| Support
Contact
| "McCainism," RIP, and Good Riddance to Bad Rubbishsteve and I were talking, I mentioned how rudderless the McCain campaign was, because nothing with McCain is clear. There is no "McCainism" as there was a "Bushism" or "Reaganism." Those men offered fairly clear visions (well, Reagan particularly so). Not McCain. Everything with him is just his personal gut, principle-free, just an instinct, an impulse, which often takes him in wildly contradictory places (but he's always haughty about the moral superiority of his decisions). For example, he's pro-drilling... but not in ANWR. Um, why? He's forever undercutting himself with unexplained hedges and caveats. He's pro-business... Kinda. Except when he's making his distaste for anyone working in the private sector "for profit not patriotism" so glaringly evident. He wants to lower taxes. Sorta. Sometimes. Maybe. In election years. We must regard Obama as suspect because of his association with the terrorist Bill Ayers... but it's racist to mention his membership in Jeremiah Wright's Church of Hate. This leads to a paralysis among his campaign staff. Everyone knew, pretty much, the Idea of Reagan. They could act independently with confidence that they were advancing Reagan's goals. No one could do that with McCain. Steve mentioned the german military term schwerpunkt, or "critical point." (PDF link.) Every military mission needed an easily comprehended schwerpunkt; even the most complicated mission must have, at its heart, a simple idea, a non-complex goal. If the goal was to capture the bridge, it must be clear that capturing the bridge was the schwerpunkt. Not only was everyone clear on the general goal, then, but when asked to give orders independent of senior command, lower officers would know the main goal that each of their orders must advance, the schwerpunkt. Without that, lower officers could not possibly issue orders that would serve the mission's goal. How can one advance the mission without knowing precisely what is at its heart? What was McCain's schwerpunkt? What was his case? Ultimately he sought to run not on a plan or an idea, but upon his character, his personal wisdom and integrity (something I note, not uncoincidentally, could never benefit Republicans generally, as an *idea* could). He always had a tough battle, but in the end he had no plan for battle, only the unwavering belief that he alone was equipped to lead the war. There was no idea of McCain beyond McCain himself. And ultimately, he lost. No man is greater than an idea. Even the great McCain.Comments1
1st
Posted by: xander crews at November 05, 2008 12:38 AM (Jd0Cx) 2
The man was fine - if he had a plan.
No plan -> it doesn't fucking matter if you're a good leader. Posted by: Al at November 05, 2008 12:39 AM (Lk931) 3
Of course, if fucking sucks if you can't lead someone out of a grass shack. But that's what we've got.
Posted by: Al at November 05, 2008 12:41 AM (Lk931) 4
Looks like 367 electoral votes for Obama. Mandate talk will the MSM's next mantra.
Posted by: ricky at November 05, 2008 12:41 AM (muUqs) 5
Obama has no discernible plan either. He says shit and all, but when you look at any of the details you know its all just very expensive bullshit and faerie dust.
Posted by: Purple Avenger at November 05, 2008 12:42 AM (OqXyp) 6
I love you man!
Posted by: Pablo at November 05, 2008 12:42 AM (QYpqH) 7
I'm still trying to figure out how we got stuck with him. The talk that a GOP loss was inevitable was nothing more than a talking point spewed by the MSM/DNC. We could have easily won this election, and would have even with an incredibly weak candidate like McCain had it not been for Bernanke/Paulson.
Why did we pick this guy, and what can we do in the future to make sure another debacle like this doesn't happen? We need to just blow this party up and start afresh. Posted by: Cedric at November 05, 2008 12:42 AM (ntSJp) 8
This was all too apparent when McCain failed to defend conservative principles from Obama during the debates. One could only conclude that McCain does not believe in those principles.
Posted by: pirate of the perineum at November 05, 2008 12:43 AM (c3QiE) 9
FWIW, Ohio is only 60% in, and McCain is only down less than 100K votes there.
Posted by: Purple Avenger at November 05, 2008 12:43 AM (OqXyp) 10
anybody recommend a gun?
Posted by: stldynamite at November 05, 2008 12:43 AM (ER55M) Posted by: Purple Avenger at November 05, 2008 12:45 AM (OqXyp) 12
Obama's plan was to win.
Posted by: ricky at November 05, 2008 12:45 AM (muUqs) Posted by: A. Weasel at November 05, 2008 12:45 AM (JAxhX) 14
AS was said, we tried to drag him across the finish line...
...and his grip on the near side of it was just too strong. Most inept campaign since Bush Sr. Posted by: G at November 05, 2008 12:45 AM (FAYNo) 15
President elect Obama
Hey watch it with the gloating! I may just quit working and then your Omama can't pay your mom's mortgage with my tax money, parasite.
Posted by: obscenely fat sweaty he-bitch AKA ClassicCon at November 05, 2008 12:45 AM (0e8KW) 16
Republicans have two years to get their act together, come up with a coherent economic vision (updated, revised terms for Reaganomics), restate their foreign policy values, and take back state legislatures and the House of Representatives. They need to learn how to assign blame to those who deserve it - Democrats and Republicans for corruption, Democrats for the housing crisis. No more pandering, no more equivocating. McCain had the right vision for the country but a failed delivery. Let Rove run the 2010 campaign, and hope that intelligent, logical conservatives show up to run for state legislatures and US House positions. Posted by: John R. at November 05, 2008 12:46 AM (CH5NM) 17
anybody recommend a gun?
A 12ga under the roof of your mouth is usually definitive. If its for personal defense rather than offing yourself, there's lots of differing opinions. Posted by: Purple Avenger at November 05, 2008 12:46 AM (OqXyp) 18
I don't see 367 yet. He built up a pretty big expectation from the electorate. There's no way anyone would be able to live up to that. Bobby Jindal in '12! And if I have to hear anything about race next election please. The US just elected a black president, I didn't vote against him because of his skin color I voted against him because I didn't agree with his policies, just like I do ever time I vote.
Can we cut out the shots of Times Square and Grant Park now please? Posted by: subrookie at November 05, 2008 12:46 AM (tvRvM) 19
I think you're right. One of the most powerful assets of the American military is a strong NCO corps which can do things without top-down orders; they can take initiative.
As we saw with McCain, he silenced his supporters, especially against the Reverend Wright/Obama connection. I could never make a positive case for McCain, only against Obama, because I was never quite sure what he really stood for; I understood easily where Obama stood - the exact opposite of whatever the right answer was. I think you're on the money here...about nine months too late. Posted by: Vercingetorix at November 05, 2008 12:47 AM (iTDJo) Posted by: kat-missouri at November 05, 2008 12:47 AM (GxnBZ) 21
Thier hyping this shit as 'Americas First Black President". More like Americas first Premiere,........ black is optional..
Posted by: Blazer at November 05, 2008 12:48 AM (+FzLa) 22
I'm starting to think the Conventional Wisdom was right for once, and that no Republican had a chance this year. The electorate was just determined to ignore any and all facts about Obama that didn't support his HopeyChangeyness. I'd like to think Thompson or Giuliani, or hell, even Mitt Romney, would've done better, but I really don't think it's true.
Posted by: suedenim at November 05, 2008 12:48 AM (PUOpk) 23
Fuck it, McCain sucks. We all knew that. Anyone who voted for McCain in the primary because he was the only one who could win, please go shoot yourself. Anyone who crossed over and voted for Obama in the primary because he was easier to beat, please go shoot yourself.
Posted by: schizoid at November 05, 2008 12:48 AM (ifHoH) 24
This man will be a disaster. Hopefully the country does not suffer too much.
I know , that's asking a lot. Posted by: Marybeth at November 05, 2008 12:49 AM (Sa6g/) 25
restate their foreign policy values
I think Obama will take care of that for us handily by fucking up big time. Chavez and Castro are going to roll him like a Bowery bum. Posted by: Purple Avenger at November 05, 2008 12:49 AM (OqXyp) 26
We survived 3 Democratic administrations during the Cold War. They did nothing, but eventually we got to Reagan. We'll get there again.
Posted by: John R. at November 05, 2008 12:49 AM (CH5NM) 27
Ace,
Spot on. Posted by: Potosi Joel at November 05, 2008 12:49 AM (TPRbZ) Posted by: someone at November 05, 2008 12:50 AM (zHoxL) 29
18 anybody recommend a gun?
A 12ga under the roof of your mouth is usually definitive. If its for personal defense rather than offing yourself, there's lots of differing opinions. I believe he was referring to users who have actually used a gun, not someone whose only experience with guns is from a few rounds of Counterstrike. Posted by: obscenely fat sweaty he-bitch AKA ClassicCon at November 05, 2008 12:50 AM (0e8KW) 30
And without Joe the Plumber to give the campaign some sort of theme, how bad would this loss have been?
Posted by: Cedric at November 05, 2008 12:51 AM (ntSJp) 31
Hey, at least we can start badmouthing McCain publicly again. Not much, but at least it's something.
Posted by: counter at November 05, 2008 12:51 AM (8/0ME) 32
heh, need clean up... It actually feels good to be the anti-establishment party. I grew up under Clinton; it's fun to throw spitballs.
Posted by: Vercingetorix at November 05, 2008 12:51 AM (iTDJo) Posted by: Max Power at November 05, 2008 12:51 AM (q177U) 34
We're about to hear the most important acceptance speech in the history of the universe.
God help us. Posted by: SlaveDog at November 05, 2008 12:51 AM (6Gy0q) 35
So what's the latest on Larry Craig, Ted Stevens, and William "Cold Cash" Jefferson?
Posted by: Bart at November 05, 2008 12:52 AM (t9PoL) 36
Chavez and Castro are going to roll him like a Bowery bum. Apt, because if Republicans don't regroup quickly, the US is going to look like the Bowery in 1966.
Posted by: John R. at November 05, 2008 12:52 AM (CH5NM) 37
Greetings comrades! See you in the re-education camps!
Posted by: profligatewaste at November 05, 2008 12:52 AM (zz2xy) 38
The fact that this wasn't a Carter/Regan '80 election result is testiment to the man that McCain is. Any democrat should have won every red state except even the most deeply republican ones. I really don't agree with how the rudderless McCain campaign was run, but I think he had a good running mate, ran on mostly conservative platforms, but his downfall was not coming up with a consistant strategy and the economy tanked. Against a really weak economy the dems could have run a turtle against us and won. That's what Carter was up against in 80.
Posted by: subrookie at November 05, 2008 12:52 AM (tvRvM) 39
Hey, at least we can start badmouthing McCain publicly again. Not much, but at least it's something.
Well, every cloud and silver lining and all... Posted by: Vercingetorix at November 05, 2008 12:52 AM (iTDJo) 40
The thing about not drilling in ANWR was because it was a national park.
But I think the larger point about too much hedging and equivocation still holds. Posted by: Darrencardinal at November 05, 2008 12:52 AM (uHnXy) 41
This is what happens when the Republicans run a Democrat as their candidate. And McCain IS a Democrat at heart! McCain/Feingold, McCain/Kennedy, no drilling, against tax cuts....he makes me puke!
The Wussypants (RINO) Republicans have screwed up the last 8 years to a fare-thee-well! It is time for them to go...Specter, Snowe, McCain, Hutchinson, Hatch, etc. Until the Republican party returns to conservative principles, it will find itself in the pathetic shape it now suffers! Posted by: angry white dude at November 05, 2008 12:52 AM (0Vjbh) 42
I pledge to give America's first Affirmative Action President all the support that his followers gave to President George W. Bush. The war starts now. Posted by: Sunglasses of Justice at November 05, 2008 12:53 AM (hDyHJ) Posted by: spypeach at November 05, 2008 12:53 AM (QwWKI) 44
As we saw with McCain, he silenced his supporters
I think he just wanted the shot, not the job per se. Obama wanted the job. Curiously, I think Obama will grow irritated with it in a couple of years when he realizeds he can't simply wave his hands and make serious problems go away. Posted by: Purple Avenger at November 05, 2008 12:53 AM (OqXyp) Posted by: Cathy (in Chicago) at November 05, 2008 12:53 AM (3xgoE) 46
The point about Obama not exactly having a schwerpunkt is well taken. However, he had a few ideas that he could drill in a way that McCain never could.
A tax cut for 95% of Americans. Reducing premiums on health insurance. That kind of thing. Both of those things were things we had much better ideas about, but McCain would refuse to offer. I think back to 1996. Dole ran on a 15% tax cut, and it didn't work, so people assumed tax cuts didn't work. Wrong! People were getting tax cuts with Clinton! In the time frame where it mattered, 1994-1996! No, I agree with Frum that tax cuts are going to be hard to do in an environment where Social Security and Medicare and Medicaid are going to be pressing harder and harder and harder on the federal balance sheet. Fine. We'd better start talking about saving money on health insurance then. Or on property taxes through education tax credits. Or something that will actually save people money and make them more prosperous. Posted by: TomM. at November 05, 2008 12:53 AM (yaUFy) 47
Who will be RNC chair?
Posted by: someone at November 05, 2008 12:53 AM (zHoxL) 48
A wildlife reserve is not a park. Posted by: Sunglasses of Justice at November 05, 2008 12:54 AM (hDyHJ) 49
C'mon, this is merely a leadership challenge. The electorate is lamentably fickle, they'll find something shiny next week to like more. Posted by: ballsdeepfootsweep at November 05, 2008 12:54 AM (P0dVa) 50
Noonan and Parker already have articles written ready to blame Palin.
Posted by: kat-missouri at November 05, 2008 12:55 AM (GxnBZ) 51
Will McCain remain his "bipartisan" self to ram socialism through the Senate?
Posted by: someone at November 05, 2008 12:55 AM (zHoxL) 52
Probably not the place for this, but can I say out loud the President Elect's middle name yet, or even just the initial, kinda like most (if nor all) prior Presidents?
Posted by: Drive By Druid at November 05, 2008 12:55 AM (p9EDF) 53
Where was Mitt Romney tonight?
Posted by: SlaveDog at November 05, 2008 12:56 AM (6Gy0q) 54
I agree that McCain has issues. The BIASED MEDIA didn't help.
McCain was never given a chance to develop a message. Posted by: Kolchak at November 05, 2008 12:56 AM (//Qr5) Posted by: railwriter at November 05, 2008 12:56 AM (XcsD4) 56
So, how long until the NYT starts blowing McCain again? I suggest probably praising him for being an honourable loser by Friday (especially if it can be spun to stop voter fraud lawsuits). And then, back to hardcore in the New Year if the Dems need a RINO to push through the new coal tax etc. So at least something in the world will be back to normal. Posted by: andycanuck at November 05, 2008 12:56 AM (GGy7k) 57
Screw Rove. The prescription drug benefit, orchestrated by Rove, is a disaster.
Hell, one thing that no one is mentioning is the coming entitlement crisis. In present value terms, we are between 45-70 trillion in debt from unfunded SS and medicare, and that socialism is ticking time bomb. Question is, do we level with the American people about it, or just let it hit, and be around to say "I told you socialism doesn't work". Posted by: Cedric at November 05, 2008 12:57 AM (ntSJp) 58
Obamabot, I will look forward to watch you squirm as the months and years go by, and your president digs deep holes. All arguments are old, and none are ever over. Learn yer history, chief.
Posted by: Vercingetorix at November 05, 2008 12:57 AM (iTDJo) 59
I am still uncertain how we were stuck with McCain.
But older conservatives/Repubs never understood that it was war to the death with an evil adversary. McCain was too collegial, too friendly with the enemy. I want someone who looks that piece of shit, Hussein, in the eye and says "you aren't our President and we are taking your ass down. Soon, if we can find out how seriously you broke the law. By the next election if your cronies protect your sorry ass" The Democrats understand this. They cheated all the way and suffered no negatives for it. Good lesson to learn. Posted by: iconoclast at November 05, 2008 12:57 AM (TzLpv) 60
And I still have work to do so I can't even get drunk!
Posted by: Holdfast at November 05, 2008 12:57 AM (hDyHJ) 61
Romney 2012
Posted by: jawbone at November 05, 2008 12:57 AM (r/OHH) 62
Schwerpunkt isn't a thing, it's a place. It's not correct to ask "what was McCain's schwerpunkt"; instead ask "where was his schwerpunkt"? I'm not being nit-picky here. This is a distinction with a big difference. I would argue that McCain failed to understand the difference and that's a big reason for his loss. He thought in terms of the schwerpunkt being a thing: namely, himself. He should have been thinking in terms of the schwerpunkt being a place: namely, the point at which to apply maximum pressure, or effort (the meaning of the word is forever at issue, and there is no consensus on how it should be translated: it's really a concept rather than at term). In other words he should have decided where Obama was weak and applied maximum pressure/effort at that point. He didn't, and he lost. Posted by: Steve (aka Ed Snate, aka Col. Kurtz) at November 05, 2008 12:57 AM (41Acy) 63
Don't know about you kids, but I swore to defend a Constitution, against All Enemies...including my douche friends voting for this jack ass.
Posted by: ballsdeepfootsweep at November 05, 2008 12:58 AM (P0dVa) 64
I'd feel a lot more sanguine if we weren't electing this bastard in the middle of a world war.
But come tomorrow, it *is* time to get the pissing and moaning and depression out of our systems (I've definitely been purging) and *not* become a permanently deranged Angry Right mirror to the moonbats. The deck's going to be stacked heavily against us for a very long time, and we won't have any power whatsoever... except our voices. We'll need to speak out loudly and cogently and persuasively, to whoever will listen, against Obama, Reid and Pelosi when they initiate their disastrous policy changes. And support the president when he deserves it, as I hope he will at least sometimes. He'll be a wartime commander-in-chief, for better or worse, and the troops will need our support more than ever. Posted by: suedenim at November 05, 2008 12:58 AM (PUOpk) 65
xander Good for you.
Ace...Please don't use foreign words for word we in the America's already have... English Man! Use fucking English...Don't try to go all "literate" on us! Posted by: oxrock at November 05, 2008 12:58 AM (CgVe3) 66
Nation, welcome to the Chicago Way.
Now you can all pay $4000 a year in taxes for a 1000 sq foot condo in a shit neighborhood, $80 a year "City Sticker" tax, 10.25% sales tax, and heyyyyyyyyyy! Your tax dollars are funding things like leaving live infants to die after they survive an abortion, just like we in Chicago do for the poor abortion survivors at Christ Hospital. (I know, right?! Christ Hospital!) Hallelujah, holy shit. Where's the Tylenol? Posted by: Cathy (in Chicago) at November 05, 2008 12:58 AM (3xgoE) 67
I already have an outline of a fictional book ready to go on the new left lurch of the government and Republicans in the wilderness...literally.
Posted by: kat-missouri at November 05, 2008 12:58 AM (GxnBZ) 68
A little bit of music to sooth our souls: http://au.youtube.com/watch?v=omFdpnSu57U
Posted by: Billy Ray at November 05, 2008 12:58 AM (7K04W) 69
I am going to take a pass on sticking it to the GOP tonight and turn in early. John McCain might not have been my ideal candidate, but I have a good deal of respect for him.
President Barack Obama and Vice President Joe Biden. Seems absolutely nuts. As that one angry old white guy at the rally said, we're going to have Obama and Pelosi leading this country? "We ought to have our heads examined." But that is where it is, tomorrow I'll wake up and let out the dog, my girlfriend will still love me and maybe the weather will stay mild. I'll still have that same pile of stuff waiting for me on my desk at work. Tomorrow I will think about the turncoats. Oh hey, any bets on the markets tomorrow? They supposedly dislike uncertainty, so they could rise... but we've also heard of business planning pre-emptive cutbacks if Obama got in. So we'll see. Posted by: DM! at November 05, 2008 12:59 AM (6Ewgm) 70
I'll save the gun discussions and tactics arguments for tomorrow. I have to get up at 0430. This is Wiseguy Three One, out.
Posted by: SGT Dan at November 05, 2008 12:59 AM (3Z9LX) 71
"What was McCain's schwerpunkt? What was his case? Ultimately he sought
to run not on a plan or an idea, but upon his character, his personal
wisdom and integrity (something I note, not uncoincidentally, could
never benefit Republicans generally, as an *idea* could)."
Good point. He didn't really have a schwerpunkt. However considering the environment - Bush has trashed the "conservative" brand - McCain did better than could have been expected early. Posted by: beancounter at November 05, 2008 12:59 AM (FwJ1a) 72
You made a stupid move America, and Junior Senator Barack Obama will be your punishment. Posted by: Kranix at November 05, 2008 12:59 AM (hNEXT) Posted by: mare at November 05, 2008 12:59 AM (X1fsj) 74
I wonder if my unit will get any equipment to go to the 'stan.
Posted by: scaramouche at November 05, 2008 12:59 AM (o58L4) 75
If McStain couldn't carry Virginia and North Carolina, he had no business running.
Posted by: ricky at November 05, 2008 01:00 AM (muUqs) 76
Yes, Ohio could still be in play.
My wife works retail, at 10pm she talked to someone who said that less than 3% of the flash drives were included in the totals. I wonder if Ohio could be contested given the BS Brunner has been pulling. Posted by: Ring at November 05, 2008 01:00 AM (FPnM5) 77
The only thing McCain did right was choose Sarah Palin, in my opinion. He presented no image, fought no fights. I voted for him, but it was more because I knew Obama would be terrible for the country. Ace, LGF, HotAir and the other conservative blogs did all McCain's heavy lifting for him. Where the hell was he? Why wasn't he running press conference after press conference with all the ammo against Obama? Did he really want people, at the end, to say, "Well, he was sure a nice guy. Wasn't he?" Was his goal really to lose? If so, he should have never entered the race. He won't get any more support from me until he starts FIGHTING for something, or at least pretending he believes in something. Anything. Just so I can point and say, "Well, there's that. He believes in that." I would love to read a good analysis of his campaign that might explain exactly what he was doing. Posted by: BeckoningChasm at November 05, 2008 01:00 AM (fnoZ9) 78
There was never a reason to vote for McCain, only not vote for Obama, and obviously that case was never made. Hooray for McDole v 2.0 Posted by: billypaintbrush at November 05, 2008 01:00 AM (VsT/g) 79
So what's the latest on Larry Craig, Ted Stevens, and William "Cold Cash" Jefferson?
Posted by: Bart at November 05, 2008 12:52 AM (t9PoL) Who??? Posted by: the MSM at November 05, 2008 01:00 AM (GGy7k) 80
>>>McCain was never given a chance to develop a message.
Dude, he had 30 years in public life to develop one. Is "change" a gauzy message? Yes, it is. But what was McCain's? "I'll seek compromises (to what end?) and disagree with my fellow Republicans (on which issues?)." Where exactly did he intend to take us? He did not have Reagan's belief in capitalism, nor in Bush's (unhappy) belief in big-government corporatism. Posted by: ace at November 05, 2008 01:01 AM (8T2pi) Posted by: Marybeth at November 05, 2008 01:01 AM (Sa6g/) 82
McCain's problem was that the President/ Republican Senate/Republican House spent like drunken sailors and abandoned all conservative principals.
McCain is a wonderful man, and ran the campaign he had to run. He couldn't run as The Republican. He had to run as The Man. The Republican porkers and spenders lost this for him. Posted by: MayBee at November 05, 2008 01:02 AM (zI040) 83
McCain also was running on his record and legacy in the Senate.
Obama was running on his future because he had no record to speak of. Posted by: Kolchak at November 05, 2008 01:02 AM (//Qr5) 84
How long before the media gets thier bailout package .. in 3 2 1
Posted by: Cromagnum at November 05, 2008 01:02 AM (j5MnB) Posted by: someone at November 05, 2008 01:02 AM (zHoxL) 86
Sonofabitch, I forgot to mention, we're the MURDER CAPITAL OF THE NATION!!!!!
Someone should really get in here and organize the community. Oh. Right. Posted by: Cathy (in Chicago) at November 05, 2008 01:02 AM (3xgoE) 87
Well, hey, at least he had fire in the belly.
(For those saying Thompson would'nt have done better, bullshit. No fucking way in hell would Thompson have allowed the Dems to pin blame for the financial meltdown on Republicans. Not with all the evidence available. Not in a million fucking years.) I want a bumper sticker - "Don't blame me, I voted for Fred". Qwinn Posted by: Qwinn at November 05, 2008 01:02 AM (3FVXC) 88
steve, it's not a big distinction, with all due respect. I cited a where as a schwerpunkt.
And McCain didn't have a where-schwerpunkt, like "Where does he wish to lead us?" Posted by: ace at November 05, 2008 01:03 AM (8T2pi) Posted by: Kolchak at November 05, 2008 01:03 AM (//Qr5) 90
The bottom line is McCain hoped to be the republican Clinton...No real core. Had he been Reagan reincarnated he would have lost. Change...hope...Thats all the "folk" that Oreally hanged his hat on wanted.
Palin...Bless her heart! She should have been on top of the ticket. Too bad she took the crap and lost. I can't tell you the friendships I've lost. Morons? I is one Dumb Mass? I ain't. Posted by: oxrock at November 05, 2008 01:03 AM (CgVe3) Posted by: kat-missouri at November 05, 2008 01:03 AM (GxnBZ) 92
Maybe rap with Barbour about how to 'un-make-love' to this situation. That's my new, PC side...
Posted by: ballsdeepfootsweep at November 05, 2008 01:03 AM (P0dVa) 93
Did Barry just say we all get a puppy?
Posted by: d at November 05, 2008 01:04 AM (vLzVJ) 94
"Romney, I hope!" How about the guy knows how to raise $ & run a successful company? Sounds like a pretty good start to me. Posted by: Marybeth at November 05, 2008 01:04 AM (Sa6g/) 95
Great post mortem Ace. I really hated when Bush the first extolled a "kinder and gentler America" as compared to Reagan. Then his son, acorn didn't fall far, said he was a compassionate conservative. Then McCain ran this disjointed campaign where refused to use Obama'a past against him.
We need candidates that truly believe that our principals, those of the founding fathers, were needfully harsh. But that harshness was for the greater good. We do not believe in equal outcomes with unequal effort. I give liberally to charity, volunteer at a free clinic and we take foster kids in our home. I also think we should close the border, drill here drill now and also want the lazy to work and carry their own weight. Get the real message out and watch the swing back. Obama is accepting his coronation. Must turn off the TV or plug my ears. Posted by: locus ceruleus at November 05, 2008 01:05 AM (e2mBS) Posted by: Cathy (in Chicago) at November 05, 2008 01:05 AM (3xgoE) 97
What needs to be done tomorrow: 1. Nuke Teheran. 2. Nuke Damascus 3. Nuke Teheran again for giggles. 4. Blanket Nuke Pyonyang and surrounding military encampments. 5. Nuke Caracas and the oil fields as well. 6. Send letter with harsh language to Putin.
Posted by: Inspector Asshole at November 05, 2008 01:06 AM (4OJ78) 98
i think having RINOs that were defeated in 96 and 06 only ends up making conservatives get the nod in 00, so expect a conservative like palin or romney to get the nod in 2012 Posted by: YRM at November 05, 2008 01:06 AM (004wR) 99
Actually, we all get to be the Bitches...that's the difference.
Posted by: ballsdeepfootsweep at November 05, 2008 01:06 AM (P0dVa) 100
10.25% sales tax just won't do. There's inflation to attend to. Just round it to 11%.
Posted by: torabora at November 05, 2008 01:06 AM (xmsm+) 101
now come the brave souls to blame McCain. how gutless. what a bunch of Monday morning quarterbacks. I'm proud of the Senator. He had huge odds stacked against him and he did not sell out. He fought the good fight and lost. He is what he is, a senator, not a leader of an ideological movement. Any of the other Republicans would have met the same fate this time. Posted by: jimbo at November 05, 2008 01:06 AM (4mfUC) 102
#87-
Yeah, I don't doubt that Thompson would've made the case. Hell, he would've made a great case. I just don't think anyone would be listening, it wouldn't have penetrated the Hopenchange force field that has insulated Obama supporters from all logic and reason. Posted by: suedenim at November 05, 2008 01:07 AM (PUOpk) 103
Bachmann
(Incumbent) 103,939 47% Tinklenberg 93,319 43% 55% precincts reporting - 12:02 a.m. EST, Nov 5 '08 Posted by: William Amos at November 05, 2008 01:07 AM (lwvcf) 104
McCain didn't really want to win...he just wanted his 'run for President'...it's his 'swan song'...he'll probably retire soon. The Republicans didn't really want to win it...they know a shit-storm is coming down the line. Posted by: CanaDave at November 05, 2008 01:07 AM (6w8jL) 105
Ace,
I'm with ya, bud. We need to work to organize the RNC from the bottom up, to define WHAT CONSERVATISM IS. I think we've allowed the Party to go far too long without thinking about it. I joined my local RNC, and plan on attending each and every meeting. You? Regards, Brian Posted by: Brian L. at November 05, 2008 01:08 AM (gHC4P) 106
God the media and the obots will be so fucking obnoxious. Grin and bear it. Ugh.
We're still the party of class, and ideas that work. Next time we run a real conservative. So long McCain. off to bed, had enough Posted by: brak at November 05, 2008 01:08 AM (vvvWu) 107
ps: i mean it 08 not 06 Posted by: YRM at November 05, 2008 01:08 AM (004wR) 108
60 million + voted for W in 2004. only 30millionish now. Good GOTV, mccain.
Let the internal recriminations begin. Romney will be awesome in 2012. For 2010, we need a new Gingrich. a new conservative movement. Posted by: joeindc44 at November 05, 2008 01:08 AM (yrMek) 109
There is no hope left. America is going to be dead within 4 years.
I bid everyone a fond goodbye. I'm out of politics forever. Posted by: Pipe Barackage at November 05, 2008 01:08 AM (Z9IOH) 110
ToraBora,
You are so right. Don't know what I was thinking. Forgive my momentary lack of patriotism. Posted by: Cathy (in Chicago) at November 05, 2008 01:09 AM (3xgoE) 111
To those who've dismissed my comments on the grounds, "just ignore him, he voted for Ron Paul"... Yeah, I see your point now. Ron Paul wasn't a good choice, because he might have lost the election. Posted by: David Ross at November 05, 2008 01:09 AM (IA6yS) 112
Anybody else having trouble typing AND burying your guns in the back yard?
Posted by: ballsdeepfootsweep at November 05, 2008 01:09 AM (P0dVa) 113
Something tells me he's not done with us yet. There are going to be some real fights in the Senate. Guess who is going to lead the next gang of whatever.
Posted by: Robert at November 05, 2008 01:10 AM (VotgB) 114
Ace, You left out the part about McCain hiring every fucking lobbyist in Washington to run his campaign. It's no wonder he never got a theme; Charlie Black and Rick Davis don't know how to do that shit. But they knew how to get McCain the nomination. I give Barack Obama huge props for one thing: he put his campaign in Chicago and he hired non-Washington people to run it. Hillary didn't, she hired all the Washington retreads and put her HQ in Washington. And then McCain did the same thing. In 2000 Bush ran his campaign from Texas, with Texas people like Joe Allbaugh and Karen Hughes in charge. Reagan had his California Mafia. Posted by: rockmom at November 05, 2008 01:10 AM (iZqUY) 115
So where do I sign up to help the new conservative movement? Something tells me I'm going to be screwed in academia even more so than I was before.
Posted by: Sean at November 05, 2008 01:10 AM (vZzYJ) 116
Yes, Ohio could still be in play.
Oh good. McCain can still be President of Ohio. What is the consensus on those web sites like HillBuzz and the one predicting a McCain/Palin Landslide? Were we punked? Posted by: lmg at November 05, 2008 01:11 AM (A/vgC) 117
Yeah, put me in the screw McCain column, even though I believe this election says way more about the electorate than about the candidates. Still, it would've been nice to see Rudy, if he lost, swap out McCain's "classy" concession speech for a big, fat "fuck you, you fucking commies."
Posted by: TiredWench at November 05, 2008 01:11 AM (VVOw6) 118
McCain was too much the friendly Senator and not the dedicated campaigner. He never had the fire to go out and fight to win the elections--he acted like it was some kind of senatorial debate. This has all the markings of the Carter election in 76. Back then Ford had the weight of Nixon around his neck while McCain had Bush and the economy. Obama, like Carter, is a relative nobody and just as inexperienced. I just pray that Obama's term is only as bad as Carter's--if its any worse we really are screwed. Posted by: jtareb at November 05, 2008 01:12 AM (Uwxd2) 119
The Aztecs believed the world would end in like 2012 or so, so we have that to look forward to! Yay!
Posted by: Vercingetorix at November 05, 2008 01:12 AM (iTDJo) 120
He's forever undercutting himself with unexplained hedges and caveats.
That's why you don't nominate a Senator. Barry was a Senator in Name Only and never had to make the concessions that a senator needs to in order to be an effective legislator. Posted by: phreshone at November 05, 2008 01:12 AM (oH2N4) 121
McCain = Dole.
Old, clueless Republicans, out of it. These are men who, despite their personal probity, just are uneducated about the brilliance of the founding fathers. Sarah gets it. Dole, Kemp, Bushes, they think niceness is the gist. And good for them. Their inclinations are honorable, and derived from Christian ethics. They are also Bozos. The idea of freedom and liberty is now shrinking in the consciousness of mankind. The 20th Century never occurred. The material blessings of free thought, are disconnected from the thought of most voting Americans. We shall see where this will take us. Posted by: Tonawanda at November 05, 2008 01:13 AM (IA49+) 122
i think we should point this out: the dems looked FUCKED in 04, i mean looked FUCKED the way we did in 06 and 08...2 years later it all "changed" so while we whine, bitch, and moan; don't forget in just 2 years it can all change Posted by: YRM at November 05, 2008 01:13 AM (004wR) 123
Yeah, I was a Guiliani guy. Goddamnit.
Posted by: Vercingetorix at November 05, 2008 01:13 AM (iTDJo) 124
I am pissed that McCain couldn't carry New York.
Posted by: xander crews at November 05, 2008 01:13 AM (Jd0Cx) 125
McCain's only issue was a crappily run campaign. Lack of money and the fact that he stuck to his values. McCain was always my candidate. I think he would have made a truly fantastic president.
He should have just been himself and not worried about all the ilks of republicans out there. He's a conservationist. He's not a xenophobe. He has strong foreign policy. He is against the special interest groups. He is not a social conservative. WHY did he try to appeal to all of these assholes? It and they screwed him in the end. And then, in kissing their asses, he freaking gets abandoned by all the moderate lefties who extolled his virtues the entire time. I would love to personally gut the Republican party right now. Worst run and most poorly organized campaign ever. Oh, and Democrats, enjoy your win all you want. You have officially lot all chance of a publicly financed election again. Good luck with that. Posted by: TMQ at November 05, 2008 01:13 AM (aMu45) 126
Nah, McCain was too much of an Officer. Fuck it. It's over. Would love to see Sarah whip that Black Panther's Ass in Philly. Any guesses where the night stick would get shoved?
Posted by: ballsdeepfootsweep at November 05, 2008 01:14 AM (P0dVa) 127
I don't know if this will make any of you feel any better, but it helped me a little. I just went to the McCain site and sent him a sarcastic congratulations. Essentially said, congrats for keeping you "honor" and giving us President Bambi. I also suggested that he do the ex post facto "honorable" thing and and resign his senate seat, a la Dole in '96.
Posted by: rockhead at November 05, 2008 01:14 AM (DvaIL) 128
To do list:
1-Buy several firearms. 1 high powered rifle, 1 shotgun and carry weapons for me and the wife. A pair of .22 for the kids. 2-Join the local RNC and bitch my head off. 3-Support anyone in congress who has the balls to stand up and fight. 4-Cancel all subscriptions including NR, etc. 5-Get more involved with the NRA Am I missing anything? Posted by: hedghog at November 05, 2008 01:14 AM (aDOKh) 129
111
To those who've dismissed my comments on the grounds, "just ignore him, he voted for Ron Paul"... Yeah, I see your point now. Ron Paul wasn't a good choice, because he might have lost the election. Posted by: David Ross at November 05, 2008 01:09 AM (IA6yS) Ahaha...classic man. Nice. I didn't support Ron Paul, but man at this point I am willing to look at him again. Fuck off Republicans, go die the death you derserve. Spineless sacks of shit. Posted by: obscenely fat sweaty he-bitch AKA ClassicCon at November 05, 2008 01:14 AM (0e8KW) 130
What is the consensus on those web sites like HillBuzz and the one predicting a McCain/Palin Landslide? Were we punked? don't know yet, silent there Posted by: YRM at November 05, 2008 01:14 AM (004wR) 131
From NRO, He is on fire and seems to agree with Ace only in more detail. from our David Kahane's amanuensis:
Posted by: robtr at November 05, 2008 01:15 AM (C6ME0) 132
I hate when Obama evokes all these great American achievements and victorys. Yeah, no thanks to you fucking liberals.
Posted by: pirate of the perineum at November 05, 2008 01:15 AM (c3QiE) 133
Barry was a Senator in Name Only and never had to make the concessions
that a senator needs to in order to be an effective legislator.
That's an excellent point. Should have seen that one, um, nine months ago.. Posted by: Vercingetorix at November 05, 2008 01:15 AM (iTDJo) 134
Huh? Everything was always clear with McCain.
McCain has a few core decent conservative principles. Beyond that, McCain is attracted to situations where he can be a power broker. Problem is, most of the power struggles of consequence are on the left side of the scale, so he spends a lot of time over on the left looking to broker power. Finally, one of the fine points of being a power broker is you must not ever insult or attact anyone who might deal you power that you couldn't attain on your own. Hence, he never insults the left while finding little of interest in dealing with or supporting the hapless right. Posted by: Dr Fred at November 05, 2008 01:15 AM (JbxXM) 135
What is the consensus on those web sites like HillBuzz and the one predicting a McCain/Palin Landslide? Were we punked? The problem there is that they're dems, which means they're less grounded in reality than us - and I'll be the first to admit I let myself get sucked in. I don't think their goals were nefarious, though. Posted by: TiredWench at November 05, 2008 01:15 AM (VVOw6) Posted by: YRM at November 05, 2008 01:15 AM (004wR) 137
128
Kill your television? I'm seriously considering, but damn, I love the Science Channel, Discovery, and Nat Geo. Posted by: Cathy (in Chicago) at November 05, 2008 01:15 AM (3xgoE) 138
victories*
Posted by: pirate of the perineum at November 05, 2008 01:15 AM (c3QiE) 139
victory speech for BO sucked, no substance just bs, only good part was when he didnt treat the reps like fucking lucifers for once
Posted by: YRM at November 05, 2008 01:16 AM (004wR) 140
It would've been nice to see McCain defend free markets in the debates when Obama attacked "deregulation". But frankly, it wouldn't have mattered. All of you that blame McCain, remember that we just had a huge financial crisis and are heading into a recession. (You do recall the bailout that Ace urged you all to support that was massively unpopular that McCain supported and took the lead on, right?) Bush's approval rating is about 25%. The ONLY Republican who had a remote chance was "anti-Republican" McCain. (Although I think if the media did their jobs and McCain went for the jugular and people really saw what Obama was about, i.e., hard leftism, maybe, just maybe we would've had a shot.) Posted by: Bob at November 05, 2008 01:17 AM (4DoFz) 141
At least I can now tell my black neighbors how racist they are for not standing up for Condi Rice or that they elected a doughy white man in Maryland over a very competent black man in Maryland.
Racism is OVER. Posted by: Topsecretk9 at November 05, 2008 01:17 AM (Q8o0d) 142
I am sad.
Posted by: xander crews at November 05, 2008 01:17 AM (Jd0Cx) 143
You guys remember what H. Norman Schwarzkopf said what he was going to do to the enemy? "Grab it's neck and cut it's head off" was what he said. We need a leader that realizes that Reverend Wright was an indicator of the man that is Obama.
The secular preacher is giving his benediction. The media have proven, if nothing else, they are too powerful. There is no check and balance with them and it will get worse now that they have succeeded. Posted by: locus ceruleus at November 05, 2008 01:18 AM (e2mBS) 144
It's not McCain, RHINOs or any minute strategy details that lost this election. This was a MSM victory through and through. Forget about the alternative media, it's but a voice in the wilderness compared to the MSM. From 2000 onwards, the MSM have set the agenda, shaped the narrative, demonized Bush and the Right, undermined the WOT, and finally elected a novice as president. This is their finest hour.
Posted by: canuk at November 05, 2008 01:19 AM (dOOjm) 145
128 To do list:
1-Buy several firearms. 1 high powered rifle, 1 shotgun and carry weapons for me and the wife. A pair of .22 for the kids. 2-Join the local RNC and bitch my head off. 3-Support anyone in congress who has the balls to stand up and fight. 4-Cancel all subscriptions including NR, etc. 5-Get more involved with the NRA Looks just like mine... except I have a 6th - find job working for conservative lobbying group and get the hell out of academia. Posted by: Sean at November 05, 2008 01:19 AM (vZzYJ) 146
Is this where we tell everyone that McCain wan't our first choice in the first fucking place? How the hell to we get closed primary's next time? Damn it all to Hell!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Posted by: oxrock at November 05, 2008 01:19 AM (CgVe3) Posted by: OregonMuse at November 05, 2008 01:19 AM (bMJ2V) Posted by: Cathy (in Chicago) at November 05, 2008 01:20 AM (3xgoE) 149
Maybe now all of you may be just a bit humbled. What you failed to see was the reality that most Americans held.
Posted by: John Ryan at November 05, 2008 01:20 AM (xrV8E) 150
And Canuk is right too! Shit on every one of them. I will!
Posted by: oxrock at November 05, 2008 01:20 AM (CgVe3) 151
Does this mean I can finally say Sarah Palin is a dope? Good. Sarah Palin is a dope. A small town mayor who I said the day she was nominated was a way out of her league and a token who would never have been picked if not for her gender. Let's rebuild with some serious people or we can lose the next election too. Posted by: JackStraw at November 05, 2008 01:20 AM (VW9/y) 152
ballsdeepfootsweep, You need to go a step further. Rent a table at the next gun show. "Uh, yeah, I sold 'em all. Sorry I didn't report the income, didn't think it was enough to matter."
Posted by: Ronsonic at November 05, 2008 01:20 AM (ywSvi) 153
So anyone know if the colored fella won?
Posted by: xander crews at November 05, 2008 01:21 AM (Jd0Cx) 154
McCain was more concerned about his "honor" then with saving America. He is a stupid old man who cannot imagine life outside his little Senate club. That concession speech of his made me sick...it was all about him...like he'd just lost a round of golf, not handed the country over to the Chicago thug machine. Get lost McCain.
Posted by: Peter Moore at November 05, 2008 01:22 AM (IT8KW) 155
Does this mean I can finally say Sarah Palin is a dope?
Good. Sarah Palin is a dope. A small town mayor who I said the day she was nominated was a way out of her league and a token who would never have been picked if not for her gender. Biden is any less of a dope. It is going to be a hilarious 4 years. Posted by: Kolchak at November 05, 2008 01:22 AM (//Qr5) 156
I dont know what to say, currently drinking heavily though. I cried when I saw the tears well up in Palin's eyes......wow....what happened to my country?
Posted by: ChangeUCantBelieveIn at November 05, 2008 01:22 AM (rvIvq) 157
I've never gotten drunk but tonight seems like a good night to pop that cherry.
Posted by: Oil Field Trash at November 05, 2008 01:22 AM (VE3Gu) 158
12) Understand, once and for all, that the old media is part of the
Democratic Party now. Ignore it. Never send Michele Bachmann onto
Hardball again. Never send Sarah to play nice with Katie. We need to
develop and create our own work-arounds — Fox, talk radio, NRO, etc. —
and use them. Don't play by their rules: make our own.
excellent point Posted by: d at November 05, 2008 01:22 AM (vLzVJ) 159
Does this mean I can finally say Sarah Palin is a dope? Good. Sarah Palin is a dope. A small town mayor who I said the day she was nominated was a way out of her league and a token who would never have been picked if not for her gender. Let's rebuild with some serious people or we can lose the next election too. typical allah slurping jackass, palin gave Mac hope Posted by: YRM at November 05, 2008 01:22 AM (004wR) 160
Does this mean I can finally say Sarah Palin is a dope? You can say whatever you want to asshole until January 21, then not so much. Enjoy our new Messiah. Posted by: robtr at November 05, 2008 01:22 AM (C6ME0) 161
I'll never be able to call him my President. I'm sorry if I sound bitter but he lied and cheated his way into office, with help from the msm, who now can rightfully be called Pravda.
I fear for our country, and yes, I'm bitter that there are so many useful idiots out there. We are more divided than ever. Did I mention I'm bitter? Posted by: Nice Deb at November 05, 2008 01:23 AM (Yccrl) 162
John Ryan--
It's amazing. You were arrogant at 48% support, cursing those in the stupid 52% majority, and now you demand we be "humbled" at 48% support. Like you were, Hoss? fucking cunt. I wish you could say that to my face. I'd take your head off, you silly little bitch. Posted by: ace at November 05, 2008 01:23 AM (8T2pi) 163
And they said Mitt Romney couldn't win cause he was a Mormon? Mitt Romney was who we needed. And Rudy Guiliani too. That would have been a formidable ticket. But they said Giuliani wore a dress in a comedy skit and no one would vote for him. They were obviously wrong. Or maybe the wonderful sense of humor and common sense of Mike Huckabee? but no, they said he was a minister. And yet,
Posted by: incredulous at November 05, 2008 01:24 AM (zplc6) 164
It's not going to be alright. We are not going to come back from this.
Posted by: Nice Deb at November 05, 2008 01:24 AM (Yccrl) 165
I don't get it. Why bother with the free-floating speculation? Everything needs concrete context.
Are we talking about the next RNC Chair? Good. We should. Are we talking about what conservatives should plan? There's a cabal discussing that this week -- why aren't we covering that? Are we talking about who our Presidential nominee will be in 2012? There's no point. We have the primary electorate we have. For better or for worse, the nominee will be Sarah Palin. (In this case, it's *much*, *much* better.) Posted by: someone at November 05, 2008 01:24 AM (zHoxL) 166
As mentioned above, it's a shame that Gov Palin will forever be associated with this awful campaign and that awful candidate in the name of John McCain.
And as much as like Gov Palin, I feel that she has no place in future national politics. She's been irreversibly tarnished by the media. So let's not sit around for the next four years and hold out hope for Palin to prevail in the primaries and then in the general. It's not going to happen. Gov Palin needs to focus on getting reelected, first. Then, maybe, maybe she'll be a viable candidate in the primaries. Uless of course her next youngest daughter doesn't get knocked up during her junior year in high school. Posted by: Bart at November 05, 2008 01:24 AM (t9PoL) 167
robtr, good list, I agree with almost all of it. 1) We did take the fight to Obama; we tried rallying the PUMAs. But, we couldn't do it with a straight face, given McCain's mavericky stances "against Global Warming" and other such rot. This wasn't a problem with our tactics; it was a problem with our candidate. 12) Here I agree with the strategy but not on the tactics. FOX will bow to the Beltway. And National Review's refusal to publically excommunicate its "ObamaCons" is a large reason the electorate (second-hand) figured the Right had no coherence. And talk radio is about to be made subject to "the local community" (read: ACORN). Better ideas plz? Posted by: David Ross at November 05, 2008 01:24 AM (IA6yS) 168
. . . I also suggested that he do the ex post facto "honorable" thing and and resign his senate seat, a la Dole in '96.
HUH? Do you want the Dems to get closer to a fillibuster-proof majority? Janet Napolitano is AZ's guv & she'd appoint a Dem in his place in a heartbeat! Posted by: Marybeth at November 05, 2008 01:25 AM (Sa6g/) 169
Income? And feel free to eat a big bowl of dick, dude. Ain't no different than the market, it's not a time to cry, it's a time to buy. We can sit and cry about this or realize the opportunity, it's up to us. P.S. BO, feel free to lick my sweaty nuts.
Posted by: ballsdeepfootsweep at November 05, 2008 01:25 AM (P0dVa) 170
So the polls were pretty accurate after all.
Posted by: xander crews at November 05, 2008 01:25 AM (Jd0Cx) 171
I would like to say that you've done a hell of a job Ace, and fellow co-bloggers. My favorite place on the intertubes. And I will continue to stay with all you morons. The sun will come out tomorrow, and we will fight another day....
Posted by: ChangeUCantBelieveIn at November 05, 2008 01:25 AM (rvIvq) 172
Ace, this was a truly fine post, good stuff! If tequila played a part in its genesis, I'm for more tequila (might put hair on yer chest, too!)
Posted by: Cowboy at November 05, 2008 01:25 AM (0u7vW) Posted by: Cathy (in Chicago) at November 05, 2008 01:25 AM (3xgoE) Posted by: EK at November 05, 2008 01:25 AM (YA4tV) 175
Do you guys think "You Have Got To be Shitting Me" is an OK bumpersticker? Posted by: Wilhelm Klink at November 05, 2008 01:25 AM (8D00g) 176
Let us not forget the true villian of this election: the absurd dunce W, son of the absurd dunce HW.
These are men of no intellect. They came from the 19th century culture of New England noblesse oblige. Connected to great wealth, and disconnected to our reality. The Buckleys, Noonans, Hitchens, Frums, Harts, are in the same pack. Their intellect is a decoration, not an essential understanding. Speak out. Marxism is an emotional and psychological disorder. Islam is the ravings of a psychopath. We have just elected an islamo-marxist. Common denominator: hatred of America. This is a nightmare. Posted by: Tonawanda at November 05, 2008 01:25 AM (IA49+) Posted by: EK at November 05, 2008 01:26 AM (YA4tV) 178
"Sarah Palin is a dope."
No , she is courageous, down-to-earth and a fighter. Most men, let alone a woman, would have been crushed by the sh*t the MSM flung at her. But she held her head high, galvanized the base and with any other candidate other than McCain she might be on the winning side tonight. She was fighting to win this thing for America, McCain was just playing a game and was more concerned about his stupid reputation than winning. Posted by: Peter Moore at November 05, 2008 01:26 AM (IT8KW) 179
>>>. Then, maybe, maybe she'll be a viable candidate in the primaries.
Uless of course her next youngest daughter doesn't get knocked up
during her junior year in high school.
You fucking Romney people need to chill. Posted by: ace at November 05, 2008 01:26 AM (8T2pi) 180
And now the "blame Palin" crowd comes in. There's no doubt Palin lost some small % of independents. (But frankly, if they thought she was too "inexperienced", what's their justification for voting for Obama? In other words, these people are idiots anyway and would've voted for B.O. regardless.) However, she more than made up with it by totally exciting the base. I really don't think there's a doubt McCain would've lost a couple more states and at least a couple of points in the popular vote absent Palin. How many Republicans would've went to the polls with Tim Pawlenty as VP?
Posted by: Bob at November 05, 2008 01:26 AM (4DoFz) 181
Man, I'm going to miss seeing Sarah Palin everyday on the campaign trail. She was awesome.
Posted by: hockey2k5 at November 05, 2008 01:26 AM (L3UiL) 182
Ace, Remember though McCain may have been a terrible candidate, drunk on his own self-righteousness and paralyzed to inaction by the constraints of "conventional wisdom" as dictated by the national media, but at least he had purity on the abortion issue. Sweet, sweet purity. Actual ideas? Not really but purity on abortion? Bigtime. Expect the right to choose act or whatever they are calling it to pass in early January which means all restrictions on abortion will be gone and government will be paying for them. That actually doesn't bother me and it kind of makes me laugh. I guess if I had to have a bright side from this election that would be it. I kind of enjoy a little irony. Posted by: Big E at November 05, 2008 01:27 AM (RWzXM) 183
And to all you fuckers blasting Palin, Mac wouldnt have gotten as close as he did w/o her. A big Fuck You to you all!!!
Posted by: ChangeUCantBelieveIn at November 05, 2008 01:27 AM (rvIvq) 184
Pls tell me Coleman will hold his lead. pls, pls, pls.
Posted by: ding at November 05, 2008 01:27 AM (Xomyd) 185
The country didn't vote this man in with a 100% mandate. Tomorrow half the country will be dealing with disappointment. Was jsut called by a lib, they demanded that I accept Bo as my president and I told them absolutely not. They said 100% of the people would have voted him as president but that this country is racist. Is that what they are going to say? Sheesh, I didn't vote for him because he is an inexperienced kid.
Posted by: incredulous at November 05, 2008 01:27 AM (zplc6) 186
Must stop crying and drinking and go to bed. Have to go to work tomorrow so I can start saving to pay my taxes in 2010.
Posted by: Oil Field Trash at November 05, 2008 01:27 AM (VE3Gu) 187
Is Blue Moon filtered?
'Cause there's a little bit of "unfilteredness" resting in the bottom of my glass, for the second bottle in a row. WTF? Posted by: Cathy (in Chicago) at November 05, 2008 01:27 AM (3xgoE) 188
McCain had no internal compass on how to respond to the mortgage meltdown, neither politically nor economically. His bizarre suspension of his campaign, and ultimate support for the incredibly unpopular bailout package was something he just couldn't recover from.
And by the way, where were the fucking ACORN ads on that? A big fuck you to anyone who says McCain ran a good campaign. Posted by: Cedric at November 05, 2008 01:27 AM (ntSJp) 189
I say we are all speaking Iranian by October of 2011
Posted by: xander crews at November 05, 2008 01:28 AM (Jd0Cx) 190
I hope my fellow morons will be proud of me. As most of the McCain supporters tried to hide their depression/disbelief, I chose the opportunity to seek out every single fucking piece of shit reporter I could find.
As they interviewed me, I told them how they allowed someone who was a complete unknown, one who was not properly vetted become POTUS. I asked why they never questioned where his medical records were, where is college records were. I asked them who was Barack Hussein Obama? I told them it was their job to let the American public know and they failed miserably. Where was the reporting on his the fraudulent foreign donations to his campaign? His association with ACORN? Where were the hard hitting questions about his shady associations? Why didn't they interview Ayers? Where was the tape from the LAT? Etc. Etc. Etc. As I finished each interview (at least 5), they asked for my name. I gave them my first. When they asked for my last name, I said, "HELL NO! Why would I want the media to dig through my personal life?" I also told them I had no doubt they would not print the interview. Oh, and BTW, I will give Obama as much respect as liberals gave President Bush. Zero. He is not my president. I truly believe the mother fucker stole the election. Posted by: incognito at November 05, 2008 01:28 AM (Rpam5) 191
I can believe in Changin' Magazines.
Posted by: ballsdeepfootsweep at November 05, 2008 01:28 AM (P0dVa) 192
David Ross, that is not my list as you can see I copied it from NRO. I half agree with you about NRO and fox but you have to work with what you have. Posted by: robtr at November 05, 2008 01:28 AM (C6ME0) 193
That concession speech of his made me sick...it was all about
him...like he'd just lost a round of golf, not handed the country over
to the Chicago thug machine.
Don't call him McVain for nothing. He took Goldwater's seat, and Goldwater would have nothing to do with him. Posted by: Vercingetorix at November 05, 2008 01:28 AM (iTDJo) 194
Whats the matter EK ? Mommy let you play with her computer tonight ?
Posted by: Peter Moore at November 05, 2008 01:28 AM (IT8KW) Posted by: EK at November 05, 2008 01:29 AM (YA4tV) 196
It'd be a diamond in a billy goats ass if he did.
Posted by: ding at November 05, 2008 01:29 AM (Xomyd) 197
God bless George W. Bush and all you warriors on this site!
Posted by: Mury at November 05, 2008 01:29 AM (Htdcn) Posted by: EK at November 05, 2008 01:30 AM (YA4tV) 199
What troubles me most is the number of people who voted against Bush and the GOP instead of FOR Obama. I have to believe that if American voters knew everything about Obama that they should have known, they wouldn't have voted for him. My family will face hard times financially. We will be punished for our "prosperity" regardless of years of hardship in the past, including, for me, 10 years of single parenthood, 2 layoffs in as many years, and 5 years of unemployment at worst, at best making 40% of my 2001 wages for periods of time, following 9/11. We are already ineligible for the Lifetime Learning Credit and the New Hope Tax Credit, and based on last year's FAFSA, we are expected to contribute more than my take-home pay after taxes and insurance (no money leftover for the 401k!) to my children's college education. But while I'll pay more taxes so somebody else's kids can go to college on grants and subsidized loans and need-based scholarships, and their families can live better without working for it, and Peggy Johnson won't have to worry about her car payment or her mortgage, I'm not sure how to break it to my kids that I can't keep my promise to put them through college. But I've been poor before. I'm more concerned about emboldened radicals bullying society in general and rampant, in-your-face anti-white racism. It's already pretty blatant as it is. The majority, more than ever, will be treated as an unworthy minority, and it will be justified by saying that we had it coming. Our President will stand by and not just let it happen, but encourage it. Remember, this is the man who said, "that's how white folks will do you," like his own mother wasn't white, or his beloved grandparents. My son, a 21 year old PFC in the Marine Corps who decided less than a year ago to serve our country, just send me a text message. It reads, "Is this really happening?" After all the terrible things I've seen and heard today, that's what finally made me cry. Posted by: Karen at November 05, 2008 01:30 AM (oZ8o0) 200
His 'schwerpunkt' was I'm not Obama. Unfortunately this was instantaneously undercut by the libs saying "So you're Bush, then." And it worked.
Posted by: CONSERVATISM '12 at November 05, 2008 01:30 AM (+gokV) 201
Hey, EK, I take it back, YOU eat that big bowl of dick. Assneck.
Posted by: ballsdeepfootsweep at November 05, 2008 01:30 AM (P0dVa) 202
#164 - We *can* come back from this, but it'll be pretty damn tricky. We're facing the prospect of a depression in the midst of a world war, while at the same time trying to prevent the establishment of a permanent fascist dictatorship here in America.
Don't be fooled, these are deadly serious times ahead, but for that reason, it's no time to surrender. Posted by: suedenim at November 05, 2008 01:30 AM (PUOpk) 203
GOP = FAIL w/o any BDS to help you win anymore, and w/ the shit that hits the fan falling on your party now i wonder how you'll survive the next 2-4 years Posted by: YRM at November 05, 2008 01:30 AM (004wR) 204
On to Sarah...Jack you fucking tard....She was the reason the RINO Mac was even in the race. Yeh, let's dig into her qualifications. SHE IS STILL MORE QUALIFIED THAN THAT ONE that our fellow idiots just put in office. Fuck. I'm Pissed, but no more pissed than I was in 1996. I'll get over it. The Fucking Marxist Obama will have two years of saying I can't get it done because I "insert reason hear" then it'll be I can't get it done because of the new Republican congress in 2010.
Posted by: oxrock at November 05, 2008 01:30 AM (CgVe3) 205
My bet: Bush, in conjunction with Israel, bombs the piss out of Iran before January 20.
Posted by: Dead Career Sketch at November 05, 2008 01:31 AM (JTN0y) 206
Excellent analysis, Ace.
There was a time, late in the GOP primary season, when it was obvious that the only way to compete with Obama's youth and vitality was to veer away from McCain and to Romney. We all knew it at the time but made ourselves believe that McCain could do it. While I have a lot of admiration for McCain, let's face it, he was too old and devoid of vision. The MSM would have crucified Romney but at least he could have ripped Barry apart in the debates and would have been perfectly positioned for the financial crisis. May have still lost, but I wonder. Posted by: ReverseSpin at November 05, 2008 01:31 AM (zoVA8) 207
Palin's not a dope. Inexperienced, yes. Inadequately prepared by the Mac campaign, yes. Thrown to the wolves, yes. She was the only thing that gave any life to a shitty campaign, but she might be damaged goods now in the same way that a QB who is forced to start before he's ready is also damaged goods. My biggest fear after he picked her was that she'd be tainted by the stink of his failure. We'll see.
Posted by: Ghost of Lee Atwater at November 05, 2008 01:31 AM (joZsE) 208
This scares me for our country. Not just about Obama winning but all the states are changing for the dems.Look at the west. You know Dick Morris got it right in his book " The Browning of America" it is like a slow death. Most of us are becoming a minority now. This is not the country of our fathers and grandfathers. New people have moved in and they are taking over..........................I'm sad for our country............Somebody make me feel better..............
Posted by: Josey the Hygienist at November 05, 2008 01:32 AM (SjAvA) 209
Over the course of the last year, John McCain ran, not for President of the US, but for the position of "Mr Nice-Guy". In doing so he has finally explained and convinced us why he finished at the bottom of his class at Annapolis. He began in Arizona as a returned war hero without intellect who survived and prospered as the lapdog of Mo Udall, never was able to rise above being a syncophant for a Democrat, settled into a career of taking direction from anyone who blew in his ear (Feingold and Kennedy), and came to confuse that with principal. Maybe next time, given our experience with the intellect and charisma of Bob Dole, W and now John McCain the GOP will see fit to select someone with both the ability and the insight to not only win an election but to communicate and actually govern. God knows, we have tried every other methodology based on old-boy networks, cronyism, and party self importance.
Posted by: MikeD at November 05, 2008 01:32 AM (jsBcc) 210
Folks: Losses always suck. However, you learn more from them than successes. The next two years are a time to build a political machine that outspends and outorganizes our foes. Oppositions don't win elections; governments lose them. Obama and Co are the government. He can't vote present any more. He will have to do something. He will disappoint. There will be plenty in two years to corral The One. In four, enough to turf him. Sip the bourbon and start thinking about how to outfox this fox. Posted by: Teleprompter Messiah at November 05, 2008 01:32 AM (kTFE5) 211
Ace,
This is not McCains fault. People figured out the GOP sux. Posted by: EK at November 05, 2008 01:32 AM (YA4tV) 212
I'm sorry, but I know it was the Romney aides who joined McCain who were always trashing Palin.
I'm telling you, cool out, your man is already a bit damaged from what his aides did. Posted by: ace at November 05, 2008 01:32 AM (8T2pi) 213
I was a Romney person during the primaries, but I was enthusiastically supportive of Sarah Palin from day one. Posted by: Marybeth at November 05, 2008 01:32 AM (Sa6g/) 214
When McCain said "I don't care about some warshed-up old terrorist" and then tried to make an issue out of Ayers, I felt like bitch-slapping him.
Posted by: Fred Schwartz at November 05, 2008 01:33 AM (0XpI7) 215
"We are not going to come back from this."
Not if we give up we're not. Sure, if you fight, you might lose. We lost today. But if you don't fight, you'll always lose. Might as well be dead. Posted by: someone at November 05, 2008 01:33 AM (zHoxL) 216
Hey Ek, suck the barbed cock of satan, you piece of shit libtard.
Posted by: ChangeUCantBelieveIn at November 05, 2008 01:33 AM (rvIvq) 217
>>> We all knew it at the time but made ourselves believe that McCain could do it.
Well I tried. McCain was at the end of my list of acceptable, plausible candidates (Duncan Hunter = acceptable but not plausible), and he barely made that list at all. Posted by: ace at November 05, 2008 01:33 AM (8T2pi) 218
This is what happens we have 30 years of the Left controlling the education process and the MSM. Until we start fighting the culture wars against these scumbags in the media and in academia we will face heavier and heavier losses. Each new generation is being brainwashed in the schools and universities and in our popular culture. Just look at the anti-American crap churned out by young kids at the Huff Post, Daily Kos and by the Hollywood elites to see how much ground we've conceded to the Left.
Posted by: Peter Moore at November 05, 2008 01:34 AM (IT8KW) 219
Seriously, EK. You + Big Bowl of Dick + Chopsticks = Soba. Suck it Trabeck!
Posted by: ballsdeepfootsweep at November 05, 2008 01:34 AM (P0dVa) 220
BTW, MORONS, DAILYKOS AND ALL THE OTHER LEFTY FUCKERS ARE GIVING YOU KUDOS ON TURNING ON MCCAIN. You are their new heroes.
Congratulations! Posted by: incognito at November 05, 2008 01:34 AM (Rpam5) 221
Israel hits Gaza tonight - 20 rockets into Israel from Gaza
Posted by: ethel at November 05, 2008 01:34 AM (LHasg) 222
EK...You hit it...not on purpose I think though.
Posted by: oxrock at November 05, 2008 01:34 AM (CgVe3) 223
VERY interesting post from samizdata.net:
Obama in the Whitehouse... Perry de Havilland (London) North American affairs Unlike many, well, most of my compatriots, I am not filled with a deep sense of gloom and foreboding at the prospect of the most left wing president since FDR gaining the Whitehouse. In truth, I can see many reasons to think it may well be a far better outcome than if a Big State Republican like McCain won. Of course Obama will bring an avalanche of policies that will be truly appalling and quite wicked, of that I have no doubt, much like his predecessors in office in that respect. As the global economy continues to come unglued, everything Obama does to deal with the mounting crises will I fact make things worse. Civil liberties will be hammered, all in the name of 'fairness', and the flood of regulations pertaining to every aspect of economic life will grow into a drowning ocean. And that is actually the good news. Why? Because in truth the Republicans under John "I support the bailout" McCain would scarcely have done much better. The economic global meltdown is only just starting to roll: if you think the sub-prime mortgage crisis was the biggie, just wait until you see the fallout from the fun and frolics of the impending mess in other areas, such as debt swaps. This is all going to get worse, a lot worse, and Obama is going to do absolutely everything to dig the holes deeper. Looking back on this period ten to twenty years from now, the Republicans crying into their beer tonight will be saying "thank Christ it was not us in office then". The lesser evil is not going to win this time and much as it may not seem that way now... or any time soon I suspect... in the long run this has a far far better chance of leading to the rebirth of a genuine pro-liberty, pro-market political culture that the gradual incremental surrender of recent times made impossible. Many will find the glee of the statist left over the next few days and weeks hard to endure, but to be honest I have been walking around with a grin all day. Finally the era of gradualism is over and the masks are going to come off. The USA has voted for statism and it is going to get exactly what it voted for at a juncture in history where it will very quickly be impossible to hide the cost of those votes. Obama is not the start of a new era, he is the death knell for the old one. God I certainly hope so! Posted by: Major Graham at November 05, 2008 01:34 AM (qGn4/) 224
Anyone know how many Bugatti Veyrons and Lexus LX 570s have been torched by disgustingly-rich racist Republicans by now? I haven't read anything yet, although I heard they had trouble rounding up 50-year-old, single malt Glenfiddich for the Molotov cocktails, so they're looking for the 40-year-old vintage.
I wouldn't be caught dead heaving anything distilled after 1920, but that's just me. Posted by: Whitey at November 05, 2008 01:34 AM (z4EdS) 225
"I'm sorry, but I know it was the Romney aides who joined McCain who were always trashing Palin."
You axed that story before... Maybe it should be up now. Posted by: someone at November 05, 2008 01:34 AM (zHoxL) 226
Had McCain not picked Palin or someone very much like her, I would likely have stayed home. And that is even given that I loathe Obama for the cheating thug that he is. So no, Palin didn't hurt his chances. She's the only reason he did as well as he did.
Qwinn Posted by: Qwinn at November 05, 2008 01:34 AM (3FVXC) 227
Sarah Palin, the first women elected as the President of The United States....I can see it now!
Posted by: ChangeUCantBelieveIn at November 05, 2008 01:35 AM (rvIvq) 228
PUMAS? O.K!!!! We just realized we just got had, it won't happen again cunt ass bithces. Enjoy your 4 yrs. in Barry's Gulag.
Posted by: Blazer at November 05, 2008 01:35 AM (+FzLa) 229
This has to be said...FUCK ALL OF YOU WHO VOTED FOR MCCAIN IN THE PRIMARIES!!!!!
Posted by: Fred Schwartz at November 05, 2008 01:35 AM (0XpI7) 230
YRM
Please remember the mess W has left Barak Obama. ps WHERE IS OSAMA BIN LADIN? I thought W was a badass? Is 7 years enough time to catch this guy? I mean he only killed 3K americans? Oh yeah, W is a chickenshit draft dodger. But he does look good pretending to be Tom Cruise! Ha ha! Posted by: EK at November 05, 2008 01:35 AM (YA4tV) 231
War Starts At Midnight. [Start at 4:30 or 5:50 minutes if you're short on time.] Let's hope it's a Lesson Learned. Posted by: andycanuck at November 05, 2008 01:36 AM (GGy7k) 232
OK. I'll tell why I'm stoked.
Racism is off the fucking table folks. OFF. Done. No more. No Democrats EVER and no blacks ever came to the defense of Condi Rice being called House Nigrass or Uncle Tom in print and cartoons. EVER. Colin Powell never said he thought her treatment was ugly. The democrats and black voted for a doughy white man of a proven competent black man. NO longer can african americans hide behind racism. They will NOW be judged on their accomplishments and so MICHAEL STEEL - 2012 that man was should have sued, just like joe the plumber, for their personal files being illegally looked at by Democrats. Hope Obama and the Democrats don't look into mine since I didn't vote for them. Posted by: Topsecretk9 at November 05, 2008 01:37 AM (Q8o0d) 233
You fucking Romney people need to chill. And you need to stop blaming every criticism of anyone on Romney. Nobody. Not 1 fucking person, worked harder, raised more money or brought more to this candidacy from the outside than Romney. Not Fred. Not Huck. Not you. No Fucking Body. It's beyond old for you to keep hacking on Romney as you did all through the primary particulary after the dirty shit Mav did in the primary and even after Romney and his backers got behind McCain and voted for him. You need to chill on your Romney shit and accept that McCain was a shitty candidate and Palin wasn't a great VP pick regardless of any other factors. Posted by: JackStraw at November 05, 2008 01:37 AM (VW9/y) 234
Shit...Isreal is totally fucked!!!!
Posted by: Fred Schwartz at November 05, 2008 01:37 AM (0XpI7) 235
November 4, 2008 is the official end of the American Dream. It's been in the process of dying since the 1960's. Ronald Reagan gave us all hope that we could turn the tide and save this greatest of all countries that ever existed on God's good earth. It's too late, now. Too many people think it's the government's responsibility to take care of them while they enjoy their "bread and circuses." As a nation, we have shown ourselves unworthy of the sacrifices of all those who fought, and died, to give and preserve that most precious gift of freedom. We have become as soft as the Romans, and will share the same fate. I will shed no tears for myself, but I weep for my country ... and my children. Posted by: Michael at November 05, 2008 01:37 AM (BnbnR) 236
44 million people agreed with us. 3.5 million more with Obama.
Wanna a bet in 6 months those 3.5 million will want a mulligan? With the media and a 3 to 1 spending advantage and the economic meltdown only 3.5 million. We will come back. Immigration reform will raise it's ugly head with Barrack and McCain leading the way. Watch the pendulum swing. Posted by: locus ceruleus at November 05, 2008 01:37 AM (e2mBS) 237
If McCain can win Montana, he'll hold Obama to 364 electoral votes. Lets hope and pray.
Posted by: ricky at November 05, 2008 01:37 AM (muUqs) 238
>>>BTW, MORONS, DAILYKOS AND ALL THE OTHER LEFTY FUCKERS ARE GIVING YOU KUDOS ON TURNING ON MCCAIN. You are their new heroes.
>>>Congratulations! Huh? What's the point, dude? Is he running for some office I'm unaware of? He's going to announce his retirement in the next several weeks. What the hell? I'm supposed to keep on supporting a failed candidate who personally did his level-best to lose this election as he's about to retire? Why? Posted by: ace at November 05, 2008 01:37 AM (8T2pi) 239
not someone whose only experience with guns is from a few rounds of Counterstrike.
I got more hardware on hand than some smaller police forces, a CCW, tac training, and I'm a LEAA and NRA life member. You are? Posted by: Purple Avenger at November 05, 2008 01:37 AM (OqXyp) 240
Who the hell else are we to turn on? McCain fought an "honorable" fight?
What the hell is that going to mean to my business? He lost us the big prise with his "honor" ASSHATT I've got one for him....I would really like to sit down in my bar and ask him why he didn't take the fucking gloves off earlier. ASSHAT!! That's all. Posted by: oxrock at November 05, 2008 01:37 AM (CgVe3) 241
I won't blame McCain or Palin. The stars were aligned this time around, just not in the way many of us wanted. Early on I felt we were in for a repeat of the 1976 type scenario. I remember many an AoS thread where I got cursed for saying so. It's done. McCain/Palin bashing is a fruitless exercise. It will yield us nothing. You wanna bash something? How about Republicans who spend our tax dollars like crackwhores. A President who signed McCain/Feingold and nominated Harriet Miers to SCOTUS. Compassionate conservatism and 'the new tone' that didn't get us jack shit. A $700BILLION dollar bailout down the fucken tubes. A brief GOP Senate majority that STILL got rolled like bitches by the opposition time after time. Politicians in general, whose main mission in life seems to be re-election. You know what 435 House members will do tomorrow? Launch their '10 reelection efforts. We need a whole new crop of people. Posted by: Jones at November 05, 2008 01:38 AM (KOkrW) 242
Hello again Chickenhawks, You really don't get it, do you? It's the neocon movement that is dead. Charlie Crist will be the new face of your party, so deal with it. Posted by: Kos Kid at November 05, 2008 01:38 AM (t3TP5) 243
The democrats and blackS voted for a doughy white man OVER of a proven competent black man. [Steele]
Posted by: Topsecretk9 at November 05, 2008 01:38 AM (Q8o0d) 244
Geez Jack, was that your last straw or something?
Posted by: locus ceruleus at November 05, 2008 01:38 AM (e2mBS) 245
Although I really admire McCain as a man, I agree with Ace regarding his lack of a consistent ideology. The funny thing is that McCain’s persona/biography/record are what initially drew me to him (e.g., bravely going against the grain, willing to cross party lines, putting country before party, etc.). He is the reason I was even open to the notion of crossing party lines and voting Republican for the first time in my life. But as the election went on, I became less enthusiastic about him due to his aforementioned lack of a consistent ideology. In particular, it killed me that McCain couldn’t find a good fiscal conservative argument to use against Obama. Particularly since I think it’s an absolute travesty that Obama and the left wing of the Dem party is successfully selling to the American people populist claptrap/ warmed over LBJ style liberalism – something that has failed every single time it’s been implemented. So anyway, I agree that the next Republican nominee needs to be more than a personality. He/she needs to have consistent ideals that go beyond patriotism (McCain’s one consistent ideal.) (Interestingly, lack of consistent ideas/ideals hasn’t been an impediment for Obama. I think if you polled 20 Obama voters you’d get 20 different answers about what he stands for.) However, I think it’s a huge trap to simply blame this loss on McCain. In my opinion, the Republican Party has a few larger issues, 1) A huge image problem (e.g., too many American people associate it with greed, selfishness, racism, xenophobia, etc.) 2) Few if any conservative leaders can articulately and logically argue the superiority of fiscal conservatism over fiscal liberalism and explain to average people why it's in their best economic interest (e.g., think Gingrich and Reagan) and 3) An increasingly doctrinaire and vengeful base that automatically rejects any deviation from 80s Reaganism as heresy instead of logically considering what makes the most sense in 2008. Regarding point 3, I just think it's important to consider all policies in the context of today: Global economy, Baby Boomers rapidly approaching retirement age, absurdly high medical costs that are putting the pinch on middle class voters (a good conservative think tank MUST be on this issue - it's far more important than health insurance), a growing Hispanic population (many already alieniated from the Republican Party due to the tone of the immigration reform debate), younger generations increasingly indoctrinated by liberal propaganda and political correctness, increasingly biased media (this year at least), etc. I'm not saying give up conservative ideas. I'm saying try to place them in the current context. In addition, do not automatically vilify someone as a RINO if they deviate from the Reagan doctrine. (For example, I actually think McCain was RIGHT to oppose the tax cuts during wartime since they weren't offset by spending cuts. I didn't agree with his contention that the cuts disproportionately helped the rich, but I did agree that it was a terrible idea to cut them while war time spending was on the up.) Posted by: Tversky at November 05, 2008 01:38 AM (DBB37) 246
OK, I held my nose and voted for McCain. We've had a systemic problem
with Republicanism for several years. The Republican party has
demonstrated in the last two elections that it is broken. After the
2006 loss there was not enough done to fix the party. Why didn't the
party leadership take a delivery from the clue train?
I'm not thinking we should kick anyone out of the party, but we've got to be smarter about who we're listening to. Ronald Reagan is dead. We need someone else who can speak articulately to small businessmen and libertarians and values voters without embarrassing the country-club set. I think that we've seen country-club presidential candidates in both Bushes, Dole, and McCain. The civil war within the Republican Party is about to start. Mitt Romney strikes me as yet another country-club candidate. The bizarre whispers that Sarah Palin was a drag on the campaign or that she had "gone rogue" appear to have come from Romney stringers. It is my earnest hope that Sarah Palin will emerge as the next leader of the Republican party. If not her, I'll look to another neo-Reagan like Bobby Jindal. I have a hard time believing that yet another country-club Republican can unite the party and assemble a winning coalition to reboot the Republican party. I expect to see a lot more class-warfare in the next four years. Ronald Reagan effectively fought class-warfare because the guy from Dixon, IL positioned himself as the alternative to Rockefeller Republicanism. We'll need someone who isn't old money or married to it to lead us out of this Babylonian captivity. I don't think that person is Mitt Romney Posted by: steve poling at November 05, 2008 01:38 AM (UWHTf) 247
220
BTW, MORONS, DAILYKOS AND ALL THE OTHER LEFTY FUCKERS ARE GIVING YOU KUDOS ON TURNING ON MCCAIN. You are their new heroes.
Congratulations! Posted by: incognito at November 05, 2008 01:34 AM (Rpam5) Eh fuckoff, not my fault, I voted for McShamnesty.McCain was never my pick. I "held my nose" as his own mother said we would have to because he wasn't an out and out Marxist and voted for him when there was no other choice left. Thanks to Rinos that look somewhat similar to you. He was old and tired and left of center with no message other than not being the Marxist. I wonder, what would a conservative be able to do if anything as a democrat? I've heard they exist but no examples in the last century immediately come to mind. Posted by: CONSERVATISM '12 at November 05, 2008 01:39 AM (+gokV) 248
Well. If it is true that Sen. McCain really is only a personality man, then why would have it been a good thing that he won the election ...
He would have a Carteresque term (Carter's personality flaw) and we'd have a Democratic sweep in 2012 facing a nuclear, instead of a pre-nuclear, Iran. One way to go forward: ballot initiatives!!! - remove all racial & sex related preferential hiring - elimination of farming subsidies - elimination of taxes on savings accounts - elimination of state income taxes - elimination of same day voter registration I can think of a few more, but that should keep me busy for quite some time. I have to go forward with my feet here on the ground, even if some of you younger folks don't. I'm too old for somebody to risk the money to have me help colonize Mars & I'm too poor to afford my rocket ship. Posted by: Not Tom Swift, damnit at November 05, 2008 01:39 AM (wJlIy) 249
I'll tell you what - I'm fixin' to get my conservative moonbat on with all the lefties I've had to deal with over the last eight years. Shoe's on the other foot, bitches. And now Daddy's gonna dance.
Posted by: Empire of Jeff at November 05, 2008 01:39 AM (LEmSy) 250
One thing McCain did in the senate was to try and help the Mexicans and they gave him a big fuck you sandwich. What the fuck is up with those people?
Posted by: robtr at November 05, 2008 01:39 AM (C6ME0) 251
I am sorry for any asshole who says an ass-holery thing about Sarah.
By saying so, you demonstrate you do not understand where our leadership is coming. Yes, Jindal too. Those two right now are essential to keeping the idea of freedom and liberty alive, among humanity. Posted by: Tonawanda at November 05, 2008 01:39 AM (IA49+) 252
230 YRM
Please remember the mess W has left Barak Obama. ps WHERE IS OSAMA BIN LADIN? I thought W was a badass? Is 7 years enough time to catch this guy? I mean he only killed 3K americans? Oh yeah, W is a chickenshit draft dodger. But he does look good pretending to be Tom Cruise! Ha ha! Where is Osama? Fuck I would check your Presidents neighborhood first. I hear terrorists enjoy living there. Posted by: obscenely fat sweaty he-bitch AKA ClassicCon at November 05, 2008 01:39 AM (0e8KW) 253
Jones...YOUR ROCK
Posted by: oxrock at November 05, 2008 01:39 AM (CgVe3) 254
>>>You need to chill on your Romney shit and accept that McCain was a
shitty candidate and Palin wasn't a great VP pick regardless of any
other factors.
Dude, I need to accept that McCain was a shitty candidate? What? I fucking feuded with his bloggers, man. I told them how shitty he was three times a week. Whether ROMNEY himself trashed Palin, his aides definitely did. And now I see the Romney supporters continuing that here. You have to accept the reality that Romney's problem is anti-Mormon bigotry and stop sniping at all you see standing in his way. Posted by: ace at November 05, 2008 01:39 AM (8T2pi) Posted by: oxrock at November 05, 2008 01:40 AM (CgVe3) 256
Too bad you clowns didn't nominate Romney! Oh, Barak would have been soooooooo fucked.
LOL! EAT IT, DIPSHITS! Posted by: EK at November 05, 2008 01:40 AM (YA4tV) 257
Shit...Isreal is totally fucked!!!!
Big time. It's crazy. And I bet, bet, bet, that LA Times video ultimately surfaces. Posted by: Topsecretk9 at November 05, 2008 01:40 AM (Q8o0d) 258
Hey, Kos Kid, just got off the horn with your broker...bad news about your trust fund. Good news, is with Barry and Hair Plugs...ugh, yeah, you owe some taxes. I wouldn't sweat it, makes you more Patriotic, right?
Posted by: ballsdeepfootsweep at November 05, 2008 01:41 AM (P0dVa) 259
Thanks for giving me another chance, Amerika!
Posted by: Karl Marx at November 05, 2008 01:41 AM (8D00g) 260
And the project to divulge every negative thing about the media soviet propagandists is essential to keeping freedom alive.
Posted by: Tonawanda at November 05, 2008 01:41 AM (IA49+) 261
Concerns that we need to consider
Iraqi people being abandoned to die Iran with nukes Israel on their own Russia reconquering Judges Taxes Time to get some sleep and figure a way to help. Enough bitching Posted by: hedghog at November 05, 2008 01:41 AM (aDOKh) 262
I wonder what someone running on an Immigration-enforcement platform could have made of that fact that his opponent antie is an illegal-alien?
Posted by: steve poling at November 05, 2008 01:41 AM (UWHTf) 263
KUDOS ON TURNING ON MCCAIN
Not hard to do when you're basically against Obama. I voted against Obama, not for McCain. ABC is saying republican turnout was the lowest in over 20 years. Apparently Mav couldn't seal the deal with the base and they just watched I Love Lucy reruns instead. Posted by: Purple Avenger at November 05, 2008 01:41 AM (OqXyp) 264
Let me start off by saying G.W. Bush is my favorite American president! Without him Obama would not be our newest president. For the first time in my adult life I'm truly proud of my country.... God Bless America!!
Posted by: Uncle Luck at November 05, 2008 01:42 AM (y+BCs) 265
>>>Hello again Chickenhawks,
Kos Kid, I take it you've signed up for Barack's three extra brigades in Afghanistan, then? Posted by: ace at November 05, 2008 01:42 AM (8T2pi) 266
McCain is like a potential Miss Congeniality who suddenly becomes Miss World because the crooked judges (the MSM) fix it. Or something like that.
If anyone wants to know what should have been done, see this post from 10 days ago. Then, compare it to the things that some people did during those next 10 days. Posted by: 24AheadDotCom at November 05, 2008 01:42 AM (OLX6B) 267
Do you think Palin is really finished?
Posted by: Karl Marx at November 05, 2008 01:42 AM (8D00g) 268
I'll tell you what - I'm fixin' to get my conservative moonbat on with all the lefties I've had to deal with over the last eight years. Shoe's on the other foot, bitches. And now Daddy's gonna dance. Yup, they are going to have to take responsibitity now. They don't know how to act with it and we know how to hammer them for their lack of it. Posted by: robtr at November 05, 2008 01:43 AM (C6ME0) 269
I'm sorry, I can't help but conclude that the fault is in our people; not in McCain. I wanted Romney, but I don't think he would have done any better. I refuse to believe that all of my fears about President-elect Obama are just a demonization of the "opposing team." I just think people have become too dumb; too amoral; too immoral? McCain was a compromise, but Obama is a lot worse than that.
Maybe it's time to take up knitting. Or get religious. Or both. I fear for the security of our nation. I fear for Israel. I fear for the US the children I hope to have will have. Posted by: FloofyParisParamus at November 05, 2008 01:43 AM (Ihk12) 270
Ace...Good to see you are still reading this garage.
2010 right around the corner... Good night. Gotta get a Beam. Thanks for the place to vent man. Oh....My perfect ticket? Didn't see it this year. Palin should have been in the wings for 2012. But....hind site is 20/20. Posted by: oxrock at November 05, 2008 01:43 AM (CgVe3) 271
As for McCain, Good riddance, I can go back to despising him as I have consistently for the past decade or so.
He was an absolute TERRIBLE choice for President. We had Huck, we Had Fred (my Fave) we had Romney (my second choice) and we had Giuliani- all of who I think would have fared better than the assured loser we sent up-
He was too damn old. His stump speeches would make the dead reanimate, and kill themselves all over again. On Policy, he was even worse:
He took an easy #@$#%@ winning issue off the table- Immigration. EASY WIN. Particularly in these times. But, no. McCain and Obama might of well have linked to the same damn web page fo immigration policy. We still got beat by 90 to 10 in the I-Am-Illegal-but -I-voted-anyway-and the -nice democratic -pollworker-gave-me-cash-to-come-back -later-and -vote-again demographic. We always seem to lose that one, as well as the dead vote. I fail to understand why dead people are so friggin' Liberal. He never did agree to Drilling in Anwr, although Palin offset that a bit.
WHAT THE HELL with the stupid "We need to buy up everybody's mortgages" crap in the debates? THEN you want to turn around and call Obama "Socialist"? As opposed to what and who? Thanks to his asinine McCain Feingold, we lost are fund raising advantage- and Dem favoring 527s got all the bucks -from Soros and a bunch of really dimwitted actors and crap. I really thought this race was over the day he announced he was taking public financing. WTF??? the Party of self sufficiency, and he is going to take public financing????
He prances around the country talking about how tough he is on all the wasteful spending, and he VOTES FOR A BAILOUT THAT HAD $150 BILLION in CRAP added on. I am amazed it was this close.
For the record, I DID vote for him, but mostly because I saw the value in putting A real Conservative a heartbeat away in Palin. If he Hadn't picked her, I was third party or leaving that part of the ticket blank.
Now we are screwed. The Reason we will have ALL of the lower courts stacked against us now? Thanks John! His stupid self aggrandizing gang of 14. Someone hit him for me.
The Reason we got hosed on fundraising? McCain Feingold. Nothing like telling them they do not have to record who gives anything less than a couple hundred bucks. Kind of makes limits a bit pointless, eh? Again, Thanks John! So now we are stuck. All hail the Nanny state! Enjoy the decline from being a superpower- enjoy the bloodshed around the world as we falter. Crying shame History will not remember the pathetic pile of Crap named McCain who was instrumental in the decline of America. I am still at a loss why we nominated this idiot? Anyone want to come clean?
Posted by: Gerry Owen at November 05, 2008 01:43 AM (oGv5F) 272
PALIN - JINDAL 2012!
Please! HAHAHAHAHAHA! btw Alaska still hasn't closed their polls. there's still a chance! Posted by: EK at November 05, 2008 01:44 AM (YA4tV) 273
The worst of Mccain's defeatist campaign is the long term damage done to Sarah Palin. If he dint want to win, he shouldn't have user her and 4 years on, she would have been on heck of a candidate on her own. She would have been introduced to America afresh and we could have had a Reagan like statesman, who now might have been nipped in the bud. Fuck Mccain. All he cares is his damn honor. Let the country and the free world go to dogs.
Posted by: prose at November 05, 2008 01:44 AM (Z79Iq) Posted by: Purple Avenger at November 05, 2008 01:44 AM (OqXyp) 275
I would love to read a good analysis of his campaign that might explain exactly what he was doing. Posted by: BeckoningChasm at November 05, 2008 01:00 AM (fnoZ9) If it's still up, you should read Matt Bai's article in the NYT magazine about McCain's campaign. It confirms everything in this post. Even after McCain won the GOP nomination, his top campaign guys were sitting around in JUNE trying to answer the question "why should John McCain be President?" The "Country First" theme was the only one they could think of. But it came so late in the game that they had no time to flesh it out or build a narrative around it, or make any kind of coherent contrast of it with Obama. So they defaulted with tactics. The story about how they decided to suspend the campaign after the Wall Street meltdown is just awful. They didn't even go back to McCain's life story after the convention. I've seen polls and anecdotal evidence that a very large number of voters didn't even know he is a war hero.
Posted by: rockmom at November 05, 2008 01:44 AM (iZqUY) 276
Romney is exactly the asshole we do not need. Pampered, New England noblesse oblige, an extraodinary narcisscist, clueless about anything except himself.
We need Sarah and Bobby, real people. Posted by: Tonawanda at November 05, 2008 01:44 AM (IA49+) 277
138: Considered it, but I can't live without the Military Channel and it's in a teir that I have to pay big $$$$$$$ for. Fuken Charter Cable, I want a Change, I only want to pay for the Channels I watch. No more MTV no more E no more CNN.........
Posted by: mydemonsdriveon at November 05, 2008 01:45 AM (ahrXH) 278
Honestly, I was never for McCain. Never liked him. The way he sucked up to the media and was a thorn in Bush's flesh. I never forgave him for that. But then on that Friday morning when he pick that great gal from Alaska. And I heard her speak it was like WOW. something happened. I was fired up like the rest of the base.....All was going well till he put the gag order on her. One sunday about 3 weeks ago I was watching one of her rallys. You could tell she was not the same. She was holding back... No more Ayers stuff. I got so mad i went and got my boxcutter,went out to the back of my van , and I slashed the McCain part off my bumper sticker.. Just left Palen on there...
With out Palen, McCain was dead on arrival.......... Posted by: Josey the Hygienist at November 05, 2008 01:45 AM (SjAvA) 279
"The next two years are a time to build a political machine that outspends and outorganizes our foes."
This won't be turned around in two years...we have to take care of the MSM first and then start taking back our culture from the Left.. If we don't start addressing the way our culture is being manipulated by the MSM, Hollywood and our "educators" then each election will get harder and harder to fight. Bush let the MSM have things their own way for 4 years until most Americans started believing that War-for-Oil shit. We can't let that go on, we can't keep letting our kids be taught that the US is evil. That's what happened in Europe..and now the kids there have no pride in their countries, think Israel is the bad guy and that muslims are less scary than Christians. Our kids and culture are being stolen from us....how else could a Marxist, terrorist loving, nobody end up being voted for by 60 MILLION AMERICANS ?? A political machine that has to fight the MSM, the education system and an anti-American culture will find it increasingly hard to win an election. Posted by: Peter Moore at November 05, 2008 01:45 AM (IT8KW) 280
Coleman up on Frankenstein by 30,000 votes with 67% reporting.
Posted by: ricky at November 05, 2008 01:45 AM (muUqs) 281
There is no mandate since McCain got 48% of the vote, and at least 80 electoral votes were won by extremely close margins, FL, VA, IN, MO, NC and even OH were won by an average of 2 pts.
Posted by: jason at November 05, 2008 01:46 AM (SgOkM) 282
>>>Hello again Chickenhawks Right, Joe Biden got his fifth deferment the year I joined the Marines and Borack Hussein Obama is such a model fucking warrior. Posted by: robtr at November 05, 2008 01:46 AM (C6ME0) 283
They don't know how to act with it
Indeed. Pelosi's 100 hours were pretty underwhelming. The public will notice the gas tax hikes they have planned though. Remember Obie saying he thought $4/gal was about right? They'll make sure that happens again. Posted by: Purple Avenger at November 05, 2008 01:46 AM (OqXyp) 284
I'm sure someone's already said it, but I want to say it too. I hope this means we can start a new party of CONSERVATIVES. The REAL party of Reagan. Fuck the Republicans and their RINOs. I'm done with them. They've done nothing for their base. And they can't run a campaign to save their lives. We'll play dirty like the libs do. Racism is dead. After all, we just elected a black president.
Palin/Jindal 2012! Posted by: wherestherum at November 05, 2008 01:46 AM (wET2y) 285
"You have to accept the reality that Romney's problem is anti-Mormon bigotry and stop sniping at all you see standing in his way." Ace
I am not convinced of this. His ever evolving philosophy and general slickness worked against him although my wife and I were settled on him. I think Palin is a threat because she is genuine. I am tired of guessing whether a candidate is just parroting the ideas that polled well. Posted by: locus ceruleus at November 05, 2008 01:47 AM (e2mBS) 286
Hello again Chickenhawks,
You ready to sign up, arm up for citizen brigade? Drafts a commin" tinkerbell, hope you know it. HOPE you got that part of the memo. Posted by: Topsecretk9 at November 05, 2008 01:47 AM (Q8o0d) 287
Romney's problem is anti-Mormon bigotry
That was about half of it. But don't underestimate his being a Captain Planet-lookin' douche, and a "New England Republican," of which there are, uncoincidentally, no more. Posted by: The R.N.G. at November 05, 2008 01:47 AM (LB9fc) 288
Yes, Sarah and Bobby!
Ace, please promote these two for 2012. I will love to see them cornholed like McCain. Great job W! Well done, Rove! ps What happened to Fred Thompson? tee hee! Posted by: EK at November 05, 2008 01:47 AM (YA4tV) 289
Whether ROMNEY himself trashed Palin, his aides definitely did. And now I see the Romney supporters continuing that here. Romney didn't have any fucking aides after the primary. They worked for McCain. They were on his payroll. They were McCain aides. How hard is this to understand? Nobody had ever even heard of Palin before the primary but all of a sudden this woman was going to swoop down from nowhere and save the election? Please. I said from day 1 she was going to be savaged by the media just as every candidate in the primaries was. She was. Her approvals fell through the floor. It had nothing to do with aides who may or may not have worked for Romney in the primary and who may or may not have said anything to anyone. She bombed on the national stage. The only people she appealed to was the hard core base, the people who would have voted for Khan over Obama. And still, just as you did in the primary, you blame Romney. Yea, thats old. Posted by: JackStraw at November 05, 2008 01:47 AM (VW9/y) 290
We just let Oprah Winfrey pick our president.
Posted by: libertarianjim at November 05, 2008 01:47 AM (9DuL4) 291
Eh, I'd say McCain did better than I would have ever expected. I mean, he got this moron to vote for him a mere 9-months after saying I would NEVER vote for him in a general election.
Of course, he has Sarah and Barry to thank for that. Posted by: Editor at November 05, 2008 01:48 AM (p4YSL) Posted by: ballsdeepfootsweep at November 05, 2008 01:48 AM (P0dVa) 293
Yeah that's the ticket. Let's pick up right where we left off during the primaries and spend all our time trashing the field of future Republican candidates. Posted by: Bart at November 05, 2008 01:49 AM (t9PoL) 294
Dunno about you folks, but tomorrow I'm calling the RNC and telling them that I'm leaving the party ASAP. I'll join the Libertarians or Constitution Party and will rejoin the Republicans if and when they drop the RINO shit.
Posted by: rockhead at November 05, 2008 01:49 AM (DvaIL) 295
277 138: Considered it, but I can't live without the Military Channel and it's in a teir that I have to pay big $$$$$$$ for. Fuken Charter Cable, I want a Change, I only want to pay for the Channels I watch. No more MTV no more E no more CNN.........
Posted by: mydemonsdriveon at November 05, 2008 01:45 AM (ahrXH) I ditched cable years ago. I steal any show I want from the net and watch through htpc. Like I said I have been doing this for over two years now and will never go back. Posted by: obscenely fat sweaty he-bitch AKA ClassicCon at November 05, 2008 01:49 AM (0e8KW) 296
277
Can I get an afuckingmen. Why the FUCK do I need 16 shopping channels, 29 religious channels, 48 BETs, 736 Entertainment Bullshit/MTV trash channels, etc. TV sucks balls, and it sucks you have to go to the next highest tier (I did, too) to get a few decent channels. Posted by: Cathy (in Chicago) at November 05, 2008 01:50 AM (3xgoE) 297
Well said, Ace. I think that sums up how most of us have felt quite nicely. McCain was always the no choice-choice for us morons since he gained the nomination.
Posted by: SamIam at November 05, 2008 01:50 AM (jl7C/) 298
Never was a fan of Palin, not very bright. Yeah I said it. She was a drag on a campaign that already lacked focus and a message. The RNC is going to strip that $150,000 wardrobe off her back and send her packing to Alaska. If she does not get re-elected as governor, it is all over for Palin. No, on second thought forget that, it is over for Palin NOW. Being the also ran on a losing ticket but a losing ticket of 338 EVs is the kiss of death to most political careers. And Palin is no Nixon. Posted by: allheavens at November 05, 2008 01:50 AM (mRLcU) 299
So who is this John Galt I keep hearing about?
Posted by: JohnJ at November 05, 2008 01:50 AM (r27QA) 300
I wonder how the remainder of Palin's term will go. My guess is that the MSM will have some sudden, inexplicable interest in the internal affairs of Alaska, an area that - until recently - many didn't even know was an actual state.
Posted by: fretless at November 05, 2008 01:51 AM (f/j9S) 301
I have to say, I will seriously think about beating out of this country if Obama does make sure on his promise of a Hitler Youth Brigade.
My son has always wanted to enlist in the armed forces when he's OF AGE, but if Obama even goes where he's said he's going with the civilian and youth "services", I'm ought of here. Posted by: Topsecretk9 at November 05, 2008 01:51 AM (Q8o0d) 302
Actually, I can't believe that some pimply faced kid is calling me a Chickenhawk, hell, I got more time waiting for my 'chute to open than he's been on the earth.
Posted by: ballsdeepfootsweep at November 05, 2008 01:51 AM (P0dVa) 303
"The worst of Mccain's defeatist campaign is the long term damage done to Sarah Palin."
Uh, no. (1) The GOP doesn't nominate people new to the national stage. Last nominees: 2 old-time senators who'd run before, the son of a President, the VP, the down-to-the-wire runner-up in the previous primaries, etc. etc. (2) The shitstorm would have hit her no matter how she appeared, that first time, because she's such a threat otherwise. (3) She's not particularly damaged. Posted by: someone at November 05, 2008 01:51 AM (zHoxL) 304
Romney-Crist 2012!
That could get the anti-h0m0 and closeted h0mo vote! BRILLIANT! You guys owe me for coming up with that one. ps How my a$$ taste! HAHAHAHAHAHAHa! Posted by: EK at November 05, 2008 01:51 AM (YA4tV) 305
Anyone who didn't see that Governor Palin was the only thing going for the McCain campaign is a completely out of touch dunce. Please, people think before commenting.
p.s. Imagine what she was encouraged not to say. Posted by: mare at November 05, 2008 01:52 AM (X1fsj) 306
Peter Moore at #218 is right. This battle was lost in the educational institutions of America. Our universities are the enemy and the breeding grounds of socialism and fascism. In their self righteousness they truly believe they represent a greater good. I urge all of you to fight this monster, deny it funding, attack its base, send your children to other, carefully selected institutions. The football team at dear old state U alma mater may tug at your emotions but the English , Sociology, and Feminine Studies Department are slowly undermining and destroying our society. And the administrations lack any moral spine to curtail this decay. They only seek the $$ required to construct little intellectual napoleonic empires. When "YourU" Development Fund calls, tell them to get stuffed! It can be extremely satisfying.
Posted by: MikeD at November 05, 2008 01:52 AM (jsBcc) 307
Governor Plain saved McCain and got him to 47%
dont hate. Posted by: christy at November 05, 2008 01:52 AM (MiEb2) 308
Palin is the future of the REAL conservative Republicans....she isnt a rino poser
Posted by: christy at November 05, 2008 01:52 AM (MiEb2) 309
I agree about the poorly run campaign, and based on our local races, I think it was GOP-wide. Our Congressional District went to the Chairman of our Board of Supervisors, who is leaving our county with huge budget deficits and and a string of corruption charges steaming in his wake. His challenger's campaign was WEAK. OMG---did Ralph Nader really just say that Obama can either be an Uncle Sam or an Uncle Tom? And then refuse to back down when Shep called him on it? I didn't know he had nads like that. And I think Shep overreacted. All Nader was saying was that Obama couldn't now sell out and maintain any credibility. Wait, did I just side with Ralph Nader? Posted by: Karen at November 05, 2008 01:53 AM (oZ8o0) 310
EK: Is it now Body Odor's responsibility to capture Bin Ladin, or will Body Odor simply make an appointment for the two of them to discuss their differences (if any) and with no preconditions?
Posted by: Brooksie at November 05, 2008 01:53 AM (Bfgzu) 311
I will not throw John McCain and Sarah Plain under the bus because we lost!
Keep your eyes on Barry and Joe! -cs™ Posted by: Smitty at November 05, 2008 01:53 AM (9Or9E) Posted by: Cathy (in Chicago) at November 05, 2008 01:53 AM (3xgoE) 313
First, it didn't help that Bush 43 never defended himself. He let the media turn himself into the cause of every problem whether, real, imagined or constructed out of whole cloth by the MSM. He let the GOP brand get covered by taint. But McCain was an idiot who focused on cleaning off that taint. Instead of attacking Obama over Wright, all McCain wanted to do was portray himself as a clean and honorable candidate. If anything was his schwerpunkt, it was that. Which explains why he threw any aggressive campaign aids under the bus and ran against wall street instead of the Democrats on the economy. One thing that really pissed me off about McCain is that he thought voters were too stupid to understand the underpinnings of the financial meltdown. It would've been easy to explain it to the electorate, but that would've been portrayed as negative campaigning. Also, perhaps he was worried the press would've stuck up for the Democrats, forcing him to bitch slap his old buddies in the press -- something he couldn't bring himself to do. So I do think McCain had a simple goal. But it was the worst one he could've chosen. Posted by: Tinian at November 05, 2008 01:54 AM (Ohodx) 314
280 Coleman up on Frankenstein by 30,000 votes with 67% reporting. Yeah be thankful for small mercies. It's looking like Coleman has a decent chance to survive. And in my district we had a retireing Repub and an open seat and it stayed repub. Posted by: SamIam at November 05, 2008 01:54 AM (jl7C/) 315
DC insiders were talking about Palin for a year. Palin was immediately hit by the press like Quayle was. McCain didn't defend her initially. They let her turn into the person who Obama actually was (inexperienced). I don't blame her.
McCain, you fuckers, was the problem. Just like Bush, who was too born again, to fight back, McCain was too "classy" to, how did he promise, "to fight for us." We nominated an unreliable RINO. We also have a shithead president who had 8 years to crack down on orgs like ACORN. He also could have actually used the bully pulpit to promote and defend his ideas. It's time for recriminations. I still believe in what I believe. I think it's time to find politicians (cough cough, romney/jindal 12) who do the same. AND who also have the capability to explain their thought processes. Posted by: joeindc44 at November 05, 2008 01:54 AM (yrMek) 316
"trashing the field"
Heh! Funny from the guy who started this by bashing the presumptive nominee. Posted by: someone at November 05, 2008 01:55 AM (zHoxL) 317
allheavens
Utter tripe. Your pronouncements have the effect of a"fart in my general direction." Articulate rather than "she's not very bright" please. That was the common refrain against Reagan. Posted by: locus ceruleus at November 05, 2008 01:55 AM (e2mBS) 318
Wonder if Bush is going to unveil irrefutable evidence of Bin Laden's corpse tomorrow, just so he didn't make it look like a political stunt.
Posted by: Big Fat Meanie at November 05, 2008 01:56 AM (n2eCn) 319
Get off McCain's ass ya bunch of fuckin stupid fucktards... Barry O won this election by outspending us... something that wont happen again
Posted by: MikeC at November 05, 2008 01:56 AM (XWJh5) 320
"ps How my a$$ taste! HAHAHAHAHAHAHa!" EK
Careful, lickle boy....momma's coming up the stairs and she won't be happy to see that her baby is typing naughty words just to act all grown up. Posted by: Peter Moore at November 05, 2008 01:56 AM (IT8KW) 321
Ace- wow I wasn't aware you had a choice of which theater you can serve in? That's interesting news, Mr. Military Expert. Had you not been stuffing cheeseburgers in your mouth when you were of age to enlist maybe someone could have told you that you go where the military tells you to go. I'm gonna "stand up, hook up, shuffle to the door" and leave you wingnuts to implode amongst yourselves. Posted by: Kos Kid at November 05, 2008 01:56 AM (t3TP5) 322
313. Yes
I have been harping for 2 years that being embarrassed about Bush 43 was a HUGE strategic mistake. W did a very good job. But those two idiots acted embarassed about bush AND they let Obama put the recent financial crisis solely on the republican party. Good job. If McCain couldn't fight for us. Then what good was he. Posted by: joeindc44 at November 05, 2008 01:57 AM (yrMek) 323
And like others here, I wonder if the PUMAs punked us as well.
Posted by: wherestherum at November 05, 2008 01:57 AM (wET2y) 324
Eh, I'd say McCain did better than I would have ever expected.
Yeah, cannot argue with that. It was always an uphill fight from day one, and with the economic crisis (and there is one), that pretty much negated his chances. My dad said something yesterday - he voted for Obama: all of his candidates for the last thirty years of his life lost. Maybe he doesn't know how to pick 'em, but this is a long term fight. That's fine. I don't think Obama will be Carter, I believe he will be Andrew Jackson (without the balls); and will do some amazingly destructive things to the economy, but we will recover, in time. Posted by: Vercingetorix at November 05, 2008 01:57 AM (iTDJo) Posted by: d at November 05, 2008 01:57 AM (vLzVJ) Posted by: SamIam at November 05, 2008 01:58 AM (jl7C/) 327
298
Never was a fan of Palin, not very bright. Yeah I said it. Posted by: allheavens at November 05, 2008 01:50 AM (mRLcU) I call astroturf on your shit, asshole. She's more eloquent that Plugs and Uh-uh-uh-bama. Unfortunately, I think she of her own volition will return to Alaska and remain there, her priority being her family, having been essentially drafted by McShamnesty. If she does come back to us, she will be weighed again and I say she has a bloody good chance so long as she doesn't carry too much old Rino dirt on her ex VP run. Posted by: CONSERVATISM '12 at November 05, 2008 01:58 AM (+gokV) 328
Palin will have a TV show. By 2012, it'll be clear to everyone that she's far from dumb, no matter what the MSM says. That trick is only going to work once.
Posted by: Dead Career Sketch at November 05, 2008 01:58 AM (JTN0y) 329
I'm sure someone's already said it, but I want to say it too. I hope this means we can start a new party of CONSERVATIVES. The REAL party of Reagan. Fuck the Republicans and their RINOs. I'm done with them. They've done nothing for their base. And they can't run a campaign to save their lives. We'll play dirty like the libs do. Racism is dead. After all, we just elected a black president. AMEN! Peter Moore at #218 is right. This battle was lost in the educational institutions of America. Our universities are the enemy and the breeding grounds of socialism and fascism. In their self righteousness they truly believe they represent a greater good. I urge all of you to fight this monster, deny it funding, attack its base, send your children to other, carefully selected institutions. The football team at dear old state U alma mater may tug at your emotions but the English , Sociology, and Feminine Studies Department are slowly undermining and destroying our society. And the administrations lack any moral spine to curtail this decay. They only seek the $$ required to construct little intellectual napoleonic empires. When "YourU" Development Fund calls, tell them to get stuffed! It can be extremely satisfying AMEN! AMEN! AMEN!
Posted by: ethel at November 05, 2008 01:58 AM (LHasg) Posted by: andycanuck at November 05, 2008 01:58 AM (GGy7k) 331
Public financing's done. Good for our side. Now we need to identify good conservative governors for the next go 'round.
Posted by: hedghog at November 05, 2008 01:59 AM (aDOKh) 332
306 "Peter Moore at #218 is right. This battle was lost in the educational institutions of America."
My wife and I just watched Expelled with Ben Stein. Truly scary. Posted by: locus ceruleus at November 05, 2008 01:59 AM (e2mBS) 333
This fits right into our plans. These fuckers are so stupid. We smart conservatives are alligning ourselves with B.O.'s brownshirts and setting up a Bolshevik, brownshirt apocolypse.
Muuuuuhahahayhahahaa!!!!!!!!!!!!!. We planned this shit faggots, and when your ass is gettin' shipped offf to the north pole or gettin' a bullet in your mug, us conservtatives will give you a wink, right before sending you to your demise you fuckin', Bolshevik+Nazi. You guys have been had. Look up "The Domination", you fucks just got fucked. Bwwaaaahahahahahahahaahahahahahahah!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Posted by: The Draka at November 05, 2008 02:00 AM (+FzLa) 334
I'm sure someone's already said it, but I want to say it too. I hope this means we can start a new party of CONSERVATIVES. The REAL party of Reagan. Fuck the Republicans and their RINOs. I'm done with them. They've done nothing for their base. And they can't run a campaign to save their lives. We'll play dirty like the libs do. Racism is dead. After all, we just elected a black president. I'll climb on top of that wagon. Posted by: Ginger at November 05, 2008 02:00 AM (PJjjl) 335
Couldn't agree more with Ace's post. It's time conservatives take back the Republican Party and throw the pussy RINOs out on their asses.
Posted by: George Moneo at November 05, 2008 02:00 AM (JP33a) 336
Obama's endorsement from Al Gore didn't come soon enough. Posted by: Cincinnatus at November 05, 2008 02:01 AM (ZAlQ3) 337
Mike C, McCain was outspent because no conservative wanted to give him money. And I won't give any to another RINO ever.
Posted by: mare at November 05, 2008 02:02 AM (X1fsj) 338
Yes Gov Palin is an awesome human being. I love her. But it doesn't make her a good candidate for president. Through (almost) no fault of her own, her "brand" was ruined by the media. That's it. End of chapter.
In just 2 months she surpassed Hillary Clinton's negatives. She's been Dan Quayled. Posted by: Bart at November 05, 2008 02:02 AM (t9PoL) 339
I did think before I posted and I stand by my post about Palin. She is not the future to the Republican party, REAL conservatives or not.
Did she ever utter a coherent sentence that was not scripted? My four-year-old has better command of the English language and his thought processes. Posted by: allheavens at November 05, 2008 02:02 AM (mRLcU) 340
Karen, when they illegalize monogamy will you be my second wife, I'll give you the other half of my unemployment check.
Posted by: mydemonsdriveon at November 05, 2008 02:02 AM (ahrXH) 341
Romney will be a fucking dem before 4 years are up. He was like McCain, he only moved right when it suited him. Sarah Palin, Bobby Jindal and David Pretraus will be our next hope of kicking out the racist, marxist asshole we just elected.
Posted by: robtr at November 05, 2008 02:02 AM (C6ME0) Posted by: Ginger at November 05, 2008 02:03 AM (PJjjl) 343
The fact that the Axelturfers are still here slagging on Palin tells it all.
Palin scares the fuck out of them. Posted by: Dead Career Sketch at November 05, 2008 02:03 AM (JTN0y) 344
Sarah Palin and those like her are the future of the GOP, we have to change the party leadership, if we don't it's gonna be a long time before we get another majority in Congress..... Jindal/Palin or Palin/Jindal? Posted by: shoey at November 05, 2008 02:04 AM (RxUMK) 345
For my fellow Californians, the state propositions look hopeful 1A - NO 2 - YES - (I know it's more liberal, but I want farm animals treated humanely) 3 - NO 4 - NO ( that's bad for conservatives 5 - NO 6 - NO 7 - NO 8 - YES ( this one will ruin Andrew Sullivan's night if it passes) 9 - NO 10 - NO 11 - NO 12 - YES
Posted by: KBDaBear at November 05, 2008 02:04 AM (miw86) 346
Bart
"In just 2 months she surpassed Hillary Clinton's negatives. She's been Dan Quayled." Sir, Dan Quayle was a pussy. Sarah ain't no pussy! Posted by: locus ceruleus at November 05, 2008 02:04 AM (e2mBS) 347
Since Obama won, blacks can no longer say the "man" is keeping them down. If he does not live up to his hype he will be like Episode 1 was to all the Star Wars freaks. When they think "I waited how long for this shit?".
Obama has a huge job ahead of him and a huge ego. Like those with huge egos they usually write checks their body can't cash. He already did that during the campaign, the DEMS do not have a filibuster proof congress. He will not be able to do everythign he says he will. He even said we will not be able to solve all the problems as he is trying to soften the sting when he cannot enace all of this "CHANGE" and his "HOPE" begins to fade as the idealism of his campaign becomes tempered by reality. Posted by: Gary B at November 05, 2008 02:05 AM (iInYK) 348
By the way, boys: you'd best be collecting that check from Axelrod if you haven't already. He doesn't need you any more, and I hear he has a real short memory.
If I were you, I'd be concentrating on what you're going to do now that you have your wish. You wanted the big boy chair, you got it. Now everything that goes wrong is gonna be your fault.
Posted by: Dead Career Sketch at November 05, 2008 02:05 AM (JTN0y) 349
298
Never was a fan of Palin, not very bright. Yeah I said it. FUCK YOU, allheavens. How many huge crowds did YOU draw? What are YOUR accomplishments? Just post your bio here, ASSHOLE. So we can judge. What state do YOU govern, asshole? ASSHOLE????
Posted by: fulldroolcup at November 05, 2008 02:05 AM (aLDzD) 350
Does the EK not realize that it's a few months away from being drafted into the 3rd Hussein Brigade of the Oborg Civilian Force and will spend all its free time cleaning out rat-infested stairwells in Detroit housing projects? Oh, and his supervisor? A black panther with a billy club.
Posted by: TiredWench at November 05, 2008 02:05 AM (VVOw6) 351
@338 Sadly, I have to agree with that assessment. Between the MSM and McCain's incompetents handling her, she was given a raw deal. I hope her fellow Alaskans welcome her home in style. Posted by: Gran at November 05, 2008 02:05 AM (mTWN+) 352
JackStraw @233,
I agree with you completely, although there is nothing to "agree" with. You just stated the facts. Posted by: mare at November 05, 2008 02:06 AM (X1fsj) 353
re:#306 MikeD Mike, the universites are going to be fully funded indoctrination centers now. Part of the Obaplan is to get every kiddy into them whether he belongs or not. All they have to do is "volunteer" in his brownshirt brigades where their re-education starts, then they qualify for huge taxpayer cash to continue it in college. Sure, the significance of a degree will fall through the floor but that doesn't matter. Indoctrination does. This is coming, it's too late. America jumped off the cliff tonight. Obama is going to emulate the Hugo Chavez model and maintain the appearance of everything being "legal." Getting the kids taught properly is an integral part of what Obama plans.
Posted by: SamIam at November 05, 2008 02:07 AM (jl7C/) 354
I've now allowed myself all the time I can spare for sadness and despair. It's time to fight. It's time to take back the "Grand Old Party," dust off the detritus of the RINO's, shine our shields, buckle on our breast plates, sharpen our swords, and march off to battle. The clarion call goes forth from here ... from this time and this place ... to all who believe in liberty, to all who believe in the American dream, to all who believe in personal responsibility, and most of all, to all who believe in a culture of life. I will not give in, I will not give up, I will not back off, and I will not stand down. I will fight. I will fight with everything I have. I know no other way. The days of compromise are over. We cannot allow even the stray thought that we might be able to find common ground with the Democrat/Liberal party. That is the path of defeat. And I do not intend to lose. Posted by: Michael at November 05, 2008 02:07 AM (BnbnR) 355
Funny from the guy who started this by bashing the presumptive nominee.
Well, if Gov Palin is the best we got... Like I said, she needs to begin her reelection campaign right now. Posted by: Bart at November 05, 2008 02:08 AM (t9PoL) Posted by: locus ceruleus at November 05, 2008 02:09 AM (e2mBS) 357
"Barry O won this election by outspending us... something that wont happen again"
Why not ? The big corporations will put money behind the guys they think are winners, the MSM won't report on 'Bama's crooked financing and a Leftwing Govt ain't about to start regulating it's own spending. Anyway, the "honorable" old man cost us this election.....he would have fought harder on a shuffleboard court than he fought to stop Obama. All that "old boy network" bullshit about Obama being a good man - yeah right ! The old codger refused to attack Wright and still got called a racist by "Bama and his media cock-suckers. McCain is Colonel Blimp....if you don't know who it is then check out the film....it's about an "honourable" old fashioned military man in the 1920s who always plays by Queensbury rules....always admires his enemies and then along comes WW2 and Blimp is asked to organise a war game to train the Brit army. He's sitting there in his club , drinking brandy when this young officer from the other side in the war game bursts into the club with his men and capture the old fart. "What are you doing ? This isn't cricket !" Blimp cries out. "That's right " says the young officer " This is war and we're fighting to save our country and we won't do it by being honorable, we'll do it by winning" Posted by: Peter Moore at November 05, 2008 02:09 AM (IT8KW) 358
She has 86% approval in state.
She's not gonna lose. Your boy didn't even run, because he knew he'd get tossed. Posted by: someone at November 05, 2008 02:10 AM (zHoxL) 359
295: *hunkers down like a beaten dog* My wife likes those channels I mentioned. She hates the computer.
Posted by: mydemonsdriveon at November 05, 2008 02:11 AM (ahrXH) 360
339
I did think before I posted and I stand by my post about Palin. She is not the future to the Republican party, REAL conservatives or not.
Did she ever utter a coherent sentence that was not scripted? My four-year-old has better command of the English language and his thought processes. Yeah, Alldipshit, that's how she got elected a state governor. Everything was all scripted out for her. By someone, certainly not the entrenched bigwigs she beat. Aside from your four year old "mistake", what have you ever created?
Posted by: fulldroolcup at November 05, 2008 02:12 AM (aLDzD) 361
I love Palin for what she stands for and the enthusiasm she generates, but I seriously doubt she can handle the job. We don't need another dumbass or perceived dumbass like W in the White House.
Posted by: pirate of the perineum at November 05, 2008 02:12 AM (c3QiE) 362
Tune into Rush tomorrow for more of the same analysis. After Fordism and Bob Dolism, we must ensure this RINO groupthink never happens again.
One thing to be sure of: McCain will sabotage any efforts to stop Obama's liberal agenda with more gangs and compromises. Posted by: Valiant at November 05, 2008 02:13 AM (KByvo) 363
This is the first time this country elected a president/vice president who have never served in the military since Herbert Hoover. Not only that but Joe Biden is a fucking Jody! Putin must be having his coffee this morning looking over the map of the US smiling.
Posted by: robtr at November 05, 2008 02:13 AM (C6ME0) 364
She has 86% approval in state. Not anymore she doesn't. Not even in a Republican state of less than a million people spread out over a state larger than Texas. She has great principles. When can we start judging her as a politician just like any other candidate? I'm pretty sure the rest of the world already has. Posted by: JackStraw at November 05, 2008 02:17 AM (VW9/y) 365
No. Not Romney.
Not Fred, not Mike, not Rudy, maybe not even Sarah. Somebody with a plan. A short, sweet, irresistibly bold plan. - Abolish the income tax - Implement a single consumption tax - Mandate a 10% federal spending cut every year for 4 years - Secure the borders - Strengthen the military - Unburden small business Hell, choose any four of those - I don't care. Is that so much to ask? Posted by: Greg Griffith at November 05, 2008 02:17 AM (6cvPQ) 366
Pirate, don't you get it yet? Anyone who is a republican will be labeled or perceived as a dumbass. Haven't you been paying attention? Liberals are smart. Conservatives are dumb. Get with the program.
Posted by: mare at November 05, 2008 02:19 AM (X1fsj) 367
361: too late, a new dumbass is about to enter the White House.
And I think Palin could handle the job fine. By all accounts she's a political natural with a photographic memory. If she keeps doing impressive political cleanup work in Alaska and engages in a little brand fixup here and there on the Sunday shows she'd be ready for 2012. Posted by: Ian S. at November 05, 2008 02:19 AM (pg/HS) 368
Putin is looking over the map of Eastern Europe smiling robtr.
Posted by: hedghog at November 05, 2008 02:22 AM (aDOKh) 369
Here is McCain's problem. Be all things to all people. Fence sitter. Well, there have been words written about fence sitters. I know thy works, that thou art neither cold nor hot: I would thou wert cold or hot. So then because thou art lukewarm, and neither cold nor hot, I will spue thee out of my mouth. ~Rev. 3:15-16 I don't want to see that man run for anything again because of the pussy that he is. He played nice and the nice guy finished last. The bully is fucking the prom queen right. fucking. now. McCain is jacking off in the stall. I want to see Romney, Jindal, Palin, Crist, Newt. I want big, swinging balls before us. Stones, even. I want leadership. This pansy-assed reach-across-the-isle bullshit is done. For losers, obviously. Fuck these fucking liberals. The country just started running toward the cliff, and God help us to keep it from going all the way over. Posted by: I'm into Stitches at November 05, 2008 02:22 AM (KyqYb) 370
I am thinking a combination of David Petreaus/Sarah Palin 2012. It's obvious Palin scares the panties off astroturfers like Jack Straw and the other wonderful little pricks that have blessed us with their pressance tonight. Posted by: robtr at November 05, 2008 02:22 AM (C6ME0) 371
"No. Not Romney.
Not Fred, not Mike, not Rudy, maybe not even Sarah." Listen, I'm telling you again. This is the Republican Party. It will NEVER nominate a national politics newcomer to be President. Posted by: someone at November 05, 2008 02:22 AM (zHoxL) 372
Colonel Blimp. (For Peter Moore.) Posted by: andycanuck at November 05, 2008 02:22 AM (GGy7k) 373
>>>Romney didn't have any fucking aides after the primary. They worked
for McCain. They were on his payroll. They were McCain aides.
Dude, they're Romney loyalists. Don't be deliberately unclever. I do not myself understand the sort of passion Romney inspires in some -- for me, I liked, not loved him -- but I do see it in a lot of Romneyites. You guys are getting the reputation of The Candidate and His Supporters Who Do Not Play Nice With Other Republicans. I'm advising some chillage, if only tactically. Posted by: ace at November 05, 2008 02:23 AM (8T2pi) 374
Have gas prices gone up yet.
No more drill baby drill. Excuse me, I need to check the air in my tires. Posted by: Kolchak at November 05, 2008 02:25 AM (//Qr5) 375
Palin scares the panties off astroturfers like Jack Straw and the other wonderful little pricks that have blessed us with their pressance tonight. Yea, I just got here tonight. Who the fuck are you again? Posted by: JackStraw at November 05, 2008 02:25 AM (VW9/y) 376
well, they can't do that to Jindal, he's smarter than all of them. they can call him crazy jesus freak, but that's not gonna fly
Posted by: pirate of the perineum at November 05, 2008 02:25 AM (c3QiE) 377
Palin Jindal 2012
Or put Fred in there somewhere.
Sarah Palin is 1.refreshing, 2.DEAD on with her views 3Damn near reaganesque in presentation, 4SOLID, I really have little doubt she is going to sell me out down the road on pretty much everything I agree with her on 5. holding up prettuy damn good after the press onslaught she had to face. Hell, you would have thought she was the Presidential.. ....wait, that doesn't work- Obama got a pass compared to her-
You would have thought she had asked the all holy annointed one a tough question or something!
If you can't see that, you are either a press addled fool or an elitist snob, but I repeat myself.
Don't sweat it, you are in good(if mypoic) company- Will, Noonan, and a few others went stupid over Palin. I see it now:
"Damn, It is terrible all those coal miners out of work miners out of work in OH, PA,WV, & IN. Too bad small business cratered over Obama's tax hikes. But seriously, so what a nuke went off in an American city- at least McCain didn't take office with teat Alaskan Governor as a VP- I am SOOOOO MUCH HAPPIER we have an unqualified haven't lead anything Obama at the helm with his Quack sidekick Biden to keep him straight. "
Please. Posted by: Gerry Owen at November 05, 2008 02:27 AM (oGv5F) 378
The really sad thing about all of this will be McCain going back to his kick-fellow-Republicans-in-the-nuts mode of operation.
Expect him to facilitate BO's initiatives. Posted by: rinseandspit at November 05, 2008 02:27 AM (oEAm5) 379
I do not myself understand the sort of passion Romney inspires in some.
He's got great hair. And his kids punk'd him. That's totally awesome. Posted by: Editor at November 05, 2008 02:27 AM (p4YSL) 380
steve, it's not a big distinction, with all due respect. I cited a where as a schwerpunkt.
And McCain didn't have a where-schwerpunkt, like "Where does he wish to lead us?" No worries, Ace. You're right, I see now that you did indeed cite a "where" as a schwerpunkt. I'm just gabbing. The schwerpunkt concept makes for an interesting topic of discussion, endlessly arguable. Also applicable in many endeavors other than war, as you astutely observed. I like your analogy and basically agree with your analysis. I suppose I was being nit-picky. I'm a military historian and analyst by profession and I can't resist a discussion like this. Unfortunately I'm not having a very good night, even in my supposed area of expertise--I know I don't have to explain why. Posted by: Steve (aka Ed Snate, aka Col. Kurtz) at November 05, 2008 02:27 AM (41Acy) 381
As to few people asking about the "PUMAs".....they weren't conning you. They existed. But the few you've seen we're just passionate activists on websites. They were never a "movement". If you looked at the polls, Obama had the Democrats locked up, even more so than McCain had Republicans locked up. There just weren't that many PUMAs that existed. So when you read "Hillbuzz" and other sites, you were just believing what you wanted to believe, i.e that there was a big Dem minority out there that was going to vote for McCain. Posted by: Bob at November 05, 2008 02:27 AM (4DoFz) 382
Posted by: Bob at November 05, 2008 02:27 AM (4DoFz)
Yeah, Bob - that was always the caveat we were afraid to recognize as a huge possibility. Slublog '10. Posted by: Editor at November 05, 2008 02:30 AM (p4YSL) 383
Palin scares me because I'm afraid she'll be turned into another RINO.
Posted by: pirate of the perineum at November 05, 2008 02:30 AM (c3QiE) 384
Take a page out of Newt's playbook.
A new Contract with America. New party leadership. Steele Jindal for starters Posted by: d at November 05, 2008 02:30 AM (vLzVJ) 385
Peter Moore's post was excellent. It's the message, how it's massaged, and how often it is delivered. There are institutional biases that will blunt any message from the Right until either a) the institutions are infiltrated by an alternate and competing POV, or b) an especially effective frontman or frontmen can communicate an overarching ideology that grabs people by the shirt collar and wakes them up. The GOP lacked an effective head and the tarnish of middling, same-ol' same-ol' wasn't going to wake up anyone. "Compassionate conservatism" should have been buried long ago and remains a taint that really damaged the GOP brand. Lots of hands over an extended period did that.
So, any chance we actually go conservative now, or is it still du jour to move Left to get the "centrist" vote? That seems to be, um, unproductive. If the nation really is turning socialist European, then we're up shit creek. Maybe we are already, and it would be hard to argue otherwise. But before we concede wholly, maybe burning an effigy of "compassionate conservatism" and actually promoting just conservatism deserves one more try. As to Palin, she's still a star to me. I hope she returns to Alaska, keeps doing what she has been doing, and tries again ASAP with a retooled, conservative machine to climb the mountain. Palin made me excited about politics again. McCain just pissed me off. Obama/Axelrod just scared me. Still do. But there's no question that an ideological movement needs to be redefined with new players willing to fight for the Right and who can communicate in spite of the institutional muzzles that constrain conservatives. Palin can do that and probably better now without McCain's political constraints keeping her back. Voices like hers and people like the Palins will be needed in vast numbers to reanimate the Reagan ghosts. Posted by: AnonymousDrivel at November 05, 2008 02:31 AM (sI5Ho) 386
Yea, I just got here tonight. Who the fuck are you again? robtr jack, the fact that you have been a long term astroturfer doesn't make you Jesus. Posted by: robtr at November 05, 2008 02:33 AM (C6ME0) 387
I agree with some of the posters above, I voted in my first election for Carter in 76: oops. Have never voted for a Democrat again. We'll survive 4 years of Osama.
My one concern though, and what upsets me, is the lack of replacements on the GOP side. McCain's defeat has one bright side--it sends out the old-timers to pasture once and for all. It also makes it DEATH within the party to be a RINO, and that's very much of a good thing. But where is the cavalry? I hear Palin, Jindal and Steele, I certainly hope there are more options than that which emerge in the coming months. Posted by: SarahGroupie at November 05, 2008 02:33 AM (m8WKL) 388
#306. The teachers union is the most powerful union in the country. This is why home schooling and the voucher system are so popular. What is the saying, something about when you are too much of a loser to succeed what do you do? you teach.
Posted by: incredulous at November 05, 2008 02:34 AM (zplc6) 389
we'll also need to turn off AVS for our campaign donation systems, so big republican donors can donate over the limit.
Posted by: pirate of the perineum at November 05, 2008 02:34 AM (c3QiE) 390
383
Palin scares me because I'm afraid she'll be turned into another RINO.
Posted by: pirate of the perineum at November 05, 2008 02:30 AM (c3QiE) I'm afraid you're wrong. She's made it very clear that she's more Conservative small "l" libertarian and that she wants to be on the national stage leading the party, but ONLY if they are clear on the principals and stick to them. Posted by: Editor at November 05, 2008 02:34 AM (p4YSL) 391
386
Yea, I just got here tonight. Who the fuck are you again? robtr jack, the fact that you have been a long term astroturfer doesn't make you Jesus. Posted by: robtr at November 05, 2008 02:33 AM (C6ME0) Ehh, not sure you noticed rob, but they already won. I doubt they are still paying people to astroturf. Posted by: obscenely fat sweaty he-bitch AKA ClassicCon at November 05, 2008 02:34 AM (0e8KW) 392
Hey I have an idea.
Let's stop nominating our next president and let's focus on our unambitious do-nothing leaders in the House and Senate. Our main focus for the next few months should be to put extreme pressure on Boehner and McConnell to advance the Conservative agenda and be ruthless opposition to the Democrats. Posted by: Bart at November 05, 2008 02:35 AM (t9PoL) 393
Ace, BTW, coincidentally I am currently Jehuda L. Wallach's The Dogma of the Battle of Annihilation: The Theories of Clauswitz and Schlieffen and Their Impact on the German Conduct of Two World War. Fascinating--it might interest you. Lots of discussion on what Clausewitz meant when using the term "schwerpunkt." Lots of controvery, no general consensus. It seems even Clausewitz had different meanings for it, depending on which section of On War you're reading. I'm reading the book as part of my research on a a lengthy piece I'm writing about the fallacies of battle-centric warfare as exemplified, in particular, by Hannibal in the Second Punic War. This is what I do for fun, along with herding sheep with my border collies. Anyway, I'll drop the subject before I cause the discussion to spin off into another "longbow" tangent. Posted by: Steve (aka Ed Snate, aka Col. Kurtz) at November 05, 2008 02:35 AM (41Acy) 394
BTW,
Can we agree that despite our skepticism, amazingly, the media polls were actually pretty damn accurate in the end? Sure, I won't argue that there may be some degree of "self-fulfilling prophecy" amongst the half of Americans that are dumbass sheeple, but even so, the numbers are almost dead-on. Except for PA, WTF happened there? Goddamn PUMAs. Posted by: SarahGroupie at November 05, 2008 02:36 AM (m8WKL) Posted by: Dead Career Sketch at November 05, 2008 02:36 AM (JTN0y) 396
Dude, they're Romney loyalists. Don't be deliberately unclever And don't you be deliberately obtuse. You made a living out of slamming McCain during the Amnesty shit. Does that mean you have been a secret agent out to derail McCain during the general?
There comes a point where a rumor becomes a legend and you are doing your damnest to reinforce it. I woke my ass out of bed at the crack of dark in Boston to vote for McCain. Romney has worked his ass off for months to elect McCain after he graciously bowed out far earlier than Hillary did. He has spent considerable personal and political capital on McCain. Even the Mav has lavished him with praise. Still, any chance you get to take shots at people who supported Romney in the primary you take it with the same "I don't get what people who supported Romney saw so let me shit on them again" line. You might want to rethink the oh so clever insider bullshit and look at the facts. Romney has campaigned harder, spent more political capital and raised more money than any other surrogate in this election. Period. Posted by: JackStraw at November 05, 2008 02:38 AM (VW9/y) 397
Is there no one to rid us of the odious phrase:
"I can reach across the aisle"
???
Or has History done just that??
Posted by: fulldroolcup at November 05, 2008 02:38 AM (aLDzD) 398
Ehh, not sure you noticed rob, but they already won. I doubt they are still paying people to astroturf. Maybe they 2 hours wasn't enough time to get the pink slips out or maybe they are just playing for the next election. Posted by: robtr at November 05, 2008 02:39 AM (C6ME0) 399
We got our asses kicked. It was our own fault. We let those who craved power for power's sake speak for us. (tom delay). We did not cull from our midst the corrupt (jack abramoff and those he corrupted). We let the economic collapse caused be the socialist CRA act be blamed on us. People stopped listening to us becuase we let Ron Emanuel and the liars in his propganda wing of the demo party relentlessly speak against us. A war hero lost to a man whose has 20+ year association with the terrorist william ayers (3 dead policeman, one almost dead supreme court judge and family, several robbed banks). People don't listen to us because they don't trust us. We kept power not through being steadfast to our ideals. We kept power by being a little less liberal than the democrats just to keep power. We lost becuase we deserved to. Now it is time to get up and get moving. We did not lose by much. Two years from now we will gain alot of those seats back. Four years from now we can regain the whitehouse if we rebuild the peoples faith in the party. Limited government. Thank you John Mccain. I was honored to have you as my candidate. I would have been honored to have you as my president. ps we should shoot the next person who says the polls are biased against republicans.
Posted by: pete at November 05, 2008 02:41 AM (jsdnL) 400
I'd love to see Romney as the Chair of the RNC. Time for a grownup in there. Now what about the RNCC and RNSC?
Posted by: XBradTC at November 05, 2008 02:41 AM (6vAfW) 401
Dunno about you folks, but tomorrow I'm calling the RNC and telling them that I'm leaving the party ASAP. I'll join the Libertarians or Constitution Party and will rejoin the Republicans if and when they drop the RINO shit. Awesome. Concede total defeat. Give your country away to MoveOn.org. ABC is saying republican turnout was the lowest in over 20 years That is fucking pathetic. McCain and the dreaded RINOs are not to blame for that particular statistic. The problem is that the Republican Party is chock full of fucking idiots who claim to be conservatives but don’t understand the simple logic that staying home or voting for Barr is effectively the same as giving ½ a vote away to the biggest socialist radical in American presidential history. (Not to mention signing a death warrant for millions of unborn babies if you’re a Pro-Lifer). This statistic is especially egregious when you look at the popular vote. Barry has an electoral landslide but not a popular vote landslide. There are several states where his win was tiny. More Republicans could have made all the difference in the world in a few key states. (If Montana goes to Barry I’m going to go apeshit. That will be SOLEY due to Republican fucktards “sending the party a message.” ) While I appreciate Ace’s post and agree wholeheartedly with him that the next Republican presidential candidate needs to have a more articulate conservative vision, the comments on this thread are beyond depressing. Clearly, the loons at Daily Kos (that are now effectively in charge of our country for at least the next 2 years thankyouverymuch Republicans that stayed home or voted for Barr rather than vote for a RINO), do not own the market on whininess, absence of personal responsibility, and Stalinist vilification of dissenters. When is this analysis going to turn inward? When are you guys going to look at yourselves and see what you may or may not have done to help create this loss? RE: Palin. She can come back. But she needs to be able to discuss international issues much more coherently. Her failure to do that in the MSM interviews and the media’s all out assault on her character are what did her in. Not the fact that the McCain camp kept her from attacking Barry on Rev. Wright. That’s idiotic. Plenty of people already knew about Wright thanks to the Democratic primaries. Apparently they didn’t care. It’s almost like 52% of the American people were either brainwashed by Barry’s Messiah act or blinded by Bush Derangement Syndrome. Posted by: Tversky at November 05, 2008 02:42 AM (DBB37) 402
I'm afraid you're wrong. She's made it very clear that she's more
Conservative small "l" libertarian and that she wants to be on the
national stage leading the party, but ONLY if they are clear on the
principals and stick to them.
She can't lead the party if she doesn't learn how to speak in coherent sentences. I'm placing all my hopes on Jindal instead. He actually appears to be able to articulate conservative principles and be able to defend them when challenged. Posted by: pirate of the perineum at November 05, 2008 02:42 AM (c3QiE) 403
BTW--
The Brownshirts are already talking about offering McCain the SecDef job as a sign of "bipartisanship." Bullshit. They're offering it so Napolitano can nominate a Dem replacement for McCain in the Senate. And the fucking RINO old man will probably take the job, "duty to country" and all. You're a fine American, but a shitty politician, Johnny Mac. Posted by: SarahGroupie at November 05, 2008 02:42 AM (m8WKL) 404
It almost seems like McCain was trying not to win.
Posted by: incredulous at November 05, 2008 02:43 AM (zplc6) 405
Why did we lose? It goes way beyond McCain's defects. 1. Pigs at the trough - a) Dems - "It (the election) is also .... the triumph of the subsidized over the victimized.....The Democrats may have reached their long-term goal of placing more than half the population in dependency on the party of government." http://www.seablogger.com/ b) Reps - We played that game too when we controlled both houses. And we did so in part because the temptation to spend other peoples' money 'compassionately', combined with the constant pressure from 'special interests', proved to be irresistable (and fatal). Result - it's very difficult to build a successful political party based on the premise of NOT doing people 'favors'. The Reps tried and failed dismally, both money-wise and electorally - the worst of both worlds. But for the Dems doing favors is their life's blood, and they can from their point of view get the best of both worlds by doing exactly what for the Reps is a losing stategy. 2. Resentment - Most of the people who post here, and dare I say it, most Republicans, are remarkably free from greed, envy, jealousy, resentment etc. This is in part because we're overwhelmingly white, so don't feel the resentment that blacks do, but it's also in part because it's how we're brought up and how we believe one should be. The Dems in contrast are full of envy, jealousy, resentment and let's face it greed. And yet they think those vices are virtues, and do everything they can to fan the flames of these destructive emotions. (And it helps explain the amazing number of rich people who are Dems. - rich people are all too often greedy and they are full of resentment) 3. Jewish and gay apartness from straight Christian white people - This is something that is never mentioned, but which I think explains their loyalty to the party that blacks (who feel apart from white people generally) identify with. Without these 3 groups, the Dems would never win a single election. But when they stick together they can often enough beat the group that from their perspective is overwhelmingly composed of people they are apart from. 4. Big Media - their influence is still much greater than it should be. For many people, it's easier (much easier) to go with the line put out by Big Media. It's socially acceptable, and they don't have to fear 'Big Brother' coming after them, since they are toeing the line. What do we do going forward? Taking my 4 points is oresr: 1. Try to make the Reps the party of NOT SPENDING, except for national defense and the party of letting people keep what they earn, and of not subsidizing those who don't earn. 2. Don't know, except to try to emphasize the essential goodness of America and the destructiveness of emotions like envy and jealousy. 3. Accept that they feel apart, but try to make it clear that they have no reason to do so given how we behave towards them. 4. Do everything we can to get Big Media to go out of business. Posted by: maxxman at November 05, 2008 02:47 AM (OYeDg) 406
Karl Rove said on Fox that "they" had a better voter registration. Why didn't the republicans do voter registration drives?
Posted by: incredulous at November 05, 2008 02:48 AM (zplc6) 407
#394...See most post at #381. As to the Romney partisans (or Fred!, Giuliani, etc. supporters....I liked Giuliana also actually), I had a post way earlier I"m not going to to look for that essentailly argued that with Bush with a low rating, the economy, the bailout, etc. McCain was the best we could do because he was the "anti-Republican" Republican. He could've campaigned better, maybe won another state or two, but the GOP was just fated to lose this year. Being more conservative wouldn't have helped and would probably have hurt.
Posted by: Bob at November 05, 2008 02:48 AM (4DoFz) 408
EK -- you know that every fucking penny you've been paid by the O campaign is never going to see your wallet.
And your ass is going to get drafted into the Red Guard. When that happens, boy, CYA. Ace will treat you like a fucking hobo. Posted by: troll patroller (home version) at November 05, 2008 02:49 AM (UMePk) 409
Holy shit! Ted Stevens is winning? I'm sorry, but this is not good news for the Republican Party. We need to get his ass impeached and his replacement named by Sarah.
Posted by: Jim62sch at November 05, 2008 02:50 AM (6rQXk) 410
...I think Obama will grow irritated with it in a couple of years when he realizeds he can't simply wave his hands and make serious problems go away. This has been my experience with every affirmative action leader I've had the displeasure to do business with. He will FAIL and FAIL BIG.
Posted by: Max Rockatansky at November 05, 2008 02:51 AM (X7Ey1) 411
392 Hey I have an idea.
Let's stop nominating our next president and let's focus on our unambitious do-nothing leaders in the House and Senate. Our main focus for the next few months should be to put extreme pressure on Boehner and McConnell to advance the Conservative agenda and be ruthless opposition to the Democrats. Ding, Ding, Ding - we have a winner, folks! Posted by: Marybeth at November 05, 2008 02:53 AM (Sa6g/) 412
McCain lost for two major reasons. The first and greatest reason was the media. The media was responsible for choosing him in the first place. They wanted a liberal Republican, preferably Rudi, Romney, or McCain. He was always their darling on the Republican side because he liked to cross the aisle and stick his thumb in the eye of the conservatives and all Republicans in general. Those of us with half a brain knew they would turn on him though like the rabid dogs they are.
Well with all their “fire in the belly” remarks and “humor” directed at Huckabee they whittled it down to the 3 most liberal candidates, none of who got more than 30% with McCain finally getting the nod.
Then, as predicted, they turned on him. I have never seen the media so openly biased. Sure, they have always been in the tank for the Dems but this time it was like they didn’t care that it was obvious. They safely his every embarrassing thing that Obama had and magnified McCain’s faults as well as just making up lies about him and Palin both.
The biggest thing they did to cause the loss was blaming the banking crisis on McCain and Republicans in general. After the Palin nomination McCain’s fortunes were rising and Obama was sinking. The media managed to sink McCain by repeating the communist talking points of deregulation and Wall Street greed. I honestly believe that without that McCain would have won.
Add to that the fact that McCain refused to fight back on that score, or when he did it was too weakly done and too late.
The other major reason he lost was that he NEVER had the support of the party base. Most of his support was lackluster and characterized by “the lesser of two evils” syndrome. The base was sick of George Bush “compassionate socialism” and they could see round II of that coming.
It wasn’t until Palin was nominated that the base got any energy at all. That being said, I think there was still a significant portion of the base that stayed home or voted 3rd party. When the finals come in we will see.
We will see a lot of the pundits rationalizing the “defeat of conservatism” and a new era in politics. This is BS of course and exactly what the media would like to promote. The liberal Republicans will want to blame Palin and the Romney crowd has already started that before the campaign was even over.
What the Republican Party needs to do is purge all the asshole liberals and they need to change the rules for the primaries so that in order to win, the candidate must have the support of the party, not 30% with half of that being crossover votes. Posted by: Vic at November 05, 2008 02:55 AM (Qd7GC) 413
96% of blacks voted for BO. 4% voted for McCain. Am I the only person who sees this as a sort of reverse racism? I've never voted for a candidate cause they were white yet, black Americans really did vote for BO cause he was black. Wonder how they will eventually analyze that one?
Posted by: incredulous at November 05, 2008 02:55 AM (zplc6) 414
I know the left blames Bush for every damn thing, but I lay the death of the Republican party at his feet. In 8 years he (and the RINOs) has managed to obliterate the party and what it stood for. I don't know enough about Bush Sr.'s term, but I bet that was the beginning of the end of the party.
And never again will I underestimate the stupidity and gullibility of the American public. Score one for public education!/sarc Posted by: wherestherum at November 05, 2008 02:56 AM (wET2y) 415
Incredulous: It does seem that way. But the truth of the matter is even more troubling. He was trying to win but he didn't know how to win. Both his strategy and tactics were flawed. As Ace pointed out, he didn't, couldn't, identify the schwerpunkt of his campaign. Another military analogy might be applicable, one pertaining to the operational level of warfare. In some instances he fought and won tactical battles. The choice of Palin, in my opinion, is a case in point. In the days immediately following her selection and triumphal appearance at the GOP convention, McCain's rating surged. He had scored a tactical victory. But he didn't know how to exploit it. In other words, he didn't know how to make the transition from the tactical level of warfare to the operational level, where exploitation takes place. He didn't understand the the politcal applications of the operational art. Which should come as no surprise, given his background as an attack aircraft pilot. Attack aircraft are tactical weapons, and their mission is tactical in nature. His politcal thinking was an extension of his military experience. Posted by: Steve (aka Ed Snate, aka Col. Kurtz) at November 05, 2008 02:56 AM (41Acy) 416
incredulous: "Wonder how they will eventually analyze that one?"
They'll call you an insensitive racist for bringing it up. It's in the playbook. Posted by: AnonymousDrivel at November 05, 2008 02:57 AM (sI5Ho) 417
Jesus fucking christ Ace. One thing that has pissed me off since the beginning is the rightblogs bitching about McCain, he should have done this, he should have done that blah blah blah.
No other Republican would have stood a chance this year. Without the big hit of the financial mess, which was not his fault, he might have pulled it out. Who do YOU propose might have? Your darling Romney? Huckabee? You hate him too. It's bullshit that McCain was "rudderless" or didn't have a campaign theme or plan. I'm not even going to go into the nuts and bolts of it, but he damn sure had more than "Change and Hope". It's just dishonest and frankly, childish to make these kinds of false statements. The guy ran a classy, hard-edged and gutsy campaign. The motherfucker is more than 2x my age, and I'm tired after one plane trip. He took at least several a day for 3 years, and never slowed down, never backed down, came back from NO WHERE with his entire staff quitting and no money and damn sure nearly pulled it off. Can't you even fucking give him a couple hours of props before bitching about HIM? You ask me, you and other half-assed conservatives who either withheld support (Malkin) or gave it grudgingly or voted for him "with nose held shut" instead of getting behind him 100% are part of the problem. He shouldn't have needed Palin to shore up conservatives. If they were truly conservatives, they should have sucked it up. In the end, the Dems got behind Obama 100%. The PUMAs were a myth, or a tiny minority. The left blogs were a monolithic force for Obama, and I believe they moved coverage and influenced the "narrative" for whatever that's worth. The right blogs moved a narrative that McCain wasn't pure enough and could barely stand him. Who the FUCK do you see leading the party now? Palin? Please. Romney? He'll never win national office, ever. I'm proud of McCain, proud that he led our party, prooud of the job he did in the face of ENORMOUS odds. Jesus Christ, can't you put aside your hurt feelings for one night at least and give the man props? He's the only decent, honest and forthright politician of national stature I know of in this country right now, barring Bush. He's the most experienced and he's got a claim as having done more for his country than any other. You don't like him on immigration and finance reform and I guess a few other vagaries. Well boo fucking hoo. To every conservative who withheld 100% support of McCain, this defeat partially lies at your door as well. Every post you made slamming him. Every whining bitching post about some arcane policy difference. I read the left blogs, and once Obama as the nominee, they were like a juggarnaut in their solidarity. In this day and age, and with the odds McCain faced, he needed and deserved our unwavering support. Who better? And what was the alternative? Big picture man. Eyes on the fucking prize. Hey Michelle Malkin, hey Rush Limbaugh, hey "conservatives" sending a message, what have you won? What have you proven? I blame them more than McCain. He gave his all, as he always has. They didn't. You could at least have the decency to go one night before bitching about the man. Now go off on me and foam at the mouth. Jesus, you talk about Sullivan being hormonal. You go off like this regularly, and you have all through the election. It's not constructive. It's not helpful. And you can garner some of the blame or credit for President Barack Obama yourself before you start complaining about a man who, in my opinion, gave the full measure of himself in this campaign. I love the guy like a brother McCain's a bawcock and a heart of gold, A lad of life, an imp of fame; Of parents good, of fist most valiant. I kiss his dirty shoe, and from heart-string I love the lovely bully. I'd have been proud for him to be my president. I respect him more than any other politician extant. We're fucking lucky to have had him, and I thank him for his effort, which was prodigious. I supported him from the start, without reservation, once he was our nominee. Thank you to John McCain, a conservative, a patriot and a decent man. Posted by: docweasel at November 05, 2008 02:58 AM (SOSlE) 418
John Mccain has code of honor and ethics. There were certain things he could not , and would not do as part of this campaign. Regardless of the consesequences. This is what we have lost as a party. We do not adhere to the principles of our party with the same intensity as John Mccain adheres to his principles. If there is a way back from this socialist hell hole we have dug for ourselves it will be by following his example. Stay true to your beliefs and principles. Accept the consequences of your beliefs, and revel in your future vindication.
Posted by: pete at November 05, 2008 02:58 AM (jsdnL) 419
"It’s
almost like 52% of the American people were either brainwashed by
Barry’s Messiah act or blinded by Bush Derangement Syndrome."
No,it's like 52% of the American people have been so brainwashed by education, the media and popular culture that they really didn't care that an unrepentant terrorist who killed fellow Americans was a lecturer at an American university ! They didn't care that the next President went to a "church " that preached hatred for America ! They tolerate a media that gives away State secrets to our enemies (can you imagine the American people of 1900/1939/1959 not boycotting the NYT for leaking the anti-terrorist info they published last year ? This country has been so brainwashed that a sizeable minority actually believe 9/11 was an inside job...this kind of shit doesn't happen in a vaccum. The Left has outflanked us in the culture thing, in the media and in the schools. We can plan all we like about turning the Republican Party around but it won't make any difference because our foundations are constantly being eroded by the Left. We left the field of battle to the Left and they have taken full advantage of it. Let's stop the rot in education and culture now and the politics will take care of themselves. Posted by: Peter Moore at November 05, 2008 03:00 AM (IT8KW) 420
We need to get his ass impeached and his replacement named by Sarah. I thought it was made clear weeks ago that in Alaska they do not allow the governor to nominate replacements. They will have to hold another election if he gets booted. Posted by: Vic at November 05, 2008 03:00 AM (Qd7GC) 421
I wonder if intrade has a line on how long Iraq will be an ally of the United States.
Posted by: robtr at November 05, 2008 03:02 AM (C6ME0) Posted by: Deuce Geary at November 05, 2008 03:02 AM (Q285d) 423
#230 - ps WHERE IS OSAMA BIN LADIN?
I look forward to asking this question every single fucking day after January 20th. Posted by: Jim62sch at November 05, 2008 03:03 AM (6rQXk) 424
#416. Oh I'm the last person you would ever call a racist. My friends look like the UN and my best friend from childhood is haitian. I didn't vote for McCain. I voted against BO because he never got his message across to me and I felt he had too little experience for what may be coming to our country. I don't believe in big goverment and big spending yet I watched GWB look so unrepublican in this last term I was horrified. My concern is always to preserve our democratic republic and to uphold the tenets of the Constitution. I worry that he will stack the Supreme Court with liberal judges while I watched Bush put up no fight about his appointments. The dems have not approved any of bush's judges. I think a real test of BO will be how he treats Patrick Fitzgerald.
Posted by: incredulous at November 05, 2008 03:04 AM (zplc6) 425
My sympathies go out to the freedom loving people of Iraq, Ukraine and Georgia. The irony of tonights victory may rest in the belief that Black Americans can finally feel liberated; yet their liberator is no champion of liberty. He is a champion of equality. Equality triumphs freedom in his mind. A dictator who espouses equality is more righteous than an elected leader chosen by his people. Those who have fought so valiantly for democracy and freedom in their countries will not longer be able to count on the US as a staunch ally. Now, the UN will take precedent. You will be on your own. May God help you.
Posted by: Kolchak at November 05, 2008 03:06 AM (//Qr5) 426
Do we know yet whether the Dems won a super-majority in Congress? Impeachment is a bad idea. Setting your sights on impeachment is a bad strategy that will only piss off a lot of people and demonstrate that the GOP isn't serious about governance. People will see it a an effort to avenge their loss and they'll be right. Obama was elected by a majority of Americans (voting fraud nothwithstanding) and efforts to impeach him would constitute an effort to subvert the democractic (with a small d) process. And, anyway, the Reps don't have enough people in Congress to pull it off. The whole issue is a non-starter. Posted by: Steve (aka Ed Snate, aka Col. Kurtz) at November 05, 2008 03:09 AM (41Acy) 427
.
"Thank you to John McCain, a conservative, a patriot and a decent man." And a loser. If he had shown half the aggression towards Obama that he showed against the conservative base during the Amnesty campaign he would have won this thing. He didn't fight this election for the country, he fought it to preserve his self___ as the all-round, cross-party good guy. He could happily insult the rank-and-file of the base but wouldn't say a cross word to a fellow member of the Senate Posted by: Peter Moore at November 05, 2008 03:10 AM (IT8KW) 428
We are screwed. But, as some have said - I, too, welcome our new, insectoid overlords.
Posted by: TennDon at November 05, 2008 03:12 AM (TTjg8) 429
Steve (aka Ed Snate, aka Col. Kurtz),
You're my kind of guy. Wickedpinto thinks the world of you, and every time you post, my opinion of you goes up. And who doesn't like a military historian? Posted by: XBradTC at November 05, 2008 03:13 AM (6vAfW) 430
Some idiot Bob Shrum is on MSNBC and he just said Gore won the election. They don't give it up do they? And yet no less than twenty of them called me tonight to tell me the republican party is dead. I'm not a Republican, I'm an independent cause I don't much care for either party. This guy shrum has decalred campaign financing law as dead. I think on this he is correct.
Posted by: incredulous at November 05, 2008 03:17 AM (zplc6) 431
incredulous: "Oh I'm the last person you would ever call a racist..."
Please don't misunderstand my point. I'm not inferring in any way that you are. It's just that if you make an observation like that, a factually precise observation that carries absolutely zero bias, you will have pointed out an uncomfortable hypocrisy. Your observation must, according to the race-baiters and class dividers, be qualified to your detriment. You aren't presenting facts anymore. You are presenting oppressive ideology that hides some hidden, historical flaw in your personal perceptions. You become the target, ad hominem-style, and not the bias itself from the offending group that actually projects bias against others while exercising its own so transparently. The key to winning the argument is to be offensive and not defensive. That's in the playbook. Charging "racist" is probably the most powerful muzzle, however cowardly, disingenuous, and overused, that can be made today. Posted by: AnonymousDrivel at November 05, 2008 03:18 AM (sI5Ho) 432
Some timely quotes from the great Thomas Jefferson:
"The democracy will cease to exist when you take away from those who are willing to work and give to those who would not." "To compel a man to subsidize with his taxes the propagation of ideas which he disbelieves and abhors is sinful and tyrannical." Posted by: wherestherum at November 05, 2008 03:20 AM (wET2y) 433
From Alexander Tytler:
"A democracy cannot exist as a permanent form of government. It can only exist until the voters discover that they can vote themselves largesse from the public treasury. From that moment on, the majority always votes for the candidates promising the most benefits from the public treasury with the result that a democracy always collapses over loose fiscal policy, always followed by a dictatorship. The average age of the world's greatest civilizations has been about 200 years. These nations have progressed through this sequence: '>From bondage to spiritual faith; From spiritual faith to great courage; From courage to liberty; From liberty to abundance; From abundance to selfishness; From selfishness to apathy; From apathy to dependence; From dependence back into bondage." I don't think he means the fun kind of bondage. =( Posted by: wherestherum at November 05, 2008 03:21 AM (wET2y) 434
XBradTC -- Many thanks for your kind words. They've lifted my spirits on a dismal night. And right back at you: I enjoy reading your views and opinions too. Also, I think the world of WickedPinto. I think of him as kind of younger brother. Sometimes he drives me nuts, but that's what younger brothers do. Posted by: Steve (aka Ed Snate, aka Col. Kurtz) at November 05, 2008 03:26 AM (41Acy) 435
a younger brother? I always pictured WP as being like 70 years old :p
Posted by: docweasel at November 05, 2008 03:29 AM (SOSlE) 436
Dang, did Ace of Spades just turn into the new Kos Kids?
Yeah, McCain wasn't the first choice for most of us, but he did as well as he could have under the circumstances. The CIRCUMSTANCES being that the MSM were going to control both his and Obama's messages to make sure Obama won. Not much can be done with that in the short term. Then, of course, there's also most of the educational establishment. If it bothers you that the MSM and Big Ed are in the tank for the left, maybe you should think about joining one of them and working from within. That's exactly how the left took them over in the first place -- 50 years ago both were conservative institutions, for the most part. Posted by: lumpenscholar at November 05, 2008 03:34 AM (QSTYZ) 437
docweasel: LOL! I think he's in his thirties--a conclusion I reached by backdating his stories of serving in the Corps. He may seem to be 70 because he's an old soul in a relatively young body. Posted by: Steve (aka Ed Snate, aka Col. Kurtz) at November 05, 2008 03:35 AM (41Acy) 438
50 years ago both were conservative institutions, for the most part. I don't think that's true of the media. Well, sort of: the media was more conservative in the 50s in the sense that newspaper journalism was still a low-paying profession populated by alcoholics, border-line sociopath risk-takers, bullshit artists, iconoclasts, eccentrics, oddballs, thrill-seekers, authority-haters, unscrupulous manipulators, pathological liars, sex perverts, skirt chasers, social deviants, poontang hounds, and outright if functioning lunatics and nutters. The kind of people, in other words, who were too crazy, disorganized in their personal lives, and/or mentally unstable to be dogmatically ideological for extended periods. On the other the journalist elite were decidedly liberal--but they were Cold War liberals, which was not such a bad thing. However they were deeply in the tank for John Kennedy, arguably one of the worst presidents. As for education: well, in the 50s I was in elementary school, and I can attest from experience that my education was conservative. There was an American flag in every classroom and and at the start of every day we faced the flag and placed our hands over our hearts and recited the Pledge of Allegiance complete with the "under God" part. Then we sang "God Bless America" or "My Country 'Tis of Thee." History lesson, and the overall educational milieu, was very pro-American, with an emphasis on traditional values. Posted by: Steve (aka Ed Snate, aka Col. Kurtz) at November 05, 2008 03:53 AM (41Acy) 439
If Palin decides that she can be a force in national politics, I think she'll do well. She's not stupid, despite the media portrayal, and she now has experienced the hell of MSM/leftist character assasination. The big question, to me, is, will she be willing to drag the family through that hell again? If she does, I'd have to believe that she's really committed to the cause...or insane.
Jindal is more likeley. Like it or not, it will be imperitive to the conservatives/Pubs to get some signifigant minority leadership. There's no reason that we can't recruit like-minded minorities. Demographically, we have no choice. Posted by: Dr. Remulak at November 05, 2008 03:56 AM (0AHha) 440
#436 amen
when the "conservatives" aren't eeyoring and damaging morale under the guise of "being realistic" they are carping about McCain's failures instead of facing their own shortcomings in _their_ role as supporters, boosters and warriors for the good guys, just because their favored candidate didn't get the nomination (whoever the fuck that was) or some petty grievance with McCain. #437 Steve I was being facetious, but sometimes it seems like WP has 70+ years of grievance and bitterness stored up in his soul. and in WP's honor: "LONGBOWS!" Posted by: docweasel at November 05, 2008 04:02 AM (SOSlE) 441
439
I don't think Palin is stupid, I think she's uninformed, intellectually incurious about anything other than local politics, and out of her depth in national politics. Which is fine if she intends on staying Governor of Alaska. She's not ready to be POTUS by a long shot. Now Bobby Jindal is a policy wonk, a stunning intellect and a stellar campaigner, debater and interviewee. I think he would have been the better choice, except I don't think McCain could have won with anyone after the financial crash, not with half the base still whinging like babies about minor policy differences and refusing to back him. Posted by: docweasel at November 05, 2008 04:06 AM (SOSlE) 442
I speak as a right wing conservative. I think we're being too hard on McCain. It would have been a tall order for any Republican to win this election. 1) Obama's bold-face lie about public financing gave him an obscene advantage in funds. 2) The MSM's betrayal of the American public made Obama nearly untouchable. 3) A uninformed public put the economic downfall on the Republicans. Whatever McCain's faults, which we can probably agree on, I doubt he could have surmounted the odds against him in this election. Just think about how utterly miserable a choice Obama is, and you might start to believe that it was pretty much out of McCain's hands. The Democrats could have run anybody. A dirty sock puppet with a Russian accent would have attained a mandate. Posted by: braininahat at November 05, 2008 04:18 AM (0C3b0) 443
Docweasel, she may have been uninformed and incurious, but now that she's been through the war, she may start working toward fixing those flaws. She may well have been out of her depth in this election, but I still feel that she was the only VP that McCain could have picked to get any kind of "oomph". In 4 years, with proper discipline and attention, she very well could be ready to run for POTUS. But if she decides that she's happy in Alaska, I wouldn't blame her either.
I also agree that Jindal is our best hope in 2012, with a little seasoning. Posted by: Dr. Remulak at November 05, 2008 04:19 AM (0AHha) 444
McCain was the same McCain he has always been. He fought the best way he knew how. I will, for the most part, try to avoid tearing the guy apart now. That said, WTF? Not just McCain either. Let's "spread the wealth around". 1. Greed on Wall Street? Pandering. He probably should have kept "naming the names" and left the populist big business-bashing to the Democrats. 2. I'm not Bush? Right, except when you are ratifying his worst instincts, like Comprehensive Immigration Reform. Speaking of which.... 3. The Hispanic Vote. Boy, that one really blew up in our faces, didn't it? All that pandering, and instead of getting 45% like we did in 2004, we get one-fricken-third. Now, some might be tempted to point to the Conservatice backlash against Amnesty for this shift. They would probably be right, which leads me to ask, why the fuck did we even bring it up in the first place? Amnesty? Whose fucking brilliant idea was that? Nice own goal, GOP. 4. Palin. Wow, we just totally pulled the rug out from under the coronation of Teleprompter Jesus by picking her. What do we do next? I know, lock her up in a fucking convent, and let her out only for interviews with hacks whose lifework is destroying Republicans. Hey, while we're at it, let's not do LIVE interviews they can't cut and paste. Fucking brilliant. 5. Wright. It's not like the guy wasn't selling prepackaged GOP attack ads on DVDs or anything. Ayers had potential, but there just were not hours and hours of histrionics readily available like there were for Wright. 6. Voiceovers. Was it just me, or did the narrators of GOP ads pretty much suck across the board? The Debbie Downer who did the 527 Wright ads...I just wasn't feeling it. 7. Palin. Again. Look, I don't know if the aides who anonymously trashed her were longtime McCain guys, Romney guys who worked for McCain, or whatever. It doesn't really matter, since NOBODY who is with the campaign should have been trashing the running mate during the last week of the election. Mindboggling. 8. Abortion. Gun Rights. Gay Marriage. I don't know, aren't those issues that merit more than a passing mention during a campaign? 9. Tom Ridge. Shut up. Thank you. 10. Conservative Intellectuals. Hey, we nominated just the sort of bipartisan, serious and sober sort of fella you wanted us to. So, where were you? Oh, that's right, toasting that mountain of nuanced thoughtfulness from Chicago. Thanks for jumping ship, assholes. And that's all the Patriotic Grace I can muster up, Peg, you book-touting twat. 11. Open Primaries. Wow, we sure are seriously naive, no? Another own goal for the GOP. Maybe McCain would still have won, and maybe he really was the only one in the field who had a chance of even making this thing respectable. Still, it would be sort of nice to exit the primaries knowing that it was Republicans who chose the GOP nominee. 12. GOTV. Mea culpa. I personally didn't do anything except work on some of my family, who predominatly lean Republican anyways. Nobody's fault but my own. Sorry, everyone. Don't misunderstand me. I don't think this was McCain's fault. He is who he is, his intentions and effort were honest and honerable but, we need to somehow nominate a candidate whose primary virtue is something more than the fact that he has an acrimonious relationship with an unpopular sitting President. Posted by: A Balrog of Morgoth at November 05, 2008 04:26 AM (wgLRl) 445
And a loser. If he had shown half the aggression towards Obama that he showed against the conservative base during the Amnesty campaign he would have won this thing. He didn't fight this election for the country, he fought it to preserve his self___ as the all-round, cross-party good guy. He could happily insult the rank-and-file of the base but wouldn't say a cross word to a fellow member of the Senate As a life long Democrat that crossed over for the first time to vote Republican today (straight ticket by the way), this very common charge (judging by the bitter conservative blogs) pisses me the hell off. By the time John McCain faced off against Barack Obama, the Obama myth had been well cultivated. But it wasn’t just the MSM and the loony left that helped create the myth of Obama “the nice guy, uniter not divider, post-partisan engaged in a new type of politics”, it was also conservatives in the media that were so fucking obsessed with destroying the Clintons they couldn’t help but join the pile on. (There is definitely a Bush Derangement Syndrome on the left, but there’s an equally bizarre phenomenon known as Clinton Derangement Syndrome that exists on the right.) People like George Will, David Brooks and Peggy Noonan kissed Obama’s ass every chance they got. Others like Hannity enjoyed perpetrating the “Clintons are just bitter evil people trying to destroy nice guy Bambi” meme that played into the Obama campaign’s chosen narrative (as well as the “Clinton voters are just bitter racist bitches” garbage). The worst in my opinion was Rush Limbaugh who gleefully called Bill Clinton “Bull Connor” for the same type of race-baiting attack that the Obama camp later perpetrated on Limbaugh himself. For conservatives to bitch that McCain wouldn’t attack Obama harder is pretty fucking rich after they helped build up the Obama myth either directly or indirectly by tearing down the credibility of anyone that went against Our Dear Leader. McCain did many things wrong during this campaign, but this was not one of them. This Republican on Republican hate and calls for purging the party of people like McCain truly makes me sick. I’m sure you won’t give a shit, but these attacks on McCain are really turning me off of the Republican Party. That man got his ass kicked by the left during this election: He was derided for reaching out to the base by picking Palin, he was called a racist and a Nazi for daring to fight instead of just lying down and playing the loser for the Great Obama, his honor was besmearched when Obama’s Chicago pols (along with those media asshats Joe Klein and Jonathan Alter) said he was running the “sleaziest campaign ever.” McCain’s entire political cache was based on his honor, reputation for running clean campaigns and being a maverick Republican willing to take on the base when they were wrong. He SACRIFICED all of that for the good of the American people. The one issue he said was off limits was Rev Wright and dammit, it was the correct call! The Wright issue was already out in the open thanks to the Dem primaries. Moreover, it was the most racially touchy of all of Obama’s associations. Would it have been racist to call Obama out for attending that church for 20+ years? Of course not. But the Republican Party didn’t have the luxury of going after Obama in that way. There are huge number of Americans that already suspect the Republican Party is a party of racists. Like it or not, it would’ve backfired against a black candidate. There was no way the Republicans could’ve played that same type of hardball politics against a black candidate. Bottom line: You could not be more wrong. McCain sacrificed his image for the good of the country. His image has been destroyed by the MSM, the lefty bloggers and the assholes in the Dem party that claimed to be his friends at one time (Kerry, Biden, etc. The exceptions were the Clintons, Lieberman and Russ Feingold.) Maybe you don’t watch anything other than Fox or listen to anything other than Hannity or Limbaugh. But let me guarantee you: McCain DID fight this election for our country. Just because he didn’t engage in mutually assured destruction tactics doesn’t mean he didn’t have the country’s best interest at heart. Such tactics would’ve actually HURT his chances with everyone except the hardest core members of the base. That is, he would’ve received 33% of the vote instead of 47% Posted by: Tversky at November 05, 2008 04:31 AM (DBB37) 446
Docweasel you are FOS.
Posted by: Vic at November 05, 2008 04:32 AM (Qd7GC) 447
Posted by: Tversky at November 05, 2008 04:31 AM (DBB37) You do realise that it was Limbaugh who spearheaded the effort to keep Clinton in the race, right? I don't know how well it worked, but he did try. Posted by: A Balrog of Morgoth at November 05, 2008 04:35 AM (wgLRl) 448
I love that "chickenhawks" meme now. I'm gonna jam that one down a leftist's throat every time they talk about the need for our military to do something about one of their pet causes. Oh, they will be doing that BTW. Those are their fucking jets now. Posted by: A Balrog of Morgoth at November 05, 2008 04:38 AM (wgLRl) 449
Look on the bright side. America's race card had an expiration date, 11/4/08.
I mentioned how happy I was to a black co-worker tonight that America isn't a racist country anymore after he brought up the Ascension of the One. The "Oh shit" look he gave me was priceless. I also can't wait to rub it in to all the miserable fat bridge trolls I encountered tonight that bragged about voting for O how miserable they still are a year from now. "What, Obama didn't invent a fat burning pill, pay your mortgage and get you a six-figure job, Who'dve thunk it?" Posted by: nightwitch at November 05, 2008 04:54 AM (vQPBu) 450
McCain's schwerpunkt is national security. That is the field where he has always stuck to his guns. That is the field where he has supported conservative principles. That is the area where he has walked the walk.
I supported him in the Primaries and in the General because I knew that he'd be the most effective Commander-in-Chief. That was what he tried to sell. The people didn't buy it. Posted by: embittered redleg at November 05, 2008 04:56 AM (c5k7x) 451
10. Conservative Intellectuals. Hey, we nominated just the sort of bipartisan, serious and sober sort of fella you wanted us to. So, where were you? Oh, that's right, toasting that mountain of nuanced thoughtfulness from Chicago. Thanks for jumping ship, assholes. And that's all the Patriotic Grace I can muster up, Peg, you book-touting twat. See, I don’t think those were conservative intellectuals at all. They were and are moderates. In my opinion, the Republican Party desperately needs conservative intellectuals. It needs people that can logically argue the merits of conservatism over liberalism instead of just using emotion-based, value laden and ad hominem attacks. This is particularly important in today’s society where so many young voters have been indoctrinated by political correctness. They are almost conditioned to interpret anti-affirmative action as inherently racist and anti-immigration reform as racist and/or xenophobic. Frankly I think it was a damn shame that it took me months to find a logical, empirically driven argument against immigration reform (I think it was an article by Frum that illuminated the subject for me.) You do realise that it was Limbaugh who spearheaded the effort to keep Clinton in the race, right? I don't know how well it worked, but he did try. That’s true. Actually my respect for Limbaugh grew a lot later in the campaign when he put aside his personal animus toward McCain to support McCain. I’m dreading him attacking McCain tomorrow morning though. *sigh* What good is that going to do? It’s good to logically deconstruct where the campaign went wrong and discuss how conservatives can win again. But the scapegoating of McCain is only going to fracture the party further in my opinion. Trying to purge the party doesn’t make sense to me as a tactic. Trying to lure people into the fold using core conservative principles, respect and logic makes more sense to me. One thing I wish the conservative base would get into their heads is that there are a lot of well intentioned RINOs, Democrats and Independents out there that can be reached if you are moderately respectful of them. They aren’t your enemies!!!! Pelosi, Reid, Obama, Howard Dean, Donna Brazile, Bill Ayers, etc. are your enemies. But not all the people that vote for them are. Some are just misinformed. Some need deprogramming from the liberal indoctrination they’ve underwent in school. It’s important to chose your enemy carefully and specifically. Don’t use broad terms like “liberals”, “progressives”, etc. Talk about Pelosi, Reid, etc. and how their policies suck and are self-defeating. That way you aren’t unintentionally insulting or alienating potential voters. Most of you despise McCain, but the fact that he didn’t automatically vilify the people on the other side of the political spectrum was one thing that I found extremely appealing about him and initially made me open to voting Republican this year. Posted by: Tversky at November 05, 2008 05:06 AM (DBB37) 452
So I guess the way to be president is to buy it and cheat. Will ANYTHING be done about all that funny money he got? ANYTHING? Why was he allowed to break all kinds of laws?
I will never call him president. Never. Now I must go and puke. Posted by: Roving Patrol at November 05, 2008 05:18 AM (7UEUL) 453
In my opinion, the Republican Party desperately needs conservative intellectuals. It needs people that can logically argue the merits of conservatism over liberalism instead of just using emotion-based, value laden and ad hominem attacks.
I cannot believe that you think “logic” and “intellectual” thought will win these elections, especially after this election where an empty suited idiot won with a message of “hope and change”.
Logic has never won an election in the U.S. since TV and the mass media came into play. Posted by: Vic at November 05, 2008 05:25 AM (Qd7GC) 454
McCain was the best we could do because he was the "anti-Republican" Republican. He could've campaigned better, maybe won another state or two, but the GOP was just fated to lose this year. Being more conservative wouldn't have helped and would probably have hurt.
Posted by: Bob at November 05, 2008 02:48 AM (4DoFz) If the Republicans were destined to lose this time, maybe we should have nominated someone who was at least willing to fight for our cause and make the best case for it he could. McCain said he'd rather win the war and risk losing the election... well, what about the war of ideas? Or is that war not worth fighting? Is free market capitalism not worth defending? Maybe not another Goldwater, exactly... but if we expect another Reagan-like figure to emerge, we need someone to set the stage for him. We can't just depend on some kind of Carter effect to bring our perfect candidate out of the crowd. But instead we nominated our version of Mondale and the Democrats got their Reagan... ironically, their Reagan was the one promising to raise taxes and snatch defeat from the jaws of victory. What a fucking joke. Posted by: Watcher at November 05, 2008 05:36 AM (OnpsZ) 455
And good riddance to the undisciplined rank and file who whined nonstop if they did not get every thing the dreamed of in a candidate. Without your support, McCain/Palin could never have lost.
Allahpundit is now playing the dead Dean Barnett card. Screw him. Posted by: Marcus Antonius at November 05, 2008 05:50 AM (7QXqh) 456
Logic has never won an election in the U.S. since TV and the mass media came into play.
Bullshit. Logic alone has never won an election. But Reagan used logic and reason as well as a pro-America positive message to win in 1980 and 1984. Moreover, Gingrich definitely used logic and reason to guide the Republican take over of the House during the Clinton years. However, in the last few elections both parties have been relying heavily on negative emotion based messages. Even Obama with all his hopey changing nonsense always starts by painting a dire picture of American today. He’s actually EXCEEDINGLY negative. The only way a liberal can win is through negativity, hopelessness, tapping into resentments, promoting a victimization agenda and then promising that the government can “save you”. The Republicans have the advantage that they don’t need to rely on negative emotion based messages to win. But for the last few elections, instead of offering logical, reasonable, thoughtful solutions and a positive message of American self-determination and initiative they’ve relied on negative emotions like fear (national security, immigration), anger (homosexual and liberal agendas) and resentment (affirmative action) to rile up the base and win 51% elections. So yes, I do think logic and reason can be a huge asset for the Republican Party. In fact, it’s an area where the Republicans have a distinct advantage over Democrats since conservatism is actually pretty darn logical (in contrast to amorphous, emotional, flakey liberalism). At the very least I think it would’ve helped McCain in the debates to have a logical, coherent argument for why Obama’s economic policies would end up hurting the very people he claimed they would help. Posted by: Tversky at November 05, 2008 05:54 AM (DBB37) 457
Hard to say this: If McCain lost because he was insufficiently conservative and principled, where'd the conservative votes to make the difference go? Barr? Stay at home? Nope. Look at Murtha. The voters voted for handouts. The chumps don't know they're selling their votes FOR THEIR OWN MONEY. Solve that one.
Posted by: Richard Aubrey at November 05, 2008 06:05 AM (KG/Ye) 458
On a brighter note, Iranian missiles can now reach Europe. I say, Let 'em rip! and let's stay out of any conflicts between europe and their new islamofascists overlords.
Posted by: Marcus Antonius at November 05, 2008 06:08 AM (7QXqh) 459
McCain said he'd rather win the war and risk losing the election... well, what about the war of ideas? Or is that war not worth fighting? Is free market capitalism not worth defending? That’s McCain’s biggest flaw. He doesn’t have a real core ideology except patriotism. He understands foreign policy and national security but he doesn’t know jack about conservative economic principles and why they’re superior to the warmed over LBJ era liberal claptrap the Dems are peddling this year. In the future, the Republicans really need to rally behind someone that can make that case because free markets are under assault now in this country (this is what I mean by the Republicans using logic and reason – not just negative emotion based messages.) Not only is it shocking how little McCain really understands economics, it’s shocking how little most Americans understand it. Apparently a lot of them think the government can over tax business people and the little guy will never be affected. I guess they think businesses will just absorb the taxes through lower profits. *shudders* One of my biggest concerns with ObamaNation is the disincentive for entrepreneurship and new business creation. We already have a problem in that area and Obama’s tax policies will just make it worse. But instead we nominated our version of Mondale and the Democrats got their Reagan... ironically, their Reagan was the one promising to raise taxes and snatch defeat from the jaws of victory. I think the Mondale comparison is over-stating it. McCain did better than McGovern in 72, Carter in 80, Mondale in 84 and Dukakis in 88 in terms of electoral college and proportion of the vote. His electoral count looks closest to Bush in 92 and Dole in 96 although he got more votes than all of the above “losers.” Interestingly, for all the talk about Barry being the left’s Reagan, I think his electoral college count will be a little smaller than Clinton’s in 96 at 379. Not so great when compared to Reagan and Nixon’s electoral college blowouts. Moreover, I’ll be surprised if he tops George W. Bush’s popular vote count of 2004. It’ll be close though. Looking at the sheer number of votes George W. Bush got in 2004 with what McCain got this time and considering the fact that the Democrats did all they could to turn McCain into McBush I tend to blame most of this loss on Bush’s unpopularity (whether earned or not.) A crap load of people (approximately 7 million) that voted for Bush in 2004 refrained from voting for a guy that the media and the Dems painted as a veritable Bush clone. RE: Barry raising taxes. I think a lot of people buy the argument that Barry is cutting taxes for 95% of Americans and this will have no negative consequences. There were only a few really thoughtful conservative voices out there arguing that this faux-tax cut (i.e., welfare policy) was terrible economics (e.g., Newt Gingrich, Larry Kudlow, Jack Welch). Instead I saw a shocking number of business people, investment banker types, and econ types arguing for Obama on economic grounds. The point is: McCain sucked on this issue. No doubt. But it wasn’t like McCain got much visible backup from smart, thoughtful conservatives either.Once again, I think this is a good example of how logic and reason would’ve helped McCain tremendously. Conservative economic policies have to be explained and sold. It isn’t immediately clear why they’re beneficial to the regular guy. In contrast, liberal economic policies are easy: The Dems simply promise give aways. Posted by: Tversky at November 05, 2008 06:37 AM (DBB37) 460
Obviously I'm not happy with the election, but I also don't see it as the end of the world. How much damage can he do? Posted by: digitalbrownshirt at November 05, 2008 07:43 AM (SZOS3) 461
"The chumps don't know they're selling their votes FOR THEIR OWN MONEY." Easy, they think it's someone else's, and it probably is as those people in Connellsville and other locations in PA make shit money. That state is in economic decline, just like other rust-belt states, but it is worse than the others. Posted by: Senator Rev. Dr. E Buzz Miller at November 05, 2008 07:55 AM (vFeQi) 462
Geez, let's blame the candidate for everything. I can tell you why McCain lost. It's because the vast majority of voters are ignorant. We think that everyone is as informed as those of us who post and read these blogs and the news, but trust me,they're not. I made tons of calls and all of the Obama supporters gave the same mantra, he cares about us and he will take care of us. An example....I was on the bus yesterday and a group were talking about Obama being elected. Comments such as..."he's going to help me get a car," "he's got $3 trillion he's going to give to help us get by," "he's going to make sure we never go to war," "he's going to make those oil companies pay," and my personal favorite..."he really cares about people and he's going to get rid of unemployment." All of these people voted and only one of the 10 or so was Black. Name any Republican candidate those people would have voted for....the only one I can think of would maybe have been Rudy. The media created and elected Obama. And it wasn't just the national MSM, it was the small town papers and stations too. This wasn't a mandate by the people, it was a high school popularity contest. Posted by: Deanna at November 05, 2008 08:28 AM (9mK1/) 463
To the democrats: This is a nice moment for you. I'm gonna let you have it.
To the conservatives: Never again. From this moment on, no more Rino's. Flush them out of the party. And to McCain: If I never hear you say "my friends" again, it will be too soon. Posted by: Scout at November 05, 2008 08:40 AM (4DIx7) 464
462 Thanks for sparing my energy this morning. You said it all. Who could stand up to the media onslaught for obamassiah. This is all beyond comprehension. Add to that the rampant cheating and voter fraud. I am sure not ready to bash John Mccain to this degree nor do I think he deserves it. No wonder we lose so much the way we kill our wounded. John McCain is a decent man and a war hero. I wish him, Cindy and all their family the very best. Thank you for your heroic service to this country John McCain. Hold your head high. Sometimes the better man doesn't win. This is certainly one of those times. Posted by: bitter, clinging Pennsylvanian at November 05, 2008 08:40 AM (bd68Z) 465
Call me in a year or so and tell me if y'all are better off then you would have been. When ya let the media pick your horse in the race, it was doomed. Palin tried to revive it but alas we have become a nation of lazy no accounts waiting for the next handout from the socialists we put in power. Whether we elected them or through inaction to stop them. Now there is nothing to stop them from ruining the greatest nation ever on earth. Maybe this will be the wake up call we need to pick better leaders who think more of getting out of your wsy, thsn grabbing the ring of power for their own selfish interests. Posted by: Fred H at November 05, 2008 08:41 AM (WBR0j) Posted by: Phinn at November 05, 2008 10:13 AM (4DIx7) 467
we need to get the gop to end crossover voting in primaries.
without dem support in the early primaries mccain loses. Posted by: reliapundit at November 05, 2008 10:13 AM (2grY3) 468
After the Palin nomination McCain’s fortunes were rising and Obama was
sinking. The media managed to sink McCain by repeating the communist
talking points of deregulation and Wall Street greed. I honestly
believe that without that McCain would have won.
It didn't help that McCain repeated those same talking points. Posted by: VRWC Agent at November 05, 2008 10:19 AM (o2slJ) 469
I was a Guiliani fan as well before McCain won the primary. I think McCain fought the best fight he could. How did you expect him to compete with:
1. The liberal media which refused to to report on, or investigate into any negative aspect of Obama. Unbiased and objective journalism is dead; 2. Obama's use of unverified contributions to his campaign and breaking his promise of campaign finance reform; and 3. Obama's out-spending McCain to about a 4 to 1 ratio. Already, nations are beginning to test him. Russia, this morning, refused to congratulate his win this morning and is talking about the proposed missile systems near its borders. I am afraid we will re-live the Jimmy Carter years (1976-1979). Start stocking your provisions now. Posted by: Coogen at November 05, 2008 11:04 AM (h4UWR) 470
There was no idea of McCain beyond McCain himself.
Hence my method of referring to him all along. John McCain, (r-McCainland) Funny. I woke up this morning having paid no attention to news yesterday/last night. So this is the first I hear of McCain's loss. I feel no sense of personal loss. Just grim acceptance of the hard work that must follow. Principles matter, people. The Democrats are going to over-reach. When they do so, we must not be bitter, petty or angry. We must be there to provide Conservative alternatives in two and four years. Those alternatives must be rooted in fiscally conservative, socially responsible first principles. And the candidates we nominate must embrace those principles. If we continue allow the media to choose our nominees for us, we are doomed. If we allow ourselves to accept fatally flawed candidates such as McCain, we are doomed. The bright spot in all this is we may have found a superstar in Palin. Someone who, after 4 years of Obama's spectacularly left-wing governing and misogyny, may get a new look by a lot of centrists who have barely sublimated memories of the Democrat party's sexist attacks on women of quality this election. Posted by: krakatoa at November 05, 2008 11:17 AM (/FUhT) 471
It's times like these I'm glad we nominated someone with fire in his belly, willing to do what it takes to win even if it means being somewhat rude.
Posted by: Entropy at November 05, 2008 12:14 PM (m6c4H) 472
Ok, one problem with blaming McCain and McCainism...
We nominated him. The Republican party had a primary candidate crew that far outstripped the Dems in diversity and accomplishment, Instead of lawyer, lawyer, lawyer, we had: A Governor with a proven record of pulling his state out of a financial crisis. The Mayor of the biggest city on the East Coast who pulled his city out of a financial crisis, lowered crime to levels not seen since the Wagner administration, who showed genuine leadership on 9/11 and incredible, unpublicized compassion afterwards. A decorated Viet Nam veteran with a son in Iraq. A senator with a track record of going against his party and pandering to the opposition. And we nominated the last one. Is this where I say, "Don't blame me, I voted for Romney"? Is this where I say Posted by: richard mcenroe at November 05, 2008 12:17 PM (n7hY1) 473
WHITE POWER!
Posted by: jaff@lanerfrr.edu at November 05, 2008 02:23 PM (Q6MMB) 474
Fuck you, jaff.. you fucking astroturfing cocksucker. Your guy won, now go collect your check and buy some crack with it.
Posted by: Watcher at November 05, 2008 02:28 PM (8Sy56) 475
"455
And good riddance to the undisciplined rank and file who whined nonstop
if they did not get every thing the dreamed of in a candidate. Without
your support, McCain/Palin could never have lost.
Allahpundit is now playing the dead Dean Barnett card. Screw him. Posted by: Marcus Antonius at November 05, 2008 05:50 AM (7QXqh)" AMEN! I been saying that since all the whiny ass titty baby conservatives were moaning about McCain winning the nomination, when they hated Huckabee even worse. And the people saying "I voted Romney don't blame me", please. Romney would have won Utah yesterday, and that's about it. McCain at least kept it close to the point we has some hope and he probably saved some Senators. Romney would have been demolished in the South and taken down Senators with him, as well as congressmen. Posted by: ms. docweasel at November 05, 2008 04:16 PM (SOSlE) 476
Ms. D -- I voted Romney in the primary and I worked my ass off in the McCain campaign after he was nominated. Might have been nice if he'd done the same but the fact is the party picked him knowing what they were getting.
Posted by: richard mcenroe at November 05, 2008 04:46 PM (jCJ5W) 477
"But they said Giuliani wore a dress in a comedy skit and no one would vote for him. They were obviously wrong."
Rudy got about as many votes as Duncan Hunter, and a lot fewer than Ron Paul. So no, they were not obviously wrong. Posted by: flenser at November 05, 2008 06:59 PM (BRMTh) 478
"The right blogs moved a narrative that McCain wasn't pure enough and could barely stand him."
McCain made it very clear that he can't stand us, so that seems like a fair exchange. Posted by: flenser at November 05, 2008 07:18 PM (BRMTh) 479
I'm telling you. Get ready for the worst failed Republican nominee in history. It's going to be like when Bush welcomed the Democratic Congress as people he could pass "immigration reform" with. Comprehensive POS, global warming - McCain's not only going to enable them, he's going to enjoy it. He's got to prove he's still the media's John McCain and make up for daring to mention mentioning Ayers even ever so slightly.
Posted by: Responsibility at November 05, 2008 09:02 PM (PLmsY) 480
McCain would have made a good leader, but a leader controlled by advisers. Considering he would be fighting an illuminati leftist Congress, there would be a lot bending to accommodate them under a McCain presidency anyways.
Posted by: RJ at November 06, 2008 12:42 AM (7nbTg) 481
McCain took a chance on Palin, sure, but he also had a great opportunity to show off a young regional leader for 2012. He did something good for his party.
I think it was a Herculean effort to even come this close this election, especially after the September economy. McCain did okay. Yeah, he needed to push the FM FM on the Dems. In fact, that's also useful for 2010, because we absolutely cannot let there be no alternative meme to what the MSM decides is the "Story" about the recesssion. Posted by: Harun at November 06, 2008 06:50 AM (zGfws) 482
In Ace's main post, he said the exact things I got crucified for saying back in March.
VINDUHCHASHUN. I HAS IT. Posted by: V the K at November 06, 2008 09:30 AM (PLvLS) 483
Ace, schwerpunkt!
Crystal clear analysis of the McCain clusterfuck campaign. The bastards that gave us McCain on our GOP ticket think that they can mutilate Sarah Palin are in for an ass whoopin' provided at their own expense. The Grand Old Party: Hardline Conservatives wanted by public demand. RNC Elitist, RINO, & Saboteur Inc. need not apply. Posted by: maverick muse at November 06, 2008 10:21 AM (F1b/5) 484
The anger in these comments, the narrowminded cavemen's views of the world, and the continued slander towards Obama is nothing but a true reflection why the McCain / Palin campaign lost, and lost big. We saw too many of your ilk in the rallies, shooting off your mouths with foul language and ridiculous swiftboat charges. The country saw it, reckognized it for what it was, and 63 million Americans voted for the better candidates, the better ideas, and yes, they voted for the skinny , cool guy with the nice suntan. Go Obama.
Posted by: TomT at November 06, 2008 11:16 AM (XzpF8) Posted by: Jim62sch at November 06, 2008 11:22 AM (6rQXk) 486
Tom T...
Obama received only slightly more of the popular vote than Bush did in 04.. chew on that for a while.. Obama's mandate is the same as Bush's mandate Posted by: Dave C at November 06, 2008 03:20 PM (Rzry9) 487
#484# Bad language at the rallies, you mean like the people who kept showing up at each rally wearing the "Obama is a CU*T t-shirts? Oh, wait, those weren't McCain supporters, were they. No, I think that was an Obama supporter t-shirt, wasn't it. Hmmm . . . weird.
Posted by: Jason at November 07, 2008 09:36 AM (fUEg8) 488
Welcome to wow gold our wow Gold and wow power leveling store. We wow gold are specilized, wow power leveling professional and reliable wow power leveling website for wow power leveling selling and wow gold service. By the world of warcraft gold same token,we offer wow power leveling the best WoW service wow power leveling for our long-term and wow powerleveling loyal customers. wow powerleveling You will find wow powerleveling the benefits and value powerlevelingwe created powerleveling different from other sites. As to most people, power leveling they are unwilling to power leveling spend most of wow power leveling the time wow gold grinding money Rolex for mounts or rolex replica repair when replica rolex they can purchase Watches Rolex what they Rolex Watches are badly need. The Watch Rolex only way is to look Rolex Watch for the best place RS Gold to buy Cheap WARHAMMER ONLINE GOLD. Yes! You find it here! Our WoW Gold supplying service has already accumulated a high reputation and credibility. We have plenty of Gold suppliers, which will guarantee our delivery instant. Actually, we have been getting RuneScape Gold tons of postive feedbacks from our loyal RuneScape Money customers who really appreciate our service.
Posted by: wow power leveling at January 16, 2009 02:06 AM (jlcze) 489
ãäÊÏì ÈÇÑÈí - ÈÇÑÈí ÇáÎáíÌ - ÈÇÑÈí - ÈäÇÊ ÈÇÑÈí - ÝÓÇÊíä ÈÇÑÈí - ÞÕÕ ÈÇÑÈí - ÚÇáã ÈäÇÊ ÈÇÑÈí - ÈÇÑÈí ÇáÎáíÌ ÈäÇÊ - ãäÊÏíÇÊ ÈÇÑÈí - ÊÍãíá ÈÇÑÈí - ÑÝÚ ÈÇÑÈí - ãÑßÒ ÈÇÑÈí - ÑÝÚ ÕæÑ ÈÇÑÈí - ÈÇÑÈí ááÊÍãíá - ãÑßÒ ÊÍãíá ÈÇÑÈí ÈÇÑÈí ÇáÇÓáÇãí - ÈÇÑÈí ÇáÕæÊíÇÊ æÇáãÑÆíÇÊ - ÈÇÑÈí ÇáÓíÇÍÉ æÇáÓÝÑ - ÈÇÑÈí ÇáãÑÃÉ - ÚÇáã ÇáãÑÃÉ - ÝÓÇÊíä 2009 - ÇßÓÓæÇÑÇÊ æÚØæÑÇÊ ÈÇÑÈí ÝÓÇÊíä ÓåÑÉ- ÝÓÇÊíä ÓåÑÉ 2009 - ÝÓÇÊíä ÒÝÇÝ - ÝÓÇÊíä ÒÝÇÝ ÝÎãÉ - ãßíÇÌ - ãáÇÈÓ ÇáÕíÝ - ÇÒíÇÁ ÕíÝ 2009 - ãáÇÈÓ ÕíÝíÉ - ãáÇÈÓ ÕíÝíÉ ááÈäÇÊ ÇÒíÇÁ ÇáÑÈíÚ - ãáÇÈÓ ÇáÑÈíÚ - ÇÒíÇÁ ÚÇáã ÇáÑÈíÚ - ãáÇÈÓ ÇáÑÈíÚ - ÏæÑÉ ÊÚáíã ÇáßÑæÔíÉ - ÇáÑíÝ ÇáÊÑßí - ÊÑßíÇ - ÕæÑ ÇáÑíÝ ÇáÊÑßí - ãÚÇáã ÊÑßíÇ ÕæÑ ãÚÇáã ÊÑßíÇ- ÓíÇÍÉ æÓÝÑ - ãäÇÙÑ Çáíãä - ãØÈÎ ÈÇÑÈí - ØÈÎÇÊ æÇßáÇÊ - ØÈÎÇÊ ÈÇÑÈí - ÞÕÕ ÈÇÑÈí - ÞÕÕ æÍßÇíÇÊ - ÍßÇíÇÊ ÈÇÑÈí - ÑæÇíÇÊ ÈÇÑÈí ÕæÑ ÈÇÑÈí- ÕæÑ ÌÏíÏÉ - ÕæÑ ÈÇÑÈí - ãÇÓäÌÑ ÈÇÑÈí - ÊæÈíßÇÊ ÈÇÑÈí - ÕæÑ ãÓä ÌÏíÏÉ - ÕæÑ ãÓä - ÈÑÇãÌ æÇäÊÑäÊ - ÈÑÇãÌ ÈÇÑÈí - ÎáÝíÇÊ 2009 - ÎáÝíÇÊ ááßæãÈíæÊÑ ÎáÝíÇÊ ááßæãÈíæÊÑ 2009- ÇÌãá ÎáÝíÇÊ ÇáßæãÈíæÊÑ - ÊÕÇãíã æÌÑÇÝíßÓ - ÊÕÇãíã ÈÇÑÈí - ÈÇÑÈí ÇáÊÕÇãíã - ÊÕÇãíã ÌÏíÏÉ -ÈÑäÇãÌ ÇáÊÕÇãíã ÇáÓæíÔ ãÇßÓ - ÈÑäÇãÌ ÇáÓæíÔ ãÇßÓ - ÏÑæÓ ÇáÊÕãíã - ÏÑæÓ ÓæíÔ æÝáÇÔ - ÏÑæÓ ÇáÓæíÔ ãÇßÓ - ÏÑæÓ ÝæÊæÔæÈ ÏÑÓ Úãá ÊæÞíÚ ÝáÇÔí- ÏÑÓ Úãá ÊæÞíÚ - ÔÑÍ Úãá ÊæÞíÚ ÈãÑæÑ ÇáãÇæÓ - Úãá ÊæÞíÚ ÈÇáÓæíÔ ãÇßÓ - ÇÎÈÇÑ ÇáÝä æÇáÝäÇäíä - ÈÇÑÈí ÇÎÈÇÑ ÇáÝä ÇÎÈÇÑ ÝäíÉ - ÈÇÑÈí ÇáÝä æÇáÝäÇäíä - ÍÝá ÒÝÇÝ åíÝÇÁ æåÈí - ÒæÇÌ äæÇá ÇáßæíÊíÉ - ÒæÇÌ äæÇá ÇáßæíÊíÉ æãÔÚá ÇáÚÑæÌ - ÒæÇÌ äæÇá -äæÇá ÇáßæíÊíå ÒæÇÌ äæÇá æãÔÚá- ÕæÑ äÇäÓí - ÕæÑ äÇäÓí ÚÌÑã - ÕæÑ äÇäÓí ÌÏíÏÉ - ÕæÑ Íãá äÇäÓí - ÕæÑ äÇäÓí æåí ÍÇãá - äÇäÓí ÚÌÑã ÍÇãá ÓíäãÇ ÈÇÑÈí- ÈÇÑÈí ÇáÓíäãÇ - ÈÇÑÈí ÇÝáÇã æãÓáÓáÇÊ - ÇÝáÇã ÈÇÑÈí - Ýáã Hannah Montana -Ýáã ÞÈáÇÊ ãÓÑæÞÉ - Ýáã ãäÇÍí - Çäãí ÈÇÑÈí ÈÇÑÈí ÇáÇäãí - ÇÝáÇã Çäãí ÈÇÑÈí - ÕæÑ Çäãí -Çäãí ÈÇÑÈí - ÇÝáÇã Çäãí - ÕæÑ ßäÏã åÇÑÊÓ ÇÝáÇã æÇáÊ ÏíÒäí ÕæÑ ÒæÇÌ åíÝÇÁ æåÈí - ÒæÇÌ åíÝÇÁ æåÈí - ÝÓÇÊíä ÇãíÑÉ ãÍãÏ - ÇãíÑÉ ãÍãÏ - ÕæÑ ÇãíÑÉ ãÍãÏ - ÍÝáÉ ÒÝÇÝ åíÝÇÁ æåÈí ÈÇÑÈí- ÞÕÕ ÈÇÑÈí - ãäÊÏì ÈÇÑÈí - ÈÇÑÈí ÇáÎáíÌ - ÚÇáã ÈÇÑÈí - ÈäÇÊ ÈÇÑÈí - ãäÊÏíÇÊ ÈÇÑÈí Posted by: ÈÇÑÈí at May 04, 2009 03:57 AM (QEAnS) 490
they are high quality timepieces which is attractive,<A href="http://www.newstylerolex.com/" title="Cheap Brand Name Watches">Rolex</A> - Posted by: Rolex at July 31, 2009 09:04 PM (934PC) 491
Our website have many goods,<A href="http://www.newstylerolex.com/" title="Cheap Brand Name Watches">Rolex</A> -
<A href="http://www.newstylerolex.com/" title="Replica Rolex">Replica Rolex</A> - <A href="http://www.newstylerolex.com/" title="Brand Name Watches">Replica Watches</A> - <A href="http://www.newstylerolex.com/" title="Brand Name Watches">Rolex Watches</A> - <A href="http://www.sunglassvip.net" title="Welcome to our Replica Watches website">Replica rolex</A> - <A href="http://www.sunglassvip.net" title="high quality timepieces">Rolex</A> - <A href="http://www.2g-3g.com" title="high quality timepieces">Rolex</A> <A href="http://www.watches-life.com" title="cheap price">Rolex</A> <A href="http://www.watches-life.com" title="cheap price">Replica Rolex</A> <A href="http://www.rolex-hot.com" title="cheaper price">Rolex</A> <A href="http://www.rolex-hot.com" title="cheaper price">Replica Rolex</A> <A href="http://www.vertuexclusiveshop.com" title="cheaper vertu">Vertu</A> <A href="http://www.vertuexclusiveshop.com" title="cheaper Replica vertu">Vertu Replica</A>, <A href="http://www.e-lv.net" title="Replica handbags">Replica handbags</A>, <A href="http://www.enjoy-watches.com/" title="high quality watches">Rolex</A>, <A href="http://www.enjoy-watches.com/" title="Brand Name Watches">Replica Watches</A> I belive that you will like them !057 Posted by: Replica Watches at September 02, 2009 12:18 AM (KhjNC) 492
Our is a website of selling game online gold. and we have a number of customers, Our specialty is to make a long-term relationship across multiple game players. In meeting the demand of game players to buy, sell and trade in-game currencies and items, we provides gamers with fast transactions, 24-hour customer service and transactional security guaranteed. Our is intercommunion and trade flat roof of dofus kamas,cabal alz,age of conan gold,2moons dil,eve isk,flyff penya,maplestory mesos,RF gold,Aion kina,Wonderland Gold,Rose zuly,Knight Noah,bug,一键代发 and more online games. At the meaning time we have instanted reliable delivery methods . We are offering the safe , circumspect and 100% service. We will provide you the best 7/24 online service; you could get in touch with us by live chat or MSN at all times! Posted by: hong at September 17, 2009 02:44 AM (Ax+s/) 493
rolex watches review|miu miu handbags|designer handbags|replica handbags|replica designer handbags|replica gucci|fendi Handbags|Replica Louis Vuitton|replica LV|Prada Handbags|Burberry Handbags|replica Patek Philippe| replica Tag Heuer|replica watch|Rolex watches|
Posted by: hihandbag at October 11, 2009 11:01 PM (z3isx) 494
Some people like LV handbags,Some people like Chanel handbags,but most popel have been keeping an eye on cheap fashion brand handbags .we often talk about all kinds of designer handbags with my friends,most of my friends also like cheap fashion brand handbags.We admire cheap fashion brand handbags designer who often be able to design so many stylish handbags.We want to be a handbag抯 designer in the future too. In our store online,you can buy all series of cheap fashion brand handbags,include: Louis Vuitton,LV Luggage,LV Wallets,LV Agendas,LV Belts,LV Shoes,LV Accessories,Gucci,Gucci Wallets,Gucci Shoes,Marc Jacobs handbags,Marni handbags,Miu Miu handbags,Mulberry handbags,Prada handbags,Thomaswylde handbags,TOD handbags,Bottega Veneta handbags,D&G handbags,Dior handbags,YSL handbags,Coach handbags
Posted by: steve at October 15, 2009 08:58 AM (+aWy4) 495
Discount Boots
Womens UGG UGG Shoes UGG Australia UGG UK UGG USA discount ugg boots cheap ugg boots Posted by: fdsfds at October 27, 2009 07:33 PM (8kvkz) 496
buy Discount Boots
Womens UGG UGG Shoes UGG Australia UGG UK UGG USA discount ugg boots cheap ugg boots air force 1 shoes nike air force air force 1 mens air force 1 boots air force onefrom usa Posted by: airforceoneshop at November 03, 2009 08:30 PM (LHCCE) 497
Our is a website of selling game online gold. and we have a number of customers, Our specialty is to make a long-term relationship across multiple game players. In meeting the demand of game players to buy, sell and trade in-game currencies and items, we provides gamers with fast transactions, 24-hour customer service and transactional security guaranteed. Our is intercommunion and trade flat roof of dofus kamas,cabal alz,age of conan gold,2moons dil,eve isk,flyff penya,maplestory mesos,RF gold,Aion kina,Wonderland Gold,Rose zuly,Knight Noah,lotro gold,cheap kamas,bug,一键代发 and more online games. At the meaning time we have instanted reliable delivery methods . We are offering the safe , circumspect and 100% service. We will provide you the best 7/24 online service; you could get in touch with us by live chat or MSN at all times! Posted by: hong at November 05, 2009 10:06 PM (f/AAF) 498
Laptop Battery Laptop Battery Laptop Batteries Laptop Batteries discount laptop battery discount laptop battery notebook battery notebook battery computer battery computer battery replacement laptop battery replacement laptop battery notebook batteries notebook batteries
Posted by: laptopbatterytop at November 07, 2009 01:06 AM (AhInz) 499
wholesale nike shoes
wholesale shoes wholesale nike running shoes wholesale nike basketball shoes wholesale shoes wholesale jordan shoes wholesale dunk shoes wholesale adidas shoes SEO Ugg boots UK Ugg boots 美国主机< Posted by: asd at November 08, 2009 04:59 AM (ZGh8a) 500
Come to our website for shopping with high quality and best service! There have new products,MBT M. Walk
and MBT Lami,Welcome everybody to buy it. Posted by: mbt shoes at November 08, 2009 02:50 PM (QhfLM) 501
ed hardy ed hardy
ed hardy clothing ed hardy clothing ed hardy shop ed hardy shop christian audigier christian audigier ed hardy cheap ed hardy cheap ed hardy outlet ed hardy outlet ed hardy sale ed hardy sale ed hardy store ed hardy store man ed hardy man ed hardy woman ed hardy woman ed hardy kid ed hardy kid ed hardy Posted by: edhardy at November 12, 2009 01:03 AM (AhInz) 502
Buy discount ugg shoes
cheap ugg shoes cheap ugg ugg rainier buy ugg ugg usa discount ugg boots ugg 5825 ugg shoes sale ugg sundance ugg shoes cheap ugg boots ugg 5815 ugg sale ugg uk ugg knightsbridge womens ugg boots ugg boots ugg australia ugg 5819free shipping Posted by: ugg boots at November 12, 2009 09:40 AM (IeIJx) 503
buy [url=http://www.reviewups.com/]discount ugg shoes[/url]
[url=http://www.reviewups.com/]cheap ugg shoes[/url] [url=http://www.reviewups.com/]cheap ugg[/url] [url=http://www.reviewups.com/ugg-coquette-casual-shoes-c-22]ugg rainier[/url] [url=http://www.reviewups.com/]buy ugg[/url] [url=http://www.reviewups.com/]ugg usa[/url] [url=http://www.reviewups.com/]discount ugg boots[/url] [url=http://www.reviewups.com/ugg-classic-short-c-1]ugg 5825[/url] [url=http://www.reviewups.com/]ugg shoes sale[/url] [url=http://www.reviewups.com/ugg-sundance-c-5]ugg sundance[/url] [url=http://www.reviewups.com/]ugg shoes[/url] [url=http://www.reviewups.com/]cheap ugg boots[/url] [url=http://www.reviewups.com/ugg-classic-tall-c-3]ugg 5815[/url] [url=http://www.reviewups.com/]ugg sale[/url] [url=http://www.reviewups.com/]ugg uk[/url] [url=http://www.reviewups.com/ugg-knightsbridge-c-27]ugg knightsbridge[/url] [url=http://www.reviewups.com/]womens ugg boots[/url] [url=http://www.reviewups.com/]ugg boots[/url] [url=http://www.reviewups.com/]ugg australia[/url] [url=http://www.reviewups.com/ugg-classic-cardy-c-2]ugg 5819[/url]from usa Posted by: cheap at November 14, 2009 10:52 AM (s7MB5) 504
Replica Omega | soccer jersey wholesale | Replica Cartier | Replica watches | Replica watches | Seiko Watches Replica | Replica IWC | Fake Aigner Watches | Fake Oris | Hublot Fake | Seiko Fake | Zenith Fake Watches | Concord Watch | Fake Corum | Breitling Watches
Posted by: replica watches at November 17, 2009 05:58 AM (xpuiO) 505
Replica Breitling Watches | soccer jersey wholesale | Replica Watches | soccer jersey wholesale | replica soccer jersey | Maurice Lacroix Watches | Replica Piaget Watches | Replica Girard Perregaux Watch | Fake Vacheron Constantin Watches | Fake Chanel Watches | Tag Heuer Watch Replica | Replica Christian Dior Watch | Zenith Watches | Tissot Watch Replica | Replica Louis Vuitton
Posted by: replica watches at November 17, 2009 08:45 PM (xpuiO) 506
soccer jersey wholesale | Replica watches | Replica Rolex | Replica Omega | Replica watches | Fake IWC Watches | Replica Gucci Watch | Fake Baume & Mercier Watches | Rolex Fake | Philip Stein Replica Watch | Replica Alain Silberstein Watch | Hamilton Fake | Replica TAG Heuer Watch | best replica watches | replica watch
Posted by: replica watches at November 17, 2009 10:27 PM (xpuiO) 507
Replica Rolex | Replica Watches | Fake Cheap Rolex | replica soccer jersey | Replica Watches | Cheap Audemars Piguet Fake Watch | Fake Porsche Watch | Cheap Frank Muller | Cheap Other | Cheap Breitling Watches | Maurice Lacroix Replica Watches | Calvin Klein Replica Watch | Fake Piaget Watch | U-boat Replica Watches | Fake Maurice Lacroix Watches
Posted by: replica watches at November 18, 2009 04:58 AM (C/zDM) Posted by: mbtshoesbuy at November 23, 2009 01:32 PM (bNNim) 509
The proper function of man is to live, but not to exist.ugg classic cardyConquer fear of death and you are put into possession of your life. ugg classic tallThere is a time to speak and a time to be silent. ugg knightsbridgefree shippingmbt cheap
mbt sale mbt uk mbt shoes cheap MBT M.Walk Posted by: reviewups at November 27, 2009 12:15 PM (xUZwC) 510
hot news for brand shoes online store ,do you want to win more discount ?and popular for younger,and nike air maxwith top quality A ,come on all air max shoes with lowest price for highest quality !
Posted by: nike air max at December 02, 2009 12:03 AM (OKj2x) 511
Replica Cartier | Replica Breitling Watches | Fake Cheap Rolex | Replica Breitling Watches | Fake Watches | soccer jersey supplier | Replica Breitling Watches | Fake Watches | watches brand | replica watch | replica watches | replica watches | watches brand | replica watch | replica watch | best replica watches | Luxury watches | replica watch | Luxury watches | Luxury watches | replica wristwatch | replica wristwatch | watches brand | Luxury watches | watches brand | replica watch | best replica watches | watches brand | watches brand | Luxury watches | replica watch | best replica watches | best replica watches | replica watch | best replica watches | best replica watches | replica wristwatch | replica watches
Posted by: replica watches at December 04, 2009 09:13 AM (bsW/x) 512
We supply authentic discount Lacoste Shoes
Lacoste Trainers New Lacoste Lacoste Sale Mens Lacoste camden lacoste trainers lacoste trainers shoes lacoste camden retro camden lacoste trainers lacoste carnaby shoes lacoste carnaby retro lacoste shoes sale New Lacoste shoes Lacoste shoes online cheap Lacoste shoes Lacoste shoe mens lacoste shoes Lacoste Shua Lace Black Lace shoes white Lace shoes lacoste swerve shoes White Lacoste shoes Lacoste shoes sale Cheap Lacoste shoes Lacoste Women Shoes Women Lacoste Shoes Lacoste Shoes online on line, cheap price,Top quality,Free shipping! Posted by: Lacoste shoes at December 13, 2009 03:03 PM (/3s/N) 513
<h1><a href="http://www.handbagsmaster.com">gucci</a><br />
<a href="http://www.bestbuyreplicas.com">louis vuitton</a><br /> <a href="http://www.cheapsoftwares.cc">cheap software </a></h1> Posted by: ho at December 17, 2009 02:11 AM (OxG4G) 514
Fake Watches | Fake Watches
Parmigiani Watches Replica Replica Chopard Fake Ulysse Nardin Watches TAG Heuer Replica Tissot Replica Watch Blancpain Watches Replica Zenith Watches Replica Vacheron Constantin Replica Replica Rolex A Lange & Sohne Replica Watches Rolex Watches Replica Breguet Replica Watch Christian Dior Fake Watches Replica Christian Dior Watch Chanel Watches Replica Bedat & CO Watches Replica Omega Fake Gucci Watch Parmigiani Replica Watches Fake Gucci Replica Rado Breguet Fake Watches Bulgari Watch Breguet Replica Watches Oris Watches Replica Posted by: rolex watches at December 17, 2009 11:24 AM (EGD2i) 515
[url=http://www.kina4aion.com/aion-kinah.html]aion kinah[/url]
[url=http://www.aiononline-powerleveling.com]aion power leveling[/url] [url=http://www.mmomage.com]wow power leveling[/url] [url=http://www.mmomage.com/gamegold.html]wow gold[/url] [url=http://www.gamespowerleveling.com]wow power leveling[/url] [url=http://www.gamespowerleveling.com]wow gold[/url] [url=http://www.gamespowerleveling.com]aion kinah[/url] [url=http://www.gamespowerleveling.com]aion power leveling[/url] [url=http://www.daevahome.com]aion power leveling[/url] [url=http://www.daevahome.com/gamegold.html]aion kinah[/url] Posted by: mmo at December 18, 2009 04:41 PM (RC8+F) 516
Shopping for a Rolex watch online can tag heuer make the job Rolex Watches easier but you Replica Watches also have to be patek philippe wary about the reputation of the dealer Chanel Watches and the brand of Breitling Watches watch you are audemars piguet getting. The more mont blanc watches considerable you are, the less danger you would come to armani watches when buying a Omega Watches gold watch online.
Posted by: rolex at December 20, 2009 09:04 AM (/pchr) 517
Buy rolex Fake Watches and Replica Watches brands,rolex watches rolex watches, Replica rolex watches, replica rolex: replica rolex,replica rolex: replica breitling watches,replica tag heuer: replica tag heuer,replica cartier watches: replica cartier watches,replica omega watches: replica omega watches,replica panerai watches: replica panerai watches,replica armani watches: replica armani watches,replica audemars piguet: replica audemars piguet,replica bvlgari watches: replica bvlgari watches,replica chanel watches: replica chanel watches,replica gucci watches: replica gucci watches,replica movado watches: replica movado watches,replica montblanc watches: replica montblanc watches,replica patek philippe: replica patek philippe on sale.
Posted by: fake watches at December 20, 2009 09:11 AM (/pchr) 518
Alain Silberstein Replica Watches | Philip Stein Replica Watches | Aigner Replica Watches | Watches Swiss Fashion | Zenith Replica Watches | Replica Porsche Design Watches | Replica Tissot Watches | Replica Tissot Watches | Gucci Belt Replica Watches | Blancpain Fake Watches | Watches Roger Dubuis Fashion | Rado Fake Watches | Replica Emporio Armani Watches | Concord Replica Watches | Replica Concord Watches | Watches Panerai Fashion | Watches Audemars Piguet Fashion | Girard Perregaux Fake Watches | Patek Philippe Replica Watches | Replica Mont Blanc Watches
Posted by: wholesale jewelry at December 20, 2009 10:09 AM (1dySH) 519
Wholesale rolex watches,tag heuer watches and replica rolex watches,replica watches replica breitling watches breitling watches,chanel watches chanel watches replica patek philippe patek philippe watches,replica audemars piguet watches replica montblanc watches from China.Tag heuer fake watches and replica watches replica tag heuer watches,buy replica rolex watches and replica rolex breitling watches breitling watches at lowest price for you.
Posted by: tag heuer at December 24, 2009 09:01 AM (Q1bfX) 520
Replica rolex watches,tag heuer watches and replica rolex watches,replica watches replica breitling watches breitling watches,chanel watches chanel watches replica patek philippe patek philippe watches,replica audemars piguet watches replica montblanc watches for men and women.
Posted by: tag heuer at December 24, 2009 07:35 PM (Bp0xg) 521
Replica fake watches and replica watches brands,rolex watches rolex watches, replica rolex: replica rolex,replica rolex: breitling watches,replica tag heuer: tag heuer,replica cartier watches: cartier watches,replica omega watches: omega watches,replica panerai watches: replica panerai watches,replica armani watches: replica armani watches,replica audemars piguet: replica audemars piguet,replica bvlgari watches: replica bvlgari watches,replica chanel watches: replica chanel watches,replica gucci watches: replica gucci watches,replica movado watches: replica movado watches,replica montblanc watches: replica montblanc watches,replica patek philippe: replica patek philippe sale.Replica rolex watches and tag heuer watches, rolex watches,Replica Watches replica watches,patek philippe patek philippe Watches,audemars piguet audemars piguet,Omega Watches: omega watches,replica Cartier Watches cartier watches,Breitling Watches breitling watches,Chanel Watches: chanel watches,armani watches: armani watches,iwc watches iwc watches,mont blanc watches montblanc watches.
Posted by: rolex at December 25, 2009 10:33 AM (nRNCD) 522
We sell rolex and tag heuer watch, rolex watches,Rolex replica watches,replica patek philippe Watches,replica audemars piguet,Omega Watches omega watches,replica Cartier cartier watches,Breitling breitling watches,replica chanel watches,armani watches: armani watches,iwc watches iwc watches,montblanc montblanc watches Replica.Cheap fake watches and replica watches on sale,rolex watches rolex watches, watches replica rolex,replica breitling watches,replica tag heuer: tag heuer,replica cartier watches: cartier watches,replica omega watches: omega watches,replica panerai watches: replica panerai watches,replica armani watches: replica armani watches,replica audemars piguet: replica audemars piguet,replica bvlgari watches: replica bvlgari watches,replica chanel watches: replica chanel watches,replica gucci watches: replica gucci watches,replica movado watches: replica movado watches,replica montblanc watches: replica montblanc watches,replica patek philippe: replica patek philippe sale for people.
Posted by: replica watches at December 27, 2009 07:55 AM (52U6J) Posted by: Breguet watches at December 27, 2009 08:50 PM (QN9Ge) 524
You will have Aion Power Leveling many options that you can Tiffany choose from Aion Gold during play.
Posted by: Aion Power Leveling at January 01, 2010 02:03 AM (Jxie0) 525
Cheap replica rolex and tag heuer watches,replica watches of rolex rolex watches replica,buy patek philippe Buy replica watches,fake watches and tag heuer watches.
Posted by: tag heuer at January 01, 2010 12:32 PM (nUnK8) 526
ed hardy ed hardy ed hardy clothing ed hardy clothing ed hardy jeans ed hardy jeans christian audigier christian audigier ed hardy hoodies ed hardy hoodies ed hardy uk ed hardy uk ed hardy bags ed hardy bags ed hardy t shirts ed hardy t shirts ed hardy mens ed hardy mens ed hardy womens ed hardy womens ed hardy kids ed hardy kids ed hardy kids
Posted by: ed hardy at January 02, 2010 09:25 PM (AhInz) 527
Solar cell phonechargers have the advantage that since they are connected to the solar panels, a battery back up is provided for storing the solar power. The Turbo recharge facility available in such chargers makes sure that the phone is not damaged or over charged unlike the conventional electrical battery chargers. These products are a kind of power banks which can serve as important back ups for small electronics in case of electricity failures.
Posted by: cell phone at January 03, 2010 03:29 AM (AhInz) 528
Buy low and sell high. There is a good source to help your business grow and profitable to buy handbags at wholesale prices from our best China wholesale online stores offering wide range of wholesale products including cheap handbags, designer handbags, wholesale handbags, replica handbags, UGG boots and many more. Whatever style you choose, you would get a good price!
Posted by: handbags at January 05, 2010 01:43 AM (QutGb) 529
Un total de once comunidades autnomas estn este jueves en alerta naranja Christmas gift ugg tall boots (riesgo importante) por nevadas y bajan las temperaturas en toda Espa09a, segn la Agencia Estatal de Meteorologa (AEMET). En concreto, se Christmas gift ugg napoule sandal trata de Aragn, Cantabria, Castilla-La Mancha, Catalu09a, Christmas gift timberland classic boots Madrid, Navarra, Comunidad Valenciana, Galicia, Pas Vasco, Asturias y Murcia. La cota de nieve bajar a menos de 200 metros en el CantbricoLa Pennsula Ibrica est bajo dos borrascas y un anticicln que crearn un pasillo que permitir el paso de una corriente de aire muy fro, como la que est provocando un temporal de fro glaciar en Europa, aunque es esperan que el fro que suframos no sea tan intenso como en otros pases. An as, se espera que las bajas temperaturas se mantengan hasta el domingo. La cota de nieve baja en el Cantbrico a menos de 200 metros
Posted by: El temporal de fr¨ªo y nieve pone en alerta a once comunidades aut¨®nomas ugg boots|ugg uk|timberlan at January 10, 2010 08:10 AM (tWrEP) 530
Buy rolex watches,tag heuer watches and replica patek philippe patek philippe watches,replica audemars piguet> replica breitling watches breitling watches,chanel watches chanel watches watches replica montblanc watches.Rolex fake watches and replica watches brands,replica rolex: breitling watches,replica tag heuer: tag heuer, replica rolex: replica rolex replica cartier watches: cartier watches,replica omega watches: omega watches,replica panerai watches: panerai watches,replica armani watches: armani watches,replica audemars piguet: audemars piguet,replica bvlgari watches: bvlgari watches,replica chanel watches: chanel watches,replica gucci watches: gucci watches,replica movado watches: movado watches,replica montblanc watches: montblanc watches,replica patek philippe: patek philippe on sale.replica watches and replica watches.
Posted by: rolex at January 10, 2010 09:09 PM (OO9Jx) 531
徵信社徵信徵信社徵信徵信社徵信徵信社徵信徵信社徵信徵信社徵信徵信社徵信徵信社徵信徵信社徵信徵信社徵信徵信社徵信徵信社徵信徵信社徵信徵信社徵信徵信社徵信徵信社徵信徵信社徵信徵信社徵信徵信社徵信徵信社徵信徵信社徵信徵信社徵信徵信社徵信徵信社徵信徵信社徵信徵信社徵信徵信社徵信
Posted by: dd at January 17, 2010 09:27 PM (wevkx) 532
cheap replica watches and breitling watches,tag heuer He chose the name Edox,English rolex, being patek philippe the oldest brands omega watches in watch manufacturing.audemars piguet,with its montblanc watches The cartier watches name of this new watch is Edox Mens Class Royale Mechanical panerai watches Watch bvlgari watches of attraction.The case is armani watches rectangular on sale.
Posted by: replica watches at January 21, 2010 05:44 PM (fyHwu) 533
Good replica watches and buy replica watches and replica rolex replica replica tag heuer watches,buy replica replica omega watches and breitling watches replica breitling watches sale at lowest prices.
Posted by: replica watches at January 23, 2010 08:03 PM (ioa0w) 534
Our website have many goods,Rolex - Replica handbags,Replica Rolex - Replica Watches - Rolex Watches - Replica rolex - Rolex - Rolex Rolex Replica Rolex Rolex Replica Rolex Vertu Vertu Replica, Rolex,Replica Watches, I belive that you will like them !
Posted by: replica watches paypal at January 27, 2010 09:47 PM (+29Vi) 535
coach handbagselectronic cigarettenfl jerseyweight loss nfl jerseys wholesaleweight loss tipsnfl jerseyscheap car insurance car insurance
Posted by: weight at January 28, 2010 09:53 PM (/n8uu) 536
Buy rolex replica watches and replica watches replica replica watches and replica rolex watches patek philippe watches and fake watches and breitling watches,replica tag heuer: tag heuer,replica cartier watches: cartier watches,replica omega watches: omega watches at lowest prices.
Posted by: replica rolex at January 29, 2010 08:47 AM (h+uyA) 537
Swiss replica watches Now while replica watches you can buy a good digital replica watches and pocket watch you might need to see what features are present on your new purchase. This is important as you should know and understand the quickest way to set any of the watch brands. You will also need to familiarize yourself with how to know when you will need to change the batteries on your digital watch.The key to finding your perfect watch is mainly replica watches keeping your options open. There are flea markets where you should be able to find replica watch stalls. You can see if you will come across any great antique watch brands in auction houses. These places will sometimes have fantastic looking antique pocket watches that will grace the hand of any owner.These facts may seem to be quite daunting but if you have ever owned a watch of any kind then you will replica watches know that you just how replica watches easy wristwatch these devices can make your life. The many different styles and features that you can find on an average watch will make choosing the right watch brands an exciting experience. Posted by: replica watches at January 29, 2010 11:42 PM (ihruD) 538
The replica watches dial design replica watches 100% copy replica watches of the previous omega watches model: the famous Manchester Logo is located at 3 and the cartier watches chronograph 45-minute breitling watches at 9 with orange figures. Football fans can use the very special 45-minute chronograph to measure the halves of a football match. Black patek philippe hour hand and minute hand features yellow luminescent coating. The hour makers, chronograph audemars piguet and the first 15-minute scale of the tag heuer chronograph counter is montblanc watches presented in eye-catching rolex red. Bright Yellow movado watches tones are found on the minute track, date bvlgari watches window and the text.
Posted by: replica watches at February 03, 2010 03:54 PM (FS54P) 539
Cheap replica watches and replica watches 100% copy replica watches of the previous omega watches model: the famous Manchester Logo is located at 3 and the cartier watches chronograph 45-minute breitling watches at 9 with orange figures. Football fans can use the very special 45-minute chronograph to measure the halves of a football match. Black patek philippe hour hand and minute hand features yellow luminescent coating. The hour makers, chronograph audemars piguet and the first 15-minute scale of the tag heuer chronograph counter is montblanc watches presented in eye-catching rolex red. Bright Yellow movado watches tones are found on the minute track, date bvlgari watches rolex on sale.
Posted by: replica watches at February 04, 2010 11:36 PM (0uEN8) 540
Certainly watches are Replica Watches used to help people record rolex Watches time, but rolex watches nowadays its functions have enlarged. Replica watches are now tag heuer Watches not only objects that tag heuer watches can tell you what time it is, they are also a status symbol. You should not feel strange when you find someone wearing a watch on his wrist, but use the cell phone to tell time. In that situation, the watch is just showing its luxurious function cartier watches. It is normal and cartier watches perhaps also happens to you. .If asked that among the watches of various brands, which one can suit your taste? There is no doubt that most people will choose Rolex. Whichever social class you are in, it is naturally Rolex was known breitling Watches and cherished breitling watches for a long time. However, the elements do not usually enter the market alone, always come with the price tag up to the hand. For this reason, many people, especially men, their dreams of luxury Rolex watches are buried in omega Watches his heart omega watches. What should I do? Rolex watches are simply stunning worn by the rich and famous, right? No, this world is not the world's richest men, is the world of each. All are equal before the search of luxury and be men's watches respected. Within men's watches, the law, when consumers are in the market, women's watches they should women's watches receive the same treatment. This is the real reason why replica Rolex watches are ladies watches ladies watches more welcome than Rolex. Because in this world are not difficult to understand that the rich are much less than people with low income, you agree with me? You are forced to nod and say with certainty that is the reality. These low-income people do not have enough money to save every month. They can not afford such luxury Rolex watches
Posted by: replica watches at February 05, 2010 09:17 AM (TUJDt) Posted by: dannysun at February 06, 2010 03:35 AM (5A97J) 542
this replica watches replica watchWhoever wants replica watches timekeeper that does the job of a tachometer will be crazy for. The operation is performed by the copied replica rolex 's bezel. The Daytona also applies automatic movement ¨C just one of many breitling watches characters and functionalities that ensures the precision of time. Originally created to measure lap time and the cartier watches overall time of a race, Rolex Daytona replica omega watches timepieces can measure elapsed time for omega any sporting event. The power of this breitling replica item is made possibly by its internalized perpetual rotor mechanism. Known for its precision, this special Rolex replica cartier watch model only has to be set once to the cartier watches standard time of the owner's choice. Once rolex watches being created, it updates itself during time changes, making upkeep of the replica's time setting replica watches nonexistent. Even though these replica watches were made for sporting events, (specifically those involving laps or circuits), it's not so adversible to put them tag heuer in water since they are not fake watches waterproof. Even thought most of the time, the replica watches do not bear the tag heuer same functionalities as the original ones, they are still the most desirable alternatives of the expensive real models.
Posted by: replica watches at February 06, 2010 03:16 PM (KbTNE) 543
Factors Replica Watches About The Rolex replica watches Oyster The Oyster is so closely get in touch with Rolex, and it is inevitably that some people think these are the only Replica watches Rolex manufacture. Others suppose that there is a single Oyster watch. But as a matter of fact, the name Oyster does not actually meant for a rolex Watches particular watch you can buy rolex watches or even to a series but to a type of case that available in some of the Rolex ranges. History The Oyster case was first released in 1926. The objective was to protect the workings of the watch from dust and moisture. Early watches were far from waterproof. The Oyster tag heuer Watchescase was an tag heuer watches innovative design to eliminate these problems. It had a new double locking crown that screwed into place. It has been compared to the hatch on a submarine. Like a submarine, the Oyster case was waterproof. In 1927 Mercedes Gleitze swam the English breitling Watches Channel breitling watches . Before she set off she was presented with a Rolex Oyster. When she arrived, the watch was still working perfectly. The resulting publicity gave the new case a massive boost. Why is it called Oyster? Legend has it that Hans cartier Watches Wilsdorf cartier watches, who invented the Oyster, chose the name because the new case reminded him of the difficulty he had experienced prising open oysters at dinner. Since then the Oyster has further, particularly advanced. Many Oyster watches today are omega Watches perpetual-self-winding, in other omega watches words, it does not require to expose the mechanism to the outside world in order to wind it. The Osyter Perpetual is one of the toughest, most durable, most reliable watches (under truly adverse conditions). It is probably the best mechanical watch money can buy.
Posted by: replica watches at February 08, 2010 08:40 AM (TUJDt) Processing 0.2, elapsed 0.2089 seconds. |
MuNuvians
MeeNuvians
Polls! Polls! Polls!
Dale's ECB Election Projection Federal Review Real Clear Politics Rasmussen Reports Gallup Zogby FoxNews Polls Sabato/Crystal Ball Frequently Asked Questions
The (Almost) Complete Paul Anka Integrity Kick
Primary Document: The Audio
Paul Anka Haiku Contest Announcement Integrity SAT's: Entrance Exam for Paul Anka's Band AllahPundit's Paul Anka 45's Collection AnkaPundit: Paul Anka Takes Over the Site for a Weekend (Continues through to Monday's postings) George Bush Slices Don Rumsfeld Like an F*ckin' Hammer Top Top Tens
Democratic Forays into Erotica New Shows On Gore's DNC/MTV Network Nicknames for Potatoes, By People Who Really Hate Potatoes Star Wars Euphemisms for Self-Abuse Signs You're at an Iraqi "Wedding Party" Signs Your Clown Has Gone Bad Signs That You, Geroge Michael, Should Probably Just Give It Up Signs of Hip-Hop Influence on John Kerry NYT Headlines Spinning Bush's Jobs Boom Things People Are More Likely to Say Than "Did You Hear What Al Franken Said Yesterday?" Signs that Paul Krugman Has Lost His Frickin' Mind All-Time Best NBA Players, According to Senator Robert Byrd Other Bad Things About the Jews, According to the Koran Signs That David Letterman Just Doesn't Care Anymore Examples of Bob Kerrey's Insufferable Racial Jackassery Signs Andy Rooney Is Going Senile Other Judgments Dick Clarke Made About Condi Rice Based on Her Appearance Collective Names for Groups of People John Kerry's Other Vietnam Super-Pets Cool Things About the XM8 Assault Rifle Media-Approved Facts About the Democrat Spy Changes to Make Christianity More "Inclusive" Secret John Kerry Senatorial Accomplishments John Edwards Campaign Excuses John Kerry Pick-Up Lines Changes Liberal Senator George Michell Will Make at Disney Torments in Dog-Hell Greatest Hitjobs
The Ace of Spades HQ Sex-for-Money Skankathon A D&D Guide to the Democratic Candidates Margaret Cho: Just Not Funny More Margaret Cho Abuse Margaret Cho: Still Not Funny Iraqi Prisoner Claims He Was Raped... By Woman Wonkette Announces "Morning Zoo" Format John Kerry's "Plan" Causes Surrender of Moqtada al-Sadr's Militia World Muslim Leaders Apologize for Nick Berg's Beheading Michael Moore Goes on Lunchtime Manhattan Death-Spree Milestone: Oliver Willis Posts 400th "Fake News Article" Referencing Britney Spears Liberal Economists Rue a "New Decade of Greed" Artificial Insouciance: Maureen Dowd's Word Processor Revolts Against Her Numbing Imbecility Intelligence Officials Eye Blogs for Tips They Done Found Us Out, Cletus: Intrepid Internet Detective Figures Out Our Master Plan Shock: Josh Marshall Almost Mentions Sarin Discovery in Iraq Leather-Clad Biker Freaks Terrorize Australian Town When Clinton Was President, Torture Was Cool What Wonkette Means When She Explains What Tina Brown Means Wonkette's Stand-Up Act Wankette HQ Gay-Rumors Du Jour Here's What's Bugging Me: Goose and Slider My Own Micah Wright Style Confession of Dishonesty Outraged "Conservatives" React to the FMA An On-Line Impression of Dennis Miller Having Sex with a Kodiak Bear The Story the Rightwing Media Refuses to Report! Our Lunch with David "Glengarry Glen Ross" Mamet The House of Love: Paul Krugman A Michael Moore Mystery (TM) The Dowd-O-Matic! Liberal Consistency and Other Myths Kepler's Laws of Liberal Media Bias John Kerry-- The Splunge! Candidate "Divisive" Politics & "Attacks on Patriotism" (very long) The Donkey ("The Raven" parody) News/Chat
|