| Support
Contact
| Begich Now Up By 814 VotesThey're not done counting yet, but this one is looking like another loss. No Palin Senatorship, most likely. And, even worse:Jennifer Duffy, editor of the Cook Political Report, said Democrats have an outside chance of attaining their goal of 60 Senate votes. ``It's sure still possible,'' she said. Meanwhile, Al Franken wants to add "undervotes" to his tally, better known as "votes deliberately not cast for Al Franken but to which he believes himself entitled. I'd like to see a history of Democrats coming from behind in recounts. I imagine they've "won" just about every time they've been behind, but close. And I'd like to see a statistical analysis of the likelihood of their impressive record. Comments1
And AoSHQ commenters were strangely glad about Palin's chance to remain Alaska's governor as oil prices fall, the state faces tougher economic times, and her approval ratings to plummet.
But, on the minus side, it's one more senate seat toward tyranny. Posted by: Christoph at November 13, 2008 04:07 PM (hawOV) 2
At least she doesn't have to sully herself with the filth in the senate.
Posted by: right at November 13, 2008 04:08 PM (pMGkg) 3
in other news Senator Boxer's senior aide just nabbed for kiddy porn. Isn't this her 2nd aide to have been arrested for this?
Posted by: Topsecretk9 at November 13, 2008 04:09 PM (ZF5+A) 4
"in other news Senator Boxer's senior aide just nabbed for kiddy porn. Isn't this her 2nd aide to have been arrested for this?"
Dude. Posted by: Christoph at November 13, 2008 04:13 PM (hawOV) 5
Who are we kidding. 60 seats....Most of our Rinos vote democratic too. They have it wrapped.
Posted by: free at November 13, 2008 04:14 PM (cFwGO) 6
Ace, I know one can go to jail for murder. But do you think we could at least beat the living fuck out of Franken , and get away with it. Maybe I could claim Liberal derangement syndrome.
Posted by: rightwingchef at November 13, 2008 04:15 PM (imFqN) 7
Cheating Commiecrats, sigh.
Posted by: Curmudgeon at November 13, 2008 04:15 PM (ujg0T) 8
60 seats is a good thing for republicans. Come on.
Dems will be unable to control themselves; they'll do everything they've ever wanted. Want to see a revolt against government in 2010 or 2012? Give democrats everything they want today. Besides, dems said they'd use the nuclear option whenever necessary, so 58 votes is irrelevant anyways. I'd rather them have 60, so there is nothing stopping them. Crash and burn. Posted by: lorien1973 at November 13, 2008 04:16 PM (IhQuA) 9
Ace how can you give me such bad news before 12.00 p.m.?
Posted by: fireweed at November 13, 2008 04:16 PM (rSr2s) 10
Its not even subtle, 100% of the 'found' votes are for Franken. Go ahead and steal the elections Dems, apparently no one cares.
The best part: paying Franken's taxpayer funded Senatorial pension for the rest of his worthless life. Posted by: kefka at November 13, 2008 04:18 PM (fKivs) 11
Is it time to refresh the tree of liberty yet?
Posted by: thirteen28 at November 13, 2008 04:20 PM (s8N54) 12
Meh, big deal. Stevens was going to be expelled anyway, and there's no guarantee of the results in the special election. Let the dimbulb Dems who ran on Republican-lite platforms be elected, show their constituents how badly they were lying, and then get tossed out on their behinds.
Posted by: North Dallas Thirty at November 13, 2008 04:20 PM (uUR4m) 13
Senator Palin? Do. Not. Want. Governor is the best place to build leadership cred. I also hope the Dems get 60. If they want the keys, give them the keys - watch them drive the car over the cliff. We know their ideas do not work. 58/59 is essentially the same as 60 so far as conservatives are concerned. Like Oympia Snowe and Arlen Specter will stand up for us? We're better off relying on Blue Dogs like Tim Johnson and Ben Nelson...they're more likely to stand up for things we care about. Posted by: Jim62sch at November 13, 2008 04:25 PM (zYagu) 14
I'd like to see a history of Democrats coming from behind in recounts. I can only think of one instance in which the pubbies mustered the cojones necessary to stop them. Of course, as one commenter explained on a different "Donk vote fraud" thread-maybe it isn't vote fraud at all, maybe it's just that Dem voters, being more stupid, are more likely to screw up their ballots and the recounts identify and fix that problem. Posted by: CavMedic at November 13, 2008 04:26 PM (UyFYg) 15
If the D's DO attain 60 votes, then you can rest assured that this country will embark on a 4 year living nightmare. There is NO chance they won't enact their most desired wishes. I fear that if this happens, the damage will be irreparable.
Posted by: irongrampa at November 13, 2008 04:26 PM (ud5dN) 16
I am perpetually amazed at the ability of every "found" ballot after the fact to go Dem. Here are some examples of what Ace is asking about (excluding the crap from this year) 2004 WA Gov Race shitload of "found" ballots in the 2002 SD Senate race from the reservations, and Tim Johnson miraculously comes from behind Now you know why ACORN has been targeting the SecOf State offices
Posted by: eddiebear at November 13, 2008 04:27 PM (wnU1W) 17
in other news Senator Boxer's senior aide just nabbed for kiddy porn. Isn't this her 2nd aide to have been arrested for this?
That was Maria Cantwell's aide. However, the confusion is explainable; it's hard to tell one incompetent moronic vicious liberal man-hating harpy from another. Posted by: North Dallas Thirty at November 13, 2008 04:27 PM (uUR4m) Posted by: eddiebear at November 13, 2008 04:28 PM (wnU1W) 19
Meanwhile, Al Franken wants to add "undervotes" to his tally, better known as "votes deliberately not cast for Al Franken but to which he believes himself entitled.
I don't know how they work in Minnesota, but in Florida , the optical scanners detect an incomplete ballot and the voter has an opportunity to amend it or have it scanned as is. That's one of the benefits of optical scanners. So how can there be "undervotes" whose intent can be anything but no vote. On the other hand, I'm enjoying the ability to make fun of the voter problems in another state. Especially one up in the liberal north. Although I haven't heard too much criticism of the Minnesota Secretary of State's excessive makeup and gaudy wardrobe. I guess that's too much to ask. Posted by: SlaveDog at November 13, 2008 04:28 PM (H6Jyg) 20
>>No Palin Senatorship, most likely.
Good. And politically, in Alaska, more salient than the budget surplus engendered by high crude oil prices is the local cost of things like heating oil and gasoline. Those prices are dropping just in time for winter. Sarah will be fine. Posted by: Robert_Paulson at November 13, 2008 04:29 PM (zjgCD) 21
Stevens was going to be expelled anyway, and there's no guarantee of the results in the special election.
There was at least a 50/50 chance of a Republican winning. I don't need a guarantee, but I'd prefer not to watch as election after election is stolen from under us. Posted by: flenser at November 13, 2008 04:30 PM (ii74s) 22
shitload of "found" ballots in the 2002 SD Senate race from the reservations, and Tim Johnson miraculously comes from behind There was a silver lining to that cloud - John Thune remained in the bullpen and knocked off Daschle two years later. Even though Thune turned into a Bailout-pushing Porkmeister, I'm glad that we have Johnson & Thune rather than Daschle and Thune. Posted by: Jim62sch at November 13, 2008 04:31 PM (zYagu) 23
We're fucked.
Posted by: AGR at November 13, 2008 04:32 PM (r8a5Z) 24
Absentee ballots usually lean GOP. Yet these have a 6.5% edge for the Democrat, in a Republican state. Looks pretty fishy to me.
Posted by: flenser at November 13, 2008 04:34 PM (ii74s) 25
There was at least a 50/50 chance of a Republican winning. I don't need a guarantee, but I'd prefer not to watch as election after election is stolen from under us. Think 2010, when Sarah will have four years as a governor under her belt, and the chance to knock off Lisa Murkowski, who aside from being as corrupt as her father, is far less competent (and far more of a lefty moonbat). Posted by: North Dallas Thirty at November 13, 2008 04:34 PM (uUR4m) Posted by: Cromagnum at November 13, 2008 04:35 PM (UxAb/) 27
Absentee ballots usually lean GOP. Yet these have a 6.5% edge for the Democrat, in a Republican state. Looks pretty fishy to me. Yeah, a lot of the absentee ballots should be military - i.e. overwhelmingly Republican. A shitload of GIs who have been posted to Alaska have made it their permanent residence, legally speaking, because of the tax benefits - even though they've subsequently moved on to elsewhere. The other odd thing is that most absentee ballots would have been submitted before Stevens was convicted. However, it's not like the outcome of that trial was ever really in doubt. Posted by: Jim62sch at November 13, 2008 04:38 PM (zYagu) 28
i'm out of words Posted by: spypeach at November 13, 2008 04:40 PM (QwWKI) 29
So how nervous are the Dems about getting a 60 seat Senate Majority?
I'd say they're quite nervous. If they have 60, there's no excuses for not passing all the loony legislation that their commie-pinko-leftest-fascist supporters really want and expect, but that would insure substantial losses in 2010. And no excuses for not doing whatever it is that the teaming masses of Obama voters think the House and Senate should do to set the world straight (and pay their mortgages and buy their gas and get them a free no-effort education and make all rich people poor, etc.) Just a thought. Posted by: SlaveDog at November 13, 2008 04:48 PM (H6Jyg) 30
most of the votes counted yesterday were early votes from Anchorage, which Begich was expected to carry by a large margin. Most of the remaining votes are actual absentees. So the remaining votes shouldn't trend democrat, at least not near as much. http://tinyurl.com/5adbtf Posted by: buzz at November 13, 2008 04:50 PM (kwhut) 31
The standard recount rules, proposed in 2000 in Florida but not fully implemented until in Washington state in 2004: 1. Count newly found votes. 2. If Democrat ahead, stop counting, celebrate victory. 3. Else, go to step 1. Posted by: sherlock at November 13, 2008 04:50 PM (ojW85) Posted by: eddiebear at November 13, 2008 04:51 PM (wnU1W) 33
Add mine to the voices that would rather not see Palin as a senator. Senators have done poorly in Presidential elections for a long time; the only reason a senator won this year was because both candidates were senators. Palin can do fine in 2012 or 2016 with 6-10 years experience as a governor.
As for Stevens, if it's this close they will cheat Begich to victory. Franken's going to win his race too; as a Washington state resident, I was privy to all the antics Democrats went through to insure Gregoire won the final recount in 2004. I mean, they counted a write-in ballot for "Christine Rossi" (the Democrat's first name and the Republican's last name) for Gregoire. They weren't even trying to be subtle about it. The only race I have ever seen that was close (less than 1000 votes) where the Republican prevailed was Bush in Florida in 2000, and the fact that Democrats weren't able to steal that one has always struck me as an act of God. I'd say maybe this recount process needs more prayer, but... pray for the corrupt Stevens to win? Yeah right. I'll risk waiting till 2010, tyvm. Posted by: Bridget Jack Meyers at November 13, 2008 04:53 PM (JDJ8A) 34
But do you think we could at least beat the living fuck out of Franken
, and get away with it. Maybe I could claim Liberal derangement
syndrome.
You don't have to claim anything but self defense. Just walk up to Franken and say to him, "Hey Stuart, your Air America show sucked." He's guaranteed to take a swing at you. Posted by: kbiel at November 13, 2008 04:55 PM (pVZ1M) 35
if they get 60 seats, Dems may decide to Sell Alaska back to Canada or Russia. Sure fire way to get rid of the Palin threat
Posted by: jp at November 13, 2008 04:58 PM (DFDtC) 36
I find it hard to be outraged by this, because the Rep in this case is a slimebag that I would hope would be turned out of office by the voters if the GOP is stupid enough to leave him as the candidate. Think of it as a "Don't put corrupt assholes up for office" lesson. Next time, the path will be clear for a less corrupt, non felonious candidate that wouldn't reflect poorly on the GOP and its voters if elected.
Posted by: Cautiously Pessimistic at November 13, 2008 05:05 PM (ltwze) 37
The dems already drove the car off the cliff during a test drive. That cliff being the current economic situation. Giving them the keys to a new car is not going to be a profound moment for people in 2010 and 2012. We are in a profound moment right now and they have still been rewarded by the people and the press.
Posted by: robtron12 at November 13, 2008 05:06 PM (gue+Q) 38
Is Chambliss in trouble now too? I thought the runoff was pretty much going to go his way?
Posted by: peterargus at November 13, 2008 05:12 PM (2P9jn) 39
Another election stolen by the Dems. Palin needs to get involved in this to make sure its honest theft.
Posted by: Vic at November 13, 2008 05:14 PM (Qd7GC) 40
Think of it as a "Don't put corrupt assholes up for office" lesson.
Next time, the path will be clear for a less corrupt, non felonious
candidate that wouldn't reflect poorly on the GOP and its voters if
elected.
I agree totally. Posted by: William Jefferson (D-LA) at November 13, 2008 05:18 PM (T0NGe) 41
"35 if they get 60 seats, Dems may decide to Sell Alaska back to Canada or Russia. Sure fire way to get rid of the Palin threat"
Here's a thought. If the Dems sell Alaska, the Alaskans will never go for it - they're smart, we're not - and will revolt. Then, as a newly conceived nation, they can install Palin as their President. I dunno bout youse guys, but things is lookin' mighty grim in these parts... I'll take a chance at being an illegal alien in the Republic of Alaska. If I'm caught, I can throw myself at her and beg for pity (and some moose chili). Posted by: turfmann at November 13, 2008 05:33 PM (nfFO+) 42
I was doing some statistical analysis of the Florida recount in 2000 to see what the odds were that all of the counties with large changes, either in actual votes or as a percentage of the votes just happened to go Democrat. Then I read an article where some guy who does the odds for casinos in Vegas came out and said for the numbers to break the way they did for Gore in the 2000 recount was something like 18 million or 30 some million to one. It was a recount. You are suppose to be counting the same votes over. No one side should benefit but the reality is they always seem to go the Dems way as in the recounts in Washington state, Senate in 2000 and Gov. in 2004, both times the recount produced just big enough changes to give the Dems a win. Einstein could not calculate those odds. Posted by: AndrewsDad at November 13, 2008 05:43 PM (C2//T) 43
What the hell is wrong with you people?
Your country, I mean. Who the hell could even think about adding a ballot without a selection in a given race to one candidate's totals. I've never heard of such a thing. That such a thought can even be expressed out loud is just Twilight Zone. Posted by: Christoph at November 13, 2008 05:47 PM (hawOV) 44
Sounds like the liberals in Canada have a lot to learn about stealing elections.
In fairness to our guys, this shit is a last resort. Usually they just use fake ballots. Posted by: flenser at November 13, 2008 05:59 PM (ii74s) 45
Why do recounts always seem to benefit the Left?
Posted by: G at November 13, 2008 06:12 PM (FAYNo) 46
#36 Stevens is a corrupt asshole, there's no denying. But if Begich steals the election, he'll have proven himself to be as corrupt as Stevens. In fact, I think I'd rather have the corrupt asshole who takes 'gifts' and spends the money on drinking and whoring than the corrupt asshole who's willing to undermine the electoral process itself.
I also don't think you should read much tolerance for corruption into the choices of Alaska's voters. Stevens' indictment came just days before his primary. Republicans were probably hoping that Stevens would withdraw and allow them time to field a better candidate for the general. They weren't approving of his corruption. He didn't step aside of course. So pretty much the same dynamic may have played itself out in the general. Stevens was convicted days before the election. There was no time to change horses. If Alaskans return Stevens to the Senate, they're not saying "Corruption is A-OK." I should think that their election of the 'upstart' Palin against Murkowski would have settled the issue of where Alaskans stand on corruption. Alaskans will have decided to vote for Stevens, knowing that he would not be likely to serve. They will have voted, more-or-less, to have a special election. If it works out that way, look for the Republican to win. Posted by: WisdomLover at November 13, 2008 06:33 PM (jnzqV) 47
@13: I also hope the Dems get 60. If they want the keys, give them the keys - watch them drive the car over the cliff.
Uh, we're all in that car, buddy. Posted by: Kathy from Kansas at November 13, 2008 06:46 PM (Prdx7) 48
@45: Why do recounts always seem to benefit the Left?
It probably doesn't help Norm Coleman that Minnesota's Secretary of State, Mark Ritchie, is pretty far left. http://tinyurl.com/6gdlcf I heard him speak in Kansas a few years back, about sustainable agriculture and trade and such, but if my memory serves me correctly, he also put in a plug for the New Party. Posted by: Kathy from Kansas at November 13, 2008 06:55 PM (Prdx7) 49
@43: Who the hell could even think about adding a ballot without a selection
in a given race to one candidate's totals. I've never heard of such a
thing.
Am I completely losing my memory? I thought that was exactly what they did back in 2000 in Florida!! Posted by: Kathy from Kansas at November 13, 2008 06:59 PM (Prdx7) 50
43 What the hell is wrong with you people? Your country, I mean. Posted by: Christoph at November 13, 2008 05:47 PM Christoph, Seriously, Fuck off. Go crawl back to Hot Air. If you ask really nicely, maybe they'll let you comment again. Seriously. Posted by: ConcernedCitizen at November 13, 2008 07:00 PM (hmDr/) 51
It certainly seems the dems win the recounts. Posted by: Wolverine at November 13, 2008 07:07 PM (/Zcox) 52
#45: Because lefties don't care much for rules. You see, "rules" are meant to be interpreted so that we might discover the true intentions of the rule-makers. And, as everybody knows, liberalism is morally superior to every other ideology so it just makes sense that those wise rule-makers would have intended liberals to win. For more examples of this tortured logic, see "the living Constitution".
Posted by: chemjeff at November 13, 2008 07:30 PM (wy+AE) 53
Man I'm more depressed than ever now. Someone throw me a beer!
Posted by: chemjeff at November 13, 2008 07:30 PM (wy+AE) 54
left doesn't care about 'fairness' when it comes to elections
Posted by: jp at November 13, 2008 07:37 PM (skV5q) 55
Except for when Bush was able to successfully stop the Dems from stealing Florida in 2000, it does seem like the guy with a D next to his name always wins close races. I haven't done any kind of a deeper analysis though. Anyways, I never thought keeping 40 Republicans in the Senate would be a major brake on Obamapelsoireid. The Maine sisters or Hagel or McCain will always be availible to break a filibuster. I think the major brake will be the 50-70 conservative Dems they got elected in the last 2 elections. Unless the Dems want 2010 to be another 1994 they will have to listen to those guys and not go crazy with liberalism. Either way the country is better off in the long run. Posted by: jarod at November 13, 2008 07:38 PM (jKvSW) 56
The filibuster stinks. It is so un-democratic.
58 or 60, with the Maine girls and Spectre, how many filibusters are feasible anyway. Give the Dem majority all the rope they need to hang themselves. Posted by: Bob from Ohio at November 13, 2008 07:41 PM (cQlDu) 57
I'm not a Minnesotan, but from what I understand, Minnesota uses a fill-in-the-bubble scantron-like system. If a voter fills in two bubbles ("overvotes"), the machine kicks the ballot back to him. It can definitively tell that such a ballot is invalid. But it won't kick back undervotes because it can't tell whether the voter intentionally or accidentally left the ballot blank.
But in some of those cases, the voter might have marked the ballot for one candidate or the other by circling it or put an arrow next to it or something of that nature. Only a hand inspection will reveal that. (Of course, if Minnesota's system prompts a voter about an undervote and asks him if he really meant to leave the ballot blank, then such marks should probably be ignored. But from what I've read, the voter does not get prompted when his ballot is an undervote.) In any event, I'm not convinced that trying to count undervotes is sinister in and of itself. I might add that I don't see any reason to think that undervotes will break for Franken instead of Coleman. I'd expect it to go the other way, in fact. Voters who make that kind of mistake are likely to be older voters who didn't grow up taking scantron tests. And those voters seem more likely to vote Republican. Having said that, hand recounts are major invitations for fraud and back-room intimidation (whether you're looking for undervotes or not). Furthermorre, even if the recount is not corrupted, the human factor seems like it will introduce a lot of errors that you don't have with the machine. It could be that any 'error' involving undervotes will be overwhelmed by honest human errors involved in a hand recount. The bottom line is that candidates should generally let the initial machine count stand (but no, I don't favor a law requiring that...I just think that it's good form). Posted by: WisdomLover at November 13, 2008 07:58 PM (jnzqV) 58
@57: but you haven't been paying attention. Statistically all the "new" votes should be approximately 50/50 Coleman/Franken. Amazingly, they are all 100% for Franken. So of course those undervotes will all magically break for Franken!
Posted by: chemjeff at November 13, 2008 08:43 PM (oCLMU) 59
If the D's DO attain 60 votes, then you can rest assured that this
country will embark on a 4 year living nightmare. There is NO chance
they won't enact their most desired wishes. I fear that if this
happens, the damage will be irreparable.
60 votes or no 60 votes this country will embark in a 4 (if we are lucky) year nightmare. The damage will be done, and we cannot just blame the democrats, it looks like the idiots have attained majority status in the population of this country, someone tell me what's going to turn the idiots into thinking organisms by next election. Posted by: don_erico Knight of the Codpiece at November 13, 2008 08:46 PM (sDDDA) 60
Stevens is getting what he deserves. Don't worry though. I'm sure Bush will pardon him before he leaves office, Scooter Libby style.
Alaska + Minnesota +Lieberman + one of the Maine Senators switches parties = Democratic Super majority and our democracy is better for it already! It'd be even funnier if McCain himself switched parties to make 60, as was once strongly rumored, now in the wake of the Republicans suing to overturn their own presidential candidate's signature legislation! Hilarious! With the sinking ship that is the modern GOP, nothing would surprise me now. Posted by: Lizzie at November 13, 2008 08:47 PM (Kbl0/) Posted by: Ronster at November 13, 2008 09:47 PM (cZUa9) 62
The filibuster stinks. It is so un-democratic.
What gave you the mistaken notion the USA is a democracy? Posted by: Purple Avenger at November 13, 2008 10:25 PM (OqXyp) 63
What gave you the mistaken notion the USA is a democracy?
I blame the sad state of government schools. Posted by: toby928 at November 14, 2008 07:51 AM (PD1tk) 64
balance of shoes nike shoes shoes.com adidas shoes puma shoes womens shoes dress shoes. casual shoes wholesale shoes sport shoes nike shoes shoes boots sandal shoes basketball shoes slippers shoes . replica rolex watches rolex watch replica watches- cartier watches- cartier watches swiss watch automatic watch chronograph watch. mens watch watch com men's watch the watch womens shoes leather shoes dress shoes running shoes . adidas shoes tote bag golf bag plastic bag purses bag briefcase bag steve madden shoes gold watch rockport shoes repairs watches best replica watches youtube watch youtube watch rolex watch rolex watches casio watches watches online timex watches tag watches. nike jordan shoes ladies watch leather bag replica handbag replica handbags wearing fashions clothes jorand shoes . oyster rolex dive watches replica watches- watches for men- timex watches buy watch rolex mens chrono watch elgin watch. automatic watch ladies watch mens watches new shoes steve madden shoes sneakers shoes sneaker shoes jorand shoes . rolex replica belts bag diaper bags travel bag laptop bag shoulder bag wears art glass urban wear fendi bag briefcase bag nike shoes men shoes fashion shoes women's shoes shoe store nike shoes best replica watches nike shoes men shoes fashion shoes women's watches cracked- medieval times- cidreq cidreq mens health ukraine 2009 calendar. chopper leipzig madsen donald duck isis king ncaa mens soccer cuny portal croazia . pasolini safari e-buddy espace pub rugby henderson waves jewelry ring wrist watches rolex watches replica watches fine watches casio watches watches online quartz watch. nike shoes ladies watch men's watch nike shoes running shoes Tiffany Bracelet basketball shoes jorand shoes . replica rolex watches rolex watch replica watches- fine watches- rolex datejust rolex mens watch repair oyster rolex watch. air flight ladies watch men's watch rolex submariner running shoes Tiffany Bracelet rolex replica jorand shoes . rolex replica watches rolex replica nike shoes rolex replica rolex replica fake rolex replica rolex replica watches rolex replica rolex replica rolex replica watches rolex replica best replica watches watches diamond watches replica watches rolex watches casio watches watches online timex watches tag watches. nike jordan shoes ladies watch luxury rolex watch nike shoes running shoes Tiffany Bracelet basketball shoes jorand shoes . oyster rolex dive watches replica watches- watches for men- rolex datejust buy watch rolex mens watch repair oyster rolex watch. air flight ladies watch seagull watches rolex submariner running shoes Tiffany Bracelet rolex replica jorand shoes . rolex replica watches rolex replica nike shoes rolex replica rolex replica fake rolex replica rolex replica watches rolex replica rolex replica shoe store nike shoes best replica watches nike shoes men shoes fashion shoes women's shoes shoe store nike shoes best replica watches nike shoes men shoes fashion shoes women's watches
Posted by: dressshoes at November 21, 2008 04:20 AM (bYVeT) 65
wrist watches rolex watches replica watches fine watches casio watches watches online quartz watch. nike shoes ladies watch men's watch nike shoes running shoes Tiffany Bracelet basketball shoes jorand shoes . replica rolex watches rolex watch replica watches- fine watches- rolex datejust rolex mens watch repair oyster rolex watch. air flight ladies watch men's watch rolex submariner running shoes Tiffany Bracelet rolex replica jorand shoes . rolex replica watches rolex replica nike shoes rolex replica rolex replica fake rolex replica rolex replica watches rolex replica rolex replica rolex replica watches rolex replica best replica watches watches diamond watches replica watches rolex watches casio watches watches online timex watches tag watches. nike jordan shoes ladies watch luxury rolex watch nike shoes running shoes Tiffany Bracelet basketball shoes jorand shoes . oyster rolex dive watches replica watches- watches for men- rolex datejust buy watch rolex mens watch repair oyster rolex watch. air flight ladies watch seagull watches rolex submariner running shoes Tiffany Bracelet rolex replica jorand shoes . rolex replica watches rolex replica nike shoes rolex replica rolex replica fake rolex replica rolex replica watches rolex replica rolex replica shoe store nike shoes best replica watches nike shoes men shoes fashion shoes women's shoes shoe store nike shoes best replica watches nike shoes men shoes fashion shoes women's watches
Posted by: watchstyle08 at November 26, 2008 02:57 AM (HKMq7) 66
Some people like LV handbags,Some people like Chanel handbags,but most popel have been keeping an eye on cheap fashion brand handbags .we often talk about all kinds of designer handbags with my friends,most of my friends also like cheap fashion brand handbags.We admire cheap fashion brand handbags designer who often be able to design so many stylish handbags.We want to be a handbag抯 designer in the future too. In our store online,you can buy all series of cheap fashion brand handbags,include: Louis Vuitton,LV Luggage,LV Wallets,LV Agendas,LV Belts,LV Shoes,LV Accessories,Gucci,Gucci Wallets,Gucci Shoes,Marc Jacobs handbags,Marni handbags,Miu Miu handbags,Mulberry handbags,Prada handbags,Thomaswylde handbags,TOD handbags,Bottega Veneta handbags,D&G handbags,Dior handbags,YSL handbags,Coach handbags
Posted by: steve at October 15, 2009 04:32 AM (+aWy4) 67
Discount Boots
Womens UGG UGG Shoes UGG Australia UGG UK UGG USA discount ugg boots cheap ugg boots Posted by: fdsfds at October 27, 2009 07:48 PM (8kvkz) 68
buy Discount Boots
Womens UGG UGG Shoes UGG Australia UGG UK UGG USA discount ugg boots cheap ugg boots air force 1 shoes nike air force air force 1 mens air force 1 boots air force onefrom usa Posted by: airforceoneshop at November 03, 2009 08:41 PM (LHCCE) 69
discount Discount Boots
Womens UGG UGG Shoes UGG Australia UGG UK UGG USA discount ugg boots cheap ugg boots air force 1 shoes Nike air force air force 1 mens air force 1 boots air force onefree shipping Posted by: reviewups at November 06, 2009 07:17 AM (XxrVz) 70
Come to our website for shopping with high quality and best service! There have new products,MBT M. Walk
and MBT Lami,Welcome everybody to buy it. Posted by: mbt shoes at November 08, 2009 02:59 PM (QhfLM) 71
Buy discount ugg shoes
cheap ugg shoes cheap ugg ugg rainier buy ugg ugg usa discount ugg boots ugg 5825 ugg shoes sale ugg sundance ugg shoes cheap ugg boots ugg 5815 ugg sale ugg uk ugg knightsbridge womens ugg boots ugg boots ugg australia ugg 5819free shipping Posted by: ugg boots at November 12, 2009 09:51 AM (IeIJx) 72
buy [url=http://www.reviewups.com/]discount ugg shoes[/url]
[url=http://www.reviewups.com/]cheap ugg shoes[/url] [url=http://www.reviewups.com/]cheap ugg[/url] [url=http://www.reviewups.com/ugg-coquette-casual-shoes-c-22]ugg rainier[/url] [url=http://www.reviewups.com/]buy ugg[/url] [url=http://www.reviewups.com/]ugg usa[/url] [url=http://www.reviewups.com/]discount ugg boots[/url] [url=http://www.reviewups.com/ugg-classic-short-c-1]ugg 5825[/url] [url=http://www.reviewups.com/]ugg shoes sale[/url] [url=http://www.reviewups.com/ugg-sundance-c-5]ugg sundance[/url] [url=http://www.reviewups.com/]ugg shoes[/url] [url=http://www.reviewups.com/]cheap ugg boots[/url] [url=http://www.reviewups.com/ugg-classic-tall-c-3]ugg 5815[/url] [url=http://www.reviewups.com/]ugg sale[/url] [url=http://www.reviewups.com/]ugg uk[/url] [url=http://www.reviewups.com/ugg-knightsbridge-c-27]ugg knightsbridge[/url] [url=http://www.reviewups.com/]womens ugg boots[/url] [url=http://www.reviewups.com/]ugg boots[/url] [url=http://www.reviewups.com/]ugg australia[/url] [url=http://www.reviewups.com/ugg-classic-cardy-c-2]ugg 5819[/url]from usa Posted by: cheap at November 14, 2009 11:01 AM (s7MB5) 73
Replica Omega | soccer jersey wholesale | Fake Cheap Rolex | Replica Breitling Watches | Replica watches | Replica Technomarine | Fake Vacheron Constantin | Wholesale Girard Perregaux Watch | Rado Replica | Replica A Lange & Sohne Watch | Hermes Replica Watches | Jacob & Co Fake Watches | Ulysse Nardin Watch Replica | Replica Girard Perregaux Watch | Movado Replica
Posted by: replica watches at November 17, 2009 05:50 AM (xpuiO) 74
soccer jersey wholesale | Replica watches | Replica Rolex | Replica Watches | Fake Watches | Zenith Watches Replica | Replica Corum | Replica Tag Heuer | Blancpain Watches | Replica Cartier Watch | Chanel Watch Replica | Fake Girard Perregaux | Baume & Mercier Watch | Blancpain Fake Watches | Jaeger LeCoultre Fake Watches
Posted by: replica watches at November 17, 2009 10:27 AM (xpuiO) 75
soccer jersey wholesale | Replica Cartier | Replica watches | Replica Breitling Watches | Replica watches | Cheap Tudor Watches | Tudor Replica | Hublot Watches | Panerai Fake Watch | Baume & Mercier Replica | Porsche Watches | Vacheron Constantin Replica | Fake Breitling Watches | Omega Replica Watches | Fake Hermes Watches
Posted by: replica watches at November 18, 2009 06:18 AM (C/zDM) Processing 0.04, elapsed 0.0588 seconds. |
MuNuvians
MeeNuvians
Polls! Polls! Polls!
Dale's ECB Election Projection Federal Review Real Clear Politics Rasmussen Reports Gallup Zogby FoxNews Polls Sabato/Crystal Ball Frequently Asked Questions
The (Almost) Complete Paul Anka Integrity Kick
Primary Document: The Audio
Paul Anka Haiku Contest Announcement Integrity SAT's: Entrance Exam for Paul Anka's Band AllahPundit's Paul Anka 45's Collection AnkaPundit: Paul Anka Takes Over the Site for a Weekend (Continues through to Monday's postings) George Bush Slices Don Rumsfeld Like an F*ckin' Hammer Top Top Tens
Democratic Forays into Erotica New Shows On Gore's DNC/MTV Network Nicknames for Potatoes, By People Who Really Hate Potatoes Star Wars Euphemisms for Self-Abuse Signs You're at an Iraqi "Wedding Party" Signs Your Clown Has Gone Bad Signs That You, Geroge Michael, Should Probably Just Give It Up Signs of Hip-Hop Influence on John Kerry NYT Headlines Spinning Bush's Jobs Boom Things People Are More Likely to Say Than "Did You Hear What Al Franken Said Yesterday?" Signs that Paul Krugman Has Lost His Frickin' Mind All-Time Best NBA Players, According to Senator Robert Byrd Other Bad Things About the Jews, According to the Koran Signs That David Letterman Just Doesn't Care Anymore Examples of Bob Kerrey's Insufferable Racial Jackassery Signs Andy Rooney Is Going Senile Other Judgments Dick Clarke Made About Condi Rice Based on Her Appearance Collective Names for Groups of People John Kerry's Other Vietnam Super-Pets Cool Things About the XM8 Assault Rifle Media-Approved Facts About the Democrat Spy Changes to Make Christianity More "Inclusive" Secret John Kerry Senatorial Accomplishments John Edwards Campaign Excuses John Kerry Pick-Up Lines Changes Liberal Senator George Michell Will Make at Disney Torments in Dog-Hell Greatest Hitjobs
The Ace of Spades HQ Sex-for-Money Skankathon A D&D Guide to the Democratic Candidates Margaret Cho: Just Not Funny More Margaret Cho Abuse Margaret Cho: Still Not Funny Iraqi Prisoner Claims He Was Raped... By Woman Wonkette Announces "Morning Zoo" Format John Kerry's "Plan" Causes Surrender of Moqtada al-Sadr's Militia World Muslim Leaders Apologize for Nick Berg's Beheading Michael Moore Goes on Lunchtime Manhattan Death-Spree Milestone: Oliver Willis Posts 400th "Fake News Article" Referencing Britney Spears Liberal Economists Rue a "New Decade of Greed" Artificial Insouciance: Maureen Dowd's Word Processor Revolts Against Her Numbing Imbecility Intelligence Officials Eye Blogs for Tips They Done Found Us Out, Cletus: Intrepid Internet Detective Figures Out Our Master Plan Shock: Josh Marshall Almost Mentions Sarin Discovery in Iraq Leather-Clad Biker Freaks Terrorize Australian Town When Clinton Was President, Torture Was Cool What Wonkette Means When She Explains What Tina Brown Means Wonkette's Stand-Up Act Wankette HQ Gay-Rumors Du Jour Here's What's Bugging Me: Goose and Slider My Own Micah Wright Style Confession of Dishonesty Outraged "Conservatives" React to the FMA An On-Line Impression of Dennis Miller Having Sex with a Kodiak Bear The Story the Rightwing Media Refuses to Report! Our Lunch with David "Glengarry Glen Ross" Mamet The House of Love: Paul Krugman A Michael Moore Mystery (TM) The Dowd-O-Matic! Liberal Consistency and Other Myths Kepler's Laws of Liberal Media Bias John Kerry-- The Splunge! Candidate "Divisive" Politics & "Attacks on Patriotism" (very long) The Donkey ("The Raven" parody) News/Chat
|