| Support
Contact
| Raid Inside Syria [Vinnie]Yup, we're all out of bubblegum. Did we net a big fish? Only time will tell.A U.S. military official said the raid by special forces targeted the foreign fighter network that travels through Syria into Iraq. The Americans have been unable to shut the network down in the area because Syria was out of the military's reach. "We are taking matters into our own hands," the official told The Associated Press on condition of anonymity because of the political sensitivity of cross-border raids.More good news here. Hat tip: The entire right blogosphere. I don't know possibly where to start! Update: Again from LWJ, it appears we have a target. Comments1
Can I get a "Fuck yeah!"?
Posted by: paranoidpyro at October 26, 2008 06:52 PM (W4Ivi) 2
You can!
Posted by: Vinnie at October 26, 2008 06:53 PM (idf83) 3
fuck yeah!!
Posted by: trailortrash at October 26, 2008 06:53 PM (pseS/) 4
I hope no innocent civilians were killed.
Posted by: Christoph at October 26, 2008 06:57 PM (hawOV) 5
Break out the Val-U-Rite Posted by: Vic at October 26, 2008 06:58 PM (b1ysY) 6
No pictures of the wedding?
Posted by: Stinky Esposito at October 26, 2008 07:01 PM (MMC8r) 7
The only innocent civilians killed in the raid were carrying AK-47's and not considered combatants according to liberals and the UN.
Posted by: Fish at October 26, 2008 07:01 PM (6Rihj) 8
Our spec ops are getting a little sloppy... YOU'RE NOT SUPPOSED TO LEAVE ANY WITTNESSES!!!
Posted by: MikeC at October 26, 2008 07:01 PM (XWJh5) 9
I question the timing!
Posted by: The Left at October 26, 2008 07:06 PM (qsGH+) 10
Today someone mentioned the time Bush saved his bodyguard in Chile?
Wouldn't it be great to gather your favorite moments and send them to him in January. He has taken a beating since 9-11, and Laura is a pain...burka wearing, george you shouldn't kill Osama, blah blah.....he needs our love. Pundits are calling the demise of the GOP, sorry msm and rinos, we just needed a candidate.other than McAmnesty and we would have wiped floor with our platform..SARAH USA SARAH USA Posted by: free at October 26, 2008 07:07 PM (cFwGO) 11
Vinnie Borden took an axe/
Gave Lizzie 40 whacks/
When he saw what he had done/
He watched internet porn and gave himself 41
Posted by: Lizzie at October 26, 2008 07:08 PM (Kbl0/) 12
How many kites were destroyed?
Posted by: toby928 at October 26, 2008 07:08 PM (PD1tk) 13
"The only innocent civilians killed in the raid were carrying AK-47's
and not considered combatants according to liberals and the UN."
How do you know, shithead? Posted by: Christoph at October 26, 2008 07:11 PM (hawOV) Posted by: JavaJoe at October 26, 2008 07:14 PM (Am6n/) 15
#11 - "Troops overwhelmingly are excited to get Obama as their Commander in Chief" That statement is so mind numbingly wrong it is hard to believe you posted it. All the military folks that I know (and there are a bunch) are getting ready to resign if O becomes the CIC. Every poll of military personnel show overwhelming support (like 70-30) for McCain. And with the Dems openly calling for defense cuts that O will sign off on the military will once again be hollowed out as it was under Carter and then again under Clinton. Posted by: aww at October 26, 2008 07:15 PM (JcoKu) Posted by: Popcorn at October 26, 2008 07:15 PM (Tha0W) 17
Lizzie is a fucking laugh a minute. I really do pity her when election day comes and goes. I really do fear for her, knowing her messiah lost. She might have to triple her meds.
Posted by: incognito at October 26, 2008 07:16 PM (Rpam5) 18
This is NOT the first raid into Syria guys. We have been doing these all along. Posted by: Vic at October 26, 2008 07:16 PM (b1ysY) Posted by: Fish at October 26, 2008 07:18 PM (6Rihj) 20
"Troops overwhelmingly are excited to get President Obama as their commander in chief."
Lizzie, you're a liar: You have no evidence for your assertion because you can't. The proof is on the other side. Further, you support a terrorist-associating bastard who's an infanticide-supporting asshole. You're an evil person and I'm sure you value your right to "choose". In a just society, if you made such a choice, you would be shot. Posted by: Christoph at October 26, 2008 07:18 PM (hawOV) 21
#11
Maybe there will come a time when military families look forward to a Democratic White House and Congress. But that time is not now. As of now, the memories of Kerry, Pelosi, and Murtha are still fresh. Posted by: Popcorn at October 26, 2008 07:18 PM (Tha0W) 22
Yeah!
Concern trolls and Obamabots! Next you'll see, I'm a concerned Christian Republican Conservative, I voted for Bush 3 times but what I'm seeing in this campaign is making me concerned. Blah blah blah... Posted by: JavaJoe at October 26, 2008 07:18 PM (Am6n/) 23
JavaJoe, you are stupid. But you vote for the right side, so I can forgive that.
Posted by: Christoph at October 26, 2008 07:20 PM (hawOV) 24
You seem concerned Chrissy.
Posted by: JavaJoe at October 26, 2008 07:20 PM (Am6n/) 25
Well one thing's for sure, we can kiss stories like these goodbye if the one is elected.
Posted by: Kae Gregory at October 26, 2008 07:24 PM (YbfnA) 26
The sentence, "I hope no innocent civilians were killed," is hardly an example of trolling.
The U.S. military commander in this operation/theater is or ought to be concerned about that. And I'm sure they are. It's not their main concern -- nor should it be: Accomplishing their mission is and collateral damage is both a risk and a reality. However, as a human being, one who is "concerned", I can hope, for what little good it does, that no innocent people died in the operation. That's hardly unreasonable. Posted by: Christoph at October 26, 2008 07:25 PM (hawOV) 27
One can only hope that Bush finally kicks in for Cainer and keeps this up all week, changing the subject to foreign policy...Obama will screw up answering questions about this. Posted by: geoff at October 26, 2008 07:25 PM (zEGWh) 28
Well one thing's for sure, we can kiss stories like these goodbye if the one is elected.
No, stories like these will be plastered as the greatest military victory since Midway if Barry is the CinC. Posted by: JavaJoe at October 26, 2008 07:25 PM (Am6n/) 29
Oh, Lizzie, you made that one far too easy for me. Try better next time, k?
Posted by: Vinnie at October 26, 2008 07:26 PM (idf83) 30
As a concerned Christian conservative, I find this information disturbing. I may just have to vote for Obama, and since I live in Pa, I may have to vote for him 25-26 times.
Posted by: TotallynotatrollIswear at October 26, 2008 07:26 PM (W4Ivi) 31
Christoph, keeping civilian deaths to a minimum is a worthy goal, but when "innocent civilians" are acting as human shields it's kinda hard to successfully complete a mission without a few "innocents" biting the dust.
Posted by: paranoidpyro at October 26, 2008 07:28 PM (W4Ivi) 32
I think its a good sign to see trolls and Obamanots. Bush has to get Osama next week and we're all set. Posted by: geoff at October 26, 2008 07:29 PM (zEGWh) Posted by: Fish at October 26, 2008 07:30 PM (6Rihj) 34
President Obama has promised to step up the War on Terror. By unconditionally surrendering the war in Iraq, acknowledged by the DoD, the U.S. military, and, you know, the terrorists as the front line campaign in the War on Terror. And a war that we pretty much can't lose at this point without the intervention of Barack Obama and his "we must surrender because we can only confront evil with 'humility'!!!!!" anti-American psychosis. I predict under President Obama that Bin Laden will be captured. He's dead, you stupid bitch. He's been dead for years. He's dead like so, so many of his Al Qaeda cohorts, courtesy of the U.S. military under George W. Bush. Al Qaeda is a spent and fractured force, despite the vaginal blubberings of beta-male pussies like Barack Obama. But by all means, let's elect a corrupt, incompetent, unaccomplished, racist, Marxist buffoon so he can dedicate the military (that he intends to burn to the ground with budget cuts) to dredging up bin Laden's teeth in a cave somewhere. Islamic terrorism problem solved! Bin Laden is, after all, the Head Jihadi Vampire! Troops overwhelmingly are excited to get President Obama as their commander in chief. Wow. Just wow. If you're a parody, you're leaning awfully close over the "way too obvious" line. Best step it back a bit to keep the skit going. Not even Kos himself would spit out Axelrod's cock long enough to choke up something this intellectually dishonest and detached from reality. Posted by: VJay at October 26, 2008 07:32 PM (k87Wm) 35
Chrissy,
Yes, your concern has no bounds. You read a story like this that the military is kicking butt and your heart bleeds for the innocent (no proof of any) civilians slaughtered. Then when someone comments that the innocents were carrying AK47s you call him a shithead, then me stupid. I'm concerned for you. Posted by: JavaJoe at October 26, 2008 07:32 PM (Am6n/) 36
"Education can be both beneficial and seductive. Try it!"
Posted by: Fish at October 26, 2008 07:30 PM (6Rihj) You don't know. You're stupid and ignorant in addition to being an immoral shithead around concern -- yes, concern -- about innocent life. Education would lead one to this blatantly obvious conclusion: civilians sometimes die in military operations. Posted by: Christoph at October 26, 2008 07:33 PM (hawOV) 37
aww @15: I sorta' thought that might be the attitude within the military wrt an Obama presidency. It makes me wonder if that wouldn't force the MFs hand on reinstitution of the draft.
Don't get me wrong, I don't blame those serving in the military one tiny bit, I'd do the same if I were in their position. Reminds me of the military folks I worked with during the Clinton years. Posted by: NM Hick at October 26, 2008 07:34 PM (STXJ7) 38
Vjay: What about that Times of India report on Bin Laden? All false psyops? If so, who's running the show now if Bin Laden is dead? Posted by: geoff at October 26, 2008 07:35 PM (zEGWh) 39
I urge the United States and Syria to suspend their military activities so we can ask the UN what to do.
Posted by: Barack Obama at October 26, 2008 07:37 PM (KOkrW) 40
I hope there was collateral damage, meaning Syrian civilians. They don't overthrow the Assad dynasty, they can suffer the consequences. Fuck them. Of course, action like this will be a thing of the past come next January, when The One travels to Damascus to apologize. Posted by: Jones in CO at October 26, 2008 07:39 PM (KOkrW) 41
Christoph, people are just twigging on the fact that Syria's reporting -all- the injuries as civilians.
"Five insurgents and a civilian were killed..." -> ok, reasonable. But if the statement is '100% of injuries were to civilians', then we're in Baghdad Bob territory. Posted by: Al at October 26, 2008 07:40 PM (Lk931) 42
You're stupid and ignorant
1963-64 Co A, 1st Special Forces Group(Abn), TDY from Okinawa to I Corp, Team A-113, Republic of Vietnam 1966-67 118th Assault Helicopter Co, Bandit Gun Platoon, Bandit 32, III Corp, Bien Hoa, Republic of Vietnam (Attack pilot) 1969 Co A, 228th Avn Bn, 1st Cavalry Division, III Corp, Bear Cat, Republic of Vietnam (Chinook Cargo Pilot) Maybe stupid and ignorant, but heavily schooled in the art of avoidance of civilian casualities. Your resume sir? Posted by: Fish at October 26, 2008 07:40 PM (6Rihj) 43
JavaJoe, as I said, you're stupid. Literally stupid. Not a figure of speech.
Military operations carry the risk of collateral damage. I fully understand it. I was trained to kill the enemy while trying not to kill civilians, but not to be overly concerned about the fact either. I get it. And if you were a smarter man, instead of the mentally deficient idiot you embarrassingly show yourself to be: "your heart bleeds for the innocent (no proof of any) civilians slaughtered" ... you would understand I simply said, "I hope no innocent civilians were killed." That's all. Nothing more or less. I didn't say any were killed nor did I say the operation wasn't completely justified even if they were civilian casualties. A decent man, a moral man, would say, "I hope no civilians were killed either, but even more, I hope they got their target." Instead you gloat and glee with blood lust from behind a computer. You're a puke. "when someone comments that the innocents were carrying AK47s" Speaking of proof, there's no proof of that either. And I don't deny the possibility. My not desiring innocent civilians to be killed does not equal not wanting enemies to be defeated... or killed. Posted by: Christoph at October 26, 2008 07:41 PM (hawOV) Posted by: JavaJoe at October 26, 2008 07:43 PM (Am6n/) 45
Christoph: I don't see why you have such a beef with people on here. Everyone agrees that civi casualties should be avoided if possible, you're standing on principle in your complaints but you have no facts to back it up. At best its a misunderstanding, and can't we all agree it is a good development that we got away clean from a Syria raid on a HVT? Go America, hu-wah Posted by: geoff at October 26, 2008 07:43 PM (zEGWh) 46
"Christoph, people are just twigging on the fact that Syria's reporting -all- the injuries as civilians."
U.S. Special Forces probably dismounted so they could confirm their target and minimize civilian casualties. It's entirely probable there weren't any. Or that they were minimized. My saying I hope there weren't any innocent killed doesn't mean I think the U.S. acted recklessly. By putting soldiers on the ground they increased their risk... which is further proof that my position of "hoping" innocent civilians weren't killed is a reasonable one. So reasonable, it probably made it into mission planning. Posted by: Christoph at October 26, 2008 07:43 PM (hawOV) 47
In these, the last 100 days of the Bush administration, we might expect a certain "ehhhh, fuck-it" quality to what might have required delicate diplomatic measures before.
In other words, he ain't got nothing to lose! Iran - nervous much? Posted by: Arthur at October 26, 2008 07:45 PM (OJ3yu) Posted by: JavaJoe at October 26, 2008 07:45 PM (Am6n/) 49
Jones, Sadlly, the Obama DAmascus tour to apologize would probably happen if he wins. Freaking sickening.......America is maybe going to handed over to a unrepentant New Party America hating Socialist, witha capital S. All those troops, all those decades of defending America...and now, the people are wanting Obama to lead us? It just doesn't make sense...................
Posted by: geoff at October 26, 2008 07:46 PM (zEGWh) 50
What about that Times of India report on Bin Laden? All false psyops? Maybe, maybe not. You tell me why a guy who would kill you if you got between him and a camera for years just plum decided that he doesn't like the limelight a few years ago, curiously around the time that our military was pounding the shit out of his positions and sending every single "newly promoted" upper-middle manager he nominated to hell on a shudder before he could apply for health insurance. Why the need to generate a series of laughably obvious fake videos featuring Obama bin Ventriloquist Dummy? He was charging too much for cameos? If so, who's running the show now if Bin Laden is dead? What show? Al Qaeda is screwed. It's dead. It's a crushed and humiliated force and soon to be an absolute joke even in the Middle East. If it weren't being systematically annihilated in Iraq and Afghanistan, it would be regularly conducting eye-grabbing terrorist operations on low-hanging fruit targets around the world just to maintain its appearance of strength and swell recruitments. But it hasn't because it can't. And I don't really give a shit about Bin Laden anyway. This isn't Law and Order; we're not looking to bring one man to justice. We're looking to kill tens of thousands of terrorist shitstains, cripple logistical and financial support for terrorist organizations, topple terrorist-supporting governments, and implant in the psyches of young youths of indeterminate ethnic origin that a career in Islamic terrorism is all about getting killed -- quickly -- and accomplishing absolutely nothing in the process. And we're succeeding on all these fronts. Posted by: VJay at October 26, 2008 07:46 PM (k87Wm) 51
"Troops overwhelmingly are excited to get President Obama as their commander in chief." See, this shit can't be real. Nobody....not even the Obamabots are this stupid and out of touch. Posted by: Twinks at October 26, 2008 07:46 PM (7QUxD) 52
You know, of course, that the whole category of "civilian" is a throwback to the era when European monarchs fought wars with each other because they were bored of chess. War as large-scale dueling, except with the duelists safely out of the way.
The distinction between soldier and civilian was invented to give such wars a legitimacy and dignity they did not deserve. Now, it is both moral and good policy not to kill people who are not engaged in assisting a war against us. But in a total war, when the whole resources of a state are brought to bear, "civilians" as such no longer exist. We are not in a total war against Syria. This is just a reminder that the issues are not so cut and dry. Posted by: Mastiff at October 26, 2008 07:47 PM (SkyLZ) 53
You right wingers can smear and censor and that's fine. Funny I get smeared and censored even when I am praising US troops and commenting that this is great news. I guess that simply gets in the way of your anti American or unpatriotic storyline. Imagine that: I praise the troops, I give the Bush defense department credit, and it still isn't enough.
But digest this, Vinnie and everyone else. The majority of voters aren't buying it either. So you can shut me up here. That's cool. But in 9 more days, Barack Obama will be elected president. You can't stop that. You can oppose it or lament it. But deep down, you know it's gonna happen. You know that you folks are in the minority in this country. You can cling to your beliefs. That's fine and I even respect you in some ways for doing so. But President Obama is coming. And he will fight the War on Terror much better than Bush has. He will defeat the Taliban - something that Bush has failed to do for 8 years and counting now. Posted by: Lizzie at October 26, 2008 07:47 PM (Kbl0/) Posted by: Christoph at October 26, 2008 07:47 PM (hawOV) 55
JavaJoe re: UN article: Love Bolton's response, "The fact is that most conservatives, most Republicans don't worship at the altar in New York, and I think that aggravates them more than anything else."
You got that right, John! Posted by: incognito at October 26, 2008 07:49 PM (Rpam5) 56
"See, this shit can't be real. Nobody....not even the Obamabots are this stupid and out of touch."
It's nothing to do with being stupid and out of touch. She's a liar. And evil. Posted by: Christoph at October 26, 2008 07:49 PM (hawOV) 57
Chrissy,
Thou buttons are very easy to push. Have you thrown the keyboard at the screen yet? Eyebrows knitting a sweater? Hey Fish just bitch slapped you with his Copter-Fu that's some wicked shit right there, but I'm sure you're gonna ignore it and well...I don't know I guess Eyem two dum. Posted by: JavaJoe at October 26, 2008 07:49 PM (Am6n/) 58
Although we can agree that Lizzy is a fucking liar and evil.
Posted by: JavaJoe at October 26, 2008 07:51 PM (Am6n/) 59
I wonder how much this little op cost? The reason I'm asking, is I always thought it to be a good idea to "spread the wealth" into countries that actively promote jihadis flooding into Iraq.
K Posted by: Kestrel♠ at October 26, 2008 07:51 PM (/HZnk) Posted by: Geebus at October 26, 2008 07:52 PM (ng56Z) Posted by: VJay at October 26, 2008 07:52 PM (k87Wm) 62
From the Yahoo! article:
"Iraqi travelers making their way home across the border reported hearing many explosions, said Farhan al-Mahalawi, mayor of Qaim." Must have been all them exploding shovels and tractor parts fabbed outta C4...serves 'em right for buying cheap Iranian goods. Should have been doing this a lot, lot sooner... Posted by: CPT. Charles at October 26, 2008 07:52 PM (nQ6xk) 63
And by the way, Fish, it is stupid and ignorant to state all the civilians were carrying AK-47s.
I've said they could have been. Or not. But you don't have any intelligence one way or the other. It's a stupid thing to say even if your resume rivals Chesty Puller's. Posted by: Christoph at October 26, 2008 07:52 PM (hawOV) 64
Mad Mullahs aren't happy. They were waiting for Obama to save their arses...LOL
Hope we hit something good. Posted by: SH at October 26, 2008 07:54 PM (arAyy) 65
Lizzie: Obama does have at least an even money chance of winning - but that is not because of his policies or his attractiveness. It is because this CENTER RIGHT country has been spooked by the financial crisis and slowly worn down by 6 years of Bush/GOP demonization. On the Taliban, Obama is NOT going to defeat them. Obama wouldnt know which end of a gun to hold. THE US MILITARY'S HEROS will defeat the TAliban, SO LONG AS OBAMA STAYS OUT OF THE FUCKING WAY. IF Obama interferes, with freaking peace talks iwth the TAliban, we will lose. McCain would never do that. So, the only chance of losing is electing your Messiah.
Posted by: geoff at October 26, 2008 07:54 PM (zEGWh) Posted by: Christoph at October 26, 2008 07:55 PM (hawOV) 67
Permit me to restate my comment with addendum. The only innocent civilians killed in the raid were carrying AK-47's and not considered combatants according to liberals and the UN. /S Posted by: Fish at October 26, 2008 07:57 PM (6Rihj) 68
A decent man, a moral man, would say, "I hope no civilians were killed either, but even more, I hope they got their target."
For a decent, moral man this would be implicit, something that does not need to be stated out loud. However for a moral exhibitionist... Posted by: Smash'em at October 26, 2008 07:59 PM (Vp5gu) 69
Christof: I find your assumption against our troops being moral human beings who WOULD NOT KILL CIVILIANS completely unacceptable. The assumption AGAINST good behavior by American citizens at arms, by YOU AND YOUR FRIEND, MURTHA, is the disease that could possibly kill the idea of America. You should be ashamed of yourself, those troops make it possible for you to breath air and live. To quote "A Few Good Men" YOU WANT [OUR TROOPS] ON THAT WALL, DEFENDING YOU. YOU MAY HATE [OUR TROOPS}, BUTYOU WANT THEM THERE, NEED THEM THERE. IF people liek you take over the country, America will be in deep trouble until we can clear you out in 12. Posted by: geoff at October 26, 2008 07:59 PM (zEGWh) 70
Good lord, why is this annoying little putz Christoph spending his entire waking life igno-blogging about OUR country? What's the matter, Chrissy, won't you countrymen hang out with you any more?
Go worry about Canada, for chrissakes, ya twit. Posted by: CB at October 26, 2008 08:01 PM (9Wv2j) 71
Christof, the only problem is that Obama thinks that the Taliban has "legitimate grievances" That will lose the war on terror, that one phrase alone. Murderous Islamic terrorists who set out to kill civilians by design HAVE NO LEGITIMATE GRIEVANCES. Posted by: geoff at October 26, 2008 08:01 PM (zEGWh) 72
"I find your assumption against our troops being moral human beings who WOULD NOT KILL CIVILIANS completely unacceptable.*"
geoff, Read again. Start at comment 46. Posted by: Christoph at October 26, 2008 08:03 PM (hawOV) 73
"Go worry about Canada"
We're doing fine. You're about to associate a Marxist who is pro-infantacide and chums with anti-American plotters, intellectuals, and bombers. Posted by: Christoph at October 26, 2008 08:04 PM (hawOV) 74
It's always heartwarming to know we have offed a few more Al Qaeda.
Posted by: mare at October 26, 2008 08:04 PM (X1fsj) 75
Did you see where evil nut fucker from Iran has fallen ill? obama has probably sent him a get well package of balloons and flowers.
Posted by: Ginger(KCLady) at October 26, 2008 08:07 PM (DLs8F) 76
You know there had to be a wedding nearby.
Posted by: mare at October 26, 2008 08:08 PM (X1fsj) 77
I'm sorry, did I get you miffed, Lizzie?
Let me remind you that only the government can censor. Idjit. I'll let your second moby comment stand as is, because, part of me believes that such idiocy needs to be let alone for the world to see. Posted by: Vinnie at October 26, 2008 08:08 PM (idf83) 78
geoff:
I support a strong, well-funded, and superbly armed military. On these threads, I've called for the United States to urgently rebuild it's nuclear arsenal. Etcetera. And etcetera. I merely said I hope no civillians died. I did not say one word against the U.S. military. Can you not see the difference? And if you look when I brought it up, you'll see there comments ahead of mine saying, "Fuck yeah!" I decided to add the other side to the mix. If, as you say: "Everyone agrees that civi casualties should be avoided if possible..." ... then what's wrong with me saying I hope they were avoided? Riddle me that. Posted by: Christoph at October 26, 2008 08:10 PM (hawOV) 79
Christoph, do you go around in your everyday life starting stupid arguments with everyone you meet? Or is it just here? Posted by: rickinstl at October 26, 2008 08:10 PM (XtOUI) Posted by: JavaJoe at October 26, 2008 08:10 PM (Am6n/) 81
Chris,
So which is it? Do our troops have the benefit of the doubt that they are conscientious operators that do their best to minimize civilian casualties or are they unpredictable automatons that should be always held in presumptive doubt? Your solitary statement of concern read like the latter. Posted by: adamthemad at October 26, 2008 08:11 PM (aVVGO) 82
"He will defeat the Taliban..." Lizzy, Lizzy, poor, stupid, delusional Lizzy.
What do you think Obama will do to defeat the Taliban? Straight answer please. And keep the rainbows, unicorns and free weed out of it. Posted by: mare at October 26, 2008 08:12 PM (X1fsj) 83
It's more likely that we landed troops in order to get some sort of intelligence rather than/or in addition to minimizing casualties.
Posted by: Popcorn at October 26, 2008 08:12 PM (Tha0W) 84
Blame Canada!! And pass the Midol . . . they just wish they were playas. They're not.
Posted by: CB at October 26, 2008 08:12 PM (9Wv2j) 85
"So which is it? Do our troops have the benefit of the doubt that they
are conscientious operators that do their best to minimize civilian
casualties..."
I give them the benefit of the doubt. I'm also saying I hope there were no civilian casualties regardless of what was intended. Posted by: Christoph at October 26, 2008 08:13 PM (hawOV) 86
I call on both sides in this conflict to exercise restraint.
Posted by: Barack Obama at October 26, 2008 08:13 PM (yn9Ji) 87
"Blame Canada!! And pass the Midol . . . they just wish they were playas. They're not."
So can we withdraw our forces from Afghanistan and our ships from the Gulf and just leave those lots to you? Posted by: Christoph at October 26, 2008 08:14 PM (hawOV) 88
Posted by: incognito at October 26, 2008 07:49 PM (Rpam5)
Yeah, did you see the quotes about them seeing Obama as African, not African American? Posted by: JavaJoe at October 26, 2008 08:15 PM (Am6n/) 89
Adam and Rick: Thanks for the backup. Chris, i am calling you out. You buy intot hte Murtha school of thought that the troops are guilty until proven innocent. BULLSHIT. The troops are innocent, and only guilty if they absolutely intentionally killed a defenseless civilian for no military reason. Your stream of thought is the reason Obama will destroy US Military credibility worldwide. Posted by: geoff at October 26, 2008 08:15 PM (zEGWh) 90
So can we withdraw our forces from Afghanistan and our ships from the Gulf and just leave those lots to you?
Yes Chrissy, yes, take them out now. What are you waiting for? Posted by: JavaJoe at October 26, 2008 08:16 PM (Am6n/) Posted by: mare at October 26, 2008 08:17 PM (X1fsj) 92
Aren't you glad John Bolton's Mustache is on our side. I love that guy.
Bolton's Mustache for President any year. FTFY Posted by: JavaJoe at October 26, 2008 08:20 PM (Am6n/) 93
Blame Canada!! And pass the Midol . . . they just wish they were playas. They're not. Actually Canada had nuclear weapons up to 1984, so they were most definitely players up to that point. But it's been a slow decline since then, mostly due to the governement continuously starving them of maintenance funds. Posted by: Mætenloch at October 26, 2008 08:20 PM (Js8cd) 94
Have fun, Tools. After January 20, no more dumb ass misconceived murder and mayhem by Cheney. And I'm not talking about it having to last 4 years - it's for at least 8, almost as likely 12, and quite possibly for the rest of your lives. You can't get thrills up your leg with Republican administrations reporting: Vini, vidi, we ated it unless you have Republican administrations, and right now that entire phylum is looking quite diplodocus.
Posted by: diderot's dog at October 26, 2008 08:21 PM (nrD02) 95
So can we withdraw our forces from Afghanistan and our ships from the Gulf and just leave those lots to you?
Fortunately, you don't seem to have an opinion that counts in your own country, which appears to explain your obsessive interest in ours. And, ya know what? FUCK Syria. We're still the only big dog in the fight and we definitely put a boot in their ass today. Posted by: CB at October 26, 2008 08:22 PM (9Wv2j) 96
Yeah, did you see the quotes about them seeing Obama as African, not African American?
Maybe they know something we don't know? Posted by: incognito at October 26, 2008 08:23 PM (Rpam5) 97
"Chris, i am calling you out. You buy intot hte Murtha school of thought that the troops are guilty until proven innocent"
"BULLSHIT." Geoff, you can "call me out" all you want, but you don't know what the fuck you're talking about. You'd be hard pressed to find a bigger supporter of the U.S. military in Canada than yours truly. You're reaching the wrong conclusion here. But I don't think you're being intellectually honest either. When you read comment #46, is it not apparent that I believe the U.S. sent dismounted troops for 2 reasons, one of which increased their own risk of casualties, but decreased the risk of innocent civilian casualties? Does this sound like slander against the United States armed forces? You're a funny fellow, geoff. On the one hand, you say everyone is in agreement that civilian casualties should be avoided if possible... and on the other hand, if a person says they hope civilian casualties were avoided, you think they're anti-U.S. military. It's a compliment, actually. The U.S. military generally does take great precautions to minimize civilian casualties, as they appear to have done in mission planning in this case. I'm saying some of the blog commenters here (paranoidpyro, Vinnie) are a bit gung ho.Posted by: Christoph at October 26, 2008 08:23 PM (hawOV) 98
Oh, great, look who just crawled out of the basement, dirty diapers and all.
Posted by: CB at October 26, 2008 08:23 PM (9Wv2j) 99
Canada has relinquished it's sovereignty to the US for it's Nuclear retaliation and defense.
Yeah, the Yanks will protect their land from missiles, no need for us hosers to spend a dime. Nope. I have relatives in Toronto too, they don't care. Big Brother will take care of um. Posted by: JavaJoe at October 26, 2008 08:24 PM (Am6n/) Posted by: incognito at October 26, 2008 08:25 PM (Rpam5) 101
Yes Chrissy, yes, take them out [Canadian Forces, one of the few countries alongside your own taking the offense and fighting in Afghanistan, and assisting in other areas like naval patrols in the Gulf including commanding a task force largely made up of American ships] now. What are you waiting for?
Posted by: JavaJoe at October 26, 2008 08:16 PM (Am6n/) Posted by: Christoph at October 26, 2008 08:25 PM (hawOV) 102
Hey dog, Do you want to hear the Muslim call to prayer every day 5 times a day? Vote Obama. Look at Europe. That's what happens a society goes soft and redistributionist. You really want that? Millions of Americans have died to give you the freedom you now want to give away to vote for the "cool" guy and be in the "in" crowd. Sickening. Read about Hitler's rise to power sometime....the "in" crowd was with him too, and the intellectuals, some working class folks and Jews stood against him. It's sad to think that America is going to voluntarily surrender its liberty to folks like you. Posted by: geoff at October 26, 2008 08:26 PM (zEGWh) 103
Maybe they know something we don't know?
They put elephants and donkeys on the door. See that crap? Wow this is what the UN does? Maybe McCain can let Sarah's shoes loose in the UN with Bolton's Mustache and together than can fight crime in there as a super hero duo. Posted by: JavaJoe at October 26, 2008 08:28 PM (Am6n/) 104
Chris, my family is from Milton, Ontario outside of Toronto so i can relate. Perhaps i misunderstood you. But I am intolerant, yes, intolerant of folks living in this great country would assume the troops are killing civilians. Like Murtha, and like some would have taken your comments, like me. Posted by: geoff at October 26, 2008 08:28 PM (zEGWh) 105
Hoo-WAH CB. We need to keep swinging that boot until Nov 4, and if Obama wins, until Jan 20. Maybe Bush can win this now so that Obama will have no choice but to allow a US victory.
The media will have an incentive to say Iraq is a success if Obama wins....sickening as it is. Posted by: geoff at October 26, 2008 08:30 PM (zEGWh) 106
Chrissy,
Oh for a minute there I thought you had control of the Canadian forces in Afghanistan. Here you were making a proposition to remove them to punish someone's comment about Canada being irrelevant to the world as a whole. My bad. Posted by: JavaJoe at October 26, 2008 08:30 PM (Am6n/) 107
Actually, I hope McCain-Palin kick the UN out of NY and stop giving them billions of dollars.
Posted by: incognito at October 26, 2008 08:31 PM (Rpam5) 108
The Obama World Apology Tour: coming Spring 2009. It kicks off at the UN in New York- then it's on to Havana, Caracas, Managua and San Salvador before heading to Europe, the Middle East, and Asia; then multiple stops in Africa and India before wrapping things up in Hiroshima Japan- sometime in early August 2009. Posted by: Jones in CO at October 26, 2008 08:32 PM (KOkrW) 109
Hooah to the guys on the ground. As far as mil folks wanting Obama as CinC, I'm I have 26 years in and will give serious consideration to popping smoke in the event of a dem takeover of the white house and I Am Not Alone.
Posted by: MAJHAM at October 26, 2008 08:33 PM (TToUv) Posted by: geoff at October 26, 2008 08:34 PM (zEGWh) 111
>Actually, I hope McCain-Palin kick the UN out of NY and stop giving them billions of dollars. You are more likely to see Nancy Pelosi selling her ass on Pennsylvania Avenue at $10 a pop first. Posted by: Jones in CO at October 26, 2008 08:34 PM (KOkrW) 112
"Like Murtha, and like some would have taken your comments, like me. "
geoff, will you do this: Acknowledge saying, "I hope that no innocent civilians were killed," and -- in essence -- also saying, "America sent ground forces in order to minimize the risk to Syrian civilians," is categorically NOT the same as calling U.S. Marines murderers on national television without any evidence? You see the difference. Posted by: Christoph at October 26, 2008 08:34 PM (hawOV) 113
Did someone already mention this? From U of Hawaii at Manoa, Photographs Collection. Reference to a photo of Obama, winner of a scholarship ostensibly available only to foreign nationals: Barack Obama from Africa Scholarship winner; Phi Beta Kappa; portraits Neg# A62-00099 Saw reference on HillBuz.Posted by: ahem at October 26, 2008 08:34 PM (a5Mmi) 114
Chris,
I believe that was your intention, but the single reflection regarding civilians left some of us in a vacuum. Perhaps it could have been a little bit more circumspective. Something along the lines of, "I hope that the US forces involved were successful in their mission, returned safely, and that no civilians were harmed." It probably would have negated this whole unnecessary flame thread. Posted by: adamthemad at October 26, 2008 08:34 PM (aVVGO) 115
MAJHAM God Bless you sir. Keep up the good work, we'll try to keep that leftist radical fool out of the White House. God Bless. Posted by: geoff at October 26, 2008 08:36 PM (zEGWh) 116
Inconito,
McCain isn't going to Boltonize the UN. He'll throw Ridge at them. We're screwed either way. Although Sarah is the wild card. Maybe she can convince him to beat the crap out of it. Posted by: JavaJoe at October 26, 2008 08:36 PM (Am6n/) 117
Okay, Christoph, I will say right now that I fucking love Canada and that I consider the Banff Springs Hotel about as close to a spiritual home as I will ever get (the others are in the US and have been fucking ruined). It just irks the living crap out of me to see you on here, day and night, apparently without so much as drawing breath, when this shit has NOTHING to do with you. You're like the kid nobody in the neighborhood will play with, even if you bring your own ball.
It's not like we all are surfing around trying to find Canadian political websites to bother with our nonsense 24/7. I'm just sayin . . . Posted by: CB at October 26, 2008 08:37 PM (9Wv2j) Posted by: incognito at October 26, 2008 08:38 PM (Rpam5) 119
MAJHAM, God bless you and thank you for your service. We are in your debt. And, no, you are definitely not alone.
Posted by: CB at October 26, 2008 08:40 PM (9Wv2j) 120
Adam, agreed. Chris, I agree. The problem is the perceived assumption of wrongdoing by US Troops, which is absolutely unacceptable to me. And anyone who is a patriotic American.
Posted by: geoff at October 26, 2008 08:40 PM (zEGWh) 121
Dog crap cleanup needed on aisles 45 and 46 in the Justice Department Investigating Voter Fraud post.
Posted by: NM Hick at October 26, 2008 08:42 PM (STXJ7) 122
on the other hand, having lived in AK and NATO, I can say the Canucks make decent soldiers...someone has to pull KP and gate guard...supply and barbers and camp followers...lots of things to do. For Canadians, what with their socialist leaning gubmint and having disbanded the Queen Anne Airborne ...for being too aggressive, if you can believe. No joke.
Posted by: johnjacobjingleheimersmith and wesson at October 26, 2008 08:43 PM (xi8GP) 123
"I believe that was your intention, but the single reflection regarding civilians left some of us in a vacuum."
Just like, "Fuck yeah!" and "more good news" could leave some people in a vacuum after reading a story which alleges civilians were killed. I provided counterpart. Do I trust the Syrians? No. AP? No. But does history and common sense allow for the possibility innocent civilians could have been killed or injured in a military raid? You know the answer. I note that some of you filled in that vacuum the wrong way, and that isn't my problem. To assume the worse of someone who says something positive, something that geoff postulates* we're all in agreement with, is more a highlight into your and/or their own mental processes, not anything I actually said. * The reaction I received leads me to legitimately question whether geoff's postulate is actually true. Sounds good, but evidence here is lacking. Posted by: Christoph at October 26, 2008 08:44 PM (hawOV) 124
"What do you think Obama will do to defeat the Taliban?"
Great question, Mare. Thanks for asking instead of merely attacking my patriotism like some do. Even when I am praising the troops too! Amazing. But as to your question, I think President Obama will defeat the Taliban by changing our overall approach to the War on Terror. John McCain has stated that Iraq is his number 1 priority, regardless of how long it takes, even if that is 100 years. Bush agrees. The policy has been to make Iraq priority #1 and "muddle along" in Afghanistan by relying on NATO troops and commanders to supplement American forces. Obama seeks to change this. He would double or triple our troop presence in Afghanistan. He will make sure US troops are pursuing US policies. He will not treat Pakistan with kid gloves as this administration has. He will hold them accountable. At the same time, President Obama has learned the lessons of Iraq that Bush and McCain refuse to admit. You cannot merely overwhelm by shock and awe and win a war. That doesn't work anymore. You need to roll up the shirtsleeves and work with local people. Perhaps it's not always possible to win the hearts and minds, but we can win with our wallet. President Obama supports outreach programs to address the wrongs that lead to extremism and terrorism. He wants to negotiate with tribal leaders who otherwise would side with the Taliban. He is not so opposed to diplomacy like McCain that he refuses to negotiate with enemies. President Obama will defeat enemies but also make sure that we don't create enemies through flawed policies. Hope this helps. I'd encourage you to study the Obama plan more thoroughly on his website. There's a reason people like Sam Nunn and Warren Christopher and Colin Powell are supporting him. Give him a chance. It's Americas last best hope I think. And I've always believed in a place called Hope. Yes, we can!! Posted by: Lizzie at October 26, 2008 08:45 PM (Kbl0/) 125
Imagine that!
Christoph has managed to get into a pissing match with people on this blog. I don't think I have ever seen anyone argue semantics more than you Christoph. You take comments that are meant to be snarky, throw away one liners, and turn them into dissertations on the failings of western man. Don't get me wrong, I do read alot of what you have to say, and process it accordingly. But sometimes I find myself scrolling past them just like douche dog posts. K Posted by: Kestrel♠ at October 26, 2008 08:46 PM (/HZnk) 126
No wonder Chris kicks it in here; there's nothing to crow about in the great white North if you're even remotely of the military mind set as Chris seems to want to be. I say give him a pass and let us flame the other arseholes instead.
concentrate on the O-nauts and let this crap go,k... Posted by: johnjacobjingleheimersmith and wesson at October 26, 2008 08:48 PM (xi8GP) 127
Oh, Lizzie, you are such a barking moonbat....what are you, like, 12? Have you sent "President Obama" a mix tape yet?
Bet you dot your i's with circles. Douchette. Posted by: Milesdei at October 26, 2008 08:49 PM (ACHxk) 128
He is not so opposed to diplomacy like McCain that he refuses to negotiate with enemies.
What a load of crap! America deals with her enemies in a way that puts them on notice that negotiation is simply not an option. Because our ENEMIES (please look that word up, Lizzie, you fuckin' commie ass) view that as capitulation. Never gonna happen, not as long as I and other red-blooded American patriots draw breath and stock up on ammo. Posted by: CB at October 26, 2008 08:50 PM (9Wv2j) 129
Lizzie: I and others here tend to ignore posts that are based on false premises, like your assertion that we're talking about President Obama.
Posted by: NM Hick at October 26, 2008 08:51 PM (STXJ7) 130
Mare: Beware! Do not drink the koolaid. We wouldn't want to lose you! Please, stop! Noooooo!
LOL. Posted by: incognito at October 26, 2008 08:51 PM (Rpam5) Posted by: Kestrel♠ at October 26, 2008 08:51 PM (/HZnk) 132
The only time anyone will call Obama president is when he leads his fan club to the insane asylum after McCain kicks his butt to the curb.
Posted by: incognito at October 26, 2008 08:52 PM (Rpam5) 133
Obama seeks to change this. He would double or triple our troop presence in Afghanistan.
Getting these troops from? He will make sure US troops are pursuing US policies. Those wascally twoops are out pursuing their own policies again.... You need to roll up the shirtsleeves and work with local people. Perhaps it's not always possible to win the hearts and minds, but we can win with our wallet. Yes, yes we know about "our" wallet. Spread the wealth. He is not so opposed to diplomacy like McCain that he refuses to negotiate with enemies. Without precondition too! No, sit down Mr Achmadinajad please...tea? Yes I'll elevate your tinhorn dictatorship to be on par with the US because we don't want you to be an enemy... Hope this helps Works for me. You're a good trench digger. Posted by: JavaJoe at October 26, 2008 08:55 PM (Am6n/) 134
The funniest part of Lizzie's post was where she fantasizes about "President Obama" negotiating with tribal leaders and supporting "outreach programs." I am laughing out loud so literally that LOL does not suffice. Laughing at the thought of Sheik Barack Obama squatting on his haunches in some musty tent that smells of a thousand unwashed goats, drinking herb tea while wearing a towel on his head and describing the "outreach" to the "tribal leaders."
Keep 'em coming, Lizzie. Keep 'em coming. Posted by: Milesdei at October 26, 2008 08:56 PM (ACHxk) 135
Lizzie, you do understand we are winning in Iraq right?
You did know that Obama wanted to defund and pull out of Iraq right? You do know we need to have a presence in Iraq to fight in Afghanistan right? ( Have you ever seen pictures of the terrain in Afghanistan? Very mountainous, very tough fighting) Now, I'm also going to assume you are not a total dumbass and you realize that if we had given up in Iraq, Al Qeada/Taliban and insurgents would have been imbolden and we would have lost footing in THE ENTIRE REGION. And just for the sake of argument, how does Obama double or triple our troops while at the same time reduce military spending (which he wants to do), slow down or eliminate new weapons programs, and from which base will he operate out of if we had left Iraq completely? Posted by: mare at October 26, 2008 08:57 PM (X1fsj) 136
even if the O does lose and we almost all hope this happens, we still have to live with the mouth-breathers like Diderots Dog Pecker and Lis(bian), so keep a lid on it and let it slide. This blog is open to the public, even those who are a waste of the hemoglobin they use everyday.
Of course, they are assclowns and dangling chad hemmorhoids, so there is that. for what its worth. Posted by: johnjacobjingleheimersmith and wesson at October 26, 2008 08:58 PM (xi8GP) Posted by: JavaJoe at October 26, 2008 08:58 PM (Am6n/) 138
Notice there have been no factual comebacks to my argument.
Makes sense since even McCain couldn't put a dent in Obama when Barack dominated the foreign policy debate, something that all the polls showed as well. NM Hick: you are right. And I am wrong here. I am so used to thinking of Barack as president that I realize I am jumping the gun. For that I apologize. But all good things in time, right? Incognito: well, you're on record. I give you that. We'll settle it in about 9 days. Feel free to eat crow, as would I were Barack to lose, but that's not happening and deep down, most conservatives know it. They may hate it, but they know it. Posted by: Lizzie at October 26, 2008 08:59 PM (Kbl0/) 139
Did you read Mare's post, Lizzie? That's why we have thinkers like Mare here, so the rest of us drunken assholes can do what we do best--heap invective on moonbat trolls like you.
Posted by: Milesdei at October 26, 2008 09:01 PM (ACHxk) Posted by: CB at October 26, 2008 09:03 PM (9Wv2j) 141
O.T.: I can't believe they haven't found that Hudson boy. Soon, he'll be missing for 72 hours. If he was being held somewhere, it would mean more bozos involved so the police would have a better chance of finding him. Because they haven't, I think the kid is dead. Not sure why the step father wouldn't have killed him in the house.
Anyway, bring back torture. They could have solved this case already. If the boy is dying somewhere, why waste time. Just give me a rubber hose and I'll do it. This is idiotic. Posted by: Thomas E. Dewey '48 at October 26, 2008 09:03 PM (s+2rG) 142
Lizzie said:
He will not treat Pakistan with kid gloves as this administration has. He will hold them accountable. This incredibly ignorant statement just proves to me that you have no fucking clue as to what you are talking about. K Posted by: Kestrel♠ at October 26, 2008 09:06 PM (/HZnk) 143
Oh yeah, please come back on November 5th, Lizzie.
It took THREE responses from Gutterball on the Georgia/Russia conflict. 1) He chided both sides when it was clear Russia was the culprit. 2) He wanted to go to the UN without realizing RUSSIA HAS VETO POWER. 3. He gave the same response McCain gave the first time. What polls showed McCain lost the foreign policy debate? The online polls you Obots like to freep? Give me a break. Each debate, gutterball gave the same song and dance. It was like listening to a broken record. He has ZERO credibility when it comes to foreign policy. Neither does Biden. Posted by: incognito at October 26, 2008 09:07 PM (Rpam5) 144
And furthermore, Thin Lizzie, if you're so cock-sure about an Obama win, what psychological need are you addressing by trolling here, practically begging to be showered with rotten vegetables? Do you enjoy having chamber pots dumped on your head? You and Diderot's Dog and the rest of your sorry ilk are nothing but a bunch of masochistic exhibitionists.
Barack Obama thinks he's Cock of the Walk. Well, let me tell you, Barack Obama is cock of NOTHING. And this will be on display internationally in nine days. Bet on it. I am. Posted by: Milesdei at October 26, 2008 09:07 PM (ACHxk) 145
Factual comebacks to a fantasy? WTF!!??
Posted by: NM Hick at October 26, 2008 09:08 PM (STXJ7) 146
"Lizzie, you do understand we are winning in Iraq right?
"
Yes, Mare, I do. And I am grateful we are. God bless our troops for winning a war in spite of a Moron -in- Chief who did everything he could to lose. Even John McCain admits that! "You did know that Obama wanted to defund and pull out of Iraq right? " I will be attacked for this, but I think Obama actually deserves credit for the victory. Only because of leaders like Obama constantly critiquing the mishandling of the war, were changes forced to be made. No, it was not John McCain's cry for a surge. It was the fact that the Pentagon realized the election of 2006 was in reaction to failing policies in Iraq. And Barack and the Democrats made that possible. Our commanders realized they were letting down our troops and letting down all Americans too. Did you think it was just a coincidence Donald Rumsfeld resigned 1 day after the elections of 2006??? "You do know we need to have a presence in Iraq to fight in Afghanistan right?" This is not true. You have forgotten about Turkey, dear. It is the key and it is a NATO member ironically. Bush has been afraid to stand up to Turkey and Pakistan. Obama will not be. As to other points, Obama will increase troops in Afghanistan with the troops that are leaving Iraq. Even Iraq welcomes our troops going home according to a timetable - something Barack proposed a long time ago. Posted by: Lizzie at October 26, 2008 09:08 PM (Kbl0/) 147
gee lizzie, you've convinced me to vote for barack through the sheer intellectual weight of your argument. thank you! (((((((((((hugs)))))))))))) Posted by: Geebus at October 26, 2008 09:08 PM (ng56Z) 148
Thomas Dewey:
Why, that sounds like a surefire answer to voter fraud too, a caning in the middle of the street on Election Day if you get your ACORN- affiliated, leftist moonbat libtard ass caught monkeying with the vote. No rubber hoses though, I prefer strands of metal harvested from old radial tires, as thay are eco-friendly. Recycling, dontcha know... See, I care about the environment and clean voting too. Gawd, I am a Choir Boy... Posted by: johnjacobjingleheimersmith and wesson at October 26, 2008 09:10 PM (xi8GP) 149
Milesdei- I enjoy the debate. You could call me a troll. Thats fine. I dont like preaching to the choir nor being preached to by the choir either. Why don't you fight with your arguments on liberal blogs? What good is it to debate people who think exactly the same as you? It's like talking to a mirror. And yet again, this is why Barack is winning. He is winnings independents and Republicans day by day because he is open to debate and a free discussion of ideas. Sorry you hate me so.
Posted by: Lizzie at October 26, 2008 09:10 PM (Kbl0/) 150
But President Obama is coming. And he will fight the War on Terror much better than Bush has. He will defeat the Taliban - something that Bush has failed to do for 8 years and counting now. If he does so it will be because scum-sucking POS Democrats (birm X 4) like you will not be undermining their country and their President for political gain. The stench of Democrat hypocricy (birm X 2) will still be as bad, though. God, you filthy "people" suck. Posted by: sherlock at October 26, 2008 09:11 PM (ojW85) 151
Lizzie, you've won another convert. I can see now how right you are and I will definitely vote for the Plastic Jesus. Poll me, baby!!!
P.S. Milesdei, have I told you today that I love you? Posted by: CB at October 26, 2008 09:13 PM (9Wv2j) 152
Btw, I'm a scorpio. What sighn are y'all? Posted by: Lizzie at October 26, 2008 09:13 PM (ng56Z) 153
Lizzie. I don't hate you. I'd piss on you to put you out if you were on fire.
As to why I don't debate at Kos, like I'm really going to win the hearts and minds of those who have no hearts, and no minds? I come here to hang, get ribald, troll bash, and most of all, LEARN from people who are peers and comrades-in-arms. Posted by: Milesdei at October 26, 2008 09:14 PM (ACHxk) 154
I CAN HAZ TINFOIL HAT?
Posted by: Lizzie at October 26, 2008 09:16 PM (ng56Z) 155
Btw, I'm a scorpio. What sighn are y'all?
Smith & Wesson. The world's first point & click interface. Geebus, you are such a sly one . . . Posted by: CB at October 26, 2008 09:17 PM (9Wv2j) 156
CB, I need to hear it at least once a day. Especially if you're hot.
Posted by: Milesdei at October 26, 2008 09:17 PM (ACHxk) Posted by: Lizzie at October 26, 2008 09:17 PM (ng56Z) 158
And a girl. You have to be a girl.
Posted by: Milesdei at October 26, 2008 09:17 PM (ACHxk) 159
Liz(bian) is just plain full of shit, to be absolutely honest. Turkey WANTS to be NATO and EU but is hamstrung from both goals. A member of NATO but with strict limits a la France, and denied EU membership for a decade.
A weak sister if ever there were one, with a Muslim slant to boot. You really are that damn dumb arent you. It is not an act. Amazing. Now go hug your Big O vibrator and say good night. Posted by: johnjacobjingleheimersmith and wesson at October 26, 2008 09:18 PM (xi8GP) Posted by: Amy at October 26, 2008 09:18 PM (U0dI+) 161
Lizzie, you lost me when you claim Obama should get credit for the victory when he advocated pulling out by March 08, come what may. ONLY EXCESSIVE KOOLAID CAN SUPPORT YOUR POSITION.
Obama ran on pullin gout of Iraq as a lost cause!!!! Get a clue, Lizzie, you're way to deep in mind=meld obama. Posted by: geoff at October 26, 2008 09:18 PM (zEGWh) 162
>But President Obama is coming. And he will fight the War on Terror much better than Bush has. He will defeat the Taliban - something that Bush has failed to do for 8 years and counting now. You are fuckin' DREAMING if you believe that. jesus h christ jr on a crutch- that is the stupidest fucken thing a troll has ever posted here- fucking BRAVO, lady! Posted by: Jones in CO at October 26, 2008 09:18 PM (KOkrW) 163
Milesdei- You just never know. I was once a Republican. Barack changed all that. I listened. I explored different and opposite opinions. That's great that you learn from people who believe exactly the same as you. There is merit in that. But there is also merit in putting your beliefs to the test and to the fire - free and clear of any piss, I might add too.
Just look above. I've already "won" 2 converts. And you haven't even seen how gorgeous I am either!! Well, I guess I will leave you conservatives in peace. I may be wrong about Senator Al Franken. It is possible he will lose. That's only because his opponent has all but endorsed Barack Obama. But I will not be wrong about Barack. And I will eat crow if so. But I'm quite sure I'll be eating caviar and champagne instead. Change is coming, change we can believe in. Yes, we can. Yes we can. Bye! Posted by: Lizzie at October 26, 2008 09:19 PM (Kbl0/) Posted by: CB at October 26, 2008 09:20 PM (9Wv2j) 165
Milesdei has Lizzie pegged .
There's nothing wrong with being twelve Lizzie but this is a grownup thread , so run along to bed . Tomorrow is a school day . Posted by: aubrey at October 26, 2008 09:20 PM (joS+d) 166
Giants won too. But that was an ugly win. Sheesh
Posted by: Tiny Smeagle at October 26, 2008 09:21 PM (1V2sa) 167
@149: ... because he is open to debate and a free discussion of ideas.
So long as those ideas and questions for debate were presented in triplicate 48 hours in advance. Even then, you'd better be careful because the One doesn't like some questions, so you're probably better off not asking about anything substantive like his Marxist buddies and racist preacher and voting record (or lack thereof) and ..................... Posted by: NM Hick at October 26, 2008 09:21 PM (STXJ7) Posted by: johnjacobjingleheimersmith and wesson at October 26, 2008 09:22 PM (xi8GP) 169
I think we've just been punked by Jim Treacher or something. That cant be for real.
Posted by: David Crosby at October 26, 2008 09:22 PM (ng56Z) 170
Get this video out to people everywhere:
Here's an audio of Obama from 2001 discussing how best to redistribute the wealth: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iivL4c_3pck Note the discussion isn't about whether or not it's right to redistribute wealth...but which manner would be the best way to do it! Posted by: PowerPro at October 26, 2008 09:24 PM (JPEqm) 171
Well since it looks like President Bush has decided to open up a can and leave no unfinished business on the table, what about a raid on ACORN. Just kidding Kos kiddies.
Makes me wonder if Iran is feeling comfortable right now? Think Obama will come out with an apology to the people of Syria tomorrow? Obama's strategy team are sitting around a table as we speak thinking of a response. "I know! This is a desperate attempt by the Bush/McCain team to get peoples mind off the economy and how well people are feeling about Senator Obama". Posted by: locus ceruleus at October 26, 2008 09:25 PM (e2mBS) 172
It was the fact that the Pentagon realized the election of 2006 was in reaction to failing policies in Iraq. Kind of like the war in Iraq, you can just pick your reason for it. Some, I mean, like most, said it was the culture of corruption. Now that the democrats have their own culture of corruption the failing policies in Iraq were the reason for the loss in 2006. Posted by: Sue at October 26, 2008 09:25 PM (+osns) 173
I am no fan of censorship but couldnt we put up a bullshit meter to track return commenters and be forewarned that they might nust be libtard walking dicks of the first order...just asking, but my question mark on this flaky laptop stopped working... Could Ace not drop the valu-rite vodka and stagger into his computer room, or bathroom as the case may be, and address that simple idea...à
Just asking.is all. Posted by: johnjacobjingleheimersmith and wesson at October 26, 2008 09:27 PM (xi8GP) 174
Change is coming, change we can believe in. Yes, we can. Yes we can. Bye!
Posted by: Lizzie at October 26, 2008 09:19 PM (Kbl0/) You sound like a fucking cult, lizzie. There is no difference between chanting Yes, we can and Heil Hitler. Posted by: Thomas E. Dewey '48 at October 26, 2008 09:27 PM (s+2rG) 175
Could Ace not drop the valu-rite vodka and stagger into his computer room, or bathroom as the case may be, and address that simple idea...à
Just asking.is all. He already did. Posted by: Thomas E. Dewey '48 at October 26, 2008 09:29 PM (s+2rG) 176
Crappy laptop.
Posted by: johnjacobjingleheimersmith and wesson at October 26, 2008 09:29 PM (xi8GP) 177
Does anybody think Bush is gonna pull Bin Laden out of his hat in the next week? I keep hearing from a friend with connections that this will be the October surprise. Can't quite bring myself to believe it (actually I think the bastard's been decomposing for a while now), but wonder what you all think about that.
Posted by: CB at October 26, 2008 09:30 PM (9Wv2j) 178
Thomas , my bad, I apologize to the Ace and his beverage of choice.
Has he ever tried a bottle of Banaka mouthwash... Posted by: johnjacobjingleheimersmith and wesson at October 26, 2008 09:30 PM (xi8GP) 179
A part of me feels like this should have been saved special for Ace, but with the speed of news cycles it probably won't last.
So Tools - I bring you a feast for the comments section & grist for the mill: http://tinyurl.com/6asaqt Posted by: diderot's dog at October 26, 2008 09:33 PM (nrD02) 180
"Hey Baracky! Watch me pull Osama out of my hat!"
"Again? But that trick never works!" "And for your sake you better hope it continues not to." Posted by: Milesdei at October 26, 2008 09:35 PM (ACHxk) 181
Sue - agreed, but the Bush demonization is so very strong. I worked in the primaries for Cainer and even on the GOP side, it was strong. very strong.
Posted by: geoff at October 26, 2008 09:35 PM (zEGWh) 182
johnjacobjingleheimersmith: I was referring to the IDs.
Posted by: Thomas E. Dewey '48 at October 26, 2008 09:35 PM (s+2rG) 183
Because, of course, that would completely ruin the whole tea and talk thing, doncha know.
Posted by: CB at October 26, 2008 09:36 PM (9Wv2j) 184
Just read through the whole thread and wow the morons are restless. Nice to talk about something other than the media.
Posted by: locus ceruleus at October 26, 2008 09:37 PM (e2mBS) 185
Re: Diderot's Dog:
Jesse Jackson Junior. You can call him "J"! Or you can call him "Gay"! Or you can call him "JJ"! Or you can call him "Junior"! Or you can call him "Jay Jack"! Or you can call him "Jess Jay"! Or you can call him "JJJ"! Or you can call him "3J"! But you doesn't have to call him "douchebag"! Unless you want to. And we do. Posted by: Milesdei at October 26, 2008 09:40 PM (ACHxk) 186
I provided counterpart.
Counterpart to people happy that we're chasing Al-Qeada and insurgents? How is a counterpart necessary here? Are you under the impression that this isn't a worthwhile endevor? Again, either our troops have the benefit of the doubt in attacking an enemy or they don't. You can't have it both ways. The first posts exclaiming happiness about going after insidious elements is not in a vaccum to anyone that has read more than a few posts here. You've been here too long to excuse yourself by that. Posted by: adamthemad at October 26, 2008 09:42 PM (aVVGO) 187
The funniest thing about Jesse Jackson Jr. is that he assumes there will be a space to fill . . . What a goofball!
Posted by: CB at October 26, 2008 09:42 PM (9Wv2j) Posted by: John Loki at October 26, 2008 09:43 PM (PyVfJ) 189
Holy Shit! Holy Shit! Holy Shit! Holy Shit! We are FUCKED!
Obama Bombshell Redistribution of Wealth Audio Uncovered Posted by: TheBigOldDog at October 26, 2008 09:43 PM (0oAW0) 190
Watching an episode of "House" last night, I liked how The Learned Doctor illustrated Wilson's out-of-control impulse to "rescue" damaged women by saying "he married a Canadian". Pure gold. And I'm not just talkin yellow snow here....
Posted by: fulldroolcup at October 26, 2008 09:44 PM (n5xaw) 191
1) Obama said he didn't believe sending additional troops into Iraq to execute a secure and hold strategy - i.e. The Surge - would work. He believed it would make the situation worse.
What information has convinced him an identical strategy is a recipe for success in Afganistan while maintaining his belief The Surge has not been successful? 2) At present, the US is battling Iranian/Syrian proxies and foreign terrorists in Iraq. Beyond al Sadr (who we should bombed in his Mosque back in 2004...), all reports indicate there is little organized Iraqi resistance left. Every single military and civilian expert agrees the current situation is Iraq is fragile and reversible. Should US troops vacate Iraq before the government is capable of protecting itself from foreign agent and maintaining social order, how would the US prevent Iran from overrunning and assuming control of Iraq? What strategic advantage in the global war on terror would the US achieve from a precipitous withdrawal from Iraq and its subsequent decent into chaos? 3) Pakistan is a nuclear armed nation with many supporters of al Qaeda's brand of Isalmofacism embedded in the highest corridors of power. The US is already "unpopular" with a large percentage of the Pakistani people because of our relationship with India (sound familiar, kinda like the whole Israel thingy...). What kid-gloves-off policy can Obama order that doesn't risk an overthrow of the already fragile Pakistani government? And when such an overthrow occurs, how would Obama ensure Pakistan's nuclear arsenal is secure? 4) Lastly, besides empty campaign promises and stump speeches, which specific Obama actions and votes lead you to believe he would aggressively pursue the war on terror with the same fervor he will pursue the war on "the rich" here at home? Posted by: Baron Von Ottomatic at October 26, 2008 09:46 PM (Ulsfn) 192
Obama is going to be tougher on terrorists and the war than McCain?
Why does every left wing peace group support Obama? And Obama should get the credit for our success in Iraq when he wanted to pull out at the worst possible moment? He still cannot acknowledge that we won! :Lizzie you came to the wrong place if you think you can blow smoke up everyone's asses here. Posted by: the real joe at October 26, 2008 09:52 PM (NJ/RA) 193
Holy Shit! Holy Shit! Holy Shit! Holy Shit! We are FUCKED!
Obama Bombshell Redistribution of Wealth Audio Uncovered Holy crap. This video has only been viewed 215 times. Morons, this needs to go viral asap. Posted by: CB at October 26, 2008 09:52 PM (9Wv2j) 194
>> President Obama supports outreach programs to address the wrongs that lead to extremism and terrorism<< Missionaries? Posted by: Javems at October 26, 2008 09:53 PM (/IQA9) 195
Apparently Sullivan has posted what Powerline calls 'a semi pornographic video' about Sarah Palin.
Posted by: Jones in CO at October 26, 2008 09:58 PM (KOkrW) 196
Obama's Silly Putty policy machinations give his supporters every opportunity to craft an agenda. Obama's like a Barbie Doll rollout for Christmas--there's Throttle the Pakis Obama...Safe Bicyclist Obama...Anti-Osama Obama... There's no need to spread the wealth--just bring whatever loaves and fishes you have, and there'll be enough for the whole village! Posted by: SlutNews.net at October 26, 2008 09:59 PM (n2eCn) 197
193 CB,
YouTube's counters aren't 'live'. There's hours of lag in there, and there's a lot of accusations of shenanigans. (It might be live to around 200, because you'll run into a lot of videos that are in the range 200-220 views.) Posted by: Al at October 26, 2008 10:00 PM (Lk931) Posted by: Watcher at October 26, 2008 10:00 PM (qc5DE) 199
Holy crap. This video has only been viewed 215 times. Morons, this needs to go viral asap.
Posted by: CB at October 26, 2008 09:52 PM (9Wv2j) We have a smoking gun and nobody is paying attention! Uhg! Posted by: TheBigOldDog at October 26, 2008 10:01 PM (0oAW0) 200
Baron Von Ottomatic said:
3) Pakistan is a nuclear armed nation with many supporters of al Qaeda's brand of Isalmofacism embedded in the highest corridors of power. The US is already "unpopular" with a large percentage of the Pakistani people because of our relationship with India (sound familiar, kinda like the whole Israel thingy...) This is one of the things that pisses me off when ignorant cocksuckers bash Bush's "Cowboy Diplomacy". Getting Pakistan to play ball was one of the greatest diplomatic successes in history. And to hear the MSM talk about it, a 6 year old could have traded off a Pokemon card to achieve this. K Posted by: Kestrel♠ at October 26, 2008 10:01 PM (/HZnk) 201
"Obama seeks to change this. He would double or triple our troop presence in Afghanistan." So how do you resolve that against doddering idiot barney frank calling for a cut in military spending? And what's the antiwar faction of the modern liberal party going to do while all of this troop expansion is going on? Isn't that what they consider to be....gasp....IMPERIALISM? Is Cindy Sheehan going to be squatting in front of BO's chicago mansion? "He will make sure US troops are pursuing US policies." Right, because as of now, the military is a rouge entity, totally uncontrolled by the US government... "He will not treat Pakistan with kid gloves as this administration has. He will hold them accountable." Pakistan is an ALLY of ours, and a nuclear armed one at that. You don't threaten your allies. "Obama has learned the lessons of Iraq that Bush and McCain refuse to admit. You cannot merely overwhelm by shock and awe and win a war. That doesn't work anymore. You need to roll up the shirtsleeves and work with local people. Perhaps it's not always possible to win the hearts and minds, but we can win with our wallet." You're describing the precepts of the surge. So now O! supports the surge? This guy is worse than a flip-flopper. "He is not so opposed to diplomacy like McCain that he refuses to negotiate with enemies. President Obama will defeat enemies but also make sure that we don't create enemies through flawed policies." You do realize that the precedent to the Iraq war was a good solid decade of diplomacy (that didn't work), both on the UN and the US's behalf? Then there's N Korea, which has been subject to diplomacy by (horrors!) the Bush administration, and the Clinton administration, with NO PERCEPTIBLE SOLUTION FOR US INTERESTS. Obama plays with action figures at Holiday Inn and thinks it counts as experience. "I'd encourage you to study the Obama plan more thoroughly on his website." I encourage you to stop pushing the failed ideas of the 19th, 20th centuries as something new. Study the history books more thoroughly on how these bankrupt ideas gave power to a few at the expense of 100 million lives. Posted by: kal at October 26, 2008 10:02 PM (ugH8j) 202
What's never been explained regarding Pakistan or Pokeeston is how do we get to Afghanistan if Pokeeston has been "not handled with kid gloves"?.
We have a flight path through it that they grant us. We have to fight an air supremacy battle to establish our lines of communication to Afghanistan? No doubt we'll win but how many pilots will be lost and captured to accomplish this? Odd thing is we already have the access. Unless The One's strategy fucks that up. Posted by: JavaJoe at October 26, 2008 10:02 PM (Am6n/) 203
Javems, you're misunderstanding.
Missionaries are the cause of the wrongs that lead to extremism and terrorism in Obamaland. Posted by: Al at October 26, 2008 10:02 PM (Lk931) 204
The Kos Kiddie Koolaid Kult is shitting its pants.
I saw some yob over there claiming that the US military is "on the verge of open rebellion". Posted by: Dead Career Sketch at October 26, 2008 10:05 PM (JTN0y) 205
We have a smoking gun and nobody is paying attention! Uhg!
Well, I just put it in comments at hillbuzz and texas darlin. PowerPro put it on a thread at PL. By tomorrow, there should be a pretty wide viewership. It's up to all of us. Posted by: CB at October 26, 2008 10:05 PM (9Wv2j) 206
I just posted the link at Gretawire
Posted by: oldfart at October 26, 2008 10:07 PM (zY6zl) 207
While I think Lizzie is sincere and almost reasonable, she clearly believes that a socialist liar that is allied with a man that contemplated killing 25 million americans that he guessed would not go along with the reeducation camps he proposed is capable of speaking the truth. He said he supported the 2nd amendment. If I took that at face value I might believe him. However his entire career he has voted to take away that right at every opportunity. So should I believe his words or his deeds?
Obama is a LIAR and I do not believe a thing he says. Posted by: Vmaximus at October 26, 2008 10:08 PM (zWV8s) 208
CB at October 26, 2008 10:05 PM (9Wv2j):
Damn right it's up to all of us. I just sent it to the biggest spammers I know. Posted by: Milesdei at October 26, 2008 10:13 PM (ACHxk) 209
Late, but perhaps useful. Lizzie; The gist of your post #124: 124 "What do you think Obama will do to defeat the Taliban?" "He [Obama] would double or triple our troop presence in Afghanistan." What, specifically, will this achieve? Later you mention negotiating with Tribal leaders. Read on. "He will make sure US troops are pursuing US policies." Are they not? Evidence? Links? The truth is that neither you nor Obama have any. You make an attempt to create an issue where there is none. Obama’s vote of choice is "Present". How can such a vote make anything happen? It seems to have failed in Illinois. "He will not treat Pakistan with kid gloves as this administration has." He will invade Pakistan (he said so last year)? This is Obama’s naivete showing. There are about 140million (maybe 160million) Pakistanis, and the government has several nuclear devices. Further, the opposition parties are primarily fundamentalist Muslim parties. There are divisions among the Pakistani populace, but nothing as deep as the Shia-Sunni and Kurd-Sunni Arab divisions in Iraq. The current Bush policy makes much more sense than Obama's naive nonsense. "He will hold them accountable." How? By whining to the UN? Issuing condemnations? Voting"Present"? How about by cutting off aide? "At the same time, President Obama has learned the lessons of Iraq that Bush and McCain refuse to admit." HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA. Remember, Obama wanted to defund and pull out of Iraq. He was completely wrong. Does Obama learn from his mistakes? His years as a community organizer were a complete failure, He achieved nothing. Even the $100,000 grant to build a garden had problems; only $20,000 can be accounted for, the remaining $80,000 cannot. Then, some years later, working with Ayres, Obama doled out $100MILLION, intended to help Chicago public schools, to who? It seems that most of the money went o Ayres’ friends, pet projects, and other tangentially relevant things. Final result: no detectable increase in public school student test scores in math, science, …. Does Obama learn from his mistakes? No. "You cannot merely overwhelm by shock and awe and win a war. That doesn't work anymore." HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA. And "There are no American Tanks in Baghdad". "You need to roll up the shirtsleeves and work with local people. Perhaps it's not always possible to win the hearts and minds, but we can win with our wallet." Remember, you mention negotiating with Tribal leaders. "President Obama supports outreach programs to address the wrongs that lead to extremism and terrorism. He wants to negotiate with tribal leaders who otherwise would side with the Taliban." These tribal leaders side with the winner, and it has been this way for a thousand years. Many tribes were allied with the Taliban, partly to oppose the Soviets, and partly to minimize the problems the Taliban created for those they thought insufficiently Islamic. When the US started actively assisting the Northern Alliance, and particularly when the US sent in troops, more than a few changed sides. But some have gone back, and others play both sides. The "wallet"is one of the few things that takes the "taillight guarantee" with it. The tribes are notably conservative, religiously conservative, and we, the US, are the wrong religion. We can negotiate forever, but our negotiations will not last. We can triple the number of troops, but the Taliban will hide. We can fund projects and bleed to death. The best plan seems to be the current one: hunt down the Taliban, strengthen the Afghan government, build some infrastructure, educate the people (girls too), declare victory and eventually hand the outhouse over to the Afghan government. Obama’s plan is not better, only more expensive. "He is not so opposed to diplomacy like McCain that he refuses to negotiate with enemies. President Obama will defeat enemies but also make sure that we don't create enemies through flawed policies." See previous From your post #138: "Notice there have been no factual comebacks to my argument." There are many. This is one. You simply choose not to read them.
Then, from your post #146: "I will be attacked for this, but I think Obama actually deserves credit for the victory." Believe as you wish, but no, you are, in real life, wrong.. He, Reid, Pelosi and company wanted to defund and pull out of Iraq. He, and they, were clearly wrong, and deserve no credit. "You have forgotten about Turkey," Who, other than possibly the Turks, wants Turkey in Northern Iraq? The Kurds, both in Iraq and TURKEY (clue: Kurdish lands in Turkey are very much larger than those in Iraq) will likely rise up. Iraq will have a major conniption about Turks stationed on Iraqi soil. Even Iran, with its large Kurdish minority will be unhappy. The Turks seem quite uninterested in getting heavily involved in Afghanistan. "Obama will not be" "[afraid to stand up to Turkey and Pakistan]" Obama was known for NOT being a confrontational guy when he was a community organizer. Obama was picked by the Chicago Machine for his "go along to get along" attitude, as evidenced by his preference for voting "present". Obama is not a standup guy. He is a mistake no one needs. "Even Iraq welcomes our troops going home according to a timetable - something Barack proposed a long time ago." Read carefully what the Iraqis say. Yes, they want a timetable, but not Obama’s timetable. Obama got it wrong. Obama seems to have no leadership skills at all, and may simply be parroting positions he is told. Told by whom? Remember, Obama spent $100million while working with Ayres (or was if FOR Ayres?), and all to zero effect. Perhaps Obama is simply Ayres’ puppet. The naïve socialist/Marxist policies scream Ayres: 40 years later and still an undereducated Marxist. There’s good evidence that Obama would repeat his mistakes again. Posted by: Arbalest at October 26, 2008 10:16 PM (AgBuQ) 210
205
We have a smoking gun and nobody is paying attention! Uhg!
Well, I just put it in comments at hillbuzz and texas darlin. PowerPro put it on a thread at PL. By tomorrow, there should be a pretty wide viewership. It's up to all of us. I just got it to Charles at LGF and he has it up now.... I tried to get Allahpundit's attention at HotAir but that's a lost friggin cause.... Posted by: TheBigOldDog at October 26, 2008 10:17 PM (0oAW0) Posted by: TheBigOldDog at October 26, 2008 10:18 PM (0oAW0) 212
Just sent it to AP and Ed at HA. Who knows, maybe they will have a look. And who is posting all that long-ass shit up there? I thought that was, um, frowned upon . . . Personally, I never read a long-ass post.
Posted by: CB at October 26, 2008 10:20 PM (9Wv2j) 213
"Milesdei- You just never know. I was once a Republican."
I'm still a Democrat! And I voted for O! in the primaries! "Just look above. I've already "won" 2 converts. And you haven't even seen how gorgeous I am either!!" I think I'll vote Obama. Go tell one of your friends that she doesn't have to go through the hassle of voting, I'll vote for her. Posted by: kal at October 26, 2008 10:22 PM (ugH8j) 214
Sorry about the long-assed post. It may be frowned upon, I don’t know (URLs over about 15 characters ARE frowned upon by the link feature, though), but it is readable, since I used the "return" key to get extra blank lines, unlike some of DD’s earlier stuff. Originally, I thought that only a few of Lizzie’s points needed to be handled (and these are only a few), and I thought it would only be ¾ of a Word page. It grew a bit. But perhaps Lizzie will read it, as it contains no invective (only 2 HAHAHAs), and reconsider her "facts" and position. Posted by: Arbalest at October 26, 2008 10:29 PM (AgBuQ) 215
And who is posting all that long-ass shit up there? I thought that
was, um, frowned upon . . . Personally, I never read a long-ass post.
No moratorium on long posts that I know of. Arbalest is generally worth reading. Posted by: Milesdei at October 26, 2008 10:29 PM (ACHxk) 216
ahem (comment#113) I looked up photographs in question, and they are of Obamas father taken in june of 1962. Barry was born in 1961. Posted by: KEVIN at October 26, 2008 10:30 PM (VG7jk) 217
Did I say Pakistan? I meant Syria.
Posted by: Barrackin' Hussy Obama at October 26, 2008 10:32 PM (cBYAd) 218
Has everyone heard this Youtube of Obama in 2001 on chicago radio and redistribution , should go viralYouTube - Obama Bombshell Redistribution of Wealth Audio Uncovered
Posted by: willowone at October 26, 2008 10:32 PM (8nB5X) 219
Did I say Pakistan? I meant Syria.
It's PAH-key-stahn. You will learn to pronounce it correctly at "camp." Posted by: Milesdei at October 26, 2008 10:33 PM (ACHxk) 220
Oh, gosh, GIANT apology to Arbolest. I just did read your post and it's totally right on! Sorry, man, I thought I saw somewhere on here that Ace did not like the longies. But, you make some excellent points and consider me spanked. Mwah! for all the hard work you put into that.
Posted by: CB at October 26, 2008 10:34 PM (9Wv2j) 221
Just so you guys know...the Obama campaign is TERRIFIED of any kind of National Security issue popping up before the election...a la the bin laden tape buried john kerry.
they are purposefully talking about HOW bad the economy is every fucking minute thru their campaign and their media propaganda wing....just to keep the american eyes off the ball. its the full press strategy right now. we need to flood the nets and the blogs, and if possible, the NEWS, with the message of ITS A FREEKIN DANGEROUS WORLD out there!! good Lord Why is this not THEE most important issue??? ...the economy ALWAYS goes up and down....but when I see the people complaining & whining the loudest, lining up to buy iPhones, and 200 dollar disposable halloween costumes... and their candidate advertising in their VIDEO GAMES & textbooks, with his One Billion Dollar payday..recession isnt the first thing im seeing. sensationalisim is. Its amazing to me how hypocrates claim, so easily, that terrorism is sensationalized...it DOESNT HAVE TO BE... ITS. THAT. BAD. The democrats are petrified to get off the economy issue and accidentally onto a National Security issue, because they know its that bad too. Posted by: christy at October 26, 2008 10:38 PM (drHfj) Posted by: Milesdei at October 26, 2008 10:39 PM (ACHxk) 223
I don't care if they blow half of Syria up, that place is a den of evil.
Posted by: Christopher Taylor at October 26, 2008 10:42 PM (0+Ggj) 224
This is the transcript of the Obama 2001 Redistribution of Wealth audio, courtesy Perdogg on the Sean Hannity board (I haven't proofread it but it looks like it's an accurate portrayal):
TRANSCRIPT: MODERATOR: Good morning and welcome to Odyssey on WBEZ Chicago 91.5 FM and we’re joined by Barack Obama who is Illinois State Senator from the 13th district and senior lecturer in the law school at the University of Chicago. OBAMA: If you look at the victories and failures of the civil rights movement and its litigation strategy in the court, I think where it succeeded was to vest formal rights in previously dispossessed peoples. So that I would now have the right to vote, I would now be able to sit at the lunch counter and order and as long as I could pay for it I’d be okay. But the Supreme Court never ventured into the issues of redistribution of wealth and sort of more basic issues of political and economic justice in this society. And to that extent as radical as people tried to characterize the Warren court, it wasn’t that radical. It didn’t break free from the essential constraints that were placed by the founding fathers in the Constitution, at least as it’s been interpreted, and the Warren court interpreted it in the same way that generally the Constitution is a charter of negative liberties. It says what the states can’t do to you, it says what the federal government can’t do to you, but it doesn’t say what the federal government or the state government must do on your behalf. And that hasn’t shifted. One of the I think tragedies of the civil rights movement was because the civil rights movement became so court focused, I think that there was a tendency to lose track of the political and community organizing and activities on the ground that are able to put together the actual coalitions of power through which you bring about redistributed change and in some ways we still suffer from that. MODERATOR: Let’s talk with Karen. Good morning, Karen, you’re on Chicago Public Radio. KAREN: Hi. The gentleman made the point that the Warren court wasn’t terribly radical with economic changes. My question is, is it too late for that kind of reparative work economically and is that that the appropriate place for reparative economic work to take place – the court – or would it be legislation at this point? OBAMA: Maybe I’m showing my bias here as a legislator as well as a law professor, but I’m not optimistic about bringing about major redistributive change through the courts. The institution just isn’t structured that way. You just look at very rare examples during the desegregation era the court was willing to for example order changes that cost money to a local school district. The court was very uncomfortable with it. It was very hard to manage, it was hard to figure out. You start getting into all sorts of separation of powers issues in terms of the court monitoring or engaging in a process that essentially is administrative and takes a lot of time. The court’s just not very good at it and politically it’s very hard to legitimize opinions from the court in that regard. So I think that although you can craft theoretical justifications for it legally. Any three of us sitting here could come up with a rational for bringing about economic change through the courts. Posted by: PowerPro at October 26, 2008 10:44 PM (JPEqm) 225
Hey, it seems Syria is "condemning" the US attack as "serious aggression." Might be time to take those fuckers to school.
Posted by: CB at October 26, 2008 10:45 PM (9Wv2j) 226
Man, the trolls are getting thick. In both ways.
And Christoph - your problem is that everyone was getting their marshmallows out for a roast when you pissed on the campfire for fear of someone burning themselves. Next time, just brush the tinder back into the fire. No one likes piss on their campfires. And Lizzie - I'm not sure whether you need more or less medication - but change is definitely needed. Posted by: Merovign at October 26, 2008 10:46 PM (UXoQt) 227
The transcript leaves out the eleventy billion "ahhhs" and "ummmms."
Posted by: Milesdei at October 26, 2008 10:48 PM (ACHxk) 228
Is there nobody here watching the store who can get a post up? Yeah, it's like all the grown-ups have left. Posted by: katya at October 26, 2008 10:50 PM (G3frc) 229
You know, I am starting to think we need to take the gloves off. It is like a tug of war and the Kos kiddies don't care about civility or truth. They so convinced their cause is just and their end justifies their means.
The PUMA's get this. I was on one of their sites earlier and they said "If Sarah is a c*nt then Barrack is a n*gger". Now I must say I feel like that is an escalation but is it? It is a response to the lack of civility on the left. Posted by: locus ceruleus at October 26, 2008 10:54 PM (e2mBS) 230
....the Constitution is a charter of negative liberties. It says what the
states can’t do to you, it says what the federal government can’t do to
you, but it doesn’t say what the federal government or the state
government must do on your behalf.
What the government must do on my behalf, Senator Government, is, first, leave me the hell alone; second, bomb the enemy; and third, secure the homeland. From this wellspring flow peace and prosperity. Posted by: Milesdei at October 26, 2008 10:55 PM (ACHxk) 231
The quote I like best from Lizzie was, "Obama changed all that."
Definitely cult-like language. And she was even involved in "outreach" on this blog. Posted by: DCox at October 26, 2008 10:55 PM (2pT9a) 232
What the government must do on my behalf, Senator Government, is,
first, leave me the hell alone; second, bomb the enemy; and third,
secure the homeland. From this wellspring flow peace and prosperity.
And we have a winner! Posted by: CB at October 26, 2008 10:57 PM (9Wv2j) 233
The PUMA's get this. I was on one of their sites earlier and they said "If Sarah is a c*nt then Barrack is a n*gger".
THAR SHE BLOWS!!!!!!!! OFF THE PORT BOW!!!! LOWER THE BOATS, MY HEARTIES! Posted by: Milesdei at October 26, 2008 10:58 PM (ACHxk) 234
nope. not okay, out of bounds and get the fuck out of here with that shit. doesn't matter if it's in quotes, matters even less that you substituted out the 'i'. you have no business posting that here except in outright condemnation. Posted by: phil at October 26, 2008 10:59 PM (fDO1N) 235
Milesdei
Sorry, it may seem tactically ungainly but no, we aren't free to vomit up such slurs. We are the Right. Try to act accordingly. Otherwise people might rightly assume that we are as unprincipled as the new left. It may seem like a burden but so be it. Posted by: adamthemad at October 26, 2008 11:04 PM (aVVGO) 236
Phi
I think you might be right I am just struggling with the lack of civility on one side. It also seems that no viable response is acceptable. Your outrage at the statement makes me ask were just as outraged at the Palin part? Posted by: locus ceruleus at October 26, 2008 11:04 PM (e2mBS) 237
215 Milesdei Thanks for the vote. My usual expectation is that either no one reads my posts, or decides they like, then continue reading. 220 CB No sweat. No apology needed. Posted by: Arbalest at October 26, 2008 11:05 PM (AgBuQ) 238
>....the Constitution is a charter of negative liberties. It says what the states can’t do to you, it says what the federal government can’t do to you, but it doesn’t say what the federal government or the state government must do on your behalf. Sure it does, in the Preamble: We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defence, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America. Posted by: Jones in CO at October 26, 2008 11:05 PM (KOkrW) Posted by: Milesdei at October 26, 2008 11:06 PM (ACHxk) 240
Ace, Vinnie, whomever: Check out the youtube video at the top of LGF....Obama says "the Warren court wasn't that radical because it "didn't break down
the fundamental constraints of the Constitution as laid down by the
Founding Fathers"? run with it
Posted by: MrPaulRevere at October 26, 2008 11:06 PM (RD91O) 241
l.c. the way you are being provacitive and underhanded while trying to create empathy for those who use racist slurs makes me ask if you are a troll. Posted by: phil at October 26, 2008 11:07 PM (fDO1N) 242
I must say it did not seem as inflammatory when I typed it. But when I saw it on screen I cringed. So I formally withdraw my question.
I was really agreeing with the outrage the PUMA's felt about the c*nt comments. Posted by: locus ceruleus at October 26, 2008 11:09 PM (e2mBS) 243
California in play? early voting results here- http://tinyurl.com/5zmd4f don't they have any acorn offices there to pad the box? geesh. Posted by: politicalmuse at October 26, 2008 11:09 PM (kLKnf) 244
That redistribute the wealth audio is dynomite! What was the poll number on that subject before ... like 70% said HELL NO to redistributing the wealth?
Posted by: incognito at October 26, 2008 11:10 PM (Rpam5) 245
243: It's the left's trademark. Let them have it. Its all they have.
Posted by: Swegin at October 26, 2008 11:12 PM (q0Z3p) 246
assuming that you are sincere here, this is just a friendly reminder that the hateful, racist rethuglican meme needs exactly NO supporting evidence. in this case fighting fire with fire is entirely counterproductive and only draws attention away from the foulness of the left (as if there was any attention for it to begin with.) be more careful, please. Posted by: phil at October 26, 2008 11:14 PM (fDO1N) 247
re: 245 - should be for 242. It moved.
Posted by: Swegin at October 26, 2008 11:14 PM (q0Z3p) Posted by: CB at October 26, 2008 11:15 PM (9Wv2j) 249
Yeah, openblog posted the video!!
Posted by: incognito at October 26, 2008 11:15 PM (Rpam5) 250
Apologies to Vinnie for calling him openblog! LOL!
Posted by: incognito at October 26, 2008 11:18 PM (Rpam5) 251
I will humbly apologize and I will be more careful.
Posted by: locus ceruleus at October 26, 2008 11:20 PM (e2mBS) 252
Way up on the blog about 100 or so ago, Lizzie commented that she used to be a Republican but is now an Obama disciple. I was raised in a house of Democrats and started off in the tradition of following my parents' political affiliation. There are many reasons that I am now and will always be registered as Republican. One is that the Democrats have stars in their eyes about living in a giant commune. Yes, the thought of everyone working together for the common good is a lovely idea. The problem is, as history has shown us OVER AND OVER AGAIN, that it DOES NOT WORK. It goes against human nature. It has never worked in any period of history, in any culture, any country, ever. Simple logic. Posted by: katya at October 26, 2008 11:28 PM (G3frc) 253
#243- humm link says internal error? hope the obamabots weren't bad little boys. Either way they're getting spanked (nsfw) nov 4th. Posted by: politicalmuse at October 27, 2008 12:08 AM (kLKnf) 254
It's okay, incognito, when I first posted it, I didn't put my name in the brackets like I'm supposed to.
Posted by: Vinnie at October 27, 2008 12:46 AM (idf83) Posted by: adamthemad at October 27, 2008 12:55 AM (aVVGO) 256
I for one, welcome our new idiot troll overlords.
Posted by: Purple Avenger at October 27, 2008 01:49 AM (OqXyp) 257
Luv the ref to Duke Nukem!
Posted by: scif at October 27, 2008 07:33 AM (+Or6G) 258
Do any of you other vets think this begins to smell like Laos? I've thought so for some time. Iran not only transports them, it trains and pays them, but Syria just looks the other way while a highway runs through it. Iran = N. Viet Nam Syria = Laos Posted by: chuck in st paul at October 27, 2008 11:02 AM (jDpso) 259
One thing that just occurred to me when I read the reaction to the strike on Mohammed Omar, which almost certainly caused civilian casualties, and it's a strike I approve of and would certainly have ordered...
... is that this is a conservative blog where many commenters are Christians. I'm not. They presumably believe what the Bible says. I don't. And yet I express my hope there were no civilian casualties in the strike inside Syria and the American conservatives on this blog assume I'm shilling for Obama, a man who supports infanticide, and am a compatriot of Jack Murtha, a man who accuses Marines of murder without proof, then doesn't apologize, and who also calls his own constituents racist. Their proof, these American conservatives on this blog? I said I hope no civilians were killed, something Jesus would approve of, and so would your pastors, priests, bishops, and rabbis. Posted by: Christoph at October 27, 2008 11:39 AM (hawOV) 260
Welcome to wow gold our wow Gold and wow power leveling store. We wow gold are specilized, wow power leveling professional and reliable wow power leveling website for wow power leveling selling and wow gold service. By the world of warcraft gold same token,we offer wow power leveling the best WoW service wow power leveling for our long-term and wow powerleveling loyal customers. wow powerleveling You will find wow powerleveling the benefits and value powerlevelingwe created powerleveling different from other sites. As to most people, power leveling they are unwilling to power leveling spend most of wow power leveling the time wow gold grinding money Rolex for mounts or rolex replica repair when replica rolex they can purchase Watches Rolex what they Rolex Watches are badly need. The Watch Rolex only way is to look Rolex Watch for the best place RS Gold to buy Cheap WARHAMMER ONLINE GOLD. Yes! You find it here! Our WoW Gold supplying service has already accumulated a high reputation and credibility. We have plenty of Gold suppliers, which will guarantee our delivery instant. Actually, we have been getting RuneScape Gold tons of postive feedbacks from our loyal RuneScape Money customers who really appreciate our service.
Posted by: wow power leveling at January 20, 2009 02:39 AM (jlcze) 261
gaming blog
Top1gaming forum
Gaming
2Moons
9Dragons
Age of Conan
Aion
Angels Online
Anarchy Online
ArchLord
Cabal
City of Hero
City of Villains
Conquer Online
Dofus
Dragonica
Dream of Mirror Online
Dreamland Online
Eve Online
EverQuest
EverQuest II
Final Fantasy XI
Fly for fun
Gaia online
GodsWar Online
Guild Wars
Holic Online
Knight online
Lineage II
Lord of the Rings Online
Mabinogi Online
Maple Story
Myth War II Online
Perfect World
Ragnarok Online 2
Rappelz
Rohan Online
Runes Of Magic
RF Online
Runescape
Scions of Fate
Second Life
shaiya
Silkroad Online
Star Wars Galaxies
Tales of Pirates
Voyage century Online
Warhammer Online
Wonderland Online
World of Warcraft
Zu Online
gaming blog
Top1gaming forum
Parasite Eve cosplay
World of Warcraft cosplay
Ah! My Goddess Cosplay
Tomb Raider cosplay
Death Note Amane Misa cosplay
kipi Amane Misa cosplay
Yuna cosplay
Tekken 5 cosplay
Dead Or Alive cosplay
Tenjho Tenge cosplay
Dragon Ball cosplay
Gundam Seed cosplay
Gurren cosplay
Kiddy Grade cosplay
Gintama Sarutobi Ayame cosplay
Al Azif cosplay
Ranka Lee cosplay
Final Fantasy X Lulu cosplay
Cardcaptor Sakura cosplay
D.Gray-Man cosplay
Shakugan No Shana cosplay
Shoujo Kakumei Utena cosplay
cosplay
CD KEY
Posted by: baidu at July 21, 2009 04:38 AM (pXYcm) 262
rolex watches review|miu miu handbags|designer handbags|replica handbags|replica designer handbags|replica gucci|fendi Handbags|Replica Louis Vuitton|replica LV|Prada Handbags|Burberry Handbags|replica Patek Philippe| replica Tag Heuer|replica watch|Rolex watches|
Posted by: hihandbag at October 11, 2009 11:00 PM (z3isx) 263
Discount Boots
Womens UGG UGG Shoes UGG Australia UGG UK UGG USA discount ugg boots cheap ugg boots Posted by: fdsfds at October 27, 2009 07:20 PM (8kvkz) 264
buy Discount Boots
Womens UGG UGG Shoes UGG Australia UGG UK UGG USA discount ugg boots cheap ugg boots air force 1 shoes nike air force air force 1 mens air force 1 boots air force onefrom usa Posted by: airforceoneshop at November 03, 2009 08:18 PM (LHCCE) 265
Come to our website for shopping with high quality and best service! There have new products,MBT M. Walk
and MBT Lami,Welcome everybody to buy it. Posted by: mbt shoes at November 08, 2009 02:44 PM (QhfLM) 266
Buy discount ugg shoes
cheap ugg shoes cheap ugg ugg rainier buy ugg ugg usa discount ugg boots ugg 5825 ugg shoes sale ugg sundance ugg shoes cheap ugg boots ugg 5815 ugg sale ugg uk ugg knightsbridge womens ugg boots ugg boots ugg australia ugg 5819free shipping Posted by: ugg boots at November 12, 2009 09:32 AM (IeIJx) 267
buy [url=http://www.reviewups.com/]discount ugg shoes[/url]
[url=http://www.reviewups.com/]cheap ugg shoes[/url] [url=http://www.reviewups.com/]cheap ugg[/url] [url=http://www.reviewups.com/ugg-coquette-casual-shoes-c-22]ugg rainier[/url] [url=http://www.reviewups.com/]buy ugg[/url] [url=http://www.reviewups.com/]ugg usa[/url] [url=http://www.reviewups.com/]discount ugg boots[/url] [url=http://www.reviewups.com/ugg-classic-short-c-1]ugg 5825[/url] [url=http://www.reviewups.com/]ugg shoes sale[/url] [url=http://www.reviewups.com/ugg-sundance-c-5]ugg sundance[/url] [url=http://www.reviewups.com/]ugg shoes[/url] [url=http://www.reviewups.com/]cheap ugg boots[/url] [url=http://www.reviewups.com/ugg-classic-tall-c-3]ugg 5815[/url] [url=http://www.reviewups.com/]ugg sale[/url] [url=http://www.reviewups.com/]ugg uk[/url] [url=http://www.reviewups.com/ugg-knightsbridge-c-27]ugg knightsbridge[/url] [url=http://www.reviewups.com/]womens ugg boots[/url] [url=http://www.reviewups.com/]ugg boots[/url] [url=http://www.reviewups.com/]ugg australia[/url] [url=http://www.reviewups.com/ugg-classic-cardy-c-2]ugg 5819[/url]from usa Posted by: cheap at November 14, 2009 10:45 AM (s7MB5) 268
Replica watches | Replica Watches | Fake Watches | Replica Breitling Watches | Replica watches | Louis Vuitton Replica Watch | Oris Fake | Tudor Watch Replica | Girard Perregaux Watch Replica | Hublot Replica Watches | Franck Muller Watches Replica | Breguet Replica Watch | Porsche Design Watches Replica | Replica Hublot Watches | Fake Porsche Design Watches
Posted by: replica watches at November 17, 2009 09:40 AM (xpuiO) 269
Replica watches | Replica Watches | Replica Watches | Replica watches | Replica Rolex | Audemars Piguet Replica Watch | Fake Ebel Watches | Replica Parmigiani Watches | Longines Replica Watch | A Lange & Sohne Replica | Wholesale Breguet Watch | Daniel Roth Replica Watch | Mont Blanc Fake Watches | Replica Aigner Watches | Philip Stein Watches Replica
Posted by: replica watches at November 18, 2009 01:05 AM (C/zDM) 270
replica soccer jersey | Replica Omega | soccer jersey wholesale | replica soccer jersey | soccer jersey supplier | Replica Ebel | Replica Christian Dior Watches | Cheap Chanel Watches | Cheap Christian Dior Fake Watch | Titoni Watch | Replica Other Watches | Fake Movado Watch | Fake Hublot Watch | Cheap Movado Watches | Panerai Fake Watch
Posted by: replica watches at November 18, 2009 04:14 AM (C/zDM) Posted by: mbtshoesbuy at November 23, 2009 01:22 PM (bNNim) 272
The proper function of man is to live, but not to exist.ugg classic cardyConquer fear of death and you are put into possession of your life. ugg classic tallThere is a time to speak and a time to be silent. ugg knightsbridgefree shippingmbt cheap
mbt sale mbt uk mbt shoes cheap MBT M.Walk Posted by: reviewups at November 27, 2009 12:03 PM (xUZwC) 273
hot news for brand shoes online store ,do you want to win more discount ?and popular for younger,and nike air maxwith top quality A ,come on all air max shoes with lowest price for highest quality !
Posted by: nike air max at December 02, 2009 12:00 AM (OKj2x) 274
soccer jersey supplier | Replica Watches | Replica watches | Replica Omega | Replica Breitling Watches | Replica Cartier | Replica Cartier | soccer jersey wholesale | replica wristwatch | watches brand | best replica watches | watches brand | replica wristwatch | best replica watches | replica wristwatch | best replica watches | best replica watches | replica watch | replica watches | replica watches | replica wristwatch | replica wristwatch | best replica watches | replica wristwatch | Luxury watches | replica watch | best replica watches | best replica watches | replica watches | watches brand | replica wristwatch | replica wristwatch | replica watch | replica wristwatch | replica watches | replica wristwatch | best replica watches | replica wristwatch
Posted by: replica watches at December 04, 2009 10:12 AM (bsW/x) 275
Casting Bracelets Fashion | Zircon Cufflink Best | Stamping Bracelet Fashion | Wire Bracelet Best | Stamping Ring Best | Stainless Steel Rings Fashion | Ceramic Jewelry Luxury | Wholesale Stainless Steel Bracelets | Carbon Pendants Best | Wholesale Stainless Steel Cufflink | Zircon Cufflink Best | Wholesale Corrosion Pendant | Key Rings Best | Wire Bracelet Best | Tungsten Rings Yiwu | Zircon Pendant Wholesale | Dior Jewelry Wholesale | Wholesale ceramic rings | Wholesale Casting Rings | Links of London Jewelry Wholesale | Wholesal Leather Bracelet | Wholesale Zircon Bangles | Wholesal Stamping Bracelet | Stainless Steel Bangle Yiwu | Casting Bracelets Fashion
Posted by: wholesale jewelry at December 06, 2009 09:45 AM (xj2FR) 276
We supply authentic discount Lacoste Shoes
Lacoste Trainers New Lacoste Lacoste Sale Mens Lacoste camden lacoste trainers lacoste trainers shoes lacoste camden retro camden lacoste trainers lacoste carnaby shoes lacoste carnaby retro lacoste shoes sale New Lacoste shoes Lacoste shoes online cheap Lacoste shoes Lacoste shoe mens lacoste shoes Lacoste Shua Lace Black Lace shoes white Lace shoes lacoste swerve shoes White Lacoste shoes Lacoste shoes sale Cheap Lacoste shoes Lacoste Women Shoes Women Lacoste Shoes Lacoste Shoes online on line, cheap price,Top quality,Free shipping! Posted by: Lacoste shoes at December 13, 2009 02:42 PM (/3s/N) 277
Watches Gucci Fashion | IWC Replica Watches | Jacob & Co. Fake Watches | Porsche Design Fake Watches | Replica Hublot Watches | Watches Gucci Fashion | Watches Jaeger LeCoultre Fashion | Concord Replica Watches | Watches Gucci Fashion | Replica Swiss Army Watches | Panerai Fake Watches | Replica Ulysse Nardin Watches | Watches Movado Fashion | Replica Ulysse Nardin Watches | Replica Longines Watches | Bedat & CO Replica Watches | Replica A Lange & Sohne Watches | Replica Roger Dubuis Watches | Watches Zenith Fashion | Alain Silberstein Replica Watches
Posted by: wholesale jewelry at December 20, 2009 09:56 AM (1dySH) 278
Shopping for a Rolex watch online can tag heuer make the job Rolex Watches easier but you Replica Watches also have to be patek philippe wary about the reputation of the dealer Chanel Watches and the brand of Breitling Watches watch you are audemars piguet getting. The more mont blanc watches considerable you are, the less danger you would come to armani watches when buying a Omega Watches gold watch online.
Posted by: rolex at December 20, 2009 10:10 AM (/pchr) 279
Buy rolex Fake Watches and Replica Watches brands,rolex watches rolex watches, Replica rolex watches, replica rolex: replica rolex,replica rolex: replica breitling watches,replica tag heuer: replica tag heuer,replica cartier watches: replica cartier watches,replica omega watches: replica omega watches,replica panerai watches: replica panerai watches,replica armani watches: replica armani watches,replica audemars piguet: replica audemars piguet,replica bvlgari watches: replica bvlgari watches,replica chanel watches: replica chanel watches,replica gucci watches: replica gucci watches,replica movado watches: replica movado watches,replica montblanc watches: replica montblanc watches,replica patek philippe: replica patek philippe on sale.
Posted by: fake watches at December 20, 2009 10:14 AM (/pchr) 280
Replica rolex watches,tag heuer watches and replica rolex watches,replica watches replica breitling watches breitling watches,chanel watches chanel watches replica patek philippe patek philippe watches,replica audemars piguet watches replica montblanc watches for men and women.
Posted by: tag heuer at December 24, 2009 08:24 PM (Bp0xg) 281
Replica fake watches and replica watches brands,rolex watches rolex watches, replica rolex: replica rolex,replica rolex: breitling watches,replica tag heuer: tag heuer,replica cartier watches: cartier watches,replica omega watches: omega watches,replica panerai watches: replica panerai watches,replica armani watches: replica armani watches,replica audemars piguet: replica audemars piguet,replica bvlgari watches: replica bvlgari watches,replica chanel watches: replica chanel watches,replica gucci watches: replica gucci watches,replica movado watches: replica movado watches,replica montblanc watches: replica montblanc watches,replica patek philippe: replica patek philippe sale.Replica rolex watches and tag heuer watches, rolex watches,Replica Watches replica watches,patek philippe patek philippe Watches,audemars piguet audemars piguet,Omega Watches: omega watches,replica Cartier Watches cartier watches,Breitling Watches breitling watches,Chanel Watches: chanel watches,armani watches: armani watches,iwc watches iwc watches,mont blanc watches montblanc watches.
Posted by: rolex at December 25, 2009 12:25 PM (nRNCD) 282
We sell rolex and tag heuer watch, rolex watches,Rolex replica watches,replica patek philippe Watches,replica audemars piguet,Omega Watches omega watches,replica Cartier cartier watches,Breitling breitling watches,replica chanel watches,armani watches: armani watches,iwc watches iwc watches,montblanc montblanc watches Replica.Cheap fake watches and replica watches on sale,rolex watches rolex watches, watches replica rolex,replica breitling watches,replica tag heuer: tag heuer,replica cartier watches: cartier watches,replica omega watches: omega watches,replica panerai watches: replica panerai watches,replica armani watches: replica armani watches,replica audemars piguet: replica audemars piguet,replica bvlgari watches: replica bvlgari watches,replica chanel watches: replica chanel watches,replica gucci watches: replica gucci watches,replica movado watches: replica movado watches,replica montblanc watches: replica montblanc watches,replica patek philippe: replica patek philippe sale for people.
Posted by: replica watches at December 27, 2009 10:54 AM (52U6J) 283
Cheap replica rolex and tag heuer watches,replica watches of rolex rolex watches replica,buy patek philippe Buy replica watches,fake watches and tag heuer watches.
Posted by: tag heuer at January 01, 2010 01:53 PM (nUnK8) 284
replica rolex rolex and tag heuer watches,replica watches of rolex rolex watches replica,buy patek philippe Buy replica watches,fake watches and tag heuer watches.breitling watches breitling watches at low price.
Posted by: rolex at January 06, 2010 05:09 PM (TspGB) 285
Un total de once comunidades autnomas estn este jueves en alerta naranja Christmas gift ugg tall boots (riesgo importante) por nevadas y bajan las temperaturas en toda Espa09a, segn la Agencia Estatal de Meteorologa (AEMET). En concreto, se Christmas gift ugg napoule sandal trata de Aragn, Cantabria, Castilla-La Mancha, Catalu09a, Christmas gift timberland classic boots Madrid, Navarra, Comunidad Valenciana, Galicia, Pas Vasco, Asturias y Murcia. La cota de nieve bajar a menos de 200 metros en el CantbricoLa Pennsula Ibrica est bajo dos borrascas y un anticicln que crearn un pasillo que permitir el paso de una corriente de aire muy fro, como la que est provocando un temporal de fro glaciar en Europa, aunque es esperan que el fro que suframos no sea tan intenso como en otros pases. An as, se espera que las bajas temperaturas se mantengan hasta el domingo. La cota de nieve baja en el Cantbrico a menos de 200 metros
Posted by: El temporal de fr¨ªo y nieve pone en alerta a once comunidades aut¨®nomas ugg boots|ugg uk|timberlan at January 10, 2010 07:37 AM (tWrEP) 286
Buy rolex watches,tag heuer watches and replica patek philippe patek philippe watches,replica audemars piguet> replica breitling watches breitling watches,chanel watches chanel watches watches replica montblanc watches.Rolex fake watches and replica watches brands,replica rolex: breitling watches,replica tag heuer: tag heuer, replica rolex: replica rolex replica cartier watches: cartier watches,replica omega watches: omega watches,replica panerai watches: panerai watches,replica armani watches: armani watches,replica audemars piguet: audemars piguet,replica bvlgari watches: bvlgari watches,replica chanel watches: chanel watches,replica gucci watches: gucci watches,replica movado watches: movado watches,replica montblanc watches: montblanc watches,replica patek philippe: patek philippe on sale.replica watches and replica watches.
Posted by: rolex at January 10, 2010 11:32 PM (OO9Jx) 287
Cheap tag heuer watches,rolex watches that replica watches,fake watches and tag heuer watches,replica breitling breitling watches,cheap replica rolex cartier replica cartier watches,replica omega omega watches and panerai replica panerai watches replica armani armani watches,cheap audemars piguet audemars piguet watches,bvlgari watches replica chanel watches replica gucci gucci watches and movado watches replica montblanc montblanc watches sale patek philippe watches for us.
Posted by: rolex at January 14, 2010 11:10 PM (GTMOj) 288
徵信社|徵信|徵信社|徵信|徵信社|徵信|徵信社|徵信|徵信社|徵信|徵信社|徵信|徵信社|徵信|徵信社|徵信|徵信社|徵信|徵信社|徵信|徵信社|徵信|徵信社|徵信|徵信社|徵信|徵信社|徵信|徵信社|徵信|徵信社|徵信|徵信社|徵信|徵信社|徵信|徵信社|徵信 徵信社|徵信|徵信社|徵信|徵信社|徵信|徵信社|徵信|徵信社|徵信|徵信社|徵信|徵信社|徵信|徵信社|徵信|徵信社|徵信|徵信社|徵信|徵信社|徵信|徵信社|徵信|徵信社|徵信|徵信社|徵信|徵信社|徵信|徵信社|徵信|徵信社|徵信 徵信社|徵信|徵信社|徵信|徵信社|徵信|徵信社|徵信|徵信社|徵信|徵信社|徵信|徵信社|徵信|徵信社|徵信|徵信社|徵信|徵信社|徵信|徵信社|徵信|徵信社|徵信|徵信社|徵信|徵信社|徵信|徵信社|徵信|徵信社|徵信|徵信社|徵信|徵信社|徵信|徵信社|徵信|徵信社|徵信|徵信社|徵信|徵信社|徵信|徵信社|徵信|徵信社|徵信|徵信社|徵信|徵信社|徵信|徵信社|徵信
Posted by: azx at January 18, 2010 03:45 AM (Aemi7) 289
cheap replica watches and breitling watches,tag heuer He chose the name Edox,English rolex, being patek philippe the oldest brands omega watches in watch manufacturing.audemars piguet,with its montblanc watches The cartier watches name of this new watch is Edox Mens Class Royale Mechanical panerai watches Watch bvlgari watches of attraction.The case is armani watches rectangular on sale.
Posted by: replica watches at January 21, 2010 05:29 PM (fyHwu) 290
Good replica watches and buy replica watches and replica rolex replica replica tag heuer watches,buy replica replica omega watches and breitling watches replica breitling watches sale at lowest prices.
Posted by: replica watches at January 23, 2010 07:53 PM (ioa0w) 291
Swiss replica watches Now while replica watches you can buy a good digital replica watches and pocket watch you might need to see what features are present on your new purchase. This is important as you should know and understand the quickest way to set any of the watch brands. You will also need to familiarize yourself with how to know when you will need to change the batteries on your digital watch.The key to finding your perfect watch is mainly replica watches keeping your options open. There are flea markets where you should be able to find replica watch stalls. You can see if you will come across any great antique watch brands in auction houses. These places will sometimes have fantastic looking antique pocket watches that will grace the hand of any owner.These facts may seem to be quite daunting but if you have ever owned a watch of any kind then you will replica watches know that you just how replica watches easy wristwatch these devices can make your life. The many different styles and features that you can find on an average watch will make choosing the right watch brands an exciting experience. Posted by: replica watches at January 29, 2010 10:09 PM (ihruD) 292
Buy rolex replica watches and replica watches replica replica watches and replica rolex watches patek philippe watches and fake watches and breitling watches,replica tag heuer: tag heuer,replica cartier watches: cartier watches,replica omega watches: omega watches at lowest prices.
Posted by: replica rolex at January 30, 2010 10:03 AM (h+uyA) 293
fast weight loss fast weight loss car insurance car insurance cheap auto insurance cheap auto insurance coach handbags coach handbags electronic cigarette electronic cigarette nfl jerseys nfl jerseys tomic tomic nfl jersey nfl jersey abercrombie fitch wholesale abercrombie fitch wholesale Cartier Montblanc cartier monblanc blackberry fans blackberry fans jordan shoes jordan shoes true religion true religion love coach handbags love coach handbags monica~yo monica~yo nfl jerseys nfl jerseys ed hardy shirt ed hardy shirt weight loss tips weight loss tips ghd ghd seochan seochan jerseysshoes shoes wholesale wholesale abercrombie fitch abercrombie fitche tomic tomic time's up time's up skechers shape up shoes skechers shape ups shoes Posted by: wholesale nfl jersey at February 04, 2010 02:18 AM (Mgsdy) 294
Certainly watches are Replica Watches used to help people record rolex Watches time, but rolex watches nowadays its functions have enlarged. Replica watches are now tag heuer Watches not only objects that tag heuer watches can tell you what time it is, they are also a status symbol. You should not feel strange when you find someone wearing a watch on his wrist, but use the cell phone to tell time. In that situation, the watch is just showing its luxurious function cartier watches. It is normal and cartier watches perhaps also happens to you. .If asked that among the watches of various brands, which one can suit your taste? There is no doubt that most people will choose Rolex. Whichever social class you are in, it is naturally Rolex was known breitling Watches and cherished breitling watches for a long time. However, the elements do not usually enter the market alone, always come with the price tag up to the hand. For this reason, many people, especially men, their dreams of luxury Rolex watches are buried in omega Watches his heart omega watches. What should I do? Rolex watches are simply stunning worn by the rich and famous, right? No, this world is not the world's richest men, is the world of each. All are equal before the search of luxury and be men's watches respected. Within men's watches, the law, when consumers are in the market, women's watches they should women's watches receive the same treatment. This is the real reason why replica Rolex watches are ladies watches ladies watches more welcome than Rolex. Because in this world are not difficult to understand that the rich are much less than people with low income, you agree with me? You are forced to nod and say with certainty that is the reality. These low-income people do not have enough money to save every month. They can not afford such luxury Rolex watches
Posted by: replica watches at February 05, 2010 07:09 AM (TUJDt) 295
this replica watches replica watchWhoever wants replica watches timekeeper that does the job of a tachometer will be crazy for. The operation is performed by the copied replica rolex 's bezel. The Daytona also applies automatic movement ¨C just one of many breitling watches characters and functionalities that ensures the precision of time. Originally created to measure lap time and the cartier watches overall time of a race, Rolex Daytona replica omega watches timepieces can measure elapsed time for omega any sporting event. The power of this breitling replica item is made possibly by its internalized perpetual rotor mechanism. Known for its precision, this special Rolex replica cartier watch model only has to be set once to the cartier watches standard time of the owner's choice. Once rolex watches being created, it updates itself during time changes, making upkeep of the replica's time setting replica watches nonexistent. Even though these replica watches were made for sporting events, (specifically those involving laps or circuits), it's not so adversible to put them tag heuer in water since they are not fake watches waterproof. Even thought most of the time, the replica watches do not bear the tag heuer same functionalities as the original ones, they are still the most desirable alternatives of the expensive real models.
Posted by: replica watches at February 06, 2010 01:20 PM (KbTNE) 296
Factors Replica Watches About The Rolex replica watches Oyster The Oyster is so closely get in touch with Rolex, and it is inevitably that some people think these are the only Replica watches Rolex manufacture. Others suppose that there is a single Oyster watch. But as a matter of fact, the name Oyster does not actually meant for a rolex Watches particular watch you can buy rolex watches or even to a series but to a type of case that available in some of the Rolex ranges. History The Oyster case was first released in 1926. The objective was to protect the workings of the watch from dust and moisture. Early watches were far from waterproof. The Oyster tag heuer Watchescase was an tag heuer watches innovative design to eliminate these problems. It had a new double locking crown that screwed into place. It has been compared to the hatch on a submarine. Like a submarine, the Oyster case was waterproof. In 1927 Mercedes Gleitze swam the English breitling Watches Channel breitling watches . Before she set off she was presented with a Rolex Oyster. When she arrived, the watch was still working perfectly. The resulting publicity gave the new case a massive boost. Why is it called Oyster? Legend has it that Hans cartier Watches Wilsdorf cartier watches, who invented the Oyster, chose the name because the new case reminded him of the difficulty he had experienced prising open oysters at dinner. Since then the Oyster has further, particularly advanced. Many Oyster watches today are omega Watches perpetual-self-winding, in other omega watches words, it does not require to expose the mechanism to the outside world in order to wind it. The Osyter Perpetual is one of the toughest, most durable, most reliable watches (under truly adverse conditions). It is probably the best mechanical watch money can buy.
Posted by: replica watches at February 08, 2010 06:50 AM (TUJDt) Processing 0.12, elapsed 0.1179 seconds. |
MuNuvians
MeeNuvians
Polls! Polls! Polls!
Dale's ECB Election Projection Federal Review Real Clear Politics Rasmussen Reports Gallup Zogby FoxNews Polls Sabato/Crystal Ball Frequently Asked Questions
The (Almost) Complete Paul Anka Integrity Kick
Primary Document: The Audio
Paul Anka Haiku Contest Announcement Integrity SAT's: Entrance Exam for Paul Anka's Band AllahPundit's Paul Anka 45's Collection AnkaPundit: Paul Anka Takes Over the Site for a Weekend (Continues through to Monday's postings) George Bush Slices Don Rumsfeld Like an F*ckin' Hammer Top Top Tens
Democratic Forays into Erotica New Shows On Gore's DNC/MTV Network Nicknames for Potatoes, By People Who Really Hate Potatoes Star Wars Euphemisms for Self-Abuse Signs You're at an Iraqi "Wedding Party" Signs Your Clown Has Gone Bad Signs That You, Geroge Michael, Should Probably Just Give It Up Signs of Hip-Hop Influence on John Kerry NYT Headlines Spinning Bush's Jobs Boom Things People Are More Likely to Say Than "Did You Hear What Al Franken Said Yesterday?" Signs that Paul Krugman Has Lost His Frickin' Mind All-Time Best NBA Players, According to Senator Robert Byrd Other Bad Things About the Jews, According to the Koran Signs That David Letterman Just Doesn't Care Anymore Examples of Bob Kerrey's Insufferable Racial Jackassery Signs Andy Rooney Is Going Senile Other Judgments Dick Clarke Made About Condi Rice Based on Her Appearance Collective Names for Groups of People John Kerry's Other Vietnam Super-Pets Cool Things About the XM8 Assault Rifle Media-Approved Facts About the Democrat Spy Changes to Make Christianity More "Inclusive" Secret John Kerry Senatorial Accomplishments John Edwards Campaign Excuses John Kerry Pick-Up Lines Changes Liberal Senator George Michell Will Make at Disney Torments in Dog-Hell Greatest Hitjobs
The Ace of Spades HQ Sex-for-Money Skankathon A D&D Guide to the Democratic Candidates Margaret Cho: Just Not Funny More Margaret Cho Abuse Margaret Cho: Still Not Funny Iraqi Prisoner Claims He Was Raped... By Woman Wonkette Announces "Morning Zoo" Format John Kerry's "Plan" Causes Surrender of Moqtada al-Sadr's Militia World Muslim Leaders Apologize for Nick Berg's Beheading Michael Moore Goes on Lunchtime Manhattan Death-Spree Milestone: Oliver Willis Posts 400th "Fake News Article" Referencing Britney Spears Liberal Economists Rue a "New Decade of Greed" Artificial Insouciance: Maureen Dowd's Word Processor Revolts Against Her Numbing Imbecility Intelligence Officials Eye Blogs for Tips They Done Found Us Out, Cletus: Intrepid Internet Detective Figures Out Our Master Plan Shock: Josh Marshall Almost Mentions Sarin Discovery in Iraq Leather-Clad Biker Freaks Terrorize Australian Town When Clinton Was President, Torture Was Cool What Wonkette Means When She Explains What Tina Brown Means Wonkette's Stand-Up Act Wankette HQ Gay-Rumors Du Jour Here's What's Bugging Me: Goose and Slider My Own Micah Wright Style Confession of Dishonesty Outraged "Conservatives" React to the FMA An On-Line Impression of Dennis Miller Having Sex with a Kodiak Bear The Story the Rightwing Media Refuses to Report! Our Lunch with David "Glengarry Glen Ross" Mamet The House of Love: Paul Krugman A Michael Moore Mystery (TM) The Dowd-O-Matic! Liberal Consistency and Other Myths Kepler's Laws of Liberal Media Bias John Kerry-- The Splunge! Candidate "Divisive" Politics & "Attacks on Patriotism" (very long) The Donkey ("The Raven" parody) News/Chat
|