Sweet: Vicky Iseman Sues NYT for Defamation Over NYT Sleaze-Story Claiming "Improper (<i>Wink, Wink</i>) Relationship"

Sweet: Vicky Iseman Sues NYT for Defamation Over NYT Sleaze-Story Claiming "Improper (Wink, Wink) Relationship"

When someone is willing to sue, it usually means they're telling the truth. Discovery is a bitch, and if there's a there there, she wouldn't risk it.

Thanks to CJ.

$27 Million: I missed the amount she's seeking. 27 large.

Posted by: Ace at 05:41 PM

Comments

1 Take 'em down, Vicky. Take 'em down hard. Beat the hell out of them with legal fees (both sides) and then for the $27 million. The sooner the NYT vampire has the stake driven through its heart, the better. Your lawsuit is just one more big hammerstroke on that wooden spike.

Posted by: mac at December 30, 2008 05:47 PM (km5b4)

2 She better hurry while they still have some assets to satisfy any judgment she may get.

Posted by: DrewM. at December 30, 2008 05:48 PM (hlYel)

3 Even if she doesn't get a dime but takes them down, it'll be worth it.

Posted by: Bob's Kid at December 30, 2008 05:49 PM (ZG16a)

4 MexCain should have sued when it might have made a difference.

Posted by: eman at December 30, 2008 05:51 PM (O8KSM)

5 This might be the first time a newspaper has been totalled.

Posted by: Jim Treacher at December 30, 2008 05:51 PM (NV3P1)

6 Sweet. That Allen guy is a damn good plaintiff's attorney and a democrat. He's not taking the case to make a statement - he must think there is some cash to be had. Smolla is pretty highly regarded as well.

Posted by: buzz at December 30, 2008 05:52 PM (kwhut)

7 Yeah, because a lawsuit is exactly what you want during a presidential campaign.

Posted by: Donkey Lips at December 30, 2008 05:52 PM (oKlJy)

8 Could she wind up owning a portion of the Red Sox?

Posted by: huerfano at December 30, 2008 05:52 PM (knHvu)

9 I'd hit it. Vicky, not the NYT, that is.

Posted by: jaleach at December 30, 2008 05:52 PM (gHrZU)

10 A lawsuit would not have hurt Mac. His lack of balls hurt him.

He turned into a completely befuddled useless pussy when it came time to be a fucking fighter pilot.

Posted by: eman at December 30, 2008 05:57 PM (O8KSM)

11 I just heard this on Fox News...I was kinda-sorta napping, so I wasn't sure I'd heard right.

Sweet!

Posted by: Eric at December 30, 2008 05:57 PM (quZLX)

12 Given the financial state of the NYT, she'll be lucky to get $2.70.

Posted by: Circa (Insert Year Here) at December 30, 2008 05:58 PM (B+qrE)

I wonder if she can actually win. The article implied something salacious, but journalistic bottom-feeders know how to libel within the legal limit. The New York Times has plenty of practice.

But Iseman and her attorney may not expect to win. They may be counting on the Times to pay off rather than expose their damaged brand to further damage in open court. It may be worth a million to make this go away.

Posted by: lyle at December 30, 2008 06:01 PM (aiizS)

14 Iseman waited to file the suit until after the presidential election, in an effort to avoid influencing its outcome, her lawyers said.

Yes, because it's okay to have false rumors influence the outcome of a presidential election, but not a spirited rebuttal against them. That's brilliant thinking.

Qwinn

Posted by: Qwinn at December 30, 2008 06:02 PM (3FVXC)

15 I'd hit it. Vicky, not the NYT, that is.

Really? Because I'd hit the NYT. With an aluminum bat.

Posted by: RedFox84 at December 30, 2008 06:03 PM (jG82H)

Oh boy, I can hardly wait. The lawsuit will be proclaimed to be a threat to the very existence of the NYT and, consequently, the viability of a free press. President Obama will allocate some TARP billions to bail out his propaganda machine(s). Let the healing begin, Chicago Style.

More importantly, will commentators on AOSHQ qualify for Fourth Estate bailout funds? I wait patiently for my check, unicorn, and rainbow.

Posted by: Publicserf at December 30, 2008 06:06 PM (rsOXj)

17 Waste of time. She can't prove $27M worth of "damage" to her reputation. Indeed, one can argue that her value as a lobbiest has been enhanced by rumors that she was real close with a notable senator. Clients like it when you're willing to do anything to get your point across.

Posted by: Purple Avenger at December 30, 2008 06:08 PM (Z0HFQ)

18 Vicky is pretty confident I think. This isn't the sort of thing you file unless you are angry and have the facts. Also the NYT will have to put up with this being spread all over the talking head shows on FOX now. And that Discovery stuff works both ways. I have always wondered just how vile journalists' e-mails must be. Maybe we'll get to find out.

Posted by: The Obvious at December 30, 2008 06:08 PM (1g+FW)

19 Can you even get 27 Mil out of those fucking leftards? Maybe Schmaltzfucker Jr. will have to sell his sex dungeon.

Posted by: mossback at December 30, 2008 06:08 PM (in8Vs)

20 PA,
This isn't about her reputation. It's about hurting the Times. They'll settle, and the settlement will be pretty large.

Posted by: The Obvious at December 30, 2008 06:10 PM (1g+FW)

21 Depending upon what discovery shows the Times was up to she might be able to hurt some journalists' individual pocket books.

Posted by: The Obvious at December 30, 2008 06:11 PM (1g+FW)

22 I hope the Times is forced to sell the Boston Globe to Rush Limbaugh and Karl Rove.

Posted by: eman at December 30, 2008 06:12 PM (O8KSM)

23 I think that you are all overlooking the obvious. If the NYT says it, it's true.

Posted by: WalrusRex at December 30, 2008 06:14 PM (DVVXZ)

24 If she does bring down the Times, it would be the second good thing to come from McCain's run.

Posted by: kev at December 30, 2008 06:16 PM (RYqhx)

25 Scoundrels, every last one of 'em.

Posted by: vinman at December 30, 2008 06:17 PM (idc+/)

26 "She better hurry while they still have some assets to satisfy any judgment she may get."

If they can't come up with the $27MM this will do...it would make a nice crip I think....

Posted by: Ulises Jorge Bido at December 30, 2008 06:23 PM (oczdu)

27 Oh and did I mention that no one is going to want to buy this newspaper with this hanging out there unresolved? They'll settle.

Posted by: The Obvious at December 30, 2008 06:25 PM (1g+FW)

28 Heh. Owning the building would rock.

Posted by: Al at December 30, 2008 06:25 PM (CyBUS)

29 The NYT has staff lawyers on salary, she probably doesn't. That alone tells you who will probably prevail. They'll just run her out of money.

Posted by: Purple Avenger at December 30, 2008 06:25 PM (Z0HFQ)

30 http://tinyurl.com/4zu9cg

Posted by: dan-O at December 30, 2008 06:27 PM (AEBFS)

I am thinking there maybe a lawyer or two out there thay may take this case on contingency.

Just thinkin...

Posted by: AndrewsDad at December 30, 2008 06:28 PM (C2//T)

32 I wish Mrs. McLame would sue the "reporter" slut dem. that went after her daughter's friends...Surely there are some others that need suing....own petard sort of thing. While we are at it some Palin lawsuits too....by the way, what happened to that little dem. hacker.

Posted by: free at December 30, 2008 06:29 PM (cFwGO)

33 PA,

These cases are taken on a contingency fee basis. The times has a problem here. A big one.

Posted by: The Obvious at December 30, 2008 06:29 PM (1g+FW)

34 They'll just run her out of money.

That's what contingency fees are for. It's about time someone hit them back.

Posted by: alexthechick at December 30, 2008 06:36 PM (xUOXi)

35 Judgment is worthless here. Try collecting from the Old Gray Bag-lady.

Posted by: Herr Morgenholz at December 30, 2008 06:46 PM (ZSEm1)

She, and this lawsuit, are spooge-worthy indeed.

How beautiful would it be if she wins and greatly contributes to the downfall of the NYT?

Posted by: SamIam at December 30, 2008 06:48 PM (jl7C/)

37 I hope the Times is forced to sell the Boston Globe to Rush Limbaugh and Karl Rove.

Rush could by the NYT right now. How sweet would it be if he did so as an anonymous investor and then made Pinch/Punch/Paunch Sulzberger dance in Times Square for a hamburger?

Posted by: Herr Morgenholz at December 30, 2008 06:49 PM (ZSEm1)

38 34 They'll just run her out of money.
That's what contingency fees are for. It's about time someone hit them back.

True. So please tell everyone center-right to stop railing against contingency fees.

Posted by: FloofyParisParamus at December 30, 2008 06:49 PM (hr1Fa)

39 by=buy. Does not = bi. Just sayin'.

Posted by: Herr Morgenholz at December 30, 2008 06:50 PM (ZSEm1)

All the news that sticks, we print.

Wait....

She's doing what?

Posted by: New York Times at December 30, 2008 06:54 PM (EW49d)

41 The NYSlimes can't come up with $0,27 in cash without floating a loan. They are like a catfish thrown in mudhole, flop around a while but eventually die and stink up the place.

Posted by: Scrapiron at December 30, 2008 07:00 PM (XWJh5)

42 NY Times editor: "But... but... they're Republicans! I thought we could lie about them with impunity! They can't sue us! Quick; get out the long list of liberal judges."
/sarc

Posted by: RoadRunner at December 30, 2008 07:11 PM (MJFrd)

43 I don't think the Sullivan standard would apply to her. She isn't a public person, nor has she thrust herself into the limelight. The NYT may have some real problems here.

Posted by: Mikey NTH at December 30, 2008 07:16 PM (TUWci)

Good luck to her. Hope she takes that worthless organization for everything it's worth. Granted, that's not that much these days, but still...

The only complaint I have here is that this is just now happening.

Posted by: SpideyTerry at December 30, 2008 07:17 PM (m9bd2)

45 Interesting question, can the NYT apply the Sullivan standard to her? She' a public figure, because they made her one...

Posted by: XBradTC at December 30, 2008 07:19 PM (/K0QE)

46 Well, they must be holding pocket aces with ace-ace-king on the board if they're making this much noise about it. Here's hoping.

tmi3rd

Posted by: tmi3rd at December 30, 2008 07:23 PM (nHN8Z)

47 27 million ought to put them out of business right?

Posted by: Topsecretk9 at December 30, 2008 07:39 PM (UGtRM)

48 I hope that she wins the money, and screws the Slimes over in the process...just another nail in their coffin...

Posted by: Buck Naked - Pron Star at December 30, 2008 07:40 PM (gNXjy)

The thing about Sullivan, I believe, is that while it sets a damn high difficult bar for libel against a public official, it does not set an impossible one.

Meaning that if Iseman does have the facts on her side (and she has to be to be getting involved in this) and can prove that the Times intentionally lied about her (a third party not seeking the spotlight) and her sex life to maliciously or recklessly attack an ideological opponent, then this is damning.

If a court finds that the Times is culpable, especially because the standards set by Sullivan were intentionally set so damn high, then this is, to be truthful, a devastating shaming that may never be overcome. This would be ironic since Sullivan was a case that originally involved the once-proud Times.

And while I don't think that it would actually involve the actual legal case, the facts that she did wait untill after the election will play well with the court of public opinion.

Posted by: Lee at December 30, 2008 07:40 PM (TxTIh)

50 Why are these evil Rethuglicans constantly trying to distract Barry ?

Posted by: eman at December 30, 2008 07:47 PM (O8KSM)

To elaborate further to a hypothetical small potatoes scenario.

Sullivan creates a very high bar to libel against a public official, especially politicians, because the dangers of restricting the free flow of political speech due to fear of lawsuit, especially frivilous lawsuit, is much more dangerous than the occasional risk of a reputation being unfairly harmed.

However, if a small town publisher simply hates a local political official, he can not intentionally sceme to tell outright malicious lies about that official. He can't blatantly lie and say this official likes little boys, or burnt down a church, or accidently killed someone while drunk back in college.

I don't think that Sullivan protects against an actual conspiracy to lie.

But such situations discussing whether Sullivan applies or not usually have to be hypothetical, because acheiveing that high bar of proof and culpability is extremely rare.

So for the NY Times, the supposed paper of record, the supposed standard by which all journalists and publishers should judge themselves by, to be brought down so low as to be guilty of libeling Iseman, and by extention John McCain, is breathtaking.

If this were in Japan, Pinch would pretty much be forced to disembowel himself to save face.

Posted by: Lee at December 30, 2008 07:52 PM (TxTIh)

52 Sullivan can be overcome. Knowledge of falsehood is hard, but its cohort "reckless disregard of the truth," is much easier. Arguably, reckless disregard of facts where Republicans are concerned is S.O.P. at the Slimes.

Obviously, the Slimes will attempt to argue Sullivan is the standard, while Iseman will argue she is a private figure. IIRC, the libel of private figures standard is simply (1) falsehood; (2) publication; and (3) lack of "due care." Again, the amount of care injected by the partisan hack Mediacrats at the NYT has to be minimal in most cases.

I think she will probably settle for a much smaller sum. But I hope she doesn't. It would be great to have a 20,000-candlepower spotlight on these cockroaches for a few months...just to remind everyone how much and why we hate their ever-living guts.

Pukes.

Posted by: Fresh Air at December 30, 2008 07:57 PM (ytzxB)

53 Lee--

A conspiracy to lie is most definitely not protected. In fact, a proven conspiracy is prima facie evidence of knowledge of falsehood, ergo, guilt.

Posted by: Fresh Air at December 30, 2008 08:00 PM (ytzxB)

Fresh Air ~ I'm definately not a lawyer, just remembering from a first amendment class I took back in college. But I think I'm generally right on this. I'm sure you and some other morons out there can shed some more light on this.

Posted by: Lee at December 30, 2008 08:12 PM (TxTIh)

55 Hell if the Times loses, they might have to turn Gail Collins and MoDo out on the street to turn tricks (not just rhetorical either). That oughtta bring in $3 or $4 bucks a night

Posted by: Frank G at December 30, 2008 08:19 PM (P0rQD)

56 If this were in Japan, Pinch would pretty much be forced to disembowel himself to save face.

Oooh! Change of venue, please!

Posted by: lmg at December 30, 2008 08:23 PM (A/vgC)

57 Even first year law student wouldn't take the case unless it was rock solid...

...I just hope she doesn't settle.

Posted by: G at December 30, 2008 08:35 PM (FAYNo)

58 Well, since the NYT is on its way down the toilet, of course she won't get it all even if the case is rock-solid. What she gets with a judgment is a seat at the table in bankruptcy court.

Posted by: Dave J at December 30, 2008 08:46 PM (xHFvH)

59 Awe. Some.

Posted by: Fallen Sparrow at December 30, 2008 09:20 PM (gx1Lm)

60 Isn't that 27,000 large? Or has the large been embiggened?

Posted by: Daryl Herbert at December 30, 2008 09:32 PM (vpcJV)

61 Schmaltz!

Posted by: mossback at December 30, 2008 09:34 PM (in8Vs)

62 So you're saying a "large" is a "stack of high society" or a "big one".

Posted by: mossback at December 30, 2008 09:36 PM (in8Vs)

63 mill = a million dollars or a million pounds. Interestingly mill is also a non-slang technical term for a tenth of a USA cent, or one-thousandth of a dollar, which is an accounts term only - there is no coinage for such an amount. The word mill is derived simply from the Latin 'millisimus' meaning a thousandth, and is not anything to do with the milled edge of a coin.

The more correct slang term for 27 million dollars is 27 mill according to the money slang website.

Posted by: mossback at December 30, 2008 09:43 PM (in8Vs)

64 IF the discovery process reveals that the "un-named sources" cited by the article from the McCain camp were either non-existent, or mis-quoted by the TImes- then they're well and truly fucked

Posted by: Mr. Happy at December 30, 2008 10:01 PM (/YM8H)

65 Can the jury award more than she is seeking?

Posted by: Thomas Jackson at December 30, 2008 10:34 PM (0Qynq)

66 Better late than never I guess :/

Posted by: Mark at December 30, 2008 11:22 PM (HSVfY)

67 Every right wing advocacy group will contribute to her cause just to get discovery, she probably has deeper pockets at this point then the slimes. The potential liability and legal costs associated with this are going to be reported and further drag on their worthless stock.

Hell, I bet the WaPo tosses a few bucks her way.

Posted by: Jean at December 30, 2008 11:22 PM (xCBQ4)

29 The NYT has staff lawyers on salary, she probably doesn't. That alone tells you who will probably prevail. They'll just run her out of money.

Not only are her lawyers likely working on contingency, as several above have mentioned, but the NYT will have to hire lawyers in Virginia to defend the case. Plus depositions and responding to discovery requests will tie everyone involved up in knots, leaving them even less time to practice their version of "journalism".

Posted by: buzz at December 30, 2008 11:41 PM (nlr0Y)

69 To add to Buzz, she filed in the Rocket Docket, this isn't going to take years.

Posted by: Jean at December 30, 2008 11:59 PM (xCBQ4)

70 These things happen.

Posted by: Dave C at December 31, 2008 12:32 AM (4sgOQ)

71 "Can the jury award more than she is seeking?"

I wouldn't think so; however, the complaint probably has a catch-all request for something like "any and all other lawful relief as may be deemed appropriate," which opens the door to them doing anything.

Posted by: Dave J at December 31, 2008 01:18 AM (xHFvH)

The Times still has a few assets of value, mostly real estate. I believe they have a small share of the Red Sox. And ultimately their brand name is still salable.

But the brand is vulnerable to this lawsuit. Under Pinch, the Times has grown in partisanship while bleeding out its integrity. The newspaper used to come into court swinging a ponderous reputation. Not any longer.

I wonder if Iseman is holding more than just a malicious bit of Times' hatchetry. She must have sworn statements from McCain staffers. What about tapes?

Does she have anything from inside the Times? That article embarrassed a lot of liberal reporters with its naked agenda and lack of evidence. What about within the Times itself?

The 'story' would not have been pursued and published without the active involvement of Pinch. He's an idiot. Can he hold up in court?

I doubt the Times will let this go to a jury.

Posted by: lyle at December 31, 2008 02:37 AM (aiizS)

The Times still has a few assets of value, mostly real estate. I believe they have a small share of the Red Sox. And ultimately their brand name is still salable.

I wonder if Iseman is holding more than just a malicious bit of Times' hatchetry. She must have sworn statements from McCain staffers. What about tapes?

Does she have anything from inside the Times? That article embarrassed a lot of liberal reporters with its naked agenda and lack of evidence. What about within the Times itself?

The 'story' would not have been pursued and published without the active involvement of Pinch. He's an idiot. Can he hold up in court?

I doubt the Times will let this go to a jury.

Posted by: lyle at December 31, 2008 02:37 AM (aiizS)

If the Izeman team can get some of the "sources" to testify under oath that the Times fucked with their statements, lied, manipulated, or otherwise distorted what they said- shes going to be a rich woman.

Posted by: TMF at December 31, 2008 08:35 AM (waaUg)

On the other hand- and I dont handle any defamation cases- Im not so sure the definition of defamation includes libel by "implication" and "reading between the lines". I would think the salacious comments would have to be pretty direct and explicit

But Im not sure.

Posted by: TMF at December 31, 2008 08:36 AM (waaUg)

76 Perception is everything. The Times' retraction was pathetic and hidden, as their apologies always are. This same derelict media has the public believing that Palin said she can see Russia from her house also has caused this mess.

The Times is pure scum. I only wish that Iseman made it $100 million.

Posted by: drjohn at December 31, 2008 08:39 AM (ToVRf)

77 I cannot help but notice that this does not appear on the front page of the Times, as did the original article.

Posted by: drjohn at December 31, 2008 08:43 AM (ToVRf)

78 May she have victory in this most glorious of battles!

Posted by: t.ferg at December 31, 2008 09:43 AM (2YVh7)

79 I remember a time when 27 large would have meant $27,000. Damn inflation.

Posted by: kbiel at December 31, 2008 11:20 AM (HAib+)

The newspaper used to come into court swinging a ponderous reputation.

Coincidently, I also have the reputation of swinging something quite ponderous. You know what I mean ladies? Awww right... giggity.

Posted by: Lee at December 31, 2008 11:32 AM (TxTIh)

81 The Times 'source' is THEMSELVES. Just like every other you hear sources referred to as 'some people' 'experts' 'many' etc. Fuck them all. I hope they don't leave too many streaks on the bowl.

The NYT building should be used as a homeless shelter.

Posted by: Melodic Metal at December 31, 2008 11:38 AM (0TU9n)

The NYT building should be used as a homeless shelter.

Too late.

Posted by: TallDave at December 31, 2008 02:01 PM (AZmZT)

83 Um, 27 large would mean, $27,000. In Chicago terminology, this would be 27 fuckin' HUGE.

Posted by: SK at January 02, 2009 03:35 PM (J1jrF)

84 AVI to iPod Converter,ASF to iPod Converter ,DVD to iPod Converter ,Vob to iPod Converter ,MPEG to iPod Converter ,WMV to iPod Converter ,FLV to iPod Converter ,MKV to iPod Converter ,TiVo to iPod Converter ,RM/RMVB to iPod Converter ,MOV to iPod Converter ,YouTube to iPod Converter ,iPod to Computer Transfer,iPod to Mac Transfer

Posted by: qweqwes at March 06, 2009 12:40 AM (QLvrP)

85 货架货架托盘托盘货架

Posted by: google排名 at August 13, 2009 08:28 PM (2pNYT)

Posted by: UGGSale at October 08, 2009 08:48 PM (ZlJW7)

87 Some people like LV handbags,Some people like Chanel handbags,but most popel have been keeping an eye on cheap fashion brand handbags .we often talk about all kinds of designer handbags with my friends,most of my friends also like cheap fashion brand handbags.We admire cheap fashion brand handbags designer who often be able to design so many stylish handbags.We want to be a handbag抯 designer in the future too. In our store online，you can buy all series of cheap fashion brand handbags，include: Louis Vuitton,LV Luggage,LV Wallets,LV Agendas,LV Belts,LV Shoes,LV Accessories,Gucci,Gucci Wallets,Gucci Shoes,Marc Jacobs handbags,Marni handbags,Miu Miu handbags,Mulberry handbags,Prada handbags,Thomaswylde handbags,TOD handbags,Bottega Veneta handbags,D&G handbags,Dior handbags,YSL handbags,Coach handbags

Posted by: steve at October 14, 2009 07:58 AM (+aWy4)

Posted by: retailike at October 17, 2009 10:37 AM (zFgZJ)

89 discounthair straighteners
ghd hair
chi hair straightener
ghd straighteners
chi straighteners
chi hair
chi hair iron
hair straighteners ghd
ghd hair straighteners
free shipping!

Posted by: hair straighteners at October 24, 2009 06:27 AM (9oMrs)

90 Discount Boots
Womens UGG
UGG Shoes
UGG Australia
UGG UK
UGG USA
discount ugg boots
cheap ugg boots

Posted by: reviewups at October 24, 2009 10:12 AM (tKCDW)

91 Your post very good,thanks for sharing!Are you also like these:ugg boots uk,buy ugg boots,australia ugg,cheap ugg boots,ugg boots,ugg boots sheepskin,womens ugg boots,ugg australia boots,cheap ugg boots

Posted by: australia ugg at October 27, 2009 07:55 AM (c6EK2)

92 Standard is very important to choose a thing.Different criteria lead to different results.

Choosing shoes is the same rationale.Beautiful and comfortable standard of the majority of people are basically.nike dunk sb shoe is consistent with this standard.Regardless of the external and internal design would use this unique technology. http://www.dunksky.com/

Posted by: nike dunk sb at October 29, 2009 07:45 AM (qtc5Q)

Do anything needed to support an idea, a good idea usually brings good results, doing

/>

business is like that.http://www.dunksky.com/.This site has always been on

Posted by: nike dunk sb at October 30, 2009 06:59 AM (LACJ9)

94 Cheap UGG Cardy
UGG Shoes Sale
UGG Australia
Discount UGG boots
UGG Bailey Button
cheap ugg boots

Posted by: gfhgyuj at November 02, 2009 06:02 AM (Rzoq5)

95 buy Discount Boots
Womens UGG
UGG Shoes
UGG Australia
UGG UK
UGG USA
discount ugg boots
cheap ugg boots
air force 1 shoes
nike air force
air force 1 mens
air force 1 boots
air force onefrom usa

Posted by: mbtshoesbuy at November 02, 2009 07:18 PM (jjolb)

96 Come to our website for shopping with high quality and best service! There have new products,MBT M. Walk
and MBT Lami,Welcome everybody to buy it.

Posted by: mbt shoes at November 08, 2009 07:40 AM (QhfLM)

Posted by: ugg at November 11, 2009 12:14 AM (ly6Oi)

Posted by: ugg boots at November 12, 2009 12:16 AM (IeIJx)

99 nike dunk sb

Do anything needed to support an idea, a good idea usually brings good results, doing

business is like that.http://www.dunksky.com/.This site has always been on

Posted by: nike dunk sb at November 13, 2009 11:46 PM (APB+g)

100 Fake Watches | IWC Replica Watch

Posted by: replica watches at November 17, 2009 02:27 AM (xpuiO)

Posted by: replica watches at November 17, 2009 11:09 AM (xpuiO)

Posted by: replica watches at November 18, 2009 01:05 AM (C/zDM)

Posted by: replica watches at November 18, 2009 03:38 AM (C/zDM)

Posted by: replica watches at November 18, 2009 08:51 PM (C/zDM)

105 mbt cheap
mbt sale
mbt uk
mbt shoes cheap
buy mbt shoes
shoes mbt sale

Posted by: mbtshoesbuy at November 23, 2009 12:16 AM (bNNim)

106 None of us are born with a set of shoes mbt shoes on our feet, but they are infinitely important to our wellbeing. Even though the commercial shoe http://www.mbter.com industry didn't get underway during the beginnings of civilization, man is believed to have constructed footwear mbt shoes 40,000 years ago. So the question isn't whether you should buy a pair of shoes... it's how should you go about buying them!
When you're shoe shopping, the task can seem overwhelming and frustrating. You just want to try on a few pairs of shoes and then get out of the store. But the reality is that you should pick out a pair of shoes mbt shoes with a lot more care than other items of your wardrobe. After all, the health of your feet are at stake!

Posted by: pigeu at November 23, 2009 08:02 PM (1aNEH)

107 The proper function of man is to live, but not to exist.ugg classic cardyConquer fear of death and you are put into possession of your life. ugg classic tallThere is a time to speak and a time to be silent. ugg knightsbridgefree shippingmbt cheap
mbt sale
mbt uk
mbt shoes cheap
MBT M.Walk

Posted by: reviewups at November 26, 2009 10:58 PM (xUZwC)

108 hot news for brand shoes online store ,do you want to win more discount ?and popular for younger,and nike air maxwith top quality A ,come on all air max shoes with lowest price for highest quality !

Posted by: nike air max at December 01, 2009 08:10 PM (OKj2x)

109 The cheap ugg boots sale for women are stylish, they are comfortable and what��s more, they keep your feet. theres a pair of fellow sufferers,ugg australia uk to complement your personal preferences, why do we not take the traditional high discount ugg boots on salefor cold winter?
As a matter of fact, with the passing time, the love for ugg usa is increasing among girls in this modern world. The growing demand for these womens ugg made the manufacturers UGG Boots Sale to revamp the looks of these boots with different hues.come our website and buy a pair of ugg uk.UGG Classic Cardy are popular as shoes for cowboys. The SHOES close the whole parts of the foot. The ugg cardy are important to protect your feet from any dangerous things during your walking activities. There are many oatmeal ugg available in the Market and if you are interested to get one you can directly go to the store that sells it.

Posted by: reviewups at December 03, 2009 02:45 AM (OKj2x)

110 discount ugg boots
ugg boots outlet
cheap ugg outlet
cheap ugg boots
ugg classic tall
ugg bailey button
ugg rainier
ugg classic cardy
ugg classic crochet
ugg classic mini
ugg classic short
ugg classic tall
ugg nightfall
ugg sundance
ugg ultra short
ugg ultra tall
ugg boots 5389

Posted by: uggboots at December 07, 2009 06:26 AM (Cooh2)

111 Today ugg boots online have become a phenomenon.Every winter,the ugg classic crochet are one of the hottest goods in the market all over the world.So now don't be hesitation,own a pair of ugg usa immediately.

Posted by: ugg boots sale at December 10, 2009 06:06 AM (I3/dZ)

Posted by: Lacoste shoes at December 12, 2009 12:53 PM (/3s/N)

113 The womens mbt Tembea is a new generation lace-up with Dual Board construction and a striking style that pays tribute to the classic sneaker. It packs in all the mbt lami shoes benefits with a fresh look and feel, striking the perfect balance between health benefits ... The discount mbt Shuguli GTX is a is a sleek and stylish professional shoe ideal for work and more formal occasions whilst delivering full waterproofing from GORE-TEX. These are especially effective for those who have to stand or walk for long periods of time ...
The mbt shoes Fanaka GTX is a sporty but rugged styled shoe that combines fashionable, casual design with all the health benefits associated with the sporting style discount mbt shoes. These are especially effective for ladies who have to stand or walk for long periods ... The black mbt Bia is a classic, professional shoe ideal for work and more formal occasions whilst delivering all the health benefits from MBT design. These are especially effective for ladies who have to stand or walk for long periods of time during work ...

Posted by: gfdg at December 14, 2009 01:04 PM (iV/dV)

Posted by: wholesale jewelry at December 15, 2009 01:43 AM (1dySH)

Posted by: wholesale jewelry at December 16, 2009 11:51 AM (1dySH)

116

Posted by: ugg sole at December 17, 2009 03:17 AM (kjiNu)

Posted by: wholesale jewelry at December 20, 2009 03:38 PM (1dySH)

118 nike air max 88
nike air max 89
nike air max 90
nike air max 91
nike air max 93

Posted by: nike air max 360 shoes at December 22, 2009 10:39 AM (xnxK1)

119 thank you very much,your article write very nice and usefull,i'm so like that i will recommend the article to my friends.Meanwhile,the nike air max sell in our air max store,if you like nike air max,you can view the beautifull womens air max in our website,thank you again.
http://www.shoe-wholesale.com/

Posted by: nike air max at December 23, 2009 10:19 AM (3i5cr)

120 Hair Straightener
GHD
GHD MK4
GHD MK5
Pink GHD
Pink GHI Hair
CHI Camo
Hair Straightener
GHI

Posted by: GHD at January 02, 2010 02:08 AM (8u0Dq)

121 nike shox for kids
nike shox monster
nike shox nz
nike shox nz ii
nike shox oz
nike shox R3
nike shox R4
nike shox R4 torch
nike shox R5
nike shox TL1
nike shox TL3
nike shox Torch
nike shox turb

Posted by: nike high dunk at January 02, 2010 02:12 AM (8u0Dq)

Posted by: replica watches at January 05, 2010 11:58 AM (ndMAX)

123 UGG cardy
Ugg Australia
Ugg Shoes Sale
Bailey Button
ugg boots
Ugg classic cardy
UGG cardy
Ugg Australia
Ugg Shoes Sale
Bailey Button
ugg boots

Posted by: ugg shoes|timberland uk|ugg boots|87415555.com.cn at January 06, 2010 06:54 AM (qzq48)

124 Un total de once comunidades autnomas estn este jueves en alerta naranja Christmas gift ugg tall boots (riesgo importante) por nevadas y bajan las temperaturas en toda Espa09a, segn la Agencia Estatal de Meteorologa (AEMET). En concreto, se Christmas gift ugg napoule sandal trata de Aragn, Cantabria, Castilla-La Mancha, Catalu09a, Christmas gift timberland classic boots Madrid, Navarra, Comunidad Valenciana, Galicia, Pas Vasco, Asturias y Murcia. La cota de nieve bajar a menos de 200 metros en el CantbricoLa Pennsula Ibrica est bajo dos borrascas y un anticicln que crearn un pasillo que permitir el paso de una corriente de aire muy fro, como la que est provocando un temporal de fro glaciar en Europa, aunque es esperan que el fro que suframos no sea tan intenso como en otros pases. An as, se espera que las bajas temperaturas se mantengan hasta el domingo. La cota de nieve baja en el Cantbrico a menos de 200 metros

Posted by: El temporal de fr��o y nieve pone en alerta a once comunidades aut��nomas ugg boots|ugg uk|timberlan at January 08, 2010 08:22 AM (tWrEP)

Posted by: air max shoes at January 28, 2010 12:30 AM (JOSIc)

126

The H4 replica watches took replica watches Harrison a massive 13 years to replica watches construct-but this was only the end of a lifetime's work. His genius was clear from the very beginning. Unfortunately many astronomers such as Nevil Maskelyne were convinced that a mechanical solution replica watches would not work and that only astronomy could solve the replica watches longitude problem. The fact that Harrison was from a working class family and had little replica watches formal education probably didn't help his prospects.Solving the longitude problem through horology meant designing a timepiece that could work accurately at sea. When you watch consider the rolling waves, changes in replica watches temperature and generally adverse replica watches conditions the dificulty of this task becomes apparent.The H1 was completed in 1735 and proved replica successful at sea. However the Board of Longitude demanded a full a transatlantic wholesale watch voyage. They gave Harrison a grant of 500 pounds with which he began work on the H2 watches.

Posted by: replica watches at January 30, 2010 09:21 PM (Ddc+V)

Posted by: airmax at January 31, 2010 10:37 AM (3vSvS)

128 Replica Watches have become trendy Replica Watches accessories to men and women apart from just being used to indicate time. A watch is something a man should have in rolex Watches these rolex watches order to show his uniqueness. A man wearing a men's watch is just like a woman who can do a good appearance make up with her fancy clothing and shoes. Especially a famous watch, it means a lot to a man.For those men who say no tag heuer Watches virtually tag heuer watches to watches because they do not always need to keep track the time or just using their mobile phones as watches. But they may need to think twice. Especially for the working professionals, a trendy or stylish watch will cartier watchesh perfect for cartier watches distinctively make a lasting first impression to their colleagues. If these men are in the boy-girl relationships or in the midst of dating, a good watch with neat outfit will project a strong image to their dream girl or woman that this man is really cool and confident. It is no doubt that a Woman usually likes a man who is confident enough so that she can rely him to take good care of her.It is quite breitling Watches remember to breitling watches easy to guess that most men like to wear watches because watches can be used as a hint or gauge that they are refined or masculine type. There are many types of watches for different age group. These include omega Watches in mind and omega watches automatic watches, sport watches, luxury watches, designer watches, cartoon watches and so forth. In today's fashion world, the trend is going back to chronograph watches. Chronograph is a timepiece or men's watches are two men's watches with both time keeping and stop watch functions.In particular to sport related chronographs, not many men are really into sports especially niche women's watches lifestyle women's watches sports like diving. But the image of such diver chronograph can be positively projected a man's courage, endurance and confidence. Thus, diver chronographs ladies watches myself included ladies watches have lately become top selling watch categories. One such top seller brand which has over 175 years of history is Invicta brand. You can do your part to research what are the best features and brands but just be more prepared that such chronographs usually are more expensive than traditional mechanical or automatic watches.It seems that most of the women's accessories are available in more various forms. To affluent women, they may collect different watches for use in different occasions. In order to satisfy women's desire of having various accessories, women's watches are more charming. Women do not really care how powerful or complex the watch is. They will focus more on design, colors and styles, i.e. the aesthetical beauty of a watch.

Posted by: replica watches at February 03, 2010 02:31 PM (5grrG)

Posted by: may at February 06, 2010 12:39 PM (Eu9Vs)

130 Factors Replica Watches About The Rolex replica watches Oyster The Oyster is so closely get in touch with Rolex, and it is inevitably that some people think these are the only Replica watches Rolex manufacture. Others suppose that there is a single Oyster watch. But as a matter of fact, the name Oyster does not actually meant for a rolex Watches particular watch you can buy rolex watches or even to a series but to a type of case that available in some of the Rolex ranges. History The Oyster case was first released in 1926. The objective was to protect the workings of the watch from dust and moisture. Early watches were far from waterproof. The Oyster tag heuer Watchescase was an tag heuer watches innovative design to eliminate these problems. It had a new double locking crown that screwed into place. It has been compared to the hatch on a submarine. Like a submarine, the Oyster case was waterproof. In 1927 Mercedes Gleitze swam the English breitling Watches Channel breitling watches . Before she set off she was presented with a Rolex Oyster. When she arrived, the watch was still working perfectly. The resulting publicity gave the new case a massive boost. Why is it called Oyster? Legend has it that Hans cartier Watches Wilsdorf cartier watches, who invented the Oyster, chose the name because the new case reminded him of the difficulty he had experienced prising open oysters at dinner. Since then the Oyster has further, particularly advanced. Many Oyster watches today are omega Watches perpetual-self-winding, in other omega watches words, it does not require to expose the mechanism to the outside world in order to wind it. The Osyter Perpetual is one of the toughest, most durable, most reliable watches (under truly adverse conditions). It is probably the best mechanical watch money can buy.

Posted by: replica watches at February 07, 2010 03:25 AM (TUJDt)

Processing 0.08, elapsed 0.0701 seconds.
15 queries taking 0.0084 seconds, 139 records returned.
Page size 130 kb.
Powered by Minx 0.7 alpha.