| Support
Contact
| Obama...Let's Not Let Details Get In The Way Of My Gigantic Spending PlansPresident Barack Obama says that "very modest differences" should not get in the way of swift congressional passage of a massive economic stimulus package.It's a clever idea to minimize the differences rhetorically, makes it look like the Republicans are killing the country's hope of recovery over petty issues. It ignores one inconvenient truth...there are huge differences in philosophy and scale of the proposals. Check out what the Republicans in the House are proposing...tax cuts. Lots of tax cuts that would put money in people's pockets and create (as opposed to 'spread around') wealth and real recovery. Total cost of the House Republican plan? About $478 billion.* (In the comments "Bald Ninja" asks how much of that is spending vs. tax cuts. According to this it was all tax cuts.) Meanwhile the Democrats are proposing plans in the $800-$900 billion range. And as for who has some differences to resolve, the President make want to ask House Democrats why they came up with only $182.3 billion in tax cuts when he originally proposed around $300 billion in "tax cuts" (though a good bit of that was really just transfer payments to non income tax payers). These aren't "very modest differences", they are profoundly different versions of the role of government and people in a free society. Also, only one of these will actually work, while the other does nothing more than empower government for generations. *I get the philosophy that says tax cuts don't cost anything and agree with it. I simply wrote "cost" before I realized the plan was all tax cuts. So please stop telling me I'm speaking like a liberal. I'm just not going to do a post on Supply Side Economics or the joys of dynamic budget scoring at the moment to clarify it further. Comments1
It's time for the government to enact Directive 10-289! Or rather, it won't be long before they do. We're in deep trouble.
Posted by: The Other Shoe at February 02, 2009 01:56 PM (Pus2I) 2
Popcorn time.
Posted by: Roy at February 02, 2009 01:57 PM (cB77O) Posted by: Hayao at February 02, 2009 01:58 PM (mlQoX) 4
let's call the whole thing off.
Posted by: IllTemperedCur at February 02, 2009 02:00 PM (kJisp) 5
C'mon people, he's the PRESIDENT - he is smarter than all of us. Read the 'People's History of the United States', that book will fuckin blow your mind.
Posted by: Matt Damon at February 02, 2009 02:00 PM (LdYLm) 6
Opposing the stimulus is the highest form of patriotism.
Posted by: Milesdei at February 02, 2009 02:01 PM (ACHxk) 7
A billion here, a billion there and eventually you're talking about real money. Posted by: Andy at February 02, 2009 02:03 PM (WsTw8) 8
It's a sad day when the 'reasonable' plan is "only" 400 billion. It wasn't too long ago that Democrats loved Republicans who were willing to spend that much.
Posted by: Bald Ninja at February 02, 2009 02:04 PM (4pdbX) 9
Once again: the Dems have all the votes they need to pass this. If it's such a great idea, why are they so torqued about getting Republican support?
Posted by: Farmer_Joe at February 02, 2009 02:07 PM (z4es9) 10
It's a clever idea to minimize the differences rhetorically, makes it look like the Republicans are killing the country's hope of recovery over petty issues.
Yes, and like Bill Clinton and the recent campaign the media will trumpet that message constantly straight from the commiecrat talking papers. Hell, they got the public to believe it was Gingrich’s fault that Clinton shut down the government. The got a lot of the public to believe that repeal of Glass-Steagle caused the banking collapse. Those are two of the biggest lies in history but they pulled it off.
What I am hoping is that the public is finally wising up to the media. I think they jumped the shark so bad during the election that even some of the liberals started smelling a rat and this blatant lying will no longer have an impact.
Also, what I am hoping for is that Republicans fight this bill tooth and nail. O’Connel said at his press conference that they wanted a bill, but that the current bill was not going to work.
I would settle for a bill that made the Bush tax cuts permanent and also added the reduction in rates to 10% they were talking about. I would not support ANY more bailouts and ANY more welfare spending of any kind.
And I especially don’t want to see Republicans sign up for more of that regardless of these phony compromises. Posted by: Vic at February 02, 2009 02:08 PM (f6os6) 11
Curse those Replublicans and all those darn "distractions!" Posted by: reason at February 02, 2009 02:09 PM (sPO/s) 12
Obama really believes we're idiots. Apparently, he's right.
Posted by: Jimmy at February 02, 2009 02:09 PM (/Ft4q) 13
Posted by: Bald Ninja at February 02, 2009 02:04 PM (4pdbX)
I'm not in favor of spending $400 billion but I'll take that much in tax cuts all day, every day. It likely won't 'cost' anything when more revenue starts coming in from increased economic activity. Posted by: DrewM. at February 02, 2009 02:09 PM (hlYel) 14
Obama says that "very modest differences" should not get in the way...
This is like saying the difference between normative sex and bestiality is just a pair of limbs. Posted by: George Orwell at February 02, 2009 02:10 PM (AZGON) 15
The alternate stimulus plan by the House Republicans has good ideas in it. I work for a small business and my husband is a small business owner and there will be direct, positive impacts for us if even some of those proposals are implemented.
Posted by: IC at February 02, 2009 02:10 PM (jZNCU) 16
Obama really believes we're idiots. Apparently, he's right.
Posted by: Jimmy at February 02, 2009 02:09 PM (/Ft4q) Well, he knows that 54% of the voters are either idiots or socialists. Posted by: Hayao at February 02, 2009 02:10 PM (mlQoX) 17
The Republican plan sure beats the hell out of Obama's plan. I'm fucking thrilled we've managed to stall it this long. One week ago we were all completely fucked and the U.S.S.A. had arrived. I'm thinking this is a step in the right direction. I hope it keeps going. Posted by: ErikW at February 02, 2009 02:12 PM (hKtiw) 18
"I'm not in favor of spending $400 billion but I'll take that much in tax cuts all day, every day.
It likely won't 'cost' anything when more revenue starts coming in from increased economic activity." Don't get me wrong - the Republicans plan is much much better than the Democrats...and I'd take that much in tax cuts as well...though I'm not sure how much of that 400 billion 'spending' is tax cuts (I am a moron after all). How much of the Republican plan is actual tax cut? Posted by: Bald Ninja at February 02, 2009 02:14 PM (4pdbX) 19
nuance
Posted by: Dave C at February 02, 2009 02:16 PM (sqStN) 20
Posted by: Bald Ninja at February 02, 2009 02:14 PM (4pdbX)
See the link in my addition to the post. Short answer...all of it was tax cuts. Posted by: DrewM. at February 02, 2009 02:19 PM (hlYel) Posted by: Bald Ninja at February 02, 2009 02:20 PM (4pdbX) 22
OMG #14, you are hysterically funny today.
Posted by: hmmmm at February 02, 2009 02:21 PM (zplc6) 23
Assimilation is the goal. It's not enough for The One's administration to pass legislation over objection; it won't be vindicated or satisfied until thourough ideological conversion is completed. As long as there's one Republican legislator calling foul on Hope And Change, The One's work remains unfinished. It's kinda like a jerk quarterback in school. He loves having the cloying attention of the girls and the respect of the guys, but he's not satisfied until that little group--the group who completely lacks interest in the hero-worship going on around them--he won't be sated until that one group gives him props. At present, that vocal group is Rush Limbaugh and the House GOP. I've found in my neighborhood of hard-blue zombies that simply stating that you're a Republican--and not engaging in any further discussion--will get every Birks-wearing Volvo-driving composter in one's grill pronto, trying to talk you into conversion. Twice I've been asked if I'm "at least a moderate Republican," to which the deliciously simple answer is, "well, no. Not at all."
Posted by: General Zod at February 02, 2009 02:22 PM (nwEiU) 24
Barfulus. Thank you for nothing, Senator McConnell.
Under the mortgage plan, any ”credit-worthy borrower” could get a government-backed loan at 4 percent. Details were not available, but Republicans have talked about having the government guarantee the 30-year loans for a year or two. Thirty-year fixed rates recently have been around 5 percent. No cost estimates were available for the McConnell plan. Gosh, all this time I kept hearing that too much easy credit led the Nation Below Canada to spend recklessly. How wrong I was. Thank God McConnell is on the same page as Lord Unicorn. Posted by: George Orwell at February 02, 2009 02:22 PM (AZGON) 25
Well, he knows that 54% of the voters are either idiots or socialists. That isn't an either-or proposition. Posted by: sherlock at February 02, 2009 02:23 PM (8V5Ut) 26
Tax cuts don't "cost" anything. Don't use that terminology. Once you start, you accept their premise.
Posted by: lorien1973 at February 02, 2009 02:23 PM (IhQuA) 27
I am waiting for our grandkids to say this was taxation without representation. A bunch of boomers are taxing their grandkids to make their life easier?
Posted by: Locus Ceruleus at February 02, 2009 02:23 PM (e2mBS) 28
#16 - There's a difference between idiots and socialists? Who wudda thunk it.
Posted by: teej at February 02, 2009 02:24 PM (QdUKm) 29
hmmmm...
You're scaring the goose crap out of me today, with some of your news items. Holy Peter on a treadmill, we are so fucked. Posted by: George Orwell at February 02, 2009 02:25 PM (AZGON) 30
When do the baby boomers start partaking from Social Security? 2011? It's going to be a meltdown for the ages.
Posted by: IC at February 02, 2009 02:25 PM (jZNCU) 31
A billion here, and a trillion here, and pretty soon you are NO LONGER talking about real money. Hope. Change. Hyperinflation! Posted by: Dick Cheney at February 02, 2009 02:25 PM (wgLRl) 32
Those word "credit worthy borrower"...will be the words that prevent the very people who need the help from getting it.
Posted by: hmmmm at February 02, 2009 02:26 PM (zplc6) 33
That isn't an either-or proposition.
Posted by: sherlock at February 02, 2009 02:23 PM (8V5Ut) True enough. All socialists are idiots. I was going under the assumption that not all idiots were socialist...just, well, idiots. Posted by: Hayao at February 02, 2009 02:26 PM (mlQoX) 34
Does anyone else worry that $400B worth of tax cuts might actually turn the US economy white-hot? Not a good thing. How about a "measly" $50B or so of tax cuts?
Posted by: sherlock at February 02, 2009 02:27 PM (8V5Ut) 35
REPORTED ON CNBC, quoting Obama:
"Now is not a time for profits on Wall Street." You may draw your own conclusions. (Reposted from the sweater thread.) Posted by: Nom de Blog at February 02, 2009 02:27 PM (szcvf) 36
34 Does anyone else worry that $400B worth of tax cuts might actually turn
the US economy white-hot? Not a good thing. How about a "measly" $50B
or so of tax cuts?
Posted by: sherlock at February 02, 2009 02:27 PM (8V5Ut) Cut the corporate tax rate in half and then stay the hell out of the way. Posted by: Hayao at February 02, 2009 02:28 PM (mlQoX) 37
Hey, I got an idea, how about screw the "stimulus package" and let people keep more of their money by reducing taxes. Also, how about not printing billions thereby preventing the type of inflation we saw with that moron Jimmy Carter. Just a freaking thought.
Posted by: mare at February 02, 2009 02:28 PM (X1fsj) 38
A little early, but I'm dusting off the phrase "miserable failure"... should be able to use it in 10.... 9..... 8....
Posted by: ken at February 02, 2009 02:29 PM (SDc54) 39
The entire microeconomic meltdown within my own checkbook would easily be completely mitigated with a "paltry" $1.0B. What do you say, Uncle Sam? Posted by: reason at February 02, 2009 02:29 PM (sPO/s) 40
"It's a sad day when the 'reasonable' plan is "only" 400 billion. It
wasn't too long ago that Democrats loved Republicans who were willing
to spend that much." -- Bald Ninja above @ 8
Taking less out of my pocket is NOT spending money. It means the US government would either have to debt finance or spend less. But not taking tax revenue is not spending. It's not the government's fucking money. It is my money. And it is your money. Posted by: Nom de Blog at February 02, 2009 02:32 PM (szcvf) 41
"REPORTED ON CNBC, quoting Obama:
Conclusion #2 "I want liberal garbage like Barack Obama's socialist policies to fail." - Rush Limbaugh "I want responsible investors like those who listen to Rush Limbaugh to fail." - Barack Obama Posted by: reason at February 02, 2009 02:32 PM (sPO/s) 42
The nice thing this comparison we don't have to worry about the stupid liberal dodge, that tax cuts "cost" the government money. Even if it were true, $478 billion "costs" less than $800 to-whatever-we-feel-like billion.
Posted by: t-bird at February 02, 2009 02:34 PM (FcR7P) 43
Please! Let's not bicker and argue about who killed who!
Posted by: B. Hussein Obama at February 02, 2009 02:35 PM (PonvG) 44
"Ach, Alta! Wo sind meine Milliarden Mark?"
Just thought I'd get ready for the monetization of Hope and Change. Posted by: George Orwell at February 02, 2009 02:35 PM (AZGON) 45
Is there any particular reason that the MSM is not even remotely discussing the Republican proposal?
/ sarc Looks like a damn good plan to me. Too bad that the only thing anyone is allowed to talk about is Porkulus. I am also disappointed the the Republicans are talking about "improvements" to Porkulus (which cannot be improved, other than to down it in a well and ram it up Pelosi's ass) and not pushing their plan. Posted by: Damiano at February 02, 2009 02:37 PM (cfKer) 46
Remember that the word "economy" is a loaded term now - it means business enterprise that exists under the government umbrella. The stimulus isn't meant for business - it's mean for the larger "economy," i.e., the umbrella. Yeah, so under this swallowed assumption, why quibble over little details, right? Anyone here think you can trace this thinking to the "promote the general welfare" clause of our Constitution's Preamble? Posted by: Jimmy at February 02, 2009 02:37 PM (/Ft4q) 47
Drew, You're speaking the language of liberals. Tax cuts don't "cost" the government anything. It's OUR MONEY. There are expected revenue decreases, which might be offset by increased economic activity. Don't speak their language. Posted by: Sydney Carton at February 02, 2009 02:38 PM (nWYwS) 48
"REPORTED ON CNBC, quoting Obama:
"Now is not a time for profits on Wall Street." I assume he wants to extend this insight to Hollywood and the NBA. Posted by: Locus Ceruleus at February 02, 2009 02:40 PM (e2mBS) 49
Hey, they need to treat this like a government contract, TO THE LOWEST BIDDER!!!!! Tax cuts wins!!!
Posted by: CDR M at February 02, 2009 02:40 PM (WGcw3) 50
This has got to be the stupidest idea I have ever heard.
The stimulus plan has a provision for the feral government to buy nearly new low gas mileage trucks & SUVs & crush them.
Somebody please tell me this is a joke.
Posted by: CAD Daddy at February 02, 2009 02:43 PM (U6x6j) Posted by: Michelle Obama's Ass Crack at February 02, 2009 02:44 PM (LdYLm) Posted by: CAD Daddy at February 02, 2009 02:44 PM (U6x6j) 53
Not to worry, #52. A FERAL government is next.
Posted by: Jimmy at February 02, 2009 02:46 PM (/Ft4q) 54
#50
So, just how far are we from eliminating unemployment by hiring half to dig ditches, and the other half to fill them? Dumbest Administration Evah. Posted by: George Orwell at February 02, 2009 02:46 PM (AZGON) 55
Jimmy @ 46,
Yep, Dems forget that the preamble calls for "provide for the common defense" and "promote the general welfare". Instead, they seem to read, "promote the general defense" and "provide the general welfare." Posted by: XBradTC at February 02, 2009 02:49 PM (4hvz0) 56
Hey let's just pass this, I've got to get home for Presidents' Day break so I can "service" my constituents.
Posted by: House and Senate at February 02, 2009 02:51 PM (SPoPe) Posted by: Tinian at February 02, 2009 02:51 PM (Ohodx) 58
It's time for the government to enact Directive 10-289! Or rather, it won't be long before they do. We're in deep trouble.
You're mistaken on the order number. Next up is Order 66, after which it becomes Emperor Obama. But, yes, we are in deep trouble. Posted by: I R A Darth Aggie at February 02, 2009 02:53 PM (1hM1d) Posted by: Pres. O'bama at February 02, 2009 02:55 PM (SPoPe) 60
"I am a law only for my kind, I am no law for all."
Thus Spake Obamathustra, from "Shit Friedrich Nietzsche Might Have Written" Posted by: George Orwell at February 02, 2009 02:58 PM (AZGON) 61
Why are we not kicking their doors in and grabbing the bastards by their ties yet?
I am not kidding. Posted by: Howard Beale at February 02, 2009 03:00 PM (Z2+2W) 62
Well, he has to have some kind of meeting on the economy, some kind of presidential summit. At this point all the stakeholders are blaming all the other stakeholders and nothing is getting done. The people need to be represented not by their "representatives" but by real, honest to goodness, regular people. People nee to talk and think and talk and think some more.
I mean Macy's just cut their dividend folks, this is not good. Posted by: hmmmm at February 02, 2009 03:02 PM (zplc6) Posted by: Rocks at February 02, 2009 03:03 PM (Q1lie) 64
Michelle was just on MSDNC touting the stimulus, and all the addtional benefits she will bestow on young children with the millions that will be made available. She also said there will be money there for teachers to keep their jobs during the downturn in the economy. She raved about the new leader "Obama". Just like that, no President Obama, or my husband, just Obama. Great news!!! Obama wants to be one word ....think Prince, Madonna, Cher,.... What a commie. Posted by: ford at February 02, 2009 03:03 PM (Ki7fm) 65
Executive Order #66? Is that the liquidation of the 25,000,000 or so Americans that refuse to re-educated according to Bill Ayers?
Posted by: Lemmiwinks at February 02, 2009 03:04 PM (5GNS+) 66
Why are they surprised that loan demand is weakening? Maybe Americans are going back to what their grand parents taught them "if you don't have the cash it means you can't buy it" period.
Posted by: hmmmm at February 02, 2009 03:04 PM (zplc6) 67
Please don't fall for the "do something" disease. We don't have regular people aboard Congress, we have a ship of fools. I'd sooner trust the fickle tides than giving the rudder to Obozo The Clown and the Pirates of Pennsylvania Avenue.
Posted by: George Orwell at February 02, 2009 03:08 PM (AZGON) 68
Now Obama will try to convince you that you haven't lost your job yet, because he has taken measure to preserve it...you now owe him. This will work with some people.
Posted by: ford at February 02, 2009 03:10 PM (Ki7fm) 69
You morons can just forget it. You are getting a tax cut.
You would just spend it on booze, Viagra and guns. Ain't happening. Posted by: Barack Obama at February 02, 2009 03:11 PM (Q1lie) 70
Is there any particular reason that the MSM is not even remotely discussing the Republican proposal? Oh they are. With the headline, "Republicans want elimination of Buy American Clause." I'm surprised the article I read mentioned "trade war" in it. It even had a Canadian minister talking about retaliatory action if it went through. But you would have to do more than read the headline to know it. Posted by: buzzion at February 02, 2009 03:11 PM (Lrsi6) Posted by: Barack Obama at February 02, 2009 03:12 PM (Q1lie) 72
50 This has got to be the stupidest idea I have ever heard. The stimulus plan has a provision for the feral government to buy nearly new low gas mileage trucks & SUVs & crush them.
Somebody please tell me this is a joke. Will they be crushed under Obama's withering glower of disapproval? Posted by: reason at February 02, 2009 03:12 PM (XiVKO) 73
But he really CARES....
Posted by: MikeH at February 02, 2009 03:13 PM (LdYLm) 74
The trucks and SUVs will be crushed under the direction of our new Secretary of Arts Michael Jackson and then the we will sell them at a huge profit as Art. I expect we could balance the budget this year.
Posted by: Barack Obama at February 02, 2009 03:15 PM (Q1lie) 75
"Let's not bicker and argue about 'oo killed 'oo..."
Posted by: mojo at February 02, 2009 03:18 PM (g1cNf) 76
67- I articulated your sentiment much better back before I was dead.."I'd rather be governed by the first 2000 names in the phone book.".....or words to that effect. No prob. Bill Posted by: William F. Buckley at February 02, 2009 03:20 PM (Cy5K8) 77
President Obama has the hugest, throbbing stimulus plan I have ever see.
I practically choked on it. Just ask Alan, he watched. Posted by: Andrea Mitchell at February 02, 2009 03:21 PM (Q1lie) 78
"29
hmmmm...
You're scaring the goose crap out of me today, with some of your news items. Holy Peter on a treadmill, we are so fucked. Posted by: George Orwell at February 02, 2009 02:25 PM (AZGON)" Oh, I'm so sorry, that is certainly not my intent at all. I really do feel that there are so many points of view here and that this is such a serious and important subject that the more you know, the better will be the solution. sort of like that suit guy always says, something about an educated buyer being his best customer. Posted by: hmmmm at February 02, 2009 03:21 PM (zplc6) 79
Just make sure it's not the first 2000 names in the Manhattan phone book.
Posted by: George Orwell at February 02, 2009 03:22 PM (AZGON) 80
#78
The scary part is there are some very definite points of view in the White House and in the offices of Pelosi and Reid. They're falling entirely within the category of "Command Economies, and How to Enslave Its Members." Posted by: George Orwell at February 02, 2009 03:25 PM (AZGON) 81
Come on, Drew, this is great news. Because if all the differences are minor, and nothing that should stand in the way of this vitally needed bill, then clearly the Democrats should have no problem with "compromising", and accepting the Republican version of the stimulus.
No? Posted by: Greg Q at February 02, 2009 03:26 PM (87k2j) 82
Who gives a fuck, as long as I get my piece of the action? Posted by: Vinny the Union Hack at February 02, 2009 03:27 PM (wgLRl) 83
Thus Spake Obamathustra, from "Shit Friedrich Nietzsche Might Have Written" Ha! Nice. Now I want to watch "2001" for some odd reason. Posted by: ErikW at February 02, 2009 03:29 PM (hKtiw) 84
if all the differences are minor, and nothing that should stand in the way of this vitally needed bill, then clearly the Democrats should have no problem with "compromising"
We have a winner! It's this simple, clear thinking that somehow, astonishingly, eludes the MSM. Now, why could that be? Posted by: George Orwell at February 02, 2009 03:29 PM (AZGON) 85
<i> The stimulus plan has a provision for the feral government to buy nearly new low gas mileage trucks & SUVs & crush them.</i>
Why can't I find that on Stimuluswatch.org? Posted by: H & R Block at February 02, 2009 03:36 PM (wWwJR) 86
Damn it, H&R Block, get out of my computer!!!
Posted by: wiserbud at February 02, 2009 03:36 PM (wWwJR) 87
Obama needs the R's to get on board. That way, when the plan tanks, he can say, "Well, the R's agreed with me that this would work." He's trying to cover his ass. That's all it is.
Posted by: Steve L. at February 02, 2009 03:39 PM (Gkhxf) 88
Now is not a time for profits on Wall Street.
That's an easy prediction. One of my bank stocks is now at 1% of its IPO price of 3 years ago. I'm going to double down on it, its not like it will cost me much. Posted by: nostradamus' 401k at February 02, 2009 03:41 PM (PD1tk) 89
87 His is a whole lot easier to cover than that beast Mish's. Dammit! BM everytime I think of her. BRB! Posted by: William F. Buckley at February 02, 2009 03:43 PM (Cy5K8) 90
I'll tell you what needs to be done. The government needs to give all households of exactly 4 a million dollars. Also, the father's name must start with a K.
That's the key to recovery people. Who's with me? Posted by: Kevin at February 02, 2009 03:50 PM (8uBBu) 91
23
Assimilation is the goal.
Here's a lesson I learned from my Grandfather from Communist Poland: When they come and tell you that you won't get any government benefits at all unless you join the Obamaparty, smile and join. Then use the money you're sucking out of them to fund the Resistance. Posted by: shibumi at February 02, 2009 03:55 PM (tZB/c) 92
I'll tell you what needs to be done. The government
needs to give all households of exactly 4 a million dollars. Also, the
father's name must start with a K.
That's the key to recovery people. Who's with me?
Posted by: Kevin at February 02, 2009 03:50 PM (8uBBu) Finally...a great plan I can get behind. Posted by: Kurt at February 02, 2009 03:58 PM (mlQoX) 93
Heh. An interstate bridge in Moline, Ill. needs to be replaced. The cost, according to the Stimulus Package: $950,000,000.00. To qoute a resident: "A billion $ to replace a bridge?? Is it golden?" Posted by: ErikW at February 02, 2009 04:03 PM (hKtiw) 94
The government needs to give all households of exactly 4 a million dollars.
Heh. I'm currently arguing about this pork-laden pile of crap stimulus package with a liberal friend of mine. I mentioned one of the projects on the list, which is a $600million construction project to build a museum. Jobs created; 65. I jokingly said we could save $535million by simply giving those 65people a million each and forget about building the stupid museum. He actually, seriously agreed and said it would be fantastic idea to just give everyone in the country a million dollars, cause then we'd all be rich. Intelligence and Liberalism are like oil and water. Posted by: wiserbud at February 02, 2009 04:03 PM (IHbof) 95
I really can't understand why republicans aren't harping on the fact that this isn't a stimulus plan at all. It spends less than 10% of the money in the first year.
If they emphasized that they wanted 100% of the spending/tax cuts to apply to the first year, then they would have a true stimulus plan, and would have very clear differences with Obama. Lets get this fact into the public mind! Posted by: Village Idiot at February 02, 2009 04:07 PM (pflbj) Posted by: NotME! at February 02, 2009 04:14 PM (RuCco) 97
You know, John McMaverick's concept in the second(?) debate of "bring every non-essential aspect of federal government to a screeching halt, and then slowly turn them back on one by one as we find the money to fund them" really isn't sounding half bad right about now. Put the scalpel down, Obama. Now is the time to take a machete to your stimulus package. Posted by: reason at February 02, 2009 04:17 PM (XiVKO) 98
Does else find it odd that a lot of this stuff is like a flat 5 mil. It's just weird, you would think they could predict, to the penny even, what this stuff will cost.
Posted by: hmmmm at February 02, 2009 04:20 PM (zplc6) 99
The stimulus plan has a provision for the feral government to buy nearly new low gas mileage trucks & SUVs & crush them.
If the crushing is via snarling, leaded-gas fueled, CO2-belching monster trucks, I might be able to compromise here. Posted by: IllTemperedCur at February 02, 2009 04:20 PM (kJisp) 100
And while we are railing about this, they are working hard on the problem. For them, the problem is not the economy, it is how to sell this piece of shit to the majority of the country.
Posted by: Hayao at February 02, 2009 04:22 PM (hn6ao) 101
You know, John McMaverick's concept in the second(?) debate of "bring every non-essential aspect of federal government to a screeching halt, and then slowly turn them back on one by one as we find the money to fund them" really isn't sounding half bad right about now. Problem is that liberals think that the military and law enforcement are non-essential Posted by: Lemmiwinks at February 02, 2009 04:26 PM (Nwbo8) 102
"Please stop telling me I'm speaking like a liberal" is even more "speaking like a liberal" than the tax crap was. Stop doing that.
Posted by: Hc34T at February 02, 2009 04:28 PM (Hc34T) 103
Problem is that liberals think that the military and law enforcement are non-essential
Posted by: Lemmiwinks at February 02, 2009 04:26 PM (Nwbo Except to the extent that it is government employment. The Border Patrol is hiring in big numbers now. Why now, after all the uproar. I don't hear anyone in Congress talking down illegals. Perhaps they will have a greater need to keep people in than keep them out. The first thing Mao did was close the borders. Posted by: Hayao at February 02, 2009 04:30 PM (hn6ao) 104
The stimulus plan has a provision for the feral government to buy nearly new low gas mileage trucks & SUVs & and crush them.
If they want'em to vanish, just park'em on the Cross Bronx Expressway. They'll be stripped to the bare bones in about a half hour. Posted by: Purple Avenger at February 02, 2009 04:34 PM (Ygf78) 105
Per Newsbusters, the host of Mad Money, Tom Cramer on Obama's Anti-Wall Street Comments: 'We Heard Lenin.' Posted by: reason at February 02, 2009 04:35 PM (sPO/s) 106
"103
Problem is that liberals think that the military and law enforcement are non-essential
Posted by: Lemmiwinks at February 02, 2009 04:26 PM (Nwbo Except
to the extent that it is government employment. The Border Patrol is
hiring in big numbers now. Why now, after all the uproar. I don't
hear anyone in Congress talking down illegals. Perhaps they will have
a greater need to keep people in than keep them out. The first thing
Mao did was close the borders. Posted by: Hayao at February 02, 2009 04:30 PM (hn6ao)" What? Posted by: hmmmm at February 02, 2009 04:37 PM (zplc6) 107
Just had to look at what Austin, TX wants out of the stimulus package....Among a long list of crap, they threw in almost a million dollars for another disc golf course!
Posted by: suburbmom at February 02, 2009 04:38 PM (biD77) 108
@105, Is this the Jim Cramer clip they are talking about:
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/3036789/#28975919 Posted by: hmmmm at February 02, 2009 04:46 PM (zplc6) 109
I need confirmation or info on something: the Obama "tax cuts" are they actually tax cuts or a rebate? I know that the people who aren't paying any taxes now are getting an effective rebate, but is that forever, or just a one time thing? Some of the tax cuts he has planned are going to reduce a lot of poorer peoples' effective tax burden to zero. Is that permanent?
See, the GOP plan would be permanent, but a tax rebate just doesn't make much difference in terms of economic stimulus. Posted by: Christopher Taylor at February 02, 2009 04:52 PM (PQY7w) 110
@109 "the Obama "tax cuts" are they actually tax cuts or a rebate? I know
that the people who aren't paying any taxes now are getting an
effective rebate, but is that forever, or just a one time thing? Some
of the tax cuts he has planned are going to reduce a lot of poorer
peoples' effective tax burden to zero. Is that permanent?
"
Obama's OWN "tax cuts" that he burbled on about during the campaign, and that weren't going to ever happen in any case, were the cash-transfer thing. Obama's post-election tax cuts, in the Pelosi-drafted stumbulus bill look to BE actual tax cuts, but only for low-income (hardly-any-tax-paying) tax payers. Still, it's an improvement over the crap he WAS peddling last fall. Posted by: Stoop Davy Dave at February 02, 2009 05:17 PM (7O2Gh) 111
Tom...Jim...you know...that really loud guy! :p
Posted by: reason at February 02, 2009 05:27 PM (V40IZ) 112
It's not about public work projects or infrastructure rebuilding or improvement. It all comes down to how much money can we spend/steal without doing anything...You see, if we never solve the problems, we can just keep throwing money at them. The government in California along with the Federal Transportation Administration studied the BART to the Airport Project for twenty years. They spent more money on the studies than it would have cost to build the damn thing originally. It was in the original concept construction plans. That story is replicated thousands of time around the country. America is littered with highways to nowhere and snowplow equipment and buildings to store them in at airports that never see a flake of snow from one year to another. We have projects, but first we have studies and commissions on which to spend enormous amount of money.....This new group in Washington are past Masters at the commission and studies game. A friend of mine is going to Washington tomorrow to get several Billion dollars. For a study on a plan that already has federal/state funding and bonds issued to build a commuter railroad. They already have the project in place with construction commencing in about 6 months. Now Washington wants him to do a total long range assessment and expansion study for future funding.....With a cost guide line of approximately 1.5 to 2.5 Billion...The whole damn railroad will only cost less than 2 Billion with all the equipment and construction...And so it goes.....These stimulus programs are great ways to screw the taxpayers..
Posted by: sickinmass at February 02, 2009 06:00 PM (/i4dU) 113
Ohhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh, lord it's hard to be humble When your perfect in every way...... Come on, sing it with me peasants! Posted by: Barrack Obama at February 02, 2009 06:05 PM (hphNR) 114
15 The alternate stimulus plan by the House Republicans has good ideas in it. I work for a small business and my husband is a small business owner and there will be direct, positive impacts for us if even some of those proposals are implemented.--- And for that very reason, they won't be included. Narcissistic Personality Disorder can not admit they were wrong or that someone else had a better idea than he did. NPD Lacks empathy: is unwilling to recognize or identify with the feelings and needs of others; Posted by: Road King at February 02, 2009 06:12 PM (hphNR) 115
I need confirmation or info on something: the Obama "tax cuts" are they actually tax cuts or a rebate
The answer is Both. That being said the actual “tax cuts” are primarily targets at low income people who don’t pay taxes. This will be done via the EIC and other “children’s allowances”. Everyone below 75K (150 dual) will once again get the 500/1000 “rebate” as a one time shot. Businesses will get a tax break for some previous losses and for hiring “disconnected youths”. A new type of defined welfare class. (Older than 16 and younger than 25, not in school and not working).
I haven’t gone through all the tax provisions but it appears that they are just like the spending provisions, targeted towards welfare. Posted by: Vic at February 02, 2009 06:26 PM (f6os6) 116
seriously what the fuck is wrong with you people??? the republican proposal?? how about doing nothing at all???? no more spending period....maybe some spending cuts... i know i'm fucking out of my mind but how many times can you kick a dog before it bites you? there is a reason why know one can answer that question.
Posted by: unamerican libertarian formerly known as e.koenig at February 02, 2009 06:45 PM (2J+Vs) 117
"* Cut the lowest two income tax rates for 2009 and 2010, from 15 percent to 10 percent and from 10 percent to 5 percent." If we must do a "stimulus," I could easily live with this. But Dems are going to attack taxcuts as "more of the same old failed Bush policies." Posted by: gp at February 02, 2009 08:16 PM (X3X3b) 118
Hannity just had a clip of Barney Frank from over the weekend, can't believe I missed it. Admitted HALF the plan isn't stimulus at all - just going to help people who "have been damaged thru no fault of their own." At least that's what I think Barney said; it's hard to tell he's so difficult to understand, slurring his words the way he does. Man, he must be impossible to understand when he has a dick in his mouth...
Posted by: hannitys_hybrid at February 02, 2009 09:18 PM (PGrdo) Posted by: lace wigs at February 02, 2009 10:01 PM (mQXlB) 120
YES BILLY BOB I REKON WE,LL BE SLOPPIN THEMS DEMACRATIC HAWGS TILL DOOMSDAY YEAH HUALING STONES TO NEWCASTLE AND PAWS STILL SPOILIN THEM DAD GUM DEMACRATIC HAWGS
Posted by: Spurwing Plover at February 03, 2009 01:01 AM (JUu35) 121
So in a household, corporate and public sector "crisis" of too much debt and irresponsible spending, we now have the unwinding underway: asset (housing and stock) values decline and household's adjust to lower spending and more savings. Take a look at historical charts. We as a nation have never before been at this level of GDP/debt in all these sectors. The process now underway was inevitable. The result is a temporary recession, if government fixes its own house, as balance sheets get rebuilt.
But, returning to the real world, one party wants to solve a debt and spending spree... with more debt and spending. Surely you jest. The other party is only 50% better: it apparently likes the increasing the public sector debt part, but can muster some discipline on the spending side. The long term answer is - Neither! My investment advisor just sent me an e-mail telling me how he's working on his gardening and canning skills. Uh, oh. Regression to the mean is going to be a b*tch, but you better get used to it. Posted by: boqueronman at February 03, 2009 12:23 PM (Gn/lR) 122
Want to do the task that TARP was supposedly designed for?
Really? Because obviously this administration and Congress DON'T want to, but say you were them, and you DO want to ... what do you do? Here's whatcha do: Declare a permanent tax holiday on (a) all capital gains derived from houses bought in foreclosure during 2008 and/or 2009, and (b) all rental income derived from such houses. Bingo. The bad mortgages underlying the toxic tranches of the tainted MBSes get bought out, case by case, by private individuals and private corporations, without any further abuse of Uncle Sam's line of credit. Easy. Simple. Neat. Quick. And never ever gonna happen. Posted by: Stoop Davy Dave at February 03, 2009 01:12 PM (goF9I) 123
Oh!
Just in case anybody actually still IS reading this thread, and gets the mistaken idea that I was smart enough to have thought of that idea, no no, that idea was stolen by me from Bob Brinker. He may have the world's most boring radio show, but damn if he doesn't do some top-notch thinking every now and then. Posted by: Stoop Davy Dave at February 03, 2009 01:15 PM (goF9I) 124
If we can make everyone think it's Rush Limbaugh's fault then we can slip in a few more billion in spending and the top 98% of Americans won't even know the difference.
Posted by: jeff at March 04, 2009 08:51 PM (f39Ps) 125
I pledge allegiance to the stimulus and the united states of socialism and to the government for which is corrupt; One nation under Obama, unemployment, with welfare and higher taxes for all. Posted by: Joe Biden at March 04, 2009 09:55 PM (f39Ps) Posted by: 货架、" rel="nofollow">仓储笼 at March 08, 2009 07:55 AM (n1XSH) 127
Gucci Shoes
Louis Vuitton
UGG Boots
Louis Vuitton Handbags
gucci shoes
gucci shoes gucci shoes Louis Vuitton Handbags Posted by: mm at April 22, 2009 03:07 AM (1Qq3g) 128
<a href=http://www.handbagon.com>Louis Vuitton Handbags</a>
<a href=http://www.uggstore.org>replica UGG</a> <a href=http://www.wmbags.com>Louis Vuitton Handbags</a> <a href=http://www.bestguccishoes.com>Gucci Shoes</a> <a href=http://www.louisvuittonfr.com>Louis Vuitton</a> <a href=http://www.uggstore.org>replica UGG sale</a> Posted by: sxdasd at June 12, 2009 09:56 PM (ETI+y) Posted by: 数控机床维修 at July 20, 2009 08:27 PM (U8lqp) Posted by: Wedding Dresses at August 20, 2009 10:34 PM (syU91) Posted by: 货架 at August 24, 2009 08:47 AM (TElUT) 132
very interesting to read.I enjoyed well while reading.I will recommend my friends to read this one for sure.
lingerie wholesale | wholesale lingerie | sexy lingerie | Halloween Costume Wholesale | Wholesale Corsets | Wholesale fancy dress | Wholesale Christmas Lingerie | Posted by: sexy lingerie at September 22, 2009 05:44 AM (iUF4j) 133
discounthair straighteners
ghd hair chi hair straightener ghd straighteners chi straighteners chi hair chi hair iron hair straighteners ghd ghd hair straighteners free shipping! Posted by: hair straighteners at October 24, 2009 07:39 AM (9oMrs) 134
discountugg boots sale
ugg shoes tall ugg boots ugg classic boots nike shox air jordan shoes nike air max nike air force one bailey button ugg rainier ugg boots ugg classic cardy ugg crochet boots ugg mini ugg classic short classic tall ugg ugg coquette ugg baby boots ugg knightsbridge ugg lo pro new ugg boots ugg short boots ugg nightfall boots ugg skimmer ugg sundance boots ultra short ugg ugg ultra tall discount ugg slippers ugg sandals ugg halendi ugg slippers ugg layback ugg matala sandal ugg napoule sandal ugg persephone tasmina ugg air force 1 shoes jordan air shoes nike shox shoes air max nike free shipping! Posted by: ugg boots at October 27, 2009 06:16 AM (Am8nx) 135
Your post very good,thanks for sharing!Are you also like these:ugg boots uk,buy ugg boots,australia ugg,cheap ugg boots,ugg boots,ugg boots sheepskin,womens ugg boots,ugg australia boots,cheap ugg boots
Posted by: australia ugg at October 27, 2009 09:18 AM (c6EK2) 136
Do anything needed to support an idea, a good idea usually brings good results, doing business is like that.http://www.dunksky.com/.This site has always been on Posted by: nike dunk sb at October 30, 2009 08:14 AM (LACJ9) 137
buy Discount Boots
Womens UGG UGG Shoes UGG Australia UGG UK UGG USA discount ugg boots cheap ugg boots air force 1 shoes nike air force air force 1 mens air force 1 boots air force onefrom usa Posted by: airforceoneshop at November 03, 2009 01:21 PM (LHCCE) 138
Discount Boots
Womens UGG UGG Shoes UGG Australia UGG UK UGG USA discount ugg boots cheap ugg boots Posted by: fdsfds at November 06, 2009 10:10 PM (ZxjpI) 139
Come to our website for shopping with high quality and best service! There have new products,MBT M. Walk
and MBT Lami,Welcome everybody to buy it. Posted by: mbt shoes at November 08, 2009 08:04 AM (QhfLM) 140
Buy discount ugg shoes
cheap ugg shoes cheap ugg ugg rainier buy ugg ugg usa discount ugg boots ugg 5825 ugg shoes sale ugg sundance ugg shoes cheap ugg boots ugg 5815 ugg sale ugg uk ugg knightsbridge womens ugg boots ugg boots ugg australia ugg 5819free shipping Posted by: ugg boots at November 12, 2009 12:47 AM (IeIJx) 141
Supra FootwearThe supra shoe is comfortable and can wear all day.
supra ShoesThe bestsupra.com seems to be from strong material, and have many seems all over. They are really beautifull. Supra Skytopbestsupra.com offer Great quality shoe for a reasonable price. Supra 2009Comfort Posted by: ryiu at November 12, 2009 09:04 PM (9dQ8A) 142
nike dunk sb
Do anything needed to support an idea, a good idea usually brings good results, doing business is like that.http://www.dunksky.com/.This site has always been on Posted by: nike dunk sb at November 14, 2009 12:08 AM (APB+g) 143
buy [url=http://www.reviewups.com/]discount ugg shoes[/url]
[url=http://www.reviewups.com/]cheap ugg shoes[/url] [url=http://www.reviewups.com/]cheap ugg[/url] [url=http://www.reviewups.com/ugg-coquette-casual-shoes-c-22]ugg rainier[/url] [url=http://www.reviewups.com/]buy ugg[/url] [url=http://www.reviewups.com/]ugg usa[/url] [url=http://www.reviewups.com/]discount ugg boots[/url] [url=http://www.reviewups.com/ugg-classic-short-c-1]ugg 5825[/url] [url=http://www.reviewups.com/]ugg shoes sale[/url] [url=http://www.reviewups.com/ugg-sundance-c-5]ugg sundance[/url] [url=http://www.reviewups.com/]ugg shoes[/url] [url=http://www.reviewups.com/]cheap ugg boots[/url] [url=http://www.reviewups.com/ugg-classic-tall-c-3]ugg 5815[/url] [url=http://www.reviewups.com/]ugg sale[/url] [url=http://www.reviewups.com/]ugg uk[/url] [url=http://www.reviewups.com/ugg-knightsbridge-c-27]ugg knightsbridge[/url] [url=http://www.reviewups.com/]womens ugg boots[/url] [url=http://www.reviewups.com/]ugg boots[/url] [url=http://www.reviewups.com/]ugg australia[/url] [url=http://www.reviewups.com/ugg-classic-cardy-c-2]ugg 5819[/url]from usa Posted by: cheap at November 14, 2009 04:12 AM (s7MB5) 144
Fake Cheap Rolex | Fake Watches | Fake Watches | Replica Watches | soccer jersey wholesale | Replica Emporio Armani Watch | Christian Dior Replica Watch | Fake Michele | Ebel Fake Watches | Technomarine Replica Watch | Fake Hamilton | Rolex Fake Watches | Corum Fake Watches | Chanel Replica Watches | Panerai Replica
Posted by: replica watches at November 17, 2009 05:34 AM (xpuiO) 145
Fake Watches | Replica Breitling Watches | replica soccer jersey | Replica watches | replica soccer jersey | Fake Tag Heuer Watches | Replica Ulysse Nardin Watches | Fake Omega Watches | Hamilton Replica | Patek Philippe Fake | Porsche Design Replica Watches | Replica Chanel Watches | Omega Watches | Piaget Watches Replica | Replica Tissot
Posted by: replica watches at November 17, 2009 11:53 AM (xpuiO) 146
Replica watches | Replica watches | soccer jersey wholesale | Fake Watches | replica soccer jersey | Richard Mille Fake Watches | Breguet Replica Watches | Glashutte Fake | Bedat & CO Fake Watches | Audemars Piguet Watch | Fake Chopard Watches | Movado Watch | Wholesale Panerai Watch | Wholesale Concord Watch | Fake Victorinox Swiss Army Watches
Posted by: replica watches at November 17, 2009 10:20 PM (xpuiO) 147
soccer jersey wholesale | Replica Rolex | Replica Rolex | replica soccer jersey | Replica Watches | Cheap Longines Watches | Replica Alain Silberstein Watch | Replica Tissot | Hublot Watches Replica | Cheap Other Watches | Cheap Corum Fake Watch | Baume & Mercier Replica Watch | Cheap Rolex Fake Watch | Fake Bell & Ross Watch | Fake Versace Watches
Posted by: replica watches at November 18, 2009 03:16 AM (C/zDM) 148
UGG BOOTS
Posted by: UGG BOOTS at November 19, 2009 06:23 AM (n0jE1) Posted by: mbtshoesbuy at November 23, 2009 01:00 AM (bNNim) 150
None of us are born with a set of shoes mbt shoes on our feet, but they are infinitely important to our wellbeing. Even though the commercial shoe http://www.mbter.com industry didn't get underway during the beginnings of civilization, man is believed to have constructed footwear mbt shoes 40,000 years ago. So the question isn't whether you should buy a pair of shoes... it's how should you go about buying them!
When you're shoe shopping, the task can seem overwhelming and frustrating. You just want to try on a few pairs of shoes and then get out of the store. But the reality is that you should pick out a pair of shoes mbt shoes with a lot more care than other items of your wardrobe. After all, the health of your feet are at stake! Posted by: pigeu at November 23, 2009 09:45 PM (1aNEH) 151
The proper function of man is to live, but not to exist.ugg classic cardyConquer fear of death and you are put into possession of your life. ugg classic tallThere is a time to speak and a time to be silent. ugg knightsbridgefree shippingmbt cheap
mbt sale mbt uk mbt shoes cheap MBT M.Walk Posted by: reviewups at November 26, 2009 11:49 PM (xUZwC) 152
hot news for brand shoes online store ,do you want to win more discount ?and popular for younger,and nike air maxwith top quality A ,come on all air max shoes with lowest price for highest quality !
Posted by: nike air max at December 01, 2009 08:23 PM (OKj2x) 153
The cheap ugg boots sale for women are stylish, they are comfortable and what،¯s more, they keep your feet. theres a pair of fellow sufferers,ugg australia uk to complement your personal preferences, why do we not take the traditional high discount ugg boots on salefor cold winter?
As a matter of fact, with the passing time, the love for ugg usa is increasing among girls in this modern world. The growing demand for these womens ugg made the manufacturers UGG Boots Sale to revamp the looks of these boots with different hues.come our website and buy a pair of ugg uk.UGG Classic Cardy are popular as shoes for cowboys. The SHOES close the whole parts of the foot. The ugg cardy are important to protect your feet from any dangerous things during your walking activities. There are many oatmeal ugg available in the Market and if you are interested to get one you can directly go to the store that sells it. Posted by: reviewups at December 03, 2009 03:35 AM (OKj2x) 154
Today ugg boots online have become a phenomenon.Every winter,the ugg classic crochet are one of the hottest goods in the market all over the world.So now don't be hesitation,own a pair of ugg usa immediately.
Posted by: ugg boots sale at December 09, 2009 02:29 PM (I3/dZ) 155
We supply authentic discount Lacoste Shoes
Lacoste Trainers New Lacoste Lacoste Sale Mens Lacoste camden lacoste trainers lacoste trainers shoes lacoste camden retro camden lacoste trainers lacoste carnaby shoes lacoste carnaby retro lacoste shoes sale New Lacoste shoes Lacoste shoes online cheap Lacoste shoes Lacoste shoe mens lacoste shoes Lacoste Shua Lace Black Lace shoes white Lace shoes lacoste swerve shoes White Lacoste shoes Lacoste shoes sale Cheap Lacoste shoes Lacoste Women Shoes Women Lacoste Shoes Lacoste Shoes online on line, cheap price,Top quality,Free shipping! Posted by: Lacoste shoes at December 12, 2009 02:18 PM (/3s/N) 156
The womens mbt Tembea is a new generation lace-up with Dual Board construction and a striking style that pays tribute to the classic sneaker. It packs in all the mbt lami shoes benefits with a fresh look and feel, striking the perfect balance between health benefits ... The discount mbt Shuguli GTX is a is a sleek and stylish professional shoe ideal for work and more formal occasions whilst delivering full waterproofing from GORE-TEX. These are especially effective for those who have to stand or walk for long periods of time ...
The mbt shoes Fanaka GTX is a sporty but rugged styled shoe that combines fashionable, casual design with all the health benefits associated with the sporting style discount mbt shoes. These are especially effective for ladies who have to stand or walk for long periods ... The black mbt Bia is a classic, professional shoe ideal for work and more formal occasions whilst delivering all the health benefits from MBT design. These are especially effective for ladies who have to stand or walk for long periods of time during work ... Posted by: gfdg at December 14, 2009 02:44 PM (iV/dV) 157
Stainless Steel Bangles Cheap | Stainless Steel Earring Luxury | Wholesal Carbon Fiber Bracelet | Accessories Luxury | Carbon Fiber Bangle Luxury | Stamping Bracelet Yiwu | Money Clips Best | Line Earring Wholesale | Corrosion Bangle | Wholesal Plating Ring | Stamping Necklace Luxury | Leather Bangles Cheap | Carbon Fiber Bangle Fashion | Titanium Jewelry | New Jewelrys Luxury | Stone Pendants Wholesale | Small Necklace | Zircon Earring Yiwu | Rubber Necklaces Cheap | Laser Rings
Posted by: wholesale jewelry at December 17, 2009 06:22 AM (1dySH) 158
nike max
air max shoes nike air max nike max shoes air max 1 nike air max 1 air max 2 nike air max 2 air max 89 nike air max 89 air max 90 nike air max 90 air max 91 nike air max 91 air max 95 nike air max 95 air max 97 nike air max 97 air max 180 nike air max 180 air max 360 nike air max 360 air max 2003 nike air max 2003 air max 2009 nike air max 2009 air max ltd nike air max ltd air max tn nike air max tn Posted by: nikemax at December 20, 2009 01:30 AM (g3/iU) 159
Watches Gucci Fashion | Replica Mont Blanc Watches | Jacob & Co Replica Watches | Watches Zenith Fashion | Rado Fake Watches | Watches Movado Fashion | Patek Philippe Replica Watches | Replica Hamilton Watches | Watches Roger Dubuis Fashion | Richard Mille Fake Watches | Ebel Fake Watches | Patek Philippe Replica Watches | Zenith Replica Watches | Replica Ulysse Nardin Watches | Alain Silberstein Replica Watches | Watches Gucci Fashion | Watches Zenith Fashion | Watches Roger Dubuis Fashion | Piaget Replica Watches | Raymond Weil Fake Watches
Posted by: wholesale jewelry at December 21, 2009 11:22 AM (1dySH) Posted by: nike air max 360 shoes at December 22, 2009 12:21 PM (xnxK1) 161
thank you very much,your article write very nice and usefull,i'm so like that i will recommend the article to my friends.Meanwhile,the nike air max sell in our air max store,if you like nike air max,you can view the beautifull womens air max in our website,thank you again.
http://www.shoe-wholesale.com/ Posted by: nike air max at December 23, 2009 12:23 PM (3i5cr) 162
Replica A Lange & Sohne Handbags | Replica Fashion Omega handbags | Replica Express Shipping Fee Handbags | Replica Ebel Handbags | Replica Fashion Bell & Ross handbags | Christian Dior Replica bags | Luxury Jaeger LeCoultre handbags | Best Emporio Armani bags | Luxury Vacheron Constantin handbags | Best Movado bags | Replica Fashion Maurice lacroix handbags | Luxury Hermes handbags | Ulysse Nardin Fake Handbags | Replica IWC Handbags | Rolex Replica bags | Best Parmigiani bags | Omega Fake Handbags | Luxury Panerai handbags | Patek Philippe Fake Handbags | Breguet Replica bags | Best Franck Muller bags | Replica Zenith Handbags | Replica Bvlgari Handbags | Replica Rolex Handbags | Hublot Fake Handbags
Posted by: wholesale jewelry at December 28, 2009 04:07 AM (1dySH) 163
nike shox for kids
nike shox monster nike shox nz nike shox nz ii nike shox oz nike shox R3 nike shox R4 nike shox R4 torch nike shox R5 nike shox TL1 nike shox TL3 nike shox Torch nike shox turb Posted by: nike high dunk at January 02, 2010 04:06 AM (8u0Dq) 164
UGG cardy
Ugg Australia Ugg Shoes Sale Bailey Button ugg boots Ugg classic cardy UGG cardy Ugg Australia Ugg Shoes Sale Bailey Button ugg boots Posted by: ugg shoes|timberland uk|ugg boots|87415555.com.cn at January 06, 2010 08:46 AM (qzq48) 165
Un total de once comunidades autnomas estn este jueves en alerta naranja Christmas gift ugg tall boots (riesgo importante) por nevadas y bajan las temperaturas en toda Espa09a, segn la Agencia Estatal de Meteorologa (AEMET). En concreto, se Christmas gift ugg napoule sandal trata de Aragn, Cantabria, Castilla-La Mancha, Catalu09a, Christmas gift timberland classic boots Madrid, Navarra, Comunidad Valenciana, Galicia, Pas Vasco, Asturias y Murcia. La cota de nieve bajar a menos de 200 metros en el CantbricoLa Pennsula Ibrica est bajo dos borrascas y un anticicln que crearn un pasillo que permitir el paso de una corriente de aire muy fro, como la que est provocando un temporal de fro glaciar en Europa, aunque es esperan que el fro que suframos no sea tan intenso como en otros pases. An as, se espera que las bajas temperaturas se mantengan hasta el domingo. La cota de nieve baja en el Cantbrico a menos de 200 metros
Posted by: El temporal de fr¨ھo y nieve pone en alerta a once comunidades aut¨®nomas ugg boots|ugg uk|timberlan at January 08, 2010 11:19 AM (tWrEP) 166
منتديات اغليك-افلام مصرية-منتديات حب بنات-شات حب بنات-افلام
Posted by: shat bnat at January 19, 2010 11:46 AM (nVm+l) Posted by: wedding gowns at January 25, 2010 05:53 AM (bBg/v) 168
The H4 replica watches took replica watches Harrison a massive 13 years to replica watches construct-but this was only the end of a lifetime's work. His genius was clear from the very beginning. Unfortunately many astronomers such as Nevil Maskelyne were convinced that a mechanical solution replica watches would not work and that only astronomy could solve the replica watches longitude problem. The fact that Harrison was from a working class family and had little replica watches formal education probably didn't help his prospects.Solving the longitude problem through horology meant designing a timepiece that could work accurately at sea. When you watch consider the rolling waves, changes in replica watches temperature and generally adverse replica watches conditions the dificulty of this task becomes apparent.The H1 was completed in 1735 and proved replica successful at sea. However the Board of Longitude demanded a full a transatlantic wholesale watch voyage. They gave Harrison a grant of 500 pounds with which he began work on the H2 watches. Posted by: replica watches at January 30, 2010 11:14 PM (Ddc+V) 169
Certainly watches are Replica Watches used to help people record rolex Watches time, but rolex watches nowadays its functions have enlarged. Replica watches are now tag heuer Watches not only objects that tag heuer watches can tell you what time it is, they are also a status symbol. You should not feel strange when you find someone wearing a watch on his wrist, but use the cell phone to tell time. In that situation, the watch is just showing its luxurious function cartier watches. It is normal and cartier watches perhaps also happens to you. .If asked that among the watches of various brands, which one can suit your taste? There is no doubt that most people will choose Rolex. Whichever social class you are in, it is naturally Rolex was known breitling Watches and cherished breitling watches for a long time. However, the elements do not usually enter the market alone, always come with the price tag up to the hand. For this reason, many people, especially men, their dreams of luxury Rolex watches are buried in omega Watches his heart omega watches. What should I do? Rolex watches are simply stunning worn by the rich and famous, right? No, this world is not the world's richest men, is the world of each. All are equal before the search of luxury and be men's watches respected. Within men's watches, the law, when consumers are in the market, women's watches they should women's watches receive the same treatment. This is the real reason why replica Rolex watches are ladies watches ladies watches more welcome than Rolex. Because in this world are not difficult to understand that the rich are much less than people with low income, you agree with me? You are forced to nod and say with certainty that is the reality. These low-income people do not have enough money to save every month. They can not afford such luxury Rolex watches
Posted by: replica watches at February 04, 2010 04:07 AM (YOuVm) 170
nike max
air max shoes nike air max nike max shoes air max 1 nike air max 1 air max 2 nike air max 2 air max 89 nike air max 89 air max 90 nike air max 90 air max 91 nike air max 91 air max 95 nike air max 95 air max 97 nike air max 97 air max 180 nike air max 180 air max 360 nike air max 360 air max 2003 nike air max 2003 air max 2009 nike air max 2009 air max ltd nike air max ltd air max tn nike air max tn air max tailwind nike air max tailwind womens air max 1 womens air max 90 womens air max 95 womens air max BW womens air max LTD womens air max TN womens air max 360 womens air max 2003 womens air max 2007 womens air max 2009 Posted by: airmax at February 04, 2010 12:07 PM (Eu9Vs) 171
nike max
air max shoes nike air max nike max shoes air max 1 nike air max 1 air max 2 nike air max 2 air max 89 nike air max 89 air max 90 nike air max 90 air max 91 nike air max 91 air max 95 nike air max 95 air max 97 nike air max 97 air max 180 nike air max 180 air max 360 nike air max 360 air max 2003 nike air max 2003 air max 2009 nike air max 2009 Posted by: may at February 06, 2010 01:31 PM (Eu9Vs) 172
Factors Replica Watches About The Rolex replica watches Oyster The Oyster is so closely get in touch with Rolex, and it is inevitably that some people think these are the only Replica watches Rolex manufacture. Others suppose that there is a single Oyster watch. But as a matter of fact, the name Oyster does not actually meant for a rolex Watches particular watch you can buy rolex watches or even to a series but to a type of case that available in some of the Rolex ranges. History The Oyster case was first released in 1926. The objective was to protect the workings of the watch from dust and moisture. Early watches were far from waterproof. The Oyster tag heuer Watchescase was an tag heuer watches innovative design to eliminate these problems. It had a new double locking crown that screwed into place. It has been compared to the hatch on a submarine. Like a submarine, the Oyster case was waterproof. In 1927 Mercedes Gleitze swam the English breitling Watches Channel breitling watches . Before she set off she was presented with a Rolex Oyster. When she arrived, the watch was still working perfectly. The resulting publicity gave the new case a massive boost. Why is it called Oyster? Legend has it that Hans cartier Watches Wilsdorf cartier watches, who invented the Oyster, chose the name because the new case reminded him of the difficulty he had experienced prising open oysters at dinner. Since then the Oyster has further, particularly advanced. Many Oyster watches today are omega Watches perpetual-self-winding, in other omega watches words, it does not require to expose the mechanism to the outside world in order to wind it. The Osyter Perpetual is one of the toughest, most durable, most reliable watches (under truly adverse conditions). It is probably the best mechanical watch money can buy.
Posted by: replica watches at February 07, 2010 05:49 AM (TUJDt) Processing 0.09, elapsed 0.0774 seconds. |
MuNuvians
MeeNuvians
Polls! Polls! Polls!
Dale's ECB Election Projection Federal Review Real Clear Politics Rasmussen Reports Gallup Zogby FoxNews Polls Sabato/Crystal Ball Frequently Asked Questions
The (Almost) Complete Paul Anka Integrity Kick
Primary Document: The Audio
Paul Anka Haiku Contest Announcement Integrity SAT's: Entrance Exam for Paul Anka's Band AllahPundit's Paul Anka 45's Collection AnkaPundit: Paul Anka Takes Over the Site for a Weekend (Continues through to Monday's postings) George Bush Slices Don Rumsfeld Like an F*ckin' Hammer Top Top Tens
Democratic Forays into Erotica New Shows On Gore's DNC/MTV Network Nicknames for Potatoes, By People Who Really Hate Potatoes Star Wars Euphemisms for Self-Abuse Signs You're at an Iraqi "Wedding Party" Signs Your Clown Has Gone Bad Signs That You, Geroge Michael, Should Probably Just Give It Up Signs of Hip-Hop Influence on John Kerry NYT Headlines Spinning Bush's Jobs Boom Things People Are More Likely to Say Than "Did You Hear What Al Franken Said Yesterday?" Signs that Paul Krugman Has Lost His Frickin' Mind All-Time Best NBA Players, According to Senator Robert Byrd Other Bad Things About the Jews, According to the Koran Signs That David Letterman Just Doesn't Care Anymore Examples of Bob Kerrey's Insufferable Racial Jackassery Signs Andy Rooney Is Going Senile Other Judgments Dick Clarke Made About Condi Rice Based on Her Appearance Collective Names for Groups of People John Kerry's Other Vietnam Super-Pets Cool Things About the XM8 Assault Rifle Media-Approved Facts About the Democrat Spy Changes to Make Christianity More "Inclusive" Secret John Kerry Senatorial Accomplishments John Edwards Campaign Excuses John Kerry Pick-Up Lines Changes Liberal Senator George Michell Will Make at Disney Torments in Dog-Hell Greatest Hitjobs
The Ace of Spades HQ Sex-for-Money Skankathon A D&D Guide to the Democratic Candidates Margaret Cho: Just Not Funny More Margaret Cho Abuse Margaret Cho: Still Not Funny Iraqi Prisoner Claims He Was Raped... By Woman Wonkette Announces "Morning Zoo" Format John Kerry's "Plan" Causes Surrender of Moqtada al-Sadr's Militia World Muslim Leaders Apologize for Nick Berg's Beheading Michael Moore Goes on Lunchtime Manhattan Death-Spree Milestone: Oliver Willis Posts 400th "Fake News Article" Referencing Britney Spears Liberal Economists Rue a "New Decade of Greed" Artificial Insouciance: Maureen Dowd's Word Processor Revolts Against Her Numbing Imbecility Intelligence Officials Eye Blogs for Tips They Done Found Us Out, Cletus: Intrepid Internet Detective Figures Out Our Master Plan Shock: Josh Marshall Almost Mentions Sarin Discovery in Iraq Leather-Clad Biker Freaks Terrorize Australian Town When Clinton Was President, Torture Was Cool What Wonkette Means When She Explains What Tina Brown Means Wonkette's Stand-Up Act Wankette HQ Gay-Rumors Du Jour Here's What's Bugging Me: Goose and Slider My Own Micah Wright Style Confession of Dishonesty Outraged "Conservatives" React to the FMA An On-Line Impression of Dennis Miller Having Sex with a Kodiak Bear The Story the Rightwing Media Refuses to Report! Our Lunch with David "Glengarry Glen Ross" Mamet The House of Love: Paul Krugman A Michael Moore Mystery (TM) The Dowd-O-Matic! Liberal Consistency and Other Myths Kepler's Laws of Liberal Media Bias John Kerry-- The Splunge! Candidate "Divisive" Politics & "Attacks on Patriotism" (very long) The Donkey ("The Raven" parody) News/Chat
|