Support




Contact
Powered by
Movable Type

Reporter Dishing Palin Dirt: No, It's Not Former Romney Aides

As I spread this rumor myself, I owe it to Romney and his supporters to put up a main-post about this. Not Romneyites.

Note that Red State now says they've "confirmed" that Wallace and Schmidt are two of the three backbiters.

Posted by: Ace at 05:26 PM



Comments

1 Good, I didn't think this was Romney's deal. And Nicole Wallace FROM CBS, now that smells. Nasty deal. And who thought these people would be good for the campaign anyway?

Posted by: mare at November 08, 2008 05:31 PM (X1fsj)

2

Okay, this is totally unrelated, but I couldn't find anywhere else to put it that people might see it. Found this on change.gov website. Really pissed me off.

Recruiting and retention problems have been swept under the rug by an administration that does not understand the value of service to our nation.

Bolded portion mine. Give me a break.

Posted by: Hurting Head at November 08, 2008 05:32 PM (yW/Al)

3 Where does it say they've confirmed it? It looks unchanged from two days ago. And before we give Romney's minions a complete pass, let's not forget their info planting earlier.

Posted by: geoff at November 08, 2008 05:33 PM (pInXR)

4 Let's make 'em all pariahs.  And like Red State wants, Lepers.  Whoever they work for in the future, actively work AGAINST that candidate, and let the candidate know the reason!!!

Posted by: codekeyguy at November 08, 2008 05:34 PM (+WuRB)

5 This is very tenuous, so I'm just throwing it out. There's a commenter on hotair who says he has a friend who worked on the campaign, and that the friend said that Tucker Askew was a jerk and treated Palin like she worked for him. The commenter's handle is aquaviva, or something like that.

I know, it's all very third hand anonymous stuff, but since we're trying to find the third creep, it might be a name to check out.

Posted by: stace at November 08, 2008 05:35 PM (JO0c/)

6 Get off of Romney already, he's one of the good guys.

Posted by: pirate of the perineum at November 08, 2008 05:35 PM (rKSJ1)

7 in before "yeah but Romney still sux"

Posted by: Bart at November 08, 2008 05:37 PM (ICFJ+)

8 >>>Where does it say they've confirmed it? It looks unchanged from two days ago. And before we give Romney's minions a complete pass, let's not forget their info planting earlier.

At the end, says they've taken McKinnon off the list and they've confirmed the other two.

What info planting are you referring to? I forget, please remind.

Posted by: ace at November 08, 2008 05:38 PM (7FHPf)

9 I never thought this was Romney in the first place.  I keep thinking this is democrat crap to try and get the Republicans into an "internal" war within the party.  Yes, there are idiots in the Republican Party but this shit should be ignored.

Posted by: Kaitian at November 08, 2008 05:39 PM (5MllT)

10 I doubt its Schmidt.  He called Greta yesterday and harshly denied alot of these reports.  Said the bathrobe thing "never happened".  I bet it's Mark and Nicole Wallace.

Posted by: ousoonerfan15 at November 08, 2008 05:41 PM (yAq/A)

11 ...this shit should be ignored.

Fuckin-A right!

These distractions will ruin us. Gov Palin knows what she needs to do; it's up to her to repair her reputation. Let's move on to 2010.

Posted by: Bart at November 08, 2008 05:42 PM (ICFJ+)

12 Kaitian, that's wrong. We should have spirited but friendly debates over policy. This is unfounded, undeserved character assassination that hurts a good person on our side to the benefit of nobody we like. It has to be stopped.

Posted by: bgates at November 08, 2008 05:43 PM (CFjXn)

13 >>>I doubt its Schmidt.  He called Greta yesterday and harshly denied alot of these reports.  Said the bathrobe thing "never happened".  I bet it's Mark and Nicole Wallace.

Wallace says all  sorts  of nice things, too.  Publicly.


Posted by: ace at November 08, 2008 05:43 PM (7FHPf)

14 well none of these rumors are true.  Whoever is guilty of this needs to be outed and thrown out of the party for life

Posted by: ousoonerfan15 at November 08, 2008 05:45 PM (yAq/A)

15 Speaking of smearing Sarah, did you see this? http://tinyurl.com/6saz8t
Sarah Palin blamed by the US Secret Service over death threats against Barack Obama Sarah Palin's attacks on Barack Obama's patriotism provoked a spike in death threats against the future president, Secret Service agents revealed during the final weeks of the campaign.

and of course this bit by poor michelle ...yuck

Michelle Obama, the future First Lady, was so upset that she turned to her friend and campaign adviser Valerie Jarrett and said: "Why would they try to make people hate us

Posted by: Lyn at November 08, 2008 05:45 PM (a3abx)

16 I thought Wallace had been cleared, and actually came out and defended Palin this week.  Wish I could remember where I read/heard that. 

Anyway, who cares?  I'm much more curious as to what kind of dog the Mutt is buying to shit on the White House lawn.

How courageous of the Mutt to call himself a Mutt
.  It brings tears of joy to your embittered racist heart, does it not?


Posted by: Shy Yll at November 08, 2008 05:46 PM (301dE)

17 Most people were saying that it was Romney's people who had gone to work for McCain who were the aholes. The criticism against Romney was that he did not immediately defend Palin and cooperate with exposing the smearers.

Posted by: 48 Percenter at November 08, 2008 05:46 PM (XcrOy)

18 Yeah, Mark Wallace is a prime suspect too.

Here's that Hotair thread I mentioned above, with the mentions of Tucker Eskew, the Wallaces, and Schmidt.

Posted by: stace at November 08, 2008 05:47 PM (JO0c/)

19 Bear in mind the backlash!

Wallace and Schmidt are not stupid. They will sing with the choir if they can avoid the guillotine.

Posted by: Travis at November 08, 2008 05:47 PM (uOj//)

20 Well, crap, this is it. It's in the first age of comments, by aquaviva. FWIW

http://tinyurl.com/6a7r4d

Posted by: stace at November 08, 2008 05:48 PM (JO0c/)

21 Lyn at November 08, 2008 05:45 PM (a3abx)

And there lies the problem. When you repeat lies often enough they become true in the publics perception and it is almost impossible to change people's minds. I resent that Palin has been made into a punchline. Any one who didn't speak up immediately aided in this crap.

Posted by: 48 Percenter at November 08, 2008 05:51 PM (XcrOy)

22 All of the campaign staff should be booted.  They all have the taint.  Those that are truly guilty, and those that are being complicit by not setting the record straight.  None of them can be trusted at this point.  At least I have faith that if Sarah runs for any higher office, she has the judgement and common sense not to employ any of these people.  We need commited people, not mercenaries.

Posted by: ICBM at November 08, 2008 05:53 PM (FcwAY)

23 On a brighter note, Indonesia just whacked three of the terrorists involved in the Bali bombings.

Posted by: Bob Dole on Bob Dole saying at November 08, 2008 05:54 PM (yIy7z)

24 Does anyone remember the term "Rockefeller Republicans?" They were the ones calling Mr. Ronald Reagan a dangerous extremist. I think they're the ones trying to torpedo Mrs. Sarah Palin now. I am willing to bet that those trying to knife Mrs. Palin in the back do not come from the wing of the Republican Party associated with Mr. Reagan.

It gets worse. Mr. Bush was known to hire media flacks who simply are NOT Republicans. And Mr. McCain perpetuated that practice. So, they have clutched to their breasts individuals who are not loyal to "conservatism" and who are not loyal to "Republicanism." Why are we surprised when they act like mercenaries?

Posted by: steve poling at November 08, 2008 06:01 PM (UWHTf)

25 I'm really skeptical about Schmidt being the guy here - he supposedly played a decent part in her being picked and there was that whole incident with him practically yelling at the New York Times in a conference call that the smears have to stop.

Posted by: AD at November 08, 2008 06:03 PM (dW9kw)

26

I have a question about the way these snarking items are referred to by others. They call these things “leaks” which implies that there is truth to them and they, being the knowledgeable insiders, are releasing that truth to the public.

 

So people, these things are NOT leaks, they are more vicious lies spread by enemies just like the left did during the campaign and for the same damn reasons.

 

Don’t call them leaks.

Posted by: Vic at November 08, 2008 06:03 PM (Qd7GC)

27 All of the campaign staff should be booted.

Absolutely. Undoubtedly there might be some collateral damage to a few of the good guys, but they won't starve. They can go back to practicing law.

Fuck 'em. Political operatives are a dime a dozen.

Posted by: IllTemperedCur at November 08, 2008 06:03 PM (wjZW+)

28 OK, I'm mad as hell at this. LISTEN UP FOLKS - It shouldn't matter WHO these leaks are coming from SACK THEM ALL!

Nicole Wallace, Rick Davis, Christian Ferry, Steve Schmidt - all central campaign management on the McCain campaign and they LOST. And lost hard. The GOP can't afford our own Bob Schrums. The Schrumster was allowed to manage losing campaigns for the DNC for decades and the idiots kept employing him.

As for Romneyman Kevin Madden - before he worked for Romeny, we worked for Boehner and DeLay. NOW he owns a strategy firm with Dem operative and Hillary campaign manager Howard Wolfson.

If you want to play in the New Conservative GOP, then you're a winner and you're loyal. Period.

It's high time we stop recycling the same pack and use new blood!

Posted by: AGR at November 08, 2008 06:05 PM (r8a5Z)

29 Oh shyte, look at this steaming pile of shit.

"Politics is about winning. Period.

Ask Tucker Eskew. He's part of the political architectural team that effectively destroyed Senator John McCain's chances for the presidency in 2000 as part of George W. Bush's smear campaign in the South Carolina Primary. He and Warren Tompkins and Neal Rhodes masterminded a push-polling campaign that asked voters if they knew about Senator McCain's involvement in the S&L Scandal and the Keating Five. McCain lost the South Carolina Primary. Bush went on to become president through a recount in Florida, helped by Eskew, Tompkins, and Rhodes, called by one McCain adviser, "the darker side of our party."

That darker side now shadows vice presidential nominee Sarah Palin. Tucker Eskew has been hired by McCain camp to help Palin with media matters and prepare her acceptance speech to be delivered at the Republican National Convention."

So WINNER WINNER CHICKEN DINNER.

Posted by: portfolio at November 08, 2008 06:06 PM (nqVVt)

30

Lyn,

I call BS on that whole article.  1) the secret service is about as tight lipped as you can get.  2) that whole 'kill him' thing was debunked BY the secret service.  They conducted an investigation themselves and could find absolutely no one else that heard 'kill him' but the sole reporter that reported it. 

Bunch o'crap.

Posted by: Tami at November 08, 2008 06:06 PM (P3ErD)

31 Tucker Eskew "the darker side of our party"

http://tinyurl.com/6x3qq6

Posted by: portfolio at November 08, 2008 06:08 PM (nqVVt)

32 This is very tenuous, so I'm just throwing it out. There's a commenter on hotair who says he has a friend who worked on the campaign, and that the friend said that Tucker Askew was a jerk and treated Palin like she worked for him. The commenter's handle is aquaviva, or something like that.

I know, it's all very third hand anonymous stuff, but since we're trying to find the third creep, it might be a name to check out.

Posted by: stace at November 08, 2008 05:35 PM (JO0c/)


Hmmm.... isn't Askew the same creep who slimed McCain back in 2000?  What role did he play in this campaign, and what kind of interaction would he have had with Palin?

Posted by: Watcher at November 08, 2008 06:10 PM (/gmmH)

33

Fred Barnes:  I think Rohm Emmanuel was a great pick.

Well Fred, stop drinking Kool Aid, and what does Fred know that we don't?

Posted by: Fish at November 08, 2008 06:11 PM (6Rihj)

34 On a lighter note, isn't it a shame that crazy bitch moonbat Huffpo contributor who stabbed her, heh, lover* 222 times didn't wait a few days to see her plastic jesus steal the election?

How about some Maya Angeloo poetry?

*nothing says I love you like 222 well-placed stab wounds, right?

Posted by: Bart at November 08, 2008 06:12 PM (ICFJ+)

35 Tucker Eskew is a Republican political consultant in the United States currently "chief of staff and permanent companion on the campaign trail" to Sarah Palin.[1] He is the founding partner of the Eskew Strategy Group, an Alexandria based Republican communications firm.

During the presidential primary campaign in 2000, Tucker directed South Carolina communications for George W. Bush in his hard-fought campaign against John McCain. A New York Times report on the South Carolina Republican primary described him as "Mr. Bush's spokesman here and a longtime political operative," quoting his pushback against crossover voters: "I think this alliance between the limousine-liberal Democrats and the McCain campaign is distorting the intent of real Republican voters."[7]

According to ABC News, "When the media first reported push-poll phone calls from Voter/Consumer Research, a company hired by the Bush campaign, asking South Carolinians if they knew about McCain’s role in the S&L crisis and his scandal as a member of the Keating Five, it was Eskew -- Bush’s South Carolina spokesman – who acknowledged, and defended, the calls." [8]

According to ABC News, Eskew was brought on board the McCain campaign to "help Palin prepare for her Wednesday night acceptance speech at the GOP convention and for her stump speech as she hits the road, brief her on policy matters, and help her handle the media scrutiny a lifetime in Alaska does not necessarily prepare one for." [8]

The Chicago Tribune (September 11, 200 described Eskew as "a constant by Palin's side this week, as she has hopped between SUVs and campaign planes, all the while reading briefing materials or receiving quick tutorials from policy advisers who have dipped on and off the campaign trail to visit with her."[12]

Posted by: portfolio at November 08, 2008 06:13 PM (nqVVt)

36 It seems to me that the easiest way to handle this is to treat everyone on McCain's campaign except Palin herself as though they had the stinking rot. McCain sucked, his campaign sucked, and anyone who had a hand in it should be disallowed from spreading that taint to other campaigns.

The only reason I exclude Palin from that list of untouchables is because she's the only thing in the whole campaign that single-handedly gave that ticket a swing in the polls. Everything and everyone else on that boat stank like a sack of assholes.

Posted by: DoDoGuRu at November 08, 2008 06:15 PM (xBkZj)

37 im a little suspicious of everyone except the 2 guys who actually spent time with Sarah.  Randy Schunemann and Steve Biegun are the two guys who are actually putting there names behind there quotes in the papers. 

Posted by: ousoonerfan15 at November 08, 2008 06:15 PM (yAq/A)

38 Tucker Askew has a history of smearing and stabbing fellow Republicans in the back. He was Sarah Palin's initial handler. He was the one who prepped her, along with Nicolle Wallace, for the Gibson interview. Funny, he has not stepped up and said anything about Sarah Palin since this controversy started.

He knew her first and best among the campaign. Why the silence?

Posted by: portfolio at November 08, 2008 06:16 PM (nqVVt)

39 Tucker Askew has a history of smearing and stabbing fellow Republicans in the back. He was Sarah Palin's initial handler. He was the one who prepped her, along with Nicolle Wallace, for the Gibson interview. Funny, he has not stepped up and said anything about Sarah Palin since this controversy started.

He knew her first and best among the campaign. Why the silence?

Posted by: portfolio at November 08, 2008 06:16 PM (nqVVt)


Is it Askew or Eskew?

And how sure are you that he was involved in prepping Palin?  He does sound like a creep, but I want to know who ALL the preppers were before ruling anyone out as the culprit.

Posted by: Watcher at November 08, 2008 06:19 PM (/gmmH)

40

Posted by: Tami at November 08, 2008 06:06 PM (P3ErD)

I agree it is all BS, I'm posting it in Hopes you guys do something to figure out how to get the GOP to stand up and say STOP! I am a PUMA who plans on working with you guys for quite a while. Right now my sites are on Palin 2012 and some GOP leaders need to stand up and put a stop to this crap.

 I think the Palin bashing serves 2 purposes, to destroy her before 2012 and to keep people from asking Barky about things like Odingo, if he really is a natural born cit,  and is he going to pardon Resko and what are his plans since he never really did his job, just used it to run for the next higher title.

Posted by: Lyn at November 08, 2008 06:20 PM (a3abx)

41 ESKEW

Posted by: portfolio at November 08, 2008 06:20 PM (nqVVt)

42

....some GOP leaders need to stand up and put a stop to this crap.

HAHAHA!  GOP leaders?  Now there's an oxymoron! (not to be confused with an acemoron.)

Posted by: Tami at November 08, 2008 06:23 PM (P3ErD)

43

The Romneys are decent family folk with a good reputation.  I understand that people may oppose Mitt, but I do not understand the hatred.

I never thought that Romney aids were behind this.  Even if, there is no chance this is from Mitt, he is just not into sneaky.  I wish everyone could have seen the Romney family as I did, growing up near Bloomfield Hills, Michigan.  Not possible.

Someone is being too clever by half, destroy Palin and blame it on Mitt. – truly a Rasputin-level treachery.  But Rasputin didn’t face the Internet.

 

This will out.

Posted by: Robert at November 08, 2008 06:26 PM (VotgB)

44 I think it is a collaborative effort between Wallace and Eskew. Why?

These two were the most intimate in prep for Sarah Palin following her nomination for interactions with the media. It is widely distributed that Sarah Palin performed "embarrassingly" in the Gibson and Couric interviews. Perceptions differ obviously.

Tucker Eskew is Former Deputy Assistant to the President for Communications

Tucker Eskew was Deputy Assistant to the President in the White House Office of Communications. He was responsible for strategic communications with global audiences.

As he was responsible for her performance in these "game changing" interviews, it would serve him greatly - and his professional reputation - to say that Gov. Palin is dead between the ears. It deflects criticism from him and the job he did by making it seem as though he had nothing to work with in Gov. Palin. By selling her down the river, he saves himself from professional criticism.


Posted by: portfolio at November 08, 2008 06:26 PM (nqVVt)

45

Wallace and Schmidt (and perhaps one level higher) as the prime instigators was beginning to be the logical conclusion in my mind. The reasons for Schmidt, in particular, would seem obvious. Of course, there may be a personal aspect that we will probably never be privvy to, as these things always turn on seemingly trivial matters, and there are many details I do not know.

And somebody may be trying to shape the party into getting away from those dang divisive "Christianists." Please. Let the party members make that determination via both the primary process and the subsequent verdict of the national electorate .

I'm confident the entire story will come out a little more fully in time, as people start figuring out the relative balances of power. Outside of the Senate, McCainism is dead, whereas I would say Palinism is not.

The trouble here is that we do not wish to convict unjustly, now that it has been made clear that no more smears will be tolerated, and also that the smears to date appear to have been effectively both stopped and countered.

For myself, I have held off signing RedState's petition precisely because of this--that there may be something I do not know. I am satisfied with knowing that in time the leaker will be revealed more fully, and their reasons for doing so. Once a fuller story is uncovered, the nuclear option still exists if needed.

Thus as far as actions we should take for the moment--I say we let Governor Palin determine their fate. After all, we are proposing the death penalty, as it were, and Governors do have powers of clemency. If she says no more action should be taken and the matter dropped, then we should do that (reserving the right to act when/if more details emerge). Otherwise, proceed as RedState intends, but always with the spirit of justice in our hearts.

Naturally, being a person of quality, I doubt the Governor is interested in engaging in much more, and I doubt she will be hiring the leakers herself.  This in and of itself will help identify the culprits. If she decides that they should continue in GOP politics, as she most likely would, our maleafactors will have the knowledge of knowing that the only reason they are still in conservative politics is because the "hick who doesn't know Africa is a continent" proved to be a better person than they were. 

And naturally, if the Governor decided, later, that some people were a little too troublesome for their present worth to the party, I would support RedState in carrying out execution of sentence.

I have said once and say again that there is only one man to blame for the loss of this campaign (as far as it was winnable, a question open to doubt)--John McCain. Not because I can name something he did wrong, but because he was the man in charge. He, being a good naval officer, understands this and lived up to it, as his father and grandfather before him. The campaign is over, and other than the tactical lessons that need to be learned about the mechanics that went wrong (press, GOTV, fundraising, etc), let us leave it behind and move onto redefining conservatism for the new era we are in. Maybe if we started figuring out how to teach America the value of conservatism more than figuring out how to fight better the last war, we would do better. The campaigns would take care of themselves.

No more recriminations. For we have nearly two decades worth to indulge in, if we be honest with ourselves. Let us look now to the future, and not the past.   

 

 

 

 

Posted by: Horatius at November 08, 2008 06:27 PM (DQveX)

46

Portfolio

 

I have been a resident of SC since 1977 and yes I was here for the 2000 election and primary. I have heard all kinds of shit about this so-called “push-poll” for the black baby but you know what???  I have never found any real person who actually got one of those calls. I started doubting that entire set of bullshit about a week after it came out.

Posted by: Vic at November 08, 2008 06:27 PM (Qd7GC)

47 Fry both Wallace and Schmidt's asses.  Throw them into RINO purgatory with Powell and all the rest.

May they never work in politics ever again.

Posted by: Nyctalus Lasiopterus at November 08, 2008 06:28 PM (N+Ydc)

48

I was spreading this too, at least in these comments, on the circumstantial grounds of method, motive and opportunity. (Although I did recognise that Romney himself was blameless in his support of McCain himself.)

I apologise sincerely to Romney and to his supporters.

Posted by: David Ross at November 08, 2008 06:31 PM (rtzHA)

49

portfolio 44 "It is widely distributed that Sarah Palin performed "embarrassingly" in the Gibson and Couric interviews. Perceptions differ obviously."

The Gibson\Palin interview embarrassed Gibson more than Palin. But Palin erred in not taking that as a warning shot. Couric was a disaster for her, and us.

Posted by: David Ross at November 08, 2008 06:35 PM (rtzHA)

50 Bush Campaign Accused of Using Push Polls Against McCain.
College of Charleston student Suzette Latsko said she received a telephone call from a woman who identified herself as an employee of Voter/Consumer Research, and that the caller misrepresented McCain’s positions and asked if Latsko knew McCain had been reprimanded for interfering with federal regulators in the savings and loan scandal. Voter/Consumer Research is listed as a polling contractor on Bush’s Federal Election Commission filings; the Bush campaign has paid Voter/Consumer Research $93,000 through December 31, 1999. Bush spokesman Ari Fleischer denied the call was a push poll, but said it was important that the Republican Party remember McCain’s role in the S&L crisis.

Vic, Eskew admitted to authoring and making the calls. They just disagreed about the purpose of the calls.

Posted by: portfolio at November 08, 2008 06:37 PM (nqVVt)

51 some GOP leaders need to stand up and put a stop to this crap.

HAHAHA!  GOP leaders?  Now there's an oxymoron! (not to be confused with an acemoron.)

I meant to put the word leaders in quote marks,  I am just SO angry. first at MY party for the primary fraud, coverring up the causcus fraud, staying silent when the Clintons were painted as racists (now I know you aren't Clintons fans here, but I think even you agree they are NOT racists)  not saying anything about the sexism, but crying racist at any criticism of the Fraud Prince.and yours, for not hitting Obama with all that is out there about him. Why didn't anyone mention Odingo? I mean I still think Obama would have won, thanks to ACORN and people voting lots of times, but it didn't seem like McCain side really fought.

  

Posted by: Lyn at November 08, 2008 06:38 PM (a3abx)

52 David, that's why i used the quotation fingers as everyone immediately flips when they see a negative word following or proceeding Gov. Palin's name. I'm talking about the Media narrative.

Posted by: portfolio at November 08, 2008 06:39 PM (nqVVt)

53 The ONE person who remains quiet and above the din, sits in a cabin in Arizona. This is the person at the top of the food chain, he us the general in command, the supreme decision-maker himself. However, this person continues to remain silent....above the fray. He's never been known to be shy before. He has seemed to relish inserting himself in the spotlight throughout past contentions. There is a huge undercurrent going on now in the Republican Party. We're seeing an epic battle for the heart and soul of the party being played out Keep an eye on Jim Demint.....he leads the conservative charge.

Posted by: Ad rem at November 08, 2008 06:41 PM (z00/5)

54 Lyn,
I call BS on that whole article.
Posted by: Tami at November 08, 2008


Of course it is. But still it inflicts damage. When I mentioned repeating lies, I wasn't referring to Lyn's post, since I linked the same article in another thread, but to the media. They have gone nuttier than I could have ever imagined.

Posted by: 48 Percenter at November 08, 2008 06:43 PM (XcrOy)

55 #51...Lyn,

Welcome! Those of us who "get it" need to work together.

Posted by: Ad rem at November 08, 2008 06:45 PM (z00/5)

56 Yes, Ace, you do owe it to Romney. He and his people are not stupid enough for this crap. This is slime city stuff.

What I can't get out of my head are the similarities between this garbage and the 2000 campaign. Poor John McCain was slimed with horrible racist calls?/literature? suggesting he had an illegitimate bi-racial child, and McCain blamed it on Bush.  And the proof was? The media, repeating it over and over again.

Fast forward to 2008. McCain loses, and, lo and behold, it's because Palin answered the door in a towel, went off-message, spent thousands on clothes, didn't know what NAFTA was, and is, in general a total moron, compared to the prodigious intellectualism of McCain. And the proof is? The media, through unnamed sources.

Posted by: JBean at November 08, 2008 06:51 PM (4E/z0)

57 We need a clean up in the Foreign Policy Advisor thread.

Posted by: 48 Percenter at November 08, 2008 06:54 PM (XcrOy)

58 JBean, you realize that the same people who handled Gov. Palin on a daily basis were the same people who worked for Bush in 2000 correct? Go look it up. Eskew has admitted to taking part in the SC crap.

Posted by: portfolio at November 08, 2008 06:56 PM (nqVVt)

59 I'm starting to think that Don Surber might be right:

"Did Newsweek just make things up?"

Posted by: mark at November 08, 2008 07:01 PM (j8plk)

60 portfolio, if " Eskew has admitted to taking part in the SC crap," and McCain was so wounded by it, then why in hell was he working in McCain's campaign?

Posted by: JBean at November 08, 2008 07:03 PM (4E/z0)

61

#55 thanks I agreee, there are many PUMAs who are already planning next step, which HAS to be GOP since Barky will not give up his power in 4 years.

Posted by: Lyn at November 08, 2008 07:05 PM (a3abx)

62 It's possible. I mean jimminycrickets, we had freakin Rathergate with completely fabricated documents that no one even thought to question during the course of the investigative journalism.

Who knows. If there is a leak, I'm sticking to my guns that the Bush people are behind it out of personal .

Posted by: portfolio at November 08, 2008 07:08 PM (nqVVt)

63 JBean there is an article asking that same question. Some bloggers say it was McCain's biggest mistake and a sign that he was willing to sacrifice a huge amount of his personal integrity to win the presidency. Hell fucking Schmidt is a Kar Rove protege.

the whole damn campaign stinks to high heaven. No wonder he lost.

Posted by: portfolio at November 08, 2008 07:09 PM (nqVVt)

64 Mark, that makes as much sense as anything. I haven't weighed in on McCain's duty in this, because I didn't want to be flamed for making excuses for him, but I've always thought that it's possible that he really doesn't know enough about this to place blame. He could still make a general statement in her support, though.

I've been in work situations where the HR department had to deal with situations that were totally he said-she said, and I learned not to jump to conclusions based on only one person's account.

There are a lot of hired guns on these big campaigns, and everyone is frantically running all over the country on multiple airplanes and buses. If you haven't worked with someone for a very long time, you really don't know what's going on in his head.

Posted by: stace at November 08, 2008 07:11 PM (JO0c/)

65 Just don't blame Bush for this whole fiasco, please...

Posted by: '80sbaby at November 08, 2008 07:12 PM (zmiSr)

66 "Even as the McCain-Palin campaign seeks to distance itself from the Bush administration, at least half a dozen former Bush operatives are now advising McCain-Palin. A Republican with ties to Bush questioned the wisdom of the move.

McCain-Palin advisors include Bush U.N. appointee Mark Wallace, Bush communications coordinator Tucker Eskew and Bush deputy assistant Greg Jenkins. They are now working with Sarah Palin on media interviews and debate preparation.

One Republican said anonymously, "If the McCain campaign is trying to prop up Palin as its change agent, and its inoculation against the 'third Bush term' rap, then why on earth is she surrounded by a cast of Bush advisors?"

So yeah, freakin Bush scum turning on the party the second they might find themselves in hot water professionally.

Posted by: portfolio at November 08, 2008 07:12 PM (nqVVt)

67 Another article - "I remember seeing Tucker Eskew—an old Bush hand out of South Carolina who had never spent a day in McCain World until Nicolle Wallace recruited him to be Palin’s counselor—wandering around the premises, looking somewhat lost. He and Wallace took charge of schooling the Alaska governor on message discipline."

Posted by: portfolio at November 08, 2008 07:15 PM (nqVVt)

68 Just wanna say thanks to Lyn before I go out to a party. Instead of drinking at home with the computer, I'll be drinking with other humans with whom I don't live.

Posted by: stace at November 08, 2008 07:18 PM (JO0c/)

69

Lyn: If you are to remain a Democrat, you should work to unseating Dems in the Congressional Progressive Caucus in primaries. The CPC is Obama's faction in Congress. If you're ignoring your party then you're no longer in your party; you're an ex-Democrat, not a dissident Democrat.

Also, let's not have talk about citizenship or Odinga. This stuff is a flammable puff of smelly fever-swamp methane.

Posted by: David Ross at November 08, 2008 07:29 PM (rtzHA)

70 Not that there's anything wrong with being an ex-Democrat. If you are a Repub now, welcome home. Just saying that as a PUMA, you should work to getting good Democrats to Election Day. Just like I, as a Republican, want to get good Republicans to Election Day.

Posted by: David Ross at November 08, 2008 07:31 PM (rtzHA)

71 So yeah, freakin Bush scum turning on the party the second they might find themselves in hot water professionally.

Cut the crap. McCain is a politician. Not some water-walking saint. If he didn't know who was working for him -- (and secretly seeking to plot his destruction, per the repetitive McCain script)  that's his problem.

He owns this campaign. It's his problem.

Posted by: JBean at November 08, 2008 07:31 PM (4E/z0)

72

i'm with #36 all of the McCain staffers are damaged goods, what gets me is how truly stupid John McCain is as a politican, this Eskew guy is a mercenary dirty-trickster who McCain hired to do political consulting, hello! he's a smear-monger with no direction to go, what did McCain think guy was going to do?

stupid

stupid

stupid! 

Posted by: shoey at November 08, 2008 07:33 PM (RxUMK)

73 I've blamed Romney for a lot of this too.  Sorry Mitt.  Time for McCain to step up the leaksters worked for him.

Posted by: The Obvious at November 08, 2008 07:34 PM (1g+FW)

74 Before D-Day, Ike wrote a statement that was to be released to the press in case the invasion was beaten on the beachhead. In the release, he accepted all the blame for failure even though he was no where near the beaches. That is leadership and that is what a leader does. McCain is not a leader and would not know a leader if one kicked him in his wrinkled old ass

Posted by: hephaestus at November 08, 2008 07:36 PM (Cw3bd)

75 If I remember rightly on this, discoverthenetworks.org, reported that they looked into Soros -McCain connections and found, inter alia, that Soros paid Rick Davis a salary to revive McC's moribund presidential campaign. <-----McCain's hopes had crashed and burned with the GOP base, and with most of the country, over immigration ''reform''. However, Mac and Soros and ACORN all saw eye to eye and exchanged much support on at least that one subject. Soros funded both ACORN and Mac's immigration reform project.------> Therefore, McCain's Faustian bargain brought in the devils that destroyed him--and us. So screw him and the demons he rode in on, and the mangy dogs who followed them , and the shit they're all slinging to obscure their ignominious exit .

Posted by: yes we candyman at November 08, 2008 08:16 PM (xP+39)

76 Hephaestus...

I'd say that you have a certain "bent" for making McCain look "lame"....mythologically speaking...;-}

Posted by: Ad rem at November 08, 2008 08:52 PM (z00/5)

77 Just a couple personal observations here: 1. repubs need to decide what being repub means..what do we value...a mission statement...a goal 2. eliminate all who are not loyal to the above. This election was the voters going for scorched earth...getting rid of anyone connected to the opposite of hope and change...so repubs need to do the same now. Get a definition clearly stated and slice off all the old and bring in new. 3. stop hiring folks who worked for opposition..turncoats are not always loyal (unless you are positive they want revenge...but that's another issue) 4. what makes you all think Sarah and Todd are clueless? Couples...especially cloe couples usually can read signals pretty good. I betcha if Sarah misseda look, Todd probably saw it....the insinuation that he was laconic or uninvolved tellsme he probably was/is amaster at reading folks and probably has some real strong perceptive opinions! And she didn't make it thru small town political gauntlets without some street smarts too.

Posted by: ItalianMama at November 08, 2008 08:58 PM (sCDCd)

78   McLame has done us one serious favor: He has shown the "go along,get along" brand of Republicanism to be a sham. These people, like Dole and MCCain, their stalwart military service aside, are gutless under political fire, backbiting the party they are members of just to be seen more favorably by their perceived masters on thr other side of the aisle. They seem to consistently come down on the other team's side of the issue, tebachle being the notable exception.
  Futhermore, it should be noted that just as he  has failed to stifle the rumormongering amongst his own campaign staff, McCain's past actions as part of the so-called gang of 14 reflect a consistent willingness to sabotage his own party's best interest in favor of  his own ego. The hindreds of open appelate court vacancies that McLame helped to loggerhead in committe and tie up for eight years will now be filled in a large rush by Dem apponitees. This is, for me, the worst thing that old fart has ever done, and he got a pass on it when he was heralded as the moderate who could beat Hillary.
  A Moderate socialist against a real socialist, and anyone had any doubt how Bob Dole II was going to come out?
  The final thing I would say is that McLame pwn this Palin bashing in that his always present ego has let him allow the bashing the same way it allowed him and his merry band of compromisers to aid the dems in clogging pro-Repub actions because the Repubs chose Bush over him.

Over all, this is a petty man, damaged by an overly large ego, his own hubris, and given to towering amounts of passive aggressive actions.
Blame the loss, the campaign, the slandering of his running mate, and the fresh wave of dem approved lifetime fed judges on him; they are his tainted legacy to the damaged American future he has helped to craft since first he kissed the proffered ring of Mo Udall in the late 70's as his political patron.
  Good riddance to the end of the McLame era, and now let us begin the grassroots retaking of our country, our rights as they will be eroded, and the repeal of the Patriot Act and the rest of GW Bush's socialist agenda during his eight miserable, not even close to conservative years in office.

I feel better now.




Posted by: enter sandman at November 08, 2008 09:06 PM (oAK3b)

79 "iraq debachle aside"
missed that part. OOps.

Posted by: enter sandman at November 08, 2008 09:08 PM (oAK3b)

80 I wrote that in an hurry, and some typos are apparent. However, as a moron, I am going to over look them and blame them on my drinking, even though I am noot drinking...yet.
I campaigned for McLame in NC, got alot of scorn and derision for it from both sides of the political party spectrum. I will remain conservative but will never again aid in the campaign of an acknowledged moderate of any sort. A moderate Republican is a sure Democrat vote in any legislative body. They want to be Dems but don't have the stones to take the jump, or are afraid they will not get elected if they go out as Dems.
Either way, a Moderate anything is an abomination (Obamanation) and a cancer and should be treated as such. Kill it or cure it but don't try to live with it.

Posted by: enter sandman at November 08, 2008 09:15 PM (oAK3b)

81

I was a fierce Romneyite during the primaries and advovocated for him as VP but I came out of my chair cheering for Sarah Palin when she was picked. I will always believe Romney was our strongest candidate and he would have won if we did not allow indies and Demorats to vote in OUR primaries. I am a huge fan of Sarah Palin and she was the only reason I didn't have to hold my nose to vote for McCain.

I have little respect for him now that he was willing to defend Obama but not his own running mate, that just stinks in my barnyard.  I will be supporting Mitt again in '12 if he chooses to run if not its full blown Palin for Pres!

Posted by: goat at November 09, 2008 12:05 AM (z+6oJ)

82 I also think this is Demorats making shit up as they have been known to do before.

Posted by: goat at November 09, 2008 12:13 AM (z+6oJ)

83 To 51, 55 and th rest - for crying out loud! Paid political managers are a dime dozen - and I'm not one, but know them ALL!

They are stabbing Palin in the back to save their asses and support their next candidate. SACK THEM ALL FOR GOD'S SAKE.

Posted by: AGR at November 09, 2008 12:20 AM (r8a5Z)

84

How about some Maya Angeloo poetry?

Posted by: Bart at November 08, 2008 06:12 PM (ICFJ+)

Maya Angelou, America's Vogon Poet!!!

Posted by: Gen. Sherman at November 09, 2008 12:22 AM (blNMI)

85 #75 got to gut of the issue for shits sake. I may be a girl, but for shit sake, when something is right, I'll stand right the fuck next to it and defend the hell out of it. To hell with the RINOs. Rot.

Posted by: AGR at November 09, 2008 12:42 AM (r8a5Z)

86 Let's keep it simple. If you're part of the McCain campaign and NOT doing something to ID the troublemakers then you don't deserve the presumption of innocence, no matter how loudly you proclaim your love and admiration for Gov Palin. Gov Palin may be saddled with a few scurrilous rumors courtesy of this campaign, but thanks to these weasels it's going to be awfully difficult to tie McCain albatross around her neck. Anyone who can thrive in Alaska despite the dangers of the wild and the predators in the statehouse will be just fine.

Posted by: crazy at November 09, 2008 02:16 PM (EBdQZ)

87

Thanks, Ace.  Decent of you.  There never was any actually evidence of people who used to work for Romney doing this, just gossip on the American Spectator, a highly esteemed tabloid suitable for wiping your ass or wrapping dead fish.

And before we give Romney's minions a complete pass, let's not forget their info planting earlier.

I blame geoff and his minions.  Why not?  There is every bit as much evidence he did it.  Before we stop blamming him, I want him to prove he and his minions have stopped planting false accustations.

And no, Romney and his team never planted shit for those of us who live in the real world.

Posted by: JackStraw at November 09, 2008 05:14 PM (VW9/y)

88

You can send emails to Tucker Eskew at info@eskewstrategy.com.

I agree, I'm not supporting campaigns employing any of these people, unless I have confidence that they are cleared of making these smears.

Posted by: Liberace at November 09, 2008 10:43 PM (sKPmg)

89

Just don't blame Bush for this whole fiasco, please...

I don't blame Bush at all.  But I was almost certain the people doing the Palin smearing had to be some of the ex-Bush staffers that McCain hired and not any of McCain's loyal staffers.   I say this because the Palin smears reflect very poorly on McCain's judgment in selecting her.  Loyal McCain staffers wouldn't hurt their old boss just to trash Palin.  I know McCain had ex-Romney staffers too but (maybe this is just my weirdly pro-Mormon prejudice) I couldn't imagine Romney orchestrating something like that.  He was aggressive and negative during the early primaries (and pissed off both McCain and Huckabee as a result) but he was never sleazy or over the top.  Do you know what I mean? 

That left ex-Bush campaign staffers.  Now that's its come out that Tucker Eskew and Nicole Wallace worked closely with Palin and Eskew was involved in some of the borderline too negative push polling against McCain in SC 2000?  I'm confident I'm right.  The question I have is why they're doing this?

Are they just trying to cover their asses after a crap campaign?  That is, are they motivated by personal incentives only? 

Or are they trying to destroy Palin because they see her as a threat to the party's future?  That is, do they either prefer a different candidate or they think Palin is now too polarizing to win? 

Let me reiterate: I don't see how this has anything to do with Bush.  He just happened to hire some asses to work for him.  But maybe that's part of what made them so effective?  McCain obviously was willing to compromise a little bit of his integrity in order to win by hiring these people for his 2008 election.  He should have known they were snakes.  So yeah, this reflects poorly of him.  :-(    

Posted by: Tversky at November 10, 2008 02:47 AM (/yWtL)

90 balance of shoes nike shoes shoes.com adidas shoes puma shoes womens shoes dress shoes. casual shoes wholesale shoes sport shoes nike shoes shoes boots sandal shoes basketball shoes slippers shoes . replica rolex watches rolex watch replica watches- cartier watches- cartier watches swiss watch automatic watch chronograph watch. mens watch watch com men's watch the watch womens shoes leather shoes dress shoes running shoes . adidas shoes tote bag golf bag plastic bag purses bag briefcase bag steve madden shoes gold watch rockport shoes repairs watches best replica watches youtube watch youtube watch rolex watch rolex watches casio watches watches online timex watches tag watches. nike jordan shoes ladies watch leather bag replica handbag replica handbags wearing fashions clothes jorand shoes . oyster rolex dive watches replica watches- watches for men- timex watches buy watch rolex mens chrono watch elgin watch. automatic watch ladies watch mens watches new shoes steve madden shoes sneakers shoes sneaker shoes jorand shoes . rolex replica belts bag diaper bags travel bag laptop bag shoulder bag wears art glass urban wear fendi bag briefcase bag nike shoes men shoes fashion shoes women's shoes shoe store nike shoes best replica watches nike shoes men shoes fashion shoes women's watches cracked- medieval times- cidreq cidreq mens health ukraine 2009 calendar. chopper leipzig madsen donald duck isis king ncaa mens soccer cuny portal croazia . pasolini safari e-buddy espace pub rugby henderson waves jewelry ring wrist watches rolex watches replica watches fine watches casio watches watches online quartz watch. nike shoes ladies watch men's watch nike shoes running shoes Tiffany Bracelet basketball shoes jorand shoes . replica rolex watches rolex watch replica watches- fine watches- rolex datejust rolex mens watch repair oyster rolex watch. air flight ladies watch men's watch rolex submariner running shoes Tiffany Bracelet rolex replica jorand shoes . rolex replica watches rolex replica nike shoes rolex replica rolex replica fake rolex replica rolex replica watches rolex replica rolex replica rolex replica watches rolex replica best replica watches watches diamond watches replica watches rolex watches casio watches watches online timex watches tag watches. nike jordan shoes ladies watch luxury rolex watch nike shoes running shoes Tiffany Bracelet basketball shoes jorand shoes . oyster rolex dive watches replica watches- watches for men- rolex datejust buy watch rolex mens watch repair oyster rolex watch. air flight ladies watch seagull watches rolex submariner running shoes Tiffany Bracelet rolex replica jorand shoes . rolex replica watches rolex replica nike shoes rolex replica rolex replica fake rolex replica rolex replica watches rolex replica rolex replica shoe store nike shoes best replica watches nike shoes men shoes fashion shoes women's shoes shoe store nike shoes best replica watches nike shoes men shoes fashion shoes women's watches

Posted by: dressshoes at November 21, 2008 04:05 AM (bYVeT)

Posted by: watchstyle08 at November 26, 2008 02:32 AM (HKMq7)

92 Welcome come to watchs Store, we specialize in collecting watch, watchinstyle replica watches online store,cheap watches on sale Max online since 2006, we get cheap cheap watches on sale and new rolex,Breitling U-boatevery month, our watchinstyle replica watches online store are in highest quality, if you see our iwc WATCHES FOR SALE you will definitely love thoseiwc WATCHES FOR SALE watch. More info please clike the following link All watchinstyle replica watches online store . We also provide Breitling, cheap rolex. We are the best and new rolex Outlet, our and new U-boat and newU-boat watch is very good

Posted by: onlinewatchforsale at March 21, 2009 05:12 AM (r2pvx)

93 We supply all kinds of ladies fashion replica designer handbags,provide you the best quality,selection and price you can only find in the top specialty stores,Keeping you abreast of the lastest trends and providing the convenience of shopping from home handbags , replica marni handbags , miu miu replica handbags , replica mulberry handbags , prada replica handbags , replica thomas wylde handbags , valentino replica handbags , versace replica handbags , ysl replica handbags , replica handbags , replica handbags ,

Posted by: handbags at July 15, 2009 01:34 PM (+5xc0)

Posted by: google排名 at August 11, 2009 09:41 PM (KUnwh)

95 Some people like LV handbags,Some people like Chanel handbags,but most popel have been keeping an eye on cheap fashion brand handbags .we often talk about all kinds of designer handbags with my friends,most of my friends also like cheap fashion brand handbags.We admire cheap fashion brand handbags designer who often be able to design so many stylish handbags.We want to be a handbag抯 designer in the future too. In our store onlineyou can buy all series of cheap fashion brand handbagsinclude: Louis Vuitton,LV Luggage,LV Wallets,LV Agendas,LV Belts,LV Shoes,LV Accessories,Gucci,Gucci Wallets,Gucci Shoes,Marc Jacobs handbags,Marni handbags,Miu Miu handbags,Mulberry handbags,Prada handbags,Thomaswylde handbags,TOD handbags,Bottega Veneta handbags,D&G handbags,Dior handbags,YSL handbags,Coach handbags

Posted by: steve at October 15, 2009 05:17 AM (+aWy4)

Posted by: FDSAFDS at October 18, 2009 02:08 PM (GQ3Y4)

Posted by: fdsfds at October 27, 2009 07:45 PM (8kvkz)

Posted by: airforceoneshop at November 03, 2009 08:39 PM (LHCCE)

99 Come to our website for shopping with high quality and best service! There have new products,MBT M. Walk
and MBT Lami,Welcome everybody to buy it.

Posted by: mbt shoes at November 08, 2009 02:57 PM (QhfLM)

100 buy [url=http://www.reviewups.com/]discount ugg shoes[/url]
[url=http://www.reviewups.com/]cheap ugg shoes[/url]
[url=http://www.reviewups.com/]cheap ugg[/url]
[url=http://www.reviewups.com/ugg-coquette-casual-shoes-c-22]ugg rainier[/url]
[url=http://www.reviewups.com/]buy ugg[/url]
[url=http://www.reviewups.com/]ugg usa[/url]
[url=http://www.reviewups.com/]discount ugg boots[/url]
[url=http://www.reviewups.com/ugg-classic-short-c-1]ugg 5825[/url]
[url=http://www.reviewups.com/]ugg shoes sale[/url]
[url=http://www.reviewups.com/ugg-sundance-c-5]ugg sundance[/url]
[url=http://www.reviewups.com/]ugg shoes[/url]
[url=http://www.reviewups.com/]cheap ugg boots[/url]
[url=http://www.reviewups.com/ugg-classic-tall-c-3]ugg 5815[/url]
[url=http://www.reviewups.com/]ugg sale[/url]
[url=http://www.reviewups.com/]ugg uk[/url]
[url=http://www.reviewups.com/ugg-knightsbridge-c-27]ugg knightsbridge[/url]
[url=http://www.reviewups.com/]womens ugg boots[/url]
[url=http://www.reviewups.com/]ugg boots[/url]
[url=http://www.reviewups.com/]ugg australia[/url]
[url=http://www.reviewups.com/ugg-classic-cardy-c-2]ugg 5819[/url]from usa

Posted by: cheap at November 14, 2009 10:59 AM (s7MB5)

Posted by: replica watches at November 17, 2009 04:05 AM (xpuiO)

Posted by: replica watches at November 17, 2009 10:17 AM (xpuiO)

Posted by: replica watches at November 18, 2009 12:17 AM (C/zDM)

Posted by: replica watches at November 18, 2009 07:41 AM (C/zDM)

Posted by: mbtshoesbuy at November 23, 2009 01:41 PM (bNNim)

106 The proper function of man is to live, but not to exist.ugg classic cardyConquer fear of death and you are put into possession of your life. ugg classic tallThere is a time to speak and a time to be silent. ugg knightsbridgefree shippingmbt cheap
mbt sale
mbt uk
mbt shoes cheap
MBT M.Walk

Posted by: reviewups at November 27, 2009 12:27 PM (xUZwC)

107 hot news for brand shoes online store ,do you want to win more discount ?and popular for younger,and nike air maxwith top quality A ,come on all air max shoes with lowest price for highest quality !

Posted by: nike air max at December 02, 2009 12:06 AM (OKj2x)

Posted by: reviewups at December 02, 2009 05:43 AM (fZN4w)

Posted by: Lacoste shoes at December 13, 2009 03:24 PM (/3s/N)

Posted by: wholesale jewelry at December 21, 2009 03:07 AM (1dySH)

Posted by: wholesale jewelry at December 28, 2009 07:26 AM (1dySH)

112 Un total de once comunidades autnomas estn este jueves en alerta naranja Christmas gift ugg tall boots (riesgo importante) por nevadas y bajan las temperaturas en toda Espa09a, segn la Agencia Estatal de Meteorologa (AEMET). En concreto, se Christmas gift ugg napoule sandal trata de Aragn, Cantabria, Castilla-La Mancha, Catalu09a, Christmas gift timberland classic boots Madrid, Navarra, Comunidad Valenciana, Galicia, Pas Vasco, Asturias y Murcia. La cota de nieve bajar a menos de 200 metros en el CantbricoLa Pennsula Ibrica est bajo dos borrascas y un anticicln que crearn un pasillo que permitir el paso de una corriente de aire muy fro, como la que est provocando un temporal de fro glaciar en Europa, aunque es esperan que el fro que suframos no sea tan intenso como en otros pases. An as, se espera que las bajas temperaturas se mantengan hasta el domingo. La cota de nieve baja en el Cantbrico a menos de 200 metros

Posted by: El temporal de fr¨ªo y nieve pone en alerta a once comunidades aut¨®nomas ugg boots|ugg uk|timberlan at January 10, 2010 08:42 AM (tWrEP)

113

Swiss replica watches Now while replica watches you can buy a good digital replica watches and pocket watch you might need to see what features are present on your new purchase. This is important as you should know and understand the quickest way to set any of the watch brands. You will also need to familiarize yourself with how to know when you will need to change the batteries on your digital watch.The key to finding your perfect watch is mainly replica watches keeping your options open. There are flea markets where you should be able to find replica watch stalls. You can see if you will come across any great antique watch brands in auction houses. These places will sometimes have fantastic looking antique pocket watches that will grace the hand of any owner.These facts may seem to be quite daunting but if you have ever owned a watch of any kind then you will replica watches know that you just how replica watches easy wristwatch these devices can make your life. The many different styles and features that you can find on an average watch will make choosing the right watch brands an exciting experience.

Posted by: replica watches at January 30, 2010 12:19 AM (ihruD)

114 Certainly watches are Replica Watches used to help people record rolex Watches time, but rolex watches nowadays its functions have enlarged. Replica watches are now tag heuer Watches not only objects that tag heuer watches can tell you what time it is, they are also a status symbol. You should not feel strange when you find someone wearing a watch on his wrist, but use the cell phone to tell time. In that situation, the watch is just showing its luxurious function cartier watches. It is normal and cartier watches perhaps also happens to you. .If asked that among the watches of various brands, which one can suit your taste? There is no doubt that most people will choose Rolex. Whichever social class you are in, it is naturally Rolex was known breitling Watches and cherished breitling watches for a long time. However, the elements do not usually enter the market alone, always come with the price tag up to the hand. For this reason, many people, especially men, their dreams of luxury Rolex watches are buried in omega Watches his heart omega watches. What should I do? Rolex watches are simply stunning worn by the rich and famous, right? No, this world is not the world's richest men, is the world of each. All are equal before the search of luxury and be men's watches respected. Within men's watches, the law, when consumers are in the market, women's watches they should women's watches receive the same treatment. This is the real reason why replica Rolex watches are ladies watches ladies watches more welcome than Rolex. Because in this world are not difficult to understand that the rich are much less than people with low income, you agree with me? You are forced to nod and say with certainty that is the reality. These low-income people do not have enough money to save every month. They can not afford such luxury Rolex watches

Posted by: replica watches at February 05, 2010 09:51 AM (TUJDt)

115 Factors Replica Watches About The Rolex replica watches Oyster The Oyster is so closely get in touch with Rolex, and it is inevitably that some people think these are the only Replica watches Rolex manufacture. Others suppose that there is a single Oyster watch. But as a matter of fact, the name Oyster does not actually meant for a rolex Watches particular watch you can buy rolex watches or even to a series but to a type of case that available in some of the Rolex ranges. History The Oyster case was first released in 1926. The objective was to protect the workings of the watch from dust and moisture. Early watches were far from waterproof. The Oyster tag heuer Watchescase was an tag heuer watches innovative design to eliminate these problems. It had a new double locking crown that screwed into place. It has been compared to the hatch on a submarine. Like a submarine, the Oyster case was waterproof. In 1927 Mercedes Gleitze swam the English breitling Watches Channel breitling watches . Before she set off she was presented with a Rolex Oyster. When she arrived, the watch was still working perfectly. The resulting publicity gave the new case a massive boost. Why is it called Oyster? Legend has it that Hans cartier Watches Wilsdorf cartier watches, who invented the Oyster, chose the name because the new case reminded him of the difficulty he had experienced prising open oysters at dinner. Since then the Oyster has further, particularly advanced. Many Oyster watches today are omega Watches perpetual-self-winding, in other omega watches words, it does not require to expose the mechanism to the outside world in order to wind it. The Osyter Perpetual is one of the toughest, most durable, most reliable watches (under truly adverse conditions). It is probably the best mechanical watch money can buy.

Posted by: replica watches at February 08, 2010 09:13 AM (TUJDt)






Processing 0.07, elapsed 0.0721 seconds.
15 queries taking 0.0082 seconds, 124 records returned.
Page size 142 kb.
Powered by Minx 0.7 alpha.

MuNuvians
MeeNuvians
Polls! Polls! Polls!
Frequently Asked Questions
The (Almost) Complete Paul Anka Integrity Kick
Top Top Tens
Greatest Hitjobs

The Ace of Spades HQ Sex-for-Money Skankathon
A D&D Guide to the Democratic Candidates
Margaret Cho: Just Not Funny
More Margaret Cho Abuse
Margaret Cho: Still Not Funny
Iraqi Prisoner Claims He Was Raped... By Woman
Wonkette Announces "Morning Zoo" Format
John Kerry's "Plan" Causes Surrender of Moqtada al-Sadr's Militia
World Muslim Leaders Apologize for Nick Berg's Beheading
Michael Moore Goes on Lunchtime Manhattan Death-Spree
Milestone: Oliver Willis Posts 400th "Fake News Article" Referencing Britney Spears
Liberal Economists Rue a "New Decade of Greed"
Artificial Insouciance: Maureen Dowd's Word Processor Revolts Against Her Numbing Imbecility
Intelligence Officials Eye Blogs for Tips
They Done Found Us Out, Cletus: Intrepid Internet Detective Figures Out Our Master Plan
Shock: Josh Marshall Almost Mentions Sarin Discovery in Iraq
Leather-Clad Biker Freaks Terrorize Australian Town
When Clinton Was President, Torture Was Cool
What Wonkette Means When She Explains What Tina Brown Means
Wonkette's Stand-Up Act
Wankette HQ Gay-Rumors Du Jour
Here's What's Bugging Me: Goose and Slider
My Own Micah Wright Style Confession of Dishonesty
Outraged "Conservatives" React to the FMA
An On-Line Impression of Dennis Miller Having Sex with a Kodiak Bear
The Story the Rightwing Media Refuses to Report!
Our Lunch with David "Glengarry Glen Ross" Mamet
The House of Love: Paul Krugman
A Michael Moore Mystery (TM)
The Dowd-O-Matic!
Liberal Consistency and Other Myths
Kepler's Laws of Liberal Media Bias
John Kerry-- The Splunge! Candidate
"Divisive" Politics & "Attacks on Patriotism" (very long)
The Donkey ("The Raven" parody)
News/Chat