| Support
Contact
| You Actually Think We Still Have a Chance?Yep, I do. I am not an optimist. At all. Whenever I feel a twinge of pain, it's cancer. When the car makes a funny noise, it's a $5000 repair job. When it rains, the new roof is obviously going to leak. When I sit down to watch football, my favorite team is going to lose. On that last one, my pessimism has been justified. Despite my Eeyore-like nature, I believe John McCain and Sarah Palin have a good shot at winning this election. Why the uncharacteristic optimism on this point? Because I think the polls are crap. In college, I suffered through statistics. I hated that class more than Michael Moore hates George W. Bush. Statistical research methods was even worse. In retrospect, I'm glad I took those courses. Because what I learned from them is that for the most part, polls are crap. And this election's polls have been worse than usual. Polling is, at best, an extremely inexact science and even the best polls are based on numerous assumptions about the population at large. And it's safe to say the polls we've seen this election season are not the best. In order to believe the polls are accurate, one would have to think voter sentiment can swing dramatically in the space of one week, and that the choice of Sarah Palin hasn't made a difference in GOP enthusiasm. You would also have to believe that only 27% of those who show up to vote on election day will be Republicans. And let's face it - the media has been allowing bias to affect their coverage. Why wouldn't that bias extend to the polls they commission? Some of the pollsters have justified their out-of-whack party distribution numbers by assuming that Obama will bring in huge numbers of new voters. How well did that work out for him in the primary? He lost the big rural states and his massive army of new voters was only good enough to give him a bare win over Hillary Clinton in pledged delegates. I should mention there's growing evidence to suggest he cheated his way into a primary victory. So don't believe garbage polls like these. Look at the historical trends on party ID advantage - a ten-point Democratic advantage is a full six points over historical norms. The spread was only three points in 2006, which wasn't exactly a good year for Republicans. I say again: the polls are crap. Will this election be a hard slog? Absolutely. Should we give up and wait for an Obama coronation? Not me. I think there's still a chance. If you need more encouragement, the PUMAs are quoting Ronald Reagan. Yes, you read that right. (Optimism h/t: Treacher and Lucas)Comments1
I want to hire the Goodyear blimp so it can fly over Obambi's victory loser party flashing the sign "Congrats to President-elect McCain and Vice-President-elect Palin."
Posted by: Murph at October 21, 2008 09:11 AM (Dw2sU) 2
I've been pessimistic ever since McCain locked up the nomination (thank you 27% of Florida Republicans). I'm still not convinced a vote for Predator is necessarily better than a vote for Alien, even if Predator's running mate is Ellen Ripley.
Posted by: Socky at October 21, 2008 09:11 AM (PLvLS) 3
The strategy is to discourage the opposition turnout. When Obama loses, it'll be because we are racists. The fact that he's a corrupt politician with no experience and dubious associates won't matter. Just call me a racist, now. He'll win NY, in that sense I know my vote is wasted. I didn't vote for McCain in the primary, but I know who will do less damage to the country. I'll vote accordingly. I always do. Posted by: MarkD at October 21, 2008 09:11 AM (MMy4A) 4
I think that's a fair assessment. Five points with 2 weeks to go is not insurmountable, and there are plenty of revelations, gaffes, investigations, etc. that could produce a small or large game changer in the last 2 weeks. The whole Dem strategy is to portray the election as a done deal, trying to dampen enthusiasm among conservatives. I say fight like hell until the last vote is cast and counted.
Posted by: jason at October 21, 2008 09:11 AM (Cy1m7) 5
ALERT: just noticed that there is speculation brewing about the real reason Obama may be headed to Hawaii....not just because his grandmother may be ill. Apparently Andy Martin has filed a lawsuit in Honolulu demanding access to Obama's Birth Certificate. Suit was filed in Honolulu on 10-18-08.
Posted by: Juliet16 at October 21, 2008 09:14 AM (2xgu5) 6
I'm not pessimistic at all. Bad days once in awhile? Sure. But I do think in the end we're going to win this election. Did anyone see Barney Frank comments from yesterday on CNBC? "I think at this point, there needs to be an immediate increase in spending, and I think this is a time when deficit fear has to take a second, uh, a second seat. I do think this is the time for a very important kind of dose of [unintelligible]. Yes, I think later on, there should be tax increases. Speaking personally, I think there are a lot of rich people out there who we can tax at a point down the road to recover some of this money." http://tinyurl.com/6q9b7z More spending! More taxes!! WAHOO!!! Come on John! You gotta jump on this!!
Posted by: SueM at October 21, 2008 09:15 AM (hme2f) 7
we need huge base turnout to offset the black turnout for Obama. he was on the hip hop station in charlotte this morning telling them to all go vote even if they aren't registered because they could register and vote on same day(like a provisional ballot on election day).
Hopefully the Fear of Obama and Sarah Palin will combine for huge base turnout. So far in NC, its huge Dem and black vote turnout in early voting Posted by: jp at October 21, 2008 09:15 AM (DFDtC) 8
C'mon, Rethugs, give it up. Barack has promised to give 95 percent of Americans a tax cut--even the lowest-income 50% who *already* pay no income tax. So we'll get our "tax cut" in the form of a nice big check. Every year.
I just *love* that idea. As do all my friends. And we're registered to vote. In fact I've got a dozen voter registrations just in case you Rethugs close down my polling place, or the line's too long. McSame hasn't offered me anything near what Barack has. So I hope you guys enjoy 8 years of an Obama presidency! Posted by: Typical Dem at October 21, 2008 09:17 AM (EsQly) 9
obama is also running out the clock running to Hawaii right now, how do you drop the Ayers babysat his kids story with him at his 'dying' grandmothers side?
Clock is running out, we screwed up not dropping his stuff in August/September and before the Financial Crisis hit Posted by: jp at October 21, 2008 09:17 AM (DFDtC) 10
Well, as far as done deals and inevitability are concerned- let's ask Hillary Clinton how that worked out. I'm one of those that isn't particularly thrilled with McCain and even was on the "Let Obama win just to remind the country of the Carter years" bandwagon, but I'll admit, Palin won me over. Posted by: Darth Randall at October 21, 2008 09:20 AM (oLULt) 11
obama is also running out the clock running to Hawaii right now, how do
you drop the Ayers babysat his kids story with him at his 'dying'
grandmothers side?
Easy. You drop it on him when he comes back. Closer to the election and before the weekend. Posted by: Slublog at October 21, 2008 09:23 AM (R8+nJ) 12
When I sit down to watch football, my favorite team is going to lose. Seriously? You know that there are Lions fans on this site, don't you? Jeez... Posted by: Misfit138 at October 21, 2008 09:25 AM (A9Bze) 13
Hell, yes, we have a chance. The GOP always wins when it's this close, and polling party ID has been fucked with more than usual this time around. In fact, Mav will win. I sense desperation and stupidity in the Omega camp and the Democrat party in general. Omega stupidly tipped his hand with Joe the Plumber. Then they stupidly went after Joe the Plumber. Bawney Fwank stupidly just called for tax increases. Omega and Pelosi have tried to create the appearance of a juggernaut, picking cabinet officials, and talking about calling Congress into session right after the election. Omega is already planning his giant victory party and telegraphing that fact to everyone. All this reeks of desperation. In times like this--with all the stupidity, nastiness, and naked media bias--Reagan would have just leaned back, smiled, and said, "It means we're winning." Posted by: Blondie at October 21, 2008 09:26 AM (CrSOk) 14
DEVELOPING STORY: update to Berg Lawsuit 10/21/08: Due to Procedure. Obama and DNC Admit All Allegations Link: http://tiny.cc/8bD2E Given the "usually devastating" consequence of failure to respond in time to a request for admissions such as those served upon Obama and the DNC on September 15, just what were some of the admissions that Berg asserts Barack Obama and the DNC have, at least procedurally, admitted to? Posted by: Juliet16 at October 21, 2008 09:27 AM (2xgu5) 15
Wasn't Bush ahead in some national polls at this point in 2004 though?
Posted by: Rip at October 21, 2008 09:27 AM (T2nvY) 16
``I say again: the polls are crap.''
Amen, amen, amen. I've only been polled once - on behalf of my Congresscritter, Rahm Emanuel - and there's no question that the thing was skewed to get the answers the Emanuelites wanted to hear. ``Do you think he's doing a fantastic job as Congressman, an excellent job, or just a very good job?'' (``None of the above'' was not an option.) Or ``Do you think he's doing a good enough job fighting eeevil Big Pharma?'' (``That's not part of his job description'' was not an allowable answer.) I stuck it out to the end (even helping the nice young lady on the phone who could not pronounce ``Daley'' or ``Blagojevich'') but I felt frustrated and disgusted afterwards. MarkD, I sympathize: I know what it's like to have all my local-level votes go to waste. And I wasn't crazy about McCain either (though, bless him for picking Gov. Palin as a running mate). But even though Illinois will go for Obama - either through fraud, or because there are enough idiots here who genuinely want to see him as President - I'm going to vote anyway. It'll add to the nationwide popular vote by which the Republican candidate wins this year - just as it did in 2004. Posted by: Annalucia at October 21, 2008 09:27 AM (OMiLl) 17
9: obama is also running out the clock running to Hawaii right now, how do you drop the Ayers babysat his kids story with him at his 'dying' grandmothers side? Clock is running out, we screwed up not dropping his stuff in August/September and before the Financial Crisis hit I say fuck it. Drop.It.All. Now. Wasn't The One busting on McCain for not being able to mutli-task when McCain suspended his campaign to go back to Washington when the Paulson/Bernanke engineering financial crisis hit the fan?? Drop.It.All and let's see Barry squirm. It's time to go Alinsky on Barry. Isn't that part of the Alinsky strategy? Attack, attack, attack. From all sides. Starting Thursday morning when he's in the air after leaving Indy.
Posted by: TheAdmiral at October 21, 2008 09:28 AM (7umsY) 18
I agree that we still need to go with any and all fair attacks on Obama, including Ayers, Wright, as well as normal policy arguements. I am NOT SURE that "the grandmother illness" isn't a HOAX to buy time forsome other reason.... Posted by: Juliet16 at October 21, 2008 09:34 AM (2xgu5) 19
I don't know, Juliet. A guy tells me his grandmother's sick and goes to visit her, I'm inclined to believe him on that one.
Posted by: Slublog at October 21, 2008 09:35 AM (R8+nJ) 20
You should have taken my stats class. We have lots of fun. Having said that:
"Polling is, at best, an extremely inexact science and even the best polls are based on numerous assumptions about the population at large." Indeed it is, and I hope your stats prof made that crystal clear in class. Posted by: rightwingprof at October 21, 2008 09:36 AM (52wuV) 21
Why would Bambi have to go physically to Hawaii to keep his birth certificate wrapped up? It seems like counsel could handle it long-distance.
My opinion is that Barry needs breathing room, and that their internals are crumbling. They're going to try to re-tool and are claiming a 'family crisis' as a 'don't you dare' cover story, as well as get Biden's gaffe to dwindle and to separate himself from the savaging of JtP. Posted by: Stinky Esposito at October 21, 2008 09:37 AM (MMC8r) 22
Remember the three types of lies, Slu: lies, damned lies, and statistics. Can McCain/Palin win? Why yes ... yes we can!* There's gonna be a huge debt owed to the PUMAs, but I'll gladly pay it.
* And I'm sooo ready to dial the taunting end zone celebration up to 11 on these three words come November 5th. I got your "Yes We Can" right here, Obambots. Posted by: Andy at October 21, 2008 09:38 AM (C3mTI) 23
I keep wondering if he's got so much money, why is his lead next to non-existant? Now's the time to ramp up the pressure, both on Barry Ho and the Dems in Congress. I think they've got a sugar-glass jaw, and if you hit it, they'll disintergrate. Posted by: Iblis at October 21, 2008 09:40 AM (yhBRO) 24
From ""Dumb and Dumber":
Lloyd: What are the chances of a guy like you and a girl like me... ending up together? Mary: Well, that's pretty difficult to say. Lloyd: Hit me with it! I've come a long way to see you, Mary. The least you can do is level with me. What are my chances? Mary: Not good. Lloyd: You mean, not good like one out of a hundred? Mary: I'd say more like one out of a million. [pause] Lloyd: So you're telling me there's a chance. Posted by: Kasper Hauser at October 21, 2008 09:41 AM (KeOQp) 25
As I think Ann Coulter said, nobody tells a pollster they are voting for McCain to look cool. When they get in the privacy of a voting booth, I think the undecideds will, more often than not, stay away from the blank slate called Obama. Posted by: hoss at October 21, 2008 09:42 AM (USQ2d) 26
I dunno which way this Ozombie movie ends. Do the Ozombies overrun everything or do the human holdouts suvive through this dark (racist!) night? Who knows what the election day dawn will bring. I do know that I will keep struggling for McCain and Palin. If we lose to the ozombie horde I will know that I stood with others against that foul tide. If we win then I will dance. And that is good enough for me. Posted by: ArandomPerson at October 21, 2008 09:44 AM (MSMPS) 27
I pray the polls in Virginia are wrong. But if McCain loses Virginia, I want to apologize to everyone. We're trying here.
Posted by: kelley in virginia at October 21, 2008 09:54 AM (ioTid) 28
I never doubted for a moment that Bush would win in 2000 and 2004. And yet, those were...kinda close, IIRC. Now I'm not so sure. I think we can pull it off. I really worry about all the corruption. That could be the difference right there. I hope the people in solidly red and blue states really get out and vote. I want to see that popular vote. Can you imagine if McCain gets the popular vote but loses the election? As they explain why it doesn't matter now, the leftie blogs will be covered with bits of exploded head. Posted by: MamaAJ at October 21, 2008 09:56 AM (X6Zdh) 29
.
Don't let these people bring you down, keep fighting! You can do this, you have to do this! Everything they are doing to McCain now, I watched them do to Hillary and get away with it. They trickled out all kinds of big named Obama endorsements right towards the end of the primary, and it was never enough for them to just politely endorse Obama. They had to completely rip apart the opposition, and accuse them of running a dirty campaign, while insinuating racism.
If you think this stifling of dissent nonsense is bad now, imagine how bad it will be with Obama in office, when he's done asking for your vote, and he can spend the next four years hushing up all conservative voices. Don't sit around thinking you can run your dream candidate and win in 2012, it's not going to happen if Obama is running for re election then. He will have 4 years in power to make sure of it!
Posted by: Crouching PUMA at October 21, 2008 09:59 AM (XWJh5) Posted by: Stinky Esposito at October 21, 2008 10:02 AM (MMC8r) Posted by: railwriter at October 21, 2008 10:03 AM (nwEiU) 32
I taught Statistics, Statistical Research and Statistical Analysis. I even had my own company consulting Statistical Process Control in the business world. Ace is correct here, political polls are crap.
Posted by: MCPO Airdale at October 21, 2008 10:06 AM (wba6w) 33
It is a commonly known fact that numbers & mathmatics have a liberal bias. Newton and Pascal where both socialists! Just look at the number 4, it is clearly pointing to the left! Proof! I say!
Posted by: zeek at October 21, 2008 10:07 AM (pLTLS) 34
Posted by: rightwingprof at October 21, 2008 09:36 AM (52wuV)
Wish I'd taken your class. I should admit that research methods was more interesting - the chance to apply the concepts was welcome. Posted by: Slublog at October 21, 2008 10:09 AM (R8+nJ) 35
Crouching PUMA at October 21, 2008 09:59 AM (XWJh5)
In 2005, my Congressman Frank Pallone and 3 others brought up an attempt to repeal the 22nd Amendment (2 term limit ) for presidents. It was tabled. Didn't Barry talk about dealing with world leaders for 8-10 years? Posted by: chs31 at October 21, 2008 10:10 AM (CNME6) 36
I wouldn't put it past him. Bloomberg did it, with the Democrats running everything in DC, Obama will be able to do it too.
Posted by: Crouching PUMA at October 21, 2008 10:17 AM (XWJh5) 37
there are plenty of revelations, gaffes, investigations, etc. that could produce a small or large game changer in the last 2 weeks. Exactly. Why do you think Obama is pushing so desperately to get his supporters to do the early voting thing? Posted by: Jim62sch at October 21, 2008 10:18 AM (zYagu) 38
Don't forget history.
Election of 1948 Truman was so widely expected to lose the 1948 election that the Chicago Tribune ran this incorrect headline. Truman is standing on the rear platform of the train car Ferdinand Magellan at St. Louis Union Station. The 1948 presidential election is best remembered for Truman’s stunning come-from-behind victory. In the spring of 1948, Truman’s public approval rating stood at 36 percent, and the president was nearly universally regarded as incapable of winning the general election. The “New Deal” operatives within the party—including FDR’s son James—tried to swing the Democratic nomination to General Dwight D. Eisenhower, a wildly popular figure whose political views—and party affiliation—were totally unknown. Eisenhower emphatically refused to accept, and Truman outflanked opponents to his nomination. At the 1948 Democratic National Convention, Truman attempted to calm turbulent domestic political waters by placing a tepid civil rights plank in the party platform; the aim was to assuage the internal conflicts between the northern and southern wings of his party. Events overtook the president’s efforts at compromise, however. A sharp address given by Mayor Hubert Humphrey of Minneapolis—as well as the local political interests of a number of urban bosses—convinced the Convention to adopt a stronger civil rights plank, which Truman approved wholeheartedly. All of Alabama’s delegates, and a portion of Mississippi’s, walked out of the convention in protest. Unfazed, Truman delivered an aggressive acceptance speech attacking the 80th Congress and promising to win the election and “make these Republicans like it.” Within two weeks, Truman issued Executive Order 9981, racially integrating the U.S. Armed Services. Truman took considerable political risk in backing civil rights, and many seasoned Democrats were concerned that the loss of Dixiecrat support might destroy the Democratic Party. The fear seemed well justified—Strom Thurmond declared his candidacy for the presidency and led a full-scale revolt of Southern “states’ rights” proponents. This revolt on the right was matched by a revolt on the left, led by former Vice President Henry A. Wallace on the Progressive Party ticket. Immediately after its first post-FDR convention, the Democratic Party found itself disintegrating. Victory in November seemed a remote possibility indeed, with the party not simply split but divided three ways. There followed a remarkable 21,928-mile (35,290 km) presidential odyssey, an unprecedented personal appeal to the nation. Truman and his staff crisscrossed the United States in the presidential train; his “whistlestop” tactic of giving brief speeches from the rear platform of the observation car Ferdinand Magellan came to represent the entire campaign. His combative appearances, such as those at the town square of Harrisburg, Illinois, captured the popular imagination and drew huge crowds. Six stops in Michigan drew a combined total of half a million people; a full million turned out for a New York City ticker-tape parade. The large, mostly spontaneous gatherings at Truman’s depot events were an important sign of a critical change in momentum in the campaign—but this shift went virtually unnoticed by the national press corps, which continued reporting Republican Thomas Dewey’s apparent impending victory as a certainty. One reason for the press’ inaccurate projection was polls conducted primarily by telephone in a time when many people, including much of Truman’s populist base, did not own a telephone. This skewed the data to indicate a stronger support base for Dewey than existed, resulting in an unintended and undetected projection error that may well have contributed to the perception of Truman’s bleak chances. The three major polling organizations also stopped polling well before the November 2 election date—Roper in September, and Crossley and Gallup in October—thus failing to measure the very period when Truman appears to have surged past Dewey. In the end, Truman held his midwestern base of progressives, won most of the Southern states despite his civil rights plank, and squeaked through with narrow victories in a few critical “battleground” states, notably Ohio, California, and Illinois. The final tally showed that the president had secured 303 electoral votes, Dewey 189, and Thurmond only 39. Henry Wallace got none. The defining image of the campaign came after Election Day, when Truman held aloft the erroneous front page of the Chicago Tribune with a huge headline proclaiming “Dewey Defeats Truman.” Posted by: PUMAgrrl at October 21, 2008 10:18 AM (keuUj) Posted by: MamaAJ at October 21, 2008 10:18 AM (X6Zdh) Posted by: Thomas Dewey '48 at October 21, 2008 10:22 AM (MKM35) 41
Eww, railwriter, now I have to go wash my hands. The optimism of Redskins fans amused me greatly when I lived in the DC area. Win one game and it's "We're headed to the Superbowl!!!1!" Quite a change from the Philly fans I was used to. Posted by: MamaAJ at October 21, 2008 10:23 AM (X6Zdh) Posted by: Thomas Dewey '48 at October 21, 2008 10:23 AM (MKM35) 43
Actually, this is a good time to go full hog on Biden. He's given us some good ammo even just recently. Avoids the appearance of hamminering on Zero while he's out visiting his ill typical white grandmother and can't defend himself, and lets us focus on showing people how lame the "gravitas" and "experience" part of the Donk ticket is.
Posted by: Oedipus at October 21, 2008 10:24 AM (5Djkl) 44
A guy tells me his grandmother's sick and goes to visit her, I'm inclined to believe him on that one.
Never taught college students, have you? The good news for us is that when he's out surfing instead of holding a vigil at her side, Newsweek and Time won't be able to resist running the photos of him shirtless. Posted by: HeatherRadish at October 21, 2008 10:26 AM (yG+tb) 45
Never taught college students, have you?
Heh. I asked a friend to go see a movie with me. She said no, "I have to stay home for the dead grandma calls, I just got my 8th one tonight." [Her husband taught a large physics class.] Posted by: Thomas Dewey '48 at October 21, 2008 10:31 AM (MKM35) 46
I'd better hop over to the Atlantic and see if Sullivan has started demanding Obama's grandmother's medical records.
Posted by: MamaAJ at October 21, 2008 10:33 AM (X6Zdh) 47
A guy tells me his grandmother's sick and goes to visit her, I'm inclined to believe him on that one.
Posted by: Slublog at October 21, 2008 09:35 AM Isn't that how (amoung other things) Johnny what's-his-butt made himself famous on Survivor? Lying about his grandmother? Posted by: MMW at October 21, 2008 10:34 AM (Xf5RQ) 48
I'd better hop over to the Atlantic and see if Sullivan has started demanding Obama's grandmother's medical records.
Ugh. I made the mistake of going over there yesterday after I swore I never would again. Every time I think he can't get any worse, he does. The other writers should realize that his shit makes them stink, too. I'm not going to subscribe to the gay newsletter or click on their link in order to continue employing the pervert. Posted by: Thomas Dewey '48 at October 21, 2008 10:36 AM (MKM35) 49
Lynn Forrester is on Laura Ingraham.
Posted by: Thomas Dewey '48 at October 21, 2008 10:38 AM (MKM35) 50
Talk about pessimism, try being an Eagles fan. Four NFC title games in a row led to only one (losing) Super Bowl appearance. I'm kinda an optomistic pessimist. I always hold out hope but still expect a broken heart. I do believe polls can indicate outcome. However, this year's election includes a few heretofore unseen variables- Palin; Pumas; Bradley Effect (maybe); The unusual cult of personality and Rush's Operation Chaos, which may all be skewing things. Even if the polls are on target, McCain may be closing. I'm not sure if I'll be able to watch on election night though.
Posted by: Kevin at October 21, 2008 10:38 AM (kvn1C) 51
Kelley ... are you going to post that same eeyore post on every thread?
Glad to see the optimistic threads! Yes, McCain has an excellent chance to win. The internal polls are better indicators than the other polls. GOTV, people. Yes, the MSM is trying to stop the hope for Republicans. Why start a rumor that McCain was pulling out of CO, IA, etc.? As far as BO and his grandmother ... his grandmother, the one who has given him everything, went into the hospital and BO didn't stop campaigning to go see her. Now she is out and may be dying and he is going to campaign for two days and then go see her. Hmmm. If it were my grandmother, I'd be on the next plane. Grandma First. Campaign Second. Posted by: incognito at October 21, 2008 10:40 AM (Rpam5) 52
When even the MSM-filtered polls state the majority of respondents consider McCain to be "More trustworthy", you've got to wonder what else is there left to discuss by serious people? The rest amounts to so much rigidly enforced rictus-smile Excitement! of the dem base and fluffy hope-for-change-for-the-sake-of-change syrup aimed at the fence sitters who see choosing a president as a decorating choice...
Fluffy voters historically, thankfully, have a lower turnout at polltime, but I'm concerned about whether McCain is doing enough to motivate his own base... and by that I mean really going on the offensive - as we saw in '04 nothing ignites the conservative base like seeing evidence of the opposition's lies and cheating, but as we also saw it takes a massive amount of effort to move the message through the MSM or other avenues. The one real threat to McCain winning the presidency is his own tendency to pull his punches/not push his advantage, I suspect because he wants to preserve his status on the gang of 14 as a middle-of-the-road/RINO/"maverick" etc so he has something to go back to if his presidential bid should fail; unfortunately if so, that kind of thinking is what could make his loss a self-fulfilling prophecy. The trustworthiness score is really at the heart of the matter and if McCain/Palin and supporters can max out their efforts at vetting Obama's various BS, they should be able to use that score as a wedge issue to deny Obama a large number of votes, and have a pretty good chance of winning. We'll see. Posted by: Scott at October 21, 2008 10:43 AM (kSvWi) 53
Listen, we can win this. And you know why? Spite. To piss off Jon "Fuck you, Palin" Stewart. To piss off Chris "Tingle" Matthews. To see Olbermann get himself into such a fit of anger on national television he fucking explodes like when the Rumplestiltskin hears his name. To hear liberal pundits, in rage, accidently tell America what they really think about us. To have the media realize that the irreversable shedding of all respectibility, objectivity, and prestige in shill work was for naught. To drown in the oh so delicious salty tears of unfathomable sorrow cousing from the ducts of Obama worshipers at the fall of their false Messiah. To win this election, with all that has gone down this campaign season, would be the sweetest, most intoxicating wine imaginable. Posted by: Lee at October 21, 2008 10:46 AM (TxTIh) 54
Lynn Forrester said on Laura Ingraham that she over heard an Obama official say that they are now going to go after her personally for linking Obama with Rashid Khalidi in her speeches.
Posted by: Thomas Dewey '48 at October 21, 2008 10:47 AM (MKM35) 55
Seems to me like this would be a good time to run against the Democratic Congress anyway. A lot of undecideds don't like the idea of single-party government. I wonder if Obama's "typical white person" Gramma will finally expire from her bus wounds. Posted by: spongeworthy at October 21, 2008 10:47 AM (a00go) 56
googled the: "Feb. 23, 1996 The Democratic Socialists of America Present The First Chicago Town Meeting on Economic Insecurity" ...which was mentioned in comment 2 from the PUMA link above and came up with this: http://tinyurl.com/3mepsc Obama was a speaker. Quote from the article: One of the themes that has emerged in Barack Obama's campaign is "what does it take to create productive communities", not just consumptive communities. It is an issue that joins some of the best instincts of the conservatives with the better instincts of the left. He felt the state government has three constructive roles to play. The first is "human capital development". By this he meant public education, welfare reform, and a "workforce preparation strategy". Public education requires equality in funding. It's not that money is the only solution to public education's problems but it's a start toward a solution. The current proposals for welfare reform are intended to eliminate welfare but it's also true that the status quo is not tenable. A true welfare system would provide for medical care, child care and job training. While Barack Obama did not use this term, it sounded very much like the "social wage" approach used by many social democratic labor parties. By "workforce preparation strategy", Barack Obama simply meant a coordinated, purposeful program of job training instead of the ad hoc, fragmented approach used by the State of Illinois today. Posted by: Midas Rex at October 21, 2008 10:47 AM (RfZk6) 57
I recall learning a bit about newsroom polling methodologies back in the late 1980s when it was thought that professional whites were oversampled and "hard-working blue collar Democrats" were undersampled, thus requiring an adjustment in the sampling distribution. The theory went that professional whites were home during the evening and answering pollster's calls, while blue collar types were on swing shifts, and lower income minorities simply didn't have a phone.
I haven't seen a correction in the model, but note we clearly have had demographic shift. Show me a welfare minority who can't be reached, while too many professionals have gone exclusively to cell phones and dropped the land line. We haven't been polled in over 5 years, but then again, our "home phone" are our cell phones and we reject all unsolicited calls. There's certainly 1-2% out there of error in the polling model from this factor alone. That, other polling error (e.g. claiming to vote left to seem cool when you're not going to), and any reasonable conservative turnout and we can win this thing. Posted by: redherkey at October 21, 2008 10:51 AM (kjqFg) 58
Thomas: The Clinton supporters love Lynn Forrester (even the ones on the fence or reluctantly voting for BO). It would be a huge mistake for BO and camp to go after her. I say, Go for it BO. LOL.
Loved your post, Lee #53!! Posted by: incognito at October 21, 2008 10:54 AM (Rpam5) 59
obama is also running out the clock running to Hawaii right now, how do you drop the Ayers babysat his kids story with him at his 'dying' grandmothers side? This is a sympathy play. Idiots will think it's all wonderful that he rushed to the side of his dying grandmother instead of campaigning. By Friday, she wil make a miraculous recovery. Posted by: Steve L. at October 21, 2008 10:57 AM (o0YD+) 60
Don't forget.
EARLY VOTING IS PART OF THE DIM STRATEGY TO DISCOURAGE REPUBLICAN VOTES ON ELECTION DAY. That's why the Dims are so intent on early voting So, early "accidently leaked" numbers will so an Obama landslide. Bank on it. So, vote early if you can. And don't be discouraged if you can't. You can't trust anything polls, news, anything until after the polls close nationally and the real returns start coming in. Posted by: rinseandspit at October 21, 2008 10:59 AM (ao5cQ) 61
In college, I suffered through statistics. I hated that class more than Michael Moore hates George W. Bush. Statistical research methods was even worse. In retrospect, I'm glad I took those courses. Because what I learned from them is that for the most part, polls are crap. I couldn't agree more. The best course I've taken in graduate school was a course on survey design and methodology. The professor spent two weeks explaining just how easy (and common) it is to manipulate poll results. Interestingly, he discussed this not in the context of politics, but in the context of marketing research. Posted by: Meezle at October 21, 2008 11:00 AM (UCPCy) 62
This year, MamaAJ. This year. Lee (#53) is right, but I prefer to keep the spite local. If McCain wins, the neighborhood that I endure (I could sell and move. Yeah, right.) is going to see their bespectacled, mild-mannered, token Republican off the fucking chain. "Hi, Bobby! How was school? Hey, listen. Here's twenty bucks. I don't care what you spend it on, as long as you tell your mom and dad I gave it to you so you could buy yourself an American flag or a used copy of Capitalism and Freedom."
Posted by: railwriter at October 21, 2008 11:01 AM (nwEiU) 63
Before I comment on the on-topic posting let me just say that depending of the Troofers to save the day with a birth certificate is insane and a huge waste of energy. Even if one has been found that is bullet-proof, the courts will find a way to ventilate it aster than you can get a sub-prime mortgage. (I hear they have tightened things up--you can't get one approved on Sunday anymore.)
(And I think it is very wrong for us to speculate on alternate reasons for Obama's trip to Hawaii. We must take that at face value until He discloses and alternate reason. On this kind of stuff I do agree with John McCain.) As is speculating on what The Atlantic Monthly might have in its cesspit. (And I think the speculation itself is wrong--she is no doubt demanding the medical records of the orderly in the Maternity pod.) I think the remarks about the polls are probably right. I think the ballots-cast will be overwhelmingly in favor of McCain. I would not be surprised to learn that the down-ballot results were very favorable. I also think that is all irrelevant. What matters is what is on the tally sheets when they are certified. And I think the necessaries are already in place to insure that the Right Numbers are on the tally sheets at the right time. I would really like to be found to be as wrong and as silly as the Troofers. Posted by: Larry Sheldon at October 21, 2008 11:07 AM (OmeRL) 64
Of course, when all the polls show Obama is winning, the more likely explanation is that some people are denying reality.
Posted by: Jim at October 21, 2008 11:15 AM (YwDKF) 65
#53 Lee, I'll add to that: to see the baffled spluttering of Noonan, Buckley, Brooks, etc...
Posted by: lael at October 21, 2008 11:17 AM (ulEmZ) 66
Yea, I seem to recall how the new demographic were supposed to win it for John Kerry. They had the same get-out-the-vote drive with acorn and MTV hip-hop artists. Funny how everything new stays the same. I would like to see some comparisons with past elections including acorn's role. Posted by: Cluebat from Exodar at October 21, 2008 11:17 AM (Mv/2X) Posted by: MamaAJ at October 21, 2008 11:19 AM (X6Zdh) 68
Of course, when all the polls show Obama is winning, the more likely explanation is that some people are denying reality.
If the polls reflected reality, you would be correct. However, as the post you're replying to clearly states, the party sampling ignores historical trends in party ID. Posted by: Slublog at October 21, 2008 11:20 AM (R8+nJ) 69
Let's remember that with 16 days to go in 2004, John Kerry was leading GWB by a greater margin than Obama leads McCain. Also, we're seeing a tightening in the published polls, which puts McCain in a better position than GWB in 2004.
Posted by: Jason Coleman at October 21, 2008 11:25 AM (ZJEB6) 70
The tracking polls had Bush up by about 3 at this point in the 2004 election. Go to www.pollingreport.com and type in 2004 tracking polls. (I'd give you the exact link, but this cite won't let me post it for some reason). Posted by: Jim at October 21, 2008 11:26 AM (YwDKF) 71
And you're wrong, Jason. The late October 2004 polls showed a tightening that benefited Kerry, not Bush. That's because a popular vote blowout rarely happens.
Posted by: Jim at October 21, 2008 11:28 AM (YwDKF) 72
If Obama is such a damn inevitability, then why is McCain as close in
the polls as he is? McCain is about as electrifying and charismatic as
Bob Dole (much as I admire and respect the man) -- yet, he's within a
few points of Kid Lightning. That alone should tell you something.
Watch the polls over the next few days. If a few of the better known show the race essentially "tied" (within the margin of error) then the pollsters are trying to salvage what little respectability they have by trying to edge back toward the reality. That's what this last bit of garbage is about -- create such an aura of inevitability that they win by the discouragement factor alone. The reality is that Obama wins by demoralizing enough conservatives that they simply don't bother to vote. Maybe McCain gets slaughtered November 4th, I don't know. But I hope every damn conservative will go to the polls just for the chance of giving Obermann a stroke. Posted by: prairiemain at October 21, 2008 11:28 AM (uDqa7) 73
an Obama official say that they are now going to go after her personally for linking Obama with Rashid Khalidi
Now?!? Posted by: tobwing plover at October 21, 2008 11:28 AM (evdj2) 74
Ace, the party trends have gotten worse for the GOP since 2006, as almost every poll since then has shown. The only question is how much worse.
Posted by: Jim at October 21, 2008 11:31 AM (YwDKF) 75
Ace, the party trends have gotten worse for the GOP since 2006, as
almost every poll since then has shown. The only question is how much
worse.
And historically, those pre-election party affiliation polls underestimate actual GOP turnout or party ID. Yes, things have been getting worse for the GOP, but a ten-or-fifteen point gap? Posted by: Slublog at October 21, 2008 11:36 AM (R8+nJ) 76
Kevin, try this...the last (in fact, only) time the Phillies made a World Series in a Presidential election year was 1980. They won their only title, and Reagan beat Carter.
Also, '08 is '80 reversed! See how stupidly optimistic a Philly fan can be? Posted by: Dr. Remulak at October 21, 2008 11:43 AM (YmPwQ) 77
Of course the polls are crap. I had stats in high school and college, loved it.
But stats are like other scientific research, without something to compare it to it means nothing. Comparing the current stuff to older accurate election results shows these are out of whack. Real results showing a change is easy to see and doesn't bounce around ala Reagan-Mondale or Nixon. Another way to know these polls are garbage is because the MSM and pollsters are already covering their asses. Politico has a story up on how they are sweating them. Why? because they know the history. Polls showing Obama up double digits in Red States are a complete joke. If Obama wins Virginia or North Carolina it will not be by more then 3 percentage points. So at least it shows a trend then you say? Bad stats are bad stats, the only thing the show is bad methodology. I wouldn't place too much emphasis on the AA turnout either. It will increase but nothing beyond the norm. The increase in AA in the primaries is the result of AA moving from independent to Dem to vote for Obama. They aren't new voters for the most part and they voted Democratic anyway, they just weren't part of a party. Posted by: Rocks at October 21, 2008 11:45 AM (Q1lie) 78
if anyone is interested in a well reasoned analysis of the polls. Ya know one based on actual data (all the data, not just the data he likes) try out this:
538 tracking-poll-primer Posted by: zeek at October 21, 2008 11:52 AM (pLTLS) 79
GOTV:
Daytime Phone Bank (10:00AM-6:00PM local time) Evening/Weekend Phone Bank (6:00PM-9:00PM & Weekends 10:00AM-9:00PM local time) Posted by: incognito at October 21, 2008 11:56 AM (Rpam5) 80
Posted by: zeek at October 21, 2008 11:52 AM (pLTLS)
So an aggregation of faulty polling data is better than individual polling data? Righto. Posted by: Slublog at October 21, 2008 11:56 AM (R8+nJ) 81
Guys, we're looking at epic pollster malpractice this year. I have never seen them so bad in over 20 years of closely observing these things. National polls are hopelessly skewed and state polls are for the most part done by incompetent firms and use much smaller samples/larger MOEs. Add a small Bradley Effect and you're talking +5 for McCain right now.
Don't forget who pays for the damn polls, either. Posted by: Fresh Air at October 21, 2008 11:56 AM (+j+vu) 82
Ok. How much money does any of you want to wager on the President election? You take McCain, I take Obama. Even odds. Electoral vote winner takes all.
Posted by: Jim at October 21, 2008 12:01 PM (YwDKF) 83
I M/P pulls this out, I will be making and posting an "Oh Yes We Fucking Can" sign outside of my cubicle on that Wednesday morning, just to twist the knife in the office libs. My boss will let it stay up for a couple of hours I'm guessing. He'd fire their asses for being such insufferable twats if we didn't need their particular forms of expertise.
Posted by: mr.frakypants at October 21, 2008 12:02 PM (PonvG) 84
Who is John Galt?
Posted by: conservative and ex-Republican at October 21, 2008 12:02 PM (AQj/2) 85
You take McCain, I take Obama. Even odds.
Dude, Intrades giving me 6.5 to 1 right now. You'll have to offer better. Posted by: toby928 at October 21, 2008 12:04 PM (evdj2) 86
I also took Probability and statistics in college. At one point, we had to design a poll to measure public opinion about some esoteric issue and turn the poll in for a grade. It took some effort to make sure that the poll was balanced and properly sampled. The very next assignment was to design a fake poll that looks balanced but would return the results that we wanted. Suprisingly this was a MUCH easier assignment. I already knew the results of the poll and it was easy to tweak the questions a little to achieve the desired results. I even accurately predicted the final percentages of the poll. Since then, I've watched a lot of polls and when the questions are shown, I 've seen many of the questions "tweaked" in one direction. I don't know whether they are doing it on purpose but the fix is there. This happens almost exclusively on non-professional polls like TV networks and newspapers. The people who make their living on polls like Rasmussen and Zogby can't afford to do fake polls. Posted by: Max Entropy at October 21, 2008 12:06 PM (VW5L+) 87
rinseandspit: my take on increased early voting is that it allows the Dems to really leverage their money advantage for GOTV. If you must vote only on one day, regardless of your funding there are only so many people you can drag off their couches, take to Burger King, then take to the polls. If you have fourteen days over which to do that, you can increase your "consideration"-based efforts by fourteen times. Shitty but true.
Posted by: mr.frakypants at October 21, 2008 12:08 PM (PonvG) 88
As per "negative campaign ads" advice from advisers telling McCain to quit being negative, "polling results" telling McCain to quit being negative, STFU until you tell AND GET Obama to quit being negative. And that ain't gonna happen.
McCain's supporters don't actively support McCain unless McCain unleashes the truth against Obama. And if Obama and the MSM can't take the heat, get the hell out of the kitchen before our enemies bomb the hell out of America with Obama in the Oval Office. Geez, when Albright seconds Biden's "statement of fact" don't sweep the shit under the rug. Posted by: maverick muse at October 21, 2008 12:16 PM (F1b/5) 89
Just checked those 2004 tracking polls TIPP, Marist, Zogby All showed 1-3 point margins from mid October up through election day and no wild swings. Bush was up in most of them by 1 or 2, although some had Kerry up by 1 or 2 So all in all they were pretty accurate
Posted by: TMF at October 21, 2008 12:21 PM (waaUg) 90
Rasmussen is the only one I follow. State polls don't matter, lagging trends and all. If Ras closes in the next week to 10 days, Mac will win. If it stays in the 3 to 6 point range for O, Mac loses. The trends are ok towards Mac, so I'm not overly worried about early voting. This "polls are crap" stuff is what people say when they are behind. If Mac were leading in the polls, we would be screaming them from the rooftops. Ras and some others are respectable, and are not in it to elect a certain candidate, they want to be the pollsters who "nailed" the 08 election, it's good for business.
Posted by: Judd at October 21, 2008 12:31 PM (BXHeE) 91
I know Ace is trying to get people to show up and vote GOP down the ticket, so the overall loses aren't greater, but this idea that Kerry was beating Bush at this point in 2004 (except in a few polls) is just incorrect.
Posted by: Jim at October 21, 2008 12:34 PM (YwDKF) 92
Here is why I think McCain will still win. My home state Tennessee tends to be a bellwether state. We (Don't blame me I couldn't vote yet) we elected Carter. We elected Clinton. We elected Reagan, and Bush twice, even though this is/was former Senator Gore's home state.
All in all, we tend to vote for the winner. In fact, for a very long way excepting when JFk stole his election. So, I have a very very hard time believing that McCain is winning TN by 15%+ but losing so badly nationally. If McCain loses, it will be a historic event that highlights a large broad shift in the political climate in the US. Posted by: Novanglus at October 21, 2008 12:35 PM (Pu8yK) 93
Jim, most reader here go through the entire thread, so you really don't have to keep posting the same comment.
Thanks. Posted by: runninrebel at October 21, 2008 12:55 PM (0n9wc) 94
Jack Murtha is in one of the "slam-dunk, we'll re-elect you until you croak" districts.
And he might lose this year. In Pennsylvania. A solid blue state. Posted by: Al at October 21, 2008 01:12 PM (Lk931) 95
I used to live in Murtha's district. He's a toad who needs squashin.
Posted by: mr.frakypants at October 21, 2008 01:36 PM (PonvG) 96
A chance? Obama loses unless he gains a ton of ground in a hurry.
Posted by: Christopher Taylor at October 21, 2008 01:42 PM (0+Ggj) 97
They really need to vote Murtha out this year. He is a disgrace.
Posted by: Crouching PUMA at October 21, 2008 01:44 PM (XWJh5) 98
I am living in Northern Virginia.
I am praying that Virginia goes to McCain. this is almost hideous that Obama is ahead in this state. Keep praying Posted by: Rosemary at October 21, 2008 01:49 PM (sMzuS) 99
HH and HotAir are talking about tightening polls, and internals, including supposed leaked internals.
Can someone explain why internals are able to be more accurate than non-internals? Posted by: FloofyParisParamus at October 21, 2008 01:52 PM (jGNc3) 100
Can someone explain why internals are able to be more accurate than non-internals? I think the internals are more detailed in their findings. I just don't understand how Obama can be so far ahead, I live in NJ, and every Hillary supporting Democrat I know can't stand Obama and are either writing in Hillary, or voting McCain. There are a few I know of from chat that are voting Obama because of Palin's stand on the abortion issue, but most of the Pumas I know are very firm in their belief that Obama is an awful choice, and dangerous for America. Posted by: Crouching PUMA at October 21, 2008 02:10 PM (XWJh5) 101
I never buy claims about "internal" polling They're usually trial balloons to effect a medial cycle Posted by: TMF at October 21, 2008 02:17 PM (waaUg) 102
I think the internals are more detailed in their findings.
How do "details" translate into overall better numbers? The details might indicate who is voting for whom, but not the overall numbers, no? Posted by: FloofyParisParamus at October 21, 2008 02:29 PM (jGNc3) Posted by: railwriter at October 21, 2008 02:49 PM (nwEiU) 104
I think you guys will be lucky to avoid giving Obama the dreaded "M word."
Mandate. If anything, polls under-represent Obama supporters because most polls don't reach people who don't have land-lines. Something like a third of people 18-25 do not have a traditional phone line. Those people will vote for Obama overwhelmingly. Murtha might have insulted part of Pennsylvania, but McCain's campain is insulting every person who lives in a city or suburb. That's most of us. Posted by: Seattle Slough at October 21, 2008 02:58 PM (H5l9d) 105
If anything, polls under-represent Obama supporters because most polls don't reach people who don't have land-lines.
Yeah, it's tough to poll the homeless who will be dragged to the voting booths and who will vote for whatever in exchange for cigarettes and beer. Posted by: wiserbud at October 21, 2008 03:09 PM (wWwJR) 106
I don't know any young people who see a point in having two phone numbers. Since they already have a cell phone, they don't get a land line unless they have to. (like if they get put on Electronic Home Detention).
Oh, and thanks to our Australian Ballot (a.k.a. secret ballot) you can drag a homeless person to the polls, but for the most part you cannot verify who they vote for. Posted by: Seattle Slough at October 21, 2008 03:16 PM (H5l9d) 107
Oh, Seattle, your naivete is so precious.
Posted by: wiserbud at October 21, 2008 03:41 PM (IHbof) 108
think you guys will be lucky to avoid giving Obama the dreaded "M word."
Mandate.
Democrats always claim a mandate, no matter what they win by. President Clinton lost the popular vote but won by a plurality and claimed a mandate. Posted by: Christopher Taylor at October 21, 2008 04:01 PM (0+Ggj) 109
Wiserbud, your sub-par intelligence and wit are scarcely comment-worthy.
Posted by: Seattle Slough at October 21, 2008 05:20 PM (H5l9d) 110
If anything, polls under-represent Obama supporters because most polls don't reach people who don't have land-lines.
That's why Obama under-polled in the primaries, wait, what? Posted by: toby928 at October 21, 2008 05:34 PM (evdj2) 111
Don't forget, dead people don't have land lines either, but are going to be voting in record numbers this year. And I think Mickey Mouse is strictly a cell-phone user, too. Posted by: Phoenix at October 21, 2008 06:05 PM (2YM81) 112
"I suffered through statistics. I hated that class more than Michael Moore hates George W. Bush. Statistical research methods was even worse."
It wasn't a complete waste of time for me, because I learned a valuable Latin phrase: "Purgamentum init, purgamentum exit." I didn't necessarily learn how to spell it right, but I can pronounce the hell out of it. Posted by: Stoop Davy Dave at October 21, 2008 06:15 PM (2zdTt) 113
SueM #6 "I do think this is the time for a very important kind of dose of [unintelligible]. "
"Keynesianism." And to Barney, it IS unintelligible, com-PLETE-ly. Anything he knows about Keynes, he read in the Econ equivalent of a Jack Chick tract. Posted by: Stoop Davy Dave at October 21, 2008 06:18 PM (2zdTt) 114
I don't comment on the polls posts too often because I, too, think they're crap. The polling that truly pisses me offl however; are the polls they conduct outside of the precincts on election day. During the Clinton-Dole election I still remember returning home (EST) and hearing that Clinton had won. It was still the middle of the friggin afternoon to the west of me and yet they had already started declaring the election for Clinton. The polls in the east hadn't even closed yet! THAT is what pisses me off! Posted by: jmflynny at October 21, 2008 09:23 PM (1W7ZO) 115
If anything, polls under-represent Obama supporters because most polls don't reach people who don't have land-lines. Here we go with this nonsense again. And hard-working, middle-class whites -- who always vote in significant majorities for the Republican -- have better things to do than talk to some pimple-faced phone bank operator for 20 minutes. Guess which demographic turns out a much higher percentage of its members on election day? But go on, Seattle -- keep pinning your hopes on Jim and Jane Bongwalker to bring it home for your corrupt clown of a candidate. And aren't you proud that without welfare parasites, dipshit students, and menopausal View/Oprah hags your boy would be down by 20% nationally? Yay for the least informed and least useful members of American society! Murtha might have insulted part of Pennsylvania, but McCain's campain is insulting every person who lives in a city or suburb. That's most of us. Of course he is, Seattle. I'm sure you'll be back any minute to explain these McCainian "insults" to us. And your pretending that your leftist worldview comports in any way with the one shared by "most of us" is just precious in its ego-centric dementia. Posted by: VJay at October 22, 2008 03:28 PM (gQ+XA) 116
nike shoes cucusoft air jordan shoesadidas shoes cod4 cd key call of duty 4 cd key call of duty 4 key code starcraft cd key warcraft 3 cd key diablo 2 cd key diablo 2 cd keys dvd to ipod converter free dvd to ipod converter ipod video converter free ipod video converter nike shoes air jordan shoes fake air jordans air jordan adidas superstar adidas basketball shoes jordan shoes air force ones air force air force 1 air max nike air max air max 90 nike dunk high nike dunk low nike dunk nike shox shox nike basketball shoes adidas superstar adidas basketball shoes jordan shoes air force ones air force air force 1 air max nike air max air max 90 nike dunk high nike dunk low nike dunk nike shox shox nike basketball shoes adidas shoes
Posted by: aaabs at December 30, 2008 03:55 AM (veTFs) 117
When I have my seal cegel, you feel it is not the point, but there is a lot of emotional feeling cross, complex and exciting. When you have more sealonline cegel, you can own the entire world. Once you have seal online cegel, you can do more! Quickly go alone in unfamiliar streets, there is no concern and warmth look of sympathy, just silently listening to headphones, different styles of music, his eyes drift without purpose, I do not know whether to find his own corner. Although we have cheap seal cegel, At least I can have my own things, rather than wishful thinking. When you buy seal online cegel, you can make a choice if you had been ready for it! Posted by: seal cegel at January 03, 2009 04:08 AM (fMiY/) 118
Welcome to our company which sells all kinds of maple mesos, very cheap mesos, and the more cheap mesos. If you have to buy maplestory mesos, please come to our company, we can give you the best service for you to buy maple story mesos. Posted by: maplestory mesos at January 08, 2009 11:33 PM (fMiY/) 119
http://www.bestprog.com
http://www.interbd.com http://www.zappeduster.com http://www.grupopenelope.com http://www.42plus.com http://www.brv-inc.com http://www.meditacija.net http://www.aec-dk.com/ http://www.mb-friends.net/ http://seo-mobi.net/jk/ http://www.hmt-ag.com/ http://www.biotechcgi.com/ http://www.hi-tech-reno.com/ http://www.mb-deai.net/ http://www.littlediablo.net/ http://www.ccc-p.com/ http://www.sit-n-shop.com/ http://www.mtdcases.com/ http://www.louisville-realtor.com/ http://www.heartminders.com/ http://www.targetvehiclerental.com/ http://www.mail24x7.com/00/idkb0022.html http://www.kessel-diamonds.com http://sincerely-love.com/00 http://www.cambridgeins.com/ http://www.lots-ins.com/ http://www.chihuahuaelpub.com/ http://www.aec-dk.com/merutomo/ http://www.andritz-na.com/merutomo/ http://www.hi-tech-reno.com/merutomo/ http://www.sugudeai.com/ Posted by: Źo‰ď‚˘Śn at January 09, 2009 04:08 AM (1Sh6N) 120
Welcome to wow gold our wow Gold and wow power leveling store. We wow gold are specilized, wow power leveling professional and reliable wow power leveling website for wow power leveling selling and wow gold service. By the world of warcraft gold same token,we offer wow power leveling the best WoW service wow power leveling for our long-term and wow powerleveling loyal customers. wow powerleveling You will find wow powerleveling the benefits and value powerlevelingwe created powerleveling different from other sites. As to most people, power leveling they are unwilling to power leveling spend most of wow power leveling the time wow gold grinding money Rolex for mounts or rolex replica repair when replica rolex they can purchase Watches Rolex what they Rolex Watches are badly need. The Watch Rolex only way is to look Rolex Watch for the best place RS Gold to buy Cheap WARHAMMER ONLINE GOLD. Yes! You find it here! Our WoW Gold supplying service has already accumulated a high reputation and credibility. We have plenty of Gold suppliers, which will guarantee our delivery instant. Actually, we have been getting RuneScape Gold tons of postive feedbacks from our loyal RuneScape Money customers who really appreciate our service.
Posted by: wow power leveling at January 17, 2009 04:22 AM (jlcze) 121
Yesterday, my boyfriend gave me a lot of runescape gold and I buy runescape or rs gold as the gift to return him. The runescape money is attractive and I have plenty of the cheap rs gold.
Posted by: runescape money at January 21, 2009 08:32 PM (fMiY/) 122
SWF Converter,SWF to AVI,SWF to MP4,SWF to FLV Converter,SWF to WMV,SWF to MOV,SWF to 3GP,SWF to MPG, MPEG,SWF to VOB,SWF to iPod,SWF to iPhone,SWF to Apple TV,SWF to PSP,SWF to Zune,SWF to MP3,SWF to WMA,SWF to JPG, JPEG,SWF to Gif, Animated Gif,SWF to PNG
Posted by: asdasdasd at March 03, 2009 03:28 AM (fCigk) 123
gaming blog
Top1gaming forum
Gaming
2Moons
9Dragons
Age of Conan
Aion
Angels Online
Anarchy Online
ArchLord
Cabal
City of Hero
City of Villains
Conquer Online
Dofus
Dragonica
Dream of Mirror Online
Dreamland Online
Eve Online
EverQuest
EverQuest II
Final Fantasy XI
Fly for fun
Gaia online
GodsWar Online
Guild Wars
Holic Online
Knight online
Lineage II
Lord of the Rings Online
Mabinogi Online
Maple Story
Myth War II Online
Perfect World
Ragnarok Online 2
Rappelz
Rohan Online
Runes Of Magic
RF Online
Runescape
Scions of Fate
Second Life
shaiya
Silkroad Online
Star Wars Galaxies
Tales of Pirates
Voyage century Online
Warhammer Online
Wonderland Online
World of Warcraft
Zu Online
gaming blog
Top1gaming forum
Parasite Eve cosplay
World of Warcraft cosplay
Ah! My Goddess Cosplay
Tomb Raider cosplay
Death Note Amane Misa cosplay
kipi Amane Misa cosplay
Yuna cosplay
Tekken 5 cosplay
Dead Or Alive cosplay
Tenjho Tenge cosplay
Dragon Ball cosplay
Gundam Seed cosplay
Gurren cosplay
Kiddy Grade cosplay
Gintama Sarutobi Ayame cosplay
Al Azif cosplay
Ranka Lee cosplay
Final Fantasy X Lulu cosplay
Cardcaptor Sakura cosplay
D.Gray-Man cosplay
Shakugan No Shana cosplay
Shoujo Kakumei Utena cosplay
cosplay
CD KEY
Posted by: baidu at July 21, 2009 04:22 AM (pXYcm) Posted by: google排名 at August 12, 2009 07:41 AM (y8xQJ) 125
discounthair straighteners
ghd hair chi hair straightener ghd straighteners chi straighteners chi hair chi hair iron hair straighteners ghd ghd hair straighteners free shipping! Posted by: hair straighteners at October 25, 2009 01:09 AM (MtGwJ) 126
Discount Boots
Womens UGG UGG Shoes UGG Australia UGG UK UGG USA discount ugg boots cheap ugg boots Posted by: fdsfds at October 27, 2009 07:06 PM (8kvkz) 127
discount Discount Boots
Womens UGG UGG Shoes UGG Australia UGG UK UGG USA discount ugg boots cheap ugg boots air force 1 shoes Nike air force air force 1 mens air force 1 boots air force onefree shipping Posted by: reviewups at November 06, 2009 07:01 AM (XxrVz) 128
Come to our website for shopping with high quality and best service! There have new products,MBT M. Walk
and MBT Lami,Welcome everybody to buy it. Posted by: mbt shoes at November 08, 2009 02:35 PM (QhfLM) 129
Buy discount ugg shoes
cheap ugg shoes cheap ugg ugg rainier buy ugg ugg usa discount ugg boots ugg 5825 ugg shoes sale ugg sundance ugg shoes cheap ugg boots ugg 5815 ugg sale ugg uk ugg knightsbridge womens ugg boots ugg boots ugg australia ugg 5819free shipping Posted by: ugg boots at November 12, 2009 09:23 AM (IeIJx) 130
buy [url=http://www.reviewups.com/]discount ugg shoes[/url]
[url=http://www.reviewups.com/]cheap ugg shoes[/url] [url=http://www.reviewups.com/]cheap ugg[/url] [url=http://www.reviewups.com/ugg-coquette-casual-shoes-c-22]ugg rainier[/url] [url=http://www.reviewups.com/]buy ugg[/url] [url=http://www.reviewups.com/]ugg usa[/url] [url=http://www.reviewups.com/]discount ugg boots[/url] [url=http://www.reviewups.com/ugg-classic-short-c-1]ugg 5825[/url] [url=http://www.reviewups.com/]ugg shoes sale[/url] [url=http://www.reviewups.com/ugg-sundance-c-5]ugg sundance[/url] [url=http://www.reviewups.com/]ugg shoes[/url] [url=http://www.reviewups.com/]cheap ugg boots[/url] [url=http://www.reviewups.com/ugg-classic-tall-c-3]ugg 5815[/url] [url=http://www.reviewups.com/]ugg sale[/url] [url=http://www.reviewups.com/]ugg uk[/url] [url=http://www.reviewups.com/ugg-knightsbridge-c-27]ugg knightsbridge[/url] [url=http://www.reviewups.com/]womens ugg boots[/url] [url=http://www.reviewups.com/]ugg boots[/url] [url=http://www.reviewups.com/]ugg australia[/url] [url=http://www.reviewups.com/ugg-classic-cardy-c-2]ugg 5819[/url]from usa Posted by: cheap at November 14, 2009 10:37 AM (s7MB5) 131
Replica Breitling Watches | Replica Omega | Replica watches | Replica watches | Fake Cheap Rolex | Fake Swiss Watches | Maurice Lacroix Watches Replica | Wholesale Gucci Watch | Cartier Fake | IWC Fake Watches | Tissot Watches Replica | Replica Gerald Genta Watches | Fake Hamilton | Hublot Fake | Bulova Watches
Posted by: replica watches at November 17, 2009 05:10 AM (xpuiO) 132
Fake Cheap Rolex | Replica Breitling Watches | Fake Watches | soccer jersey supplier | Fake Watches | Raymond Weil Replica Watch | Louis Vuitton Watch Replica | Replica Concord | Blancpain Watches Replica | IWC Fake | Chopard Watches Replica | Fake Vacheron Constantin | Panerai Watch | Gerald Genta Replica Watch | Gucci Replica Watch
Posted by: replica watches at November 17, 2009 08:22 AM (xpuiO) 133
Replica Cartier | replica soccer jersey | Fake Watches | Replica Omega | replica soccer jersey | Alain Silberstein Watches Replica | Replica Omega | Chanel Replica | Chanel Watches Replica | Cheap Jaeger Lecoutre Watches | Replica Iwc Watches | Girard Watches Replica | Gucci Watches Replica | Tudor Watch | Fake Movado Watches
Posted by: replica watches at November 17, 2009 09:45 PM (xpuiO) 134
soccer jersey supplier | replica soccer jersey | soccer jersey supplier | Replica Watches | soccer jersey wholesale | Cheap Maurice Lacroix | Calvin Klein Replica | Audemars Piguet Wristwatch | Replica Movado Watches | Other Replica | Zenith Watches | Replica Maurice Lacroix Watches | Fake Tissot Watch | Girard Watch | Omega Replica Watch
Posted by: replica watches at November 18, 2009 04:05 AM (C/zDM) Processing 0.05, elapsed 0.0576 seconds. |
MuNuvians
MeeNuvians
Polls! Polls! Polls!
Dale's ECB Election Projection Federal Review Real Clear Politics Rasmussen Reports Gallup Zogby FoxNews Polls Sabato/Crystal Ball Frequently Asked Questions
The (Almost) Complete Paul Anka Integrity Kick
Primary Document: The Audio
Paul Anka Haiku Contest Announcement Integrity SAT's: Entrance Exam for Paul Anka's Band AllahPundit's Paul Anka 45's Collection AnkaPundit: Paul Anka Takes Over the Site for a Weekend (Continues through to Monday's postings) George Bush Slices Don Rumsfeld Like an F*ckin' Hammer Top Top Tens
Democratic Forays into Erotica New Shows On Gore's DNC/MTV Network Nicknames for Potatoes, By People Who Really Hate Potatoes Star Wars Euphemisms for Self-Abuse Signs You're at an Iraqi "Wedding Party" Signs Your Clown Has Gone Bad Signs That You, Geroge Michael, Should Probably Just Give It Up Signs of Hip-Hop Influence on John Kerry NYT Headlines Spinning Bush's Jobs Boom Things People Are More Likely to Say Than "Did You Hear What Al Franken Said Yesterday?" Signs that Paul Krugman Has Lost His Frickin' Mind All-Time Best NBA Players, According to Senator Robert Byrd Other Bad Things About the Jews, According to the Koran Signs That David Letterman Just Doesn't Care Anymore Examples of Bob Kerrey's Insufferable Racial Jackassery Signs Andy Rooney Is Going Senile Other Judgments Dick Clarke Made About Condi Rice Based on Her Appearance Collective Names for Groups of People John Kerry's Other Vietnam Super-Pets Cool Things About the XM8 Assault Rifle Media-Approved Facts About the Democrat Spy Changes to Make Christianity More "Inclusive" Secret John Kerry Senatorial Accomplishments John Edwards Campaign Excuses John Kerry Pick-Up Lines Changes Liberal Senator George Michell Will Make at Disney Torments in Dog-Hell Greatest Hitjobs
The Ace of Spades HQ Sex-for-Money Skankathon A D&D Guide to the Democratic Candidates Margaret Cho: Just Not Funny More Margaret Cho Abuse Margaret Cho: Still Not Funny Iraqi Prisoner Claims He Was Raped... By Woman Wonkette Announces "Morning Zoo" Format John Kerry's "Plan" Causes Surrender of Moqtada al-Sadr's Militia World Muslim Leaders Apologize for Nick Berg's Beheading Michael Moore Goes on Lunchtime Manhattan Death-Spree Milestone: Oliver Willis Posts 400th "Fake News Article" Referencing Britney Spears Liberal Economists Rue a "New Decade of Greed" Artificial Insouciance: Maureen Dowd's Word Processor Revolts Against Her Numbing Imbecility Intelligence Officials Eye Blogs for Tips They Done Found Us Out, Cletus: Intrepid Internet Detective Figures Out Our Master Plan Shock: Josh Marshall Almost Mentions Sarin Discovery in Iraq Leather-Clad Biker Freaks Terrorize Australian Town When Clinton Was President, Torture Was Cool What Wonkette Means When She Explains What Tina Brown Means Wonkette's Stand-Up Act Wankette HQ Gay-Rumors Du Jour Here's What's Bugging Me: Goose and Slider My Own Micah Wright Style Confession of Dishonesty Outraged "Conservatives" React to the FMA An On-Line Impression of Dennis Miller Having Sex with a Kodiak Bear The Story the Rightwing Media Refuses to Report! Our Lunch with David "Glengarry Glen Ross" Mamet The House of Love: Paul Krugman A Michael Moore Mystery (TM) The Dowd-O-Matic! Liberal Consistency and Other Myths Kepler's Laws of Liberal Media Bias John Kerry-- The Splunge! Candidate "Divisive" Politics & "Attacks on Patriotism" (very long) The Donkey ("The Raven" parody) News/Chat
|