| Support
Contact
| "Now Comes Talk of a Bailout from the Bailout"This story just gets better and better. In a panic, we gave Treasury $700 billion and broad discretion to use it to keep the financial services industry from crumbling. We thought that money would be spent on the financial services industry, buying up toxic assets and other securities deemed necessary to keep ailing banks in the black. At present, no toxic assets have been purchased, but we have bought $172 billion in equity. Amusingly, Democrats are now arguing that the aiding the automobile industry is essential to that purpose.House Speaker Nancy Pelosi and Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid sent a letter to Paulson today saying the rescue bill gives him "broad discretion to purchase, or make commitments to purchase, financial instruments you determine necessary to restore financial-market stability." Pelosi was among the lawmakers who met two days ago with the chief executives of General Motors Corp., Ford Motor Co. and Chrysler LLC. The three companies are seeking $50 billion in federal loans to help them weather the worst auto market in 25 years, according to a person familiar with the matter. The letter increases pressure on the administration of George W. Bush to take action as he prepares to hand power to president-elect Barack Obama on Jan. 20. Obama said yesterday that policy options to help the industry will be a "high priority" for his transition team. "A healthy automobile manufacturing sector is essential to the restoration of financial market stability, the overall health of our economy, and the livelihood of the automobile sector's workforce," Pelosi and Reid said in their letter.Every lobbyist in Washington just sent Pelosi, Reid, and Obama briefs on how "essential" their particular clients are for market stability. Plenty of sectors are experiencing rough times this year; all could make colorable claims to being "too big to let fail." Whoever is owed the most favors and whoever cries the loudest will get the prize: your money. As if shady government spending weren't enough, this spending will be spent on creeping socialism. We were asked to put up with partial government ownership of banks because (the argument went) their survival was simply too important to long-term capitalism. The socialist policies would be a temporary situation (allegedly). Now Pelosi and Reid are suggesting the government purchase equity shares in American automakers...and as with the bank purchases, the auto equity comes with strings attached. Government ownership. Government control. That sounds familiar and vaguely alarming, for some reason. In Related News: AIG is "negotiating" for better terms on its bailout. You will recall that the taxpayers gave AIG an $85 billion loan in September. AIG now says the repayment terms of that loan are too harsh and that it won't be able to pay. But former AIG chairman Maurice R. "Hank" Greenberg, a major shareholder, made the case for federal forbearance in an interview yesterday, saying the costs associated with the $85 billion loan pose a potentially crushing burden for the company. "It's clear that the original terms as the government negotiated with AIG . . . were so draconian that it would be impossible for the taxpayers to be repaid," Greenberg said. To make payments on the $85 billion credit line, including charges he estimated at $22 billion over two years, AIG would be forced to sell pieces of itself at a fraction of their value, Greenberg said. AIG has been trying to sell assets but has not announced any transactions yet. Market conditions have compounded the challenge, making it harder for prospective buyers to finance deals. One industry source familiar with the negotiations framed the matter as a question of fairness, too, noting that since the AIG rescue was announced, the government has made funds available to banks on more favorable terms.This is a shakedown. The taxpayers already own 80% of AIG according to the terms of the loan. We own the company; it has nothing left with which to negotiate except its own survival, which we are now unfortunately very invested in. This is the consequence of acting as if we will do anything to prevent a company from naturally failing. We were believed. Brace yourselves; AIG will release its second quarter report on Monday. Resist the urge to panic when it does. Comments1
Now that it's Recriminations Season, I'd like those who supported the bailout (Ace, I'm looking in your direction) to answer two questions:
(1) Are you ready to admit that your support of the bailout was a mistake? (2) HadMcCain come out swinging against anti-bailout and pinned the whole thing on Obama and the Democrats, do you think he would have done better or worse in the election? Posted by: Masturbatin' Pete at November 08, 2008 10:58 PM (yn9Ji) 2
I had a financial guy explain that the bailout was needed to prime the pump of the economy. That it had to be big because it needed to be a psychological lift to investors.
Law of unintended consequences. Now every business that is struggling, which is a lot right now, is bellying up to the trough. This a hurt now or hurt more later thing. I say hurt now. Unless the Messiah has a better idea. By hurt now I mean make them crawl for the bailout. CEO's and top execs forfeit their pay and bonuses to qualify for the bailout. What do you want to bet they figure out a better way than to stick the taxpayers? Posted by: locus ceruleus at November 08, 2008 11:07 PM (e2mBS) 3
GM, Ford and Chrysler are in deep shit. Chrysler will disappear within months and it makes more sense for Nissan-Renault to buy it than GM. General Motors refuses to get out of its own way and will also soon die. Ford ought to shut its US factories and just produce abroad.
The fucking UAW brought this on just as much as the companies, so fuck them, too. cocksuckers Posted by: billypaintbrush at November 08, 2008 11:08 PM (FD6zE) 4
This bailout shit has to stop. And the reason the auto industry is doing poorly has as much to do with the UAW having them by the balls as anything else. I read an article by George Will on this subject, and he wrote that GM is basically a healthcare provider that makes cars and trucks on the side. I hate when failure is rewarded, but it seems to be official US Government policy now. Posted by: Jones at November 08, 2008 11:10 PM (VkNlv) 5
Pete,
McCain could not do that because he views himself as the peacemaker with the Democrats. He will not make principled stands against anybody but republicans. He could have won simply by laying the blame at the feet of Barney, Chris and Nancy. Yes he should have rejected the bailout as a political stunt with little economics behind it. Posted by: locus ceruleus at November 08, 2008 11:10 PM (e2mBS) 6
Seems like we need a better more sleek business model. All these MBA's are losing to the Japanese just like they did in the 70's and early 80's. No foresight.
Posted by: locus ceruleus at November 08, 2008 11:12 PM (e2mBS) 7
McCain was too busy being obsequious to Obama and Jeremiah Wright whilst running his hideous abortion of a campaign he squeezed between his arse cheeks to stand up against the bailout and espouse conservative principles.
Posted by: mossback at November 08, 2008 11:13 PM (in8Vs) 8
"A healthy automobile manufacturing sector being essential to the restoration of financial market stability, ..."
I think that's already in the Constiution, no? Posted by: worf at November 08, 2008 11:15 PM (4+vov) 9
the reason the auto industry is doing poorly has as much to do with the UAW having them by the balls as anything else.
Yeah. This is a bailout for the auto worker unions as much as for the auto makers. In return, money will flow back from the unions into the Democratic Party coffers. Posted by: worf at November 08, 2008 11:17 PM (4+vov) 10
It is tough to post after masterbatin' pete, but I must.
I am going to string a few things together and end up somewhere crazy, but I could not find the right place to leave this comment on your website. I left a prediction in the comment section here a few months ago that something horrible might happen and it spilled into the real world. One person said the comment was passive aggressive and I could not disagree because I have not read it and I was drunk when I wrote it. It was not directed at anyone from the internet or in the news industry. I did not want to try and contact anyone because it seemed a bit creepy, but I am close to normal and feeling fine. Posted by: bleh at November 08, 2008 11:19 PM (GNCy6) 11
The entire 'baby-boomer' period was fueled with artificial, debt-fueled prosperity. Bill Gates is a billiionaire because the U.S. is 10 trillion dollars in debt. If the gov't didn't borrow and spend during that time, there would never have been all that money flying around the economy for Bill Gates to make ( I'm just using BG as an example). The baby-boomers were never 'wealth creators', all they did was indulge themselves and pass the debt burden on to their kids, grandkids, great-grandkids, etc. Everything about the 'global economy' is un-natural...nature has to be allowed to re-assert itself...the longer you postpone the 'coming back down to earth', the more devastating it's going to be and the longer it's going to take to recover. No bailouts. Posted by: CanaDave at November 08, 2008 11:21 PM (6w8jL) 12
Er, Greenberg?? He's the one Spritzer went after. A mess of Joos here boys, and YOU CAN BLAME IT ON THEM, Giving capitalism a bad name. I want the rewards, but I don't want the penalties. Let's play football, and I don't have to accept any penalties, but you do. Fuck him. Why am I sucking wind so Greenberg can play golf? I don't remember them offering me any discounts on my insurance. Fuck him, go broke asshole, you make wrong decisions, you pay the price. Oh, and now Republicans are all for socialism? WTF is going on? Is the water in DC that toxic? I need a drink. Kemp Posted by: kempermanx at November 08, 2008 11:23 PM (2+9Yx) 13
I was one of the "It doesn't sound like a good idea but hell if I know." bunch on the 1st bailout. I read up on it, I also watched all those CSPAN videos too. But the one thing that was made certain was the bailout needed a firm definition to determine the value of it. Well we got a plan with little definition and what does the govt do? Screw up! That's the 64 Thousand dollar question and answer! Erm, 700 Billion. We need to do everything we can to stop this bailout and buy in to failing businesses game.
Posted by: annoyamouse at November 08, 2008 11:24 PM (wPRKf) 14
"Barack Obama's Creepy Presidential Seal is Back!"
Did you guys notice this? There it is, plain as day, on his podium. That guy is a menace. He is no fucking Jimmy Carter. Posted by: Christoph at November 08, 2008 11:27 PM (hawOV) 15
In 15 years, the American auto industry will be just as mighty as the British auto industry, and for the same reason.
Let them fail. Let the UAW parasite die with its host. Posted by: leoncaruthers at November 08, 2008 11:28 PM (JSO4h) 16
Argentina? Nationalized all pensions last week. Wait boys, its coming to your 401K any day now. Where do you send yours to save it? Maybe it IS time for some gold, oh wait, FDR forbid you to own it the last time we had this. Think we might see that again?? Da Huh, wonder why guns sales are up?? Kemp
Posted by: kempermanx at November 08, 2008 11:28 PM (2+9Yx) 17
CanaDave,
I believe everything you said in#11. But here is the rub, how do you return to a real income based market. Babyboomers rejected their parents values, blew through their inheritance, have no savings, have spent their children's money. Now these unprincipled fools want to saddle their grandchildren and great grandchildren with their debt. Hey, what was the national debt in 1965? 320 billion. Posted by: locus ceruleus at November 08, 2008 11:31 PM (e2mBS) 18
The $700 billion should have gone to the tax payers. With that kind of money in our pocket the economy would have boomed. Its our money anyway. I want my bailout!
Posted by: roving at November 08, 2008 11:36 PM (7UEUL) 19
I move that we start calling us actual conservatives the HAN SHOT FIRST wing of the party: Fully armed, taking no crap, and in total resistance of revisionist history.
Posted by: Filly at November 08, 2008 11:37 PM (VLsit) 20
This is not the first time to bailout the automakers. Let them go under, and take the UAW with them. The automakers have proved that they do not deserve to stay in business. Posted by: ICBM at November 08, 2008 11:38 PM (FcwAY) 21
Everything about the 'global economy' is un-natural...nature has to be allowed to re-assert itself
This chickens are coming home to roost!!!! You sound like Rev. Wright. Not necessarily disagreeing though. Posted by: pirate of the perineum at November 08, 2008 11:40 PM (rKSJ1) Posted by: cromagnum at November 08, 2008 11:41 PM (j5MnB) 23
I will NEVER buy a new truck, car, from these Idiots again. They can flush down the toilet. They deserve what they get. I now drive a 1970 bad ass rig, and they can fuck themselves. No smogg shit, No have to go for expensive regulations regarding any of it. FUCK THEM, All the O nuts, gore nuts , Unions Voted for this ass. FUCK YOU! Posted by: Hugh Jass at November 08, 2008 11:42 PM (YR3yJ) 24
As owners of AIG, the US govt would be making a terrible mistake to dispose of THEIR assets at bargain basment prices. This illustrates yet one more problem with the govt getting involved, i.e. they don't know how to run a business. I would just as soon turn over AIG to a bunch of kids in grade 6 than I would the govt. I'd trust teh kids' instincts to turn a profit more than the bureaucrats. I do think that those who argue that the financials were necessary to bailout but not the autos, are full of it. Either you can argue for both, or you can argue for neither (which is what I would argue). The exact same arguments can be made of both. Why should Wall St. get rewarded - ESPECIALLY since THEY are the ones who caused this mess for the entire world! - with survival, but not Detroit? The thing that bother me most in this whole crisis (read: scam) is that Moody's and S&P are still standing. Worse, they are still downgrading, causing havoc. How can this be tolerated when ti was their AAA ratings that caused so many to lose so much money? Why do the American people put up with this? Shocking how they bend over. Posted by: slick at November 08, 2008 11:46 PM (OjNK+) 25
I'm just using BG as an example - CanaDave at November 08, 2008 11:21 PM Dude, one can never err on the side of excess when it comes to demonizing Bill Gates. Never. Posted by: davis,br at November 08, 2008 11:46 PM (zewwG) 26
@locus ceruleus: That's the question...I've already pretty much lived a minimal life...don't have much more to give this mess...that's what pisses me off the most about people in government that are older than me...their blind arrogance that us later generations can just keep picking up the tab...with what?...they farmed all our jobs overseas for 'growth'. What do we have left to build on?
Posted by: CanaDave at November 08, 2008 11:46 PM (6w8jL) 27
Let them fail and take the UAW with them. Didn't like the first bailout and now this. Its out of control. Who next? Line up, assholes.
Posted by: Swegin at November 08, 2008 11:47 PM (q0Z3p) 28
cromagnum,
you just ruined a nice glass of wine. I read Billy Ayers article above and now I need to hit something. Did you read the last line? Isn't that an Obamaism? "In this time of new beginnings and rising expectations, it is even more urgent that we figure out how to become the people we have been waiting to be." Posted by: locus ceruleus at November 08, 2008 11:49 PM (e2mBS) 29
I don't think that the Big 3 are viable entities. They cannot survive the coming storm of low end cars from India. Protectionism is really the only way to make sure they survive, and I'm not sure how India is going to take that.
K Posted by: Kestrel♠ at November 08, 2008 11:49 PM (4xNUv) 30
The best part about it is now I don't have to worry about putting gas in my car; I don't have to worry about paying my mortgage. If I support him, he'll support me. The worst part about this is that there are no moon colonies for me to flee to as yet. But, you know, I hope that will change. Best regards Posted by: ATNorth at November 08, 2008 11:49 PM (dBJw1) 31
@pirate of the perineum..Wright?...no need to get insulting
Posted by: CanaDave at November 08, 2008 11:50 PM (6w8jL) 32
...this spending will be spent on creeping socialism. Its not really creeping anymore, it's sprinting. Posted by: Gen. Sherman at November 08, 2008 11:51 PM (blNMI) 33
@Kestrel: Protectionism is really the only way to make sure they survive, and I'm not sure how India is going to take that. Howsabout we put that to a vote...all those in favor of protectionism, say 'Aye' Fuck India. Posted by: CanaDave at November 08, 2008 11:54 PM (6w8jL) Posted by: Mr. Pissed at November 08, 2008 11:54 PM (X7Ey1) 35
CanaDave,
if Palin and Jindal start saying that "we are not the kind of people that would max out a credit card that is in our children's name are we?" We are ruining our children's credit and future and need to get off that addiction now! I believe the average American would understand and sacrifice to give our kid's a better future. Billy Ayers in the article above is exactly what I am talking about. He believes the 60's saved America. Posted by: locus ceruleus at November 08, 2008 11:54 PM (e2mBS) 36
locus sorry about the wine I read the whining bastard too ... lost my appetite. This means Lincoln bedroom for an American Hater. Posted by: cromagnum at November 08, 2008 11:54 PM (j5MnB) 37
Kestral 2 floods .. China and India Thats a tsunami of cheapeness, unless currency/tariffs are imposed They wont have the quality of Japan/SKorea, but come with free lead paint, or extra towel room for your head Posted by: cromagnum at November 08, 2008 11:57 PM (j5MnB) 38
Feb 6/08
Obama:"We are the ones we’ve been waiting for. We are the change that we seek." 11/08 Ayers:"In this time of new beginnings and rising expectations, it is even more urgent that we figure out how to become the people we have been waiting to be." Posted by: locus ceruleus at November 08, 2008 11:57 PM (e2mBS) 39
Another Update:
Bloomberg News, the media company, is suing the Fed over a FOIA request. Bloomberg News asked a U.S. court today to force the Federal Reserve to disclose securities the central bank is accepting on behalf of American taxpayers as collateral for $1.5 trillion of loans to banks. Posted by: Gabriel Malor at November 08, 2008 11:57 PM (rWvvO) 40
locus 35 - I was always glad I didn't have kids because I'm selfish and stuff, but I'm glad now for very different reasons. I would be afraid for their future given what we even suspect is coming.
Posted by: Swegin at November 08, 2008 11:58 PM (q0Z3p) 41
I consider this latest series of TOTAL FUCKING RIPOFFS coming from Washington to be only the second most important reason to reject socialist plans like this bailout.
Yeah, I said it. Socialist. Reason No. 1 is that socialist bailout schemes like this one, even when they work as intended (or, at least, as they are sold to the voters and taxpayers), cause all kinds of economic problems. The worst among these problems is that bailouts (like all subsidies and corporate welfare) interferes with the ability of market actors to find the true market price. This, in turn, makes it impossible to determine the proper, economically-sound level of production in that market. In this case, the simple fact is we have too many damned houses, too many houses that are too big, too many subdivisions, etc. These easy-credit loan programs artificially inflated housing prices, and thus artificially increased house-building production above the levels that were supportable by actual market demand. This bailout interferes with the liquidation process that we desperately need. Reason No. 2 to oppose socialist bailout schemes is corruption. I have no doubt in my mind that this $700 billion will be spent on political crap. They have NO REASON to spend it on things that are actually economically beneficial. (In truth, they couldn't find the economically-beneficial ways to spend it even if they wanted to, but they don't want to.) This is what socialism brings -- (a) distorted markets and (b) huge sums of money placed in the hands of politicians instead of normal, hard-working people who earned it. Giving money to politicians is like handing $80,000 in cash and the keys to your Ferrari to a heroin addict who just got out of prison for embezzlement, and expecting him to behave responsibly. Jesus fucking Christ. How stupid can you get? This bailout was a fuck-up of the first order. Posted by: Phinn at November 08, 2008 11:59 PM (4DIx7) 42
Swegin,
we have never had our own children. We do however have foster children that I care about deeply. I believe they will have to be tougher than I ever was. Posted by: locus ceruleus at November 09, 2008 12:01 AM (e2mBS) Posted by: Sekhmet at November 09, 2008 12:01 AM (QiWeI) 44
@locus ceruleus: He believes the 60's saved America I wonder how those fucked up liberal socialist pukes connect those dots...the late 60's was the beginning of the end of Western Civilization, period. No culture could indulge itself the way they did and survive. What's left to us is to try and detach ourselves from it somehow and not go down with their fruitcake sinking ship...how I don't know, but I think about it every damn day. Posted by: CanaDave at November 09, 2008 12:01 AM (6w8jL) 45
Gabriel comment #39: Couldn't we be doing more to protect SaudiGroup Inc. ahem CitiGroup Inc. and the other worthless failing banks? Sarc
Posted by: annoyamouse at November 09, 2008 12:07 AM (wPRKf) 46
@CanaDave,
I think all post-Boomers feel the same way about the Boomer generation. It's like they sucked the life, the money, the very blood of the nation for themselves and their perpetual dream of youth. I think attrition alone may produce some nice results. Posted by: Sekhmet at November 09, 2008 12:07 AM (QiWeI) 47
CanaDave,
have you read Warning to the West: Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn? He saw this coming back in 1978. He gave this speech at the graduation ceremony at Harvard. I think it was prophetic and brilliant. The problem is materialism alone and unchecked in the human spirit leads to what we have. Man is more than just what he acquires. I believe that it is not to late. Maybe we can turn this behemoth around. Posted by: locus ceruleus at November 09, 2008 12:10 AM (e2mBS) 48
Remember folks the Federal Reserve Bank doesn't have to disclose public information if it makes them look bad.
Posted by: annoyamouse at November 09, 2008 12:11 AM (wPRKf) 49
Heh - watching the re-run of Red Eye and they're showing the photo of Purple-Lipped Messiah on his Urkel Bicycle.
Love Gutfeld! Posted by: Jim62sch at November 09, 2008 12:12 AM (6rQXk) 50
We all need to move to texas, annex New Mexico AZ, UT and NV and succeed from the union.
Posted by: bob hussein dole at November 09, 2008 12:12 AM (yl9yA) 51
"Crisis! Crisis!" Borrow money from the Chinese and Saudis. Put the debt on the U.S.' books. Make a plan to buy up distressed assets to get liquidity going. Instead, take equity positions in private US companies. Company officers take the cash and pay it to themselves in dividends and bonuses. Net outcome: Chinese money delivered to executives, US taxpayers and their grandkids left to repay the Chinese. Good work, Congress. Posted by: mega at November 09, 2008 12:12 AM (N2Mmz) 52
John G and I quit.
Posted by: dagney taggart at November 09, 2008 12:13 AM (I1WeW) 53
@Sekhmet: I've always felt that way...it's probably not all their fault...herd mentality being what it is, nevertheless, they don't seem to give much of a damn what kind of position they are leaving us in. I remembrer back in the 80's, this whole 'put your money to work for you' thing...this is the end result..a majority of population expecting to live off the interest...it's just not possible and maintain your sovereignty...they expect 100 Chinese to work for 50 cents an hour to support them?...not gonna happen. Bill Clinton (baby boomer) opened the floodgates to trade with China. Bush (baby boomer) capitalized on it. I hate them both...they should both be charged with treason and hanged. Posted by: CanaDave at November 09, 2008 12:15 AM (6w8jL) 54
Eh, fuck this whole new metal thing. Not worth it.
Posted by: Hank Rearden at November 09, 2008 12:16 AM (6rQXk) Posted by: Ken Dannager at November 09, 2008 12:23 AM (B+HYX) 56
Blue states and the unions gonna get the money...gonna get a hand. Red states, you're gonna settle for the "finger".
Posted by: Ad rem at November 09, 2008 12:24 AM (z00/5) 57
@locus ceruleus: No, haven't read that...sounds interesting though. I've always kind have felt this coming too though, back in the 80's getting out of high school, they began this insane debt fueled artificial economy. Even as a clueless teenager it had the feeling of betrayal. We've all seen with our own eyes how government people rationalize their excesses. But now they don't even trouble trying to rationalize them, they just do it. No bailouts, period. Better to let it crash and burn now while we are semi-strong than later when we'll be a hell of a lot weaker. We don't owe the self-indulgent baby-boomers a comfortable retirement...they lived their life, let them go kicking and screaming into the night...motherfuckers. Posted by: CanaDave at November 09, 2008 12:26 AM (6w8jL) 58
I guess we now know why Granholm was on the stage with Barry.
Posted by: Helen Jones-Kelley at November 09, 2008 12:27 AM (gHrZU) 59
@Helen: I didn't know Canucks could be governors of US states...hey, I could use a job
Posted by: CanaDave at November 09, 2008 12:30 AM (6w8jL) 60
About that "We Are the Ones We Have Been Waiting For" quote from Barack and echoed by Billy Ayers. When you google that phrase it's like being transported into a Berkley think tank.
Alice Walker, a poet who claims Fidel is religious because he stands for the poor, has book with that title. June Jordan, a Berkley professor and also a communist, is credited with coining the phrase. Sojourners are a liberal faith community that anti-war and pro social justice. Their site is what you would expect. Thomas Friedman uses the phrase in an article to push for more movement on global warming. It goes on and on. It seems our friends on the left have code words. "We are the people we have been waiting for" means we are the ones to disassemble democracy and capitalism. Interesting that the messiah knows this jargon even though he only had passing acquaintance with them. Posted by: locus ceruleus at November 09, 2008 12:33 AM (e2mBS) 61
Hey! I'm a baby boomer! And I didn't blow through anything or waste anything! All my husband and I ever did was get well educated, work hard, and raise our kids!
I inherited a very modest amount of money - which represented my parent's life savings, and is in investments, and which I was saving for our kids. Now the stock market has crashed and taken away 12% of that (last I looked, and probably more now), the value of our houses is down, and now Obama's plans are to increase capital gains, increase taxes on dividends, raise taxes (yes, even ours, you know he will), and bring in new estate taxes. Not to mention promising to skyrocket fuel prices and god knows what all else. We are going to be wiped out before this is all over- by half, is my estimate (and I hope it's not worse) - and what we worked for all our life taken away, right before we can retire. We are baby boomers, and none of it is our fault. Try watching your life savings dwindle, after a lifetime of work, and then get back to me on that bit about how it's all the baby boomers' fault, why dontcha. Posted by: Alana at November 09, 2008 12:36 AM (JE2zV) 62
Socialism or a big fucking swindle?
I knew that once the original $700B was authorized "they'd" come back for more. This is embezzlement, plain and simple. Didn't "excessive taxation" and "taxation without representation" become significant issues for a revolution a few years back? It's becoming clearer and clearer that the party elites, from both sides, represent nobody but themselves and their corporate/lobbyist handlers, - aided and abetted by their media enablers... These are becoming dangerous times, indeed. Posted by: Bitter Clingy Buttscratcher in flyover country at November 09, 2008 12:39 AM (aaGD+) 63
Expect the worst from the Democrats, and you'll never have to worry about being surprised. The shit will hit the fan sooner than most think, and those unprepared ( i.e. no gold, guns, or ready supplies) will be the worse for it. If you think people get ugly over elections, just wait. What might have been a recession 6 mo. ago, is starting to look much darker. Has anybody tried to buy gold eagles , or any small gold coin lately? Near impossilble to find here in California. Saw some advertised up in Washington two weeks ago....now they're gone too. T-bills will get you 1, 1.5% if you're lucky......
Posted by: Ad rem at November 09, 2008 12:41 AM (z00/5) 64
@Alana: Sorry to put you so on the spot...it's not that you personally did it, but what your generation let the government do during your time...admittedly, there's not much anyone can really do with their government at any given time, but we're pointing out that your generation spent a hell of a lot more than you made. And now we all are spending a hell of a lot more than we are making...mostly so the politicians can keep living in Roman luxury. Posted by: CanaDave at November 09, 2008 12:42 AM (6w8jL) 65
@Bitter Clingy: Didn't "excessive taxation" and "taxation without representation" become significant issues for a revolution a few years back? I've been thinking about that a lot lately. The American Revolution was about excessive taxation by England. The second American Revolution is going to be about the excessive taxation by Washington. Maybe it'll be more like the French Revolution though...with a guillotine and the whole 9 yards heh heh Posted by: CanaDave at November 09, 2008 12:46 AM (6w8jL) 66
Alana,
thanks for the smack down. I am sorry but you are part of the problem. You only see things as how they effect you. I am sorry for your loss. I am more sorry for the loss of future generations. Your parents were the greatest generation and your generation, well not so much. You were raised in the greatest expansion of an economy on record. You were given a solid infrastructure with institutions that people believed in. You gave us Keith Olberman , MTV and bailouts. "We are baby boomers, and none of it is our fault." I am sorry for your myopic perspective. Each generation has it's own responsibilities and yours failed miserably. Posted by: locus ceruleus at November 09, 2008 12:47 AM (e2mBS) 67
OK- guys, I know it's fun to speculate about the Indians taking over the US car market, but it will not happen. There are a few reasons: 1) Indian cars do not meet US safety or emissions standards. They do have the technical know-how, but the cost is quite prohibitive for such a limited sales model. And grey-market cars are a thing of the past. 2) The Indian market, large as it is, is quite concentrated. Virtually everything built there is for "local" consumption. There is very little available that would even begin to suit our market design-wise. 3) Even if they did enter our market, setting up a sales network and working on some sort of brand recognition would take years, if not decades. The only reason Acura, Infinity and Lexus didn't fail is because they were backed by three financially powerful companies that could afford to wait. Even at that, Infinity was shaky for the first few years. 4) The Indian market is so large, saturation is decades into the future. The Indians don't need to go looking for a market to sell to just yet. All this isn't to say it couldn't happen. Hell, Tata just got through buying Jaguar and Land Rover from Ford. Who knows- maybe Hindustan will buy GM. If you know what Hindustan is, that would be funny. The whole point is, though, we won't be seeing a Maruti Esteem on our streets anytime soon. Posted by: Bill H at November 09, 2008 12:50 AM (q8CmE) 68
You all arn't the Morons I thought I knew. Hopefully you can tighten it up by Monday PM. You sound like a bunch of sad sacks
sorry to have to say this but it's true. Posted by: Mr. Chumpo at November 09, 2008 12:50 AM (20py5) 69
Whoa!
I don't know where the generational blame-game started, but it is a gross generalization to say that the baby boomers qua baby boomers are responsible for our current situation. Posted by: Gabriel Malor at November 09, 2008 12:51 AM (rWvvO) Posted by: locus ceruleus at November 09, 2008 12:52 AM (e2mBS) 71
I should mention there are quite a few older Japanese and a few older American designs in India. But they still are limited by all the reasons I gave.
Posted by: Bill H at November 09, 2008 12:54 AM (q8CmE) 72
Right on locus. I have read your comments the last vouple of weeks and have liked them. Some of you all here tonight bette recognize that this is AoSHQ not some bummer crybaby log. pull it together and pull for the future.
Posted by: Mr. Chumpo at November 09, 2008 12:55 AM (20py5) 73
Gabriel,
qua? Lawyering up on us? I was not offered latin in the Detroit public schools. In all seriousness I believe the zeitgeist of the 60's is the point of the discussion. Posted by: locus ceruleus at November 09, 2008 12:56 AM (e2mBS) 74
I too am a "boomer", and share a similar story to Alanas. Never voted for bigger government, asked for a subsidized student loan, or collected unemployment. Never wanted a hand-out, never expected one. Worked four nights a week and Saturdays to put myself through college. Put 20% down on our first house, and became quite familiar with "sweat equity". Don't expect to get a new car every other year......one we drive now is six years old, and we still consider it our "good" car. Our Toyota Rav has 145,000 on it, and nothing but oil changes and brakes....best car we ever owned! Now, I'm forced to contimplate the possibility that my 401k could be taxed, or usurped in some way.....oh, Barry you're gonna feeeeeel the love.....
Posted by: Ad rem at November 09, 2008 12:57 AM (z00/5) 75
Posted by: Gabriel Malor at November 09, 2008 12:51 AM (rWvvO) True enough- especially considering that quite a few in Congress and in statehouses across the country are a wee bit older than the 'baby-boom' generation. Posted by: Bill H at November 09, 2008 12:57 AM (q8CmE) 76
Reading some of the financial blogs and even some of the people who supported Obama are starting to get the jitters. Posted by: Travis at November 09, 2008 01:00 AM (uOj//) 77
Mr. Chumpo,
My posts above were a poor attempt to say, that if our party seized the mantel of personal responsibility, we would expand our base. We are not the party that will free you from the repercussions of your actions. Posted by: locus ceruleus at November 09, 2008 01:01 AM (e2mBS) 78
Reading some of the financial blogs and even some of the people who supported Obama are starting to get the jitters.
No kidding. Sounds like buyers remorse. Just what the fuck did they expect? Guess what, folks- there is a no-return policy on presidential elections. Posted by: Bill H at November 09, 2008 01:05 AM (q8CmE) Posted by: Swegin at November 09, 2008 01:05 AM (q0Z3p) 80
Oh for Christ's sakes.
I didn't give you anything of the kind. I've fought it tooth and nail. It is absurd for anyone to latch on to "baby boomers" as the enemy. That simply causes division among ourselves. Anyway, think about it: How do you figure that you are screwed any worse than we are? How would you like to be facing this right before retirement? To have done everything right all your life and end up having it taken away from you by (a) stock market crash and (b) a socialist redistributing president? Because Obama isn't out to soak the rich. He is out to soak me and thee. Anyone of any age who has been hard-working and conscientious (and volunteered, I might add!) is getting soaked by him to pay for people who actually have more color tv's and so forth than we do. If you don't have your retirement saved up, then bully for you. You won't lose it. You won't have it confiscated. Do you know they are talking about confiscating the 401k's and the IRA's? What it means for you is you won't be *able* to save up for retirement. But for us, it means having done it, then having it taken away. I think that is the more bitter loss. And don't blame people for voting. What did you expect us to do, not vote? We are supposed to be represented by our representatives. That they are doing a lousy job of it is their fault, not ours. That they turn out to be a bunch of crooks is their fault. (Now that we know, though . . .) The enemy is not us. The enemy is not young people, or baby boomers, or old people. The enemy is not me, it's not you, and it's not my parents. The enemy was first corruption in government, and now we are facing a worse enemy: The wrong ideology. Absolutely zero of this is my fault, or anybody's fault, by virtue of having been a baby boomer. And I will remind you that while you are being bitter about your generation, I am way being way more bitter about having my children's future taken away from them, and the money is the least of it. Focus. Posted by: Alana at November 09, 2008 01:05 AM (JE2zV) 81
"Maybe it'll be more like the French Revolution though...with a guillotine and the whole 9 yards heh heh "
Naah, haven't you read your Jonah Goldberg? The French Revolution was the first fascist revolution. I prefer the American Revolution Posted by: Sekhmet at November 09, 2008 01:07 AM (QiWeI) 82
"Reading some of the financial blogs and even some of the people who supported Obama are starting to get the jitters."
Gee, why do people vote for a politician who they don't believe will do what he says he is going to do? I mean, it should be a safe bet that any given politician will at the very least pay lip service to what they are saying before getting elected---and if something about the plans bother you----DON'T VOTE FOR THE CHUMP! Geez, and I'm not even any kind of financial genius... Posted by: Sekhmet at November 09, 2008 01:11 AM (QiWeI) 83
About that "We Are the Ones We Have Been Waiting For" quote from Barack and echoed by Billy Ayers. When you google that phrase it's like being transported into a Berkley think tank.
Alice Walker, a poet who claims Fidel is religious because he stands for the poor, has book with that title. June Jordan, a Berkley professor and also a communist, is credited with coining the phrase. Sojourners are a liberal faith community that anti-war and pro social justice. Their site is what you would expect. Thomas Friedman uses the phrase in an article to push for more movement on global warming. It goes on and on. It seems our friends on the left have code words. "We are the people we have been waiting for" means we are the ones to disassemble democracy and capitalism. Interesting that the messiah knows this jargon even though he only had passing acquaintance with them. Posted by: locus ceruleus at November 09, 2008 12:33 AM (e2mBS) For fuck's sake... that was the only line that I could ever remember from any of his speeches, and it's just some commie slogan he ripped off from somewhere else?! Reagan must be spinning in his grave like a top right now. And, by they way... I notice in the Bill Ayers article that he repeats the "kill him" lie that's already been debunked at least a hundred times. Just another reason to hate that stupid cocksucking treasonous piece of shit socialist asshole. Posted by: Watcher at November 09, 2008 01:18 AM (KvpcJ) 84
Something to cheer us up: Piper Palin radio interview (and a little Sarah):
http://tiny.cc/7nglB Posted by: Swegin Yeah I listened to that. Piper Palin is a sweetheart. Can't help but smile when I see her. Posted by: Travis at November 09, 2008 01:19 AM (uOj//) 85
Watcher, WATCHER! C'mon, man! Get your facts straight. It's "stupid cocksucking treasonous piece of shit socialist COMMUNIST asshole." Sheesh.
Posted by: jaleach at November 09, 2008 01:21 AM (gHrZU) 86
If you all are feeling bad, and of course this has been a real shit sandwich, try to find Kaptain Americas blog. I'm not going to link it now 'cause finding it requires that you do the minimum search through these blessed chapters of AoS. Things are fucked up, yeah, especially if you have the severe misfortune not to be an American Citizen. I love this country, nothing pissed in the Libs soup more than that.
Posted by: Mr. Chumpo at November 09, 2008 01:23 AM (20py5) 87
And I just laugh and laugh and laugh... GM couldn't be worse off if it was managed by a car full of clowns. They're a pack of demanding, arrogant morons to do business with. Posted by: Barbelle at November 09, 2008 01:26 AM (qF8q3) 88
@Sekhmet: Naah, haven't you read your Jonah Goldberg? The French Revolution was the first fascist revolution. I prefer the American Revolution I was just trying to make it sound more scary Posted by: CanaDave at November 09, 2008 01:28 AM (6w8jL) 89
@Alana & Mr Chumpo: Conservatives are the same anywhere and anywhen...we're not accusing you personally, more during your time. When our kids look at us (those that had kids, which is not me), they are going to accuse us of not having been tougher with you. Nobody wants the burdens of a previous era passed on to them...it's pretty much guaranteed that the future is going to fail...especially when there are less children born now than there were 40 years ago. That's why the government should never be allowed to borrow money...saint seducing gold...you can never trust another human being with your money...period. You can't trust them with your credit card, you can't trust them with your checkbook, you just can't trust them. Posted by: CanaDave at November 09, 2008 01:39 AM (6w8jL) 90
?
Posted by: Mr. Chumpo at November 09, 2008 01:46 AM (20py5) 91
??
Posted by: CanaDave at November 09, 2008 01:48 AM (6w8jL) 92
It's not the baby boomers fault as a whole. It's just that the baby boomers who were throwing tantrums in the streets in 1968 are now solidly in control of our government...with a very smooth talker as POTUS to make it all sound nice.
Posted by: Sgt. York at November 09, 2008 01:55 AM (u3pgy) 93
We had to destroy capitalism in order to save it!
Posted by: United States Congress at November 09, 2008 01:57 AM (shkE3) 94
Yea! Let's plant money and see if it grows out of the ground!
Posted by: LC at November 09, 2008 02:06 AM (zZCR2) 95
Alana, It is the mindset of the 60's that is at fault. The 'if it feels good do it', the instant gratification and let's postpone the consquences. That mentality led to paying the minimum payment on credit cards and letting personal debt skyrocket, putting only 10% down on a home you couldn't afford, and hocking the future to have a good time today. Their parents were more willing to accept self-sacrifice. Posted by: JimD at November 09, 2008 02:12 AM (j/wD+) 96
Yea! Let's plant money and see if it grows out of the ground! So THAT'S why a venture capitalist calls it seed money! /duh Posted by: Bill H at November 09, 2008 02:20 AM (q8CmE) 97
I'm usually pretty gung-ho for the US Automakers, I worked at Ford and have a lot of family there. Being a good American who loves his (former now) work, and really doesn't like the idea of the in-laws becoming the moved-in-laws I was pretty upbeat about the possibilities from Ford, they've got pretty good technology and some nice cars in the pipeline. My problem is that after a decade of struggling, the management is becoming geared to operating in failure mode rather than streamlining new products and reacting more quickly to the market. I love the Focus and Fusions, but the Flex is an abomination from the late 90's, why the heck did they finish the most expensive part of launching it when they could have booked the research and plowed money into retooling for other more marketable cars, like the EuroFocus or a 50state legal diesel? The automakers need to find a fire and competitve spirit that makes them thirst for the blood of the competition, not this craptastic morass they've sunk to. Posted by: Allen at November 09, 2008 02:29 AM (UCNld) 98
If you guys didn't catch the $50 billion ... YES BILLION dollar low interest loans they are requesting, guess what.
$25 billion of those loans go to cover healthcare costs. Healthcare costs from whom and how the fuck does any company need $25 billion to cover healthcare costs!? Ladies and gents, I present to you... The UAW! Posted by: portfolio at November 09, 2008 02:40 AM (DdzMd) 99
Guys, it's important to remember, just because GM and/or Ford go banctrupt doesn't mean that they suddently cease to exist. It just means that they have certain rights under the law to restructure and rearrange their operations while they try to retain their solvency. It also allows an opportunity for the torch to be handed to more capable owner/operators as high-level management may receive a shake-up. Bottom line, not handing out a hand-out doesn't spell the end of the world. Let the system work. What do you think we did before the "bailout" was ever considered before? That's right...let it fail. Posted by: LC at November 09, 2008 02:43 AM (zZCR2) 100
JimD - no, I just don't buy it. Nobody I know did any of that profligate buying more than you could afford stuff, spending everything and living it up, like you talk about.
I don't think this has anything to do with age at all. And certainly, if you want to go throwing around age, you could move a decade younger from that, and then a decade younger, and so forth - just where are all the fiscally conservative people in those decades younger than mine? What are the mistakes the younger groups made? (Such as, for example, voting for Obama en masse.) We ordinary citizens - of any age group - are not the problem here. Fact is, we're being sold crap, and expected to buy it. All of us. My main point is, this is very early on times here of what we are facing, and dividing ourselves into age groups to blame is unhelpful. However, I will accept your point of view from a philosophical angle, as a philosophical observation. While not blaming younger people, which I could make a case against, if I wanted to. Because it wouldn't be helpful to do that, and it also wouldn't be accurate or fair. We need to hang together for this. Posted by: Alana at November 09, 2008 02:49 AM (JE2zV) 101
I wrote a scathing letter to Rep. Jeff Flake, Sens. Kyl and McCain 3 days prior to the first vote that shot down the bailout in the House.
I was literally jumping for fucking joy when the vote came out 227 against. I was screaming, "Finally, the fucking politicians are afraid of us!" Then the fucking Senate decides to pull a smooth criminal (kinda like a Dutch Rudder, but nastier) and fuck over the constituency again. I made it very very clear that I would not vote to re-elect any representative of mine who voted in favor of the Bailout. I received 2 letters from Sens. Kyl and McCain basically saying: Fuck you ignorant voter. Your opinion is shit. You are a drone. Rep. Jeff Flake voted against the bailout (the $840 billion one with mental health and pet projects and shit) and I will be volunteering for his reelection. Sens. Kyl and McCain, not so much. This shit needs to stop. We need to make these fuckers afraid of us again like they were in Bailout Pt I. God knows what other Faustian deals these bastages will cut with Barry despite us setting the DC Phone Lines on fire. Stand up! Stand up! Stand up and fight, you cooter sniffers! Posted by: portfolio at November 09, 2008 02:50 AM (DdzMd) 102
So UAW and GM want a bailout, while UAW insists on Card Check, so they can get more members on the permanent GM dole, continuing to bleed GM white, and me and you are supposed to grab our ankles and crap money for a bailout. Which way to Galt's Gulch?
Posted by: Jones at November 09, 2008 02:53 AM (VkNlv) 103
Yes we should definitely send $50 billion to 3 companies who continue to pay people their full salaries AFTER they have been laid off... for months... sometimes years... and providing them with full benefits.
How about we do that for our soldiers, airmen, sailors, and marines instead of some assholes who swing a robotic arm into position every 60 seconds. "Shot down in a blaze of glory" is sounding more and more tempting every day. Posted by: portfolio at November 09, 2008 03:04 AM (DdzMd) 104
Oh, the "I didn't know anyone that..." line. Reminds me of the "I didn't know anyone that voted for Nixon" line. No one is blaming YOU Alana. Looks like the old phrase birds of a feather flock together is appropriate here. You were a responsible citizen, and so were your friends. Few others of that generation were. And ya, I will take you up on your "generation younger" line. The "me" generation started in the 60s and they passed that sense of entitlement on to their kids, and onward. All of them? OF COURSE NOT! But the crap started in the 60s and continues up to today. After all, the "youth" went big for Obama.
Posted by: JimD at November 09, 2008 03:10 AM (j/wD+) 105
To summerize. America went from "ask not what your country can do for you, ask what you can do for your country" to "where's mine at" in the 60s, and we never looked back. Posted by: JimD at November 09, 2008 03:13 AM (j/wD+) 106
Jones - I think that may eventually be Texas.
Posted by: LC at November 09, 2008 03:22 AM (zZCR2) 107
The Unions want this card check BS because they know the auto manufacturers are about to go belly up. Every industry that they have tied up has gone belly up. They are like lethal parasites moving from one industry to another killing the host and moving on the fresh blood.
They are smaller scale equivalents of Democraps who try to do the same thing to the country at large. That is to implement an economy based on “magic beans” which somehow produce a free lunch. Posted by: Vic at November 09, 2008 04:37 AM (Qd7GC) 108
The US already has a "healthy automobile manufacturing sector". It's just not in MI.
Posted by: Brett_McS at November 09, 2008 05:30 AM (hPpeu) 109
Alana,
The enemy is the consolidation of power in any one place. The fact that it's government is a symptom of the larger human condition. Any time power is consolidated it will attract corruption and abuse. It's the nature of WE, the people. The whole point of a limited government was to keep power dispersed. In that way the Founding Fathers hoped to leave their progeny a system that might work over time. And it has. But with the first great crisis of the modern era, The Great Depression, that government model was dismantled and we have one now where power is concentrated. And that inevitably leads to downturn and misery for those not within the power structure. Ever has it been. Posted by: Nom de Blog at November 09, 2008 05:36 AM (nOQ1R) 110
The feds won't stop until they have a seat on the board of every major corporation in the U.S. We are truly screwed.
Posted by: Bugler at November 09, 2008 06:43 AM (YCVBL) 111
But with the first great crisis of the modern era, The Great Depression, that government model was dismantled and we have one now where power is concentrated.
My take on this is that the government model of the founders was dismantled long before the Great Depression. Indeed, the great depression itself was caused by the actions of FDR and in order to do that the government had already concentrated power.
My feeling is that the concentration of power in Washington occurred during the Civil War and the days leading up to that war. When Lincoln was elected he assumed office with a working government comprised of what were known then as the “radical Republicans”. These individuals and the party of the time bore absolutely no resemblance to the current Republican Party.
Lincoln seized power like no one else ever before and he basically threw out the Constitution. Since the Democrat Party had split between the Southern slaveholders and the Northern Copperheads there essentially was no opposition. Following the war and the assassination of Lincoln and his subsequent deification the Radical Republicans in congress further concentrated power in Washington at the expense of the States.
The current “modern era” of socialism and communism actually had its roots in the “progressive era”. That group of politicians is what ultimately led to the 16th amendment and FDR’s follies.
So the bottom line here is that great president that all call the savior of the union actually destroyed the country in order to keep ALL the States together. Posted by: Vic at November 09, 2008 06:59 AM (Qd7GC) 112
Two more banks went down today; one in CA one in TX. And other banks were "awarded" their assets by the Feds, again, for pennies on the dollar. Pennies. On. The. Dollar. Who's blowin' who? Who's your daddy? What the hell is that thing called ...rico, no ...libor. Yep. LIBOR, that's what it's called. Who's to really effin' say that the LIBOR wasn't being gamed? Are we watching money being drained from the smaller players to the bigger players? The investments of the middle class are being vaporized by this whatever-it-is-that's-going-down. I hear some upstate commie-economist wants to go after 401K's now. Wealth is changing hands in a very, very fundamental way. Convenient that all this financial crap happens right after the Republican convention, after the Palin choice totally stole the Obama thunder and had turned the polls upside down. And that they're still lobbing grenades at her. And ... ...and I'm turning into a 'noid. Can I still blame Bush? Posted by: davis,br at November 09, 2008 07:08 AM (zewwG) 113
I'm a baby boomer and I agree with their critics. Don't throw out the baby with the bathwater, however. I fought those 60's lib sons of whores as hard as I could. I donated thousands to the Republican Party to get a shot at having Reagan elected. The problem isn't with the boomers; it's with the greatest generation who should have shot the boomer libs down in the streets when they were treasonous college students. Those bastards should have been liquidated or jailed for forty years. The greatest generation was too bewildered to do that because their will was sapped by the "hate America first" crowd. Those of us who fought like hell for the Republicans and conservative agendas in those bitter years from 73 to 80 bought your generation time to prepare. Without us there is no Ronald Reagan and the Soviet Union (with the help of lefty bastard American traitors) wins the Cold War. Again, I agree with the boomer critics. Just don't make the mistake of blaming all of us. Some of us fought in Vietnam for a country that first sent us there, then often looked like it hated us for going. If nothing else, we at least made damned sure that crap didn't happen again to our men and women in uniform who fought for us in Iraq and Afghanistan. Remember one thing: if you think you hate and despise these lefty boomer bastards, you can't hate them as badly as people like me do. We've been putting up with their garbage for a hell of a lot longer and hate them with the searing fire of a thousand suns. I'm serious as a heart attack when I say I've wished many times it would come to guns. There are a lot of people on the left whose thinking would be greatly improved by what they would receive in a civil war. Posted by: mac at November 09, 2008 07:17 AM (km5b4) 114
why not just have the gov't buy everyone a new car, solves two problems...
Posted by: new at November 09, 2008 07:27 AM (MobLv) Posted by: Vic at November 09, 2008 07:30 AM (Qd7GC) 116
the car companies have been failing for years, it has been a shell game.
Posted by: lions at November 09, 2008 07:43 AM (+q06x) 117
Howzabout a bail-out for the firearms manufacturers? Oh wait -- I hear that they're doing pretty well in recent days. Go figure.
Posted by: deMontjoie at November 09, 2008 08:04 AM (D4bPm) 118
I've always hated Ford's shitty sales practices and refuse to ever set foot in a dealership ever again. GM cars just suck, their company is run by accountants, not car people. I acquired a GMC Sierra via auction with 650 miles on it, I have 1200 on it now and I am already having problems. It was a good deal only on paper.
Let it all burn. Posted by: Nyctalus Lasiopterus at November 09, 2008 08:19 AM (N+Ydc) 119
This article on the Automaker troubles talks about Ford and what is wrong with the industry. Basically that they couldn’t make any money off of small fuel efficient cars due to high labor costs and how trucks and SUVs were carrying them. Now that gas prices killed the trucks and the SUVs they are going belly up.
Now they say they need a bailout loan from the Democrats and the Democrats are more than willing to help them in order to help the unions. And here is where the real problem lies. The Democrats basically created the all powerful unions and the unions have destroyed the auto makers. So now the Democrats have to bailout the automaker.
This is NOT an isolated instance and it reflects the overall bankruptcy of the socialist practices of big government intervention. They intervene to make unions virtually undefeatable and when the unions became corrupted by that power they began bankrupting the auto company. Then a correction by the government is needed to fix the “unintended consequences” of the first act. That correction will be either highly inflationary or be associated with high taxes, both of which the people will have to pay for. That will then cause further economic downturn and will require even further government intervention. It becomes an engine ran off of regenerative (positive) feedback. Engineers know how well that works.
This is not restricted to the auto industry. Every time the heavy hand of government gets involved in some endeavor they screw it up, either through shear incompetence, corruption, or the law of unintended consequences. They create these programs, whether large or small, place their buddies in charge of them and move right along. None of these programs are ever examined to see if they actually work, or indeed, if they cause actual HARM. Once they start creating problems instead of simply eliminating the program they create additonal programs to fix the consequences of the first. It is literally insane.
They always become part of the entrenched bureaucracy complete with their own ever expanding fiefdoms. LOL, we still have a national program for helium in order to fill Navy dirigibles for submarine watch off the coast.
The sad thing is that this will continue until the country and the government collapses and the blood begins to run in the street.
Posted by: Vic at November 09, 2008 08:40 AM (Qd7GC) 120
I gree w/ Allen@ 97. I got rid of my F250 Diesel, because I only needed that much truck 6 times a year to tow my boat. And at $4.85/gal., it was not that cool a ride anymore. ... I miss my 1989 Isuzu turbo diesel 4x4 X-cab. As for the bailout.............(1) Drill here and Now!. I've had my eye on a new F-150, but I'm not budging because I'm afraid gas will hit $5/gallon in 18 months. Yes, the $8300 off sticker and 0% are tempting, but if fuel spikes, I'm fucked. (2) Ask all the assholes that bragged about forcing the big three into higher CAFE standards how they feel now. ...." Senator douchebag, now that you have forced the big 3 into making cars people don't want, how will a Bailout help them?????" I would love a small truck with a turbo diesel....Make quads street legal, in side roads (I saw this in Greece last summer)....Make a motorcycle only lane, 3'-4' wide, on all Interstate roads. This will entice more people to ride a 7500cc/ 80mpg bike. 4' of extra paving will have a huge payback in jobs and fuel economy. Every road has room for these...Relax impact standards... Every asshole with an airbag and a cellphone thinks they are invurnerable to personal harm. ../.If the want a 3 wheel, car with Zero safety features, let 'em have it.
Posted by: hutch1200 at November 09, 2008 08:59 AM (rmy0B) 121
Motorcycle tax credit. Double if American made. Triple if you have a concealed carry permit and discourage cage drivers from tailgating and being assholes in general. Bonus credit for hauling the kids to school in a Sidecar.
Posted by: hutch1200 at November 09, 2008 09:02 AM (rmy0B) 122
How come nobody's talking about the shitheads at AIG? They use their bailout for a executive spa vacation, then complain that the bailout terms are "too draconian"? What the fuck! Give me some of that draconian shit man, I need a massage!
Posted by: Average Jen at November 09, 2008 09:06 AM (OINAg) Posted by: Stephen Macklin at November 09, 2008 09:07 AM (R7LgM) 124
Jen, you just got you colon massaged. What mor do you want want? Hater!
Posted by: hutch1200 at November 09, 2008 09:16 AM (rmy0B) 125
Yep, and here is yet anotheri industry going belly up due to government harrassment that needs a bailout. Posted by: Vic at November 09, 2008 09:24 AM (Qd7GC) 126
Chemjeff's To Do List 1. Cash out the 401(k). It is managed by an AIG subsidiary anyway so it will go under any day now. Who cares if I have no retirement funds, the government will bail me out. Spend the money on hookers, smokes 'n' beer. 2. Mortgage the house. Hell get a second, third, fourth mortgage. I tell ya, I was SWINDLED by the evil greedy bankers! Bail me out! Spend the money on hookers, smokes 'n' beer. 3. Max out the credit cards. After all I'll be bailed out here too. Spend the money on...you guessed it. 4. Shack up with Peggy the Moocher.
Posted by: chemjeff at November 09, 2008 09:30 AM (gv6Tj) 127
As to the automotives....
We note that The O-and-Savior is likely to prescribe, by EO, the Californicate emissions standards.
Think that the Big Three will object, knowing that their $50Bn gift is on the line? Posted by: dad29 at November 09, 2008 09:31 AM (q1ayR) 128
"worst auto market in 25 years" my lily-white dimpled ass! They are planning on using 20 bil, give or take, just to fund their various retirement and pensions for the beloved union workers they mever could afford in the first damn place. Why don't they send one million people a check for 30K so we can buy new cars instead of begging for handouts that won't be used appropriately anyway. Fucking idiots.
Posted by: Sweet Sarah at November 09, 2008 09:33 AM (LFsh1) 129
#99 - You are right. Airlines seem to go bankrupt all the time. And then they merge, spin off, do whatever it is that they do, get back on their feet. And they still continue to fly planes even while in bankruptcy. Let the automakers do the same thing.
Posted by: chemjeff at November 09, 2008 09:40 AM (gv6Tj) 130
The smartest post on the thread. I WORKED for BARRY GOLDWATER, while you guys weren't even a glime in someones eye. Don't give me shit about be a liberal. It was my parents and their friends, too lazy and preached to by Dr. Spock, et al, that did not disciple the boomers. Most Boomers are spoiled brats. I was in Chicago in 68, watching the hippies and fighting them. I know of what I speak. Me Me Me. And most of the Boomer's kids, you all, are worse. No one teaches accepting responsibility for your acts anymore, it's aways someone else's fault. Lots folks here need to GROW UP. You teach your kids to take responsiblity for their acts and not blame someone else then we'll be off to a good start. My sons worked in college and paid for their entire college education. Any of you all do that? Kemp Posted by: kempermanx at November 09, 2008 10:26 AM (2+9Yx) 131
I will wager that the auto industry, and any industry with unionized workers, will get whatever they want come January. If GM fails, the UAW and its massive contributions to Dems, fails, which will put a financial dent in Barack's second campaign.
Posted by: PJ at November 09, 2008 11:17 AM (GVdvM) 132
I'm with Alana (#61). Blaming the boomers is not the answer. I'm a baby boomer, too, with four adult children. My husband and I worked our butts off to put all four of them through private schools (Catholic) and private colleges and they are hard-working EARNERS and CONTRIBUTORS to society because of the example we set for them. (My parents did the same for me and my seven brothers and sisters.)We live modestly, always within our means and take nothing from anyone. Those greed-heads in Washington and their cronies looted the place and now Frank, Dodd, Pelosi, Reid want to grab the money that all of us (including boomers) have socked away. If that happens, President HopeyChangey will be in real trouble. They'll have to pry my retirement money from my cold dead hands. Believe me, in a couple of years, President Bush will be looking real good and lots of folks will be feeling like total saps.
Posted by: maryanne at November 09, 2008 11:37 AM (A6Bqs) 133
Wow. It's just a shame that no one could have seen any of this coming. How could we possibly have expected this? Oh, wait. I did expect this. Posted by: Cautiously Pessimistic at November 09, 2008 11:39 AM (BGcGB) 134
Kemp,
I did. I got scholarships and I worked too. And I made great grades. WTF do you think I'm a conservative? Posted by: Nom de Blog at November 09, 2008 11:49 AM (nOQ1R) Posted by: heartlessnewt at November 09, 2008 11:57 AM (GhwKr) 136
#134 Good! Yeah, a little work makes most kids understand, when the man takes their money, they don't like it. Kemp Posted by: kempermanx at November 09, 2008 12:03 PM (2+9Yx) 137
Fuck 'em all. Let it fall. We need some much needed and overdue house cleaning. Let the UAW fall with them. Give them a chance to rise from the ashes and cast aside those parasitic unions...
Posted by: LC at November 09, 2008 12:07 PM (zZCR2) 138
(The Left): "Our economy is totally controlled by big *corporations*, and they're, like, real *eeevil*, and Bush and Cheney are in cahoots with 'em and give those damn corporations all the tax breaks, see? So what we need is to elect **Democrats** to congress, because they'll stand up for the working stiff instead of the big corporations! Yeah, dat's da ticket!
Fast-forward to a couple of days ago: "A healthy automobile manufacturing sector is essential to the restoration of financial market stability, the overall health of our economy, and the livelihood of the automobile sector's workforce," Pelosi and Reid said in their letter [in which they requested $50 billion for the Big 3 U.S. automakers]. (The Left): "Oh, well *that's* okay because that money is gonna go to keep jobs for working stiffs, so they can keep those good union jobs. And we're for anything that helps unions! Posted by: sf at November 09, 2008 12:37 PM (EsQly) 139
The Democratic-led government now wants to buy shares in the auto industry, as if 700 billion for their failed sub-prime mortgage debacle wasn't enough. Look for more of this to happen. Everytime a corporation fails due to its own mistakes, government interference, or just the fact that it didn't succeed in the global market, it will be able to dig deeper into the pockets of taxpayers for salvation. Welcome to centralized government extortion. Lenin would be proud. Posted by: sfcmac at November 09, 2008 01:34 PM (sfqwI) 140
The
Democrats basically created the all powerful unions and the unions have
destroyed the auto makers. So now the Democrats have to bailout the
automaker.
As some others have already noted, I think the Dems are most interested in bailing out the auto makers in order to save the auto makers unions. The Dem party fully expects to get their kickback on this. Posted by: flenser at November 09, 2008 01:46 PM (gYvdZ) 141
I think Cavuto had the right idea. Make firing the CEOs with no parachutes a condition of the bailout. Also, I would add firing of all the union heads a condition. Posted by: Vic at November 09, 2008 01:59 PM (Qd7GC) 142
#5...during the campaign, I distinctly remember McAislecrosser refusing to mention any of the Fannie Mae offenders by name...he called out Obama for his glut of donations from Fannie/Freddie, but never once that I heard mentioned Frank or Dodd by name...always by committee position. Sue Myrick from NC voted against the 1st bailout then voted for the 2nd more craptacular version. I called her office and emailed several times. She sent me a nice long, uninspiring letter explaining her cave. I sent a very pointed, but professional, rebuttal and she actually called...I've yet to call her back because I don't think I can stop from screaming the words "I told you so". Let this be a lesson to all conservative reps and senators...when you give in on principle, you also lose on political grounds. Posted by: The Hammer at November 09, 2008 02:06 PM (P89vv) 143
when the 700 billion bailout was being argued i said it wouldn't fix anything, it didn't, i said the gov's answer to that failure would be even more money, it is. can we all agree now that throwing worthless currency at the problem is NOT the answer? Posted by: shoey at November 09, 2008 02:55 PM (RxUMK) 144
the uaw has 4 billion in a strike fund.let them float a loan.why don't they pay there own lazy slugs for a month. where is any capilist ideas on any of these bailouts.is the gop that much in the tank. how much whould it have cost to just not have them pay their taxes.this whole thing is just a wholesale socialist takeover of the country. the only way they can totally count on complete power is the destruction of the economy.
Posted by: todd bruning at November 09, 2008 03:58 PM (f9A2Z) 145
The taxpayers already own 80% of AIG according to the terms of the loan.
Yes, but the management of AIG owns 100% of the Democratic Congress. Posted by: richard mcenroe at November 09, 2008 05:33 PM (/3ev3) 146
If we were talking about a crisis at another time, I'd say the UAW contributed.
But, when people can't buy cars because they can't get loans and the US Auto Industry Suffers, that is the UAW's fault how? This is doing what the bailout money was suppose to be used for. To keep credit flowing so businesses like the Auto Companies, the reason the financial sector exists, can go about their business. Posted by: jpm100 at November 09, 2008 05:39 PM (d1G81) 147
Here's the deal: It's not "baby boomers who did this."
It's "liberals who did this." (And now, spineless conservatives who have joined their ranks.) So let's just get that straight. Conservative baby boomers did not do this. Never did, never will. The issue is ideology, not age. Posted by: Alana at November 09, 2008 05:57 PM (JE2zV) 148
#146 i don't have the best credit on the planet, i talked to my bank and a car dealer, if i wanted to i could go get a loan for a new car tomorrow, there is no consumer credit crunch, this is a manufactured crisis being used to destroy the dollar. i know that sounds all Alex Jones-y but it's the only thing makes any sense to me... someone please talk me down from here with some solid facts, because i don't see any facts that would support the need for anymore bailouts. Posted by: shoey at November 09, 2008 07:54 PM (RxUMK) 149
My sons worked in college and paid for their entire college education. Any of you all do that? Good for them. As it happens, that doesn't have anything to do with being a conservative. My parents had 7 kids and put them all through college. Their philosophy was, "Don't have the kids if you can't help them get enough education to make a decent living." Zero college loans and ROTC or academic scholarships only... ...and every single one of us is a Republican. On the flip side, I went to college with plenty of people footing their own bill and thinking the government should save them all that work. I got an earful of how unfair it was that my parents had the foresight to provide for my education. Like that was a flaw. Political philosiphy has nothing to do with a parent's ability to provide financial support and everything to do with the manner in which it's provided. Posted by: Barbelle at November 09, 2008 07:55 PM (qF8q3) 150
i'm a baby-boomer and i agree that my generation has totally screwed-the-pooch, it's my generation more than any other has engendered this "i deserve something for nothing" attitude, to be certain there are many bommers who resisted, but as a rule of thumb, boomers are a bunch of spoiled, whiny brats and they have passed their disease on to the following generation(s)
Posted by: shoey at November 09, 2008 08:21 PM (RxUMK) 151
I want this bailout to fail for both ideological and tactical reasons: Ideological: I don’t want my tax dollars paying for retirement benefits of UAW workers – particularly since the monies will be managed by the corrupt, sleazy UAW. Moreover, this is much worse than the financial bailout in that there’s no payback potential at all. It’s just money going down a black hole. Tactical: Unions love Barry and Barry loves unions. This bailout is merely payback for all the money the unions put in Democratic coffers this year. I guarantee you, the Dems will try to frame this as “helping the hard working auto workers” instead of “spending our tax dollars on a corrupt union” (or “helping the big bad auto companies” for that matter.) It’s in the best interest of conservatives and the Republican Party for this bill to go down in defeat. The unions are nothing more than a Dem special interest group – like ACORN. Fuck ‘em. They need to taste a little market discipline. To me this is like the Dems spitting in our faces while we’re down. We need to get all Republicans and Blue Dog Democrats, and all the members of the Skeptics Caucus from the financial bailout to vote against it. This is just wong. Posted by: Tversky at November 10, 2008 04:43 AM (/yWtL) 152
#148 GM's former financing arm GMAC won't give loans to people with credit ratings below 700 pts. But what you don't see is that the auto industry moves inventory and supplies on credit. If they amassed a huge wad of capital to perform these tasks, one of two things would happen. Shareholders would raid the kitty. Or, someone would conduct a takeover to raid the kitty. The former happened when Daimler took over Chrysler and raided their $12bln rainy day fund. Posted by: jpm100 at November 10, 2008 11:37 AM (wSTfB) 153
balance of shoes nike shoes shoes.com adidas shoes puma shoes womens shoes dress shoes. casual shoes wholesale shoes sport shoes nike shoes shoes boots sandal shoes basketball shoes slippers shoes . replica rolex watches rolex watch replica watches- cartier watches- cartier watches swiss watch automatic watch chronograph watch. mens watch watch com men's watch the watch womens shoes leather shoes dress shoes running shoes . adidas shoes tote bag golf bag plastic bag purses bag briefcase bag steve madden shoes gold watch rockport shoes repairs watches best replica watches youtube watch youtube watch rolex watch rolex watches casio watches watches online timex watches tag watches. nike jordan shoes ladies watch leather bag replica handbag replica handbags wearing fashions clothes jorand shoes . oyster rolex dive watches replica watches- watches for men- timex watches buy watch rolex mens chrono watch elgin watch. automatic watch ladies watch mens watches new shoes steve madden shoes sneakers shoes sneaker shoes jorand shoes . rolex replica belts bag diaper bags travel bag laptop bag shoulder bag wears art glass urban wear fendi bag briefcase bag nike shoes men shoes fashion shoes women's shoes shoe store nike shoes best replica watches nike shoes men shoes fashion shoes women's watches cracked- medieval times- cidreq cidreq mens health ukraine 2009 calendar. chopper leipzig madsen donald duck isis king ncaa mens soccer cuny portal croazia . pasolini safari e-buddy espace pub rugby henderson waves jewelry ring wrist watches rolex watches replica watches fine watches casio watches watches online quartz watch. nike shoes ladies watch men's watch nike shoes running shoes Tiffany Bracelet basketball shoes jorand shoes . replica rolex watches rolex watch replica watches- fine watches- rolex datejust rolex mens watch repair oyster rolex watch. air flight ladies watch men's watch rolex submariner running shoes Tiffany Bracelet rolex replica jorand shoes . rolex replica watches rolex replica nike shoes rolex replica rolex replica fake rolex replica rolex replica watches rolex replica rolex replica rolex replica watches rolex replica best replica watches watches diamond watches replica watches rolex watches casio watches watches online timex watches tag watches. nike jordan shoes ladies watch luxury rolex watch nike shoes running shoes Tiffany Bracelet basketball shoes jorand shoes . oyster rolex dive watches replica watches- watches for men- rolex datejust buy watch rolex mens watch repair oyster rolex watch. air flight ladies watch seagull watches rolex submariner running shoes Tiffany Bracelet rolex replica jorand shoes . rolex replica watches rolex replica nike shoes rolex replica rolex replica fake rolex replica rolex replica watches rolex replica rolex replica shoe store nike shoes best replica watches nike shoes men shoes fashion shoes women's shoes shoe store nike shoes best replica watches nike shoes men shoes fashion shoes women's watches
Posted by: dressshoes at November 21, 2008 07:02 AM (bYVeT) Posted by: google排名 at August 11, 2009 09:41 PM (KUnwh) 155
Air force 1 shoes
Nike air force one Nike air force Air force 1 mens Air force one UGG Boots UGG Australia UGG Shoes UGG Sale Lebron Shoes Cheap UGG UGG Boots UGG Shoes Discount UGG UGG Australia UGG Sale UGG Online Posted by: FDSAFDS at October 18, 2009 02:09 PM (GQ3Y4) 156
Discount Boots
Womens UGG UGG Shoes UGG Australia UGG UK UGG USA discount ugg boots cheap ugg boots Posted by: fdsfds at October 27, 2009 07:45 PM (8kvkz) 157
buy Discount Boots
Womens UGG UGG Shoes UGG Australia UGG UK UGG USA discount ugg boots cheap ugg boots air force 1 shoes nike air force air force 1 mens air force 1 boots air force onefrom usa Posted by: airforceoneshop at November 03, 2009 08:40 PM (LHCCE) 158
Come to our website for shopping with high quality and best service! There have new products,MBT M. Walk
and MBT Lami,Welcome everybody to buy it. Posted by: mbt shoes at November 08, 2009 02:57 PM (QhfLM) 159
Buy discount ugg shoes
cheap ugg shoes cheap ugg ugg rainier buy ugg ugg usa discount ugg boots ugg 5825 ugg shoes sale ugg sundance ugg shoes cheap ugg boots ugg 5815 ugg sale ugg uk ugg knightsbridge womens ugg boots ugg boots ugg australia ugg 5819free shipping Posted by: ugg boots at November 12, 2009 09:49 AM (IeIJx) 160
buy [url=http://www.reviewups.com/]discount ugg shoes[/url]
[url=http://www.reviewups.com/]cheap ugg shoes[/url] [url=http://www.reviewups.com/]cheap ugg[/url] [url=http://www.reviewups.com/ugg-coquette-casual-shoes-c-22]ugg rainier[/url] [url=http://www.reviewups.com/]buy ugg[/url] [url=http://www.reviewups.com/]ugg usa[/url] [url=http://www.reviewups.com/]discount ugg boots[/url] [url=http://www.reviewups.com/ugg-classic-short-c-1]ugg 5825[/url] [url=http://www.reviewups.com/]ugg shoes sale[/url] [url=http://www.reviewups.com/ugg-sundance-c-5]ugg sundance[/url] [url=http://www.reviewups.com/]ugg shoes[/url] [url=http://www.reviewups.com/]cheap ugg boots[/url] [url=http://www.reviewups.com/ugg-classic-tall-c-3]ugg 5815[/url] [url=http://www.reviewups.com/]ugg sale[/url] [url=http://www.reviewups.com/]ugg uk[/url] [url=http://www.reviewups.com/ugg-knightsbridge-c-27]ugg knightsbridge[/url] [url=http://www.reviewups.com/]womens ugg boots[/url] [url=http://www.reviewups.com/]ugg boots[/url] [url=http://www.reviewups.com/]ugg australia[/url] [url=http://www.reviewups.com/ugg-classic-cardy-c-2]ugg 5819[/url]from usa Posted by: cheap at November 14, 2009 10:59 AM (s7MB5) 161
Replica watches | Replica watches | Replica Omega | Replica Cartier | Replica Watches | Replica Mont Blanc Watch | Parmigiani Watch | Girard Perregaux Watch Replica | Fake Bell & Ross | Michele Replica Watch | Rolex Fake Watches | Replica Cartier Watch | Alain Silberstein Replica Watch | Bvlgari Fake Watches | Dolce & Gabbana Fake Watches
Posted by: replica watches at November 17, 2009 06:06 AM (xpuiO) 162
soccer jersey wholesale | Fake Watches | Fake Watches | Fake Cheap Rolex | Fake Cheap Rolex | Replica Longines Watch | Fake Baume & Mercier | Montblanc Replica | Replica Bedat & Co Watches | Gucci Replica Watch | Raymond Weil Watch Replica | Rado Fake | Porsche Design Watch Replica | Raymond Weil Replica | Replica Parmigiani Watch
Posted by: replica watches at November 17, 2009 07:52 AM (xpuiO) 163
Replica watches | Replica watches | Replica Watches | Replica Omega | soccer jersey supplier | Fake Baume & Mercier | Patek Philippe Wristwatch | Bmw Wristwatch | Luxury watches | Cheap Benz Watches | Replica Alain Silberstein Watch | Cheap Rado Watches | Chanel Replica Watches | Cheap Piaget | Patek Philippe Fake Watches
Posted by: replica watches at November 17, 2009 09:24 PM (xpuiO) 164
Replica Watches | Replica Watches | Fake Watches | Replica Watches | Replica Breitling Watches | replica watch | Fake Frank Muller | Chanel Watches | Iwc Watches | Cheap Hublot | best replica watches | Titoni Watch | Burberry Watches | Tudor Watches | Piaget Wristwatch
Posted by: replica watches at November 18, 2009 05:33 AM (C/zDM) Posted by: mbtshoesbuy at November 23, 2009 01:41 PM (bNNim) 166
The proper function of man is to live, but not to exist.ugg classic cardyConquer fear of death and you are put into possession of your life. ugg classic tallThere is a time to speak and a time to be silent. ugg knightsbridgefree shippingmbt cheap
mbt sale mbt uk mbt shoes cheap MBT M.Walk Posted by: reviewups at November 27, 2009 12:28 PM (xUZwC) 167
hot news for brand shoes online store ,do you want to win more discount ?and popular for younger,and nike air maxwith top quality A ,come on all air max shoes with lowest price for highest quality !
Posted by: nike air max at December 02, 2009 12:06 AM (OKj2x) 168
Replica Breitling Watches | Fake Watches | Replica Omega | soccer jersey supplier | Fake Cheap Rolex | Fake Cheap Rolex | Fake Cheap Rolex | Replica Watches | Luxury watches | watches brand | replica watches | replica wristwatch | replica wristwatch | best replica watches | best replica watches | replica watches | replica wristwatch | watches brand | best replica watches | best replica watches | best replica watches | replica watch | watches brand | replica wristwatch | Luxury watches | Luxury watches | Luxury watches | replica wristwatch | watches brand | replica watches | best replica watches | replica wristwatch | replica watch | replica wristwatch | replica watches | replica watch | replica watch | Luxury watches
Posted by: replica watches at December 04, 2009 09:06 AM (bsW/x) 169
We supply authentic discount Lacoste Shoes
Lacoste Trainers New Lacoste Lacoste Sale Mens Lacoste camden lacoste trainers lacoste trainers shoes lacoste camden retro camden lacoste trainers lacoste carnaby shoes lacoste carnaby retro lacoste shoes sale New Lacoste shoes Lacoste shoes online cheap Lacoste shoes Lacoste shoe mens lacoste shoes Lacoste Shua Lace Black Lace shoes white Lace shoes lacoste swerve shoes White Lacoste shoes Lacoste shoes sale Cheap Lacoste shoes Lacoste Women Shoes Women Lacoste Shoes Lacoste Shoes online on line, cheap price,Top quality,Free shipping! Posted by: Lacoste shoes at December 13, 2009 03:25 PM (/3s/N) 170
Cartier Fake Watches | Watches Louis vuitton Belt Fashion | Gucci Belt Replica Watches | Watches Bvlgari Fashion | Watches Breguet Fashion | Baume & Mercier Replica Watches | Watches Bedat & CO Fashion | Seiko Replica Watches | Replica Concord Watches | Jacob & Co Replica Watches | Jacob & Co. Fake Watches | Watches Maurice Lacroix Fashion | Chopard Fake Watches | Michele Fake Watches | Watches Daniel Roth Fashion | Watches Hermes Fashion | Replica Emporio Armani Watches | Replica TAG Heuer Watches | Replica Longines Watches | Christian Dior Replica Watches
Posted by: wholesale jewelry at December 19, 2009 10:04 PM (1dySH) 171
Un total de once comunidades autnomas estn este jueves en alerta naranja Christmas gift ugg tall boots (riesgo importante) por nevadas y bajan las temperaturas en toda Espa09a, segn la Agencia Estatal de Meteorologa (AEMET). En concreto, se Christmas gift ugg napoule sandal trata de Aragn, Cantabria, Castilla-La Mancha, Catalu09a, Christmas gift timberland classic boots Madrid, Navarra, Comunidad Valenciana, Galicia, Pas Vasco, Asturias y Murcia. La cota de nieve bajar a menos de 200 metros en el CantbricoLa Pennsula Ibrica est bajo dos borrascas y un anticicln que crearn un pasillo que permitir el paso de una corriente de aire muy fro, como la que est provocando un temporal de fro glaciar en Europa, aunque es esperan que el fro que suframos no sea tan intenso como en otros pases. An as, se espera que las bajas temperaturas se mantengan hasta el domingo. La cota de nieve baja en el Cantbrico a menos de 200 metros
Posted by: El temporal de fr¨ªo y nieve pone en alerta a once comunidades aut¨®nomas ugg boots|ugg uk|timberlan at January 10, 2010 08:44 AM (tWrEP) 172
Swiss replica watches Now while replica watches you can buy a good digital replica watches and pocket watch you might need to see what features are present on your new purchase. This is important as you should know and understand the quickest way to set any of the watch brands. You will also need to familiarize yourself with how to know when you will need to change the batteries on your digital watch.The key to finding your perfect watch is mainly replica watches keeping your options open. There are flea markets where you should be able to find replica watch stalls. You can see if you will come across any great antique watch brands in auction houses. These places will sometimes have fantastic looking antique pocket watches that will grace the hand of any owner.These facts may seem to be quite daunting but if you have ever owned a watch of any kind then you will replica watches know that you just how replica watches easy wristwatch these devices can make your life. The many different styles and features that you can find on an average watch will make choosing the right watch brands an exciting experience. Posted by: replica watches at January 30, 2010 12:23 AM (ihruD) 173
Certainly watches are Replica Watches used to help people record rolex Watches time, but rolex watches nowadays its functions have enlarged. Replica watches are now tag heuer Watches not only objects that tag heuer watches can tell you what time it is, they are also a status symbol. You should not feel strange when you find someone wearing a watch on his wrist, but use the cell phone to tell time. In that situation, the watch is just showing its luxurious function cartier watches. It is normal and cartier watches perhaps also happens to you. .If asked that among the watches of various brands, which one can suit your taste? There is no doubt that most people will choose Rolex. Whichever social class you are in, it is naturally Rolex was known breitling Watches and cherished breitling watches for a long time. However, the elements do not usually enter the market alone, always come with the price tag up to the hand. For this reason, many people, especially men, their dreams of luxury Rolex watches are buried in omega Watches his heart omega watches. What should I do? Rolex watches are simply stunning worn by the rich and famous, right? No, this world is not the world's richest men, is the world of each. All are equal before the search of luxury and be men's watches respected. Within men's watches, the law, when consumers are in the market, women's watches they should women's watches receive the same treatment. This is the real reason why replica Rolex watches are ladies watches ladies watches more welcome than Rolex. Because in this world are not difficult to understand that the rich are much less than people with low income, you agree with me? You are forced to nod and say with certainty that is the reality. These low-income people do not have enough money to save every month. They can not afford such luxury Rolex watches
Posted by: replica watches at February 05, 2010 09:52 AM (TUJDt) 174
Factors Replica Watches About The Rolex replica watches Oyster The Oyster is so closely get in touch with Rolex, and it is inevitably that some people think these are the only Replica watches Rolex manufacture. Others suppose that there is a single Oyster watch. But as a matter of fact, the name Oyster does not actually meant for a rolex Watches particular watch you can buy rolex watches or even to a series but to a type of case that available in some of the Rolex ranges. History The Oyster case was first released in 1926. The objective was to protect the workings of the watch from dust and moisture. Early watches were far from waterproof. The Oyster tag heuer Watchescase was an tag heuer watches innovative design to eliminate these problems. It had a new double locking crown that screwed into place. It has been compared to the hatch on a submarine. Like a submarine, the Oyster case was waterproof. In 1927 Mercedes Gleitze swam the English breitling Watches Channel breitling watches . Before she set off she was presented with a Rolex Oyster. When she arrived, the watch was still working perfectly. The resulting publicity gave the new case a massive boost. Why is it called Oyster? Legend has it that Hans cartier Watches Wilsdorf cartier watches, who invented the Oyster, chose the name because the new case reminded him of the difficulty he had experienced prising open oysters at dinner. Since then the Oyster has further, particularly advanced. Many Oyster watches today are omega Watches perpetual-self-winding, in other omega watches words, it does not require to expose the mechanism to the outside world in order to wind it. The Osyter Perpetual is one of the toughest, most durable, most reliable watches (under truly adverse conditions). It is probably the best mechanical watch money can buy.
Posted by: replica watches at February 08, 2010 09:15 AM (TUJDt) Processing 0.07, elapsed 0.0787 seconds. |
MuNuvians
MeeNuvians
Polls! Polls! Polls!
Dale's ECB Election Projection Federal Review Real Clear Politics Rasmussen Reports Gallup Zogby FoxNews Polls Sabato/Crystal Ball Frequently Asked Questions
The (Almost) Complete Paul Anka Integrity Kick
Primary Document: The Audio
Paul Anka Haiku Contest Announcement Integrity SAT's: Entrance Exam for Paul Anka's Band AllahPundit's Paul Anka 45's Collection AnkaPundit: Paul Anka Takes Over the Site for a Weekend (Continues through to Monday's postings) George Bush Slices Don Rumsfeld Like an F*ckin' Hammer Top Top Tens
Democratic Forays into Erotica New Shows On Gore's DNC/MTV Network Nicknames for Potatoes, By People Who Really Hate Potatoes Star Wars Euphemisms for Self-Abuse Signs You're at an Iraqi "Wedding Party" Signs Your Clown Has Gone Bad Signs That You, Geroge Michael, Should Probably Just Give It Up Signs of Hip-Hop Influence on John Kerry NYT Headlines Spinning Bush's Jobs Boom Things People Are More Likely to Say Than "Did You Hear What Al Franken Said Yesterday?" Signs that Paul Krugman Has Lost His Frickin' Mind All-Time Best NBA Players, According to Senator Robert Byrd Other Bad Things About the Jews, According to the Koran Signs That David Letterman Just Doesn't Care Anymore Examples of Bob Kerrey's Insufferable Racial Jackassery Signs Andy Rooney Is Going Senile Other Judgments Dick Clarke Made About Condi Rice Based on Her Appearance Collective Names for Groups of People John Kerry's Other Vietnam Super-Pets Cool Things About the XM8 Assault Rifle Media-Approved Facts About the Democrat Spy Changes to Make Christianity More "Inclusive" Secret John Kerry Senatorial Accomplishments John Edwards Campaign Excuses John Kerry Pick-Up Lines Changes Liberal Senator George Michell Will Make at Disney Torments in Dog-Hell Greatest Hitjobs
The Ace of Spades HQ Sex-for-Money Skankathon A D&D Guide to the Democratic Candidates Margaret Cho: Just Not Funny More Margaret Cho Abuse Margaret Cho: Still Not Funny Iraqi Prisoner Claims He Was Raped... By Woman Wonkette Announces "Morning Zoo" Format John Kerry's "Plan" Causes Surrender of Moqtada al-Sadr's Militia World Muslim Leaders Apologize for Nick Berg's Beheading Michael Moore Goes on Lunchtime Manhattan Death-Spree Milestone: Oliver Willis Posts 400th "Fake News Article" Referencing Britney Spears Liberal Economists Rue a "New Decade of Greed" Artificial Insouciance: Maureen Dowd's Word Processor Revolts Against Her Numbing Imbecility Intelligence Officials Eye Blogs for Tips They Done Found Us Out, Cletus: Intrepid Internet Detective Figures Out Our Master Plan Shock: Josh Marshall Almost Mentions Sarin Discovery in Iraq Leather-Clad Biker Freaks Terrorize Australian Town When Clinton Was President, Torture Was Cool What Wonkette Means When She Explains What Tina Brown Means Wonkette's Stand-Up Act Wankette HQ Gay-Rumors Du Jour Here's What's Bugging Me: Goose and Slider My Own Micah Wright Style Confession of Dishonesty Outraged "Conservatives" React to the FMA An On-Line Impression of Dennis Miller Having Sex with a Kodiak Bear The Story the Rightwing Media Refuses to Report! Our Lunch with David "Glengarry Glen Ross" Mamet The House of Love: Paul Krugman A Michael Moore Mystery (TM) The Dowd-O-Matic! Liberal Consistency and Other Myths Kepler's Laws of Liberal Media Bias John Kerry-- The Splunge! Candidate "Divisive" Politics & "Attacks on Patriotism" (very long) The Donkey ("The Raven" parody) News/Chat
|