| Support
Contact
| A Surge in AfghanistanA long analysis at Smal Wars Journal. Executive Summary: The situation is far less succeptible to surge tactics due to Afghanistan having a larger population than Iraq (32 million versus Iraq's, what, 25 million?), and furthermore dispersed in small villages rather than concentrated in cities. There is no chance of achieving the doctrinal requirement of 20 insurgent troops (including indigenous forces) per 1000 of the population, even in the Pashtun areas. An optimistic projection of adding eight combat brigades (as opposed to the five surged in Iraq) only gets us a 10:1000 ration of COIN forces to population, which would be helpful, but still is only half of what doctrine suggests. Add to that the fact that the borders are well-nigh unsecurable and that the Pashtuns in Afghanistan are determined to assist the insurgency -- and that we can't often pursue them across the borders -- and the magnitude of the problem becomes apparent. Michael Yon, in fact, suggests that we not even attempt the surge, as he thinks the 15,000-40,000 troops we could conceivably insert into Afghanistan aren't enough as it is. He says finish the job in Iraq first. Bush really should have increased the size of the armed forces by a division or two on Sept 11. Another point that seems worth mentioning is that thanks to the great (leftwing happy-talk) global crusade against mines, we can't seed the various terrorist trails with mines and channel them into trails controlled by US forces. This despite the fact that the US is extremely cautious about marking, and later removing, mines, and that the loss of life from unimpeded Taliban infiltration into Afghanistan greatly exceeds the possible civilian deaths from minefields (with prominent warning signs and directions to non-mined, but guarded, alternate routes). Correction: Small Wars Journal, not Long War Journal.Comments1
Iraq and Afghanistan have about the same population; Iraq is 29 million and Afghanistan is 31.
Posted by: Robert at November 16, 2008 03:52 PM (Ym7rz) 2
Psst! I think it's called Small Wars Journal.
Posted by: YourAssIsTooBigForTheTent at November 16, 2008 03:54 PM (P1Evy) 3
Racist!
Posted by: The Landmines at November 16, 2008 04:03 PM (Am6n/) 4
This isn't really surprising.
Iraq was 'doable' because it was a real country, it just suffered from a brutal dictatorship (and yes, sectarian issues). Still, they produced doctors, engineers, businessmen, etc that you need to have a real country. Afghanistan? Um, not so much. It's not now, nor has it ever been, a country as the modern world understands the term. We need to consider that 'victory' there is different from Iraq. We can't make it something it's never been but rather continue to deny its use by the enemy as a sanctuary from which to strike us. That's not as satisfying but it might just be the best we can do. Posted by: DrewM. at November 16, 2008 04:07 PM (hlYel) 5
Oh and Iraq has oil. Lots of oil.
It gives them something to build with. Afghanistan's biggest resource? Poppies. Posted by: DrewM. at November 16, 2008 04:08 PM (hlYel) 6
bush should of nuked tora bora with a coupla-three-four-more tactical nukes in 2001 and thake out all the AQ leadership and all the taliban leadership.
now what to do? tell 10% bhutto and the other crooked pro-islamists running the show in pakiland that in one month we're gonna declare pakistan's FATA region an outta control lawless non-national territory and call "talibanistan" and then give the people there three weeks to evacuate and then nuke it / vaporize it. end of problem. for us. pakistan and afghanistan, Posted by: reliapundit at November 16, 2008 04:23 PM (Hhqr7) 7
THIS IS THE WRONG WAY:
President Hamid Karzai of Afghanistan has offered to provide security for the Taleban's reclusive leader, Mullah Omar, if he agrees to peace talks. Mr Karzai made the offer despite the multi-million dollar bounty offered for the militant leader's capture by the United StatePosted by: reliapundit at November 16, 2008 04:24 PM (Hhqr7) 8
I think we should pull out of Afghanistan. Go back in periodically and wreck it if they give us any problems. but otherwise, just line up a firing squad and shoot the prisoners we've got and then leave. Nation building is crap. Fallacy. Waste of resources.
Posted by: TCO at November 16, 2008 04:39 PM (nfuZQ) 9
Plus it's fucking land locked.
Posted by: TCO at November 16, 2008 04:40 PM (nfuZQ) 10
I'd like to see if these work--the smart mines:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intelligent_Munitions_System As seen on TV! Posted by: Johnny I at November 16, 2008 04:43 PM (lIamh) 11
Congress authorizes the size of the military, not the president.
Posted by: Purple Avenger at November 16, 2008 05:20 PM (OqXyp) 12
Accoring to Dalton Fury, the Delta Force commander in charge at Tora Bora (see his book - Kill Bin Laden), our coalition allies wouldn't stand for us mining the escape routes out the back of Tora Bora. This did allow,in part, for the escape of some AQ. His book, which is really politcally neutral, for the most part, describes in detail what went on in the much discussed battle of Tora Bora, and it's a very different account than the standard media stories. Plus it's very interesting look into Special Forces Operational Detachment-Delta. Posted by: Wolverine at November 16, 2008 05:25 PM (/Zcox) 13
And that would be "according" ... never type immedialtely after a football induced sleep coma ... collecting favorite inspirational sayings .... just click on my name
Posted by: Wolverine at November 16, 2008 05:33 PM (/Zcox) 14
Christopher Hitchens warned -- over three years ago -- that our drug-war motivated policy of eradicating poppy fields would backfire and I suspect that it is a big source of Al Queda resergence (it was how they initially rose to power in the first place). Rather than eradicating poppy fields, we should shift our policy to buying out the poppy farmers and using the crop for legal domestic medical uses, thus drying up Al Queda's financing. Kinda like what we should have been doing years ago in driving up supply of domestic oil production to drive down the price of oil and undemine Iran, Russia, and Venezuela. Posted by: Sean P at November 16, 2008 05:34 PM (8g9lw) 15
>>>Congress authorizes the size of the military, not the president.
I cannot imagine congress would have refused. Posted by: ace at November 16, 2008 05:38 PM (8T2pi) 16
provide security for the Taleban's reclusive
leader, Mullah Omar, if he agrees to peace talks
Omar needs a helicopter "crash". Those damn things are falling out of the sky all the time you know. I'm just saying... Posted by: Purple Avenger at November 16, 2008 05:39 PM (OqXyp) 17
he'd be pretty secure 6 feet underground in a pine box ... like the idea Purple Avenger
Posted by: Wolverine at November 16, 2008 05:45 PM (/Zcox) 18
I cannot imagine congress would have refused.
Congress can up it even if the president doesn't want it too. The thing is, did the military want it? Do we even need it? We've had 10's of thousands tied down in Korea for 50 years. Maybe its time to take those training wheels off? Same with Europe. Its about time for the training wheels to come off there too. We've got 10's of thousands garrisoning CONUS bases. Are they really necessary? Might they be offset with a older "home guard" type group? It wouldn't be too hard to get older out of work guys to volunteer for domestic garrison/maintenance duty, but the military won't accept them. A lot of the non-combat CONUS stuff could be handled by guys in their 50's or 60's. I just don't think we've been too creative about where to obtain staffing from. Posted by: Purple Avenger at November 16, 2008 05:50 PM (OqXyp) 19
We need to get out, nothing to save there, no Oil to worry about. These ttothless privatives deserve their fate, let Pakistan worry about it Just let it become a SpecOps playground from here on out. There is no real country to liberate/save We would have been far, far better off doing the Iraq building in Iran Posted by: bob hussein dole at November 16, 2008 05:53 PM (yl9yA) 20
Let me expand on the other problem: logistics.
Very simply put, we have only a few ways to provide supplies and equipment to our troops in Afghanistan. As it is, we provide a lot of extra equipment and supplies because of the loss rate. Now imagine putting in double again the troops that we have and trying to supply them with the two unprotected routes coming out of Pakistan, one route out of Tajikistan and some flights. To do any surge of that size, we would basically have to re-invent the Berlin airlift. But, this time, you'd know that the enemy would have no compunction about shooting down the hundreds of air craft coming in there because we are already at war. It would be a target rich environment. Posted by: kat-missouri at November 16, 2008 06:06 PM (GxnBZ) 21
In short, while Iraq is not won, Afghanistan is a disaster in the making. We have the tiger by the tail and no clue how to get off. The good news is that Afghanistan, is probably the less important front, aside from some unforseen earthquake in pakistan. The bad news is it's also the choice front, for largely sentimental and partisan political reasons at that, of our idiotic new leadership. Woohoooooo.
Posted by: MlR at November 16, 2008 06:15 PM (PLmsY) 22
Christopher Hitchens warned -- over three years ago -- that our
drug-war motivated policy of eradicating poppy fields would backfire
and I suspect that it is a big source of Al Queda resergence (it was
how they initially rose to power in the first place).
Maybe ol Chris can explain "damned if you and damned if you don't" to you since you think some general commentary pundit can write war policy? Look, it wasn't some moralistic "war on drugs" that had us eradicating poppy fields, crack heads. It is because the billions of dollars that these drug lords are making and funneling to AQ and the Taliban to support their war efforts. So, basically, it's a choice between letting them make billions of dollars to buy weapons, EFPs and people to support their insurgency or it is piss off the locals by eradicating their money making crops, who then join the insurgency. but, at least they'll be poor insurgents with just an AK-47 instead of rich insurgents with EFPs and MANPADS and other weapons that can really do harm to our troops. The real issue here is not whether we should or should not destroy poppy crops, but whether there is a long term solution to replacing those crops as money making crops that create a better condition of living. The two problems there are that a) the land: is it arable? will it support other crops (it's not a given that poppies growing in one place means any other crop will suffice) b) planting cycles: you can't just go in, in the middle of a planting cycle,destroy their crops and then try to get these farmers to plant something that will not have enough time to grow and mature before the growing cycle is up. They will have no money to live through the winter. Their families will starve. That is one reason why the past eradication of poppies created more insurgents. Not just because they were pissed about the poppies being gone, but because they needed money to support their families when the poppy crop was gone and had no way to make it but to pick up a gun. You have to be smart about it. We were not smart. We did it as "drug war" instead of "agricultural improvement". Posted by: kat-missouri at November 16, 2008 06:18 PM (GxnBZ) 23
The two problems there are that a) the land: is it arable? will it
support other crops (it's not a given that poppies growing in one place
means any other crop will suffice) b) planting cycles:
Let me add c) market decline for agricultural products: if the price of the replacement crops cannot compete with the price of poppies then the farmers don't make enough money. That is why in some areas they have tried to replace the poppy crops with a crop that has two or three planting cycles before the winter. You have to start at the beginning of the planting cycle. But, that also leaves the question of what will the land and weather in the area permit for crops. I would also note that the idea of buying poppies for pharmaceutical purposes has been pushed off. As many might be aware, morphine was originally an extract of opium or poppies. However, because the purity actually is hard to control and, thus, the dosing, it is now made with synthetics. Posted by: kat-missouri at November 16, 2008 06:28 PM (GxnBZ) 24
Everyone here knows this, but on change.gov, Obama says he and Biden will "...finish the fight against the Taliban and al Qaeda in Afghanistan...Obama and Biden will refocus American
resources on the greatest threat to our security -- the resurgence of
al Qaeda and the Taliban in Afghanistan and Pakistan..."
That gun grabbing stuff is back in the Agenda too. Posted by: stace at November 16, 2008 06:35 PM (JO0c/) 25
but whether there is a long term solution to replacing those crops as
money making crops that create a better condition of living.
BTDT. There were/are already many efforts underway to show the locals how to grow something that pays better than poppy (the locals do NOT get rich off the poppy harvest, its everyone downstream who cashes in). The problem of course is that the Taliban needs the locals growing poppy rather than exotic flowers, beans, whatever, because poppy is a weapon and source of income for them. Hence, locals who do cut over to more lucrative (for the locals) cash crops wind up terrorized and murdered by the Taliban. Afghan farmers have no love affair with poppy, they do want to keep their lives though. As in Iraq, it all boils down to local security. Lacking that, reform efforts inevitably fail. Posted by: Purple Avenger at November 16, 2008 08:29 PM (OqXyp) 26
Atlas Shrugged has a transcribed speech from VDH that is his usual laser sharp insight into BO and expectations.
http://atlasshrugs2000.typepad.com/atlas_shrugs/ "I think in the Obama view , men like him that are charismatic, articulate, they can change the world because it's naturally a peaceful thing until people like George Bush rush in and through their stubborness "smoke 'em out dead or alive" vernacular destroys it but the fact of the matter is the only reason there is any semblance of peace and tranquility in the world today is because in places as diverse as the Aegean, planes overflying in Greek airspace daily, where there's near fighting on Cypress, or whether we are talking about the Korean sea and the Philippines, Taiwan, South Korean democracies not going nuclear because the United States is there ... or whether Russian ships keep [intelligible] away every hour ... all of that is predicated on the presence of the United States. Posted by: locus ceruleus at November 16, 2008 08:55 PM (e2mBS) 27
I really don't think the countries population would effect a surge strategy. You would have to run it differently of course, since it's a different country, but it could be adapted. Also you would have to run it on a larger scale, but Afghanistan doesn't have more than 2 million people more than Iraq.
Posted by: kadel at November 16, 2008 09:21 PM (SfpsN) 28
Different country you need a different strategy. Send it to the "think tank" like they did in Iraq.
Side note, my friends nephew deployed to Afghanistan; when he came back he described it as "a shit hole with nothing there" Posted by: Mike H at November 16, 2008 09:59 PM (1V2sa) 29
Nonsense. Borders are securable, it just takes defining the difference between secure and unsecure areas/borders.
Consider the task like a Risk game where you start with one or a couple disconnected countries surrounded 'countries' surrounded by bad guys. Taking over the region requires a strategy where newly secured territory eliminates or reduces the need for border security in some fashion, allowing border security to be moved to new borders. Sometimes one expands outwardly, sometimes one surrounds and crushes outside in, sometimes one squeezes -- allowing the enemy an "escape" route that is turned against them in some fashion at the choke point. There's also various counter guerilla options based upon how insurgents tend to 'live' off the land a lot -- Leave goods with various innocuous tracking devices (like UPS does to shipments) to be stolen that can be tracked to 'home'. Posted by: Dr Fred at November 16, 2008 10:37 PM (JbxXM) 30
Bush really should have increased the size of the armed forces by a division or two on Sept 11.
kat-missouri is right. The problem with putting troops in Afghanistan is not lack of troops, it's "how many combat troops can we support there?" That is a limitation of the country, it's land locked status, and it's crappy transportation network. We've been working on improving the last problem, which is why we can probably support more troops there now than we could have 5 years ago. But the problem with Afghanistan is logistics, not number of US Troops. Posted by: Greg Q at November 16, 2008 11:11 PM (87k2j) 31
Bush should have reinstated the draft after 9/11. the armed forces should have been beefed up, tax cuts rescinded and the whole country made to sacrifice in time of war. Instead the volunteer armed forces and national guard carried the whole burden and for the great majority of the country 9/11 faded into the past. My wife asked me if we would prevail against terrorism after 9/11 and I replied only if it was quick, otherwise the country would forget and lose interest. That is exactly what happened!!! I am a New Yorker, i can no longer look at the downtown skyline without grieving. When I find myself softening I remember my fellow New Yorkers holding hands with strangers and leaping from the towers to escape death by inferno. My hatred is fresh and has not cooled. Bush did a decent job but he never rallied the country to his cause. GWB did not know how to use the bully pulpit. My daughter, a ACLU card carrying super lib, was for the war in Iraq and Afghanistan, yet she pointed out the GWB was terrible at making his case. During WWII there were movies called "Why WE Fight", in the age of the internet there should have been a modern equivelant. GWB almost destroyed the Republican party because of his war on terror. Democrats were able to stake out the position that this was not their war. They then proceeded to bash us over the head for years for trying to do the right and honourable thing. Look at our party now. We are in opposition and the majority party is led by Obama, Reid and Pelosi. How the hell did this happen. Not in my wildest nightmares did I forsee this!!! What has happened to my country. We were attacked, fought a war on terror and somehow lost almost everything. My heart is broken.
Posted by: Bob t at November 17, 2008 12:34 AM (DmlVS) 32
@30: Most of the NATO troops in Afghanistan are a drain on logistics, too. They require supplies, but - with a few exceptions - they don't fight. They should be replaced with troops who actually *add* to the combat strength in country.
Posted by: Fa Cube Itches at November 17, 2008 01:16 AM (RWmCt) 33
Ace, we effectively DID add several combat divisions after 9/11. The heart of each division was its manuver brigades, and each of the Army's ten divisions (mostly) had three on 9/11. 2nd Infantry in Korea only had two, so did the 10th Mountain at Drum. I forget when 1st Cavalry got their 3rd Brigade again, I think it was in the late '90's. Now seven years later, most every one of the ten divisions has four, and in one case, by absorbing the expanded 1/501 Parachute Infantry in Alaska, the Hawaii-based 25th ID has five. You also still have the independent players of the 2nd and 3rd Armored Cavalry Regiments and the Italy-based 173rd Airborne Brigade. While we didn't add more division HQ's, which is a good thing, we went from ten old-pattern divisions to the equivalent of something like fourteen. It's the number of deployable brigade/regimental combat teams you have to keep an eye on. Posted by: SGT Dan at November 17, 2008 06:30 AM (Q6BTe) 34
Bush really should have increased the size of the armed forces by a division or two on Sept 11. More like eight-plus or so. And someone should've taken Rummy aside on 9/11 and said, "I know you're not fond of nation-building vs. high-tech warfare against a peer competitor, but our national security environment is going to have a whole bunch more of the former than the latter. Deal with it." Posted by: Cobalt Shiva at November 17, 2008 12:57 PM (hJZz1) 35
Kat-Missouri: I don't get you. You slam me as an ignorant crackhead and then parrott my entire point in a much longer form. You might want to cut back on your psyche meds.
Posted by: Sean P at November 17, 2008 01:14 PM (Gzyo5) 36
I like how we ran Somalia. Have the Ethipians go in and fuck around without these pussy ROE. Use some drones and naval gunfire and planes and such. Don't fucking land and try to civilze the fucking barbarians though. Posted by: TCO at November 17, 2008 11:08 PM (nfuZQ) 37
Perfect iPod to PC transfer software helps you transfer between iPod/iPhone and personal computer. The iPod to PC transfer can transfer iPod/iPhone music, video, photos, iPod podcast and TV program to PC. It can transfer iPod to PC, transfer iPod to iTunes, transfer between iPod and iPhone, and among several iPods/iPhones. transfer iPod to PC is versatile iPod transfer software to help you backup Songs & Videos from ipod to computer. The iPod to PC transfer software can efficiently transfer iPod music, photos, video and movies. The iPod transfer software connects your iPod to PC with the ability of transferring all kinds of files from iPod to Computer.The FLV to iPod software is a powerful software which can convert FLV to iPod with hight outputquality either extract audio from FLV to iPod supported audio such as AAC, MP3, WAV or convert FLV to iPod supported video formats such as mp4, m4v, mov, H.264, MPEG4, etc......
Posted by: cccccc at January 05, 2009 02:20 AM (wra3/) Posted by: hgfj at February 02, 2009 08:32 PM (zCAjn) 39
Some people like LV handbags,Some people like Chanel handbags,but most popel have been keeping an eye on cheap fashion brand handbags .we often talk about all kinds of designer handbags with my friends,most of my friends also like cheap fashion brand handbags.We admire cheap fashion brand handbags designer who often be able to design so many stylish handbags.We want to be a handbag抯 designer in the future too. In our store online,you can buy all series of cheap fashion brand handbags,include: Louis Vuitton,LV Luggage,LV Wallets,LV Agendas,LV Belts,LV Shoes,LV Accessories,Gucci,Gucci Wallets,Gucci Shoes,Marc Jacobs handbags,Marni handbags,Miu Miu handbags,Mulberry handbags,Prada handbags,Thomaswylde handbags,TOD handbags,Bottega Veneta handbags,D&G handbags,Dior handbags,YSL handbags,Coach handbags
Posted by: steve at October 15, 2009 04:11 AM (+aWy4) 40
UGG Boots Sale
ugg shoes ugg classic cheap ugg UGG UK bape shoes bape shoes sale cheap bape shoes UGG UK UGG boots sale UGG Classic discount UGG UGG Bailey Button UGG Amelie Suede UGG Bailey Button UGG Classic Cardy cheap UGG Cardy UGG Classic Crochet UGG Classic Mini UGG Classic Short UGG Classic Tall UGG Coquette Casual UGG Gypsy Sandal UGG Halendi Sandal UGG Hammond Slipper UGG Infant's Erin Baby UGG KnightsBridge UGG Layback Slipper UGG Lo Pro Button UGG Matala Sandal UGG Napoule Sandal UGG New Arrival 5389 UGG New Short Boots Posted by: retailike at October 17, 2009 02:16 PM (zFgZJ) 41
Air force 1 shoes
Nike air force one Nike air force Air force 1 mens Air force one UGG Boots UGG Australia UGG Shoes UGG Sale Lebron Shoes Cheap UGG UGG Boots UGG Shoes Discount UGG UGG Australia UGG Sale UGG Online Posted by: FDSAFDS at October 18, 2009 02:14 PM (GQ3Y4) 42
Discount Boots
Womens UGG UGG Shoes UGG Australia UGG UK UGG USA discount ugg boots cheap ugg boots Posted by: fdsfds at October 27, 2009 07:58 PM (8kvkz) 43
buy Discount Boots
Womens UGG UGG Shoes UGG Australia UGG UK UGG USA discount ugg boots cheap ugg boots air force 1 shoes nike air force air force 1 mens air force 1 boots air force onefrom usa Posted by: airforceoneshop at November 03, 2009 08:47 PM (LHCCE) 44
discount Discount Boots
Womens UGG UGG Shoes UGG Australia UGG UK UGG USA discount ugg boots cheap ugg boots air force 1 shoes Nike air force air force 1 mens air force 1 boots air force onefree shipping Posted by: reviewups at November 06, 2009 07:20 AM (XxrVz) 45
Come to our website for shopping with high quality and best service! There have new products,MBT M. Walk
and MBT Lami,Welcome everybody to buy it. Posted by: mbt shoes at November 08, 2009 03:04 PM (QhfLM) 46
Buy discount ugg shoes
cheap ugg shoes cheap ugg ugg rainier buy ugg ugg usa discount ugg boots ugg 5825 ugg shoes sale ugg sundance ugg shoes cheap ugg boots ugg 5815 ugg sale ugg uk ugg knightsbridge womens ugg boots ugg boots ugg australia ugg 5819free shipping Posted by: ugg boots at November 12, 2009 09:57 AM (IeIJx) 47
buy [url=http://www.reviewups.com/]discount ugg shoes[/url]
[url=http://www.reviewups.com/]cheap ugg shoes[/url] [url=http://www.reviewups.com/]cheap ugg[/url] [url=http://www.reviewups.com/ugg-coquette-casual-shoes-c-22]ugg rainier[/url] [url=http://www.reviewups.com/]buy ugg[/url] [url=http://www.reviewups.com/]ugg usa[/url] [url=http://www.reviewups.com/]discount ugg boots[/url] [url=http://www.reviewups.com/ugg-classic-short-c-1]ugg 5825[/url] [url=http://www.reviewups.com/]ugg shoes sale[/url] [url=http://www.reviewups.com/ugg-sundance-c-5]ugg sundance[/url] [url=http://www.reviewups.com/]ugg shoes[/url] [url=http://www.reviewups.com/]cheap ugg boots[/url] [url=http://www.reviewups.com/ugg-classic-tall-c-3]ugg 5815[/url] [url=http://www.reviewups.com/]ugg sale[/url] [url=http://www.reviewups.com/]ugg uk[/url] [url=http://www.reviewups.com/ugg-knightsbridge-c-27]ugg knightsbridge[/url] [url=http://www.reviewups.com/]womens ugg boots[/url] [url=http://www.reviewups.com/]ugg boots[/url] [url=http://www.reviewups.com/]ugg australia[/url] [url=http://www.reviewups.com/ugg-classic-cardy-c-2]ugg 5819[/url]from usa Posted by: cheap at November 14, 2009 11:06 AM (s7MB5) 48
Replica watches | Replica watches | soccer jersey supplier | Replica watches | Replica Omega | Fake Breguet | Fake Hermes | Wholesale Jacob & Co Watch | Breitling Fake | Replica Zenith Watch | Wholesale Zenith Watch | Hamilton Replica Watches | Maurice Lacroix Watch | Fake Bell & Ross | Gucci Watch
Posted by: replica watches at November 17, 2009 06:55 AM (xpuiO) 49
Replica watches | Fake Watches | Replica Cartier | Replica Watches | Replica Watches | Oris Replica Watch | Chopard Replica | Bvlgari Watch | Parmigiani Watch | Ulysse Nardin Watches Replica | Maurice Lacroix Replica Watches | Glashutte Fake Watches | Replica Tudor Watch | Concord Replica Watch | Replica Audemars Piguet Watches
Posted by: replica watches at November 17, 2009 11:04 AM (xpuiO) 50
Fake Watches | replica soccer jersey | Fake Watches | Replica Cartier | Replica Breitling Watches | Seiko Watches | Rolex Watches | Patek Philippe Fake Watches | best replica watches | Bulova Replica | Oris Watches | Tissot Replica Watch | Emporio Armani Watches Replica | Bell & Ross Watches | Gucci Watch Replica
Posted by: replica watches at November 18, 2009 02:33 AM (C/zDM) 51
Replica watches | Replica Rolex | Fake Cheap Rolex | Replica Breitling Watches | Replica Breitling Watches | Replica Blancpain Watches | Fake Rolex Watch | Fake Zenith Watch | Fake Tudor Watch | Panerai Replica Watch | Cheap A.lange Sohne | Omega Replica | Fendi Fake Watches | Other Wristwatch | Fake Ebel
Posted by: replica watches at November 18, 2009 06:40 AM (C/zDM) Processing 0.03, elapsed 0.0275 seconds. |
MuNuvians
MeeNuvians
Polls! Polls! Polls!
Dale's ECB Election Projection Federal Review Real Clear Politics Rasmussen Reports Gallup Zogby FoxNews Polls Sabato/Crystal Ball Frequently Asked Questions
The (Almost) Complete Paul Anka Integrity Kick
Primary Document: The Audio
Paul Anka Haiku Contest Announcement Integrity SAT's: Entrance Exam for Paul Anka's Band AllahPundit's Paul Anka 45's Collection AnkaPundit: Paul Anka Takes Over the Site for a Weekend (Continues through to Monday's postings) George Bush Slices Don Rumsfeld Like an F*ckin' Hammer Top Top Tens
Democratic Forays into Erotica New Shows On Gore's DNC/MTV Network Nicknames for Potatoes, By People Who Really Hate Potatoes Star Wars Euphemisms for Self-Abuse Signs You're at an Iraqi "Wedding Party" Signs Your Clown Has Gone Bad Signs That You, Geroge Michael, Should Probably Just Give It Up Signs of Hip-Hop Influence on John Kerry NYT Headlines Spinning Bush's Jobs Boom Things People Are More Likely to Say Than "Did You Hear What Al Franken Said Yesterday?" Signs that Paul Krugman Has Lost His Frickin' Mind All-Time Best NBA Players, According to Senator Robert Byrd Other Bad Things About the Jews, According to the Koran Signs That David Letterman Just Doesn't Care Anymore Examples of Bob Kerrey's Insufferable Racial Jackassery Signs Andy Rooney Is Going Senile Other Judgments Dick Clarke Made About Condi Rice Based on Her Appearance Collective Names for Groups of People John Kerry's Other Vietnam Super-Pets Cool Things About the XM8 Assault Rifle Media-Approved Facts About the Democrat Spy Changes to Make Christianity More "Inclusive" Secret John Kerry Senatorial Accomplishments John Edwards Campaign Excuses John Kerry Pick-Up Lines Changes Liberal Senator George Michell Will Make at Disney Torments in Dog-Hell Greatest Hitjobs
The Ace of Spades HQ Sex-for-Money Skankathon A D&D Guide to the Democratic Candidates Margaret Cho: Just Not Funny More Margaret Cho Abuse Margaret Cho: Still Not Funny Iraqi Prisoner Claims He Was Raped... By Woman Wonkette Announces "Morning Zoo" Format John Kerry's "Plan" Causes Surrender of Moqtada al-Sadr's Militia World Muslim Leaders Apologize for Nick Berg's Beheading Michael Moore Goes on Lunchtime Manhattan Death-Spree Milestone: Oliver Willis Posts 400th "Fake News Article" Referencing Britney Spears Liberal Economists Rue a "New Decade of Greed" Artificial Insouciance: Maureen Dowd's Word Processor Revolts Against Her Numbing Imbecility Intelligence Officials Eye Blogs for Tips They Done Found Us Out, Cletus: Intrepid Internet Detective Figures Out Our Master Plan Shock: Josh Marshall Almost Mentions Sarin Discovery in Iraq Leather-Clad Biker Freaks Terrorize Australian Town When Clinton Was President, Torture Was Cool What Wonkette Means When She Explains What Tina Brown Means Wonkette's Stand-Up Act Wankette HQ Gay-Rumors Du Jour Here's What's Bugging Me: Goose and Slider My Own Micah Wright Style Confession of Dishonesty Outraged "Conservatives" React to the FMA An On-Line Impression of Dennis Miller Having Sex with a Kodiak Bear The Story the Rightwing Media Refuses to Report! Our Lunch with David "Glengarry Glen Ross" Mamet The House of Love: Paul Krugman A Michael Moore Mystery (TM) The Dowd-O-Matic! Liberal Consistency and Other Myths Kepler's Laws of Liberal Media Bias John Kerry-- The Splunge! Candidate "Divisive" Politics & "Attacks on Patriotism" (very long) The Donkey ("The Raven" parody) News/Chat
|