I'm so shocked!  Ann Coulter made a big fuss to draw attention to herself and her conveniently, coincidentally timed book release!

Who would ever expect such a thing from this paragon of virtue and tact.

Will we have another flame war today between the Ann supporters and opponents?

As for the issue of whether the whole thing was a put up job or not only Matt Drudge can answer that since he is the one who started that banned for life shit.

Cassius Clay vs. Clay Aiken.

I love AC.  I'd drink her bath water.

I'm so shocked!  Ann Coulter made a big fuss to draw attention to herself and her conveniently, coincidentally timed book release!

Who would ever expect such a thing from this paragon of virtue and tact.

Asshole. Ann didn't make a fuss - Drudge went with a story get got from sources INSIDE NBC, and NBC created the mess. If they really needed to run the Blair piece they put in Ann's alloted spot, all they needed to do was move it to a later slot. Done all the time. But no - they inserted other meaningless spots in her stead. Wonder why that was? Ya think they wouldn't give shithead Lauer a chance to preen before the cameras if it wasn't decided by upper echelons - as Drudge stated - to keep her off?

Quality Control for "Daily Kos"?

she alienates otherwise reasonable people who could be won to conservatism by being a shrill, off-putting provocateur who takes pleasure in sowing discord where there's already plenty.

Screw the people who don't base their politics on logic.  And she's definitely NOT shrill.

I'd eat the beans out of her shit.

Ann was interviewed by Hoda and Kathy Lee a few minutes ago.  At least, I think it was an interview.  Ann was talking but all I could hear from the other two were yips and barks.

I watched this at the gym this morning without sound and read the closed-captions. Do yourselves a favor. Watch the video without sound.

The bitch-slappiong body language is awesome.

And for my likin's, Coulter needs to eat a lot more pizza.

Yes we all saw how successful “being nice” and “crossing the aisle” was for the pussyfied Republicans in 06 and 08. The fact is that if the Republican Party would grown a pair And act like real conservatives we wouldn’t need Ann Coulter.

Seems like most conservative critics of Coulter oppose her disproportionate attack against the other side.

Look haters, don't you understand that we are supposed to be the party of perfect tolerance (i.e. the Doormat Party), so that the progressives like Michael Moore can set the agenda and don't get their feelings hurt?  Look at how many times Johnny McComity set the example us by praising his opponent, apologizing for people who criticized him, and refusing to bring up sordid things like his racist spiritual mentor.  Gosh, don't you feel proud of how well we take it on the chin and politely ask for more, while admitting it probably is all our fault anyway.

Is there a political equivalent to battered wife syndrome... perhaps Battered Party Syndrome!?

That's why I like AC... she doesn't put up with the excrement the MSM likes to shovel out and call truth, like so many of our "leaders" do.

I'm not sure Stewart belongs on that list. Yes, he skews way left but he is enough of a mainstream performer to play reasonably broad.

DrewM., I'm not following your point there.  What do you mean by that?

Seems like most conservative critics of Coulter oppose her disproportionate attack against the other side.

I think for most its the fact that her disproportionate attack is to go nuclear.  Might win the argument but for everyone looking on its not getting their support and possibly turning them the other way.

I love her bitch slapping NBC.  Drudge NEVER had to retract a story!  Oh, Matt, hear that again, I never had to retract a story like NBC.

How you like me so far asshole?

We need more of this, not less.  It takes a 90 pound woman to teach the rest of the conservatives to man up?

Let's not forget THIS is a WAR.  We lost that last battle, it is not over.  We need to regroup, and charge ahead!

Kemp

Too bad that this did not end with Matt Lauer getting hit with a chair.

It's a good day when he gets hit with a chair.

A very dood day.

By the way, I downloaded the unabridged audio version of the book from Audible last night for $20.  It's always a little odd to hear another voice reading Ann's words, but it's pretty good so far.

Kensington a link please!

Kemp

I think for most its the fact that her disproportionate attack is to go nuclear.

buzzion at January 07, 2009 01:06 PM (Lrsi6)

Got an example of going 'nuclear' or at least what I expect we will disagree on as being 'nuclear' ?  

Posted by: The Committee to Keep Conservatives Out of Power Forever"

Give me a break, please.  AC is notable because she's one of the very few conservatives who'll fight back.

There are so many assholes on the Left, it's not funny.  Do they ever worry about chasing people off?  Uhm, no.  Are they out of power forever?  Err, no.

There's about 2.1 bombthrowers on the Right.  There are millions on the Left.  Doesn't seem to be hurting their popularity.

i.e., strong women get targeted and have to put up with a lot of shit from guys who have the need to prove something.

As opposed to weak women who aren't being targetted because they aren't even trying to put themselves out there?  Could it be possible that the guys are criticizing her because she is actually putting herself out there, and they are treating her with an equality in mind i.e., "I don't like her methods so I will speak my mind about her the same as I would another guy."

Ann sure isn't going to help the GOP's outreach efforts to moderates and minorities.

The GOP tried that with McCain and look what that got us.

Back to the overarching point of the Coulter / Lauer face-off:

 Who had the prettier dress -- Ann or Matt?

If Ann Coulter is allowed on the channels owned by NBC Universal, then it's possible, just possible, that she's the twelfth Cylon.

I can take Ann in small doses.  

But man did she hammer the liberal glorification of single moms.  LOVED IT.

Please, Coulter gets targeted because she throws things at people and then jumps up and down saying, "I did that, I did that, come and get me!!!!" And if they don't 'target her' she does it again only with bigger stuff and louder.

Its only Jan 7th and we already have the most ironic post of the year winner.

Posted by: Unclefacts at January 07, 2009 01:39 PM (M+Vfm)

I didn't say it was a bad thing.

Got an example of going 'nuclear' or at least what I expect we will disagree on as being 'nuclear' ?  

Not really.  I'm merely applying your analogy of disproportionate attack.  Because it doesn't really seem that most of the critics are in disagreement with her or believe she is wrong.  So it would have more to do with methodology.  My reasoning of using 'nuclear' is because I believe if for instance the US were to have started dropping atomic bombs on afghanistan it would have turned more people away from the US than to them, while a more conventional disproportionate response wouldn't do that.

No. If you haven't notice that the criticisms of her in this thread are pathetic and if they were directed at a guy, they would be laughed at.

She's abrasive, is more of a hinderance than a positive in the promotion of conservativism, is more out for the promotion of herself and making money than in furthering conservativism as a whole, and the left likes to use her as a caricature to bash all conservatives, are all things that if they were directed towards a guy would be laughed at, huh?  Yeah sure.

I neither love nor hate Coulter.  She's an entertainer.  But I do like the fact that she has the balls to be entirely unpolitically correct and get right up in the grills of liberals and call them on their obvious bias and lies.  We sit and here and do it in a vacuum, Ann has the guts and yeah, talent even if you don't like the style, to do it with a national following.

Some of the stuff she does makes me cringe.  So what.  Some of the stuff lesser lights on our side of the aisle makes me cringe.  And much of the stuff our so called leaders makes me furious.  At least I don't have to worry what side Ann will come down on.

Plus, she's a Deadhead so that gets big marks with me.

buzzion at January 07, 2009 01:44 PM (Lrsi6

I understand what you meant but for it to be a correct analogy there has to be an example of what you consider Coulter's 'nuclear' methodology as opposed to as you put it, a 'conventional disproportionate' methodology.

  I agree that Ann sticks her neck out there a bit more than a prudent person should, but the problem with that isn't so much what she says but the fact that damn few of the Media's "House Conservatives" are willing to back her up when the facts are on her side.

  And there's where she gets me:  The facts are usually on her side.  If the argument comes down to sizzle vs. steak, I'll take the steak every damn time.

  I don't think that every one of her critics is a misogynist, and I'll listen to their criticism with an open mind.  I'm just glad that Ann apparently doens't listen to their criticism.

No. If you haven't notice that the criticisms of her in this thread are pathetic and if they were directed at a guy, they would be laughed at.

True dat.  And from some of the same guys who gleefully call libs "cockholster" in the cozy confines of AoSHQ.  Fuck that.  If you're not prepared to say it to someone's face, don't act like you have a pair.  For example, I wore this shirt to the gym this morning and the girl at the desk got all pissy and said, "What is that supposed to mean?"  Self-explanatory, kitten.  Now gimme a towel and make me a fucking turkey pot pie while I get my swell on.

If the posters and commenters here had the audience that Ann Coulter does, would you be yourself or an NRO-style pussy who's worried about Peggy Noonan's disapproving gaze? 

Ann Coulter serves a purpose - energizing the base.  And HER readers get out and fucking vote.  Blame Noonan's readers for suppressing Republican votes.  If your fantasy is George Will tying you to the bedframe with his bowtie, fine.  I shit on you, but fine.  Ann Coulter is pulling freight for our team. How much do the country club conservalibs at NRO pull?

Jack Straw @ 98:  you wrote yours while I was writing mine @ 105.  Looks like we said the same thing only with different words.

Cool.

Feh.  As an aging childless female she may have issues with all moms, but knows that only single moms are an acceptable target.

Issues with ALL moms?   Dude, really. 

Who would by the memoirs of someone who's never done a thing in his life?

Present!  My Life and Times. 

Obama doesn't like Coulter?  That makes me like her.

Russ from W-

I love bacon so we he have that too.

And here I thought you were talking about an equal comparison plover.  I didn't realize that my standing as a commenter on a blog was equivalent to Coulter's standing as a best selling author that gets television appearances.

If there were a guy out there doing what Coulter does, I believe he would get the same amount of negative views from conservatives, and even more from liberals since that joke comment about what calling Edwards a certain name, would have ended a guy's career.

A guy would receive the same criticism here, though I doubt you would be attempting to defend that guy by claiming something like: "Coulter is good looking" as you did in your defense of her.

  Drew, I think you've got a point there with the 30/30/40 math, but what portion of the undecided vote do you REALLY think bases their vote solely on their disgust over Ann Coulter going too far?

  Now, if EVERYONE on the Republican side of the aisle were to act like Ann 24/7, that might work to turn off a significant portion of the base, if they said something that was blatantly untrue or flagrantly unfair.

  My theory on undecided voters who say things like "I was going to vote for (insert generic (R) here), but when Ann Coulter said that thing on Hannity and Colmes, I decided to vote for (insert generic (D) here) as a protest."?

  They really weren't all that "undecided" in the first place.  They just needed an excuse. 

Icus quoting Obama on Coulter. Delicious.   Obama's man tits couldn't even begin to fit in Coulters law school bra.  When she was the editor of the Michigan Law Review she wrote peer reviewed papers.  She doesn't have to hide her grades from her undergraduate school, Cornell, where was cum laude.  She didn't do half ass legal work when she graduated and let people think she was a full time law professor. 

Posted by: DrewM. at January 07, 2009 02:02 PM (hlYel)

BZZZZZZZZT!!!  Dead fuckin' wrong, Drew.  The problem over the last 20 years is that liberals have been allowed to define conservatives.  And they have been tremendously successful at doing so.  Conservatives are old, white, male, square, rich, greedy, selfish, planet-raping assholes.  Turn on any channel.  It's in the zeitgeist.

And it happened while firebrands from the left screeched and jumped up and down like fucking howler monkeys, pissing all over the conservative brand - Completely. Fucking. Unchallenged.

Ann Coulter does what they do - she defines liberals.  Their worldview is immature, selfish and dangerous, and the actions they have taken to grab and maintain power are reprehensible.  So what's wrong with bashing them over the head with a fucking shovel?  I'm not saying that's the only tool in my truck, but it's a valuable one. 

Why don't you step back a bit - you're standing on her dick and that makes it harder for her to cockslap liberals like they so desperately need to be cockslapped.

I understand what you meant but for it to be a correct analogy there has to be an example of what you consider Coulter's 'nuclear' methodology as opposed to as you put it, a 'conventional disproportionate' methodology

I was merely giving a possible view of why some people aren't in favor of her disproportionate attacks.  You yourself claim that is exactly what she does.  I'm looking more at "why" as opposed to "when."  I'm personally not really a fan of Coulter because her voice and laugh tends to annoy me, so I don't watch her on tv.  And political books aren't what I want to spend my additional free time reading so I don't read her books.  When I do catch blurbs of her writings or on tv I do tend to agree with her, but I can understand why others might be getting turned off by her methodology.

I just I wish she wasn't the most visiable conservative pundit in the country because her style isn't geared to winning people over

How would you know, Drew?  That last time we "won people over" was in 1980 and 1984 with crushing landslides from Ronald Reagan doing exactly what Ann Coulter does:  defining liberals as the foolish assclowns that they are and contrasting it with solid conservative principles.

Sure, he used less hyperbole, but he took after liberals with a sharp fucking stick, let's not kid ourselves.  So now her style isn't geared to winning people over?  Horseshit.

Playing to the middle has been the biggest recipe for failure in the last two election cycles and only having a hot war kept Bush from losing to Kerry.  And the one before that was a squeaker almost dropped to a fucking insane man.

I'd argue the problem with conservatives Republicans is that over the last 10 years elected conservatives Republicans became big government advocates almost indistinguishable from big government liberals.

FTFY.

Quite frankly in a world of unlimited spending, regulations and bailouts* approved on Republican/conservative watches, we have a substance, not image problem.
*Full disclosure, I reluctantly supported the original bank bailout.  I did not and do not support these other industry bailouts.

I agree with that, but then again, that makes YOU part of that substance problem.

Coulter is neither our biggest problem or best solution.

But she is part of the solution.  The problem is RINOs and wobbly "conservatives" who jump at liberal solutions when the going gets rough to make it look like they're "doing something."

What I say:

When I see Ann Coulter or Sean Hannity Barry baying shuttering and bumbling across the television screen, I find it hard to take them him seriously; I assume they he must be saying what they do primarily to boost book sales or ratings he does to bullshit the braindead of this country into believing empty slogans, although I do wonder who would spend their precious evenings with such sourpusses be that fucking stupid to believe any of the stuttering bullshit that comes out of his mouth then remember all of the braindead Oprah followers and other assorted mindless wonders in this country.

buzzion, I don't know what you are talking about most of the time. You're all over the place. As a blog commenter, who are you to say she can't promote her book on a book tour?

Where did I say she isn't allowed to promote her book?  You're the one equating me to her in promoting conservatism.  And I was only using that as an example of the criticism of Coulter.  Are you really going to say that no one here has ever been critical of a male conservative because they are more about promoting themselves than conservative causes? 

As far as Edwards goes, Lord knows we never heard a joke regarding his sexuality before Coulter! Oh, no! Tell that to Ingram, Malkin, Ace, etc.

And they cracked the jokes on television when?  If it was a guy that had done what Coulter did in that situation it would have severely damaged him and likely have been career suicide.

And I said Coulter is good looking as a response to the ad nauseum comments regarding her looks that are mandatory when her name gets mentioned. How many guys get called skanky? Seems like a double standard.

Who has called her skanky here?  Or even close to that?  Most negative comments about her looks I've seen minus the trolls have come after multiple comments about how smokin' hot she is and not used as a reason not to listen to her.  Do you want to talk about all criticisms of her, or just those that are being brought up here?  Because I'm talking about criticisms brought up here, none of which would be laughable if used against a guy.

The left sure thinks Ann is damaging to conservatives, they have her on all the time.  I don't see the MSM calling Sowell up as the face of conservatism.

ABC answered their own question with some expert who opined "Well, with things like Bristol Palin, Juno and [I forget what else he said] it makes it look like teen pregnancy is okay".

Don't they count teen pregnancies based on births of children to teen mothers?  How is it that a girl who the world didn't find out was pregnant until the end of August making it look like teen pregnancy is okay causing the increase?  He'd have had a better argument if he used Britney Spears' younger sister as his example, but that wouldn't allow him to get his jab in.

Drew, I think you need a refresher on Reagan's philosophy and quite possibly some ideological spine-stiffening.  I recommend reading Reagan's "Time for Choosing" speech.

"They say the world has become too complex for simple answers. They are wrong. There are no easy answers, but there are simple answers. We must have the courage to do what we know is morally right."

Courage.

From USA Today:

Sarah Brown, CEO of the National Campaign to Prevent Teen and Unplanned Pregnancy, says she is less inclined to believe abortion is driving higher teen birth rates and suggests that increases in high-profile unmarried births in Hollywood, movies and even politics is a significant factor for impressionable teens.

"In the last couple of years, we had Jamie Lynn Spears. We had Juno and we had Bristol Palin. Those three were in 2007 and 2008 and not in 2005 to 2006, but they point to that phenomenon," she says.

So preggers teens can see into the future.

Who knew?

  Is it just me, or is there some significant irony in Drew Fucking M. getting called out here for being too much of a McCain-esque RINO?

  Jesus, if you go back in the archives here at the AoSHQ, you'll find multiple instances of Drew (and me, but since I don't post as much as he does, he caught the majority of the fire) being called out as a defeatist for not drinking the McCain Kool-Aid.

  C'mon people:  He's not calling her a tranny.  He's just saying that she's a little more polarizing than what he'd like to see from one of the public faces of the Republican Party.  Actually, more accurately as a public face of the "Conservative Movement", but since the (D) party has an atmosphere poisonous to conservatives at this time the two are unfortunately linked...for now.  He's not calling for everyone to bend over & lube up like McCain is getting ready to do for the Dems.  There's one hell of a lot of "thoughtspace" between Coulter & McCain, and the perfect republican advocate would be found in this area.

  (of course, this "perfect advocate" would be one HELL of a lot closer to Coulter intellectually and publicly than they would be to McCain) 

I'd argue the problem with conservatives is that over the last 10 years elected conservatives became big government advocates almost indistinguishable from big government liberals.

I would argue that they were never conservatives to begin with. The ones who did that are like that asshole Lindsey Graham who ran as a conservative Republican then crawled up McLame’s ass and became just another liberal sellout. The when he had a challenge in this past election’s primary he rigged the election so that it became difficult for people to vote for his opponent. Not to mention the fact that the polls in one of the heaviest populated districts were shut down due to lack of ballots.

I also do not buy into that 40% myth, or even 30% as I have also heard. I think that if you really could look at what people do instead of what they say you will find that there are probably only about 5% of the regular voters who flop around like the brainless maggots that they are. My belief is that the other 95% of the voters are either registered with one party or the other or are independents who always vote for the same party all the time.

The things that decides the election is NOT whether you can get that last brainless idiot to make up his or her mind, its whether or not you can turn out YOUR party’s voters. If the people who normally vote for your party stay at home because the candidate is a fuckwad sellout then you are going to lose.

The squishy Republicans have tried to run to that squishy mythological center twice now and lost both times. If they try it again, they will in fact cease to be a mainstream party and go the way of the Whigs.

@111

"I'm sorry but for all of Coulter's many talents and successes, she's not helping a lot with that 40% and even hurts somewhat. Again, it's not her job to help. That's my only point about her. I don't like that she is what a lot of people in that 40% group think of when they think of conservatives. That's simply a function of her success.

your proof is what?

i'll side with substance over personality everytime...drew you're a fuckin rino

Drew, would it be fair to say that Coulter herself and the MSM's caricature of Coulter are two separate people?

I think you're spot on in thinking that the caricature of AC is helping drive the mushy middle away from Republicans, but since that persona is a creation of the MSM then it's a little unfair to blame her for what the media's Eva Braun fembot does to the conservative cause.

  I think that part of the perception of Ann being too extreme comes from her willingness to go ANYWHERE to argue politics with ANYONE.  When you end up arguing foreign policy with noted intellectual D.L. Hughley on the Bill Maher show, sometimes the ugliness exhibited by your opponents gets attributed to you.  It ain't fair, but it's fact.

  I'm not saying that she shouldn't take the hard jobs, but her public persona is going to be affected by who she matches up with; and unfortunately for her (and the rest of us on the right), the typical strategy of most of the cable screamers is to try to outnumber & outshout her instead of outthink her.

"I don't think she's fundamentally different on the Today Show then she is on Hannity."

  True, but at least Hannity will let her complete a sentence so that's she's not as likely to be taken out of context.  Everytime I see her interviewed by Matt Lauer or his ilk, it's like a Minnesota Senate Recount.  They want to hear what she says, right up 'til she utters a couple of words that they can twist around.  Then they stop listening.

Liberal Flack:  "So Ann, do you really think that liberals all hate America?

Ann:  "Well, when you say liberals hate America...

Liberal Flack:  "WAIT A MINUTE, DID YOU JUST SAY THAT LIBERALS HATE AMERICA?  HOW DARE YOU, MS. COULTER!  HOW DARE YOU!"

Plus, Maddow's a chick.  The minute someone starts to get the best of her intellectually, it'll be that scene in "Stripes" where John Candy's finally fighting back against the lady mud wrestlers.

  "You HIT me!  And I'm a girl!"

Plus, Maddow's a chick. 

Posted by: Russ from Winterset at January 07, 2009 04:10 PM (dyz/7)

Prove it.

I don't know about you guys, but I'd rather have Ann Coulter on TV attracting attention, selling books, and proving what fools our opponents are rather than have to help kill a couple million people in American Civil War Part II.

I don't know, SGT Dan, I started to plump a little from reading that, to be honest.  But I'm with you.  No slack.

Because Fuck Them, That's Why.™

Look, to show there's no hard feelings, I'm sending everyone a bootleg copy of the movie Milk.  I promise Sean Penn gets shot and killed.

Ann is the best.  She writes about what she believes which isn't far from my principles.  Her books are based on jarring yet intuitively truthful observations.  She is more exotic than beautiful but very feminine which seems to clash monstrously with her pronouncements sometimes.  That clash is hilarious.  The world would be a better place if she and P. J. O'Rourke formed a team.  Speaking of which, has the moonbat Maher ever booked either on his dhimmi-fest?  Suspect the craven metrosexual wouldn't dare.

She's one of the reasons conservatives have to be so defensive. 

I respectfully disagree.  Most conservatives (even those in the public eye) are polite, respectful and rational, yet libs and the MSM take the few extreme conservatives and purposefully uphold them to represent us all.  Or yet they even (!) make things up about us.

I repeat, being quiet and rational has gotten us nada.  We know we are right.  Why should we be quiet about it?

#101, rinse and spit,

Hear, hear. The left has many, many voices of venom and hate which are so prevalent and loud that someone equivalent to Coulter on the left would be considered a "moderate" voice. 

Just last night Letterman noted that Laura Bush is writing her memoirs. Then he oh, so cleverly informed the oh, so sophisticated, hip crowd that it will be called "I'm With Stupid."

I've read several of Coulter's books and have seen her on TV, heard her on the radio numerous times. I've never seen or heard anything from her on cable or radio that was more nasty than Letterman's remark on a national, big 3 TV show seen by millions. Ann is considered polemic because she is a conservative spokesperson. If she were a leftist she would be right in the middle of the pack somewhere.

Now, I know we are supposed to be better than they are and the voice of reason. But having a few people who can come out with quick, hard, cutting humor with an edge to it that can provide a counterpoint to this stuff is a good thing IMO. Just as Osama Bin Laden said, people will always look for a strong horse. And after a while, if bullies and jerks aren't shamed (libs have no shame, it can't be done) or put firmly in their place; the person or group being bullied begins to look weak and pathetic instead of reasonable. And the bullies, mockers, jerks, whatever attract more and more (weak) people to join in, the longer it goes on.

Get in my face once and insult my family and belief system, I might ignore you, thinking I misheard you or that you weren't worth listening to. Do it twice, who knows, depending on the situation, I might buy you a beer so we can talk it over and see if I've misinterpreted something and if we can find some common ground somewhere. Do it three times and I might just ruin your day so it will never, ever happen again. Sorry for the lack of nuance and compassion and poor analogy, but we are way past the third time with the libs.

Um, people who complain that Coulter is the "queen of conservatism" don't get it. Its the MSM who makes her that. If she wouldn't do it, they'd find someone else. Would you really rather have the MSM select some stammering NRO wimp as their queen of conservatism?

As far as I'm concerned, the worst thing about Ann Coulter is she's so entertaining to watch she improves the ratings of the MSM shows she's on. Ron Paul would never do that.

Do you smell that?

Shill, i'm also calling bullshit on your "book review."  You didn't address a single point in it, just copy-and-paste generalities before you move on to your intellectual superiority, making YOUR post boring and trite.

Al Franken at least attempted to fisk her.  He at least deserves respect for trying to make his way, toolshed.

Um, people who complain that Coulter is the "queen of conservatism" don't get it. Its the MSM who makes her that. If she wouldn't do it, they'd find someone else.

Same with Sarah Palin.  And for 99% of America, the ones who tune in 1 week before election time, she was portrayed as dumb, uniformed, uninterested with a freaky deaky family and despite her popularity with many core conservatives, she has a very negative appeal with the larger voting public.  That's partially McCain's fault, partially the MSM and partially hers.

You, Shill, should know this better than anyone.  You, er, shilled for her from the day she was named and fought against the MSM even when she shot herself in the foot with dumbass things like "the real America" or horrid interviews.  Did the MSM help her?  Of course not.  Name a conservative they do?  But you adore Palin, a woman of some accomplishments and bash the hell out of Coulter who has many accomplishments because you like one and don't like the other.  That's fair.  But it doesn't give you the postion to same who is a true conservative and who isn't.

Some contribute to the cause in different ways.  One is an entertainer and one is a politician but they get treated the same by the MSM whenever they say something that doesn't meet their bar.  Ann reacts as an entertainer, which is just what she is, and Palin reacts like a politician, which is just what she is.  And if the test is which attracts more people to the party, not excite the base, you'd be hard pressed to prove that Palin's politcally correct way is any more successful than Coulter's.  Hell, given her huge popularity and duration of her career, you'd be hard pressed to prove that Palin does more to excite the base.

A lot of pussy Republicans resented the twinkle in Sarah Palin's eye as she twisted the knife.

I senseing a "Republican Pussy Pattern".

Note to Drew and others:  Check your balls, they may have retreated into your body cavity.

Ann is on TV for one reason. Ratings. People watch her. No interest, no interviews.

Besides, Who is the perfect Conservative (living)?

Fuck!

I promise, I sincerely feel sorry for you and will even say a stupid little prayer for you instead for my arteries after the steak/sex I have planned for the evening.

Say hi to Rosie and her 5 sisters for me

In all the above comments I haven't seen any post about how Matt Lauer would ask Coulter a question and not allow her to answer.  He interrupted her repeatedly.  I hate it when the host talks over the guest.  He was as hostile with Coulter and Gibson was with Sarah.  This is how the libs work.  They try to  defang the conservatives and they show their contempt more with women than with men.

I like Anne Coulter.  I don't think she is abrasive enough.  I want her to tell the libs what they are.. Every time her name comes up on the righty blogs there are some eople who say in so many words she's not "nice".  She's not "polite".  Nice and polite to these people means let the libs walk all over you and use you like a doormat.  As a oister abive saud "we need a hundred just like her"..

@ Warden, Hog, Unclefacts, kdabear, OregonMuse, et. al...

Harumph! Harumph!

What you said.

Because Fuck Them.

Of course its all a lie, NBC wouldn't distort or ban conservatives.  What would ever give you such a silly idea when they can employ people like

Matthews and Obermensch?

Do anything needed to support an idea, a good idea usually brings good results, doing

/>

business is like that.http://www.dunksky.com/.This site has always been on

Do anything needed to support an idea, a good idea usually brings good results, doing

business is like that.http://www.dunksky.com/.This site has always been on

Posted by: wholesale jewelry at December 17, 2009 06:57 AM (1dySH)

Posted by: nikemax at December 20, 2009 01:07 AM (g3/iU)

Posted by: wholesale jewelry at December 20, 2009 07:04 AM (1dySH)

Posted by: nike air max 360 shoes at December 22, 2009 11:21 AM (xnxK1)

Posted by: nike air max at December 23, 2009 11:15 AM (3i5cr)

Posted by: wholesale jewelry at December 28, 2009 01:18 AM (1dySH)

Posted by: GHD at January 02, 2010 03:04 AM (8u0Dq)

Posted by: nike high dunk at January 02, 2010 03:06 AM (8u0Dq)

Posted by: replica watches at January 05, 2010 08:40 AM (ndMAX)

Posted by: ugg shoes|timberland uk|ugg boots|87415555.com.cn at January 06, 2010 07:43 AM (qzq48)

Posted by: El temporal de fr¨ªo y nieve pone en alerta a once comunidades aut¨®nomas ugg boots|ugg uk|timberlan at January 08, 2010 09:42 AM (tWrEP)

Posted by: wedding gowns at January 25, 2010 09:23 PM (bBg/v)

Posted by: guess watches at January 28, 2010 11:16 AM (9vkhz)

Posted by: dkny watches at January 29, 2010 10:03 AM (AcMLr)

Posted by: replica watch at January 30, 2010 08:32 AM (AcMLr)

Posted by: replica watches at January 30, 2010 09:41 PM (Ddc+V)

Posted by: airmax at January 31, 2010 11:02 AM (3vSvS)

Posted by: citizen watches at February 01, 2010 09:00 AM (AcMLr)

Posted by: replica watch at February 02, 2010 01:12 PM (CPNio)

Posted by: replica rolex at February 03, 2010 01:48 PM (CPNio)

Posted by: replica watches at February 03, 2010 02:57 PM (5grrG)

Posted by: replica watches at February 04, 2010 01:21 AM (YOuVm)

Posted by: breitling watch at February 04, 2010 01:29 PM (CPNio)

Posted by: fashion news at February 05, 2010 04:19 AM (ARptk)

Posted by: may at February 06, 2010 01:03 PM (Eu9Vs)

Posted by: rolex at February 06, 2010 07:07 PM (TUJDt)

Posted by: replica watches at February 07, 2010 03:56 AM (TUJDt)

Posted by: breitling watches at February 08, 2010 02:25 AM (TUJDt)

Posted by: omega watch at February 09, 2010 10:00 AM (fa8ya)

Processing 0.12, elapsed 0.1301 seconds.
15 queries taking 0.0137 seconds, 316 records returned.
Page size 266 kb.
Powered by Minx 0.7 alpha.