| Support
Contact
| Indian Navy Goes After PiratesThe upswing in pirate attacks around the world but especially off the Horn of Africa has been going on for awhile now but it's finally starting to break into the MSM (hijacking an oil tanker will do that). Several nations have sent warships to that troubled area in an attempt to deal with the problem. It looks like the Indian Navy has drawn the first series bit of pirate blood.An Indian naval vessel sank a suspected pirate "mother ship" in the Gulf of Aden and chased two attack boats into the night, officials said Wednesday, as separate bands of brigands seized Thai and Iranian ships in the lawless seas. ..."Pirates were seen roaming on the upper deck of this vessel with guns and rocket propelled grenade launchers," said a statement from the Indian navy. Indian forces fired back, sparking fires and a series of onboard blasts — possibly due to exploding ammunition — and destroying the ship. They chased one of two speedboats shadowing the larger ship. One was later found abandoned. The other escaped, according to the statement. Larger "mother ships" are often used to take gangs of pirates and smaller attack boats into deep water, and can be used as mobile bases to attack merchant vessels.The British Royal Navy, once the scourge of pirates has been told to ignore the problem lest captured pirates press a claim for asylum. The Indians seem to have dealt with that problem nicely by not taking prisoners. Nice. If you are interested in following the pirate situation I recommend Eagle 1's blog. I've been reading him on this subject for at least a year now and he's all over it. CommentsPosted by: Village Idiot at November 19, 2008 12:15 PM (NJvYJ) 2
I'm saddened that the U.S. didn't get first blood, but I guess as long as someone's killing pirates, it's jake. Besides, we mixed it up with the Barbary pirates back in the 1800's, right?
Posted by: Cautiously Pessimistic at November 19, 2008 12:16 PM (ltwze) 3
Seriously, arm your ship and shoot anything that approaches that can't verify they are official government representatives by radio prior to approach. I'm sure there are tons of anti-aircraft batteries available from decommissioned warships.Shoot first and ask questions later, whether it's Somali Pirates or Green Peace.
Posted by: Rocks at November 19, 2008 12:20 PM (Q1lie) 4
How terrible is it that the Royal Navy is nothing more than a joke now? Why even waste money on ships?
Posted by: Alex at November 19, 2008 12:21 PM (Tr7vq) 5
No prisoners!
Posted by: GarandFan at November 19, 2008 12:21 PM (eJ32B) 6
Where the hell is Tushar? He oughta be on here strutting around and crowing like a sumbitch.
Don't mess with them dot Indians. Hey pirates, who's your daddy? Posted by: OregonMuse at November 19, 2008 12:23 PM (FO+YO) 7
ARRRRR!
Posted by: Sort-of-Mad Max at November 19, 2008 12:23 PM (kKgTD) 8
Only strong democracies such as the U.S., Britian and now India are willing to go after pirates. What does this have to say about the Sauds with the loss of $100 million in crude?
Posted by: fbundy at November 19, 2008 12:24 PM (/K5oT) 9
WTF? Aren't these pirates the epitome of the type of combatant that has ZERO protections under any international treaties? And where are the mercenaries that could be hired to stand watch on these ships? Seems like a good business proposition for those private security guards currently in Iraq......
Posted by: Ken at November 19, 2008 12:24 PM (3rbzb) 10
Thank you, come again!
Posted by: Wyatt Earp at November 19, 2008 12:25 PM (sfjJC) 11
Hmm, pirate masala anyone? At least someone's navy has the balls to go after them and not worry about lefties screaming about the rights of the pirates!
Posted by: IC at November 19, 2008 12:26 PM (jZNCU) 12
Can anyone explain why none of the target ships seem to be able to fight back against the pirates? Can ships planning to sail through known piracy hot spots not arm themselves with their own machine guns, rockets, or torpedo launchers, and have crew trained to use them?
What prevents this -- some international convention, or the laws of their port countries, or do the shipping companies just have the same attitude towards arming their ships that urban liberals have towards personally-owned defensive firearms? Posted by: Alex at November 19, 2008 12:28 PM (OdxC7) 13
I wonder if, instead of "come get some!", the guy manning the machinegun was shouting "Please come again! Thank you very much please come again!" Posted by: Entropy at November 19, 2008 12:29 PM (m6c4H) Posted by: Kevin Costner at November 19, 2008 12:29 PM (wWwJR) 15
I don't understand why the merchant ships don't just protect themselves. It shouldn't be too difficult. Are they prohibited by law from shooting pirates?
Posted by: Bugler at November 19, 2008 12:30 PM (YCVBL) 16
Whatever happened to that ship with the mysterious cargo, and the Russian tanks that was hijacked a few weeks ago?
Posted by: HawaiiLwyr at November 19, 2008 12:30 PM (Mt4OE) 17
Way to go India! Here's hoping we get some pirate kills too! Though I would still like to carpet-bomb the ports they operate from. And, what the heck is wrong with the Brits? You don't give pirates asylum, you shoot them dead or if you capture some alive give them a quick trial on the spot followed by a quick hanging. Posted by: BattleofthePyramids at November 19, 2008 12:31 PM (tFaev) 18
Between the emasculation of the Royal Navy and Australia's 2 month holiday for sailors, Ronald Reagan's 600 ship Navy is missed more and more every day. I'm telling you, we need to buy this bucket and give our troops a nice R&R cruise. Nothing more relaxing than the occasional pirate beat-down.
Posted by: tim at November 19, 2008 12:33 PM (3Wewy) Posted by: myiq2xu at November 19, 2008 12:34 PM (2WD/G) 20
"Indians seem to have dealt with that problem nicely by not taking prisoners." No quarter. It's not just for nreakfast anymore. Posted by: Snoop-Diggity-DANG-Dawg at November 19, 2008 12:34 PM (y67bA) 21
Can ships planning to sail through known piracy hot spots not arm themselves with their own machine guns, rockets, or torpedo launchers, and have crew trained to use them? Meh. Some do. Cruise boats now have people in the crews trained for these things. Some shipping companies also hire bodyguard/mercenary escort vessels. Some companies are hot on it, others say it's irresponsible and dangerous. It also depends what your shipping. Hiring merc escorts for every shipment is very expensive, possibly costing more then having a few of them hijacked. You can load up the crew with weapons too, but the crew aren't trained soldiers. They're a sailing crew. There's a greater chance that if they start a firefight and loose, they'll wind up getting themselves killed. And I'm sure the crew themselves aren't hot on risking their lives over someone else's ship and cargo. Posted by: Entropy at November 19, 2008 12:35 PM (m6c4H) 22
I have a feeling India perceives this as an opportunity for themselves to establish a beneficial military presence on the world stage and expand their sphere of influence. They're right. And that's probably good. Even if the Royal Navy were permitted to act, I am not sure it would matter in the end anyway. The preening powers of Europe are so shriveled by impotence nobody takes them seriously as a force for anything anymore. Even their own citizens. America, take note.
Posted by: shropshirelad at November 19, 2008 12:35 PM (oqqhF) 23
No one is asking the really important question here: how will this impact "Talk Like A Pirate Day?" Posted by: TallDave at November 19, 2008 12:36 PM (AZmZT) 24
Indians vs. Pirates? That's like Dracula vs. Billy the Kid Actually, that series seems to be scheduled for June 24-27, next year, in Pittsburgh.Posted by: Alex at November 19, 2008 12:39 PM (OdxC7) 25
A (British) Foreign Office spokesman said: “There are issues about human rights and what
might happen in these circumstances. The main thing is to ensure any
incident is resolved peacefully."
I agree, these pirates should be in pieces. I don't see why they are worried about prisoners seeking asylum. If any pirates do surrender than disarm they and put them back on their boat and leave. They may come back but economically that won't work for the pirates very long. Even they gotta turn a profit once in awhile or try something else. Posted by: Rocks at November 19, 2008 12:41 PM (Q1lie) Posted by: Eric at November 19, 2008 12:41 PM (+7oCm) 27
Who knew the Indians even HAD a navy?
Posted by: headhunt23 at November 19, 2008 12:44 PM (OMCBg) 28
Every time I read about this my first reaction is "pirates, really, no, really pirates?" Good lord the world is trying to revert to barbarism.
Posted by: alexthechick at November 19, 2008 12:45 PM (SHHaV) 29
Posted by: shropshirelad at November 19, 2008 12:35 PM (oqqhF)
I was going to add something about that to the post but life got in the way. India is going to be a player in the future, as much if not more so than China simply because free people do better in the long run than those stuck in authoritarian kleptocracies. Yes, they have a long way to go and a lot of hurdles to overcome but better to get them close to us now and have an influence on their future. It drives me nuts that Democrats delayed and almost killed Bush's nuclear deal with India. They claimed it circumvented the non-proliferation regime. Well, so the fuck what? India is a democracy and shouldn't be treated the same as Pakistan or other wannabe nuclear terrorist nations. They finally got it passed last month. Of course it made zero news. Posted by: DrewM. at November 19, 2008 12:45 PM (hlYel) 30
You can load up the crew with weapons too, but the crew aren't trained
soldiers. They're a sailing crew. There's a greater chance that if they
start a firefight and loose, they'll wind up getting themselves killed.
And I'm sure the crew themselves aren't hot on risking their lives over
someone else's ship and cargo.
It's not just someone else's ship & cargo that's at stake -- there's also the prospect of being taken hostage by a gang of savages. You'd think that would enter into the calculation. Not to mention the fact that the more crews just roll over and hand over the keys to the boat, the more dangerous it becomes for every other crew out there. The pirates are so bold precisely because nobody seems to be fighting back. Posted by: Alex at November 19, 2008 12:45 PM (OdxC7) Posted by: free at November 19, 2008 12:47 PM (cFwGO) 32
Good lord the world is trying to revert to barbarism.
Posted by: alexthechick at November 19, 2008 12:45 PM (SHHaV) Read Steyn's post in The Corner about that sad fact. Posted by: DrewM. at November 19, 2008 12:47 PM (hlYel) 33
12 Can anyone explain why none of the target ships seem to be able to fight back against the pirates? Can ships planning to sail through known piracy hot spots not arm themselves with their own machine guns, rockets, or torpedo launchers, and have crew trained to use them? Well, a couple of reasons. One, on the super tanker, the crew was for some reason, probably not anxious to start a fire fight with well armed pirates while the floating on 1-2 M bbls of oil. If the question is a larger one, its a matter of ability and economics. Would the shipping company really be better off hiring essentially a security force for the trip, and paying said security force probably about 500K-1M per trip? What's the likelihood of a ship being pirated? the odds of any ship being pirated are long, and the ransom is just cheaper. It's also just cheaper to pay them off, as the pirates actually have a pretty good track record of returning the crews unharmed. Having the crews "defend" themselves - untrained amatures that they are - would probably only result in most of them getting killed. Posted by: headhunt23 at November 19, 2008 12:50 PM (OMCBg) Posted by: cheshirecat at November 19, 2008 12:53 PM (iSoGU) Posted by: krakatoa at November 19, 2008 12:55 PM (/FUhT) 36
It's not just someone else's ship & cargo that's at stake -- there's also the prospect of being taken hostage by a gang of savages. You'd think that would enter into the calculation. I don't disagree with you. And I would certainly want a rifle handy to fire back with, personally. But sadly, to the world's great detriment, everyone is not me. Opinions differ, like I said. Some companies do arm themselves, or hire armed mercenary escorts. Others don't and are opposed to the very idea of anybody doing it. Posted by: Entropy at November 19, 2008 12:55 PM (m6c4H) Posted by: Long Island at November 19, 2008 01:00 PM (9f5NQ) 38
Bigger issue here is India reaching west into Arab "space". The Arabian peninsula is very dependent on India for labor (skilled and unskilled). There are a lot of Indians with a lot of grievances in the Magic Kingdom and the Gulf States.
With Hindu Nationalists gaining power in India and a decent, professional military - esp in comparison the what the Arab field - we may see a lot of Arab begging and scraping for the US not to pull out of the Middle East. They have other problems then just a bunch of crazy Persians(Turks). The Saudis should have paid someone to take care of the this; now it is out of control. It would not shock me to see someone take over that old Soviet Navy base in Somalia. Posted by: Jean at November 19, 2008 01:01 PM (HVRSA) Posted by: MrsPaulsFishSticks at November 19, 2008 01:02 PM (iYbLN) 40
The British Royal Navy, once the scourge of pirates has been told to ignore the problem lest captured pirates press a claim for asylum.
Actually the British did draw first blood in this latest round of pirate BS. This article was on Foxa few days ago. I mentioned it in a post but nobody had any comment.
The royal Navy was told not to “apprehend them”, that doesn’t mean that they can’t kill them.
Also, the History Channel did that special on modern day pirates last year and their thing on crews arming themselves was typical liberal gun control BS. One must not fight back lest the violence escalate. Also, shooting guns aboard a ship could be “dangerous”.
As I said, typical liberal bull shit. What they need is a few ex-military armed with assault weapons and trained in repel boarders actions.
But also, what I said last week is still true. This shit will keep up until the international community takes action in the countries supporting and harboring these scum. That was true in the 17th century and it is true in the 21st century. Posted by: Vic at November 19, 2008 01:02 PM (Qd7GC) 41
33. Cost for on board expert security assistance for short duration hops thru the area would not be in the 500K range; your talking about a 2-3 men for 3 days, so with small arms and a good radio, helicopter on/off may be the biggest cost. I don't see how they would easily board/disembark on the east bound exit leg.
34. I'm afriad it will be a long time before we see the Pirates in the World Series. Posted by: Jean at November 19, 2008 01:07 PM (HVRSA) 42
"Captured pirates"? Why in the hell would you want to do that? Kill 'em where you find 'em.
Put one guy on a cargo ship who knows what he's doing with a Barrett M107, and he could fuck up a whole pirate ship's day. Posted by: Dang at November 19, 2008 01:07 PM (XFyLb) 43
Wait...India has a navy?
Posted by: Bob at November 19, 2008 01:08 PM (4DoFz) 44
This is an easy problem to solve (put some small U.S. naval patrols in the area; sink a few dozen pirate boats, especially the ones that are far out to sea). Bush needs to get this rolling before he leaves office.
Posted by: TomK at November 19, 2008 01:09 PM (hcSw8) 45
NPR had a feature about pirates a while back. They blamed Bush... actually, no, they didn't, it was a travelogue from a guy who had some scary encounters with them. He explained that pirates aren't romantic swashbucklers like in movies, but the way to think about them is like this: the guys who rob little old ladies at ATMs, or jack your car, or mug you in a dark alley, put them in a boat, and those are your pirates. They're just floating thugs.
Posted by: OregonMuse at November 19, 2008 01:10 PM (FO+YO) 46
Put a coupla sharpshooter in the crow's nest of the navy vessel and pop those pirates off one by one. Piece of cake. The world will thank them.
Posted by: kevlarchick at November 19, 2008 01:13 PM (TNuqz) 47
I still don't get it. The cost of 4 .50 cals is nothing compared to the cost of a tanker, and crewmen could be trained to fire them. In the pictures I've seen the pirates zoom up in little fiberglass boats. I'm no expert, but I'd guess a .50 could easily sink one of those boats a mile away. Problem solved. What am I missing?
Posted by: Bugler at November 19, 2008 01:14 PM (YCVBL) 48
44 This is an easy problem to solve (put some small U.S. naval patrols in the area; sink a few dozen pirate boats, especially the ones that are far out to sea). Bush needs to get this rolling before he leaves office.
Posted by: TomK at November 19, 2008 01:09 PM (hcSw Until some asshat apologists/pirate sympathizers start filing lawsuits on behalf of the dead pirates' family members, saying that the pirates' civil rights were infringed. Well, that'll only happen if the USN goes after the pirates. If any other nation, such as our friends in India, continue to take care of the problem, then we won't hear a peep. Yes, I'm incredibly cynical. Let's target the family members of the pirates, in addition to the pirates. How's that sound? Posted by: The Other Shoe at November 19, 2008 01:14 PM (Pus2I) 49
You don't give pirates asylum, you shoot them dead or if you capture some alive give them a quick trial on the spot followed by a quick hanging.
Steady on, mate! Let's not be too hasty here. Posted by: Jack Sparrow at November 19, 2008 01:15 PM (xKESL) 50
I don't think the solution here is Naval Patrols. The area is large with a lot of small craft action. You can't shoot every small fisherman or dhow plying those waters.
You need persistent airborne coverage and response. You need a clear communications plan. It's not worth a US Carrier - so what are you left with: basing patrol and response aircraft in Yemen or Somalia (eeh...) International shipping is not as well organized as aviation - so someone would have to make this happen. The only people I can think of to do are the insurers, and they are going to look at the bottom line. I believe the Indians have other motives for jumping in. Posted by: Jean at November 19, 2008 01:17 PM (HVRSA) 51
Who knew the Indians even HAD a navy? They do. It's built from decommissioned taxicabs and Slurpee machines, but it's good enough to kill them some pirates. Posted by: Hollowpoint at November 19, 2008 01:20 PM (plsiE) 52
Problem solved. What am I missing?
You forgot about Abrams, Rosenweig, Rosen, and O'Brian, world-class wrongful-death attorneys suing for the family of poor Shufed Umbop Al-Islam for 50 million bucks on a 75% contingency fee. Pirates have families too! Posted by: Sort-of-Mad Max at November 19, 2008 01:20 PM (kKgTD) 53
Gratz to India. So tired of developed nations being such politically correct panty-wastes that they will take crap from goons. Pirate ships are crammed with people and guns. They dont look or act like cargo ships. They don't look or act like fishing ships. They are easy to identify. It doesn't take a hoisted Jolly Roger to see what the hell they are up to. Find them. Sink them.
Posted by: Micheal at November 19, 2008 01:20 PM (MOsSq) 54
43:
Wait...India has a navy?
Not only does India have a navy, they're looking to acquire an aircraft carrier. As I understand it, they've paid Russia a buttload of money for one, but Russia has so far not delivered. Posted by: Anachronda at November 19, 2008 01:21 PM (3K4hn) Posted by: Dang at November 19, 2008 01:22 PM (XFyLb) 56
All credit to India for taking the "traditional" approach.
Posted by: EC at November 19, 2008 01:23 PM (mAhn3) 57
45:
but the way to think about them is like this: the guys who rob little old ladies at ATMs, or jack your car, or mug you in a dark alley, put them in a boat, and those are your pirates. They're just floating thugs.
Clearly, he was a ninja fanboi. Posted by: Anachronda at November 19, 2008 01:23 PM (3K4hn) 58
I do not know what the thinking in Washington is on this, but I would remind you all to think about American interests. Saudi Arabia humiliated Bush when he went there last time, so this may be some payback. A not to subtle hint that they need to pay attention to us when we talk.
Posted by: Harry at November 19, 2008 01:25 PM (J6QDn) 59
For all other comments about a 50cal or a sharpshooter ... Based on my experience, direct fire is not the way to go. A depressed angle shot with an "anti-material rifle" from a moving platform to a moving platform is not easy shot. Go on a boat and try and keep a pair of unstabilized binoculars locked on a target.
Now a old fashion M79 40mm grenade launcher and a little practice ... Provides a capability for warning shots using smoke rounds, illumination rounds for night, and buckshot for the really close stuff. Posted by: Jean at November 19, 2008 01:25 PM (HVRSA) 60
59:
Now a old fashion M79 40mm grenade launcher and a little practice ... Provides a capability for warning shots using smoke rounds, illumination rounds for night, and buckshot for the really close stuff.
Plus, good for fishing. Posted by: Anachronda at November 19, 2008 01:26 PM (3K4hn) 61
53 Every boat in that region is full of idiots with guns. Those clans conflicts don't stop when they get their feet wet and they are all smuggling something.
Additionally, there has traditionally been an unofficial market of sorts (drugs, food, etc.) between the small boats and the freighter crews. Now these Mother Ships and organized raiding parties - that's all new and probably linked to some "professional" assistance. Posted by: Jean at November 19, 2008 01:31 PM (HVRSA) 62
Look, just drop me onto that ship and I'll have it taken care of in less than 24 hours!
CLOE! Upload the schematics of that tanker to my phone right away! Posted by: Jack Bauer at November 19, 2008 01:31 PM (wWwJR) 63
I was under the impression it was still OK to hang pirates from the yard arm?
Posted by: I R A Darth Aggie at November 19, 2008 01:32 PM (1hM1d) 64
60 True. Bit rough on the shoulder for shooting clays off of the rear deck.
Posted by: Jean at November 19, 2008 01:32 PM (HVRSA) 65
The M 79. I loved shooting them things. An all purpose, get out of trouble quick weapon. I love anything that goes boom in the night.
Posted by: Harry at November 19, 2008 01:35 PM (J6QDn) 66
What they need is a few ex-military armed with assault weapons and trained in repel boarders actions.
Why stop there? why not just embarq a company of Marines on board a cargo ship driven by a Navy crew. Pirates show up to sieze the ship, Marines kill pirates, they move along to the next target area. Just change out ships every trip. Posted by: I R A Darth Aggie at November 19, 2008 01:37 PM (1hM1d) 67
After you kill the pirates, dress the front of your ship with their carcasses and go through pirate-infested waters like this. I'm thinking of the scene from the movie "Serenity" when they're traveling through Reaver space.
Posted by: The Other Shoe at November 19, 2008 01:39 PM (Pus2I) 68
PREPARE TO REPEL BOARDERS!!! Posted by: Paladin at November 19, 2008 01:39 PM (bWB5j) 69
65 The problem was it only went boom once. There is a new one floating around that's a six shooter.
Posted by: Jean at November 19, 2008 01:40 PM (HVRSA) 70
31 #l6, the pirates died of something mysterious. There was an unknown substance aboard that ship. Like what, a Navy SEAL? Posted by: Roy at November 19, 2008 01:43 PM (cB77O) 71
I'm thinking that it won't be long until we see wholesale, temporary reflagging of cargo ships when they are in the pirating areas, similar to the Operation Earnest Will situation in the 80's. The question is, who will take this step?
Posted by: IllTemperedCur at November 19, 2008 01:44 PM (Ds4I5) Posted by: Eeyore's Swinging Sack at November 19, 2008 01:47 PM (gxcKe) 73
I was under the impression it was still OK to hang pirates from the yard arm
It was until some time in the 1800s when more modern admiralty laws were developed. Current piracy law is contained within the Law of the Seas treaty which the U.S. has never ratified, but which we are following for the most part. In this international law pirate ships may be pursued and taken by any nation and tried in courts arranged by the nation doing the taking.
The implication is that the pirates would receive a trial in a civilian court and punishment accordingly. Posted by: Vic at November 19, 2008 01:49 PM (Qd7GC) 74
Joe Biden said that India doesn't have enough people for a Navy. They are all working in Dunkin Donuts or 7-11s.
Posted by: Jim King at November 19, 2008 01:52 PM (1Phgz) 75
How about giving teams of rednecks speedboats, automatic weapons, and a prize for whoever brings in the most pirate heads? We can get FOX of ESPN to finance it in exchange for the reality TV rights. Posted by: myiq2xu at November 19, 2008 01:56 PM (2WD/G) Posted by: myiq2xu at November 19, 2008 01:57 PM (2WD/G) 77
I have a suggestion. Let' send the pirates $200million, no strings attached. That way they'll know that we don't hate them.
Problem solved! Posted by: VP-Elect Joe Biden at November 19, 2008 01:59 PM (wWwJR) 78
Mr Biden, you strike me as the sort of man I can do business with.
Posted by: Jack Sparrow at November 19, 2008 02:06 PM (xKESL) 79
So let me see if I have this straight...
For Britain, it is better that pirates be killed, because if they aren't killed they will be granted asylum on the grounds that if they aren't granted asylum they would be sent back to their native country where they would be killed. The natural response to which is, "I think we can make that happen, Leftennant!" No? No. Instead, the response is "Quite a spot of bother we've found ourselves in, isn't it? I guess we'll just have to leave these chaps alone." Someone should put this article in a time capsule, so that a couple thousand years from now anthropologists in the next civilization will be able to pinpoint the exact place and time that our long-lost civilization went so completely batshit insane that it decided crime MUST be rewarded, PRECISELY BECAUSE the only other alternative would be to punish it. Posted by: The Guvnah at November 19, 2008 02:13 PM (Rg8DN) 80
75
How about giving teams of rednecks speedboats, automatic weapons, and a prize for whoever brings in the most pirate heads? I like it! Bass Boats retro fitted with machine guns and rocket launchers. We'll call 'em Kick-Ass Boats! Barrels in the front, beer in the back. I'd watch it! Posted by: Dang at November 19, 2008 02:13 PM (XFyLb) 81
Didn't Obama say we weren't gonna outsource anything any more? Guess that didn't include pirate trashing. Anyway kudos to the Indian Navy for a job well done.
Posted by: Captain Hate at November 19, 2008 02:16 PM (m2sQh) 82
>>"Indians seem to have dealt with that problem nicely by not taking prisoners."
Prisoners get clingy. Dead pirates don't cling so much. >>Who knew that India had a Navy. Dude, we have a decent sized navy. Been operating Aircraft Carriers for atleast 3 decades, and now building 3 of our own. Once they are commissioned, Indian Navy will be the third biggest naval force in the world, after the US Navy and the US Marines. Maybe even the second biggest, if Obama gets his way and downsizes the Marines. India has one important motivation for this. Indians constitute the largest manpower of global merchant shipping, and everytime shit happens, Indians die. The Navy finds the situation unacceptable. Posted by: Tushar at November 19, 2008 02:22 PM (PTWes) 83
Now that's what I'm talkin' about!
Go India! Now notice, boys and girls, that India just got done planting their flag on the moon, all by themselves, with no help from us smug 'Mericans, or the short-dicked Chinese, or the "Oops, so solly" boys over in Japan, or the EU. They did it themselves. Yes! (Fist in air!) Now that piracy (piracy! In the 21st century!) has reared its ugly head, what do they do? Why they go out, take no prisoners, killed a bunch of 'em until they died a lot, sank their boat all the way down to the bottom of the sea, and soon the sea lanes will be safe for all us nuclear wuss powers and oh-so-civilized idiots. India is the New Democracy! India has inherited the mantle that for too long sat on us US'er shoulders, wobbling around, and all shakey-like. I vote we put India in charge of the world. Besides, I like Tandori chicken and Nan bread and those hot honey balls (no, its not teh gay!) they serve in buffets. So there. Posted by: Steamboat McGoo at November 19, 2008 02:23 PM (1A5Ni) 84
Dead men tell no tales.
Posted by: mojo at November 19, 2008 02:24 PM (g1cNf) 85
The Indian Navy can get away with this because they're "coloured" too. Despite the mention above about the RN killing a few of the pricks, if an RN or other Commonwealth RCN or RAN, for example, or USN vessel killed all (or most) of the pirates attacking a merchant vessel, the Western MSM would go apeshit with the racism charges. It would probably happen if the French did it too, but the French public and government wouldn't give a shit, but the Anglosphere's MSM, governments and bureaucracies and the usual suspects amongst the population would bring down whoever did it if it were one of our navies. So, keep up the good work, Indian men, and enjoy the Bollywood musicals that will surely follow about the Indian Navy fighting pirates. Posted by: andycanuck at November 19, 2008 02:25 PM (6rN+7) 86
Steamboat,
US did provide some sensing equipment for India's moon mission. And those 'hot honey balls' are called Gulab Jamun. Posted by: Tushar at November 19, 2008 02:25 PM (PTWes) 87
I hopped over to Eagle 1's blog to read more and I was shocked to discover that not only have the pirates been escalating around Somalia, they are also boarding vessels around Singapore. In the Singapore area they are just mostly robbing the crew right now but it seems like with the laid back attitude the world is taking (except India-way to go!) toward the Somali pirates that this will embolden the ones over around Asia as well. There'd be a good way to fuck with our economy more, right there... At first I believed these pirates were only acting out of a desire to get money for themselves but with the massive amount of seizures I am now totally on board with the theory that this is a large scale financing operation for Al-Qaida. Bastards. Posted by: ParanoidInSeattle at November 19, 2008 02:26 PM (AJ4xq) 88
Not only does India have a navy, they're looking to acquire an aircraft carrier. As I understand it, they've paid Russia a buttload of money for one, but Russia has so far not delivered. India already has one carrier, Viraat, the old HMS Hermes of the Falklands Task Force. They got a good deal from Russia, where Ivan gave them gratis an old Kiev class ship, under the condition that India pay for the conversion into a full deck CV. They're still waiting, as the ship is over budget and overdue. Hint: "good deal" and "Russians" are never to be used in the same sentence. And finally, India is building their own indigenously designed medium sized CV at Cochin, which will probably enter service in 2012. I just spent some time in Goa, which is where the Flag Officer, Indian Naval Air is located. Posted by: Steve Skubinna at November 19, 2008 02:26 PM (1ii59) 89
Didn't Obama say we weren't gonna outsource anything any more? Guess that didn't include pirate trashing.
Consider it "Maritime Tech Support". Posted by: IllTemperedCur at November 19, 2008 02:27 PM (Ds4I5) Posted by: Tushar at November 19, 2008 02:28 PM (PTWes) 91
HANG THEM FROM THE YARD ARM BRING IN THEIR HEADS SWNING FROM THE BOWSPRIT
Posted by: Spurwing Plover at November 19, 2008 02:38 PM (GxfQr) 92
BTW,
US and Indian navies have been cooperating on anti-piracy and shipping-lane security for a few years now. If my memory serves me right, Indian Navy even provided armed escort to some US Navy supply ships that were feeding the Iraq war effort. Posted by: Tushar at November 19, 2008 02:39 PM (PTWes) 93
for those wondering, th eU.S Navy has been doing this for years. I was involved with CTF 150, the international task force charged with interdicting these thugs. My ship was involved with two separate incidents that resulted in at least one death and one sinking. This was over two years ago. We liberated a dhow being used as a mother ship and sunk the skiffs she was towing. The next time, the pirates fired on the Navy ship attetmpting to board them. Needless to say, many rounds were expended, causing one death and major maxillofacial surgery due to premature hope, change, and .50 caliber rounds, but mostly .50 caliber rounds.
Posted by: Jeff Weimer at November 19, 2008 02:41 PM (1Mn8Z) 94
NATO's been escorting, too, along with the USN on duty as well; and NATO and Coalition navies doing it at the same time as working around Iraq.
Posted by: andycanuck at November 19, 2008 02:48 PM (6rN+7) 95
andycanuck,
NATO has been providing escorts to US supply ships, but it was, atleast till now, reluctant to take on the pirates. This will change when Europe starts losing money to pirates. Posted by: Tushar at November 19, 2008 02:56 PM (PTWes) 96
What about some Alaskan wolf hunters in helicopters?
Posted by: myiq2xu at November 19, 2008 03:07 PM (2WD/G) Posted by: pendejo grande at November 19, 2008 03:15 PM (Y65Rl) 98
Can we get video, with musical accompaniment from the Dance Hall Girls like there is on the A10 vs Talibikers?
Posted by: April at November 19, 2008 03:23 PM (2B3NC) 99
How about Hooters girls in bikinis with AK-47's chasing down pirates in speedboats??
"Girls Gone Wild Somali Pirate Hunt" Posted by: myiq2xu at November 19, 2008 03:29 PM (2WD/G) 100
Posted by: Steve Skubinna at November 19, 2008 02:26 PM (1ii59)
God are the Russians screwing them on that. There's an offer out there to give them the Kitty Hawk if they buy F-18's (or the JSF, I don't remember). I hope that deal happens though I doubt it. The Kitty Hawk will be very expensive to operate and I doubt Obama will push it like Bush was. Posted by: Hugh Hewitt at November 19, 2008 03:37 PM (hlYel) 101
73. Current piracy law is contained within the Law of the Seas treaty
No it is not; see: Protocols to the UN Convention for the Suppression of Unlawful Acts Against the Safety of Maritime Navigation, (SUA for short). The relevant UNCLOS section deals with a broader scope (drug interdiction, PSI, security operations et al). The US is a party to the revised SUA, but not the UNCLOS.
87. In the Singapore area they are just mostly robbing the crew right now but it seems like with the laid back attitude the world is taking (except India-way to go!) toward the Somali pirates that this will embolden the ones over around Asia as well.
When I was in the Navy during the Clinton years the straits in Indonesia were a known area for pirates. Piracy there has been going on there for many years but it is mostly targeted against barges (shallower drafted vessels) or anchored ships, and directed towards fleecing the crew instead of kidnapping them or stealing the vessel. IMO the Indonesians are doing it the “right” way – relatively small amounts of cash, vessel and crew and cargo left to continue on – basically not significant enough to warrant anything more than a police action vice a military warship’s attention; who’d send a half a billion dollar warship and imperil its crew to stop the ocean-equivalent of a mugging?. And the local police/enforcement can be bought off or co-opted – a nation’s military not so much. I would not expect to see more high-profile acts of piracy in the waters off Indonesia, though if a few were to happen it would be a game changer.
Posted by: blogRot at November 19, 2008 03:56 PM (EKMxC) 102
101
73. Current piracy law is contained within the Law of the Seas treaty No it is not; see:
wow - my bad - after reading what I wrote you are right in both your content and in regards to piracy overall; I was more US centric in context and in the Somali piracy activity. (so kindly ignore that part of my post - "piracy" isn't even mentioned in the SUA though it applies) Posted by: blogRot at November 19, 2008 04:14 PM (EKMxC) 103
Piracy is contained in Part VII, Sections 100 through 107.http://tinyurl.com/6hu47b Posted by: Vic at November 19, 2008 04:30 PM (Qd7GC) Posted by: myiq2xu at November 19, 2008 04:36 PM (2WD/G) 105
Twin Oerlikons and twin M2s aren't expensive, nor are having a few men who know what they are doing. Just a cost of doing business. Life jackets - check; flak vests - check. Go to full speed, head away from the coast, yell for help on every frequency, shoot if they get close. At the start of the nineteenth century merchant ships were armed. At the end they weren't. And that change came about because Britain, France, the United States, and other powers put warships on patrol to deal with this. They did so well that the lesson has to be learned again. Sink 'em, kill 'em, destroy their bases. Posted by: Mikey NTH at November 19, 2008 04:43 PM (TUWci) 106
And that change came about because Britain, France, the United States, and other powers put warships on patrol to deal with this.
It stopped because the great powers went after the people who were supporting the pirates. That is the only way this shit will stop. Posted by: Vic at November 19, 2008 05:06 PM (Qd7GC) 107
Slurpees? You want some slurpees? Say hello to my slurpees and his little friend!
Posted by: NHGuy at November 19, 2008 05:30 PM (kLk/O) 108
This headline sounds like deranged Cleveland fans wreaking havoc in Pittsburg.
Posted by: Jazz at November 19, 2008 05:49 PM (JGP4g) 109
You know, in a lot of ways India is a really f*ed up country. But I am starting to like them more and more all the time for a bunch of different reasons.
They definitely have the right approach here. Enough pirates meet up with by big assed naval guns and I guarantee the problem will go away right quick. Posted by: Peggy38 at November 19, 2008 10:06 PM (QqO+R) 110
Steamboat,
Exactly! Like I said I am becoming more of an India-phile every single day. You couldn't be more right about the crucial factor being that they are a real bonafide democracy in the classic sense. They seem to be doing a fantastic job of taking what is best about their robust English colonial heritage (which the English could hardly identify much less practice these days) and adapting it to their own needs and culture. They aren't wannabes. They are doing it their way which to me is actually the whole idea of western democracy anyway. That is why I am so totally on their side. We need to back them up in big way. And yeah I was just as happy as you about them getting to the moon. Just purely happy for them. Can't say that about the f-ing Chinese govt. about anything. Posted by: Peggy38 at November 19, 2008 10:28 PM (QqO+R) 111
@8: "What does this have to say about the Sauds with the loss of $100 million in crude?" It's been years since they tipped that little? Posted by: Fa Cube Itches at November 19, 2008 10:58 PM (LxjSI) Posted by: adagioforstrings at November 19, 2008 11:14 PM (5mK/2) 113
So sad.... No one has suggested a free market solution to the problem? Have the government issue a few letters of marque and reprisal. Private individuals arm up some ships, go pirate hunting, bring back loot/reward money. Done and done. Posted by: Fa Cube Itches at November 19, 2008 11:23 PM (LxjSI) 114
I've wondered why there hasn't been a sting operation in play here, but maybe there is. I mean, plant a bunch of armed military on-board a ship and set it off s a target. Once the pirates board, blow them to hell. Then, I wondered, is it possible that there are captains aboard some of these ships that stand to gain by making their vessel a target? Not that I'm trying to blame the victim, I'm not, it's just that it seems awful damn easy for these thugs to gain control over vast ocean-going vessels. Posted by: jmflynny at November 19, 2008 11:30 PM (EJq2G) 115
balance of shoes nike shoes shoes.com adidas shoes puma shoes womens shoes dress shoes. casual shoes wholesale shoes sport shoes nike shoes shoes boots sandal shoes basketball shoes slippers shoes . replica rolex watches rolex watch replica watches- cartier watches- cartier watches swiss watch automatic watch chronograph watch. mens watch watch com men's watch the watch womens shoes leather shoes dress shoes running shoes . adidas shoes tote bag golf bag plastic bag purses bag briefcase bag steve madden shoes gold watch rockport shoes repairs watches best replica watches youtube watch youtube watch rolex watch rolex watches casio watches watches online timex watches tag watches. nike jordan shoes ladies watch leather bag replica handbag replica handbags wearing fashions clothes jorand shoes . oyster rolex dive watches replica watches- watches for men- timex watches buy watch rolex mens chrono watch elgin watch. automatic watch ladies watch mens watches new shoes steve madden shoes sneakers shoes sneaker shoes jorand shoes . rolex replica belts bag diaper bags travel bag laptop bag shoulder bag wears art glass urban wear fendi bag briefcase bag nike shoes men shoes fashion shoes women's shoes shoe store nike shoes best replica watches nike shoes men shoes fashion shoes women's watches cracked- medieval times- cidreq cidreq mens health ukraine 2009 calendar. chopper leipzig madsen donald duck isis king ncaa mens soccer cuny portal croazia . pasolini safari e-buddy espace pub rugby henderson waves jewelry ring wrist watches rolex watches replica watches fine watches casio watches watches online quartz watch. nike shoes ladies watch men's watch nike shoes running shoes Tiffany Bracelet basketball shoes jorand shoes . replica rolex watches rolex watch replica watches- fine watches- rolex datejust rolex mens watch repair oyster rolex watch. air flight ladies watch men's watch rolex submariner running shoes Tiffany Bracelet rolex replica jorand shoes . rolex replica watches rolex replica nike shoes rolex replica rolex replica fake rolex replica rolex replica watches rolex replica rolex replica rolex replica watches rolex replica best replica watches watches diamond watches replica watches rolex watches casio watches watches online timex watches tag watches. nike jordan shoes ladies watch luxury rolex watch nike shoes running shoes Tiffany Bracelet basketball shoes jorand shoes . oyster rolex dive watches replica watches- watches for men- rolex datejust buy watch rolex mens watch repair oyster rolex watch. air flight ladies watch seagull watches rolex submariner running shoes Tiffany Bracelet rolex replica jorand shoes . rolex replica watches rolex replica nike shoes rolex replica rolex replica fake rolex replica rolex replica watches rolex replica rolex replica shoe store nike shoes best replica watches nike shoes men shoes fashion shoes women's shoes shoe store nike shoes best replica watches nike shoes men shoes fashion shoes women's watches
Posted by: dressshoes at November 21, 2008 06:59 AM (bYVeT) 116
Some people like LV handbags,Some people like Chanel handbags,but most popel have been keeping an eye on cheap fashion brand handbags .we often talk about all kinds of designer handbags with my friends,most of my friends also like cheap fashion brand handbags.We admire cheap fashion brand handbags designer who often be able to design so many stylish handbags.We want to be a handbag抯 designer in the future too. In our store online,you can buy all series of cheap fashion brand handbags,include: Louis Vuitton,LV Luggage,LV Wallets,LV Agendas,LV Belts,LV Shoes,LV Accessories,Gucci,Gucci Wallets,Gucci Shoes,Marc Jacobs handbags,Marni handbags,Miu Miu handbags,Mulberry handbags,Prada handbags,Thomaswylde handbags,TOD handbags,Bottega Veneta handbags,D&G handbags,Dior handbags,YSL handbags,Coach handbags
Posted by: steve at October 15, 2009 03:44 AM (+aWy4) 117
Discount Boots
Womens UGG UGG Shoes UGG Australia UGG UK UGG USA discount ugg boots cheap ugg boots Posted by: fdsfds at October 27, 2009 08:01 PM (8kvkz) 118
buy Discount Boots
Womens UGG UGG Shoes UGG Australia UGG UK UGG USA discount ugg boots cheap ugg boots air force 1 shoes nike air force air force 1 mens air force 1 boots air force onefrom usa Posted by: airforceoneshop at November 03, 2009 08:48 PM (LHCCE) 119
discount Discount Boots
Womens UGG UGG Shoes UGG Australia UGG UK UGG USA discount ugg boots cheap ugg boots air force 1 shoes Nike air force air force 1 mens air force 1 boots air force onefree shipping Posted by: reviewups at November 06, 2009 07:21 AM (XxrVz) 120
Come to our website for shopping with high quality and best service! There have new products,MBT M. Walk
and MBT Lami,Welcome everybody to buy it. Posted by: mbt shoes at November 08, 2009 03:06 PM (QhfLM) 121
Buy discount ugg shoes
cheap ugg shoes cheap ugg ugg rainier buy ugg ugg usa discount ugg boots ugg 5825 ugg shoes sale ugg sundance ugg shoes cheap ugg boots ugg 5815 ugg sale ugg uk ugg knightsbridge womens ugg boots ugg boots ugg australia ugg 5819free shipping Posted by: ugg boots at November 12, 2009 09:59 AM (IeIJx) 122
buy [url=http://www.reviewups.com/]discount ugg shoes[/url]
[url=http://www.reviewups.com/]cheap ugg shoes[/url] [url=http://www.reviewups.com/]cheap ugg[/url] [url=http://www.reviewups.com/ugg-coquette-casual-shoes-c-22]ugg rainier[/url] [url=http://www.reviewups.com/]buy ugg[/url] [url=http://www.reviewups.com/]ugg usa[/url] [url=http://www.reviewups.com/]discount ugg boots[/url] [url=http://www.reviewups.com/ugg-classic-short-c-1]ugg 5825[/url] [url=http://www.reviewups.com/]ugg shoes sale[/url] [url=http://www.reviewups.com/ugg-sundance-c-5]ugg sundance[/url] [url=http://www.reviewups.com/]ugg shoes[/url] [url=http://www.reviewups.com/]cheap ugg boots[/url] [url=http://www.reviewups.com/ugg-classic-tall-c-3]ugg 5815[/url] [url=http://www.reviewups.com/]ugg sale[/url] [url=http://www.reviewups.com/]ugg uk[/url] [url=http://www.reviewups.com/ugg-knightsbridge-c-27]ugg knightsbridge[/url] [url=http://www.reviewups.com/]womens ugg boots[/url] [url=http://www.reviewups.com/]ugg boots[/url] [url=http://www.reviewups.com/]ugg australia[/url] [url=http://www.reviewups.com/ugg-classic-cardy-c-2]ugg 5819[/url]from usa Posted by: cheap at November 14, 2009 11:07 AM (s7MB5) 123
Replica Cartier | soccer jersey wholesale | Replica Omega | Fake Watches | Replica Cartier | Rado Watches Replica | Swiss Watches Replica | Replica Breitling Watch | Fake Ulysse Nardin Watches | A Lange & Sohne Replica | Chopard Watch Replica | Replica Glashutte Watch | Wholesale Roger Dubuis Watch | Corum Watch | Concord Replica Watches
Posted by: replica watches at November 17, 2009 05:49 AM (xpuiO) 124
replica soccer jersey | Fake Cheap Rolex | soccer jersey wholesale | Replica Breitling Watches | soccer jersey supplier | Replica Chopard Watch | Tag Heuer Watch | Concord Watches Replica | Chopard Replica Watch | Replica Gerald Genta Watch | Zenith Replica Watches | Fake Maurice Lacroix Watches | Rolex Ladies Watch Replica | Fake Japan Rolex Watches | Replica Cartier Watch
Posted by: replica watches at November 17, 2009 09:11 AM (xpuiO) 125
replica soccer jersey | replica soccer jersey | Fake Cheap Rolex | Replica watches | Replica Omega | Corum Watches | Fake Cartier | Replica Breitling | replica watches | Louis Vuitton Watch | Replica Glashutte Watches | Wholesale Bulova Watch | Glashutte Watch | Replica Corum Watch | Jacques Lemans Replica
Posted by: replica watches at November 17, 2009 10:36 PM (xpuiO) 126
Replica Cartier | Fake Watches | Replica Breitling Watches | Replica Cartier | Fake Cheap Rolex | Fake Other Watches | Baume & Mercier Replica Watches | Movado Watch | Cheap U-boat | Montblanc Wristwatch | Dkny Watches | Corum Wristwatch | Cheap Seiko | Dkny Watch | Cheap A.lange Sohne Fake Watch
Posted by: replica watches at November 18, 2009 06:26 AM (C/zDM) Processing 0.07, elapsed 0.0784 seconds. |
MuNuvians
MeeNuvians
Polls! Polls! Polls!
Dale's ECB Election Projection Federal Review Real Clear Politics Rasmussen Reports Gallup Zogby FoxNews Polls Sabato/Crystal Ball Frequently Asked Questions
The (Almost) Complete Paul Anka Integrity Kick
Primary Document: The Audio
Paul Anka Haiku Contest Announcement Integrity SAT's: Entrance Exam for Paul Anka's Band AllahPundit's Paul Anka 45's Collection AnkaPundit: Paul Anka Takes Over the Site for a Weekend (Continues through to Monday's postings) George Bush Slices Don Rumsfeld Like an F*ckin' Hammer Top Top Tens
Democratic Forays into Erotica New Shows On Gore's DNC/MTV Network Nicknames for Potatoes, By People Who Really Hate Potatoes Star Wars Euphemisms for Self-Abuse Signs You're at an Iraqi "Wedding Party" Signs Your Clown Has Gone Bad Signs That You, Geroge Michael, Should Probably Just Give It Up Signs of Hip-Hop Influence on John Kerry NYT Headlines Spinning Bush's Jobs Boom Things People Are More Likely to Say Than "Did You Hear What Al Franken Said Yesterday?" Signs that Paul Krugman Has Lost His Frickin' Mind All-Time Best NBA Players, According to Senator Robert Byrd Other Bad Things About the Jews, According to the Koran Signs That David Letterman Just Doesn't Care Anymore Examples of Bob Kerrey's Insufferable Racial Jackassery Signs Andy Rooney Is Going Senile Other Judgments Dick Clarke Made About Condi Rice Based on Her Appearance Collective Names for Groups of People John Kerry's Other Vietnam Super-Pets Cool Things About the XM8 Assault Rifle Media-Approved Facts About the Democrat Spy Changes to Make Christianity More "Inclusive" Secret John Kerry Senatorial Accomplishments John Edwards Campaign Excuses John Kerry Pick-Up Lines Changes Liberal Senator George Michell Will Make at Disney Torments in Dog-Hell Greatest Hitjobs
The Ace of Spades HQ Sex-for-Money Skankathon A D&D Guide to the Democratic Candidates Margaret Cho: Just Not Funny More Margaret Cho Abuse Margaret Cho: Still Not Funny Iraqi Prisoner Claims He Was Raped... By Woman Wonkette Announces "Morning Zoo" Format John Kerry's "Plan" Causes Surrender of Moqtada al-Sadr's Militia World Muslim Leaders Apologize for Nick Berg's Beheading Michael Moore Goes on Lunchtime Manhattan Death-Spree Milestone: Oliver Willis Posts 400th "Fake News Article" Referencing Britney Spears Liberal Economists Rue a "New Decade of Greed" Artificial Insouciance: Maureen Dowd's Word Processor Revolts Against Her Numbing Imbecility Intelligence Officials Eye Blogs for Tips They Done Found Us Out, Cletus: Intrepid Internet Detective Figures Out Our Master Plan Shock: Josh Marshall Almost Mentions Sarin Discovery in Iraq Leather-Clad Biker Freaks Terrorize Australian Town When Clinton Was President, Torture Was Cool What Wonkette Means When She Explains What Tina Brown Means Wonkette's Stand-Up Act Wankette HQ Gay-Rumors Du Jour Here's What's Bugging Me: Goose and Slider My Own Micah Wright Style Confession of Dishonesty Outraged "Conservatives" React to the FMA An On-Line Impression of Dennis Miller Having Sex with a Kodiak Bear The Story the Rightwing Media Refuses to Report! Our Lunch with David "Glengarry Glen Ross" Mamet The House of Love: Paul Krugman A Michael Moore Mystery (TM) The Dowd-O-Matic! Liberal Consistency and Other Myths Kepler's Laws of Liberal Media Bias John Kerry-- The Splunge! Candidate "Divisive" Politics & "Attacks on Patriotism" (very long) The Donkey ("The Raven" parody) News/Chat
|