Support




Contact
Powered by
Movable Type

Democrats and "Torture:" In for a Penny, In for a Pound

Yes, by all means, let us get to the bottom of who was responsible for this unconstitutional, illegal, barbaric regime of "torture."

The briefings [about aggressive interrogation techniques of high-level Al Qaeda, including, specifically, waterboarding] were first available to the Chairmen and ranking Members of the Intelligence Committees. From 2003 through 2006, that gang of four included Democrats Bob Graham and John D. Rockefeller in the Senate and Jane Harman in the House, as well as Republicans Porter Goss, Peter Hoekstra, Richard Shelby and Pat Roberts. Senior staffers were sometimes present. After September 2006, when President Bush publicly acknowledged the program, the interrogation briefings were opened to the full committees.

If Congress wanted to kill this program, all it had to do was withhold funding. And if Democrats thought it was illegal or really found the CIA's activities so heinous, one of them could have made a whistle-blowing floor statement under the protection of the Constitution's speech and debate clause. They'd have broken their secrecy oaths and jeopardized national security, sure. But if they believed that Bush policies were truly criminal, didn't they have a moral obligation to do so? In any case, the inevitable media rapture over their anti-Bush defiance would have more than compensated.

Ms. Harman did send a one-page classified letter in February 2003 listing her equivocal objections to the interrogation program. She made her letter public in January 2008 after the CIA revealed that it had destroyed some interrogation videotapes. After lauding the CIA's efforts "in the current threat environment," she noted that "what was described raises profound policy questions and I am concerned about whether these have been as rigorously examined as the legal questions." Ms. Harman also vaguely wondered whether "these practices are consistent with the principles and policies of the United States," but she did not condemn them as either torture or illegal.

This wasn't the only time a politician filed an inconsequential expression of anti-antiterror protest. Mr. Rockefeller famously wrote a letter to Vice President Dick Cheney objecting to warrantless wiretapping, but then stuck it (literally) in a drawer. Like Ms. Harman, only after the program was exposed did he reveal his missive to show he'd been opposed all along, though he'd done nothing about it.

According to Mr. Goss, some Members at the time even wondered if our terror fighters were harsh enough as they tried to extract potentially live-saving information. Mr. Goss, who later served as CIA director from 2004 to 2006, told the Washington Post in 2007 that, "Among those being briefed, there was a pretty full understanding of what the CIA was doing. And the reaction in the room was not just approval, but encouragement."

The article is about Democrats' likely push for "Truth Commissions" to get to the bottom of the "Torture Regime." As is common, Congress will be looking to scapegoat others for its own decisions.


More at Hamilton, Madison, and Jay.


Posted by: Ace at 11:29 AM



Comments

1

Just imagine the screeds of unintentionally hilarious stupidity that will emanate from Excitable Andi during such Truth Commmissions.  He'll be so focused on the proceedings that he might forget, for once, to fuck his Beagle. 

Posted by: Sharkman at January 07, 2009 11:40 AM (69J41)

2
Ahhh, memories. This is where the Democrats did an about-face and went from mocking the Terror Alert Color Code System and demanding that we "connect the dots" to prevent future attacks to granting Geneva Convention rights to Al Qaeda and opposing interrogations.

Posted by: Darling at January 07, 2009 11:41 AM (t9vIz)

3 Ace posting in the AM???  WTF?

Posted by: right at January 07, 2009 11:50 AM (EquV1)

4

I look forward to the Republicans asking Panetta at his confirmation what he knew about Clinton's rendition program of sending suspected terrorists to Egypt.  Waterboarding would have been like a day at a water park compared to the techniques that the Egypt secret police use.

Ok, I know they won't bring it up.  But I can dream.

Posted by: JackStraw at January 07, 2009 11:52 AM (VW9/y)

5 Who knows, maybe the Repubs will finally show some balls again.  Maybe not Blago-sized balls, but at least HRC sized balls.

Posted by: In Exile at January 07, 2009 12:01 PM (NOk/i)

6 Look for more Democratic nuance.  They were for it before they were against it.

Posted by: GarandFan at January 07, 2009 12:06 PM (237hA)

7 Wow, show trials already?  Usually Dear Leader waits and consolidates his power before the purging.

Posted by: PJ at January 07, 2009 12:26 PM (fyFnu)

8

>" As is common, Congress will be looking to scapegoat others for its own decisions."

We'll surely see some tortured logic here.

Posted by: Speller at January 07, 2009 12:38 PM (2Hv5h)

9 Well if nothing else works, divert their gaze.

Posted by: bill-tb at January 07, 2009 01:56 PM (7evkT)

10 Man, you've got to be really careful. Imagine Rockefeller pulling the wrong letter from the drawer- the one that said he fully supported security measures and their secrecy. 'Top Democrat accidentally supports the President...'

Posted by: t-bird at January 07, 2009 01:59 PM (FcR7P)

11 I buy car/home/boat/paternity insurance hoping I'll never need it...JStones issued himself an asshole policy, but never paid the premiums. Now he wishes to cash it in?..I had last weeks powerball numbers, but for got to play. Wish me luck at the 7-11

Posted by: hutch1200 at January 07, 2009 02:02 PM (yyXfK)

12

Before Christmas, Cheney said Democrats signed off on everything--sometimes asking for stronger measures. Not a peep, not one little peep, was heard from Democrats denying it. I promise you he has the tapes to back it up.

If the Bush/Cheney Junta are war criminals, then so is all the Democrat leadership including Nuremberg Nancy.

Good Germans shouldn't grandstand.

Posted by: Noel at January 07, 2009 02:42 PM (4gHqM)

13

Boy, what a great way to encourage our counter-terror agents.

Democrats: "Right, you do whatever you think is necessary to stop terror attacks.  Interrogate terrorists throughly with all the methods we agree you can use. Try as hard as you can to prevent future terrorist attacks on American soil.  If you are successful and prevent attacks for a period of 7 years or so, then we will not only not continue to support you, we will condemn and put you on trial for using the interrogation methods we said you could use.  You could go to jail."

Do these people even understand the concept that actions have consequences?

Posted by: BattleofthePyramids at January 07, 2009 03:00 PM (8cDlN)

14 First, waterboarding ain't good enough.  I've dreamed up additional methods during periods of road rage good enough to separate Nancy from her jet.  Second, if the 'Pubs don't now give as good as they've been receiving during these hearings, I'll join my better half as an Independent, regardless of the craven and unprincipled position that reflects.

Posted by: iowavette at January 07, 2009 04:48 PM (0JTac)

15 You know, there's only one means of interrogation to make a torturer confess...

Posted by: comatus at January 07, 2009 05:11 PM (CMi/T)

16 Mr. Rockefeller famously wrote a letter to Vice President Dick Cheney objecting to warrantless wiretapping, but then stuck it (literally) in a drawer. Like Ms. Harman, only after the program was exposed did he reveal his missive to show he'd been opposed all along, though he'd done nothing about it.

Heh. That's exactly what Charlie Rangel did with his federal income tax return, lol. "I actually did fill out my income tax reform, before I decided against mailing it."

And these are the great Liberal Moral Authorities in the Democratic Congress...

Posted by: CoolCzech at January 07, 2009 05:16 PM (iafWn)

17 Its understandable that these folks just wrote some vaguely critical letters. After all, its not like they were in a position to pass laws about it or something.

Posted by: Harun at January 07, 2009 08:32 PM (mG9Ce)

18 May I also suggest the GOP Congrescritters vote for the bail outs and then they write thoughtful, questioning letters they keep just in case it doesn't work. Maybe a form letter would be easiest.

Posted by: Harun at January 07, 2009 08:33 PM (mG9Ce)

19 You know, I've been thinking for some time now that there's an imbalance between the parties in terms of symbolism. I mean, for now we have the Republican Elephant and the Democrat Donkey. Or, Ass.

For an elephant, about the worst thing you can say is that they're kind of lumbering. And afraid of mice, which isn't really either here or there.

As to the Democrat Ass, well, it's an ass. Braying, stubborn, kind of stupid - that's what people think of when they see a donkey.

I think the Democrats need a new animal to represent them. Maybe something big, not as big as an elephant, of course, because that would mean sea creatures and huge aquariums at rallies, and that just won't fly.

Maybe a Hippopotamus. Shorten it to hippo. The animal has no great public precedent, so prejudices will be minimal. And a name change could go along with it, at least at the logo/mascot level.

Perhaps change the initial vowel in honor of the Womyns Myvement. And drop the double P, because there's no sense in wasting letters.

And to balance the equation, we can change -crats to -crites, because we dropped an I and the ending is to vowel-light.

Hypocrites.

What do you think?

Posted by: Merovign at January 07, 2009 09:22 PM (or0jG)

Posted by: timm at February 02, 2009 03:21 AM (uLZ40)

21 Hello. A hobby a day keeps the doldrums away. Help me! I can not find sites on the: Invert mini paintball gun. I found only this - stryker paintball guns. Zero kick back block lpr nut trilogy shaft kit. Username or mail log in back to tippmann paintball guns. Thanks :rolleyes:. Dior from Japan.

Posted by: Dior at July 15, 2009 07:36 PM (kZgnP)

22 Sorry. Over the years your bodies become walking autobiographies, telling friends and strangers alike of the minor and major stresses of your lives.
I am from Lithuania and learning to speak English, give please true I wrote the following sentence: "Com online datingarticle source benefits of online dating services."

Thank you very much :-). Bette.

Posted by: Bette at August 04, 2009 01:14 AM (ULlLm)

Posted by: UGGSale at October 08, 2009 09:10 PM (ZlJW7)

Posted by: hair straighteners at October 24, 2009 06:59 AM (9oMrs)

Posted by: reviewups at October 24, 2009 10:58 AM (tKCDW)

Posted by: ugg boots at October 27, 2009 05:29 AM (Am8nx)

Posted by: australia ugg at October 27, 2009 08:33 AM (c6EK2)

28 Standard is very important to choose a thing.Different criteria lead to different results.

Choosing shoes is the same rationale.Beautiful and comfortable standard of the majority of people are basically.nike dunk sb shoe is consistent with this standard.Regardless of the external and internal design would use this unique technology. http://www.dunksky.com/

Posted by: nike dunk sb at October 29, 2009 08:28 AM (qtc5Q)

29

Do anything needed to support an idea, a good idea usually brings good results, doing

/>


business is like that.http://www.dunksky.com/.This site has always been on

Posted by: nike dunk sb at October 30, 2009 07:33 AM (LACJ9)

Posted by: gfhgyuj at November 02, 2009 07:03 AM (Rzoq5)

Posted by: mbtshoesbuy at November 02, 2009 07:38 PM (jjolb)

Posted by: reviewups at November 05, 2009 11:56 PM (XxrVz)

33 Come to our website for shopping with high quality and best service! There have new products,MBT M. Walk
and MBT Lami,Welcome everybody to buy it.

Posted by: mbt shoes at November 08, 2009 07:51 AM (QhfLM)

Posted by: ugg at November 11, 2009 12:23 AM (ly6Oi)

Posted by: ugg boots at November 12, 2009 12:28 AM (IeIJx)

36 Supra FootwearThe supra shoe is comfortable and can wear all day.
supra ShoesThe bestsupra.com seems to be from strong material, and have many seems all over. They are really beautifull.
Supra Skytopbestsupra.com offer Great quality shoe for a reasonable price.
Supra 2009Comfort

Posted by: ryiu at November 12, 2009 07:59 PM (9dQ8A)

37 nike dunk sb

Do anything needed to support an idea, a good idea usually brings good results, doing


business is like that.http://www.dunksky.com/.This site has always been on

Posted by: nike dunk sb at November 13, 2009 11:56 PM (APB+g)

38 buy [url=http://www.reviewups.com/]discount ugg shoes[/url]
[url=http://www.reviewups.com/]cheap ugg shoes[/url]
[url=http://www.reviewups.com/]cheap ugg[/url]
[url=http://www.reviewups.com/ugg-coquette-casual-shoes-c-22]ugg rainier[/url]
[url=http://www.reviewups.com/]buy ugg[/url]
[url=http://www.reviewups.com/]ugg usa[/url]
[url=http://www.reviewups.com/]discount ugg boots[/url]
[url=http://www.reviewups.com/ugg-classic-short-c-1]ugg 5825[/url]
[url=http://www.reviewups.com/]ugg shoes sale[/url]
[url=http://www.reviewups.com/ugg-sundance-c-5]ugg sundance[/url]
[url=http://www.reviewups.com/]ugg shoes[/url]
[url=http://www.reviewups.com/]cheap ugg boots[/url]
[url=http://www.reviewups.com/ugg-classic-tall-c-3]ugg 5815[/url]
[url=http://www.reviewups.com/]ugg sale[/url]
[url=http://www.reviewups.com/]ugg uk[/url]
[url=http://www.reviewups.com/ugg-knightsbridge-c-27]ugg knightsbridge[/url]
[url=http://www.reviewups.com/]womens ugg boots[/url]
[url=http://www.reviewups.com/]ugg boots[/url]
[url=http://www.reviewups.com/]ugg australia[/url]
[url=http://www.reviewups.com/ugg-classic-cardy-c-2]ugg 5819[/url]from usa

Posted by: cheap at November 14, 2009 04:02 AM (s7MB5)

Posted by: replica watches at November 17, 2009 03:14 AM (xpuiO)

Posted by: nike shoes at November 17, 2009 03:53 AM (DuP3Z)

Posted by: replica watches at November 17, 2009 11:42 AM (xpuiO)

Posted by: replica watches at November 17, 2009 11:01 PM (xpuiO)

Posted by: replica watches at November 18, 2009 05:44 AM (C/zDM)






Processing 0.03, elapsed 0.0275 seconds.
15 queries taking 0.0047 seconds, 52 records returned.
Page size 64 kb.
Powered by Minx 0.7 alpha.

MuNuvians
MeeNuvians
Polls! Polls! Polls!
Frequently Asked Questions
The (Almost) Complete Paul Anka Integrity Kick
Top Top Tens
Greatest Hitjobs

The Ace of Spades HQ Sex-for-Money Skankathon
A D&D Guide to the Democratic Candidates
Margaret Cho: Just Not Funny
More Margaret Cho Abuse
Margaret Cho: Still Not Funny
Iraqi Prisoner Claims He Was Raped... By Woman
Wonkette Announces "Morning Zoo" Format
John Kerry's "Plan" Causes Surrender of Moqtada al-Sadr's Militia
World Muslim Leaders Apologize for Nick Berg's Beheading
Michael Moore Goes on Lunchtime Manhattan Death-Spree
Milestone: Oliver Willis Posts 400th "Fake News Article" Referencing Britney Spears
Liberal Economists Rue a "New Decade of Greed"
Artificial Insouciance: Maureen Dowd's Word Processor Revolts Against Her Numbing Imbecility
Intelligence Officials Eye Blogs for Tips
They Done Found Us Out, Cletus: Intrepid Internet Detective Figures Out Our Master Plan
Shock: Josh Marshall Almost Mentions Sarin Discovery in Iraq
Leather-Clad Biker Freaks Terrorize Australian Town
When Clinton Was President, Torture Was Cool
What Wonkette Means When She Explains What Tina Brown Means
Wonkette's Stand-Up Act
Wankette HQ Gay-Rumors Du Jour
Here's What's Bugging Me: Goose and Slider
My Own Micah Wright Style Confession of Dishonesty
Outraged "Conservatives" React to the FMA
An On-Line Impression of Dennis Miller Having Sex with a Kodiak Bear
The Story the Rightwing Media Refuses to Report!
Our Lunch with David "Glengarry Glen Ross" Mamet
The House of Love: Paul Krugman
A Michael Moore Mystery (TM)
The Dowd-O-Matic!
Liberal Consistency and Other Myths
Kepler's Laws of Liberal Media Bias
John Kerry-- The Splunge! Candidate
"Divisive" Politics & "Attacks on Patriotism" (very long)
The Donkey ("The Raven" parody)
News/Chat