Support




Contact
Powered by
Movable Type

The Comprehensive Case Against Obama

Guy Benson, Mary Katherine Ham and Ed Morrissey have put together your one stop shopping site for reasons not to vote for Obama.

Their conclusion:

...Put together as a narrative, we believe this paints the picture of a man who has few real credentials for the office he seeks beyond the Constitutional minimum, and a politician who has succeeded in obfuscating his hard-Left ideology.

Perhaps if Barack Obama had taken more time to build his resumé – especially with executive experience – he might have made a more compelling candidate, and might have demonstrated at least a little of the moderation he has claimed. Instead, Democrats want America to support at once the most radical and least qualified candidate for President in at least a century. They have tried to conceal this with the complicity of a pom-pom-waving national media that has shown much more interest in the political background of a plumber from Ohio than in a major-party candidate for President.

From abortion and taxes to foreign policy and choice of associates they cover it all. I haven't read through it all yet but as you imagine, it seems pretty devastating.

Posted by: DrewM. at 01:59 PM



Comments

1 I appreciate the effort but, outside of the choir, who is this aimed at?

Posted by: ECM at October 21, 2008 02:04 PM (q3V+C)

2

I read it, copied the link and sent it out to several people in my address book.

At the McCain rally on Saturday, Senator Burr suggested blast emailing, thought I'd give it a try, and that article is a good one to send.

Posted by: HRPKathy at October 21, 2008 02:05 PM (WqFVw)

3 I've read through most of it (but not watched the clips) and the only problem I can see is that with the Obama supporters I've talked to they have already made up thier minds.  None of this will change that.  It's basically to the point that anything short of him shooting someone in public won't matter.  I've sent a link to some of my friends and family though, just in case.  Who knows, maybe it can hit some fence sitters, if there truly are any of those left around.

Posted by: Grunt2Jag at October 21, 2008 02:05 PM (Yr6lx)

4

They missed the most obvious reason why people shouldn't vote for Obama: 

He's got a funny sounding name and he doesn't look like Presidents on our currency.

Oh, did I mention he's black?

Posted by: EC at October 21, 2008 02:09 PM (mAhn3)

5 This might be better to send to friends (and more to the point with a lot less text to drown potential fence-sitters in):

http://tinyurl.com/69bwah

Posted by: ECM at October 21, 2008 02:09 PM (q3V+C)

6 One point to keep in mind: make sure to state your case to family members and such who are in the enemy camp before the election. You want to say "I told you so" or "this is why McCain won" by pointing at what you've already told them, not by revealing this stuff as if it's new to anyone but them.

That is, give them every opportunity to remove their Obiden-colored glasses, and have a righteous fall-back position, instead of making them feel (if they ever do understand actual facts) as if you wrote them off as a lost cause.

Posted by: Anonymous at October 21, 2008 02:12 PM (4yauu)

7 #5: "a brilliant orator"? Yeah, um uh, right.

Posted by: Anonymous at October 21, 2008 02:13 PM (4yauu)

8 I am doing the same thing at my place.  I think the point is not merely to "preach to the choir", but rather to remind people of goodwill that we have many legitimate reasons to prefer a McCain Administration over an Obama Administration.  Speaking in the negative, we have much to fear if things don't come out right on Nov. 4.

Posted by: DC at October 21, 2008 02:13 PM (LpoUM)

9 Too many big words for the people that need to read it. Now if it was a You-tube video, maybe the drooling would stop long enough for the message to sink in.

Posted by: roy at October 21, 2008 02:13 PM (cB77O)

10 Trolling for love.  Help me out here.

Democrats are getting elected in towns, counties, cities, states, and federal elections running against President George Bush.

There's little chance Jimmy Carter is elected President if President Ford declines to pardon President Nixon.

From a national electoral strategy perspective, if I had to pick one time when I would want the Democrats in charge of everything, it would be right now.

Posted by: Gabriel Sutherland at October 21, 2008 02:13 PM (AHrTm)

11

There are a lot of people who grew up in the 60's who know who Barry really is and don't like hard-left Democrats.

I think he is screwed.

Posted by: Sen. Rev. Dr. E Buzz at October 21, 2008 02:14 PM (sf4Oe)

12 2010 races start on November 5th.  Be prepared to work long hours for little or no pay.

Posted by: Gabriel Sutherland at October 21, 2008 02:16 PM (AHrTm)

13 My despair is about an impending Obama Court that will easily outlive me and extend far into my children's lives. I remember well the Rose Bird Court here in California; it was disgusting beyond words, it's damage continues to this day.

How about Bill Ayers on the Supreme Court? Think it can't happen? Well, with a liberal super-majority in the senate, who's gonna stop it?

Posted by: Old Coot at October 21, 2008 02:17 PM (97mq+)

14 7: If the best they can say (and it is) is that he's a "brilliant orator" that should speak volumes--did you even read the rest?

Posted by: ECM at October 21, 2008 02:20 PM (q3V+C)

15 ECM wrote @ 1: "who is this aimed at?"

I second that.

First, to be effective with an undecided voter, even assuming one can move a self-described "decided" voter with less than 2 weeks to go

[which all the polling data over the course of 70 years says does not happen - ever]

the target voter has to be able to read ...

at length...

and concentrate...

and retain.

All voters who can read, concentrate and retain to the level necessary are already accounted for.

So - does this "comprehensive case" stand up to challenge IE does each and every point made show Obama outside the mainstream?

No. There are a number of points in which Obama is within the mainstream - maybe on the left side, but in there.

Are there any distortions of reality or the truth?

Yes. There are several instances of rhetorical overexuberance, exaggaeration, and outright fabrication.

Is the piece "spin free"?

Are you kidding? No one point is missing spin.

Who is left to battle for?

"Low information" voters - the sort of folks who don't read, are completely credulous, and often fail to vote out some personal failing, like never having registered or having failed to register for this year, or getting drunk the night before and missing the fun.

If every low information voter were eligible and then were to show up and vote, here is what would happen:

McCain can not expect to get more than about 65% of the low infos. He's not going to get the blacks, the hispanics or the Asians, which make up 35% of the low infos.

There would be a 100% voter turnout. Yeah, right.

McCain would still lose, because low infos are concentrated in already-decided states. Who cares if McCain wins in Kentucky by MORE, or if Obama wins in California by MORE.

Here is reality:

Assuming an all time high voter turnout - which as everyone here knows is NOT good news from McCain - of 80%,

McCain gets his butt kicked.

Posted by: diderot's dog at October 21, 2008 02:21 PM (nrD02)

16 Hello Mr. Axelrod. Thank you for coming to visit us today. I like your new name too.

Unfortunately for you, most sane individuals don't want Barack Obama to move into the White House and bring his wonderful lifetime friends like William Ayers, Tony Rezko, Jeremiah Wright, Penny Pritzker, "Father" Phleger, Richard Daley, Mike Klonsky, Bernardine Dorhn, and Michelle Obama with him.

Nice effort though. You will have better luck over at hotair.com. Look for a post written by allahpundit and your pied piper act may pay dividends.

Posted by: funky chicken at October 21, 2008 02:24 PM (xyyHG)

17 Troll alert, troll alert - actually let me rephrase that - there is a brain-dead Obamabot lurking around here..Hey DD - I am Asian American as are many of my friends here and none of us support Obama..don't be presumptuous.


Posted by: IC at October 21, 2008 02:24 PM (jZNCU)

18

Help me out here.

One term of "The One" will bring failure in both Iraq and Afghanistan.

One term of "The One" probably will bring more agressive challenges from Iran, Russia, China and Venezuela (Chavez isn't big league yet but why get him drafted?).

One term of "That One" may well bring nationalized health care.

One term of "That One" will stifle our best chance of energy reform (drill baby, drill!) and make expanding the economy much harder for decades to come. With all our eggs in solar and wind we will have an energy crisis in short order.

One term of "That One" will probably result in a net gain in numbers of Supreme Court Justices who will rule by judicial fiat.

 

 

Posted by: kidney at October 21, 2008 02:25 PM (QAdII)

19 ECM, so you are now BFF with DD?

LOL have fun with that.

Posted by: funky chicken at October 21, 2008 02:25 PM (xyyHG)

20 Exposé? HotAir? Content detrimental to The One?

Never heard of it.

Posted by: The Deciders™ at October 21, 2008 02:25 PM (sI5Ho)

21 Assuming an all time high voter turnout - which as everyone here knows is NOT good news from McCain - of 80%,

Check the voter turnout in 2004.  Pretty high, wasn't it?

Who won that election, dd?

Posted by: Slublog at October 21, 2008 02:26 PM (R8+nJ)

22

How about Bill Ayers on the Supreme Court? Think it can't happen? Well, with a liberal super-majority in the senate, who's gonna stop it?

Do you think that they would all be able to work together on anything? Look at Illinois, where BO learned his chops. The total Dem government can't even get simple budgets passed without whining and sniping amongst themselves. Pelosi vs. Reid vs. Obama would be like a real bad version of Mean Girls. No grown-ups.

Posted by: roy at October 21, 2008 02:28 PM (cB77O)

23 Yea   on grew up in the 60's.  I can see a liberal from a mile away.

Posted by: Farmer at October 21, 2008 02:29 PM (xCWAG)

24

Wow, somebody left this comment on an article over at Pajamas:

Make no mistake: It is Barack Obama’s destiny to be President of the United States. Justice demands it. The Truth demands it. The World demands it.

Oppressed peoples throughout the world are looking to Obama for hope. For Justice. For an to war. For America to stop attacking the world and for it to start being a just and peaceful member of the community of nations.

If for some reason he is not elected then there will be a cry of outrage so great that America and all its racist institutions will shake and collapse. It will be the end of America and God will damn it for its final and most terrible sin.

This is Obama's base. God help us.

Posted by: Jim62sch at October 21, 2008 02:30 PM (zYagu)

25 Old Coot @ 13: You have to be a lawyer to get appointed to the Supreme Court. Bill Ayers is not a lawyer.

Obama was the gold medalist at Harvard Law, the top law school in the nation. He knows lots of lawyers. The top constitutional law professor in the nation, Lawrence Tribe, his teacher, called him one of the top 3 students of constitutional law he ever taught in over 35 years teaching at Harvard Law. Obama knows all the top constitutional lawyers and judges in the nation: he is in fact one of them. Obama was the most popular law prof at Chicago, and it got to the point that he couldn't take on all the students who wanted in our his courses. Many of his students have gone on to have terrific legal careers.

So drop the Bill Ayers for SCOTUS bullshit, will you?

You old coot.

Posted by: diderot's dog at October 21, 2008 02:31 PM (nrD02)

26 Check the voter turnout in 2004.  Pretty high, wasn't it?

I would crawl across broken glass and jump through a ring of fire to vote in this election for McCain. And I don't even live in a swing state.

Posted by: Long Island at October 21, 2008 02:31 PM (3W8xS)

27

who is this aimed at?

It's aimed at the mental defectives who, after nonstop coverage of this fucking race for months, still "don't have enough information" to make a decision. It's not that they lack information; it's because being publicly coy about their vote--no matter who's asking--gives them a momentary frisson of importance and numbs the pain of being brain-dead. The election is in their hands!

Every time I hear someone say, "well, I'll probably decide in the voting booth," I want to jam a pencil in my ear, Electric Larryland style.

American politics: dominated by empty-dancecard onanists who're so pathetic that they need validation once every four years by pretending to hold out for "the best offer."

That I have to share air with these drooling mutants makes my guitar gently weep.

Posted by: railwriter at October 21, 2008 02:33 PM (nwEiU)

28 If it's any comfort to Ace and the Hole Cards and the Tools, the polling results in the district I live in are overwhelmingly McCain. They've been overwhelmingly GOP since Reagan. They've been overwhelmingly white conservative since before I was born, almost 60 years ago.

The problem is that if one looks around to one's neighbors and just what's happening in one's home county, district, state and region, there's a possibility that one might get a pretty screwed up impression of what's going on in other regions of the country.

McCain isn't going to lose in Sweet Home or anywhere within two states of it. But there's a hell of a lot of states beyond those, and he's losing in most of them - by a lot.

Posted by: diderot's dog at October 21, 2008 02:36 PM (nrD02)

29

Excellant, RR! Two cathartic rants in one day! Your's and Funky's in another post. You guys are great and help keep me mostly sane.

 

Mostly.

Posted by: kidney at October 21, 2008 02:37 PM (QAdII)

30 You have to be a lawyer to get appointed to the Supreme Court. Bill Ayers is not a lawyer.

Why do you insist on demonstrating your ignorance?

No where in the Constitution does it require a judge to be a lawyer, or a member of any profession. Also, there's not even the age requirement that others (president, senators, representatives) have.


Posted by: Raoul Ortega at October 21, 2008 02:37 PM (jO77p)

31 Posted by: Jim62sch at October 21, 2008 02:30 PM (zYagu)

appropriately located below a Moran post LOL


Posted by: funky chicken at October 21, 2008 02:39 PM (xyyHG)

32 #24: People need to be fearless enough to call Communism and Fascism out when they see it.

There's way too much pussy-footing around that. Because they don't want to look like somebody who's batshit insane calling a dog a cat because it licks itself.

Here's some news: that's why they did it. First you discredit criticism, then you agitate the proles for power.

Posted by: Anonymous at October 21, 2008 02:40 PM (4yauu)

33

You have to be a lawyer to get appointed to the Supreme Court.

 

Says who?

Posted by: JackStraw at October 21, 2008 02:41 PM (VBon8)

34 They left off his record on gun rights.  The Illinois State Rifle Association has done a fantastic job compiling Obama's record on Second Amendment issues - banning most guns, allowing the police to enter one's house and seize banned weapons, voted against allowing the proles to use a gun to defend their property/family, voted to expel gun manufacturers from Illinois.

He's a firm believer that an unarmed citizen is the government's best friend.

Obama is already imploring the Justice Department to investigate people who speak out against him.  No respect for the First Amendment.  No respect for the Second Amendment.  Utter contempt for the Tenth Amendment.  He'll show those white slave-owning bastards who ratified the Constitution who knows best.

Posted by: Baron Von Ottomatic at October 21, 2008 02:41 PM (Ulsfn)

35 Bah, I see you beat me to it, Raoul.  I should have just kicked him in the nuts, repeatedly, for saying that Larry Tribe is the top Constitutional lawyer in the country.

Posted by: JackStraw at October 21, 2008 02:42 PM (VBon8)

36 diderot's dog: "...and it got to the point that he couldn't take on all the students who wanted in our his courses."

Freudian slip? Are/were you on staff or a student at UIC?

And for all his pedigree and immersion with all those supposed eggheads, his legal and legislative dossier remained alarmingly thin. I wonder if his scholastic work was ghostwritten, too.

Posted by: AnonymousDrivel at October 21, 2008 02:42 PM (sI5Ho)

37

"You have to be a lawyer to get appointed to the Supreme Court. Bill Ayers is not a lawyer."

 

Not according to this website:  http://tinyurl.com/5zqb98

 

Quote: 

There are no requirements in order to be appointed a Justice, but all have been trained in the law. Many Justices served as members of Congress, governors, or members of the President's Cabinet. One president, William Howard Taft, was later appointed Chief Justice.

 

All HAVE BEEN doesn't mean ALL MUST BE.  So it is possible that someone that isn't a lawyer or judge could be nominated to the court if this site is correct.  I would hope, regardless of party and controlling majority, that the person would be shot down in flames, but there is certainly a possibility that it could happen.

Posted by: Grunt2Jag at October 21, 2008 02:44 PM (Yr6lx)

38 The top constitutional law professor in the nation, Lawrence Tribe, his teacher, called him one of the top 3 students of constitutional law he ever taught in over 35 years teaching at Harvard Law. Obama knows all the top constitutional lawyers and judges in the nation: he is in fact one of them.

And yet in the last debate he said Roe v. Wade established a right to privacy when it was in fact Griswald v. Connecticut that established that right.

The Germans bombed Pearl Harbor?  Forget it, he's rolling.

Apparently, Lawrence Tribe has taught a bunch of senseless dunderpates if Obama is one of his top three students ever...

Posted by: Baron Von Ottomatic at October 21, 2008 02:49 PM (Ulsfn)

39 The problem is that if one looks around to one's neighbors and just what's happening in one's home county, district, state and region, there's a possibility that one might get a pretty screwed up impression of what's going on in other regions of the country.

You know DD I shouldn't engage you and the regular posters may went to slap me for even entertaining your manifestos.

But you do not fucking know anything about me. You do not know where I live. You do not where I grew up. You do not know where I work. In fact you would be shocked about how so little about me reflects your so carefully constructed narrative of a republican.

In fact if what you said is true about your neighborhood I sure as shit have a lot more working class inter-city street cred than you ever possibly imagine.

So once again fuck you and your generalizations.

Posted by: Long Island at October 21, 2008 02:49 PM (3W8xS)

40

The Hot Air article is quite thorough and well done. If you can send the link to others, do so.

Represent the link as a tight, distilled argument against Obama, with supporting videos of who said what, and when.

Tell the people you send the link to, to ignore the comments. You only read the link for the article, right?.

To summarize the statements of very many other posters and commenters:

Remember to vote for John McCain on Tuesday November 4th.

Encourage all others to vote, and to vote for McCain.

A vote for anyone else is a vote for Obama.

Ignore the MSM; their polls are done by idiots

Posted by: Arbalest at October 21, 2008 02:50 PM (AgBuQ)

41 one of the top 3 students of constitutional law

If that were true, and it is not, he would have not had to rely on affirmative action to gain admission, or on a popularity vote created to allow minority students on law review, instead of the usual academic competitiveness. Additionally, he wrote nothing for law review.

Posted by: Thomas Dewey '48 at October 21, 2008 02:55 PM (s+2rG)

42 Additionally, he wrote nothing for law review.

That can't be noted enough.  For such a brilliant scholar, he has no paper trail at all.  None.

Spooky.

Posted by: toby928 at October 21, 2008 03:09 PM (evdj2)

43 Obama knows all the top constitutional lawyers and judges in the nation: he is in fact one of them.

I love how you just make up shit. At most, obama attended a seminar or aba meeting where a big shot atty or a judge spoke. We all do. It does not mean "we know them."

And, no, Obama is not a top constitutional lawyer. I never heard of him until he spoke at the 2004 DNC and neither had any of my colleagues, two of which have LLMs (post JD degree) in Constitutional Law. And all of us have been practicing law for 20+ years.

Posted by: Thomas Dewey '48 at October 21, 2008 03:11 PM (s+2rG)

44

The top constitutional law professor in the nation, Lawrence Tribe, his teacher, called him one of the top 3 students of constitutional law he ever taught in over 35 years teaching at Harvard Law.

The words iindicate an opinion, not necessarily a fact.

The facts that BHO only taught constitutional law (and never seems to have litigated it), and seems to no longer have a license to practice law (why? no one seems to know), points to Obama not being particularly good.

 

 

Posted by: Arbalest at October 21, 2008 03:14 PM (AgBuQ)

45 Great.  Now where's the comprehensive case to vote FOR McCain?

Posted by: spamhead at October 21, 2008 03:19 PM (vBuk9)

46 Obama was the most popular law prof at Chicago, and it got to the point that he couldn't take on all the students who wanted in our his courses.

He was a lecturer actually.  He's never been credentialed as a law professor.

You actually make a good case for Obama.  It's the same case his maternal grandmother made.  However, the end results are skewed.  She wanted Obama to avoid politics and set his sights on the Supreme Court.

Tribe saw it too.

His pedigree is a tribe of wanderers though.  I vote for Obama the travel writer.

Posted by: Gabriel Sutherland at October 21, 2008 03:22 PM (AHrTm)

47 You do not know where I live. You do not where I grew up. You do not know where I work. - Long Island

I'm just gonna take a shot here and make a wild-assed guess.....

New York?

Posted by: wiserbud at October 21, 2008 03:25 PM (wWwJR)

48 Down the Memory Hole:

Second Video under “File: Radical Associations”


Deleted from Youtube.


“We’re sorry this video no longer exists”



Posted by: aquaviva at October 21, 2008 03:34 PM (w19Us)

49

From a national electoral strategy perspective, if I had to pick one time when I would want the Democrats in charge of everything, it would be right now.

Not me. Too much is at stake right now; al-qaeda isn't broken, not yet, and playing patty-cake with them for four years is going to lead to tragedy in the future. An increasingly welfare-dependant population is a one way street to sky-high crime and permanent poverty for many. I don't buy that Obama will be the next Jimmy Carter, ushering in the next Reagan revolution. Carter wasn't as radical, and didn't have the creepy cult of supporters Obama does. He gets in, he'll do damage it will take years to undo. I really don't want America turning into New Orleans or Detroit.

Posted by: UGAdawg at October 21, 2008 03:36 PM (IE6OO)

50 By the way, When is BHO going to 'spreading the wealth around' to his half-brother George in Kenya? Or is he waiting for an earmark to a U.S. Kenyan aid bill to lift the poor schlub outta his shack?

Posted by: ProfShade at October 21, 2008 03:40 PM (CgxJk)

51 I think that if Obama had shown he was more of a moderate, demonstrated he was willing to work with his opponents, was less of a liar, wasn't so tied in with radicals, and had more experience I'd have voted for him over McCain.

Posted by: Christopher Taylor at October 21, 2008 03:59 PM (0+Ggj)

52

I tried twice to put a URL in using your dealy, but I got the error message about long strings so I'll have to use tiny url.

I tried reading that but the fine Captain bores me to death. He's nearly ruined Hot Air for me. That article was about 15,237 words too long (I counted, it was less boring than the post).

Saying that, I think this post http://tiny.cc/wxK7M is much better, it's short, to the point and you can stay awake for the whole thing.

Plus, the first sentence will make you laugh your butt off.

Posted by: Veeshir at October 21, 2008 04:19 PM (zXUuJ)

53

That's the "silenced majority" link from Instapundit, I had that in the first two attempts, but forgot it this time.

Posted by: Veeshir at October 21, 2008 04:20 PM (zXUuJ)

54 The Germans bombed Pearl Harbor?  Forget it, he's rolling.

Toga party.

Posted by: Anonymous at October 21, 2008 05:03 PM (4yauu)

55 I think that if Obama had shown he was more of a moderate, demonstrated he was willing to work with his opponents, was less of a liar, wasn't so tied in with radicals, and had more experience I'd have voted for him over McCain.

Sure, because then he'd be JC Watts

Posted by: toby928 at October 21, 2008 05:22 PM (evdj2)

56 Personally, I think Obama's support has a soft underbelly.  He could be up by twenty in a bunch of polls but from what I see plenty of Democratics have their doubts about him.  Come November 5th I think you'll see McCain pull out a win and bunch of public laments but private sighs of relief.

Posted by: RedRiverTed at October 21, 2008 05:54 PM (Z7fcC)

57 balance of shoes nike shoes shoes.com adidas shoes puma shoes womens shoes dress shoes. casual shoes wholesale shoes sport shoes nike shoes shoes boots sandal shoes basketball shoes slippers shoes . replica rolex watches rolex watch replica watches- cartier watches- cartier watches swiss watch automatic watch chronograph watch. mens watch watch com men's watch the watch womens shoes leather shoes dress shoes running shoes . adidas shoes tote bag golf bag plastic bag purses bag briefcase bag steve madden shoes gold watch rockport shoes repairs watches best replica watches youtube watch youtube watch rolex watch rolex watches casio watches watches online timex watches tag watches. nike jordan shoes ladies watch leather bag replica handbag replica handbags wearing fashions clothes jorand shoes . oyster rolex dive watches replica watches- watches for men- timex watches buy watch rolex mens chrono watch elgin watch. automatic watch ladies watch mens watches new shoes steve madden shoes sneakers shoes sneaker shoes jorand shoes . rolex replica belts bag diaper bags travel bag laptop bag shoulder bag wears art glass urban wear fendi bag briefcase bag nike shoes men shoes fashion shoes women's shoes shoe store nike shoes best replica watches nike shoes men shoes fashion shoes women's watches cracked- medieval times- cidreq cidreq mens health ukraine 2009 calendar. chopper leipzig madsen donald duck isis king ncaa mens soccer cuny portal croazia . pasolini safari e-buddy espace pub rugby henderson waves jewelry ring wrist watches rolex watches replica watches fine watches casio watches watches online quartz watch. nike shoes ladies watch men's watch nike shoes running shoes Tiffany Bracelet basketball shoes jorand shoes . replica rolex watches rolex watch replica watches- fine watches- rolex datejust rolex mens watch repair oyster rolex watch. air flight ladies watch men's watch rolex submariner running shoes Tiffany Bracelet rolex replica jorand shoes . rolex replica watches rolex replica nike shoes rolex replica rolex replica fake rolex replica rolex replica watches rolex replica rolex replica rolex replica watches rolex replica best replica watches watches diamond watches replica watches rolex watches casio watches watches online timex watches tag watches. nike jordan shoes ladies watch luxury rolex watch nike shoes running shoes Tiffany Bracelet basketball shoes jorand shoes . oyster rolex dive watches replica watches- watches for men- rolex datejust buy watch rolex mens watch repair oyster rolex watch. air flight ladies watch seagull watches rolex submariner running shoes Tiffany Bracelet rolex replica jorand shoes . rolex replica watches rolex replica nike shoes rolex replica rolex replica fake rolex replica rolex replica watches rolex replica rolex replica shoe store nike shoes best replica watches nike shoes men shoes fashion shoes women's shoes shoe store nike shoes best replica watches nike shoes men shoes fashion shoes women's watches

Posted by: dressshoes at November 21, 2008 03:41 AM (bYVeT)

Posted by: watchstyle08 at November 26, 2008 02:24 AM (HKMq7)

Posted by: asdasdasd at March 03, 2009 03:26 AM (fCigk)

60

دردشة بنات الجنوب شات بنات الجنوب دردشة بنات شات بنات شات دردشه شات كتابي دردشة كتابيه منتدى بنات الجنوب منتديات بنات الجنوب دردشة جازان دردشة ابها دردشة نجران دردشة ظهران الجنوب دردشة خميس مشيط دردشة عسير دردشة تنومه دردشة النماص دردشة بيشه دردشة القنفذة دردشة الرياض دردشة وادي الدواسر دردشة جده دردشة مكه المكرمه منتديات بنات الجنوب دردشة المدينه المنوره دردشة الشرقيه دردشة الدمام دردشة الخبر دردشة الهفوف دردشة عرعر دردشة القصيم دردشة تبوك دردشة الجوف دردشة حائل دردشة الشمال دردشة اماراتيه دردشة كويتيه دردشة بحرينيه دردشة عراقيه دردشة عمانيه دردشة قطريه دردشة يمنيه دردشة ابو ظبي دردشة بغداد دردشة المنامه دردشة الدوحه دردشة مصريه دردشة مغربيه دردشة تونس دردشة الجزائر دردشة ليبيا دردشة السودان دردشة سوريا دردشة لبنان دردشة الاردن دردشة فلسطين دردشة موريتانيا اناشيد اطفال اناشيد اسلامية صور اسلامية صور جديدة صور انمي تحميل انمي توبيكات توبيكات رومانسية رسائل جوال جوال نوكيا العاب فلاشية pc العاب جديدة، موضه العاب باربي ديكور واثاث منتديات باربي دليل باربي منتديات منتديات نسائية دليل مواقع العاب دردشة جنوبيه

Posted by: دردشة at March 23, 2009 10:36 AM (34qPH)

61 sohbet sitesi üzerinden chat ve a‏k odalar‎nda muhabbet edilebilir.
sohbet siteleri

Posted by: sohbet at March 26, 2009 03:47 AM (Z0ip6)

62 Hi everyone. I don't think about risks much. I just do what I want to do. If you gotta go, you gotta go. Help me! Please help find sites for: drug centers. I found only this - detox facilities. We offer alcoholics addicts free self treatment non step recovery programs for alcohol,cocaine,heroin,meth, prescription addiction. Substance abuse and alcohol addiction treatment program for sustained recovery. THX , Leslie from Republic.

Posted by: Leslie at May 19, 2009 08:05 AM (NNxYx)

63 Good afternoon. With or without religion, you would have good people doing good things and evil people doing evil things. But for good people to do evil things, that takes religion.
I am from Saudi and also now teach English, tell me right I wrote the following sentence: "Travelers looking for hotels in boston franklin massachusetts will delight in the hotel accommodations at boston small refrigerator."

Regards :-D Murray.

Posted by: Murray at July 15, 2009 08:17 PM (odp+k)

64 Good evening. If a free society cannot help the many who are poor, it cannot save the few who are rich. Help me! I find sites on the topic: Bachelor degree english. I found only this - bachelor Degree certificate. B educational qualifications as on I a first class bachelor degree with a minimum of marks or an equivalent grade or ii a second class master degree with a minimum of marks or an equivalent grade or iii a doctorate degree with marks in master degree or equivalent grade or iv chartered cost accountant company secretary acs with a bachelor degree or v a post graduate diploma in management from iim only. Note sc st vh hi candidates having second class with a minimum of marks or equivalent grade in bachelor degree examination or having a post graduate degree or equivalent recognized qualification, are eligible to apply. With respect , Saloman from Dominican.

Posted by: Saloman at July 16, 2009 09:35 PM (O7ANZ)

Posted by: baidu at July 21, 2009 04:23 AM (pXYcm)

66 Good evening. Fall is my favorite season in Los Angeles, watching the birds change color and fall from the trees.
I am from Tunisia and too bad know English, give please true I wrote the following sentence: "Win a vax vacuum cleaner john lewis ukdealsbox."

Thank Household vacuum cleaner.

Posted by: Household vacuum cleaner at August 07, 2009 10:32 AM (bZ8te)

Posted by: google排名 at August 12, 2009 07:55 AM (y8xQJ)

68 Very informative and enlightening website.
I am from Bosnia and now study English, give please true I wrote the following sentence: "Stanley says whitening your teeth involves using."

Waiting for a reply 8-), Zoom2 teeth whitening.

Posted by: Zoom2 teeth whitening at August 13, 2009 01:36 PM (bZ8te)

Posted by: Aoobi at October 20, 2009 09:24 AM (7Jo7r)

Posted by: Christian Louboutin shoes at October 23, 2009 06:14 AM (jZQQa)

Posted by: hair straighteners at October 25, 2009 01:10 AM (MtGwJ)

Posted by: fdsfds at October 27, 2009 07:07 PM (8kvkz)

Posted by: Aoobi at October 31, 2009 02:55 AM (UEQMB)

Posted by: airforceoneshop at November 03, 2009 08:11 PM (LHCCE)

Posted by: reviewups at November 06, 2009 07:02 AM (XxrVz)

76 Come to our website for shopping with high quality and best service! There have new products,MBT M. Walk
and MBT Lami,Welcome everybody to buy it.

Posted by: mbt shoes at November 08, 2009 02:36 PM (QhfLM)

Posted by: ugg boots at November 12, 2009 09:23 AM (IeIJx)

78 Hi! PvloRrY

Posted by: HEEgcQTw at November 12, 2009 07:18 PM (L37bi)

79 buy [url=http://www.reviewups.com/]discount ugg shoes[/url]
[url=http://www.reviewups.com/]cheap ugg shoes[/url]
[url=http://www.reviewups.com/]cheap ugg[/url]
[url=http://www.reviewups.com/ugg-coquette-casual-shoes-c-22]ugg rainier[/url]
[url=http://www.reviewups.com/]buy ugg[/url]
[url=http://www.reviewups.com/]ugg usa[/url]
[url=http://www.reviewups.com/]discount ugg boots[/url]
[url=http://www.reviewups.com/ugg-classic-short-c-1]ugg 5825[/url]
[url=http://www.reviewups.com/]ugg shoes sale[/url]
[url=http://www.reviewups.com/ugg-sundance-c-5]ugg sundance[/url]
[url=http://www.reviewups.com/]ugg shoes[/url]
[url=http://www.reviewups.com/]cheap ugg boots[/url]
[url=http://www.reviewups.com/ugg-classic-tall-c-3]ugg 5815[/url]
[url=http://www.reviewups.com/]ugg sale[/url]
[url=http://www.reviewups.com/]ugg uk[/url]
[url=http://www.reviewups.com/ugg-knightsbridge-c-27]ugg knightsbridge[/url]
[url=http://www.reviewups.com/]womens ugg boots[/url]
[url=http://www.reviewups.com/]ugg boots[/url]
[url=http://www.reviewups.com/]ugg australia[/url]
[url=http://www.reviewups.com/ugg-classic-cardy-c-2]ugg 5819[/url]from usa

Posted by: cheap at November 14, 2009 10:38 AM (s7MB5)

Posted by: replica watches at November 17, 2009 04:44 AM (xpuiO)

Posted by: replica watches at November 17, 2009 12:10 PM (xpuiO)

Posted by: replica watches at November 18, 2009 08:15 AM (C/zDM)






Processing 0.06, elapsed 0.0611 seconds.
15 queries taking 0.0085 seconds, 91 records returned.
Page size 112 kb.
Powered by Minx 0.7 alpha.

MuNuvians
MeeNuvians
Polls! Polls! Polls!
Frequently Asked Questions
The (Almost) Complete Paul Anka Integrity Kick
Top Top Tens
Greatest Hitjobs

The Ace of Spades HQ Sex-for-Money Skankathon
A D&D Guide to the Democratic Candidates
Margaret Cho: Just Not Funny
More Margaret Cho Abuse
Margaret Cho: Still Not Funny
Iraqi Prisoner Claims He Was Raped... By Woman
Wonkette Announces "Morning Zoo" Format
John Kerry's "Plan" Causes Surrender of Moqtada al-Sadr's Militia
World Muslim Leaders Apologize for Nick Berg's Beheading
Michael Moore Goes on Lunchtime Manhattan Death-Spree
Milestone: Oliver Willis Posts 400th "Fake News Article" Referencing Britney Spears
Liberal Economists Rue a "New Decade of Greed"
Artificial Insouciance: Maureen Dowd's Word Processor Revolts Against Her Numbing Imbecility
Intelligence Officials Eye Blogs for Tips
They Done Found Us Out, Cletus: Intrepid Internet Detective Figures Out Our Master Plan
Shock: Josh Marshall Almost Mentions Sarin Discovery in Iraq
Leather-Clad Biker Freaks Terrorize Australian Town
When Clinton Was President, Torture Was Cool
What Wonkette Means When She Explains What Tina Brown Means
Wonkette's Stand-Up Act
Wankette HQ Gay-Rumors Du Jour
Here's What's Bugging Me: Goose and Slider
My Own Micah Wright Style Confession of Dishonesty
Outraged "Conservatives" React to the FMA
An On-Line Impression of Dennis Miller Having Sex with a Kodiak Bear
The Story the Rightwing Media Refuses to Report!
Our Lunch with David "Glengarry Glen Ross" Mamet
The House of Love: Paul Krugman
A Michael Moore Mystery (TM)
The Dowd-O-Matic!
Liberal Consistency and Other Myths
Kepler's Laws of Liberal Media Bias
John Kerry-- The Splunge! Candidate
"Divisive" Politics & "Attacks on Patriotism" (very long)
The Donkey ("The Raven" parody)
News/Chat