| Support
Contact
| Get In Touch With Your Inner Tom ClancyWith "The One" less than 10 days from assuming the office of President, it's nice to see that the ultranationalist patriots over at the New York Times are still doing their part to undermine The Last Days of Bush. (Once again, "Stolen blatantly from Hot Air" - You know, if I'm going to mine them for information like I do, I should probably register to comment over there. Sort of like "giving the old reach-around"....it's just common courtesy.) What I'd like to see is a Moron Thought Experiment. Give me your best Tom Clancy/Ian Fleming scenario as to how this is an indication of our "Intelligence" services pulling a full-on Keyzer Soze and getting over on the world. I'm looking for theories that give me a little confidence that the CIA isn't completely populated by bureaucratic ass-covering fucktards. Allahpundit (PBUH) has already covered the "This is incoming Obama staffers clearing the way for unconditional talks with Iran" angle, so let's take the other side and assume that SOMEONE in Washington knows their ass from a hole in the ground. I'll start it out with two possible scenarios:A.) Our government has decided that direct attacks on Iran are impractical and would generate too much backlash in Iraq, Europe, Russia and the rest of the Middle East. Accordingly, they've decided to go the covert op route, with Sub Rosa assistance from Middle Eastern countries who have fears of a nuclear Iran. With inside information on the location of separated portions of the program, the covert op will target selected portions of this program with tactical nuclear weapons. A small tactical nuke set off at any one of these facilities has three advantages: It denies the facility and all it's products to Iran, regardless of how much of the facility is destroyed in the initial blast. If you have to cross a mile of highly irradiated blast zone in order to get back into your laboratory, the odds are that the efficiency of the facility is going to be significantly degraded. If you can't get the nuke into the facility itself, a good portion of the facility probably survives the attack, but a close ground blast from a nuclear weapon will poison enough area to set things back significantly. After all, the facilities are nothing without people working in them. Even if the tools and work product at the bombed facility could be salvaged, it requires that the Iranian government move in the open with their salvage operation. A hurried salvage operation in a poison atmosphere is going to be easy to watch with spy satellites and spy plane overflights, and any material leaving a facility like this would be susceptible to bombing attacks or capture by aggressive special ops. It probably kills or incapacitates a significant portion of the staff working on this project. You don't have to kill their Oppenheimer or their General Leslie Groves to incapacitate the project. Take out the machinists working on this project, and you've taken out a big part of their capacity. Hell, take out the janitors and the facility guards and you're weakening the structure of their program. Remember, just because it's damn near impossible to infiltrate someone into their first string talent that doesn't mean that you can't get someone two or three steps away from working inside the program. All you've got to do is take out the people in front of them. As any person who watches the NFL knows, a team doesn't put a Hell of a lot of thought into who their 3rd string QB is, but if the first two go down in a game, that third stringer is going to have to sack up and get into action. A tactical nuclear strike on a nuclear facility has plausible deniability. Sure, the Iranians would know that they've been hit, but they couldn't prove that it was a "misfire" to the rest of the world. Well, at least the rest of the world wouldn't hate the US and Israel any more than they already do. The attack would almost HAVE to be done by placing the device on the ground and detonating it there, instead of delivering it with a plane or UAV. If there are radar traces of a delivery device, then the US and Israel will immediately get the blame for this attack. The problem with this is that our side doesn't utilize suicide delivery systems. Unless we can talk Bruce Willis into drillling a hole next to the facililty and setting the nuke off himself, it would have to be detonated either through remote control or on some sort of timer. This works good on paper, but one misstep in the detonation process leaves Iran sitting on a FUNCTIONAL NUCLEAR DEVICE that they could either whip out in front of the UN or smuggle into Jerusalem (depending on their mood that day). Yeah, using a nuke to prevent use of a nuke is serious stuff. I know that. I know that it's escalating the process, and that America hasn't used nukes since 1945 and that was to prevent the sure-thing loss of millions of Allied and Japanese lives - and even THAT decision has been subject to 63 years of secong guessing. I also know that using diplomacy to stop Iran from using a bomb on Israel or Iraq is going to be about as effective as using diplomacy to stop rockets from raining down on Israel. Iran will develop nuclear weapon technology if they are allowed to continue down this road, and once they have a bomb, the only thing that will deter them is fear of retaliation. In case you haven't noticed, there's a significant portion of the Islamic faith that believes that nothing that happens in this world is significant, since Allah will reward those who do his bidding in the afterlife. It's not like we're negotiating a Wall Street takeover bid here, people. The only question is this: Is it better to use a few tactical nukes now, or wait until Iran destroys Israel and bomb their country with multiple strategic "crowd pleasers" later? B.) The other option available to our side is the use of the new experimental "Model 19, Mark 3 Liquid Metal Assault Unicorn". This new breakthrough in science is impervious to anything in Iran's arsenal (save industrial puddles of molten steel, but how likely are they to have one of those laying around when the attack occurs?), but deployment of this weapons system would probably be judged to be in violation of a good portion of the Geneva Conventions and the 1947 International Agreement on the Misuse of Magical Creatures. Remember, this is a Moron Thought Experiment. It's purely hypothetical, so don't get your panties in a bunch about "Chairborne Rangers demanding that we kill them all & let God sort 'em out". Just drop your plausible strategy for eliminating the Iranian nuclear threat in the comments, and we'll announce the winner in 75 years or so when all the documents related to this crisis are finally declassified. Yeah, it's pointless and academic, but what's your alternative? Bitch about Obama's bailout plans some more? (Look, if any gub'mint types are reading this and thinking that it's a "Three Days of the Moron" scenario where they've got to snuff the entire AoSHQ staff to keep their secrets buried - just remember that the Liquid Metal Assault Unicorn is just a myth right now. Any movement against proponents of wild theories will just draw attention to their theories and make them into martyrs (also known as "The Mulder Defense"). It's probably just easier to mock us and start a "These idiots think that fire can't melt unicorns" meme in the MSM.)Comments1
Using one of our own nukes or an Israeli Nuke is not a good idea. Each nuke has it's own unique radiological signature depending on where the fissile material was produced. Best option? IAF TBOs (The Big One) Iran completely, hits all major strategic targets in Iran with nuclear devices -- this of course will destroy Iran as a modern nation pretty much, but hey; Israel is going to be hated if it uses just one nuke to take out an Iranian Enrichment facility; so why not go all the way? This also solves the problems of: 1.) Insufficient IAF air strength; you only need to fight your way to Iran and drop your nukes. 2.) Lack of aircraft in IAF inventory that can drop heavy penetrating bombs like MOP, to defeat the Iranian superbunkers for their bomb program. The IAF could use what they have now, but it would require that several planes orbit over an Iranian facility, dropping each penetrator bomb into the crater left by the last one; until the bunker is destroyed. Not Good. So, THE BIG ONE is the only realistic option. The nuclear destruction of Iran. Posted by: RyanCrierie at January 11, 2009 01:33 PM (QSOio) 2
You're thinking short-term. 1) The US government has, and is hiding technology to extract oil from shale, to convert coal to oil, and cheap agriculturally-grown chemicals for plastics, gasoline, and so forth. 2) We want Iran to attack Israel, so Saudi Arabia and Russia have to get involved. The talk of WW IV will be for naught, as the US doesn't get involved. China and India will get dragged in. The oil fields will burn, the poppy fields will burn, the endless supply of martyrs/fantatics will burn. We'll hear dire forecasts of the US running out of oil, but somehow the US will always have 'almost enough' oil. We'll export to England, Australia, New Zealand, Japan, and the rest of our friends but there just isn't enough oil for France et al. Posted by: dustydog at January 11, 2009 01:40 PM (5u36L) 3
Ryan, I thought about that. Well, more like I read "The Sum of All Fears" back in the 90's. You could get around this by directing a proxy to purchase a surplus Russian nuke on the black market, or possibly acquire one from one of the breakaway Soviet republics who have no love lost for their former Commie masters (think Ukraine, et al). The best possible scenario would be to get ahold of some fissile material from Pakistan or the Norks, which would likely match a good portion of what Iran's already working with, but Russian fissile material would do in a pinch. Hell, it's not as if you'd have to rely on the trigger & other technology on the Russian bomb - that stuff doesn't survive detonation like the radiological signature of the core material does, so you could put Russian core material in an American/Israeli bomb and cover that angle just in case a neutral third party (about as fictional as the Unicorn in my Plan B) does examine the aftermath of the explosion.
Posted by: Russ from Winterset at January 11, 2009 01:42 PM (cdAdD) 4
>>I'm looking for theories that give me a little confidence that the CIA isn't completely populated by bureaucratic ass-covering fucktards.<<
Theory: You're an idiot who knows absolutely nothing worth knowing about the intelligence community. Posted by: railwriter at January 11, 2009 01:44 PM (XcsD4) 5
Anything worth doing is worth doing twice
---Contact If we try to attack them out in the open, we only enflame the situation without gaining any real advantages, since they probably have at least one site that we don't know about. Posted by: james at January 11, 2009 01:46 PM (Pq8YS) 6
I hate to be rude, but this story circulated this fall. I believe it was BEFORE the election. Sorry, I can not remember where the hell I read it, probably in the Economist or WSJ. It is OLD news. Kemp Posted by: kempermanx at January 11, 2009 01:48 PM (2+9Yx) 7
Jesus, railwriter. I've got enough "real life" in my real life. I'm a freakin' Packers fan after all. As long as I've got to watch the Giants play the Eagles today, I thought it would be nice to pretend that we're citizens of an omnipotent Nation that utilizes it's competent intelligence services to eliminate threats to world peace. It's not like I'm asking the Intelligence Agencies of our country to solve the Global Financial Crisis after all. This is just MINOR fantasy. Posted by: Russ from Winterset at January 11, 2009 01:48 PM (cdAdD) 8
Nuke 'em from space.
It's the only way to be sure. Posted by: harrison at January 11, 2009 01:49 PM (Gv4O0) 9
"1947 International Agreement on the Misuse of Magical Creatures" That's not what it's called. It's the Dresden Agreement. After what the Nazi's tried to do, everyone (even Molotov) agreed that they could cause too much damage. See Charles Stross.
Anyway, the best way to take care of it is to simply publicize your failures, and conceal your successes. If they think you're stupid, they'll underestimate you. You still hear about the Bay of Pigs, but you don't hear about any nuclear scientists that were suborned, or at least not for long. The story from a couple of months back that said the CIA had actually done something right disappeared after only 2 days. They probably think that since the CIA is working to negotiate with them, that they must not have anyone inside the program. The negotiations are a decoy to keep them from noticing the bad information that is being fed to them. They hear "this component is good" but really it's faulty. It's the quiet ones that get you. Posted by: Tetragramm at January 11, 2009 01:51 PM (MGClW) 10
Seems to me the simplest black-ops solution is to cut off the electricity to the nuclear site. Disable the nearest power plant. Then blow up the entrances to the nuclear site and plug any air vents, trapping everyone inside. It won't kill the program, but it would set it back a year or two. So you do it again next year.
Posted by: lmg at January 11, 2009 01:52 PM (A/vgC) 11
Fair enough, Russ. Next time you decide to disparage a group of folks who work to keep you and yours safe--and have done a pretty goddamn good job of it, with scant thanks--ask yourself if they really deserve the kind of disdain that "fucktards" implies.
Posted by: railwriter at January 11, 2009 01:54 PM (XcsD4) 12
You're going about it all wrong. Play on the weaknesses of the muslim man.
Drop video iPods loaded with hardcore porn all around the nuke facility. Preferably during a shift change, as there will be more people running around scooping them up. Wait about 12-24 hours and then detonate the small charge located inside. A variation on the Mossad technique of swapping booby-trapped satphones used by Hezbollah. The explosions will be small, but scattered all around the facility, including the high security areas. Muslim men won't be able to resist the temptation to keep/hide these iPods rather than turn them in, and they won't want to leave them at home where they can be stolen. If you've ever seen a group of muslim men fight over free porn, you'll know what I mean. Posted by: IllTemperedCur at January 11, 2009 01:57 PM (MKNSy) 13
"I'm looking for theories that give me a little confidence that the CIA isn't completely populated by bureaucratic ass-covering fucktards." But it is completely populated by fucktards. Gresham's law applies to organizations as well as to money, especially organizations that are immune to public scrutiny and feedback. When they accidentally recruit someone who is patriotic and/or capable, said person gets driven out just as soon as the organization recognizes its mistake. We can sit here and daydream all we like, but that's not going to change the fact that the CIA we pay for is working for itself, not us. Posted by: Brown Line at January 11, 2009 01:57 PM (xYeJ1) 14
There is an 'image' that Obama is against war, but no he's not. He says he's against the invasion of Iraq, though we'll see what he does about that in office. How can a man calling for more troops, including European troops, to be sent to Afghanistan be against war? He has also said he is prepared to bomb Pakistan and use military force to stop Iran building nuclear weapons and he has appointed Hillary 'Let's bomb 'em' Clinton as Secretary of State and re-appointed Bush's 'Let's bomb 'em' Secretary of Defense, Robert Gates. So that's the 'change we can believe in', then.
Obama isn't against war at all and, if his controllers have their way, he will engage the US in even more foreign conflicts with the troops sent to their deaths, and the deaths of their targets, on a wave of oratory from the dark suit with the black face who would never go where he's sending them. He claims to be a 'uniter', which is exactly what Bush said about himself before he came to office, but unity in and of itself is not the issue. Nazi Germany had unity in the early years of the war, but was that a good thing? What matters is what the unity is designed to achieve and Obama's much-vaunted 'unity' is to 'inspire' a mass movement to support his Orwellian plans. Posted by: sickinmass at January 11, 2009 02:00 PM (/i4dU) 15
I'm looking for theories that give me a little confidence that the CIA
isn't completely populated by bureaucratic ass-covering fucktards.
That's going way out there Posted by: toby928 at January 11, 2009 02:01 PM (PD1tk) 16
We create an "industrial accident" using our secret technology that can detonate a nuclear device from a distance by squirting a focused beam of .... Hey, what are those black Hummers doing in front of my house? Better go see what they want. Back later. Posted by: sherlock at January 11, 2009 02:01 PM (8V5Ut) 17
Bailout? Yeah, right. It's the funding mechanism for a new off the books ( out of budget cutting/"oversight" liberals ) for a new stealthy terrorist capture/torture/kill organization. At least that's my wet dream. Posted by: Dang at January 11, 2009 02:04 PM (Y5LIx) 18
How about identify key personnel and take them out in a lowkey approach? Some die in car accidents, some get so sick they cant continue their work, some mysteriously disappear. Recruit the 3rd string replacements, and get them to "adjust" select parts of the production. Instead of setting of a nuclear device, just set off an ordinary explosive close enough to the material to contaminate the whole facility. As an added touch, recruit janitors to "adjust" other systems so the alarms keep going off, power surges happen at crucial times, climate systems fail, and so on. If done competently, it will be so lowkey that there will be full deniability, or in worst case plausible deniability ("the janitor was asked to provide information, not to detroy things") There might be quite some time before the opposing side realizes there is more to this than just bad luck. It will also have a good chance to wreak havoc with the program, and set it back years, if not stop it cold. (Take out the 1st and 2nd string, and you will not have much of a team left) Yes, recruiting people to do all this, and to pull off these kind of operations inside a hostile country is extremely difficult if not impossible. But as a pure thought excercise... Posted by: Erik at January 11, 2009 02:05 PM (heVHJ) 19
Okay, our elite CIA operatives sneak into Iran.. They replace every map in the entire country with new maps. In these new maps, the location of Israel and Syria are switched.
So, when the Iranians do finish their bomb, and decide to nuke Israel, they actually wind up bombing Syria. I don't expect a reward for this idea. A Presidential Medal of Freedom (and some cash) would be sufficient. Posted by: JayC at January 11, 2009 02:07 PM (idZZ3) 20
My understanding, railwriter, is that Clinton completely depleted the CIA of older experienced analysts and replaced them with college kids that don't know their ass from a hole in the ground. My further understanding is that Bush didn't do a whole lot to remedy that situation. But whatever.
Posted by: The Band at January 11, 2009 02:07 PM (QtRBc) 21
Here's an idea:
Deliver a nuke via a meteorite. Put a nuke inside a big rock, send it up into space then drop it on their facility. The issue with this is that I'm pretty sure nukes don't just detonate because you hit them really hard (someone with a real science background feel free to correct me). You need a special detonator and it would be a bit difficult to pass it off as an accident (though we could claim the meteorite hit the detonate button accidentally, Iran can't really extract that much evidence from a crater). Another idea is to make the meteorite out of ice. This way it's going to melt after impact and will leave no evidence Iran can examine and call foul on. We should, of course, have our astronomers let them know there's a big block of ice coming their way so they know it's made out of ice in advance. Posted by: Johnny at January 11, 2009 02:08 PM (D4i3P) 22
Didn't mean to come on so strong, Russ--I know you were setting up a scenario for imagination. Seven years of seeing real successes--and watching the media in toto shit on that work, without knowing thing one about it--has become a real drag, though. There are a bunch of hardworking pros at Langley, and they deserve our gratitude, the more so because, unlike many other professions, they're not at liberty to bray on endlessly about themselves.
Posted by: railwriter at January 11, 2009 02:08 PM (XcsD4) 23
I still believe that the best option in dealing with Iran is to arm the populous. We captured hundreds of thousands of AKs and millions of rounds of ammo in Iraq. We should modify some stealth bombers to drop them all over the Iranian countryside. Don't attempt to form resistance groups ourselves, just drop them randomly and let nature take its course.
Lets see if the countryside really supports the city Mullahs. Posted by: toby928 at January 11, 2009 02:09 PM (PD1tk) 24
Seriously, the thing to avoid is letting them know they are about to lose their nukes - that's when the "use 'em or lose 'em" scenario comes into play. The converse of that is to let them think they ain't gonna lose them, right up to the moment they do.
Posted by: sherlock at January 11, 2009 02:10 PM (8V5Ut) 25
Fair enough, Russ. Next time you decide to disparage a group of folks who work to keep you and yours safe--and have done a pretty goddamn good job of it, with scant thanks--ask yourself if they really deserve the kind of disdain that "fucktards" implies.
Hahahah, jesus. Go crack one off or something, you're tighter than a nuns ass. Posted by: Max Power at January 11, 2009 02:15 PM (Oj90Z) 26
There are a bunch of hardworking pros at Langley, and they deserve our gratitude, the more so because, unlike many other professions, they're not at liberty to bray on endlessly about themselves. But they are at liberty to leak like a sieve and shit all over the President to the press. Posted by: The Band at January 11, 2009 02:16 PM (QtRBc) 27
Meh.
If you can get someone inside the facility, carrying a micro-bomb loaded with SuperGlue, (or a dozen of them, 12X++ better, even), you've shut it down for a minimum of a year. Posted by: dad29 at January 11, 2009 02:19 PM (GVb0I) Posted by: torabora at January 11, 2009 02:20 PM (JrCRC) 29
Well, you did say "moron thought experiment", and both A) and B) above fit that bill nicely.
I think the real answer is far more simple. By inferring that there is sabotage in progress, we plant the seeds of doubt in the minds of those running the Iranian nuke program. They are already reinventing the wheel, and now they don't know if there has been some sort of subtle, hard to detect malfunction inserted into their product. Obviously, with so much prestige and national pride at stake, the very last thing they want is for their efforts to fail. Now they will go nuts trying to look for the sabotage. Posted by: Dave at January 11, 2009 02:23 PM (SoLXf) 30
Lets see if the countryside really supports the city Mullahs. Heh. Remember that Iranian story about a country mouse that moved to the big city and hung out with a Mullah mouse. Hilarity ensued as their respective lifestyles clashed. Then the Mullah mouse had the country mouse tried in a people's court and hung in the town square for being a homosexual. I love that story! Posted by: jaleach at January 11, 2009 02:25 PM (gHrZU) 31
With "The One" less than 10 days from assuming the office of President I was having a great weekend. Thanks for ruining it! Posted by: katya at January 11, 2009 02:33 PM (oRJZj) 32
Dropping AKs by stealth bomber isn't a bad idea, but it's kind of low reward. But if you drop explosives and simple detonators, that's a higher reward activity.
I'm thinking of the Steinbeck novella "The Moon Is Down" (yeah I know, lefty Steinbeck. But hear me out.). In the book, the Allies dropped hundreds of packages to the occupied villagers. Each package contained a stick of dynamite, detonator, small leaflet with demolitions instructions, and a chocolate bar. The kids ran all over the place snatching up the packages for the chocolate, and they gave the boomy stuff to their parents. Who started using it to start blowing up Nazi equipment & soldiers within a few hours of the first package hitting the ground. So why not a modern variation? 1 lb of Semtex and an iPod loaded with American top 40 songs? Posted by: IllTemperedCur at January 11, 2009 02:35 PM (MKNSy) 33
Everyone seems to assume that some sort of nuclear explosion is needed, optionally with bunker-busting capabilities, and that’s not quite the case. The Iranian labs may be 600feet underground, surrounded with 50 of heavily reinforced concrete and steel doors. But there’s at least one thing they don’t have: oxygen tanks, say 5 days’ worth, for the entire staff. They probably don’t even have internal electricity generation capability, and are unlikely to have batteries for more than a day’s worth of flashlight usage. If the buildings located at the entrance(s) were to accidentally burn down, consuming all available oxygen and cutting electrical power, this would be a major inconvenience to the Iranian program. Accidents do happen. Perhaps someone parked a panel van 300m away one evening. Then, one night about 2AM, one of the sides collapsed, exposing 150 or so loaded RPG-7 launchers, all pointed to cover the building. As the side collapsed, all 150 were ripple-fired at the building, and ... ... … inexplicably, the van then caught fire and exploded. Alternatively, a group of smugglers flying several stolen AN-12s might be forced to ditch their cargo, at very low altitude, of scrap truck engine blocks, 55-gal rusty barrels of tar, 5-gallon cans of gasoline and cluster of road emergency flares. What would be the odds they’re all carrying mix of each item, light the flares in an attempt to mark the drop zone, and just happen to each score an Iranian nuclear facility? Posted by: Arbalest at January 11, 2009 02:39 PM (pmAMk) 34
Could it be that the NYT, in their normal stupid over-zealous need to bash Bush and hurt the U.S. has the story wrong?
ABC News (200
International Herald Tribune (200
Posted by: Vic at January 11, 2009 02:39 PM (f6os6) 35
It's tight, Max. Clean, too. You're a pro, don't go changing.
Posted by: railwriter at January 11, 2009 02:40 PM (XcsD4) 36
Incoming administration's global strategic plan:
1. Pretend to capitulate to the mad mullahs of Iran. 2. ??? 3. Profit! Posted by: cthulhu at January 11, 2009 02:42 PM (uIche) 37
A serious CIA would not have tolerated Valerie Plame for even a minute. CIA "spies" doing photo shoots for Vanity Fair. If the CIA had neither authority nor inclination to rein her in, it doesn't inspire much confidence in the overall seriousness of the organization.
Posted by: caspera at January 11, 2009 02:42 PM (vSuMy) 38
Alternatively, a group of smugglers
flying several stolen AN-12s might be forced to ditch their cargo, at
very low altitude, of scrap truck engine blocks, 55-gal rusty barrels
of tar, 5-gallon cans of gasoline and cluster of road emergency flares.
You forgot 2 tons of used banana peels. Posted by: IllTemperedCur at January 11, 2009 02:44 PM (MKNSy) 39
Don't the dudes building the bomb have to eat and drink? I mean, it's not possible that they obtain all of their sustenance from within their own borders. Thus, wouldn't a simple case of botulism do the trick? I mean, sure, by itself it may not be enough , but what if you combined it with a heavy-duty dose of diurectics and/or laxatives? Sure, it's not like Tom Clancy sexy or anything like that, but you could always pick out one poor fucker who wasn't on-duty at the time and claim that he played a really bad practical joke, right? Posted by: jmflynny at January 11, 2009 02:45 PM (ylnwA) 40
What makes you think we don't already have Russian nukes, or at least Russian-origin weapons-grade nuclear materials?
Posted by: richard mcenroe at January 11, 2009 02:47 PM (DBS+D) 41
Using the new facial surgery techniques, a bevy of loyal, highly motivated CIA agents who look "foreign" and speak Farsi, are transformed into the image of Dinnerjacket and the most powerful imams. Using intelligance supplied by Israeli spy squirrels, the targets in Iran are quickly apprehended, killed and replaced by their CIA replicas. Their first duty is to turn the country back to Zorasterianism; the Muslims who resist will be eliminated by their fellow Iranians. Once that is settled, the CIA Dinnerjacket will forge a new alliance with the U.S., and we will use Iran as our secondary middle eastern base.
Oh yeah, and Halliburton will get all their oil, while Blackwater takes care of security. Have I missed anything? Posted by: shibumi at January 11, 2009 02:49 PM (tZB/c) Posted by: lmg at January 11, 2009 02:51 PM (A/vgC) 43
We send michelle O to take care of the job. After all she's a communications expert that makes over 300 or 400 grand a year for a hospital, so she's good with communications. She just needs to get get into the country. Maybe she can use that affirmative action ticket that she didn't use to get into college. Or the one she didn't use to get into law school. Yeah, that's it. Then she can take care of business, while her mom sits for the kids in the white house. Then we'd have that excuse we've been looking for to give the first lady a salary. She can command the "Unicorn of DestructionTM" with a laser pointer, sort of like that laser guidance thingy that the military guys use some times. Posted by: Mephitis at January 11, 2009 02:53 PM (7rLjo) 44
What if they do?
Then we'll know that all the blather about imminent regime change from within is bullshit. We can move on to more active messures. Posted by: toby928 at January 11, 2009 02:54 PM (PD1tk) 45
Funny, you had the best plot in your throw away line. Bruce Willis played a oil driller, right? Todays the technology exists to steer a drill in any direction, even laterally. So you drill laterally next to key facilities, such as power generation or Gas refining or even nuclear development. Pack in a few tons of conventional high explosives, and set them all off at the same time. OK, second part of the story. The plan fails to destroy the Iran leadership or their program. But the surprise is, the operators always knew it had a zero chance of success. Their intention wasn't to succeed, but to fail in such a spectacular fashion that the attempt was clear and traceable. Now you have one highly pissed off Iran leadership screaming bloody murder and fully committed to all out war and everyone else finally has to choose a side. Your welcome. Posted by: Bill Ciz at January 11, 2009 02:56 PM (DSGw3) 46
Use real meteorites, aka, railguns launched from stealth ships.
We have the stealth ships, and we may have the railguns too. We fake not having railguns, and when the Fire of Allah rains sweet sweet merciless death on every Iranian nuclear site simultaneously, along with every power plant, tv station, and government building... Well, plausible deniability. Have a few scientists declare that it was a real metorite and we are set. Then we run psyops that declare that "Allah has abandoned you because of your leaders refusing to denounce Mohammad and acknowledge Jesus" while arming the populus with bibles and guns. When flaming meteorites keep crashing from the sky on mosques, while Jews and Christians are spared, even mullahs and goat farmers can tell that there is a new omnipotent sheriff in town, and he goes by the name of YHWH. Iran falls apart. Islam is ripped apart. Israel easily conquers all land from the canal to the tigris, millions convert, and light sweet crude flows for 15 a barrel. So, let's see that railgun video again, eh? Posted by: Evil genius at January 11, 2009 02:56 PM (Pu2BW) 47
"... 2 tons of used banana peels." Well, yes, but finding 5 well-built blondes to fly Cessnas to do the follow-up drop involves as-yet unsolved technical issues. See the preceeding thread with the girl trying to fit through the opening. Such issues could endanger the entire mission, so perhaps leaving this action for later is a better choice.. Posted by: Arbalest at January 11, 2009 03:00 PM (pmAMk) 48
A genetically engineered virus that causes uncircumcised penises to become infected and eventually kill the men they are attached to. Spread it around the middle east water supplies. Look for lots of surprising conversions to Judaism and interfaith marriages... Posted by: Log Cabin at January 11, 2009 03:03 PM (1xm+6) 49
Then we'll know that all the blather about imminent regime change from within is bullshit.
It probably is. Muslims are constantly telling us that they are all on the same team, so I tend to take them at their word on this. Besides, hoping that someone else will do our job for us is a bad strategy. Posted by: lmg at January 11, 2009 03:05 PM (A/vgC) 50
Send in Jon Voight with a buck knife, three feet of wire and the silenced weapon of his choice. Fucker is a badass, they'll never knew what hit 'em.
Posted by: ErikW at January 11, 2009 03:07 PM (hKtiw) 51
railwriter, I don't doubt that there are serious, honest and hardworking people at CIA. But don't try to tell me that the CIA is not also frighteningly political and willing to leak, dissemble and manipulate evidence to force its own preferred policies on the government. In the last several years we have seen one case after another of disloyal backstabbing politics being played out to the detriment of our national security. It is a bit much that you ask that we be grateful for their hard work while they fuck over the lawful chain of command. Posted by: Ronsonic at January 11, 2009 03:11 PM (ywSvi) 52
We'll dress up Barack for the ole "candygram for Mr. Mongo" routine
Posted by: Evil midnight Bomber What Bombs at Midnight at January 11, 2009 03:13 PM (gIga4) Posted by: Buck Naked - Pron Star at January 11, 2009 03:14 PM (utes0) 54
Cross the polarity for the quantum fusion generator, sending the dylithium crystals into a state of flux but only for a few minutes.. Long enough to create a black hole on site and suck in the entire lab and facilities.
The beauty of this is once the crystals stabilize, the black hole collapse in on itself and everything will be okay. We will air drop old lead lined refrigerators to the men in the field so they can jump inside them and be safe from the Black Hole.. Posted by: Dave C at January 11, 2009 03:14 PM (bU9ij) Posted by: Jimmie at January 11, 2009 03:15 PM (XBUmp) 56
Come one morons, don't you get it? The real rouge intelligence and Black ops counter to a missguided administration isn't to have a real honest to goodness workable plan. It is to put forward a intentionally flawed plan, cloaked in so much secrecy that no one who would know that it was certain to fail can get near it to reveal it as doomed to fail. The purpose being not to succeed and give power and cover to the current missguided administration, but instead to complete discredit it and to make clear to the whole of the world that the stakes are real, that nuclear war really is going to happen, if people don't actually do something to stop it. It would be in effect tricking the weak and duplicious leadership to accidently calling "All in!". Posted by: Bill Ciz at January 11, 2009 03:15 PM (DSGw3) 57
Where's McGyver when you need him...give him a leatherman, broken shoelace and some bubblegum and he'll take anything out.
Posted by: Buck Naked - Pron Star at January 11, 2009 03:16 PM (utes0) 58
Not Jon Voight.
Richard Roundtree HALO's into Tehran with a .38 snubbie, switchblade and a black leather trenchcoat. Booyah! But this only works if you have VOA hijack all the radio stations in Iran and change the format to "all Issac Hayes, all the time". Posted by: IllTemperedCur at January 11, 2009 03:20 PM (MKNSy) 59
Oh come on! It's Jon Fucking Voight! No? He may not have the style of Roundtree but he's cold. Very cold.
Posted by: ErikW at January 11, 2009 03:26 PM (hKtiw) 60
ITC...fuck yea...send Shaft, Dolemite, Gravedigger Jones and Coffin Ed Johnson over to fuck them up...and they'll just say that they were going after "DA MAN"!
Love those Blackxploitation Movies! Posted by: Buck Naked - Pron Star at January 11, 2009 03:32 PM (utes0) 61
This story is total crap. New York Times at it's traitorous worst. Those fuel air bombs "Chimpy Bushitler" supposedly didn't send off to Israel for Iran are somehow being used right now as we speak to level Gaza. He he.
I 'd love to think the Mahmoud is hunting far and wide for the CIA in Iran. One would have to believe that the CIA is still competent enough to subvert Iran and undermine it's nuclear program. Kinda doubtful at this point Posted by: Paul at January 11, 2009 03:37 PM (52e0M) 62
sabotage the water and power lines into any suspect areas.
The US has had eight years to act covertly in Iran. Now is a bit late. Posted by: davod at January 11, 2009 03:46 PM (GUZAT) 63
Get in touch with you inner Tom Clancy?
This is Obama we're talking about here. I suggest getting in touch with our inner Blake Edwards... You know, The Pink Panther? That's more like it. Posted by: turfmann at January 11, 2009 03:49 PM (yStT3) 64
I seriously doubt the Israelis are using Fuel Air bombs in Gaza.
Posted by: A Balrog of Morgoth at January 11, 2009 03:52 PM (wgLRl) 65
Very well, to really get into the spirit of post #56 . . . The Israelis buy a few older oil tankers, something in the 700-800foot-long size. The decks are cleared and smoothed of all small items, and the larger items are made removable. This creates effectively an aircraft carrier. The deck will probably need structural reinforcement (lots of I-beams underneath) to carry loads, and possibly a second layer to prevent punctures. Steel plate from one of the other tankers might be used. The idea is to create a deck suitable for 20 or so take-offs and landings. Turn the aft end into an elevator that goes down one deck to a hangar for perhaps 16 fully-loaded F-15s. Take-off is via RATO-pack assist (might need 2 or 3 spare sets per plane, in case things work better than planned); landing uses cables. Build maybe 3 of these tankers Scrub all compartments, to avoid creating an oil slick, add large pumps to quickly flood / clear compartments, to simulate an oil cargo, and add charges to cause the ship to break cleanly into 4 or 5 pieces if necessary. Float 2 of them to near the Straits of Hormuz before launching. Keep one near Yemen, as guard. Do the launch as the ships are leaving the PG. Have an E2/E3 appear shortly before the strikes happen (or perhaps after). The E2/E3 will then proceed to rendezvous with a refueling plane, then both proceed on to another country. After the first strike, the planes return to the tankers, refuel and either reload for another strike, or load for distance and A2A, and then wait or return home. The tankers get lost in the Arabian Gulf, returning home or optionally scuttling in deep water after transferring crew to another ship. Optionally, on the way back, distribute spankings to Somali pirates, maybe an Al Q. villa in Yemen, … Posted by: Arbalest at January 11, 2009 04:00 PM (pmAMk) 66
How about we just send someone in to pour bacon grease all over their yellowcake?
Posted by: Brendan at January 11, 2009 04:01 PM (2jQGY) 67
Deliver a load of Members Only jackets with a poison embedded in the linings that is activated by body heat. Posted by: ParanoidInSeattle at January 11, 2009 04:04 PM (AJ4xq) 68
Let your enemies do the heavy lifting.
Step One: Set up the NYT by feeding them enough leaks to build a plausible and very juicy story about the people you've already got inside the programme. They won't be able to resist the opportunity to burn intelligence sources in the pursuit of the public's right to know. Step Two: Sit back and place bets on the number of key figures in the programme to survive negative vetting at the hands of whatever SAVAK calls itself these days. Generate enough hysteria and you'll have the Mullahs thinking every physicist and engineer is a Secret Jew*. *See Inquisition for more details. Posted by: lotocoti at January 11, 2009 04:10 PM (TXbqY) 69
Hey, is that an RCMP cruiser outside my front door? I'll go see what they want. Back later. Posted by: andycanuck at January 11, 2009 04:14 PM (55TIb) 70
you cross the beams..
Posted by: Dave C at January 11, 2009 04:30 PM (bU9ij) 71
And for the record, I haven't touched a Clancy novel since he took up with General Zinni. I don't roll with people who steal money from enlisted men.
Posted by: Chris Matthews at January 11, 2009 04:31 PM (DBS+D) 72
What makes you think we don't already have Russian nukes, or at least Russian-origin weapons-grade nuclear materials?
Posted by: richard mcenroe at January 11, 2009 02:47 PM
That's what I'm talking about. I don't know whether or not we've got any Russian fissile material. That's a GOOD thing. If I knew about it, then everyone would know about it, and then having it wouldn't be useful anymore.
Railwriter, I believe that there are still good people working at the CIA. Unfortunately, in order to accomplish anything, you've got to have a chain of good people ranging from field ops all the way up to the Deputy Directors and the politically appointed Director. If there's as much as one "kumbayah" singer in the chain, there's a chance that the operation will either get cut from within or that the whole freakin' thing will be on Page 1 of the NYT just as soon as it looks like it might work. I want to believe that our intelligence professionals can still get it done, but reality says that a bad organization trumps good individuals every freakin' time. Of course, if they ARE working on something that will be effective in ending this situation, the guys working at the CIA should thank me for publicly calling them out as incompetent fucktards. Reinforcing their cover, so to speak. Posted by: Russ from Winterset at January 11, 2009 04:45 PM (cdAdD) 73
This could all be a colossal mind fuck on the Iranians. Get them thinking that that the CIA and other intelligence agencies are trying to sabotage their Nuke program and have covert agents in place and sit back and watch as the Iranians go nuts trying to discover who the traitors are and purge anyone in their Nuke program who is suspect.
Posted by: Matt at January 11, 2009 04:59 PM (TEf8s) 74
Arbalest, in post #65 I think you missed the real plot that is offered. The idea as I understand it, is to make an attempt you have absolutely no intention of actually working. But to mask it so that it looks like a genuine effort. The mechanics are such that it is the effort becoming public knowledge does three things at once. 1 - It guarantees the failure of the current US administration as being seen as ineffectual. 2 - It raises world wide public attention to the fact that things will not be allowed to continue, not even by the seemingly peacful side of the US, a price WILL be payed. Clearly, another, stronger more determined less graceful attempt will be made. 3 - It forces everyone world wide to reconcile where they stand in unambiguous terms, reinforcing the above realization that full out nuclear war is more than possible, it is eminent. Some have said that in reality, that was exactly what the failed Iran hostage rescue attempt was. An intentionally doomed effort. But how much of a failure was it really? 1 - It unseated Carter by making him appear ineffectual and robbing him of any cover on the whole debacle that is Iran. 2 - It made the Iranians choose between those more ready to negotiate and those who would certainly cause a war. Those in the US were less willing to suffer mediocrity in our own efforts or our allies. Suddenly guy were volunteering for SF assignments when before we had to recruit hell out of them. 3 - It made the other countries realize they had better decide who's side they were going to be on when the real shooting began. Thus the whole affair quickly began to unwind. If we had succeeded, then the US would potentially have been worse off in the long run. It took many years for me to be at ease with the concept that this could have been the intention all along since I had an involvment and lost comrades in the attempt. Which is not to say I think it was intended to fail, certainly not by the military. Just that I can now see how such a thing could be. If you were close enough to the operation, then you would know, the CIA held back many critical pieces of intelligence required for the success of the mission. So much so, that "The Activity" formed it's own ability to get intelligence, and that pissed off the CIA so badly they tried to get them completely shut down. They tried hard enough that "The Activity" had to fake it's own demise. Posted by: Bill Ciz at January 11, 2009 05:02 PM (DSGw3) 75
But there’s at least one thing they
don’t have: oxygen tanks, say 5 days’ worth, for the entire staff. They
probably don’t even have internal electricity generation capability,
and are unlikely to have batteries for more than a day’s worth of
flashlight usage...
Err, how can you assume that? If you were the one designing an underground weapons facility, isn't that exactly what you'd install? Air scrubbers and O2 seems like blindingly obvious pieces of equipment in an underground facility even if it weren't a weapons center. Posted by: adamthemad at January 11, 2009 05:10 PM (aUyuV) 76
Iran is ripe for special ops covert operations. You have a whole generation of young people who absolutely hate the mullahs. All you have to do is make the mullahs look like fools first and then you make them look weak. Then you do things to destabilize Iran. This is a legitimate activity because Iran has been destabilizing countries for decades. It would only be justice to screw them up. Remember the word "escalate"? It is your friend, because you can make something look like someone else's fault. You never start out with your worst option first, just because you limit your options. This is of course, is tempered by the level of threat against you. But then if you are faced with a serious threat, you want as many options on the table as you can get. Whenever possible, get someone else to do your dirty work. There are all kinds of people in the Middle East that hate Iran and would love to see them get what's coming to them. A conflict between Saudi Arabia and Iran is much better than a conflict between Iran and Israel. How hard would that be to pull off. Timing is everything. It would be much better to get Iran to move rashly now than later. How hard is it to provoke Iran? Even better, if you can provoke someone into provoking Iran for you. How about covert ops dressed as Kurdish rebels attacking a Turkish military post inside Turkey from Iran? When people seek to be troublesome, it is too easy to cause trouble for them. This is what special ops people are for. And the CIA and all those types. In my opinion a clandestine invasion of Iraq, where you give Saddam Hussein tons of problems through special operations missions would have been highly effective. Maybe I am wrong on that, since President Bush was able to accomplish his goal which was to kill thousands of jihadi types. Good for you, Mr. President. Posted by: Harry at January 11, 2009 05:12 PM (1PrID) 77
#74 Bill Ciz I thought I did a rather good job of making my scenario(s) look like (a) genuine effort(s). Was I over the top? Posted by: Arbalest at January 11, 2009 05:13 PM (pmAMk) 78
#75 adamthemad Indeed, "Air scrubbers and O2 seems like blindingly obvious pieces of equipment in an underground facility", but given the overall technical depth of most Iranian weapons and industries, I think my assumptions (and they are wild assumptions on my part) are reasonable. I bet they have only ventilation shafts and fans. The AAR after a good 2-day burn of the building(s) on top of the site should tell us. Posted by: Arbalest at January 11, 2009 05:19 PM (pmAMk) 79
Arbalest #77 Not in making the attempt seem real, but rather in that if an attempt is to look sincere, and still be intended to fail, you don't risk losing a large percentage of your most valuable aircraft. The real agenda isn't to succeed after all. Also, I don't think the Isreali leadership is a target for discrediting. So the planning for failure would ruin the wrong leadership. Think again along the lines of: You have a horrible boss you want fired. But you can get them to approve a attempt to do the right thing one time. If they do the right thing once and succeed, it is virtually guarunteed they will use that one time as cover while they run their other agendas. So you have one shot, and that is to set your boss up to fail, making him take the fall, and draw everyone's atttention to what really should be a priority and how your boss is the wrong guy to do it. Now you get a new boss and better attention on the real issues. Posted by: Bill Ciz at January 11, 2009 05:27 PM (DSGw3) 80
Here is a classic example of what I mean. A kitchen manager was bringing in unskilled undocumented workers to work the kitchen at a resort. The Manager also made other cutbacks in garbage collection. The result of the two combines was that there was a developing rodent problem. Now you can get the boss to realize that if the rodant problem continues, it will be bad for everyone, so something has to be done. But the boss doesn't want to hire exterminators and have the bill show up and bring attention to what they have been doing wrong in the kitichen. You could help the boss actually clean up the garbage area and improve cleanliness of the kitchen, but then you will have a new full time job dealing with rats forever, all while watching your friends replaced by unqualified, even illegal workers. OR You could offer the bos a way out. You tell you boss that if he laced a bucn of sugar with Alum, it would kill the rats and the mice and the good thing is, it makes them die away from where they eat, far away from the kitchen, because it causes a unquencable thirst and they basicly go down to the creek and drink until they drown. He loves the idea and so you do it. But you haven't told him that the water lines to the ice maker in the dinning area are plastic and they leak. So when you give the rats the alum, the don't go out side down the road to the creek, they go into the dining area, chew through the plastic line on the ice maker, flood the room attracting all the other rats to the water where they all drink until they drown. Now everyone in the whole club membership and the local health department knows that there is and has been a rat problem. It even ends up in the local paper so the whole illegal worker issue becomes public knowlege. Not only is the kitchen manager fired, but the people in the club managment that empowered him are also canned. If you have been successful, it would have actually been worse for you and everyone else. Do you see the plot line now? Posted by: Bill Ciz at January 11, 2009 05:46 PM (DSGw3) Posted by: Bill Ciz at January 11, 2009 05:47 PM (DSGw3) 82
Wow, look at all those typos. I'm not so good with a broken finger and dimn lighting. I suppose the 4 shots of McCallen haven't helped either. I hope you can work out what I meant. Posted by: Bill Ciz at January 11, 2009 05:51 PM (DSGw3) 83
#79 Bill Ciz Your last paragraph makes sense, although my historical response has been to go to Westech (a job faire, later called Brass Ring, now defunct, so I use Monster). Senior management once in a while needs to be reminded that when they hire problem managers, they occasionally need to return to put out the resulting fires and fix the ugly (and avoidable) screw-ups themselves. However, in terms of the thread topic and much of your post #74, well, there seems to be an inconsistency. Discrediting one of the players in a scenario, to end their foolishness and get the proper solution implemented, seems not to apply to the Iranian nuclear program. The Iranian regime is forging ahead with bomb development, and the only clear way to stop this, via discrediting them, is to have the first weapon test fail, either completely, or to generate less than a 1Kt blast. Failing this, the Iranians will proceed, and with the support of much of their people. I merely followed the "Black Ops". "cloaked in secrecy" part of your #56 post, and came up with things so improbable as to be laughed at, yet just plausible enough to cause the opponent to spend time, money and resources analyzing and potentially countering them. Can the Iranians check every panel van, every cargo plane, every female Cessna pilot, every old tanker? How long can they make an effort? Or will they do nothing? Mu. Ha Ha Ha. Posted by: Arbalest at January 11, 2009 05:56 PM (pmAMk) Posted by: Dean Keaton at January 11, 2009 05:59 PM (c+zb4) 85
Checklist for a nuclear free Iran:
1) Reduce the combat effectiveness of Iran's international proxies by destroying their materiel bases and attriting their command and control infrastructures. See: IDF, Gaza, HAMAS 2) Establish and maintain rat lines into Iran from adjoining nations which can be used to resupply internal forces in opposition to the theocracy. Invite the Mullah's to come to terms with roosting chickens. 3) Tie down Iranian security elements by turning a blind eye to and/or influencing existing [extra-regime] narco-trafficking and black market smuggling networks operating across their frontiers. 4) Manipulate world markets with the aim of minimizing and/or eliminate profits on the export commodities the Iranian theocracy has depended on to finance their domestic and regional agendas. 5) Capitalize on the attractiveness of postmodern secular concepts of personal liberty and continue the ongoing globalization/democratization of the means of communication...In other words - Porn bomb the regime and further weaken their youth culture through cheap Euro-trash techno and revolutionary French philosophy. 6) Cause the world to believe that the Great Satan's 'decadently obese white devil' citizens have chosen new and exciting cadre of sheptards that relies on "Hope", "Change" and skittle-shitting unicorns in their negotiations with self-proclaimed enemies. .This is a fantasy pissing-match right?. 7) Through the use of targeted economic policy; encourage or otherwise force the regime to rely on Franco-Russian weapon systems and combat doctrines. 10) Sit back, pop some corn, and crack a beer. Posted by: monkeyfan at January 11, 2009 06:00 PM (cEE8N) 86
If you have been successful, it would have actually been worse for you and everyone else. Do you see the plot line now? Boy do I ever. I just lost my job last month because of this type of scenario. No, I didn't start it, some other asshole did this, and I got caught in the shitstorm along with every other employee. However, I'm not so sure that this applies to Eagle Claw. I just don't see the de-nutted, post-Church Committee, post-Vietnam CIA being competent enough to plan this sort of thing. One can make an argument that this was the unintended effect, but it would require a level of competence and long-range vision that just wasn't present in the CIA at the time. Posted by: IllTemperedCur at January 11, 2009 06:04 PM (MKNSy) 87
9) Be precise in labeling lists...
Posted by: monkeyfan at January 11, 2009 06:05 PM (cEE8N) 88
Why would you want to nuke certain areas of Iran? Dumb on the face of it. A more practical scenario would be a TOTAL blockade if the country--nothing in or out. Period. We could seal Iran tighter than a bull's ass in fly season, and nobody on the planet could deny us the act. For added zest, ruining their only oil refinery would deny them any sort of mobility for their military. Lest you think we haven't the ability to do so, I remind you of the Navy and Air Force, woefully underemployed currently. Within 3 months their economy (and gov't) would crumble.
Posted by: irongrampa at January 11, 2009 06:06 PM (ud5dN) 89
Arbalest Look again at the proposal. If the object is to come up with a Clancy type plot line, then look at Clear and Present Danger. Now instead of a small op where the men on the ground are sacraficed fighting a drug lord for a personal vendeta, it is a larger operation that is sent on a sacraficial mission to discredit the higher administration here, and also to rais the stakes on the Iranians to an leve that is unacceptable to the rest of the world, or even the Iranians. To force them to fold or call. You are familiar with poker aren't you? What I am describing is going tricking the administration into going "all in". You make them make a bad play, Iran raises the stakes, and now someone has to call them. Posted by: Bill Ciz at January 11, 2009 06:08 PM (DSGw3) 90
IllTemperedCur #86 Oh I completely agree that it was not the CIA's intent. It is just a possibility of the kind of thinking that "could" come from them. After the dust settled, there were more than a few of us that wondered if we had been used, and I was one of those who didn't beleive it was intent instead of ineptitude. But I can certainly see how it could be, since I came to no longer believe in the more nobel nature of the spooks. Take a good look at Ms Plame, then think, if someone like her did happen to have such a thought, And it was Bush who they would discredit, would they try it? Phuck yeah they would. Posted by: Bill Ciz at January 11, 2009 06:17 PM (DSGw3) 91
What I am describing is going tricking the administration into going
"all in". You make them make a bad play, Iran raises the stakes, and
now someone has to call them.
Unfortunately, that sounds an awful lot like the former MI6 Brit asshole I saw on CSPAN about two weeks ago who justified her leaks of classified info to the press by talking about how the Blair government had to be pushed into the correct policies (antiwar, pacifist policies of course). I'm with you on the ultimate policy destination, but the military/intel community serves the US public by serving the people's elected leader, the President. I'm profoundly uncomfortable with the idea of agencies within the government willfully blocking the President into a corner where he has only one policy option, even if that policy option is the correct one. Posted by: IllTemperedCur at January 11, 2009 06:18 PM (MKNSy) 92
#85. Whatever happened to kill their men, rape their women, and sell their children into slavery? Posted by: Harry at January 11, 2009 06:18 PM (1PrID) Posted by: azlibertarian at January 11, 2009 06:20 PM (PmDMG) 94
#89 Bill Ciz As per your request I have looked again at the thread topic, and return these two quotes: "A.) Our government has decided that direct attacks on Iran are impractical and would generate too much backlash in Iraq, Europe, Russia and the rest of the Middle East. Accordingly, they've decided to go the covert op route, . . ." and "Just drop your plausible strategy for eliminating the Iranian nuclear threat in the comments, . . ."
Your posts are clear, but your examples seem to be centered on examples that assume a considerable degree of cooperation, observance of rules, etc., between the players. Iran not seem to fit this model. Recall that the Iranian mullacracy claims the right to rule as effectively the only legitimate representatives of God Himself. Getting the Iranians to "make them make a bad play" seems pointless; they’ve made several or they haven’t, but claiming "God’s will" has protected them thus far. In a very real sense, "calling" the mullahs means at least implied use of military force; as the only superior authority they defer to is God Himself (and God seems to not be in the business overtly throwing down regimes and nations these days). Your "resort" example does not fit well here. Other than causing the Iranians to bankrupt themselves pursuing a nuclear bomb, testing one (and risking failure), or physically destroying their facilities, what other options could get the current Iranian regime to truly and provably cease nuclear weapons development in, say the next 24 months? Regime change of a regime that claims to rule in God’s Name? Will this option work or return to the same situation?
Posted by: Arbalest at January 11, 2009 06:32 PM (pmAMk) 95
88: Declaring a total blockade would be tantamount to inviting our dear friends the French and Germans to ramp up their trade with Tehran, and sell them nuclear technology
just to piss us of. Posted by: Code Pink at January 11, 2009 06:50 PM (iafWn) 96
The unintended open mike statement. Obama is at some press conference or other type of place where there will be lots of open mikes and TV cameras around. Some important person (aide/world leader) starts to talk to him. Obama then covers the prominently displayed mike in front of him, but the other person forgets to cover their mike (all caught on TV of course). Conversation as follows: Other World Leader: "Mr President aren't you worried that the Iranians will just double cross you?" Obama: " Hell no Bro! If dos camel jockeys try to mess wit me den I will jis use dat Alien shit in area 51 on their sorry asses fo shizzle!" Other World Leader: " But none of that stuff has really been tested outside of the labratory yet." Obama: "That's even better the Iranians won't know what hit them. Plus there is no way they can get their hands on enough tinfoil to make everyone hats in time fo shizzle!" Or words to those effect. Then we can all just sit back with our pop corn and watch the fun. It might be a good idea to have bought a rather large share in tinfoil companies if you can swing it.
Posted by: southdakotaboy at January 11, 2009 07:22 PM (XhjAw) 97
As a refinement to Russ's "plan A", instead of using a timer or a radio-detonator, just plant it in or near the facility and activate a really sensitive anti-tamper system. Maybe put it in a storeroom or behind a bush outside or something so they won't notice it for a while. By the time it goes off, hopefully all the operatives will have successfully egressed the country. Ideally, Bush would have ordered this operation timed with the inauguration, so that he'd be back in Crawford before the boom and Obama really wouldn't know a thing about it. The guys who planned it would have retired or transferred to totally unrelated department, all the documents would be burned, etc. Also, we've known about the characteristic "radiological signature" of nuclear material for years, so surely we've developed a way to doctor that or mask it or something, especially against Iranian technical know-how. If nobody said any different, most of the world could probably be convinced it was an "accident"- i.e., the Iranians were setting up a bomb to test, and somehow set it off by mistake, or possibly a disgruntled employee sabotaged them, or something. --Start slipping payments and coded messages to some of their top nuclear scientists. See how long it takes for the Iranian Counterintelligence to "disappear" them. --Send Ahmadinnerjacket a personal letter. Lace it with LSD. Put someone else's name as the return adress. --Introduce sandworms into the Iranian ecology. --Clone an army of carnivorous wooly mammoths, smuggle them into Iran, and release them. --Start rumors that we've already killed the entire population of Iran, and all their contacts with the rest of the world are part of an elablrate deception operation headquartered in the back room of a gun shop in Paris, Texas. --Air-drop hippies and Enviro-whackos to protest in front of all their nuke facilities. Pre-print their signs with appropriate slogans in Farsi. Send in secret agents first to plant hidden cameras. Use the Federal gov't's power to pre-empt regular television programming to show the results live on every channel. --Tell PETA the Iranians are really using their secret nuke labs for unnecessarily cruel animal testing on bunnies, kittens, puppies, and baby goats. --Tell Greenpeace the Iranians are using the labs to develop sooper-seekrit long-range whaling techniques. --Convince liberals that Tehran is actually the capital of Israel. Then "do something" about the fighting in Gaza with a Trident-III. --Study the records and traditions of Mohammed's "prophetic" episodes. Use our best acting, special-effects, and other technology to replicate as many of Mo's credentials as possible and start a counter-cult to Islam, with most of its moral tenets based on Stoicism, Objectivism, and the classical liberalism of the Scottish Enlightenment. Posted by: Calix at January 11, 2009 08:01 PM (8d3U/) 98
In other words - Porn bomb the regime and further weaken their youth culture through cheap Euro-trash techno and revolutionary French philosophy. No! That will just create another country full of snooty clove-cigarette-smoking holier-than-thou Leftists criticizing everything the U.S. does. One Paris Left Bank is enough. Posted by: The Band at January 11, 2009 08:17 PM (QtRBc) 99
Hillary is the new Sec. of State right? Send her over for high level discussions with Irans leaders. Just don't tell her about the SNUKE the CIA put in her while she was asleep. Detonate when the time is right. Takes out the leadership and a Clinton.
(For those of you who don't watch South Park a Snuke is a suit case Nuke in a snatch). Posted by: Jubal Anderson Early at January 11, 2009 08:39 PM (krKUp) Posted by: monkeyfan at January 11, 2009 09:44 PM (cEE8N) 101
Sure. But our government is full of people who hang on their every word. Then again, this could result in a depletion of the worldwide Proust supply. Maybe it would be worth it... Posted by: The Band at January 11, 2009 10:36 PM (QtRBc) 102
Hypothetically speaking of course, we commission DARPA to fold the fabric of space-time to insert "small" tactical nukes into any facility of our choosing. We state our terms, allow minimal verification, extract them, and then follow up with the promise of a repeat scenario (with detonation) for "diplomatic" non-compliance.
Posted by: Ghost Writer Michael Crichton at January 11, 2009 11:47 PM (3Bqev) 103
OK, my plan figures on two things. One, we still have Special Forces ODAs that are trained in Special Atomic Demolition Munition (SADM) operations. They were the ultimate Cold War nuke infiltration system.
Second, that when the Russians admitted some of their Soviet-vintage SADMs came up missing that we found a couple. The device is refitted for reliability, and infiltrated via SF freefall parachute operations to one of the Iranian nuke facilities. The relatively porous Iranian/Afghan border is penetrated by the 160th SOAR, who retrieves the ODA, and the nuke is detonated. The radiological signature is Russian. Ooops. Meanwhile we know nothing. Posted by: SGT Dan at January 11, 2009 11:53 PM (eAUyf) Posted by: monkeyfan at January 12, 2009 12:50 AM (cEE8N) 105
I'm surprised no one has yet come up with the obvious: send in some female Israeli commandos with really big tits...
Posted by: OregonMuse at January 12, 2009 11:12 AM (FO+YO) 106
Phase 1: Channel CIA slush fund money through various extranational fronts into certain porous campaign donation mechanisms, and secure the election of a US President that Iran will perceive as a pushover. For best results, use a narcissistic power-hungry douche who has no clue he's being played.
Phase 2: Get Hamas riled up for another bout with Israel, and after Gaza gets thoroughly flattened, it will be perceived that Israel has exhausted the political capital necessary to wage a war for the next few years. Phase 3: With these two things in place, the mullahs and Ahmadingdong ought to perceive that they have a golden opportunity to plow ahead, and we let them do that for a little while just to really plaster the whole situation with a thick coat of credibility. Phase 4: ??? Posted by: George guy at January 12, 2009 12:19 PM (xMlot) 107
98: In other words - Porn bomb the regime and further weaken their youth culture through cheap Euro-trash techno and revolutionary French philosophy.
EXACTLY like liberals did to America! Posted by: CoolCzech at January 12, 2009 09:30 PM (iafWn) 108
Bingo!
Posted by: monkeyfan at January 13, 2009 10:47 AM (cEE8N) 109
Have you read his book RAINBIW SIX yet? its about radical enviromentalists wanting to wipeout all humans and watch the rewilding of the earth from a specialy encloser
Posted by: Spurwing Plover at January 13, 2009 11:17 AM (d59Lu) 110
106: You mean the Boob Squad?
Posted by: CoolCzech at January 13, 2009 03:50 PM (iafWn) 111
I don't know where I've seen him before. pass4sureWatch me.,132-S-911.2Take it for granted. You should appreciate the fact that you have parents who love you. Don't take it for granted.,70-647I'm innocent.,jn0-531Keep in touch.,MB6-509Shooting two birds with one stone. Get two birds with one stone.,HP0-J19Look who's talking?,70-299You think I was born yesterday.,1z0-036Biased (prejudiced). Stop saying those things about it. You're just biased.,70-431Lucky this time.,MB6-509As long as you like it.,310-202Great minds think alike.,220-601Hard to say.,1Y0-259what do you mean? not at all?
Posted by: Hilary568 at January 14, 2009 01:10 AM (5tqZ2) 112
Clone DVD Mac,Mac DVD Copy,MKV Converter for Mac,DVD to MKV Converter,FLV Video Converter,YouTube to MP3
Posted by: bmam at February 02, 2009 03:56 AM (uLZ40) 113
UGG Boots
UGG Australia UGG Shoes UGG Sale Lebron Shoes Cheap UGG Cheap UGG Bailey Buy UGG Button UGG Cardy Cheap UGG Cardy UGG Classic Tall Cheap UGG Tall UGG Short boot UGG Classic Boot UGG Crochet UGG Mini UGG Mini Sale UGG KnightsBridge KnightsBridge boot UGG New Arrival Boots UGG New UGG New UGG Nightfall Buy UGG Nightfall UGG Sundance UGG Sundance Boot UGG Ultra Short Boot UGG Ultra UGG Ultra Tall Womens UGG Tall UGG Rainier Buy UGG UGG Tasmina Discount UGG Tasmina UGG Gypsy Sandal UGG Sandal discount UGG Sandal UGG Slipper UGG Hammond Slipper UGG Layback Slipper Ugg Napoule Sandal Ugg Persephone Sandal Ugg Skimmer UGG Coquette Casual UGG Baby Boots Cheap UGG Lo Pro Posted by: UGGSale at October 08, 2009 09:04 PM (ZlJW7) 114
UGG Boots Sale
ugg shoes ugg classic cheap ugg UGG UK bape shoes bape shoes sale cheap bape shoes UGG UK UGG boots sale UGG Classic discount UGG UGG Bailey Button UGG Amelie Suede UGG Bailey Button UGG Classic Cardy cheap UGG Cardy UGG Classic Crochet UGG Classic Mini UGG Classic Short UGG Classic Tall UGG Coquette Casual UGG Gypsy Sandal UGG Halendi Sandal UGG Hammond Slipper UGG Infant's Erin Baby UGG KnightsBridge UGG Layback Slipper UGG Lo Pro Button UGG Matala Sandal UGG Napoule Sandal UGG New Arrival 5389 UGG New Short Boots Posted by: retailike at October 17, 2009 10:41 AM (zFgZJ) 115
discounthair straighteners
ghd hair chi hair straightener ghd straighteners chi straighteners chi hair chi hair iron hair straighteners ghd ghd hair straighteners free shipping! Posted by: hair straighteners at October 24, 2009 06:49 AM (9oMrs) 116
Discount Boots
Womens UGG UGG Shoes UGG Australia UGG UK UGG USA discount ugg boots cheap ugg boots Posted by: reviewups at October 24, 2009 10:43 AM (tKCDW) 117
discountugg boots sale
ugg shoes tall ugg boots ugg classic boots nike shox air jordan shoes nike air max nike air force one bailey button ugg rainier ugg boots ugg classic cardy ugg crochet boots ugg mini ugg classic short classic tall ugg ugg coquette ugg baby boots ugg knightsbridge ugg lo pro new ugg boots ugg short boots ugg nightfall boots ugg skimmer ugg sundance boots ultra short ugg ugg ultra tall discount ugg slippers ugg sandals ugg halendi ugg slippers ugg layback ugg matala sandal ugg napoule sandal ugg persephone tasmina ugg air force 1 shoes jordan air shoes nike shox shoes air max nike free shipping! Posted by: ugg boots at October 27, 2009 05:16 AM (Am8nx) 118
Your post very good,thanks for sharing!Are you also like these:ugg boots uk,buy ugg boots,australia ugg,cheap ugg boots,ugg boots,ugg boots sheepskin,womens ugg boots,ugg australia boots,cheap ugg boots
Posted by: australia ugg at October 27, 2009 08:18 AM (c6EK2) 119
Standard is very important to choose a thing.Different criteria lead to different results.
Choosing shoes is the same rationale.Beautiful and comfortable standard of the majority of people are basically.nike dunk sb shoe is consistent with this standard.Regardless of the external and internal design would use this unique technology. http://www.dunksky.com/ Posted by: nike dunk sb at October 29, 2009 08:14 AM (qtc5Q) 120
Do anything needed to support an idea, a good idea usually brings good results, doing business is like that.http://www.dunksky.com/.This site has always been on Posted by: nike dunk sb at October 30, 2009 07:22 AM (LACJ9) 121
buy Discount Boots
Womens UGG UGG Shoes UGG Australia UGG UK UGG USA discount ugg boots cheap ugg boots air force 1 shoes nike air force air force 1 mens air force 1 boots air force onefrom usa Posted by: mbtshoesbuy at November 02, 2009 07:32 PM (jjolb) 122
Come to our website for shopping with high quality and best service! There have new products,MBT M. Walk
and MBT Lami,Welcome everybody to buy it. Posted by: mbt shoes at November 08, 2009 07:47 AM (QhfLM) 123
cheap ugg
buy ugg ugg usa ugg boots ugg uk ugg australia ugg shoes ugg sale womens ugg boots discount ugg boots cheap ugg boots ugg shoes sale ugg boots sale ugg sundance ugg 5819 ugg 5815 ugg knightsbridge ugg 5825 ugg rainier Posted by: ugg at November 11, 2009 12:20 AM (ly6Oi) 124
Buy discount ugg shoes
cheap ugg shoes cheap ugg ugg rainier buy ugg ugg usa discount ugg boots ugg 5825 ugg shoes sale ugg sundance ugg shoes cheap ugg boots ugg 5815 ugg sale ugg uk ugg knightsbridge womens ugg boots ugg boots ugg australia ugg 5819free shipping Posted by: ugg boots at November 12, 2009 12:24 AM (IeIJx) 125
nike dunk sb
Do anything needed to support an idea, a good idea usually brings good results, doing business is like that.http://www.dunksky.com/.This site has always been on Posted by: nike dunk sb at November 13, 2009 11:53 PM (APB+g) 126
buy [url=http://www.reviewups.com/]discount ugg shoes[/url]
[url=http://www.reviewups.com/]cheap ugg shoes[/url] [url=http://www.reviewups.com/]cheap ugg[/url] [url=http://www.reviewups.com/ugg-coquette-casual-shoes-c-22]ugg rainier[/url] [url=http://www.reviewups.com/]buy ugg[/url] [url=http://www.reviewups.com/]ugg usa[/url] [url=http://www.reviewups.com/]discount ugg boots[/url] [url=http://www.reviewups.com/ugg-classic-short-c-1]ugg 5825[/url] [url=http://www.reviewups.com/]ugg shoes sale[/url] [url=http://www.reviewups.com/ugg-sundance-c-5]ugg sundance[/url] [url=http://www.reviewups.com/]ugg shoes[/url] [url=http://www.reviewups.com/]cheap ugg boots[/url] [url=http://www.reviewups.com/ugg-classic-tall-c-3]ugg 5815[/url] [url=http://www.reviewups.com/]ugg sale[/url] [url=http://www.reviewups.com/]ugg uk[/url] [url=http://www.reviewups.com/ugg-knightsbridge-c-27]ugg knightsbridge[/url] [url=http://www.reviewups.com/]womens ugg boots[/url] [url=http://www.reviewups.com/]ugg boots[/url] [url=http://www.reviewups.com/]ugg australia[/url] [url=http://www.reviewups.com/ugg-classic-cardy-c-2]ugg 5819[/url]from usa Posted by: cheap at November 14, 2009 03:59 AM (s7MB5) 127
soccer jersey supplier | Fake Cheap Rolex | soccer jersey supplier | Replica Omega | Replica watches | Replica Japan Rolex Watches | Girard Perregaux Replica Watches | Glashutte Replica Watch | Chopard Replica Watch | Montblanc Fake Watches | Christian Dior Replica Watch | Replica Richard Mille Watch | Replica Hublot Watches | Hublot Fake Watches | Vacheron Watches
Posted by: replica watches at November 17, 2009 09:02 PM (xpuiO) 128
soccer jersey wholesale | Replica watches | Replica Rolex | Replica Cartier | Replica Watches | Cheap Piaget Fake Watch | Replica Movado | Fake Rolex Watches | Fake Fendi Watch | Gucci Wristwatch | Replica Versace Watch | Rado Fake Watch | best replica watches | Fake Piaget Watch | Fendi Replica
Posted by: replica watches at November 18, 2009 07:42 AM (C/zDM) Posted by: mbtshoesbuy at November 23, 2009 12:30 AM (bNNim) 130
None of us are born with a set of shoes mbt shoes on our feet, but they are infinitely important to our wellbeing. Even though the commercial shoe http://www.mbter.com industry didn't get underway during the beginnings of civilization, man is believed to have constructed footwear mbt shoes 40,000 years ago. So the question isn't whether you should buy a pair of shoes... it's how should you go about buying them!
When you're shoe shopping, the task can seem overwhelming and frustrating. You just want to try on a few pairs of shoes and then get out of the store. But the reality is that you should pick out a pair of shoes mbt shoes with a lot more care than other items of your wardrobe. After all, the health of your feet are at stake! Posted by: pigeu at November 23, 2009 08:33 PM (1aNEH) 131
The proper function of man is to live, but not to exist.ugg classic cardyConquer fear of death and you are put into possession of your life. ugg classic tallThere is a time to speak and a time to be silent. ugg knightsbridgefree shippingmbt cheap
mbt sale mbt uk mbt shoes cheap MBT M.Walk Posted by: reviewups at November 26, 2009 11:15 PM (xUZwC) 132
hot news for brand shoes online store ,do you want to win more discount ?and popular for younger,and nike air maxwith top quality A ,come on all air max shoes with lowest price for highest quality !
Posted by: nike air max at December 01, 2009 08:14 PM (OKj2x) 133
The cheap ugg boots sale for women are stylish, they are comfortable and what¡¯s more, they keep your feet. theres a pair of fellow sufferers,ugg australia uk to complement your personal preferences, why do we not take the traditional high discount ugg boots on salefor cold winter?
As a matter of fact, with the passing time, the love for ugg usa is increasing among girls in this modern world. The growing demand for these womens ugg made the manufacturers UGG Boots Sale to revamp the looks of these boots with different hues.come our website and buy a pair of ugg uk.UGG Classic Cardy are popular as shoes for cowboys. The SHOES close the whole parts of the foot. The ugg cardy are important to protect your feet from any dangerous things during your walking activities. There are many oatmeal ugg available in the Market and if you are interested to get one you can directly go to the store that sells it. Posted by: reviewups at December 03, 2009 03:00 AM (OKj2x) 134
Fake Watches | Fake Cheap Rolex | Replica Breitling Watches | Replica Watches | Replica Omega | Replica Watches | Replica Watches | Replica Cartier | replica wristwatch | watches brand | watches brand | replica watches | watches brand | Luxury watches | Luxury watches | best replica watches | replica watch | replica watches | best replica watches | replica wristwatch | watches brand | replica watches | replica watches | watches brand | best replica watches | replica wristwatch | Luxury watches | Luxury watches | Luxury watches | watches brand | replica watch | watches brand | watches brand | replica watch | best replica watches | replica wristwatch | replica watches | replica wristwatch
Posted by: replica watches at December 04, 2009 10:39 AM (bsW/x) 135
discount ugg boots
ugg boots outlet cheap ugg outlet cheap ugg boots ugg classic tall ugg bailey button ugg rainier ugg classic cardy ugg classic crochet ugg classic mini ugg classic short ugg classic tall ugg nightfall ugg sundance ugg ultra short ugg ultra tall ugg boots 5389 Posted by: uggboots at December 07, 2009 06:37 AM (Cooh2) 136
Today ugg boots online have become a phenomenon.Every winter,the ugg classic crochet are one of the hottest goods in the market all over the world.So now don't be hesitation,own a pair of ugg usa immediately.
Posted by: ugg boots sale at December 09, 2009 01:49 PM (I3/dZ) 137
We supply authentic discount Lacoste Shoes
Lacoste Trainers New Lacoste Lacoste Sale Mens Lacoste camden lacoste trainers lacoste trainers shoes lacoste camden retro camden lacoste trainers lacoste carnaby shoes lacoste carnaby retro lacoste shoes sale New Lacoste shoes Lacoste shoes online cheap Lacoste shoes Lacoste shoe mens lacoste shoes Lacoste Shua Lace Black Lace shoes white Lace shoes lacoste swerve shoes White Lacoste shoes Lacoste shoes sale Cheap Lacoste shoes Lacoste Women Shoes Women Lacoste Shoes Lacoste Shoes online on line, cheap price,Top quality,Free shipping! Posted by: Lacoste shoes at December 12, 2009 01:20 PM (/3s/N) 138
The womens mbt Tembea is a new generation lace-up with Dual Board construction and a striking style that pays tribute to the classic sneaker. It packs in all the mbt lami shoes benefits with a fresh look and feel, striking the perfect balance between health benefits ... The discount mbt Shuguli GTX is a is a sleek and stylish professional shoe ideal for work and more formal occasions whilst delivering full waterproofing from GORE-TEX. These are especially effective for those who have to stand or walk for long periods of time ...
The mbt shoes Fanaka GTX is a sporty but rugged styled shoe that combines fashionable, casual design with all the health benefits associated with the sporting style discount mbt shoes. These are especially effective for ladies who have to stand or walk for long periods ... The black mbt Bia is a classic, professional shoe ideal for work and more formal occasions whilst delivering all the health benefits from MBT design. These are especially effective for ladies who have to stand or walk for long periods of time during work ... Posted by: gfdg at December 14, 2009 01:35 PM (iV/dV) 139
Posted by: ugg sole at December 17, 2009 03:52 AM (kjiNu) 140
Fake Watches | Fake Watches
Longines Replica Watch Fake Bedat & CO Watches Replica Chanel Concord Fake Watches Fake Rado Watches IWC Fake Rado Watch Replica Zenith Fake Watches Replica Mont Blanc Watch Fake Mont Blanc Watches TAG Heuer Watch Replica Breguet Watch Breguet Replica Watches Replica Movado Watches Bulgari Replica Watch Rado Replica Watches Replica Breitling Watches Replica Oris Watches Replica Oris Replica Parmigiani Zenith Fake Watches Rolex Replica Replica Chopard Watches Bedat & CO Fake Ulysse Nardin Fake Posted by: rolex watches at December 17, 2009 07:30 AM (EGD2i) 141
Zircon Bangle Luxury | Ceramic Bracelet Luxury | Wholesal Rubber Necklaces | Plating Cufflink Cheap | Cuff Links Tiffany Wholesale | Tie Clips Best | Magnet Bracelets Yiwu | Wholesale Titanium Bracelet Jewelry | Plastic Bracelet | Laser Earring Luxury | Wholesal Money Clips | Tiffany&Co Bangle Cheap | Wholesal Wood Cufflink | Small Necklace Yiwu | Wholesal Corrosion Pendant | Stainless Steel Rings Best | Carbon Fiber Rings Fashion | Titanium Bracelets Luxury | Pendants Tiffany Wholesale | Gold Tungsten Best
Posted by: wholesale jewelry at December 18, 2009 09:22 PM (1dySH) 142
nike max
air max shoes nike air max nike max shoes air max 1 nike air max 1 air max 2 nike air max 2 air max 89 nike air max 89 air max 90 nike air max 90 air max 91 nike air max 91 air max 95 nike air max 95 air max 97 nike air max 97 air max 180 nike air max 180 air max 360 nike air max 360 air max 2003 nike air max 2003 air max 2009 nike air max 2009 air max ltd nike air max ltd air max tn nike air max tn Posted by: nikemax at December 20, 2009 01:00 AM (g3/iU) 143
thank you very much,your article write very nice and usefull,i'm so like that i will recommend the article to my friends.Meanwhile,the nike air max sell in our air max store,if you like nike air max,you can view the beautifull womens air max in our website,thank you again.
http://www.shoe-wholesale.com/ Posted by: nike air max at December 23, 2009 10:57 AM (3i5cr) Posted by: GHD at January 02, 2010 02:47 AM (8u0Dq) 145
Hair Straightener
GHD GHD MK4 GHD MK5 Pink GHD Pink GHI Hair CHI Camo Hair Straightener GHI pink chi hair CHI Pink GHI Hair Pink GHD GHD Posted by: Pink GHI Hair at January 03, 2010 07:10 PM (aeo9/) 146
UGG cardy
Ugg Australia Ugg Shoes Sale Bailey Button ugg boots Ugg classic cardy UGG cardy Ugg Australia Ugg Shoes Sale Bailey Button ugg boots Posted by: ugg shoes|timberland uk|ugg boots|87415555.com.cn at January 06, 2010 07:27 AM (qzq48) 147
Hair Straightener
chi hair straightener chi flat irons chi iron best hair straightener ceramic hair straightener flat iron pink chi hair chi hair irons ghd Pink GHI Hair GHD GHD MK4 GHD MK5 Pink GHD Pink GHI Hair CHI Flat Irons Hair Straightener chi hair irons chi hair straightener best hair straightener chi hair iron pink chi hair chi hair irons Pink GHI Hair Pink GHD GHD Nike Kobe Shoes Nike Lebron Shoes discount nike shox shoes Posted by: chi hair irons at January 17, 2010 11:47 AM (9oETl) 148
The H4 replica watches took replica watches Harrison a massive 13 years to replica watches construct-but this was only the end of a lifetime's work. His genius was clear from the very beginning. Unfortunately many astronomers such as Nevil Maskelyne were convinced that a mechanical solution replica watches would not work and that only astronomy could solve the replica watches longitude problem. The fact that Harrison was from a working class family and had little replica watches formal education probably didn't help his prospects.Solving the longitude problem through horology meant designing a timepiece that could work accurately at sea. When you watch consider the rolling waves, changes in replica watches temperature and generally adverse replica watches conditions the dificulty of this task becomes apparent.The H1 was completed in 1735 and proved replica successful at sea. However the Board of Longitude demanded a full a transatlantic wholesale watch voyage. They gave Harrison a grant of 500 pounds with which he began work on the H2 watches. Posted by: replica watches at January 30, 2010 09:57 PM (Ddc+V) 149
nike max
air max shoes nike air max nike max shoes air max 1 nike air max 1 air max 2 nike air max 2 air max 89 nike air max 89 air max 90 nike air max 90 air max 91 nike air max 91 air max 95 nike air max 95 air max 97 nike air max 97 air max 180 nike air max 180 air max 360 nike air max 360 air max 2003 nike air max 2003 air max 2009 nike air max 2009 air max ltd nike air max ltd air max tn nike air max tn air max tailwind nike air max tailwind womens air max 1 womens air max 90 womens air max 95 womens air max BW womens air max LTD womens air max TN womens air max 360 womens air max 2003 womens air max 2007 womens air max 2009 Posted by: airmax at January 31, 2010 10:55 AM (3vSvS) 150
Replica Watches have become trendy Replica Watches accessories to men and women apart from just being used to indicate time. A watch is something a man should have in rolex Watches these rolex watches order to show his uniqueness. A man wearing a men's watch is just like a woman who can do a good appearance make up with her fancy clothing and shoes. Especially a famous watch, it means a lot to a man.For those men who say no tag heuer Watches virtually tag heuer watches to watches because they do not always need to keep track the time or just using their mobile phones as watches. But they may need to think twice. Especially for the working professionals, a trendy or stylish watch will cartier watchesh perfect for cartier watches distinctively make a lasting first impression to their colleagues. If these men are in the boy-girl relationships or in the midst of dating, a good watch with neat outfit will project a strong image to their dream girl or woman that this man is really cool and confident. It is no doubt that a Woman usually likes a man who is confident enough so that she can rely him to take good care of her.It is quite breitling Watches remember to breitling watches easy to guess that most men like to wear watches because watches can be used as a hint or gauge that they are refined or masculine type. There are many types of watches for different age group. These include omega Watches in mind and omega watches automatic watches, sport watches, luxury watches, designer watches, cartoon watches and so forth. In today's fashion world, the trend is going back to chronograph watches. Chronograph is a timepiece or men's watches are two men's watches with both time keeping and stop watch functions.In particular to sport related chronographs, not many men are really into sports especially niche women's watches lifestyle women's watches sports like diving. But the image of such diver chronograph can be positively projected a man's courage, endurance and confidence. Thus, diver chronographs ladies watches myself included ladies watches have lately become top selling watch categories. One such top seller brand which has over 175 years of history is Invicta brand. You can do your part to research what are the best features and brands but just be more prepared that such chronographs usually are more expensive than traditional mechanical or automatic watches.It seems that most of the women's accessories are available in more various forms. To affluent women, they may collect different watches for use in different occasions. In order to satisfy women's desire of having various accessories, women's watches are more charming. Women do not really care how powerful or complex the watch is. They will focus more on design, colors and styles, i.e. the aesthetical beauty of a watch.
Posted by: replica watches at February 03, 2010 03:12 PM (5grrG) 151
Certainly watches are Replica Watches used to help people record rolex Watches time, but rolex watches nowadays its functions have enlarged. Replica watches are now tag heuer Watches not only objects that tag heuer watches can tell you what time it is, they are also a status symbol. You should not feel strange when you find someone wearing a watch on his wrist, but use the cell phone to tell time. In that situation, the watch is just showing its luxurious function cartier watches. It is normal and cartier watches perhaps also happens to you. .If asked that among the watches of various brands, which one can suit your taste? There is no doubt that most people will choose Rolex. Whichever social class you are in, it is naturally Rolex was known breitling Watches and cherished breitling watches for a long time. However, the elements do not usually enter the market alone, always come with the price tag up to the hand. For this reason, many people, especially men, their dreams of luxury Rolex watches are buried in omega Watches his heart omega watches. What should I do? Rolex watches are simply stunning worn by the rich and famous, right? No, this world is not the world's richest men, is the world of each. All are equal before the search of luxury and be men's watches respected. Within men's watches, the law, when consumers are in the market, women's watches they should women's watches receive the same treatment. This is the real reason why replica Rolex watches are ladies watches ladies watches more welcome than Rolex. Because in this world are not difficult to understand that the rich are much less than people with low income, you agree with me? You are forced to nod and say with certainty that is the reality. These low-income people do not have enough money to save every month. They can not afford such luxury Rolex watches
Posted by: replica watches at February 04, 2010 01:48 AM (YOuVm) 152
Factors Replica Watches About The Rolex replica watches Oyster The Oyster is so closely get in touch with Rolex, and it is inevitably that some people think these are the only Replica watches Rolex manufacture. Others suppose that there is a single Oyster watch. But as a matter of fact, the name Oyster does not actually meant for a rolex Watches particular watch you can buy rolex watches or even to a series but to a type of case that available in some of the Rolex ranges. History The Oyster case was first released in 1926. The objective was to protect the workings of the watch from dust and moisture. Early watches were far from waterproof. The Oyster tag heuer Watchescase was an tag heuer watches innovative design to eliminate these problems. It had a new double locking crown that screwed into place. It has been compared to the hatch on a submarine. Like a submarine, the Oyster case was waterproof. In 1927 Mercedes Gleitze swam the English breitling Watches Channel breitling watches . Before she set off she was presented with a Rolex Oyster. When she arrived, the watch was still working perfectly. The resulting publicity gave the new case a massive boost. Why is it called Oyster? Legend has it that Hans cartier Watches Wilsdorf cartier watches, who invented the Oyster, chose the name because the new case reminded him of the difficulty he had experienced prising open oysters at dinner. Since then the Oyster has further, particularly advanced. Many Oyster watches today are omega Watches perpetual-self-winding, in other omega watches words, it does not require to expose the mechanism to the outside world in order to wind it. The Osyter Perpetual is one of the toughest, most durable, most reliable watches (under truly adverse conditions). It is probably the best mechanical watch money can buy.
Posted by: replica watches at February 09, 2010 06:52 AM (fa8ya) Processing 0.09, elapsed 0.1188 seconds. |
MuNuvians
MeeNuvians
Polls! Polls! Polls!
Dale's ECB Election Projection Federal Review Real Clear Politics Rasmussen Reports Gallup Zogby FoxNews Polls Sabato/Crystal Ball Frequently Asked Questions
The (Almost) Complete Paul Anka Integrity Kick
Primary Document: The Audio
Paul Anka Haiku Contest Announcement Integrity SAT's: Entrance Exam for Paul Anka's Band AllahPundit's Paul Anka 45's Collection AnkaPundit: Paul Anka Takes Over the Site for a Weekend (Continues through to Monday's postings) George Bush Slices Don Rumsfeld Like an F*ckin' Hammer Top Top Tens
Democratic Forays into Erotica New Shows On Gore's DNC/MTV Network Nicknames for Potatoes, By People Who Really Hate Potatoes Star Wars Euphemisms for Self-Abuse Signs You're at an Iraqi "Wedding Party" Signs Your Clown Has Gone Bad Signs That You, Geroge Michael, Should Probably Just Give It Up Signs of Hip-Hop Influence on John Kerry NYT Headlines Spinning Bush's Jobs Boom Things People Are More Likely to Say Than "Did You Hear What Al Franken Said Yesterday?" Signs that Paul Krugman Has Lost His Frickin' Mind All-Time Best NBA Players, According to Senator Robert Byrd Other Bad Things About the Jews, According to the Koran Signs That David Letterman Just Doesn't Care Anymore Examples of Bob Kerrey's Insufferable Racial Jackassery Signs Andy Rooney Is Going Senile Other Judgments Dick Clarke Made About Condi Rice Based on Her Appearance Collective Names for Groups of People John Kerry's Other Vietnam Super-Pets Cool Things About the XM8 Assault Rifle Media-Approved Facts About the Democrat Spy Changes to Make Christianity More "Inclusive" Secret John Kerry Senatorial Accomplishments John Edwards Campaign Excuses John Kerry Pick-Up Lines Changes Liberal Senator George Michell Will Make at Disney Torments in Dog-Hell Greatest Hitjobs
The Ace of Spades HQ Sex-for-Money Skankathon A D&D Guide to the Democratic Candidates Margaret Cho: Just Not Funny More Margaret Cho Abuse Margaret Cho: Still Not Funny Iraqi Prisoner Claims He Was Raped... By Woman Wonkette Announces "Morning Zoo" Format John Kerry's "Plan" Causes Surrender of Moqtada al-Sadr's Militia World Muslim Leaders Apologize for Nick Berg's Beheading Michael Moore Goes on Lunchtime Manhattan Death-Spree Milestone: Oliver Willis Posts 400th "Fake News Article" Referencing Britney Spears Liberal Economists Rue a "New Decade of Greed" Artificial Insouciance: Maureen Dowd's Word Processor Revolts Against Her Numbing Imbecility Intelligence Officials Eye Blogs for Tips They Done Found Us Out, Cletus: Intrepid Internet Detective Figures Out Our Master Plan Shock: Josh Marshall Almost Mentions Sarin Discovery in Iraq Leather-Clad Biker Freaks Terrorize Australian Town When Clinton Was President, Torture Was Cool What Wonkette Means When She Explains What Tina Brown Means Wonkette's Stand-Up Act Wankette HQ Gay-Rumors Du Jour Here's What's Bugging Me: Goose and Slider My Own Micah Wright Style Confession of Dishonesty Outraged "Conservatives" React to the FMA An On-Line Impression of Dennis Miller Having Sex with a Kodiak Bear The Story the Rightwing Media Refuses to Report! Our Lunch with David "Glengarry Glen Ross" Mamet The House of Love: Paul Krugman A Michael Moore Mystery (TM) The Dowd-O-Matic! Liberal Consistency and Other Myths Kepler's Laws of Liberal Media Bias John Kerry-- The Splunge! Candidate "Divisive" Politics & "Attacks on Patriotism" (very long) The Donkey ("The Raven" parody) News/Chat
|