Support




Contact
Powered by
Movable Type

Sarah Palin's PAC

She's a player; she needs to do this.

I don't think we got a real handle on Palin's politics -- only some of it , not nearly all -- during he campaign. Most importantly, she was a deputy in service of John McCain, so many of her actual stances were burred or suppressed entirely to remain on message. In addition, her sudden, shock elevation to the national stage didn't give her a lot of time to announce her political thinking, or to develop it where she hadn't thought about it too much at all.

This PAC -- and hopefully a more prominent role as spokesperson for the Republican wing of the Republican Party -- will do a lot to put some flesh on the bones of what, I hope, will coalesce into an actual "Palinite" program. Which candidates will she actively support? What heterodoxies are deal-breakers? Hopefully we'll soon be finding out.

I do hope that she was just making nice-nice with McCain on border (in)security and amnesty.


Oh: Despite previous questions, it's real, not a prank.


Posted by: Ace at 04:31 PM



Comments

1 PAC'in Heat.

Posted by: reason at January 27, 2009 04:36 PM (F26eZ)

2

Posted by: Wolfwood at January 27, 2009 04:37 PM (p2LDU)

3 I could be wrong, but I'm guessing that illegal immigration isn't all that high on Alaska's list of priorities.

Posted by: Wolfwood at January 27, 2009 04:37 PM (p2LDU)

4 I just registered there. I'll donate when I see it heading in a direction I like.

Posted by: TC at January 27, 2009 04:38 PM (QXKjZ)

5 I'm looking forward to getting a real handle on her politics.

Posted by: Rocks at January 27, 2009 04:41 PM (Q1lie)

6 The logo's rather clever. Alaska superimposed over the lower 48, actual size. Graphically illustrating that the Cuda controls an area 1/3 the size of the continental US.

Posted by: IllTemperedCur at January 27, 2009 04:42 PM (InMdt)

7 Sarah Palin *is* a hetero doxy, if you get my meaning.

... and I think you do.

Posted by: BumperStickerist at January 27, 2009 04:42 PM (MKFU7)

8 Okay, maybe not actual size, but relative. Shut up, I'm a moron.

Posted by: IllTemperedCur at January 27, 2009 04:43 PM (InMdt)

9 Don't talk about Palin and flesh in the same sentence. You'll get a lot of folks started.

Posted by: Attila (Pillage Idiot) at January 27, 2009 04:46 PM (wwy6Z)

10 Not to mention bone.

Posted by: IllTemperedCur at January 27, 2009 04:46 PM (InMdt)

11

I hope her PAC beats the crap out of McCain's.

Posted by: PDizzle at January 27, 2009 04:50 PM (5DhtJ)

12 she is going to raise millions from this thing.  Very smart idea that shows she still is a BIG part of the national political scene.  This is the start of a possible 2012 campaign.

Posted by: ousoonerfan15 at January 27, 2009 04:53 PM (yAq/A)

13 Speaking of McCain.

Bi-Partisan curious...........and loving it !


http://tinyurl.com/6zjc6w

Posted by: Blazer at January 27, 2009 04:57 PM (9XXMp)

14 Even with some separation since the election, I find myself still wanting to have sex with her.  And it's a powerful urge.

Posted by: My package has a mind of it's own at January 27, 2009 04:57 PM (8/DeP)

Posted by: Blazer at January 27, 2009 04:58 PM (9XXMp)

16 It says it is her official PAC, but it also says "Not authorized by any candidate or candidate's committee".  But I guess she is not a candidate for anything so this is legit... right? 

I guess what I'm wondering is to what extent this is her's.  Is she the head of it and directs everything?  Or is there going to be some knucklehead rino running it and using her name?  Although she probably would not give permission to use her name for that. 

If this is fully her effort, they need to put up a youtube video of her saying so, or some other type of "signature".  I'm a little skeptical of republican politicians right now.

Posted by: dan-O at January 27, 2009 04:58 PM (teb/C)

17

Sarah is paying Alaska residents dividends from the profit of oil sales.

I think that is a slippery slope. This simular to the the policy in Kuwait. In Kuwait the kids hire noncitizen residents to do their household chores. I would not want to hire anyone to do my.......oh wait  yeah um  Hey Go Sarah Go!

Posted by: Krazy Kat at January 27, 2009 04:59 PM (K4Zxt)

18 I'd hit it........

Posted by: Jubal Anderson Early at January 27, 2009 05:00 PM (krKUp)

19

Slow-loading site this afternoon. You morons must all be thinking the same thing.

Posted by: Michael Rittenhouse at January 27, 2009 05:02 PM (02AID)

20 I just sent her PAC $25 bucks and I  STILL can't get a date with her! Always my problem with MILFs.

Posted by: John425 at January 27, 2009 05:03 PM (nGlrt)

21 Well McCain's camp certainly has no love for her.  Did you catch the WaPo article today on Rush Limbaugh?  It had a McCain Campaign guy throwing Limbaugh and Palin together as the "far right" if my memory serves me correctly.

Posted by: buzzion at January 27, 2009 05:05 PM (Lrsi6)

22 Very positive move. It's important to not confuse this with being an announced candidate (see Frist, Bill) but it certainly means she's preserving the option and intends to "throw a block" in the effort to fight Obama's socialist onslaught.

Posted by: Robert_Paulson at January 27, 2009 05:11 PM (zjgCD)

23 Good for her. If nothing else, this whole experience with McCain and the press has given her a good understanding of how vicious and unfair the liberal and some conservative pundits and media can be. If she decides to run again, she will know what she needs to do differently in dealing with those scum.

Posted by: IC at January 27, 2009 05:13 PM (jZNCU)

24

Palin/Boehner 2012 !!!1!1!

Posted by: Eleven at January 27, 2009 05:14 PM (7DB+a)

25 Palin/BONER 2012!

Damn, she's hot. Red hot GILF.

Posted by: Dan at January 27, 2009 05:16 PM (y5AQe)

26 Hmmmm.

"Sarah is paying Alaska residents dividends from the profit of oil sales."

I had a problem with that too until I watched "Tougher in Alaska" on Discovery.  I didn't know that a lot of villages are off-grid and every family needs their own oil storage tank for surviving the winter.

I think it works basically as an offset to high energy prices.  Energy that Alaska produces for the lower 48.  If energy prices are low, and thus cost of surviving winter is low for residents, then the residents don't get much.  If energy prices are very high, and the cost of surviving winter is consequently high, then the residents get some extra cash to pay for the winter oil.

Not super happy but I don't think many people could have survived $140/barrel oil otherwise.

Posted by: memomachine at January 27, 2009 05:18 PM (kPJKz)

27 Hmmmm.

Here's an example:
http://www.thetundradrums.com/news/show/4517

Posted by: memomachine at January 27, 2009 05:21 PM (kPJKz)

28

UN Official wants Bush tried for warcrimes

http://tinyurl.com/ak7bgo

 

Posted by: William Amos at January 27, 2009 05:21 PM (z+hUq)

29 Is it 2012 yet? Did we survive?

Posted by: Sebastian B. O. Bunionstow IV. at January 27, 2009 05:23 PM (NLtVk)

30

Posted by: Krazy Kat at January 27, 2009 04:59 PM (K4Zxt)

Posted by: memomachine at January 27, 2009 05:18 PM (kPJKz)

The dividends are constitutionally mandated.

Posted by: ol-dirty-/b/tard at January 27, 2009 05:26 PM (IoUF1)

31

Palin would make an able VP choice for Mitt Romney.

Best Regards

Posted by: ATNorth at January 27, 2009 05:26 PM (3h3kv)

32
I love Sarah Palin but she and her supporters are going to spend 3/4's of their time defending against baseless personal attacks; Palin will never be able to get down to the nitty-gritty of the issues.

Also, my confidence of Palin was really shaken when she was punked by a couple of turds in Canada pretending to be Sarkozy.

And, also, Palin did lousy in an interview with a birdbrain, Katie Couric. If you can't run circles around Katie Twit Couric, you're not ready for primetime.

Posted by: Darling at January 27, 2009 05:27 PM (MUhMA)

33 McCain attracted staffers that were often less conservative than he was, except on military/defense issues.

What the effin' Beltway GOP crowd needs to understand is that the center of gravity of the party is no longer in Washington. If we know one thing, it is this: the next conservative president will not be elected because he/she met with the approval of some former McCain staffer or the WaPo or anyone with a metro DC residential zip code.

Posted by: Robert_Paulson at January 27, 2009 05:27 PM (zjgCD)

34

26

Hey my comment was all snark. I would take a dividend check in a NJ heart beat.

Posted by: Krazy Kat at January 27, 2009 05:30 PM (K4Zxt)

35 Hmmm.

@ Darling

"Also, my confidence of Palin was really shaken when she was punked by a couple of turds in Canada pretending to be Sarkozy."

*shrug* I wouldn't know Sarkozy by voice.  If someone at the office told me that Sarkozy was on the line I'd take it at face value.  If that voice had a really ridiculous accent then what?  Do you make an accusation?  What if it turns out to -be- Sarkozy?  You end up looking even more ridiculous for accusing the President of France of not being French.

IMO the fault lies with the staffer who didn't filter this out.

Posted by: memomachine at January 27, 2009 05:30 PM (kPJKz)

36

30

Really whats not to like?

Posted by: Krazy Kat at January 27, 2009 05:31 PM (K4Zxt)

37 Hmmm.

@ Krazy Kat

"Hey my comment was all snark. I would take a dividend check in a NJ heart beat."

Only over Corazine's dead body.  In the State of Taxation, otherwise known as "New Jersey", nobody gets dividends.

Posted by: memomachine at January 27, 2009 05:31 PM (kPJKz)

38

Doesn't a gallon of milk cost somewhere around $11 in Alaska?  I never hear them really complain about any of it, so I don't readily know.  But if that's the case, then I am totally cool with them getting dividends from sale of natural resources.

At least at first blush, it sounds pretty in-line with the general conservative concept of "strong states, small central government to step in only when vitally necessary."

Posted by: reason at January 27, 2009 05:33 PM (XiVKO)

39 fox is making the announcement now regarding Palin's PAC during Beck.

Posted by: Krazy Kat at January 27, 2009 05:33 PM (K4Zxt)

40 How does this tie in with the PETA ad.


I'll be in my pantry.

Posted by: Leopold Stotch at January 27, 2009 05:35 PM (iTcPB)

41

She's a player; she needs to do this.

 

I'm a player, I needs to do her.

Posted by: Javems at January 27, 2009 05:36 PM (hq71Y)

42

Sarah is paying Alaska residents dividends from the profit of oil sales.

The dividend is from the permanent fund, established by amendment to the Alaskan Constitution back in the '70s. The Governor doesn't have much to do with setting the dividend amounts, even if they wanted to

The reason for the permanent fund's existence is that Alaskans got pissed off at how the late 60's state government wasted the money. So the idea was to take a good portion of Alaska's oil money and render it immune from partisan politics.

Posted by: IllTemperedCur at January 27, 2009 05:37 PM (InMdt)

43 I do wonder if the hurdles she would face, from the media and stupid electorate who believe the media, would be too much to overcome. That said, she and Jindal are definitely the future of the conservative party.

Posted by: IC at January 27, 2009 05:38 PM (jZNCU)

44

I am six flags over Steel getting RNC Chair, and Jindal being a big player in 2012.  Romney needs to work his persona. He is pinched, and often you get the feeling that he is your boss, ready to fire you...Sad.

I admire Palin but I agree with other poster here that she would be a distraction, unless she addresses these issues before she runs...

Posted by: ford at January 27, 2009 05:39 PM (Ki7fm)

45 But I can't talk about her testicles, guys!!

Posted by: Orin Hatch at January 27, 2009 05:40 PM (1g+FW)

46 Romney needs to over come his interview with Hannity.  That's what Romney needs to over come.

Posted by: The Obvious at January 27, 2009 05:41 PM (1g+FW)

47 -

Things I Learned while Watching "It's Tougher in Alaska"

It's tougher in Alaska.

Things I learned watching Fox's "When Animals Attack">/i>

Animals, sometimes they attack.

-

Posted by: BumperStickerist at January 27, 2009 05:42 PM (MKFU7)

48 Palin has been Quayled.  I'm afraid there is no coming back from that. 

Posted by: polynikes at January 27, 2009 05:45 PM (m2CN7)

49 polynikes,

Maybe.  But no one else is going to draw money like she will.  Unless you'd rather the party did without all that.

Posted by: The Obvious at January 27, 2009 05:46 PM (1g+FW)

50 OT - What is happening at the RNC Chairperson election or debate or whatever it is they do to elect a new chairperson? Does anyone know?

Posted by: IC at January 27, 2009 05:47 PM (jZNCU)

51 We don't need money.  We just need me to talk about balls.

Posted by: Orin Hatch at January 27, 2009 05:47 PM (1g+FW)

52

I admire Palin but I agree with other poster here that she would be a distraction, unless she addresses these issues before she runs...

Posted by: ford at January 27, 2009 05:39 PM (Ki7fm)

How the fuck is she supposed to address "these issues" w/o a PAC? The only way to get the message out is to raise gi-fucking-normous amounts of coin and hire people to get it out, as the MSM pseudo-humans only report slander and innuendo. I'll contribute, even if she has no plans to run in the future, simply to help counter the lies.

Posted by: ol-dirty-/b/tard at January 27, 2009 05:47 PM (IoUF1)

53

The Obvious at January 27, 2009 05:46 PM (1g+FW)

I have no problem with her PAC. I was strictly speaking in regard to her chances at a national elected office.  I could see her in someone's cabinet though. 

Posted by: polynikes at January 27, 2009 05:50 PM (m2CN7)

54 Like I said.  She'll raise tons of money.  Heh.  It would be even funnier in a way...knowing she was pulling the strings from behind the curtain.

Posted by: The Obvious at January 27, 2009 05:51 PM (1g+FW)

55 I like Mitt Romney. I think he is very smart, and a fine communicator. I don't even mind that he is a Mormon. But the guy looks like at any time a circuit could blow and we would find out he is an android. I would start talking about Palin, but my wife is nearby and would wonder why I am drooling.

Posted by: John F Not Kerry at January 27, 2009 05:51 PM (HF2US)

56 polynikes,

Don't jump the gun.  Right now there isn't a single Republican in this land who could get himself or herself elected to the presidency, and the party isn't improving.

Posted by: The Obvious at January 27, 2009 05:53 PM (1g+FW)

57 48 Palin has been Quayled.  I'm afraid there is no coming back from that. 

Posted by: polynikes at January 27, 2009 05:45 PM (m2CN7)

Fuck that. They will "Quayle" anybody whose not a POS Ivy-League inside-the-beltway leftist cocksucker. If the MSM pseudo-humans are now deciding who is or isn't fit to be elected, the country is fucked no matter what. Besides, when The Jug-Eared Jackass fucks everything into oblivion, and he will, the MSM who foisted his sorry ass upon us will have zero cred. It won't matter what they say when people are freezing to death in their homes because of rolling blackouts caused by his idiotic luddite energy policy.

Her approval/ disapproval rating as of a couple weeks ago was 49-40, even after months of mostly unanswered, non-stop negative stories, 99% of which were unadulterated propagandist fiction.

Finally, even if she decides not to run the PAC will be worth it, to counter the lies of the MSM filth if for no other reason.

Posted by: ol-dirty-/b/tard at January 27, 2009 06:00 PM (IoUF1)

58

37

Your right about Corazine. I think the policy says alot about Palin. That is my point. She is a giver not a taker. Sarah sold off State assets and cut the State budget. She even jogs to work sometimes. Palin's aim is true and when it comes down to it I would rather have one straight shooter in a governing job than a congress full of thirld world mentality FOLKS. As an asside I just moved home to NJ last year after 30 years in Florida.

Posted by: Krazy Kat at January 27, 2009 06:00 PM (K4Zxt)

59 One of Nixon's last post-presidency books, titled In the Arena, has a chapter called "Wilderness" where he explains what he did between 1962 (when he lost the CA Gubernatorial Election) and 1968 (when he was elected president). Basically, it comes down to three things: (1) he improved his political skill-set; (2) he worked very hard helping other Republicans get elected; (3) times and opinions change.

As the CBO report shows, Obama's trillion-dollar stimulus gambit is almost certainly going to be a failure. The American people, in 2012, are going to be increasingly unemployed, increasingly taxed to pay for Obama's spending, and increasingly rip-shit angry at the bill of goods they were sold in 2008. It doesn't guarantee GOP victory, but it probably means that the public will be looking for a  plausible defender of middle class values and interests "hockey mom" rather than the most famous celebrity in the world.

Posted by: Robert_Paulson at January 27, 2009 06:01 PM (zjgCD)

60 Besides Palin and with luck Jindal, who do you think will seriously want to run in 2012?

I would imagine there will be plenty of conservative phonies that are interested in the job. We must not let that happen again.

Posted by: mare at January 27, 2009 06:05 PM (X1fsj)

61 I voted for Palin back in November.  It sure as hell wasn't for McCain.  I eagerly look forward to seeing the Full Palin with no McCain staff fucking it all up.  The reaction she gets from the trolls really speaks volumes don't it?

Posted by: CDR M at January 27, 2009 06:06 PM (TJoU6)

62

All you folks who are trashing Palin over the “interviews” or because she would have to spend time defending herself from baseless media attacks are making the same mistakes that led to McLame getting the Republican nod.

 

YOU ARE LETTING THE MEDIA MAKE YOUR DECISIONS FOR YOU!

 

Those interviews did not represent Sarah Palin….they were edited to make her look bad. In that, maybe she has learned to either do live interviews or to demand a contract in writing that the interview will not be edited.

 

Oh one other thing, Romney is another squishy Republican RINO.

Posted by: Vic at January 27, 2009 06:08 PM (f6os6)

63 31

Palin would make an able VP choice for Mitt Romney.

Best Regards

/end quoted text

why would she want to run again as the VP for another RINO?

Romney and all the other tired old white RINO's need to get the fuck out of the way and let a Republican run for President........

IMHO, of course.




Posted by: redc1c4 at January 27, 2009 06:14 PM (sT30R)

64 In that, maybe she has learned to either do live interviews or to demand a contract in writing that the interview will not be edited.

Not to mention, keep her own camera and crew running non-stop. I wouldn't trust the media cocksuckers to obey a no-edit contract.

Posted by: IllTemperedCur at January 27, 2009 06:19 PM (InMdt)

65 Here's my thinking on amnesty: it's a done deal, that was decided definitively on Election Day. So in other words, it's a non-issue. Border security on the other hand... THAT's where she needs to be vocal as a stalwart conservative.

I'm glad to hear about her PAC, but want to see give speeches and write books on her views. She needs to do what Krauthammer suggested: take time to read, read, READ and become as familiar with every national and regional issue as she is with Alaskan politics and energy issues. The only way she can overcome the hatchet job the media will continue to do on her will be to answer every question during interviews in a way that is credible and can't be ridiculed without making the Left look ridiculous.

Did I mention she is an incredibly hot fox, and would make the world's first POTUSILF?

Posted by: CoolCzech at January 27, 2009 06:22 PM (iafWn)

66

Did you catch the WaPo article today on Rush Limbaugh?  It had a McCain Campaign guy throwing Limbaugh and Palin together as the "far right" if my memory serves me correctly.

More crap from John Maverick McCrap's people --

From Chris Cilizza's Post column -- John Weaver, a former senior aide to Sen. John McCain (R-Ariz.), said that Republicans must be careful not to allow their Democratic rivals to paint them all with the brush of Limbaugh.

"The Democrats and the far left will do all they can to grab electoral turf," said Weaver. "And one sure way to do it is take some of the most controversial voices on the extreme right -- like Limbaugh and [Alaska Gov. Sarah] Palin -- and try to insist they speak for all members of the center/right movement."

Posted by: Bender at January 27, 2009 06:22 PM (62LLx)

67 Jindal is a Creationist moonbat, and has no business running for President, unless you all want Juggy to get reelected......


Posted by: redc1c4 at January 27, 2009 06:24 PM (sT30R)

68 Sarah is paying Alaska residents dividends from the profit of oil sales.

These payments predate Palin by decades, and are mandated by Alaska's constitution.

Posted by: OregonMuse at January 27, 2009 06:25 PM (FO+YO)

69 64: exactly. I don't trust those fuckers worth a squirt of piss. She needs to agree ONLY to live interviews, and have her own camera crew or, at least, consultant to guard against crap like the Turkey setup. Shame the media is so childish, but there you go...

Posted by: CoolCzech at January 27, 2009 06:26 PM (iafWn)

70 If we push Palin 2012 hard enough, maybe the media be less gung-ho and giggly about the next person they feel they need to 'quayle'. 
What hope can we ever have for a decent POTUS if we pretend the media is the final arbiter?


Posted by: Cincinnatus at January 27, 2009 06:31 PM (5OVpL)

71 Is Palin qualified. Yup. Far more so than our current White House-sitter, especially.

That said, she needs to work on letting everyone else know that she's qualified. Sure, McCain's folks are pathetic and threw her under the bus, the Couric and Gibson interviews were edited within an inch of their lives and completely on a mission to trash her... fine.

But she still did a shit job in handling the press. As much as I like her, she always positioned herself like she was auditioning for something and trying to impress people. She the Governor of the largest state in the Union and has accomplished more on top issues in her 2 years as governor than the D.C. crowd has done in the last 20 or so. She needs to start throwing some weight around and shutting people up. That's where she's lacks what the DC players have. They bitch slap the media.

Posted by: Damiano at January 27, 2009 06:38 PM (cfKer)

72 If she runs for senator in 2010 and wins, by 2012she could brush most of the media shit off as inexperience.

Posted by: Eli at January 27, 2009 06:39 PM (Qodbn)

73

If we push Palin 2012 hard enough, maybe the media be less gung-ho and giggly about the next person they feel they need to 'quayle'. 

 

Dream on. The media is still portraying Edward R. Murrow as a media saint and McCarthy as the devil incarnate and he died in 1957.

Posted by: Vic at January 27, 2009 06:40 PM (f6os6)

74 I just joined SarahPac and kicked in for a continuing monthly donation. 

Due to the volatility of the conservative values held by currently serving Republicans - I stopped all donations to the Republican party and other Pacs when McCain lost the election and big wig Republicans started unloading baggage on Palin.  Previously - I was a regular donor for McCain in spite of my reservations about him.

Now when Republican operatives call me for $$ - my response will be to inform them that all my political contributions go to the Sarah Palin PAC - because she is a true conservative who will stick by her principles.  If they want money from me - I'll suggest they seek her endorsement and then I'll consider it.

And about Palin's politics - the record (pre-McCain) is there and there is plenty of it.  She's a compassionate person - and doesn't hold ill will towards opposing points of view - but she's no fan of big government.

She is also the best we have right now.

Posted by: HondaV65 at January 27, 2009 06:40 PM (9vlDt)

75

Jindal is a Creationist moonbat

Posted by: redc1c4

I hope the worms are gentle with your corpse.

Posted by: John F Not Kerry at January 27, 2009 06:40 PM (HF2US)

76 This would be a good way to veto any pick for RNC chair that is a RINOdouche.  Instead of donating to the RNC, donate to the Cuda PAC.

And let them know.

K

Posted by: Kestrel♠ at January 27, 2009 06:40 PM (bHpgI)

77 Of the Right Palin has the biggest target on her back than any electable, political entity; so, the PAC and it's development at this early date is a great idea.

Is she viable? Of course she is. The Democrats and the MSM (BIRM) will smear her or any real antagonist to leftythink no matter what - guaranteed - and we've seen it in spades already with Palin in VP 2008. The Right cannot let that happen as mentioned earlier. Do not let the media define the candidate.

That is the real test and purpose of the PAC at this point. Its effectiveness at getting around the dying MSM, though it still holds most of the cards, will remain tantamount and the measuring stick by which we will predict Palin's presidential success.

The parallel question is can the conservasphere fight off its own RINO-class so that it isn't undermined by those who think "moving to the middle" is the key to electoral success. We have a pretty decent track record on how well that works out, so those who promote it while trashing Palin/Limbaugh are pretty much ignorable at this point. The conservatives need to provide momentum for the pendulum to swing against compassionate conservatism and Pelosi-esque Marxism. Palin's PAC is a great start if she is actually behind it and not some ancillary group just capitalizing on her appeal.

And fuck McCain. Thank heavens she's free from the albatross.

Posted by: AnonymousDrivel at January 27, 2009 06:47 PM (sI5Ho)

78 And seeing as how some of you morons can't take your eyes off of Palin, there is a little link at the bottom of the page called FAQ's.

Here is a largish snippet.

How will contributions be spent?

Your support of SarahPac will make it possible for Gov. Palin to continue to be a strong voice for energy independence and reform. By supporting SarahPac, you will allow Gov. Palin to help find and create solutions for America's most pressing problems; priority number one is building a strong and prosperous economy that recognizes hard work, innovation and integrity by rewarding small businesses and hard working American families. SarahPac will support local and national candidates who share Gov. Palin's ideas and goals for our country.

Who is behind SarahPac?

Gov. Sarah Palin believes all Americans must work together for the future, regardless of their party affiliation. Gov. Palin is the official chair of SarahPac, and its supporters are Republicans, Democrats, Independents, and those unaffiliated with any political party.

(emph mine)

K

Posted by: Kestrel♠ at January 27, 2009 06:50 PM (bHpgI)

79 meh - but be going viral - the site won't even load for me. Half a page and .... nada. For shits

Posted by: Bruce at January 27, 2009 06:53 PM (oedyI)

80

Not to mention, keep her own camera and crew running non-stop. I wouldn't trust the media cocksuckers to obey a no-edit contract

Another good idea I read in a comments section (probably here) was that she should wear, or have displayed on her desk I'd opine, a timer clock so you could see when the edited version of the interview ran, how much time had passed between answers and questions (and vice versa).

BTW, Jacques Chirac was punked by the same two Montreal disc jockeys phoning pretending to be Canada's new Prime Minister.

Posted by: andycanuck at January 27, 2009 07:19 PM (rtZbL)

81

My initial impression is that this is some Soros site trying to trick me into funding them.

How can you demostrate it is authentic?

Posted by: Steve at January 27, 2009 07:25 PM (lv+sJ)

82 Yeah I got to that "Who are we? Gov Sarah Palin believes... " as if her beliefs were "who we are". This is not making any sense to me. It has to be a tricksy liberal suck-hole to take your money and use it against conservative/libertarian purposes

Posted by: Steve at January 27, 2009 07:28 PM (lv+sJ)

83

Palin has been Quayled.  I'm afraid there is no coming back from that. 

Not really. Quayle couldn't fight back (even if he had been capable) because he was under Bush I's aegis. Sarah was on McCain's leash, too.

Now she's on her own and—bonus—wiser, too.

Posted by: Michael Rittenhouse at January 27, 2009 07:34 PM (02AID)

84 @81: Well, Fox News reported it today as her official site, for what that's worth...

Posted by: CoolCzech at January 27, 2009 07:57 PM (iafWn)

85 I think we can safely say that Palin will be the nominee if she runs.  I expect a huge crossover vote in our primaries and they're convinced that she's damaged goods.  Being moonbats, they will not acknowledge any evidence to the contrary.  Which means it's probably in our best interests to get her in a position to fight.

I'm not demanding anyone give up their opinion, that just seems the likely case to me.

Posted by: Methos at January 27, 2009 08:11 PM (LqLye)

86

I'm in. It's the only little bright ray of sunshine to come my way in months.

...and I live in sunny California.

...for now.

Posted by: davis,br at January 27, 2009 08:20 PM (OJAxK)

87 John Weaver, a former senior aide to Sen. John McCain (R-Ariz.), said that Republicans must be careful not to allow their Democratic rivals to paint them all with the brush of Limbaugh.

"The Democrats and the far left will do all they can to grab electoral turf," said Weaver. "And one sure way to do it is take some of the most controversial voices on the extreme right -- like Limbaugh and [Alaska Gov. Sarah] Palin -- and try to insist they speak for all members of the center/right movement."


First, Chris Cilizza can suck my neighbor's dog's dick. The one with mange. Second, I was willing to give McCain the benefit of the doubt last year, because he was all we had to fight Waffles. But now, I can proudly say... Fuck you, Johnny MacMaverick. Only a master backstabber would hire other backstabbers like Weaver. I only wish I were an Arizonan... so I could vote against you.

Posted by: George Orwell at January 27, 2009 08:24 PM (AZGON)

88 Palin wasn't ready for prime time, and she's not going to be ready for prime time. She'll raise bundles of money, she'll galvanize people...and she won't be a national-level winner.

Arguing that "she's the best we got" is no argument. If Sarah Palin is the best candidate that the GOP can field for POTUS, then we're pretty much doomed, and aren't looking hard enough. I don't care what people say about "ambushes," and "letting the media define her," and all that other puppy-love denial bitter-ender nonsense. She ought to stick to being a leader in the party, doing her part to shape conservatism going forward--noble and necessary work, all of it--and abandon any ambitions toward national election.

Posted by: railwriter at January 27, 2009 08:30 PM (XcsD4)

89 ...said (former McCain aid) Weaver. "And one sure way to do it is take some of the most controversial voices on the extreme right -- like Limbaugh and [Alaska Gov. Sarah] Palin -- and try to insist they speak for all members of the center/right movement.

God, I'm starting to loath the McCainiacs.

If Palin is so "extreme right," why did McCain freaking choose her to begin with?!

Posted by: CoolCzech at January 27, 2009 08:35 PM (iafWn)

90 I refuse to link directly to EeyorePundit, but he wants to let you know that your betters who are Repugnican members of Congress think you had better not listen to Rush or anyone like him (this would include Palin). You have been warned.

(howls of laughter)

Posted by: George Orwell at January 27, 2009 08:36 PM (AZGON)

91 I checked out her site... she looks great.

Unfortunately, judging by the policy description portion of the site (there isn't any) I think she put the cart before the horse. She still hasn't done her reading, and come up with some positions she can claim as her own. Read, girl... read!!!

Posted by: CoolCzech at January 27, 2009 08:51 PM (iafWn)

92 Sarah Palin has more character and internal fortitude than either Quayle or McQueeg.

She apparently decided it was her time to follow Ronaldus MAgnus and get into the national scene while she still has the name recognition thing in her favor. Good press or bad, you know who she is. If the MSM wants to get her under the mike now they have to do it by her rules or not at all. You know they hate having rules dictated to them, since they are the Deciders, after all, but like the day she did her interview where the guy was killing turkeys, she made sure the viewer knew she's not some squeamish shrinking violet and she'll get the job done wherever she winds up in '12.

She probably knows the MSM did its best to marginalize Ronald Reagan after he lost to Ford who lost to Carter the Bumpkin Jihadist in '76, too.
Reagan ignored them, their opinion of him, and proceeded to clean the floor with that smiling Friend to Dictators, all the while cheerfully telling the people to ignore the press. He ignored them, used them against their will, and won in a landslide that the MSM never saw coming.

I remember the press wondering how Carter lost even as the tallies came in...Palin has that level of name recognition, the rest is organization and planning. I think she has all the chance in the world if a conservative has any chance in this handout greedy damned nation at all...

Posted by: enter sandman at January 27, 2009 08:52 PM (zxaA2)

93 "...if the press wants to get her under the mike now they have to do it by her rules or not at all."

The Press chooses not at all. She needs press, they don't need her. Your post presupposes that she's operating from a position of authority; she's not. And if you think The Press is going to be dictated to by someone they've already owned, on at least two separate, well-publicized instances, well, sir, please have another, it's on the house.

Posted by: railwriter at January 27, 2009 09:13 PM (XcsD4)

94 She'll raise bundles of money, she'll galvanize people...and she won't be a national-level winner.

Well,  for a unknown politician who governs  'way out in the frozen hinterlands' she sure does capture America's national attention easily; next to Obama number two on goggle search. . 

In a couple of years America will need  real energy to revive her broken engine and Gov Palin is someone who will be in the position to deliver; building a grassroots on energy and small business is encouraging to me.

As for national security, I have a feeling that nothing will ever be a bad as the current CiC we have now.

Whatever her style, I know beyond doubt that she is the type of American who would fight to the death to  protect the Constitution and those who defend it.

That's what I like about her. 

Posted by: syn at January 27, 2009 09:18 PM (ASzue)

95 Syn: Earnest sentiments, and none I substantially disagree with. But a question: Do you think she could beat a national-level Democratic candidate and get elected President of the United States by the current electorate?

I didn't think so. I don't, either.

Posted by: railwriter at January 27, 2009 09:24 PM (XcsD4)

96

I think the worst thing that happened to Sarah was the two week seclusion while they handled her, brought her up to speed, whatever, then tossed her in front of Caddy Kouric.  I knew about her before the primaries and what I saw and my impression was someone trying to respond the way she had been told to respond rather than just being herself. 

I would have put her out there on the campaign trail immediately and let her talk about energy policy and  brought her up to speed on the plane between rallies.

The reaction of the press and the left to her shows me they are scared to death of her.  The reaction of the RINOs tells the same story.  Sarah is one of us.  She believes in the things we believe in.  She doesn't buy into the global warming parc, she understands how to achieve true energy independence and she understands that will be a good thing for the economy.  She also knows a helluva lot more about national security than anyone else at the state level and probably more than jokin joe did as a senator simply because the governor of Alaska, whoever it is, is in the loop when it comes to our national security.  To her credit she never brought that up because people with that kind of clearance are not suppose to bring it up unlike a certain jokin gird-your-loins Joe.

Screw what the press and the left says.  If she wants this and can get her message out and lead, she'll bitch-slap that Marxist right out of the White House in 4 years.  I think The One's condescending arrogance is going wear thin in the next year.  I think 10-15% of the 52 had no idea what they were voting for except the black guy that wasn't a republican.  Reality is a bitch and they are not going to like this new age reality.  Four years from now they'll understand what voting for change really means.

Posted by: RB at January 27, 2009 09:28 PM (ewXBY)

97

Do you think she could beat a national-level Democratic candidate and get elected President of the United States by the current electorate?

I didn't think so. I don't, either.

Name someone who can.

Posted by: buzzion at January 27, 2009 09:31 PM (lCm/E)

98

Holy cow.

I'm having palpatations just from reading the membership list for the Alfalfa Club. J-H-C! How in the world does one stand out in that room?

Do you think they stand around and wonder how in the hell they wound up in such a place?

Posted by: jmflynny at January 27, 2009 09:32 PM (oIWx1)

99 I can't, buzzion. Neither can you.

My point stands.

Posted by: railwriter at January 27, 2009 09:34 PM (XcsD4)

100 Oh, she'll stand out as the hottest thing in a room full of, let me guess, MEN!  What a smart woman she is.

Posted by: Nancy at January 27, 2009 09:37 PM (iVQ+Z)

101 Everyone needs to calm down.  This PAC doesn't mean that Palin is running - or will run for Prez.  No doubt she's thinking about it - would like to but ...

THE REAL VALUE OF THIS PAC - is that ... by donating to it ... you will send a message to the Republicans about what direction you want the Republican party to move.  Conservatives need to regain this party from the likes of Schwarzerneggar, McCain, and Snowe.  By moving $$ into Sarah's pac - you will empower her to make the agenda - or at least get these lamentatious lard asses moving in the right direction.

Give to Sarah's PAC - and only Sarah's PAC - and when the Republican party calls for cash - tell them to get Sarah's endorsement and you'll consider it.

It's the money that talks folks.  Tells these RINO's to STFU now.

Posted by: HondaV65 at January 27, 2009 09:38 PM (9vlDt)

102 Maybe you're just trying to expand the thread, railwriter, but exactly what is your objection to her. That some stupid people bought the Tina Fey hatchet job of her, based on Couric and Gibson's own edited transcript of her interviews. That she wouldn't answer Couric's condescending questions about her reading habits. Is it a policy issue, that's she's not an immigration hawk, or her stand on the bailout (she reluctantly went along with it) The fact that she's pro-gun, pro-life, pro-war on terror, pro-drilling, pro-tax cuts are good enough for me, what say you. There's
a reason why she drew such large crowds where ever she went, and certainly put Chambliss over the top in the runoff; which might not of happened if some people
had not decided to sulk, because they didn't like the top of the ticket.

Posted by: narciso at January 27, 2009 09:40 PM (9EG7Z)

103
Do you think she could beat a national-level Democratic candidate and get elected President of the United States by the current electorate?


Yes, I do. With me (and a few of the more savvy, clever AoS commenters) running her campaign, absolutely.

With a few hundred million $$ for a media campaign, I could crush the Left. So could most of you.

Posted by: Darling at January 27, 2009 09:45 PM (MUhMA)

104 99 I can't, buzzion. Neither can you.

My point stands.

Posted by: railwriter

You mean your idiotic point?  You're declaring her done because of it.  But you can't think of anyone else.  How do you know she won't be viable as a national level candidate in 2 years or 4 years?  Just because she doesn't inspire you to believe she's done huh?  Railwriter doesn't think she can win in the future based on the present so no point in trying.  The Decider has spoken.

Posted by: buzzion at January 27, 2009 09:45 PM (lCm/E)

105 The Press chooses not at all. She needs press, they don't need her. Your post presupposes that she's operating from a position of authority; she's not.


Wrong. Wrong. Wrong.
The Press fell over itself trying to get to her. They will do anything in their power to get her in front of a camera, one because, unlike Algore the human truss, palin brings in viewers, and two, they want to try and tear her down. Oprah was all about not talking to her, until the election was over...why have her on after all the fireworks.when she could have had her during the big run up to the general election and all that crap...because people tune into talk radio, conservative radio, and they tune into conservative television.
Libs or not, ultimately the nutlickers at PMSNBC want ratings and ad money and that comes from viewers and high arbitronéneilson  ratings...Palin brings those in, as does Joe the maligned plumber. Algore is seldom seen in prime time because his numbers will suck ass, big time. People avoid him, period.

Like it or not, as long as she chooses to be careful with her interviews, and keeps from overexposing herself to the national audience, there will be more folks trying to talk to her than ignore her and let the next network scoop them and have her on their show. It is why the few interviews with Rush Limbaugh get such high ratings and the networks that hate him will cheerfully kiss his ass to get a ten minute segment. One segment of him or Palin will draw more viewers than the rest of an hour long show put together.
The shitheads at the alphabet soup networks know this. It is why they have people in Alaska aggravating and gyrating now, with nothing more important up there than the number of pregnant mooses. They need her for a story, she already has a job until she gets ready to run again, and they will be there every time she opens her front door.
Count on it. Reagan did much the same thing with the press when there was no talk radio, no friendly network like FauxNews, and there were only hostile print journo pricks around. And it worked fine. It will again.

Posted by: Enter sandman at January 27, 2009 09:49 PM (zxaA2)

106
railwriter isn't 100% wrong; if Sarah Palin runs for prez in 2012 with the same caliber of handlers as she had in 2008, she'll get skewered and probably take down the GOP with her.

Palin's got the chops, she's got the smarts, and she's got the right ideas. (She was excellent in the debate against Foreign Policy Expert Buffoon Biden). But she doesn't know how to handle* the media or articulate the more tacky issues, e.g., global warming, abortion, evolution, etc.

*manipulate, as opposed to allowing them to manipulate her.

Posted by: Darling at January 27, 2009 09:53 PM (MUhMA)

107 101: I'm not sure WHAT message we'll send anyone: I mean, the site doesn't list a single policy position. On ANYTHING.

It would be nice if she actually posted some - don't ya think??

Posted by: CoolCzech at January 27, 2009 09:56 PM (iafWn)

108
I wouldn't worry too much about overexposure. The first thing I would do is have Sarah Palin, Joe the Plumber, and some other Conservatives travel across the country and hold some town meetings with real people. It's a great way to articulate the positions of the GOP while addressing the concerns of real Americans.

And the put the vids on Youtube and just like that you have a cheap media informercial.

Posted by: Darling at January 27, 2009 09:58 PM (MUhMA)

109

101: I'm not sure WHAT message we'll send anyone: I mean, the site doesn't list a single policy position. On ANYTHING.

It would be nice if she actually posted some - don't ya think??

=======================================

Haven't you ever heard of a "teaser".  Makes you want more, makes you want to check back and see what's happening or what might happen.

Posted by: Nancy at January 27, 2009 10:02 PM (iVQ+Z)

110

You wait, it won't be long and she will be on the cover of "Good Housekeeping" and "Redbook". 

Posted by: Nancy at January 27, 2009 10:07 PM (iVQ+Z)

111 Buzzion: I was talking about Sarah Palin. You'd prefer not to talk about her; you'd prefer to invalidate my observations by changing the subject and challenging me to speculate about other off-topic candidates. It's an illogical, unnecessarily defensive position to take. It's not a winner.

Sandman: We'll have to agree to disagree. I don't think the press has anything more than a snide, dismissive interest in her, and will continue to belittle her if they pay any attention to her at all. Name one story of a major network that was turned down. Name one that's tried to get her. Her last appearance wasn't a Nixonian "no more Dick to kick around;" it was a laundry-list of grievance that made her look...well, not presidential.

I like Sarah Palin. But I don't allow my support for her positions to blind me to the fact that she's not a contender. Everyone has a role; her role is to pitch in. She doesn't have to be the honcho to be a big help.

Posted by: railwriter at January 27, 2009 10:12 PM (XcsD4)

112 Can I just say it, since nobody else has?!


FUCK YEAH!


This thread needed more profanity....Oh yeah, and Sarah rocks.

Posted by: kal at January 27, 2009 10:17 PM (tVgV+)

113 106
railwriter isn't 100% wrong; if Sarah Palin runs for prez in 2012 with the same caliber of handlers as she had in 2008, she'll get skewered and probably take down the GOP with her.

Palin's got the chops, she's got the smarts, and she's got the right ideas. (She was excellent in the debate against Foreign Policy Expert Buffoon Biden). But she doesn't know how to handle* the media or articulate the more tacky issues, e.g., global warming, abortion, evolution, etc.

*manipulate, as opposed to allowing them to manipulate her.

All true, if she were stupid enough to run a shitty campaign like Mcqueeg did, run by the shitty staffers McQueeg chose, and in the god-awful stiff way that McQueeg ran his sorry ass campaign. But that obviously is not the way she does her own campaigning or she would not have had the level of success and notoriety she already enjoys.
Remember: McQueeg came to Alaska to get her, she did not go about seeking him. He needed a conservative voice to have any chance, however slim. She needs none of the crap McQueeg or his handlers bring to the table. And the fact that the McQueeg camp did such a shitty job of handling her and stifling anything she had to offer was apparent in her interviews, which the campaign set up and oversaw, the public appearances in that first month, and the way McQueeg clearly feared being overshadowed and marginalized by the rising star of his number two candidate.
As for knowing how to handle the media, the campaign made damn sure to get her exposed to the MSM in such a way as to marginalize her assets to the campaign and keep old McQueeg at the top of the ticket. Even if it cost them the contest and the nation a four year run into the depths of the Old Soviet System.

I bet you money the same sons of bitches who screwed her over for McQueeg try to get into her camp if she runs for national office. If they are turned away, you can look for some Tell All Bullshit to come from them, about her.

It happened at the end of the campaign and not one SOB in the McQueeg camp defended her, nor took the time to set the record straight, including King Fuckbucket Hisownself, McQueeg.

The sooner she does her own campaigning, and puts McQueeg in her rear view mirror, the sooner she can get to the business of reacquainting this dumb ass country with Reagan Conservatism, and put GW Bush, his daddy, Gerald Ford, McQueeg and all the sorry ass RINOS into the dust bin of history.
Where they all belong.

She can win, but she has got to separate herself and what she does from those assholes and  Washington Moderates inside the Beltway. They are tainted, too close to their enemies to know who is a friend and who is a foe. Helsinki Syndrom politics. She avoids that crap and she has a good shot to do something big on the national stage.
Time will tell, but clearly she has bigger plans as of right now.
That is good enough for me, for now.

Posted by: Enter sandman at January 27, 2009 10:22 PM (zxaA2)

114 Plus, she is just hawt...

Posted by: Enter sandman at January 27, 2009 10:25 PM (zxaA2)

115

Not sure if Palin can recover enough to withstand the onslaught from the media should she run in 2012 but I do think she has a decent chance to become a galvanizing force for the Republicans in the next couple elections.

Before she does anything though on a national level I really feel she needs to have an image of a successful governor. I feel she's probably going to need an approval rating of around 70% by 2010 or win her next election (whatever she runs for) with at least 60% of the vote to vindicate her blunders, both real and media induced from this past election to really seem like a potent figure.

Fortunate for her, I can't see the national media being able to harp on her too much. As influential as they are, even they only have so many resources and I think those resources are devoted first to Obama's glorification and then milking the BDS for all it's worth. That should leave her under the radar to a fair extent except for the media up her way, which while a challenge, is one that she should be able to handle without too much help assuming she sticks to her convictions.

Sarah sticking to a Republican version of Republican governorship these next two years (and I hate to say it, but the family has to behave as well) probably won't be enough by itself to override entirely what the media has done to her but I like to think it'd get her an easily (re)-election, increase her influence as a conservative model and begin to sway people outside of the Republican base.

Or at I can wish.

Posted by: Frank at January 27, 2009 10:32 PM (wCpbA)

116 With a few hundred million $$ for a media campaign, I could crush the Left. So could most of you.

Posted by: Darling

with a few thousand dollars of ammo i could.. ah never mind... but i have a big jeep i could crush them for free.. just saying.

Posted by: unamerican libertarian formerly known as e.koenig at January 27, 2009 11:03 PM (2J+Vs)

117 I could be wrong, but I'm guessing that illegal immigration isn't all that high on Alaska's list of priorities.

Not according to ABC News.

http://abcnews.go.com/US/wireStory?id=6462552

Carlos Rico, Mexico's undersecretary for North American Affairs, says that Mexicans are hot-footing it to red states Idaho, Alaska, North Carolina* and Georgia. I''m sure the Alaska Permanent Fund is a big incentive.



Posted by: Tattoo De Plane at January 27, 2009 11:04 PM (EJmQG)

118 Slightly off topic..

 a blog I help out on received a mention in the New York Times..

conservatives4palin.com


Posted by: Dave C at January 27, 2009 11:14 PM (a7WVT)

119 Ronald Reagan's family didn't behave themselves.  Ron, the ballet dancer, and Patti, the father-hater....They celebrated their separation from their Dad, until they got older, like all of us and realized that the "old man" wasn't as bad as I thought.

Posted by: Nancy at January 27, 2009 11:16 PM (iVQ+Z)

120

The story has hit MSNBC, and if the comments are any indication she still has her fan club.

http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/

Scroll down to Norah O'Donnell's column.

Posted by: Larry at January 27, 2009 11:24 PM (xa1/W)

121 Railwriter, has become adept at avoiding the question. Buzzion didn't mention another candidate, just your dismissive take on her, based on the aftermath of a brutal campaign. Unlike Nixon, who came from similar modest background, she doesn't display a chip on her shoulder. In fact, sometimes I think she's a little too gracious and understanding. The Ziegler interview as part of a documentary, an art form that Morgan Spurlock and Michael Moore, have done the best to tarnish; raised some of these points, and she did show some righteous anger for once. She has been otherwise been focused on the tough but not insurmountable task ahead for her state, and the cause of  much needed reform of the Party. She made those points in Miami, two months ago, yet the Party chose to ignore them, on the bailout; they chose a lackluster spokesman for the Governor's instead. This was partly obscured by the paparazzi pics while she was relaxing at the  hotel she was staying. Then the next gaffe, I suppose was the whole turkey incident, I guess she should have just ignored the basic reality there. Then came the pivotal Chambliss runoff race, where she certainly put everything over
the top.  When she proved her worth, they resurrected the old clothes and makeup story,  despite the fact that no one ever spotted her at any of the sites
mentioned therein. When they burned her church down, she showed remarkable understanding and compassion, speaking of what is called for 'a servant's heart' not desire for money and power. Now after she put forth a very fiscally stringent
budget, the shrews at the New Majority, bring up the clothes story again, this time pointing to the RNC's mishandling. We know what her stands on most of the key issues are, she's moving ahead on some health care initiatives and on getting the AGIA pipeline on course. In light of the last story, maybe she should
pick up some Spanish lessons, that she maybe needing when campaigning in the SouthWest and Florida some years from now. The press who deified Obama, that's sadly not an exaggeration, will rarely cut her an even break, it would disabuse their own self created illusions about her. Tina Fey's little scam, will soon run dry, and Katie Couric, well her performance, probably keeps Sumner Redstone, up at night, wondering about the future viability of Viacom.

Posted by: narciso at January 27, 2009 11:38 PM (9EG7Z)

122

I am all for Sarah, and believe in what I've heard so far. 

She won me over when she ran for Mayor and reduced the cost of government in her small town.  An accomplishment.  Can anyone say the same of McCain or Obama?  Didn't think so.

Same at the state level ... she took on a crooked Republican crowd and cleaned house ... Has Obama EVER tried to clean up anything.  That fucker has nominated everyone with objectionable problems.  Has he even policed his friends to see if they are decent human beings?  ... not hardly.

Sarah seems to be a kind human being, and I think that's a great qualification far far beyond the scope of the current Pres.  He is THE president, but he's not mine. 

Posted by: Mephitis at January 27, 2009 11:41 PM (17pTk)

123

And lets talk about guts.  If she's gone out being a crew on her husband's fishing boat in Alaska waters, she's got more guts than Obama ever dreamed of. 

She's a great mom, and has a ton of strength.  Her son is off in Iraq somewhere, and there's a special blessing to those that have enough strength to love and support those sons that answer the call of this country's great military.  The sons are blessed with the knowledge of their own immortality... mom's not so much, which is why they are sometimes even braver than the soldiers heading into harms way.

God bless her and her family, and best of luck in the coming campaigns, whatever they may be.  She can certainly count on my help.

Posted by: Mephitis at January 27, 2009 11:46 PM (17pTk)

124 I just signed up. Money will follow depending on what happens. But it appears to me that what she says on her site, albeit still lacking specific positions; would work as well if not better in a political movement outside the Republican party than within it. The PAC keeps her visible. It provides a rallying point for Conservatives, and if the Vichy Republicans do continue to marginalize her and us; it can help make us a bloc that has some clout wherever we go.

And I do believe that we will be going somewhere besides the collaborationist Republicans. I have already figured out what to say when I next get a fundraising call from the Republican National Committee. I will add the point about Sarah. And if they end up choosing another collaborationist as head of the RNC, I will add a few choice expletives.

Subotai Bahadur

Posted by: Subotai Bahadur at January 27, 2009 11:48 PM (iflwh)

125 Cross-posted comment:

I will again say that, while I’m not sure how we get there, a Romney-Palin ticket would be killer, with each side bolstering the other’s perceived weaknesses. I fear that they would not run together; certainly Mitt Romney would not take the VP position, in any case I JUST THINK IT WOULD BE A KILLER TICKET! Those who are scared by Palin are reassured by Romney, and vice-versa.


Posted by: floofyparisparamis at January 27, 2009 11:49 PM (5w5Z/)

126 (we have to assume that by 2012, the failure of Obama will be clear, somewhat a la Carter.) Romney-Palin: no ticket is close to perfect, but it would just WORK.

Posted by: floofyparisparamis at January 27, 2009 11:52 PM (5w5Z/)

127

Jindal is a Creationist moonbat, and has no business running for President

So the Creation issue is the only reason you don't support him?

Posted by: katya at January 28, 2009 12:46 AM (oRJZj)

128 I'm very interested in donating, but I'm curious: Will my money go toward forcing teen mothers to give birth? I'd really like that! Thanks.

Posted by: Squiyote at January 28, 2009 01:17 AM (fXQAR)

129 First donation complete. I expect it to be one of many.

Squiyote: "Will my money go toward forcing teen mothers to give birth? I'd really like that! Thanks."

Yes. At the point of a gun, too. So, you're clear. Empty your pockets early.

Posted by: AnonymousDrivel at January 28, 2009 01:56 AM (sI5Ho)

130 If it is true that Ms. Palin is unworthy of our support b/c she has been "Quayled" then any Republican candidate except John McCain is unworthy of our support. Since this is ridiculous, the premise does not hold. ANY Republican candidate who has any chance of "being another Reagan" is going to be the target of every possible attack by the drive-bys. Thus, we have to find a way to neutralize the propaganda that will be directed against any movement Conservative running for national office.

We should keep in mind that where Sarah Palin is concerned the only difference between a liberal commentator and a conservative commentator is whether they stick the knives in her front or in her back.

Posted by: Steve Poling at January 28, 2009 02:49 AM (UWHTf)

131 And of course, Eeyorepundit over at HotAir is using this as just one more opportunity to fly-speck Palin anytime he can.

What kind of a fuckin' douchenozzle do you have to be to troll your own site.

SarahCuda 2012!

Posted by: GrayLoess at January 28, 2009 04:28 AM (eifYH)

132 She's a TURD!

Posted by: joseph at January 28, 2009 05:21 AM (N+eMe)

133 >>Railwriter, has become adept at avoiding the question. Buzzion didn't mention another candidate, just your dismissive take on her, based on the aftermath of a brutal campaign.<<

You're not paying attention. Or you're not reading closely enough. Or something. Whatever the case, you're wrong. He implied that there was a correlation between my inability to name a better candidate and her electability/desirability as a candidate. There isn't.

The rest of your post says absolutely nothing worthwhile about her electability, which is the point I've been making...a point you've ignored.

I've made my point; harping on it is only wasting keystrokes. She's not going to get elected President, those of you who think she is are wrong, and none of that means she can't play a helpful role. Sermon over.

Posted by: railwriter at January 28, 2009 07:39 AM (XcsD4)

134 @ Darling, good point.  Let's remember those were McCain's handlers this last time around, not hers.  The same crazy traitorous wench that was slobbering all over Obama last week

Posted by: RB at January 28, 2009 08:42 AM (ewXBY)

135 She's not going to get elected President.

Wasn't long ago that everyone said Hillary Clinton was definitely going to defeat Rudy Giuliani for the Presidency yet look how that turned out;  at this point I won't rely on absolutes.

I have no idea whether or not she is not going to get elected however I do know she has rare talent for attracting a large audience and right now Conservatives need someone who can rally the troops and inspire us to fight on; there are terrific potential candidates such as Jindal, Romney,  yet they don't seem to be able to inspire the action necessary to building a winning campaign.

It could very well be she ends up as a 'cult of personality' candidate however she isn't spending her time on her personality but on her leadership skills and over the next couple years we will find out which leaders are able to survive the long dark winter we are about to face and which ones fail.

Until then what I know is that she is taking direct action to inspire Conservatives to stay involved and encouraged; right now, other than Rush Limbaugh there is no one out there who is taking up that charge.

Right now Conservatives don't need an absolute candidate for 2012, we need leaders who can inspire us to survive the next four years and out of that leadership we will have our candidate.

If Jindal began his own PAC then perhaps he would inspire Conservatives however he has not taken this action and simply being a successful Republican elected in a heavily corrupt Democrat state isn't going to be enough. Take a look at what happened to Rudy  he was America's mayor of the most populated city in the union yet he failed to inspire the troops and didn't even make it past Iowa. 

I have no idea who will be the 2012 candidate however I am not going to thrash and burn anyone who takes action to keep the Conservative movement engaged; I will not kill off our own potential leaders particularily when the Left will do that anyway.


Posted by: syn at January 28, 2009 08:52 AM (ASzue)

136 one other observation, the Hot Air EeyorePundit reminds me of a petulant, snotty brat who enjoys sticking  dynamite up the ass of innocent lambs just to get his kicks; for me EeyorePundit one of the most annoying bloggers on the right, so self-righteous, judgemental and arrogant that I purposefully avoid anything posted by him.  I read Ed's stuff however that other blogger sucks rotten eggs.

He used to be funny then he filled himself full obnoxious shit.

Posted by: syn at January 28, 2009 09:10 AM (ASzue)

137 I'll register there if I'm guaranteed bikini or lingerie photos, and new ones each month.

Posted by: Bilwick at January 28, 2009 09:30 AM (/Y+Yb)

138

This new PAC is awesome! Everybody should donate lots of money.

 

And candy, too.

Posted by: Piper from Alaska at January 28, 2009 09:59 AM (7dXKM)

139 This is only the first step. After two consecutive terms as the first female President, with a %83 approval rating, America will decide that we can't do without Sarah. The Constitution will be amended to elevate Sarah to monarch status. That's right motherfuckers. Her Majesty Queen Sarah the Benevolent Conservative I, of these United States of America. Commander in Chief, U.S. Armed Forces and Head of State. The position of President will be more like a Prime Minister.

 I am going to start recruiting for the Royal Guard Regiment tomorrow. If you dare to ask how much the royal guard uniforms cost and who paid for them, off with your heads!

Matthews, Olbermann, Gibson and Couric will be excellent reasons to re-open Club Gitmo for media traitor jackals. Their lamentations will make a terrific patriotic reality show on FOX every Tuesday night at 8:00pm EST.

The planning has begun also for the next class of Super Carriers for the Navy, the Trig class, to be launched with the comissioning of the U.S.S. Trig Palin. This will be the largest ship ever built, with 6 nuclear reactors, 8 electro-magnetic catapults, and 250 combat aircraft. Fuck with that, beotches. Please.

Posted by: Brian72 at January 28, 2009 10:17 AM (h6lGQ)

140 So railwriter, which McCain staffer are you then?

The next party pick to run has one simple criteria:

Does the left absolutely fucking despise the pick?

Then that's who you fucking nominate.

See how easy that was?

Posted by: Unclefacts at January 28, 2009 12:38 PM (M+Vfm)

141 Railwriter, your's is a reasonable view to hold, but I think it's presumptuous and early. The current recession is a transformative political event, it will make or break Obama, and in any event will completely drive everything about 2012. Sure, Palin's polling negative's are high...now, but extrapolating from them that Palin's chances for turning them around are equal to zero seems fairly wrong. One reason: Sarah Palin is probably the Republican nominee for President were a nominating election held today. Second, insofar as Palin is unelectable you should also acknowledge that no Republican is electable given the current polling. Third, as a candidate, Palin's fundamental's don't support a zero chance analysis. I saw enough film of Palin's rally performances and in interviews outside of the Gibson/Couric duo that I feel quite secure in believing that those interviews are not accurate reflection of Palin's true political talent and capacity to survive the nominating process.

Posted by: Robert_Paulson at January 28, 2009 01:19 PM (zjgCD)

142 Darling, if you're still around, that's a GREAT idea you had @108. Maybe you really should run her campaign.

Posted by: RM at January 28, 2009 04:44 PM (8nB5X)

143

The Republican party needs leadership and reformation. She is there best bet. I will certainly give to her PAC over the RNC at this point.

The RNC needs someone with guts to jerk a knot in the party light weights. Get them in line or force the to move on over to the Democratic party.

Posted by: D White at February 01, 2009 10:45 PM (ZLe37)

Posted by: bvhgfh at February 02, 2009 09:38 PM (zCAjn)

145 Food for thought:  Why does Palin bring out the worst in the Liberal establishment and the media?  Because according to Liberal theology women are supposed to be the victims of society who need the help of the Liberals to attain equality.  Now we know this is nonsense because any women who settles for equality deserves what she gets.  And any women who accepts the thesis that she needs help attaining equality certainly does need help.

But the Liberal response to Palin is not really anger.  It is fear.  They fear her because she can steal their thunder.  That fact gives her tremendous power.  That power is doubled if applied carefully because she can both steal their thunder AND make them overreact.

If she becomes a presidential candidate, stand by for the most vicious policital actions since Lenin's liquidations.  The Liberal focus will be incredibly intense, especially if she is running against Mrs. Clinton* or JFK's daughter Caroline*.  I wonder how Ron Paul would fare in that situation?  I always liked hypergolic reactions...

* End Note: It is mandatory that we acquiesce to the Liberal dogma that women need help to attain equality when we refer to or discuss Liberal female candidates.  After all it would not be fair to them to expect them to to measure up to a standard they cannot, by their own admitted premises, be expected to reach.  So they should always be referred to as adjuncts to the men in their lives who are the "true" source of their political stature.

Posted by: Self at February 08, 2009 01:09 AM (gK+60)

146 FLV Editor is an all-in-one flv editor converter which provides you a powerful editing and converting function.,FLV Joiner,FLV Ripper,FLV Clipper,FLV Capture,FLV Splitter,FLV Effect,FLV Cropper,FLV Watermark,FLV Cutter Joiner

Posted by: dvd covnerter mac at March 31, 2009 01:59 AM (COmpT)

147 V2GoGz hi! mi site is http://norffg.com see you!

Posted by: marvell at May 27, 2009 11:20 PM (ZLd1Z)

148 fbaba71e56 purchase ephedrine 456e9 tramadol hcl 8aaf3 5bdd7 0a029 order diazepam 0c417 buy xanax d6fbb nolvadex addiction 89a52 fioricet pills da6ee cheapest lipitor 31162 purchase zolpidem c4396 5275d alprazolam addiction 7ff5c xanax addiction a7f22 1dd9f ee0f4

Posted by: tramadol at July 02, 2009 11:54 PM (RiQnG)

149 5163ef9037 34edb order adipex 7129b 5e6dc 8b15a celebrex online 24480 c56f7 diazepam e55a4 buy effexor 1fe64 paxil pills e0e1f adipex prescription 4564e cheap effexor 27417 tramadol no prescription dd3e5 4cd91 cialis online ed515 celexa online 95654

Posted by: cheapest at July 03, 2009 01:50 AM (S3zPG)

Posted by: generic at July 03, 2009 03:48 AM (QTejj)

151 67206eafa5 lipitor addiction 8d508 prozac 99b47 dc38c 5068f buy codeine online ec84d 74732 cheap carisoprodol b50ce discount ambien 9da41 8396d cheapest ephedrine 2a3ce ephedrine products cbe2d cheap butalbital 5ee89 cheapest klonopin 98aed order tramadol 8fe01 e01fd

Posted by: cheapest at July 03, 2009 03:43 PM (Q0c51)

Posted by: aaa at July 03, 2009 07:44 PM (QFqZM)

153 Good morning. For most men life is a search for the proper manila envelope in which to get themselves filed. Help me! I can not find sites on the: Adt home security lakeland fl. I found only this - Adt security services homepage. Find adt security service numbers, address, reviews, and driving directions. Non free media use rationale non free logo for adt security services corporate logo for adt fire and security. With love :mad:, Yehudi from Marino.

Posted by: Yehudi at July 17, 2009 06:51 PM (kZgnP)

Posted by: xenical at July 18, 2009 03:44 PM (KV4Cs)

Posted by: 343 at July 18, 2009 08:32 PM (w8miG)

Posted by: price at July 19, 2009 12:42 AM (w0c7h)

Posted by: viagra at July 19, 2009 02:58 AM (RiQnG)

Posted by: how at July 19, 2009 11:27 AM (yuEDd)

Posted by: viagra at July 19, 2009 07:53 PM (OlZCu)

Posted by: buy at July 19, 2009 09:55 PM (evHSc)

Posted by: buy at July 20, 2009 06:35 AM (k2QOU)

Posted by: Wedding Dresses at August 20, 2009 10:34 PM (syU91)

163 rmpfwbv geudppp [url=http://reskrtw.com]reskrtw[/url] http://ulxocfq.com

Posted by: Hello at September 14, 2009 08:02 PM (LVzeg)

164 mptcrqo hyyvmui [url=http://rzvfybp.com]rzvfybp[/url] http://botlmgk.com

Posted by: Hello at September 18, 2009 01:05 PM (LYQY/)

Posted by: FDSAFDS at October 18, 2009 08:26 AM (GQ3Y4)

Posted by: hair straighteners at October 24, 2009 07:20 AM (9oMrs)

Posted by: reviewups at October 24, 2009 11:27 AM (tKCDW)

Posted by: australia ugg at October 27, 2009 08:58 AM (c6EK2)

169

Do anything needed to support an idea, a good idea usually brings good results, doing

/>


business is like that.http://www.dunksky.com/.This site has always been on

Posted by: nike dunk sb at October 30, 2009 07:55 AM (LACJ9)

Posted by: gfhgyuj at November 02, 2009 07:38 AM (Rzoq5)

Posted by: mbtshoesbuy at November 02, 2009 08:01 PM (jjolb)

172 Come to our website for shopping with high quality and best service! There have new products,MBT M. Walk
and MBT Lami,Welcome everybody to buy it.

Posted by: mbt shoes at November 08, 2009 07:58 AM (QhfLM)

Posted by: ugg at November 11, 2009 12:30 AM (ly6Oi)

Posted by: ugg boots at November 12, 2009 12:37 AM (IeIJx)

175 Supra FootwearThe supra shoe is comfortable and can wear all day.
supra ShoesThe bestsupra.com seems to be from strong material, and have many seems all over. They are really beautifull.
Supra Skytopbestsupra.com offer Great quality shoe for a reasonable price.
Supra 2009Comfort

Posted by: ryiu at November 12, 2009 08:31 PM (9dQ8A)

176 nike dunk sb

Do anything needed to support an idea, a good idea usually brings good results, doing


business is like that.http://www.dunksky.com/.This site has always been on

Posted by: nike dunk sb at November 14, 2009 12:02 AM (APB+g)

177 buy [url=http://www.reviewups.com/]discount ugg shoes[/url]
[url=http://www.reviewups.com/]cheap ugg shoes[/url]
[url=http://www.reviewups.com/]cheap ugg[/url]
[url=http://www.reviewups.com/ugg-coquette-casual-shoes-c-22]ugg rainier[/url]
[url=http://www.reviewups.com/]buy ugg[/url]
[url=http://www.reviewups.com/]ugg usa[/url]
[url=http://www.reviewups.com/]discount ugg boots[/url]
[url=http://www.reviewups.com/ugg-classic-short-c-1]ugg 5825[/url]
[url=http://www.reviewups.com/]ugg shoes sale[/url]
[url=http://www.reviewups.com/ugg-sundance-c-5]ugg sundance[/url]
[url=http://www.reviewups.com/]ugg shoes[/url]
[url=http://www.reviewups.com/]cheap ugg boots[/url]
[url=http://www.reviewups.com/ugg-classic-tall-c-3]ugg 5815[/url]
[url=http://www.reviewups.com/]ugg sale[/url]
[url=http://www.reviewups.com/]ugg uk[/url]
[url=http://www.reviewups.com/ugg-knightsbridge-c-27]ugg knightsbridge[/url]
[url=http://www.reviewups.com/]womens ugg boots[/url]
[url=http://www.reviewups.com/]ugg boots[/url]
[url=http://www.reviewups.com/]ugg australia[/url]
[url=http://www.reviewups.com/ugg-classic-cardy-c-2]ugg 5819[/url]from usa

Posted by: cheap at November 14, 2009 04:07 AM (s7MB5)

178 BJ's Restaurants links of london . Management might be tempted to belly up and drown cheap links of london their sorrows, links of london jewellery since the majority of this chain's 89 restaurants are in links of london jewelry deep-recession states like California, Arizona, links of london sale and Florida. links london

Posted by: mxc at November 16, 2009 09:19 PM (amVaT)

Posted by: nike shoes at November 17, 2009 04:03 AM (DuP3Z)

Posted by: replica watches at November 17, 2009 07:25 AM (xpuiO)

181 If you are looking for buying a quality pair of warm sheepskin boots you really need to try the ugg classic tall boots. The quality of the it means that they will last 4 or 5 times as long as the cheaper copies and the level of comfort they provide to the wearer is much higher.So when it comes to you finding a pair of ugg boots that will match up to any outfit in your wardrobe then it is worth considering investing money in a pair of Ugg classic tall this

Posted by: ugg classic tall at November 17, 2009 10:47 AM (CsraQ)

Posted by: replica watches at November 17, 2009 11:48 AM (xpuiO)

Posted by: replica watches at November 17, 2009 10:56 PM (xpuiO)

Posted by: replica watches at November 18, 2009 04:48 AM (C/zDM)

185 UGG BOOTS

Posted by: UGG BOOTS at November 19, 2009 06:08 AM (n0jE1)

186 Chipotle Mexican Grill links of london jewellery . The fast food at these casual links of london eateries feels slow, links london jewelry thanks to organic ingredients cheap links of london , custom combos, link of london and an emphasis on freshness. links of london sale Traffic is down at many locations, links of london jewelry but the company has been able to compensate by raising prices, links london Olive Garden. links of london Charms More food for less money hits the sweet spot these days, links of london Charm which makes the family-style portions at this casual Italian chain a hit with diners. links of london Necklaces Olive Garden is a division of Darden Restaurants, links london Necklace which also operates Red Lobster, links of london Bracelets Longhorn Steakhouse, links london Bracelet and a few smaller chains. links of london Sweetie Bracelets Olive Garden has been the best performer of the bunch, links london Sweetie Bracelet with same-store sales down slightly but overall sales up, links of london Friendship Bracelets thanks to about 35 new outlets that have opened over the past year links london Friendship Bracelet

Posted by: links of london at November 22, 2009 11:47 PM (amVaT)

Posted by: mbtshoesbuy at November 23, 2009 12:48 AM (bNNim)

188 None of us are born with a set of shoes mbt shoes on our feet, but they are infinitely important to our wellbeing. Even though the commercial shoe http://www.mbter.com industry didn't get underway during the beginnings of civilization, man is believed to have constructed footwear mbt shoes 40,000 years ago. So the question isn't whether you should buy a pair of shoes... it's how should you go about buying them!
When you're shoe shopping, the task can seem overwhelming and frustrating. You just want to try on a few pairs of shoes and then get out of the store. But the reality is that you should pick out a pair of shoes mbt shoes with a lot more care than other items of your wardrobe. After all, the health of your feet are at stake!

Posted by: pigeu at November 23, 2009 09:17 PM (1aNEH)

189 Attention, class. Here's a logic question for you: If it's true that everyone loves Nightfall Ugg Boots Nightfall Ugg Boots Nightfall Ugg Boots a deal, and Black Friday offers the best deals of the year, then is it safe to assume that folks will go ugg boots on sales ugg boots on sales ugg boots on sales into a state of high-grade hysteria the day after Thanksgiving? The answer is: duh, of course. Though over a week away, Black Friday is already igniting the Search box. ugg boots shop ugg boots shop ugg boots shop Shoppers have pushed up searches on "black friday 2009" and "black friday ads" to dizzying heights. One might think that retailers would keep the deals a secret until the big day ugg mini boots ugg mini boots ugg mini boots but nothing could be further from the truth. classic cardy ugg boots classic cardy ugg boots classic cardy ugg boots

Posted by: mxc at November 23, 2009 09:19 PM (amVaT)

190 The proper function of man is to live, but not to exist.ugg classic cardyConquer fear of death and you are put into possession of your life. ugg classic tallThere is a time to speak and a time to be silent. ugg knightsbridgefree shippingmbt cheap
mbt sale
mbt uk
mbt shoes cheap
MBT M.Walk

Posted by: reviewups at November 26, 2009 11:36 PM (xUZwC)

191

It is a great idea especially for relatively new blogs. I’d like to try this.

ugg bailey button Just got my ugg classic mini! They are absolutely beautiful, and the quality is just amazing. No wearing them in, no blisters just absolutely snug strait out of the box.

Everything dynamic and very positively!

Posted by: ugg bailey button boots at November 30, 2009 12:33 PM (uWeaI)

192 hot news for brand shoes online store ,do you want to win more discount ?and popular for younger,and nike air maxwith top quality A ,come on all air max shoes with lowest price for highest quality !

Posted by: nike air max at December 01, 2009 08:19 PM (OKj2x)

193 The cheap ugg boots sale for women are stylish, they are comfortable and what¡¯s more, they keep your feet. theres a pair of fellow sufferers,ugg australia uk to complement your personal preferences, why do we not take the traditional high discount ugg boots on salefor cold winter?
As a matter of fact, with the passing time, the love for ugg usa is increasing among girls in this modern world. The growing demand for these womens ugg made the manufacturers UGG Boots Sale to revamp the looks of these boots with different hues.come our website and buy a pair of ugg uk.UGG Classic Cardy are popular as shoes for cowboys. The SHOES close the whole parts of the foot. The ugg cardy are important to protect your feet from any dangerous things during your walking activities. There are many oatmeal ugg available in the Market and if you are interested to get one you can directly go to the store that sells it.

Posted by: reviewups at December 03, 2009 03:22 AM (OKj2x)

Posted by: replica watches at December 04, 2009 09:01 AM (bsW/x)

Posted by: uggboots at December 07, 2009 06:54 AM (Cooh2)

196 Today ugg boots online have become a phenomenon.Every winter,the ugg classic crochet are one of the hottest goods in the market all over the world.So now don't be hesitation,own a pair of ugg usa immediately.

Posted by: ugg boots sale at December 10, 2009 07:22 AM (I3/dZ)

Posted by: Lacoste shoes at December 12, 2009 01:56 PM (/3s/N)

Posted by: buy ugg online at December 13, 2009 10:38 PM (UPAGD)

199 The womens mbt Tembea is a new generation lace-up with Dual Board construction and a striking style that pays tribute to the classic sneaker. It packs in all the mbt lami shoes benefits with a fresh look and feel, striking the perfect balance between health benefits ... The discount mbt Shuguli GTX is a is a sleek and stylish professional shoe ideal for work and more formal occasions whilst delivering full waterproofing from GORE-TEX. These are especially effective for those who have to stand or walk for long periods of time ...
The mbt shoes Fanaka GTX is a sporty but rugged styled shoe that combines fashionable, casual design with all the health benefits associated with the sporting style discount mbt shoes. These are especially effective for ladies who have to stand or walk for long periods ... The black mbt Bia is a classic, professional shoe ideal for work and more formal occasions whilst delivering all the health benefits from MBT design. These are especially effective for ladies who have to stand or walk for long periods of time during work ...

Posted by: gfdg at December 14, 2009 02:19 PM (iV/dV)

Posted by: wholesale jewelry at December 16, 2009 04:01 PM (1dySH)

Posted by: wholesale jewelry at December 20, 2009 03:06 PM (1dySH)

Posted by: nike air max 360 shoes at December 22, 2009 11:54 AM (xnxK1)

203 thank you very much,your article write very nice and usefull,i'm so like that i will recommend the article to my friends.Meanwhile,the nike air max sell in our air max store,if you like nike air max,you can view the beautifull womens air max in our website,thank you again.
http://www.shoe-wholesale.com/

Posted by: nike air max at December 23, 2009 11:51 AM (3i5cr)

Posted by: Breguet watches at December 24, 2009 03:07 PM (QN9Ge)

Posted by: wholesale jewelry at December 28, 2009 12:57 AM (1dySH)

206 Cheap replica rolex and tag heuer watches,replica watches of rolex rolex watches replica,buy patek philippe Buy replica watches,fake watches and tag heuer watches.

Posted by: tag heuer at January 01, 2010 09:18 AM (nUnK8)

Posted by: GHD at January 02, 2010 03:39 AM (8u0Dq)

Posted by: replica watches at January 05, 2010 08:08 AM (ndMAX)

209 replica rolex rolex and tag heuer watches,replica watches of rolex rolex watches replica,buy patek philippe Buy replica watches,fake watches and tag heuer watches.breitling watches breitling watches at low price.

Posted by: rolex at January 06, 2010 08:00 AM (TspGB)

Posted by: ugg shoes|timberland uk|ugg boots|87415555.com.cn at January 06, 2010 08:16 AM (qzq48)

211 Of course, the name used to identify the best way to package, or by identifying her serial number, serial number for the  designer handbags 
is as if her identity is as important, it is a good way to help us identify the
  replica bags    is true. LV bag leather seams at the edge wherever there hidden serial number, its number is stating that the bag of manufacture and date of manufacture.

Posted by: replica bags at January 07, 2010 02:42 AM (DxxOg)

212 Un total de once comunidades autnomas estn este jueves en alerta naranja Christmas gift ugg tall boots (riesgo importante) por nevadas y bajan las temperaturas en toda Espa09a, segn la Agencia Estatal de Meteorologa (AEMET). En concreto, se Christmas gift ugg napoule sandal trata de Aragn, Cantabria, Castilla-La Mancha, Catalu09a, Christmas gift timberland classic boots Madrid, Navarra, Comunidad Valenciana, Galicia, Pas Vasco, Asturias y Murcia. La cota de nieve bajar a menos de 200 metros en el CantbricoLa Pennsula Ibrica est bajo dos borrascas y un anticicln que crearn un pasillo que permitir el paso de una corriente de aire muy fro, como la que est provocando un temporal de fro glaciar en Europa, aunque es esperan que el fro que suframos no sea tan intenso como en otros pases. An as, se espera que las bajas temperaturas se mantengan hasta el domingo. La cota de nieve baja en el Cantbrico a menos de 200 metros

Posted by: El temporal de fr¨ªo y nieve pone en alerta a once comunidades aut¨®nomas ugg boots|ugg uk|timberlan at January 08, 2010 10:32 AM (tWrEP)

213 Buy rolex watches,tag heuer watches and replica patek philippe patek philippe watches,replica audemars piguet> replica breitling watches breitling watches,chanel watches chanel watches watches replica montblanc watches.Rolex fake watches and replica watches brands,replica rolex: breitling watches,replica tag heuer: tag heuer, replica rolex: replica rolex replica cartier watches: cartier watches,replica omega watches: omega watches,replica panerai watches: panerai watches,replica armani watches: armani watches,replica audemars piguet: audemars piguet,replica bvlgari watches: bvlgari watches,replica chanel watches: chanel watches,replica gucci watches: gucci watches,replica movado watches: movado watches,replica montblanc watches: montblanc watches,replica patek philippe: patek philippe on sale.replica watches and replica watches.

Posted by: rolex at January 10, 2010 04:07 PM (OO9Jx)

214 cheap replica watches and breitling watches,tag heuer He chose the name Edox,English rolex, being patek philippe the oldest brands omega watches in watch manufacturing.audemars piguet,with its montblanc watches The cartier watches name of this new watch is Edox Mens Class Royale Mechanical panerai watches Watch bvlgari watches of attraction.The case is armani watches rectangular on sale.

Posted by: replica watches at January 21, 2010 06:33 PM (fyHwu)

215

Welcome! What can I do for you?” she always asks links of london every customer who comes across. links of london sale She says the same words every day and always be seen strangely. “Madam” she hears a magnetic sound from a man.  links of london jewellery “Sorry! What can I do for you?

Posted by: links of london at January 23, 2010 02:25 AM (q0nSd)

216 Good replica watches and buy replica watches and replica rolex replica replica tag heuer watches,buy replica replica omega watches and breitling watches replica breitling watches sale at lowest prices.

Posted by: replica watches at January 23, 2010 08:32 PM (ioa0w)

Posted by: wedding gowns at January 25, 2010 09:45 PM (bBg/v)

218 Buy rolex replica watches and replica watches replica replica watches and replica rolex watches patek philippe watches and fake watches and breitling watches,replica tag heuer: tag heuer,replica cartier watches: cartier watches,replica omega watches: omega watches at lowest prices.

Posted by: replica rolex at January 29, 2010 09:57 AM (h+uyA)

219

The H4 replica watches took replica watches Harrison a massive 13 years to replica watches construct-but this was only the end of a lifetime's work. His genius was clear from the very beginning. Unfortunately many astronomers such as Nevil Maskelyne were convinced that a mechanical solution replica watches would not work and that only astronomy could solve the replica watches longitude problem. The fact that Harrison was from a working class family and had little replica watches formal education probably didn't help his prospects.Solving the longitude problem through horology meant designing a timepiece that could work accurately at sea. When you watch consider the rolling waves, changes in replica watches temperature and generally adverse replica watches conditions the dificulty of this task becomes apparent.The H1 was completed in 1735 and proved replica successful at sea. However the Board of Longitude demanded a full a transatlantic wholesale watch voyage. They gave Harrison a grant of 500 pounds with which he began work on the H2 watches.

Posted by: replica watches at January 30, 2010 10:53 PM (Ddc+V)

Posted by: airmax at January 31, 2010 11:16 AM (3vSvS)

Posted by: wedding gowns at February 02, 2010 09:27 PM (3UQpc)

222 The replica watches dial design replica watches 100% copy replica watches of the previous omega watches model: the famous Manchester Logo is located at 3 and the cartier watches chronograph 45-minute breitling watches at 9 with orange figures. Football fans can use the very special 45-minute chronograph to measure the halves of a football match. Black patek philippe hour hand and minute hand features yellow luminescent coating. The hour makers, chronograph audemars piguet and the first 15-minute scale of the tag heuer chronograph counter is montblanc watches presented in eye-catching rolex red. Bright Yellow movado watches tones are found on the minute track, date bvlgari watches window and the text.

Posted by: replica watches at February 03, 2010 04:47 PM (FS54P)

223 Certainly watches are Replica Watches used to help people record rolex Watches time, but rolex watches nowadays its functions have enlarged. Replica watches are now tag heuer Watches not only objects that tag heuer watches can tell you what time it is, they are also a status symbol. You should not feel strange when you find someone wearing a watch on his wrist, but use the cell phone to tell time. In that situation, the watch is just showing its luxurious function cartier watches. It is normal and cartier watches perhaps also happens to you. .If asked that among the watches of various brands, which one can suit your taste? There is no doubt that most people will choose Rolex. Whichever social class you are in, it is naturally Rolex was known breitling Watches and cherished breitling watches for a long time. However, the elements do not usually enter the market alone, always come with the price tag up to the hand. For this reason, many people, especially men, their dreams of luxury Rolex watches are buried in omega Watches his heart omega watches. What should I do? Rolex watches are simply stunning worn by the rich and famous, right? No, this world is not the world's richest men, is the world of each. All are equal before the search of luxury and be men's watches respected. Within men's watches, the law, when consumers are in the market, women's watches they should women's watches receive the same treatment. This is the real reason why replica Rolex watches are ladies watches ladies watches more welcome than Rolex. Because in this world are not difficult to understand that the rich are much less than people with low income, you agree with me? You are forced to nod and say with certainty that is the reality. These low-income people do not have enough money to save every month. They can not afford such luxury Rolex watches

Posted by: replica watches at February 04, 2010 03:43 AM (YOuVm)

224 Cheap replica watches and replica watches 100% copy replica watches of the previous omega watches model: the famous Manchester Logo is located at 3 and the cartier watches chronograph 45-minute breitling watches at 9 with orange figures. Football fans can use the very special 45-minute chronograph to measure the halves of a football match. Black patek philippe hour hand and minute hand features yellow luminescent coating. The hour makers, chronograph audemars piguet and the first 15-minute scale of the tag heuer chronograph counter is montblanc watches presented in eye-catching rolex red. Bright Yellow movado watches tones are found on the minute track, date bvlgari watches rolex on sale.

Posted by: replica watches at February 05, 2010 12:35 AM (0uEN8)

225 this replica watches replica watchWhoever wants replica watches timekeeper that does the job of a tachometer will be crazy for. The operation is performed by the copied replica rolex 's bezel. The Daytona also applies automatic movement ¨C just one of many breitling watches characters and functionalities that ensures the precision of time. Originally created to measure lap time and the cartier watches overall time of a race, Rolex Daytona replica omega watches timepieces can measure elapsed time for omega any sporting event. The power of this breitling replica item is made possibly by its internalized perpetual rotor mechanism. Known for its precision, this special Rolex replica cartier watch model only has to be set once to the cartier watches standard time of the owner's choice. Once rolex watches being created, it updates itself during time changes, making upkeep of the replica's time setting replica watches nonexistent. Even though these replica watches were made for sporting events, (specifically those involving laps or circuits), it's not so adversible to put them tag heuer in water since they are not fake watches waterproof. Even thought most of the time, the replica watches do not bear the tag heuer same functionalities as the original ones, they are still the most desirable alternatives of the expensive real models.

Posted by: replica watches at February 06, 2010 03:50 PM (KbTNE)

226 Many people are dreaming of wearing rolex watch as it is a great brand designer watch.Women like to wear all kinds of fashionable accessories sun as the Replica Yachtmaster watches which make them look more fashionable and graceful.man like to wear all kins of Franck Muller watches to highlight them life style at a fraction of the cost.

Posted by: fake rolex watches at February 07, 2010 09:48 PM (+29Vi)

227 Factors Replica Watches About The Rolex replica watches Oyster The Oyster is so closely get in touch with Rolex, and it is inevitably that some people think these are the only Replica watches Rolex manufacture. Others suppose that there is a single Oyster watch. But as a matter of fact, the name Oyster does not actually meant for a rolex Watches particular watch you can buy rolex watches or even to a series but to a type of case that available in some of the Rolex ranges. History The Oyster case was first released in 1926. The objective was to protect the workings of the watch from dust and moisture. Early watches were far from waterproof. The Oyster tag heuer Watchescase was an tag heuer watches innovative design to eliminate these problems. It had a new double locking crown that screwed into place. It has been compared to the hatch on a submarine. Like a submarine, the Oyster case was waterproof. In 1927 Mercedes Gleitze swam the English breitling Watches Channel breitling watches . Before she set off she was presented with a Rolex Oyster. When she arrived, the watch was still working perfectly. The resulting publicity gave the new case a massive boost. Why is it called Oyster? Legend has it that Hans cartier Watches Wilsdorf cartier watches, who invented the Oyster, chose the name because the new case reminded him of the difficulty he had experienced prising open oysters at dinner. Since then the Oyster has further, particularly advanced. Many Oyster watches today are omega Watches perpetual-self-winding, in other omega watches words, it does not require to expose the mechanism to the outside world in order to wind it. The Osyter Perpetual is one of the toughest, most durable, most reliable watches (under truly adverse conditions). It is probably the best mechanical watch money can buy.

Posted by: replica watches at February 09, 2010 08:26 AM (fa8ya)






Processing 0.14, elapsed 0.1451 seconds.
15 queries taking 0.0144 seconds, 236 records returned.
Page size 226 kb.
Powered by Minx 0.7 alpha.

MuNuvians
MeeNuvians
Polls! Polls! Polls!
Frequently Asked Questions
The (Almost) Complete Paul Anka Integrity Kick
Top Top Tens
Greatest Hitjobs

The Ace of Spades HQ Sex-for-Money Skankathon
A D&D Guide to the Democratic Candidates
Margaret Cho: Just Not Funny
More Margaret Cho Abuse
Margaret Cho: Still Not Funny
Iraqi Prisoner Claims He Was Raped... By Woman
Wonkette Announces "Morning Zoo" Format
John Kerry's "Plan" Causes Surrender of Moqtada al-Sadr's Militia
World Muslim Leaders Apologize for Nick Berg's Beheading
Michael Moore Goes on Lunchtime Manhattan Death-Spree
Milestone: Oliver Willis Posts 400th "Fake News Article" Referencing Britney Spears
Liberal Economists Rue a "New Decade of Greed"
Artificial Insouciance: Maureen Dowd's Word Processor Revolts Against Her Numbing Imbecility
Intelligence Officials Eye Blogs for Tips
They Done Found Us Out, Cletus: Intrepid Internet Detective Figures Out Our Master Plan
Shock: Josh Marshall Almost Mentions Sarin Discovery in Iraq
Leather-Clad Biker Freaks Terrorize Australian Town
When Clinton Was President, Torture Was Cool
What Wonkette Means When She Explains What Tina Brown Means
Wonkette's Stand-Up Act
Wankette HQ Gay-Rumors Du Jour
Here's What's Bugging Me: Goose and Slider
My Own Micah Wright Style Confession of Dishonesty
Outraged "Conservatives" React to the FMA
An On-Line Impression of Dennis Miller Having Sex with a Kodiak Bear
The Story the Rightwing Media Refuses to Report!
Our Lunch with David "Glengarry Glen Ross" Mamet
The House of Love: Paul Krugman
A Michael Moore Mystery (TM)
The Dowd-O-Matic!
Liberal Consistency and Other Myths
Kepler's Laws of Liberal Media Bias
John Kerry-- The Splunge! Candidate
"Divisive" Politics & "Attacks on Patriotism" (very long)
The Donkey ("The Raven" parody)
News/Chat