Support




Contact
Powered by
Movable Type

Pre-emptive Warfare and the Viet Nam Effect(Kat-Mo)

So, Barack Obama's little "video that never made it to a campaign ad" about freezing development of new nuclear weapons and reducing existing arsenals, plus Joe Biden's "we're going to do something that might make the polls go down and won't seem right in the beginning, trust us" speech, might have some defense minded folks a little worried.

At least worried enough to make a statement to the press.

Their main concern is that our current weapons are largely from post WWII Cold War era and Reagan's build up in the 80's. Nuclear weapons can erode, even with general maintenance. It is one of the main issues with Russia's deteriorating nuclear arsenal. Nuclear proliferation is on the rise and the US military proficiency in handling the weapons has been notably slipping.

But, SecDef Gates' concern is that the loss of nuclear weapons is a loss of deterrence in a world with rapidly rising third world countries continually developing or attempting to develop a nuclear arsenal.

Obviously, someone is a little concerned about the re-emergence of the left's Cold War mentality that unilateral disarmament will convince others to do the same or that the US is not a threat so there is no need to develop such weapons or point them at the US. A mentality that is about to be elected into office.

Is anyone else concerned that, even electing a much younger person to office (if we do), it will still be the same issue with the 2004 election: Viet Nam radicals keep coming back to haunt us.

Aren't we done with this yet?

Is anyone else tired of having the Viet Nam syndrome still shoved up our batuskis? Obama doesn't come to his conclusion about nuclear disarmament from a post Cold War euphoria about a new world without real enemies that can seriously confront the remaining super power of the United States. Even though that is a false premise as well.

No, by Obama's own words, he came by his ideology the same way Kerry and the other Democrats that came from the Viet Nam era had: associating with radical sixties "make love, not war", "war crimes of the US" (don't forget "air raiding villages and bombing civilians " from Obama), and "continuous revolution". The variety of revolution in the US supported by and infiltrated by the KGB. The idea that it was US aggression that fostered aggression from other nations as opposed to the natural tensions of competitive interests.

Without giving into hysteria about Obama being a "communist", what continues to reverberate through our politics are these left over tentacles of that long ago time, echoing out through individuals that Barack has associated with, up to and including Bill Ayers.

Are we done with Viet Nam yet?

Please?

Posted by: Open Blog at 02:35 PM



Comments

1 Thank you Ace, allow me to promote this blog post by my friend's site, one more time:
http://www.mikefrancesa.com/wordpress/?p=1746

The title is Reagan launches SDI, Obama will destroy it.

This needs to be in a campaign commercial by McCain, I would contrast Reagan and Obama.

ACE What are your thoughts on the siren blaring headline on Drudge, U.S. Helicopters attack targets in Syria.

Posted by: War69DotCom at October 26, 2008 02:42 PM (rxX8B)

2 Ace - check out this quote form Michelle O via Macsmind:

“African press International is supposed to support Africans and African-American view,” and she went to state that, “it is strange that API has chosen to support the racists against my husband. There is no shame in being adopted by a step father. All dirt has been thrown onto my husband’s face and yet he loves this country. My husband and I know that there is no law that will stop him from becoming the president, just because some American white racists are bringing up the issue of my husband’s adoption by His step father. The important thing here is where my husband’s heart is at the moment. I can tell the American people that My husband loves this country and his adoption never changed his love for this country. He was born in Hawaii, yes, and that gives him all the right to be an American citizen even though he was adopted by a foreigner”

Could there really by a problem with the One's citizenship status?

Posted by: P at October 26, 2008 02:45 PM (4m2l1)

3 GIRD YOUR LOINS!

Posted by: Globular Cluster at October 26, 2008 02:51 PM (rRO4e)

4 Could there really by a problem with the One's citizenship status?

Posted by: P at October 26, 2008 02:45 PM (4m2l1)


Stop with this stupid shit!  There are so many lines of attack you could choose, including things that came right out of Obama's own mouth or right from his campaign website, yet you choose to bitterly cling to the kind of stuff that makes you sound like a fucking Truther.

Posted by: Watcher at October 26, 2008 02:53 PM (dU9fz)

5 Pat,

that has been out for awhile. API is like Berg in Philly looking for internet traffic. API has been days away from releasing a phone conversation with Michelle for weeks.

Posted by: locus ceruleus at October 26, 2008 02:54 PM (e2mBS)

6

Personally I don’t think this is a “Vietnam” thing, other than the fact that the people actually running the Democrat Party came of age during that era. I think it truly is a Communist thing. Soros is really the man behind the far left tilt of the Democrat Party and he is a product of the communists.

 

This election was and is being coordinated by Soros and the media. The media, by the way, was infiltrated by the Communists long ago in the 50s.

Posted by: Vic at October 26, 2008 02:57 PM (b1ysY)

7
We won't be done with Vietnam until the last blithering hippie fucking commie rat bastard falls forward into his oatmeal and drowns of nursing home neglect.

Even then it won't be over because these malignant haters of America and decency and success have infiltrated our schools and actually write the curriculum. That is what Bill Ayers is all about, preserving the legacy of the commie-fellating destruction that is the code of the hippie.

This is the fight of our times and it will continue throughout our lives. Just get used to life in the trenches, because that is our fate.

Posted by: Ronsonic at October 26, 2008 03:02 PM (ywSvi)

8
P, I don't read it like that. It sounds to me like Michelle is saying that her husband was born in Hawaii, but then adopted by his mother's second husband (the Indonesian) but that that adoption doesn't affect his citizenship status or his love of this country. Bracketing the second issue, she's absolutely correct about the first: his adoption by an Indonesian at a young age did not affect his citizenship or his eligibility for the presidency.

I do find it appalling that she equates McCain supporters with "racists". Win, lose, or draw, we're going to be hear a lot more of that garbage over the next four years.

Posted by: Brown Line at October 26, 2008 03:03 PM (OMiLl)

9

Folks, I have never thought that John McCain was a great communicator or an effective speaker.

Well,  maybe the Mav is getting better?

Look at what I found over at Hillbuzz... HRC's supporters embedded this video of McCain on the trail... and I have to admit he looks and sounds pretty damn good.

http://tiny.cc/aX32i

The background music is pretty rousing...worked on me..

***.tear is rolling down my face (sigh)***

If they can shorten this one up, the Mav's team might have a good ad...but we are  getting down to the wire...

Posted by: Juliet16 at October 26, 2008 03:03 PM (2xgu5)

10 If Obama fucks up, this will be the last fart of the multi-culti academic nomenklatura.

Posted by: Globular Cluster at October 26, 2008 03:06 PM (rRO4e)

11 2 and 4, I don't think it's necessarily either/or.  Personally I won't be surprised if there is a serious problem with O's status, he's certainly been cagey enough about it.  But absent a definitive "smoking gun", Watcher is right, it unfortunately jeopardizes our credibility to focus on that issue when there's so much wrong with O the candidate.

'some American white racists are bringing up the issue of my husband’s adoption by His step father'

Yikes!  Is she telling us that "He" really is the Messiah?

Posted by: Asher Abrams at October 26, 2008 03:08 PM (mbePX)

Posted by: Globular Cluster at October 26, 2008 03:08 PM (rRO4e)

13 Ronsonic,

you are the most optimistic guy evah. Your first paragraph was spot on. The greatest generation gave birth to the worst generation. Baby boomers will never and I repeat never be able to do what is right for the country over what makes them feel good in the moment.

They all believe they are Alan Alda in MASH and imagine conservatives are all Frank Burns. They are incapable of sacrifice for the greater good. They honestly believe that defeating you is all that is needed to make this country great again.

Posted by: locus ceruleus at October 26, 2008 03:10 PM (e2mBS)

14 You people need to focus.  Did anyone read the lead off post?  Or am I having an acid flash back or something.

Posted by: SlaveDog at October 26, 2008 03:11 PM (H6Jyg)

15 If Obama fucks up, this will be the last fart of the multi-culti academic nomenklatura.

Would that it were, would that it were. Those people will never go away.

Posted by: Farmer Joe at October 26, 2008 03:12 PM (nYv/9)

16 1 / war69,

FWIW, Debka is reporting this:
http://www.debka.com/headline.php?hid=5676
'October 26, 2008, 9:00 PM (GMT+02:00)

Eye witnesses are quoted as describing four US helicopters striking a house in Al-Sukkariya near the Iraqi border town of Deir Azzun Sunday night, Oct. 26, and killing 9 people. Eight US soldiers are said to have disembarked for the attack before being flown out. There has been no US comment on the incident.

DEBKAfile’s military sources report previous US strikes on Syrian soil in 2004 and 2005 targeting al Qaeda exit points to Iraq. These attacks were discontinued for three years. Sunday’s operation was an extension of the US-Iraqi offensive to purge the northern Iraqi town of Mosul and their northern Syria havens of al Qaeda elements, the last two strong bastions the jihadists still retain in the region....

DEBKAfile’s political sources link the operation in northern Syria with the US presidential campaign 10 days before voting. Both candidates, Barack Obama and John McCain, will no doubt comment and if the attacks continue they could become a focal campaign theme.'

Yeah, I know, it's Debka.  FWIW like I said.

Posted by: Asher Abrams at October 26, 2008 03:12 PM (mbePX)

17 Great post.

Could not agree more.

Posted by: TMQ at October 26, 2008 03:15 PM (aMu45)

18 14 You people need to focus.  Did anyone read the lead off post?  Or am I having an acid flash back or something.
Posted by: SlaveDog

Yes, I think the main issue here is the loss of deterrence and the problems of having a president, possibly for eight years, who will do nothing about it.

with a nuclear Iran and NK going back and forth without any promise of a continuing check regime, going on "trust" alone without the "verification" part of Reagan's idea, is a dangerous, dangerous place to be.

Add on to that Frank's comments about a 25% reduction in military capabilities, we are in deep trouble.

Posted by: Kat-Mo at October 26, 2008 03:20 PM (GxnBZ)

19 Thank you Asher Abrams, could not believe so many people ignored it. If the story is true it could be huge. Let's pray for our troops, if Syria attacks back things could get ugly. If the story is true it sounds like a raid to take somebody out, Al Qaeda? Bin Laden? Who knows and who knows if the MSM will focus on this story, McCain needs to drive some points home if it is true.

Posted by: War69DotCom at October 26, 2008 03:21 PM (rxX8B)

20

If Obama fucks up, this will be the last fart of the multi-culti academic nomenklatura.
Don't bet on it, there's still plenty of gas left in their tank.

What might save us is if there is a strong movement of younger men and women who have served in combat into politics and other leadership positions.  These people are smart, dedicated and courageous in ways the left cannot come close to.

Somehow they have to be convinced that having their lives turned inside out and being subjected to smears and illegal investigations isn't worse than facing death in combat... I'm hoping it isn't, that is.

And by the way, welcome to the most corrupt election in modern history, brought to you by your local Democratic Party Well-played, "patriots"!

Posted by: sherlock at October 26, 2008 03:22 PM (ojW85)

21

We won't be done with Vietnam until the last blithering hippie fucking commie rat bastard falls forward into his oatmeal and drowns of nursing home neglect.

Have you ever seen nursing home oatmeal?  You cannot drown it it.  Set fenceposts with it, sure, but drown?  Not a chance.

Posted by: ThomasD at October 26, 2008 03:27 PM (UK5R1)

22 Kat-Mo,

I enjoy your posts and agree with this one.

I'm in no position to decide the impact of the Vietnam-era, but I'd say we are still early in the America-hating-we-are-the-source-of-all-problems-in-the-world wave. I hope I'm wrong.

I wonder what would happen if BHO became Prez and expanded the military in Afghanistan and invaded Pakistan. What would the lefty moonbats say about that? Chickenhawks take power syndrome? Bill Clinton redux?

Would it suddenly be okay to protect our interests abroad or would all of their heads explode?

Enquiring minds want to know...but not badly enough to actually elect that fucker.

Posted by: ConcernedCitizen at October 26, 2008 03:28 PM (hmDr/)

23 And the Iranians are currently wetting themselves with glee over the prospect of getting another Carter installed as U.S. President. The last one worked out so well for them.

Well, fuck those assholes. My gut says my country won't fuck up that badly.

I think having a Viet Nam-era serviceman as President who has Iraq-era servicemen as his children will go a long way to killing off the Viet Nam effect. He and his make the statement for our country that it is great and it is good and it is worth fighting for.

Posted by: ConcernedCitizen at October 26, 2008 03:34 PM (hmDr/)

24 President COMACHO from Idiocracy....promises that JOE will heal the econmoy and end finally the dustbowl!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XkGCwgWW3_U


Posted by: christy at October 26, 2008 03:36 PM (drHfj)

25

#6  -- I agree.

For anyone who has never watched this disturbing 1984 video interview of KGB defector Yuri Bezmenov, here is a link.  You really must watch it.  Bezmenov describes how Western journalists (e.g., Look magazine reporters, etc.) were targeted by KGB for "proselytization" -- and how it slowly happened.  Useful Idiots....sad.

 http://tiny.cc/cnKb1

 

Posted by: Juliet16 at October 26, 2008 03:41 PM (2xgu5)

26 Speaking of preemptive war...It's on bitches!

With Syria!  Er, so says Syria's official news agency.

Does this help Michelle's kids?  You betcha! 

Just in time for the election, Baby Doc Assad manufactures a reminder that Bush and Co. are war-mongering war-mongers, who would monger us up a whole passel of wars if the Sainted Lightworker and Man of Peace, Barack "The Second Jesus" Obama doesn't pound our swords in plowshares,  tout de suite.

I call bullshit on this one, until the DoD officially confirms it.

Posted by: Lawrence Walsh at October 26, 2008 03:44 PM (Yw/4J)

27 Are we done with Viet Nam yet?

Nope.  Vietnam wasn't really the American loss and humiliation they were looking for.  Vietnam was the US congress snatching defeat from the jaws of victory, and anyone with a micro gram of intellectual honesty known this.

Similarly, Iraq isn't shaping up as they'd hoped either, so until we chalk up a solid humiliating loss of grand scale (I won't count Somalia here), they're not going to be happy.

Posted by: Purple Avenger at October 26, 2008 03:55 PM (OqXyp)

28 I wonder what would happen if BHO became Prez and expanded the military in Afghanistan and invaded Pakistan.

Well, I think this question is partly moot.  Frank has already intimated that the Democrats seek a 25% reduction in military spending.  Kind of hard to expand the military with a 25% reduction.  Or invade Pakistan for that matter.

I think that the expansion of the military personnel or invasion of Pakistan is all bluster to cover for the actual agenda. 

Posted by: Kat-Mo at October 26, 2008 03:59 PM (GxnBZ)

29

If Syria “attacks back” they will be dog meat in about 24 hours. It would be a GOOD thing for them to “attack back”.

Posted by: Vic at October 26, 2008 04:12 PM (b1ysY)

30 The 25% cut in military funding is bad enough, but I'd say that we're looking at cuts in actual war-fighting equipment and funding in the 50-60% range. Note that just about every time Democrats tout their commitment to the military, it's always in terms of benefits for servicemembers; GI Bill-type education funding, medical and disability funding etc. Now, don't get me wrong, these benefits are necessary to fulfill our nation's moral commitment to our folks in uniform. But I'd bet that if you give a combat soldier a choice between full medical/dental after he leaves the service, or going to war with more that 100 rounds of ammo, he'll take the ammo every time.

 If the Democrats have their way, DoD will be transformed into HHS with guns.

Posted by: IllTemperedCur at October 26, 2008 04:13 PM (wjZW+)

31

Does everyone remember the last time we had a “peace dividend” with Bill Clinton?  He cut troop levels to the point where the “extended mission” became a fact of life. That is what drove additional people out.

Posted by: Vic at October 26, 2008 04:24 PM (b1ysY)

32

 

Conspiracy Theory type of Question

 

Did Tim Russert die of natural causes, or was it caused by others?

He was the only major MSM reporter who might have challenged Obama-media to be truthful. Maybe it was natural causes, but as they say in Logic and Law Enforcement: "Quo Bene?"

 

 

Posted by: cromagnum at October 26, 2008 04:28 PM (j5MnB)

33 Without giving into hysteria about Obama being a "communist"

Ah yes, let us be, by all means, level-headed and tolerant. Heaven forbid we should label anything "communist," although Obama's '60's friends don't really have a problem with that. Let us be tolerant....of those "left over tentacles of that long ago time." Tut, tut, they're just the stodgy notions of some dudes who have since thoroughly infiltrated and influenced our educational system -- but let us not worry, or be intolerant.

"...the defeat of the Nazis in 1945 quite logically brought a shift to the Left in world politics, while a defeat of communism in 1991 brought again a shift to the Left, this time quite illogically.” Bukovksy is right: We never had a thorough de-Marxification process after the Cold War, similar to the de-Nazification after WW2, and we are now paying the price for this. Many Marxist ideas have been allowed to endure and mutate, such as the notion that culture is unimportant or that it is OK to stage massive social experiments on hundreds of millions of people....But Marxist ideals of forced equality can only be enforced by a government with totalitarian powers, and will thus inevitably lead to a totalitarian society. There is no “enlightened Marxism,” and the idea that there is has ruined more lives than probably and other ideology in modern history. Marxism is an organized crime against humanity.”Link

Hmm, that "organized crime" resonates somehow, but, again, not to worry, as long as we don't call it "communism," all will be well.

Posted by: JBean at October 26, 2008 04:38 PM (ozO6+)

34

I wonder what would happen if BHO became Prez and expanded the military in Afghanistan and invaded Pakistan.

I don't think they'll go on the attack, but when they are attacked (and they will be, because of Obama's distaste for America and our military strength, which will only embolden our enemies), they will respond with military force, and probably go pre-emptive somewhere else. That's what I think Biden was saying when he said, "You won't like it." He wasn't talking to us, or most normal Americans. He was talking to the nutroots people.

Their whole slurring of Bush over Iraq and pre-emptive strikes has been bullshit, and as they get closer to the Oval Office, Biden is at least adult enough, honest enough, and stupid enough to admit it.

Posted by: Ted K. at October 26, 2008 04:42 PM (yCmN/)

35 It seems like it would be cheaper to just tell everyone we had nuclear weapons. The basic principle behind having them is that it makes it impossible for two major powers to go to war with each other and you could pretend to have them. That is the sort of forward thinking that could win the imaginary people with bi-polar vote.

Posted by: bleh at October 26, 2008 05:06 PM (GNCy6)

36 No. we're not "done with" Viet Nam because we haven't learned the lessons from it. More precisely, we haven't, as a nation, made the choice which was presented to us at that time, via the "resistance" to that war. We didn't win that war [except militarily] and we haven't won this one. Yet.

The choice? Live Free or live with some varying degree of socialism.

We cannot continue to accommodate and toooolerate those with a socialist/Marxist POV and still maintain our dedication to the Principles in the Constitution. We gotta get off the pot and pick one.

So, no -- even when all "those old farts" die off, this nation will not be "done with" Viet Nam.

Posted by: Faye Kinnitt at October 26, 2008 05:11 PM (l1oyw)

37

>"Obviously, someone is a little concerned about the re-emergence of the left's Cold War mentality that unilateral disarmament will convince others to do the same or that the US is not a threat so there is no need to develop such weapons or point them at the US. A mentality that is about to be elected into office."

Pakistan developed nuclear weapons to protect themselves from India who had nuclear weapons and a conventional military the regularly whupped Pakistan's ass.

India developed nuclear weapons to protect themselves from China.

China developed nuclear weapons to protect themselves from Russia.

Russia developed nuclear weapons because they needed them to advance International Communism.

The U.S. developed nuclear weapons because they wanted to win WWII and spend less American lives to attain victory.

If the U.S. gets rid of their nuclear weapons there is no linkage or incentive between the U.S. unilaterally disarming and ANY of those other nuclear armed nations getting rid of their nuclear weapons.

And last but not least, nuclear weapons are the only way small nations that can't raise and maintain large sophisticated conventional forces, can convince nearby nations that can, to leave them alone.

 

Nuclear disarmament is a pipe-dream, nuclear proliferation is the future.

Posted by: Speller at October 26, 2008 06:08 PM (xUoRl)

38 !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!Sunday conspiracy theory: !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Ted Stevens (R) of Alaska, on trial for money stuff...whatever. BUT
he is still expected to win easily and retain his seat anyway, but ONLY IF THEY CAN GET A RULING BEFORE THE ELECTION....ok?
SOOOOOOO....
everything was on track and, afer the long and arduous court hearings, jury deliberations had begun...and a decision was about to come down......BUT
mysteriously a juror was abruptly just authorized to leave deliberations to attend to her "ailing father" in California.
IF said juror is for some reason UNABLE TO RETURN TO DELIBERATIONS....then
the ENTIRE TRIAL MUST BE RE-TRIED! incuding all new Jurists!!!
MEANING there would not be enough time for a whole new trial and jury decision before election day, and TED STEVENS will be forced off of the ballot and the REPUBS will AUTOMATICALLY lose a SURE seat in the house.

anyone wanna fly to Cali and see whats up with this, wrench in the works "juror gone missing" ??!

Posted by: christy at October 26, 2008 06:12 PM (drHfj)

39

I'm one of those "old farts" and I've said for years that the best thing that can happen to America is when my generation dies off.

Some of us managed to avoid the brainwashing and even fought against it on the campuses in the '60s.

 

Posted by: Muskwa at October 26, 2008 06:26 PM (dfHkI)

40 I have very little hope that we're ever going to be through with "Vietnam." Maybe the loons whose worldviews were shaped by their opposition to the Vietnam War... sure, we'll be rid of them because one day they'll all be dead. Time will not be denied. But just consider what we're looking at in 15 years once the anti-Iraq generation starts getting gray hair. And tenure. And citizen-of-the-year awards.

No, friends... we're in for a long, long culture war. The tide may ebb our way every now and then, but it will ebb their way too, and no tide in American history has yet been able to wash those troglodytes out to sea once and for all. This is the same strain of diseased thinking that has reared its head in the thirties, the fifties, the sixties and early seventies, and now.

Posted by: Greg Griffith at October 26, 2008 06:31 PM (6cvPQ)

41 No, by Obama's own words, he came by his ideology the same way Kerry and the other Democrats that came from the Viet Nam era had: associating with radical sixties "make love, not war", "war crimes of the US" (don't forget "air raiding villages and bombing civilians " from Obama), and "continuous revolution".

That needs to be bolded. It's the "tell". Only someone from the far left would advocate for unilateral disarmament. Nobody is talking about unilateral disarmament or has been since the end of the Cold War. Even John Kerry, who was in favor of it back then, he didn't make an issue out of it. It's not a moderate position and never has been, certainly not two decades past its sell-by date.

Posted by: dorkafork at October 26, 2008 07:29 PM (NThlF)

42

But just consider what we're looking at in 15 years once the anti-Iraq generation starts getting gray hair. And tenure. And citizen-of-the-year awards.

There are fewer of them, and many of them will get more conservative as they age and get paychecks and have 401(k)s, just like the Baby Boomers did.

We'll always have some wackos around. The key is to remain ever vigilant, elect patriots to office, even small local ones, and remind people that America isn't supposed to be like the rest of the world.

Posted by: Muskwa at October 26, 2008 08:06 PM (dfHkI)

43 Make love, not war.

Nice soundbite.

Esp. for the people who make war, who are gonna kick the lover's asses.

Posted by: Joseph at October 26, 2008 09:18 PM (SlDWP)

44

Reagan was the only one to say it right, communism is slavery.  If a person is enough of a mysanthrop, they will like the prospects of slavery regardless of whether they're the slave or the master.  Stuff like missile defense just gets in the way of our new space-ant overlords.

 

Posted by: Cincinnatus at October 26, 2008 10:24 PM (PEcd6)

45 It will never be over until the "hysterics" who recognized communists for who and what they are are recognized for having been right every time.

Qwinn

Posted by: Qwinn at October 26, 2008 10:46 PM (3FVXC)

46 Damn right it's all about the '60s. This is why American presidential elections drag out longer than any others in the world: because each election is so much more than just an election--it's a battle over our very identity. We're still trying to figure out who we are / what America is about. The "culture war" has always been a continuation of the great culture war that blazed up in the '60s.

But don't take my word for it. Here's Barack Obama himself, in his sorry excuse of an overrated book The Audacity of Hope:
"Despite a 40-year remove, the tumult of the '60s continues to drive our political discourse."

And how bitterly and perfectly ironic is it that his opponent is a man who endured 5-1/2 years of torture from the very Communists that Obama's buddy Ayers aided and abetted?

Posted by: Kathy from Kansas at October 26, 2008 11:56 PM (kZ9L/)

47   Sorry to disillusion you, Kat, but I'm afraid that the Vietnam war willnot go away until the last of us are buried. Just gonna have to live with it, I guess.

Posted by: irongrampa at October 27, 2008 02:47 PM (ud5dN)

Posted by: pokin at October 28, 2008 03:39 AM (dVaBx)

Posted by: baidu at July 21, 2009 04:38 AM (pXYcm)

50 Nowadays it is hard to find a man or a woman who does not wish to look different and to show the unique style. so replica Watches today become one of the most popular object of attention.
chanel watches,rolex watches,omega watches and other brand watches that We offer FREE express door to door world wide shipping.

Posted by: chanel watches at August 27, 2009 03:01 AM (3a5X9)

Posted by: hair straighteners at October 25, 2009 01:34 AM (MtGwJ)

Posted by: fdsfds at October 27, 2009 07:20 PM (8kvkz)

Posted by: airforceoneshop at November 03, 2009 08:18 PM (LHCCE)

Posted by: reviewups at November 06, 2009 07:07 AM (XxrVz)

55 Come to our website for shopping with high quality and best service! There have new products,MBT M. Walk
and MBT Lami,Welcome everybody to buy it.

Posted by: mbt shoes at November 08, 2009 02:43 PM (QhfLM)

Posted by: ugg boots at November 12, 2009 09:32 AM (IeIJx)

57 buy [url=http://www.reviewups.com/]discount ugg shoes[/url]
[url=http://www.reviewups.com/]cheap ugg shoes[/url]
[url=http://www.reviewups.com/]cheap ugg[/url]
[url=http://www.reviewups.com/ugg-coquette-casual-shoes-c-22]ugg rainier[/url]
[url=http://www.reviewups.com/]buy ugg[/url]
[url=http://www.reviewups.com/]ugg usa[/url]
[url=http://www.reviewups.com/]discount ugg boots[/url]
[url=http://www.reviewups.com/ugg-classic-short-c-1]ugg 5825[/url]
[url=http://www.reviewups.com/]ugg shoes sale[/url]
[url=http://www.reviewups.com/ugg-sundance-c-5]ugg sundance[/url]
[url=http://www.reviewups.com/]ugg shoes[/url]
[url=http://www.reviewups.com/]cheap ugg boots[/url]
[url=http://www.reviewups.com/ugg-classic-tall-c-3]ugg 5815[/url]
[url=http://www.reviewups.com/]ugg sale[/url]
[url=http://www.reviewups.com/]ugg uk[/url]
[url=http://www.reviewups.com/ugg-knightsbridge-c-27]ugg knightsbridge[/url]
[url=http://www.reviewups.com/]womens ugg boots[/url]
[url=http://www.reviewups.com/]ugg boots[/url]
[url=http://www.reviewups.com/]ugg australia[/url]
[url=http://www.reviewups.com/ugg-classic-cardy-c-2]ugg 5819[/url]from usa

Posted by: cheap at November 14, 2009 10:45 AM (s7MB5)

Posted by: replica watches at November 17, 2009 08:54 AM (xpuiO)

Posted by: replica watches at November 17, 2009 10:59 PM (xpuiO)

Posted by: replica watches at November 18, 2009 05:46 AM (C/zDM)






Processing 0.03, elapsed 0.0313 seconds.
15 queries taking 0.0057 seconds, 69 records returned.
Page size 80 kb.
Powered by Minx 0.7 alpha.

MuNuvians
MeeNuvians
Polls! Polls! Polls!
Frequently Asked Questions
The (Almost) Complete Paul Anka Integrity Kick
Top Top Tens
Greatest Hitjobs

The Ace of Spades HQ Sex-for-Money Skankathon
A D&D Guide to the Democratic Candidates
Margaret Cho: Just Not Funny
More Margaret Cho Abuse
Margaret Cho: Still Not Funny
Iraqi Prisoner Claims He Was Raped... By Woman
Wonkette Announces "Morning Zoo" Format
John Kerry's "Plan" Causes Surrender of Moqtada al-Sadr's Militia
World Muslim Leaders Apologize for Nick Berg's Beheading
Michael Moore Goes on Lunchtime Manhattan Death-Spree
Milestone: Oliver Willis Posts 400th "Fake News Article" Referencing Britney Spears
Liberal Economists Rue a "New Decade of Greed"
Artificial Insouciance: Maureen Dowd's Word Processor Revolts Against Her Numbing Imbecility
Intelligence Officials Eye Blogs for Tips
They Done Found Us Out, Cletus: Intrepid Internet Detective Figures Out Our Master Plan
Shock: Josh Marshall Almost Mentions Sarin Discovery in Iraq
Leather-Clad Biker Freaks Terrorize Australian Town
When Clinton Was President, Torture Was Cool
What Wonkette Means When She Explains What Tina Brown Means
Wonkette's Stand-Up Act
Wankette HQ Gay-Rumors Du Jour
Here's What's Bugging Me: Goose and Slider
My Own Micah Wright Style Confession of Dishonesty
Outraged "Conservatives" React to the FMA
An On-Line Impression of Dennis Miller Having Sex with a Kodiak Bear
The Story the Rightwing Media Refuses to Report!
Our Lunch with David "Glengarry Glen Ross" Mamet
The House of Love: Paul Krugman
A Michael Moore Mystery (TM)
The Dowd-O-Matic!
Liberal Consistency and Other Myths
Kepler's Laws of Liberal Media Bias
John Kerry-- The Splunge! Candidate
"Divisive" Politics & "Attacks on Patriotism" (very long)
The Donkey ("The Raven" parody)
News/Chat