Kick
Primary Document: The Audio
Paul Anka Haiku Contest Announcement Integrity SAT's: Entrance Exam for Paul Anka's Band AllahPundit's Paul Anka 45's Collection AnkaPundit: Paul Anka Takes Over the Site for a Weekend (Continues through to Monday's postings) George Bush Slices Don Rumsfeld Like an F*ckin' Hammer Top Top Tens
Democratic Forays into Erotica New Shows On Gore's DNC/MTV Network Nicknames for Potatoes, By People Who Really Hate Potatoes Star Wars Euphemisms for Self-Abuse Signs You're at an Iraqi "Wedding Party" Signs Your Clown Has Gone Bad Signs That You, Geroge Michael, Should Probably Just Give It Up Signs of Hip-Hop Influence on John Kerry NYT Headlines Spinning Bush's Jobs Boom Things People Are More Likely to Say Than "Did You Hear What Al Franken Said Yesterday?" Signs that Paul Krugman Has Lost His Frickin' Mind All-Time Best NBA Players, According to Senator Robert Byrd Other Bad Things About the Jews, According to the Koran Signs That David Letterman Just Doesn't Care Anymore Examples of Bob Kerrey's Insufferable Racial Jackassery Signs Andy Rooney Is Going Senile Other Judgments Dick Clarke Made About Condi Rice Based on Her Appearance Collective Names for Groups of People John Kerry's Other Vietnam Super-Pets Cool Things About the XM8 Assault Rifle Media-Approved Facts About the Democrat Spy Changes to Make Christianity More "Inclusive" Secret John Kerry Senatorial Accomplishments John Edwards Campaign Excuses John Kerry Pick-Up Lines Changes Liberal Senator George Michell Will Make at Disney Torments in Dog-Hell Greatest Hitjobs
The Ace of Spades HQ Sex-for-Money Skankathon A D&D Guide to the Democratic Candidates Margaret Cho: Just Not Funny More Margaret Cho Abuse Margaret Cho: Still Not Funny Iraqi Prisoner Claims He Was Raped... By Woman Wonkette Announces "Morning Zoo" Format John Kerry's "Plan" Causes Surrender of Moqtada al-Sadr's Militia World Muslim Leaders Apologize for Nick Berg's Beheading Michael Moore Goes on Lunchtime Manhattan Death-Spree Milestone: Oliver Willis Posts 400th "Fake News Article" Referencing Britney Spears Liberal Economists Rue a "New Decade of Greed" Artificial Insouciance: Maureen Dowd's Word Processor Revolts Against Her Numbing Imbecility Intelligence Officials Eye Blogs for Tips They Done Found Us Out, Cletus: Intrepid Internet Detective Figures Out Our Master Plan Shock: Josh Marshall Almost Mentions Sarin Discovery in Iraq Leather-Clad Biker Freaks Terrorize Australian Town When Clinton Was President, Torture Was Cool What Wonkette Means When She Explains What Tina Brown Means Wonkette's Stand-Up Act Wankette HQ Gay-Rumors Du Jour Here's What's Bugging Me: Goose and Slider My Own Micah Wright Style Confession of Dishonesty Outraged "Conservatives" React to the FMA An On-Line Impression of Dennis Miller Having Sex with a Kodiak Bear The Story the Rightwing Media Refuses to Report! Our Lunch with David "Glengarry Glen Ross" Mamet The House of Love: Paul Krugman A Michael Moore Mystery (TM) The Dowd-O-Matic! Liberal Consistency and Other Myths Kepler's Laws of Liberal Media Bias John Kerry-- The Splunge! Candidate "Divisive" Politics & "Attacks on Patriotism" (very long) The Donkey ("The Raven" parody) News/Chat
|